Next Article in Journal
Research on the Force-Sensitive Characteristic of InAs QD Embedded in HEMT
Next Article in Special Issue
Convenient Heme Nanorod Modified Electrode for Quercetin Sensing by Two Common Electrochemical Methods
Previous Article in Journal
RuO2 Nanorods as an Electrocatalyst for Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitive and Selective Electrochemical Detection of Epirubicin as Anticancer Drug Based on Nickel Ferrite Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/mi12111409
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA

by
Sze Shin Low
1,
Daizong Ji
2,
Wai Siong Chai
3,
Jingjing Liu
4,*,
Kuan Shiong Khoo
5,
Sadegh Salmanpour
6,
Fatemeh Karimi
7,
Balakrishnan Deepanraj
8 and
Pau Loke Show
9,*
1
Research Centre of Life Science and Healthcare, China Beacons Institute, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, 199 Taikang East Road, Ningbo 315100, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
3
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
4
College of Automation Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
5
Faculty of Applied Sciences, UCSI University, UCSI Heights, Cheras 56000, Malaysia
6
Department of Chemistry, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari 1931848161, Iran
7
Department of Chemical Engineering, Quchan University of Technology, Quchan 9477177870, Iran
8
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jyothi Engineering College, Thrissur 679531, India
9
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor 43500, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2021, 12(11), 1409; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111409
Submission received: 16 October 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important non-coding, single-stranded RNAs possessing crucial regulating roles in human body. Therefore, miRNAs have received extensive attention from various disciplines as the aberrant expression of miRNAs are tightly related to different types of diseases. Furthermore, the exceptional stability of miRNAs has presented them as biomarker with high specificity and sensitivity. However, small size, high sequence similarity, low abundance of miRNAs impose difficulty in their detection. Hence, it is of utmost importance to develop accurate and sensitive method for miRNA biosensing. Electrochemical biosensors have been demonstrated as promising solution for miRNA detection as they are highly sensitive, facile, and low-cost with ease of miniaturization. The incorporation of nanomaterials to electrochemical biosensor offers excellent prospects for converting biological recognition events to electronic signal for the development of biosensing platform with desired sensing properties due to their unique properties. This review introduces the signal amplification strategies employed in miRNA electrochemical biosensor and presents the feasibility of different strategies. The recent advances in nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of miRNA were also discussed and summarized based on different types of miRNAs, opening new approaches in biological analysis and early disease diagnosis. Lastly, the challenges and future prospects are discussed.

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small size (19–24 nt) endogenous non-coding, single stranded RNAs which modulate the expression of their target genes. They possess high stability even in extreme conditions that cause degradation of most RNAs [1]. MiRNA was first discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans when the lin-4 gene expression was found to regulate the developmental stage of larvae, thereby revolutionizing the molecular biology field [2,3]. They play crucial regulatory roles in a wide variety of biological processes, such as cell differentiation, proliferation, control of developmental timing, organ development, apoptosis, and others [4]. MiRNA negatively regulate their targets by complementary binding to protein-coding messengerRNA sequences, activating the RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) pathway. On the other hand, miRNAs could also adhere to the 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of targets via imperfect complementary binding, repressing post-transcriptional gene expression, resulting in negative regulation [5].
For the past few years, miRNAs have been investigated in different types human cancers, where they are found to be heavily dysregulated in cancer cells, leading to cancer progression based on different mechanisms [6]. There has been report demonstrating that high-throughput profiling of genome-wide miRNA expression showed specific profile of upregulated and downregulated miRNAs for almost all cancer types [7]. Since deregulated miRNA expression is an early event in tumorigenesis, multiple studies have explored the potential usefulness of miRNA expression profiles as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment. Owing to the excellent stability, resistance to harsh environment, distinctive miRNA expression profile for every cancer, miRNAs possess huge potential of noninvasive biomarkers for early cancer detection, greatly reducing the worldwide health burden of cancer [8]. Therefore, the need for simple noninvasive detection of miRNA is essential for early detection of cancer, increasing the survival rate of cancer patients.
Low abundance, short sequence length, high sequence homology, heterogeneity in GC contents and large number of isoforms of miRNAs present challenges in the designing of primer or probe for hybridization, making them very difficult for detection [9,10]. Traditional methods for miRNAs detection include Northern blotting, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), microarray technique and next-generation sequencing (NGS) and each method possesses unique advantages and disadvantages. For instance, Northern blotting is a widely used miRNA detection method that enables size detection and alternate splice product observation, but it is semi quantitative, less sensitive and low throughput. The gold standard miRNA detection method is RT-PCR due to its large dynamic range, high sensitivity, and specificity, it suffers from drawbacks such as false-positive anxiety and difficulty in primer design. On the other hand, a microarray-based technique displays high throughput and multiplexing capacity, but poor sensitivity and lengthy hybridization time limits its wide applications [11]. NGS is highly sensitive, high throughput and provides specific sequence information but it is very time-consuming and expensive [12]. In view of the pros and cons of different methods, the detection approach for miRNA continues to develop to meet the demands.
The advancement in nanotechnology has led to their potential applications in various fields, including the development of biosensor. The nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors have become one of the spotlights in the field of diagnostics. With the growing demand for higher sensitivity and lower detection limit, nanomaterials could enhance the sensing performances due to their high surface area-to-volume ratio (SA:V), excellent electrical conductivity, and remarkable chemical stability [13,14]. Nanomaterials are generally used as working electrode modifier in biosensor, enabling sensitive detection of analyte as low as minute concentration [15]. Nanomaterials have been displayed to play an important role in the development of electrochemical biosensor for detection of various analytes, such as antibiotics, metabolic, cancer, virus, and miRNA biomarkers [16,17,18,19,20,21]. In this review, we provide an overview on the recent progress in the development of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of miRNA. The amplification strategies in miRNA biosensor were introduced, including cyclic enzymatic amplification method based on nuclease, rolling circle amplification (RCA) and enzyme-free amplification strategy. Nanomaterials have been employed for the modification of biosensing platform and electrochemically active labels for detection signal amplification. Recent works completed have been discussed based on different miRNA types and their sensing performances were summarized. Furthermore, the challenges and potential opportunities for the nanomaterial-based electrochemical miRNA biosensor are also proposed.

2. Amplification Strategies in miRNA Biosensor

Various amplification strategies have been employed in miRNA biosensor to achieve higher sensitivity and lower detection limit due to the generally low concentration of miRNA present in real sample. MiRNA biosensor typically relies on the hybridization between complementary probe and target miRNA sequence for detection. However, hybridization probes form a 1:1 complex with targets to produce signal, leading to low signal being generated, which is insufficient for the sensitive detection of low abundance miRNA. Therefore, various signal amplification strategies have been developed to replicate the target miRNA by 108–109-fold, achieving increased signal generation, thereby improving the detection limit of miRNA [22,23].

2.1. Cyclic Enzymatic Amplification Method (CEAM) Based on Nuclease

Cyclic enzymatic amplification method (CEAM) based on nuclease is frequently employed for the sensitive detection of nucleic acids, where nuclease cleaves the duplex nucleic acid, releasing the one target for recycling, thereby achieving output signal amplification. CEAM is a simple, rapid and inexpensive method often employed in biosensing platform design for highly sensitive detection of miRNA as reported in review [24].
Duplex specific nuclease (DSN) is an enzyme that was originally isolated from hepatopancreas of the Kamchatka crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) and was applied for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection [25]. It is typically used in the normalization of the relative transcript abundance in mRNA-enriched cDNA libraries from eukaryotic organisms, quantitative determination of telomeric overhang [26,27]. DSN preferentially cleaves double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) or DNA in the DNA:RNA heteroduplexes at high temperatures while inactive towards single-stranded DNA and single- or double-stranded RNA. The good ability of DSN in discriminating between perfect and imperfect (up to one base mismatch) matched short duplexes has rendered its usefulness in biosensor. Recent work displayed that a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-modified gold electrode was coupled with DSN-assisted target recycling for sensitive detection of miR-100 in the linear range of 100 aM to 10 pM as displayed in Figure 1 [28]. Results showed that the biosensor was highly specific, illustrating the ability to distinguish one base-pair mistake in miR-100 detection. Furthermore, the 5 fM cutoff miR-100 concentration in human sera was sufficient for detection of gastric cancer in clinical applications.
Exonuclease III (Exo III) is an enzyme isolated from Escherichia coli that possesses phosphomonoesterase activity specific for 3′ positions of double-stranded nucleic acid [29]. It catalyzes the degradation of double-stranded DNA terminating in 3′-OH, performing stepwise removal of mononucleotides from DNA in the 3′ to 5′ direction. Exo III degrades dsDNA from blunt ends, 5′-overhangs or nicks and produces stretches of single-stranded DNA. Noteworthily, Exo III can digests dsDNA from the 3′ end even though it contains up to three base mismatched but fails to initiate digestion for dsDNA terminating in four base protrusions [30]. On the other hand, T7 exonuclease is also widely applied in CEAM as it catalyzes the removal of mononucleotide from the 5′-phosphorylated and 5′-hydroxylated end to the 3′ end of dsDNA [31]. Contrary to Exo III, T7 exonuclease hydrolyzes dsDNA in the 5′ to 3′ direction but it is unable to act on dsDNA with protruding ends. Both Exo III and T7 nuclease have been applied in biosensor for the sensitive detection of miRNA based on CEAM [32,33,34,35].

2.2. Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA)

RCA amplification is an isothermal enzymatic process for the amplification of circular nucleic acid [36]. RCA utilizes DNA/RNA polymerase with strand displacement activity to extend short DNA or RNA primer annealed to the circular nucleic acid template. The polymerase performs strand displacement activity to release single-stranded DNA for further amplification, resulting in the generation of long single-stranded oligonucleotide with repeated sequence complementary to the circular template. The end product is a concatemer containing tens to hundreds of tandem repeats, presenting RCA as a highly versatile amplification tool with wide range of applications in genomics, proteomics, biosensing, and more [37,38]. RCA is also applied in miRNA detection where Jonstrup et al. (2006) developed a padlock exponential rolling circle amplification using the target miRNA as template, performed the detection of specific miRNA in a few nanograms of total RNA without specialized equipment and a detection limit of 10 pM was achieved [39]. Although RCA is versatile and capable of producing tailor-designed nucleic acids or complex nanostructures, its limited sensitivity and time-consuming process still requires improvement to satisfy the detection need.

2.3. Enzyme-Free Amplification Strategy

Hybridization chain reaction (HCR) displays great potential in biosensor signal amplification as it provides an attractive approach to enzyme-free nucleotide amplification [40]. It is a kinetics-controlled reaction with high sensitivity and selectivity for target sequence detection. HCR triggers the DNA nanostructures self-assembly based on the potential energy in two hairpin species [41]. In the presence of target nucleic acid, one hairpin species will be opened up and expose the region that could trigger the opening of another hairpin species, as shown in Figure 2. The process kept on repeating, leading to the formation of nicked double helix that grows until hairpin supply is exhausted. HCR is often employed for the detection of miRNA as it can trigger a series of cascade hybridization chain reaction, leading to extended growth of oligonucleotide chains and higher amplification efficiency [42,43,44]. Generally, HCR is an effective signal amplification strategy as it is enzyme-free and can bind thousands of auxiliary hairpin sequences. However, it suffers from drawbacks, such as laborious labeling techniques or strict requirement for reaction environment [24].
Catalyzed hairpin assembly (CHA) is also an enzyme-free signal amplification strategy that is based upon DNA nanostructure organization. It is a highly efficient isothermal amplification method that is widely utilized in amplifying and transducing signals for nucleic acid analyte towards biosensing [45]. CHA is similar to HCR where the presence of single-stranded target analyte initiates the opening of hairpins, resulting in thermodynamically stable duplexes. CHA is often used with HCR to achieve desired signal amplification as illustrated in Figure 2 [46]. Studies have proved that CHA could achieve up to 600,000-fold signal amplification under certain conditions, displaying its promising versatility [47]. Nevertheless, it is difficult to completely prevent undesired hybridization event in the absence of an input, culminating the high background noise, which might compromise the performance of CHA.

2.4. Intercalation of Redox Mediator

Redox mediators play pivotal roles in enhancing the performance of electrochemical sensors due to the electron transfer process involved in the redox reactions. In electrochemical biosensors, redox mediators are often intercalated between two oligonucleotide strands as signal indicators. The redox mediators could be intercalated via direct and indirect method, where the former relies on the interaction of electroactive species with double-stranded oligonucleotide and the latter involves the creation of recognition sites in oligonucleotide for intercalation [48]. Methylene blue (MB) is a popular electroactive indicator used as DNA intercalating agent as it could interacts with both single-stranded and double-stranded oligonucleotide with different binding modes. Therefore, MB is often employed for sensitive electrochemical detection of microRNA due to its signal amplification properties. For instance, an electrochemical sensor modified using graphene, polypyrrole, and gold nanoparticles was applied for the detection of miR-21 based on intercalating MB signal amplification [49]. The peak current of MB redox process was proportional to miR-21 concentration, achieving low detection limit of 0.02 fM. On the other hand, a newly discovered G-triplex that can specifically bind with MB was applied in electrochemical detection of let-7a by coupling with two-stage isothermal exponential amplification reaction, displaying ultralow detection limit of 0.45 fM and high specificity [50].

3. Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for miRNA Detection

Electrochemical biosensors have been developed for detection of various miRNA biomarkers due to the ease of electrochemical detection, low cost, and potential for multiplexed platforms. The emerging field of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors has been gaining attention among the scientific community due to the outstanding electrochemical properties of nanomaterials, along with good biocompatibility, chemical stability, and large SA:V. Most of the electrochemical biosensors rely on complementary hybridization between oligonucleotide strands for miRNA detection, on top of signal improvement via nanomaterial modifications. The introduction of nanomaterials into electrochemical biosensors could enhance the precision and accuracy for miRNA detection, serving as the electrode materials in biosensor for enhanced sensitivity, generation of active sites for immobilization of biological molecules, signal amplifier in a series of hybridization events, catalyst for electrochemical reaction, electroactive labels [19]. The most commonly detected miRNA biomarkers are miR-141, miR-21, miR-155, and more.

3.1. Detection of miR-21

Different types of miRNAs have been identified and their sequence information could be obtained from various databases, including miRBase, miRVIT, miRDB, and more. Among numerous miRNAs types, miR-21 has been studied extensively and identified to be overexpressed in various types of cancerous tumors, including stomach, prostate, head and neck, pancreas, lung, colorectal, esophagus, glioblastoma, and neuroblastoma [51]. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are often employed in biosensing platform due to the excellent catalytic and conductive properties. Sabahi et al. (2020) modified bare fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) electrode with single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) and dendritic gold nanostructure for the detection of miR-21 with Cadmium ions (Cd2+) as signal units as illustrated in Figure 3 [52]. Low detection limit (0.01 fM) was achieved and the fabricated biosensor also displayed acceptable performance in human serum samples. Gold nanoparticles functionalized with MoS2 nanosheet (NS) were synthesized using thionine as reducing agent for label-free detection of miR-21 in the linear range of 1 pM to 10 nM and detection limit of 0.26 pM [53]. Reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles (rGO/AuNPs) were also employed for the detection of spiked miR-21 in artificial saliva with good recovery rate ranging from 96.2% to 107.2% [54]. In another study, virus-like hallow structure of CuCo2O4 was applied to modify the screen carbon printed electron-gold nanoparticle (SCPE-AuNP) electrode surface to hold large amounts of p19 protein, mimicking the inherent virus (Carnation Italian ringspot virus) for the detection of miR-21 [55]. The fabricated biosensor displayed good sensing performance when applied in human serum, MCF-7, and HeLa cells with high sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility in few minutes. The same research group also tested the SCPE-AuNP electrode for miR-21 detection from MCF-7 exosome based on the multi-covalent attachment of p19 protein [56]. It was the first time that the exosomal electrochemical properties were proven as the electrochemical amplifier bed, achieving detection limit of 1 aM. Apart from direct modification of electrode surface with nanomaterials, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) subjected to different treatments were applied in miR-21 biosensor [57]. The loading capacity of thionin on the MWCNTs was investigated to determine the good electrochemical signal nanoprobes, resulting in low detection limit of 0.032 pM.
Owing to the low concentration of miRNA in sample, most of the electrochemical biosensing design incorporate amplification strategy in the detection mechanism. Amplification strategy that involves the recycling of target is highly sensitive and specific as the target miRNA is essential for the initiation of amplification cycle. For instance, Chen et al. (2019) performed T7 exonuclease-assisted target recycling for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of miR-21 based on the one-step biorecognition reaction at vertically aligned SWCNTs [58]. In the presence of target miR-21, the ferrocene-labeled DNA probe hybridized with miR-21 to form duplex that was later release from the electrode surface, leading to corresponding decrease in electrochemical signal. T7 exonuclease cleaved the duplex and recycled the target miR-21 for further hybridization, amplifying the signal to a low detection limit of 3.5 fM. On the other hand, DSN-assisted target recycling is employed for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of miR-21 using multi-walled carbon nanotubes@graphene oxide nanoribbons/gold nanoparticles (MWCNTs@GONRs/AuNPs)-modified biosensor [59]. Dual amplification strategy was carried out by the addition of streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase (SA-ALP)-immobilized DNA probe, showing satisfactory sensitivity (detection limit, 0.034 fM) and good accuracy (recovery ratio, 77.4–120.2%). Zhang et al. (2019) further enhance the sensitivity by performing triple signal amplification approach, including DSN-assisted target recycling followed with AuNPs and horse radish peroxidase (HRP) amplification [60]. As shown in Figure 4, the presence of target miR-21 opened the hairpin DNA and formed duplex which was recognized and cleaved by DSN. The residual DNA fragment on electrode hybridized with signal DNA and attracted the binding of AuNPs through streptavidin–biotin interaction. The Au NPs served as nanocarriers for HRP and maintained their enzymatic activity, where the HRP catalyzed the reduction of hydrogen peroxide to generate electrochemical current signal, presenting a low detection limit of 43.3 aM.
Padlock exponential rolling circle amplification (P-ERCA) combined with CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs)-assisted non-substrate nanoelectrocatalysis were applied in the biosensing platform design for the detection of miR-21 [61]. In order to improve the catalytic efficiency, CoFe2O4 MNPs and redox molecule (toluidine blue) were co-immobilized onto graphene surface, significantly improving the detection sensitivity with a wide dynamic range of 1 fM to 2 nM. Furthermore, CHA is also employed in conjunction with Pd-based nanomaterials (Pd NPs, Pd@UiO-66) for the ultrasensitive detection of miR-21, providing a powerful sensing platform [62,63]. Noteworthily, the utilization of metal-organic framework (MOF) UiO-66 is attractive as the combination of inorganic metal ions and organic linkers have demonstrated extraordinary performance due to well-defined porosities, high thermal stability, large surface area, and chemical tunability. Hu et al. (2018) also performed target-recycled non-enzymatic amplification for in vitro miR-21 sensing in a broad linear dynamic range of 0.1 fmol to 5 pmol and a detection limit of 56.7 amol [64]. Interestingly, paper-based electrochemical biosensor was develop to present a rapid, portable and renewable method for convenient and sensitive detection [65]. A microfluidic paper-based analytical device (μPAD) shown in Figure 5 was constructed using cerium dioxide–Au@glucose oxidase (CeO2-Au@GOx) acting as the signal transducer layer [66]. The μPADs provided a wide linear range of 1 to 1000 fM with a relatively low detection limit of 0.434 fM. Zhao et al. (2021) utilized guanine-quadruplex (G-quadruplex) formation in nanochannels for label-free electrochemical biosensing of miR-21 [67]. Carbon nanofibers-modified electrode was applied to monitor the change in electrochemical signal generated from the methylene blue fluxed through the nanochannels due to the presence of miR-21. A novel relay-race mechanism based on RNA/barcode gold nanoflower hybrid was proposed to enhance the electrochemical signal by ~230 times [68]. The fabricated sensor only requires small sample volume of 4 μL and could operate in a wide linear range of 500 aM to 1 μM, successfully profiling two cancer serums (breast and liver) at different development stages based on the miR21 abundance differences.

3.2. Detection of miR-144 and miR-200a

MiR-144 and miR-200a belong to the miR-200 family, which is associated with the formation of cancer steam cells and regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), increasing the cancer cell motility and invasiveness [69]. MiR-141 is commonly dysregulated in malignant tumors and the detection of its concentration is important in monitoring tumor development and progression. Miao et al. (2018) employed T7 exonuclease-assisted cascade signal amplification and DNA-templated copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) for the electrochemical detection of miR-141 [34]. The nucleic acid duplex served as template for the in situ synthesis of CuNPs as excellent electrochemical signal sources, the addition of miR-141 triggered T7 exonuclease activity and decreased the electrochemical signal, displaying good detection linear range of 10−16 to 10−13 M and detection limit of 4.5 × 10−17 M. The same research group further developed the electrochemical miRNA biosensor based on DNA-functionalized porous Fe3O4 nanoparticles with target recycling amplification [70]. Redox probe [Fe(CN)6]3− entrapped inside porous Fe3O4 nanoparticles by DNA probe was released upon hybridization with target miR-141, significantly increasing the open circuit voltage, performing “signal-on” self-powered biosensor with good detection limit (1.4 aM), demonstrating great potential as a powerful tool for miRNA diagnostics. Ratiometric biosensor displays greater anti-interference ability and measurement accuracy, which has also been employed for miRNA detection [71]. Yuan et al. (2018) designed a ratiometric electrochemical miR-141 assay based on dual-amplification mechanism (DSN, HCR) as shown in Figure 6 [72]. The ratiometric signal was obtained from the electrochemical signal of thionine and ferrocene, providing a detection limit down to 11 aM. This dual-amplified ratiometric biosensor possesses intrinsic self-calibration ability to remove the fluctuations from the system, which is promising for diagnostic applications. Another member of miR-200 family, miR-200a is a potential ovarian cancer biomarker and thus femtomolar determination of miR-200a in blood plasma using label-free electrochemical biosensor based on L-cysteine functionalized ZnS quantum dots has been performed [73]. The functionalized nanomaterial acted as suitable substrate for immobilization of DNA probe and enhance the sensing performance to a wide linear detection range of 1 × 10−14 to 1 × 10−6 M.

3.3. Detection of Other miRNAs

Research works have been reported on the detection of various miRNAs as they are the potential biomarkers for different types of diseases. Most of the works employed nuclease-assisted signal amplification strategy for the improved sensing performance to detect low concentration of miRNA. The incorporation of nanomaterials in addition to signal amplification strategy significantly enhanced the sensitivity and detection limit of electrochemical miRNA biosensor, such as the modification of electrode surface with AuNPs/Ti3C2 MXene, AuNPs, addition of Ag-PEI NPs as electroactive label and addition of nanoscale copper based metal organic framework assembled Pt NPs and horseradish peroxidase (Cu-NMOF@PtNPs/HRP) as catalytic nanoprobe for the detection of miR-155 [32,74,75,76]. Similarly, AuNPs, cysteamine-capped AuNPs, amino-functionalized graphene quantum dots (GQDs), graphene oxide (GO), electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide/gold nanowires (ERGO/AuNRs), GO/AuNRs, black phosphorus nanosheets/thionine-doped copper-MOF (BPNSs/TH/Cu-MOF) and C60@PAMAM-MOF were applied to modify the electrode surface for sensitive detection of miR-103, miR-25, miR-34a, miR-137, miR-199a-5p, miR-3123, and miR-3675-3p [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. Furthermore, nanomaterials also serve as electroactive label for enhancing the electrochemical signal generation. Silver nanoparticles/single-walled carbon nanotubes (AgNPs/SWCNTs) nanohybrid and doxorubicin-loaded AuNPs were introduced as label to that could interact with the duplex nucleic acid for sensitive detection of miR-25 in human plasma and let-7d [86,87]. Both biosensors displayed good sensing performances with detection limit of 3.13 × 10−13 M and 0.17 pM for miR-25 and let-7d, respectively.

3.4. Simultaneous Detection of miRNAs

Simultaneous multiplex miRNA biomarker detection is in great demand for early and accurate cancer diagnosis. MiR-21 and miR-141 are often detected simultaneously using different reporter molecules, or different types of nanomaterials, which could generate different electrochemical signal output for multiplex detection. Tian et al. (2019) constructed MoS2/AuNPs/AgNW paper-based electrode as biosensor for simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141 using ferrocene and methylene blue as the reporter molecule [88]. Hierarchical assembled nanomaterials and MOF (PtCuMOFs) were further immobilized on the DNA probe for signal enhancement as the combination of multi-dimensional nanomaterials contributes to low impedance and large sensing area. Under optimal conditions, simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141 with detection limit of 0.1 fM was demonstrated. Similar work was reported for the simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141 towards point of care cancer screening as shown in Figure 7, where AuNP@Mxene was employed for the modification of biosensor [89]. DSN-based amplification assay was applied, enhancing the sensing sensitivity (detection limit: 204 aM for miR-21; 138 aM for miR-141) and single-mutation recognition ability. The DNA probe was labeled with ferrocene and methylene blue which generate distinguishable electrochemical signal, providing multiplexability for the biosensor.
On the other hand, Yuan et al. (2017) paired up ferrocene with thionine as the reporter molecule for simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141 [90]. Target-triggered HCR strategy was introduced to improve the sensitivity, enabling the sensor to detect miRNAs in cell lysate. In another work, MOF UIO-66-NH2 was applied as nanocontainer for the loading of electroactive dyes (methylene blue and TMB), which was used in the simultaneous detection of let-7a and miR-21 [91]. A specially designed oligonucleotide that is complementary to target miRNA acted as the gatekeeper to form dsDNA-capped MOFs, which released the electroactive dyes upon the presence of miRNA triggering the toehold-mediated strand displacement reaction. Thus, detection limits of 3.6 and 8.2 fM have been demonstrated for let-7a and miR-21, respectively, which are comparable or even lower than other reported strategies. Apart from the reporter molecule, nanomaterials were also employed to generate differential signal that is suitable for multiplex detection of miRNA. Electrochemically encoded responsive nanolabels comprising biotinylated molecular beacons and AuNPs or AgNPs were applied to generic neutravidin biosensor for the simultaneous multiplexed detection of miR-21 and miR-141 [92]. Stripping square-wave voltammetry (SSWV) was performed to analyze the electrochemical signal generated from the gold and silver label, resulting in limit of detection of 0.3 and 10 pM for miR-21 and miR-141, respectively. On an interesting note, the development of biosensor towards portable, miniaturized system could be assisted with self-powered system. Wang et al. (2018) fabricated a Nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres-based high-energy-density biofuel cells for self-powering simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141, displaying detection limits as low as 0.1 and 4.0 fM, respectively [93]. This work has excellent potential in the development of economical and portable self-powered biomedical sensors.
Table 1 summarizes the performances of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for various miRNA targets detection.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The advancement of nanotechnology has contributed positively to the progression of biosensor development and fabrication. Significant progress has been made towards the development of advanced nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of miRNAs over the last decades. Nanomaterials with unique properties, such as SA:V, good chemical stability, conductivity, electrocatalytic activity displayed promising results in enhancing the sensitivity and lowering the detection limit of target miRNAs through synergistic effects. The applications of signal amplification strategies based on enzymes and oligonucleotides have also successfully improved the detection sensitivity and specificity. The mechanisms of different signal amplification strategies were discussed to provide understanding on the key concept. The combination of signal amplification strategies and nanomaterial modifications have significantly enhanced the sensing performance that could be applied for detection of miRNA in complex matrix or clinical sample. However, there are still many challenges in the development of nanomaterial-based electrochemical miRNA biosensor and future research direction should gear towards the solution for these problems.
(i)
Coupling of novel nanomaterials with recognition element—The progress in nanomaterial synthesis will lead to the construction of novel nanomaterials with desired properties that are suitable for application in electrochemical biosensor. Therefore, the coupling of novel nanomaterials with recognition element for miRNA biosensor, which is normally complementary DNA probe will lead to the fabrication of biosensor with high sensitivity and low detection limit. In addition, novel nanomaterials could also be applied as nanolabels that bind specifically to duplexes, generating enhanced electrochemical signal output and multiplex detection capability.
(ii)
Reproducibility of nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensor—The modification of biosensor with nanomaterials could improve the sensing performance of the biosensor, but there might be variation among each biosensor that was modified with the same nanomaterial. This could be due to the variation in the conformation or topology of modified nanomaterial on the biosensor surface, which is associated with the increased complexity of modified surface, giving rise to the reproducibility issue. Therefore, it is possible to perform statistical sampling on a batch of fabricated sensor and apply the testing and calibration to the entire batch.
(iii)
Validation of miRNA biosensor via real sample detection—It is crucial that the miRNA biosensor could function in clinical sample, providing accurate and reliable results as diagnostic tool. As miRNAs are present in various bodily fluids, for example saliva, plasma, tear, interstitial fluid, serum, urine, and others, the clinical samples obtained will be complex matrices, which will interfere the detection and recovery ratio. In addition, real sample often contains many species that might affect the electrochemical process or non-specific adsorption to sensing surface. Therefore, innovative materials and methods need to be developed to create boundary or functional linkage for the specific adhesion of target analyte to the sensor surface, ensuring the accuracy and recovery of biosensor.
The ideal electrochemical biosensor for miRNA detection should be facile, efficient, highly sensitive and specific towards target miRNA, providing simple and rapid sensing for diagnostic purpose. Various signal amplification strategies could be employed to achieve the ideal goal, overcoming false positive and providing accurate detection. The incorporation of nanomaterials also contributed in enhancing the sensing performance due to their desired properties. It is anticipated that the future research direction could aid in solving the problems associated with nanomaterial-based electrochemical miRNA biosensor, providing a new perspective for miRNA sensitive detection, which is critical in biomedical applications development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.L. and W.S.C.; data curation, D.J. and J.L.; formal analysis, W.S.C. and K.S.K.; funding acquisition, P.L.S.; investigation, K.S.K. and S.S.; methodology, F.K. and B.D.; project administration, B.D. and S.S.; supervision, J.L. and P.L.S.; validation, D.J. and S.S.; visualization, S.S.L. and F.K.; writing—original draft, S.S.L. and D.J.; writing—review and editing, S.S.L. and W.S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Malaysia (FRGS/1/2019/STG05/UNIM/02/2) and MyPAIR-PHC-Hibiscus Grant (MyPAIR/1/2020/STG05/UNIM/1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitchell, P.S.; Parkin, R.K.; Kroh, E.M.; Fritz, B.R.; Wyman, S.K.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Peterson, A.; Noteboom, J.; O’Briant, K.C.; Allen, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10513–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Reinhart, B.J.; Slack, F.J.; Basson, M.; Pasquinelli, A.E.; Bettinger, J.C.; Rougvie, A.E.; Horvitz, H.R.; Ruvkun, G. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2000, 403, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Slack, F.J.; Basson, M.; Liu, Z.; Ambros, V.; Horvitz, H.R.; Ruvkun, G. The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 transcription factor. Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Peng, Y.; Croce, C.M. The role of microRNAs in human cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016, 1, 15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Esquela-Kerscher, A.; Slack, F.J. Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kosaka, N.; Iguchi, H.; Ochiya, T. Circulating microRNA in body fluid: A new potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chugh, P.; Dittmer, D.P. Potential pitfalls in microRNA profiling. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2012, 3, 601–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Pritchard, C.C.; Cheng, H.H.; Tewari, M. MicroRNA profiling: Approaches and considerations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, J.; Xu, M.; Tian, X.; Cai, S.; Zeng, S. Research advances in the detection of miRNA. J. Pharm. Anal. 2019, 9, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Krepelkova, I.; Mrackova, T.; Izakova, J.; Dvorakova, B.; Chalupova, L.; Mikulik, R.; Slaby, O.; Bartos, M.; Ruzicka, V. Evaluation of miRNA detection methods for the analytical characteristic necessary for clinical utilization. Biotechniques 2019, 66, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Wei, Q. The role of nanomaterials in electroanalytical biosensors: A mini review. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 781, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yoon, J.; Shin, M.; Lee, T.; Choi, J.-W. Highly Sensitive Biosensors Based on Biomolecules and Functional Nanomaterials Depending on the Types of Nanomaterials: A Perspective Review. Materials 2020, 13, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Holzinger, M.; Le Goff, A.; Cosnier, S. Nanomaterials for biosensing applications: A review. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Alsaiari, N.S.; Katubi, K.M.; Alzahrani, F.M.; Siddeeg, S.M.; Tahoon, M.A. The Application of Nanomaterials for the Electrochemical Detection of Antibiotics: A Review. Micromachines 2021, 12, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farzin, L.; Shamsipur, M.; Samandari, L.; Sheibani, S. Advances in the design of nanomaterial-based electrochemical affinity and enzymatic biosensors for metabolic biomarkers: A review. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, B.; Akiba, U.; Anzai, J. Recent Progress in Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors for Cancer Biomarkers: A Review. Molecules 2017, 22, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, Y.-H.; He, L.-L.; Huang, K.-J.; Chen, Y.-X.; Wang, S.-Y.; Liu, Z.-H.; Li, D. Recent advances in nanomaterial-based electrochemical and optical sensing platforms for microRNA assays. Analyst 2019, 144, 2849–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Low, S.S.; Loh, H.-S.; Boey, J.S.; Khiew, P.S.; Chiu, W.S.; Tan, M.T.T. Sensitivity enhancement of graphene/zinc oxide nanocomposite-based electrochemical impedance genosensor for single stranded RNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Low, S.S.; Tan, M.T.T.; Loh, H.-S.; Khiew, P.S.; Chiu, W.S. Facile hydrothermal growth graphene/ZnO nanocomposite for development of enhanced biosensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 903, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gerasimova, Y.V.; Kolpashchikov, D.M. Enzyme-assisted target recycling (EATR) for nucleic acid detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 6405–6438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mohammadi, H.; Yammouri, G.; Amine, A. Current advances in electrochemical genosensors for detecting microRNA cancer markers. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2019, 16, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Y.-X.; Huang, K.-J.; Niu, K.-X. Recent advances in signal amplification strategy based on oligonucleotide and nanomaterials for microRNA detection-a review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shagin, D.A.; Rebrikov, D.V.; Kozhemyako, V.B.; Altshuler, I.M.; Shcheglov, A.S.; Zhulidov, P.A.; Bogdanova, E.A.; Staroverov, D.B.; Rasskazov, V.A.; Lukyanov, S. A novel method for SNP detection using a new duplex-specific nuclease from crab hepatopancreas. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 1935–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yi, H.; Cho, Y.-J.; Won, S.; Lee, J.-E.; Jin Yu, H.; Kim, S.; Schroth, G.P.; Luo, S.; Chun, J. Duplex-specific nuclease efficiently removes rRNA for prokaryotic RNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, e140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Qiu, X.; Zhang, H.; Yu, H.; Jiang, T.; Luo, Y. Duplex-specific nuclease-mediated bioanalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhuang, J.; Wan, H.; Zhang, X. Electrochemical detection of miRNA-100 in the sera of gastric cancer patients based on DSN-assisted amplification. Talanta 2021, 225, 121981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grossman, L. Enzymes Involved in the Repair of DNA. In Advances in Radiation Biology; Lett, J.T., Adler, H., Zelle, M.B.T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974; Volume 4, pp. 77–129. ISBN 0065-3292. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eun, H.-M. Nucleases. In Enzymology Primer for Recombinant DNA Technology; Eun, H.-M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1996; pp. 145–232. ISBN 978-0-12-243740-3. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shinozaki, K.; Tuneko, O. T7 gene 6 exonuclease has an RNase H activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978, 5, 4245–4262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yang, X.; Feng, M.; Xia, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Z. An electrochemical biosensor based on AuNPs/Ti3C2 MXene three-dimensional nanocomposite for microRNA-155 detection by exonuclease III-aided cascade target recycling. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 878, 114669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, X.-M.; Wang, Y.-Q.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.-P.; Yu, R.-Q. Detection of microRNAs by the combination of Exonuclease-III assisted target recycling amplification and repeated-fishing strategy. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1131, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miao, P.; Zhang, T.; Xu, J.; Tang, Y. Electrochemical Detection of miRNA Combining T7 Exonuclease-Assisted Cascade Signal Amplification and DNA-Templated Copper Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 11154–11160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, M.; Fu, Z.; Li, B.; Zhou, Y.; Yin, H.; Ai, S. One-Step, Ultrasensitive, and Electrochemical Assay of microRNAs Based on T7 Exonuclease Assisted Cyclic Enzymatic Amplification. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 5606–5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mohsen, M.G.; Kool, E.T. The Discovery of Rolling Circle Amplification and Rolling Circle Transcription. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2540–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhao, W.; Ali, M.M.; Brook, M.A.; Li, Y. Rolling Circle Amplification: Applications in Nanotechnology and Biodetection with Functional Nucleic Acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6330–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ali, M.M.; Li, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, K.; Kang, D.-K.; Ankrum, J.A.; Le, X.C.; Zhao, W. Rolling circle amplification: A versatile tool for chemical biology, materials science and medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 3324–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jonstrup, S.P.; Koch, J.; Kjems, J. A microRNA detection system based on padlock probes and rolling circle amplification. RNA 2006, 12, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Dirks, R.M.; Pierce, N.A. Triggered amplification by hybridization chain reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15275–15278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Evanko, D. Hybridization chain reaction. Nat. Methods 2004, 1, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liang, M.; Pan, M.; Hu, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, X. Electrochemical Biosensor for MicroRNA Detection Based on Cascade Hybridization Chain Reaction. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, J.; Shim, J.S.; Han, B.H.; Kim, H.J.; Park, J.; Cho, I.-J.; Kang, S.G.; Kang, J.Y.; Bong, K.W.; Choi, N. Hydrogel-based hybridization chain reaction (HCR) for detection of urinary exosomal miRNAs as a diagnostic tool of prostate cancer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 192, 113504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, M.; Cheng, J.; Yuan, Z.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, L.; Dai, Y.; Shen, Q.; Fan, Q. Sensitive electrochemical detection of microRNA based on DNA walkers and hyperbranched HCR-DNAzyme cascade signal amplification strategy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 345, 130348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, L.; Ye, H. Applications of Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Reaction in Biosensing. Small 2019, 15, 1902989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; Liang, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, F. A DNAzyme-amplified DNA circuit for highly accurate microRNA detection and intracellular imaging. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 9597–9604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, X.; Briggs, N.; McLain, J.R.; Ellington, A.D. Stacking nonenzymatic circuits for high signal gain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5386–5391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. El Aamri, M.; Yammouri, G.; Mohammadi, H.; Amine, A.; Korri-Youssoufi, H. Electrochemical Biosensors for Detection of MicroRNA as a Cancer Biomarker: Pros and Cons. Biosensors 2020, 10, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pothipor, C.; Aroonyadet, N.; Bamrungsap, S.; Jakmunee, J.; Ounnunkad, K. A highly sensitive electrochemical microRNA-21 biosensor based on intercalating methylene blue signal amplification and a highly dispersed gold nanoparticles/graphene/polypyrrole composite. Analyst 2021, 146, 2679–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, L.-L.; Pan, H.-Y.; Zhang, X.-X.; Zhou, Y.-L. Ultrasensitive detection of microRNA based on a homogeneous label-free electrochemical platform using G-triplex/methylene blue as a signal generator. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1116, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Medina, P.P.; Slack, F.J. MicroRNAs and cancer: An overview. Cell Cycle 2008, 7, 2485–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sabahi, A.; Salahandish, R.; Ghaffarinejad, A.; Omidinia, E. Electrochemical nano-genosensor for highly sensitive detection of miR-21 biomarker based on SWCNT-grafted dendritic Au nanostructure for early detection of prostate cancer. Talanta 2020, 209, 120595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, D.; Liu, W.; Zhao, D.; Hao, Q.; Li, J.; Huang, J.; Shi, J.; Chao, J.; Su, S.; Wang, L. Label-Free Electrochemical Sensing Platform for MicroRNA-21 Detection Using Thionine and Gold Nanoparticles Co-Functionalized MoS2 Nanosheet. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35597–35603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Low, S.S.; Pan, Y.; Ji, D.; Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Q. Smartphone-based portable electrochemical biosensing system for detection of circulating microRNA-21 in saliva as a proof-of-concept. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 308, 127718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ghazizadeh, E.; Moosavifard, S.E.; Daneshmand, N.; kamari Kaverlavani, S. Impediometric Electrochemical Sensor Based on The Inspiration of Carnation Italian Ringspot Virus Structure to Detect an Attommolar of miR. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ghazizadeh, E.; Naseri, Z.; Jaafari, M.R.; Forozandeh-Moghadam, M.; Hosseinkhani, S. A fires novel report of exosomal electrochemical sensor for sensing micro RNAs by using multi covalent attachment p19 with high sensitivity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 113, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deng, K.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Huang, H. Sensitive electrochemical sensing platform for microRNAs detection based on shortened multi-walled carbon nanotubes with high-loaded thionin. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 117, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Z.; Xie, Y.; Huang, W.; Qin, C.; Yu, A.; Lai, G. Exonuclease-assisted target recycling for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of microRNA at vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 11262–11269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, J.; Lu, J.; Dong, S.; Zhu, N.; Gyimah, E.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z. An ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for detection of microRNA-21 based on redox reaction of ascorbic acid/iodine and duplex-specific nuclease assisted target recycling. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 130, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, H.; Fan, M.; Jiang, J.; Shen, Q.; Cai, C.; Shen, J. Sensitive electrochemical biosensor for MicroRNAs based on duplex-specific nuclease-assisted target recycling followed with gold nanoparticles and enzymatic signal amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1064, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yu, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Han, J.; Bu, H. Combining padlock exponential rolling circle amplification with CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles for microRNA detection by nanoelectrocatalysis without a substrate. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 962, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meng, T.; Jia, H.; An, S.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y. Pd nanoparticles-DNA layered nanoreticulation biosensor based on target-catalytic hairpin assembly for ultrasensitive and selective biosensing of microRNA-21. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 323, 128621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Meng, T.; Shang, N.; Nsabimana, A.; Ye, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y. An enzyme-free electrochemical biosensor based on target-catalytic hairpin assembly and Pd@UiO-66 for the ultrasensitive detection of microRNA-21. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1138, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hu, F.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Sheng, T.; Gu, Y. An electrochemical biosensor for sensitive detection of microRNAs based on target-recycled non-enzymatic amplification. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 271, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, X.; Li, X.; Gao, X.; Ge, L.; Sun, X.; Li, F. A Universal Paper-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Zero-Background Assay of Diverse Biomarkers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 15381–15388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sun, X.; Wang, H.; Jian, Y.; Lan, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, H.; Ge, S.; Yu, J. Ultrasensitive microfluidic paper-based electrochemical/visual biosensor based on spherical-like cerium dioxide catalyst for miR-21 detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 105, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhao, F.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, J. Novel electrochemical biosensing platform for microRNA detection based on G-quadruplex formation in nanochannels. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 327, 128898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mohammadniaei, M.; Go, A.; Chavan, S.G.; Koyappayil, A.; Kim, S.-E.; Yoo, H.J.; Min, J.; Lee, M.-H. Relay-race RNA/barcode gold nanoflower hybrid for wide and sensitive detection of microRNA in total patient serum. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 141, 111468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, Y.; Feng, B.; Han, S.; Zhang, K.; Chen, J.; Li, C.; Wang, R.; Chen, L. The Roles of MicroRNA-141 in Human Cancers: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 38, 427–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, T.; Chai, H.; Meng, F.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Miao, P. DNA-Functionalized Porous Fe3O4 Nanoparticles for the Construction of Self-Powered miRNA Biosensor with Target Recycling Amplification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 36796–36804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Low, S.S.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Q. Design Principle in Biosensing: Critical Analysis based on Graphitic Carbon Nitride (G-C3N4) Photoelectrochemical Biosensor. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 116454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yuan, Y.-H.; Chi, B.-Z.; Wen, S.-H.; Liang, R.-P.; Li, Z.-M.; Qiu, J.-D. Ratiometric electrochemical assay for sensitive detecting microRNA based on dual-amplification mechanism of duplex-specific nuclease and hybridization chain reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 102, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Moazampour, M.; Zare, H.R.; Shekari, Z. Femtomolar determination of an ovarian cancer biomarker (miR-200a) in blood plasma using a label free electrochemical biosensor based on l-cysteine functionalized ZnS quantum dots. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jou, A.F.-J.; Chen, Y.-J.; Li, Y.; Chang, Y.-F.; Lee, J.; Liao, A.T.; Ho, J.A. Target-Triggered, Dual Amplification Strategy for Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of a Lymphoma-associated MicroRNA. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 236, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hakimian, F.; Ghourchian, H. Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for detection of microRNA-155 as a breast cancer risk factor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1136, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liang, Z.; Ou, D.; Sun, D.; Tong, Y.; Luo, H.; Chen, Z. Ultrasensitive biosensor for microRNA-155 using synergistically catalytic nanoprobe coupled with improved cascade strand displacement reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 146, 111744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tran, H.V.; Nguyen, N.D.; Piro, B.; Tran, L.T. Fabrication of a quinone containing layer on gold nanoparticles directed to a label-free and reagentless electrochemical miRNA sensor. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 2696–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Asadzadeh-Firouzabadi, A.; Zare, H.R. Application of cysteamine-capped gold nanoparticles for early detection of lung cancer-specific miRNA (miR-25) in human blood plasma. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 3852–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akbarnia, A.; Zare, H.R. A voltammetric assay for microRNA-25 based on the use of amino-functionalized graphene quantum dots and ss- and ds-DNAs as gene probes. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Isin, D.; Eksin, E.; Erdem, A. Graphene oxide modified single-use electrodes and their application for voltammetric miRNA analysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 75, 1242–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Congur, G.; Eksin, E.; Erdem, A. Impedimetric detection of miRNA-34a using graphene oxide modified chemically activated graphite electrodes. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 279, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Azimzadeh, M.; Nasirizadeh, N.; Rahaie, M.; Naderi-Manesh, H. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease using a biosensor based on electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide and gold nanowires for the quantification of serum microRNA-137. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 55709–55719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Ebrahimi, A.; Nikokar, I.; Zokaei, M.; Bozorgzadeh, E. Design, development and evaluation of microRNA-199a-5p detecting electrochemical nanobiosensor with diagnostic application in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Talanta 2018, 189, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sun, Y.; Jin, H.; Jiang, X.; Gui, R. Black phosphorus nanosheets adhering to thionine-doped 2D MOF as a smart aptasensor enabling accurate capture and ratiometric electrochemical detection of target microRNA. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zuo, J.; Yuan, Y.; Zhao, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Bai, L. An efficient electrochemical assay for miR-3675-3p in human serum based on the nanohybrid of functionalized fullerene and metal-organic framework. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1140, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Asadzadeh-Firouzabadi, A.; Zare, H.R. Preparation and application of AgNPs/SWCNTs nanohybrid as an electroactive label for sensitive detection of miRNA related to lung cancer. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 260, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tao, Y.; Yin, D.; Jin, M.; Fang, J.; Dai, T.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Pu, Q.; Xie, G. Double-loop hairpin probe and doxorubicin-loaded gold nanoparticles for the ultrasensitive electrochemical sensing of microRNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 96, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tian, R.; Li, Y.; Bai, J. Hierarchical assembled nanomaterial paper based analytical devices for simultaneously electrochemical detection of microRNAs. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1058, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mohammadniaei, M.; Koyappayil, A.; Sun, Y.; Min, J.; Lee, M.-H. Gold nanoparticle/MXene for multiple and sensitive detection of oncomiRs based on synergetic signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 159, 112208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yuan, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-D.; Chi, B.-Z.; Wen, S.-H.; Liang, R.-P.; Qiu, J.-D. Simultaneously electrochemical detection of microRNAs based on multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles probe coupling with hybridization chain reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chang, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Li, F. Nucleic Acid-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework-Based Homogeneous Electrochemical Biosensor for Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Tumor Biomarkers. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 3604–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Azzouzi, S.; Fredj, Z.; Turner, A.P.F.; Ali, M.B.; Mak, W.C. Generic Neutravidin Biosensor for Simultaneous Multiplex Detection of MicroRNAs via Electrochemically Encoded Responsive Nanolabels. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Wang, L.-L.; Shao, H.-H.; Wang, W.-J.; Zhang, J.-R.; Zhu, J.-J. Nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres for high-energy-density biofuel cells and self-powered sensing of microRNA-21 and microRNA-141. Nano Energy 2018, 44, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Micromachines 12 01409 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic workflow for electrochemical detection of miR-100 using AuNPs-modified AuE coupled with DSN-assisted target recycling for signal amplification. Reprinted from [28] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1. Schematic workflow for electrochemical detection of miR-100 using AuNPs-modified AuE coupled with DSN-assisted target recycling for signal amplification. Reprinted from [28] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g001
Micromachines 12 01409 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing an example of cascade amplification strategy involving catalyzed hairpin assembly (CHA) and hybridization chain reaction (HCR) where both strategies also employ hairpin probes for signal amplification. Reprinted from [46] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram showing an example of cascade amplification strategy involving catalyzed hairpin assembly (CHA) and hybridization chain reaction (HCR) where both strategies also employ hairpin probes for signal amplification. Reprinted from [46] with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry.
Micromachines 12 01409 g002
Micromachines 12 01409 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of the various steps involved in biosensor modification with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and dendritic gold nanostructure for the electrochemical sensing of miR-21 via differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Reprinted from [52] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of the various steps involved in biosensor modification with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and dendritic gold nanostructure for the electrochemical sensing of miR-21 via differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Reprinted from [52] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g003
Micromachines 12 01409 g004 550
Figure 4. Electrochemical biosensor for miR-21 detection based on triple signal amplification approach, displaying excellent sensitivity with sensing performance comparable to that of qRT-PCR. Reprinted from [60] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 4. Electrochemical biosensor for miR-21 detection based on triple signal amplification approach, displaying excellent sensitivity with sensing performance comparable to that of qRT-PCR. Reprinted from [60] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g004
Micromachines 12 01409 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Schematic representation and (B) fabrication of μPADs for the detection of miRNA combining chromogenic reaction and electrochemistry. Reprinted from [66] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic representation and (B) fabrication of μPADs for the detection of miRNA combining chromogenic reaction and electrochemistry. Reprinted from [66] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g005
Micromachines 12 01409 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic diagram illustrating the ratiometric electrochemical assay for miR-141 detection based on DSN and HCR amplification. Reprinted from [72] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 6. Schematic diagram illustrating the ratiometric electrochemical assay for miR-141 detection based on DSN and HCR amplification. Reprinted from [72] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g006
Micromachines 12 01409 g007 550
Figure 7. Schematic diagram representing the biosensing assay for simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141. (I) Enzymatic signal amplification was performed based on DSN-assisted target recycling approach followed by magnetic separation; (II) Electrochemical signal amplification was achieved via the Au electrode modification with AuNP@MXene. Reprinted from [89] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram representing the biosensing assay for simultaneous detection of miR-21 and miR-141. (I) Enzymatic signal amplification was performed based on DSN-assisted target recycling approach followed by magnetic separation; (II) Electrochemical signal amplification was achieved via the Au electrode modification with AuNP@MXene. Reprinted from [89] with permission from Elsevier.
Micromachines 12 01409 g007
Table
Table 1. Sensing performances of nanomaterial-modified electrochemical biosensor for the detection of miRNAs.
Table 1. Sensing performances of nanomaterial-modified electrochemical biosensor for the detection of miRNAs.
miRNANanomaterial UsedLinear RangeLimit of Detection (LOD)Electrochemical TechniqueRemarkRef
miR-21Pd@UiO-6620 fM to 600 pM0.713 fMDPVCHA amplification[63]
SWCNT0.01 to 100 pM3.5 fMDPVT7 Exonuclease-Assisted Cascade Signal Amplification[58]
AuNPs0.1 fM to 100 pM43.3 aMAmperometryTriple amplification via DSN-assisted target recycling combined with gold nanoparticles, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) enzymatic catalysis[60]
CNTs1 fM to 1 μM-DPVTarget-induced synthesis of Mg2+-dependent DNAzyme[65]
GO; Pd NPs1 fM to 50 pM63.1 aMDPVCHA amplification[62]
AuNPs; CoFe2O4 MNPs1 fM to 2 nM0.3 fMSWVPadlock exponential rolling circle amplification (P-ERCA)[61]
GNF@Pt1 μM to 500 aM135 aMDPVRelay-race RNA/barcode gold nanoflower hybrid[68]
AuNPs1 aM to 500 pM1 aMDPVExosomal electrochemical properties as electrochemical amplifier bed[56]
AuNRs; CeO2-Au@GOx1 fM to 1000 fM0.434 fMDPV-[66]
SWCNTs/dendritic Au0.01 fM to 1 μM0.01 fMDPV-[52]
MWCNTs-COOH0.1 fmol to 5 pmol56.7 amolDPVTarget-recycled non-enzymatic amplification[64]
MoS2-Thionine-AuNPs1.0 pM to 10.0 nM0.26 pMSWV-[53]
rGO/Au0.1 mM to 1 pM1 pMDPVSmartphone-based portable electrochemical biosensing system[54]
Carbon nanofibers1 aM to 10 pM0.5 aMDPVLabel-free sensing based on guanine-quadruplex (G-quadruplex) formation[67]
AuNPs; MWCNTs0.1 to 12000 pM0.032 pMDPV-[57]
CuCo2O4100 fM to1 aM1 aMDPVVirus-like hollow structure of CuCo2O4 filled with p19 protein[55]
MWCNTs@GONRs/AuNPs0.1 nM to 0.1 fM0.034 fMDPVDSN amplification[59]
miR-141AuNPs0.1 fM to 100 pM11 aMDPVDual-amplification: DSN, HCR[72]
CuNPs0.1 pM to 0.1 fM0.45 aMDPVT7 Exonuclease-Assisted Cascade Signal Amplification[34]
GO/AuNPs/Gox; Fe3O4 NPs10 aM to 10 fM1.4 aMEISSelf-powered system with DSN amplification[70]
miR-155AuNPs-3.57 fMSWVDual amplification via DSN amplification and strand displacement reaction[74]
Ag-PEI NPs2 × 10−20 to 2 × 10−12 mol20 zmolCV-[75]
Cu-NMOF@PtNPs0.50 to 1.0 × 105 fM0.13 fMSWVSynergistically catalytic nanoprobe coupled with improved cascade strand displacement reaction[76]
AuNPs/Ti3C2 Mxene10 nM to 1 fM0.35 fMDPVExonuclease III-aided cascade target recycling[32]
miR-103AuNPs100 fM to 5 nM100 fMSWVLabel-free and reagentless detection[77]
miR-25Cysteamine-AuNPs1 pM to 0.1 nM; 0.1 nM to 1 µM0.25 pMEIS-[78]
AgNPs/SWCNTs1 pM to 0.1 nM; 0.1 nM to 0.1 10 nM0.313 pMDPV-[86]
Amino-functionalized GQDs0.3 nM to 1.0 μM95.0 pMDPVAccumulation of p-Biphenol[79]
miR-34aGO5 to 35 μg/mL7.52 μg/mLDPV-[80]
GO0 to 10 µg/mL261.7 nMEIS-[81]
miR-137ERGO + AuNWs5 to 750 fM1.7 fMDPV-[82]
miR-200aL-cysteine functionalized ZnS QDs1 µM to 10 fM8.4 fMEIS-[73]
miR-199a-5pGO-AuNRs15 fM to 148 pM4.5 fMEIS-[83]
miR-3123BPNSs/Thionine/Cu-MOF2 pM to 2 μM0.3 pMSWV-[84]
miR-3675-3pC60@PAMAM-MOF; Au@PtNPs10 fM to 10 nM2.99 fMDPV-[85]
Let-7dAuNPs@Doxorucibin1 pM to 10 nM0.17 pMSWVDouble-loop hairpin probe[87]
Simultaneous detection: miR-141 and miR-21Fe3O4 NPs1 nM to 1 fM0.44 fM (miR-141)
0.46 fM (miR-21)		DPVHCR amplification[90]
MoS2/AuNPs/AgNW1 nM to 1 fM0.1 fMSWV-[88]
AuNPs; AgNPs50 to 1000 pM (miR-141);
0.5 to 1000 pM (miR-21)		10 pM (miR-141);
0.3 pM (miR-21)		SSWVNeutravidin—biotin affinity[92]
AuNPs/Mxene500 aM to 50 nM138 aM (miR-141); 204 aM (miR-21)DPVDSN amplification[89]
Simultaneous detection: miR-21 and let-7apNHCSs0.1 nM to 3.16 fM4.0 fM (miR-141); 0.1 fM (miR-21)EISHigh-energy-density biofuel cells for self-powered sensing[93]
UIO-66-NH20.01 to 100 pM8.2 fM (miR-21); 3.6 fM (let-7a)DPV-[91]
AuNPs—gold nanoparticles; DPV—differential pulse voltammetry; DSN—duplex-specific nuclease; HCR—hybridization chain reaction; CuNPs—copper nanoparticles; GO—graphene oxide; Gox—glucose oxidase; EIS—electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; CHA—target-catalytic hairpin assembly; SWCNTs—single-walled carbon nanotubes; CNTs—carbon nanotubes; CoFe2O4 MNPs—CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles; SWV—square wave voltammetry; GNF@Pt—gold nanoflower/platinum; AuNRs—gold nanorods; CeO2—cerium dioxide; MWCNTs-COOH—carboxyl multi-walled carbon nanotubes; MoS2—molybdenum disulfide; rGO—reduced graphene oxide; CuCo2O4—nanoporous copper-cobalt oxide hollow spheres; GONRs—graphene oxide nanoribbons; Ag-PEI NPs—polyethyleneimine-silver nanoparticles; CV—cyclic voltammetry; Cu-NMOF—copper-based metal organic framework; PtNPs—platinum nanoparticles; GQDs—graphene quantum dots; ERGO—electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide; AuNWs—gold nanowires; BPNSs—black phosphorus nanosheets; C60—fullerene; SSWV—stripping square wave voltammetry; pNHCSs—nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres with large pores.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Low, S.S.; Ji, D.; Chai, W.S.; Liu, J.; Khoo, K.S.; Salmanpour, S.; Karimi, F.; Deepanraj, B.; Show, P.L. Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111409

AMA Style

Low SS, Ji D, Chai WS, Liu J, Khoo KS, Salmanpour S, Karimi F, Deepanraj B, Show PL. Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA. Micromachines. 2021; 12(11):1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Low, Sze Shin, Daizong Ji, Wai Siong Chai, Jingjing Liu, Kuan Shiong Khoo, Sadegh Salmanpour, Fatemeh Karimi, Balakrishnan Deepanraj, and Pau Loke Show. 2021. "Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA" Micromachines 12, no. 11: 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111409

APA Style

Low, S. S., Ji, D., Chai, W. S., Liu, J., Khoo, K. S., Salmanpour, S., Karimi, F., Deepanraj, B., & Show, P. L. (2021). Recent Progress in Nanomaterials Modified Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of MicroRNA. Micromachines, 12(11), 1409. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop