Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of X-ray Gratings for Interferometric Imaging by Conformal Seedless Gold Electroplating
Previous Article in Journal
Simplified Method of Microcontact Force Measurement by Using Micropressure Sensor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/mi12050516
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wafer-Bonding Fabricated CMUT Device with Parylene Coating

by
Changde He
1,2,3,
Binzhen Zhang
3,
Chenyang Xue
3,
Wendong Zhang
3 and
Shengdong Zhang
1,2,*
1
School of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
Institute of Microelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Testing Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2021, 12(5), 516; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050516
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 3 May 2021 / Published: 4 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section E：Engineering and Technology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The advantages of the capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) technology have provided revolutionary advances in ultrasound imaging. Extensive research on CMUT devices for high-frequency medical imaging applications has been conducted because of strong demands and fabrication realization by using standard silicon IC fabrication technology. However, CMUT devices for low-frequency underwater imaging applications have been rarely researched because it is difficult to fabricate thick membrane structures through depositing processes using standard IC fabrication technology due to stress-related problems. To address this shortcoming, in this paper, a CMUT device with a 2.83-μm thick silicon membrane is proposed and fabricated. The CMUT device is fabricated using silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology. A 5-μm thick Parylene-C is conformally deposited on the device for immersion measurement. The results show that the fabricated CMUT can transmit an ultrasound wave, receive an ultrasound wave, and have pulse-echo measurement capability. The ability of the device to emit and receive ultrasonic waves increases with the bias voltage but does not depend on the voltage polarity. The results demonstrate the viability of the fabricated CMUT in low-frequency applications from the perspectives of the device structure, fabrication, and characterization. This study presents the potential of the CMUT for underwater ultrasound imaging applications.

1. Introduction

Ultrasound imaging technology has a wide range of applications, including medical diagnostics, underwater exploration, and nondestructive evaluation of materials. Ultrasound imaging is based on the scattering of ultrasound energy by material interfaces with different properties through interactions governed by acoustic physics. Ultrasound transducers are used to transmit and receive acoustic energy. Since the first demonstration of a capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) in the early 1990s [1,2,3], the CMUT has become a promising candidate for three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging systems [4,5,6]. The most attractive advantages of CMUTs over traditional piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers are a wide bandwidth in immersion and an easy realization of two-dimensional (2D) high-density arrays for real-time ultrasonic volumetric imaging [4,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The CMUTs also provide advantages of the reduction in size and cost and integration with electronics [13,14].
In the past 3 decades, extensive research has been conducted on modeling [15,16], performance improvement [17,18,19], fabrication methods [9,20,21,22,23,24], front-end circuitry [4,8,10,25,26,27,28], and applications [4,5,11,12,29,30,31,32] of the CMUT technology. The pioneering research on the CMUT mostly focused on medical ultrasound imaging applications and less consideration was given to underwater ultrasound imaging applications. The main differences between these two types of applications relate to different requirements for device frequencies. The device’s structural parameters, materials, and fabrication process can also differ. The CMUT devices for medical imaging are usually designed to operate at frequencies over 3 MHz and are fabricated by the surface micromachined process. Silicon nitride (Si3N4) film deposited by Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) or (Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (LPCVD) is a vibration membrane material of the device, and its thickness is less than 1.5-μm in medical CMUT. The size of a device for underwater imaging is much larger than that of the medical CMUT. The CMUT devices for underwater imaging are usually designed to operate at frequencies below 1.5 MHz, and the membrane thickness is wider than 2-μm. However, with the increase of thickness, it is more difficult to fabricate a low stress silicon nitride membrane by standard silicon integrated circuit (IC) fabrication technology, therefore mono-crystalline silicon or polysilicon is a good choice as a vibration membrane material. Although traditional piezoelectric transducers can meet the requirements of linear arrays due to the relatively large size of transducers for underwater acoustic imaging, it is difficult to fabricate 2D transducer arrays. Fabrication of 2D transducer arrays is an inherent advantage of the CMUT technology, which has been demonstrated in high-frequency medical imaging applications [4,5,12]. Additionally, mass-produced CMUT transducers can reduce the cost of devices. In addition, high uniformity of array elements based on the silicon micromachined process can reduce the complexity of back-end data processing, while the broadband characteristics of devices can improve the imaging quality of the system. Due to the mentioned advantages of the CMUT technology, the CMUT devices are highly expected to be applied to underwater imaging systems.
This article aims at the potential of the CMUT devices for underwater ultrasound imaging applications. A CMUT device with a 2.83-μm thick silicon membrane is proposed and fabricated. The CMUT device is fabricated using silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology. The mono-crystalline silicon is selected as a vibration membrane material because of its stable, certain mechanical properties. The pulse-echo underwater measurement of the device is conducted to demonstrate the viability of the fabricated CMUT device.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Transducer Structure

A CMUT element usually comprises several capacitor cells connected in parallel. Each cell is a parallel plate capacitor with a movable membrane over a vacuum sealed cavity. The frequency of the transducer affects the imaging resolution and the detection range. The operation frequencies between 300 kHz and 2.5 MHz are mostly needed for different underwater imaging applications. The structure properties of the movable membrane over vacuum cavity determine the frequency of the CMUT element. The movable membrane is designed to be a circular membrane, which can be equivalent to a circular thin plate. The lowest resonant frequency can be expressed as:
f 0 = 0.47 t m a 2 E ρ ( 1 − σ 2 ) ,
where E is Young’s modulus, ρ is the density of the membrane material, σ is the Poisson’s ratio, a is the radius of the circular membrane, and tm is the thickness of the membrane. A CMUT transducer for low-frequency underwater imaging applications is designed. The parameters of the CMUT transducer are given in Table 1. The structure of the cell is shown in Figure 1. The cell consists of two conductive silicon plates separated by the vacuum gap dielectric and oxide silicon dielectric. One plate is a thin metalized silicon membrane used as a top electrode of a capacitor, and the other plate is a heavily doped silicon substrate used as a bottom electrode. A thickness of 2.83-μm and a diameter of 180-μm of the silicon membrane are the optimized design parameters to get 1.4 MHz center frequency. The theoretical center frequency is 1.43 MHz, calculated from Equation (1). Vacuum cavity gap distance is another critical parameter and 0.65-μm height is designed to balance the transmitting and receiving performance of the CMUT. The oxide silicon insulation layer of 0.15-μm thickness between the vacuum cavity and substrate is used to prevent the silicon membrane from contacting and short-circuiting with the silicon substrate when the silicon membrane collapses under high voltage. Another oxide silicon insulation layer on the silicon membrane is also designed to prevent short-circuiting and improve withstanding voltage performance. The CMUT transducer comprises 900 capacitor cells connected in parallel on the same die, as shown in Figure 2, where the 3D measuring laser microscope image of the fabricated CMUT device is displayed.

2.2. Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasound Transducer (CMUT) Fabrication

The CMUT device was fabricated using silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology, which was a direct bond between two silicon surfaces at high temperatures and showed features of high bond strength and extreme hermeticity [33]. The wafer-bonding was used because it allows easier fabrication of membrane structures from mono-crystalline silicon. Mono-crystalline silicon as a mechanical material has been extensively studied and is well characterized. The process began with two wafers: a prime quality oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer and a Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) wafer. The wafer-bonding fabrication process was described in detail in earlier reports [21,22], therefore, in this article, the fabrication process of the designed CMUT will be summarized and introduced briefly.
First, the oxide layer was etched 650 nm away from the total 800-nm thickness to define cavities on the oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer, as shown in Figure 3b. Next, the SOI wafer and the cavities patterned oxide silicon wafer were pre-bonded in the vacuum at room temperature, and the pre-bonded wafers were annealed at high temperature, with a maximum temperature up to 1150 °C, which denoted the fusion bonding process, as shown in Figure 3c. The handle layer and the buried oxide (BOX) layer of the SOI wafer were then removed to release the thin membranes of the device layer by performing the Chemical Mechanical Polish (CMP) step and wet etching, as shown in Figure 3d. At that point, an SOI wafer with cavities was fabricated and a 100-nm thick oxide silicon layer was deposited on the device layer, as shown in Figure 3e. After that, around the device cells, the patterned silicon membrane trenches were defined and etched to the oxide layer to isolate the device electrically from the other devices and frame structure. Finally, the aluminum metal layer was sputtered on the side of the device layer of the cavity SOI and patterned, thus forming the top electrode of the CMUT device. Another aluminum metal layer was sputtered on the side of the handle layer of the cavity SOI but not patterned, thus forming the bottom electrode of the CMUT device, as shown in Figure 3f. Annealing was performed to make ohmic contact between the bottom electrode and highly-doped silicon substrate.

2.3. CMUT Package for Immersion Measurement

The fabricated CMUT die was glued to a printed circuit board (PCB). The whole bottom electrode of the die was glued to the pad on the PCB by conductive epoxy, and the pad of the top electrode was wire-bonded to another pad on the PCB. In order to make CMUT work underwater, a waterproof package was needed. Parylene-C is a protective polymer material and is widely used for waterproofing sensors. After gluing and wire-bonding the die, a 5-μm thick Parylene-C was conformally deposited on the PCB by vapor deposition in order to seal the device, PCB, and wires for immersion operation. The CMUT device with the Parylene-C coating is shown in Figure 4.

3. Results

3.1. Capacitance-Voltage Characteristics

The CMUT’s operating principle is based on the elastic deformation of the thin plates of the capacitors under electrostatic force or acoustic wave. The thin plate was composed of the top electrode, oxide silicon insulating dielectric layer, and the silicon membrane. The capacitance-voltage (CV) characteristics of the CMUT device directly illustrate the quantitative relationship between the structure deformation and bias voltage. The CV curve is also related to the device’s important parameters, such as sensitivity, electromechanical conversion efficiency, and collapse voltage. The CV measurements were performed using the KEYSIGHT E4990A impedance analyzer, and bias voltage swept from −40 V to 40 V. The CV curves are presented in Figure 5. The black curve was obtained from the measurement results of the CMUT without Parylene-C on the PCB, and the red curve was obtained from the results of the same CMUT with deposited 5-μm thick Parylene-C.
The results showed that depositing the Parylene affected the CV characteristics of the CMUT device. The capacitance of the CMUT without Parylene increased by 460 pF when the bias voltage changed from 0 to 40 V, while the capacitance of the CMUT with Parylene increased by 402 pF under the same conditions. There was a slight distortion at +10 V in the curves, and this phenomenon did not occur at −10 V. The silicon membrane and silicon substrate of the CMUT capacitor were both semiconductor materials. The parasitic capacitance, due to the semiconductor material, caused this distortion and inconsistency.

3.2. Transmitting Performance

In the measurement of the CMUT transmitting performance, the CMUT was driven by a power amplifier (HSA4101, NF Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) and emitted ultrasound waves in the water tank. The ultrasound output generated by the CMUT was measured with a calibrated needle hydrophone (NH4000, Precision Acoustics Ltd, Dorchester, UK). The distance between the CMUT and hydrophone was 2.7 cm. The measurement setup of the CMUT transmitting performance is shown in Figure 6. The needle hydrophone was fixed on the three-dimensional displacement platform. By finely adjusting the horizontal position, vertical position, and angle of the hydrophone, the maximum output voltage amplitude was found and the output response signal of the hydrophone at this position was recorded.
Figure 7a shows the output responses of the needle hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the sinusoidal impulses voltage signals with the DC bias voltages of −15 V, −20 V, and −25 V. Sinusoidal impulses consisted of five sine cycles with a fixed peak-to-peak voltage amplitude of 20 V and fixed frequency of 1.1 MHz. Figure 7b shows the output responses of the needle hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the sinusoidal impulse voltage signals, with the DC bias voltages of 15 V, 20 V, and 25 V. The response peak-to-peak output amplitude of the needle hydrophone was 59.1 mV at the bias voltage of −15 V, 75.1 mV at the bias voltage of −20 V, 94.2 mV at the bias voltage of −25 V, 60.1 mV at the bias voltage of 15 V, 75.1 mV at the bias voltage of 20 V, and 95.2 mV at the bias voltage of 25 V. Figure 7c shows that the output amplitudes of the hydrophone at negative and positive bias voltages were basically the same at the same absolute voltage. The output responses indicated that the transmitting performance of the designed CMUT was related to the absolute DC bias voltage amplitude but not the voltage polarity, which is consistent with the fact that the change of capacitance is related to absolute voltage and not polarity. Additionally, the output amplitudes of the needle hydrophone reflect the transmitting sensitivity of the CMUT transducer. In the non-collapse working mode, transmitting sensitivity of CMUT increased with the increase of the bias voltage, as shown in Figure 7c, which is consistent with the theory. 5-cycle pulse signals were clearly visible in the output response of the needle hydrophone, as shown in Figure 7a,b, which proves that the CMUT dynamically responsed perfectly to the 5-cycle sine excitation signals at different bias voltages.

3.3. Receiving Performance

The CMUT receiving performance was evaluated at various DC bias voltages using a constant-transmitting acoustic source. The transmitting acoustic source was another CMUT device (CMUT-2#) that had the same structure as the CMUT to be evaluated (CMUT-1#). The distance between the CMUT-1# and the CMUT-2# was 9.6 cm. The CMUT-2# was driven by the power amplifier with five sinusoidal impulses signals, with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 20 V and a frequency of 1.1 MHz added to the DC bias voltage of 20 V. The DC bias voltage was applied to the CMUT-1# by a bias tee circuit. The current output of the CMUT-1# device flowed through the bias tee and was amplified and converted to the voltage output by a trans-impedance amplifier (TIA) circuit. The TIA circuit consisted of a broadband low-noise amplifier chip (AD, LTC6268-10). The voltage output of the TIA circuit was the output response amplitude of the CMUT-1# device. The measurement setup of the CMUT receiving performance is shown in Figure 8, and the measurement results are shown in Figure 9. The peak-to-peak output response amplitude of the CMUT-1# was 1559.4 mV at the bias voltage of −15 V, 1902.2 mV at the bias voltage of −20 V, 2364.1 mV at the bias voltage of −25 V, 1523.7 mV at the bias voltage of 15 V, 1935.5 mV at the bias voltage of 20 V, and 2467.9 mV at the bias voltage of 25 V.
As shown in Figure 9c, the output amplitude of the CMUT-1# increased with the absolute voltage value. The difference of the output amplitudes of CMUT-1# at negative and positive bias voltages was small at the same absolute voltage. The maximum output voltage difference was only 103.8 mV, and the voltage difference when the bias voltages of −25 V and 25 V were applied was only 4.39%. The output responses indicate that the receiving performance of the designed CMUT is related to the absolute DC bias voltage amplitude but not the voltage polarity. It was demonstrated again that the change of capacitance was related to the absolute voltage and irrelevant to the polarity. 5-cycle pulse signals were clearly visible in the output response of the CMUT-1#, as shown in Figure 8a,b, which proves that the CMUT-1# dynamically responsed to the ultrasound waves at different bias voltages. In the non-collapse working mode, the output amplitudes of CMUT-1# increased with the increase of the bias voltage, as shown in Figure 9c, which is consistent with the theory.

3.4. Pulse-Echo Measurements

The measurement setup of the CMUT pulse-echo signal is shown in Figure 10. The CMUT device emitted ultrasound signals and received the ultrasound echo signals reflected from the aluminum block. The distance between the CMUT and the aluminum block was 5.1 cm. The high voltage bipolar pulses were generated by the pulse generator circuit MAX14808. The two echo signals reflected by the aluminum block are shown in Figure 11a. Figure 11b shows the first echo signals when the CMUT device was biased at 15 V, 20 V, and 25 V and excited by three bipolar pulses (9.4 V, 1.1 MHz) at a pulse repetition frequency of 500 Hz. Figure 11c shows that the first echo signal amplitude increased with the DC bias voltage applied to the CMUT device. The pulse signals were clearly visible in the output response of the CMUT, as shown in Figure 9b, which proves that the CMUT dynamically transmitted ultrasound excited by pulse excitation signals and received the ultrasound waves reflected from the aluminum block at different bias voltages. The output amplitudes of the CMUT increased with the increase of the bias voltage, as shown in Figure 9c, which is consistent with the theory.

4. Discussion

This paper studies the potential of CMUT devices for underwater ultrasound imaging applications and demonstrates the viability of the proposed CMUT device from the perspectives of the device structure, fabrication, and characterization. A CMUT device operating at a frequency below 1.5 MHz that meets the demands of underwater imaging applications is proposed and fabricated. The transmitting, receiving, and pulse-echo characteristics of the fabricated CMUT device were measured at the frequency of 1.1 MHz in the water tank. The results show that the 5-μm thickness Parylene-C coating on the CMUT device meets the waterproof requirements of underwater measurement.
The designed CMUT can transmit and receive ultrasound waves separately. The designed CMUT can also receive the echo signal of the ultrasonic wave emitted by itself when the emitting ultrasonic wave is reflected from obstacles. The output response of the proposed CMUT is related to the absolute bias voltage but not the bias voltage polarity. The ability of the proposed device to emit and receive ultrasonic waves increases with the bias voltage, but the applied bias voltage needs to be within the device tolerance range. The optimal bias voltage and the maximum bias voltage of the CMUT device are not studied in this work, but these two parameters are important and will be analyzed in our future research.
In the fabrication process of the proposed CMUT device, the silicon fusion wafer-bonding process is the key technology. The silicon fusion wafer-bonding process allows easier fabrication of thick membrane structures, which are required by low-frequency CMUT devices. The widely studied surface micromachined process is used to fabricate the CMUT devices by deposition, and it is suitable for the fabrication of high-frequency CMUT devices. However, it is difficult to deposit a thick membrane structure due to stress-related problems, but a thick membrane structure is required for low-frequency CMUT devices.
It should be noted that the CMUT technology is not simply a low-cost replacement of the piezoelectric transducer technology. Many features of the CMUT technology enable revolutionary advances in ultrasound imaging. Recently, extensive research on the CMUT has focused on its application in medical imaging systems. There are a few studies on CMUTs for underwater imaging applications. The realization of 3D underwater imaging sonar depends on 2D transducer arrays. The CMUT technology is the most promising technology to fabricate 2D transducer arrays. Based on the results presented in this article, the CMUT devices could play an important role in future 3D imaging sonar systems.

5. Conclusions

A CMUT device with a 2.83-μm thick silicon membrane is proposed and fabricated using silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology. A 5-μm thick Parylene-C is conformally deposited on the device for immersion measurement. The transmitting and receiving performance of the device were evaluated at various DC bias voltages. The results presented in this article demonstrate that the fabricated CMUT device with Parylene coating meets the requirements of underwater measurement from the perspective of structure, fabrication, and characterization. Based on the device’s structural parameters and fabrication process proposed in this article, the CMUT transducer arrays can be developed and used in underwater imaging sonar systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H., B.Z., and S.Z.; formal analysis, B.Z., C.H., and S.Z.; data curation, C.H. and B.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.; writing—review and editing, B.Z., C.X., W.Z., and S.Z.; funding acquisition, B.Z., C.X., and W.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2016YFC0105004. This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 61927807 and 61525107. This work was funded by the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” Key Subject Construction and innovation Special Zone Project.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Congwei Liao and Yanan Meng for their suggestions that helped to improve the paper significantly. We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com (accessed on 19 March 2021)) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haller, M.I.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. A surface micromachined electrostatic ultrasonic air transducer. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 1996, 43, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ladabaum, I.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T.; Spoliansky, D. Micromachined ultrasonic transducers: 11.4 MHz transmission in air and more. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Xuecheng, J.; Ladabaum, I.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. The microfabrication of capacitive ultrasonic transducers. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 1998, 7, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wygant, I.O.; Zhuang, X.; Yeh, D.T.; Oralkan, O.; Sanli Ergun, A.; Karaman, M.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Integration of 2D CMUT arrays with front-end electronics for volumetric ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2008, 55, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oralkan, O.; Ergun, A.S.; Cheng, C.H.; Johnson, J.A.; Karaman, M.; Lee, T.H.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Volumetric ultrasound imaging using 2-D CMUT arrays. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2003, 50, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gurun, G.; Tekes, C.; Zahorian, J.; Xu, T. Single-chip CMUT-on-CMOS front-end system for real-time volumetric IVUS and ICE imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2014, 61, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Chee, R.K.; Zemp, R.J. Feasibility of modulation-encoded TOBE CMUTS for real-time 3-D imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2015, 62, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhuyan, A.; Choe, J.W.; Lee, B.C.; Wygant, I.O.; Nikoozadeh, A.; Oralkan, O.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Integrated circuits for volumetric ultrasound imaging with 2-D CMUT arrays. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2013, 7, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adelegan, O.J.; Coutant, Z.A.; Zhang, X.; Yamaner, F.Y.; Oralkan, O. Fabrication of 2D Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer (CMUT) Arrays on Insulating Substrates with Through-Wafer Interconnects Using Sacrificial Release Process. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 2020, 29, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, X.; Cheong, J.H.; Cha, H.K.; Yu, H.; Je, M.; Yu, H. A high-frequency transimpedance amplifier for CMOS integrated 2D CMUT array towards 3D ultrasound imaging. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, Japan, 3–7 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fisher, T.G.; Hall, T.J.; Panda, S.; Richards, M.S.; Barbone, P.E.; Jiang, J.; Resnick, J.; Barnes, S. Volumetric elasticity imaging with a 2-D CMUT array. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010, 36, 978–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Vaithilingam, S.; Ma, T.J.; Furukawa, Y.; Wygant, I.O.; Xuefeng, Z.; De, L.; Oralkan, O.; Kamaya, A.; Gambhir, S.S.; Jeffrey, R.B. Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging using a two-dimensional CMUT array. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2009, 56, 2411–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oralkan, O.; Ergun, A.S.; Johnson, J.A.; Karaman, M.; Demirci, U.; Kaviani, K.; Lee, T.H.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: Next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging? IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2002, 49, 1596–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brenner, K.; Ergun, A.S.; Firouzi, K.; Rasmussen, M.F.; Stedman, Q.; Khuri-Yakub, B.P. Advances in Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers. Micromachines 2019, 10, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wygant, I.O.; Kupnik, M.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. An Analytical Model for Capacitive Pressure Transducers With Circular Geometry. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 2018, 27, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bayram, B.; Kupnik, M.; Yaralioglu, G.G.; Oralkan, O.; Ergun, A.S.; Lin, D.S.; Wong, S.H.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Finite element modeling and experimental characterization of crosstalk in 1-D CMUT arrays. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2007, 54, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Munir, J.; Ain, Q.; Lee, H.J. Reliability issue related to dielectric charging in capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: A review. Microelectron. Reliab. 2019, 92, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, Y.; Pun, S.H.; Mak, P.U.; Cheng, C.H.; Wang, J.; Mak, P.I.; Vai, M.I. Design of a Collapse-Mode CMUT With an Embossed Membrane for Improving Output Pressure. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2016, 63, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pekar, M.; Dittmer, W.U.; Mihajlovic, N.; van Soest, G.; de Jong, N. Frequency Tuning of Collapse-Mode Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer. Ultrasonics 2017, 74, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, X.C.; Ladabaum, I.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Surface micromachined capacitive ultrasonic immersion transducers. In Proceedings of the MEMS 98. IEEE. Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Systems (Cat. No.98CH36176), Heidelberg, Germany, 25–29 January 1998. [Google Scholar]
  21. Erguri, A.S.; Huang, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Oralkan, O.; Yarahoglu, G.G.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers: Fabrication Technology. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52, 2242–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Park, K.K.; Lee, H.; Kupnik, M.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Fabrication of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers via Local Oxidation and Direct Wafer Bonding. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 2011, 20, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bagolini, A.; Savoia, A.S.; Picciotto, A.; Boscardin, M.; Bellutti, P.; Lamberti, N.; Caliano, G. PECVD low stress silicon nitride analysis and optimization for the fabrication of CMUT devices. J. Micromechanics Microengineering 2015, 25, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yildiz, F.; Matsunaga, T.; Haga, Y. Fabrication and Packaging of CMUT Using Low Temperature Co-Fired Ceramic. Micromachines 2018, 9, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sautto, M.; Savoia, A.S.; Quaglia, F.; Caliano, G.; Mazzanti, A. A Comparative Analysis of CMUT Receiving Architectures for the Design Optimization of Integrated Transceiver Front Ends. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2017, 64, 826–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tan, M.; Kang, E.; An, J.-S.; Chang, Z.-Y.; Vince, P.; Mateo, T.; Senegond, N.; Pertijs, M.A.P. A 64-Channel Transmit Beamformer With ±30-V Bipolar High-Voltage Pulsers for Catheter-Based Ultrasound Probes. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2020, 55, 1796–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kang, E.; Ding, Q.; Shabanimotlagh, M.; Kruizinga, P.; Chang, Z.-Y.; Noothout, E.; Vos, H.J.; Bosch, J.G.; Verweij, M.D.; de Jong, N.; et al. A Reconfigurable Ultrasound Transceiver ASIC With 24×40 Elements for 3-D Carotid Artery Imaging. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2018, 53, 2065–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, K.; Lee, H.-S.; Sodini, C.G. A Column-Row-Parallel ASIC Architecture for 3-D Portable Medical Ultrasonic Imaging. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2015, 51, 738–751. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhao, D.; Zhuang, S.; Daigle, R. A commercialized high frequency CMUT probe for medical ultrasound imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings, Taipei, Taiwan, 21–24 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  30. Khuri-Yakub, B.T.; Oralkan, O. Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging and therapy. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2011, 21, 54004–54014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Choi, W.Y.; Kwak, Y.S.; Park, K.K. Fingerprint Imaging System Based on Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer by Using Impediography Method Including Direct Touch and Waveguide Methods. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2019, 66, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ilkhechi, A.K.; Ceroici, C.; Li, Z.; Zemp, R. Transparent capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays for real-time photoacoustic applications. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 13750–13760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ramm, P.; Lu, J.Q.; Taklo, M. Handbook of Wafer Bonding; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Micromachines 12 00516 g001 550
Figure 1. Cross-section of a single capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) cell.
Figure 1. Cross-section of a single capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) cell.
Micromachines 12 00516 g001
Micromachines 12 00516 g002 550
Figure 2. A microscope photograph of the fabricated CMUT device die. (a) Top view of the fabricated CMUT device with 900 cells; (b) magnified view of cells.
Figure 2. A microscope photograph of the fabricated CMUT device die. (a) Top view of the fabricated CMUT device with 900 cells; (b) magnified view of cells.
Micromachines 12 00516 g002
Micromachines 12 00516 g003 550
Figure 3. The CMUT fabricated using the silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology. (a) Oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer; (b) cavity definition; (c) wafer-bonding of the oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer and Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) wafer; (d) removal of the handle and the buried oxide (BOX) layer of the SOI wafer to release the membranes; (e) depositing a 100-nm thick oxide silicon layer as an insulator dielectric; (f) fabrication of the top and bottom electrodes.
Figure 3. The CMUT fabricated using the silicon fusion wafer-bonding technology. (a) Oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer; (b) cavity definition; (c) wafer-bonding of the oxide mono-crystalline silicon wafer and Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) wafer; (d) removal of the handle and the buried oxide (BOX) layer of the SOI wafer to release the membranes; (e) depositing a 100-nm thick oxide silicon layer as an insulator dielectric; (f) fabrication of the top and bottom electrodes.
Micromachines 12 00516 g003
Micromachines 12 00516 g004 550
Figure 4. Photograph of the CMUT glued and wire-bonded to the printed circuit board (PCB).
Figure 4. Photograph of the CMUT glued and wire-bonded to the printed circuit board (PCB).
Micromachines 12 00516 g004
Micromachines 12 00516 g005 550
Figure 5. The capacitance-voltage (CV) curves of the CMUT device.
Figure 5. The capacitance-voltage (CV) curves of the CMUT device.
Micromachines 12 00516 g005
Micromachines 12 00516 g006a 550Micromachines 12 00516 g006b 550
Figure 6. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT transmitting performance; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Figure 6. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT transmitting performance; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Micromachines 12 00516 g006aMicromachines 12 00516 g006b
Micromachines 12 00516 g007a 550Micromachines 12 00516 g007b 550
Figure 7. (a) Response waveforms of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the DC bias voltages from −15 V to −25 V; (b) response waveforms of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the DC bias voltages from 15 V to 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak response amplitude of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by different DC bias voltages.
Figure 7. (a) Response waveforms of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the DC bias voltages from −15 V to −25 V; (b) response waveforms of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by the DC bias voltages from 15 V to 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak response amplitude of the hydrophone when the CMUT was driven by different DC bias voltages.
Micromachines 12 00516 g007aMicromachines 12 00516 g007b
Micromachines 12 00516 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT receiving performance; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Figure 8. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT receiving performance; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Micromachines 12 00516 g008
Micromachines 12 00516 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Response waveforms of the CMUT-1# driven by the DC bias voltages from −15 V to −25 V; (b) response waveforms of the CMUT-1# driven by the DC bias voltages from 15 V to 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak response amplitude of the CMUT-1# driven by different DC bias voltages.
Figure 9. (a) Response waveforms of the CMUT-1# driven by the DC bias voltages from −15 V to −25 V; (b) response waveforms of the CMUT-1# driven by the DC bias voltages from 15 V to 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak response amplitude of the CMUT-1# driven by different DC bias voltages.
Micromachines 12 00516 g009
Micromachines 12 00516 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT pulse-echo signal; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Figure 10. (a) Schematic of the measurement setup of the CMUT pulse-echo signal; (b) photograph of the measurement setup.
Micromachines 12 00516 g010
Micromachines 12 00516 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) Pulse-echo impulse response; (b) the first pulse-echo impulse responses when the CMUT device was biased at 15 V, 20 V, and 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak amplitude of the first echo signals when the CMUT was driven by different DC bias voltages.
Figure 11. (a) Pulse-echo impulse response; (b) the first pulse-echo impulse responses when the CMUT device was biased at 15 V, 20 V, and 25 V; (c) peak-to-peak amplitude of the first echo signals when the CMUT was driven by different DC bias voltages.
Micromachines 12 00516 g011
Table
Table 1. Capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) device parameters.
Table 1. Capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) device parameters.
ParameterValue
Device size8800 μm × 8800 μm
Number of cells per device900 (30 × 30)
Cell size200 μm × 200 μm
Vacuum cavity diameter180 μm
Vacuum cavity gap distance0.65 μm
Oxide silicon Insulating dielectric thickness0.15 μm
Silicon membrane thickness2.83 μm
Silicon substrate thickness400 μm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, C.; Zhang, B.; Xue, C.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, S. Wafer-Bonding Fabricated CMUT Device with Parylene Coating. Micromachines 2021, 12, 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050516

AMA Style

He C, Zhang B, Xue C, Zhang W, Zhang S. Wafer-Bonding Fabricated CMUT Device with Parylene Coating. Micromachines. 2021; 12(5):516. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050516

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Changde, Binzhen Zhang, Chenyang Xue, Wendong Zhang, and Shengdong Zhang. 2021. "Wafer-Bonding Fabricated CMUT Device with Parylene Coating" Micromachines 12, no. 5: 516. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12050516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop