Next Article in Journal
Investigation of an Output Voltage Harmonic Suppression Strategy of a Power Quality Control Device for the High-End Manufacturing Industry
Next Article in Special Issue
Germanium-Tin (GeSn) Metal-Semiconductor-Metal (MSM) Near-Infrared Photodetectors
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation Study of FEUDT Structure Optimization and Sensitive Film Loading of SAW Devices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deformation Monitoring and Shape Reconstruction of Flexible Planer Structures Based on FBG
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

A Review of Fault Diagnosis Methods for Rotating Machinery Using Infrared Thermography

Micromachines 2022, 13(10), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101644
by Rongcai Wang, Xianbiao Zhan, Huajun Bai, Enzhi Dong, Zhonghua Cheng and Xisheng Jia *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2022, 13(10), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101644
Submission received: 6 September 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Infrared and Physical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Reviewed article concerns review of fault diagnosis methods for rotating machinery using infrared thermography and is write in accordance with generally accepted standards of the review works. After careful reading of the submitted text there are some substantive remarks that should be taken into consideration by the Authors to improve reviewed text.

1.      The abstract should include more information about motivation to proper such review and its significance.

2.      The Authors should more carefully and more detailed describe figures (e.g., Figure 1 requires an explanation of each graphic).

3.      Consistently provide sources for each figure and table if not authored.

4.      In review articles, it is good to indicate the contribution of the authors of the text to the field by presenting the results of the author's research along with the achievements of other centers.

5.      I suggest providing the main conclusions as numbered sentences.

6.      The conclusion should be improved in term of the new knowledge gained during analysis, which should be concise with the journal scope.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

see attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept as it is.

Back to TopTop