Next Article in Journal
Resistance of Transgenic Maize Cultivars to Mycotoxin Production—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Delphi Analysis: Optimizing Anatomy Teaching and Ultrasound Training for Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Injection in Spasticity and Dystonia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multi-Year Study of Mycotoxin Co-Occurrence in Wheat and Corn Grown in Ontario, Canada

1
London Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1391 Sandford Street, London, ON N5V 4T3, Canada
2
Department of Chemistry, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2024, 16(8), 372; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16080372
Submission received: 29 July 2024 / Revised: 13 August 2024 / Accepted: 16 August 2024 / Published: 22 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mycotoxins)

Abstract

:
Mycotoxin emergence and co-occurrence trends in Canadian grains are dynamic and evolving in response to changing weather patterns within each growing season. The mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and zearalenone are the dominant mycotoxins detected in grains grown in Eastern Canada. Two potential emerging mycotoxins of concern are sterigmatocystin, produced by Aspergillus versicolor, and diacetoxyscirpenol, a type A trichothecene produced by a number of Fusarium species. In response to a call from the 83rd Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants, we conducted a comprehensive survey of samples from cereal production areas in Ontario, Canada. Some 159 wheat and 160 corn samples were collected from farms over a three-year period. Samples were extracted and analyzed by LC-MS/MS for 33 mycotoxins and secondary metabolites. Ergosterol was analyzed as an estimate of the overall fungal biomass in the samples. In wheat, the ratio of DON to its glucoside, deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside (DON-3G), exhibited high variability, likely attributable to differences among cultivars. In corn, the ratio was more consistent across the samples. Sterigmatocystin was detected in some wheat that had higher concentrations of ergosterol. Diacetoxyscirpenol was not detected in either corn or wheat over the three years, demonstrating a low risk to Ontario grain. Overall, there was some change to the mycotoxin profiles over the three years for wheat and corn. Ongoing surveys are required to reassess trends and ensure the safety of the food value chain, especially for emerging mycotoxins.
Key Contribution: Deoxynivalenol: its related metabolites and zearalenone are the predominant mycotoxins observed in corn and wheat from Ontario, Canada. There is some isolated risk of sterigmatocystin but very little risk of diacetoxyscirpenol contamination.

1. Introduction

The mycotoxin contamination of food and feed is a major economic challenge for the small grains value chain in Canada. The risks associated with mycotoxins in grain were first appreciated following the recognition of ergot toxicosis in the 17th century, then again following the discovery of citrinin in 1931, the isolation of deoxynivalenol (DON: also known as vomitoxin) in 1972, and the discovery of fumonisin in 1988 [1,2]. In Canada, early reports of animal toxicoses from grains with Fusarium head blight (FHB) appeared in the literature in the late 19th century [3]. The causative fungal agent of FHB in wheat and other small grains, Fusarium graminearum, is also responsible for Gibberella ear rot in corn [4]. As chemical standards became available, reports of mycotoxins in feed and food, particularly ochratoxin (OTA) and T-2/HT-2 toxins, started to appear in the early 1970s [5,6,7,8,9]. The catastrophic FHB of 1980 in Southern Ontario produced a crop that was highly contaminated by DON [10]. This resulted in increased efforts to monitor and understand the toxicity of mycotoxins of importance to Canada. Wheat is susceptible to head blight if it is warm and wet at anthesis, while corn is prone to ear rot if those conditions occur around silk emergence [11].
Since the late 1970s, the pattern of the mycotoxin contamination in Ontario changed. In the 1970s, the Fusarium graminearum toxin zearalenone (ZEN) was common in corn and to a lesser extent in small grains [12,13]. Zearalenone is biosynthesized under cooler conditions, whereas the same fungus produces deoxynivalenol (DON) under warmer—but not hot—conditions [14,15]. As temperatures in Ontario increased from the 1980s to the present, DON came to dominate in crops during years where Fusarium head blight or Gibberella ear rot occurred [15,16,17]. Aside from DON, the precursor 15-acetyldexoynivalenol (15-ADON) as well as the plant-produced glycoside deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside (DON-3G) are common in infected wheat and corn in Ontario. The acetylated DON derivative, 3-ADON, has come to dominate parts of Western Canada but has been demonstrated to be rare in Ontario, where the 15-ADON chemotype dominates [18]. The presence of DON-3G increases the risk of human exposure to DON because the sugar is cleaved off by the gut microbiome in both humans and animals [19]. Other Fusarium species, such as F. sporotrichioides (T-2/HT-2 toxins) and F. avenaceum (beauvericin, enniatins), can also be common depending on weather conditions [20,21]. Periodic and systematic monitoring of mycotoxins in wheat and corn is essential to detect and track changes in contamination patterns and fungal populations. Climate change has emerged as a significant factor influencing mycotoxin distribution and prevalence. In North America, the impact of climate change on mycotoxin contamination has been identified as one of the primary threats leading to increased exposure to these chemical toxins [22,23].
In Canada, regular monitoring for mycotoxins is conducted for exported wheat, most of which comes from Western Canada [24,25,26,27,28]. Because all the corn and much of the wheat produced in Ontario stays in Canada, this level of monitoring is less frequent. In this study, we report the results of a comprehensive LC-MS/MS analysis of wheat and corn samples taken from across the cereal-producing areas of Ontario in each of the growing seasons of 2015, 2016, and 2017. Aside from DON and ZEN, we responded to a recommendation by the 83rd Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (JECFA), who issued a call for survey data on sterigmatocystin (STE) and diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS) [29,30].
A comprehensive multi-mycotoxin screening method was employed for the simultaneous detection and quantification of 33 distinct mycotoxins in a total of 319 grain samples, comprising 159 wheat and 160 corn specimens. Additionally, ergosterol levels were measured as a biomarker to assess the overall fungal biomass and infection severity in the samples.

2. Results

Weather conditions where the wheat and corn were grown in the three growing seasons varied considerably. The 2015 growing season was somewhat cooler and much wetter than the 30-year average, where some areas in Southwestern Ontario received over 200% of normal rainfall amounts between 30 May and 30 June [31]. The 2016 growing season was 1–2.5° warmer and ~10% drier. The 2017 growing season was slightly cooler and somewhat wetter than the 30-year average [32,33,34].

2.1. Wheat

The pattern of toxins in the samples varied by crop year. In 2015, 59 samples were analyzed. Of these, 36% had >1 µg/g DON (Table 1). In these samples, the concentration (µg/g) ratio of DON-3G:DON varied considerably, with an arithmetic mean of 0.238 ± 0.215 (Figure 1). Enniatins B and B1 co-occurred at similar concentrations in the wheat samples. More than 1 µg/g enniatin B + B1(combined) was present in 20% of the samples, but most samples in 2015 had modest (66.0 µg/kg ± 2.7 enniatin B, B1) median concentrations of both. Approximately one-third of the samples where beauvericin was detected had modest (0.06–0.75 µg/g ± 0.17) median concentrations of beauvericin present. Zearalenone (ZEN) was detected in 76% of the 2015 wheat samples, and 66% of the detected samples had low median concentrations (0.02–1.64 µg/g ± 0.33), with one sample having >1 µg/g. Most samples had low concentrations (0.005–0.412 µg/g ± 0.040) of the Alternaria metabolites alternariol, tentoxin, alternariol, and alternariol monomethyl ether. Low concentrations (0.11–1.32 µg/g ± 0.22) of fusaric acid were also common.
Four wheat samples were positive for STE in 2015, with a range of 0.14–9.42 µg/g, where two of the four hits were above 5 µg/g. In 2016 and 2017, 50 samples were analyzed. Sterigmatocystin was not detected in any of the 2016 and 2017 wheat samples. Diacetoxyscirpenol was not detected at all between 2015 and 2017. Considering all the toxins found in the wheat samples over three years, DON and ZEN were by far the most common and were almost always together (Figure 2). The precursor 15-ADON was also frequently detected (Table 1, Figure 2). The full dataset is found in the supplementary.xls file.
The median ergosterol values in wheat varied slightly between the three sampling years (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2). The wheat samples from 2015 (10.7 µg/g) and 2017 (10.8 µg/g) were similar in both median values, positive hits (96% of samples in 2015, 100% in 2017), and maximum reported values (33.0 µg/g in 2015 and 31.0 µg/g in 2017). The wheat samples from 2016 had lower overall ergosterol by comparison, with a median concentration of 4.47 µg/g, and a maximum reported value of 19.5 µg/g. Though the concentrations of ergosterol were lower, the 2016 wheat samples were still comparable to 2015 and 2017 in the number of samples with quantifiable ergosterol (94% of samples). Pearson’s correlation of ergosterol showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.95, p = 3.25 × 10−3) with STE, as well as a moderately positive relationship with DON (r = 0.44. p = 7.18 × 10−5).

2.2. Corn

In 2015, 44 samples were analyzed. Of these, DON was detected in 36% of the samples, where three samples had >1 µg/g DON (Table 2). Most of these had low (0.01–1.24 µg/g ± 0.33) ZEN except one sample at >1 µg/g. Beauvericin was detected in 18% of the 2015 corn samples. The majority of the samples with beauvericin had low concentrations (0.03–0.34 µg/g ± 0.13), except for one sample which had > 5 µg/g. The other toxins measured were largely absent.
In 2016, 51 samples were analyzed. Of these, 39% had detectible DON, where six samples were >1 µg/g, including two above 10 µg/g. The concentration (µg/g) ratio of DON-3G:DON was 0.282 ± 0.241 (Figure 1). Zearalenone was present in 60% of the samples, with one having > 1 µg/g. Of the 2016 samples, 16% of them had beauvericin, where detected samples had modest (0.03–6.43 µg/g ± 2.23) concentrations, with two samples at >2 µg/g.
In 2017, 65 samples were analyzed. Of these, 23% had DON, where six samples were >1 µg/g, including two samples that were >10 µg/g. The concentration (µg/kg) ratio of DON to DON-3G was 0.329 ± 0.322. Zearalenone was detected in 48% of the 2017 samples, with most samples having low concentrations of zearalenone (0.01–1.39 µg/g ± 0.31), with two samples having > 1 µg/g. Only four samples had detectible beauvericin, with two samples having > 1 µg/g.
Fumonisins were generally found in low concentrations overall (35.4 µg/kg–1.59 µg/g ± 0.261 µg/g for FB1, FB2 and FB3) between 2015 and 2017, and were uncommon across all three years of the study. The sole exception was a single sample from 2016, which contained 1.6 µg/g of FB1. Fusaric acid (FUSA) was uncommon in 2015 and had only a single detection (318 µg/kg). However, FUSA was detected in some samples in 2016 (0.107–1.180 µg/g ± 0.385) and in 2017 (0.199–2.060 µg/g ± 0.764). The full dataset is found in the Supplementary Materials.
Considering all the toxins that were detected in the corn, DON, 15-ADON, and ZEN were by far the most common (Figure 4). As noted, fumonisin occurred sporadically, mostly in low µg/kg concentrations (Table 2).
A number of compounds were not detected, such as diacetoxyscirpenol, primarily from F. sambucinum [35], and the Penicillium toxins griseofulvum and mycophenolic acid. Other Penicillium compounds, including penitrem A and viridicatin as well as the Aspergillus versicolor toxin sterigmatocystin, were infrequently detected in low (µg/kg) abundance (Table 2, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2).
Ergosterol in the corn samples was typically lower than in the wheat samples, where fewer samples had detectable levels, especially in 2017 (Figure 5, Supplementary Table S2). The samples from 2015 and 2016 had comparable detections (88.6% of samples in 2015, 82.3% in 2016) and median values (6.00 µg/g in 2015, 7.85 µg/g in 2016). By contrast, in 2017, only 55.3% of the corn samples had detectable levels of ergosterol, with a median value of 1.24 µg/g. Pearson’s correlation showed only a moderate correlation of ergosterol value to DON (r = 0.59, p = 4.41 × 10−5), D3G (r = 0.57, p = 9.39 × 10−3), and ZEN (r = 0.42, p = 8.98 × 10−4).

3. Discussion

Wheat becomes susceptible to head blight when warm and wet conditions coincide with anthesis, and corn becomes susceptible to ear rot if those conditions occur around silk emergence. Corn is susceptible to Fusarium kernel rot and the accumulation of fumonisins under hot dry conditions, often combined with insect stress [36]. The impacts of temperature and rainfall are clearly seen in the data from the two crops over the three years of the survey.
As noted, DON remains the dominant mycotoxin in Ontario-grown wheat, and this has not changed since the mid-1980s, nor since the severe epidemics of Gibberella ear rot from the mid-1990s [37]. Generally, modest concentrations of the cyclic peptides, enniatins, and beauvericin were seen in both crops. This is consistent with other recent studies in Ontario of both wheat and corn [38,39]. Strains of F. verticillioides from Ontario were shown to produce fumonisins shortly after their discovery in the early 1990s [40]. Despite historical concerns, fumonisin contamination remains relatively uncommon. Nevertheless, the risk persists, particularly during warm summers, necessitating continued vigilance. A recent study of mycotoxins in corn harvested in Michigan indicated a similar pattern, except fumonisin was more common and in higher average concentrations [41]. As noted, the minor compounds from Penicillium species and STE were uncommon in both crops over the three years. This is similarly consistent with the recent study of wheat in Ontario and in samples of grain corn in the USA [39,42]. This, along with fact that DAS was not observed in any samples, helps to address the question of what the risk is of these potentially emerging mycotoxins to grains in Canada. It is clear that there is currently very little to no risk of STE or DAS contamination during the years studied for this survey. This finding further reiterates the importance of DON in Canada and focuses the need for devoting our attention and resources to the continued monitoring and management of DON.
Tothill et al. (1992) noted significant correlations between ergosterol values at higher water activity (aw) values (0.95) [43]. Similarly, Abramson et al. (2005) noted increased ergosterol after the wheat moisture content (mc) increased from 3.9–8.4 µg/g at 16% mc to 3.9–55.5 µg/g at 20% mc in stored Manitoba wheat samples [44]. The samples from 2015 in the current study had the highest recorded rainfall between the sampling years and also the maximum reported ergosterol values. The ergosterol ranges for wheat (0.24–33 µg/g) and corn (0.19–24 µg/g) found in this study align with the ranges reported by Tittlemier et al. (2020) for Canadian oat sample shipments taken between 2014 and 2017 (1.77–37 µg/g) [45]. Perkowski et al. (2008) reported lower ergosterol values (0.4–3.40 µg/g) in Polish wheat samples [46]. In contrast, Pietri et al. (2004) reported higher ergosterol values (0.3–174.8 µg/g) from a multi-year study of Italian corn samples, with significant correlations shown between ergosterol and high concentrations of DON (p < 0.01), ZEN (p < 0.01) and FB1 (p < 0.001) [47]
The largest difference over the three years of this study was the extremely variable DON-3G concentrations found. In some cases, DON-3G was >50% of the DON concentration in wheat in the 2015 samples, where DON was >1 ppm (Figure 1). At the time of the original report of the existence of a DON glycoside in wheat in 1986 [48], DON-3G was present in low concentrations or not detectable in Ontario wheat and corn. Based on the available data, wheat cultivars have higher ratios of DON-3G to DON in Europe than in the USA [49]. Wheat cultivars from Europe also tend to have higher relative amounts of DON-3G [50]. In both humans and swine, the gut microbiome can cleave the sugar off, thus increasing their exposure to DON [51,52]. Because of this, the European regulation for DON is a value comprising the sum of DON, DON-3G, and the two acetates 15- and 3-ADON [53]. The ratios of DON-3G to DON in the positive corn samples were comparable to those reported by Blackwell et al. (2022) [54].
Our initial interest in the samples was to monitor for the genetic changes of the F. graminearum population in Ontario cereals [18,37]. The present work attempts to determine if any major changes in the mycotoxins profile have occurred by comparing the present findings to studies published over the past 40 years. During this study period, the measured temperature change in Southern Ontario has increased by >1 °C [15]. The present data suggest little change to the overall mycotoxin profile in cereals so far. However, the data will permit this question to be asked again in a decade or so from now. In Europe, growing concern has emerged regarding the potential health risks associated with the co-occurrence of low-level mycotoxins and minor secondary metabolites in food and animal feed [55]. Much of this is based on in vitro tests of limited applicability to human and animal health [56]. The one example of interaction that has human health relevance is the combination of aflatoxin and fumonisin. The impact of co-exposure of a genotoxic carcinogen with a powerful cancer promoter has been clearly demonstrated in relevant animal models, and the mechanism is clear [57]. Mixtures of the major metabolites from F. graminearum that co-occur with DON (15-ADON, culmorin, sambucinol, and dihydroxycalonectrin) in typical concentrations do not result in an increased effect over DON in swine [58]. The ZEN and DON quantified in the current study commonly co-occurred in corn, albeit at levels that were below the guidelines for swine. Early studies demonstrated that the effect of ZEN on swine was antagonized by co-exposure [59,60]. This reflects the well-understood feed refusal effect of DON on swine.

4. Conclusions

The analysis of the wheat and corn samples from 2015 to 2017 revealed that DON, ZEN, and 15-ADON were the most commonly detected mycotoxins from farms in Ontario, Canada. This trend remains unchanged for the region when comparing the present findings to data published over the last 40 years. However, what has changed is the occurrence of DON-3G, which was uncommon in the past. The implications of this change in terms of human exposure need further study, preferably by a urinary biomarker study. In addition, the analysis revealed that there was little risk of STE and DAS contamination in maize and small grains over the sampling period and fulfilled the survey recommendation proposed by JECFA. However, there needs to be continued surveillance of STE, DAS, and Fusarium trichothecenes in small grains and maize as regional trends may shift as average temperatures and rainfall amounts increase.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Corn and Wheat Sample Collection

Samples were collected as described in Crippin et al. (2020) [37]. Briefly, 160 corn and 159 wheat samples (90–100 g) were collected in 2015, 2016, and 2017 from the southern, central, and eastern regions of Ontario, Canada. The samples were collected by the Ontario Corn Committee and Kent Corn Committee from experimental plots at the University of Guelph’s Ridgetown Campus. Grain samples were also collected from annual Fusarium head blight and Gibberella ear rot surveys that were conducted by the Ontario Ministry of Food and Agriculture and the University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus. It is important to note that in Ontario there is a rotation of soybean, corn, and wheat crops, with cereals following soybeans. The samples were all stored under air drying conditions at −20 °C at the University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, until being sent to Agriculture Agri-Food Canada in London.
All the samples were air dried and stored at −20 °C until being processed in 2023. The corn and wheat samples were ground using the Retsch Twister Mill with a 1 mm sieve. The ground subsamples were stored in paper envelopes at −20 °C until extraction.

5.2. Mycotoxin Extraction

The ground corn and wheat samples (200 mg ± 20 mg) were extracted with 1 mL 79/20/1 acetonitrile/H2O/acetic acid [61,62,63,64,65]. The samples were sonicated for 15 min and then shaken at 1400 rpm on an Eppendorf Thermomixer C (2.0 mL sample block) at 30 °C for 20 min, in accordance with Kelman, 2022, and Teeter-Wood, 2024 [66,67]. The samples were first incubated at 4 °C for 10 min before being centrifuged at 4 °C at 8000 rpm for 8 min. The supernatant was diluted 1:1 with water and filtered through 0.45 µM PTFE syringe filters into 250 µL polypropylene snap cap vials (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for an LC-MS analysis [64].

5.3. LC-MS/MS Analysis and Quantification of Mycotoxins

The corn and grain samples were initially pre-screened by an LC-MS analysis on an Agilent 1290 HPLC that was coupled to a Q-Exactive Quadrupole Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer, as previously described [66]. All the grain samples were screened for NX and 3ANX toxins, but these were not detected and, thus, not included in the quantification. A mycotoxin quantification by LC-MS was performed on a Thermo Fisher Vanquish HPLC that was coupled to a Thermo Fisher TSQ Altis triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Separation was achieved using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus RRHD C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µM, Agilent Technologies) maintained at 35 °C. The sample extracts were analyzed using water with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B) (Optima grade, Fisher Scientific, Lawn, NJ, USA). Briefly, B was held at 2% for 0.75 min and increased to 22% B over 0.5 min. Then, B was slowly increased to 35% over 2.75 min before ramping to 100%. Finally, B was held at 100% for 2.5 min before returning to 2% over 0.5 min. Each sample was injected with 5 µL using a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The samples were analyzed using a HESI in SRM mode using the following spray conditions: ion spray voltage, 3500 V; sheath gas, 35 units; auxiliary gas, 10 units; sweep gas, 1 unit; transfer tube temperature, 325 °C; and vaporizer temperature, 350 °C. The calibration standards were prepared neat in 50/50 acetonitrile/water over low (0.2–20 ng/mL) and high (50–800 ng/mL) concentration ranges. The instrumental limits of detection and quantification were determined using the standard deviation of y-intercepts of regression lines following ICH guidelines [68]. The methods were validated in corn and wheat sample matrices. The clean, blank corn and wheat material required for SSE (signal suppression and enhancement) and recovery (RE) experiments were determined by extraction and an LC-MS analysis of the provided samples (as previously described) and by selecting the samples with the lowest detected amounts of mycotoxins in the screening method (Supplementary Table S1). The extraction recovery experiments were conducted at 500 µg/kg into blank matrix material (corn, wheat) using 200 ± 20 mg of clean corn and wheat sample matrices. The spiked samples were vortexed for 60 s before being dried for 30 min at room temperature. The control and spiked samples were extracted as previously described [61,63,64,65]. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the control sample supernatants were similarly spiked with 500 µg/kg of the mycotoxin mixture. The supernatant (400 µL) was removed and diluted 1:1 with water and filtered with 0.45 µM PTFE syringe filters into 250 µL polypropylene snap cap HPLC vials for an LC-MS analysis. All the peak areas were integrated for the quantifier ion listed in Supplementary Table S1. Labeled standards of U[13C18] Sterigmatocystin (25.1 µg/mL, Romer Labs); U[13C34] Fumonisin B1 (25 µg/mL, Romer Labs); U[13C19] Diacetoxyscirpenol (25.1 µg/mL, Romer Labs); U[13C15] Deoxynivalenol (25 µg/mL, Romer Labs); U[13C20] Ochratoxin A (10 µg/mL, Romer Labs); and U[13C18] Zearalenone (25.1 µg/mL, Romer Labs) were used as quality controls for quantifications. Briefly, the internal standard (IS) spiking solution was prepared as a dilution from stock solutions in 50/50 acetonitrile/H2O. The wheat and corn samples (200 mg ± 0.2) were spiked with 5 µL of IS to final concentrations of 10 µg/kg OTA and STE; 100 µg/kg FB1, ZEN, and DAS; and 500 µg/kg DON on grain. After spiking, the corn and wheat samples were air-dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen for 15 min prior to extraction (5.2). All samples with positive hits for OTA, STE, FB1, ZEN, and DON were validated using their internal standard prior to quantification by external calibration by their unlabeled standard.

5.4. Ergosterol Extraction and Quantification by LC-MS/MS

The LC-MS analysis of ergosterol was performed using an APCI source, as previously described [66], with a minor modification to the chromatography to adjust for the d7-cholesterol internal standard. The corn and wheat samples were weighed (200 mg ± 20 mg) into anaerobic tubes and spiked at 50 µg/g d7-cholesterol (Sigma Aldrich, prepared in 1 mg/mL stocks in acetone) and allowed to dry for 15 min before extraction. The extraction solution was prepared per Tittlemier et al., 2020, and Dong et al., 2006, using 10% potassium hydroxide in methanol [45,69]. Two mL of the 10% KOH was added to the samples that were spiked with an internal standard, which were then vortexed briefly for 15 s, capped, and saponified at 90 °C in a water bath for 90 min. Following solution neutralization with hydrochloric acid, samples were extracted 1:1 (v:v) with hexane. The organic portions were removed and evaporated to dryness and then reconstituted in 1 mL optima grade acetonitrile. Samples were diluted 100× with acetonitrile and syringe filtered with 0.45 µm PTFE into HPLC vials for an LCMS analysis. Separation was achieved using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C8 column (2.1 × 50 mm × 1.8 µm; Agilent Technologies) using mobile phase A (Optima grade water + 0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B (Optima grade acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid). B was held at 30% for 30 secs, increased to 100% over 3 min, and held at 100% B for 3.5 min, returned to 30% B over 1.5 min, and held for 1 min before the next injection. Samples were quantified using matrix-matched calibration curves in clean wheat and corn matrices up to 700 µg/g with a reported extraction efficiency of 92%. Ergosterol LOD and LOQ (10 ng/mL) were determined from 5 repeated injections with % RSD < 25% that were run on the Q-Exactive Orbitrap with an APCI source, with an MQL of 0.054 mg/kg. Pearson’s correlation (α = 0.05) was performed in R using the Hmisc [70] package to assess whether ergosterol was correlated to mycotoxin concentration (µg/g).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins16080372/s1. Supplementary.pdf: Table S1: Instrumental LODs and LOQs and associated quantifier/qualifier ions of analyzed mycotoxins; Table S2: MRM transition information for 13C labeled mycotoxin standards; Table S3: Ergosterol concentration summary (µg/g) in wheat and corn between 2015 and 2017; Figure S1: Pearson correlation coefficients (r) for 159 wheat samples, (α = 0.05); Figure S2: Pearson correlation coefficients (r) for 160 corn samples, (α = 0.05); Figure S3: DON:DON3G concentration ratio in corn samples by year (2015–2017); Figure S4: Pearson correlation coefficients (r) for 160 corn samples, (α = 0.05). Wheat and corn data.xlsx: 2015–2017 wheat data, 2015–2017 corn data, mycotoxin abbreviations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W.S. and J.D.M.; methodology, J.B.R., M.W.S. and M.J.K.; formal analysis, J.D.M., M.J.K. and M.W.S.; data curation, M.J.K.; sample preparation, D.B. and M.J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.D.M. and M.J.K.; funding acquisition, M.W.S. and J.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada a grant from the Ontario Ministry of Food and Agriculture (FS2015-2617/SF6115) J. David Miller (PI).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The assistance of Trinda Crippin, Carleton University, and Arthur Schaafsma and Victor Limay-Rios for the collection and organization of these samples is gratefully acknowledged).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hesseltine, C. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1974, 53, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pitt, J.I.; Miller, J.D. A concise history of mycotoxin research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7021–7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miller, J.D. Mycotoxins in small grains and maize: Old problems, new challenges. Food Addit. Contam. 2008, 25, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sutton, J. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1982, 4, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Andrews, R.; Thompson, B.; Trenholm, H.L. A national survey of mycotoxins in Canada. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1981, 58, A989–A991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Greenway, J.; Puls, R. Fusariotoxicosis from barley in British Columbia. I. Natural occurrence and diagnosis. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1976, 40, 12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prior, M. Mycotoxin determinations on animal feedstuffs and tissues in Western Canada. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1976, 40, 75. [Google Scholar]
  8. Scott, P.; Walbeek, W.v.; Harwig, J.; Fennell, D. Occurrence of a mycotoxin, ochratoxin A, in wheat and isolation of ochratoxin A and citrinin producing strains of Penicillium viridicatum. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1970, 50, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scott, P.M.; Van Walbeek, W.; Kennedy, B.; Anyeti, D. Mycotoxins (ochratoxin A, citrinin, and sterigmatocystin) and toxigenic fungi in grains and other agricultural products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fitzpatrick, D.W. Mycotoxins in the food chain: Nutritional and toxicological considerations. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1990, 68, 979–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hooker, D.; Schaafsma, A.; Tamburic-Ilincic, L. Using weather variables pre-and post-heading to predict deoxynivalenol content in winter wheat. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Funnell, H. Mycotoxins in animal feedstuffs in Ontario: 1972 to 1977. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1979, 43, 243. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sutton, J.; Baliko, W.; Funnell, H. Relation of weather variables to incidence of zearalenone in corn in southern Ontario. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1980, 60, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miller, J.D. Factors that affect the occurrence of fumonisin. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 321–324. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller, J.D. Changing patterns of fungal toxins in crops: Challenges for analysts. J. AOAC Int. 2016, 99, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Campbell, H.; Choo, T.M.; Vigier, B.; Underhill, L. Comparison of mycotoxin profiles among cereal samples from eastern Canada. Can. J. Bot. 2002, 80, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scott, P. Multi-year monitoring of Canadian grains and grain-based foods for trichothecenes and zearalenone. Food Addit. Contam. 1997, 14, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Crippin, T.; Renaud, J.B.; Sumarah, M.W.; Miller, J.D. Comparing genotype and chemotype of Fusarium graminearum from cereals in Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sumarah, M.W. The deoxynivalenol challenge. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 9619–9624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miller, J.D. Epidemiology of Fusarium Ear Diseases of Cereals. In Mycotoxins in Grain; Compounds Other than Aflatoxin; Eagen Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1994; pp. 19–36. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xue, A.G.; Chen, Y.; Seifert, K.; Guo, W.; Blackwell, B.A.; Harris, L.J.; Overy, D.P. Prevalence of Fusarium species causing head blight of spring wheat, barley and oat in Ontario during 2001–2017. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 41, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balbus, J.M.; Boxall, A.B.; Fenske, R.A.; McKone, T.E.; Zeise, L. Implications of global climate change for the assessment and management of human health risks of chemicals in the natural environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013, 32, 62–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miller, J.D. Mycotoxins, climate change, and food system management. J. Food Diagn. 2022, 4, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bianchini, A.; Horsley, R.; Jack, M.M.; Kobielush, B.; Ryu, D.; Tittlemier, S.; Wilson, W.W.; Abbas, H.K.; Abel, S.; Harrison, G. DON occurrence in grains: A North American perspective. Cereal Foods World 2015, 60, 32–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tittlemier, S.A.; Roscoe, M.; Trelka, R.; Gaba, D.; Chan, J.M.; Patrick, S.K.; Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; McKendry, T.; Gräfenhan, T. Fusarium damage in small cereal grains from Western Canada. 2. Occurrence of Fusarium toxins and their source organisms in durum wheat harvested in 2010. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5438–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tittlemier, S.A.; Gaba, D.; Chan, J.M. Monitoring of Fusarium trichothecenes in Canadian cereal grain shipments from 2010 to 2012. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7412–7418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tittlemier, S.A.; Roscoe, M.; Blagden, R.; Kobialka, C. Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Canadian wheat shipments, 2010–12. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2014, 31, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tittlemier, S.A.; Blagden, R.; Chan, J.; Gaba, D.; Mckendry, T.; Pleskach, K.; Roscoe, M. Fusarium and Alternaria mycotoxins present in Canadian wheat and durum harvest samples. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 41, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. JECFA (World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). Evaluation of Certain Contaminants in Food: Eighty-Third Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Contaminants, 3.2: 4,15-Diacetoxyscirpenol; World Health Organization: Geneva, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 40–54. [Google Scholar]
  30. JECFA (World Health Organization Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives). Evaluation of Certain Contaminants in Food: Eighty-Third Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Contaminants, 3.6-Sterigmatocystin; World Health Organization: Geneva, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 106–122. [Google Scholar]
  31. CMOS (Canadian Meterological and Oceanographic Society). Canada’s Top Ten Weather Stories for 2015. Available online: https://cmos.in1touch.org/uploaded/web/website/top_ten/EN_Final%20Top%20Ten%20Weather%20Stories%20in%202015.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2024).
  32. ECCC (Environment Climate Change Canada). Climate Trends and Variations Bulletin–Summer 2015. Available online: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/eccc/En81-23-2015-3-eng.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2024).
  33. ECCC (Environment Climate Change Canada). Climate Trends and Variations Bulletin–Summer 2016. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/migration/main/sc-cs/cabbe0ee-bb3d-4e6c-96dc-6f83a9beb427/4325-20summer-20eng04.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2024).
  34. ECCC (Environment Climate Change Canada). Climate Trends and Variations Bulletin–Summer 2017. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/documents/pdf/climate-change/trends-variations/summer-2017-en.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2024).
  35. Munkvold, G.P.; Proctor, R.H.; Moretti, A. Mycotoxin production in Fusarium according to contemporary species concepts. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2021, 59, 373–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Reid, L.; Nicol, R.; Ouellet, T.; Savard, M.; Miller, J.; Young, J.; Stewart, D.; Schaafsma, A. Interaction of Fusarium graminearum and F. moniliforme in maize ears: Disease progress, fungal biomass, and mycotoxin accumulation. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crippin, T.; Limay-Rios, V.; Renaud, J.; Schaafsma, A.; Sumarah, M.; Miller, J. Fusarium graminearum populations from maize and wheat in Ontario, Canada. World Mycotoxin J. 2020, 13, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Limay-Rios, V.; Schaafsma, A.W. Effect of prothioconazole application timing on Fusarium mycotoxin content in maize grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4809–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Limay-Rios, V.; Schaafsma, A.W. Relationship between Mycotoxin Content in Winter Wheat Grain and Aspirated Dust Collected during Harvest and after Storage. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 1857–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miller, J.; Savard, M.; Schaafsma, A.; Seifert, K.; Reid, L. Mycotoxin production by Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium proliferatum from Ontario and occurrence of fumonisin in the 1993 corn crop. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1995, 17, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fusilier, K.; Chilvers, M.I.; Limay-Rios, V.; Singh, M.P. Mycotoxin co-occurrence in Michigan harvested maize grain. Toxins 2022, 14, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weaver, A.C.; Weaver, D.M.; Adams, N.; Yiannikouris, A. Co-occurrence of 35 mycotoxins: A seven-year survey of corn grain and corn silage in the United States. Toxins 2021, 13, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tothill, I.E.; Harris, D.; Magan, N. The relationship between fungal growth and ergosterol content of wheat grain. Mycol. Res. 1992, 96, 965–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abramson, D.; Hulasare, R.; York, R.K.; White, N.D.G.; Jayas, D.S. Mycotoxins, ergosterol, and odor volatiles in durum wheat during granary storage at 16% and 20% moisture content. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2005, 41, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tittlemier, S.A.; Blagden, R.; Chan, J.; Roscoe, M.; Pleskach, K. A multi-year survey of mycotoxins and ergosterol in Canadian oats. Mycotoxin Res. 2020, 36, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perkowski, J.; Buśko, M.; Stuper, K.; Kostecki, M.; Matysiak, A.; Szwajkowska-Michałek, L. Concentration of ergosterol in small-grained naturally contaminated and inoculated cereals. Biologia 2008, 63, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pietri, A.; Bertuzzi, T.; Pallaroni, L.; Piva, G. Occurrence of mycotoxins and ergosterol in maize harvested over 5 years in Northern Italy. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. David Miller, J.; Arnison, P.G. Degradation of deoxynivalenol by suspension cultures of the Fusarium head blight resistant wheat cultivar Frontana. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1986, 8, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miller, J.D. Mycotoxins: Still with us after all these years. In Present Knowledge in Food Safety; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 62–78. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, Z.; Nie, D.; Fan, K.; Yang, J.; Guo, W.; Meng, J.; Zhao, Z.; Han, Z. A systematic review of plant-conjugated masked mycotoxins: Occurrence, toxicology, and metabolism. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1523–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gratz, S.W.; Duncan, G.; Richardson, A.J. The human fecal microbiota metabolizes deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside and may be responsible for urinary deepoxy-deoxynivalenol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 1821–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gratz, S.W.; Currie, V.; Richardson, A.J.; Duncan, G.; Holtrop, G.; Farquharson, F.; Louis, P.; Pinton, P.; Oswald, I.P. Porcine small and large intestinal microbiota rapidly hydrolyze the masked mycotoxin deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside and release deoxynivalenol in spiked batch cultures in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02106–e02117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Knutsen, H.K.; Alexander, J.; Barregård, L.; Bignami, M.; Bruschweiler, B.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cottrill, B.; Dinovi, M.; Grasl-Kraupp, B. Risks to human and animal health related to the presence of deoxynivalenol and its acetylated and modified forms in food and feed. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04718. [Google Scholar]
  54. Blackwell, B.A.; Schneiderman, D.; Thapa, I.; Bosnich, W.; Pimentel, K.; Kebede, A.Z.; Reid, L.M.; Harris, L.J. Assessment of deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol derivatives in Fusarium graminearum-inoculated Canadian maize inbreds. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2022, 44, 504–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stoev, S.D. Food security, underestimated hazard of joint mycotoxin exposure and management of the risk of mycotoxin contamination. Food Control 2023, 159, 110235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alassane-Kpembi, I.; Schatzmayr, G.; Taranu, I.; Marin, D.; Puel, O.; Oswald, I.P. Mycotoxins co-contamination: Methodological aspects and biological relevance of combined toxicity studies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3489–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, C.; Riley, R.T.; Wu, F. Dietary fumonisin and growth impairment in children and animals: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 1448–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rotter, R.; Trenholm, H.; Prelusky, D.; Hartin, K.; Thompson, B.; Miller, J. A preliminary examination of potential interactions between deoxynivalenol (DON) and other selected Fusarium metabolites in growing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 72, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Trenholm, H.; Friend, D.; Thompson, B.; Prelusky, D. Effects of zearalenone and deoxynivalenol combinations fed to pigs. JSM Mycotoxins 1988, 1988, 101–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Williams, K.; Blaney, B.; Magee, M. Responses of pigs fed wheat naturally infected with Fusarium graminearum and containing the mycotoxins 4-deoxynivalenol and zearalenone. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1988, 39, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Frisvad, J.C.; Andersen, B.; Thrane, U. The use of secondary metabolite profiling in chemotaxonomy of filamentous fungi. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Frisvad, J.C.; Larsen, T.O.; De Vries, R.; Meijer, M.; Houbraken, J.; Cabañes, F.; Ehrlich, K.; Samson, R. Secondary metabolite profiling, growth profiles and other tools for species recognition and important Aspergillus mycotoxins. Stud. Mycol. 2007, 59, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Malachová, A.; Sulyok, M.; Beltrán, E.; Berthiller, F.; Krska, R. Optimization and validation of a quantitative liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method covering 295 bacterial and fungal metabolites including all regulated mycotoxins in four model food matrices. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1362, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sulyok, M.; Krska, R.; Schuhmacher, R. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric multi-mycotoxin method for the quantification of 87 analytes and its application to semi-quantitative screening of moldy food samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1505–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Andersen, B.; Dongo, A.; Pryor, B.M. Secondary metabolite profiling of Alternaria dauci, A. porri, A. solani, and A. tomatophila. Mycol. Res. 2008, 112, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kelman, M.; Renaud, J.; Baines, D.; Yeung, K.-C.; Miller, J.; Sumarah, M. Mycotoxin determination in fungal contaminated Canadian silage toxic to dairy cows and goats. World Mycotoxin J. 2022, 15, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Teeter-Wood, K.R.; Kelman, M.J.; Teeter, D.P.; Sumarah, M.W. Prevalence of mycotoxins from silage in a small beef cattle feedlot over a storage season: A case study. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2024, 46, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Borman, P.; Elder, D. Chapter 5, validation of analytical procedures Q2 (R1). In ICH Quality Guidelines: An Implementation Guide; Teasdale, A.E.D., Nims, R., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 127–166. [Google Scholar]
  69. Dong, Y.; Steffenson, B.J.; Mirocha, C.J. Analysis of ergosterol in single kernel and ground grain by gas chromatography−mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 4121–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Harrell, F.E., Jr.; Harrell, M.F.E., Jr. Package ‘hmisc’. CRAN2018 2019, 2019, 235–236. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Concentration (µg/g) ratios of DON-3G:DON in wheat and corn over the 2015, 2016, and 2017 sampling years.
Figure 1. Concentration (µg/g) ratios of DON-3G:DON in wheat and corn over the 2015, 2016, and 2017 sampling years.
Toxins 16 00372 g001
Figure 2. Number and distribution of mycotoxins (blue) and co-occurring mycotoxins (grey) in wheat samples between 2015 and 2017.
Figure 2. Number and distribution of mycotoxins (blue) and co-occurring mycotoxins (grey) in wheat samples between 2015 and 2017.
Toxins 16 00372 g002
Figure 3. Ergosterol (µg/g) in wheat samples between 2015 and 2017. Outlier values (°) are shown as points outside of the maximum or minimum whisker of the dataset.
Figure 3. Ergosterol (µg/g) in wheat samples between 2015 and 2017. Outlier values (°) are shown as points outside of the maximum or minimum whisker of the dataset.
Toxins 16 00372 g003
Figure 4. Number and distribution of mycotoxins (blue) and co-occurring mycotoxins (grey) in corn samples between 2015 and 2017.
Figure 4. Number and distribution of mycotoxins (blue) and co-occurring mycotoxins (grey) in corn samples between 2015 and 2017.
Toxins 16 00372 g004
Figure 5. Ergosterol (µg/g) in corn samples between 2015 and 2017. Outlier values (°) are shown as points outside of the maximum or minimum whisker of the dataset.
Figure 5. Ergosterol (µg/g) in corn samples between 2015 and 2017. Outlier values (°) are shown as points outside of the maximum or minimum whisker of the dataset.
Toxins 16 00372 g005
Table 1. Quantification 1 of mycotoxins and secondary metabolites in 159 wheat samples from Ontario farms from 2015–2017.
Table 1. Quantification 1 of mycotoxins and secondary metabolites in 159 wheat samples from Ontario farms from 2015–2017.
2015, n = 592016, n = 502017, n = 50
Median
(# 2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Median
(# 2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Median
(# 2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Deoxynivalenol (DON)948 (53)20.1–14,600537 (16)8.96–8070109 (11)18.2–563
15-Acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON)82.3 (45)38.7–16577.0 (4)70.0–165
3-Acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON)113 (6)81.6–148118 (1)
Deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside (DON-3G)271 (33)35.5–67315 (7)114–993107 (2)85.1–128
Zearalenone (ZEN)28.4 (45)16.5–164019.3 (13)16.2–59.518.5 (17)16.1–4670
HT-2 toxin (HT-2)237 (1)
Fumonisin FB1 (FB1)42.8 (3)41.8–47.1
Fumonisin FB2 (FB2)33.6 (3)33.6–34.234.0 (1)
Fumonisin FB3 (FB3)46.3 (3)45.9–47.448.3 (1)
Sterigmatocystin (STE)3630 (4)135–9420 1420 (2)322–2510
α-cyclopiazonic acid (αCPA)121 (7)118–163118 (1) 117 (2)117–117
Mycophenolic acid (MPA)494 (2)132–855
Penitrem A (PENTA)51.3 (3)51.0–53.9 51.6 (1)
Roquefortine C (ROC)26.2 (5)25.1–42.4 28.2 (2)26.9–29.4
Viridicatin (VIRI)54.9 (4)52.3–63.7 60.6 (2)58.2–63.0
Altenuene (ALT)13.6 (12)11.6–18.614.2 (3)12.9–14.411.9 (1)
Tentoxin (TEN)41.9 (40)4.73–12045.6 (9)2.70–11016.7 (11)3.05–96.5
Alternariol (AOH)23.5 (42)15.7–41223.2 (12)17.2–85.719.3 (8)18.3–36.1
Alternariol monomethyl ether (AME)20.4 (42)16.0–84.220.6 (12)17.5–39.219.8 (8)17.5–27.0
Beauvericin (BEA)118 (21)9.27–748324 (5)52.4–44880.4 (4)50.0–554
Enniatin B (ENNB)65.6 (59)5.29–65008.84 (41)5.30–15806.59 (38)3.08–50.4
Enniatin B1 (ENNB1)66.8 (59)22.6–410026.2 (41)22.5–67723.0 (39)22.0–50.0
Fusaric acid (FUSA)116 (34)112–230115 (12)112–133114 (12)111–216
1 Only samples above the limit of quantification (LOQ) are included. Instrumental LOQ values are reported in the Supplementary Table S1. 2 Number (#) of hits or detections > LOQ.
Table 2. Quantified 1 mycotoxins and secondary metabolites in 160 corn samples from Ontario farms between 2015 and 2017.
Table 2. Quantified 1 mycotoxins and secondary metabolites in 160 corn samples from Ontario farms between 2015 and 2017.
2015, n = 442016, n = 512017, n = 65
Median
(# 2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Median
(#2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Median
(# 2 Hits)
µg/kg
Range
(Min–Max)
µg/kg
Deoxynivalenol (DON)125 (16)15.5–3760393 (20)17.9–17,600319 (15)63.8–18,500
15-Acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON)126 (4)63.9–178195 (13)62.2–335128 (10)57.3–1080
3-Acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON)136 (1) 302 (6)92.7–1184502 (5)218–981
Deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside (DON-3G)331 (4)107–1300447 (9)75.6–6650176 (9)89.0–4930
Zearalenone (ZEN)16.5 (20)12.2–179013.1 (30)12.0–162014.1 (31)12.0–1390
HT-2 Toxin (HT-2)1260 (2)901–16301240 (1) 883 (1)
Fumonisin FB1 (FB1)47.4 (4)46.0–52.151.7 (10)45.2–160055.0 (4)45.4–76.6
Fumonisin FB2 (FB2)35.8 (4)35.6–38.236.8 (7)35.5–11836.3 (2)35.4–37.3
Fumonisin FB3 (FB3)54.0 (2)53.4–54.755.6 (7)53.3–10155.0 (1)
Sterigmatocystin (STE)750 (1)
α-cyclopiazonic acid (αCPA) 100.0 (1)
Penitrem A (PENTA)54.4 (1)
Roquefortine C (ROC)79.7 (6)36.8–371 28.3 (1)
Viridicatin (VIRI)139 (3)71.4–250
Altenuene (ALT)20.1 (8)13.8–28.317.5 (4)12.1–41.117.1 (3)12.5–26.3
Tentoxin (TEN) 4.12 (2)3.81–4.42
Alternariol (AOH)69.4 (16)24.1–21427.4 (19)21.3–21828.0 (16)19.0–177
Alternariol monomethyl ether (AME)16.1 (2)14.6–17.674.5 (3)23.3–332
Beauvericin (BEA)168 (8)34.5–5670180 (8)34.0–6430605 (5)77.0–13,000
Enniatin B (ENNB)5.27 (26)4.81–6.785.03 (10)4.83–5.545.33 (24)4.81–8.40
Enniatin B1 (ENNB1)32.8 (1) 25.3 (1) 35.1 (1)
Fusaric acid (FUSA)318 (1) 411 (8)107–1180982 (6)199–2060
1 Only samples above the limit of quantification (LOQ) are included. Instrumental LOQ values are reported in the Supplementary Table S1. 2 Number (#) of hits or detections > LOQ.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kelman, M.J.; Miller, J.D.; Renaud, J.B.; Baskova, D.; Sumarah, M.W. A Multi-Year Study of Mycotoxin Co-Occurrence in Wheat and Corn Grown in Ontario, Canada. Toxins 2024, 16, 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16080372

AMA Style

Kelman MJ, Miller JD, Renaud JB, Baskova D, Sumarah MW. A Multi-Year Study of Mycotoxin Co-Occurrence in Wheat and Corn Grown in Ontario, Canada. Toxins. 2024; 16(8):372. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16080372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kelman, Megan J., J. David Miller, Justin B. Renaud, Daria Baskova, and Mark W. Sumarah. 2024. "A Multi-Year Study of Mycotoxin Co-Occurrence in Wheat and Corn Grown in Ontario, Canada" Toxins 16, no. 8: 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16080372

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop