3.1. Isolation and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies
Earlier studies aimed at development of a sensitive capture ELISA for BoNT/B using mAbs for both the capture and detection reagents meet with only partial success [
13]. Using a standard ELISA with immobilized antigen for screening cell fusion experiments, a number of mAbs were isolated. However, none of the antibodies so produced effectively bond toxin in solution under physiological conditions, and thereby were not useful as a capture antibodies in a sandwich ELISA. Furthermore, none of the mAbs produced in this earlier study were able to function as a detector antibody (even though they bound toxin in ELISA and on Western blots [
13]. A single mAb able to capture toxin from solution eventually was identified but only after incorporating a double-capture ELISA screen [
13]. In the studies described here the double-capture ELISA screen was used in an effort to identify additional capture and detector antibodies and useful antibody pairs for measurement of BoNT/B.
Following cell fusions, putative capture mAbs were trapped on microassay plates pre-coated with anti-mouse Ig (Fc) specific antiserum (see methods). We identified positive responses in 18 of ~2000 fusion wells screened. Wells were considered positive if the measured activity was at least 2–3 times the average response of all wells on the plate. Incorporating authentic BoNT/B into the screen (see methods) eliminates isolation of peptide specific mAbs in favor of those mAbs capable of binding the intact toxin molecule. It was hoped that this approach would guarantee that all of the mAbs detected in the screen were capable of capturing BoNT/B in solution. Equally important, the capture-capture screen does not detect the vast majority of monoclonal antibodies that are detected in a traditional ELISA screen but fail to capture antigen in solution. None of the 18 mAbs identified in the initial screen bound toxin immobilized on microassay plates by ELISA. However, analysis of antibody binding to microtiter plate immobilized recGST-HcP5 peptide (the immunogen) demonstrated that 13 of the 18 mAbs bound the recGST-HcP5 peptide by ELISA, but only to the recGST-HcP5 peptide corresponding to the amino acid sequence found in toxin serotype B1, but not the H5 fragments based on the A1 or E1 serotypes (
Figure 2).
Four of the mAbs, BoB90-1, BoB90-21, BoB92-23, and BoB92-32, survived multiple rounds of cloning by limited dilution and were further analyzed. All four were able to function at capture antibody in a sandwich ELISA using a polyclonal anti-BoNT/B serum as detector (
Figure 3). Subsequent ELISA titration experiments using BoNT/B immobilized on microtiter plates revealed that none of the isolates were able to bind toxin after it was adsorbed onto microtiter plates in a typical ELISA.
In an effort to further characterize the binding epitopes each mAbs was analyzed for binding to the recGST-peptide panel: LcP1; LcP2; HcP1; HcP2; HcP3; HcP4; and HcP5 peptides (
Figure 1), immobilized on 96-well microtiter plates. Binding was observed to HcP5 peptide but not to the HcP2, HcP3, or HcP4 peptides suggesting that the epitope was destroyed when the HcP5 fragment was subdivided (
Figure 4). In addition, mAb BoB92-23 demonstrated weak but consistently binding to the LcP2 peptide.
Figure 2.
Antibody binding to recombinant BoNT-GST fusion proteins representing the receptor binding domain of the toxin HC for serotypes A, B, and E. Hybridoma supernatants analyzed by ELISA using recombinant peptides as antigen.
Figure 2.
Antibody binding to recombinant BoNT-GST fusion proteins representing the receptor binding domain of the toxin HC for serotypes A, B, and E. Hybridoma supernatants analyzed by ELISA using recombinant peptides as antigen.
Figure 3.
Capture-Capture sandwich ELISA. Identification of capture mAbs immobilized on anti-mouse Ig coated microtiter plates. Detection of bound toxin using a polyclonal anti-BoNT/B antiserum with mAb capture antibodies indicated. Data represents average of three replicates, error bars = ±standard deviation.
Figure 3.
Capture-Capture sandwich ELISA. Identification of capture mAbs immobilized on anti-mouse Ig coated microtiter plates. Detection of bound toxin using a polyclonal anti-BoNT/B antiserum with mAb capture antibodies indicated. Data represents average of three replicates, error bars = ±standard deviation.
Figure 4.
Monoclonal antibody binding to recombinant peptides of BoNT/B (see
Figure 1). Antibodies MCS6-27 and F27-33 described earlier [
13].
Figure 4.
Monoclonal antibody binding to recombinant peptides of BoNT/B (see
Figure 1). Antibodies MCS6-27 and F27-33 described earlier [
13].
Bilayer interferometry was used to measure the affinity constant (K
D) of each of the four mAbs described here (
Table 1). BoB92-23 showed the strongest binding, with a dissociation constant of 10.2 × 10
−11 M. Weaker affinity constants were measured for the other mAbs. Isotype analysis indicated that BoB92-23 is an IgG2b while the remaining three mAbs are IgG1, all having kappa light chains (
Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of BoNT/B monoclonal antibodies.
Table 1.
Characteristics of BoNT/B monoclonal antibodies.
Antibody | Isotype | KD (×10−11 M) |
---|
BoB90-1 | IgG1, kappa | 23.0 |
BoB90-21 | IgG1, kappa | 48.0 |
BoB92-23 | IgG1, kappa | 10.2 |
BoB92-32 | IgG2b, kappa | 48.3 |
MCS6-27 | IgG1, kappa | 8.6 |
Weak antibody binding to the 50 kDa toxin Hc and to the 150 kDa non-reduced holotoxin was observed on Western blots (
Figure 5) following electrophoresis in the presence of DTT. The weak binding on Western blots was expected, since antibody binding to microtiter plate immobilized toxin by ELISA was minimal. The long exposure times needed to visualize bands in the Western blots suggests that heating toxin in SDS-PAGE sample buffer causes partial disruption of the antibody binding epitopes. Clearly SDS-PAGE modifies proteins, altering their surface charge and potentially denaturing tertiary structures. Changes of surface charge and/or structural changes that can eliminate binding epitopes also can occur following adsorption to a solid phase [
14].
The ability of the four mAbs (mAbs BoB90-1, BoB90-21, BoB92-23, and BoB92-32) to function as detector antibodies using a previously produced capture mAb (MCS6-27) (Scotcher
et al. 2010) was evaluated. These experiments, summarized in
Figure 6, revealed that only one of the antibodies, biotin-labeled BoB92-32 functioned as a detector antibody.
Figure 5.
Western blot analysis of anti-botulinum serotype B mAbs. Lane 1, BoB90-1; Lane 2, BoB90-21; Lane 3, BoB92-23; Lane 4, BoB92-32. Each lane contained BoNT/B at 10 µg/mL plus DTT and probed with 10 µg/mL antibody. All lanes exposed for 10 min. Standards on right side represent Kilo Daltons.
Figure 5.
Western blot analysis of anti-botulinum serotype B mAbs. Lane 1, BoB90-1; Lane 2, BoB90-21; Lane 3, BoB92-23; Lane 4, BoB92-32. Each lane contained BoNT/B at 10 µg/mL plus DTT and probed with 10 µg/mL antibody. All lanes exposed for 10 min. Standards on right side represent Kilo Daltons.
Figure 6.
BoNT/B detection in a capture ELISA using mAb MCS6-27 as capture antibody and the four mAbs described here as detector antibodies. Points for MCS 92-23 and 90-1 hidden by the points for MCS 90-21. Line represents a linear curve fit, R2 = 0.996.
Figure 6.
BoNT/B detection in a capture ELISA using mAb MCS6-27 as capture antibody and the four mAbs described here as detector antibodies. Points for MCS 92-23 and 90-1 hidden by the points for MCS 90-21. Line represents a linear curve fit, R2 = 0.996.
3.2. Capture ELISA
These data are consistent with competition ELISA experiments (
Figure 7) demonstrating that mAb BoB92-32 did not compete with mAb MCS6-27 for toxin binding at any of the concentrations tested. In contrast, mAbs BoB90-1, BoB90-21, and BoB92-23 competed with MCS6-27 for toxin binding suggesting that they bind the same or closely related epitopes.
All possible combinations of the four mAbs described here plus mAb MCS6-27 were evaluated for development of a sandwich ELISA. These experiments (data not shown) demonstrated that only two capture/detector antibody pairs (BoB92-23/BoB92-32 and MCS6-27/BoB92-32) were useful for development of a capture ELISA. Careful titration experiments using BoNT/B holotoxin suggest that the combination BoB92-23 (capture) and BoB92-32 (detector) resulted in a more sensitive assay than pairing MCS6-27 (capture) with BoB92-32 (detector) (
Figure 8).
Figure 7.
Competition capture -ELISA using mAb MCS6-27 as capture antibody. Toxin mixed with increasing concentrations of competing mAb (indicated on figure) and immediately added to the capture antibody coated well. Toxin detection using a polyclonal anti-BoNT/B.
Figure 7.
Competition capture -ELISA using mAb MCS6-27 as capture antibody. Toxin mixed with increasing concentrations of competing mAb (indicated on figure) and immediately added to the capture antibody coated well. Toxin detection using a polyclonal anti-BoNT/B.
Figure 8.
Capture ELISA comparing assay performance using either MCS6-27 (open blue circle) or BoB92-23 (open orange square) as capture antibody and BoB92-32 as detector antibody. Bars represent standard deviation (N = 3). Data fitted using 4-paramater-curve fitting. The average of the zero toxin control plus three standard deviations represented by the horizontal lines for BoB92-21 (solid) and MCS6-27 (dashed).
Figure 8.
Capture ELISA comparing assay performance using either MCS6-27 (open blue circle) or BoB92-23 (open orange square) as capture antibody and BoB92-32 as detector antibody. Bars represent standard deviation (N = 3). Data fitted using 4-paramater-curve fitting. The average of the zero toxin control plus three standard deviations represented by the horizontal lines for BoB92-21 (solid) and MCS6-27 (dashed).
In an effort to determine if the four mAbs represented separate fusion products of a clonally expanded lymphocyte population, the amino acid sequences of the light and heavy chain variable regions were determined. Inspection of the translated amino acid sequences of the combining region of each antibody (
Figure 9) suggests that mAbs BoB92-23 and BoB92-31 are unique antibodies. MAb BoB90-1 and BoB90-21 have identical Lc sequences, but sequence information for the Hc of BoB90-21 was not obtained so they could represent independent hybridomas resulting from fusion of a clonally expanded lymphocyte population. The amino acid sequences of the variable region of the four antibodies described here are different from that of mAb MCS6-27 shown for convenience.
3.3. Food Analysis
The assay was next applied for evaluation of foods fortified at different concentrations with BoNT/B. In these experiments, all samples were fortified with BoNT/B at a constant volume (10 µL) of toxin and the samples were incubated at room temperature for 30 min before processing. These data (
Supplemental Figure 1) were used to establish the L.O.D. (average of the buffer control plus three standard deviations). In all cases, the signal observed at the lowest spike level was higher than the L.O.D. Thus, the percentage toxin recovery (
Table 2) could be calculated for each toxin concentration. In those dairy products tested, the percentage recovery varied from 63.8% to 131%. However, at the 50 and 5.0 ng/mL spike levels the recoveries were close to 100% (only one sample was below 89%). Greater variations of the percentage recovery were observed following analysis of the ground beef sample.
Figure 9.
Clustal W2 alignment of the amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA of the variable regions of the anti-BoNT/B monoclonal antibodies. The Framework Regions (FWR) and Complementarity Determining Regions (CD-1, -2, and -3) are indicated (boxed), bold text indicates constant region sequences.
Figure 9.
Clustal W2 alignment of the amino acid sequence deduced from the cDNA of the variable regions of the anti-BoNT/B monoclonal antibodies. The Framework Regions (FWR) and Complementarity Determining Regions (CD-1, -2, and -3) are indicated (boxed), bold text indicates constant region sequences.
Table 2.
Percentage recovery of BoNT/B spiked into different food matrices.
Table 2.
Percentage recovery of BoNT/B spiked into different food matrices.
Percentage Recovery |
---|
Matrix/Spike Level | 50 ng/mL | 10 ng/mL | 5 ng/mL | 2 ng/mL | 0.5 ng/mL |
---|
Non Fat Milk | 108 (54)1 | nd2 | 89 (4.45) | nd | 131 (0.655) |
2% Milk | 97 (48.5) | nd | 76 (3.35) | | 73 (0.365) |
Whole Milk | 101 (50.5) | nd | 105 (5.25) | nd | 116 (0.58) |
Ground Beef 95% Lean | 63.8 (31.9) | 116 (5.8) | nd | 100 (2)3 | nd |