1. Introduction
Nephrite is a beautiful jade composed mainly of microcrystalline amphibole of the tremolite–actinolite series [
1], along with several secondary minerals, such as carbonate minerals, the epidote group, the chlorite group, quartz, rutile, other amphibole minerals, pyrite, and others [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7]. Nephrite deposits are widespread all over the world and are mainly located in China in the regions of Xinjiang, Guangxi, Qinghai, Liaoning, Guizhou and Taiwan [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. In the other parts of the world, nephrite is found in Russia [
16,
17,
18,
19,
20], South Korea [
1,
21], Australia [
1], Canada [
22], the United States [
1], New Zealand [
23,
24], Somaliland [
25], Afghanistan [
26], Vietnam [
1], Italy [
27], Pakistan [
28] and Poland [
29].
Based on variations in mineral content and composition, as well as differences in granular morphology and structure, nephrite can exhibit a wide range of colors, transparencies and lusters. White, green, yellow, gray, brown and black nephrites can be found with greasy, waxy or vitreous lusters and fine-to-coarse consistencies [
2,
6,
30]. Tremolites in nephrite usually show distinctive features in terms of grain size, morphology and structure, resulting in notable macroscopic variations. Based on the grain size of the tremolite, nephrite can be divided into three main types: coarse-grained crystalline, microcrystalline and cryptocrystalline [
31]. Furthermore, the internal morphological structure of nephrites can be further classified into various types based on the different morphologies and compact textures of the tremolite grains. These include but are not limited to the felt-like, leaf-like, bladed, fibrous, fibrous–cryptocrystalline and radial microscopic blastic textures. Tremolite in nephrite may exhibit metasomatic relict textures like corona, helicitic, diablastic, ring, harbor and pseudomorphic textures [
32,
33,
34]. In general, nephrite with fine and evenly sized tremolite grains shows a compact microstructure and a delicate and greasy macroscopic appearance, and these characteristics can be observed in nephrites from the regions of Xinjiang, Qinghai and Liaoning.
A major deposit of white and greenish white nephrites (Mida deposit) was recently discovered in the eastern Kunlun Mountains in the region of Qiemo County in Northwest China. The nephrites here have attracted much attention due to their atypical characteristics. Most Mida nephrites show a typical ivory white color, fine texture, semitranslucent-to-opaque transparency and greasy luster, while a smaller portion shows less transparency than the former and a porcelain-like luster. Mida nephrites show distinctive differences from Xinjiang white nephrite, which is known for its fine-grained texture, semitransparent-to-translucent appearance and greasy luster, as well as Qinghai white nephrite, which shows higher transparency and a vitreous luster. Being aware of the potential significance of understanding the formation of nephrite deposits, field investigation and analyses were conducted on this deposit, with a focus on determining the composition and structural characteristics of its component minerals, its microstructure, its macroscopic appearance, the country rock and the connection between the microstructure and the macroscopic appearance.
2. Geological Setting
The Mida nephrite deposit (GPS position: 37°08′51.94″ N, 85°24′23.55″ E, 4069 m) is located in the East Kunlun Mountains (
Figure 1).
The Mida nephrite deposit occurs in the Tokuzidaban Formation in Karamiran in the Late Paleozoic trench–arc–basin system between the Altyn fault and Muztag–Jingyu Lake fault (
Figure 2). Zircon U–Pb dating of the volcanic rocks in the Tokuzidaban Formation in the Aksu River region indicates the formation age ranges from 364 to 343 Ma [
39]. The Tokuzidaban Formation is located in the South Kunlun terrane, which is part of the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt. The East Kunlun Orogenic Belt is divided into North Kunlun, South Kunlun and Bayan Har terranes based on the boundary between the Central Kunlun fault and the South Kunlun fault [
40,
41].
Field investigations have revealed that the nephrite orebodies occur as blocks, veins and irregular banded bodies within gray-white or gray-black carbonate rocks composed mainly of marble and marbleized limestone. The main minerals in the carbonate rocks are calcite, with small quantities of tremolite and graphite, along with carbonaceous bands in the center. The carbonate rocks exhibit a large scale, measuring approximately 30 m in horizontal width and over 300 m in length and extending vertically for about 500 m in the Mida nephrite deposit (
Figure 3).
The Lower Carboniferous Tokuzidaban Group, mainly composed of limestone, siltstone, silty mudstone and tuff, is found outcropping from the marble. The Tokuzidaban Group consists of sedimentary sea fragments and volcanic fragments with intermediate-basic volcanic rock and partly carbonate rocks. It overlies the Middle Proterozoic strata with a supra-unconformity and has a thickness ranging from 881 to 2788 m. In addition, a high number of fossils occur in the strata of the Tokuzidaban Group, such as coral, brachiopods, bivalves, gastropods, stromatoporoidea, bryozoans, crinoids and microfossils. The monzonitic granite, which is exposed in the northern part of the deposit, intrudes into the Lower Carboniferous Tokuzidaban Group. Additionally, a grey-green vein-like wall can occasionally be observed in close proximity to the nephrite bodies throughout the mining area. During the field investigation, samples of nephrites, wall rocks, marbles and monzonitic granites were collected.
3. Samples and Methods
Among all the samples available to us, we selected four representative nephrites for this study (
Figure 4). A small part of the Mida white nephrite exhibits a porcelain-like luster (
Figure 4a), while the majority show a typical ivory white color, fine texture, semitranslucent-to-opaque transparency and greasy luster (
Figure 4b–d). The color, structure, texture and morphological characteristics of the samples were investigated. Refraction index (RI), specific gravity (SG), Mohs hardness, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) were performed at the laboratory of the School of Gemology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing (CUGB). The hardness was examined using a TH763 digital microhardness tester and then converted to Mohs hardness through calculation. We also chose two carbonate rocks for this study (
Figure 4e,f). The slices of nephrites and carbonate rocks were observed using an OLYMPUS BX5 polarizing microscope to determine the mineral composition, structural characteristics and contact relationships.
FTIR was performed in reflection mode with a resolution of 4 cm−1 over the range of 400–2000 cm−1. A test grating of 6 mm was used, and 32 scans were performed with a Bruker Tensor 27 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer to investigate the main minerals and compare them with Raman spectroscopy results. All samples were crushed and ground into powders with a size of less than 200 mesh using an agate mortar. The KBr pellets method was employed for analysis. XRD studies were conducted using a Smartlab Rigaku X-ray diffractometer with Cu target, 45 kV–100 mA and scanning speed of 8°/min.
The chemical compositions and backscattered electron (BSE) images of nephrites were acquired using a Shimadzu EPMA–1720 Electron Microprobe Analyzer (EPMA) at the Institute of Earth Sciences, CUGB. The instrument was operated with a 15 kV accelerating voltage, 10 nA beam current and 3 μm spot size. All counting times of element peaks and backgrounds were set to 10 s, with relative sensitivity levels ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 (wt%), an absolute sensitivity of 10−14 g, and relative error ranges between 1% and 3%. The instrument was equipped with an X-ray energy spectrometer for qualitative analysis of element contents in the samples to enhance observation efficiency and selection accuracy. Major elements in carbonate rocks were determined through energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) using Shimadzu EDX-7000 at the laboratory of the School of Gemology, CUGB.
The surface characteristics and mineral structure of the nephrite were examined using a ZEISS SUPRA 55 scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at the Institute of Earth Sciences, CUGB. The instrument was operated under the following conditions: room temperature of 18 °C, humidity of 30% and acceleration voltage of 15 kV. Each sample was sliced to a size of 1 × 1 cm and coated with carbon powder as a conducting medium.
4. Results
4.1. Gemological Properties
The appearance of the four nephrite jade samples investigated in this paper is similar, and the conventional gemological properties are listed in
Table 1.
All samples are white to grayish white in color. The refraction index ranges from 1.61 to 1.62, the Mohs hardness ranges from 5.97 to 6.21, and the specific gravity ranges from 2.86 to 2.95. The relatively low values of specific gravity, compared to the theoretical range (2.9 to 3.1 [
6]), suggest that there may be some minor minerals with lower specific gravity values within the samples.
4.2. Petrography
4.2.1. Nephrite
The Mida nephrite consists of tremolite, with minor accessory minerals of quartz, calcite and diopside.
Tremolite
Under the polarizing microscope, at least two types of tremolite grains can be observed (
Figure 5). The first type of grains, which are rare, appear as flakes and bundles approximately 200 μm long and 30 μm wide. Most of the edges and the interiors of these grains exhibit a metasomatic corrosion texture. The second type of tremolite grains display randomly oriented micro to cryptocrystalline fibrous–felted textures with intertwined boundaries. This structure is probably the main factor determining the fine and smooth macroscopic appearance of nephrite.
SEM images reveal that the jade domains contain tremolite–actinolite crystals in the form of long, slender fibers measuring approximately 100 µm in length and ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 µm in diameter. Most of these fibers are straight, compacted and oriented parallel or occasionally cross-cutting, while a few exhibit curvature. Additionally, granular and flaky tremolite with interstitial pores can be observed (
Figure 6).
Quartz
Based on the shape and stage of formation, quartz grains can be divided into two types (
Figure 5). The first type exhibits a metasomatic relict texture, and wave-like extinction is visible under a polarized microscope. The size of quartz grains varies from 1.0 to 400 μm, and they have xenomorphic crystalline shapes. Furthermore, we observe that the granules are dispersed in the tremolite matrix, with their edges being replaced by fibrous tremolite. The second type of quartz occurs as veins that cross-cut through the tremolite matrix.
Calcite
The calcite grains exhibit a granular, crystalloblastic texture with a grain size ranging from 0.2 to 2 mm, and their edges are often replaced by tremolite (
Figure 5g,h). Sometimes, irregular calcite veins disseminating in the nephrite can be observed.
Diopside
Granular and flaky diopside grains with a diameter of approximately 50 to 100 μm are observed, occurring alongside fine granular tremolite (
Figure 5i).
4.2.2. Carbonate Rocks
The carbonate rocks are mainly composed of marbleized limestone and marble. Among them, the polarizing microscope reveals the presence of biogenic detritus and a micrite matrix (
Figure 7). The biogenic detritus primarily consists of Echinodermata, such as fossil crinoid stems and forams.
4.3. Mineral Chemistry
4.3.1. Amphibole
According to the classification diagram based on the chemical composition (
Table 2 and
Figure 8), the amphiboles belong to the calcic subgroup, which is close to the tremolite end number [
42].
4.3.2. Diopside
Diopside in Mida nephrite exhibits a nearly constant chemical composition (
Table 3). SiO
2 content ranges from 54.20 to 54.70 wt%, CaO content ranges from 26.12 to 26.46 wt%, and MgO content ranges from 17.69 to 18.48 wt%. FeO content is low, ranging from 0.55 to 0.96 wt%. Based on the general mineral formula (XY[T
2O
6]) and sample calculations, the chemical characteristics of diopside are as follows: Si occupies 1.96 to 1.97 atoms per formula unit (a.p.f.u.) on the T site, Mg (M
1) occupies 0.96 to 0.99 a.p.f.u on the Y site, and Ca (M
2) occupies approximately 1.02 a.p.f.u on the X site.
4.3.3. Quartz and Calcite
The chemical compositions of quartz and calcite (
Table 4) in Mida nephrite indicate that quartz is primarily composed of SiO
2 (98.04–99.44%), while calcite is mainly composed of CaO (56.66–58.13%).
4.4. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
The infrared ranges of 1200 to 900 cm
−1 and 600 to 400 cm
−1 are indicative of the mineral components in Mida nephrite (
Figure 9).
The vibration absorption peaks observed in all samples at 540 cm
−1, 511 cm
−1, 468 cm
−1 and 420 cm
−1 are attributed to the characteristic Si-O bending vibration, M-O bending vibration and external lattice vibration. Additionally, the peaks at 761 cm
−1, 688 cm
−1, 663 cm
−1 and 644 cm
−1 can be detected in the samples and are assigned to the Si-O-Si symmetric stretching vibration. Furthermore, the peaks at 1136 cm
−1, 1041 cm
−1, 995 cm
−1 and 925 cm
−1 are due to the O-Si-O and Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching vibrations as well as O-Si-O symmetric stretching vibration. Moreover, the presence of other minerals is indicated by certain characteristic vibrational absorption peaks found in some samples, such as diopside (850 cm
−1 peak), calcite’s CO
32− bending vibration (875 cm
−1 peak), quartz’s Si-O asymmetric stretching vibration (1091 cm
−1 peak) and quartz’s Si-O-Si symmetric vibrations (800 cm
−1 and 783 cm
−1 peaks). The band positions and assignments can be found in
Table 5.
4.5. Powder X-ray Diffraction
The results indicate that Mida white nephrites are relatively pure and mainly composed of tremolite, with minor minerals such as calcite and quartz (
Figure 10). The diffraction peaks and their assignment to the identified mineral species are listed in
Table 6.
4.6. Chemical Characteristics of Carbonate Rocks
The chemical composition of carbonate rocks is listed in
Table 7. In all the analyzed samples, the major element contents show limited variations: CaO (52.04–53.44%) and MgO (0.74–1.22%).
5. Discussion
5.1. Cause of the Ivory White Color and Porcelain-like Appearance of Nephrite
Quartz is present in a granular or disseminated form within the tremolite matrix of a small portion of white Mida nephrite. Samples with a minor amount of quartz exhibit a porcelain-like appearance at a macroscopic level, without any apparent internal features observed under transmitted light. While quartz is mentioned as a minor mineral in many deposits, such as in Utah (USA), Tashisayi and Ruoqiang in Xinjiang (China), Luodian in Guizhou (China), and Sanchakou and Golmud in Qinghai (China) [
1,
11,
41,
43,
44], the porcelain-like appearance seems to be present only in nephrites with smaller quantities of quartz from the Mida deposit.
The primary factors that determine the light scattering ability are particle size, volume of the second-phase particles and relative refractive index [
45]. In all types of jade, the degree of compaction of the granules also influences light penetration because loose parts can be filled with a gas substance having the lowest refractive index. When the grains are uniform in size, well-oriented and tightly interlocking, light can effectively penetrate nephrite, achieving a high level of transparency and exhibiting a greasy to vitreous luster (
Figure 11). However, the occurrence of an ivory white color and a porcelain-like appearance in Mida white nephrite may indicate a different internal texture compared to the aforementioned situation. Observations under a polarizing microscope and scanning electron microscope have shown that the white Mida nephrite contains tremolite and quartz grains, with the latter dispersed within the matrix of the former. The size of tremolite grains varies greatly, ranging from 0.05 to 10 μm in width. Similarly, there is significant variability in the size of quartz grains, ranging from 0.05 to 1 mm. A low degree of compaction can also be detected between these grains and their pores.
Consequently, the substantial difference in size between tremolite and quartz grains, along with a low degree of compaction and random orientation of the grains, leads to a reduction in the ability of light to pass through Mida white nephrite (
Figure 11c). The significant variation in mineral grain size and random orientation also contribute to an increase in inter-particle pores, the formation of surfaces that are not very smooth and lower internal density. All these factors ultimately cause light to scatter more and consume more energy while passing through some Mida white nephrites. As a result, its ability to reflect surface light and transmit internal light decreases, resulting in a macroscopic appearance characterized by an ivory white color and porcelain texture (
Figure 12a). Examples of nephrites corresponding to models a and b are shown in
Figure 12b,c.
5.2. Origin of Quartz in Mida Nephrite
Based on differences in geological background, nephrite deposits can generally be divided into two types: those related to the replacement of dolomite (D-type) and those related to the replacement of serpentinite (S-type) [
1,
46]. The Mida nephrite deposit is more closely related to the former due to metasomatism between Si-rich hydrothermal fluids and host carbonate rocks. However, it differs from typical D-type nephrites as its occurrence stratum consists of limestone rather than dolomite or dolomitic marble, which distinguishes it from other nephrite deposits along the Kunlun–Altyn Tagh Mountains. The presence of quartz may be connected with this new type of limestone replacement nephrite deposit. However, further study is needed to understand its mechanism.
Although quartz has been mentioned in other nephrite deposits as a minor component, its origin in these deposits and in Mida nephrites has not been extensively investigated. Therefore, determining its origin could be of significant importance. By analyzing the occurrence of quartz in this context, two possible explanations for its presence can be proposed.
The first possibility is that quartz may originate from Si-rich hydrothermal fluids. During the late stage of metasomatism, when the Mg in the ore-forming fluids was nearly depleted, and pressure and temperature values decreased, abundant silica in the hydrothermal fluids began to crystallize as quartz. Crystallization might have occurred within the less compact tremolite matrix, resulting in dispersed quartz grains throughout it.
The second possibility is that quartz may have originated from the host rocks, which are primarily composed of limestone. If the host rocks contained a significant number of quartz particles, they would have participated in reactions during the thermal effect and led to the formation of tremolite. This hypothesis would rely on the evidence of a substantial quantity of quartz grains in the host rocks. However, our observations on the host rock did not confirm this hypothesis.
Therefore, the occurrence of quartz in Mida white nephrites is more likely due to the first hypothesis, suggesting that quartz grains overlapped the less compact tremolite matrix during the formation of the Mida white nephrites. This hypothesis illuminates the potential processes that lead to the formation of nephrites.
6. Conclusions
The gemological and mineralogical characteristics of a white nephrite from the newly discovered Mida deposit are presented. The nephrite exhibits an ivory white color and a porcelain-like appearance with semitranslucent-to-opaque transparency and a porcelain-to-greasy luster. It is mainly composed of tremolite, with minor amounts of quartz, diopside and calcite. Quartz was found in petrographic observation, electron probe microanalysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction. Quartz grains were found dispersed in the tremolite matrix, and these observations may be correlated with the appearance of an ivory white color and a porcelain-like appearance rather than the traditional greasy luster.
After investigating the grain size and inter-particle pores, we hypothesize that the difference in size between tremolite and quartz grains, along with low compaction and random grain orientation, is related to the ivory white color and porcelain-like appearance. The occurrence of quartz in nephrite is relatively rare, which could provide valuable insights into the ore-forming process, making it a focal point for further investigation of the Mida nephrite deposit.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, T.J. and G.S.; methodology, T.J. and G.S.; software, T.J. and D.Y.; validation, T.J. and G.S.; formal analysis, T.J. and D.Y.; investigation, T.J., G.S. and H.H.; resources, T.J. and G.S.; data curation, T.J. and G.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.J. and G.S.; writing—review and editing, T.J., G.S., X.Z. and L.Z.; visualization, T.J.; supervision, G.S.; project administration, G.S.; funding acquisition, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC2903302), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STHP) (Grant No. 2019QZKK0802) and the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42273044).
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available in this article.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully appreciate X.H. Lv (Xingfada Inc.), B.Y. Zhang (Xingfada Inc.), S.Q. Wang, and S.C. Wang for their kind support during the field investigation, Z. Yang and X.M. Zhang for help with the preparation of hand specimens and EPMA test, Z.F. Wang for the valuable suggestions, Y.Y. Zhu for the support with image processing, and Y. Li for the support with the photos of the products. The constructive and thoughtful comments and suggestions from X.Y. Yu and four anonymous reviewers, along with editorial handling by Editors are gratefully appreciated.
Conflicts of Interest
Author Hongwei Han was employed by the company Urumqi Silk Road Deyuan Mining Co., Ltd.. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Harlow, G.E.; Sorensen, S.S. Jade (nephrite and jadeitite) and serpentinite: Metasomatic connections. Int. Geol. Rev. 2005, 47, 113–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Bian, Z.; Wang, F.; Wei, J.; Ran, X. Comparative Study on Mineral Components, Microstructures and Appearance Characteristics of Nephrite from Different Origins. J. Gems Gemol. 2014, 16, 56–64, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Z.; Feng, J. A petrological and mineralogical comparison between Xinjiang nephrite and Xiuyan nephrite. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2010, 29, 331–340, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Prokhor, S.A. The Genesis of Nephrite and Emplacement of The Nephrite–bearing Ultramafic Complexes of East Sayan. Int. Geol. Rev. 1991, 33, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Liu, D. Geological characteristics of Manasi green jade in Xinjiang. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2002, 21, 22–25, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S. A Book of Gem–Jade Resources in China; Scientific and Technical Documentation Press: Beijing, China, 1999; pp. 15–20. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, X.; Schmadicke, E.; Li, Q.; Gose, J.; Wu, R.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Tang, G.; Li, X. Age determination of nephrite by in-situ SIMS U–Pb dating syngenetic titanite: A case study of the nephrite deposit from Luanchuan, Henan, China. Lithos 2015, 220–223, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, Y.; Liu, Y. Genesis and mineralogical studies of zircons in the Alamas, Yurungkash and Karakash Rivers nephrite deposits, Western Kunlun, Xinjiang, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 149, 105087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.; Yu, B.; Guo, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Ng, Y. Structural and Mineralogical Characterization of Green Nephrite in Hetian, Xinjiang, China. Key Eng. Mater. 2014, 633, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.; Jiang, C.; Santosh, M.; Chen, Y.; Bao, Y.; Chen, Q. Nephrite Jade from Guangxi Province, China. Gems Gemol. 2014, 50, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.; Wang, R.; Guo, J.; Li, J.; Yang, X. Study of the minerogenetic mechanism and origin of Qinghai nephrite from Golmud, Qinghai, Northwest China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2016, 59, 1597–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Han, L.; Qin, S.; Li, L. Raman Spectra and Its Application of Graphite Enclaves in Nephrite–Jades in Xiuyan, Liaoning. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2010, 30, 2985–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Bai, F.; Heide, G. Mineralogy, geochemistry, and petrogenesis of nephrite from Tieli, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 107, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Bai, F.; Xu, L.; Che, Y. Geochemical characteristics and ore–forming mechanism of Luodian nephrite deposit, Southwest China and comparison with other nephrite deposits in Asia. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 160, 105604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yui, T.; Usuki, T.; Chen, C.; Ishida, A.; Sano, Y.; Suga, K.; Iizuka, Y.; Chen, C. Dating thin zircon rims by NanoSIMS: The Fengtien nephrite (Taiwan) is the youngest jade on Earth. Int. Geol. Rev. 2014, 56, 1932–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kislov, E.V.; Popov, M.P.; Nurmukhametov, F.M.; Posokhov, V.F.; Vanteev, V.V. Nyrdvomenshor Nephrite Deposit, Polar Urals, Russia. Minerals 2023, 13, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kislov, E.V.; Erokhin, Y.V.; Popov, M.P.; Nikolayev, A.G. Nephrite of Bazhenovskoye Chrysotile–Asbestos Deposit, Middle Urals: Localization, Mineral Composition and Color. Minerals 2021, 11, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khudyakova, L.I.; Kislov, E.V.; Paleev, P.L.; Kotova, I.Y. Nephrite–Bearing Mining Waste as a Promising Mineral Additive in the Production of New Cement Types. Minerals 2020, 10, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burtseva, M.; Ripp, G.; Posokhov, V.; Zyablitsev, Y.; Murzintseva, A. The sources of fluids for the formation of nephritic rocks of the southern folded belt of the Siberian Craton. Geochemistry 2015, 460, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burtseva, M.V.; Ripp, G.S.; Posokhov, V.F.; Murzintseva, A.E. Nephrites of East Siberia: Geochemical features and problems of genesis. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2015, 56, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yui, T. Origin of a Dolomite–Related Jade Deposit at Chuncheon, Korea. Econ. Geol. 2002, 97, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leaming, S.F. Jade in Canada; Geological Survey of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1978; pp. 2–50. [Google Scholar]
- Adams, C.J.; Beck, R.J.; Campbell, H.J. Characterisation and origin of New Zealand nephrite jade using its strontium isotopic signature. Lithos 2007, 97, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, A.F. Nephrite and Metagabbro in the Haast Schist at Muddy Creek, Northwest Otago, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Geol. Geophys. 1995, 38, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, G.; Jia, R.; Santosh, M.; Liang, H.; He, H. First report of a nephrite deposit from Somaliland, Africa: Characterization and geological and archaeological implications. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obiadi, S.S.; Amini, M.A.; Fazli, F. Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Nephrite from Wolay Deposite, Kunar, East Afghanistan. J. Mech. Civ. Ind. Eng. 2022, 3, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamo, I.; Bocchio, R. Nephrite jade from Val Malenco, Sondrio, Italy: Review and new data. Gems Gemol. 2013, 49, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umar, Z.; Liaqat, U.; Ahmed, R.; Baig, M. Classification of Nephrite Using Calibration–Free Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (CF–LIBS) with Comparison to Laser Ablation–Time-of-Flight–Mass Spectrometry (LA–TOF–MS). Anal. Lett. 2020, 53, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil, G.; Bagiński, B.; Gunia, P.; Madej, S.; Sachanbiński, M.; Jokubauskas, P.; Belka, Z. Comparative Fe and Sr isotope study of nephrite deposits hosted in dolomitic marbles and serpentinites from the Sudetes, SW Poland: Implications for Fe–As–Au–bearing skarn formation and post–obduction evolution of the oceanic lithosphere. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 118, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suo, L.; Tao, Z.; Yuan, Z. Mineral composition and chemical composition of Chinese nephrite. Miner. Resour. Geol. 2019, 33, 484–488, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Tang, Y.; Chen, B.; Jiang, R. Chinese Hetian Nephrite; Xinjiang People’s Publishing House: Urumqi, China, 1994; pp. 100–205. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, R.; Li, W.; Ao, Y. Research on Texture and Structure Type of Hetian Jade in Xinjiang. J. Gems Gemol. 1999, 1, 7–10, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Wang, S.; Duan, T.; Zheng, Z. Mineralogical and petrological characteristics of Xiuyan nephrite and its minerogenetic model. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2002, 21, 79–90, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Yu, X.Y. Classification and mineralogical characteristics of nephrite deposits in China. Miner. Resour. Geol. 2009, 23, 375–380, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Shi, G.; Zhang, X.; Gao, K. Formation of the Nephrite Deposit with Five Mineral Assemblage Zones in the Central Western Kunlun Mountains, China. J. Petrol. 2022, 63, egac117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, F.; Ma, C.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.; Jiang, H. Reworking of old continental lithosphere: An important crustal evolution mechanism in orogenic belts, as evidenced by Triassic I–type granitoids in the East Kunlun orogen, Northern Tibetan Plateau. J. Geol. Soc. 2014, 171, 847–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cowgill, E.; Yin, A.; Harrison, T.M. Reconstruction of the Altyn Tagh fault based on U–Pb geochronology: Role of back thrusts, mantle sutures, and heterogeneous crustal strength in forming the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108, 2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Windley, B.F.; Yong, Y.; Yan, Z.; Yuan, C.; Liu, C.; Li, J. Early Paleozoic to Devonian multiple–accretionary model for the Qilian Shan, NW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 35, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Ye, B.; Zhao, Z.; Ma, B. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Late Devonian–Early Carboniferous volcanic rocks in Aksu River area, western end of the East Kunlun Orogen. Geol. J. 2020, 55, 2881–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S. Palaeogeography of the Carboniferous in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Geol. 2000, 18, 324–329, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Li, H.; Yang, J. An orogenic plateau–the orogenic collage and orogenic types of the Qinghai Tibet plateau. Earth Sci. Front. 2006, 13, 1–17, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Leake, B.E.; Woolley, A.R.; Arps, C.E.S.; Birch, W.D.; Gilbert, M.C.; Grice, J.D.; Hawthorne, F.C.; Kato, A.; Kisch, H.J.; Krivovichev, V.G.; et al. Nomenclature of amphiboles: Report of the subcommittee on amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Can. Mineral. 1997, 35, 219–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Shi, G.; Xu, L.; Li, X. Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Nephrite Jade from Yinggelike Deposit, Altyn Tagh (Xinjiang, NW China). Minerals 2020, 10, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhi, Y.; Liao, G.; Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Z. The discovery of the Luodian nephrite in Guizhou Province and its petrological and mineralogical characteristics. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2011, 30, 58–62, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Kingery, W.D.; Bowen, H.K.; Uhlmann, D.R. Introduction to Ceramics; Wiley–Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1976; pp. 20–82. [Google Scholar]
- Nichol, D. Two contrasting nephrite jade types. J. Gemol. 2000, 4, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Tectonic map of the northern Tibetan Plateau and the distribution of the primary nephrite deposits in the Kunlun Mountains and Altyn Tagh Mountains (modified after [
1,
35,
36,
37,
38]). Green stars represent the known nephrite deposits, and the red star represents the Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 1.
Tectonic map of the northern Tibetan Plateau and the distribution of the primary nephrite deposits in the Kunlun Mountains and Altyn Tagh Mountains (modified after [
1,
35,
36,
37,
38]). Green stars represent the known nephrite deposits, and the red star represents the Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 2.
(a) Geologic map of the Mida nephrite deposit, modified after National Geological Archives of China (unpublished). (b) Nephrite orebody in the Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 2.
(a) Geologic map of the Mida nephrite deposit, modified after National Geological Archives of China (unpublished). (b) Nephrite orebody in the Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 3.
Opencast mining area and orebody of Mida nephrite deposit. (a) Outcrop photograph of marbles. (b) Nephrite orebody occurs as blocks in gray-black marbles.
Figure 3.
Opencast mining area and orebody of Mida nephrite deposit. (a) Outcrop photograph of marbles. (b) Nephrite orebody occurs as blocks in gray-black marbles.
Figure 4.
Representative samples of nephrite and carbonate parent rocks from the Mida deposit. (a) Representative sample with ivory white color and porcelain-like appearance. (b–d) Samples with ivory white color and porcelain to greasy luster. (e,f) Marbleized limestone and marble.
Figure 4.
Representative samples of nephrite and carbonate parent rocks from the Mida deposit. (a) Representative sample with ivory white color and porcelain-like appearance. (b–d) Samples with ivory white color and porcelain to greasy luster. (e,f) Marbleized limestone and marble.
Figure 5.
Cross-polarized photomicrographs and BSE images of Mida nephrite. (a) Flaky and bundle/fibroblastic texture of tremolite. (b) Microscopic felt-like texture of tremolite. (c) Fine granular texture of tremolite. (d) Granular quartz with metasomatic relict texture in tremolite matrix. (e) Quartz vein fill in tremolite matrix. (f) BSE image of multiple fine quartz grains dispersed in tremolite matrix. (g) Metasomatic contact zone of tremolite and calcite. (h) BSE image of relict calcite in tremolite. (i) Granular and flaky diopside and granular tremolite grains. Tr—tremolite. Qtz—quartz. Cal—calcite. Di-diopside.
Figure 5.
Cross-polarized photomicrographs and BSE images of Mida nephrite. (a) Flaky and bundle/fibroblastic texture of tremolite. (b) Microscopic felt-like texture of tremolite. (c) Fine granular texture of tremolite. (d) Granular quartz with metasomatic relict texture in tremolite matrix. (e) Quartz vein fill in tremolite matrix. (f) BSE image of multiple fine quartz grains dispersed in tremolite matrix. (g) Metasomatic contact zone of tremolite and calcite. (h) BSE image of relict calcite in tremolite. (i) Granular and flaky diopside and granular tremolite grains. Tr—tremolite. Qtz—quartz. Cal—calcite. Di-diopside.
Figure 6.
SEM photos of Mida nephrite. (a,b) Tremolite grains in different sizes. (c,d) Fine and oriented tremolite bundles. (e,f) Flaky and granular tremolite grains; pores can be observed between them and on their edges.
Figure 6.
SEM photos of Mida nephrite. (a,b) Tremolite grains in different sizes. (c,d) Fine and oriented tremolite bundles. (e,f) Flaky and granular tremolite grains; pores can be observed between them and on their edges.
Figure 7.
Photomicrographs of the carbonate rocks with biogenic detritus in them. (a) Fossil crinoid stems in the carbonate rocks (where the yellow arrows point). (b) A fossil foram in the carbonate rocks (where the yellow arrow points).
Figure 7.
Photomicrographs of the carbonate rocks with biogenic detritus in them. (a) Fossil crinoid stems in the carbonate rocks (where the yellow arrows point). (b) A fossil foram in the carbonate rocks (where the yellow arrow points).
Figure 8.
Classification diagram of amphibole in Mida nephrite deposit (after [
42]).
Figure 8.
Classification diagram of amphibole in Mida nephrite deposit (after [
42]).
Figure 9.
FTIR spectra of the nephrite samples from Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 9.
FTIR spectra of the nephrite samples from Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 10.
XRD pattern of a sample (MD–3) from Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 10.
XRD pattern of a sample (MD–3) from Mida nephrite deposit.
Figure 11.
Three models depict light penetrating different textures of the nephrite aggregate. (a) The nephrite crystals are fine-grained and compactly intergrown but lack obvious crystallographical orientation. Some transmitted light passes through the nephrite in random directions after internal reflection and refraction, resulting in the typical greasy luster of nephrite. (b) The nephrite crystals form a bundle shape with a pronounced crystallographical orientation and are fine-grained. Most of the transmitted light passes through nephrite in a specific direction without significant internal reflection and refraction, creating the vitreous luster and translucent appearance observed in some nephrite from Qinghai province, China. (c) In a small portion of Mida nephrite, the grains vary in size and are not fine-grained. Different types and sizes of grains, along with uncompacted texture containing pores, lead to increased internal reflection and refraction, allowing less transmitted light to pass through the nephrite. This generates a semitranslucent-to-opaque transparency as well as a porcelain luster.
Figure 11.
Three models depict light penetrating different textures of the nephrite aggregate. (a) The nephrite crystals are fine-grained and compactly intergrown but lack obvious crystallographical orientation. Some transmitted light passes through the nephrite in random directions after internal reflection and refraction, resulting in the typical greasy luster of nephrite. (b) The nephrite crystals form a bundle shape with a pronounced crystallographical orientation and are fine-grained. Most of the transmitted light passes through nephrite in a specific direction without significant internal reflection and refraction, creating the vitreous luster and translucent appearance observed in some nephrite from Qinghai province, China. (c) In a small portion of Mida nephrite, the grains vary in size and are not fine-grained. Different types and sizes of grains, along with uncompacted texture containing pores, lead to increased internal reflection and refraction, allowing less transmitted light to pass through the nephrite. This generates a semitranslucent-to-opaque transparency as well as a porcelain luster.
Figure 12.
(a) A representative hand specimen of Mida white nephrite exhibits an ivory white color and a porcelain luster. (b) A polished pendant made from Mida white nephrite showcases fine-grained crystals and a greasy luster. (c) A polished pendant made from Qinghai nephrite displays a vitreous luster and a translucent appearance.
Figure 12.
(a) A representative hand specimen of Mida white nephrite exhibits an ivory white color and a porcelain luster. (b) A polished pendant made from Mida white nephrite showcases fine-grained crystals and a greasy luster. (c) A polished pendant made from Qinghai nephrite displays a vitreous luster and a translucent appearance.
Table 1.
Gemological properties of Mida nephrite.
Table 1.
Gemological properties of Mida nephrite.
Scheme | Refractive Index | Specific Gravity | Mohs Hardness |
---|
MD–1 | 1.61 | 2.86 | 6.17 |
MD–2 | 1.61 | 2.91 | 6.42 |
MD–3 | 1.62 | 2.95 | 6.42 |
MD–4 | 1.62 | 2.90 | 6.20 |
Table 2.
Chemical composition of tremolite in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Table 2.
Chemical composition of tremolite in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Sample | MD–1 | MD–2 | MD–3 | MD–4–1 | MD–4–2 |
---|
SiO2 | 59.25 | 59.04 | 59.40 | 59.55 | 59.13 |
TiO2 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
Al2O3 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
FeO | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.09 |
MnO | 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
NiO | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
MgO | 24.83 | 24.10 | 25.19 | 24.73 | 24.77 |
CaO | 13.84 | 13.18 | 12.30 | 13.05 | 12.71 |
Na2O | 0.04 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
K2O | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
Total | 98.23 | 98.00 | 97.84 | 97.75 | 97.04 |
Si | 7.98 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
Al | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
SumT | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 |
Al VI | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Fe3+ | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
Mg | 4.99 | 4.87 | 4.95 | 4.95 | 4.98 |
Fe2+ | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Mn | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
SumC | 5.00 | 4.97 | 5.00 | 4.99 | 5.00 |
Mg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
Ni | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Mn | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Ca | 2.00 | 1.91 | 1.78 | 1.88 | 1.84 |
Na | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
SumB | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.95 | 1.89 | 1.89 |
Na | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
K | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
SumA | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Mg/(Mg+Fe2+) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Minerals | Tr | Tr | Tr | Tr | Tr |
Table 3.
Chemical composition of diopside in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Table 3.
Chemical composition of diopside in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Sample | MD–2 | MD–3–1 | MD–3–2 |
---|
SiO2 | 54.48 | 54.2 | 54.7 |
TiO2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
Al2O3 | 0.01 | 0.51 | 0.07 |
Cr2O3 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
FeO | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.96 |
MnO | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
MgO | 18.48 | 17.69 | 18.19 |
CaO | 26.34 | 26.12 | 26.46 |
Na2O | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
K2O | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
Total | 100.01 | 99.49 | 100.6 |
Si | 1.96 | 1.97 | 1.97 |
Al | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
Fe3+ | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Mg | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
Ca | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 |
Na | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Sum | 4 | 3.99 | 4 |
Minerals | Di | Di | Di |
Table 4.
Chemical composition of quartz and calcite in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Table 4.
Chemical composition of quartz and calcite in Mida nephrite (wt%).
Sample | MD–1 | MD–2–1 | MD–2–2 | MD–4 | MD–2 | MD–3 | MD–4 |
---|
SiO2 | 99.73 | 99.36 | 99.80 | 99.48 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
TiO2 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Al2O3 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Cr2O3 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
FeO | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
MnO | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
NiO | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
ZnO | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
MgO | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
CaO | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 56.66 | 58.13 | 57.10 |
Na2O | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
K2O | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 57.03 | 58.35 | 57.19 |
Minerals | Qtz | Qtz | Qtz | Qtz | Cal | Cal | Cal |
Table 5.
FTIR band assignment of the nephrite samples from Mida nephrite deposit.
Table 5.
FTIR band assignment of the nephrite samples from Mida nephrite deposit.
Wavenumbers (cm−1) | Band Assignment | Suggested Minerals |
---|
1136, 1041, 995, 92 | O-Si-O and Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching vibration; O-Si-O symmetric stretching vibration | Tr |
761, 688, 663, 644 | Si-O-Si symmetric stretching vibration |
540, 511, 468, 420 | Si-O bending vibration |
1091 | Si-O asymmetric stretching vibration | Qtz |
800, 783 | Si-O-Si symmetric vibration |
875 | CO32− bending vibration | Cal |
Table 6.
XRD diffraction peaks and their assignment to the identified mineral species.
Table 6.
XRD diffraction peaks and their assignment to the identified mineral species.
2θ (°) | d (Å) | Minerals | 2θ (°) | d (Å) | Minerals |
---|
9.76 | 9.0516 | Tr | 30.36 | 2.9416 | Tr |
10.50 | 8.4183 | Tr | 32.38 | 2.7623 | Tr |
17.36 | 5.1042 | Tr | 33.08 | 2.7058 | Tr |
18.16 | 4.8729 | Tr | 34.50 | 2.5972 | Tr |
19.59 | 4.5275 | Tr | 35.30 | 2.5403 | Tr |
20.85 | 4.2563 | Qtz | 36.54 | 2.4573 | Qtz |
22.04 | 4.0218 | Tr | 38.53 | 2.3345 | Tr |
22.81 | 3.8944 | Tr | 39.38 | 2.2865 | Cal |
23.04 | 3.8568 | Cal | 41.71 | 2.1635 | Tr |
26.23 | 3.3947 | Tr | 43.13 | 2.0959 | Cal |
27.18 | 3.2784 | Tr | 47.49 | 1.9131 | Cal |
28.51 | 3.1268 | Tr | 48.44 | 1.8777 | Cal |
29.36 | 3.0391 | Cal | 50.16 | 1.8171 | Qtz |
Table 7.
Chemical composition of carbonate rocks (wt%).
Table 7.
Chemical composition of carbonate rocks (wt%).
Sample | WY-1-1 | WY-1-2 | WY-2 |
---|
SiO2 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.58 |
Al2O3 | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.36 |
Fe2O3 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.19 |
MnO | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
NiO | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
MgO | 1.14 | 0.74 | 1.22 |
CaO | 52.28 | 53.44 | 52.04 |
K2O | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
CuO | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
SrO | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
SO3 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
SUM | 54.83 | 55.36 | 54.66 |
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).