Next Article in Journal
The Cytolytic Activity of Vaginolysin Strictly Depends on Cholesterol and Is Potentiated by Human CD59
Previous Article in Journal
Triggering Apoptotic Death of Human Epidermal Keratinocytes by Malic Acid: Involvement of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress- and Mitochondria-Dependent Signaling Pathways
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 7
Issue 1
10.3390/toxins7010097
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nephroprotective Role of Resveratrol and Ursolic Acid in Aristolochic Acid Intoxicated Zebrafish

by
Yu-Ju Ding
1,
Chiao-Yin Sun
2,
Chi-Chung Wen
3 and
Yau-Hung Chen
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Tamkang University, No. 151 Ying-chuan Road, Tamsui, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan
2
Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20491, Taiwan
3
Department of Mathematics, Tamkang University, Tamsui, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2015, 7(1), 97-109; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010097
Submission received: 6 September 2014 / Accepted: 5 January 2015 / Published: 13 January 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Marine and Freshwater Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nephrotoxicity of aristolochic acid (AA) is well known, but information regarding the attenuation of AA-induced toxicity is limited. The aim of the present study was to study the nephroprotective effects of resveratrol (Resv) and ursolic acid (UA) in a zebrafish model. We used two transgenic lines, Tg(wt1b:EGFP) and Tg(gata1:DsRed), to evaluate the nephroprotective effects of Resv and UA by recording subtle changes in the kidney and red blood cell circulation. Our results demonstrated that both Resv and UA treatment can attenuate AA-induced kidney malformations and improve blood circulation. Glomerular filtration rate assays revealed that both Resv and UA treatment can restore renal function (100% for Mock; 56.1% ± 17.3% for AA-treated; 80.2% ± 11.3% for Resv+AA; and 83.1% ± 8.1% for UA+AA, n = 15). Furthermore, real-time RT-PCR experiments showed that pre-treatment with either Resv or UA suppresses expression of pro-inflammatory genes. In conclusion, our findings reveal that AA-induced nephrotoxicities can be attenuated by pre-treatment with either Resv or UA. Therefore, we believe that zebrafish represent an efficient model for screening AA-protective natural compounds.

1. Introduction

Serious damage to the kidney, a very delicate organ, increases the rate of uremic bleeding. This leads to renal failure, a life-threatening disease. Most of the patients undergo dialysis as a long-term treatment because no specific medication has been developed [1]. Therefore, investigation of the causes of renal damage and development of new methods for preventing renal damage are needed.
There are many risk factors that have been demonstrated to be highly associated with renal failure. Exposure to xenobiotics, such as antibiotics, heavy metals, aristolochic acid-containing traditional Chinese herbs and other natural toxins, is considered to be the main cause of renal damage [2,3]. Accompanied by xenobiotic-induced inflammation, such exposures often cause serious kidney injuries. For example, mice treated with cisplatin had an accumulation of leukocytes and upregulation of pro-inflammatory molecules, which consequently caused tubular damage and acute kidney injury [4]. These observations indicate that exposure to a toxin, combined with subsequent inflammation, increase the risk of renal damage.
Aristolochic acid (AA) is found primarily in herbal extracts and can induce clinical nephropathy [5,6]. Epidemiological studies have shown that aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) is associated with a high long-term risk for renal failure and urothelial cancer [7,8]. In Taiwan, approximately one-third of the population has been prescribed herbal remedies containing Aristolochia, and the recorded incidence of urinary tract cancers is the highest in the world [9]. In several AAN patients, foci of inflammatory cells infiltrating into the corticomedullary junctions were also found [10]. In rats, accumulation of monocytes/macrophages and T lymphocytes and AA-induced inflammation cause renal injury [11]. In zebrafish, our previous study showed that AA-exposure caused acute inflammation that led to malformation of embryonic zebrafish heart and kidney [12].
Because drug-induced inflammation may be the major cause of renal failure, anti-inflammatory agents should have the potential to attenuate renal failure. Resveratrol (Resv) and ursolic acid (UA) are rich in grape and apple peels, both of which are well-known natural anti-inflammatory agents [13,14]. It has been shown that UA can be used to prevent liver damage through restraining the activation of toxic ingredients, and boosting immunity [15,16,17]. Moreover, Resv is found to be capable of simultaneously restraining the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within and without cells. As a result, these agents can prevent diseases caused by oxidative stress. Castro et al. [18] reported that Resv can reduce the expression of MPO and restrain the production of inflammation. Because of their anti-inflammatory activity, Resv and UA are often used to prevent and treat immune-mediated diseases [19,20]. These observations suggest that Resv and UA may have the potential to attenuate or to prevent inflammation-induced renal malformations.
Zebrafish represent a very effective animal model for toxicological studies [21,22,23,24,25,26]. In the present study, we attempted to investigate the nephroprotective roles of Resv and UA in a zebrafish model. We utilized the transgenic lines Tg(wt1b:EGFP) and Tg(gata1:DsRed) to study the resulting subtle changes in the kidney and the red blood cells, respectively. We also generated a series of time- and dose-dependent AA exposure experiments. We hope to establish a whole-organism drug screening platform to select more useful natural compounds for the prevention of nephropathy.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Resv/UA Has No Evident Effects for Enhancing Survival Rates of AA-Intoxicated Zebrafish Embryos

To study the protective effects of Resv/UA on AA-induced renal malformations, we first treated zebrafish embryos with AA (3 ppm) at 24–31 hpf to cause kidney malformation and then treated with the desired concentrations (0, 1, 10 and 20 ppm) of either Resv or UA and calculated their survival rates (Figure 1). The results revealed that 77.8% ± 9.6% to 86.7% ± 9.6% (mean ± standard error; n = 30 (number of embryos; N = 5, repeated for 5 times) of the AA-exposed embryos were alive at 72 hpf, while 83.3% ± 4.7% to 90.0% ± 9.4% (n = 30, N = 5; UA+AA) and 86.7% ± 14.5% to 90.0% ± 5.8% (n = 30, N = 5; Resv+AA) of embryos were alive, indicating no evident differences in survival rates between AA treatment and prevention groups (UA+AA and Resv+AA).
Toxins 07 00097 g001 1024
Figure 1. (A) Administration methods for the four processing modes utilized in this study. Mock: Embryos were incubated in egg water; aristolochic acid (AA): Embryos were exposed to 3 ppm AA at 24–31 hpf; and resveratrol (Resv)+AA or ursolic acid (UA)+AA groups: Embryos were treated with Resv or UA at 12–24 hpf (1, 10 and 20 ppm) and then exposed to AA at 24–31 hpf; (B) Survival rates of embryos in the prevention method. Embryos were incubated in water (mock), exposed to 3 ppm AA only (AA control), or treated with 1, 10 and 20 ppm Resv or UA following exposure to 3 ppm AA. The X- and Y-axes represent the developmental stages and the survival rates, respectively.
Figure 1. (A) Administration methods for the four processing modes utilized in this study. Mock: Embryos were incubated in egg water; aristolochic acid (AA): Embryos were exposed to 3 ppm AA at 24–31 hpf; and resveratrol (Resv)+AA or ursolic acid (UA)+AA groups: Embryos were treated with Resv or UA at 12–24 hpf (1, 10 and 20 ppm) and then exposed to AA at 24–31 hpf; (B) Survival rates of embryos in the prevention method. Embryos were incubated in water (mock), exposed to 3 ppm AA only (AA control), or treated with 1, 10 and 20 ppm Resv or UA following exposure to 3 ppm AA. The X- and Y-axes represent the developmental stages and the survival rates, respectively.
Toxins 07 00097 g001

2.2. Resv and UA Can Attenuate Aristolochic Acid-Induced Kidney Malformation

The transgenic Tg(wt1b:EGFP) zebrafish, in which the glomerulus, pronephric tube, pronephric duct and exocrine pancreas can be easily observed by green fluorescence, is a useful tool for studying nephrotoxicities, especially for high throughput pipeline analysis [12,25,26]. The present study employed the transgenic line Tg(wt1b:EGFP) as a model to evaluate the protection effects of Resv and UA. Our results showed that AA-exposed zebrafish displayed more malformed kidney phenotypes than those in the mock control group at 48 hpf. Those malformed kidney phenotypes include (1) curved and dilated pronephric tubules and (2) a swollen and unfused glomerulus (Figure 2A vs. 2B). Interestingly, those AA-induced kidney malformations can be attenuated by pre-treatment with either Resv or UA (Figure 2C,D).
To further evaluate the protective effects of Resv and UA using statistical analyses, we first applied the ANOVA method to examine the dosage effect (0, 1, 10 and 20 ppm) on the malformation rate for the two drugs (Resv and UA) separately. The tests give very small p-values (<0.0001) for both “Resv” and “UA” treatments, indicating a highly significant difference between dosage groups for each drug treatment. The Tukey-Kramer HSD test was then used for pairwise comparison of the mean malformation rates of dosage groups for the drugs “Resv” and “UA”. For “Resv”, the test reports that the mean malformation rates (standard error, sample size) for four dose groups (AA only, AA+Resv 1 ppm, AA+Resv 10 ppm, and AA+Resv 20 ppm) are 96.88% (6.80%, n = 32), 76.67% (7.02%, n = 30), 36.67% (7.02%, n = 30), and 83.33% (7.02%, n = 30), respectively. For “UA”, the mean malformation rates (standard error, sample size) for the four dose groups (AA only, AA+UA 1 ppm, AA+UA 10 ppm, and AA+UA 20 ppm) were 96.88% (4.75%, n = 32), 70.00% (4.91%, n = 30), 96.67% (4.91%, n = 30), and 100% (5.27%, n = 30), respectively. Figure 2E,F presents the mean malformation rates with 95% confidence intervals of dosage groups for drugs “Resv” and “UA”, respectively. The findings show that the malformation rates for the “AA+Resv 10 ppm” group and “AA+UA 1 ppm” group were significantly lower than that for the “AA only” group. This suggests that both Resv with a dosage of 10 ppm and UA with a dosage of 1 ppm have significant resistance effects against “AA” poisoning.
Toxins 07 00097 g002a 1024Toxins 07 00097 g002b 1024
Figure 2. Kidney phenotypes of zebrafish embryos after prevention (10 ppm Resv or UA). (A) No defect of mock group; (B) AA caused atrophic glomerulus and pronephric tube (pt) curved defect; (C and D) Prevention groups treated to restore a similar phenotype as the mock group. All kidney photos were taken from the dorsal view at the developmental stage of 48 hpf. Tg(wt1b:EGFP). pt, pronephric tubule; pd, pronephric duct; gl, glomerulus; (E,F) The Tukey-Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference) test: the mean malformation rates and their 95% confidence intervals for treatment groups. Two group means were considered significantly different if their intervals were disjointed and were not significantly different if their intervals overlapped.
Figure 2. Kidney phenotypes of zebrafish embryos after prevention (10 ppm Resv or UA). (A) No defect of mock group; (B) AA caused atrophic glomerulus and pronephric tube (pt) curved defect; (C and D) Prevention groups treated to restore a similar phenotype as the mock group. All kidney photos were taken from the dorsal view at the developmental stage of 48 hpf. Tg(wt1b:EGFP). pt, pronephric tubule; pd, pronephric duct; gl, glomerulus; (E,F) The Tukey-Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference) test: the mean malformation rates and their 95% confidence intervals for treatment groups. Two group means were considered significantly different if their intervals were disjointed and were not significantly different if their intervals overlapped.
Toxins 07 00097 g002aToxins 07 00097 g002b

2.3. Resv and UA Treatment Attenuate AA-Induced Renal Failure

For further confirmation of the protective effects of Resv/UA, we performed glomerular filtration rate (GFR) assays on zebrafish embryos. As shown in Figure 3A, GFR at 72 hpf in the AA-treated group was 56.1% ±17.3% (n = 15) and increased to 80.2% ± 11.3% and 83.1% ± 8.1% in the Resv+AA and UA+AA groups (n = 15), respectively. This indicates that Resv and UA can partially restore kidney function. The average GFR (standard error, sample size) for the “mock”, “AA”, “AA+RESV”, and “AA+UA” groups were 79.15% (1.16%, n = 15), 44.44% (4.32%, n = 16), 63.50% (3.41%, n = 11), and 65.78% (2.55%, n = 10), respectively. The ANOVA test gives a very small p-value (<0.0001), indicating a highly significant difference in glomerular filtration rates between treatment groups. The Tukey-Kramer HSD test was then used to conduct pairwise comparisons of the average glomerular filtration rates of the different treatment groups. Figure 3B presents the average glomerular filtration rates of the treatment groups with 95% confidence intervals. The conclusions are as follows: (i) the average GFR of the “AA”, “AA+RESV”, and “AA+UA” groups were significantly lower than that of the “mock” group; (ii) the average GFR of the “AA+RESV” and “AA+UA” groups were significantly higher than that of the “AA” group; and (iii) the average GFR of the “AA+UA” group was higher than that of the “AA+RESV” group, although the difference was not significant. This suggests that Resv and UA treatment attenuate AA-induced renal failure.
Toxins 07 00097 g003 1024
Figure 3. Glomerular filtration rates of Resv and UA prevent aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). (A) Zebrafish embryos were either exposed to water (no treatment) or water containing 5 ppm AA and 10 ppm Resv or UA exposure. Dextran tetramethylrhodamine was injected into the cardiac venous sinus of 72 hpf embryos derived from different groups (mock, prevention), and fluorescence intensities were recorded after 1 h post-injection (hpi) and 24 hpi (n = 15); (B) Tukey-Kramer HSD test: the mean glomerular filtration rates and their 95% confidence intervals for treatment groups (“Mock”, “AA “, “AA+Resv”, and “AA+UA”). Two group means were considered to be significantly different if their intervals were disjointed and were not significantly different if their intervals overlapped.
Figure 3. Glomerular filtration rates of Resv and UA prevent aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN). (A) Zebrafish embryos were either exposed to water (no treatment) or water containing 5 ppm AA and 10 ppm Resv or UA exposure. Dextran tetramethylrhodamine was injected into the cardiac venous sinus of 72 hpf embryos derived from different groups (mock, prevention), and fluorescence intensities were recorded after 1 h post-injection (hpi) and 24 hpi (n = 15); (B) Tukey-Kramer HSD test: the mean glomerular filtration rates and their 95% confidence intervals for treatment groups (“Mock”, “AA “, “AA+Resv”, and “AA+UA”). Two group means were considered to be significantly different if their intervals were disjointed and were not significantly different if their intervals overlapped.
Toxins 07 00097 g003

2.4. Resv and UA Improve the Accumulation of Erythrocytes and Restoration of Blood Circulation

Transgenic Tg(gata1:DsRed) zebrafish, in which the red blood cells can be identified by red fluorescence, are a useful tool for studying defects in blood circulation [27]. We have previously shown that AA-treated Tg(gata1:DsRed) embryos had abnormal blood circulation and red blood cell accumulation in the kidney [12]. In this study, the same strategy is applied to evaluate the nephro-preventive effects of Resv and UA. As shown in the supplementary movie, the distance between T0 (initial position of one red blood cell) and T1 (position of the red blood cell 1 s later) in AA-exposed embryos was shorter than that in the mock control group, indicating that blood circulation was blocked by AA exposure (Figure 4A,A' vs. 4B,B'). However, the distance between T0 and T1 in the Resv or UA prevention groups was longer than that of embryos in the AA-exposed group, suggesting that blood circulation was restored after treatment with either Resv or UA (Figure 4C,C' vs. 4D,D').
Toxins 07 00097 g004 1024
Figure 4. Effects of Resv or UA on blood circulation. Images were captured by live video (Supplementary movie S1) of Tg(gata1:DsRed) embryos without AA treatment (A,A') after 3 ppm AA treatment (B,B') and Resv or UA prevention groups (C,C',D,D'). T0: Initial position of one red blood cell; T1: Position of the red blood cell 1 s later.
Figure 4. Effects of Resv or UA on blood circulation. Images were captured by live video (Supplementary movie S1) of Tg(gata1:DsRed) embryos without AA treatment (A,A') after 3 ppm AA treatment (B,B') and Resv or UA prevention groups (C,C',D,D'). T0: Initial position of one red blood cell; T1: Position of the red blood cell 1 s later.
Toxins 07 00097 g004
Moreover, as evidenced by ο-dianisidine staining, AA-exposed embryos had abnormal accumulation of red blood cells in the tubular and glomerular regions (Figure 5A vs. 5B), but the blood accumulation was attenuated by treatment with either Resv or UA (Figure 5C,D).
Toxins 07 00097 g005 1024
Figure 5. Resv or UA decrease AA-induced red blood cell accumulation. Embryos derived from the mock (no treatment: A), AA-treated group (B), and Resv (C) or UA prevention groups (D) were stained with ο-dianisidine. The black arrow indicates the position of the glomerulus. The red dots indicate the region of blood accumulation.
Figure 5. Resv or UA decrease AA-induced red blood cell accumulation. Embryos derived from the mock (no treatment: A), AA-treated group (B), and Resv (C) or UA prevention groups (D) were stained with ο-dianisidine. The black arrow indicates the position of the glomerulus. The red dots indicate the region of blood accumulation.
Toxins 07 00097 g005

2.5. Treatment with Either Resv or UA Suppresses the Generation of ROS and the Inflammatory Response

It has been reported that AA treatment leads to kidney inflammation [12,28]. In this regard, we further investigated whether AA-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) are eliminated by Resv/UA treatment. As shown in Figure 6, AA-induced ROS fluorescence intensity was 1826 arbitrary units (a.u.). In contrast, AA-induced ROS fluorescence intensity was decreased to 609 and 690 a.u. (approximately a 63%–67% reduction) after treatment with either Resv or UA, respectively. These observations suggest that both Resv and UA were able to significantly reduce ROS production in zebrafish embryos.
Toxins 07 00097 g006 1024
Figure 6. Concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in zebrafish exposed to 3 ppm of AA and prevention groups (containing Resv or UA). Data (fluorescence intensity) are expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 30).
Figure 6. Concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in zebrafish exposed to 3 ppm of AA and prevention groups (containing Resv or UA). Data (fluorescence intensity) are expressed as the mean ± standard error (n = 30).
Toxins 07 00097 g006
Toxins 07 00097 g007 1024
Figure 7. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of the expression levels of marker genes ((A): TNFα; (B): mpo) between mock (no treatment), AA-treated, and Resv or UA prevention embryo groups.
Figure 7. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis of the expression levels of marker genes ((A): TNFα; (B): mpo) between mock (no treatment), AA-treated, and Resv or UA prevention embryo groups.
Toxins 07 00097 g007
The expression of pro-inflammatory genes was further examined by quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the results showed that the expression of TNFα and mpo in the AA-treated embryos increased by 4.8- and 3.4-fold, respectively, in comparison with the mock control embryos (Figure 7). However, the expression of TNFα in the Resv+AA and UA+AA groups was decreased to 2.2- and 1.3-fold (Figure 7A); expression of mpo in the Resv+AA and UA+AA groups was decreased by 1.5- and 1.0-fold, respectively (Figure 7B). These results suggest that the attenuation of AA-induced kidney malformation by both Resv and UA treatment may be mediated by suppression of pro-inflammatory gene expression.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Fish Maintenance and Embryo Collection

Zebrafish (wild type, WT; AB strain), Tg(wt1b:EGFP) and Tg(gata1:DsRed) [25,26,29] were maintained in 16–20 gallon tanks at 28.5 °C under a 14/10 h light-dark cycle. Their embryos were collected according to standard criteria (hours post-fertilization, hpf, or days post-fertilization, dpf [30]. All animal experiments in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines issued by the animal ethics committee of Tamkang University.

3.2. Chemical Exposure and Survival Rate Analysis

We employed a previously described aristolochic acid (AA) exposure protocol [12] to evaluate the nephroprotective effects of resveratrol (Resv; trans-3,4,5-trihydroxystilbene) and ursolic acids (UA; C30H48O3). In the present study, four exposure protocols were used: (I) Mock: water only; (II) AA: embryos were exposed to AA from 24 to 31 hpf; (III) Resv+AA: embryos were soaked in Resv (12–24 hpf) prior to AA exposure; and (IV) UA+AA: embryos were soaked in UA (12–24 hpf) prior to AA exposure. For dose titration and survival rate analysis, Tg(wt1b:EGFP) embryos (by 12 hpf) were collected (30 embryos per group) and were exposed according to the above-mentioned protocols, differing in the addition of either Resv or UA at different concentrations (0, 1, 10 and 20 ppm). All embryos were cultivated in 24-well cell culture plates, and survival rates were counted at the check point.

3.3. Detection of ROS and Data Analysis

To detect the accumulation of ROS, embryos were incubated with 500 ng/mL dihydrodichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA). Intracellular H2DCFDA was de-esterified to dichlorodihydrofluorescein, which was oxidized by ROS to produce the fluorescent compound dichlorofluorescein (DCF). After a 60-min incubation at 28 °C, the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the embryos was measured at an excitation/emission = 485/530 nm.

3.4. Zebrafish Renal Function Assay

The procedure used for the detection of acute renal failure was described previously [31]. In brief, zebrafish embryos were anesthetized in 40 μg/mL tricaine (ethyl-m-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate salt, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and positioned in an injection holder. Tetramethylrhodamine-labeled 10-kDa dextran (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was injected into the cardiac venous sinus at 72 h post-fertilization, and individual fluorescence intensity at baseline, 1 and 24 h was measured in each fish. The fluorescence intensity ratios were defined using image J analysis software (1.47q, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA, 2013).

3.5. Red Blood Cell Staining

The procedure for detecting erythropoiesis was described previously [32] and was used in the present study with minor modification. Embryos at 48 hpf were bathed in a stain buffer with combinations of 0.6 mg/mL ο-dianisidine in 40% ethanol, 10 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.2, and 0.65% hydrogen peroxide and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min. Embryos were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and observed under a dissection microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

3.6. Histology and Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

The experimental procedures for cryosectioning and qRT-PCR have been previously described [33,34,35], except that primer sets were synthesized for detecting the expression levels of TNFα and mpo. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used as an internal control for normalization in quantification.

3.7. Images

All of the embryos were observed under a microscope (DM 2500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with Nomarski distinguishing interference contrast optics and a fluorescent module including GFP, DsRed and DAPI filter cubes (Kramer Scientific, Amesbury, MA, USA). Pictures of the embryos were captured at particular stages with a CoolSNAP CCD (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA). A 15-s movie of the embryos at 48 hpf was recorded (SONY, Tokyo, Japan).

3.8. Statistical Analysis

All analyses in this study were carried out using Matlab software (version 7.7 R2008b, MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA, 2008). ANOVA (analysis of variance) was applied to examine the effect of dose on the mean malformation rate. The p-value reported by ANOVA indicated that samples in all dosage groups are drawn from the same population. The Tukey-Kramer HSD (honestly significant difference) test was further used to compare the population mean malformation rate for each dosage group. A significance level of 0.05 was used in all statistical analyses, and a family-wise error rate of 0.05 was used in the Tukey-Kramer HSD test.

4. Conclusions

In mice and humans, pro-inflammatory responses of renal endothelial cells and activation of inflammatory leukocytes reduce renal blood flow by vascular congestion and consequently cause kidney malformations [36,37]. Similarly, aristolochic acid (AA)-induced nephropathy is mediated by inflammation in both mice and zebrafish [12,28]. In the present study, we tested whether AA-induced nephropathy can be attenuated by treating the developing zebrafish embryos with natural anti-inflammatory agents such as resveratrol (Resv) and ursolic acid (UA). Our studies revealed that AA can induce an inflammatory response associated with the progression of circulation and kidney defects in zebrafish embryos and that such an inflammatory response can be attenuated by pre-treatment with either Resv or UA. In conclusion, we believe that zebrafish represent an efficient model for screening AA-protective natural compounds.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/7/1/0097/s1.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Englert (Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany) who provided the Tg(wt1b:EGFP) fish. We also thank The Zebrafish International Resource Center (P40 RR012546, NIH-NCRR) for providing the Tg(gata1:DsRed) fish line. This project was supported by the National Science Council, Republic of China, under grant number NSC 97-2313-B-032-001-MY3.

Author Contributions

Yu-Ju Ding carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. Chi-Chung Wen performed the statistical analysis. Chiao-Yin Sun gave discussion and helped in editing the manuscript. Yau-Hung Chen was the principal investigator of this project and drafted this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murphy, T.; Robinson, S. Renal failure and its treatment. Anaesthesia Intensiv. Care Med. 2006, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Naughton, C.A. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity. Am. Fam. Physician 2008, 78, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Perazella, M.A. Renal vulnerability to drug toxicity. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 4, 1275–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nozaki, Y.; Kinoshita, K.; Yano, T.; Asato, K.; Shiga, T.; Hino, S.; Niki, K.; Nagare, Y.; Kishimoto, K.; Shimazu, H.; et al. Signaling through the interleukin-18 receptor α attenuates inflammation in cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012, 82, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Arlt, V.M.; Ferluga, D.; Stiborova, M.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Vukelic, M.; Ceovic, S.; Schmeiser, H.H.; Cosyns, J.P. Is aristolochic acid a risk factor for Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial cancer? Int. J. Cancer 2002, 101, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Debelle, F.D.; Vanherweghem, J.L.; Nortier, J.L. Aristolochic acid nephropathy: A worldwide problem. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gökmen, R.; Cosyns, J.P.; Arlt, V.M.; Stiborová, M.; Phillips, D.H.; Schmeiser, H.H.; Simmonds, M.S.J.; Cook, H.T.; Vanherweghem, J.L.; Nortier, J.L.; et al. The epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of aristolochic acid nephropathy: A narrative review. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013, 158, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Grollman, A.P.; Jelaković, B. Role of environmental toxins in endemic (Balkan) nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2817–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Grollman, A.P. Aristolochic acid nephropathy: Harbinber of a global iatrogenic disease. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2013, 54, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Depierreux, M.; van Damme, B.; Vanden Houte, K.; Vanherweghem, J.L. Pathologic aspects of a newly described nephropathy related to the prolonged use of Chinese herbs. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1994, 24, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pozdzik, A.A.; Salmon, I.J.; Husson, C.P.; Decaestecker, C.; Rogier, E.; Bourgeade, M.F.; Deschodt-Lanckman, M.M.; Vanherweghem, J.L.; Nortier, J.L. Patterns of interstitial inflammation during the evolution of renal injury in experimental aristolochic acid nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008, 23, 2480–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ding, Y.J.; Chen, Y.H. Developmental nephrotoxicity of aristolochic acid in a zebrafish model. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012, 261, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shakibaei, M.; Csaki, C.; Nebrich, S.; Mobasheri, A. Resveratrol suppresses interleukin-1β-induced inflammatory signaling and apoptosis in human articular chondrocytes: Potential for use as a novel nutraceutical for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008, 76, 1426–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ikeda, Y.; Murakami, A.; Ohigashi, H. Ursolic acid: An anti- and pro-inflammatory triterpenoid. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 26–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Ha, S.; Li, P. Oleanolic acid in decreasing hyperglycemia. Chin. Pharmaceut. J. 1994, 29, 725–726. [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh, G.B.; Singh, S.; Bani, S.; Gupta, B.D.; Banerjee, S.K. Anti-inflammatory activity of oleanolic acid in rats and mice. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1992, 44, 456–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Recio, M.C.; Giner, R.M.; Manez, S.; Gueho, J.; Julien, H.R.; Hostettmann, K.; Rios, J.L. Investigations on the steroidal anti-inflammatory activity of triterpenoids from Diospyros leucomelas. Planta. Med. 1995, 61, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Castro, R.; Lamas, J.; Morais, P.; Sanmartín, M.L.; Orallo, F.; Leiro, J. Resveratrol modulates innate and inflammatory responses in fish leucocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008, 126, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Švajger, U.; Jeras, M. Anti-inflammatory effects of resveratrol and its potential use in therapy of immune-mediated diseases. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 31, 202–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Martín, R.; Hernández, M.; Córdova, C.; Nieto, M.L. Natural triterpenes modulate immune-inflammatory markers of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Therapeutic implications for multiple sclerosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 1708–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Spitsbergen, J.M.; Kent, M.L. The state of the art of the zebrafish model for toxicology and toxicologic pathology research- advantages and current limitations. Toxicol. Pathol. 2003, 31, 62–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Stern, H.M.; Zon, L.I. Cancer genetics and drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nature Rev. 2003, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, Y.H.; Yang, Z.S.; Wen, C.C.; Chang, Y.S.; Wang, P.C.; Hsiao, C.A.; Shih, T.L. Evaluation of the structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as antioxidants and toxicants of zebrafish larvae. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, Y.H.; Wang, W.H.; Wang, Y.H.; Lin, Z.Y.; Wen, C.C.; Chern, C.Y. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory effect of chalcone and chalcone analogues in a zebrafish model. Molecules 2013, 18, 2052–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Perner, B.; Englert, C.; Bollig, F. The Wilms tumor genes wt1a and wt1b control different steps during formation of the zebrafish pronephros. Dev. Biol. 2007, 309, 7–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Westhoff, J.H.; Giselbrecht, S.; Schmidts, M.; Schindler, S.; Beales, P.L.; Tönshoff, B.; Liebel, U.; Gehrig, J. Development of an automated imaging pipeline for the analysis of the zebrafish larval kidney. PLoS One 2013, 8, e82137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Traver, D.; Paw, B.H.; Poss, K.D.; Penberthy, W.T.; Lin, S.; Zon, L.I. Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 1238–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, C.C.; Chen, P.C.; Huang, C.W.; Yu, J. Aristolochic acid induces heart failure in zebrafish embryos that is mediated by inflammation. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 100, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yaqoob, N.; Holotta, M.; Prem, C.; Kopp, R.; Schwerte, T. Ontogenetic development of erythropoiesis can be studied non-invasively in GATA-1: DsRed transgenic zebrafish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 2009, 154, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kimmel, C.; Ballard, W.W.; Kimmel, S.R.; Ullmann, B.; Schilling, T.F. Stages of embryonic development in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 1995, 203, 253–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hentschel, D.M.; Park, K.M.; Cilenti, L.; Zervos, A.S.; Drummond, I.; Bonventre, J.V. Acute renal failure in zebrafish: A novel system to study a complex disease. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2005, 288, F923–F929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Detrich, H.W., 3rd; Kieran, M.W.; Chan, F.Y.; Barone, L.M.; Yee, K.; Rundstadler, J.A.; Pratt, S.; Ransom, D.; Zon, L.I. Intraembryonic hematopoietic cell migration during vertebrate development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 10713–10717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, Y.H.; Cheng, C.C.; Lee, W.J.; Chiou, M.L.; Pai, C.W.; Wen, C.C.; Chen, W.L.; Chen, Y.H. A novel phenotype-based approach for systematically screening antiproliferation metallodrugs. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2009, 182, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, G.H.; Chang, M.Y.; Hsu, C.H.; Chen, Y.H. Essential roles of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, Capsulin and Musculin, during craniofacial myogenesis of zebrafish. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 4065–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yeh, C.H.; Liao, Y.F.; Chang, C.Y.; Tsai, J.N.; Wang, Y.H.; Cheng, C.C.; Wen, C.C.; Chen, Y.H. Caffeine treatment disturbs the angiogenesis of zebrafish larvae. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 35, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schrier, R.W.; Wang, W.; Poole, B.; Mitra, A. Acute renal failure: defi nitions, diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 2004, 114, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kinsey, G.R.; Okusa, M.D. Role of leukocytes in the pathogenesis of acute kidney injury. Crit. Care 2012, 16, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, Y.-J.; Sun, C.-Y.; Wen, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-H. Nephroprotective Role of Resveratrol and Ursolic Acid in Aristolochic Acid Intoxicated Zebrafish. Toxins 2015, 7, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010097

AMA Style

Ding Y-J, Sun C-Y, Wen C-C, Chen Y-H. Nephroprotective Role of Resveratrol and Ursolic Acid in Aristolochic Acid Intoxicated Zebrafish. Toxins. 2015; 7(1):97-109. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Yu-Ju, Chiao-Yin Sun, Chi-Chung Wen, and Yau-Hung Chen. 2015. "Nephroprotective Role of Resveratrol and Ursolic Acid in Aristolochic Acid Intoxicated Zebrafish" Toxins 7, no. 1: 97-109. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010097

APA Style

Ding, Y. -J., Sun, C. -Y., Wen, C. -C., & Chen, Y. -H. (2015). Nephroprotective Role of Resveratrol and Ursolic Acid in Aristolochic Acid Intoxicated Zebrafish. Toxins, 7(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7010097

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop