Crystallization, Structure Determination and Reticular Twinning in Iron(III) Salicylate: Fe[(HSal)(Sal)(H₂O)₂]

Abstract

In this contribution, we present the first crystal structure of iron(III) salicylate without additional counterions. The octahedral complex contains two salicylate and two water molecules as ligands. One salicylate is mono-anionic while the other is di-anionic. Because of the centrosymmetry of the complex, the acidic hydrogen atom is disordered on the midpoint between two salicylate oxygens. The structure determination of the tiny crystal indicates the presence of reticular twinning. The structure solution of the twin is shown and an explanation based on the crystal packing is provided.

1. Introduction

Iron salicylates [1] and catecholates [2] play an important role in the study of non-heme iron enzymes. In these biological systems, the oxidation state of iron can be easily changed, which makes them catalytically interesting. In pharmaceutical sciences, salicylic acid has been proposed as a chelator for iron [3]. Another important application of the salicylate ligand is in analytical chemistry. Fe(III) salicylate is a colored complex that can be used for spectrophotometry [4,5]. Spectrophotometric procedures have also been used to establish the stability constants of Fe(III) salicylates [6]. Alternatively, the stability constants can be determined using potentiometric titrations [7,8,9,10]. In the course of such experiments, different complex structures and compositions have been proposed, but, to our knowledge, none of them have been characterized by a crystal structure analysis. We therefore set out to crystallize Fe(III) salicylate and succeeded using the gel crystallization technique. The starting salt was Fe(II) nitrate which slowly oxidized during the reaction with salicylic acid.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Intramolecular Interactions

Compound 1 (Scheme 1) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group $P{2}_1/n$ with the Fe atom on an exact, crystallographic inversion center (Wyckoff position c). It is hexacoordinated by oxygen atoms originating from two salicylato and two aquo ligands, respectively. The geometry of the FeO${}_6$ polyhedron is octahedral with only a very slight deviation from perfect $O_h$ symmetry. This deviation can be expressed by a quadratic elongation of 1.003 and an angular variance of 1.42 deg${}^2$ [11]. Considering the complete complex, we find an approximate $C_{2h}$ symmetry with an r.m.s. deviation of 0.0276 Å [12]. In the octahedron, the equatorial plane is formed by two symmetry equivalent salicylato ligands that coordinate as chelate in bidentate fashion. The salicylate molecule is essentially planar with a maximum torsion angle of 2.7(7)${}^{\circ }$ in the six-membered chelate ring. The axial positions of the octahedron are occupied by water molecules. The plane of the water molecule forms an angle of 30${}^{\circ }$ with the water-Fe bond. This is halfway between a trigonal and a tetrahedral coordination mode. A molecular plot of the structure is shown in Figure 1.

The Fe-O distances to the salicylate ligand are 1.925(6) and 1.973(6) Å and to the water molecule 2.092(6) Å. A comparison of these values with the literature [13,14] indicates that the iron must be in oxidation state +3. Bond–valence calculations [15] result in a bond–valence sum of 3.206 [16], confirming this oxidation state. With an oxidation state +3 for the iron, one of the two salicylate ligands must be protonated for charge balance. From steric considerations, protonation should take place at O1, which is the only oxygen not coordinated to the iron. Inspection of the intermolecular contacts indeed shows a short $O1\cdots O{1}^i$ distance of 2.476(8) Å that can only be explained by the presence of a hydrogen bond (symmetry code $i:1-x,2-y,-z$). We therefore introduced a hydrogen atom on the midpoint between O1 and O1${}^i$, which is a special position (Wyckoff position d). With both Fe1 and H1A on special positions, the charge balance is achieved for a Fe(III) complex with the formula $\left[Fe\left(HSal\right)\left(Sal\right){\left(H_{2}O\right)}_2\right]$. With this description, the O1-H1A distance becomes rather long (1.24 Å). More likely is an alternative explanation such as a double-well hydrogen bond. Such double-well potentials preferably occur in very strong and stabilized hydrogen bonds [17,18]. A difference Fourier map at the position of H1A gives some indication for a double-well situation (Figure 2), but, due to the weak diffraction of the crystal and the twinned reflection data, this is not a full proof. For convenience, we left the hydrogen atom unrefined on the special position.

Salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid, $H_{2}Sal$) is a di-basic acid with $p{K}_a$ values of 2.853(9) and 12.897(7) [20,21]. Metal complexes of the mono-anionic ligand $HSa{l}^{-}$ are well known from the literature. For recent examples of transition metal complexes, see [22,23,24,25]. In the majority of cases, the hydroxyl group is protonated and the carboxylate group deprotonated. The carboxylate group can then act as monodentate, bidentate or bridging moiety. In total, 339 metal complexes of this kind are known in the Cambridge Structural Database [26]. It is very rare that the carboxylate group is protonated and the hydroxyl group deprotonated (Scheme 2). Coordination mode (I) is found in a Cu complex [27] and mode (II) in Ag compounds [28]. Coordination mode (III) of the present study has been first described for a MoO${}_2$ complex [29] and more recently in a Cu complex [30]. In total, five crystal structures with coordination mode (III) are known in the Cambridge Structural Database (update November 2016) [26] with determined atomic coordinates. Interestingly, all five complexes show a non-symmetric pattern with both $HSa{l}^{-}$ and $Sa{l}^{2-}$ in the coordination environment. In all five structures, the metal complex is located on a general position with $C_1$ symmetry. Compound 1 of the present study also has both $HSa{l}^{-}$ and $Sa{l}^{2-}$ in the coordination environment, but, as a consequence of the crystallographic $C_i$ symmetry, the ligands are non-distinguishable. While the Cu complex [30] is also described with a symmetric O–H⋯O hydrogen bond, compound 1 of the present study is the first molecule with the metal center and H1A on special positions.

From the statistical analysis of the crystal structures with the $HSa{l}^{-}$ ligand, it is clear that the carboxylate group is much more easily deprotonated (339 cases) than the hydroxyl group (seven cases in modes I, II and III). Why do the structures with deprotonated hydroxyl group exist at all? The answer might be in the very strong intermolecular hydrogen bond in the crystal [31]. Indeed, the hydrogen bonded $O\cdots O$ distance in compound 1 is very short (2.476(8) Å). This is generally the case in the $HSa{l}^{-}$ structures with deprotonated hydroxyl group. This intermolecular effect might thus be the reason for the increased thermodynamic stability.

2.2. Intermolecular Interactions

The molecules of compound 1 are connected by hydrogen bonds with the protonated carboxylate group and the coordinated water molecules as hydrogen bond donors. The non-coordinated carboxylate oxygen O1 and the deprotonated hydroxyl group act as acceptors (

Table 1. Hydrogen bonding interactions in compound 1. Symmetry codes i: $1-x,2-y,-z;$ $ii$: $x-1,y,z;$ $iii$: $x,y+1,z$.

$\mathit{D}–\mathit{H}\cdots \mathit{A}$	$\mathit{D}–\mathit{H}$	$\mathit{H}\cdots \mathit{A}$	$\mathit{D}\cdots \mathit{A}$	$\mathit{D}–\mathit{H}\cdots \mathit{A}$
$O1$–$H1A$⋯ O1${}^i$	1.24 Å	1.24 Å	2.476(8) Å	180${}^{\circ }$
$O4$–$H4A$⋯ O1${}^{ii}$	0.95 Å	1.87 Å	2.808(8) Å	170${}^{\circ }$
$O4$–$H4B$⋯ O3${}^{iii}$	0.95 Å	1.81 Å	2.704(9) Å	156${}^{\circ }$

). This hydrogen bonding pattern results in a two-dimensional network parallel to the $a,b$-plane (Figure 3). No strong intermolecular interactions could be detected in c-direction, which leaves as the only possibility weak dispersive effects in this direction.

2.3. Reticular Twinning

The reflection data can be indexed with a C-centered orthorhombic symmetry (a = 7.24 Å, b = 74.79 Å, c = 4.85 Å). Concerning the X-ray intensities, the merging R values for this symmetry are reasonably low. Investigation of the systematic absences indicates space group $C{222}_1$, but there is an additional pseudo B-centering present. A closer inspection of the reflection data shows that this pseudo B-centering is caused by the presence of additional (non space group compatible) systematic absences: in the layers of $h=2n$, only reflections with $h+k=4n$ are present. The structure solution in space group $C{222}_1$ failed.

Because systematic absences incompatible with space group symmetry are a clear warning sign for twinning [33], we decided to select a primitive subgroup with monoclinic symmetry and a = 7.34 Å, b = 4.85 Å, c = 37.57 Å, $\beta ={95.6}^{\circ }$ (Scheme 3). Based on the metric orthorhombic symmetry, a twofold rotation about the a-axis was chosen as a potential twin operation. Systematic absences indicated space group $P{2}_1$. However, also in this setting, there are absences incompatible with the space group: in the layers of $h=2n$ all reflections with l = odd are absent (Figure 4). Structure solution as a twin in space group $P{2}_1$ was successful (see Experimental Section). There are two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit that are both located on general positions with $C_1$ symmetry.

Importing the $P{2}_1$ structure into the PLATON routine ADDSYM [16] finds additional translational symmetry in c direction. Halving the c-axis results in the true unit cell (a = 7.34 Å, b = 4.85 Å, c = 18.79 Å and $\beta ={95.6}^{\circ }$) with space group $P{2}_1/n$. The relation between the $P{2}_1$ supercell and the $P{2}_1/n$ subcell can be seen in Figure 5, which also shows the stacking of the hydrogen bonded planes. Stacking faults in c-direction result in the twinned structure of the current analysis. This alternative stacking is shown in Figure 6. The stacking with true translational symmetry (Figure 5) as well as the alternative stacking with twinned symmetry (Figure 6) show no conflicting short contacts between the layers. We assume that both arrangements are energetically similar. The overlapping twin boundary is depicted in Figure 7 and shows an additional, approximate symmetry operation ($x+1/2$, $y+1/2$, $1/2-z$), which is a combination of the n-glide plane of the space group and the twin rotation about a. Twin generation by stacking faults have previously been discussed by Dornberger-Schiff in the context of the OD theory [34].

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the direct and reciprocal lattice for this reticular twin. Figure 9 clearly shows that the twinning is the reason for space group incompatible absences. With the knowledge of the true unit cell size and true twin relation, it is possible to freely refine the cell parameters. Based on the non-overlapping reflections of the first twin component, this results in a = 7.3392(11) Å, b = 4.8493(6) Å, c = 18.794(3) Å and $\beta =96.090{\left(9\right)}^{\circ }$. With these values, the twin obliquity is ${0.49}^{\circ }$ as calculated with PLATON using the LEPAGE-twin algorithm [35].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis and Crystallization

For the crystallization of the title compound, we used the gel technique of Arend and Connelly [36]. In addition, 6.26 g of FeSO${}_4$·7H${}_2$O was dissolved in 40.5 mL H${}_2$O, which resulted in an orange solution. The solution was filtered, leaving a green-blue filtrate. Furthermore, 4.5 mL of tetramethoxysilane was added to the solution under stirring. Stirring was continued for fifteen minutes. The mixture was poured into a test tube and left to solidify for four days. The top layer had turned yellow and was subsequently removed. In addition, 0.9 g of sodium salicylate was dissolved in 10 mL of H${}_2$O (pH ≈ 5.5). The solution was brought onto the gel. After five days, microcrystalline material had formed at the surface of the gel. One crystal (25 × 25 × 125 μm³) was selected for the single crystal diffraction experiment.

3.2. X-ray Crystal Structure Determination

X-ray intensities were measured on a Bruker Proteum diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a rotating anode generator, Helios optics, and PLATINUM-135 CCD detector. A total of 1633 images was collected with a detector distance of 60 mm, a rotation increment of 0.5${}^{\circ }$/frame, an exposure time of 120 s/frame, and a generator setting of 45 kV/60 mA. First attempts to index the reflections with the DIRAX software [37] suggested an orthorhombic C-centered unit cell (see Section 2.3). A single orientation matrix is sufficient to integrate all reflections. Space group determination and structure solution using this symmetry failed.

Therefore, the intensity integration was repeated using the monoclinic subgroup with a P lattice (c = 37.57 Å). Again, only one orientation matrix was used for the integration. A twin matrix of (−1 0 0/0 −1 0/1 0 1) was included for the structure solution with the program SHELXD [38] in space group $P{2}_1$. With this matrix, all reflections are overlapping (pseudo-merohedral twin). This gave a suitable starting model that could be completed by difference Fourier maps in the SHELXL software [19] based on the same twin matrix and space group.

The ADDSYM routine of the PLATON software [16] found additional translation symmetry resulting in a subcell with space group $P{2}_1/n$ (c = 18.79 Å). This prompted us to re-integrate the reflection data in this subcell with two orientation matrices using the Eval15 software [39]. The two orientation matrices can be related by a twofold rotation about $uvw=\left[100\right],$ which corresponds to the matrix (1 0 0/0 −1 0/−0.5 0 −1) (Scheme 3). By a twofold rotation about the monoclinic b-axis, this is equivalent with a twofold twin rotation about $hkl=\left(001\right)$ in reciprocal space and the twin matrix (−1 0 0/0 −1 0/0.5 0 1). The latter relation was used for the intensity integration. Scaling, absorption correction and merging of symmetry equivalent reflections were performed with Twinabs [40]. Because of the tiny size, the crystal did not diffract further than $\frac{sin\theta }{\lambda }=0.51$ Å${}^{-1}$. This cut-off is based on the merging R-value in the outer resolution shell. The non-overlapping reflections of the major twin component and the overlapping reflections of both twin components were stored in HKLF5 format [41] for the structure refinement.

Non-hydrogen atoms were refined freely with anisotropic displacement parameters. The rather low resolution of the data leads to a quite poor data/parameter ratio of 6.7. Consequently, all displacement parameters were restrained using the RIGU instruction [42]. C-H hydrogen atoms were introduced in calculated positions and refined with a riding model. The O-H hydrogen atom was located on position $(\frac{1}{2},1,0)$ and kept fixed during the refinement. Further experimental details are given in

Table 2. Measurement details.

Molecular Formula	$\mathbf{Fe}\left[\left({\mathit{C}}_7{\mathit{O}}_3{\mathit{H}}_5\right)\left({\mathit{C}}_7{\mathit{O}}_3{\mathit{H}}_4\right){\left({\mathit{H}}_2\mathit{O}\right)}_2\right]$
Formula weight	365.09
Temperature	110(2) K
Wavelength	1.54184 Å (CuK$\alpha$)
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, $P{2}_1/n$
Unit cell dimensions	a = 7.3392(11)	$\beta$ = 96.090(9)${}^{\circ }$
	b = 4.8493(6)
	c = 18.794(3)
Volume	665.11(15) Å${}^3$
Z, Calculated density	2, 1.823 g/cm${}^3$
Absorption coefficient	9.53 mm${}^{-1}$
F(000)	374
Crystal size	25 × 25 × 125 μm3
${\left(\frac{sin\theta }{\lambda }\right)}_{max}$	0.51 Å${}^{-1}$
Limiting indices	−7 $\le h\le$ 7
	−4 $\le k\le$ 4
	−18 $\le l\le$ 19
Refl. collected/unique/observed	3505/1246/1033	$[{\mathrm{R}}_{int}=0.0574]$
Completeness to $\theta$ = 51.35${}^{\circ }$	99.0%
Number of parameters	107
Number of restraints	93
R1/wR2 $[I>2\sigma (I\left)\right]$	0.0678/0.1730
R1/wR2 [all refl.]	0.0862/0.1901
Goodness of Fit	1.073
Twin fraction (BASF)	0.461(4)
Residual density [min/max]	−0.48/0.71 eÅ${}^{-3}$

.

CCDC 1587792 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

4. Conclusions

The octahedral complex molecules of $Fe\left[\left(HSal\right)\left(Sal\right){\left(H_{2}O\right)}_2\right]$ are connected by intermolecular hydrogen bonds to form layers in the $a,b$-plane. Stacking faults in the c-direction lead to the reticular, pseudo-orthorhombic twinning. The twin matrix was obtained by decomposition of the C-centered orthorhombic twin cell as (1 0 0/0 −1 0/−0.5 0 −1). This corresponds to a twofold rotation about the monoclinic a-axis. Two orientation matrices were used for the determination of the X-ray intensities. In every second layer in h-direction, the reflections of both twin domains fully overlap, while in the odd layers the reflections are separated. This situation is characteristic for reticular twinning. Taking this twinning situation into account, the chemistry of the complex can be consistently explained. The oxidation state of the Fe was determined as +3, and the O-H hydrogen atom is on the intermolecular midpoint between two carboxylate oxygens.