Next Article in Journal
Iron Deposits in Periaqueductal Gray Matter Are Associated with Poor Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine
Next Article in Special Issue
A Two-Year Occurrence of Fusarium T-2 and HT-2 Toxin in Croatian Cereals Relative of the Regional Weather
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins (PSTs) in Toxic Alexandrium catenella is Intertwined with Photosynthesis and Energy Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/toxins12080478
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Carbon Dioxide on Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum

by
Ladi Peter Mshelia
1,2,
Jinap Selamat
1,3,*,
Nik Iskandar Putra Samsudin
1,3,
Mohd Y. Rafii
4,5,
Noor-Azira Abdul Mutalib
1,2,
Noordiana Nordin
1 and
Franz Berthiller
6
1
Food Safety and Food Integrity, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Borno State 600230, Nigeria
3
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
5
Laboratory of Climate-Smart Food Crop Production, Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
6
Institute of Bioanalytics and Agro-Metabolomics, Department of Agrobiotechnology (IFA-Tulln), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Konrad-Lorenz-Str. 20, 3430 Tulln, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(8), 478; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080478
Submission received: 10 May 2020 / Revised: 28 June 2020 / Accepted: 2 July 2020 / Published: 28 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxins in Relation to Climate Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Climate change is primarily manifested by elevated temperature and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and is projected to provide suitable cultivation grounds for pests and pathogens in the otherwise unsuitable regions. The impacts of climate change have been predicted in many parts of the world, which could threaten global food safety and food security. The aim of the present work was therefore to examine the interacting effects of water activity (aw) (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw), CO2 (400, 800, 1200 ppm) and temperature (30, 35 °C and 30, 33 °C for Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum, respectively) on fungal growth and mycotoxin production of acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum isolated from maize. To determine fungal growth, the colony diameters were measured on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. The mycotoxins produced were quantified using a quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF-MS) combined with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system. For F. verticillioides, the optimum conditions for growth of fumonisin B1 (FB1), and fumonisin B2 (FB2) were 30 °C + 0.98 aw + 400 ppm CO2. These conditions were also optimum for F. graminearum growth, and zearalenone (ZEA) and deoxynivalenol (DON) production. Since 30 °C and 400 ppm CO2 were the baseline treatments, it was hence concluded that the elevated temperature and CO2 levels tested did not seem to significantly impact fungal growth and mycotoxin production of acclimatised Fusarium isolates. To the best of our knowledge thus far, the present work described for the first time the effects of simulated climate change conditions on fungal growth and mycotoxin production of acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum.
Keywords:
climate change; mycotoxins; aw; CO2; temperature; F. verticillioides; F. graminearum
Key Contribution: This manuscript has provided the trends about the effect of climate change factors of temperature, aw, and CO2 on the isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum (in vitro) after acclimatization to temperature.

1. Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.) is cultivated in many parts of the world and is used mainly for human food and animal feed. In the field pre-harvest, maize plants are often colonised by fungi, some of which are mycotoxigenic species and could produce mycotoxins under favourable conditions [1]. Fungal contamination of maize could also occur post-harvest [2]. Several members of the genera Aspergillus and Fusarium are common mycotoxigenic fungal contaminants of maize plants pre- and post-harvest [3,4]. Mycotoxigenic Aspergillus spp. typically produce aflatoxins and ochratoxin A, while mycotoxigenic Fusarium spp. produce fumonisins, trichothecenes, and zearalenone, all of which have adverse effects on humans, plants, and animals [5]. Legislation that prescribes limits to these mycotoxins in foods and feeds, including maize, exists globally [6]. Mycotoxin carcinogenicity levels and classification have been reviewed by Ostry et al. [7].
Ecophysiological factors such as temperature and relative humidity primarily influence fungal colonisation and mycotoxin production [8].
With the advent of climate change, these factors are predicted to alter how fungal pests and pathogens adapt and behave [9,10,11]. This subsequently leads to a global concern since fungal colonisation and mycotoxin production on economically relevant agricultural commodities could threaten food safety and food security [12,13]. Generally, climate change is defined as an alteration of the average weather distributions over a prolonged period (i.e., decades to centuries), which is caused by several factors such as biotic processes, solar radiation, and volcanic eruptions. The worldwide increase of atmospheric CO2 (i.e., the second-most abundant greenhouse gas) and consequently the rise of temperature (i.e., global warming) constitute the major manifestations of climate change [14]. Towards fungal colonisation and mycotoxin production, the effects of climate change vary from inhibition [15], to stimulation [16], to no effect at all [17]. A more recent and excellent review on the interactions of mycotoxigenic fungi under different climate change conditions is provided by Medina et al. [18].
Mycotoxigenic fungi are capable of adapting to environmental changes due to their high level of plasticity [19]. This has become a primary concern since climate change factors are expected to double or triple in the next 20 to 50 years. This will translate into the increase in temperature and excessive drought, depending on the level of industrial activities and geographical regions, and different mycotoxigenic fungi will behave differently under these climate stimuli. In order to better investigate how these fungal pests and pathogens react to different climatic conditions, researchers often use acclimatised isolates. Acclimatised isolates are isolates that have been cultivated for several generations in simulated climate change conditions (i.e., elevated CO2, elevated temperature). According to a previous study, acclimatisation of the strains may increase their resistance to survive and proliferate in the elevated conditions [19]. As to how this resistance will impact their mycotoxin production (i.e., inhibition or stimulation), further research is warranted. Although various works have been conducted to examine the effects of climate change on mycotoxigenic fungi on various crop commodities [18,19], to the best of our knowledge, however, no work has been conducted so far on acclimatised isolates of mycotoxigenic Fusarium spp. Hence, the ecophysiological data obtained from the present work could serve as a guideline to better manage and control Fusarium spp. colonisation on maize farms under climate change scenarios.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Simulated Climate Change Conditions on Diametric Growth Rates of Acclimatised Isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum

Figure 1 shows the effect of temperature, aw, and CO2 on diametric growth rate of acclimatised isolate of F. verticillioides cultivated at 30 and 35 °C, while Figure 2 shows the effect of temperature, aw, and CO2 on diametric growth rate of acclimatised isolate of F. graminearum cultivated at 30 and 33 °C, following incubation for 7 days on milled maize agar (MMA). Both isolates exhibited optimum growth and mycotoxin production at 30 °C (baseline temperature) + 0.98 aw + 400 ppm CO2 (baseline CO2 level). A similar trend was also reported on non-acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides [20,21]. However, non-acclimatised isolates of F. graminearum have also been reported [22,23]. Since there has been no work on acclimatised Fusarium isolates regarding fungal growth and mycotoxin production, data on non-acclimatised Fusarium spp. were instead used for relative comparison with the data obtained in the present work. The only other work which utilised an acclimatised isolate was demonstrated by Vary et al. [24], who performed the acclimatisation on F. graminearum using elevated CO2 (780 ppm), instead of elevated temperature, as demonstrated in the present work. This is also different from the 800 and 1200 ppm CO2 levels used for incubation in the present work. They further found out that acclimatisation with 780 ppm CO2 enhanced the pathogenic growth as measured by the increase in disease severity of Fusarium head blight on wheat, as compared to the 390 ppm control/baseline. This effect, however, was not seen in the present work; the discrepancy could be due to differences in acclimatisation procedures. In their study, both the wheat plant (as substrate) and the pathogens were acclimatised to CO2 (at 390 and 780 ppm). However, in the present study, the isolates were acclimatised to temperature, and a culture medium (milled maize agar) was used as the substrate, not wheat plant. Furthermore, climate change factors may alter the physiology of growth and crop production, which may in turn affect the interaction of mycotoxigenic fungi [25]. According to the previous study, fungi could tolerate high CO2 alone as compared to when CO2 is combined with other environmental factors such as temperature [26].
In the present work, prior to acclimatisation, it was found that F. graminearum could not grow at 35 °C (hence, the subsequent acclimatisation and climate change treatments were conducted instead at 33 °C). This might be due to F. graminearum’s poor resistance towards higher temperature. Naturally, F. graminearum grows at a lower temperature range of 15 to 25 °C [27]. Another work similarly demonstrated that F. graminearum perithecia (fruiting bodies; singular perithecium) were produced at temperatures between 5 and 30 °C (the optimum was 21.7 °C) but matured only at 20 and 25 °C [28]. F. graminearum has been recorded globally as the main cause for scab (also known as Fusarium ear blight or Fusarium head blight) on wheat and other cereal grains [29]. Its predominance in the temperate (average temperatures of 0–18 °C in the coldest month, average temperatures of 10–22 °C in warmest month, Köppen–Geiger climate classification system) climate of European countries has been extensively reviewed [30,31]. In the present work, F. graminearum was isolated from Malaysia, the climate of which is tropical with an average temperature between 25.7–29.4 °C [32]. However, when incubated at 35 °C to simulate climate change conditions, the isolate could not grow, which explains why F. graminearum is notorious in the colder and more temperate regions like the European countries. Nevertheless, work conducted in India, another tropical country, demonstrated that their F. graminearum isolates could grow at 35 and 40 °C [33], albeit at very slow growth rate. This discrepancy could be due to different strains used between that work and the present work and the fact that India’s average temperature (winter: 10–15 °C (northwest), 20–25 °C (southeast), summer: 32–40 °C); is higher than that in Malaysia (25.7–29.4 °C); thus the Indian F. graminearum isolates could better resist higher temperatures.
Between baseline temperature and elevated temperature, more than a 50% reduction (highly significant difference) in diametric growth rates was observed at the latter for both isolates and at all water activities and CO2 levels tested. Between baseline CO2 and elevated CO2, a significant difference in diametric growth rates was observed for both isolates at all water activities and temperatures tested. Therefore, it could be concluded that temperature had a bigger effect on fungal growth as compared to the other two tested parameters. Between both acclimatised isolates, the diametric growth rate of F. verticillioides was slightly higher compared to F. graminearum under the tested parameters. This could be due to the differences in response to temperature by the isolates [33]. Table 1 further describes the ANOVA results for one-way, two-way, and three-way interactions of the assessed parameters. Based on Table 1, it is apparent that single factors of temperature, aw, and CO2 had significant effects (p < 0.05) on diametric growth rates of both isolates.

2.2. Effect of Simulated Climate Change Conditions on Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum

Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the effects of temperature, aw, and CO2 on the mycotoxin production of acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum, respectively, following incubation at 30 °C for 21 days on MMA. The mycotoxins produced by F. verticillioides was FB1 and FB2, while F. graminearum produced deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA). For F. verticillioides, both FB1 and FB2 were produced at 0.98 aw (at all CO2 levels tested), while only FB1 was produced at 0.95 aw (at 400 and 800 ppm CO2). This agrees with a previous study on non-acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides [34,35]. However, this contradicts with a study that reported that the production of fumonisins by non-acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides was higher at 0.97 aw instead [36]. This discrepancy might be due to the different geographical origins of the isolates, because variations may occur in the environmental tolerance between strains from different parts of the world [34].
For F. graminearum, DON and ZEA were only produced at 0.98 aw (at 400 and 800 ppm CO2) with DON being produced significantly more than ZEA. This agrees with a study on the effect of aw on DON production by non-acclimatised F. graminearum isolates [37]. However, this contradicts with [22], who reported that the optimum conditions for DON production by non-acclimatised F. graminearum were at 20–25 °C and 0.995 aw. Again, this discrepancy might be due to the different geographical origins of the isolates, where different mycotoxigenic fungi may respond differently to climate change [19].
All mycotoxins were produced significantly (p < 0.05), the highest at the baseline CO2 level, and no mycotoxins were produced at the elevated temperature tested for both acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum, although there was significant fungal growth recorded. This agrees with a previous study where the optimum condition for Fusarium spp. growth was not always aligned with that for mycotoxin production [38]. Furthermore, this might also indicate that temperature was the key factor decreasing the production of mycotoxins by the acclimatised Fusarium isolates. Table 2 and Table 3 further describe the ANOVA results for one-way, two-way, and three-way interactions of the assessed parameters on mycotoxin production by acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum, respectively, which show that simulated climate change conditions had more effects on acclimatised F. verticillioides compared to acclimatised F. graminearum. Furthermore, acclimatised F. verticillioides had more resistance to climate change conditions because they grow better and produce mycotoxins at a wide range of climate conditions compared to acclimatised F. graminearum. The discrepancy could be due to differences in response and adaptation of the isolates to climate change conditions. In this study, due to the impact of the climate change conditions, mycotoxin production of F. verticillioides (fumonisins) was at a wider range compared to mycotoxins produced by F. graminearum (DON and ZEA).

3. Conclusions

The present work thus concluded that the effect of climate change factors of temperature, aw, and CO2 level on F. verticillioides and F. graminearum decreased the growth rate and mycotoxin production. There was a differential effect on mycotoxin production by the two isolates. In this study, mycotoxin production occurred at the baseline temperature (30 °C), where FB1 produced by F. verticillioides increased at various climate change conditions (0.98–0.95 aw and 1200–400 ppm CO2). DON and ZEA, which are produced by F. graminearum, were at a narrow range (0.98 aw and 400–800 ppm). This indicates that there is a difference in adaptation or coping mechanism to climate change factors between the isolates. Climate change is a complex process under which the biotic and abiotic components interact at levels we do not yet fully comprehend. The ecophysiological data obtained from the present work could serve as a guideline to better manage and control Fusarium spp. colonisation in maize farms under the climate change scenario. Possible future work could perhaps focus on the acclimatisation of the isolates with elevated CO2 as an extension to the acclimatisation of the isolates with elevated temperature as demonstrated in the present work.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fungal Isolates, Materials, Chemicals and Standards

Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum isolates were obtained from grain corn and soil samples at different farms (Kampong Dadong and Rhu Tapai, Terengganu; and Serdang, Selangor) in Malaysia during the month of August 2018. All fungal cultures were maintained axenically on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 4 °C until further use.
Carbon dioxide tanks (400, 800, and 1200 ppm) were provided by a gas company (Linde Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Klang, Selangor, Malaysia). Mycotoxin standards (i.e., DON, ZEA, FB1, FB2) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile and methanol (HPLC-grade) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

4.2. Semi-Synthetic Growth Medium Preparation

The preparation of semi-synthetic maize-based growth medium (to mimic natural conditions of fungal colonisation on maize) was done following Yazid et al. [39]. Approximately 500 g of mycotoxin-free maize kernels were oven-dried at 50 °C for 72 h and ground into a fine powder using a blender (Waring, Torrington, CT, USA). Then, 90 g milled maize powder and 15 g technical agar was added to 1 L sterile deionised water and stirred vigorously. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.6 with NaOH. The aw of the medium was modified following Dallyn and Fox [40] by adding 32.2, 23, and 9.2 g glycerol per 100 mL media to obtain 0.92, 0.95, and 0.98 aw, respectively. The prepared media were sterilized using an Astell autoclave (Astell Scientific, Kent, UK) at 121 °C for 15 min and 15 psi. Sterilised milled maize agar (MMA) was allowed to cool for 30 min (≈75 °C), poured into Petri dishes (90 mm Ø, 15–20 mL per plate), left to solidify, and used in the subsequent fungal acclimatisation and cultivation.

4.3. Fungal Acclimatisation

For fungal acclimatisation, the two fungal strains (F. verticillioides and F. graminearum) were successively cultivated for ten generations before being used, as described by Medina et al. [19] with slight modification; in the present work, MMA was used as the growth medium. The acclimatisation temperature was 35 °C for F. verticillioides and 33 °C for F. graminearum. However, acclimatisation of the fungal isolates was attained by gradually increasing the temperature by 0.5 °C for each generation until the 10th generation. This was carried out by growing the isolates (30, 35 °C for F. verticillioides, and 30, 33 °C for F. graminearum) for the period of 7 days and subcultured unto MMA media ten times in order to adapt to the elevated temperatures. This temperature range was selected to simulate elevated temperature condition. In Malaysia, as of January 2020, the average temperature range was between 25.7 °C and 29.4 °C based on the data collected from 25 meteorological stations located throughout Malaysia and monitored by the Malaysian Department of Meteorology. For F. graminearum, 33 °C was the highest temperature under which the isolate could grow during preliminary screening prior to fungal acclimatisation (data not shown). Here, 30 °C served as control/baseline.

4.4. Experimental Design

A full factorial design was used in the present work as described by Lahouar et al. [41], where various temperatures for acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum (30, 35, and 30, 33 °C, respectively), aw (0.92, 0.95, and 0.98 aw), and CO2 levels (400, 800, and 1200 ppm) were tested. The experiment was carried out in triplicate.

4.5. Fungal Inoculation on Milled-Maize Agar

For fungal inoculation, fungal spores (conidiophores) were harvested from 7-day old cultures of acclimatised isolates of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum using 0.05% (v/v) sterile Tween 80 solution. The concentration of the spore suspension was estimated/adjusted using a Helber haemocytometer (depth 0.01 mm; Marienfeld, Germany). Growth assessment was determined by inoculating the 0.1 mL of spore suspension at the centre of the 90 mm Petri plates containing approximately 20 mL of solid medium (MMA) and sealed with parafilm, while for mycotoxin determination, the MMA plates were aseptically inoculated with 0.1 mL spore suspension (≈106 spores/mL) using the spread-plating technique and incubated in growth chambers with simulated climate change conditions [42].

4.6. Fungal Incubation in Simulated Climate Change Conditions

Growth chambers with simulated climate change conditions were prepared following Medina et al. [43] with slight modification. The growth chambers containing inoculated MMA plates were separately and daily flushed for 10–15 min with the required CO2 levels (400, 800, and 1200 ppm) to maintain the required CO2 levels throughout fungal incubation. Here, 400 ppm, the present level of atmospheric CO2 [44], served as control/baseline. The aw in the growth chamber was maintained throughout fungal incubation by placing a solution of glycerol/water (250 mL) with corresponding aw level of the treatment. Each treatment was then incubated separately at 30 and 35 °C for the acclimatised isolate of F. verticillioides, and 30 and 33 °C for the acclimatised isolate of F. graminearum. Following incubation, two parameters were assessed: fungal growth after 7 days, and mycotoxin production after 21 days [45,46]. The milled maize agar was prevented from drying out by maintaining the aw of the growth chamber as described by Medina et al. [43]. About 250 mL of glycerol/water solution having the same aw value as the sample (0.93, 0.95, and 0.98 aw) was placed in the chamber together with the respective sample to maintain a constant relative humidity equilibrium.

4.7. Measurement of Fungal Growth by Diametric Growth Rate

Fungal growth measurement was carried out based on daily hyphal expansion (diametric growth) under simulated climate change conditions as previously described by Samsudin and Magan [47], at different days interval as described by Leggieri et al. [48] with a slight modification of days intervals of 1, 3, 5, and 7. The growth was monitored at 4 points for 7 days because the growth of the isolate was slow. However, based on previous research, mycotoxin production has been reported to be optimal between 14–21 days [45,49]. Furthermore, based on preliminary research, mycotoxin production was optimal after 14 days (data not shown). The colony diametric readings were measured in two directions perpendicular (⊥) to each other, to solve the problem of irregularly shaped hyphal expansion, and means of the readings were obtained. Next, a growth curve was plotted using the formula y = mx + c, where y = colony diameter (cm), x = incubation period (d), m = diametric growth rate (cm/d), and c = intercept on y-axis = 0 (on the assumption that at day 0, colony diameter was 0 cm). Experiments were carried out in three replicates per treatment.

4.8. Measurement of Mycotoxin Production by UHPLC/QTOF-MS

Mycotoxin extraction was performed following Bragulat et al. [50] with slight modification, in which different extraction solvent was used (methanol, methanol/formic acid, and methylene chloride/formic acid), and extraction time was increased (from 60 min to 90 min). Methanol: water (80:20) was used due to good recovery obtained, as previously reported [51]. However, in this study, the efficiency of extraction was as follows: DON = 80.26, ZEA = 77.66, FB1 = 103.03, and FB2 = 96.24. Three agar plugs were taken from MMA following a 21-day incubation and placed into safe-lock Eppendorf tubes with 1 mL extraction solvent (methanol: water, 80:20). These tubes were then placed on an orbital shaker for 90 min, at 150 rpm, and 30 °C, following which the tubes were centrifuged at 1150× g for 15 min. The supernatant (≈750 µL) was then transferred to a 2 mL amber chromatography vial using a syringe filter (0.22 μm), and an equal amount of water was added.
Mycotoxin quantification was performed following Tanaka et al. [52] using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography and a C18 ZORBAX Eclipse (50 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.8 µm) analytical column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) attached to a guard column, ZORBAX Eclipse C18 (5 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.8 µm) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The column temperature was maintained at 35 °C, and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The mixture of water containing 0.1% formic acid was used in the chromatographic system as eluent A, and methanol containing 0.1% formic acid as eluent B. The gradient started with 5% eluent B for 1 min, increased to 100% eluent B for 11 min, and reverted to 5% eluent B for 10 min before starting the next injection. The injection volume was 1 µL.
Mass spectrometry was performed using an Agilent G6550A quadrupole-time-of-flight LC/MS equipped with an electrospray ionisation source (AJS ESI) operating in positive mode [52]. The sheath gas flow, gas temperature, gas flow, nebuliser gas, and capillary voltage were 11 L/min, 200 °C, 14 L/min, 35 psi, 350 °C, and 3500 V, respectively. The fragment voltage was 175 V, and the skimmer voltage was 65 V. Data acquisition was done by Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis Software B.07.00 00 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The identification of mycotoxins was done when the compound was detected by the “Find by Formula” data-mining algorithm with a mass error below 5 ppm.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed in three replicates (n = 3). Measurements were then averaged and presented as mean ± standard error (SE). The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) on normally distributed datasets with 95% confidence interval using the statistical software Minitab® version 20 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). p < 0.05 was accepted as a significant difference. The post hoc analysis, Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test, was applied to compare the significant difference between means of treatments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P.M., J.S., N.I.P.S., M.Y.R., N.-A.A.M., N.N. and F.B.; methodology, L.P.M., J.S., N.I.P.S., M.Y.R. and F.B.; software, L.P.M.; validation, L.P.M., J.S., N.I.P.S., M.Y.R. and F.B.; formal analysis, L.P.M.; investigation, J.S.; resources, J.S. and N.I.P.; data curation, L.P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P.M.; writing—review and editing, J.S. and N.I.P.S.; visualization, M.Y.R., N.-A.A.M. and N.N.; supervision, J.S., N.I.P.S., M.Y.R. and F.B.; project administration, J.S.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work was funded by the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), under the Higher Education Centre of Excellence (HiCoE) grant scheme (HICOE-ITAFOS/2017/FS6).

Acknowledgments

This work was kindly supported by the Ministry of Education Malaysia through the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence (HICoE) grant scheme—project no. HICoE-ITAFoS/2017/FS6/6369114, and special appreciation to the Universiti Putra Malaysia for providing research materials and equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giorni, P.; Bertuzzi, T.; Battilani, P. Impact of fungi co-occurrence on mycotoxin contamination in maize during the growing season. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geary, P.A.; Chen, G.; Kimanya, M.E.; Shirima, C.P.; Oplatowska-Stachowiak, M.; Elliott, C.T.; Routledge, M.N.; Yun, Y. Determination of multi-mycotoxin occurrence in maize based porridges from selected regions of Tanzania by liquid chromatography—Tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), a longitudinal study. Food Control 2016, 68, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bankole, S.A.; Mabekoje, O.O. Occurrence of aflatoxins and fumonisins in preharvest maize from south-western Nigeria. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kimanya, M.E.; De Meulenaer, B.; Tiisekwa, B.; Ndomondo-Sigonda, M.; Devlieghere, F.; Van Camp, J.; Kolsteren, P. Co-occurrence of fumonisins with aflatoxins in home-stored maize for human consumption in rural villages of Tanzania. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 1353–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Picot, A.; Hourcade-Marcolla, D.; Barreau, C.; Pinson-Gadais, L.; Caron, D.; Richard-Forget, F.; Lannou, C. Interactions between Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium graminearum in maize ears and consequences for fungal development and mycotoxin accumulation. Plant Pathol. 2012, 61, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mazumder, P.M.; Sasmal, D. Mycotoxins–limits and regulations. Anc. Sci. Life 2001, 20, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ostry, V.; Malir, F.; Toman, J.; Grosse, Y. Mycotoxins as human carcinogens—The IARC Monographs classification. Mycotoxin Res. 2017, 33, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lahouar, A.; Crespo-Sempere, A.; Marín, S.; Saïd, S.; Sanchis, V. Toxigenic moulds in Tunisian and Egyptian sorghum for human consumption. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 63, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Moretti, A.; Pascale, M.; Logrieco, A.F. Mycotoxin risks under a climate change scenario in Europe. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 84, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paterson, R.R.M.; Lima, N. How will climate change affect mycotoxins in food? Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1902–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Battilani, P.; Toscano, P.; Van Der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Moretti, A.; Camardo, L.M.; Brera, C.; Rortais, A.; Goumperis, T.; Robinson, T. Aflatoxin B1 contamination in maize in Europe increases due to climate change. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Magan, N.; Medina, A.; Aldred, D. Possible climate-change effects on mycotoxin contamination of food crops pre- and postharvest. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Medina, Á.; González-Jartín, J.M.; Sainz, M.J. Impact of global warming on mycotoxins. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2017, 18, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nda, M.; Adnan, M.S.; Ahmad, K.A.; Usman, N.; Razi, M.A.M.; Daud, Z. A review on the causes, effects and mitigation of climate changes on the environmental aspects. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 2018, 10, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Samapundo, S.; De Meulenaer, B.; Atukwase, A.; Debevere, J.; Devlieghere, F. The influence of modified atmospheres and their interaction with water activity on the radial growth and fumonisin B1 production of Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum on corn. Part I: The effect of initial headspace concentration. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 114, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akbar, A.; Medina, A.; Magan, N. Impact of interacting climate change factors on growth and ochratoxin A production by Aspergillus section Circumdati and Nigri species on coffee. World Mycotoxin J. 2016, 9, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Luck, J.; Spackman, M.; Freeman, A.; Trebicki, P.; Griffiths, W.; Finlay, K.; Chakraborty, S. Climate change and diseases of food crops. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Medina, A.; Akbar, A.; Baazeem, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Magan, N. Climate change, food security and mycotoxins: Do we know enough? Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017, 31, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Medina, Á.; Rodríguez, A.; Magan, N. Climate change and mycotoxigenic fungi: Impacts on mycotoxin production. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Medina, A.; Schmidt-heydt, M.; Cárdenas-Chávez, D.L.; Parra, R.; Geisen, R.; Magan, N. Integrating toxin gene expression, growth and fumonisin B1 and B2 production by a strain of Fusarium verticillioides under different environmental factors. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10, 20130320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Torres, M.R.; Ramos, A.J.; Soler, J.; Sanchis, V.; Marín, S. SEM study of water activity and temperature effects on the initial growth of Aspergillus ochraceus, Alternaria alternata and Fusarium verticillioides on maize grain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 81, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Parra, R.; Geisen, R.; Magan, N. Modelling the relationship between environmental factors, transcriptional genes and deoxynivalenol mycotoxin production by strains of two Fusarium species. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 8, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Velluti, A.; Marin, S.; Bbettucci, L.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V. The effect of fungal competition on colonization of maize grain by Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum and F. graminearum and on fumonisin B1 and zearalenone formation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 59, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Váry, Z.; Mullins, E.; Mcelwain, J.C.; Doohan, F.M. The severity of wheat diseases increases when plants and pathogens are acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 2661–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Paterson, R.R.M.; Lima, N.; Taniwaki, M.H. Coffee, mycotoxins and climate change. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Magan, N.; Aldred, D. Post-harvest control strategies: Minimizing mycotoxins in the food chain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hope, R.; Aldred, D.; Magan, N. Comparison of environmental profiles for growth and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum on wheat grain. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manstretta, V.; Rossi, V. Effects of temperature and moisture on development of Fusarium graminearum perithecia in maize stalk residues. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Miller, J.D. Mycotoxins in small grains and maize: Old problems, new challenges. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, X.M.; Parry, D.W.; Nicholson, P.; Thomsett, M.A.; Simpson, D.; Edwards, S.G.; Cooke, B.M.; Doohan, F.M.; Brennan, J.M.; Moretti, A.; et al. Predominance and association of pathogenic fungi causing Fusarium ear blight in wheat in four European countries. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2005, 112, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pasquali, M.; Beyer, M.; Logrieco, A.; Audenaert, K.; Balmas, V.; Basler, R.; Boutigny, A.L.; Chrpová, J.; Czembor, E.; Gagkaeva, T.; et al. A European Database of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Trichothecene Genotypes Front. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 406. [Google Scholar]
  32. Malaysian Department of Meteorology. Available online: http://www.met.gov.my/ (accessed on 24 March 2019).
  33. Panwar, V.; Aggarwal, A.; Paul, S.; Singh, V.; Singh, P.K.; Sharma, D.; Shaharan, M.S. Effect of temperature and pH on the growth of Fusarium spp. causing Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat. South Asian J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 6, 186–193. [Google Scholar]
  34. Etcheverry, M.; Torres, A.; Ramirez, M.L.; Chulze, S.; Magan, N. In vitro control of growth and fumonisin production by Fusarium verticillioides and F. proliferatum using antioxidants under different water availability and temperature regimes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 92, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Samapundo, S.; Devlieghere, F.; de Meulenaer, B.; Geeraerd, A.H.; van Impe, J.F.; Debevere, J.M. Predictive modelling of the individual and combined effect of water activity and temperature on the radial growth of Fusarium verticilliodes and F. proliferatum on corn. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marín, S.; Homedes, V.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J.; Magan, N. Impact of Fusarium moniliforme and F. proliferatum colonisation of maize on calorific losses and fumonisin production under different environmental conditions. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1999, 35, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vesonder, R.F.; Ellis, J.J.; Kwolek, W.F.; De Marini, D. Production of vomitoxin on corn by Fusarium graminearum NRRL 5883 and Fusarium roseum NRRL 6101. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 43, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Marín, S.; Magan, N.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V. Fumonisin-producing strains of Fusarium: A review of their ecophysiology. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1792–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yazid, S.N.E.; Thanggavelu, H.; Mahror, N.; Selamat, J.; Samsudin, N.I.P. Formulation of maize- and peanut-based semi-synthetic growth media for the ecophysiological studies of aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus in maize and peanut agro-ecosystems. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 282, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dallyn, H.; Fox, A. Microbial Growth and Survival in Extremes of Environment. In Society for Applied Bacteriology Technical Series; no 15; Academic Press: London, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lahouar, A.; Marín, S.; Crespo-Sempere, A.; Saïd, S.; Sanchis, V. Influence of temperature, water activity and incubation time on fungal growth and production of ochratoxin A and zearalenone by toxigenic Aspergillus tubingensis and Fusarium incarnatum isolates in sorghum seeds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 242, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Passamani, F.R.F.; Hernandes, T.; Lopes, N.A.; Bastos, S.C.; Santiago, W.D.; Cardoso, M.D.G.; Batista, L.R. Effect of temperature, water activity, and pH on growth and production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus carbonarius from Brazilian grapes. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Medina, A.; Rodríguez, A.; Sultan, Y.; Magan, N. Climate change factors and Aspergillus flavus: Effects on gene expression, growth and aflatoxin production. World Mycotoxin J. 2015, 8, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. ESRL. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Divivon, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2020. Available online: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html (accessed on 22 February 2020).
  45. Lazzaro, I.; Susca, A.; Mulè, G.; Ritieni, A.; Ferracane, R.; Marocco, A.; Battilani, P. Effects of temperature and water activity on FUM2 and FUM21 gene expression and fumonisin B production in Fusarium verticillioides. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 1234, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mogensen, J.M.; Nielsen, K.F.; Samson, R.A.; Frisvad, J.C.; Thrane, U. Effect of temperature and water activity on the production of fumonisins by Aspergillus niger and different Fusarium species. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Samsudin, N.I.P.; Magan, N. Efficacy of potential biocontrol agents for control of Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin B1 under different environmental conditions. World Mycotoxin J. 2016, 9, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Leggieri, C.M.; Giorni, P.; Pietri, A.; Battilani, P. Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium verticillioides Interaction: Modeling the impact on mycotoxin production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  49. Duverger, F.; Bailly, S.; Querin, A.; Pinson-Gadais, L.; Guerre, P.; Bailly, J.D. Influence of culture medium and incubation time on the simultaneous synthesis of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone by Fusarium graminearum. Revenue Med. Vet. 2011, 162, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bragulat, M.R.; Abarca, M.L.; Cabañes, F.J. An easy screening method for fungi producing ochratoxin A in pure culture. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 71, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ren, G.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zou, L.; Zhao, G. Determination of multi-class mycotoxins in Tartary buckwheat by ultra-fast liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Toxins 2018, 10, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Tanaka, H.; Takino, M.; Sugita-konishi, Y.; Tanaka, T. Development of a liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous determination of trichothecenes, zearalenone and aflatoxins in foodstuffs. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 1422–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 12 00478 g001 550
Figure 1. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm), aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw), and temperature (30, 35 °C) levels on diametric growth rate (mm/d) of an acclimatised strain of F. verticillioides cultivated on milled-maize agar for seven days. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test.
Figure 1. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm), aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw), and temperature (30, 35 °C) levels on diametric growth rate (mm/d) of an acclimatised strain of F. verticillioides cultivated on milled-maize agar for seven days. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test.
Toxins 12 00478 g001
Toxins 12 00478 g002 550
Figure 2. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm), aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw), and temperature (30, 33 °C) levels on diametric growth rate (mm/d) of an acclimatised strain of F. graminearum cultivated on milled-maize agar for seven days. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test.
Figure 2. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm), aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw), and temperature (30, 33 °C) levels on diametric growth rate (mm/d) of an acclimatised strain of F. graminearum cultivated on milled-maize agar for seven days. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test.
Toxins 12 00478 g002
Toxins 12 00478 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm) and aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw) on fumonisin (FB1, FB2) production (µg/kg) by an acclimatised strain of F. verticillioides cultivated on milled-maize agar for 21 days at 30 °C. FB1 and FB2 were not detected at 33 °C. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters (small letters for FB1, capital letters for FB2) indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test; nd = not detected.
Figure 3. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm) and aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw) on fumonisin (FB1, FB2) production (µg/kg) by an acclimatised strain of F. verticillioides cultivated on milled-maize agar for 21 days at 30 °C. FB1 and FB2 were not detected at 33 °C. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters (small letters for FB1, capital letters for FB2) indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) test; nd = not detected.
Toxins 12 00478 g003
Toxins 12 00478 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm) and aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw) on mycotoxin (deoxynivalenol and zearalenone) production (µg/kg) by acclimatised strain of F. graminearum cultivated on milled-maize agar for 21 days at 30 °C. DON and ZEA were not detected at 35 °C. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters (small letters for DON, capital letters for ZEA) indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD); nd = not detected.
Figure 4. The effect of carbon dioxide (400, 800, 1200 ppm) and aw (0.92, 0.95, 0.98 aw) on mycotoxin (deoxynivalenol and zearalenone) production (µg/kg) by acclimatised strain of F. graminearum cultivated on milled-maize agar for 21 days at 30 °C. DON and ZEA were not detected at 35 °C. Data are means of triplicates (n = 3) with bars indicating standard (SE). Different letters (small letters for DON, capital letters for ZEA) indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD); nd = not detected.
Toxins 12 00478 g004
Table
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on the growth rate of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum on milled-maize agar.
Table 1. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on the growth rate of F. verticillioides and F. graminearum on milled-maize agar.
SourceDFMSF-Value
F. verticillioides
T1413.1817,122.91 *
aw221.290882.29 *
CO227.96329.94 *
T × aw29.08376.33 *
T × CO220.6627.74 *
aw × CO240.8434.99 *
T × aw × CO240.0240.01
F. graminearum
T1424.1811565.21 *
aw214.82154.69 *
CO225.9421.92 *
T × aw26.130.55
T × CO221.4222.65 *
aw × CO240.140.55
T × aw × CO240.270.14
DF: degrees of freedom; MS: mean squares; * significant (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on fumonisins (FB1, FB2) produced by Fusarium verticillioides on milled-maize agar.
Table 2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on fumonisins (FB1, FB2) produced by Fusarium verticillioides on milled-maize agar.
SourceDFMSF-Value
FB1
T17643.8531.39 *
aw22050.188.42 *
CO22514.152.11
T × aw22884.5111.85 *
T × CO22771.113.17
aw × CO241451.51.24
T × aw × CO24302.651.06
FB2
T1126.485.05
aw2198.747.94 *
CO2252.162.08
T × aw2174.516.97
T × CO2284.093.36
aw × CO2496.422.25
T × aw × CO2446.340.64
DF: degrees of freedom; MS: mean squares; * significant (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA) produced by Fusarium graminearum on milled-maize agar.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the effects of temperature (°C), water activity (aw), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA) produced by Fusarium graminearum on milled-maize agar.
SourceDFMSF-Value
DON
T16015.164.17
aw29416.856.53 *
CO222993.662.07
T × aw28829.296.12
T × CO223412.612.36
aw × CO242341.511.62
T × aw × CO242376.361.68
ZEA
T141.443.10
aw261.934.86 *
CO2223.861.79
T × aw263.514.75
T × CO2224.471.83
aw × CO2420.671.33
T × aw × CO2417.760.80
DF: degrees of freedom; MS: mean squares; * significant (p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peter Mshelia, L.; Selamat, J.; Iskandar Putra Samsudin, N.; Rafii, M.Y.; Abdul Mutalib, N.-A.; Nordin, N.; Berthiller, F. Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Carbon Dioxide on Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Toxins 2020, 12, 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080478

AMA Style

Peter Mshelia L, Selamat J, Iskandar Putra Samsudin N, Rafii MY, Abdul Mutalib N-A, Nordin N, Berthiller F. Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Carbon Dioxide on Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Toxins. 2020; 12(8):478. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080478

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peter Mshelia, Ladi, Jinap Selamat, Nik Iskandar Putra Samsudin, Mohd Y. Rafii, Noor-Azira Abdul Mutalib, Noordiana Nordin, and Franz Berthiller. 2020. "Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Carbon Dioxide on Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum" Toxins 12, no. 8: 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080478

APA Style

Peter Mshelia, L., Selamat, J., Iskandar Putra Samsudin, N., Rafii, M. Y., Abdul Mutalib, N. -A., Nordin, N., & Berthiller, F. (2020). Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Carbon Dioxide on Fungal Growth and Mycotoxin Production of Acclimatised Isolates of Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum. Toxins, 12(8), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12080478

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop