Suppose the surface of the sample is wide enough with respect to the thickness. In that case, the heat uniformly supplied by the irradiation light will propagate toward the back surface as a one-dimensional flow. The resultant temperature distribution in the sample should be expressed as a function of a depth from the front surface
, i.e.,
. Using the derivative of
, heat flow
is written via Fourier’s law as follows:
where
denotes the thermal conductivity of the sample. If the applied heat is time-modulated, the heat flux flowing into a unit volume is given by the following continuity equation:
where
and
are the specific heat and density of the substance, respectively. Equations (
) and (
) give the following thermal diffusion equation:
where
denotes the thermal diffusion constant
Pyroelectricity
generating in a thin layer with a thickness of
at a depth of
is written as follows:
where
is the length of the electrodes. Although
is temperature dependent, it is assumed to be uniform within the sample because of the small temperature distribution in a thin sample.
3.4.1. Single-Layer Model
Consider the pyroelectric current in a thin plate sample irradiated with periodic light in a heat exchange gas, as shown in
Figure 3. The temperature distribution is spatially distributed according to the flow of heat from the surface to the back, thus
can be written as follows:
where the first term indicates the damping wave of temperature with the amplitude of
.
and
represent the steady-state temperature shift and the temperature of the heat-exchange gas, respectively. Although the heat is only given from the front surface, the reflected wave from the backside is superposed to the forward wave to form a steady heat flow in equilibrium. Thus,
is written as follows:
where
and
are the complex coefficients representing the intensity and phase shift from the irradiation light for the forward and the reflected waves, respectively. The parameters
and
in the exponents denote the wavelength and the damping coefficient of the heatwave, respectively, and determine the envelope of the damped waveform. The coefficient of
in the exponential functions can be rewritten as follows:
This indicates the presence of the following relationship between
and
:
The coefficients
and
in Equation (
) are determined from the boundary conditions. In the steady state during measurement, the heat of irradiation is applied to the first boundary, i.e., the front surface of the sample. Some of it is lost by heat transfer to the gas, while the remaining heat passes through the sample and is finally transferred to the gas at the second boundary (the backside). Rigorously, the contribution of thermal radiation, which is approximately given as
[
19] (
is the Stephan Boltzmann coefficient), needs to be taken into account. However, its effect at room temperature is estimated as
, which is much smaller than the impact of the heat-exchange gas calculated in the following discussion. Thus, its effects are ignored in the following discussion. If we denote the heat flow at
as
, the amplitude and angular frequency of the irradiation as
and
, the temperature of the heat exchange gas as
, the heat-transfer coefficient between the sample and the gas as
, and the thickness of the crystal as
, the continuity of the heat flow on the front and back surfaces can be expressed as follows:
By substituting the general solution Equation (
) into these boundary conditions, we obtain the coefficients
and
and
.
Since the time-independent term does not affect the pyroelectricity, the effect is ignored in most of the literature. However, when experiments are performed close to a transition point, this term significantly affects the physical properties. In the present experiments, for example, is estimated as 2.0 K at the surface by substituting the experimental and calculated values for and in Equation (), respectively. If a higher temperature resolution than this value is required, the experimental conditions need to be adjusted.
The pyroelectricity is obtained from the time-dependent term in Equation (
). By substituting
and
into Equation (
), the solution of Equation (
) is given as follows:
The pyroelectricity can be obtained by substituting
into Equation (8).
Figure 3b,c show the frequency plot of the intensity of the pyroelectricity
and the phase difference from the irradiated light wave, respectively. Since
varies with the modulation frequency
via the argument of the hyperbolic functions, i.e.,
, the characteristics of
depend largely on the magnitude of the argument. Assuming that the threshold frequency
is as follows:
the value of
is approximated as follows [
11,
14]:
We divided the frequency domain of the experimental data into three regions according to the conditions given by Equations (
) and (
) and tried four different fitting methods to examine the agreement of the experimental results with the physical parameters of the standard material. In the following, the physical quantities other than the fitting parameters for each process were assumed to be the experimentally determined or reported values shown in
Table 1.
Equation (
) implies that the signal strength increases in proportion to the frequency in the low-frequency region.
Figure 4a shows the signal intensity in the low-frequency region. The two parameters
and
are given by the experimental conditions. As we will see later, α is determined by the analysis of Region III; thus, we can determine the value of
from the gradient for the low-frequency data. As is shown in
Figure 4a, we found that the calculated curve for
gives the best result among the several trials. A heat transfer coefficient is a parameter governed by the convection of the heat exchange gas. Therefore, this value obtained here can be applied as a device-specific parameter if samples with similar shape and surface conditions are used.
- 2.
Region II:
Next, we examine the region between Region I and III, where the modulation frequency
approaches
. In this region, the hyperbolic functions cannot be simplified by the limit approximations as performed in Equations (
) and (
). Since
is defined by Equation (
), the frequency dependence of the signal in this region is suggested to be deeply related to the values of
and
. If
is experimentally determined, fitting with
as a parameter is possible, as shown in
Figure 4b. On the other hand, if
has been obtained by other studies, it is possible to fit the experimental value with
as a parameter, as shown in
Figure 4c. In the case of the present study,
of the standard sample is known, and the curve calculated by adopting the literature value agrees well with the experiment data, as shown in
Figure 4b. Similarly, the simulation results for a sample thickness of 100 μm also agree well with the experimental values, as shown in
Figure 4c.
- 3.
Region III:
Finally, we discuss the frequency region where
. Equation (19) clearly shows no frequency dependence of the signal strength in this frequency region. Therefore, the signal indicates a simple plateau, and its value is proportional to
; hence
can be estimated from the plateau level if the specific heat and density of the sample are known. The value of
in LiNbO
3 has been investigated in several studies [
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27], and the values at room temperature vary widely from 18 [
23] to 95 [
27]
.
Figure 4d shows the comparison of the calculation with the experimental data and indicates that the curve calculated for
shows good agreement with the experiment. Thus, we adopted the literature value
reported in [
27] for other calculations.
3.4.2. Two-Layer Model
From the above discussion, it seems that the single-layer model can reproduce the observed pyroelectricity. However, as shown in
Figure 4d, the decay profile appearing above 300 Hz in the experiment is not reproduced in the calculation, which raises questions about the validity of the simulation. A candidate for this problem is the presence of a light-absorbing layer, which has not been considered in previous models. Therefore, we consider a two-layer model that includes the presence of the light-absorbing layer, as shown in
Figure 5a. Such multilayer models have been investigated in detail by Peterson et al. for vertically poled pyroelectric polymer films [
19]. The application has also been reported for a system in which the sample is bonded to a thermal bath [
11].
The two-layer model consists of an infinite absorbent layer of thickness
on the front surface of the previous one-layer model. Fourier’s law of Equation (
) and the heat conduction equation of Equation (
) has yielded the complex wavenumber
that defines the heat flow in the pyroelectric material, as shown in Equation (
). By replacing the physical parameters in these formulas with the values of the light-absorbing layer, the complex wavenumber for the light-absorbing layer
is obtained. By imposing the boundary condition of light irradiation on the surface of the light-absorbing layer and matching the temperature and heat flow at the interface of the two layers, the coupled differential equations for the two-layer model are obtained as follows:
In the above equations, the temperature distribution of the coating layer is denoted as , where indicates the depth from the surface of the layer, and the other physical parameters of the absorbing layer are represented as , and . The solutions of and satisfying the boundary conditions are obtained using the same procedure described in the discussion of the single-layer model. By substituting the obtained into Equation (8), we obtained of the two-layer model and performed the following calculations.
We should note that the frequency dependence of
of the one-layer model was governed by the magnitude of
, the argument of the hyperbolic function. In addition to these hyperbolic functions, additional hyperbolic functions with
as an argument appear in
for the two-layer model. Thereby, we can infer that there should be a new threshold
that classifies the frequency dependence of
for the two-layer model, i.e.,
In fact,
Figure 5b, the simulation result of
discussed below, shows a decaying region for
in addition to the three regions described in the one-layer model.
Since this threshold is a function of
and
, the width of Region IV changes when either parameter is changed. As shown in
Figure 6a,b, we calculated the
and
dependence based on the two-layer model. These two plots show that the optical absorption layer not only caused Region IV, but also affected the signal intensity in Regions I–III. However, in the present case, the effects were limited because the layer was sufficiently thin; thereby, the parameters obtained from the one-layer model could be directly applied to the fitting of the two-layer model. Aside from these parameters adopted in the single-layer calculations, we assumed the following physical parameters for the absorbing layer:
, which is a typical value for polymers, for
, and
for
, which is the disclosed density value of the commercial paint. If one of
and
is known, the other can be obtained by fitting the experimental values. In this case,
had been determined to be 11 μm using the surface step measurement, and we determined
to be
using the fitting in
Figure 6a. This
value is consistent with typical data for the thermal diffusivity of polymer resins [
28]. Although it may vary slightly depending on the surface condition of the sample and the coating method, it can be used as a reference value when the light-absorbing layer is prepared under similar conditions.
As seen in
Figure 4d, the pyroelectric coefficient
of the sample is estimated from the height of the plateau in Region III. However, this plateau structure will be squeezed out as Region IV widens and approaches Region II. Moreover, since the amplitude of the temperature wave decreases according to the decay function
, as shown in
Figure 5a, the pyroelectricity signal is also weakened by this decay. Therefore, to estimate
correctly,
needs to be sufficiently larger than
to protect the plateau structure; because
is a material-specific parameter that cannot be adjusted, the light-absorbing layer must be deposited as thinly as possible.
The parameters
, and
determined using the above procedure, together with the literature values of LiNbO
3, were substituted into the equation of
. The resulting pyroelectricity and the phase shift are shown in
Figure 5b,c, respectively. The calculation results show excellent agreement in both signal intensity and phase, confirming the reliability of the experimental data collected by the system and the validity of the two-layer model calculations.
Since the main source of uncertainty in quantitative analysis in the present modulation measurements depends on the estimation error of the sample temperature, the validity of the heat conduction model is of crucial importance. The successful reproduction of the experimental data strongly suggests the correctness of the one-dimensional thermal model. When we use naturally grown single crystals, the shape of the sample cannot be freely specified. If the size of the light-irradiated area of the sample is not sufficiently large compared to its thickness, heat diffusion in the transverse direction parallel to the light-irradiated plane cannot be neglected, and pure one-dimensionality is lost. In such cases, the heat transfer from the gold wire attached to the crystal edges cannot be neglected; thus, thinner gold wires or resistive wires should be used. When a one-dimensional model is applied to a system where lateral thermal diffusion cannot be neglected, the amplitude of the thermal wave is overestimated compared to its true value. Since thermal diffusion is caused by thermal gradients, this overestimation will be more pronounced in the high-frequency region where deviations from a uniform temperature distribution in the sample are more pronounced. If the simulation results show such behavior, the sample should be replaced with a more suitable geometry.
Finally, we would like to mention the sensitivity limit of this measurement system. If the purpose of this temperature modulation measurement is to find only the pyroelectric coefficient of a sample, there is no need to measure a wide range of modulation frequency dependence as we performed in the present study. Instead, one needs only to collect data for a single point at a frequency in the plateau region. To calculate the electric polarization from the pyroelectric coefficient, one should perform that experiment over a wide temperature range, including the transition point. In modulation measurements in the acoustic frequency domain such as the present study, the dominant noise is the 1/f noise generated by electronic components such as operational amplifiers. Therefore, experiments should be performed at as high a modulation frequency as possible in the plateau region to suppress the noise. However, in the case of using an optical absorption layer, as in this study, the plateau region is limited by Region IV, which imposes an upper limit on the frequency that can be selected. Even without the optical absorption layer, the amplifiers that can operate at high frequencies have a high input impedance; therefore, they cannot be used for semiconductor samples with low impedance. The researchers need to ensure these conditions for their sample and then conduct the experiment at the appropriate frequency. In this study, the modulation frequency was fixed at 103 Hz, which is close to the upper limit of Region III, and the dependence of the signal intensity on the light intensity was investigated. As a result, we confirmed that the signal could be measured, even down to 3% of the experimental condition. This indicates that the experimental method can be applied to samples with widths in the order of μm for samples with a pyroelectric coefficient comparable to that of LiNbO
3. As for the thickness, as discussed in
Figure 4c, the signal strength does not depend on the thickness of the sample, and, therefore, one can use as thin a sample as is experimentally possible.