3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows X-ray diffraction patterns of the synthesized samples depending on the composition. The general view of the diffraction patterns indicates the polycrystalline structure of the synthesized ceramic, while a change in stoichiometry leads to the formation of new peaks, which indicates that a new phase was formed in the structure of the ceramic. According to the phase analysis performed, it was found that for the LTO-1 sample, the angular position and intensities of diffraction reflections corresponded to the monoclinic phase Li
2TiO
3 with the crystal lattice parameters a = 5.042 Å, b = 8.741 Å, c = 9.717 Å, β = 100.15°. For samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, the observed appearance of new diffraction reflections corresponded to the formation of the cubic phase of LiTiO
2. Moreover, in the case of the LTO-3 sample, this phase was well structured, in contrast to the LTO-2 sample. The formation of the cubic phase in the samples led to a change in the parameters of the crystal lattice due to the processes of phase formation. Thus, the parameters of the crystal lattices for the LTO-2 sample, according to estimates, were for the monoclinic phase Li
2TiO
3 a = 5.010 Å, b = 8.703 Å, c = 9.679 Å, β = 99.84°, for the cubic phase LiTiO
2 a = 8.4596 Å. For the LTO-3 sample, for the monoclinic phase Li
2TiO
3 a = 4.991 Å, b = 8.681 Å, c = 9.662 Å, β = 99.94°, for the cubic phase LiTiO
2 a = 8.478 Å. Using full-profile analysis to estimate the peak areas and formula
where
Iphase is the average integrated intensity of the main phase of the diffraction line,
Iadmixture is the average integrated intensity of the additional phase, and
R is the structure coefficient equal to 1.45, the ratios of the contributions of the two phases were determined for the LTO-2 and LTO-3 samples. The Li
2TiO
3/LiTiO
2 phase ratio for the LTO-2 and LTO-3 samples was 91/9 and 79/21, respectively. Using the formula
where
Scr is the area of diffraction reflections,
Sam is the area characteristic of disordered regions or an amorphous halo, the degree of crystallinity was determined, which characterizes the structural ordering as a result of the processes of structure formation during synthesis and phase formation. According to the data obtained, the crystallinity degree for the samples under study was 89.5–91%, which indicates a high degree of structural ordering. The formation of the cubic phase, according to the analysis of the density of ceramic from the obtained X-ray diffraction data, leads to its increase from 3.459 g/cm
3 for the LTO-1 sample, to 3.536 g/cm
3 and 3.581 g/cm
3 for the LTO-2 and LTO-3 samples, respectively. Thus, it was found that an increase in the contribution of the cubic phase of LiTiO
2 leads not only to an increase in the degree of structural ordering and density of ceramic, but also to a decrease in porosity, which significantly affects the strength properties of ceramic. To calculate porosity, a method based on a change in ceramic density obtained from the analysis of the crystal lattice volume change was used. As the calculation formula,
was used, where
p0 is the density of the reference sample. According to the calculations, the porosity of the LTO-1, LTO-2, and LTO-3 samples was 6.5%, 4.8%, and 3.2%, respectively.
Figure 2 shows the results of changes in morphological features of the synthesized ceramics, depending on the change in composition. From the presented data, it can be seen that, for the LTO-1 sample, small pyramidal or rhomboid particles predominate, the average size of which varies from 30 to 50 nm. There are also large pyramidal particles in the structure, the concentration of which does not exceed 5–10% of the total. In the case when a cubic phase begins to form in the structure of ceramic, an enlargement of the particle size during sintering is observed, as well as a change in their shape from rhomboid and pyramidal to close to spherical or oval. There is also an increase in particle sizes to 100–120 nm and 150–200 nm in the cases of samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, respectively. This behavior indicates that the formation of the cubic phase of LiTiO
2 in the structure of ceramic has a significant effect on the morphological features of particles. It can also be seen from a detailed analysis of the morphological features that an increase in the LiTiO
2 phase leads not only to an enlargement of particles, but also to their compaction with the formation of large agglomerates fused together, in contrast to LTO-1 samples, for which the upper layer of particles appears loose and porous.
As is known, lithium and titanium belong to a group of metals of increased instability, which means that they can corrode in neutral media by oxidation and amorphization. This behavior of these structures makes them unstable to external influences, which can significantly affect the performance of ceramics when interacting with the environment. At the same time, an important role in the assessment of corrosion processes is played by such quantities as the loss or increase in mass of the samples, as well as the corrosion rate, which is determined by a whole set of factors, such as the phase composition, surface morphology, the degree of structural perfection in the initial state, etc.
Figure 3 shows the results of changes in the mass of samples during corrosion tests in an acidic electrolyte, depending on the temperature of the environment. The general view of the changes is characterized by two stages, which reflect different degradation processes. The first stage is characterized by an insignificant mass gain of 1.5–2.0%, which is associated with the formation of an oxide film on the surface of ceramics. In this case, the time frames for this stage were different for both the solution temperature and the type of ceramics. For example, the weight gain for LTO-1 samples occurs in the range of 5 to 15 days, depending on the temperature of the electrolyte. It was also found that an increase in the electrolyte temperature leads to a decrease in the time interval for weight gain, which indicates an increase in the rate of degradation. For samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, the processes of weight gain begin after 6–10 days of being in solution, which indicates resistance to the formation of oxide films on ceramics. In this case, in the case of the LTO-3 sample, the time of formation of an oxide film and an increase in mass at an electrolyte temperature of 25 °C occurred after 20 days of being in the electrolyte.
The second stage is characterized by a decrease in mass, which is due to the occurrence of degradation and corrosion processes associated with the formation of amorphous inclusions and partial destruction of the samples. In this case, as for all the samples under study, there was a tendency to increase in weight loss, with an increase in the electrolyte temperature. This behavior of corrosion processes is due to the acceleration of the dissolution of the formed oxide film at the initial stage, followed by the introduction of oxygen and hydrogen into the structure, leading to the destruction of chemical and crystalline bonds. In this case, the most probable processes are pitting corrosion or intergranular corrosion occurring at grain boundaries. In the case of LTO-1 samples, for which, in the initial state, a porous layer on the surface of the particles was observed on the surface, the rate of weight loss is maximum, and the maximum losses were from 30 to 60% of the initial weight, depending on the electrolyte temperature. At the same time, in the case of samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, the mass loss was much less. Such a difference in the dynamics of mass change for samples LTO-2 and LTO-3 compared to sample LTO-1 may be associated with the presence of a cubic phase in their structure, as well as larger particle sizes, in addition to a decrease in the concentration of porous inclusions in the structure due to higher density.
Based on the obtained data on the change in the mass of ceramics, the specific corrosion rate was calculated using the formula
, where Δ
m is the change in the mass of the samples,
S is the surface area, and
t is the corrosion time.
Figure 4a shows the calculation results. As can be seen from the presented data, the largest decrease in the corrosion rate was observed for the LTO-3 samples, for which the decrease in the corrosion rate was from 50 to 70%. This decrease was due to the presence of a cubic phase in the structure, which, as mentioned earlier, leads to a strengthening of the structure and a decrease in the corrosion rate. At the same time, an increase in temperature leads to a sharp increase in the rate of degradation of the surface layer, which indicates the instability of single-phase structures to aggressive media at elevated temperatures. The formation of a cubic phase and an increase in its concentration leads to a significant decrease in the degradation rate, which indicates an increase in the ceramic stability.
Figure 4b shows the results of the change in the depth corrosion value of the ceramics surface obtained, taking into account the density change data. From the data presented, it can be seen that the formation of the LiTiO
2 cubic phase, resulting in an increase in the density of the ceramics, had a significant effect on the depth of the corrosive layer over time. A two- to three-fold decrease in the depth of corrosion for samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, in comparison with sample LTO-1 at high temperatures of an aggressive medium, was due to the denser ceramic surface structure, as well as low density. In the case of LTO-3 samples, when they were in an aggressive environment at a temperature of 25 °C, the low corrosion rate and the depth of the corroded surface indicates that the main corrosion mechanism in this case was pitting and intergranular corrosion, which is clearly seen on the SEM images of LTO-3 samples after 30 days of testing (See
Figure 5).
Figure 5 also shows the results of elemental analysis performed from different parts of the samples with significant visual differences (marked with orange circles). According to the elemental analysis, the regions without porous inclusions contained 24–25 at.% titanium and 74–75 at.% oxygen (lithium is a forbidden element for the energy dispersive analysis method). This ratio of titanium and oxygen elements was close enough for the stoichiometric ratio Ti:O = 1:3. The porous areas marked in
Figure 5 by points 3–5, according to the elemental analysis data, contained a higher oxygen content of 80–82%, which indicates that degradation occurs due to the formation of porous inclusions containing a high oxygen concentration. When ceramics react with a solution of sulfuric acid, the following chemical reactions (1–8) are possible:
1) Li2TiO3 + H2SO4 <=> LiHSO4 + LiHTiO3
2) LiHTiO3 + H+ <=> H2TiO3 + Li+
3) H2TiO3 <=> [TiO3]2− + 2H+
4) [TiO3]2− => TiO2 + O2−
5) [TiO3]2− + 2H+ => TiO2 + H2O
6) LiTiO2 + H2SO4 <=> LiHSO4 + HTiO2
7) HTiO2 <=> [TiO2]− + H+
8) 2[TiO2]− + 2H+ => Ti2O3 + H2O
When Li2TiO3 and LiTiO2 react with sulfuric acid, lithium ion is first exchanged for hydrogen ion to form completely substituted phases. Therefore, high acidity can lead to the release of oxygen and the formation of titanium oxides. However, as the X-ray phase analysis shows, no titanium oxides were detected on the samples, thus most likely only 20% sulfuric acid is not sufficient for 4,5 reactions to take place in the case of Li2TiO3 and reaction 8 in the case of LiTiO2. Thus, etching occurs, followed by destruction of the particles under the influence of acid. Since the structure of Li2TiO3 has cavities due to the monoclinic structure, the Li2TiO3 etching reaction rate is higher than in the case of a cubic, denser structure of LiTiO2.
Figure 6 shows the results of X-ray diffraction of the samples under study after corrosion tests at a temperature of 75 °C. As can be seen from the data presented, the main structural changes are associated with deformation and changes in diffraction reflection intensities of the samples in comparison with the initial X-ray diffraction patterns. At the same time, the formation of new peaks was not established, which indicates the absence of phase transformation processes, or may be due to the washing out of the formed metastable phases in the near-surface damaged layer during the tests. Moreover, the main changes included the ratio of areas characteristic of amorphous inclusions and diffraction reflections, which characterizes the structural ordering degree (crystallinity degree). As can be seen from the data presented, the LTO-1 sample, for which the greatest changes in diffraction reflections are observed, associated with an increase in shape asymmetry and a sharp decrease in reflections intensity, while the decrease in crystallinity degree of was more than 40% (from 89.5% to 46.7%). At the same time, the shape of the main reflections at 2θ = 28 and 36° was sharply deformed with the formation of a halo-like structure, which indicates strong amorphization. In the case of two-phase LTO-2 and LTO-3 samples, changes in the intensities and shapes of diffraction reflections were less pronounced. At the same time, in the case of the LTO-3 sample, the main changes are associated with the reflection intensities ratio redistribution characteristic of the Li
2TiO
3 and LiTiO
2 phases. The change in the ratio indicates that the amorphization of the structure occurs as a result of the decomposition of the Li
2TiO
3 phase, the reflection intensities of which become lower in comparison with the reflection intensities characteristic of the LiTiO
2 phase. At the same time, for the LTO-3 sample, the deformation of the reflections shape was less pronounced than for other samples, which indicates a lower degradation degree and a lower corrosion rate. The analysis of changes in the porosity of samples after corrosion tests in comparison with the initial data is shown in
Figure 7. The data presented shows that, as a result of corrosion tests, the greatest change in porosity was observed for LTO-1 samples, for which the increase in porosity was 2.2–2.8 times, depending on the medium temperature. In this case, for LTO-3 samples, the change in porosity was no more than 62.5% at a temperature of 75 °C, which indicates a high degradation resistance of ceramics.
In the case of a large loss of sample mass during a long-term corrosion process, the main degradation mechanisms are the formation of amorphous inclusions and disordering regions, which lead to a sharp increase in deformation distortions in the structure and subsequent destruction of crystalline and chemical bonds. The deformation of the crystal structure can be caused both by the processes of incorporation of oxygen and hydrogen, and due to the formation of transient metastable oxide phases of titanium or lithium, leading to partial destruction of the structure. Based on the analysis of changes in the parameters of the crystal lattice, interplanar distances, the indices of the degree of deformation of the crystal lattice, were calculated for all the samples under study, depending on the conditions of being in the medium. The deformation index characterizes the stability of the crystal structure to external influences, and can serve as a measure for determining the critical point, after which the structure of ceramics breaks down and degrades. The results of the change in the deformation index are shown in
Figure 8. The deformation index was calculated based on the change in the diffraction maxima position, characterizing the interplanar distance. For calculations, the following formula was used:
, where
dpristine,
dcorr are interplanar distances before and after external influences.
The results obtained clearly confirm the previously stated assumption that, at high mass losses, the crystal structure is deformed due to the formation of amorphous inclusions and disordering, leading to the destruction of ceramics. Therefore, for the LTO-1 samples for which the maximum weight loss was observed, the degree of deformation of the crystal structure is maximum. At the same time, the nature of the change in the magnitude of the degree of deformation is exponential, characterized by two stages of change. The first stage of changing the degree of deformation of the crystal structure for all samples consists in small changes in the value and varies from 10 to 15, or 15 to 20, days, depending on the phase composition of the samples. This period coincides with the period for which the formation of oxide films on the surface of ceramics, characterized by an increase in mass, is characteristic. At this stage, small changes in the degree of deformation are due to the low rate of introduction of oxygen and hydrogen ions into the interstices of the crystal lattice of the near-surface layer of ceramics. The onset of degradation processes associated with the loss of mass due to the partial destruction of the structure and its amorphization is accompanied by a sharp exponential increase in the degree of deformation of the crystal structure. At the same time, for LTO-3 samples, for which it was found that the main degradation mechanisms are associated with pitting and intergranular corrosion, the maximum degradation degree was 0.05–0.09, depending on the temperature of the medium, while a similar value for LTO-1 samples was approximately 1.5–2 times more.
Another important factor influencing the assessment of the use of ceramics under the influence of this environment is the resistance of the strength properties of ceramics to crack and fracture resistance. Earlier in [
28], it was shown that the formation of a cubic phase in the structure of ceramics leads to an increase in resistance to cracking from 23 N to 40–43 N. At the same time, an increase in stability was associated with an increase in the density and degree of the crystallinity of ceramics.
Figure 9 shows a graph of changes in fracture resistance in both the initial state and after 10, 20, and 30 days of corrosion tests.
According to the data obtained, corrosion processes accompanied by mass loss and deformation of the crystal structure lead to a sharp decrease in ceramics resistance to cracking and destruction. In this case, the maximum decrease in fracture toughness for LTO-1 samples was from 47 to 78%, depending on the solution temperature. For two-phase samples LTO-2 and LTO-3, the maximum decrease in resistance to cracking and fracture was no more than 32%, which is more than 1.5–2 times less than similar indicators for LTO-1 samples. At the same time, in the case of the LTO-3 sample, when it was in an environment at a temperature of 25 °C, the maximum decrease in the resistance value was no more than 8%, which indicates a high degree of ceramics resistance to degradation and destruction as a result of external pressure forces.
Thus, summarizing all of the above, we can conclude that the formation of two-phase LiTiO
2-Li
2TiO
3 ceramics with a cubic phase content of no more than 10–20% can significantly increase both the strength properties of ceramics and increase the resistance to degradation and corrosion, as well as reduce the oxidation and destruction rate of ceramics. The results obtained are also in good agreement with other works [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14] devoted to studying the effect of two phases on the stability of lithium-containing ceramics and increasing the efficiency of their productivity.