Next Article in Journal
Intensity of Radiative Recombination in the Germanium/Silicon Nanosystem with Germanium Quantum Dots
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrodeposition of Graphene Oxide Modified Composite Coatings Based on Nickel-Chromium Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Affinity and Structural Analysis of the U1A RNA Recognition Motif with Engineered Methionines to Improve Experimental Phasing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Probabilistic Method for Estimating the Influence of Corrosion on the CuAlNi Shape Memory Alloy in Different Marine Environments

Crystals 2021, 11(3), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11030274
by Špiro Ivošević 1,*, Nataša Kovač 2, Gyöngyi Vastag 3, Peter Majerič 4 and Rebeka Rudolf 4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Crystals 2021, 11(3), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11030274
Submission received: 9 February 2021 / Revised: 6 March 2021 / Accepted: 7 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrocrystallization of Metallic Alloys and Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments for authors are in the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work layout requires correction:

Introduction

Lines 165- 174 should be in Materials and Methods chapter

Materials and Methods

Lines 209- 217 should be in Introductions chapter

Lines 218- 221 is a repetition of information from Introduction

Line 204 – 206 should be in Materials section

2.3. 2. EDX results should be in Results chapter

There is a very little information about ICP, XRF, EDX methods. Please add a discussion of the lower limits of detection and the errors involved. Add a few sentences explaining why you think these results from ICP, XRF, EDX are accurate, repeatable, and precise and can be used.  Where is the literature review of usage of your type of analyses?

References should be edited e.g. [11]

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept.

Back to TopTop