1. Introduction
Recently, diamond has been considered as a promising wide-bandgap semiconductor material for electronic device applications due to its excellent thermal conductivity and electrical properties [
1,
2]. However, the difficulty of N-type doping limits the development of diamond-based electronic devices. Fortunately, high density two-dimensional hole gas (2DHG) can be acquired by hydrogen-terminated diamond film, which has been widely investigated because of its large critical breakdown electric field [
3,
4]. To date, high-crystal-quality diamond can be acquired by high-press high-temperature (HPHT) [
5] or microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition (MPCVD) [
6] methods. However, usually an epitaxial diamond layer with a macro-bunching step surface morphology cannot be used to fabricate the devices directly [
7]. Devices fabricated directly onto a rough epitaxial layer usually have a worse performance [
8]. Therefore, the diamond substrate needs to undergo a Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) process before the fabrication of the diamond devices [
9,
10,
11]. However, it is still difficult to produce a smooth diamond substrate by CMP, which is because of the natural hardness of diamond material. On the other hand, CMP process will also cause surface damage [
12]. Therefore, the performance of diamond-based electronic devices on a polished substrate is still weak. In order to remove the surface defects introduced by the polishing process, a pre-etching process need to be added before the diamond epitaxy. The pre-etching process will introduce etch-pits on the diamond substrate, and the etch-pits usually can only be refilled under a high growth rate. In some references (100), face-diamond epitaxial film with a smooth surface has been obtained by quite a low growth rate. For instance, H. Okushi et al. [
6] realized the 2D step-flow growth of diamonds with roughness of less than 0.1 nm within a 1 × 1 μm
2 area at a growth rate less than 30 nm/h. It was reported that the disorientation angle with respect to the (100) plane must be lower than 1.5°. Currently, it is still hard to produce a high quality single-crystal diamond film with a flat and low root-mean-square (RMS) surface at a high growth rate, especially on diamond substrates with a high disorientation angle. It is essential to the fabrication of diamond devices.
Figure 1 lists the problems encountered when diamond substrates are used to fabricate devices. In this paper, high quality epitaxial diamond films with low surface roughness were grown by MPCVD. Hydrogen-terminated diamond MOSFETs with enhanced device performance were fabricated on such epitaxial diamond film.
2. Experimental Section
We used (100)-oriented CVD diamond substrates in this paper. The size of the substrates is 10 mm × 10 mm, and the (100) face disorientation angle is 3°. The substrates were provided by the EDP Corporation, Japan. Firstly, the diamond substrates were cleaned in 60 degrees aqua regia for 40 min, and then ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, alcohol, and deionized water for 15 min each before growth. The MPCVD system for the growth of diamond layers is series ARDIS-300 from Optosystems, Ltd. [
13,
14]. Before the growth, the reactor chamber was pumped to high-vacuum 2 × 10
−5 torr by using a mechanical pump and a turbomolecular pump (EDWARDS Next2400) in order to reduce residual nitrogen gas. Importantly, the substrate was pre-etched in hydrogen plasma to reduce the CMP damage and impurities, because it has been found that pre-etching treatment before growth can give birth to a smooth surface morphology of CVD diamond film [
15]. Subsequently, the growth of the epitaxial diamond layer started. The microwave power, pressure in the reaction chamber, and the time in pre-etching and growth process, were set as 3200 W/3600 W, 250 torr/300 torr, and 30 min/1 h, respectively. The gas flow rate ratio of CH
4/H
2 was 2%. In this work, the height of the sample could be adjusted vertically during growth, which is vital for the pre-etching process. It is because of this that the distance between the plasma and the diamond surface will significantly affect the nuclear center on the surface of the diamond substrate.
After the growth of the diamond layer, a thin hydrogen-terminated diamond layer was formed for the fabrication of the MOSFET device. The diamond sample was cleaned by H
2SO
4/HNO
3 solution first, and then reloaded in the MPCVD chamber and undergoing a fast treatment process by hydrogen plasma. The microwave power and the pressure in the reaction chamber were set as 2600 W and 150 torr. Finally, the diamond was exposed to the air atmosphere for one day to form 2DHG. Next, a 50 nm Au film was deposited on the diamond surface to form ohmic contacts by electron beam (EB) evaporation. The source, drain, and channel regions were protected by the photoresist. The Au in the unmasked area was removed to the potassium iodide (KI) solution. Subsequently, the diamond was exposed to an oxygen plasma condition for 5 min to achieve device electric isolations. The spacing between the source and drain was realized by a second photolithography process. Finally, a 50 nm Al
2O
3 gate dielectric was deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD). The reference sample was also fabricated under the same conditions on a polished diamond substrate.
Figure 2 demonstrates the schematic structure, the photo and SEM image of the H-diamond based MOSFET fabricated in this work.
The surface morphology was captured by the optical microscope and Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). The AFM was an NT-MDT NTEGRA Spectra Ⅱ, scanned in tapping mode. The crystal quality of the diamond was measured by Raman, XRD and photoluminescence (PL). The PL spectra were collected using a HORIBA iHR 320 with a spectral resolution of 0.06 nm, optically pumped by a 514 nm semiconductor laser. All the direct current characteristics were conducted by using an Agilent B1500A system.
3. Results and Discussion
The Raman spectra of the diamond substrate and the epitaxial diamond layer are shown in
Figure 3a. The Raman spectra of the diamond substrate peak at 1334.5 cm
−1, while that of the epitaxial diamond layer exhibit little Raman peak shift, indicating little stress accumulation. The FWHM of the original diamond substrate was 3.11 cm
−1 and it was reduced to 2.58 cm
−1 after one hour of growth. The intensity of the peak is also stronger after epitaxy. The (400) XRD rocking curves in
Figure 3b show similar results. Diamond after epitaxy has an FWHM of 0.015°, which is lower than the 0.017° of the diamond substrate. Enhanced crystal quality was realized after the epitaxy process. The thickness of the epitaxial layer is about 7 μm.
Figure 3c demonstrates the PL spectra of the CVD diamond samples, where a 514 nm wavelength laser was used as the excitation light source. The sharp peak at a wavelength of 552 nm corresponds to the Raman peak of the diamond layer. As shown in the insert picture of
Figure 3c, no other impurities-related emission is found, indicating a high purity in our growth process. The growth rate of the diamond layer is estimated to be ~7 μm/h. Normally, a high growth rate of CVD diamond can be achieved by nitrogen doping during the growth. However, it might introduce nitrogen related defects in CVD diamond layer, which have a negative influence on the electronic device’s performance. In this work, the high growth rate was acquired by using high microwave power and high pressure in the growth process. No peaks at 575 nm and 637 nm were found, which correspond to the (N-V)
0 and (N-V)
-peaks and appear as a result of the low-purity CVD process [
16].
Figure 3d shows an epitaxial diamond sample, on which was only used a mechanical pump to evacuate the reaction chamber before growth. Although there was no intentional nitrogen doping during the growth process, its PL spectra still show strong peaks associated with nitrogen defects and a molecular pump can help eliminate the effects of nitrogen impurities. As a result, undoped single crystal diamonds with smooth surfaces and better crystal quality have been obtained, supporting the fabrication of diamond MOSFET devices.
Normally, diamond epitaxial layers have a macro-bunching step morphology [
6] due to their step formation energies [
7]. A rough surface is not beneficial to the fabrication of electrodes and the performance of the devices. Therefore, diamond devices are usually fabricated on a polished diamond substrate. However, surface defects and damage will be generated in the polishing process, which have a major influence on the performance of devices fabricated on a polished diamond substrate. A pre-etching process, as shown in
Figure 4, can remove the surface defects. Under an H-plasma environment, diamond {113} faces have higher etching rates compare to other faces, such as {111} and {100} faces [
17]. Etching pits will appear at the area of the surface defects. Diamond substrates with etching pits are also not conducive to the fabrication of devices. Therefore, only a flat-surface diamond epitaxial layer can eliminate the adverse effects of surface defects and etching pits on the device. The etching pits will be recovered in a several microns thick epitaxial layer due to the higher growth rate of {113} than {100} faces, as shown in
Figure 4. In past references, atomically flat diamond epitaxial layers can only be realized in an extremely low growth rate [
6,
18,
19]. It is not practical in the semiconductor industry. In our previous works [
20], a smooth diamond epitaxial layer was achieved by optimizing the conditions of the pre-etching process. It is important to mention that the distance between the diamond surface and the plasma (d
DP) should be precisely controlled during the pre-etching process.
Etching pits with different sizes were found on the diamond substrate after the H-plasma etching process, as demonstrated in
Figure 5a, which came from the diamond itself and the polishing process. The substrates used in
Figure 5 come from the Zhengzhou Sino-Crystal Diamond Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China. These substrates have many more etching pits after the H-plasma etching process compared to the substrates from EDP Corporation, Japan.
Figure 5d shows several etching pits of different sizes. They are all rectangular in shape and the rectangular edges are parallel to each other, indicating the effect of crystal orientation on the etching rate. After epitaxy with a high growth rate (~20 μm/h) using a 6% CH
4/H
2 ratio for 20 min, etching pits were successfully recovered and a flat surface was acquired, as shown in
Figure 5b,e. Macro-bunching step morphology was also absent by using a low growth rate (0.5% CH
4/H
2 ratio). However, the etching pits might become larger as shown in
Figure 5c. The post-epitaxial pits, as presented in
Figure 5f, are significantly larger and deeper than the pre-epitaxial etching pits. The low growth rate of {113} face is not beneficial for the pits’ recovery, as shown in
Figure 4. Normally, pits’ recovery can be achieved by nitrogen doping during the growth [
17]. However, it might introduce nitrogen related defects in the CVD diamond layer, which has negative influences on the electronic device’s performance. Therefore, it is important to acquire a high growth rate for realizing the atomically flat epitaxial diamond layer. The reported growth rates and roughness of the diamond’s epitaxial layer with a flat surface morphology are summarized and shown in
Figure 6 [
6,
12,
18,
19,
20,
21]. H. Okushi et al. have realized diamond 2D step flow growth and a roughness R
a of less than 0.1 nm in 1 μm × 1 μm area, but the growth rate was only less than 30 nm/h. G. Bogdan et al. achieved a smooth diamond epitaxial layer with a higher growth rate (2.5~4.5 μm/h), but the roughness R
a also increased to 0.5~0.8 nm in a 5 μm × 5 μm area. As the growth rate increases, the surface roughness becomes larger, as indicated by the dash line. In these papers, the diamonds’ substrates usually also needed a low disorientation angle, at least lower than 1.5° with respect to the (100) plane. This may increase the cost of the diamond substrate and the low growth rate may also not be enough to refill the etch pits. In this paper and our previous work, the growth rate was improved obviously, and the surface roughness was also reduced. With the growth rate as high as 7~30 μm/h, the RMS roughness can reach as low as 0.2~0.5 nm in 5 μm × 5 μm area. The high growth rate was acquired by using high temperature and high flow ratio of CH
4/H
2 during the growth process. N-related peaks cannot be found in the PL result, as shown in
Figure 3c. Undoped single-crystal diamonds with atomically flat surfaces and high crystal quality have been obtained, providing support for the fabrication of diamond-based MOSFET devices. Therefore, better device performance can be realized by epitaxial layers attributed to reduced surface defects during growth. With the thickness of epitaxial layers increased, etching pits and polishing bunches have also been decreased, further improving the device’s performance.
Three MOSFETs were fabricated on a polished diamond substrate and epitaxial diamond layers, respectively. Sample 1 is a reference sample fabricated on a polished diamond substrate. Sample 2 has a thin epitaxial layer (~3 μm) with 0.5-h growth time and sample 3 has a thick epitaxial layer (~7 μm) with 1-h growth time. Samples 2 and 3 used a same growth condition, and the CH
4/H
2 ratio used in samples 2 and 3 was 2%. The AFM results of these three samples are shown in
Figure 7a–c. Parallel polishing grooves could be found on the surface of the substrate and it had an RMS of 0.92 nm in a 5 μm × 5 μm region. After 0.5 h of growth, the RMS was reduced to 0.50 nm, and it could be further reduced down to 0.18 nm with the increased epitaxial layer. The surface of the epitaxial layer was much smoother than that of the original diamond substrate.
The current output characteristics and the transfer characteristics of the H-diamond MOSFETs are shown in
Figure 7. The reference MOSFET sample 1, fabricated on the polished diamond substrate, was measured under the V
GS ranging from −5 V to 5 V, of which the saturation current density was ~130 mA/mm. Meanwhile, the MOSFET samples 2 and 3, fabricated on the epitaxial diamond layers, were measured under the V
GS ranging from −8 V to 5 V and had a higher saturation current density of ~150 mA/mm and ~200 mA/mm, respectively. After the epitaxy, 54% improvement was acquired with respect to the reference sample, and R
on was also decreased from 161 Ω·mm to 95 Ω·mm. The transfer characteristics shown in
Figure 7g–i further prove that the MOSFET fabricated on a thicker epitaxial diamond layer could have a better performance. For the MOSFET on the original diamond substrate, the hysteresis of transfer curve is large, and the threshold voltage will drift seriously. Significant improvement can be realized in MOSFETs on the epitaxial diamond layer, as shown in
Figure 7h–i, especially on a thicker epitaxial layer. During testing, especially at turn-off, if the device’s substrate contains more defects, the more likely its carriers will be captured by the trap. Thus, the current drops back during the scan. A larger hysteresis indicates more substrate defects. Obviously, an epitaxial diamond layer with a smooth surface is beneficial for MOSFET devices compared to the CMP polished diamond substrate.