Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Investigation of ReSe2 Thin Films Obtained from Magnetron Sputtered Re and ReOx
Next Article in Special Issue
Spectral Characteristics of Nitrogen-Doped CVD Synthetic Diamonds and the Origin of Surface Blue Fluorescence
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of a Commercial Few-Layer Graphene on Electrical Conductivity, Mechanical Reinforcement and Photodegradation Resistance of Polyolefin Blends
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toledoite, TiFeSi, a New Mineral from Inclusions in Corundum Xenocrysts from Mount Carmel, Israel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gemological and Chemical Characterization of Gem-Grade Peridot from Yiqisong, Jilin Province

1
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources and Frontiers Science Center for Deep-Time Digital Earth, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
The Beijing SHRIMP Center, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2024, 14(8), 689; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080689
Submission received: 21 May 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 27 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Progress of In-Situ Study of Mineralogy and Gemmology)

Abstract

:
Peridot has a long history and is deeply loved by people for its unique olive-green color. The Yiqisong peridot deposit in Jilin Province is a newly discovered peridot deposit that still deserves systematic research. In this study, gemological and chemical analyses of thirty-three Yiqisong peridot samples were carried out to investigate the gemological characteristics, as well as the mantle properties and formation conditions of the Yiqisong. In addition, we identified gemological differences in peridot between Yiqisong, Tanzania, and Arizona. The Yiqisong peridot samples have typical peridot gemological characteristics. The UV–visible spectrum indicated that Fe is the chromogenic element. The infrared spectra and Raman spectra of different samples are consistent, which indicates that the Yiqisong peridot belongs to forsterite. The contents of Ni and V in Yiqisong peridot are generally low, distinguishing it from peridot found in Tanzania and Arizona. The major and trace elements of samples show that the Yiqisong peridot is derived from the spinel lherzolite xenoliths with the P–T formation conditions of 813–1087 °C and 21–22 kbar. The Yisqisong peridot samples have relatively high Fo values (up to 91.6), supporting their origin from a moderate refractory lithosphere mantle. Therefore, this study provides gemological, mineralogical, and chemical evidence that fills the research gap in peridot deposit studies and lays the foundation for follow-up investigations of gem-grade peridot deposits.

1. Introduction

Peridot is an ancient gem that was first discovered in ancient Egypt about 3500 years ago, and is also known as “the gem of the sun” [1]. Olivine is one of the most important rock-forming minerals in the mantle; it is the mafic silicate mineral [(Mg,Fe)2SiO4]. Peridot is a gem-quality variety of the mineral forsterite, which belongs to the olivine group. Peridot has a narrow range of colors, commonly brownish green, yellowish green, and pure green. The gem-quality peridot is usually transparent to translucent, and is known for its characteristic “olivine color”. Peridot inclusions include black chromite crystals, which surround flat healing planes, mica flakes, and ludwigite crystals. Peridot crystals have a strong birefringence; their internal inclusions often show double shadows, and it is more difficult for them to exhibit chatoyancy or other special optical phenomena. Peridot has a bright and uniform color and fewer internal inclusions, which is considered to be the best quality [1,2,3,4].
Gem-quality peridot is produced all over the world. Peridot was first collected as a gemstone in Western countries. Peridots mainly exist in peridotite xenoliths of alkali basalts as the surrounding rock, which is commonly found in San Carlos (Arizona, SW USA), Vietnam, Italy, Tanzania, Czech Republic, and China [5,6,7,8,9]. Peridot can also exist in serpentinized dunites, which can be found in the western Himalayas in Pakistan and are presumed to be related to hydrothermal activity [10]. The Myanmar peridot has good color, large size, and high quality. Mogok peridot crystals are usually found in veins and cavities within fine-grained serpentinized peridotite [11]. In addition, a small number of peridots can be found in volcanic bombs, which are early crystalline products of lava [4]. Peridot is not only produced internally within the Earth but also can be present in stony-iron meteorites. The differences in inclusions and trace elements make it relatively easy to distinguish between terrestrial and extraterrestrial peridots [1]. Some studies have also focused on artificially synthesized peridots, which can appear purple, blue-green, and yellow-green in color. The characteristic absorption spectra of synthetic peridots are obviously different from natural peridots, providing a basis for differentiation [12,13].
China has the largest peridot mineral reserves in the world: in 1979, the first gem-grade peridot deposit in China was discovered in Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province. Subsequently, another peridot deposit was discovered in Dunhua, Jilin Province, becoming the second-largest peridot-producing area in China [7,14,15]. In 2016, a new gem-grade peridot deposit was discovered in Yiqisong, Dunhua. This gem deposit is one of the few gem-quality peridot ore bodies in China [16]. At present, the study of peridot in this deposit mainly focuses on the geological characteristics and mineralization model, but few studies have simultaneously explored the gemological characteristics of Yiqisong peridot and its chemical characteristics.
Our results supplement the gemological and spectral characteristics of the peridot and discuss the mantle properties and the P–T conditions for Yiqisong peridot formation. This study provides a basis for understanding the formation of gem-grade peridot in Yiqisong. It also effectively distinguishes peridot from the same basaltic xenoliths in Tanzania and Arizona through comparative studies of trace elements in peridot from different regions.

2. Geological Setting

Northeastern China is tectonically located between the Siberian Craton and the North China Craton (Figure 1a). The Jilin region is located in the Xingmeng Orogenic Belt, belonging to the eastern part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, which was formed by the subduction and convergence of several microcontinental blocks during the Paleozoic (Figure 1b). This orogenic belt experienced extensive basaltic magmatic activities in the Cenozoic. Previous studies have divided the Cenozoic volcanic activities in northeastern China into four stages: (1) >29 Ma; (2) 29–16 Ma; (3) 16–4 Ma; and (4) 4–0 Ma, mainly producing alkaline–peralkaline basalts [17,18,19]. The Dunhua is located on the southeastern margin of the Xingmeng Orogenic Belt. The volcanic activities in this region are mainly controlled by the Dunhua–Mishan Fault Zone, and frequent volcanic activities are dominated by fissure-centered eruptions. Regionally exposed strata include Permian, Neogene, and Quaternary, with common Mesozoic granite intrusions [16].
The Yiqisong peridot deposit (43°47′43″ N, 127°55′37″ E) is located on the northern slope and eastern part of Yiqisong. The Yiqisong gem-grade peridot deposit is hosted in the lower strata of the Neogene Chuandishan Formation in the Dunhua–Mishan Fault Zone, which unconformably overlies Paleozoic strata and Mesozoic granites [15,20] (Figure 1c). The Dunhua basalts contain a large amount of mantle peridotite xenoliths, and the peridot gems are produced from the peridotite xenoliths with an approximate east–west distribution in a near-horizontal layer. The peridotite xenoliths containing gem-grade peridot from the Yiqisong deposit are mainly spinel lherzolite xenoliths. The peridotite xenoliths have a light yellow or yellow-green color and are sub-rounded to sub-angular in shape, and were captured by black basalt with clear boundaries. The diameter of the peridotite xenolith is usually 3 to 10 cm, with the larger ones reaching 25 cm. The Yiqisong peridot deposit has been worked by Yanbian Fuli Peridot Mining Industry Co., Ltd. (Dunhua, China), using the room-and-pillar method of underground mining [16,21].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Description

In this study, thirty-three raw peridot crystals from the Yiqisong were selected for analysis, which were polished on both sides in parallel. The crystal size ranged from 4 to 8 mm (Figure 2). We collected peridotite xenoliths rich in large-grain peridots distributed in the Yiqisong peridot mine, which are encapsulated in basalts. The Yiqisong peridotite xenoliths are fresh and mainly spinel-bearing lherzolites, with diameters ranging from 4 to 7 cm. Thirty-three peridot crystal samples were mostly derived from the peridotite xenoliths. Peridotite xenolith is mainly composed of olivine (Ol), orthopyroxene (Opx), clinopyroxene (Cpx), and spinel (Sp), which show medium- to coarse-grained granular textures. Olivine is the dominant mineral in the peridotite xenoliths, accounting for 55–65% of the total volume. Some olivine grains exhibit kink bands and triple junction structures. The orthopyroxene (20–25%) and clinopyroxene (10–15%) often occurred in the olivine gaps, with some pyroxenes showing exsolution lamellae on the surfaces. A few irregularly shaped pyroxenes show curvilinear grain boundaries, and some orthopyroxenes partially enclose olivine. Spinel content ranges from 5–8%, mainly appearing reddish-brown in color. Spinel typically occurs as interstitial phases filling the gaps between the main mineral grains, with a diameter smaller than that of olivine and pyroxene minerals.
The peridot samples were observed and numbered YQS–1 to YQS–33: YQS–1 to YQS–7 have a darker green color, YQS–8 to YQS–13 have a brighter green color, YQS–14 to YQS–20 present yellowish-green color, YQS–21 to YQS–26 have a brownish-toned yellowish-green color, and YQS–27 to YQS–33 appear light yellowish-green in color.

3.2. Microscopic Observation and Spectroscopy

Gemological microscope observation, laser Raman spectrum, UV–visible spectrum, infrared spectrum, and other standard gemological tests were conducted at the Gemological Experimental Teaching Center, School of Gemology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing). Other standard gemological tests include measuring the sample’s refractive index (RI) and birefringence using a gem refractometer, determining the specific gravity (SG) of the sample through the hydrostatic method, and observing the pleochroism of the sample by using a dichroscope.
By using a GI–MP22 binocular microscope (Baoguang Technologies, Nanjing, China), the surface and internal features of the samples were observed by changing different light sources under 10× to 40× magnification. Infrared spectra were obtained using a BRUKER TENSOR 27 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, Germany). All samples were analyzed by the reflectance method. The experimental test conditions were 220 V voltage, 4 cm−1 resolution, 64 scans, a scanning range of 2000–400 cm−1, and a scanning speed of 10 kHz. The UV–visible spectra were tested by a UV–3600 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using the reflection method with a wavelength range of 300~800 nm and a sampling interval of 1s. The Raman spectra of the sample matrix and internal inclusions were obtained with an HR-Evolution micro-laser confocal Raman spectrometer (CRS) from Horiba(Kyoto, Japan). Before this test, single-crystal silicon was used for Raman calibration. The Raman instrument laser wavelength was 532 nm, the laser output power was 100 mW, the laser spot size was 1–5 µm, and the resolution was 1 cm−1. The exposure time per scan was 20 s and 3 integrations. The collected range was 100–2000 cm−1, and the data were compared with those in the RRUFF databases.

3.3. Chemical Analysis

The analysis of major elements was conducted at the Key Laboratory of Submarine Geoscience, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Administration, using a four-spectrometer Jeol JXA–8100 electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) from JEOL Ltd. In Tokyo, Japan. The experimental tests were carried out using an accelerating potential of 15 kV, beam current of 20 nA, accounting time of 20 s, and a spot size of 10 μm for mineral phase analysis of the major elements. Data were corrected using a modified ZAF (atomic number, absorption, fluorescence) correction procedure. The following standards were used for quantification: chromium oxide (Cr), diopside (Ca), jadeite (Na), nickel (Ni), olivine (Si, Mg), hematite (Fe), pyrope garnet (Al), rhodonite (Mn), rutile (Ti), and sanidine (K). The limits for individual elements were as follows: Si (339 ppm), Na (330 ppm), K (186 ppm), Fe (468 ppm), Al (309 ppm), Mg (336 ppm), Ca (210 ppm), Mn (441 ppm), P (321 ppm), Cr (825 ppm), Ti (564 ppm), and Ni (888 ppm).
Trace elements were analyzed at the Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences Institute of Geology, Beijing, using an Agilent 7900 quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) in combination with the GeoLas HD 193 nm ArF excimer laser to compose the laser-ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) test samples. LA–ICP–MS is manufactured by Coherent in Santa Clara, CA, USA. Laser ablation was performed at a repetition frequency of 5 Hz in a helium atmosphere, and NIST SRM612, ARM1, and ARM2 were used as reference materials to standardize all analyzed elements. The concentration errors of most elements measured were less than or equal to 10%. The chemical analysis was conducted on polished sample surfaces.

4. Results

4.1. Gemological Properties

Table 1 summarizes the gemological properties of the studied samples. The Yiqisong peridot samples had an overall yellowish-green color. All samples were transparent and showed a glassy luster. The RI varied between 1.655 and 1.698, the SG varied between 3.21 and 3.44. They were inert under both long-wave and short-wave UV light.

4.2. Microscopic Characteristics

Microscopic observation of gemstones showed that most of the Yiqisong peridot samples were incomplete, with visible conchoidal fractures on the surface and greasy luster (Figure 3a). Rhombohedral growth etch pits could be seen on some crystal faces (Figure 3b). Some surface cracks were often stained with brown-yellow iron. The Yiqisong peridot crystals contain few impurities. The internal solid inclusions are mainly dark-colored euhedral minerals or anhedral crystals. The euhedral minerals are usually present as isolated grains within the peridot crystals (Figure 3c). Peridots derived from mantle xenoliths commonly contain dark chromite, biotite, and spinel inclusions [7,8]. Diopside inclusions can be found in many regions, such as the United States, China, Mexico, and Korea [5,22]. In addition, the internal features of Yiqisong peridot include negative crystals (Figure 3d) and partially healed–healed cleavages. Some partially healed cleavages show an iridescence effect under reflected light (Figure 3e). The most common inclusions in Yiqisong peridot are “Lily pad” inclusions, with diameters ranging from 500 μm to larger sizes (Figure 3g). The center may be a mineral crystal or negative crystal, surrounded by round healing planes, representing a signature inclusion of peridot (Figure 3f,g). Notably, a green euhedral mineral inclusion surrounded by brown anhedral crystals forms an assemblage inclusion in YQS–14; the green euhedral mineral has a diameter of approximately 100 μm (Figure 3h).
The peridot crystals were cut to expose the inclusions to the surface, and the types and morphology of the two inclusions were determined by combining Raman spectra with microscopic features (Figure 4). The main Raman spectral bands of the first green euhedral mineral were located at 329 cm−1, 395 cm−1, 668 cm−1, and 1012 cm−1, indicating that the mineral is diopside. The absorption peaks at 668 cm−1 and 1012 cm−1 are related to [Si2O6]4− tetrahedral groups of diopside, and those at 329 cm−1 and 395 cm−1 are attributed to ionic M–O vibrations (Figure 4a) [23]. The main spectral bands of the second mineral around the diopside were located at 587 cm−1 and 705 cm−1. The absorption peaks of 705 cm−1 are due to the symmetric stretching vibration of Mg-O, while the one at 587 cm−1 is attributed to the bending vibration between metal cations and oxygen ions, indicating that the mineral is spinel with Raman peak shifts caused by element substitutions (Figure 4b) [24]. The euhedral granular dark inclusion exhibited characteristic Raman shifts at 593 cm−1 and 704 cm−1, indicating that it is spinel (Figure 4c).

4.3. Absorption Spectra

4.3.1. UV–vis–NIR Spectra

The ultraviolet–visible–infrared (UV–Vis–NIR) absorption spectra of peridot samples from Yiqisong display similar patterns, as shown in Figure 5. Absorption occurs in Yiqisong peridot at 450 and 490 nm, and there is a broad absorption band centered at 635 nm. Peridot is colored by iron as an autochromatic mineral [25]. The representative absorption spectra of the samples are similar to those of peridot from Vietnam, Pakistan, China, Myanmar, and Italy, and this spectral feature is mainly caused by Fe2+ [5,6,10,22,26]. During the testing process, we found that there were no significant differences in the UV–Vis–NIR spectra of light yellow-green and yellow-green peridot.

4.3.2. FTIR Spectra

A representative FTIR spectrum of Yiqisong peridot samples is shown in Figure 6. There are characteristic absorption peaks and some shoulder absorptions in the three spectral regions of 1100–800 cm−1, 600–450 cm−1, and 450–400 cm−1. The 1100–800 cm−1 absorption band is attributed to symmetrical stretching vibrations of the Si–O–Si group. The 650–450 cm−1 absorption is caused by bending vibrations of the Si–O group. The absorption between 450 and 400 cm−1 is attributed to crystal lattice vibrations and internal vibrations [27,28]. The characteristic peak frequencies of the peridot infrared spectrum can move with the change in Fe content. When the iron content increases, all of the absorption peaks on the forsterite–fayalite series move to lower frequencies [29].

4.3.3. Raman Spectra

Peridot has 84 vibration modes, and the vibration modes with Raman activity are 11Ag + 11B1g + 7B2g + 7B3g, totaling 36 kinds [30]. The fingerprint region absorption peaks of Yiqisong peridot samples show consistency (Figure 7): 222, 303, 326, 371, 544, 587, 824, 856, 919, and 961 cm−1, belonging to forsterite. The absorption peaks with the strongest intensities of 824, 856, 919, and 961 cm−1 are caused by the symmetric (ν1) and antisymmetric (ν3) stretching vibrations of Si—O. In addition, there are also weak–medium-intensity Raman shifts at 544 and 587 cm−1 caused by the antisymmetric bending vibration (ν4) of Si—O. The Raman shifts at 222, 303, 326, and 371 cm−1 belong to metal–oxygen translational vibration modes (T) and silicon–oxygen tetrahedra rotational vibration modes (R) [31,32].

4.4. Chemical Compositions

Table 2 lists the major element compositions of Yiqisong peridot samples measured by EPMA. The results show that the MgO content of the samples ranged from 49.83 wt % to 50.86 wt %. The range of SiO2 content was 41.18–41.79 wt %, and the FeO content was 8.14–8.91 wt %. Using the oxygen atom method, taking the number of oxygen atoms per formula unit as four, the atomic numbers of the major elements in the peridot formula unit were calculated. The Fo values of peridots were calculated according to Fo = Mg/(Mg + Fe) × 100. The Fo values of Yiqisong peridot are in the range of 90–100 (Table 2). The CaO content of Yiqisong peridot is in the range of 0.03–0.05 wt %, less than 0.1 wt %, indicating that the peridots do not originate from basalt phenocrysts [33,34]. Nickel is one of the major elements enriched in the Earth’s core and mantle. In peridots of the upper mantle with Fo of about 90, the NiO content is stable at 0.4 wt %. The NiO content of Yiqisong peridot samples was between 0.33 and 0.50 wt %, with an average of 0.42 wt %, indicating that the Yiqisong peridots are derived from mantle peridotite xenoliths [35].
The EPMA test results obtained from previous studies [14] show that the major element composition of Yiqisong peridot was SiO2 (40.96–41.33 wt %), FeO (7.80–8.99 wt %), and MgO (48.26–49.74 wt %). The CaO content was between 0.01 and 0.04 wt %, the NiO content ranged from 0.36 to 0.44 wt %, and MnO was in the range of 0.06 to 0.17 wt %, which is consistent with the main component contents of peridot obtained in this study.
The trace element compositions of Yiqisong peridot samples are shown in Table 3, measured by LA–ICP–MS, compared with peridots from Vietnam [5], Myanmar Mogok [10], and Pakistan [26]. In general, nickel is the richest trace element, with nickel contents in Yiqisong peridot samples ranging from 2280 to 3139 ppm (average 2646 ppm), followed in order of abundance by Mn, Ca, Co, Cr, and Na. The Cr content of Yiqisong peridots is higher than that of Mogok peridots. While the Co content is lower than those of Vietnam and Mogok peridots. The Li content of Yiqisong peridots is 1.14–3.14 ppm, which is similar to peridots from Vietnam but much lower than those of Mogok and Pakistani peridots. The V content ranged from 1.69 ppm to 2.97 ppm, which is close to Vietnam peridot and slightly higher than that of Pakistani peridots. Previous studies have shown that Yiqisong peridots are derived from spinel lherzolite xenoliths, which are similar to peridots from Vietnam [10,36], Mogok peridots and Pakistani peridots have similar origins [37].

5. Discussion

5.1. Mineral Characteristics and Chromogenesis of Yiqisong Peridot

The FTIR spectral distributions of Yiqisong peridots were in the three spectral regions of 1100–800 cm−1, 600–450 cm−1, and 450–400 cm−1, which is similar to peridots from Myanmar and Sardinia, Italy [6,10]. The Raman characteristic peaks of peridot were caused by vibrations of Si-O bonds [31,38]. The positions of the two strong absorption peaks of Raman spectra for Yiqisong peridot were both at 824 and 856 cm−1 (Figure 7). Infrared and Raman spectral analyses indicated that the peridot is forsterite, representing a typical gem-grade peridot.
The olivine group minerals can be divided into three sub-groups: liebenbergite Ni2SiO4, olivine (Mg, Fe)2[SiO4], and tephroite Mn2SiO4. Gem-grade peridot usually belongs to the olivine sub-group, with chemical compositions in the solid solution series of Mg2[SiO4] –Fe2[SiO4]. There is a complete isomorphic substitution between Mg2+ and Fe2+ in the structure [39]. The crystal structure of olivine is an independent silicon–oxygen tetrahedral island structure. The O2- is used as an approximate hexagonal closest packing, and Si4+ fills the tetrahedral space. Mg2+ and Fe2+ ions occupy the octahedral sites (M1 and M2). M1 is a distorted octahedron, and M2 is a regular octahedron [40]. When elements have suitable ionic valences and radius ranges, ionic substitution can be carried out. Therefore, only a few elements (Ni2+, Mn2+) have relatively high contents, while ions such as Zr4+, Li+, and Sc3+ with similar radii but different valences require to be paired with other valent ions for substitution [41,42,43]. Based on EPMA data of six Yiqisong peridot samples, the crystal chemical formula of the peridot was deduced, indicating it belongs to the olivine series (Table 4).
Peridot is an autochromic gemstone. The typical UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra of Yiqisong peridots were located at 450, 490, and 635 nm (Figure 5), caused by Fe2+. Both the oxidation state and Fe content have an effect on the color of peridots. The higher the Fe2+ content in peridot, the yellower its color [16,44,45,46]. In the visible light range, absorption of orange light at 635 nm formed a blue-green hue; absorption of green-blue light at 490 nm formed orange, and the mixing of the two hues formed the unique olivine-green color, confirming that the green color of peridot was caused by the iron element.

5.2. Origin Determination

The measured RI, DR, and SG values of Yiqisong peridot were similar to peridot samples from Arizona, Tanzania, and Italy [6,8,44], within the theoretical range for peridot (Table 5). Their common gemological characteristics could not effectively distinguish the origin of peridot. Internal features of gemstone inclusions can often indicate their specific origin. Pakistani peridot can be distinguished from that of other origins by black Vonsenite–Ludwigite needle inclusions [26]. Internal inclusions in Yiqisong peridot lacked distinguishing features, but trace element chemical analysis methods often play a major role in tracing the origin of gemstones.
Peridot from Tanzania [47] and Arizona [48] are both produced in peridotite xenoliths. Different trace element characteristic data can effectively distinguish them. It was found that the contents of Ni and V from Yiqisong peridots were significantly lower than those from Tanzania and Arizona peridots. In contrast, the Sc content in Arizona peridot was significantly higher than in that from Yiqisong. The Sc content of the Yiqisong peridots partially overlaps with the Sc range of the Tanzanian peridot but is overall higher than that of the Tanzanian peridot. The V content of Tanzania peridots was generally higher than that of Yiqisong and Arizona peridots. Its Co content was lower than that from Arizona, but higher than that of Yiqisong. Therefore, peridots from Yiqisong, Arizona, and Tanzania can be distinguished based on their Ni and V contents. The Sc content can better distinguish Arizona peridot from the other two origins. Tanzanian peridot can be effectively distinguished from the other two origins based on V and Sc contents. By plotting bivariate diagrams of Co–Cr, Sc–Cr, Ni–Sc, V–Mn, Mn–Co, and Sc–V contents (Figure 8), peridots from Yiqisong, Tanzania, and Arizona can be basically identified.

5.3. Mantle Properties and P–T Conditions of Yiqisong Peridot

Olivine, as an early crystallizing mineral in basaltic magma, is commonly produced in the forms of mantle xenolith, xenocryst, and phenocryst. It is an important information carrier of the magma source [49,50]. Olivine from mantle xenolith has a relatively high Fo value and low CaO content (<0.1 wt %). Olivine xenocryst typically has poor morphological development and obvious compositional zoning with Mg-rich cores and Fe-rich rims; olivine phenocrysts have relatively good morphological development, lower Fo content, and relatively higher CaO content [51]. The CaO content of Yiqisong peridot is within the range of 0.025–0.05 wt %, less than 0.1 wt %, indicating that it was produced from mantle xenoliths. The major element contents are close to the compositional ranges of peridots from mantle xenoliths in Vietnam [5] and Italy [6] (Table 6).
Previous studies found that the geochemical characteristics of peridotites can effectively reflect mantle properties. Olivines in refractory mantle typically have high Fo values of between 92 and 94, while olivines in fertile mantle have a low Fo content of below 90. The Fo values of Yiqisong peridots are between 91.05 and 91.60, which is similar to the Jiaohe olivines [52]. This indicated that Yiqisong peridots are derived from a moderate refractory lithosphere mantle (Figure 9).
Trace elements can effectively distinguish the genesis of olivine. The contents of Ca, Al, Ti, and Ni in olivine from mantle peridotites are generally relatively narrow, while the elemental contents of olivine phenocrysts are relatively broader. The Ti (2–26 ppm), Ni (2280–3139 ppm), Al (20–79 ppm), and Ca (117–609 ppm) contents of Yiqisong peridots are close to those of olivines derived from mantle peridotites. They have low contents of Ca and Ti, which is consistent with mantle peridotite characteristics [48]. Olivines in spinel lherzolites have high Sc content and low Zr content, while olivines in garnet lherzolites [41] are the opposite (Figure 10). Yiqisong peridots have high Sc content and low Zr content, showing a clear distinction from garnet lherzolites, and directly indicating that they may be derived from spinel lherzolites.
The geothermometers widely used for estimating the temperatures of spinel lherzolites include the two-pyroxene thermometer and Cpx thermobarometry. This study selected the following geobarometers to estimate the P–T conditions of the peridotite xenolith: (1) garnet-calculation of Cpx thermobarometry, also used to calculate the temperature of spinel lherzolites [55,56] (Table 7); (2) Taylor’s [57] two-pyroxene thermometer (Table 8); (3) Al–in–olivine (Table 9), and (4) the Ca content of olivine thermometer [41] (Table 10). The garnet-calculation of Cpx thermobarometry can be used to calculate pressure. A two-pyroxene thermometer is based on the Ca–Mg equilibrium between orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene. It is generally considered to be the most reliable estimate. This study selected the EPMA data of clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene in equilibrium state to calculate the P–T conditions using these two thermometers. Intergrown clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene with complete mineral crystal shapes and clear surfaces were selected for testing (Figure 11). Table 11 lists the major chemical compositions of pyroxene and spinel minerals in the peridotite xenoliths; the experimental results show a total of six orthopyroxenes (Opx), two clinopyroxenes (Cpx), and two spinels (Sp). The Al-in-olivine thermometer primarily calculates the temperature of peridotite mantle sources based on the Al content, Cr# value, and pressure in olivine. The Ca content of the olivine thermometer is mainly based on the Ca content and pressure in olivine, showing excellent results for spinel lherzolite temperatures. Both Al–in–olivine and Ca–in–olivine thermometers require LA–ICP–MS data of peridot for calculation [41,55,56,57] (Table 3).
The temperature results from the four methods are generally consistent, all within the range of 813–1087 °C, close to the temperature range of spinel lherzolite xenoliths from the Jiaohe area (756–1077 °C). A similar range of lherzolites from Huinan is between 850 and 1050 °C, while the Shuangliao peridotites show a range of 833–1068 °C [52,58,59].
The temperature of the spinel lherzolite xenoliths in the study area is between 813 and 1087 °C, possibly due to heterogeneity in the origin depth of the xenoliths or the equilibrium temperature of the upper mantle in the region. The P–T condition of Yiqisong peridotites was plotted against those from the Dashihe spinel lherzolites [60]. They fall into the region of transition from spinel to garnet phase (Figure 12). Combined with the contents of Sc and Zr, it is inferred that the Yiqisong peridots were mainly derived from spinel lherzolite xenoliths, which may have coexisted with the garnet phase during their formation.

6. Conclusions

The Yiqisong peridots exhibit typical gemological characteristics, with RI ranging from 1.655 to 1.698, SG from 3.21 to 3.44, relatively clean internally, and various inclusions (“Lily pad”, euhedral and anhedral spinel, and diopside inclusions). The UV–vis absorption spectrum exhibits Fe absorption, indicating that the yellowish-green color of the Yiqisong peridot is mainly due to Fe. The infrared spectrum and Raman spectrum show that they are forsterite. Major and trace elements reveal that the peridots are forsterite with moderate Fo values (~91), derived from spinel lherzolite xenoliths with moderately refractory mantle properties. The temperature of Yiqisong peridotites was roughly in the range of 813–1087 °C, and the pressure was generally within 21–22 kbar, corresponding to a depth of 70–72 km. In addition, the use of Co–Cr, Sc–Cr, Ni–Sc, V–Mn, Mn–Co, and Sc–V binary diagrams is an effective method of identifying the origin of peridots from Yiqisong, Tanzania, and Arizona.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, J.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and B.X.; data curation, J.L.; software J.L.; methodology, B.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Technologies R&D Program (2019YFA0708602) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42073038, 41803045, 42202084), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 265QZ2021012), and IGCP–662.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and reviewers for their constructive comments which helped in improving our paper. This is the 29th contribution of B.X. to the National Mineral Rock and Fossil Specimens Resource Center.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shen, A.H.; Koivula, J.I.; Shigley, J.E. Identification of extraterrestrial peridot by trace elements. Gems Gemol. 2011, 47, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, B.-L. Systematic Gemmology, 2nd ed.; Geology Press: Beijing, China, 2006; pp. 281–286. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gao, Z.-Q.; Yu, H.-Y. The Analysis of Supply, Demand and Market Value of Gemstones: Taking Peridot as An Example. J. Gems Gemmol. 2021, 23, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fuhrbach, J.R. Kilbourne hole peridot. Gems Gemol. 1992, 28, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thuyet, N.T.M.; Hauzenberger, C.; Khoi, N.N.; Diep, C.T.; Lam, C.; Minh, N.T.; Hoang, N.; Häger, T. Peridot from the Central Highlands of Vietnam: Properties, origin, and formation. Gems Gemol. 2016, 52, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adamo, I.; Bocchio, R.; Pavese, A.; Prosperi, L. Characterization of Peridot from Sardinia, Italy. Gems Gemol. 2009, 45, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koivula, J.I.; Fryer, C.W. The Gemological Characteristics of Chinese Peridot. Gems Gemol. 1986, 22, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Koivula, J.I. San Carlos peridot. Gems Gemol. 1981, 17, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mencl, V.; Bubal, J.; Stárková, M. The volcanic history of the UNESCO Global Geopark Bohemian Paradise. Geoconserv. Res. 2023, 6, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seneewong–Na–Ayutthaya, M.; Chongraktrakul, W.; Sripoonjan, T. Gemological characterization of peridot from pyaung–gaung in mogok, myanmar. Gems Gemol. 2021, 57, 318–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kane, R.E. The creation of a magnificent suite of peridot jewelry: From the Himalayas to Fifth Avenue. Gems Gemol. 2004, 40, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fan, J.-L.; Guo, S.-G.; Shi, L.-Y.; Liu, X.-L. Study on the Mineralogy of Synthetic Forsterite. J. Synth. Cryst. 2007, 36, 1431–1434. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nassau, K. Synthetic Forsterite and Synthetic Peridot. Gems. Gemol. 1994, 30, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, C. Study on the Mineralogical Characteristic of Olivine in Jilin Dunhua. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, L.; Wen, J.; Li, X. Development and Utilization of Gems Resources in Jilin Province. Changchun Inst. Tech. 2002, 4, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xu, G.-L. Distribution characteristics, exploration and development status and development prospect of olivine gem deposits in Jilin Province. Jilin Geol. 2020, 39, 69–72. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dong, Y.; Wang, S.-M.; Yu, Q.; Chen, J.-S.; Yang, H.; Ge, W.-C.; Bi, J.-H.; Jing, J.-H. Late Paleozoic tectonic–magmatic evolution history of the northeastern China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2022, 38, 2249–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.-L.; Ge, W.-C.; Sun, J.; Yang, H.; Liu, Z.-C.; Liu, J. Age and composition of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath the Xing’an–Mongolia Orogenic Belt: Implications for the construction of microcontinents during accretionary orogenesis. Lithos 2019, 326, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, H.; Gan, W.; Qiu, L.; Ye, X.-T.; Zhu, H.-J.; Jin, Z.-M. Spatio–temporal distribution and geodynamic evolution of Cenozoic volcanism in northeast China: Insights from a new geochronological compilation. Int. Geol. Rev. 2024, 66, 1663–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, J.-Y.; Gao, F.; Mu, J.-T.; Qiu, H. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of the Cenozoic basalt in eastern Dunhua area, Jilin Province. Jilin Geol. 2017, 36, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao, D.-M. Infrastructure prospecting of Songnanshan olivine gem deposit in Dunhua Yiqi, Jilin Province. Jilin Geol. 2019, 38, 52–54. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, Z.-Q.; Ye, M.; Shen, A.H. Characterisation of Peridot from China’s Jilin Province and from North Korea. Gems Gemol. 2019, 36, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, R.-Z.; Zheng, Y.-L.; Wang, C.-B.; Peng, Z.-C. Gemmological Characteristic and Colour Genesis of Golden Diopside. J. Gems Gemmol. 2023, 25, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lenaz, D.; Vanni, L. Raman spectroscopy and the inversion degree of natural Cr–bearing spinels. Am. Mineral. 2017, 102, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, W.-X.; Guo, Y.; Ma, L.-X. Influence of Fe2+ on the Color Appearance of Yellow–Green Peridot. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 492, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ruan, W.-D.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Dietmar, S.; Yang, X.-Y.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Liu, Y.-C. A study of gemology and mineral spectroscopy characteristics of peridot from Pakistan. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2021, 40, 593–604. [Google Scholar]
  27. Naghiu, M.A.; Gorea, M.; Mutch, E.; Kristaly, F.; Tomoaia–Cotisel, M. Forsterite Nanopowder: Structural Characterization and Biocompatibility Evaluation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, H.-S.; Peng, W.-S.; Xue, C.L.; Zhang, Y.-M.; Xu, H.-G.; Liu, G.-K. Synthesis, infrared spectra and X-ray diffraction of mg-fe olivine. Acta Mineral. Sin. 1986, 6, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  29. Burns, R.G.; Huggin, F.E. Cation determinative curves for Mg–Fe–Mn olivines from vibrational spectra. Am. Mineral. 1972, 57, 967–985. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lam, P.K.; Yu, R.C.; Lee, M.W.; Sharma, S.K. Structural distortions and vibrational modes in Mg2SiO4. Am. Mineral. 1990, 75, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chopelas, A. Single crystal Raman spectra of forsterite, fayalite, and monticellite. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1101–1109. [Google Scholar]
  32. Peng, B.-J.; He, M.-Y.; Yang, M.; Wu, S.-K.; Fan, J.-X. Natural Forsterite Strongly Enriched in Boron: Crystal Structure and Spectroscopy. Crystals 2022, 12, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sripoonjan, T.; Ayutthaya, M.S.N.; Bupparenoo, P.; Narudeesombat, N.; Leelawatanasuk, T.; Sawatekitithum, M. Gemmological and Chemical Characteristics of Yiqisong Peridot, Jilin, People Republic of China. In Proceedings of the 36th International Gemmological Conference (36th IGC 2019), Nantes, France, 29 August 2019; pp. 92–95. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gurenko, A.A.; Hansteen, T.H.; Schmincke, H.-U. Evolution of parental magmas of Miocene shield basalts of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands): Constraints from crystal, melt and fluid inclusions in minerals. Contrib Miner. Petrol. 1996, 124, 422–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ishimaru, S.; Arai, S. Nickel enrichment in mantle olivine beneath a volcanic front. Contrib Miner. Petrol. 2008, 156, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, X.-Y.; Long, Z.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, L.-J.; Zhang, C.; Xie, Z.-R.; Wu, Y.-R.; Yan, Y.; Wu, M.-K.; Wan, J.-X. Overview of Gemstone Resources in China. Crystals 2021, 11, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Halow, G.; Thu, K. Peridot from Pyang–Guang Mogok Track, Similarities to Sapat and Zabargad Deposits. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Sinkankas Symposium: Peridot and Uncommon Green Gem Minerals, Carlsbad, CA, USA, 5 April 2014; pp. 83–95. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, S.-Y.; Sharma, S.K.; Cooney, T.F. Micro–Raman and infrared spectral study of forsterite under high pressure. Am. Mineral. 1993, 78, 469–476. [Google Scholar]
  39. Feininger, T. An Introduction to the Rock–Forming Minerals (third edition). Can. Mineral. 2013, 51, 663–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kądziołka–Gaweł, M.; Dulski, M.; Kalinowski, L.; Wojtyniak, M. The effect of gamma irradiation on the structural properties of olivine. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 317, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. De Hoog, J.C.; Gall, L.; Cornell, D.H. Trace–element geochemistry of mantle olivine and application to mantle petrogenesis and geothermobarometry. Chem. Geol. 2010, 270, 196–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zanetti, A.; Tiepolo, M.; Oberti, R.; Vannucci, R. Trace–element partitioning in olivine: Modeling of a complete data set from a synthetic hydrous basanite melt. Lithos 2004, 75, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Imai, T.; Takahashi, E.; Suzuki, T.; Hirata, T. Element partitioning between olivine and melt up to 10 GPa: Implications for the effect of pressure. Phys. Earth Planet Inter. 2012, 212, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stockton, C.M.; Manson, D.V. Peridot from Tanzania. Gems Gemol. 1983, 19, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Burns, R.G. Crystal field spectra and evidence of cation ordering in olivine minerals. Am. Mineral. 1970, 55, 1608–1632. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tang, J.; Guo, Y.; Xu, C. Metameric effects on peridot by changing background color. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2019, 36, 2030–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, J.; Su, B.-X.; Robinson, P.T.; Xiao, Y.; Bai, Y.; Liu, X.; Sakyi, P.A.; Jing, J.-J.; Chen, C.; Liang, Z. Trace elements in olivine: Proxies for petrogenesis, mineralization and discrimination of mafic–ultramafic rocks. Lithos 2021, 388, 106085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lambart, S.; Hamilton, S.; Lang, O.I. Compositional variability of San Carlos olivine. Chem. Geol. 2022, 605, 120968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Foley, S.F.; Prelevic, D.; Rehfeldt, T.; Jacob, D.E. Minor and trace elements in olivines as probes into early igneous and mantle melting processes. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2013, 363, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Herzberg, C. Identification of source lithology in the Hawaiian and Canary Islands: Implications for origins. J. Petrol. 2011, 52, 113–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, L.-Y.; Li, N.; Prelević, D. The research status of olivine trace elements in–situ analysis and perspectives of its application. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2016, 32, 1877–1890. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yu, S.-Y.; Xu, Y.-G.; Huang, X.-L.; Ma, J.-L.; Ge, W.-C.; Zhang, H.-H.; Qin, X.-F. Hf–Nd isotopic decoupling in continental mantle lithosphere beneath Northeast China: Effects of pervasive mantle metasomatism. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2009, 35, 554–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, J.P.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Griffin, W.L.; Lu, F.X.; Zhang, M. Nature and evolution of Cenozoic lithospheric mantle beneath Shandong Peninsula, Sino-Korean Craton, Eastern China. Int. Geol. Rev. 1998, 40, 471–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zheng, J.P.; O’Reilly, S.Y.; Griffin, W.L.; Lu, F.X.; Zhang, M.; Pearson, N.J. Relict refractory mantle beneath the eastern North China block: Significance for lithosphere evolution. Lithos 2001, 57, 43–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Peng, H. The Mineralogical Study on Pyroxene from Dashihe, Jilin Province. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nimis, P.; Taylor, W.R. Single clinopyroxene thermobarometry for garnet peridotites. Part I. Calibration and testing of a Cr–in–Cpx barometer and an enstatite–in–Cpx thermometer. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 2000, 139, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Taylor, W.R. An experimental test of some geothermometer and geobaro–meter formulations for upper mantle peridotites with application to the ther–mobarometry of fertile lherzolite and garnet websterite. Neues Jahrb Miner. 1998, 172, 381–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lin, A.-B.; Aulbach, S.; Zheng, J.-P.; Cai, R.; Liu, J.; Xiong, Q.; Pan, S.-K. Lithospheric mantle provinces and crust–mantle decoupling beneath northeastern China: Insights from peridotite xenoliths. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 2023, 135, 990–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, Y.-G.; Menzies, M.A.; Thirlwall, M.F.; Huang, X.-L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.-M. “Reactive” harzburgites from Huinan, NE China: Products of the lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction during lithospheric thinning? Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003, 67, 487–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, S.-J. The Study on Mineralogical Characteristics of Olivine from Dashihe, Jilin. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram showing the main tectonic subdivisions of central and eastern Asia (modified from Zhang [18]); (b) sketch geological map of northeast (NE) China, showing the distribution of the Cenozoic volcanic rocks and peridotite xenoliths in the area (modified from Zhang [18]); (c) gem-grade peridot deposit map in Yiqisong, Dunhua of Jilin Province (modified from Xu [16]).
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram showing the main tectonic subdivisions of central and eastern Asia (modified from Zhang [18]); (b) sketch geological map of northeast (NE) China, showing the distribution of the Cenozoic volcanic rocks and peridotite xenoliths in the area (modified from Zhang [18]); (c) gem-grade peridot deposit map in Yiqisong, Dunhua of Jilin Province (modified from Xu [16]).
Crystals 14 00689 g001
Figure 2. (A) The thirty-three Yiqisong peridot rough samples collected and examined for this study; (BE) representative samples for magnified photography.
Figure 2. (A) The thirty-three Yiqisong peridot rough samples collected and examined for this study; (BE) representative samples for magnified photography.
Crystals 14 00689 g002
Figure 3. Internal features of Yiqisong peridot: (a) conchoidal fractures on the peridot surface (YQS–30); (b) rhombohedral growth etch pits on the crystal faces (YQS–14); (c) granular inclusions in YQS–14; (d) YQS–30 internal negative crystal; (e) YQS–30 internal cleavages with iridescence effect; (f,g) YQS–30 and YQS–14 internal “Lily pad” inclusions; (h) YQS–30 internal polyphase inclusion.
Figure 3. Internal features of Yiqisong peridot: (a) conchoidal fractures on the peridot surface (YQS–30); (b) rhombohedral growth etch pits on the crystal faces (YQS–14); (c) granular inclusions in YQS–14; (d) YQS–30 internal negative crystal; (e) YQS–30 internal cleavages with iridescence effect; (f,g) YQS–30 and YQS–14 internal “Lily pad” inclusions; (h) YQS–30 internal polyphase inclusion.
Crystals 14 00689 g003
Figure 4. The diopside (a) and spinel (b,c) inclusions in Yiqisong peridot. Their Raman spectra were used to prove the mineral species.
Figure 4. The diopside (a) and spinel (b,c) inclusions in Yiqisong peridot. Their Raman spectra were used to prove the mineral species.
Crystals 14 00689 g004
Figure 5. The representative UV–vis–NIR spectra of Yiqisong peridots. They are mainly characterized by Fe2+ absorption features.
Figure 5. The representative UV–vis–NIR spectra of Yiqisong peridots. They are mainly characterized by Fe2+ absorption features.
Crystals 14 00689 g005
Figure 6. The representative FTIR spectrum was obtained from Yiqisong peridot. The marked absorption bands are related to the symmetrical stretching vibration of the Si–O–Si group (1100~800 cm−1), the bending vibration of the Si–O group (650~450 cm−1), and internal vibrations and lattice vibrations (450~400 cm−1).
Figure 6. The representative FTIR spectrum was obtained from Yiqisong peridot. The marked absorption bands are related to the symmetrical stretching vibration of the Si–O–Si group (1100~800 cm−1), the bending vibration of the Si–O group (650~450 cm−1), and internal vibrations and lattice vibrations (450~400 cm−1).
Crystals 14 00689 g006
Figure 7. Raman spectrum of Yiqisong peridots is mainly characterized by the vibration of Si–O (824 and 856 cm−1).
Figure 7. Raman spectrum of Yiqisong peridots is mainly characterized by the vibration of Si–O (824 and 856 cm−1).
Crystals 14 00689 g007
Figure 8. Two-dimensional scatter plots of trace element contents in peridot from three geographic origins: (A) 2D plots of Co-Cr; (B) 2D plots of Mn-Co; (C) 2D plots of Ni-Sc; (D) 2D plots of Sc-Cr; (E) 2D plots of Sc-V; (F) 2D plots of V-Mn.
Figure 8. Two-dimensional scatter plots of trace element contents in peridot from three geographic origins: (A) 2D plots of Co-Cr; (B) 2D plots of Mn-Co; (C) 2D plots of Ni-Sc; (D) 2D plots of Sc-Cr; (E) 2D plots of Sc-V; (F) 2D plots of V-Mn.
Crystals 14 00689 g008
Figure 9. Fo value distribution of peridot in Yiqisong, Jiaohe [52], Shanwang [53], and Hebi [54] peridotite xenoliths.
Figure 9. Fo value distribution of peridot in Yiqisong, Jiaohe [52], Shanwang [53], and Hebi [54] peridotite xenoliths.
Crystals 14 00689 g009
Figure 10. Discrimination diagrams to identify the parent-rock lithologies based on trace elements. Green triangles for Yiqisong peridots, purple area for peridots from spinel peridotites, and yellow area for peridots from garnet peridotites. The data of spinel peridotites and garnet peridotites are from De Hoog [41].
Figure 10. Discrimination diagrams to identify the parent-rock lithologies based on trace elements. Green triangles for Yiqisong peridots, purple area for peridots from spinel peridotites, and yellow area for peridots from garnet peridotites. The data of spinel peridotites and garnet peridotites are from De Hoog [41].
Crystals 14 00689 g010
Figure 11. The equilibrium structure between clinopyroxenes and orthopyroxenes.
Figure 11. The equilibrium structure between clinopyroxenes and orthopyroxenes.
Crystals 14 00689 g011
Figure 12. P–T diagram of Yiqisong peridotites. The data of Dashihe peridotites are from Han [60].
Figure 12. P–T diagram of Yiqisong peridotites. The data of Dashihe peridotites are from Han [60].
Crystals 14 00689 g012
Table 1. Properties of peridots from Yiqisong.
Table 1. Properties of peridots from Yiqisong.
PropertyYiqisong, China
ColorLight yellowish-greenYellowish-greenYellowish-greenLight yellowish-green
PleochroismWeak: light yellowish-green to brownish-green
DiaphaneityTransparent
RI1.660–1.6981.655–1.6941.659–1.6951.655–1.690
Birefringence0.0380.0390.0360.035
SG3.443.313.213.37
Internal
features
‘Lily pad’ inclusions; partially healed fractures; brown staining;
dark solid inclusions
Table 2. Major element composition (wt %) of Yiqisong peridot samples by EPMA.
Table 2. Major element composition (wt %) of Yiqisong peridot samples by EPMA.
SampleYQS–9YQS–12YQS–13YQS–15YQS–17YQS–18
SiO241.5241.7941.1841.7041.2641.46
FeO8.148.278.678.528.918.55
MgO49.8350.4450.3850.2950.8650.39
CaO0.030.030.040.050.030.04
MnO0.120.120.140.150.100.11
NiO0.500.420.330.440.380.42
Total100.14101.07100.74101.15101.54100.97
Cations per 4 oxygen
Si1.011.011.001.000.991.00
Fe0.170.170.180.170.180.17
Mg1.801.811.821.811.821.81
Ca
Mn
Ni0.010.010.010.010.010.01
Fo91.6091.5891.2091.3391.0591.31
Table 3. Trace element composition (ppm) of Yiqisong peridots and those from other regions.
Table 3. Trace element composition (ppm) of Yiqisong peridots and those from other regions.
Chemical CompositionLiNaAlCaScTiVCrMnCoNiZnZr
YQS–30–11.4613.0926.24236.382.072.042.1758.79953.08119.852797.6548.530.00
YQS–30–21.3316.1025.62177.422.052.442.0759.98979.61115.892746.0548.470.01
YQS–30–31.2213.8321.03117.411.562.041.6948.42812.4799.472295.6840.050.01
YQS–30–41.2426.3619.98117.961.591.941.7852.03801.65101.442279.9740.850.00
YQS–30–51.1456.9023.41609.421.584.981.9070.27855.89105.312481.3846.160.08
YQS–25–11.6219.9935.49224.231.945.542.3782.59916.72112.192577.9345.460.01
YQS–25–21.3029.4036.68239.991.767.592.4081.33916.35116.912661.2745.700.01
YQS–25–31.4926.6640.66243.691.936.912.4383.66946.46124.072763.8646.810.01
YQS–25–41.7427.9844.93265.622.168.422.6788.721011.60128.863050.4148.260.01
YQS–25–51.9032.3346.01312.002.309.172.9794.131051.41132.903139.0251.410.02
YQS–23–12.2581.4373.85309.412.3525.531.87169.151200.67121.132505.4877.680.07
YQS–23–22.7390.8571.92327.232.3125.482.02177.261244.29126.402557.9977.490.05
YQS–23–33.0086.2178.92328.452.3925.192.14177.171227.54127.582509.9575.470.06
YQS–23–43.1485.8175.79399.272.4723.982.23183.981287.55130.952662.1777.970.07
YQS–23–52.7190.0273.88311.042.6323.022.24189.771301.20132.982666.4676.210.04
Vietnam [5]1.24–1.71 46.40–63.3038.60–782.00 7.19–13.501.70–2.5886.70–124.00869.00–1121.00137.00–150.002602.00–3062.0050.4–64.40.04–0.15
Pyaung–Gaung, Myanmar [10]1.45–15.7723.04–97.7519.50–103.14 8.19–15.926.35–57.941.01–7.6912.83–68.97788.54–1097.55123.46–167.772761.62–3965.2140.86–119.95bdl–0.15
Pakistan [26]14.45–49.92 10.85–29.31 0.27–1.70 10.37–26.58
bdl: below detection limit.
Table 4. Crystal chemical formulas of Yiqisong peridot samples.
Table 4. Crystal chemical formulas of Yiqisong peridot samples.
SamplesCrystal Chemical FormulaFo
YQS–9(Mg1.80Fe0.17Ni0.01)2Si1.01O491.60
YQS–12(Mg1.81Fe0.17Ni0.01)2Si1.01O491.58
YQS–13(Mg1.82Fe0.18Ni0.01)2Si1.00O491.20
YQS–15(Mg1.81Fe0.17Ni0.01)2Si1.00O491.33
YQS–17(Mg1.82Fe0.18Ni0.01)2Si0.99O491.05
YQS–18(Mg1.81Fe0.17Ni0.01)2Si1.00O491.31
Table 5. Gemological properties of peridot from various origins.
Table 5. Gemological properties of peridot from various origins.
PropertyYiqisong, ChinaSan Carlos,
Arizona [8]
Tanzania [44]Sardinia, Italy [6]
ColorLight yellowish-green to yellowish-greenVery dark
brown to brownish-green to bright
lime green
Light
yellowish-green
Yellowish-green
PleochroismWeak: light yellowish-green to brownish-green Weak to moderate
α, β = green; γ = yellow–green
DiaphaneityTransparent Translucent
RI1.655–1.6981.649–1.6911.650–1.6841.650–1.690
Birefringence0.035–0.0390.037–0.038 0.038–0.039
SG3.21–3.443.28–3.38 3.32–3.36
Internal features“Lily pad” inclusions; partially healed fractures; brown staining;“Lily pad” cleavages;
Chromite,
chromian spinel; negative crystals; glass blebs; chrome diopside; biotite; smoke-like veiling
“Lily pad”
inclusions,
chromite
inclusions,
healed
secondary
fractures, and
hercynite
(rarely)
Partially healed fractures, liquid inclusions,
“Lily pad” inclusions, crystals, growth planes,
traces of parallel twinning
Table 6. Chemical compositions of peridot from Yiqisong and other countries.
Table 6. Chemical compositions of peridot from Yiqisong and other countries.
Chemical
Composition
Yiqisong, ChinaVietnam [5]Sardinia, Italy [6]
SiO241.18–41.7939.82–42.6440.83–40.69
FeO8.14–8.918.24–9.908.98–8.77
MgO49.83–50.8647.22–52.2550.15–50.17
CaO0.03–0.050.03–0.10
MnO0.10–0.150.03–0.240.11–0.15
NiO0.33–0.500.16–0.550.38–0.39
Table 7. Equilibration temperatures and pressure of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by Nimis and Taylor.
Table 7. Equilibration temperatures and pressure of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by Nimis and Taylor.
Calculation
Method
Calculation of Cpx Thermobarometry [56]
T (°C)813815
P (kbar)21.7221.32
Table 8. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by Taylor.
Table 8. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by Taylor.
Calculation
Method
Two-Pyroxene Thermometer [57]
T (°C)822822822823825826
Table 9. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by De Hoog.
Table 9. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by De Hoog.
Calculation MethodAl–in–Olivine Thermometer [41]
T (°C)869 871 892 893 894 932 934 944 959 987 1027 1028 1033 1034 1037
Table 10. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by De Hoog.
Table 10. Equilibration temperatures of Yiqisong spinel peridotites; method by De Hoog.
Calculation
Method
Ca–in–Olivine Thermometer [41]
T (°C)877878924952958960962973992993994100010271087
Table 11. Major element compositions (wt %) of pyroxenes and spinel in the peridotite by EPMA.
Table 11. Major element compositions (wt %) of pyroxenes and spinel in the peridotite by EPMA.
SampleOpx–1Opx–2Opx–3Opx–4Opx–5Opx–6Cpx–1Cpx–2Sp–1Sp–2
SiO256.8257.0956.7957.0157.1756.9053.9553.270.050.08
FeO5.485.55.455.435.495.462.032.1213.0112.99
Al2O32.582.332.652.382.352.383.123.2836.9536.55
MgO34.4534.7234.4734.6334.7434.4516.8016.7017.6217.46
CaO0.550.560.530.560.520.5422.6222.400.010.01
MnO0.140.100.120.100.090.110.060.100.150.21
Cr2O30.490.440.570.500.490.491.131.2932.8034.29
NiO0.060.120.070.050.100.040.070.040.250.22
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, B. Gemological and Chemical Characterization of Gem-Grade Peridot from Yiqisong, Jilin Province. Crystals 2024, 14, 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080689

AMA Style

Li J, Zhao Y, Xu B. Gemological and Chemical Characterization of Gem-Grade Peridot from Yiqisong, Jilin Province. Crystals. 2024; 14(8):689. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080689

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jina, Yi Zhao, and Bo Xu. 2024. "Gemological and Chemical Characterization of Gem-Grade Peridot from Yiqisong, Jilin Province" Crystals 14, no. 8: 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080689

APA Style

Li, J., Zhao, Y., & Xu, B. (2024). Gemological and Chemical Characterization of Gem-Grade Peridot from Yiqisong, Jilin Province. Crystals, 14(8), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14080689

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop