Next Article in Journal
Advanced MMC-Based Hydrostatic Bearings for Enhanced Linear Motion in Ultraprecision and Micromachining Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Application Prospects of a Silicon-Based MEMS Safety and Arming Device for a Micro-Explosive Train
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Defecation Warning Monitor Based on ScAlN Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT)

by
Tao Yao
1,2,
Jianwei Zong
1,2,
Haoyue Zhang
1,2,
Zhiyuan Hou
1,2 and
Liang Lou
1,2,*
1
School of Microelectronics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 201800, China
2
The Shanghai Industrial µTechnology Research Institute, Shanghai 201899, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(5), 498; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050498
Submission received: 21 March 2025 / Revised: 20 April 2025 / Accepted: 22 April 2025 / Published: 24 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section A:Physics)

Abstract

:
This study proposes an innovative health management solution to address the defecation care needs of the elderly population. Traditional post-defecation care methods have significant limitations, particularly imposing a considerable psychological burden on patients. By leveraging the rich physiological information contained in bowel sounds, in this work, we designed and implemented a wearable defecation warning monitor based on scandium aluminum nitride (ScAlN) piezoelectric thin films and piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs). The proposed device mainly incorporates two core components: a bowel sound signal acquisition module and a real-time signal display graphical user interface (GUI) developed using the MATLAB R2023a platform. The research focuses on the systematic characterization and comparative analysis of the sound pressure sensitivity of three different signal readout structures. Experimental results demonstrate that the differential readout structure exhibits superior sensitivity. By continuously monitoring bowel sounds in healthy subjects both with and without the urge to defecate using the defecation warning monitor and a modified stethoscope, and conducting a comparative analysis of the experimental data, it is verified that the defecation warning monitor has significant advantages in clinical applications and demonstrates promising potential for defecation warning monitoring.

1. Introduction

The detrimental effects of population aging on social structures have become increasingly evident. With progressive declines in physiological functions, an increasing proportion of older patients experience difficulties in bowel care. According to a clinical study data, there is a significant difference in the incidence of fecal incontinence among elderly patients who have to be hospitalized due to medical needs, ranging from 17% to 66% [1]. Notably, advanced age (particularly over 80 years), neurological disorders, prolonged bedridden status, and polypharmacy correlate with higher incidence rates, often approaching the upper limit of this range. This phenomenon highlights the importance of defecation care in clinical nursing of hospitalized elderly patients.
Defecation care comprises pre-defecation and post-defecation components. Hospitals more commonly implement post-defecation care, which involves fecal collection devices, absorbent products, or specialized beds. However, these reactive measures cause significant psychological distress, and prolonged skin exposure to feces increases infection risks [2]. In contrast, pre-defecation care may prevent skin infections, allow better preparation for healthcare providers, and maintain patient dignity. Developing effective pre-defecation care devices requires accurate monitoring of defecation intentions.
The advancement of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) technology has significantly propelled the field of ultrasonic transducers. Micro-machined ultrasonic transducers (MUTs), owing to their advantages in production cost and performance, have been widely applied in numerous domains. As the core of MEMS-based acoustic sensing technology, MUTs primarily include capacitive micro-machined ultrasonic transducers (CMUTs) and piezoelectric micro-machined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs). The former relies on parallel-plate capacitors for electroacoustic energy conversion, while the latter utilizes the direct and inverse piezoelectric effects of piezoelectric materials for energy transduction. CMUT is significantly affected by parasitic capacitance [3] and requires high bias voltage. Despite their advantages such as high detection sensitivity and wide operating bandwidth, they still face many limitations in miniaturization and precise detection. In contrast, PMUT is not limited by the condition of high bias voltage, with a compact structure and low power consumption, making it increasingly prominent in modern ultrasound sensing applications. PMUTs have a wide range of applications, including gas flow measurement [4,5], solid defect detection [6], MEMS hydrophones [7], ultrasonic echo ranging [8], and wireless energy transfer [9]. In related research, Kim et al. designed a wearable intestinal alert system based on bowel sound acquisition using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric thin-film sensors [10]. However, compared to aluminum nitride (AlN), PVDF is more susceptible to moisture and UV exposure, leading to the gradual degradation of its piezoelectric properties over extended use. As an inorganic material, AlN demonstrates a significantly longer operational lifetime. Additionally, PVDF’s piezoelectric coefficients are sensitive to temperature and other environmental factors. In contrast, although AlN has a smaller piezoelectric coefficient, it demonstrates better stability within a certain temperature range. Nakanishi and colleagues developed a bowel movement detection device that utilizes an ultrasonic sensor to monitor rectal conditions [11]. The system works by receiving and comparing ultrasonic echo signals to detect changes in rectal thickness. However, ultrasound-based intestinal monitoring cannot provide real-time sensing, which limits its practicality for daily monitoring.
This research introduces a novel wearable defecation warning monitor utilizing PMUT technology. The device demonstrates exceptional sensitivity (−151 ± 1 dB) and enables the continuous real-time monitoring of intestinal sounds, allowing the timely detection of defecation urges. The system architecture comprises two main components: (1) a sensor module integrating signal conditioning circuits and a PMUT array, and (2) a MATLAB-based graphical user interface for data visualization and storage via a DAQ (Data Acquisition) card. Validation experiments were conducted on healthy male subjects under two physiological conditions: with and without defecation urges. Both the proposed PMUT-based defecation warning monitor and a modified electronic stethoscope were employed for comparative assessment. The experimental results demonstrate the technical feasibility of the proposed system, showing significant potential for daily bowel activity monitoring.

2. Working Principle

2.1. A Mathematical Model of Intestinal Sounds

The human bowel sounds primarily originate from intestinal peristalsis, which refers to the symmetrical contraction and relaxation of intestinal muscles that propel intestinal contents, generating characteristic acoustic signals during this process. These sounds propagate through the gastrointestinal system in a wave-like pattern [12]. Based on the bowel sound model proposed by Du [13], intestinal peristalsis is caused by the contraction of intestinal muscles, which compress the intestinal contents into a small segment of the intestine, as illustrated in Figure 1. The fundamental component of bowel sounds is the individual wave, representing the compression of intestinal contents under luminal contraction forces, which reflects the dynamic characteristics of intestinal motility. The physiological mechanism involves cyclic muscular activity: intestinal smooth muscles generate contractile forces that narrow the lumen and compress the contents, followed by muscle relaxation allowing lumen recovery, before initiating a new contraction phase to complete the motility cycle. Each movement cycle consists of two distinct phases—contraction and relaxation—that collectively enable the directional propulsion of contents through the digestive tract. The resonant frequency of bowel sounds can be calculated using Equation (1):
M d 2 x d t 2 + C d x d t + K x = p
where x represents the wall motion, p denotes the fluid pressure, M and K are the wall mass and stiffness, respectively, and C is the damping coefficient related to energy dissipation. Therefore, the resonant frequency of individual wave ( f iwc ) components can be given by Equation (2):
f iwc = 1 2 π k M C 2 m 2
Thus, as bowel sound signals exhibit distinct variations corresponding to different intestinal physiological states, their acoustic features can be used to stage-specifically characterize intestinal conditions.

2.2. Defecation Warning Monitor

The monitoring system in this study is structured as shown in Figure 2, consisting of both hardware and software components. The hardware section includes a sensing module, a data acquisition card (MCC USB-2020), and a computer terminal (PC), which work together to achieve the acquisition and transmission of bowel sound signals. The software system utilizes a MATLAB-based graphical user interface (GUI) and processes the bowel sound signals in real time using a second-order Butterworth bandpass filter (passband: 100–1200 Hz) for visualization. During experiments, the sensing module is first securely attached to a designated position on the subject’s abdomen. The collected bowel sound signals are transmitted to the computer via the data acquisition card, after which the system displays the time-domain waveform in real time.

3. Design and Fabrication of the Sensing Module

3.1. Principle and Design of PMUT

The receiving performance of PMUTs plays a crucial role in sensing modules. Table 1 summarizes the key material properties of commonly used piezoelectric thin films for PMUT applications. Although PZT exhibits the highest e 31 , f coefficient, its incompatibility with standard complementary CMOS fabrication processes limits its application. In addition, the biomedical application of PZT (lead zirconate titanate) requires careful consideration of its potential toxicity due to its lead content. In comparison to AlN, ScAlN demonstrates a significantly larger e 31 , f . Moreover, PMUTs fabricated with ScAlN show higher electromechanical coupling coefficients than those made with AlN under identical conditions [14]. This enhanced performance leads to superior receiving sensitivity in ScAlN-based PMUTs compared to their AlN-based counterparts. Therefore, Sc 0.2 Al 0.8 N was selected as the piezoelectric transduction layer for the PMUTs in this study.
When operating in receiving mode, incident acoustic waves induce mechanical vibrations in the PMUT’s membrane structure. These vibrations simultaneously generate both tensile and compressive stresses within the piezoelectric functional layer [18]. The curvature distribution of the fixed support beams or diaphragm structure exhibits a characteristic stress inversion node. This node demarcates alternating regions of tension (positive charge accumulation) and compression (negative charge accumulation) on the upper surface of the piezoelectric material, resulting in spatially opposite charge distributions. In this study, we implement a differential electrode configuration by dividing the PMUT’s top electrode into an inner electrode (IE) and an outer electrode (OE). The traditional single-electrode configuration of PMUTs limits charge accumulation to a single region, where Q represents the total generated charge and C 0 denotes the capacitance. In this case, the accumulated charge Q on the top electrode yields an output voltage V single that can be expressed by Equation (3):
V single = Q C 0
In the differential electrode configuration, the PMUT simultaneously utilizes both charge accumulation regions with Q and Q charges accumulating at the IE and OE, respectively. The output voltage V diff in the differential electrode configuration can be expressed by Equation (4):
V diff = Q C 0 Q C 0 = 2 V single
Therefore, compared to the single-electrode configurations, the differential electrode configuration exhibits a significantly higher output voltage in receiving mode, thereby further optimizing the PMUT’s receiving performance. Poor geometric design of the top electrode can significantly reduce charge collection efficiency.
To optimize the performance of the PMUT, this study employs the finite element simulation software COMSOL Multiphysics 6.1 for modeling. In the simulation, the cavity radius was fixed, and only a single top electrode was used while keeping all other parameters unchanged [19]. A parametric sweep was performed on the radius of the top electrode, and the results are shown in Figure 3. Through comparative analysis, the optimal ratio between the top electrode radius and the cavity radius was determined. When designing a PMUT with a differential electrode configuration, the rationality of electrode distribution was taken into consideration. Accordingly, the IE radius was set to 540 µm, and the outer electrode width was set to 220 µm with a 20 µm gap between them. The geometric structure and parameters of the PMUT are illustrated in Figure 4.

3.2. PMUT Manufacturing Industrial Process

The complete MEMS manufacturing process used in this study is shown in Figure 5. The process starts with the preparation of a single-side polished SOI wafer (Figure 5a). As illustrated in Figure 5b, a 50 nm ScAlN seed layer with 9.6% doping was deposited via Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), which was followed by the deposition of a 0.2 µm Mo bottom electrode layer, a 1 µm ScAlN piezoelectric layer, and a 0.2 µm Mo top electrode layer. As shown in Figure 5c, the top electrode was etched using reactive ion etching (RIE), and after patterning the top electrode, an oxide insulating layer ( SiO 2 ) was deposited via Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD). As depicted in Figure 5d, electrode vias were etched using RIE to facilitate connections between the top and bottom electrodes. As illustrated in Figure 5e, Al aluminum electrodes were deposited via PVD and patterned to form electrical interconnects. In the final step (Figure 5f), the diaphragm is released by performing backside deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) of the SOI wafer to form the cavity structure.
The prepared PMUT array was observed using an optical microscope, and the results are shown in Figure 6a. The PMUT array is arranged in a 2 × 2 distribution with the final chip size measuring 3.8 mm × 4.4 mm.
The effective electromechanical coupling coefficient ( k eff 2 ) is a critical performance parameter of PMUTs that quantifies the energy conversion efficiency between mechanical and electrical domains. When operating in receiver mode, this parameter becomes particularly crucial, as enhanced k eff 2 values directly improve electromechanical transduction efficiency, consequently enhancing receiving sensitivity. The calculation of k eff 2 is given in Equation (5) [20]:
k eff 2 = 1 f r f a 2
where f a is the anti-resonance frequency, and f r is the resonance frequency of the piezoelectric material. Impedance measurements of the fabricated PMUT array were conducted using an impedance analyzer (E4990A, KeysightTechnologies, SantaRosa, CA, USA). The corresponding results are displayed in Figure 6b. The f r measurement of the PMUT array is 48.88 kHz, and the f a is 50.45 kHz. According to Equation (5), the k eff 2 is calculated to be 6.1%.
The mechanical vibration performance of the PMUT device was characterized using a laser Doppler vibrometer (MSA 600, Polytec GmbH, Waldbronn, Germany). The test results, as shown in Figure 6c, were obtained by applying a sinusoidal excitation signal with a frequency sweep (40 kHz to 60 kHz, 1 Vpp). The first-order resonance frequency of the PMUT was found to be approximately 50 kHz with a peak displacement of 19.45 nm/Vpp.

3.3. Encapsulation and Testing of the Sensing Module

The sensing module comprises a PMUT array, a preamplifier, an acoustic matching gel, a 316L stainless steel housing, and an electronic packaging adhesive. The encapsulated sensing module is shown in Figure 7; the top layer consists of an acoustic matching gel (polyurethane) for impedance coupling, followed by the PMUT array and signal conditioning circuit in the middle, while the bottom layer uses a silicone potting compound for electronic encapsulation and mechanical fixation. The selection of acoustic matching gel plays a decisive role in the encapsulation design of the sensing module, as its performance directly impacts both the acquisition quality of bowel sounds and system reliability. When detecting bowel sounds, the packaging material must simultaneously meet dual requirements of acoustic performance and physical protection: it must achieve precise acoustic impedance matching (typically within 1.5–1.7 MRayl) to ensure efficient signal transmission from biological tissues to the sensor while minimizing signal reflection and energy loss caused by acoustic impedance mismatch at media interfaces, while also providing excellent sealing properties to prevent bodily fluid infiltration and external interference, along with good biocompatibility for long-term wearable or implantable applications. The acoustic transmission coefficient (T) at the material interface can be calculated using Equation (6) [21]:
T = 4 Z 1 Z 2 ( Z 1 + Z 2 ) 2
where Z 1 and Z 2 represent the characteristic acoustic impedances of the adjacent media at the interface. The average acoustic impedance of human soft tissue is approximately 1.63 MRayl. According to Equation (6), the impedance coefficients of the two materials should be as close as possible to improve transmission efficiency. An acoustic matching material with an impedance of 1.57 MRayl was selected. The packaged sensor module is shown in the figure with dimensional specifications of 38 mm × 10 mm.
This study implemented three distinct signal readout configurations based on the signal conditioning circuit: differential structure, single-ended structure A, and single-ended structure B. In the differential structure, the signal conditioning circuit is connected to both the IE and OE, while the bottom electrode is grounded. In single-ended structure A, the bottom electrode and OE are connected to the signal conditioning circuit with the IE left floating. In single-ended structure B, the bottom electrode and IE are connected to the signal conditioning circuit, while the OE remains floating. This work evaluated the sensing module’s sensitivity using the experimental configuration illustrated in Figure 8a. The sensing module under test was first fixed at a predetermined height h above the liquid surface. Subsequently, the acceleration and frequency of the vibration signal were set, and the vibration signal was amplified by a power amplifier before being output to the shaker. At the last stage, the sensing module transmits the electrical signal to the dynamic test system. The sensitivity ( S M ) of the sensing module was calculated using Equation (7) [22]:
S M = U M U A × S A ρ h
Here, U m and U A , respectively, represent the output voltage of the sensing module and the parameter, S A denotes the standard accelerometer sensitivity, and ρ is the density of the liquid. Three different sensing modules with different readout structures were tested, as shown in Figure 8b. They all exhibited very flat responses within the operating frequency range (10 Hz to 1000 Hz). The receiving sensitivity of the differential structure was −151 ± 1 dB, while the receiving sensitivity of the single-ended structure A and single-ended structure B were −156 ± 1 dB and −155 ± 1 dB, respectively. The experimental results showed that compared to the single-ended structure, the differential structure had higher sensitivity. Table 2 provides a performance comparison between the manufactured sensing module and existing related research.
The noise resolution becomes a critical parameter when detecting weak bowel sounds using the sensing module, as both the desired signals and noise are amplified by the signal conditioning circuit. This parameter can be calculated using Equation (8) [26]:
NoiseResolution = Noisefloor Sensitivity
Figure 9a shows the experimental setup used to measure the baseline noise levels for all readout configurations. The measurements were conducted in an anechoic chamber (Figure 9b), and all three readout configurations exhibited comparable noise floor levels. According to Equation (8) and Figure 9c, the differential PMUT structure achieved a noise resolution of 62.89 dB at 500 Hz, while the single-ended PMUT structures A and B demonstrated noise resolutions of 68.45 dB and 67.18 dB, respectively, at the same frequency. Consequently, the differential PMUT structure exhibits lower noise gain compared to the single-ended PMUT structures. Taking into account both sensitivity and noise resolution, this study ultimately selected the differential structure as the signal readout configuration for the PMUT.

4. Experiments and Discussion

In order to test the performance of the defecation warning monitor, we compared a modified stethoscope with the defecation warning monitor. The modified stethoscope was developed by integrating an electret condenser microphone module into the traditional stethoscope structure with the microphone module embedded in the rubber sound tube of the stethoscope. Three healthy adult male volunteers (A, B, and C) participated in this study. The experiment is divided into two stages: the first stage is to monitor the subjects continuously for 4 min when they have the urge to defecate and then rest for 60 min after defecation. The second stage includes continuous monitoring for 16 min under non-defecation impulse conditions. The collected data are processed over a 4-min period. Before the experiment, the designed sensing module and modified stethoscope were tightly attached to the abdominal wall of the human body and fixed, as shown in Figure 10. Throughout the experiment, subjects maintained a supine position while minimizing the generation of noise.
Figure 11a,b present the bowel sound monitoring results obtained by the proposed monitoring device and the modified stethoscope under defecation-urge and non-urge conditions, respectively. This study employed a controlled experimental design to systematically compare the performance differences in bowel sound acquisition between the PMUT-based defecation warning monitor and the modified stethoscope. The experimental data clearly demonstrate that the PMUT-based defecation warning monitor exhibits significant superiority in time-domain signal acquisition capabilities. As shown in Figure 11, its outstanding high-sensitivity characteristics enable the precise detection and recording of more low-intensity bowel sound signals. Spectral analysis results (Figure 12a,b) reveal that the bowel sound signals exhibit distinctive frequency-domain characteristics with their core frequency components predominantly concentrated in the specific range of 100–500 Hz. This spectral feature shows remarkable consistency with previously reported bowel sound frequency characteristics by Ranta et al. [27], further validating the stability of acoustical signals generated by intestinal motility in the frequency domain. These findings not only confirm the reliability of previous research but, more importantly, provide critical parameter references for the frequency-band optimization design of bowel sound monitoring devices.
Through short-time energy analysis, as shown in Figure 13, it was found that intestinal activity exhibits higher levels of activity when the urge to defecate is present, while activity is relatively lower when the urge is absent. This may be due to the more pronounced intestinal peristalsis triggered as the colon pushes feces into the rectum.

5. Conclusions and Future Work

This study introduces a highly sensitive, wearable defecation warning monitor utilizing a PMUT, which can be used for bowel movement monitoring in elderly patients. The piezoelectric material employed is ScAlN with an effective electromechanical coupling coefficient of 6.1%. Three different readout structures were experimentally tested, and the results demonstrated that the differential readout structure offers higher sensitivity compared to the single-ended readout structures. The reported defecation warning monitor consists of two modules: one for acquiring bowel sounds and another for displaying the bowel sounds in real time through a graphical user interface. Experiments were conducted on healthy adult male subjects under two conditions: with and without the urge to defecate. During the monitoring experiments, compared to the modified stethoscope, the developed sensing module was able to capture relatively weak bowel sound signals, which are crucial for bowel movement monitoring, as they may help elucidate the relationship between defecation and bowel sounds. The experimental results indicate that the developed sensing module achieves effective information acquisition in bowel movement monitoring. In future studies, we will expand the participant cohort to ensure demographic diversity and develop an automated bowel movement alert algorithm to achieve intelligent defecation monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Y. and L.L.; methodology, T.Y., J.Z. and H.Z.; software, T.Y.; validation, T.Y. and H.Z.; formal analysis, T.Y.; investigation, T.Y.; resources, T.Y.; data curation, T.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Y.; writing—review and editing, J.Z. and Z.H.; visualization, T.Y.; supervision L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Shanghai Industrial µTechnology Research Institute (SITRI) for device fabrication and for the experimental environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Leng, M.; Guo, J.; Duan, J.; Wang, Z. The Effectiveness of Faecal Collection Devices in Preventing Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis in Critically Ill Patients with Faecal Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aust. Crit. Care 2021, 34, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, T.; Yang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wu, S. Deep Residual Attention Network for Human Defecation Prediction Using Bowel Sounds. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 36097–36113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Akasheh, F.; Myers, T.; Fraser, J.D.; Bose, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Development of Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2004, 111, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eovino, B.E.; Liang, Y.; Akhbari, S.; Lin, L. A Single-Chip Flow Sensor Based on Bimorph PMUTs with Differential Readout Capabilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Belfast, UK, 21–25 January 2018; pp. 1084–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van Neer, P.L.M.J.; Robers, T.; Volker, A.W.F. A pMUT Based Flowmeter: A Feasibility Study. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Prague, Czech Republic, 21–25 July 2013; pp. 1319–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yin, J.; Zhou, Z.; Lou, L. A Novel Nondestructive Testing Probe Using AlN-Based Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers (PMUTs). Micromachines 2024, 15, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jia, L.; Shi, L.; Lu, Z.; Sun, C.; Wu, G. A High-Performance 9.5% Scandium-Doped Aluminum Nitride Piezoelectric MEMS Hydrophone with Honeycomb Structure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 1845–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ganji, B.A.; Nateri, M.S.; Dardel, M. Design and Modeling of a Novel High Sensitive MEMS Piezoelectric Vector Hydrophone. Microsyst. Technol. 2018, 24, 2085–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Ping, Q.; Qiu, L.; Lou, L. An AlScN Piezoelectric Micromechanical Ultrasonic Transducer-Based Power-Harvesting Device for Wireless Power Transmission. Micromachines 2024, 15, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kim, B.J. Wearable Apparatus for Informing the Defecation Sign of the User, Comprises a Sensor Unit Including at Least One Acoustic Sensor Measuring the Prolonged Bowel Sound Signal in the Abdomen of the User. KR 10-2019-0057771 A, 23 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakanishi, A.; Masamori, R. Apparatus for Estimating Stool Volume Collected on Patient Rectum, Has Estimation Unit That Estimates Stool Volume Which Is Collected on Rectum Based on Output of Ultrasonic Sensor Which Detects Position of Urinary Bladder Wall. WO2016178261 A1, 3 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall, J.E. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology; e-Book; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Du, X.; Allwood, G.; Webberley, K.M.; Osseiran, A.; Wan, W.; Volikova, A.; Marshall, B.J. A Mathematical Model of Bowel Sound Generation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2018, 144, EL485–EL491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, X. Multiphysics Modeling and Analysis of Sc-Doped AlN Thin Film Based Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer by Finite Element Method. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lu, Y.; Tang, H.-Y.; Fung, S.; Boser, B.E.; Horsley, D.A. Pulse-Echo Ultrasound Imaging Using an AlN Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducer Array with Transmit Beam-Forming. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2016, 25, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dubois, M.-A.; Muralt, P. Properties of Aluminum Nitride Thin Films for Piezoelectric Transducers and Microwave Filter Applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 3032–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mertin, S.; Heinz, B.; Rattunde, O.; Christmann, G.; Dubois, M.-A.; Nicolay, S.; Muralt, P. Piezoelectric and Structural Properties of c-Axis Textured Aluminum Scandium Nitride Thin Films up to High Scandium Content. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 343, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, L.; Jia, L.; Liu, C.; Yu, H.; Sun, C.; Wu, G. Performance of Aluminum Nitride-Based Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers under Different Readout Configurations. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2022, 32, 014002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, D.; Wu, P.; Zhang, J.; Dou, H.; Zhang, M.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L.; Mu, X. Airborne Rangefinding With pMUTs Array Using Differential Structure. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 22240–22247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jung, J.; Lee, W.; Kang, W.; Shin, E.; Ryu, J. Review of Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers and Their Applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2017, 27, 113001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tiefensee, F.; Becker-Willinger, C.; Heppe, G.; Herbeck-Engel, P.; Jakob, A. Nanocomposite Cerium Oxide Polymer Matching Layers with Adjustable Acoustic Impedance between 4 MRayl and 7 MRayl. Ultrasonics 2010, 50, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, D.; Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Qu, M.; Zhu, K.; Ding, H.; Li, D.; Bai, Y.; Ling, J.; Xu, J.; et al. A Piezoelectric AlN MEMS Hydrophone with High Sensitivity and Low Noise Density. Sens. Actuators A 2021, 318, 112493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Xie, Y.; Wu, G. Bone Conduction Pickup Based on Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 36th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Munich, Germany, 15–19 January 2023; pp. 949–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jia, L.; Shi, L.; Sun, C.; Liu, S.; Wu, G. AlN Based Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic Transducers for Continuous Monitoring of the Mechano-Acoustic Cardiopulmonary Signals. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 34th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Gainesville, FL, USA, 25–29 January 2021; pp. 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.; Wang, B.; Cui, J.; Zhang, G.; Wang, R.; Zhang, W.; He, C.; Li, Y.; Shi, P.; Wang, S. Design and Realization of MEMS Heart Sound Sensor with Concave, Racket-Shaped Cilium. Biosensors 2022, 12, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Fernando, S.N.; Chai, K.T.; Gu, Y. AlN-on-SOI Platform-Based Micro-Machined Hydrophone. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 109, 032902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ranta, R.; Louis-Dorr, V.; Heinrich, C.; Wolf, D.; Guillemin, F. Digestive Activity Evaluation by Multichannel Abdominal Sounds Analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57, 1507–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Intestinal peristalsis.
Figure 1. Intestinal peristalsis.
Micromachines 16 00498 g001
Figure 2. Defecation warning monitor.
Figure 2. Defecation warning monitor.
Micromachines 16 00498 g002
Figure 3. The influence of the radius–length ratio of the top electrode and cavity on the sensitivity of PMUT.
Figure 3. The influence of the radius–length ratio of the top electrode and cavity on the sensitivity of PMUT.
Micromachines 16 00498 g003
Figure 4. Schematic cross-sectional view of the PMUT.
Figure 4. Schematic cross-sectional view of the PMUT.
Micromachines 16 00498 g004
Figure 5. Fabrication process flow of PMUT. (a) Single-side polished SOI wafer. (b) Deposit Mo bottom electrode layer, AlN piezoelectric layer, and Mo top electrode layer. (c) Pattern the top electrode and deposit an oxide insulating layer (SiO2). (d) Etch electrode vias to connect the top and bottom electrodes. (e) Deposit Al electrodes and pattern them to form bonding pads for wire bonding. (f) the diaphragm is released by performing backside deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) of the SOI wafer to form the cavity structure.
Figure 5. Fabrication process flow of PMUT. (a) Single-side polished SOI wafer. (b) Deposit Mo bottom electrode layer, AlN piezoelectric layer, and Mo top electrode layer. (c) Pattern the top electrode and deposit an oxide insulating layer (SiO2). (d) Etch electrode vias to connect the top and bottom electrodes. (e) Deposit Al electrodes and pattern them to form bonding pads for wire bonding. (f) the diaphragm is released by performing backside deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) of the SOI wafer to form the cavity structure.
Micromachines 16 00498 g005
Figure 6. (a) Optical images of PMUT array. (b) Electrical properties of PMUT array. (c) Measurement of the PMUT array’s frequency response using LDV.
Figure 6. (a) Optical images of PMUT array. (b) Electrical properties of PMUT array. (c) Measurement of the PMUT array’s frequency response using LDV.
Micromachines 16 00498 g006
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of sensing module and packaging of sensing module.
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of sensing module and packaging of sensing module.
Micromachines 16 00498 g007
Figure 8. (a) Vibrating liquid column measurement system. (b) Sensitivity curves of three different readout structures.
Figure 8. (a) Vibrating liquid column measurement system. (b) Sensitivity curves of three different readout structures.
Micromachines 16 00498 g008
Figure 9. (a) Noise measurement system. (b) Noise density of three different readout structures. (c) Noise resolution of three different readout structures.
Figure 9. (a) Noise measurement system. (b) Noise density of three different readout structures. (c) Noise resolution of three different readout structures.
Micromachines 16 00498 g009
Figure 10. Experimental setup for defecation monitoring.
Figure 10. Experimental setup for defecation monitoring.
Micromachines 16 00498 g010
Figure 11. (a) Bowel sounds measured using the defecation warning monitor and modified stethoscope when the urge to defecate is present. (b) Bowel sounds measured using the defecation warning monitor and modified stethoscope when the urge to defecate is absent.
Figure 11. (a) Bowel sounds measured using the defecation warning monitor and modified stethoscope when the urge to defecate is present. (b) Bowel sounds measured using the defecation warning monitor and modified stethoscope when the urge to defecate is absent.
Micromachines 16 00498 g011
Figure 12. (a) Spectral analysis of bowel sounds when the urge to defecate is present. (b) Spectral analysis of bowel sounds when the urge to defecate is absent.
Figure 12. (a) Spectral analysis of bowel sounds when the urge to defecate is present. (b) Spectral analysis of bowel sounds when the urge to defecate is absent.
Micromachines 16 00498 g012
Figure 13. (a) Short-term energy of bowel sounds recorded by the defecation warning monitor from three volunteers during defecation urge states, presented in 4-min segments. (b) Short-term energy of bowel sounds recorded by the defecation warning monitor from three volunteers under non-defecation urge conditions, presented in 4-min segments.
Figure 13. (a) Short-term energy of bowel sounds recorded by the defecation warning monitor from three volunteers during defecation urge states, presented in 4-min segments. (b) Short-term energy of bowel sounds recorded by the defecation warning monitor from three volunteers under non-defecation urge conditions, presented in 4-min segments.
Micromachines 16 00498 g013
Table 1. Properties of commonly used piezoelectric materials.
Table 1. Properties of commonly used piezoelectric materials.
PropertiesPZT [15]AlN [16] Sc 0.2 Al 0.8 N [17]
e 31 , f ( C / m 2 ) −10−1.05−1.51
ε 33 ( F / m ) 120010.512.31
e 31 , f / ε 33 −0.008−0.1−0.123
Table 2. Comparison of the stethoscope devices in this study with existing research.
Table 2. Comparison of the stethoscope devices in this study with existing research.
AuthorChip Size (mm)Sensitivity (dB)
Chongbin Liu [23]3.2 × 3.2−154 ± 0.5
Licheng Jia [24]3.2 × 3.2−178
Yuhua Yang [25]N/A−180.6
This work3.8 × 4.4−151 ± 1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, T.; Zong, J.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Z.; Lou, L. Defecation Warning Monitor Based on ScAlN Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT). Micromachines 2025, 16, 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050498

AMA Style

Yao T, Zong J, Zhang H, Hou Z, Lou L. Defecation Warning Monitor Based on ScAlN Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT). Micromachines. 2025; 16(5):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Tao, Jianwei Zong, Haoyue Zhang, Zhiyuan Hou, and Liang Lou. 2025. "Defecation Warning Monitor Based on ScAlN Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT)" Micromachines 16, no. 5: 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050498

APA Style

Yao, T., Zong, J., Zhang, H., Hou, Z., & Lou, L. (2025). Defecation Warning Monitor Based on ScAlN Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducer (PMUT). Micromachines, 16(5), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16050498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop