Next Article in Journal
Efficient Synthesis and X-ray Structure of [1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-a]pyridines via Oxidative Cyclization Using N-Chlorosuccinimide (NCS)
Previous Article in Journal
Donor-Type Nickel–Dithiolene Complexes Fused with Bulky Cycloalkane Substituents and Their Application in Molecular Conductors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ferroelectric Properties and Spectroscopic Characterization of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-32PbTiO3:Er3+/Sc3+ Crystal

1
School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China
2
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Functional Materials and Devices, Xi’an 710021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(10), 1155; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101155
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 18 September 2021 / Accepted: 19 September 2021 / Published: 23 September 2021

Abstract

:
An Er3+/Sc3+ co-doped 0.68Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.32PbTiO3 ferroelectric single crystal was grown by high-temperature flux method. The remnant polarization Pr is 27.97 µC/cm2 and the coercive field Ec is 8.26 kV/cm for [100] oriented crystal. Green (524 and 551 nm) and red (654 nm) emission bands are generated at the 980 nm excitation, which corresponds to the 2H11/24I15/2, 4S3/24I15/2 and 4F9/24I15/2 transitions of Er3+, respectively. Judd–Ofelt theory has been applied to predict the spectroscopic characteristics of the as-grown crystals. The obtained J–O intensity parameters Ωt (t = 2, 4 and 6) are Ω2 = 0.76 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 1.0 × 10−20 cm2, Ω6 = 0.55 × 10−20 cm2. Spectroscopic characteristics, including optical transition probabilities, branching ratio, and radiative lifetime of Er3+ in the crystal, are determined. The calculated radiative lifetimes of 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 energy levels are 2.82 ms and 2.61 ms, respectively. These investigations provide possibilities for the crystal Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.32PbTiO3:Er3+/Sc3+ to be a new type of multifunctional crystal integrating electricity-luminescence.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the optical absorption properties of multifunctional materials are of interest for numerous academic and technology research [1,2,3,4], a lot of publications dealing with multifunctional material are concerned with the detector, optoelectronic device, and sensor [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Such research has significantly advanced during the last decade. However, it is still required to design new multifunctional systems to meet the new needs of functional devices [2,3,4].
Ferroelectric single crystals represented by Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 (PMN-PT) are well-known multifunctional materials owing to their excellent piezoelectric, ferroelectric properties, and ultra-high electromechanical coupling factors [7,8,9]. Rare earth (RE) ions as well-known luminescent activators with optical absorption and emission in the infrared and visible wavelength ranges have been widely used as dopants to design luminescent materials. Therefore, doping rare earth ions into relaxer-based ferroelectric single crystals will make the crystals simultaneously possess electrical-mechanical-optical properties, which have potential applications in developing innovative multifunctional devices. Our team members have successfully grown RE ions (Er3+, Ho3+, and Yb3+) doped PMN-PT and PSN-PMN-PT single crystals and investigated their electric and optic properties systematically [14,15,16,17,18,19]. It is found that the addition of rare-earth ions not only improves the electrical properties of the crystals but also makes them obtain optical absorption and up-conversion luminescence properties. For example, XI, Z reported that the remnant polarization Pr of PSN-PMN-PT increased from 24.2 to 30.99 µC/cm2 by the modification of Er3+. Meanwhile, seven optical absorption bands and the up-conversion emissions bands (564 nm and 665 nm) were observed for the Er3+ in PSN-PMN-PT [14].
In order to further analyze the optical absorptions and explore the spectral properties of RE ions in PMN-PT crystals, it is necessary to apply Judd–Ofelt [J-O] treatment. Based on the analysis of absorption spectra using the Judd–Ofelt theory, the main spectroscopic characteristics, including optical transition probabilities, branching ratio, and radiative lifetime, can be obtained [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Therefore, Judd–Ofelt treatment is widely applied to predict the spectroscopic characteristics for laser crystals, luminescent powders, and glass. However, relevant Judd–Ofelt treatment to the ferroelectric crystals PMN-PT doping with RE ions has not been found yet in the previous literature.
In this work, we incorporated rare earth ions Er3+/Sc3+ into PMN-PT crystal to form a new multifunctional system. It is anticipated that this new multifunctional crystal possesses excellent ferroelectric and luminescence properties. In addition, the spectroscopic characteristics of the new system have been predicted by applying J-O treatment for the first time, which will provide an understanding of the optical properties of Er3+ ions in PMN-PT crystal. The research includes the following steps: Firstly, ferroelectric crystal PMN-PT: Er3+/Sc3+ was grown by a high-temperature flux method. Secondly, SEM image, XRD patterns, hysteresis loops, absorption spectrum, and up-conversion luminescence emission spectra of the as-grown crystals were presented. Finally, we investigated the effect of modification of rare earth ions Er3+/Sc3+ on the ferroelectric properties of PMN-32PT crystal and the spectroscopic characteristics of Er3+ in PMN-PT crystal by applying the Judd-Ofelt treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Crystal Growth

PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ single crystals were grown by the high-temperature flux method. The process is as follows: Firstly, MgO and Nb2O5 powders with 99.99% purity were mixed at a molar ratio of 1:1 and calcinated at 1000 °C for 6 h to form the columbite precursor MgNb2O6. Secondly, MgNb2O6, PbO, and TiO2 powders were mixed according to the stoichiometric composition of 0.68PZN-0.32PT, and excessive 80 wt% PbO powders as the solvent of high-temperature solution were added to the mixtures. 2 wt% Er2O3 and 2 wt% Sc2O3 were also added to the mixtures and wet-milled for 12 hours in the alcohol. Then the slurry mixtures were dried at 80 °C for 24 h in a drying oven; and the dried mixture powders were filled into a platinum crucible which was placed in a corundum pot with the same shape, the space between the platinum crucible and the corundum crucible was filled with Al2O3 powders. Thirdly, the crucibles were sealed and placed in the crystal growth furnace with an automatic temperature controller, which was set from room temperature to 1330 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min, held for 12 h, and fell from 1330 °C to 650 °C at the rate of 0.01 °C/min, then cooled to room temperature spontaneously. Finally, the as-grown single crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ together with Pt crucible were boiled in nitric acid solution with the concentration of 50% until the crystals were separated from the platinum crucible. The as-grown crystals were obtained after the cleaning process in an ultrasonic cleaner when the crystals were removed from the platinum crucible. Finally, ferroelectric single crystal PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ was cut into thin slices along the exposed surface.

2.2. Characterization Procedure

Micro morphology and element content of the as-grown crystal was performed by scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 400 FEG) quipped with Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected on an X-ray Diffractometer (Bruker D8 ADVANCE, Hannover, Germany) with Cu Ka radiation at the room temperature. The ferroelectric hysteresis loops were investigated by aix-ACCT TF2000 analyzer. The UV-VIS-NIR absorption spectra were detected by UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer (CARY50000, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The up-conversion luminescence spectrum was measured by the Steady-State Spectrometer (FLS980, Edinburgh, England).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Macroscopic and Microscopic Morphology of the Crystals

Figure 1a shows the macroscopic morphology of as-grown PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals. It can be seen from the figure that the crystals present light yellow, the shape of which is irregular polyhedron or pseudo-cube with the size of 6 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm, similar to that of pure PMN-PT crystals reported in [15]. Figure 1b shows SEM image of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals at 1000 times magnification. There are obvious steps like growth stripes in the local area of the crystal surface, and the step edges are arranged in a linear parallel manner, which also exists in undoped PMN-PT crystal as shown in Figure 1c. The doping of rare earth ions has little effect on the crystal growth, due to the good tolerance of the crystal. Figure 1d shows an SEM image of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals at 5000 times magnification. It can be seen from Figure 1d that there are some corrosion pits with extremely irregular shapes in the crystal. The formation of corrosion pits is caused by the corrosion of wrapped PbO and various salt residues resulting from hot nitric acid during the separation of crystals. An energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was carried out at four random locations in the flat region of the crystal surface. Figure 1e,f shows a location and corresponding EDS spectrum. The spectrum shows that Pb, Mg, Nb, Ti, and O are the main elements in the single crystal. In addition, Er and Sc were also found, indicating that Er3+ and Sc3+ diffuse into the PMN-32PT. Table 1 shows the weight percentage of every element. wt% of Sc3+ and Er3+ are 0.13% and 2.21%, respectively.

3.2. XRD Patterns

Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of the exposed flat surface of a PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal. It can be seen from the figure that there are only two diffraction peaks corresponding to the crystal planes (100) and (200) at the range of 10°~60°, respectively, and no other impurity peaks, which indicates that the crystal grows basically along the [100] orientation. Figure 2b shows the XRD patterns of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT crystals powders for comparison. we can see that the diffraction peak positions are consistent with each other. The doping of rare earth ions does not make the crystal produce a new phase. They both present pure perovskite structure (ABO3) without pyrochlore phase or any other second phase, which indicates that Er3+/Sc3+ ions have been diffused into the lattice of the single crystal PMN-32PT. Figure 2c shows the enlarged view of the diffraction peaks of the strongest peak, we can see that the diffraction peak position of the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals is offset to the small angle. This phenomenon can be explained by the Bragg equation: 2dsinθ = kλ, where d is the interplanar spacing, θ is the diffraction angle, λ is the wavelength of X-ray, and k is the diffraction order. In the experiment, λ = 1.5406 Å, for the same k, the larger interplanar spacing, the smaller diffraction angle. When the Mg2+ (r(Mg2+) = 0.72 Å) or Nb5+ (r(Nb5+) = 0.64 Å) ions are replaced by larger Er3+ (r(Er3+) = 0.88 Å) ions, d becomes larger and the diffraction angle θ decreases. The deviation of the diffraction peak to a small angle further indicates that Er3+ diffuses into the PMN-32PT crystal lattice.

3.3. Hysteresis Loops

Polarization versus Electric field (P–E) hysteresis loop is a common characteristic of all ferroelectric materials. Figure 3a shows P–E hysteresis loops of the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals along [100] at room temperature. It can be seen from the figure that the hysteresis loop tends to be saturated as the applied electric field increases from 2 to 14 kV/cm. When the electric field increases to 14 kV/cm, the P-E hysteresis loop is saturated. The obtained remnant polarization (Pr) is 27.97 µC/cm2 and the coercive field EC is 8.26 kV/cm, which is higher than that of PMN-32PT crystal (Pr ~ 19.43 µC/cm2, EC ~ 3.83 kV/cm) shown in Figure 3b. The EC is also higher than that of PMN-32PT:Er3+ (EC ~ 6.37 kV/cm) and PMN-32PT:Ho3+ (EC ~ 4.31 kV/cm) crystals reported in literature [16] and [17]. The enhancement of the coercive field is attributed to the domain wall pinning by defects [17]. The higher coercive field makes the ferroelectric single crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ become a potential material for high-power piezoelectric device applications.

3.4. UV-VIS-NIR Absorption

Figure 4 shows the unpolarized absorption spectra of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT crystals in the range of 450~1800 nm at room temperature. It can be seen from the figure that there are no absorption bands for pure PMN-32PT, but seven optical absorption bands are explored for PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal. The center wavelengths of the seven bands are located at 491 nm (4I15/24F7/2), 524 nm (4I15/22H11/2), 551 nm (4I15/24S3/2), 654 nm (4I15/24F9/2), 801 nm (4I15/24I9/2), 973 nm (4I15/24I11/2), 1541 nm (4I15/24I13/2). The obtained absorption spectra are very similar to that of solely Er3+-doped PMN-32PT [16] and PSN-PMN-PT [14], which have a similar crystal structure. However, it is completely different from that of other laser crystals such as Yb3Al5O12, KY(WO4)2, Gd3Ga5O12 [20,21,22]. It seems that it is necessary to apply the Judd–Ofelt treatment for analysis of absorption spectrum and predict the spectroscopic characteristics for the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal. It is also necessary to do the same work on the solely Er-doped PMN-32PT crystals for comparison. In our previous work, we have reported the absorption spectrum of the solely Er3+-doped PMN-32PT crystal [16], but relevant Judd-Ofelt treatment was not carried out. In this paper, the absorption spectra of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT:Er3+ are analyzed by using the Judd–Ofelt theory.

3.5. Judd–Ofelt Analysis

The analyses of the optical unpolarized absorption spectra of laser crystals by using the Judd–Ofelt theory have been reported in much literature [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Firstly, the Judd–Ofelt model was applied to the unpolarized absorption bands to determine their experimental oscillation strength. The experimental oscillation strength (fexp) associated with a 4f–4f transition from the ground state (J) to an excited state (J′) can be obtained from analysis of the ∫D(λ)dλ of absorption bands using the following formula:
f exp ( J J ) = m c 2 π e 2 λ ¯ 2 N 0 × 1 0.43 L D ( λ ) d λ
where m is the electron mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum, e is the electron charge, N0 is the erbium concentration, L is the thickness of the sample, λ ¯ is the mean wavelength of the specific absorption band, and D(λ) is optical density. From the absorption spectra shown in Figure 4, only seven optical absorption bands from the ground state 4I15/2 of erbium ions in the total spectrum were explored. The values of experimental polarized oscillator strengths fexp of these seven bands were obtained from Formula (1). The results are listed in Table 2 along with the values of the main parameters.
On the other hand, the theoretical oscillator strength of the magnetic/electric dipole transition (fcalmd and fcaled) can be obtained by the Formulas (3) and (4), and the theoretical oscillator strength fcal is the sum of them, they are given by the followings:
f c a l ( J J ) = f c a l e d ( J J ) + f c a l m d ( J J )
f c a l e d ( J J ) = 8 π 2 m c 3 h λ ¯ ( 2 J + 1 ) × ( n 2 + 2 ) 2 9 n t = 2 , 4 , 6 Ω t | 4 f N ( S L ) J | | U ( t ) | | 4 f N ( S L ) J | 2
f c a l m d ( J J ) = h n 6 m c λ ¯ ( 2 J + 1 ) × | 4 f N ( S L ) J L + 2 S 4 f N ( S L ) J | 2
where J and J′ are the angular momentums of the initial and final level, respectively; h is the Planck constant; n is the average refractive index which can be express as n = (2no + ne)/3. The values of no(λ) and ne(λ) used here were derived from reference [12]; U(t) (t = 2, 4 and 6) are the reduced matrix elements of the unit tensor operator; (L + 2S) is the magnetic dipole operator which depends on ∆J given in [28]. Because of the magnetic dipole selection rules: ∆l = 0;S = 0;L = 0;J = 0, ±1;M = 0, ±1; the magnetic dipole transitions only contribute here to the 4I15/24I13/2 absorption band. Ωt (t = 2, 4, and 6) are Judd–Ofelt parameters, which characterize the efficiency of interaction of the earth ions with the field environment. The J-O parameters t (t = 2, 4, and 6) were evaluated from least-square fitting the measured fexp values to the calculated ones fcal. The quality of the fitting can be evaluated by root mean square (RMS) deviation δrms by the following:
δ r m s = ( f exp i f c a l i ) 2 N 3
where N is a number of is absorption bands. In this paper N = 7. Table 2 shows the fcal and fexp that result from the above-mentioned analysis together with the δrms and the effective J–O parameters Ωt (t = 2, 4 and 6) for the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals. We can see that the values of theoretical oscillator strength fcal are practically closed to those of experimental oscillator strength fexp and the δrms between which is 0.38 × 10−6 for PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+. Based on our previous work reported in the literature [10], Judd–Ofelt analysis was also carried out for absorption spectra of PMN-32PT:Er3+ in this paper and the calculated results are shown in Table 3. The first column of Table 4 shows the δrms of Er3+ in some laser crystals for comparison. It can be seen that the obtained δrms is lower than that of several laser crystals containing Er3+ [22,23,24,26]. The low RMS deviation indicates that our fitting is effective. The obtained effective J–O parameters Ωt (t = 2, 4 and 6) are Ω2 = 0.76 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 1.0 × 10−20 cm2, Ω6 = 0.55 × 10−20 cm2 for the crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and Ω2 = 1.77 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 1.50 × 10−20 cm2, Ω6 = 0.79 × 10−20 cm2 for PMN-32PT:Er3+. As well known, Judd–Ofelt parameters t (t = 2, 4, and 6) are important for the investigation of the local structure and bonding in the vicinity of rare-earth ions. They characterize the interaction of rare-earth ions with the host crystals. In addition, the spectroscopic quality factor, defined by Ω46, is critically important in predicting the stimulated emission for the active laser medium. For comparative study, the J–O parameters and Ω46 of other crystals are also listed in Table 4. In this work, the values of Ω46 are 1.82 and1.90 for PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT:Er3+, respectively, which are smaller than that of LiNbO3 [26,27,28]. Still, it is larger than that of other crystals reported in the literature [20,21,22,23,24,25]. The high spectroscopic quality factor Ω46 indicates the ferroelectric single crystal PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT:Er3+ can be promising laser crystal.
Based on the obtained J-O parameters t (t = 2, 4, and 6), the radiative transition probability A(J-J′) of the electric and magnetic dipole transitions from an excited manifold J′ to a lower manifold J can be calculated by followings:
A e d ( J , J ) = 64 π 4 e 2 3 h ( 2 J + 1 ) λ 3 ˉ [ n ( n 2 + 2 3 ) 2 t = 2 , 4 , 6 Ω t | 4 f N ( S L ) J | | U ( t ) | | 4 f N ( S L ) J | 2 ]
A m d ( J , J ) = 4 π 4 e 2 h 3 m 2 c 2 ( 2 J + 1 ) λ ¯ 3 [ n 2 | 4 f N ( S L ) J L + 2 S 4 f N ( S L ) J | 2 ]
A ( J , J ) = A e d ( J , J ) + A m d ( J , J )
Branching ratios β and radiative lifetimes τr were calculated according to the following.
The calculated electric and magnetic dipole spontaneous emission probabilities, radiative lifetimes, and branching ratios of Er3+ ions in crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT:Er3+ are summarized in Table 5. The radiative transitions of 4F9/24I15/2 (654 nm), 4S3/24I15/2 (551 nm), and 2H11/24I15/2 (524 nm) have larger fluorescence branching ratios in visible wavelength regions. The fluorescence branching ratios of them are 81%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. Moreover, the radiative lifetimes of 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 levels for the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals are estimated to be 2.82 ms and 2.61 ms, respectively, which are longer than those of PMN-32PT:Er3+, KY(WO4)2:Er3+/Yb3+ [21], Gd3Ga5O12:Er3+/Pr3+ [22], and Lu2O3:Er3+ [29] shown in Table 6, indicating excellent energy storage capability for the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals.
β = A J J J A J J
τ = 1 J A J J

3.6. Up-Conversion Emission

Figure 5a shows the up-conversion emission spectra of Er3+/Sc3+ co-doped PMN-32PT crystals irradiated by a 980-nm laser with different pump power. Three emission bands are generated, corresponding to 2H11/24I15/2 (524 nm), 4S3/24I15/2 (551 nm), 4F9/24I15/2 (654 nm) transitions. These assignments are coinciding with the J-O analysis because these dipole transitions have large fluorescence branching ratios and high radiative quantum efficiencies. It can be seen from the spectrum that the green light has undergone Stark level splitting, 551 nm splitting into 540 nm, 551 nm, and 565 nm. This is due to the fact that each spectral branch of rare earth ions has a 2J+1 degeneracy, if the symmetry of the crystal field is low, then the degeneracy of the energy level will be canceled or partially canceled, resulting in energy level splitting. Figure 5b shows the dependence of emission intensities on pump power used to investigate the up-conversion mechanism and the number of photons in the up-conversion process. The up-converted emission intensity Iup is proportional to IR excitation intensity IIR, Iup ∝ IIRm where m is the number of pumping photons. The dependence emission intensity on pump power is quadratic and obtained m values are 1.92 2.21 and 2.27 for 4F9/24I15/2 (654 nm), 4S3/24I15/2 (551 nm), and 2H11/24I15/2 (524 nm), respectively. These values are close to 2, which indicates that two excitation photons contribute to one UC photon.
Finally, it should be stressed that all of the preceding results and discussion concentrate on the spectroscopic properties of Er3+. As no absorption and emission bands corresponding to Sc3+ are generated, spectroscopic properties of Sc3+ cannot be investigated by Judd–Ofelt treatment. However, comparison results of the Judd–Ofelt analysis carried out for Er3+ doped PMN-32PT and Er3+/Sc3+ co-doped PMN-32PT crystals are given in Table 6, where the longer radiative lifetime for PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal indicated that Sc3+ ion doping improves the optical quality of the PMN-32PT:Er3+ crystal, but the molecular mechanism needs to be further investigated.

4. Conclusions

PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ single crystals were grown by using the high-temperature flux method. The coercive field EC of PMN-32PT crystal was enhanced from 3.83 kV/cm to 8.26 kV/cm by Er3+/Sc3+ ions modification. Moreover, seven optical absorption bands of Er3+ are explored in the PMN-32PT crystal field. Based on the analysis of absorption spectra using the Judd–Ofelt theory, the main spectroscopic characteristics, including optical transition probabilities, branching ratio, and radiative lifetime, have been obtained. The obtained J–O intensity parameters Ωt (t = 2, 4 and 6) are Ω2 = 0.76 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 1.0 × 10−20cm2, Ω6 = 0.55 × 10−20cm2 for PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ single crystals, and the spectroscopic quality factor, Ω4/Ω6, is 1.82. The investigations have shown that PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ looks promising for laser applications. Combined with the ferroelectric properties of the host crystal, Er3+/Sc3+ co-doped PMN-32PT crystal is expected to become a new type of multifunctional crystal integrating electricity-light.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and Z.X.; methodology, J.Z.; software, J.Z.; validation, J.Z., X.W. and Z.X.; formal analysis, J.Z.; investigation, J.Z.; resources, X.W.; data curation, A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.X.; visualization, X.W.; supervision, H.F.; project administration, W.L.; funding acquisition, Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51772235), the Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials Chemistry and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 2016DP173016); Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Functional Materials and Devices (Grant No. 2015SZSJ-59-5, and No. 20JS058), Fundamental Research Foundation of XATU of China (Grant No. XAGDXJJ16020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Kenzhina, I.E.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Saiymova, M.; Tishkevich, D.I.; Trukhanov, S.V.; Trukhanov, A.V. Synthesis, phase composition and structural and conductive properties of ferroelectric microparticles based on ATiOx (A = Ba, Ca, Sr). Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 17236–17242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, H.; Jia, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hao, X. Electro-optical effect and optical absorption in (K, Na)NbO3-based piezoceramics. Scr. Mater. 2020, 178, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Y.; Xi, Z.; Guo, F.; Fang, P.; Li, X.; Long, W.; He, A.; Zhu, Q. Electric and photoluminescence properties of Eu3+-doped PZN-9PT single crystal. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 11295–11302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sadok, I.B.H.; Hajlaoui, F.; Karoui, K.; Audebrand, N.; Roisnel, T.; Zouari, N. Crystal structure, optical and electrical properties of metal-halide compound [C7H16N2] [ZnCl4]. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 129, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vinnik, D.A.; Kokovkin, V.V.; Volchek, V.V.; Zhivulin, V.E.; Abramov, P.A.; Cherkasova, N.A.; Sun, Z.; Sayyed, M.I.; Tishkevich, D.I.; Trukhanov, A.V. Electrocatalytic activity of various hexagonal ferrites in OER process. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 270, 124818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaczkan, M.; Borowska, M.; Kołodziejak, K.; Łukasiewicz, T.; Malinowski, M. Impact of the heat treatment conditions on crystal structure, morphology and magnetic properties evolution in BaM nanohexaferrites. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 886, 158961–158969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, E.; Cao, W. Relaxor-based ferroelectric single crystals: Growth, domain engineering, characterization and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 65, 124–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lu, B.; Jian, X.; Lin, X.; Yao, Y.; Tao, T.; Liang, B.; Luo, H.; Lu, S. Enhanced electrocaloric effect in 0.73Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.27PbTiO3 single crystals via direct measurement. Crystals 2020, 10, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Long, X.; Han, S.; Pan, S. High piezoelectric response of a new ternary ferroelectric Pb(Ho1/2Nb1/2)O3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 single crystal. Mater Lett. 2015, 143, 88–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Man, G.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; He, H. Phase transformation and anelastic behaviors of PMN-0.33PT single crystals via nanoindentation with different strain rates. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 21604–21609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Ren, B.; Luo, H.; Ge, W.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, S. Microstructure and dielectric relaxation of dipolar defects in Mn-doped (1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–xPbTiO3 single crystals. Scr. Mater. 2013, 69, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, C.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xu, H.; Lin, D.; Luo, H. Optical dispersion properties of tetragonal relaxor ferroelectric single crystals 0.65Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.35PbTiO3. Opt. Mater. 2007, 29, 1055–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Z.J.; He, C.; Qiao, H.M.; Pang, D.F.; Yang, X.M.; Zhao, S.G.; Li, X.Z.; Liu, Y.; Long, X.F. Insitudi-, piezo-, ferroelectric properties and domain configurations of Pb(Sc1/2Nb1/2 )O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3 )O3–PbTiO3 ferroelectric crystals. Crystal Growth Des. 2018, 18, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xi, Z.; He, A.; Fang, P.; Li, X.; Long, W. Electric and optical properties of Er3+ and Er3+/Yb3+modified PSN-PMN-PT crystals. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 722, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chu, X. Growth, Struction and Performance of PMN-Based Relaxor Ferroelectric Crystal. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Long, W.; Chu, X.; Xi, Z.; Fang, P.; Li, X.; Cao, W. Growth and property enhancement of Er3+-doped 0.68Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 -0.32PbTiO3 single crystal. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 36, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, H.; Xi, Z.; Fang, P.; Long, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; He, A. Optical properties induced and ferroelectric properties enhanced of the PMN-32PT: Ho relaxor ferroelectric crystals. Optik 2018, 164, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. He, A.; Xi, Z.; Li, X.; Long, W.; Fang, P.; Zhao, J.; Yu, H. Optical properties of Ho3+ and Ho3+/Yb3+ modified PSN-PMN-PT crystals. Mater. Lett. 2018, 219, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, A.; Xi, Z.; Li, X.; Long, W.; Zhang, T.; Fang, P.; Zhang, J. Temperature dependence of upconversion luminescence and sensing sensitivity of Ho3+/Yb3+ modified PSN-PMN-PT crystals. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 803, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaczkan, M.; Borowska, M.; Kołodziejak, K.; Łukasiewicz, T.; Malinowski, M. Intensity of optical transitions of Er3+ in Yb3Al5O12 crystal. Opt. Mater. 2008, 30, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Han, X.; Lin, Z.; Hu, Z.; Wang, G.; Tsuboi, T. Spectral parameters of Er3+ ion in Yb3+/Er3+: KY(WO4)2 crystal. Mater. Res. Innov. 2003, 7, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, Q.; Piao, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, D. Optical and Judd-Ofelt spectroscopic study of Er3+/Pr3+-codoped Gd3Ga5O12 crystal. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 783, 836–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, J.; Han, S.; Liu, L.; Yao, Q.; Dong, W.; Li, J. Crystal structure and Judd–Ofelt analysis of Er3+ Doped LuAl3(BO3)4 crystal. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2018, 9, 096101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, F.; Liu, W.; Dou, R.; He, Y.; Sun, G. Czochralski growth and spectral investigations of Er: GSAG laser crystal. J. Lumin. 2018, 199, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Loiko, P.A.; Vilejshikova, E.V.; Khaidukov, N.M.; Brekhovskikh, M.N.; Mateos, X.; Aguiló, M.; Yumashev, K. Judd–Ofelt modeling, stimulated-emission cross-sections and non-radiative relaxation in Er3+: K2YF5 crystals. J. Lumin. 2016, 180, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qian, Y.; Wang, R.; Chao, X.; Xu, W.; Wu, X.; Yang, C. Spectroscopic characteristics of 1.54 μm emission in Er/Yb: LiNbO3 crystals tridoped with In3+ ions. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 527, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, A.; Sun, L.; Zheng, Z.; Wu, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, Y.; Lü, T. Spectroscopic analysis of Er3+ transition in Mg/Er codoped LiNbO3 crystal. J. Lumin. 2008, 128, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cantelar, E.; Marin-Dobrincic, M.; Jardiel, T.; Caballero, A.C.; Cussó, F. Judd–Ofelt analysis of powder samples: LiNbO3:Er3+ submicron-sized particles as a model case. Opt. Mater. 2015, 41, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hou, W.; Zhao, H.; Li, N.; Xue, Y.; Shi, J.; Xu, X.; Xu, J. Growth and spectroscopic properties of Er: Lu2O3 crystal grown by floating zone method. Mater. Res. Express. 2019, 6, 066203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Photograph of crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (b) SEM image of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (c) SEM image of undoped PMN-32PT (d) SEM image of corrosion pits in crystal PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (5000 × SEM morphology) (e) a location for EDS (f) EDS spectrum of a location on PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals surface.
Figure 1. (a) Photograph of crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (b) SEM image of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (c) SEM image of undoped PMN-32PT (d) SEM image of corrosion pits in crystal PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (5000 × SEM morphology) (e) a location for EDS (f) EDS spectrum of a location on PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals surface.
Crystals 11 01155 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (a)platelet sample. (b) crystal powder (c)zoomed XRD patterns from 30.5° to 32.5°.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ (a)platelet sample. (b) crystal powder (c)zoomed XRD patterns from 30.5° to 32.5°.
Crystals 11 01155 g002
Figure 3. Polarization versus electric field (P–E) hysteresis loops of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+crystal (a) P–E hysteresis loops at different electric fields (b) P–E hysteresis loops of the crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT at saturated state.
Figure 3. Polarization versus electric field (P–E) hysteresis loops of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+crystal (a) P–E hysteresis loops at different electric fields (b) P–E hysteresis loops of the crystals PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ and PMN-32PT at saturated state.
Crystals 11 01155 g003
Figure 4. The absorption spectra of PMN-32PT and PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals.
Figure 4. The absorption spectra of PMN-32PT and PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals.
Crystals 11 01155 g004
Figure 5. (a) UC emission spectra of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals at 980 nm excitation with different pump power (b) Power dependence of the up-conversion emission intensities.
Figure 5. (a) UC emission spectra of PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystals at 980 nm excitation with different pump power (b) Power dependence of the up-conversion emission intensities.
Crystals 11 01155 g005
Table 1. The element content of the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal obtained by EDS.
Table 1. The element content of the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal obtained by EDS.
Wt%OMgTiNbPbScEr
A 121.451.684.0215.6954.970.241.92
A 220.171.723.8716.7155.430.022.12
A 319.701.533.5015.6756.730.082.79
A 416.721.734.2716.7158.380.172.01
Average19.511.673.9216.256.370.132.21
Table 2. fcal, fexp, δrsm and t(t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal.
Table 2. fcal, fexp, δrsm and t(t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in the PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+ crystal.
S′L′J′ λ ¯ /nm D ( λ ) d λ × 10 6 f exp × 10 6 f cal × 10 6 δrsm
4I15/24F7/24912.05594.35674.43120.38 × 10−6
4I15/22H11/25243.04015.67675.6909
4I15/24S3/25511.11671.86471.9435
4I15/24F9/26543.55414.22794.2733
4I15/24I9/28011.43071.13460.7911
4I15/24I11/29732.59781.39610.7232
4I15/24I13/2154111.38432.44232.4424
Ω2 = 0.76 × 10−20/cm2; Ω4 = 1.0 × 10−20/cm2; Ω6 = 0.55 × 10−20/cm2
Table 3. fcal, fexp,δrsm and t (t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in the PMN-32PT:Er3+ crystal.
Table 3. fcal, fexp,δrsm and t (t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in the PMN-32PT:Er3+ crystal.
S′L′J′ λ ¯ /nm D ( λ ) d λ × 10 6 f exp × 10 6 f cal × 10 6 δrsm
4I15/24F7/24913.14706.35226.47680.18 × 10−6
4I15/22H11/25226.208711.088211.0951
4I15/24S3/25511.78902.85712.8171
4I15/24F9/26545.63286.40866.3404
4I15/24I9/28011.52321.17281.1944
4I15/24I11/29732.79911.43581.1051
4I15/24I13/2154115.36543.14873.1487
Ω2 = 1.77 × 10−20/cm2; Ω4 = 1.50 × 10−20/cm2; Ω6 = 0.79 × 10−20/cm2
Table 4. The J-O intensity parameters t (t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in different crystals.
Table 4. The J-O intensity parameters t (t = 2, 4 and 6) of Er3+ in different crystals.
Crystalδrms × 10−6Ω2 × 10−20/cm2Ω4 × 10−20/cm2Ω6 × 10−20/cm2Ω4/Ω6Reference
Yb3Al5O12:Er3+0.390.270.901.160.78[20]
KY(WO4)2: Er3+/Yb3+0.276.331.351.900.71[21]
Gd3Ga5O12:Er3+/Pr3+0.705.136.307.570.83[22]
LuAl3(BO3)4: Er3+0.888.333.833.551.08[23]
GSAG: Er3+0.751.941.581.411.12[24]
K2YF5:Er3+0.291.220.650.461.41[25]
LiNbO3:Er3+/Yb3+0.987.233.141.422.21[26]
LiNbO3:Er3+/Mg2+0.342.360.760.302.53[27]
LiNbO3:Er3+/6.192.170.972.23[28]
PMN-32PT:Er3+0.181.771.500.791.90This work
PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+0.380.761.00.551.82This work
Table 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Er3+ in PMN-32PTcrystal.
Table 5. Spectroscopic parameters of Er3+ in PMN-32PTcrystal.
S′L′J′→ SLJλ/nm PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+PMN-32PT:Er3+
Aed/s−1Amd/s−1A/s−1 τ / m s β Aed/s−1Amd/s−1A/s−1 τ / m s β
4I13/24I15/21540286683552.821.00420684882.051.00
4I11/24I15/297334403442.610.9052505251.750.92
4I13/22642172138 0.10262147 0.08
4I9/24I15/279355605561.600.8985208521.040.89
4I13/2163561061 0.1097097 0.10
4I11/24287347 0.01549 0.01
4F9/24I15/26544505045050.180.816684066840.120.81
4I13/211378580858 0.16127501275 0.15
4I11/219951590159 0.032370237 0.03
4I 9/2373128028 0.0137037 0.00
4S3/24I15/25512876028760.250.734169041690.170.73
4I13/28607590759 0.19110201102 0.19
4I11/212752330233 0.063390339 0.06
4I 9/2181686086 0.021190119 0.02
4F9/2353911011 0.0016016 0.00
2H11/24I15/25249417094170.080.6918,360018,3600.040.70
4I13/2789272002720 0.20530905309 0.20
4I11/211269380938 0.07183501835 0.07
4I 9/215273980398 0.037430743 0.03
4F 9/225877077 0.011510151 0.01
4S 3/29605202 0.00303 0.00
Table 6. Radiative lifetimes of Er3+ in laser crystal.
Table 6. Radiative lifetimes of Er3+ in laser crystal.
Crystal4I13/24I11/24I9/24F9/24S3/22H11/2Reference
Yb3Al5O12:Er3+6.2384.9064.5480.5730.3840.517[20]
LiNbO3:(1%mol) Er3+2.5051.8771.8410.2460.2110.030[27]
KY(WO4)2: Er3+/Yb3+2.451.792.290.230.150.05[21]
Lu2O3:Er3+1.362.525.220.710.370.12[29]
Gd3Ga5O12:Er3+/Pr3+0.780.620.600.070.050.04[22]
PMN-32PT:Er3+2.051.751.040.120.170.04This work
PMN-32PT:Er3+/Sc3+2.822.611.600.180.25 0.07This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Xi, Z.; Wang, X.; Feng, H.; Long, W.; He, A. Ferroelectric Properties and Spectroscopic Characterization of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-32PbTiO3:Er3+/Sc3+ Crystal. Crystals 2021, 11, 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101155

AMA Style

Zhang J, Xi Z, Wang X, Feng H, Long W, He A. Ferroelectric Properties and Spectroscopic Characterization of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-32PbTiO3:Er3+/Sc3+ Crystal. Crystals. 2021; 11(10):1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jin, Zengzhe Xi, Xinzhe Wang, Hao Feng, Wei Long, and Aiguo He. 2021. "Ferroelectric Properties and Spectroscopic Characterization of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-32PbTiO3:Er3+/Sc3+ Crystal" Crystals 11, no. 10: 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11101155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop