Numerical Simulation of Droplet Filling Mode on Molten Pool and Keyhole during Double-Sided Laser Beam Welding of T-Joints

Abstract

The effects of droplets filling the molten pools during the double-sided laser beam welding (DSLBW) of T-joints was established. The dynamic behavior of the keyhole and the molten pool under different droplet filling modes were analyzed. The results indicated that compared with the contact transition, the stability of metal flow on the keyhole wall was reduced by free transition and slight contact transition. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool via free transition, slight contact transition, and contact transition, the maximum flow velocity of the keyhole wall was 5.33 m/s, 4.57 m/s, and 2.99 m/s, respectively. When the filling mode was free transition or slight contact transition, the keyhole collapsed at the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool. However, when the filling mode was contact transition, the middle-upper part of the interconnected keyholes became thinner at the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool via free transition, the flow vortex at the bottom of the keyhole disappeared and the melt at the bottom of the keyhole flowed to the rear of the molten pool, however, the vortex remained during slight contact transition and contact transition.

1. Introduction

In aircraft manufacturing, riveting was used to join fuselage panels [1]. However, the riveting process increased the weight of the fuselage structure and reduced the production efficiency. Laser welding was an advanced connection technology [2,3,4]. Laser welding had concentrated heat input to the welded workpiece, narrow heat affected zone, low welding stress, and small welding deformation. Compared with riveting technology, double-sided laser beam welding (DSLBW) technology had a lighter structure quality and higher work efficiency. German Airbus applied laser welding technology to replace traditional riveting technology in the production of fuselage panel structures [5,6,7]. Oliveira et al. [8] and Enz et al. [9] found that synchronous welding could obtain completely symmetrical weld formations and small welding deformations. At present, DSLBW technology has been applied in the manufacturing of Airbus A340 and A350, and other types of aircraft.

Many researchers mainly analyzed the influence of welding process parameters on the microstructure and properties during DSLBW of T-joints. Han et al. [10], Zhao et al. [11], Badini et al. [12] studied the effects of wire composition, welding speed, and heat treatment on the microstructure and properties of welds during DSLBW of T-joints, respectively.

Porosity defect was one of the main welding defects during DSLBW of aluminum alloy T-joints. Although welding parameters could affect porosity defects, the fluctuation of keyholes was the main cause of welding bubbles, and the flow of the molten pool determined whether welding bubbles could escape from the molten pool [13,14]. In order to improve the mechanical properties of the weld, filler wire must be added for DSLBW of T-joints. However, in the current literature on the numerical simulation of DSLBW of T-joints, filler metal was prefabricated on both sides of T-joints before welding, so the influence of welding wire on the weld pool was not considered. Yang et al. [15,16,17] established the numerical model of DSLBW of T-joints. Assuming that the workpiece surface was a rigid surface, the relationship between the interconnectivity of two laser beams and the porosity of weld was studied. Chen et al. [18] found that the oscillations of the keyhole profile continuously existed in the process of DSLBW of T-joints, before and after the keyhole coupling.

Relevant literature revealed that the stability of the keyhole and the molten pool was greatly affected by the filler wire during plate welding [19,20,21,22]. Up to now, no literature has been reported on the dynamic behavior of the droplet filling into the molten pool during DSLBW process of T-joints.

In this paper, the impact of droplets filling the molten pool during double-sided laser beam welding (DSLBW) of T-joints was established by. The dynamic behavior of the keyhole and the molten pool under different droplet filling modes were analyzed.

2. Mathematical Modeling

In this research work, the FLUENT 19.0 software was adopted to investigate the effect of the droplet filling mode on the molten pool and keyhole during DSLBW of T-joints. The laser power was 1800 W, the droplet filling speed was 2.7 m/min, the droplet radius was 0.6 mm, and the welding speed was 3.8 m/min. The influence of the welding driving forces was considered in the mathematical model. The main driven forces of the weld pool can be obtained from the literature [23].

2.1. Numerical Model

The calculation region of the droplet filling into the molten pool was established during DSLBW of T-joints, as shown in Figure 1.

The welding workpiece was constantly melted under the action of the laser heat source. The keyhole wall was a gas-liquid interface, and there were continuous dynamic changes of the liquid phase and gas phase at the keyhole boundary. In this paper, the volume of fluid (VOF) method was used to deal with the problem of gas-liquid conversion on the keyhole wall [24]. The normal vector $\overrightarrow{n}$ and the curvature $\kappa$ of the free surface could be calculated as follows:

$$\overrightarrow{n}=\frac{\nabla F}{\left|\nabla F\right|}$$

(1)

$$\kappa =\nabla \cdot \overrightarrow{n}$$

(2)

To reduce the workload of the computer, the melting process of welding wire was not considered. It was assumed that the front end of the filler wire was melted and entered the molten pool in the form of a liquid droplet.

2.2. Heat Source Model

The rotary Gaussian heat source model was written as follows [25]:

$$q_{laser}=\frac{9{\alpha }_{abs}Q}{\pi R_0^{2}H\left(1-e^3\right)}\exp \left[\frac{-9\left(x^2+y^2\right)}{R_0^2\log \left(H/z\right)}\right]$$

(3)

where Q and H represent the heat source energy and the heat source height, respectively; R₀ is the effective radius of the laser beam.

2.3. Mathematical Model of Droplet Filling

The thermal interaction after the liquid droplet fell into the molten pool was treated as the change of the periodic enthalpy of melt in the molten pool. The heat formula of the droplet was expressed as [26]:

$$Q_a=\rho \pi r_w^2{w}_f{H}_d$$

(4)

where $w_f$ is the droplet velocity; $\rho$ is droplet density; $r_w$ is the droplet radius.

The effective heat formula of the droplet entering the molten pool was expressed as [26]:

$$Q_d=\rho \pi r_w^2{w}_f{C}_{pl}(T_d-T_l)$$

(5)

where $T_d$ is the liquid droplet temperature; $C_{pl}$ is specific heat of liquid droplet; $T_l$ is the liquidus temperature of liquid droplet.

According to the fixed grid numerical calculation method [27], the double-focus laser welding process of T-joints in a Cartesian coordinate system should satisfy the following equations [28]:

Mass conservation equation:

$$\frac{\partial \left(\rho \right)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho u\right)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho v\right)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho w\right)}{\partial z}+S_m=0$$

(6)

Energy conservation equation:

$$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial \left(\rho H\right)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uH\right)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho vH\right)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho wH\right)}{\partial z}& =\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(k\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}\right)+\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(k\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}\right)\hfill \\ & +\frac{\partial }{\partial yz}\left(k\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)+S_H\hfill \end{array}$$

(7)

Momentum conservation equation:

$$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial \left(\rho u\right)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uu\right)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uv\right)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uw\right)}{\partial z}& =\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(u\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)+\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(u\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)\\ & +\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left(u\frac{\partial u}{\partial z}\right)-\frac{\partial P}{\partial x}+S_x\end{array}$$

(8)

$$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial \left(\rho v\right)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uv\right)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho vv\right)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho vw\right)}{\partial z}& =\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(u\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)+\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(u\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)\\ & +\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left(u\frac{\partial v}{\partial z}\right)-\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}+S_y\end{array}$$

(9)

$$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial \left(\rho w\right)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho uw\right)}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho vw\right)}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial \left(\rho ww\right)}{\partial z}& =\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(u\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right)+\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(u\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right)\\ & +\frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left(u\frac{\partial w}{\partial z}\right)-\frac{\partial P}{\partial z}+S_z\end{array}$$

(10)

where u, v, and w are velocity components; H, k and µ are the enthalpy, thermal conductivity, and viscosity, respectively; S_m, S_x, S_y, S_z and S_H are the source terms of the governing equation.

The thermophysical parameters of 6056 aluminum alloy are described in [29] (

Table 1. The thermophysical parameters of 6056 aluminum alloy.

Property	Symbol	Unit	Value
Solid density	ρs	kg/m−3	2720
Liquid density	ρl	kg/m−3	2590
Solidus temperature	Ts	K	860
Liquidus temperature	TL	K	917
Boiling temperature	Tg	K	2740
Thermal expansion coefficient	βk	K−1	1.92 × 10−5
Convective heat transfer coefficient	h0	W/K−1m−2	15
Surface tension	δ0	N/m−1	0.914
Surface tension gradient	Aδ	N/m−1K−1	−3.5 × 10−4
Radiation emissivity	ε	---	0.08
Ambient temperature	Tref	K	300

).

$${\mathrm{C}}_p\left(Jk{g}^{-1}{K}^{-1}\right)=\{\begin{array}{c}-0.001\times T^2+1.1609\times \mathrm{T}+267.71\begin{array}{cc}& 300<T\le 573\end{array}\\ 0.0009\times T^2-0.3901\times T+514.45\begin{array}{cc}& 573<T\le 913\end{array}\\ -0.0009\times T^2+0.5832\times T+435.14\begin{array}{cc}& 913<T\le 2740\end{array}\end{array}$$

(11)

$$\mathrm{k}\left(W{m}^{-1}{K}^{-1}\right)=\{\begin{array}{c}-0.0001\times T^2-0.0697\times \mathrm{T}+95.334\begin{array}{cc}& 300<T\le 860\end{array}\\ -0.0048\times T^2+9.2812\times T-4275.6\begin{array}{cc}& 860<T\le 917\end{array}\\ -0.00001\times T^2+0.0582\times T+148.74\begin{array}{cc}& 917<T\le 2740\end{array}\end{array}$$

(12)

$$\mu \left(\mathrm{kg}{m}^{-1}{K}^{-1}\right)=\{\begin{array}{c}1\times {10}^{-7}\times T^2-0.0002\times \mathrm{T}+0.1202\begin{array}{cc}& 897<T\le 937\end{array}\\ 2\times {10}^{-11}\times T^2-5\times {10}^{-7}\times T+0.0038\begin{array}{cc}& 937<T\le 2650\end{array}\\ -6\times {10}^{-8}\times T^2+0.0003\times T-0.4151\begin{array}{cc}& 2650<T\le 2720\end{array}\end{array}$$

(13)

where C_p, k, and μ are specific heat, thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Numerical Model Validation

Figure 2 shows the comparison of the weld profiles obtained by experiment and numerical simulation during DSLBW of T-joints.

The experimentally determined weld cross sections were compared with the corresponding calculated geometries as shown in Figure 2. In the experimental results, the W was about 1.9 mm and the D was 0.8 mm. It was found that the weld profiles were in agreement between the experiment and numerical simulation.

3.2. Dynamic Behavior of the Keyhole

The 3D simulation model of droplet filling position during DSLBW of T-joints is presented in Figure 3. L represents the distance between the stringer and the center of the droplet. M represents the distance between the skin and the center of the droplet. N represents the distance between the center of the keyhole and the center of the droplet. In this paper, N₁ = 1 mm, N₂ = 1 mm.

Figure 4 shows the three-dimensional morphology of the droplet filling mode during DSLBW of T-joints. As shown in Figure 4a, L₁ = L₂ = 1.0 mm, M₁ = M₂ = 1.1 mm, and the droplet filling mode was a free transition. As shown in Figure 4b, L₁ = L₂ = 0.8 mm, M₁ = M₂ = 0.9 mm, and the droplet filling mode was a slight contact transition. As shown in Figure 4c, L₁ = L₂ = 0.7 mm, M₁ = M₂ = 0.8 mm, and the droplet filling mode was a contact transition.

Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the three-dimensional transient behavior of the keyhole with droplet filling modes of free transition, slight contact transition, and contact transition, respectively.

The different transition methods of the droplet entering the molten pool affected the stability of the keyhole in different ways. The free and slight contact transition filling modes had a greater impact on the keyhole than contact transition; the middle-upper part of the interconnected keyholes became thinner, as shown in Figure 5c and Figure 6c. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the keyhole collapsed at the position where the keyhole became thinner, as shown in Figure 5d and Figure 6d. However, during contact transition, at the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the middle-upper part of the interconnected keyholes became thinner but did not collapse, as shown in Figure 7d. The droplet impacted the keyhole after entering the molten pool, affected the stability of the keyhole, and even caused the collapse of the interconnected keyholes. After the keyhole collapsed, the generated bubbles did not escape from the molten pool before the solidification of the molten pool, resulting in porosity defects in the weld. At present, the relevant literature only studied the reason for the high porosity of DSLBW of T-joints from the perspective of the molten pool flow field, without considering the influence of the dynamic fluctuation of the keyhole under droplet filling on weld porosity defects [30].

Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10 show the three-dimensional flow fields of the keyhole with droplet filling modes of free transition, slight contact transition, and contact transition, respectively. As shown in Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, the flow direction at the opening of the keyhole was from the center of the keyhole to the outside of the keyhole, which was mainly caused by the Marangoni-driven flow [31,32,33]. The melt flow direction of the droplet entering the molten pool was opposite to the flow direction at the opening of the keyhole, which affected the melt flow velocity and the stability of the keyhole wall. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the maximum flow velocity of the keyhole wall was 5.33 m/s, 4.57 m/s, and 2.99 m/s, when the droplets entered via free, slight contact, and contact transitions, respectively. This also shows that compared with contact transition, the free transition and slight contact transition filling modes reduced the stability of the keyhole.

3.3. Melt Flow of the Molten Pool

Figure 11 shows the intercept position of the longitudinal section flow field during the DSLBW process for T-joints. The gray surface was a section, as shown in Figure 11.

Figure 12 shows the longitudinal section flow field during the DSLBW process for T-joints with the droplet transition in the form of free transition, slight contact transition, and contact transition, respectively.

When a droplet enters the molten pool, it affects the flow field of the molten pool. In the early stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the melt at the bottom of the keyhole flowed from the rear to the front of the molten pool, as shown in Figure 12a,b, Figure 13a,b and Figure 14a,b. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the melt flowed from the front to the rear of the molten pool, as shown in Figure 12d, Figure 13d and Figure 14d.

At the early stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the flow vortex caused by the Marangoni-driven flow appeared in the front and the rear of the keyhole opening in the longitudinal section of the molten pool, as shown in Figure 12a,b, Figure 13a,b and Figure 14a,b. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the flow vortex caused by the Ma-rangoni-driven flow disappeared in front of the keyhole opening in the longitudinal sec-tion of the molten pool, as shown in Figure 12d, Figure 13d and Figure 14d.

At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool via free transition, the flow vortex at the bottom of the keyhole disappeared, and the melt at the bottom of the keyhole flowed to the rear of the molten pool. When the droplet filling mode was a slight contact transition or contact transition, the vortex at the bottom of the keyhole remained.

Table 2. Schematic representation of the flow field in the longitudinal section of the molten pool when the droplets entered the molten pool via the three different filling modes.

Filling Mode	Early Stage of Droplet Entering the Molten Pool	Later Stage of Droplet Entering Molten Pool
Free transition
Slight contact transition
Contact transition

shows the schematic representation of the flow field in the longitudinal section of the molten pool when the droplets entered the molten pool via the three different filling modes.

The pressure on the keyhole wall during the DSLBW process for T-joints is shown in Figure 15. The pressures acting on the wall of the keyhole included friction force (F_f), hydrostatic pressure (P_m), recoil pressure (P_v), surface tension (F_s), and hydrodynamic pressure (F_v). In the process of the DSLBW, the keyhole was relatively stable when it was in dynamic equilibrium. By using a high-speed camera, Tao et al. [34] studied the influence of the welding wire on the weld pool during the DSLBW process for T-joints. They found that the mode by which the filler wire entered the molten pool after melting had an effect on the weld porosity. When the front end of the filler wire was melted and the liquid metal entered the molten pool via contact transition, the porosity of the weld was low. In our paper, during the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool via contact transition, the middle-upper part of the interconnected keyholes became thinner but did not collapse. When the keyhole was less prone to collapse, the weld porosity was lower. However, when the droplet entered the molten pool via free transition or slight contact transition, the keyhole collapsed at the later stage. This was because free transition and slight contact transition had a greater impact on the front wall of the keyhole than contact transition. Furthermore, the uniformity of the laser energy density distribution in the keyhole irradiated by the laser beam was affected, which in turn further affected the evaporation of metal elements in the keyhole. In the area irradiated by the laser beam, the vapor recoil force of metal vaporization increased. In the area that could not be irradiated by the laser beam, the vapor recoil force of the metal vaporization would be reduced, which would further cause severe fluctuation of the keyhole.

4. Conclusions

When droplets entered the molten pool via free transition or slight contact transition, the stability of metal flow on the keyhole wall was reduced. At the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool, the maximum flow velocity of the keyhole wall was 5.33 m/s, 4.57 m/s and 2.99 m/s for free transition, slight contact transition, and contact transition, respectively.

The keyhole collapsed at the later stage of the droplet entering the molten pool via free transition or slight contact transition. However, when the droplet entered via contact transition, the middle-upper part of the interconnected keyholes became thinner but did not collapse.

When a droplet enters the molten pool, it affects the flow field of the molten pool. We found that the melt at the bottom of the keyhole flowed from the rear to the front of the molten pool in the early stage of a droplet entering the molten pool, and that the reverse occurred in the later stage.

A greater impact on the longitudinal section flow field of the molten pool was observed during free transition of droplets into the molten pool. At the later stage, the flow vortex at the bottom of the keyhole disappeared, and the keyhole flowed to the rear of the molten pool. The vortex remained during contact and slight contact transition of the droplets into the molten pool.