Next Article in Journal
Thermo-Mechanical Reliability Study of Through Glass Vias in 3D Interconnection
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication Methods and Chronic In Vivo Validation of Mechanically Adaptive Microfluidic Intracortical Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Suppression of the Electrical Crosstalk of Planar-Type High-Density InGaAs Detectors with a Guard Hole
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Three-Dimensional Nerve Stretch Growth Device towards an Implantable Neural Interface
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/mi13101798
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity

by
Samuel Ong
*,
Aura Kullmann
,
Steve Mertens
,
Dave Rosa
and
Camilo A Diaz-Botia
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN 55344, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(10), 1798; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101798
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 13 October 2022 / Accepted: 15 October 2022 / Published: 21 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress and Challenges of Implantable Neural Interfaces)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Subdural electrode arrays are used for monitoring cortical activity and functional brain mapping in patients with seizures. Until recently, the only commercially available arrays were silicone-based, whose thickness and lack of conformability could impact their performance. We designed, characterized, manufactured, and obtained FDA clearance for 29-day clinical use (510(k) K192764) of a new thin-film polyimide-based electrode array. This study describes the electrochemical characterization undertaken to evaluate the quality and reliability of electrical signal recordings and stimulation of these new arrays. Two testing paradigms were performed: a short-term active soak with electrical stimulation and a 29-day passive soak. Before and after each testing paradigm, the arrays were evaluated for their electrical performance using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) and Voltage Transients (VT). In all tests, the impedance remained within an acceptable range across all frequencies. The different CV curves showed no significant changes in shape or area, which is indicative of stable electrode material. The electrode polarization remained within appropriate limits to avoid hydrolysis.

1. Introduction

Subdural strip and grid electrodes are essential tools in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The electrodes are used (1) to record and monitor brain activity with the goal of precisely identifying abnormally seizing tissue and (2) to deliver electrical stimulation for functional brain mapping with the goal of identifying the relationship between eloquent cortical areas (e.g., speech, movement, vision) and seizure onset zones and propagation [1,2,3,4,5]. Recordings are conducted for various lengths of time, ranging from minutes (e.g., intraoperative monitoring during tissue resection) to up to 29 days (e.g., when monitoring patients in the epilepsy monitoring units, EMU) [1,2,3,4,5]. Neural activity is recorded over a wide frequency bandwidth, with the typical bandwidth of interest for epilepsy monitoring being between 1–500 Hz [6,7]. For electrical stimulation used for brain mapping, the stimulation parameters, i.e., the amplitude, pulse width, pulse frequency and duration, are established for each patient and brain area being stimulated [8,9,10,11,12,13]. For safety, the recommended limit on the charge density of a stimulation pulse is 30 µC/cm2 for electrodes having a geometric surface area of 0.06 cm2, based on histological evaluation of tissue damage in the brains of animal models [13,14,15,16,17,18].
While silicone-based subdural electrodes have been in the market for many years (first FDA clearance in 1985), they are thick (>0.5 mm) and not flexible enough to conform to brain convolutions. Several studies have shown that thickness and lack of conformability can impact the recording quality, put pressure on the brain, creating a ‘mass effect’, and ultimately increase the potential for post-operative complications [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. To overcome these issues, companies and academic research laboratories have focused on new materials, such as polymers, that can be more conformable, flexible (e.g., polyimide), and amenable to thin sheet (e.g., thinner than 0.1 mm) manufacturing processes. In this study, we describe a 0.08 mm thick electrode array made of polyimide with platinum (Pt) contacts [26].
The ability of subdural electrodes to perform their main functions, i.e., monitoring/recording brain signals with high fidelity over a wide frequency band and providing electrical stimulation to brain tissue within safe limits, depends on the electrode metal contact interaction with the tissue. Characterization of the electrode/tissue interface is a critical step in predicting electrode performance and detecting any potential failures that can impact electrode performance and safety. The typical methods employed for characterization include electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and voltage transient measurements (VT) [27]. EIS evaluates the recording capabilities of the electrodes. CV evaluates electrode contact materials like Pt and characterizes the potential oxidative or reductive reactions that take place at the interface between the contact and the brain. VT estimates the maximum charge that can be injected in a current-controlled stimulation pulse; this is necessary during stimulation for brain mapping to ensure that stimulation limits are below the safety limits for clinical use [13,14,15,16,17,18].
Given the importance of electrochemical characterization for electrode performance and safety, this study describes the results of electrochemical testing of a new, commercially available, thin-film polyimide subdural electrode intended for temporary use (less than 30-days).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Electrodes

Subdural electrode arrays were manufactured by NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation (Eden Prairie, MN, USA) as strips (e.g., 1 × 4, Figure 1) or grids (e.g., 4 × 4). The electrodes were made of polyimide thin-film substrate (0.08 mm) and high purity Pt as the electrode contact material [26]. The contacts are 3 mm in diameter and spaced 10 mm from center to center. From an electrochemical standpoint, the geometry and construction of the contacts are identical to any other model of the cortical array. Consequently, the testing presented in this study was performed on 1 × 4 grids, but the results are applicable to all models. The electrode connector, shown in Figure 1c, is an off-the-shelf flex circuit connector with a single-tail design and a proprietary cable assembly.

2.2. Testing Paradigms

The devices underwent two testing paradigms, a short-term electrochemical test and long-term soak followed by electrochemical testing (Figure 2). The short-term test was designed to determine whether the electrode properties are impacted by delivering the types of electrical stimulation required for brain mapping. The test consisted of electrical pulses delivered at parameters similar to functional brain mapping in the clinic [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Stimulation was performed using a Cosman G4 pulse generator (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Constant-current, charge-balanced stimulation pulses at 10 mA with a pulse width of 0.5 ms and a frequency of 50 Hz were run for a total of 125 s to deliver a total of 31,250 µC of charge on each contact pair of 1 × 4 grids; this represents the worst-case foreseeable charge level during clinical use of 24,210 µC [13,16,17] plus a safety factor of 1.3. All electrochemical tests were run within poly extraction vials containing 1× PBS solution (Antylia Scientific, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) at room temperature.
The long-term test was designed to determine whether there are changes in the electrode properties and its stimulation capabilities when exposed to phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for the duration of the longest authorized implantation period. The test consisted of electrical stimulation to establish baseline values followed by a 29-day passive soak, during which the devices were immersed in 1× PBS at body temperature (37 ± 3 °C). The test ended with electrical stimulation to simulate functional brain mapping. The results of pre- and post-testing were compared to evaluate changes in material performance.
To evaluate device performance over time, prior to and following each testing paradigm, devices were characterized using visual inspection and three types of electrochemical assessments (E-Chem tests, Figure 2): EIS, CV, and VT [27]. 12 contacts (3 arrays of 1 × 4 contacts) were evaluated for each testing paradigm.

2.3. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

The electrochemical tests were conducted with a Biologic SP-200 potentiostat (Biologic, Knoxville, TN, USA) controlled by Biologic EC-Lab software (Biologic, Knoxville, TN, USA) on a Windows-compatible computer.
EIS was performed in a three-electrode cell configuration with an Ag/AgCl (Antylia Scientific, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) reference electrode, a high-area platinized titanium counter electrode (Salmue, China), and the electrode to be analyzed as the working electrode, all immersed in 1× PBS at room temperature. EIS was measured in potential control mode with a sinus amplitude of Va = 10 mV between frequencies of 1Hz to 100 kHz with 12 frequencies per decade and 20 measurements per frequency [28,29,30]. Data analysis was performed to determine the average impedance magnitude and phase at 100 Hz and 1 kHz. The average thermal noise introduced by the electrochemical interface was calculated as the sum of thermal noise at each frequency bin within the bandwidth of interest for epilepsy monitoring (1–500 Hz) [14,15,18]. Frequency bins were created within 1–500 Hz around each frequency at which impedance was measured, and thermal noise was calculated for each bin. The minimum and maximum bandwidth, which is the total range of frequencies that the signal occupies, were calculated for each frequency bin. The local noise within each bin, Vrms, was calculated using the equation Vrms = √4kTBR, where k was the Boltzmann constant, T was the temperature (37 °C), B was the difference between the minimum and maximum bin bandwidth, and R was the impedance magnitude. The thermal noise for the 1–500 Hz bandwidth was then calculated as the square root of the sum of thermal noise power (Vrms2) of each bin.

2.4. Cyclic Voltammetry

The devices were designed to record electrical signals with high fidelity as well as deliver electrical stimulation for brain mapping. Pt was chosen as the contact material for this interface due to its high electrical conductivity, inert nature, and corrosion resistance [31,32,33]. To demonstrate that Pt is the only electrochemically active material on the device, CV was used to evaluate the behavior of the device as a function of electrical potential. This experiment also characterized the electrochemically active material within the device to evaluate whether nonreversible chemical reactions occur within clinically relevant potentials [34]. CV was performed in the same three-electrode cell setup described previously. The voltammograms of the electrodes were scanned between potential limits of −0.8 V to 1.2 V at a scan rate of 50 mV/s [35]; these limits were established through a wide voltaic sweep from −2 V to 2 V on a separate device to determine the voltages at which large-scale runaway reactions would begin to occur, also known as the water window. Data analysis was performed to determine the Faradaic peaks on the plot and their accompanying reactionary sequence. The average charge storage capacity, defined as the maximum charge available for a single electrical pulse, was calculated by integrating the entire voltammogram and dividing it by the scan rate and working surface area.

2.5. Voltage Transients

VT measurements demonstrated the polarization of the device during typical stimulation parameters and were used to determine whether over-polarization occurred. VT was performed in a three-electrode cell configuration with an Ag/AgCl (Antylia Scientific, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) reference electrode, and the electrode pair to be analyzed as the counter and working electrodes, all immersed in 1× PBS at room temperature. Constant-current, cathodic-first, charge-balanced stimulation was performed at 4 mA and a 10 µs interphase delay. VTs with a pulse width of 200 µs were run before and after testing to ensure that baseline electrical pulses were able to be applied without over-polarizing the electrodes. VTs with a pulse width of 535 µs were run after simulation to determine if the application of electrical pulses at the clinically relevant charge density of 30 µC/cm2 would over-polarize the electrodes. Three sets of pulses were run during each trial [34]. Data analysis was performed to determine the maximum change in voltage during polarization. This value was taken from the potential at the end of the current pulse, which represented the highest amount of polarization that the electrode would be subjected to during testing.

2.6. Visual Inspection

Visual inspection of all contacts was performed before and after each testing paradigm using an Olympus BX60MF microscope (Olympus, Shinjuku City, Tokyo, Japan). The test assessed the presence of degradation and corrosion qualitatively.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences between pre- and post-electrochemical testing values for each parameter were tested using paired one-tail Student’s t-test. Statistically significant differences between pre- and post-electrochemical testing variance values for EIS and thermal noise were tested using paired two-tail Student’s F-test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Short-Term Electrochemical Testing

The electrochemical impedance magnitude and phase spectrograms for all contacts before and after short-term stimulation are illustrated in Figure 3. Prior to stimulation, the impedance magnitude as a function of frequency showed a linear negative slope from 1 Hz to 3 kHz, with values ranging from 150 Ω to 10 kΩ. From 3 kHz to 100 kHz, the slope of the magnitude was near 0, and values asymptotically approached 100 Ω. After stimulation, the impedance magnitude showed a similar trend, i.e., linear negative slope from 1 Hz to 3 kHz, with values ranging from 150 Ω to 2.5 kΩ, and asymptotically approached 100 Ω from 3 kHz to 100 kHz. Similar behavior was observed for the phase. Prior to stimulation, the phase angle was −80° between 1 Hz to 10 Hz and then showed a linear positive slope from 100 Hz to 10 kHz, with values ranging from −80° to 0°. From 10 kHz to 100 kHz, the slope of the phase was near 0 and values asymptotically approached 0°. After short-term stimulation, the phase displayed similar trends, with the phase angle showing a linear positive slope from 1 Hz to 1 kHz.
The average impedance magnitude and phase at 100 Hz and 1 kHz decreased post-stimulation (Table 1). The variability of the measurements also decreased (F-tests performed on the variance of the impedance data revealed that they were statistically different; p < 0.05). The average thermal noise within the 1–500 Hz frequency band was 0.445 ± 0.0311 µVrms and 0.275 ± 0.0244 µVrms before and after stimulation, respectively (p < 0.05). This indicates that stimulation does not increase thermal noise and suggests that the quality of the recordings will not degrade after stimulation.
In the CV experiments, the voltammograms showed faradaic peaks corresponding to Pt-O and Pt-H electrochemical reactions (Figure 4). The voltages and current magnitudes of these peaks are shown in Table 2. The average charge storage capacity for these experiments before and after electrical stimulation was 745 ± 13.6 and 747 ± 11.9 µC/cm2, respectively (p > 0.05).
The VT measurements at 200 µs pulse widths showed that the electrodes reached a maximum polarization of 0.380 ± 0.044 V and 0.392 ± 0.041 V before and after electrical stimulation, respectively (p > 0.05). The VT measurement at 535 µs pulse width reached a maximum polarization of 0.658 ± 0.100 V and is shown in Figure 5; these values were within the clinically safe limits of −0.8 to 1.2 V [34].
Visual inspection of all contacts revealed no corrosion, degradation, or metal delamination (example in Figure 6a,b).

3.2. Long-Term Electrochemical Testing

The electrochemical impedance magnitude and phase spectrograms for all contacts before and after 29-day soaking are illustrated in Figure 7. Before soaking, the impedance magnitude showed a linear negative slope from 1 Hz to 100 Hz, with values ranging from approximately 125 Ω to 5.6 kΩ. From 100 Hz to 100 kHz, the slope of the magnitude was near 0 and asymptotically approached 100 Ω. After soaking (long-term electrochemical testing), the magnitude of impedance showed a linear negative slope from 1 Hz to 100 Hz, with values ranging from approximately 125 Ω to 3.1 kΩ, and asymptotically approached 100 Ω from 100 Hz to 100 kHz. Prior to soaking, the phase angle showed a positive linear slope from −75° to 0° between 1 Hz to 10 kHz and asymptotically approached 0° at higher frequencies. After soaking, the phase angle had a positive linear slope from −75° to 0° between 1 Hz to 300 Hz and asymptotically approached 0° from 300 Hz to 100 kHz. The average impedance magnitude and phase at 100 Hz and 1 kHz decreased post-stimulation (Table 3). The variability of the measurements also decreased (F-tests performed on the variance of the impedance data revealed that they were statistically different; p < 0.05). The average thermal noise within the 1–500 Hz frequency band was 0.361 ± 0.0271 µVrms and 0.114 ± 0.0138 µVrms before and after stimulation, respectively (p < 0.05).
The voltammograms showed faradaic peaks before and after stimulation that were indicative of Pt-O and Pt-H electrochemical reactions (Figure 8). The voltages and current magnitudes of these peaks are shown in Table 4. The average charge storage capacity before and after soaking was 741 ± 17.2 and 681 ± 22.3 µC/cm2, respectively (p < 0.05).
The voltage transient measurements at 200 µs pulse width showed that the maximum change in voltage during polarization at 4 mA was 0.405 ± 0.030 V and 0.411 ± 0.036 V before and after soak and electrical stimulation, respectively (p > 0.05). The VT measurement at 535 µs pulse width reached a maximum polarization of 0.668 ± 0.075 V (Figure 9); this indicates that the electrodes did not over-polarize past the clinically safe limits of −0.8 and 1.2 V.
Optical analysis of all contacts revealed no visual contact corrosion, degradation, or metal delamination due to electrical stimulation (example in Figure 6c,d).

4. Discussion

This study tested the electrochemical properties of the first thin-film-based cortical electrode cleared by the FDA for less than 30-day clinical use. The characterization techniques presented here represent the standard characterization and have been extensively used in academic settings [27,28,30,37], providing a large body of literature to quantitively compare the characteristics and performance of commercially available subdural electrodes. Characteristics such as signal-to-noise ratio and the ability of the device to safely apply electrical stimulation are important to clinicians who intend to use these devices [30,32,34,38]. In this study, the electrochemical properties of the characterized electrodes demonstrate that the impedance of the contacts falls within ranges known to provide low noise recordings (up to 1 kΩ) [28,30] at the frequencies of interest for epilepsy monitoring [8,12]. Similarly, the results demonstrate that the contact material has adequate properties to deliver electrical pulses and does not exhibit degradation after the expected maximum levels of stimulation during the intended application [34].
The key metrics of interest in the electrochemical characterization of the cortical electrodes were the ability to record neural signals in the bandwidth relevant to epilepsy monitoring, the ability to apply electrical stimulation without material degradation, and the ability to inject enough electrical charge as expected in cases of most exhaustive brain mapping. The test protocols written and implemented for each of these metrics were electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and voltage transients of devices subjected to passive soak and electrical stimulation [27]. In addition, a visual inspection to evaluate the material surface was carried out for each electrode. The EIS measurements (Figure 3 and Figure 7) showed the expected frequency-dependent behavior of an electrochemical interface due to the capacitive component [29]: low impedance magnitude at phase near zero degrees for high frequency, high impedance magnitude with phase near ninety degrees for low frequencies, and a logarithmic dependency of magnitude and phase on frequency. At high frequencies (e.g., >3 kHz), where the impedance is dominated by the impedance of the electrode itself [29,39], the impedance magnitude plateaued near 100 Ω. At other characteristic frequencies like 100 Hz and 1 kHz, the impedance is similar or lower than the impedance of other reported electrode contacts of similar dimensions; these other contacts have performance that can range in the order of kΩ, despite them not been subjected to special surface treatments or coatings intended to lower impedance [15,30]. The low average thermal noise further showed that the electrodes are capable of high-fidelity signal recording. Post-stimulation recordings indicated that the impedance magnitude, phase, and thermal noise decreased. The variability of these measurements also decreased (statistically significant differences in variance for magnitude and phase) relative to pre-stimulation values (Table 1 and Table 3). It is likely that the polarization of the device removed any residual impurities on the electrochemical interface of the contacts due to cyclic voltammetry and stimulation, which resulted in more precise readings [40]. The removal of these impurities would have enlarged the electrochemically active interface, which would result in lower impedance.
With regards to the electrode’s ability to safely perform electrical stimulation, the voltammograms of all contacts tested had faradaic peaks indicative of Pt metals with anodic and cathodic peaks at voltages characteristic of Pt-O and Pt-H reactions [32,33]. As stated previously, Pt is a common electrochemically inert material widely used in neural devices due to its high corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and electrical properties [32,33,34]. The CV curves (Figure 4 and Figure 8) are characteristic of pure Pt, with no additional peaks associated to alternative materials observed [32,33]. The charge storage capacity of the devices was higher than the clinically recommended charge application limit of 30 µC/cm2, meaning that no charge was lost during stimulation [36]. Similarly, the results from the voltage transient measurements show that the electrode was not over-polarized when stimulated up to the recommended charge limit of 30 µC/cm2 (Table 2 and Table 4, Figure 5 and Figure 9) [13,14,15,16,17,18,35,41]; this helps confirm the devices’ ability to operate in the range of clinically relevant charge densities of 0–30 µC/cm2. Lastly, the lack of changes in the quality and surface appearance of the electrode contacts, as assessed by visual inspections (Figure 6) provides a demonstration that the Pt films are not being degraded or corroded.
The electrodes characterized as part of this study showed statistically significant differences in the EIS and CV results before and after soak and/or electrical stimulation. While all ranges measured were demonstrated to be safe and functional, the root of this variability is of particular interest. The EIS distribution of working electrode contacts in similar designs is often very tight [42,43]. Both measurements are particularly sensitive to the surface area [44], and it is hypothesized that the variation within the allowable tolerance of the contact diameter, as well as the variation of the surface roughness of the Pt film, can account for the variability in the measurements. As stated previously, the polarization of the devices during the presence of electrical signals can lead to changes on the electrochemical surface, such as the removal of impurities; these events alter the electrochemically active surface area, which results in shifts in the EIS and CV data. All data before and after soak and electrical stimulation were within clinically safe ranges, despite their statistical significance from one another.
It is important to highlight the context within which these experiments were carried out, which was to provide necessary data for the FDA to clear these devices for commercial use for recording brain activity and performing brain stimulation for periods of less than 30 days; these results demonstrated baseline reliability and electrical safety of the devices and validated that stimulation and electrical detection capabilities were maintained for up to 29 days; these results were the basis to set passing criteria and develop test methods performed during design verification of the NeuroOne Evo Cortical electrode. Additional formal testing for biocompatibility [26], sterility, mechanical properties, lot-to-lot variability, shelf life, and other qualities of the device was conducted to gain clearance of this device.

5. Conclusions

Electrochemical evaluation is a critical step in the path to the commercialization of implantable medical devices. This study presented the electrochemical characterization of the first thin-film-based cortical electrode cleared by the FDA for commercial use for recording brain activity and brain stimulation for less than 30 days. Techniques including electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and voltage transients were used within the context of electrically passive and active simulations to demonstrate the expected performance of this electrode. All measurements performed were consistent with commercially available subdural electrodes reported in previous academic articles, and all tests demonstrated acceptable performance of the device. Currently, this subdural electrode is being successfully used clinically, indicating that the bench top tests were adequate to predict safe and effective electrochemical performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, S.O., S.M., D.R., C.A.D.-B. and A.K.; data curation, writing–original draft preparation, S.O., A.K. and C.A.D.-B.; writing–review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, S.O., S.M., D.R., C.A.D.-B. and A.K.; funding acquisition, D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in the manuscript and on file at NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the entire NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation team of engineers and scientists for the design, testing and fabrication of the electrodes used in these studies. We also thank the personnel at Legend Technical Services, the contract organization that carried out a part of the characterization included in this study, and Debra Kridner, who handled the FDA application for the clearance of these electrodes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, L.H.; Parker, J.J.; Ho, A.L.; Feng, A.Y.; Kumar, K.K.; Chen, K.S.; Ojukwu, D.I.; Shuer, L.M.; Grant, G.A.; Graber, K.D.; et al. Contemporaneous evaluation of patient experience, surgical strategy, and seizure outcomes in patients undergoing stereoelectroencephalography or subdural electrode monitoring. Epilepsia 2021, 62, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, L.H.; Parker, J.J.; Ho, A.L.; Pendharkar, A.V.; Sussman, E.S.; Halpern, C.H.; Porter, B.; Grant, G.A. Postoperative outcomes following pediatric intracranial electrode monitoring: A case for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Epilepsy Behav. 2020, 104, 106905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mullin, J.P.; Shriver, M.; Alomar, S.; Najm, I.; Bulacio, J.; Chauvel, P.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J. Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 386–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Punia, V.; Bulacio, J.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J.; Abdelkader, A.; Bingaman, W.; Najm, I.; Stojic, A. Extra operative intracranial EEG monitoring for epilepsy surgery in elderly patients. Epilepsy Behav. Case Rep. 2018, 10, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sacino, M.F.; Huang, S.S.; Schreiber, J.; Gaillard, W.D.; Oluigbo, C.O. Is the use of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Safe and Effective in Children? A Meta-Analysis of the use of Stereotactic Electroencephalography in Comparison to Subdural Grids for Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring in Pediatric Subjects. Neurosurgery 2019, 84, 1190–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hill, N.J.; Gupta, D.; Brunner, P.; Gunduz, A.; Adamo, M.A.; Ritaccio, A.; Schalk, G. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 64, e3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jayakar, P.; Gotman, J.; Harvey, A.S.; Palmini, A.; Tassi, L.; Schomer, D.; Dubeau, F.; Bartolomei, F.; Yu, A.; Krsek, P.; et al. Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 1735–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lachaux, J.P.; Axmacher, N.; Mormann, F.; Halgren, E.; Crone, N.E. High-frequency neural activity and human cognition: Past, present and possible future of intracranial EEG research. Prog. Neurobiol. 2012, 98, 279–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Miller, K.J.; Honey, C.J.; Hermes, D.; Rao, R.P.; denNijs, M.; Ojemann, J.G. Broadband changes in the cortical surface potential track activation of functionally diverse neuronal populations. Neuroimage 2014, 85 Pt 2, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Roland, J.; Brunner, P.; Johnston, J.; Schalk, G.; Leuthardt, E.C. Passive real-time identification of speech and motor cortex during an awake craniotomy. Epilepsy Behav. 2010, 18, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Taplin, A.M.; de Pesters, A.; Brunner, P.; Hermes, D.; Dalfino, J.C.; Adamo, M.A.; Ritaccio, A.L.; Schalk, G. Intraoperative mapping of expressive language cortex using passive real-time electrocorticography. Epilepsy Behav. Case Rep. 2016, 5, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Worrell, G.; Gotman, J. High-frequency oscillations and other electrophysiological biomarkers of epilepsy: Clinical studies. Biomark. Med. 2011, 5, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kuncel, A.M.; Grill, W.M. Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115, 2431–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harris, A.R.; Allitt, B.J.; Paolini, A.G. Predicting neural recording performance of implantable electrodes. Analyst 2019, 144, 2973–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lempka, S.F.; Johnson, M.D.; Barnett, D.W.; Moffitt, M.A.; Otto, K.J.; Kipke, D.R.; McIntyre, C.C. Optimization of microelectrode design for cortical recording based on thermal noise considerations. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2006, 2006, 3361–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McCreery, D.B.; Agnew, W.F.; Yuen, T.G.; Bullara, L. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shannon, R.V. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1992, 39, 424–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Szabo, B.; Gueli, C.; Eickenscheidt, M.; Stieglitz, T. Polyimide-based Thin Film Conductors for High Frequency Data Transmission in Ultra-Conformable Implants. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 6, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Araki, T.; Otsubo, H.; Makino, Y.; Elliott, I.; Iida, K.; Ochi, A.; Weiss, S.K.; Chuang, S.H.; Rutka, J.T.; Snead, O.C. Efficacy of dexamathasone on cerebral swelling and seizures during subdural grid EEG recording in children. Epilepsia 2006, 47, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Carnicer-Lombarte, A.; Chen, S.T.; Malliaras, G.G.; Barone, D.G. Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 622524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fong, J.S.; Alexopoulos, A.V.; Bingaman, W.E.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J.; Prayson, R.A. Pathologic findings associated with invasive EEG monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 138, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mocco, J.; Komotar, R.J.; Ladouceur, A.K.; Zacharia, B.E.; Goodman, R.R.; McKhann, G.M. Radiographic characteristics fail to predict clinical course after subdural electrode placement. Neurosurgery 2006, 58, 120–125; discussion 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nagahama, Y.; Dlouhy, B.J.; Nakagawa, D.; Kamm, J.; Hasan, D.; Howard, M.A.; Kawasaki, H. Bone flap elevation for intracranial EEG monitoring: Technical note. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 129, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tong, B.A.; Esquenazi, Y.; Johnson, J.; Zhu, P.; Tandon, N. The Brain is Not Flat: Conformal Electrode Arrays Diminish Complications of Subdural Electrode Implantation, A Series of 117 Cases. World Neurosurg. 2020, 144, e734–e742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Van Gompel, J.J.; Worrell, G.A.; Bell, M.L.; Patrick, T.A.; Cascino, G.D.; Raffel, C.; Marsh, W.R.; Meyer, F.B. Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural grid electrodes: Techniques, complications, and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2008, 63, 498–505; discussion 505–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kullmann, A.; Kridner, D.; Mertens, S.; Christianson, M.; Rosa, D.; Diaz-Botia, C.A. First Food and Drug Administration Cleared Thin-Film Electrode for Intracranial Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity-Part 1: Biocompatibility Testing. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 876877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boehler, C.; Carli, S.; Fadiga, L.; Stieglitz, T.; Asplund, M. Tutorial: Guidelines for standardized performance tests for electrodes intended for neural interfaces and bioelectronics. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 3557–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gardner, A.T.; Strathman, H.J.; Walker, R.M. A multiplexed electrochemical measurement system for characterization of implanted electrodes. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Seville, Spain, 12–14 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lempka, S.F.; Miocinovic, S.; Johnson, M.D.; Vitek, J.L.; McIntyre, C.C. In vivo impedance spectroscopy of deep brain stimulation electrodes. J. Neural Eng. 2009, 6, 046001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wilks, S.J.; Richner, T.J.; Brodnick, S.K.; Kipke, D.R.; Williams, J.C.; Otto, K.J. Voltage biasing, cyclic voltammetry, & electrical impedance spectroscopy for neural interfaces. J. Vis. Exp. 2012, 60, e3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Doering, M.; Kieninger, J.; Urban, G.A.; Weltin, A. Electrochemical microelectrode degradation monitoring: In situ investigation of platinum corrosion at neutral pH. J. Neural Eng. 2022, 19, 016005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, X.; Sui, X.; Lu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zhou, C.; Li, L.; Ren, Q.; Chai, X. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a photosensitive polyimide thin-film microelectrode array suitable for epiretinal stimulation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2013, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sun, A.; Franc, J.; Macdonald, D.D. Growth and Properties of Oxide Films on Platinum: I. EIS and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Studies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, B260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Merrill, D.R.; Bikson, M.; Jefferys, J.G. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: Design of efficacious and safe protocols. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005, 141, 171–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ghazavi, A.; Cogan, S.F. Electrochemical characterization of high frequency stimulation electrodes: Role of electrode material and stimulation parameters on electrode polarization. J. Neural Eng. 2018, 15, 036023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hudak, E.M.; Kumsa, D.W.; Martin, H.B.; Mortimer, J.T. Electron transfer processes occurring on platinum neural stimulating electrodes: Calculated charge-storage capacities are inaccessible during applied stimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2017, 14, 046012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Weiland, J.D.; Anderson, D.J. Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 47, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Suarez-Perez, A.; Gabriel, G.; Rebollo, B.; Illa, X.; Guimera-Brunet, A.; Hernandez-Ferrer, J.; Martinez, M.T.; Villa, R.; Sanchez-Vives, M.V. Quantification of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Cerebral Cortex Recordings Using Flexible MEAs With Co-localized Platinum Black, Carbon Nanotubes, and Gold Electrodes. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fontes, M.B.A. Electrodes for bio-application: Recording and stimulation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 421, 012019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kyaw, T.T.; Hanawa, T.; Kasugai, S. Investigation of different electrochemical cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments in vitro: An approach for metal surface decontamination. Int. J. Implant. Dent. 2020, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harris, A.T. Current perspectives on the safe electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves with platinum electrodes. Bioelectron. Med. 2020, 3, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, B.; Rodriguez, A.V.; Vercosa, D.G.; Kemere, C.; Robinson, J.T. Sputtered porous Pt for wafer-scale manufacture of low-impedance flexible microelectrodes. J. Neural Eng. 2020, 17, 036029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Liu, H.; Bhonsle, S.P.; Wang, Y.; Davalos, R.V.; Yao, C. Ablation outcome of irreversible electroporation on potato monitored by impedance spectrum under multi-electrode system. Biomed. Eng. Online 2018, 17, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Green, R.A.; Matteucci, P.B.; Dodds, C.W.; Palmer, J.; Dueck, W.F.; Hassarati, R.T.; Byrnes-Preston, P.J.; Lovell, N.H.; Suaning, G.J. Laser patterning of platinum electrodes for safe neurostimulation. J. Neural Eng. 2014, 11, 056017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Micromachines 13 01798 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Picture of a 1 × 4 strip, tail, and connector. (b) High magnification of the electrode contacts. (c) 5× magnification of the connector.
Figure 1. (a) Picture of a 1 × 4 strip, tail, and connector. (b) High magnification of the electrode contacts. (c) 5× magnification of the connector.
Micromachines 13 01798 g001
Micromachines 13 01798 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of testing paradigms. E-Chem tests consisted of EIS, CV, and VT.
Figure 2. Schematic of testing paradigms. E-Chem tests consisted of EIS, CV, and VT.
Micromachines 13 01798 g002
Micromachines 13 01798 g003 550
Figure 3. EIS plots before and after short-term electrochemical testing. Impedance magnitude (left Y scale) and impedance phase (right Y scale) are plotted as a function of frequency. The red and blue lines are impedance magnitude measurements made before and after the electrochemical testing, respectively. The dashed lines represent all data recorded, and the solid lines are the averages of the respective category.
Figure 3. EIS plots before and after short-term electrochemical testing. Impedance magnitude (left Y scale) and impedance phase (right Y scale) are plotted as a function of frequency. The red and blue lines are impedance magnitude measurements made before and after the electrochemical testing, respectively. The dashed lines represent all data recorded, and the solid lines are the averages of the respective category.
Micromachines 13 01798 g003
Micromachines 13 01798 g004 550
Figure 4. CV plots before and after short-term electrochemical testing. The dashed red and blue lines represent measurements made before and after electrical stimulation, respectively. The solid red and blue lines are the averages of the values before and after electrical stimulation, respectively.
Figure 4. CV plots before and after short-term electrochemical testing. The dashed red and blue lines represent measurements made before and after electrical stimulation, respectively. The solid red and blue lines are the averages of the values before and after electrical stimulation, respectively.
Micromachines 13 01798 g004
Micromachines 13 01798 g005 550
Figure 5. VT plot of one set of pulses at a charge density of 30 µC/cm2 after short-term electrochemical testing.
Figure 5. VT plot of one set of pulses at a charge density of 30 µC/cm2 after short-term electrochemical testing.
Micromachines 13 01798 g005
Micromachines 13 01798 g006 550
Figure 6. Visual inspection of electrodes. Selected images of electrode contacts pre- and post-electrochemical testing on the left (a,c) and right (b,d), respectively. The top images (a,b) are from short-term electrochemical testing, and the bottom images (c,d) are from long-term electrochemical testing. The contact is 3 mm, and the magnification is 5×.
Figure 6. Visual inspection of electrodes. Selected images of electrode contacts pre- and post-electrochemical testing on the left (a,c) and right (b,d), respectively. The top images (a,b) are from short-term electrochemical testing, and the bottom images (c,d) are from long-term electrochemical testing. The contact is 3 mm, and the magnification is 5×.
Micromachines 13 01798 g006
Micromachines 13 01798 g007 550
Figure 7. EIS plots before and after long-term electrochemical testing. Impedance magnitude (left Y scale) and impedance phase (right Y scale) are plotted as a function of frequency. The red and blue lines are impedance magnitude and phase measurements made before and after soak and electrical stimulation, respectively. The dashed lines represent all data recorded, and the solid lines are the averages of the respective category.
Figure 7. EIS plots before and after long-term electrochemical testing. Impedance magnitude (left Y scale) and impedance phase (right Y scale) are plotted as a function of frequency. The red and blue lines are impedance magnitude and phase measurements made before and after soak and electrical stimulation, respectively. The dashed lines represent all data recorded, and the solid lines are the averages of the respective category.
Micromachines 13 01798 g007
Micromachines 13 01798 g008 550
Figure 8. CV plots before and after long-term electrochemical testing. The dashed red and blue lines represent measurements made before and after soak an eletrical stimulation, respectively. The solid red and blue lines are the averages of the values before and after soak and electrical stimulation, respectively, respectively.
Figure 8. CV plots before and after long-term electrochemical testing. The dashed red and blue lines represent measurements made before and after soak an eletrical stimulation, respectively. The solid red and blue lines are the averages of the values before and after soak and electrical stimulation, respectively, respectively.
Micromachines 13 01798 g008
Micromachines 13 01798 g009 550
Figure 9. VT plot of one set of pulses at a charge density of 30 µC/cm2 after long-term electrochemical testing.
Figure 9. VT plot of one set of pulses at a charge density of 30 µC/cm2 after long-term electrochemical testing.
Micromachines 13 01798 g009
Table
Table 1. EIS measurements before and after short-term test.
Table 1. EIS measurements before and after short-term test.
100 Hz1 kHz
Magnitude (Ω)Phase (°)Magnitude (Ω)Phase (°)
Before218.72 ± 39.29−37.22 ± 5.72133.02 ± 8.33−10.88 ± 2.78
After146.83 ± 5.43 *−20.46 ± 0.74 *127.32 ± 5.48−4.29 ± 0.25 *
Average and standard deviation of impedance magnitude and phase before and after short-term stimulation at 100 Hz and 1 kHz. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between pre- and post-values, tested using a paired t-test.
Table
Table 2. CV faradaic peaks and associated electrochemical reactions before and after short-term electrochemical testing.
Table 2. CV faradaic peaks and associated electrochemical reactions before and after short-term electrochemical testing.
Before StimulationAfter StimulationRelevant Reaction
Peak Voltage (V)Peak Current (mA)Peak Voltage (V)Peak Current (mA)
−0.25−0.18−0.22−0.21Pt-O reduction
−0.70−0.14−0.70−0.17Pt-H reduction
−0.520.08−0.510.10Pt-H oxidation
−0.450.07−0.450.08Pt-H oxidation
The relevant reaction was determined according to previous studies [36].
Table
Table 3. EIS measurements before and after long-term electrochemical testing.
Table 3. EIS measurements before and after long-term electrochemical testing.
100 Hz1 kHz
Magnitude (Ω)Phase (°)Magnitude (Ω)Phase (°)
Before211.23 ± 39.29−39.20 ± 5.72124.01 ± 8.33−11.75 ± 2.78
After133.81 ± 5.43 *−16.39 ± 0.74 *120.39 ± 5.48 *−3.28 ± 0.25 *
Average and standard deviation of impedance magnitude and phase before and after short-term stimulation at 100 Hz and 1 kHz. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between pre- and post-values, tested using a paired t-test.
Table
Table 4. CV faradaic peaks and associated electrochemical reactions before and after long-term electrochemical testing.
Table 4. CV faradaic peaks and associated electrochemical reactions before and after long-term electrochemical testing.
Before StimulationAfter StimulationRelevant Reaction
Peak Voltage (V)Peak Current (mA)Peak Voltage (V)Peak Current (mA)
−0.25−0.18−0.23−0.17Pt-O reduction
−0.75−0.17−0.76−0.16Pt-H reduction
−0.550.07−0.550.08Pt-H oxidation
−0.420.08−0.400.06Pt-H oxidation
The relevant reaction was determined according to previous studies [36].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ong, S.; Kullmann, A.; Mertens, S.; Rosa, D.; Diaz-Botia, C.A. Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101798

AMA Style

Ong S, Kullmann A, Mertens S, Rosa D, Diaz-Botia CA. Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity. Micromachines. 2022; 13(10):1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101798

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ong, Samuel, Aura Kullmann, Steve Mertens, Dave Rosa, and Camilo A Diaz-Botia. 2022. "Electrochemical Testing of a New Polyimide Thin Film Electrode for Stimulation, Recording, and Monitoring of Brain Activity" Micromachines 13, no. 10: 1798. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13101798

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop