Next Article in Journal
Composition Engineering on the Local Structure and Viscosity of the CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-P2O5-FeO Slag by Machine Learning Methods
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Hot V-Bent Structural Components Made of AZ31B Wrought Magnesium Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Cocrystals and Drug–Drug Cocrystals of Anticancer Drugs: A Perception towards Screening Techniques, Preparation, and Enhancement of Drug Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Microstructure, Crystallographic Texture and Mechanical Behavior of Hot-Rolled Pure Mg and Mg-2Al-1Zn-1Ca Alloy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of a Welded Ni-Based Hastelloy X Superalloy

Crystals 2022, 12(10), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101336
by Yuan Liu, Qingqing Ding *, Xiao Wei, Yuefei Zhang, Ze Zhang * and Hongbin Bei *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Crystals 2022, 12(10), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101336
Submission received: 1 September 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 16 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Microstructure and mechanical properties of a welded Hastelloy X superalloy are investigated and well organized results are presented. I recommend that this paper is suitable for publication in Crystals.

Please consider following one minor point before publication.

• Line 90: The strain rate seems to be 0.57/90=6x10^-2/s, not 10^-3/s.

Author Response

Microstructure and mechanical properties of a welded Hastelloy X superalloy are investigated and well-organized results are presented. I recommend that this paper is suitable for publication in Crystals.

Reply: Thanks very much for the reviewer’s positive comment.

Please consider following one minor point before publication.

Line 90: The strain rate seems to be 0.57/90=6x10^-2/s, not 10^-3/s.

Reply: Thank the reviewer for pointing out this mistake. Here, we made a careless error in the unit of crosshead displacement rate, which should be mm/min instead of mm/s. Therefore 0.57mm/min corresponding to an engineering strain rate of 10-3 s-1. We have corrected this in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

I could not understand why laser welded samples show different grain sizes because the grain sizes of the base metals are not different significantly (5 to 90-micron meter).  

Author Response

I could not understand why laser welded samples show different grain sizes because the grain sizes of the base metals are not different significantly (5 to 90-micron meter).

Reply: Thank the reviewer for pointing out this mistake. There is a fault in our original 90 micron welded microstructures. We have made corrections in the revised manuscript. The results show that the size of columnar grain in the weld does not change significantly when the grain size of the base metal changes. We apologize for the mistakes.

Reviewer 3 Report

Respected sir

The manuscript was reviewed carefully it may be considered for publication after making the following corrections

 

They conducted laser welding of Ni based alloys and results are acceptable. However, did they observe any laves formation in the fusion zone? Or not what is the reason?  that should be given

First point of conclusion to be re written

Author Response

They conducted laser welding of Ni based alloys and results are acceptable. However, did they observe any laves formation in the fusion zone? Or not what is the reason? that should be given.

Reply: Thanks for the reviewer’s positive comments. We have added a sentence in section 3.3 to point out that no laves phase is observed in the fusion zone.

First point of conclusion to be re written

Reply: Thanks very much for the reviewer’s comments. The first point of conclusion has been revised.

Back to TopTop