Next Article in Journal
Two 1-D Coordination Polymers Containing Zinc(II) Hexaborates: [Zn(en){B6O7(OH)6}]·2H2O (en = 1,2-diaminoethane) and [Zn(pn){B6O7(OH)6}]·1.5H2O (pn = 1,2-diaminopropane)
Previous Article in Journal
Morphological and Crystallographic Characteristics of α Structure in a Low-Carbon Iron–Nickel Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of the Crystal Surface on the Austenitic and Martensitic Phase Transition in Pure Iron

Physics Department and Research Center OPTIMAS, University Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2018, 8(12), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120469
Submission received: 22 November 2018 / Revised: 11 December 2018 / Accepted: 12 December 2018 / Published: 14 December 2018

Abstract

Using classical molecular dynamics simulations, we studied the influence that free surfaces exert on the austenitic and martensitic phase transition in iron. For several single-indexed surfaces—such as ( 100 ) bcc and ( 110 ) bcc as well as ( 100 ) fcc and ( 110 ) fcc surfaces—appropriate pathways exist that allow for the transformation of the surface structure. These are the Bain, Mao, Pitsch, and Kurdjumov–Sachs pathways, respectively. Tilted surfaces follow the pathway of the neighboring single-indexed plane. The austenitic transformation temperature follows the dependence of the specific surface energy of the native bcc phase; here, the new phase nucleates at the surface. In contrast, the martensitic transformation temperature steadily decreases when tilting the surface from the (100) fcc to the (110) fcc orientation. This dependence is caused by the strong out-of-plane deformation that (110) fcc facets experience under the transformation; here, the new phase also nucleates in the bulk rather than at the surface.
Keywords: solid–solid phase transition; molecular dynamics simulation; iron; surface solid–solid phase transition; molecular dynamics simulation; iron; surface
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meiser, J.; Urbassek, H.M. Influence of the Crystal Surface on the Austenitic and Martensitic Phase Transition in Pure Iron. Crystals 2018, 8, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120469

AMA Style

Meiser J, Urbassek HM. Influence of the Crystal Surface on the Austenitic and Martensitic Phase Transition in Pure Iron. Crystals. 2018; 8(12):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meiser, Jerome, and Herbert M. Urbassek. 2018. "Influence of the Crystal Surface on the Austenitic and Martensitic Phase Transition in Pure Iron" Crystals 8, no. 12: 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120469

APA Style

Meiser, J., & Urbassek, H. M. (2018). Influence of the Crystal Surface on the Austenitic and Martensitic Phase Transition in Pure Iron. Crystals, 8(12), 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8120469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop