Next Article in Journal
Diffusion Bonding of Al7075 to Ti-6Al-4V by Spark Plasma Sintering and Using a Copper Interlayer
Previous Article in Journal
Defect Dynamics in Anomalous Latching of a Grating Aligned Bistable Nematic Liquid Crystal Device
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/cryst12091292
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology: Characteristics, Procedure, Product Structures, and Properties, and Development of the Technology in High-Entropy Ceramics

by
Jiabei He
1,*,
Mengshan Song
1,
Kaiyun Chen
1,
Dongxiao Kan
1 and
Miaomiao Zhu
2
1
Advanced Materials Research Central, Northwest Institute for Nonferrous Metal Research, Xi’an 710016, China
2
Shaanxi Academy of Building Research Co., Ltd., No. 272 of West Huancheng Road, Xi’an 710082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(9), 1292; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091292
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 7 September 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Macromolecular Crystals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ceramics have become indispensable materials for a wide range of industrial applications due to their excellent properties. However, the traditional preparation of ceramic materials is often time-consuming and involves high sintering temperatures. These result in considerable energy consumption and high production costs, which limit the application of these materials in some industries. This paper focuses on the advent of polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs) technology, which enabled the application of ceramics to fibers, composites, coatings, and films, mainly due to the excellent design, process, and low-temperature ceramic properties. We review and evaluate the important research progress made in polymer-derived ceramics technology in recent years and discuss its recent development into high-entropy ceramics. The development of polymer-derived ceramics technology in the field of high-entropy ceramics has broad research prospects, which can greatly improve the understanding and design of high-entropy materials and accelerate their application in the industrial field.

1. Introduction

In the 1960s, Ainger and Chanttrell obtained non-oxide ceramics for the first time by pyrolyzing polymer precursors [1,2]; this method laid the foundation for the development of polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs). Later, in the early 1970s, Verbeek and colleagues successfully produced Si3N4/SiC ceramic fibers from precursors, such as polycarbosilanes, polysilanes, and polysiloxanes [3,4]. Then, in the mid-1970s, Fritz and Yajima [5,6] pyrolyzed polycarbosilane to obtain SiC ceramics; this technique greatly promoted the development of PDCs. Since then, PDCs have gradually been employed by scientists and engineers due to their advantages, such as excellent oxidation, creep, ablation, and crystallization resistances, as well as high-temperature stability [7,8].
High-entropy ceramics (HECs) are a class of novel materials with high configurational entropy (ΔSconfig > 1.5 R) [9]. The first single-phase HECs were synthesized by Rost and co-workers in 2015 [9], and several HECs with different crystal structures have been produced to date [10,11,12,13]. Research on HECs has revealed their extraordinary properties, including mechanical, electrical, and corrosion resistance [14,15,16], which have expanded their application prospects. The process of preparing PDCs from polymer precursors is referred to as PDCs technology. In recent years, several attempts have been made to prepare high-entropy ceramics using PDCs technology, with some success [17,18,19]. These advances show a new way of understanding and discovering high-entropy ceramics. Therefore, in this paper, PDCs technology and the results that have been achieved in the field of high-entropy ceramics will be reviewed.

2. Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology

At present, most of the precursors of commercial PDCs are silicon-based ceramics precursors and their modified products, and, as PDCs technology has attracted more attention, researchers have prepared precursors not only from polymers but also precursors containing a variety of organic and inorganic components that require chemical reactions to obtain ceramic products [20]. Although there are more and more types of precursors, the characteristics and preparation procedure via PDCs technology are the same.

2.1. Characteristics of Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology

The characteristics of the preparation process of PDCs technology and the improvement of the material properties via this method can be summarized as follows:
i.
The designability of the organic precursor structure can be used to tune the microstructure of ceramics; in other words, the structure, composition, and preparation process of the organic polymer precursor are adjusted to control the phase composition and structure of the final ceramic product [21].
ii.
The polymer precursors have good moldability and can be used to achieve the preparation of ceramics with complex shapes, including one-dimensional ceramic fibers [6], two-dimensional coatings [22], as well as three-dimensional micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) [23] and ceramic composites [24]. The preparation of fibers takes advantage of the fusible nature of precursors [6,25]; the synthesis of the coating exploits the fluidity of the precursor to achieve a two-dimensional uniform structure on the surface of the material [26,27,28]. Polymer-derived ceramics technology can be applied in semiconductor preparation techniques, such as lithography, and in the synthesis of ceramic micro–nano devices through the design of the functional groups of the polymer, which provides a good processing route for the manufacture of MEMS [23]. The solubility of the precursor can also be used to impregnate the fiber precast [29,30,31]; after impregnation, the polymer is crosslinked, cured, and pyrolyzed at high-temperature into the ceramic matrix to fill voids in the precast (this preparation process is called PIP); after repeating the PIP process, a dense fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composite is obtained.
iii.
The process temperature is relatively low. Traditional non-oxide ceramics, such as SiC and Si3N4, require a high sintering temperature, usually above 1600 °C, while PDCs can be sintered at temperatures as low as 900 °C [32].
iv.
Sintering aids are not needed. Due to the slow atomic diffusion caused by the properties of covalent bonds, sintering additives are often required in the preparation of non-oxide ceramics [33]. These additives form a liquid phase at high temperatures and accelerate the diffusion of atoms, thereby promoting the sintering of non-oxide ceramics [34,35]. However, the sintering additive residues at grain boundaries will impair the oxidation resistance [36,37] and the high-temperature mechanical properties of non-oxide ceramics (such as the high-temperature creep resistance) [38]. In contrast, PDCs technology can achieve the sintering of ceramic materials without sintering additives [39,40], and the resulting materials exhibit good resistance to high-temperature oxidation [41], as well as high-temperature creep properties [42].
v.
Excellent high-temperature performance. Since no sintering additives are required in the preparation of polymer-derived ceramics, a high-purity matrix is obtained after sintering; thus, the prepared material has good high-temperature properties, such as creep [42,43,44], oxidation [41,45], and corrosion [46,47] resistances.

2.2. Procedure of Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology

The most commonly used commercial precursors are silicon-based polymers, which include polycarbosilane, polysiloxane, polysilazane, and polyborosilazane and their modified products [20]. Thus, taking organosilicon as example, the processes of polymer-derived ceramics technology are as follows (Figure 1):
i.
Synthesis: various small organic molecules are used as raw materials to obtain precursors with specific molecular weights by organic synthesis methods [20]. The precursor can be varied by selecting suitable small molecules and optimizing the synthesis process. Ceramics with different microstructures can be obtained by using different precursors, as well as different curing and cracking systems [45,46,47,48,49].
ii.
Shaping: polymers can be shaped directly with a variety of methods, such as injection molding, blow molding, extrusion molding, coating, electrospinning, 3D printing, etc., which further enable one-step molding of polymer-derived ceramics [50].
iii.
Crosslinking/curing: the main purpose of crosslinking is to make the polymer backbone connected [20]. Crosslinking methods include light and thermal curing processes. Thermal-curing crosslinking generally relies on curing agents to polymerize polymer precursors into a mesh structure at a certain temperature, forming a non-molten polymer [51]. In light-curing crosslinking, a polymer is doped with a curing agent and polymerized under illumination at a specific wavelength to obtain a non-molten polymer [52].
iv.
Pyrolysis/caramelization: these processes complete the transformation of the material from organic to inorganic, inducing qualitative changes in its internal structure and properties [20]. During the process, the organic groups of the precursor gradually vanish, and the polymer transforms into amorphous ceramics, with a typical pyrolyzing temperature of 900–1000 °C [50]. The phase composition, structure, and properties of amorphous ceramics obtained by pyrolysis are strongly dependent on the caramelization process.
v.
Crystallization: typically, the polymer transforms into amorphous ceramics at a temperature between 900 and 1000 °C [38]. As the heat treatment temperature increases, the amorphous phase is gradually crystallized in the temperature range of 1200–1800 °C, and the crystalline ceramic material is finally obtained [20,38]. Several structural transformations are triggered by the amorphous → crystalline transition [20,29]: the amorphous disordered structure is rearranged with the relevant chemical bonds broken, and the structure gradually turns into crystalline as the temperature is increased; then, the rupture of chemical bonds and the atomic rearrangement cause the separation of the ceramic and carbon phases to form a multiphase ceramic system, which, in turn, promotes nucleation; the formed crystal nuclei gradually grow with increasing temperature and time. Take the C-enriched SiC produced by PDCs technology as an example; the amorphous → crystalline transition can be schematically drawn in Figure 2 [53]. Meanwhile, the amorphous → crystalline transition is usually accompanied by a decomposition reaction, along with the formation of a small amount of gaseous products.
In addition, in order to introduce metallic elements into the backbone of the precursor to improve the thermal stability of PDCs, some researchers have also developed inorganic precursors [55]. For example, the most common inorganic precursor is metal chlorides, which are often used to synthesize polymetallosiloxanes with silicic acid and partially hydrolyzed tetraethoxysilanes [56]. After the synthesis of polymetallosiloxanes, taking the SiZrOC ceramics precursor as an example, the subsequent crosslinking process can retain the metal atoms in the backbone structure of the final product and then pyrolyze to obtain PDCs containing metal elements [57]. The formation of Si–O–Zr bonds occurs during crosslinking, as shown below [55]:
≡ Si − H + ≡ Zr − OPr → ≡ Si − O − Zr ≡ + C 3 H 8 ≡ Si − H + ≡ Zr − OH → ≡ Si − O − Zr ≡ + H 2
Ceramics prepared by PDCs technology undergo a unique phase evolution process with increasing temperature, and the performance of the final product is directly affected by the pyrolyzing process, precursor composition, and molecular structure (a comparison with the traditional manufacturing procedures is displayed in Table 1). Therefore, PDCs technology can provide control of the ceramic microstructure and properties, and it represents an innovative preparation process that will play an important role in industrial applications of ceramics in the future.

3. Structure and Properties of Polymer-Derived Ceramics

PDCs are prepared by pyrolysis of ceramic precursor polymers. At lower temperatures, the PDC lattice exhibits an amorphous structure, with many unique properties, such as high-temperature stability [20,49], excellent semiconducting [50] and piezoresistive [53,54] properties, oxidation and corrosion resistance [20], as well as light transmission and luminescence [4,59]. At higher heat treatment temperatures, PDCs are gradually crystallized, and single- or complex-phase crystalline nanoceramics can be obtained by controlling the process parameters. By taking advantage of the gradual structural evolution of PDCs at high temperatures, the structure and distribution of ceramic nanoparticles can be adjusted to effectively improve their mechanical properties, such as strength, modulus, and hardness [45].

3.1. High-Temperature Stability

Thermal stability is the ability of a material to resist thermal decomposition [60]. Traditional SiC materials have good strength and thermal stability in high-temperature environments; however, Si3N4 is usually decomposed into Si and N2 above 1400 °C; decomposition leads to volatilization and weight loss, limiting the application of the material in high-temperature environments [61]. Additionally, the Si3N4 ceramic prepared by PDCs technology can remain in the amorphous state in the temperature range of 1000–1800 °C; hence, its lattice structure is stable, volatilization and weight loss are rare, and the material has outstanding high-temperature stability [61].
Riedel et al. [62] reported that polymer-derived SiCN ceramics remain amorphous at 1500 °C. The thermal weight loss curves of β-Si3N4, Si1.7C1.0N1.6, and Si3.0B1.0C4.3N2.0 in a 0.1 MPa helium environment were compared in a later study [63]; it was found that the thermal stability of Si1.7C1.0N1.6 is higher than that of Si3N4, whereas the lattice of Si3.0B1.0C4.3N2.0 remains stable up to ~2000 °C without significant degradation. Riedel [64] and his team further investigated the relationship between the PDC’s ability to retain its amorphous structure and its high-temperature stability. They found that the ability of PDCs to remain amorphous is closely related to the carbon content (Figure 3): when the carbon content in the system is high, the carbon phases are distributed in a continuous network structure, with the amorphous Si3N4 embedded in it, thus inhibiting the crystallization process. On the other hand, a continuous layer of graphite inhibits the outward diffusion of nitrogen and thus reduces volatilization. The combined effect of the two factors improves the high-temperature stability of SiCN. Studies have shown [20] that SiCN ceramics with higher carbon content have better high-temperature stability than their lower-carbon counterparts. Moreover, molecular dynamics simulations showed that the addition of boron can increase the activation energy for breaking Si–N bonds in the system so that Si–N bonds in SiBCN do not easily react with C to form SiC and N2; at the same time, the added B reduces the diffusion coefficient of carbon and nitrogen in the material so that the SiBCN system shows enhanced high-temperature stability [65].

3.2. Semiconducting and Electrical Properties

Yajima [66] found that the conductivity of amorphous SiC ceramics derived from polycarbosilane varies with the pyrolyzing temperature. Specifically, the ceramic exhibits a DC conductivity of less than 10−10 Ω−1·cm−1, as well as electrical conductivity properties similar to that of an insulator when the heat treatment temperature is below 600 °C; then, when the temperature exceeds 800 °C, the polymer precursor is fully transformed into an inorganic amorphous ceramic whose conductivity increases with the heat treatment temperature, resulting in semiconducting electrical properties [66]. In addition to the pyrolyzing temperature, the DC conductance of PDCs varies with the series, composition, and sintering atmosphere of the precursor and usually ranges from approximately 10−10 to 1 Ω−1·cm−1 [67]. For example, when the carbon phase content in the ceramic is high under high-temperature conditions, the continuous phase formed by carbon induces a tunneling effect, which increases the conductivity (from 0.1 to 1 Ω−1·cm−1) and results in electrical properties similar to those of a conductor [67].
The current research on the electrical properties of amorphous PDCs is mainly focused on SiCN and SiCO systems. Wang et al. [68] studied the relationship between DC conductance and carbon phase structure in SiCO ceramics and found that the DC conductivity activation energy of the material is similar to that of various carbon phases. This indicated that the DC conductance of SiCO ceramics is affected by the evolution of the carbon phase; moreover, the DC conductance and heat treatment temperature of the material are consistent with the Arrhenius equation. Furthermore, the authors studied the effect of the carbon phase evolution on the conductivity of SiCO ceramics under different heat treatment temperatures and found that the conductivity of the material increases with the pyrolyzing time; however, the trend changes around 1200 °C, indicating that the conductivity mechanism changes as the carbon phase structure varies at different temperatures: at 1100 °C, the carbon phase is rearranged in the matrix, new carbon clusters are formed, and the spacing between the carbon phases is reduced, resulting in an increase in the hopping conductivity and in the overall conductivity of the material. At 1300 °C, the amorphous carbon phase nucleates and transforms into a microcrystalline phase whose continuous growth results in an increasing conductance [69].
Another electrical property of amorphous PDCs is the change in piezoresistive resistivity with applied pressure, see Figure 4 [53,70]. The reported piezoresistive coefficient of polymer-derived SiCN ceramics ranges from 1000 to 4000 [20], which is much higher than that of any existing ceramic material. Some researchers have pointed out that the piezoresistivity of PDCs is affected by the structure and content of free carbon; under applied pressure, the continuous phase formed by the carbon phase in the ceramic matrix triggers a local tunneling effect, which, in turn, causes a change in resistance [53].

3.3. Oxidation and Corrosion Resistance

Several comprehensive and in-depth studies have focused on the oxidation behavior of SiC, SiCO, SiCN, and SiBCN. For crystalline SiC, the oxidation behavior in the temperature range of 800 to 1400 °C shows a parabolic trend; the activation energy remains at ~120 kJ·mol−1 and the oxidation rate is very low, close to or slightly higher than that of pure silicon carbide or silicon nitride ceramics [38]. Reidel et al. [71] studied the relationship between the silica protective layer on the surface of SiCN ceramics and the solid-state reaction of the matrix and found that the latter is inhibited by the very low diffusion coefficient of nitrogen in the SiO2 protective layer. In addition, the diffusion coefficient of oxygen atoms in the dense silica layer is also very low, with values around 10−11–10−16 cm2/s in the temperature range of 900–1400 °C, which effectively inhibits the further oxidation of the SiCN matrix [41]. The combination of the above two mechanisms leads to good oxidation resistance of SiCN ceramics. An [47] and Wang [72] prepared SiCN-based SiAlCN ceramics in which Al atoms were doped to form an effective blocking structure in the oxidized SiO2 lattice structure, which further reduced the oxygen diffusion coefficient in the SiO2 layer and greatly improved the oxidation resistance.
Two reactions occur when silicon-based ceramics are exposed to high-temperature aqueous vapors [38]: (1) silica is generated (oxidation), and (2) it continues to react with water vapor to form volatile products (corrosion), such as Si(OH)4. Oxidation causes thickening and mass increase in the oxide layer, but corrosion causes the oxide layer to become thinner and reduces its mass. When oxidation and volatilization occur at the same time, the stability of the silica layer formed by oxidation determines the corrosion rate of the material. Wang et al. [73] compared the corrosion resistances of SiCN and SiAlCN ceramics (Figure 5) and found that a small amount of doped aluminum reduces the activity of silica in Al2O3–SiO2, resulting in the SiAlCN ceramics exhibiting higher corrosion resistance. Moreover, He et al. [74] reported that Y2Si2O7 is formed when SiC is doped with Y atoms under a high-temperature air atmosphere; the Y-containing compounds cover the whole samples, resulting in a lower oxidation resistance compared with Al-doped SiC.

3.4. Light Transmission and Luminescence

Owing to the presence of a network-structured absorbing layer formed by carbon atoms in the structure of PDCs [75], their optical properties are difficult to measure and use in applications. Thus, Soraru et al. [59,76,77] used precursors with higher amounts of Si–H functional groups to design and control the content of free carbon in SiCO; in this way, the elemental content of the SiCO ceramics was closer to the stoichiometric ratio, and the prepared ceramics exhibited good transparency. The higher content of Si–H functional groups in polymers has two effects [78]: (i) they can reduce the C content in the precursor; (ii) the formation of new Si–C bonds enables more Si to be incorporated with C into the inorganic structure, reducing the final free carbon content. Fluorescence spectroscopy measurements of the SiCO ceramic show a wide luminescence band at ~500 nm, originating from sp2 carbon clusters contained in the matrix [20]; when the content of these clusters is low, their presence does not affect the transparency of the SiCO glass, which is evidenced in Figure 6. Based on this phenomenon, the luminescence of amorphous PDCs can also be improved by introducing additional elements into the precursors through the sol–gel process. For example, Zhang et al. [59] introduced Eu ions into SiCO ceramics by adding Eu(NO3)3 to the precursors. When the ceramic containing Eu3+ is pyrolyzed at a higher temperature, the Eu3+→Eu2+ reduction results in a wide blue luminescence band at ~450 nm. These photoluminescent properties of PDCs make them very promising materials for the manufacture of optical amplifier components.

3.5. Mechanical Properties

Polymers usually shrink during pyrolysis, so it is very difficult to prepare dense bulk ceramics through PDCs technology at the early stage [21]. Previous research on their mechanical properties mainly focuses on fiber preparation and modification [20]. Taking polymer-derived SiC fibers as an example, in 1976, Yajima et al. [80] reported a preparation method for silicon carbide fibers, which showed a tensile strength and Young’s modulus of 6.2 and 440 GPa, respectively. Then, PDCs technology was used to prepare the first generation of commercial Nicalon fibers. Subsequently, as the temperature and strength requirements of SiC fibers for practical applications gradually increased, improved and optimized processes [81,82,83] enabled SiC fibers to reach a tensile strength and Young’s modulus of 3 and 220 GPa [84] at 1200 °C, respectively. SiC fibers containing Al and Zr have also been studied; the mechanical strength of Al-containing fibers can be maintained at high levels even at a temperature of 1900 °C [85].
With the development of techniques to prepare dense bulk ceramics, the mechanical properties of polymer-derived block materials have also started to be investigated. For amorphous bulk ceramics, the density, modulus of elasticity, hardness, and other properties increase with the pyrolyzing temperature [20,86]:
i.
Density and modulus: as the pyrolyzing temperature increases, the Si–H and C–H bonds in the system are broken, more Si–C network connections are formed by eliminating the hydrogen content in the system, and the density and elastic modulus increase accordingly [87].
ii.
Hardness and fracture toughness: similar to the modulus of elasticity, the increase in the heat treatment temperature and the formation of more Si–C network links after dehydrogenation will increase the hardness. The fracture toughness exhibits a more complicated trend: many studies have shown that cracks in Si–C–N ceramics extend along regions of the material that have not yet been dehydrogenated. These regions exhibit lower strength compared to regions that have been dehydrogenated to form Si–C bonds [86]. As the temperature increases, the areas with lower strength gradually decrease, resulting in a tortuous crack propagation path at a certain scale, and the overall fracture toughness of the material increases.
For crystalline ceramics, the main way to transform from an amorphous network into a crystalline structure is the rearrangement of chemical bonds, which causes phase separation and eventually leads to the formation of nanocrystalline nuclei and crystal growth. Some studies of the shape and size of nanoparticles present in the structure of PDCs after heat treatment at higher temperatures showed that these nanoparticles remain stable even at very high temperatures [20]. Therefore, the preparation of a fully crystallized ceramic containing such nanostructures by the polymer-derived method can achieve the purpose of controlling the structure and composition of nanoceramics.
Kodama et al. [88] prepared single-phase silicon carbide ceramics using polycarbosilane and controlled the grain size of SiC in the range of 0.2 to 1.4 μm by varying the sintering temperature; they found that grain size is directly related to fracture toughness. Moreover, the fracture toughness of the nanosized SiC reaches a maximum of 5.1 MPa·m1/2 for a grain size of 0.7 μm, which is much higher than the fracture toughness of microscale silicon carbide ceramics (~3 MPa·m1/2). In addition to single-phase ceramics, multi-phase ceramics can also be obtained by varying the precursor components. Taking Si–C–N ceramics as an example, the amorphous SiCN undergoes phase separation at 1000 °C, as well as a carbothermal reaction at a higher temperature, yielding β-SiC and Si3N4 products after complete crystallization at 1500 °C [20]. Several studies found that, when the temperature is continually increased to 1800 °C, the powder particle size can be maintained below 200 nm [89,90,91]; this feature can be used to obtain a multi-phase ceramic powder (Figure 7). In summary, the phase separation process of PDCs at high temperatures can be used to prepare single-, bi-, or even multi-phase nanocomposites and improve the mechanical properties of materials. Therefore, this process has great application prospects in the field of functional and structural materials.

4. Development of PDCs Technology in the Field of High-Entropy Ceramics

The above discussion shows that the advantages of polymer-derived ceramics technology are mainly related to the designability and fluidity of the precursors, which is very suitable for the preparation of ceramics of any kind and their components, including high-entropy ceramics. However, the preparation of these systems using PDCs technology has rarely been reported.
High-entropy ceramics are defined as a new type of high-entropy materials consisting of four or more main components in near-equiatomic ratios, with each atomic percentage being between 5 and 35 at.% in a single-phase structure [9,92]. The complete mixing of multiple elements at the atomic scale is a key factor in triggering the properties of high-entropy ceramics [16,17,18,19], such as superionic conductivity [93], specific capacitive properties [94], water splitting resistance [95], low thermal conductivity [96], and good mechanical properties [97]. Because the PDC process starts from polymers or a mixture of inorganic and organic components, it can be expected that the first challenge to preparing high-entropy ceramics via PDCs technology is the preparation of high-entropy polymers or precursors. Several studies have focused on high-entropy polymers/precursors; for example, some researchers have studied the crystallization and mechanical behavior of multi-quaternary ammonium mixtures and found that the ternary and quaternary blending mixtures exhibit restricted crystallization behavior and high elongation at break; these characteristics are not observed in the reacted binary or unreacted quaternary blends [98]. It has also been reported that simply changing the state of some ethylene valence bonds in ternary copolymers, such as converting single to double bonds, can significantly improve their thermoelectric properties [99]. It must be noted that, in the current literature currently claiming to work on high-entropy polymers, the polymers used are actually mixtures [98] (blending multiple polymers together) and copolymers [99] (specific polymers formed by two or more polymer segments of different properties connected together). These forms of products do not achieve either atomic-level mixing or the concept of a single-phase structure. Hence, these polymers are strictly unable to meet the concept of high-entropy materials.
On the other hand, some studies skip the step of high-entropy polymer preparation and focus on the preparation of high-entropy ceramics by PDCs technology, in which polymers or raw mixtures are used to prepare high-entropy ceramics as precursors [100,101,102,103,104,105,106] and the polymer itself does not necessarily meet the concept of high entropy. Tseng et al. [100] used polymeric steric entrapment, with which cations are trapped in the long chain polyvinyl alcohol structure after stirring at room temperature and evaporating at 200 °C, and then a metal oxide is generated after heat treatment to form Gd0.4Tb0.4Dy0.4Ho0.4Er0.4O3 material. Sun et al. [101,102] successfully prepared a series of high-entropy nano-carbide powders with mixed rare-earth acetylacetonates and metal acetylacetonate alkoxides via co-hydrolysis and a subsequent polycondensation reaction (Figure 8). Moreover, the reaction between the M-OR alkoxide (M: metal, R: alkyl group) and a metal salt (MNO3 or MCl) was used to produce various high-entropy ceramics, such as (Yb0.2Y0.2Lu0.2Sc0.2Gd0.2)2Si2O7 [103], 4.5SiO2–3Al2O3–1.5P2O5–4CaO–1CaF2 [104], and 43SiO2–24.5CaO–24.5Na2O–6P2O5–2Fe2O3 [105]. Li et al. [106] and Du et al. [107] obtained high-entropy nano-carbide powders (Ti0.2Zr0.2Hf0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2)C and (Hf0.25Nb0.25Zr0.25Ti0.25)C by a hydrothermal reduction reaction at 2000–2200 °C using transition metal halides (TiCl4, ZrCl4, HfCl4, NbCl5, TaCl5) and organic materials as a source of carbon.
These studies open a new research avenue for the fabrication of high-entropy ceramics or ceramic–matrix composites via PDCs technology.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

Polymer-derived ceramics technology provides designability and manufacturability, overcoming the shortcomings of traditional ceramic processes, such as high preparation temperatures and molding and processing difficulties, and has rapidly become a research hotspot since its development in the 1960s. The current research on polymer-derived ceramics and the corresponding technology has extended to various areas in the field of materials, including synthesis and modification of precursors, structural evolution during transformation, as well as electrical, optical, chemical, and mechanical properties. These studies confirm that the preparation of ceramics using precursors can allow tuning the phase structure and enable the preparation of complex-phase nanoceramics, which may improve the brittleness and overall properties of the ceramics.
Moreover, the main advantages of PDCs technology lie in the designability and fluidity of its precursors, allowing structural designs at multiple scales to further meet the application requirements in the industrial field. Therefore, this technology has very good application prospects in the field of high-entropy ceramics, whose remarkable characteristics are closely related to the position and arrangement of atoms. However, studies exploring the use of PDCs technology in high-entropy ceramics are scarce and mainly focus on the synthesis of high-entropy polymers, pyrolyzing processes, and phase analysis.
Overall, we expect that PDCs technology will greatly support future studies in the field of high-entropy ceramics, expanding the scope and promoting the application of these systems.

Author Contributions

J.H.: Conceptualization, supervision, writing—original draft. M.S.: Investigation. K.C.: Investigation. D.K.: Investigation. M.Z.: Investigation, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2022JQ-521, 2022JQ-012) and Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province (2021SF-296). We also thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52002333), the Science and Technology Planning Project in Weiyang District of Xi’an (No. 202107), and Shaanxi Youth Science and Technology New Star Program (2022KJXX-23).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainger, F.W.; Herbert, J.M. The Preparation of Phosphorus–Nitrogen Compounds as Non–Porous Solids; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1960; pp. 168–182. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chantrell, P.G.; Popper, P. Inorganic Polymers and Ceramic; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1960; pp. 87–103. [Google Scholar]
  3. Verbeek, W. Production of Shaped Articles of Homogeneous Mixtures of Silicon Carbide and Nitride. U.S. Patent 3853567, 8 November 1973. [Google Scholar]
  4. Verbeek, W.; Winter, G. Formkoerper aus siliciumcarbid und verfahren zu ihrer herstellung. Ger. Offen 1974, 7, 2236078. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fritz, G.; Raabe, B. Bildung siliciumorganischer verbindungen. v. die thermische zersetzung von Si(CH3)4 und Si(C2H5)4. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1956, 286, 149–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yajima, S.; Hayashi, J.; Imori, M. Continuous silicon carbide fiber of high tensile strength. Chem. Lett. 1975, 4, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xia, A.; Yin, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Huang, Z. Polymer-Derived Si-Based Ceramics: Recent Developments and Perspectives. Crystals 2020, 10, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, H.; Tian, C. Manufacturing Process of New Structural Ceramics-Polymer-Derived Method and its Application; China Machine Press: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rost, C.M.; Sachet, E.; Borman, T.; Moballegh, A.; Dickey, E.C.; Hou, D.; Jones, J.L.; Curtarolo, S.; Maria, J. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Comm. 2015, 6, 8485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang, S.; Hu, T.; Gild, J.; Zhou, N.; Nie, J.; Qin, M.; Harrington, T.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. A new class of high-entropy perovskite oxides. Scripta Mater. 2018, 142, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarkar, A.; Djenadic, R.; Wang, D.; Hein, C.; Kautenburger, R.; Clemens, O.; Hahn, H. Rare earth and transition metal based entropy stabilised perovskites type oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 2318–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, J.; Hou, M.; Yan, J.; Kunz, M.; et al. Stability and Compressibility of cation-doped high-entropy oxide MgCoNiCuZnO5. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019, 123, 17735–17744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Djenadic, R.; Sarkar, A.; Clemens, O.; Loho, C.; Botros, M.; Chakravadhanula, V.S.K.; Kübel, C.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Gandhi, A.S.; Hahn, H. Multicomponent equiatomic rare earth oxides. Mater. Res. Lett. 2017, 5, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yeh, J.W.; Chen, Y.L.; Lin, S.J.; Chen, S.K. High-entropy alloys—A new era of exploitation. Mater. Sci. Forum 2007, 560, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yeh, J.W. Recent progress in high-entropy alloys. Eur. J. Control. 2006, 33, 633–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ren, K.; Wang, Q.K.; Shao, G.; Zhao, X.F.; Wang, Y.G. Multicomponent high-entropy zirconates with comprehensive properties for advanced thermal barrier coating. Scripta Mater. 2020, 178, 382–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ren, K.; Wang, Q.K.; Cao, Y.J.; Shao, G.; Wang, Y.G. Multicomponent rare-earth cerate and zirconocerate ceramics for thermal barrier coating materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 1720–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Ren, K.; Ma, C.Y.; Du, H.L.; Wang, Y.G. Dielectric and energy storage properties of flash-sintered high-entropy (Bi0.2Na0.2K0.2Ba0.2Ca0.2)TiO3 ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 20576–20581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, B.S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, K.W.; Sun, Z.Z.; Ren, K.; Wang, Y.G. Reactive flash sintering and electrical transport properties of high-entropy (MgCoNiCuZn)1−xLixO oxides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 105, 3765–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Colombo, P.; Mera, G.; Riedel, R.; Soraru, G.D. Polymer–derived ceramics: 40 years of research and innovation in advanced ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 1805–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Greil, P. Acive-filler-controlled pyrolysis of preceramic polymers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1995, 78, 835–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bill, J.; Heimann, D. Polymer-derived ceramic coatings on C/C-SiC composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 16, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schulz, M. Polymer derived ceramics in MEMS/NEMS—A review on production processes and application. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2009, 108, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jones, R.; Szweda, R.; Petrak, D. Polymer derived ceramic matrix composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 1999, 30, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Newcomb, B.A. Processing, structure, and properties of carbon fibers. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 91, 262–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, L.; Wang, Y.G. Polymer–derived SiOC–barium–strontium aluminosilicate coatings as an environmental barrier for C/SiC Composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 4148–4152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.G.; Liu, J. Corrosion of barium aluminosilicates by water–vapor: An investigation from first principles. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 2126–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. More, K.L.; Tortorelli, P.F. Evaluating the Stability of BSAS–Based EBCs in High Water–Vapor Pressure Environments; Power for Land, Sea, & Air: Vienna, Austria, 2004; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Haug, T.; Knale, H.; Ehrmann, U. Processing, properties and structure development of polymer–derived fiber–reinforced SiC. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1989, 72, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  30. Nakano, K.; Kamiya, A.; Nishino, Y.; Imura, T.; Chou, T.W. Fabrication and characterization of three–dimensional carbon fiber reinforced silicon carbide and silicon nitride composites. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1995, 78, 2811–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Naslain, R. Design, preparation and properties of non–oxide CMCs for application in engines and nuclear reactors: An overview. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Riedel, R.; Seher, M.; Mayer, J.; Szabó, D.V. Polymer–derived Si–based bulk ceramics, Part I: Preparation, processing and properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1995, 15, 703–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raju, K.; Yoon, D.H. Sintering additives for SiC based on the reactivity: A review. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 17947–17962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, D.H.; Kim, C.H. Toughening behavior of silicon carbide with additions of yttria and alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 1431–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jang, C.W.; Kim, J.; Kang, S.L. Effect of sintering atmosphere on grain shape and grain growth in liquid-phase-sintered silicon carbide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2002, 85, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Costello, J.A.; Tressler, R.E. Oxidation of silicon carbide crystals and ceramics: In dry oxygen. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1986, 69, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Singhal, C.; Lange, F.F. Effect of alumina content on the oxidation of hot–pressed silicon carbide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1975, 58, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.G. Polymer–Derived Si-Al-C-N Ceramics: Oxidation, Hot–Corrosion and Structural Evolution. Ph.D Thesis, Dissertation of the University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. He, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.G.; Fang, J.; An, L. Synthesis of ZrB2-SiC nanocomposite powder via polymeric precursor route. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1602–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.G. Mechanical properties of ZrB2–SiC ceramics prepared by polymeric precursor route. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 6520–6526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Raj, R.; An, L.; Shah, S.; Riedel, R.; Fasel, C.; Kleebe, H.J. Oxidation kinetics of an amorphous silicon carbonitride ceramic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 84, 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Riedel, R.; Ruwisch, L.M.; An, L.; Raj, R. Amorphous silicoboron carbonitride ceramics with anomalously high resistance to creep. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 3341–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. An, L.; Riedel, R.; Konetschny, C.; Kleebe, H.J.; Raj, R. Newtonian viscosity of amorphous silicon carbonitride at high temperature. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 81, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thum, G.; Canel, J.; Bill, J.; Aldinger, F. Compression creep behavior of precursor-derived Si–C–N ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 19, 2317–2323. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, Y.G.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; An, L. Polymer–derived SiAlCN ceramics resist to oxidation at 1400 °C. Scr. Mater. 2006, 55, 295–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.G.; Fei, W.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; An, L. A silicoaluminum carbonitride ceramic resist oxidation/corrosion in water vapor. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 21, 1625–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. An, L.; Wang, Y.G.; Bharadwaj, L.; Zhang, L.; Fan, Y.; Jiang, D.; Sohn, Y.; Desai, V.H.; Kapat, J.; Chow, L.C. Silicoaluminum carbonitride with anomalously high resistance to oxidation and hot corrosion. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ionescu, E.; Kleebe, H.J.; Riedel, R. Silicon–containing polymer–derived ceramic nanocomposites (PDC–NCs): Preparative approaches and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5032–5052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Vakifahmetoglu, C. Fabrication and properties of ceramic 1D nanostructures from preceramic polymers: A review. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2011, 110, 188–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fu, S.; Zhu, M.; Zhu, Y. Organosilicon polymer-derived ceramics: An overview. J. Adv. Ceram. 2019, 8, 457–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, L.; Yu, Z.; Huang, M.; Tu, H.; Xia, H. Effect of curing and pyrolysis processing on the ceramic yield of a highly branched polycarbosilane. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hauser, A.Q.; Honnef, K.; Hanemann, T. Crosslinking behavior of UV-cured polyorganosilazane as polymer-derived ceramic precursor in ambient and nitrogen atmosphere. Polymers 2021, 13, 2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, L.G.; Wang, Y.S.; Wei, Y.; Xu, W.; Fang, D.; Zhai, L.; Lin, K.C.; An, L. A silicon carbonitride ceramic with anomalously high piezoresistivity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 1346–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, W.; Cao, Y.; Cheng, L.; Wang, Y. Design of polymer-derived SiC for nuclear applications from the perspective of heterogeneous interfaces. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Packirisamy, S.; Sreejith, K.J.; Devapal, D.; Swaminathan, B. Handbook of Advanced Ceramics and Composites: Polymer-Derived Ceramics and Their Space Applications; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 999–1000. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gunji, T.; Sopyan, I.; Abe, Y. Synthesis of polytitanosiloxanes and their transformation to SiO2–TiO2 ceramic fibers. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1994, 32, 3133–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, C.; Pan, R.; Hong, C.; Zhang, X.; Han, W.; Han, J.; Du, S. Effects of Zr on the precursor architecture and high-temperature nanostructure evolution of SiOC polymer derived ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hotza, D.; Nishihora, R.K.; Machado, R.A.F.; Geffroy, P.M.; Chartier, T.; Bernard, S. Tape casting of preceramic polymers towards advanced ceramics: A review. Int. J. Ceram. Eng. Sci. 2019, 1, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, Y.; Quaranta, A.; Sorarù, G.D. Synthesis and luminescent properties of novel Eu2+-doped silicon oxycarbide glasses. Opt. Mater. 2004, 24, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Doyle, C.D. Estimating thermal stability of experimental polymers by empirical thermogravimetric analysis. Anal. Chem. 1961, 33, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Raj, R. Fundamental research in structural ceramics for service near 2000 °C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1993, 76, 2147–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Riedel, R.; Passing, G.; Schonfelder, H.; Brook, R.J. Synthesis of dense silicon–based ceramics at low temperature. Nature 1992, 355, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Riedel, R.; Kienzle, A.; Dressler, W.; Ruwisch, L.; Bill, J.; Aldinger, F. A silicoboron carbonitride ceramic stable to 2000 °C. Nature 1996, 382, 796–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Meraa, G.; Riedel, R.; Poli, F.; Müller, K. Carbon-rich SiCN ceramics derived from phenyl–containing poly(silylcarbodiimides). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 2873–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, Z.C.; Aldinger, F.; Riedel, R. Novel silicon–boron–carbon–nitrogen materials thermally stable up to 2200 °C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 84, 2179–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yajima, S. Special heat-resisting materials from organometallic polymers. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 1983, 62, 893–915. [Google Scholar]
  67. Cordelair, J.; Greil, P. Electrical conductivity measurements as a microprobe for structure transitions in polysiloxane derived Si–O–C ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 20, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, K.; Ma, B.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.G.; An, L. Structural evolutions in polymer–derived carbon–rich amorphous silicon carbide. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, K.; Ma, B.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; An, L. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the structure and conduction of polymer–derived SiC. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 2135–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raj, R.; Toma, L.; Janssen, E.; Nuffer, J.; Melz, T.; Hanselka, H. Piezoresistive effect in SiOC ceramics for integrated pressure sensors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 920–924. [Google Scholar]
  71. Riedel, R.; Kleee, H.J.; Schbrifelder, H.; Aldinger, F. A covalent micro/ nano composite resistant to high temperature oxidation. Nature 1995, 374, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Y.G.; An, L.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Burton, S.; Gao, Z. Oxidation of polymer–derived SiAlCN ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 88, 3075–3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.G.; Fei, W.; An, L. Oxidation/corrosion of polymer–derived SiAlCN ceramics in water vapor. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 89, 1079–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. He, J.; Wang, Y.G.; Luo, L.; An, L. Oxidation behaviour of ZrB2–SiC (AlY) ceramics at 1700 °C. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 3769–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, H.; Pantano, C.G. Synthesis and characterization of silicon oxycarbide glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sorarù, G.D. Silicon oxycarbide glasses from gels. J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol. 1994, 2, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sorarù, G.D.; Andrea, G.D.; Campostrini, R.; Babonneau, F. Si–O–C glasses from gels. In Sol–Gel Science and Technology; Pope, E.J.A., Sakka, S., Klein, L., Eds.; American Ceramic Society: Westerville, OH, USA, 1994; pp. 135–146. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sorarù, G.D.; Andrea, G.D.; Campostrini, R.; Babonneau, F.; Mariotto, G. Structural characterization and high temperature behaviour of silicon oxycarbide glasses prepared from Sol–Gel precursors containing Si–H bonds. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1995, 78, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Karakuscu, A.; Guider, R.; Paves, L.; Sorarù, G.D. White kuminescence from sol–gel-derived SiOC thin films. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 2969–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yajima, S.; Hayashi, J.; Omori, M.; Okamura, K. Development of a silicon carbide fiber with high tensile strength. Nature 1976, 261, 683–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hasegawa, Y.; Iimura, M.; Yajima, S. Synthesis of continuous silicon carbide fibre. Part. 2 conversion of polycarbosilane fibre into silicon carbide fibres. J. Mater. Sci. 1980, 15, 720–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hasegawa, Y.; Okamura, K. Synthesis of continuous silicon carbide fibre. J. Mater. Sci. 1983, 18, 3633–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yajima, S.; Iwai, T.; Yamamura, T.; Okamura, K.; Hasegawa, Y. Synthesis of a polytitanocarbosilane and its conversion into inorganic compounds. J. Mater. Sci. 1981, 16, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yamamura, T.; Ishikawa, T.; Shibuya, M.; Hisayuki, T.; Okamura, K. Development of a new continuous Si–Ti–C–O fibre using an organometallic polymer precursor. J. Mater. Sci. 1988, 23, 2589–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ishikawa, T.; Kohtoku, Y.; Kumagawa, K.; Yamamura, T.; Nasagawa, T. High–strenght, alkali–resistant sintered SiC fibre stable up to 2200 °C. Nature 1998, 391, 773–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Moraes, K.V.; Interrante, L.V. Processing, fracture toughness, and vickers hardness of allylhydridopolycarbosilane–derived silicon carbide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 86, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Viard, A.; Fonblanc, D.; Ferber, D.L.; Schmidt, M.; Lale, A.; Durif, C.; Balestrat, M.; Rossignol, F.; Weinmann, M.; Raj, R.; et al. Polymer derived Si–B–C–N ceramics: 30 years of research. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kodama, H.; Miyoshi, T. Study of fracture behavior of very fine–grained silicon carbide ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 3081–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Niihara, K. New design concept of structural ceramics: Ceramic nanocomposites. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 99, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kumar, R.; Cai, Y.; Gerstel, P.; Rixecker, G.; Aldinger, F. Processing, crystallization and characterization of polymer derived nano–crystalline Si–B–C–N ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 7088–7095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bill, J.; Kamphowe, T.W.; Müller, A.; Wichmann, T.; Zern, A.; Jalowieki, A.; Mayer, J.; Weinmann, M.; Schuhmacher, J.; Müller, K.; et al. Precursor–derived Si–(B–)C–N ceramics: Thermolysis, amorphous state and crystallization. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 15, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ye, B.L.; Wen, T.Q.; Nguyen, M.; Hao, L.; Wang, C.; Chu, Y.H. First-principles study, fabrication and characterization of (Zr0.25Nb0.25Ti0.25V0.25)C high-entropy ceramics. Acta Mater. 2019, 170, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bérardan, D.; Franger, S.; Meena, A.K.; Dragoe, N. Room temperature lithium superionic conductivity in high entropy oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9536–9541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Jin, T.; Sang, X.; Unocic, R.R.; Kinch, R.T.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, H.; Dai, S. Mechanochemical-assisted synthesis of high-entropy metal nitride via a soft urea strategy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhai, S.; Rojas, J.; Ahlborg, N.; Lim, K.; Toney, M.F.; Jin, H.; Chueh, W.C.; Majumdar, A. The use of poly-cation oxides to lower the temperature of two-step thermochemical water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2172–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Braun, J.L.; Rost, C.M.; Lim, M.; Giri, A.; Olson, D.H.; Kotsonis, G.N.; Stan, G.; Brenner, D.W.; Maria, J.P.; Hopkins, P.E. Charge-induced disorder controls the thermal conductivity of entropy-stabilized oxides. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1805004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gild, J.; Samiee, M.; Braun, J.L.; Harrington, T.; Vega, H.; Hopkins, P.E.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. High-entropy fluorite oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 38, 3578–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hirai, T.; Yagi, K.; Nakai, K.; Okamoto, K.; Murai, D.; Okamoto, H. High-entropy polymer blends utilizing in situ exchange reaction. Polymer 2022, 240, 124483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qian, X.; Han, D.; Zheng, L.; Chen, J.; Tyagi, M.; Li, Q.; Du, F.; Zheng, S.; Huang, X.; Zhang, S.; et al. High-entropy polymer produces a giant electrocaloric effect at low fields. Nature 2021, 600, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Tseng, K.P.; Yang, Q.; McCormack, S.J.; Kriven, W.M. High-entropy, phase-constrained, lanthanide sesquioxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sun, Y.; Chen, F.; Qiu, W.; Ye, L.; Han, W.; Zhao, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, T. Synthesis of rare earth containing single-phase multicomponent metal carbides via liquid polymer precursor route. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 6081–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Han, W.; Qiu, W.; Zhao, T. Synthesis of high entropy carbide ceramics via polymer precursor route. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 15939–15945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dong, Y.; Ren, K.; Lu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y. High-entropy environmental barrier coating for the ceramic matrix composites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 2574–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cestari, A. Sol-gel methods for synthesis of aluminosilicates for dental applications. J. Dent. 2016, 55, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Shankhwar, N.; Srinivasan, A. Evaluation of sol–gel based magnetic 45S5 bioglass and bioglass–ceramics containing iron oxide. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, F.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.G.; Bao, W.; Liu, J.X.; Xu, F.; Zhang, G.J. Liquid precursor-derived high-entropy carbide nanopowders. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 22437–22441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Du, B.; Liu, H.; Chu, Y. Fabrication and characterization of polymer-derived high-entropy carbide ceramic powders. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 4063–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 12 01292 g001 550
Figure 1. Preparation of ceramic products by PDCs technology [50].
Figure 1. Preparation of ceramic products by PDCs technology [50].
Crystals 12 01292 g001
Crystals 12 01292 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Schematics of a detailed model describing the temperature-dependent evolution of nanodomains comprised of SiC, free carbon, and residual amorphous matrix in polymer-derived C-enriched SiC ceramics. (b) the average NC–SiC particle size varied with temperature, from 2 nm (1200 °C) to 15 nm (1500 °C). (c) the in-plane crystallite diameters (La) of the NC-G phase and the average defect distances of a single graphene sheet (Ld) grow trend varied with temperature, both remained nearly constant [54].
Figure 2. (a) Schematics of a detailed model describing the temperature-dependent evolution of nanodomains comprised of SiC, free carbon, and residual amorphous matrix in polymer-derived C-enriched SiC ceramics. (b) the average NC–SiC particle size varied with temperature, from 2 nm (1200 °C) to 15 nm (1500 °C). (c) the in-plane crystallite diameters (La) of the NC-G phase and the average defect distances of a single graphene sheet (Ld) grow trend varied with temperature, both remained nearly constant [54].
Crystals 12 01292 g002
Crystals 12 01292 g003 550
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric curves of polymers S1–S4 and S5−(SiMe2−NCN)n− up to 1400 °C [64]. S1–S4 represent polymers with the structures of −(PhSiR−NCN)n−, R = Phenyl(S1), Methyl(S2), H(S3), and Vinyl(S4). The ceramic compositions of pyrolyzed S1–S4 are Si1C12.14N1.81H10.07Cl0.19O0.14, Si1C7.93N1.83H8.71Cl0.12, Si1C6.81N1.96H6.68Cl0.03O0.03, and Si1C8.75N1.37H8.63Cl0.54O0.08, respectively.
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric curves of polymers S1–S4 and S5−(SiMe2−NCN)n− up to 1400 °C [64]. S1–S4 represent polymers with the structures of −(PhSiR−NCN)n−, R = Phenyl(S1), Methyl(S2), H(S3), and Vinyl(S4). The ceramic compositions of pyrolyzed S1–S4 are Si1C12.14N1.81H10.07Cl0.19O0.14, Si1C7.93N1.83H8.71Cl0.12, Si1C6.81N1.96H6.68Cl0.03O0.03, and Si1C8.75N1.37H8.63Cl0.54O0.08, respectively.
Crystals 12 01292 g003
Crystals 12 01292 g004 550
Figure 4. Experimental data of piezoresistivity response of (a) SiCN [53] and (b) SiCO [70].
Figure 4. Experimental data of piezoresistivity response of (a) SiCN [53] and (b) SiCO [70].
Crystals 12 01292 g004
Crystals 12 01292 g005 550
Figure 5. A plot of the square of oxide scale thickness as a function of annealing time for SiCN and SiAlCN ceramics at 1200 °C [72].
Figure 5. A plot of the square of oxide scale thickness as a function of annealing time for SiCN and SiAlCN ceramics at 1200 °C [72].
Crystals 12 01292 g005
Crystals 12 01292 g006 550
Figure 6. Experimental proof of visible luminescence of the Si-rich SiCO thin films pyrolyzed from 800 °C to 1250 °C under UV laser excitation [79].
Figure 6. Experimental proof of visible luminescence of the Si-rich SiCO thin films pyrolyzed from 800 °C to 1250 °C under UV laser excitation [79].
Crystals 12 01292 g006
Crystals 12 01292 g007 550
Figure 7. Experimental results for polymer-derived multi-phase nano ceramic: (a) selected-area electron diffraction pattern after annealing at 1800 °C; (b) bright-field image [91].
Figure 7. Experimental results for polymer-derived multi-phase nano ceramic: (a) selected-area electron diffraction pattern after annealing at 1800 °C; (b) bright-field image [91].
Crystals 12 01292 g007
Crystals 12 01292 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) SEM image of Ti1.00Zr1.01Hf1.04Mo1.01W1.01C4.93 pyrolyzed at 1800 °C and corresponding EDS maps at the microscale; (b) HAADF micrograph along (110) zone axis and corresponding STEM-EDS maps of as-received Ti1.00Zr1.01Hf1.04Mo1.01W1.01C4.93 pyrolyzed at 1800 °C [102].
Figure 8. (a) SEM image of Ti1.00Zr1.01Hf1.04Mo1.01W1.01C4.93 pyrolyzed at 1800 °C and corresponding EDS maps at the microscale; (b) HAADF micrograph along (110) zone axis and corresponding STEM-EDS maps of as-received Ti1.00Zr1.01Hf1.04Mo1.01W1.01C4.93 pyrolyzed at 1800 °C [102].
Crystals 12 01292 g008
Table
Table 1. Main processing parameters for manufacturing ceramics via conventional route and PDC route [58].
Table 1. Main processing parameters for manufacturing ceramics via conventional route and PDC route [58].
Processing ParametersConventional RoutePDC Route
Ceramic Raw MaterialCeramic powders, such as alumina, zirconia, silicon carbide, or aluminum nitridePrecursor polymers, such as polysiloxanes or polysilazanes, with passive or active fillers
Mixing/MillingPowders are mixed, generally in a ball mill, to liquid + dispersant for breaking up agglomerates; binders and plasticizers are added homogenizedSynthesis: solid or liquid are dissolved, with the aid of different equipment, in a solvent; fillers, crosslinkers, and others are added and homogenized
ShapingCutting or press into desired shapes
Thermal TreatmentsDebinding at middle temperatures and sintering at high temperatures are neededCrosslinking at low temperatures (as low as room temperature) and pyrolysis at high temperatures are needed; eventually, crystallization at higher temperatures is accomplished; composite materials may be produced with partial pyrolysis of precursors
Ceramic ProductsDense parts with a residual porosity and controlled shrinkage, or, less often, macroporous parts; all kinds of oxide and non-oxide ceramics may be fabricatedNear net shape parts with the use of active/passive fillers, or controlled porosity with the aid of pore formers; mostly silicon-based ceramics are fabricated (SiC, SiOC, SiOCN…)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, J.; Song, M.; Chen, K.; Kan, D.; Zhu, M. Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology: Characteristics, Procedure, Product Structures, and Properties, and Development of the Technology in High-Entropy Ceramics. Crystals 2022, 12, 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091292

AMA Style

He J, Song M, Chen K, Kan D, Zhu M. Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology: Characteristics, Procedure, Product Structures, and Properties, and Development of the Technology in High-Entropy Ceramics. Crystals. 2022; 12(9):1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091292

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Jiabei, Mengshan Song, Kaiyun Chen, Dongxiao Kan, and Miaomiao Zhu. 2022. "Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology: Characteristics, Procedure, Product Structures, and Properties, and Development of the Technology in High-Entropy Ceramics" Crystals 12, no. 9: 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091292

APA Style

He, J., Song, M., Chen, K., Kan, D., & Zhu, M. (2022). Polymer-Derived Ceramics Technology: Characteristics, Procedure, Product Structures, and Properties, and Development of the Technology in High-Entropy Ceramics. Crystals, 12(9), 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12091292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop