Next Article in Journal
LaxPr4−xNi3O10−δ: Mixed A-Site Cation Higher-Order Ruddlesden-Popper Phase Materials as Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Equal Channel Angular Pressing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Cu-Mg Alloy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Induced Spirals in Polyethylene Terephthalate Films Irradiated with Ar Ions with an Energy of 70 MeV

Crystals 2020, 10(6), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060427
by Adil Z. Tuleushev 1, Maxim V. Zdorovets 2,3,4,*, Artem L. Kozlovskiy 2,3 and Fiona Erica Harrison 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Crystals 2020, 10(6), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060427
Submission received: 25 April 2020 / Revised: 15 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 27 May 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled "Induced spiralization in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with an energy of 70 MeV" is the continuity of previous recent work published this year by the same research team. The novelty is still present as, increasing the ion fluence in comparison to previous study, it gives rise to additional peaks in registered Xray diffraction patterns. This result is very surprising as it shows an additional ordering effect taking place under ion beam irradiation. Reversely, one would expect an increasing amorphization while the ion fluence increases. This research group claims that these several steps of ordering occur in the amorphous phase of semi-crystalline PET films. The authors explain very well the reason for that and the transition from individual tracks to overlapped ones. What was also interesting in the present study is the temporal stability of some induced ordering. It will bring constructive questioning for researchers in the field. It will also open research approaches using other semi-crystalline polymers or other ion energies.

Perhaps, the style is not conventional as the introduction is not a review itself of what was done on the topic. However, I think it is not applicable here as the authors include the bibliography in the right place in the discussion. I really appreciated the reading of this manuscript as it is clear and concise. It emphasizes the scientific soundness of the present work.

As a matter of fact, I strongly recommend this work for publication in the journal Crystals.

I have only minor comments to address to the authors:

  • abstract : remove the reference to previous work (not appropriate location)
  • increase police size of numbers in all axes of graphics in figure 1 to notably better appreciate the reduction in the average intensity of the crystalline phase diffraction reflection at 2theta=26deg and 2theta=23deg
  • mention PET crystallization content in experimental part 
  • as herein the PET material are in shape of film, depending the fabrication process, a peculiar orientation of crystallites can be found, notably if films have been axially stretched. Was it the case? If no, it is important to mention it in the experimental part as well. If yes, to what extent it may affect the results?
  • comment (no need of further experiments, just in case the authors have some left results which can be added in a supplementary information file): the aging was done keeping the irradiated PET films with no access to sunlight. It is sounded as polyester are very sensitive to UV radiation. Nevertheless, in real life, such conditions are not viable. It may be important for prospective research applications. It would have thus been advantageous to compare with aged irradiated PET films subject to UV radiation. 

Author Response

1. Correct.

2. Figure 1 shows X-ray diffraction patterns of the studied sample in the pristine state and after irradiation. A full description of the structural characteristics of the pristine sample was presented in [20] and can be summarised by the presence of the following characteristic areas: a halo at 2θ=5-15° indicating the presence of an amorphous zone in the PET film under study; two isotropic azimuthal ring diffraction reflections with maxima at 2θ=23° and 26° that belong to the PET crystalline phase [25]; and a transition area in the angular range 2θ=15-20° (see Figure 1a).

 

   

a)

   

b)

 

 

   

c)

 

Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of the PET sample: a) pristine (X-ray diffractograms for the pristine sample were taken from [20] for comparison); b) after irradiation with a dose of 2x1012 ions/cm2 in the geometry of φ=0-2π; c) temporal evolution of the diffraction spectra of the irradiated PET sample.

 

3. According to our X-ray data for the pristine film [20], the ratio of the crystalline and amorphous parts of PET was 43:57, which corresponds well with the manufacturer's passport data and with the results of fundamental work on the study of PET structures [16]. The method for calculating this ratio via analysis of X-ray diffractograms was taken from [22].

4. The subject, experimental equipment, and techniques for studying structural changes in a sample of PET film of thickness 12 microns (HOSTAPHAN® polyester films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH) irradiated with Ar8+ ions with an energy of 70 MeV were described in [20].  In this study we used a flux of 2x1012 ions/cm2. Irradiation was carried out in a vacuum at room temperature. The angle of ion incidence was 42° with respect to the normal line to the surface. The direction of irradiation of the film coincided with the direction of motion of the film through the irradiation chamber. We used angled irradiation in order to maximise the electrical interaction of the irradiating ions along the polymer molecular chains, since it is well known that PET films and fibres have a strongly pronounced molecular texture in the direction of motion during their production [22,23].

 

5. Excess charge in the core of the latent track was also found in the work of Wang et al. [16], but with opposite polarity. This discrepancy is one of many examples showing that radiation effects in latent tracks are complex and remain insufficiently understood.  Whatever the polarity, both these experiments show that there is a residual radial electric field in latent tracks after irradiation.  The stability of  this electric field over time is determined by the properties of the irradiated material and can be very long in the case of electrets [17].  The electric field can be significantly affected by UV illumination, as shown by Wang et al. [16], who invented a special technique for processing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film known as the ‘track-UV technique’. This technique is very close to the technology used to prepare ion irradiated films for etching [18] and is based on the general sensitivity of PET to UV illumination [19].

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript titled "Induced spiralization in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with an energy of 70 MeV" by A.Z. Tuleushev et al. describes the x-ray based characterization of PET exposed to high energy Ar irradiation. The work has several major concerns:

1) This work is an incrimental addition of the authors previously published work: Zdorovets, M. V., et al. "Induced ordering in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with 200 an energy of 70 MeV." Surface and Coatings Technology (2020): 125490. In this submission the authors have increased the previous dose by a factor of two and measured the sample as it sat over an extended period.

2) The manuscript does not include an introduction in any form other than a review of their previous publication.

3) The authors appear to reuse images and x-ray data from their previous publication with no citation.

4) The proposed spiralization due to intra-chain rotations of benzene-carboxyl subunits is an interesting hypothesis, but there is minimal data to support this in the work presented. I think one can easily determine many other cross-linking based hypothesis that might occur due to aging after irradiation that were not eliminated in the minimal discussion.

5) Although the work in this area is not extensive, the citation of only nine publications does not cover the full extent of the field.

Author Response

1. The authors took into account the comments of the reviewer and expanded the introduction.

 

Over the last three decades, the heavy ion irradiation of solid materials including polymers has been  the subject of extensive research, studying both the fundamental interaction mechanisms and the opportunities for real-world applications. This is evidenced by a large number of articles summarised both in reviews [1,2] and major monographs [3]. Irradiation of polymers with swift ions leads to various irreversible effects, such as amorphisation and destruction [4-5], surface modification [6-8], and chemical cross-linking of polymers [9-11]. The irreversibility of these effects is due to them being caused by highly energetic ‘δ-electrons’ knocked out from the track core by the irradiating ions, and cascades of secondary electrons formed in turn by these δ-electrons [9-13].  The stochastic nature of these processes means that these changes in the molecular structure of irradiated polymers inside the latent tracks are also stochastic [12-14].

 

Ordered changes have, however, been observed in the radial electron density of the latent track. In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing  radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track.

Excess charge in the core of the latent track was also found in the work of Wang et al. [16], but with opposite polarity. This discrepancy is one of many examples showing that radiation effects in latent tracks are complex and remain insufficiently understood.  Whatever the polarity, both these experiments show that there is a residual radial electric field in latent tracks after irradiation.  The stability of  this electric field over time is determined by the properties of the irradiated material and can be very long in the case of electrets [17].  The electric field can be significantly affected by UV illumination, as shown by Wang et al. [16], who invented a special technique for processing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film known as the ‘track-UV technique’. This technique is very close to the technology used to prepare ion irradiated films for etching [18] and is based on the general sensitivity of PET to UV illumination [19].

 

The presence of a residual radial electric field in the latent track in PET is the cause of the induced ordering of benzene-carboxyl subunits of repeat units of polymer molecules seen in [20]. It is well-known that these subunits have the ability to rotate relative to the backbone of the molecule:  the rotational properties of molecular subunits forms the basis of the field of stereochemistry [see e.g. 21].  

 

 In this paper, we report a novel ordering effect in PET film irradiated with swift Ar8+ ions at a higher  flux (of 2x1012 ions/cm2 ) than used in [20]. This new structural effect is expressed in sharp X-ray diffraction peaks, at 2θ=9-10° and 2θ=19°, with variable azimuthal intensity.  As previously, the increase in flux causes a reduction in the average intensity of the crystalline phase diffraction reflections at 2θ=26° and 2θ=23°. At this higher flux, however, both of these previously isotropic azimuthal distributions now exhibit non-isotropic behaviour.  In the amorphous phase, we again see an area of area of induced ordering along the direction of the molecular texture of the polymer with an intensity that coincides with that seen at the lower flux of 1x1012 ions/cm2. This new effect goes beyond those seen at lower fluxes, but since these higher fluxes are achieved by longer periods of exposure to the same incident beam, these effects build cumulatively on those of lower fluxes.

2. Figure 1. X-ray diffractograms of the PET sample: a) pristine (X-ray diffractograms for the pristine sample were taken from [20] for comparison); b) after irradiation with a dose of 2x1012 ions/cm2 in the geometry of φ=0-2π; c) temporal evolution of the diffraction spectra of the irradiated PET sample.

 

                    

3. Ordered changes have, however, been observed in the radial electron density of the latent track. In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing  radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track.

Excess charge in the core of the latent track was also found in the work of Wang et al. [16], but with opposite polarity. This discrepancy is one of many examples showing that radiation effects in latent tracks are complex and remain insufficiently understood.  Whatever the polarity, both these experiments show that there is a residual radial electric field in latent tracks after irradiation.  The stability of  this electric field over time is determined by the properties of the irradiated material and can be very long in the case of electrets [17].  The electric field can be significantly affected by UV illumination, as shown by Wang et al. [16], who invented a special technique for processing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film known as the ‘track-UV technique’. This technique is very close to the technology used to prepare ion irradiated films for etching [18] and is based on the general sensitivity of PET to UV illumination [19].

 

The presence of a residual radial electric field in the latent track in PET is the cause of the induced ordering of benzene-carboxyl subunits of repeat units of polymer molecules seen in [20]. It is well-known that these subunits have the ability to rotate relative to the backbone of the molecule:  the rotational properties of molecular subunits forms the basis of the field of stereochemistry [see e.g. 21].   

 

 In this paper, we report a novel ordering effect in PET film irradiated with swift Ar8+ ions at a higher  flux (of 2x1012 ions/cm2 ) than used in [20]. This new structural effect is expressed in sharp X-ray diffraction peaks, at 2θ=9-10° and 2θ=19°, with variable azimuthal intensity.  As previously, the increase in flux causes a reduction in the average intensity of the crystalline phase diffraction reflections at 2θ=26° and 2θ=23°. At this higher flux, however, both of these previously isotropic azimuthal distributions now exhibit non-isotropic behaviour.  In the amorphous phase, we again see an area of area of induced ordering along the direction of the molecular texture of the polymer with an intensity that coincides with that seen at the lower flux of 1x1012 ions/cm2. This new effect goes beyond those seen at lower fluxes, but since these higher fluxes are achieved by longer periods of exposure to the same incident beam, these effects build cumulatively on those of lower fluxes.

 

4. The authors took into account the comments of the reviewer and expanded the introduction.

References

 

1. P.Y. Apel, Fabrication of functional micro-and nanoporous materials from polymers modified by swift heavy ions, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 159 (2019) 25–34.

2. Liu Feng, et al., Fabrication and application of nanoporous polymer ion-track membranes, Nanotechnology 30 (5) (2018) 052001.

3. Wesch, Werner, and Elke Wendler. Ion Beam Modification of Solids. Vol. 61. Springer Nature, 2016.

4. Güven, Olgun. "Ionizing radiation: a versatile tool for nanostructuring of polymers." Pure and Applied Chemistry 88.10-11 (2016): 1049-1061.

5. Singh, Lakhwant, et al. "Degradation of nickel (86 MeV) ion irradiated polystyrene." Journal of non-crystalline solids 354.1 (2008): 41-48.

6. Turos, Andrzej, et al. "Ion beam modification of surface properties of polyethylene." Vacuum 70.2-3 (2003): 201-206.

7. Bielinski, D., et al. "Surface layer modification of ion bombarded HDPE." Surface science 564.1-3 (2004): 179-186.

8. Abdul-Kader, A. M., Y. A. El-Gendy, and Awad A. Al-Rashdy. "Improve the physical and chemical properties of biocompatible polymer material by MeV He ion beam." Radiation Physics and Chemistry 81.7 (2012): 798-802.

9. Apel, P., et al. "Track structure in polyethylene terephthalate irradiated by heavy ions: LET dependence of track diameter." Radiation measurements 31.1-6 (1999): 51-56.

10. Apel, P. Yu, et al. "Morphology of latent and etched heavy ion tracks in radiation resistant polymers polyimide and poly (ethylene naphthalate)." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 185.1-4 (2001): 216-221.

11. Steckenreiter, T., et al. "Chemical modifications of PET induced by swift heavy ions." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 131.1-4 (1997): 159-166.

12. Apel, P. Yu, et al. "Creation of Ion-Selective Membranes from Polyethylene Terephthalate Films Irradiated with Heavy Ions: Critical Parameters of the Process." Membranes and Membrane Technologies 2 (2020): 98-108.

13. Kusumoto, Tamon, Rémi Barillon, and Tomoya Yamauchi. "Application of Radial Electron Fluence around ion tracks for the description of track response data of polyethylene terephthalate as a polymeric nuclear track detector." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 461 (2019): 260-266.

14. Maletic, Slavica B., Dragana D. Cerovic, and Jablan R. Dojcilovic. "A study of structural and spectral properties of ion-beam modified polyethylene terephthalate membrane." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 441 (2019): 1-7.

15. Abu Saleh, Sameer, and Yehuda Eyal. "Porous tracks along wakes of swift uranium ions in polyimide." Applied physics letters 85.13 (2004): 2529-2531.

16. Wang, Pengfei, et al. "Ultrafast ion sieving using nanoporous polymeric membranes." Nature communications 9.1 (2018): 1-9.

17. Sessler, Gerhard Martin. "Physical principles of electrets." Electrets. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980. 13–80.

18. Crawford, Wayne T., James S. Humphrey Jr, and Warren De Sorbo. "Method for making visible radiation damage tracks in track registration materials." U.S. Patent No. 3,612,871. 12 Oct. 1971.

19. Zhu, Z., et al. "Influence of UV light illumination on latent track structure in PET." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 236.1-4 (2005): 61-67.

20. Zdorovets, M. V., et al. "Induced ordering in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with an energy of 70 MeV." Surface and Coatings Technology (2020): 125490.

21. Eliel, Ernest Ludwig, Samuel H. Wilen, and Michael P. Doyle. Basic organic stereochemistry. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2001.

22. Weinstein B. K. X-ray diffraction by chain molecules. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1963.

23. A. Misra, R.S. Stein, Stress-induced crystallization of poly (ethylene terephthalate), J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 17 (2) (1979) 235–257.

24. Daubeny, R. de P., Charles William Bunn, and C. J. Brown. "The crystal structure of polyethylene terephthalate." Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 226.1167 (1954): 531-542.

25. Urbanek, Sebastien, et al. "Crystallite modulus of double-stranded helices of isotactic poly (methyl methacrylate): the X-ray measurement and the theoretical calculation." Polymer 40.12 (1999): 3345-3351.

26. Wang, Ying, et al. "Double helical conformation and extreme rigidity in a rodlike polyelectrolyte." Nature communications 10.1 (2019): 1-8.

27. García, Gustavo, et al. "Amorphization kinetics under swift heavy ion irradiation: A cumulative overlapping-track approach." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 269.4 (2011): 492-497.

28. Peña-Rodríguez, O., et al. "Kinetics of amorphization induced by swift heavy ions in α-quartz." Journal of nuclear materials 430.1-3 (2012): 125-131.

29. Das-Gupta, D. K. "Molecular processes in polymer electrets." Journal of Electrostatics 51 (2001): 159-166.

30. Jacques I. Pankove, “Optical Processes in Semiconductors." (1971).

 

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper is very interesting and presents a new approach to the study of ion irradiation effects in polymers. On one hand, ion tracks in polymers are a practically important field, and, on the other hand, the radiation effects in ion tracks, especially in polymers, are very intricate and not well understood. This makes the present paper valuable to many researchers who deal with high-LET effects in organic crystals. The paper is of a high originality.

The paper is well-written and clear. Some problems (which could be resolved in revised version) are listed below:

  1. In the introduction (line 37), the authors use the term “heavy Ar8+ ions”. In my opinion, it would be better to eliminate the word “heavy”. Readers may think that beams of Ar isotopes heavier than 40 were used.
  2. Introduction. There is lack of reviewed literature. Heavy ions induce a number of different effects in polymers, and the authors should present a relevant analysis of known phenomena and identify to what specific niche their study belongs.
  3. Experimental part. Though the experimental conditions have been described previously, I would recommend to describe once again the most important details concerning the irradiation and measurement techniques. Angle of ion irradiation, the beam divergence? Dosimetry (how the ion flux was measured, what accuracy?)
  4. In line 168, the authors mention that a residual electric field was shown in Ref [9]. It seems the authors of [9] just estimated the residual electron density in a track in polyimide, didn’t they?
  5. Since the question on the residual electric field is of primary importance for the paper’s subject, can the authors present any estimate of the field strength responsible for the observed molecular reorganization?

Due to p. 2, the needed revision cannot be called minor. My conclusion is major revision.

Author Response

1. Correct.

 

We previously conducted a systematic study of the effects of irradiation on the structure of PET polymer films, using swift Ar8+ ions with an energy of 70 MeV and fluxes of 2x1010, 5x1011, 1x1012 ions/cm2 [20].

2. The authors thank the referee for the question. Below is a detailed answer to it.

 

Over the last three decades, the heavy ion irradiation of solid materials including polymers has been  the subject of extensive research, studying both the fundamental interaction mechanisms and the opportunities for real-world applications. This is evidenced by a large number of articles summarised both in reviews [1,2] and major monographs [3]. Irradiation of polymers with swift ions leads to various irreversible effects, such as amorphisation and destruction [4-5], surface modification [6-8], and chemical cross-linking of polymers [9-11]. The irreversibility of these effects is due to them being caused by highly energetic ‘δ-electrons’ knocked out from the track core by the irradiating ions, and cascades of secondary electrons formed in turn by these δ-electrons [9-13].  The stochastic nature of these processes means that these changes in the molecular structure of irradiated polymers inside the latent tracks are also stochastic [12-14].

 

Ordered changes have, however, been observed in the radial electron density of the latent track. In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing  radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track.

Excess charge in the core of the latent track was also found in the work of Wang et al. [16], but with opposite polarity. This discrepancy is one of many examples showing that radiation effects in latent tracks are complex and remain insufficiently understood.  Whatever the polarity, both these experiments show that there is a residual radial electric field in latent tracks after irradiation.  The stability of  this electric field over time is determined by the properties of the irradiated material and can be very long in the case of electrets [17].  The electric field can be significantly affected by UV illumination, as shown by Wang et al. [16], who invented a special technique for processing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film known as the ‘track-UV technique’. This technique is very close to the technology used to prepare ion irradiated films for etching [18] and is based on the general sensitivity of PET to UV illumination [19].

 

The presence of a residual radial electric field in the latent track in PET is the cause of the induced ordering of benzene-carboxyl subunits of repeat units of polymer molecules seen in [20]. It is well-known that these subunits have the ability to rotate relative to the backbone of the molecule:  the rotational properties of molecular subunits forms the basis of the field of stereochemistry [see e.g. 21].  

 

 In this paper, we report a novel ordering effect in PET film irradiated with swift Ar8+ ions at a higher  flux (of 2x1012 ions/cm2 ) than used in [20]. This new structural effect is expressed in sharp X-ray diffraction peaks, at 2θ=9-10° and 2θ=19°, with variable azimuthal intensity.  As previously, the increase in flux causes a reduction in the average intensity of the crystalline phase diffraction reflections at 2θ=26° and 2θ=23°. At this higher flux, however, both of these previously isotropic azimuthal distributions now exhibit non-isotropic behaviour.  In the amorphous phase, we again see an area of area of induced ordering along the direction of the molecular texture of the polymer with an intensity that coincides with that seen at the lower flux of 1x1012 ions/cm2. This new effect goes beyond those seen at lower fluxes, but since these higher fluxes are achieved by longer periods of exposure to the same incident beam, these effects build cumulatively on those of lower fluxes.

 

The appearance of these new features in the X-ray diffractograms suggests that there has been a change in the nature of structural transformations in the polymer under the influence of this higher irradiation flux. In order to explore the nature of these structural transformations, and to confirm that the changes we observed are not an experimental artifact, we conducted a study of their evolution over time. After 3 months of observation, the changes in the structural characteristics provided clear evidence of the underlying mechanisms for their occurrence and temporal evolution. 

 

3. The authors thank the referee for the question. Below is a detailed answer to it.

 

The subject, experimental equipment, and techniques for studying structural changes in a sample of PET film of thickness 12 microns (HOSTAPHAN® polyester films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH) irradiated with Ar8+ ions with an energy of 70 MeV were described in [20].  In this study we used a flux of 2x1012 ions/cm2. Irradiation was carried out in a vacuum at room temperature. The angle of ion incidence was 42° with respect to the normal line to the surface. The direction of irradiation of the film coincided with the direction of motion of the film through the irradiation chamber. We used angled irradiation in order to maximise the electrical interaction of the irradiating ions along the polymer molecular chains, since it is well known that PET films and fibres have a strongly pronounced molecular texture in the direction of motion during their production [22,23].

 

According to our X-ray data for the pristine film [20], the ratio of the crystalline and amorphous parts of PET was 43:57, which corresponds well with the manufacturer's passport data and with the results of fundamental work on the study of PET structures [16]. The method for calculating this ratio via analysis of X-ray diffractograms was taken from [22].

 

 

4. The authors thank the referee for the question. Below is a detailed answer to it.

 

Irradiation of polymers with swift ions leads to various irreversible effects, such as amorphisation and destruction [4-5], surface modification [6-8], and chemical cross-linking of polymers [9-11]. The irreversibility of these effects is due to them being caused by highly energetic ‘δ-electrons’ knocked out from the track core by the irradiating ions, and cascades of secondary electrons formed in turn by these δ-electrons [9-13].  The stochastic nature of these processes means that these changes in the molecular structure of irradiated polymers inside the latent tracks are also stochastic [12-14].

 

Ordered changes have, however, been observed in the radial electron density of the latent track. In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing  radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track.

Excess charge in the core of the latent track was also found in the work of Wang et al. [16], but with opposite polarity. This discrepancy is one of many examples showing that radiation effects in latent tracks are complex and remain insufficiently understood.  Whatever the polarity, both these experiments show that there is a residual radial electric field in latent tracks after irradiation.  The stability of  this electric field over time is determined by the properties of the irradiated material and can be very long in the case of electrets [17].  The electric field can be significantly affected by UV illumination, as shown by Wang et al. [16], who invented a special technique for processing polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film known as the ‘track-UV technique’. This technique is very close to the technology used to prepare ion irradiated films for etching [18] and is based on the general sensitivity of PET to UV illumination [19].

 

5. The authors thank the referee for the question. Below is a detailed answer to it.

 

If the flux is high enough to cause overlapping of latent tracks, the behaviour of benzene-carboxyl subunits will be determined not only by the residual electric field of a single latent track but also by the fields of neighbouring tracks. Because of the cylindrical symmetry of the latent tracks, the individual electric fields in overlapping regions act in opposition to each other to reduce the effective electric field.  This, together with the fact that the benzene-carboxyl subunits are already ordered, allows dipole-dipole interactions between the subunits of neighbouring chain molecules, causing correlated rotations of these subunits. The asymmetric nature of the dipoles in the subunits, together with their rotations, is sufficient in this situation for the formation of a spiral conformation of the subunits in neighbouring chain molecules, as shown in [27]. It is known from the physics of the class of polymer electrets to which PET belongs that dipole-dipole interactions between neighbouring chain molecules have low energy (0.02-0.9 eV) [29], which leads to low temporal stability of dipole-dipole conformational structures, as observed here.

 

In the wider context, we can make two observations about the results here and in [20]. First, reversing the arguments above,  in this situation some information on the structure of the residual electric fields in the PET film is provided by the x-ray diffractograms, even though they only map positions of reflecting centres in the molecules, because these show the rotation of benzene-carboxyl units responding to a residual electric field. In other words, the benzene carboxyl subunits are acting as nanoindicators of the gradient of the electric field, but provide no information about its magnitude.  This information could be provided by optical studies of irradiated films, for example, using the Franz-Keldysh effect [30], which the authors plan to do in the future. Second, our results, together with those in [26] for a very different experimental situation, suggest that preordering is a very important, and perhaps essential, prerequisite for the emergence of spiralisation.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript titled "Induced spiralization in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with an energy of 70 MeV" is improved, but does not fully address my earlier concerns and I do not feel adequate for publication.

Author Response

Review report #2.

 

 

Review’s comments

 

The manuscript titled "Induced spiralization in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with an energy of 70 MeV" is improved, but does not fully address my earlier concerns and I do not feel adequate for publication.

 

Author’s answers.

The authors are grateful for the work of the reviewer and his comments.

 

In this version, additions to the text of the article related to the method of measuring the X-ray spectra of the studied samples after irradiation are made; as well as the fact that the ordering effect we established is reversible, while the described effects of radiation crosslinking during irradiation and aging in [9,10,12, according to the citation order in the peer-reviewed work] are irreversible and do not show any signs of additional ordering during aging.

 

 

Previously comments (round 1).

 

  • This work is an incremental addition of the authors previously published work: Zdorovets, M. V., et al. "Induced ordering in polyethylene terephthalate films irradiated with Ar ions with 200 an energy of 70 MeV." Surface and Coatings Technology (2020): 125490. In this submission the authors have increased the previous dose by a factor of two and measured the sample as it sat over an extended period.

 

We have clarified our analysis and explanations to show that the results we obtained here are scientifically novel and interesting: the increase in the dose led to the manifestation of a new structural ordering of the spiral type. This is qualitatively different and in addition the previously discovered ordering effect with cylindrical symmetry at lower radiation doses.

 

 

  • The manuscript does not include an introduction in any form other than a review of their previous publication.

 

We have added an extensive introduction to our paper.

 

  • The authors appear to reuse images and x-ray data from their previous publication with no citation.

 

We have corrected this in the one instance where we have reused an image.

 

  • The proposed spiralization due to intra-chain rotations of benzene-carboxyl subunits is an interesting hypothesis, but there is minimal data to support this in the work presented. I think one can easily determine many other cross-linking based hypothesis that might occur due to aging after irradiation that were not eliminated in the minimal discussion.

 

We have explained the significance of article [27] in demonstrating experimentally that spiralisation is due to rotations of benzene rings with attached assymetrical dipole groups, not a hypothesis of ours. We agree that there are many processes occurring due to ageing in irradiated polymer films, but we are discussing an effect that appears immediately after irradiation: ageing helps us understand it but it is not due to ageing itself.

 

  • Although the work in this area is not extensive, the citation of only nine publications does not cover the full extent of the field.

 

We have tripled the number of citations.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors have addressed most of the referee’s critical remarks, and I would recommend the paper for publication in its present form, however one problem remains.

The authors write “In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track”.

Actually, Abu Saleh and co-workers mean the orbital electrons of neutral atoms. The SAXS method is sensitive to the volume density of electrons of this kind, while, for instance, SANS is sensitive to the volume density of hydrogen atom (protons) in a polymer. Therefore, the results from [15] do not imply violation of electroneutrality in a track (though it cannot be ruled out in principle).

Author Response

Review report #3.

 

 

Review’s comments

 

The authors have addressed most of the referee’s critical remarks, and I would recommend the paper for publication in its present form, however one problem remains.

 

The authors write “In the experiments of Abu Saleh et al. [15], it was found that the radial electron density increased with increasing radius, with the density in the inner core of the latent track (at radii less than 3 nm) being only 20% of that in the shell of the latent track, which means a relative excess of positive charge in the core of the latent track compared to its shell. It follows from Maxwell's equations that there is a radially inhomogeneous electric field across the latent track”.

 

Actually, Abu Saleh and co-workers mean the orbital electrons of neutral atoms. The SAXS method is sensitive to the volume density of electrons of this kind, while, for instance, SANS is sensitive to the volume density of hydrogen atom (protons) in a polymer. Therefore, the results from [15] do not imply violation of electroneutrality in a track (though it cannot be ruled out in principle).

 

 

Author’s answers.

The authors are grateful for the work of the reviewer and his comments.

 

In response to the second set of comments, we have further revised our text to clarify a few points including (in response to reviewer №3 comments about the interpretation of [15]) simplifying our explanation of the consequences of the electron density distributions observed in [15] to avoid misinterpretation.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop