Next Article in Journal
Integrated N- and O-Glycomics of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cell Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
The Pivotal Role of the Placenta in Normal and Pathological Pregnancies: A Focus on Preeclampsia, Fetal Growth Restriction, and Maternal Chronic Venous Disease
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Tumor-Derived Exosomes (TEX) in Shaping Anti-Tumor Immune Competence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evidence of Neuroinflammation and Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Women with Preeclampsia and Eclampsia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia

by
Megan A. Opichka
1,
Matthew W. Rappelt
2,
David D. Gutterman
1,2,3,
Justin L. Grobe
1,2,4,5,6 and
Jennifer J. McIntosh
1,2,7,*
1
Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
2
Cardiovascular Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
3
Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
4
Neuroscience Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
5
Comprehensive Rodent Metabolic Phenotyping Core, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
6
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
7
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(11), 3055; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113055
Submission received: 9 October 2021 / Revised: 1 November 2021 / Accepted: 4 November 2021 / Published: 6 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia)

Abstract

:
Preeclampsia is a life-threatening pregnancy-associated cardiovascular disorder characterized by hypertension and proteinuria at 20 weeks of gestation. Though its exact underlying cause is not precisely defined and likely heterogenous, a plethora of research indicates that in some women with preeclampsia, both maternal and placental vascular dysfunction plays a role in the pathogenesis and can persist into the postpartum period. Potential abnormalities include impaired placentation, incomplete spiral artery remodeling, and endothelial damage, which are further propagated by immune factors, mitochondrial stress, and an imbalance of pro- and antiangiogenic substances. While the field has progressed, current gaps in knowledge include detailed initial molecular mechanisms and effective treatment options. Newfound evidence indicates that vasopressin is an early mediator and biomarker of the disorder, and promising future therapeutic avenues include mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction, excess oxidative stress, and the resulting inflammatory state. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of vascular defects present during preeclampsia and connect well-established notions to newer discoveries at the molecular, cellular, and whole-organism levels.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder and a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [1,2]. Despite its prevalence, well-cataloged risk factors, and clinical characteristics, the exact pathophysiology of this disorder remains unknown [2]. This deficit in knowledge has hampered the development of targeted therapies and limited treatment options for healthcare providers.
Clinically, preeclampsia is associated with a number of complications for both mother and fetus [3]. It is thought to lie on a spectrum of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy, with gestational hypertension at the mildest end of the spectrum, followed by preeclampsia, chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, and eclampsia at the most extreme end [1] (Figure 1). As preeclampsia is a true systemic disease, it may manifest in a number of different ways. Classically, it has been defined as maternal hypertension and renal dysfunction, specifically characterized by proteinuria [1]. However, more recent guidelines have noted thrombocytopenia, impaired liver function, pulmonary edema, and cerebral/visual symptoms as diagnostic features [1,2,4]. Additional maternal complications include seizures (eclampsia), cerebral hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and hepatic rupture [4]. Obstetric complications associated with preeclampsia consist of uteroplacental insufficiency, placental abruption, prematurity, and increased risk of cesarean delivery [2]. Additional fetal complications include intrapartum fetal distress, intrauterine growth restriction, oligohydramnios, and in severe cases, stillbirth [3]. Epidemiologic studies have linked approximately 15–20% of all fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age infants to preeclampsia, while 20% of all preterm births are associated with the disease [5,6]. Beyond the obstetric and neonatal consequences, preeclampsia confers long-term risk of complications, including cerebrovascular accident and hypertension [7,8].
An awareness of the syndrome dates back to Hippocrates in ~400 BC, yet preeclampsia remains a significant obstetric concern [12]. According to the World Health Organization, 16% of maternal deaths are attributable to preeclampsia and related gestational hypertensive disorders [13]. Furthermore, multiple studies have displayed an alarming increase in the incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia over the past 3 decades [6,14,15,16]. Combining data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Center for Delivery, Organization, and Markets, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and the National Inpatient Sample, the rate of overall preeclampsia and eclampsia increased by 21% from 2004 to 2014, with the incidence of severe preeclampsia rising by 50% during this period [11]. This imposes a severe clinical and economic burden, as the annual total cost associated with maternal and neonatal consequences of preeclampsia 12 months after delivery was USD 2.18 billion in the United States in 2012 [17].
As clinicians attempt to better manage this rising tide, a number of risk factors have been identified that reflect the complex nature of preeclampsia [15,18]. These include conditions such as chronic hypertension and other classical cardiovascular risk factors, along with chronic renal disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, collagen vascular diseases (e.g., lupus), and preexisting diabetes [18]. Additionally, factors such as nulliparity, a previous diagnosis of preeclampsia, abnormal placentation, multiple gestation, and maternal age at either end of the spectrum (<20 years or >35 years) also increase susceptibility [15]. The rate and severity of preeclampsia are higher among African Americans [19,20], and this likely reflects healthcare inequities as well as a higher incidence of determinants, including chronic hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, which are underdiagnosed in the African American community [21]. Finally, there appears to be a genetic component to preeclampsia, as a family history of preeclampsia, hypertension, and type II diabetes (either maternal or paternal) also portends higher risk [22,23].
Nonetheless, despite health disparities and the significant clinical impact of preeclampsia, the only “cure” is delivery, and even after childbirth, there remains an elevated risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disease later in life for these mothers and their children [24,25,26,27,28]. Thus, efforts to facilitate early detection, a better understanding of gestational mechanisms, and enhanced treatment modalities are imperative for improved management and health outcomes in patients with this complex condition. As the field advances, there is an increasing awareness that multiple subtypes of preeclampsia exist, and these subtypes may vary in their underlying cause, placental transcriptomic landscape, and disease severity [29,30,31,32]. Proposed classifications include early vs. late onset, in which early is more commonly associated with malplacentation, poor uterine perfusion, and fetal growth restriction. Alternatively, late-onset preeclampsia may be a consequence of placental overgrowth (resulting in compression of the chorionic villi), stress, or senescence towards the end of pregnancy [29,30,31,32]. Redman et al. recently highlighted the notion that regardless of the initiating factors, the placental syncytiotrophoblast layer is susceptible to cell stress throughout pregnancy (i.e., oxidative, mitochondrial, endoplasmic reticulum), and, ultimately, maternal responsiveness to these syncytial stress signals determines whether a woman will develop preeclampsia [29]. Though vascular dysfunction may elicit trophoblast stress or trophoblast stress may disrupt the vasculature, many of the risk factors, proposed mechanisms, and long-term implications of preeclampsia have a direct relationship with the maternal and placental vasculature. Hence, we aim to summarize key avenues of preeclampsia research and highlight the role of the vasculature within these areas.

2. Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia

2.1. Improper Decidualization and Placentation

It is widely accepted that placental development is disrupted in some pregnancies affected by preeclampsia, leading to cellular, molecular, immunological, and vascular changes [33,34,35], and the role of insufficient decidualization has also received increasing attention [36,37,38,39]. Early-onset preeclampsia is classically thought to be mediated by abnormal placentation and shallow trophoblast invasion within the uterus, thereby resulting in incomplete spiral artery remodeling [33,34,35]. This may lead to placental hypoxia, an aberrant angiogenic state, endothelial dysfunction, further decrements in placental formation, trophoblast stress, and ultimately the maternal presence of preeclampsia [2,35,40]. While much of the etiology remains unknown, research suggests that failed decidual differentiation prior to pregnancy can contribute to impaired trophoblast invasion and its sequela [36,37,38,39].
However, this is a complex syndrome, and the exact order of events in the pathogenesis is unclear. Predicting preeclampsia is imprecise, and determining whether physiological alterations cause preeclampsia or are a secondary result is quite challenging.

2.1.1. Cellular and Molecular Aspects

Decidualization occurs during the mid-secretory phase of the endometrial cycle to prepare the uterus for a potential incoming conceptus [41]. During this process, endometrial stromal cells differentiate into decidual stromal cells [38,39,41]. This process involves morphological alterations and genetic reprogramming to promote tolerance, optimal invasion, angiogenesis, and nutritional support to the embryo preceding placental development [38,39,41]. Research suggesting abnormal decidualization in preeclampsia indicates that human endometrial stromal cells derived from nonpregnant women following severe preeclampsia failed to differentiate, which was evident by a lack of structural changes and an absence of secretory markers [37]. Further, conditioned medium from severe preeclamptic decidual cells was unable to induce cytotrophoblast invasion, unlike culture medium from normal preterm birth decidual cells [37]. One molecular underpinning for this lack of decidualization and inability to stimulate invasion is an annexin A2 deficiency in preeclamptic human endometrial stromal cells [36], which may serve as a critical biomarker in assessing a woman’s susceptibility to developing the disorder [36].
During normal placentation, trophoblasts, which are subdivided into cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts, descend from the blastocyst to form extraembryonic cells critical to placental formation [42,43]. Cytotrophoblasts comprise the inner villous placental layer closest to the fetal circulation, while syncytiotrophoblasts are derived from merging cytotrophoblasts and form the outer villous portion in contact with the maternal environment. Together, this arrangement of cells develops into a branch-like pattern referred to as the chorionic villi [42]. Though chorionic villi are essential for maternal–fetal exchange, the release of placenta-derived syncytiotrophoblast microvilli (STBM) into maternal circulation is elevated in preeclamptic women and impedes endothelial cell proliferation [44]. Furthermore, endothelium-dependent vasodilation is also impaired after infusion of placental STBM vesicles into adipose arterioles obtained during cesarean section. Electron micrographs following this perfusion confirm severe endothelial layer and intracellular organelle disruption, but the underlying smooth muscle remained intact [45]. Thus, the distribution of STBM into the bloodstream is a mechanism of vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia.
Cytotrophoblasts can also differentiate via the extravillous pathway to promote structural remodeling of maternal spiral arteries and sufficient oxygen exchange within the placenta [42,46,47]. In this process, extravillous trophoblasts infiltrate decidual and myometrial tissue during the first trimester to transform the resistance vessels within to those of greater capacitance [42,46,47,48]. Defects in this process during preeclampsia can allow spiral arteries to retain a muscular elastic phenotype, which leads to attenuated oxygen extraction between maternal and fetal circulation and instances of placental hypoxia [43,47].
Several recent findings indicate novel molecular mechanisms responsible for inadequate placentation [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] (Figure 2).
One proposed contributor involves decreased circular RNA homeodomain interacting protein kinase 3 (circHIPK3) mRNA in preeclamptic women [57]. CircHIPK3 is a circular RNA responsible for impeding microRNA (miRNA) activity [60]. Overexpression in cultured human first-trimester extravillous trophoblast cells facilitated migration and invasion, whereas small interfering RNA (siRNA) attenuated this effect [57]. CircHIPK3 has multiple known miRNA targets, including mir-124 and mir-558 [51,52], and dysregulation of miRNAs is a potential underlying cause for the progression of preeclampsia. It has been reported that mir-124 is upregulated in early-onset preeclampsia [53] and is considered a negative regulator of cardiac angiogenesis [58]. However, the exact role of mir-124 in placental tissue remains unknown. Similarly, the long non-coding RNA Linc00261 is upregulated in preeclampsia, leading to decreased mir-558 [50], which is another target of circHIPK3 [51]. In neuroblastoma cells, mir-558 has been shown to promote growth, invasion, and angiogenesis through the stimulation of hypoxia-induced factor-2α (HIF-2α) [55], so decreased mir-558 may be problematic in the context of preeclampsia if it has a similar role in placental tissue.
There is congruency between factors implicated in preeclampsia and those involved in other hypertensive disorders. In pulmonary hypertension, mir-124 is known to inhibit HIF-2α, initiating alterations in cell proliferation and the complications of this disease [61]. Members of the HIF transcription factor family, including HIF-1α and HIF-2α, have oxygen-sensing capabilities and thereby facilitate downstream regulation of angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF) [62,63]. Two placental single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding region of HIF1A have been associated with preeclampsia as well as elevated HIF-1α activity [64]. HIF-1α also governs trophoblast differentiation during placentation. In a mouse model, transduction of a constitutively active version of HIF-1α into placental trophoblast cells established a preeclamptic-like phenotype, including irregular maternal spiral artery remodeling, altered labyrinth development, and elevated blood pressure [62]. While HIF-1α overactivation as a cause of preeclampsia may seem contradictory to the notion that HIFs are essential for angiogenesis, there is likely an optimal amount of activation, which may be dysregulated in preeclamptic pregnancies. Furthermore, previous studies indicate that different HIF1 isoforms have independent functions, despite overlapping gene targets [63].
Among the many molecular cascades implicated in preeclampsia, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK) signaling pathways are essential to trophoblast function and have downstream targets implicated in similar cellular processes, including migration and invasion [56,59,65]. Components of the extracellular matrix are essential for proper placental cell migration [66], and though some cases of preeclampsia were initially thought to be caused by reduced placental cell expansion [67], this deficiency has been linked to vascular dysfunction [56]. Laminin subunit alpha-5 (LAMA5) is a type of laminin, or an extracellular matrix glycoprotein, with decreased expression in vascular endothelial cells of preeclamptic placentas [56]. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), LAMA5 knockdown combined with exposure to hypoxia/reoxygenation limited proliferation, migration, and angiogenic capacity while increasing cell death [56]. Independently, hypoxia/reperfusion and siLAMA5 caused reduced protein expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAKT), and phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin (pMTOR) (which are both downstream of PI3K), along with increased apoptosis and reduced proliferation [56]. However, the migratory function of trophoblasts relies not only on adhesion molecules such as laminins but also on proteolytic enzymes that degrade the surrounding matrix, called matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [68]. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2 (TFPI-2), an anticoagulant protein present in the plasma and on the endothelial cell surface, is upregulated in preeclamptic plasma and placental tissue [49,59]. Hypoxia also elevates TFPI-2 and MMP levels [54,59]. TFPI2 knockdown in human trophoblast cells increased cell invasion and MMP2/9 protein levels via MAPK/ERK signaling [59], which highlights the importance of this pathway and its downstream effects in early processes that may contribute to preeclampsia.

2.1.2. Immunological and Vascular Aspects

The immune system has a profound effect on the maintenance of a healthy pregnancy, as an excessive inflammatory burden can result in the development of preeclampsia [69,70]. Normally, decidual natural killer cells are present in high abundance at the beginning of gestation to stimulate cytokines, MMPs, and angiogenic factors necessary for placental maturation [71,72]. Decidual macrophages have a similar role but also maintain fetal tolerance via immunosuppressive cytokines and phagocytosis of dead trophoblast cells [72]. Additionally, trophoblasts have a direct impact on the vascular arrangement and apoptosis by synthesizing tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), fas-ligand, and other growth factors [73]. In preeclamptic cases, incomplete spiral artery remodeling, placental hypoxia, oxidative damage, and shear stress from uteroplacental blood flow impose a substantial immunological burden. The resulting proinflammatory environment can induce placental apoptosis or necrosis and the release of circulating inflammatory markers [72,74].
Preeclampsia is known to be a state of oxidative stress in which mitochondria are a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [75,76]. Mitochondria-derived free radicals can induce apoptotic caspases and the circulation of cell-free mitochondrial DNA (cf-mtDNA) [76]. Cytosine phosphate guanine (CpG) dinucleotides present in cf-mtDNA are recognized by endosomal toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) [77], which elicits downstream pro-inflammatory events, including interferon (IFN), MAPK/activator protein-1 (AP-1), and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) signaling [78]. Preeclampsia is marked by the release of cf-mtDNA and TLR9 activation [79], but other TLRs are attributed to this disease as well. For instance, administration of lipopolysaccharide, a bacterial endotoxin recognized by TLR4, in pregnant rats precipitated impaired endovascular spiral artery structure, along with the clinical symptoms of preeclampsia [80] (Table 1).
These inflammatory, blood pressure, and fetal growth effects were alleviated by treatment with a nitric oxide (NO) analog [80], highlighting the theory that vascular dysfunction is likely an etiological factor in preeclampsia. Both TLR4 and TLR9 have suppressive effects on trophoblast migration, suggesting that these receptors are attributed to placental aberrations [82,83]. Placental TLR3 is also upregulated in preeclampsia [87]. Confirming a more causative relationship, treatment with a viral mimetic in pregnant rats resulted in increased placental TLR3 expression, elevated systolic blood pressure, reduced aortic vasodilation, and higher urine protein excretion, and these effects were restricted to pregnant animals [81]. Uterine natural killer cells secrete the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin 10 (IL-10), which is highly involved in pregnancy [84,85,88,89,90]. Specific roles of IL-10 include preventing the maternal immune system from rejecting the fetal allograft, decreasing placental endoplasmic reticulum stress, and offsetting antiangiogenic factors [84,85,88,89]. In preeclampsia, there is decreased immunostaining of IL-10 and increased TNFα [91]. In mice, TLR3 activation and Il10 knockout alone caused preeclamptic phenotypes, and together, these manipulations provoked a more severe state [92]. Exogenous recombinant IL-10 administration restored the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatory responses of these mice and may have useful therapeutic potential, considering the limited treatments available [92].
Maternal T cells have many subtypes and a diverse range of immunological functions in pregnancy [72,93]. The cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ class promotes fetal acceptance and consists of regulatory and helper subsets, whereas CD8+ T cells control trophoblast invasion [72]. An adequate ratio of T cell subtypes prevents immune overactivity and detrimental fetal or autoimmune attack [72,94,95]. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) control the defensive actions of T helper cells (Th) [94] and are thought to have imbalanced activity in preeclampsia [96]. More specifically, preeclamptic patients have a suppressed number of Treg cells with upregulated circulating and decidual activity of the proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 subsets [96]. Treg cell depletion in mice causes increased uterine artery vasoconstriction and endothelin-1 production [86], suggesting that altered vasoreactivity in preeclampsia may relate to the reduction in Treg cells.
A successful pregnancy begins with proper placentation, which involves the regulation of many cell types, including trophoblast, immune, and vascular subsets [42,43,46,72]. Placental stress via abnormal placental development or other gestational insults promotes a proinflammatory milieu, accompanied by TLR activation, decreased IL-10, increased TNFα, changes in T cell ratios, and disrupted vasodilatory function [79,80,82,83,91,92,96]. It is probable that immunological and vascular anomalies are present before the onset of maternal preeclamptic symptoms and are further exacerbated throughout its progression.

3. Circulating and Placenta-Derived Vascular Substances Associated with Preeclampsia (VEGF, PlGF, sFLT-1, ENG, and sENG)

Preeclampsia is characterized by an imbalance of pro- and antiangiogenic factors, which directly impacts endothelial function [97,98,99,100]. VEGFA stimulates angiogenesis, vascular permeability, and cell migration by binding to its tyrosine kinase receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 [101,102]. VEGFA binding to VEGFR2 elicits stronger signaling than VEGFR1 [103] via activation of the phospholipase C gamma (PLCy)/protein kinase C (PKC)/MAPK pathway involved in endothelial cell proliferation [101]. During placental villous development, VEGFA is present in trophoblasts and perivascular cells to support de novo vascular development (i.e., vasculogenesis), as well as vessel expansion via endothelial sprouting (i.e., angiogenesis) [104]. In pregnancy, VEGF induces a more robust activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), with NO production primarily occurring through VEGFR2-induced PI3K/AKT signaling [105,106]. PlGF, its proangiogenic counterpart, binds to VEGFR1 to increase the likelihood of VEGF binding to VEGFR-2 [107]. PlGF’s interaction with VEGFR1 also promotes other critical events, such as transphosphorylation of VEGFR2, augmenting its downstream signaling cascade [107]. Similar to VEGF, the actions of PlGF facilitate the growth and migration of endothelial and trophoblast cells [107,108,109]. In healthy pregnancies, PlGF increases until 32 weeks and then subsequently declines [110,111]. However, in preeclampsia, there is a marked reduction in venous levels as early as 13–16 weeks, occurring before the onset of other clinical symptoms [108,112]. Not only does this have adverse cardiovascular consequences during pregnancy, but these vascular pathologies and unfavorable cardiac remodeling can persist for years beyond pregnancy [113]. This suggests that though overt symptoms are often resolved after delivery, preeclamptic mothers are at risk for cardiovascular disease years or decades later.
While the VEGFR is membrane bound, a truncated, soluble version known as soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFLT-1) sequesters ligands that bind to the VEGFR, specifically VEGF and PlGF [114]. sFLT-1 is similar to VEGFR1 but lacks the membrane-spanning domain [115]. sFLT-1 plays a role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and can be detected in the serum and placenta before other clinical manifestations, including proteinuria and hypertension [99,116]. The sFLT-1/PlGF ratio from 24 weeks to 36 weeks 6 days has been deemed a useful tool for predicting the absence of preeclampsia within 1 week of measurement, with a negative predictive value of 99.3% at a cutoff of 38 [117]. However, the positive predictive value for the diagnosis of preeclampsia within the next 4 weeks at this threshold was only 36.7% [117]. Thus, while this test is informative, earlier detection methods and tools with greater positive predictive value would be more powerful for improving the care of women prior to preeclampsia.
Adding to the complexity of this disorder, it has been discovered that a unique isoform of sFLT-1 predominates after the first trimester in both healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies [115,118]. At term, preeclamptic placentas express much higher sFLT1 mRNA, specifically in syncytial knots, which are a source of circulating sFLT [118]. Furthermore, hypoxic conditions stimulate mRNA expression of the novel sFLT1 variant and sFLT-1 peptide release in cultured primary cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast cells [115,119], but these effects are cell-specific, such that low oxygen tension does not increase the release of sFLT-1 protein in the culture medium of HUVECS or villous fibroblasts [119]. In cytotrophoblasts, no changes in free VEGF protein were detected under conditions of reduced oxygen tension despite an increase in total VEGF protein production, suggesting sequestration by sFLT-1 [119]. This imbalance leads to elevated oxidative stress, evident by increased lipid peroxidase relative to superoxide dismutase [120], a key antioxidant for scavenging oxygen free radicals [121].
Endoglin (ENG) is yet another hypoxia-induced protein implicated in preeclampsia [54,122,123]. This protein is located on endothelial cells, syncytiotrophoblasts, and columnar cytotrophoblasts prior to uterine invasion and exists in either a proangiogenic membrane-bound form or an antiangiogenic soluble form [54,122,124]. ENG serves as a receptor for the cytokines transforming growth factor-beta 1 and 3 (TGF-β1 and TGF-β3), which perform functions related to cell proliferation and apoptosis [122,125,126]. There are contradictory findings regarding the role of TGF-β in preeclampsia, which may be a product of gestational-age-related variations. Ayatollahi et al. reported no differences in serum TGF-β1 between healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies at 36–40 weeks and suggested that the anti-inflammatory properties of TGF-β may be instrumental for fetal-allograft survival [127]. Alam et al. found elevated TGF-β1 levels in preeclamptic patients from 30 to 33 weeks with a slight drop after 33 weeks [125], which may explain the lack of difference in the aforementioned study. One proposed explanation for the increase in TGF-β1 involves the shedding of necrotic placental trophoblast cells into the circulation, which are thought to undergo apoptosis in healthy pregnancies. When necrotic trophoblasts are phagocytosed by endothelial cells, the endothelial cells secrete TGF-β1, leading to IL-6 release. This causes placental soluble endoglin (sENG) secretion, sENG occupancy of ENG receptors, and impaired NO synthesis. Because TGF-β cannot bind to its receptor, its circulatory presence is increased, explaining the rise in TGF-β in preeclamptic women [125].
Both membrane and sENG are elevated in preeclampsia and have been considered as a diagnostic tool for detecting the syndrome [123,128]. Excess sENG has detrimental effects on endothelial tube development. In animal models, injection of both sENG and sFLT-1 results in a severe preeclamptic phenotype, accompanied by liver defects, fetal weight restriction, and neurological impairments [129]. More favorably, transmembrane ENG has been associated with NO-mediated vasodilation via eNOS expression [130,131] as well as trophoblast differentiation prior to invasion [126,130] (Figure 3). However, fluctuations in membrane ENG concentration and localization throughout pregnancy may be necessary for the maintenance of placental function because ENG knockdown has been shown to support extravillous trophoblast invasion [132].
Several hypotheses exist regarding the mechanism of elevated sENG in preeclampsia, many of which are thought to independently contribute to the disorder [54,130]. Proposed notions include insufficient endogenous oxidative protective factors, NFκB activation, the MAPK stress response, MMP-regulated cleavage from endothelial plasma membranes, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies (AT1-AA) [54,130]. Experimental AT1A receptor activation elicits many preeclamptic-like phenotypes, including cell proliferation, vasoconstriction, renal fluid reabsorption, and vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) hypertrophy [134]. Mechanistically, rat models suggest that reduced uterine perfusion pressure stimulates increases in TNFα, which is coupled to AT1AA production [135,136]. Further, AT1AA infusion induced elevations in sENG as well as endothelin-1, and sFLT-1 [137,138].
While there are no reliable preventive or treatment therapeutics for preeclampsia [139,140,141], numerous studies support the notion that proangiogenic factors may be a viable future target against the high sFLT-1 levels found in preeclampsia [99,142,143,144]. Administration of VEGF and PlGF reestablished endothelial tube formation in HUVECs after it was impeded by preeclamptic serum [99]. In vitro, VEGF and PlGF produce dose-dependent arteriole vasodilation, and this response is blocked by sFLT1 [99]. Along with compromised vasomotor function, sFLT-1 increases placental and vascular superoxide production, and vasodilatory impairment can be reversed by free-radical scavenging [145]. In vivo, animal models indicate that PlGF infusion eliminates hypertension caused by both sFLT-1 and reduced uteroplacental perfusion [142,143]. Removal of sFLT-1 from women prolonged pregnancy [144]. Therefore, reversing the ratio of circulating vascular substances in preeclampsia has the potential to restore the dysregulated homeostatic state of preeclamptic women or prevent the progression of this syndrome in those at high risk.

4. Endothelial Damage in Preeclampsia

The endothelium, or inner layer of blood vessels, serves a wide array of functions that encompass but are not constrained to hemostasis, fibrinolysis, regulation of vascular tone, mediation of inflammatory cascades, and permeability [146,147,148,149]. Endothelial dysfunction, specifically in the form of barrier disruption and impaired vasodilatory capacity, is prevalent in preeclampsia and implicated in many stages of the disease [150,151,152,153,154]. Hemodynamic shifts accompanying compromised endothelial junction integrity, specifically those related to vasopressin, may precede early malfunctions in placental development [155], or in late-onset preeclampsia, endothelial damage may render a mother unable to buffer trophoblast-derived stress signals that accumulate throughout pregnancy [29,32]. The vascular defects of late-stage preeclampsia appear to be targeted to the endothelium in certain vascular beds, which is evident by the incubation of uterine myometrial resistance vessels with preeclamptic plasma [152]. Preeclamptic plasma restricted endothelium-dependent relaxation, but the effect only occurred with an intact endothelium, demonstrating that the vascular smooth muscle was unimpaired [152]. Similarly, placental vessels obtained from preeclamptic pregnancies show attenuated endothelial function with unaltered smooth muscle-mediated dilation [153]. These endothelial-specific findings have also been confirmed in vivo, as endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation was impaired in women with a history of preeclampsia compared to those without [154]. Together, the imbalance between constriction and relaxation and hemodynamic modifications that alter body fluid homeostasis are prominent features of preeclampsia [156].

4.1. Volemic Changes Associated with Endothelial Barrier Integrity

Under normal physiologic conditions, pregnancy is accompanied by systemic arterial vasodilation that is countered by an increase in cardiac output, sympathetic activation, stimulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and non-osmotic vasopressin release [157,158]. As a result, maternal plasma volume expansion begins in the first trimester, resulting in a subsequent decrease in plasma osmolality, and this expansion continues until around 32 weeks [159]. The maintenance of maternal blood volume is essential for fetal development [158], and overall blood and plasma volumes are reduced in those with preeclampsia despite elevations in blood pressure [160,161]. In these hypovolemic women, body fluid is distributed more to the interstitial space rather than the intravascular space, which is indicative of capillary leak [162,163,164] and paralleled in the deoxycorticosterone acid salt rat model of preeclampsia [165]. Proposed mechanisms of disrupted endothelial barrier integrity include the release of placenta-derived HtrA serine peptidase 4 (HTRA4), which is increased in serum from patients with early-onset preeclampsia and responsible for cleaving VE-cadherin, an endothelial junctional protein [150,166]. In vitro incubation of HUVECs with similar levels of HTRA4 altered cell morphology and the integrity of cell junctions [150]. Likewise, the expression of chymotrypsin-like protease is increased in the vascular endothelium of women diagnosed with preeclampsia and promotes VE-cadherin disruption and endothelial permeability via its activation of protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) [167,168].
The presence of hypovolemia within the vessels due to endothelial leak shifts the plasma osmolality vs. vasopressin relationship such that plasma vasopressin levels are higher at a given osmolality [169,170]. Santillan et al. demonstrated that plasma copeptin, the pro-segment of vasopressin, is elevated as early as the 6th week of pregnancy in women prior to the onset of preeclampsia, independent of confounding variables such as maternal age and body mass index [171]. With a cutoff value of 811 pg/mL in the first trimester, this test has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 81%. Even within the third trimester, a threshold of 758 pg/mL maintains a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 71%, respectively [171]. Further, a causative relationship between vasopressin and preeclampsia was established in a mouse model, where infusion of vasopressin had no effect prior to pregnancy but then led to hypertension, renal glomerular endotheliosis, spiral artery malformation, decreased PlGF, and elevated placental oxidative markers during gestation [155]. In conclusion, increased vasopressin during preeclampsia may be a result of hypovolemia or another mechanism, such as a hypothalamic disturbance; regardless, the secretion of this hormone elicits many maternal and placental phenotypes typical of this syndrome and may be used as an early biomarker [155,171].

4.2. Altered Vasomotor Tone

To offset pregnancy-induced increases in blood volume, compensatory alterations include decreased sensitivity to vasoconstrictive hormones, along with increased production and responsiveness to vasodilators such as NO and prostaglandins [156,172].
However, studies have demonstrated that NO availability is diminished in preeclamptic women [173,174]. NO is a prominent endothelium-derived vasodilator catalyzed by the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline via the enzyme eNOS [148,175]. Its release is mediated by acetylcholine, bradykinin, mechanical shear stress, and a variety of other stimuli [148]. When NO is synthesized, it diffuses from the endothelium to the surrounding vascular smooth muscle cells. This facilitates vasodilation through a cascade of events involving the formation of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, activation of protein kinase G, increased potassium channel conductance, hyperpolarization of the smooth muscle sarcolemma, and decreased cytosolic calcium content [148,175,176]. eNOS is a calcium calmodulin-dependent enzyme; hence, its activation is heavily reliant on calcium [177]. Additionally, other eNOS modifications, including phosphorylation, render it more sensitive to calcium signaling [177], but phosphorylation alone is not adequate for eNOS activation in pregnant uterine artery endothelial cells [178].
Research indicates that augmented eNOS activation during pregnancy is mediated by adaptive signaling mechanisms to permit calcium influx, which are deficient in preeclampsia [179]. This calcium entry occurs through transient receptor potential channels and is maintained only with proper connexin 43 (Cx43) gap junction communication [179,180]. Interestingly, the most common variant of VEGFA, referred to as VEGF165, has been shown to initially facilitate NO generation in endothelial cells via elevated calcium responses [176]. However, longer exposure to VEGF165 impairs calcium-provoked vasodilation, presumably by promoting Cx43 phosphorylation, which attenuates calcium signaling in these cells [176,180]. VEGF has also been shown to facilitate the phosphorylation of eNOS on serine 1177 in glomerular endothelial cells, which is necessary for eNOS activation [181]. In summary, VEGF, which is sequestered by high levels of sFLT-1 in preeclampsia, promotes both calcium-dependent and -independent (i.e., phosphorylation) stimulation of eNOS, whereas vasodilators such as acetylcholine signal through the Gαq pathway to increase endothelial calcium and activate eNOS [182].
NO is also positively regulated by the endogenous vasodilator hydrogen sulfide [183,184,185,186,187], and both of these gaseous molecules work in concert [185]. Though not specific to preeclampsia, hydrogen sulfide enhances NO function by impeding cGMP degradation [185], activating eNOS via a PI3K/Akt-induced phosphorylation event [185], facilitating mir-455-3p and subsequent eNOS expression [186], and arbitrating the reduction of nitrite to NO through xanthine oxidase [187]. Conversely, NO is also necessary for the maximal vasodilatory and angiogenic effects of hydrogen sulfide [185]. Instances of both lowered and elevated plasma hydrogen sulfide levels have been reported in preeclampsia [188,189,190]. This molecule can be separately synthesized by cystathionine β synthase (CBS), cystathionine γ lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST) [191]. Within the placenta, CBS and CSE proteins were localized to fetal endothelial cells [192], and decreases in placental mRNA expression of CBS [192] and CSE [189] have been documented in preeclampsia. Administration of a CSE inhibitor beginning at gestational day 8.5 in mice led to hypertension, altered placental labyrinth vascular patterning, and fetal growth restriction, which was restored by hydrogen sulfide, establishing the direct significance of hydrogen sulfide in preeclampsia [189]. However, it should be noted that just as there is crosstalk among angiogenic, NO, and migration pathways [105,106,107,108,109], a similar relationship is paralleled by hydrogen sulfide [193]. Cell culture models indicate that CSE deficiency has a negative impact on trophoblast invasion and propagates antiangiogenic factor release [189], which, at least in part, may be responsible for the physiological effects exhibited by CSE inhibition in pregnant mice [189].
Oxidative stress in preeclampsia may be linked to the nitric oxide pathway [194,195]. For instance, arginase is upregulated in preeclamptic plasma and competes for L-arginine, the substrate used by NOS [194]. Similarly, circulating maternal asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), a competitive inhibitor of arginine binding to NOS, is elevated mid-gestation and at the time of delivery in women with a diagnosis of preeclampsia [195,196]. Both arginase and ADMA result in the formation of superoxide [194,195], and exposing HUVECs to preeclamptic plasma also elevates oxidative markers, including superoxide [197]. Human data confirm that scavenging free radicals using ascorbic acid restores endothelium-dependent vasodilation [154].
In addition to vasodilatory substances such as nitric oxide, the vasoconstrictive peptides angiotensin II and endothelin-1 also play a role in the symptomology of preeclampsia [198,199]. While angiotensin II exerts contractive effects on vascular smooth muscle cells, it can also act on endothelial cells, prompting prostacyclin synthesis and endothelin mRNA activation [200]. During pregnancy, women with preeclampsia have increased angiotensin II sensitivity and decreased circulating levels [201]. The increased sensitivity to angiotensin II persists postpartum, along with microvascular dysfunction, and angiotensin II receptor blockers facilitate vasodilation in this cohort [202].
Endothelin-1 is secreted from endothelial cells and is a strong regulator of vasomotor tone through its interactions with endothelin-A (ETA) and endothelin-B (ETB) receptors [203]. ETA receptors are localized to smooth muscle cells and evoke contraction, whereas ETB receptors are present on both the endothelial and smooth muscle vascular layers and elicit differential responses in each: contraction in smooth muscle and vasodilation in the endothelium [204]. In the context of preeclampsia, endothelin-1 is a powerful regulator of uterine artery resistance, which has a direct impact on uteroplacental perfusion [205,206]. Pharmacological antagonism of the ETA receptor blunted the rise in mean arterial pressure in a rat model of uterine ischemia, with no effect in nonpregnant animals [207]. After testing the effects of different classes of antihypertensive medications, dihydropyridines (a type of calcium channel blocker) were the most effective in blocking and reversing endothelin-1-mediated constriction in human uterine arteries obtained after hysterectomy [205]. More specifically, ex vivo pretreatment with these calcium channel antagonists in endothelium-denuded vessels reduced tension and maximal contraction to endothelin-1, even at high doses [205]. While a combination of selective ETA and ETB receptor antagonists did decrease contractile responses to endothelin-1 at lower concentrations, these compounds had no effect under conditions of high endothehlin-1, suggesting that dihydropyridines may be the most useful for enhancing blood supply to the placenta [205]. However, the function of endothelin-1 extends far beyond vasoconstriction and can also induce inflammation, angiogenesis, VSMC proliferation, and vasodilation, depending on the receptor subtype being activated [208].
Angiotensin II, endothelin-1, and other vasoconstrictive hormones, including vasopressin, predominantly signal through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [209,210], and excess input from these substances has been attributed to the symptomology of preeclampsia [155,171,198,199]. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins dampen the strength and duration of GPCR activation by hydrolyzing the guanosine-5′-triphosphate bound to an active Gα subunit [211,212,213,214]. Of the large family of RGS proteins, RGS2 is of particular importance in buffering this GPCR signaling associated with preeclampsia [213,215] and is present in vascular cells, including endothelial cells [216], as well as many other cell types of the placenta, including trophoblasts, immune cells, and fibroblasts [213,217]. Recently, Perschbacher et al. found that RGS2 was decreased in the placenta during human preeclampsia, and heterozygous knockout in only the fetoplacental unit of mice was sufficient to cause key hallmarks of the disorder, such as diastolic hypertension and proteinuria [213]. Further, transcriptomic analyses revealed that there was overlap in molecular pathways enriched in human preeclamptic placenta and mice with disrupted Rgs2, including those related to mitochondrial dysfunction, the unfolded protein response, and oxidative stress [213]. Regarding the maternal vasculature and complementing this work, Koch et al. found that elimination of Rgs2 in mice attenuated uterine artery blood flow and increased the resistive index during mid-gestation [215]. Hence, these studies indicate that preeclampsia may also be a result of disinhibition of GPCR signaling to various hormones, which contribute to placental and vascular dysfunction [213,215].
Overall, the pathogenic vascular state of preeclampsia can be attributed to the decreased synthesis of relaxing substances and elevated vasoconstrictive signaling [218,219]. This signaling may be a consequence of increased abundance or sensitivity to vasoconstrictive hormones as well as disinhibition of these pathways [213,215,218,219]. Vascular resistance has profound effects, both systemically and on specific vascular beds, and has been demonstrated experimentally in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro [152,154,197,205,207]. Systemically, previously preeclamptic women display impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation, which can be ameliorated by angiotensin II receptor blockers [154,202]. Additionally, diminished uteroplacental perfusion secondary to elevations in mean arterial pressure is prevented by ETA antagonism in rats [207]. Both uterine and placental arteries displayed attenuated endothelium-dependent vasodilatory function in the context of preeclampsia [152,153], which may be partially caused by oxidative stress [154,197]. In combination, uteroplacental resistance negatively impacts fetoplacental exchange, while systemic resistance can contribute to glomerular endotheliosis, liver failure, and central nervous system damage. Together, this creates an array of multiorgan dysfunctions [99,220,221].

5. Preeclampsia-Associated Platelet Alterations

Trophoblast stress is a common feature of preeclampsia and results in a compensatory surge of inflammatory mediators [29,75,222,223,224]. Of these, prostacyclin is a product of arachidonic acid metabolism [224,225]. Its role as a vasodilatory factor opposes the action of thromboxane, which elicits vascular smooth muscle constriction and platelet aggregation [226] (Figure 4).
These two vasoactive substances are produced by the endothelium, platelets, and reproductive tissues, and the balance between them is disrupted in preeclampsia, with the level of placental and plasma thromboxane exceeding that of prostacyclin [226,227,228]. The pharmacological effects of aspirin diminish platelet thromboxane production, altering the prostaglandin thromboxane ratio [227]. A meta-analysis revealed that starting low-dose aspirin early in pregnancy as a preventative measure for preeclampsia has moderately favorable results [231]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force now recommend low-dose aspirin for women with a high risk of preeclampsia [232].
Platelet activation, aggregation, and blood coagulation (clotting) are interrelated processes [233]. Briefly, platelets have adhesive properties and, upon binding to an injured endothelium, release substances such as thromboxane to promote aggregation. Platelet aggregation encourages the formation of a platelet plug and thrombin-mediated generation of a cross-linked fibrin clot [233]. A recent systemic review and meta-analysis suggests that preeclamptic patients have higher mean platelet volume (indicating platelet activation) and a higher likelihood of adhesion and aggregation [234]. In this paper, Jakobsen et al. reported inconsistent findings regarding aggregation, with more studies suggesting no difference or decreased aggregation, but these particular studies did not assess adhesion [234]. One study that did assess platelet adhesion reported decreased immunohistochemical expression of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 and increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the human placenta of preeclamptic individuals, which has been proposed to play a role in trophoblast invasion and vascular dysfunction [234,235]. Converging the idea that syncytiotrophoblast stress is a final common factor that leads to the maternal elements of preeclampsia [29] with the importance of platelet function in this syndrome, syncytiotrophoblast-derived extracellular vesicles (SDEVs) have been shown to activate platelets ex vivo [230]. SDEVs obtained from preeclamptic placentas evoke greater platelet activation than those from normal pregnancies, but platelet aggregation is prevented by aspirin treatment [230].
During pregnancy, there is a natural decline in platelet count throughout gestation [236], part of which may be attributed to sequestration of blood cells in the intervillous space [237], increases in plasma volume [238], and heightened aggregation from thromboxane A2 [239]. Thrombocytopenia beyond normal pregnancy-induced platelet decreases is commonly seen in preeclampsia and may specifically be accompanied by reduced platelet numbers [239,240,241] and activated coagulation [240,242]. Together, these hemostatic effects contribute to bleeding and microthrombi risk in preeclamptic mothers [239,243].

6. Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial DNA Damage, and TLR9 Activation

The generation of reactive oxygen species via placental hypoxia, immune activation, and other cellular insults has numerous consequences, including mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage [244,245,246,247]. The DNA repair capabilities of the mitochondria are less extensive than those for nuclear DNA, which renders cells with mtDNA mutations more susceptible to death by apoptosis or necrosis [248,249]. This causes the release of DNA into the maternal circulation, which is considered a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), recognized by pattern recognition receptors such as TLR9 [250]. TLR9 is a pro-inflammatory innate immune component activated by hypomethylated CpG dinucleotides, which are prevalent in mtDNA and bacteria [251,252]. Although surface receptors are also present, the recognition of DNA by TLR9 primarily occurs in endolysosomes because the acidic environment allows TLR9 to more easily bind to negative DNA [251]. Thus, DNA enters the cell through endocytosis [253] and, upon TLR9 binding, causes a downstream proinflammatory cascade of events, including signaling for IFNs, NFκB, and AP-1 [83].
Supporting these notions, there is an increased abundance of serum mtDNA in preeclamptic plasma [254], and TLR9 activity is elevated upon the presentation of preeclamptic symptoms [247] (Figure 5). Recent findings by He et al. link the TLR9 inflammatory response to other aspects of preeclampsia, including angiogenesis and trophoblast function [83]. In this study, human placental VEGFA was decreased, but TLR9 and sFLT-1 were increased in preeclamptic samples [83]. Applying these findings to a mouse model, a TLR9 agonist induced the traditional hallmarks of preeclampsia and also reproduced the downregulated VEGFA and elevated sFLT-1 observed in human tissue [83]. siRNA knockdown of TLR9 in human trophoblast cells facilitated migration and invasion, which highlights the importance of TLR9 in early phases of placentation as well [83]. The dendritic cells of preeclamptic women appear to be hyperresponsive to immune-evoking substances, suggesting a potential source for this excess TLR9 engagement. In preeclampsia, dendritic cell TLR9 expression levels were higher, and upon stimulation, these receptors evoked more proinflammatory cytokines compared to healthy pregnant controls [255]. These data reveal an interconnected relationship among inflammation, oxidative stress, TLR9 activation, the release of antiangiogenic factors, and trophoblast dysfunction [83,244,245,248,249,250] and reiterate the complex interplay between many molecular mediators in women with preeclampsia. Understanding each of these components and how they interact is essential to mitigating the disorder but has proven difficult considering its heterogeneity and the lack of a single, well-understood initiating mechanism [29,31].

7. Conclusions

Despite the profound detrimental impact that preeclampsia has upon maternal and fetal health, its pathogenesis has yet to be definitively determined and likely varies [30,256], which has limited the development of treatment options [256]. Thus, management of preeclampsia has been primarily symptomatic, focusing on maintaining acceptable blood pressure ranges, neuroprotection, and seizure prophylaxis, with prompt delivery at term or 34 weeks for cases with severe features [1]. However, it has been established that instances of vascular impairments are evident in all stages of preeclampsia, beginning with placentation and extending well beyond delivery [7,202], and are likely a product of some combination of insufficient trophoblast invasion, poor placental oxygen extraction, a proinflammatory immune environment, antiangiogenic factors, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress [34,100,135,257,258,259].
Due to a lack of robust research assessing vascular indices prior to pregnancy and preceding the onset of preeclampsia, it is unclear whether women who develop this syndrome have an underlying vascular pathology [260,261] or if the detrimental vascular effects are solely a byproduct of exacerbated trophoblast stress signals to the mother [262]. It is likely that both aspects play a role, and the dysregulated physiological state of preeclampsia begins well before the clinical diagnosis. Therefore, advancing early detection methods and screening tools is of critical importance. Though not yet utilized in the clinic, routinely measuring vasopressin during pregnancy is a promising avenue for predicting the future development of preeclampsia and providing more proactive care in these patients [171]. In terms of molecular targets, less explored areas include the modulation of RGS proteins to mitigate the negative effects of excessive GPCR induction via hormones such as angiotensin II, endothelin-1, and vasopressin [213,263] or the alleviation of cellular stress that leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, cell death, circulating DNA, and subsequent TLR9 activation [79,83,244,247,252,264,265,266]. Though much remains undiscovered, translational research [152,153,154], basic animal models [155,213,215], and mechanistic cell work [56,57,150,213] have made a profound impact in the field thus far, and emerging technologies such as trophoblast organoid cultures [267] provide great potential for new insight. Thus, collaborating across the spectrum, from bench to bedside, will allow the most rapid acceleration in our understanding of preeclampsia and may foster the development of novel targeted therapeutics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.O. and M.W.R.; writing—review and editing, J.J.M., J.L.G., D.D.G. and M.W.R.; visualization, M.A.O. and J.J.M.; supervision, J.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001436).Jennifer McIntosh receives funding through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL150340-01). Justin Grobe receives funding through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL134850, HL084207) and the American Heart Association (18EIA33890055). David Gutterman receives funding through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL135901). Megan Opichka has a predoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association (AHA826132).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 were created using Biorender.com. Graphical abstract was adapted from “Gut-Brain Axis Regulators” by Biorender.com (2021). Retrieved from https://app.biorender.com/biorender-templates (accessed on 2 October 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obs. Gynecol 2013, 122, 1122–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rana, S.; Lemoine, E.; Granger, J.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia: Pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1094–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fox, R.; Kitt, J.; Leeson, P.; Aye, C.Y.L.; Lewandowski, A.J. Preeclampsia: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Management, and the Cardiovascular Impact on the Offspring. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pankiewicz, K.; Szczerba, E.; Maciejewski, T.; Fijałkowska, A. Non-obstetric complications in preeclampsia. Prz. Menopauzalny 2019, 18, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Duley, L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin. Perinatol. 2009, 33, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeyabalan, A. Epidemiology of preeclampsia: Impact of obesity. Nutr. Rev. 2013, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bellamy, L.; Casas, J.-P.; Hingorani, A.D.; Williams, D.J. Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Clin. Res. Ed. 2007, 335, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Aykas, F.; Solak, Y.; Erden, A.; Bulut, K.; Dogan, S.; Sarli, B.; Acmaz, G.; Afsar, B.; Siriopol, D.; Covic, A.; et al. Persistence of cardiovascular risk factors in women with previous preeclampsia: A long-term follow-up study. J. Investig. Med. 2015, 63, 641–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ying, W.; Catov, J.M.; Ouyang, P. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Future Maternal Cardiovascular Risk. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e009382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Perez Botero, J.; Reese, J.A.; George, J.N.; McIntosh, J.J. Severe thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in pregnancy: A guide for the consulting hematologist. Am. J. Hematol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fingar, K.R.; Mabry-Hernandez, I.; Ngo-Metzger, Q.; Wolff, T.; Steiner, C.A.; Elixhauser, A. Delivery Hospitalizations Involving Preeclampsia and Eclampsia, 2005–2014: Statistical Brief #222. In Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell, M.J. A historical overview of preeclampsia-eclampsia. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. JOGNN 2010, 39, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Högberg, U. The World Health Report 2005: “make every mother and child count”—including Africans. Scand. J. Public Health 2005, 33, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ananth, C.V.; Keyes, K.M.; Wapner, R.J. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980–2010: Age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ 2013, 347, f6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shih, T.; Peneva, D.; Xu, X.; Sutton, A.; Triche, E.; Ehrenkranz, R.A.; Paidas, M.; Stevens, W. The Rising Burden of Preeclampsia in the United States Impacts Both Maternal and Child Health. Am. J. Perinatol. 2016, 33, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wallis, A.B.; Saftlas, A.F.; Hsia, J.; Atrash, H.K. Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987–2004. Am. J. Hypertens 2008, 21, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Stevens, W.; Shih, T.; Incerti, D.; Ton, T.G.N.; Lee, H.C.; Peneva, D.; Macones, G.A.; Sibai, B.M.; Jena, A.B. Short-term costs of preeclampsia to the United States health care system. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Duckitt, K.; Harrington, D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: Systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2005, 330, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ghosh, G.; Grewal, J.; Männistö, T.; Mendola, P.; Chen, Z.; Xie, Y.; Laughon, S.K. Racial/ethnic differences in pregnancy-related hypertensive disease in nulliparous women. Ethn. Dis. 2014, 24, 283–289. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang, M.; Wan, P.; Ng, K.; Singh, K.; Cheng, T.H.; Velickovic, I.; Dalloul, M.; Wlody, D. Preeclampsia Among African American Pregnant Women: An Update on Prevalence, Complications, Etiology, and Biomarkers. Obs. Gynecol. Surv. 2020, 75, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shahul, S.; Tung, A.; Minhaj, M.; Nizamuddin, J.; Wenger, J.; Mahmood, E.; Mueller, A.; Shaefi, S.; Scavone, B.; Kociol, R.D.; et al. Racial Disparities in Comorbidities, Complications, and Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Women With Preeclampsia/eclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2015, 34, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bezerra, P.C.; Leão, M.D.; Queiroz, J.W.; Melo, E.M.; Pereira, F.V.; Nóbrega, M.H.; Jeronimo, A.K.; Ferreira, L.C.; Jerônimo, S.M.; de Araújo, A.C. Family history of hypertension as an important risk factor for the development of severe preeclampsia. Acta Obs. Gynecol. Scand. 2010, 89, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qiu, C.; Williams, M.A.; Leisenring, W.M.; Sorensen, T.K.; Frederick, I.O.; Dempsey, J.C.; Luthy, D.A. Family history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes in relation to preeclampsia risk. Hypertension 2003, 41, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cho, G.J.; Jung, U.S.; Sim, J.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Bae, N.Y.; Choi, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Oh, M.-J. Is preeclampsia itself a risk factor for the development of metabolic syndrome after delivery? Obs. Gynecol. Sci. 2019, 62, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ryckman, K.K.; Borowski, K.S.; Parikh, N.I.; Saftlas, A.F. Pregnancy Complications and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome for the Offspring. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2013, 7, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Muijsers, H.E.C.; Roeleveld, N.; van der Heijden, O.W.H.; Maas, A.H.E.M. Consider Preeclampsia as a First Cardiovascular Event. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2019, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lu, H.Q.; Hu, R. Lasting Effects of Intrauterine Exposure to Preeclampsia on Offspring and the Underlying Mechanism. AJP Rep. 2019, 9, e275–e291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Anderson, C.M. Preeclampsia: Exposing future cardiovascular risk in mothers and their children. J. Obs. Gynecol. Neonatal. Nurs. 2007, 36, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Redman, C.W.G.; Staff, A.C.; Roberts, J.M. Syncytiotrophoblast stress in preeclampsia: The convergence point for multiple pathways. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, J.M.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; McElrath, T.F.; Garmire, L.; Myatt, L. Subtypes of Preeclampsia: Recognition and Determining Clinical Usefulness. Hypertension 2021, 77, 1430–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leavey, K.; Benton, S.J.; Grynspan, D.; Kingdom, J.C.; Bainbridge, S.A.; Cox, B.J. Unsupervised Placental Gene Expression Profiling Identifies Clinically Relevant Subclasses of Human Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2016, 68, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Phipps, E.; Prasanna, D.; Brima, W.; Jim, B. Preeclampsia: Updates in Pathogenesis, Definitions, and Guidelines. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 11, 1102–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Staff, A.C. The two-stage placental model of preeclampsia: An update. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 134–135, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Roberts, J.M.; Escudero, C. The placenta in preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012, 2, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fisher, S.J. Why is placentation abnormal in preeclampsia? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S115–S122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Garrido-Gomez, T.; Quiñonero, A.; Dominguez, F.; Rubert, L.; Perales, A.; Hajjar, K.A.; Simon, C. Preeclampsia: A defect in decidualization is associated with deficiency of Annexin A2. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 376–376.e371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Garrido-Gomez, T.; Dominguez, F.; Quiñonero, A.; Diaz-Gimeno, P.; Kapidzic, M.; Gormley, M.; Ona, K.; Padilla-Iserte, P.; McMaster, M.; Genbacev, O.; et al. Defective decidualization during and after severe preeclampsia reveals a possible maternal contribution to the etiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E8468–E8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ng, S.-W.; Norwitz, G.A.; Pavlicev, M.; Tilburgs, T.; Simón, C.; Norwitz, E.R. Endometrial Decidualization: The Primary Driver of Pregnancy Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garrido-Gómez, T.; Castillo-Marco, N.; Cordero, T.; Simón, C. Decidualization resistance in the origin of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sánchez-Aranguren, L.C.; Prada, C.E.; Riaño-Medina, C.E.; Lopez, M. Endothelial dysfunction and preeclampsia: Role of oxidative stress. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Okada, H.; Tsuzuki, T.; Murata, H. Decidualization of the human endometrium. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2018, 17, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Baergen, R.N. Manual of Pathology of the Human Placenta; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, Y.; Zhao, S. Cell Types of the Placenta. In Vascular Biology of the Placenta; Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Knight, M.; Redman, C.W.G.; Linton, E.A.; Sargent, I.L. Shedding of syncytiotrophoblast microvilli into the maternal circulation in pre-eclamptic pregnancies. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1998, 105, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cockell, A.P.; Learmont, J.G.; Smárason, A.K.; Redman, C.W.G.; Sargent, I.L.; Poston, L. Human placental syncytiotrophoblast microvillous membranes impair maternal vascular endothelial function. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997, 104, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ji, L.; Brkić, J.; Liu, M.; Fu, G.; Peng, C.; Wang, Y.L. Placental trophoblast cell differentiation: Physiological regulation and pathological relevance to preeclampsia. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 981–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pollheimer, J.; Vondra, S.; Baltayeva, J.; Beristain, A.G.; Knöfler, M. Regulation of Placental Extravillous Trophoblasts by the Maternal Uterine Environment. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lyall, F.; Bulmer, J.N.; Duffie, E.; Cousins, F.; Theriault, A.; Robson, S.C. Human trophoblast invasion and spiral artery transformation: The role of PECAM-1 in normal pregnancy, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 158, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Briones, M.A. Chapter 131—General Overview of the Hypercoaguable State In Transfusion Medicine and Hemostasis; Hillyer, C.D., Shaz, B.H., Zimring, J.C., Abshire, T.C., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 677–679. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cheng, D.; Jiang, S.; Chen, J.; Li, J.; Ao, L.; Zhang, Y. Upregulated long noncoding RNA Linc00261 in pre-eclampsia and its effect on trophoblast invasion and migration via regulating miR-558/TIMP4 signaling pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 13243–13253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Zheng, F.; Xiao, X.; Xie, F.; Tao, D.; Huang, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Zeng, F.; et al. CircHIPK3 sponges miR-558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2017, 18, 1646–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, Y.; Xia, L.; Dong, L.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Q.; Yu, X.; Zhu, H. CircHIPK3 Promotes Gemcitabine (GEM) Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Sponging miR-330-5p and Targets RASSF1. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 921–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lykoudi, A.; Kolialexi, A.; Lambrou, G.I.; Braoudaki, M.; Siristatidis, C.; Papaioanou, G.K.; Tzetis, M.; Mavrou, A.; Papantoniou, N. Dysregulated placental microRNAs in Early and Late onset Preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 61, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Oujo, B.; Perez-Barriocanal, F.; Bernabeu, C.; Lopez-Novoa, J. Membrane and Soluble Forms of Endoglin in Preeclampsia. Curr. Mol. Med. 2013, 13, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Qu, H.; Zheng, L.; Song, H.; Jiao, W.; Li, D.; Fang, E.; Wang, X.; Mei, H.; Pu, J.; Huang, K.; et al. microRNA-558 facilitates the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha through binding to 5’-untranslated region in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 40657–40673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Zhang, X.M.; Li, Q.; Jiang, W.; Xiong, X.; Li, H.Y.; Zhao, J.L.; Qi, H.B. LAMA5 promotes human umbilical vein endothelial cells migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis and is decreased in preeclampsia. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020, 33, 1114–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Cao, L.; Jia, J.; Ye, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, R. CircHIPK3 is decreased in preeclampsia and affects migration, invasion, proliferation, and tube formation of human trophoblast cells. Placenta 2019, 85, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, Y.; Yan, M.; Chen, C.; Gong, W.; Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Fan, J.; Zhang, X.A.; Wang, D.W.; Zuo, H. MiR-124 aggravates failing hearts by suppressing CD151-facilitated angiogenesis in heart. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 14382–14396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zheng, L.; Huang, J.; Su, Y.; Wang, F.; Kong, H.; Xin, H. Overexpression of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 attenuates trophoblast proliferation and invasion in preeclampsia. Hum. Cell 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, C.; Seebacher, N.A.; Hornicek, F.J.; Kan, Q.; Duan, Z. Regulation of microRNAs function by circular RNAs in human cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 64622–64637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Babicheva, A.; McDermott, K.M.; Williams, S.C.; Yee, A.M.; Dash, S.; Rodriquez, M.; Ingabire, N.; Makino, A.; Yuan, J.X.-J. Pathogenic and Therapeutic Role of MicroRNA in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. In Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension: From Bench to Bedside; Fukumoto, Y., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 31–54. [Google Scholar]
  62. Albers, R.E.; Kaufman, M.R.; Natale, B.V.; Keoni, C.; Kulkarni-Datar, K.; Min, S.; Williams, C.R.; Natale, D.R.C.; Brown, T.L. Trophoblast-specific expression of hif-1α results in preeclampsia-like symptoms and fetal growth restriction. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Rathmell, W.K.; Chen, S. VHL inactivation in renal cell carcinoma: Implications for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2008, 8, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Harati-Sadegh, M.; Kohan, L.; Teimoori, B.; Mehrabani, M.; Salimi, S. The association of the placental Hypoxia-inducible factor1-α polymorphisms and HIF1-α mRNA expression with preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 67, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gupta, S.K.; Malhotra, S.S.; Malik, A.; Verma, S.; Chaudhary, P. Cell Signaling Pathways Involved During Invasion and Syncytialization of Trophoblast Cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. O’Connor, B.B.; Pope, B.D.; Peters, M.M.; Ris-Stalpers, C.; Parker, K.K. The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine. Exp. Biol. Med. 2020, 245, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kaufmann, P.; Black, S.; Huppertz, B. Endovascular trophoblast invasion: Implications for the pathogenesis of intrauterine growth retardation and preeclampsia. Biol. Reprod. 2003, 69, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Matthiesen, L.; Berg, G.; Ernerudh, J.; Ekerfelt, C.; Jonsson, Y.; Sharma, S. Immunology of preeclampsia. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 2005, 89, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Harmon, A.C.; Cornelius, D.C.; Amaral, L.M.; Faulkner, J.L.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Wallace, K.; LaMarca, B. The role of inflammation in the pathology of preeclampsia. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Aneman, I.; Pienaar, D.; Suvakov, S.; Simic, T.P.; Garovic, V.D.; McClements, L. Mechanisms of Key Innate Immune Cells in Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, X.; Wei, H. Role of Decidual Natural Killer Cells in Human Pregnancy and Related Pregnancy Complications. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 728291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Geldenhuys, J.; Rossouw, T.M.; Lombaard, H.A.; Ehlers, M.M.; Kock, M.M. Disruption in the regulation of immune responses in the placental subtype of preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Whitley, G.S.; Cartwright, J.E. Trophoblast-mediated spiral artery remodelling: A role for apoptosis. J. Anat. 2009, 215, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Furuya, M.; Ishida, J.; Aoki, I.; Fukamizu, A. Pathophysiology of placentation abnormalities in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 1301–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Aouache, R.; Biquard, L.; Vaiman, D.; Miralles, F. Oxidative Stress in Preeclampsia and Placental Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Chen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Min, W. Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress and Innate Immunity. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Goulopoulou, S.; Davidge, S.T. Molecular mechanisms of maternal vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia. Trends Mol. Med. 2015, 21, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Prearo Moço, N.; Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos, B.; de Castro Silva, M.; Polettini, J.; Menon, R.; Guimarães da Silva, M. Spontaneous Prematurity, Innate Immune System, and Oxidative Stress at the Maternal-Fetal Interface: An Overview. In Translational Studies on Inflammation; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ozeki, A.; Tani, K.; Takahashi, H.; Suzuki, H.; Nagayama, S.; Hirashima, C.; Iwata, H.; Kuwayama, T.; Ohkuchi, A.; Shirasuna, K. Preeclamptic patient-derived circulating cell-free DNA activates the production of inflammatory cytokines via toll-like receptor 9 signalling in the human placenta. J. Hypertens. 2019, 37, 2452–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cotechini, T.; Komisarenko, M.; Sperou, A.; Macdonald-Goodfellow, S.; Adams, M.A.; Graham, C.H. Inflammation in rat pregnancy inhibits spiral artery remodeling leading to fetal growth restriction and features of preeclampsia. J. Exp. Med. 2014, 211, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tinsley, J.H.; Chiasson, V.L.; Mahajan, A.; Young, K.J.; Mitchell, B.M. Toll-like receptor 3 activation during pregnancy elicits preeclampsia-like symptoms in rats. Am. J. Hypertens 2009, 22, 1314–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Xue, P.; Fan, W.; Diao, Z.; Li, Y.; Kong, C.; Dai, X.; Peng, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; et al. Up-regulation of PTEN via LPS/AP-1/NF-κB pathway inhibits trophoblast invasion contributing to preeclampsia. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 118, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. He, B.; Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, D.; Xu, X.; Yang, W.; Dai, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Cheng, W. TLR9 (toll-like receptor 9) agonist suppresses angiogenesis by differentially regulating VEGFA (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A) and sFLT1 (Soluble Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1) in Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2018, 71, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kalkunte, S.; Boij, R.; Norris, W.; Friedman, J.; Lai, Z.; Kurtis, J.; Lim, K.-H.; Padbury, J.F.; Matthiesen, L.; Sharma, S. Sera from preeclampsia patients elicit symptoms of human disease in mice and provide a basis for an in vitro predictive assay. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 2387–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cheng, S.-B.; Sharma, S. Interleukin-10: A pleiotropic regulator in pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 73, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Care, A.S.; Bourque, S.L.; Morton, J.S.; Hjartarson, E.P.; Robertson, S.A.; Davidge, S.T. Reduction in regulatory t cells in early pregnancy causes uterine artery dysfunction in mice. Hypertension 2018, 72, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gierman, L.M.; Silva, G.B.; Pervaiz, Z.; Rakner, J.J.; Mundal, S.B.; Thaning, A.J.; Nervik, I.; Elschot, M.; Mathew, S.; Thomsen, L.C.V.; et al. TLR3 expression by maternal and fetal cells at the maternal-fetal interface in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2021, 109, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kalkunte, S.; Nevers, T.; Norris, W.E.; Sharma, S. Vascular IL-10: A protective role in preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 88, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Thaxton, J.E.; Sharma, S. Interleukin-10: A multi-faceted agent of pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Blois, S.M.; Freitag, N.; Tirado-González, I.; Cheng, S.B.; Heimesaat, M.M.; Bereswill, S.; Rose, M.; Conrad, M.L.; Barrientos, G.; Sharma, S. NK cell-derived IL-10 is critical for DC-NK cell dialogue at the maternal-fetal interface. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Hennessy, P.A.; Pilmore, H.L.; Simmons, L.A.; Painter, D.M. A Deficiency of Placental IL-10 in preeclampsia. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 3491–3495. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chatterjee, P.; Chiasson, V.L.; Kopriva, S.E.; Young, K.J.; Chatterjee, V.; Jones, K.A.; Mitchell, B.M. Interleukin 10 deficiency exacerbates toll-like receptor 3-induced preeclampsia-like symptoms in mice. Hypertension 2011, 58, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Abu-Raya, B.; Michalski, C.; Sadarangani, M.; Lavoie, P.M. Maternal Immunological Adaptation During Normal Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 575197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Corthay, A. How do regulatory t cells work? Scand. J. Immunol. 2009, 70, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhao, H.; Liao, X.; Kang, Y. Tregs: Where we are and what comes next? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Robertson, S.A.; Green, E.S.; Care, A.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Prins, J.R.; Louise Hull, M.; Barry, S.C.; Dekker, G. Therapeutic potential of regulatory T cells in preeclampsia-opportunities and challenges. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, A.; Rana, S.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia: The role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology 2009, 24, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lee, E.S.; Oh, M.-J.; Jung, J.W.; Lim, J.-E.; Seol, H.-J.; Lee, K.-J.; Kim, H.-J. The levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and soluble Flt-1 in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2007, 22, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Maynard, S.E.; Min, J.Y.; Merchan, J.; Lim, K.H.; Li, J.; Mondal, S.; Libermann, T.A.; Morgan, J.P.; Sellke, F.W.; Stillman, I.E.; et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Maynard, S.E.; Karumanchi, S.A. Angiogenic factors and preeclampsia. Semin. Nephrol. 2011, 31, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Shibuya, M. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Its Receptor (VEGFR) Signaling in Angiogenesis: A Crucial Target for Anti- and Pro-Angiogenic Therapies. Genes Cancer 2011, 2, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Smani, T.; Gómez, L.J.; Regodon, S.; Woodard, G.E.; Siegfried, G.; Khatib, A.M.; Rosado, J.A. Trp channels in angiogenesis and other endothelial functions. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Peach, C.J.; Mignone, V.W.; Arruda, M.A.; Alcobia, D.C.; Hill, S.J.; Kilpatrick, L.E.; Woolard, J. Molecular Pharmacology of VEGF-A Isoforms: Binding and Signalling at VEGFR2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Geva, E.; Ginzinger, D.G.; Zaloudek, C.J.; Moore, D.H.; Byrne, A.; Jaffe, R.B. Human placental vascular development: Vasculogenic and angiogenic (branching and nonbranching) transformation is regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor-a, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 4213–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Grummer, M.A.; Sullivan, J.A.; Magness, R.R.; Bird, I.M. Vascular endothelial growth factor acts through novel, pregnancy-enhanced receptor signalling pathways to stimulate endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in uterine artery endothelial cells. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Pandey, A.K.; Singhi, E.K.; Arroyo, J.P.; Ikizler, T.A.; Gould, E.R.; Brown, J.; Beckman, J.A.; Harrison, D.G.; Moslehi, J. Mechanisms of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) Inhibitor–Associated Hypertension and Vascular Disease. Hypertension 2018, 71, E1–E8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chau, K.; Hennessy, A.; Makris, A. Placental growth factor and pre-eclampsia. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Williams, D.; Kenyon, A.; Adamson, D. Physiology. In Basic Science in Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 173–230. [Google Scholar]
  109. Dewerchin, M.; Carmeliet, P. PlGF: A multitasking cytokine with disease-restricted activity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a011056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lobmaier, S.M.; Figueras, F.; Mercade, I.; Crovetto, F.; Peguero, A.; Parra-Saavedra, M.; Ortiz, J.U.; Crispi, F.; Gratacós, E. Levels of maternal serum angiogenic factors in third-trimester normal pregnancies: Reference ranges, influence of maternal and pregnancy factors and fetoplacental Doppler indices. Fetal. Diagn. 2014, 36, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ng, Q.J.; Han, J.Y.; Saffari, S.E.; Yeo, G.S.-H.; Chern, B.S.M.; Tan, K.H. Longitudinal circulating placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) concentrations during pregnancy in Asian women: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e028321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Levine, R.J.; Maynard, S.E.; Qian, C.; Lim, K.H.; England, L.J.; Yu, K.F.; Schisterman, E.F.; Thadhani, R.; Sachs, B.P.; Epstein, F.H.; et al. Circulating Angiogenic Factors and the Risk of Preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Benschop, L.; Schalekamp-Timmermans, S.; Broere-Brown, Z.A.; Roeters van Lennep, J.E.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W.; Ikram, M.K.; Steegers, E.A.P.; Roberts, J.M.; Gandley, R.E. Placental Growth Factor as an Indicator of Maternal Cardiovascular Risk After Pregnancy. Circulation 2019, 139, 1698–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Roberts, J.M.; Rajakumar, A. Preeclampsia and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 2252–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Thomas, C.P.; Andrews, J.I.; Raikwar, N.S.; Kelley, E.A.; Herse, F.; Dechend, R.; Golos, T.G.; Liu, K.Z. A recently evolved novel trophoblast-enriched secreted form of fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 variant is up-regulated in hypoxia and preeclampsia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Adamson, S.L. sFLT1 in preeclampsia: Trophoblast defense against a decidual VEGFA barrage? J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 4690–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Zeisler, H.; Llurba, E.; Chantraine, F.; Vatish, M.; Staff, A.C.; Sennström, M.; Olovsson, M.; Brennecke, S.P.; Stepan, H.; Allegranza, D.; et al. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sela, S.; Itin, A.; Natanson-Yaron, S.; Greenfield, C.; Goldman-Wohl, D.; Yagel, S.; Keshet, E. A novel human-specific soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1: Cell type-specific splicing and implications to vascular endothelial growth factor homeostasis and preeclampsia. Circ. Res. 2008, 102, 1566–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Nagamatsu, T.; Fujii, T.; Kusumi, M.; Zou, L.; Yamashita, T.; Osuga, Y.; Momoeda, M.; Kozuma, S.; Taketani, Y. Cytotrophoblasts up-regulate soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 expression under reduced oxygen: An implication for the placental vascular development and the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 4838–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Li, H.; Gu, B.; Zhang, Y.; Lewis, D.F.; Wang, Y. Hypoxia-induced increase in soluble Flt-1 production correlates with enhanced oxidative stress in trophoblast cells from the human placenta. Placenta 2005, 26, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Fukai, T.; Ushio-Fukai, M. Superoxide dismutases: Role in redox signaling, vascular function, and diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 1583–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Nassiri, F.; Cusimano, M.D.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Rotondo, F.; Fazio, A.; Yousef, G.M.; Syro, L.V.; Kovacs, K.; Lloyd, R.V. Endoglin (CD105): A review of its role in angiogenesis and tumor diagnosis, progression and therapy. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 2283–2290. [Google Scholar]
  123. Venkatesha, S.; Toporsian, M.; Lam, C.; Hanai, J.I.; Mammoto, T.; Kim, Y.M.; Bdolah, Y.; Lim, K.H.; Yuan, H.T.; Libermann, T.A.; et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 642–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. St-Jacques, S.; Forte, M.; Lye, S.J.; Letarte, M. Localization of endoglin, a transforming growth factor-β binding protein, and of CD44 and integrins in placenta during the first trimester of pregnancy. Biol. Reprod. 1994, 51, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Alam, S.; Ahmad, S.; Zafeer, F.; Rizvi, A.A.; Gulati, R.; Rashid, S. Role of TGF-Β1 in The Pathogenesis of Pre-Eclampsia. Ann. Int. Med. Dent. Res. 2017, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Caniggia, I.; Taylor, C.V.; Ritchie, J.W.K.; Lye, S.J.; Letarte, M. Endoglin regulates trophoblast differentiation along the invasive pathway in human placental villous explants. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4977–4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ayatollahi, M.; Geramizadeh, B.; Samsami, A. Transforming growth factor beta-1 influence on fetal allografts during pregnancy. Transplant. Proc. 2005, 37, 4603–4604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Nikuei, P.; Rajaei, M.; Malekzadeh, K.; Nejatizadeh, A.; Mohseni, F.; Atashabparvar, A. Accuracy of soluble endoglin for diagnosis of preeclampsia and its severity. Iran. Biomed. J. 2017, 21, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Powe, C.E.; Levine, R.J.; Karumanchi, S.A. Preeclampsia, a disease of the maternal endothelium: The role of antiangiogenic factors and implications for later cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011, 123, 2856–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bell, M.J.; Roberts, J.M.; Founds, S.A.; Jeyabalan, A.; Terhorst, L.; Conley, Y.P. Variation in endoglin pathway genes is associated with preeclampsia: A case-control candidate gene association study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Jerkic, M.; Rivas-Elena, J.V.; Prieto, M.; Carrón, R.; Sanz-Rodríguez, F.; Pérez-Barriocanal, F.; Rodríguez-Barbero, A.; Bernabéu, C.; López-Novoa, J.M. Endoglin regulates nitric oxide-dependent vasodilatation. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mano, Y.; Kotani, T.; Shibata, K.; Matsumura, H.; Tsuda, H.; Sumigama, S.; Yamamoto, E.; Iwase, A.; Senga, T.; Kikkawa, F. The loss of endoglin promotes the invasion of extravillous trophoblasts. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 4386–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Williams, P.J.; Mistry, H.D.; Innes, B.A.; Bulmer, J.N.; Broughton Pipkin, F. Expression of AT1R, AT2R and AT4R and Their Roles in Extravillous Trophoblast Invasion in the Human. Placenta 2010, 31, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Guo, D.F.; Sun, Y.L.; Hamet, P.; Inagami, T. The angiotensin II type 1 receptor and receptor-associated proteins. Cell Res. 2001, 11, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. LaMarca, B. Endothelial dysfunction. An important mediator in the pathophysiology of hypertension during pre-eclampsia. Minerva Ginecol. 2012, 64, 309–320. [Google Scholar]
  136. LaMarca, B.; Wallukat, G.; Llinas, M.; Herse, F.; Dechend, R.; Granger, J.P. Autoantibodies to the angiotensin type I receptor in response to placental ischemia and tumor necrosis factor alpha in pregnant rats. Hypertension 2008, 52, 1168–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. LaMarca, B.; Parrish, M.; Ray, L.F.; Murphy, S.R.; Roberts, L.; Glover, P.; Wallukat, G.; Wenzel, K.; Cockrell, K.; Martin, J.N., Jr.; et al. Hypertension in response to autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1-AA) in pregnant rats: Role of endothelin-1. Hypertension 2009, 54, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Parrish, M.R.; Murphy, S.R.; Rutland, S.; Wallace, K.; Wenzel, K.; Wallukat, G.; Keiser, S.; Ray, L.F.; Dechend, R.; Martin, J.N.; et al. The effect of immune factors, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and agonistic autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type I receptor on soluble fms-like tyrosine-1 and soluble endoglin production in response to hypertension during pregnancy. Am. J. Hypertens. 2010, 23, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Bezerra Maia E Holanda Moura, S.; Marques Lopes, L.; Murthi, P.; da Silva Costa, F. Prevention of preeclampsia. J. Pregnancy 2012, 2012, 435090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Brown, C.M.; Garovic, V.D. Drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy. Drugs 2014, 74, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Duhig, K.; Vandermolen, B.; Shennan, A. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia. F1000Res 2018, 7, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Spradley, F.T.; Tan, A.Y.; Joo, W.S.; Daniels, G.; Kussie, P.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Granger, J.P. Placental growth factor administration abolishes placental ischemia-induced hypertension. Hypertension 2016, 67, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Zhu, M.; Ren, Z.; Possomato-Vieira, J.S.; Khalil, R.A. Restoring placental growth factor-soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 balance reverses vascular hyper-reactivity and hypertension in pregnancy. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2016, 311, R505–R521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Thadhani, R.; Hagmann, H.; Schaarschmidt, W.; Roth, B.; Cingoez, T.; Karumanchi, S.A.; Wenger, J.; Lucchesi, K.J.; Tamez, H.; Lindner, T.; et al. Removal of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 by dextran sulfate apheresis in preeclampsia. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 27, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bridges, J.P.; Gilbert, J.S.; Colson, D.; Gilbert, S.A.; Dukes, M.P.; Ryan, M.J.; Granger, J.P. Oxidative stress contributes to soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 induced vascular dysfunction in pregnant rats. Am. J. Hypertens. 2009, 22, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Félétou, M. The Endothelium: Part 1: Multiple Functions of the Endothelial Cells- Focus on Endothelium-Derived Vasoactive Mediators. In Colloquium Series on Integrated Systems Physiology; Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences: San Rafael, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  147. Galley, H.F.; Webster, N.R. Physiology of the endothelium. Br. J. Anaesth. 2004, 93, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Marti, C.N.; Gheorghiade, M.; Kalogeropoulos, A.P.; Georgiopoulou, V.V.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Butler, J. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 1455–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Sukriti, S.; Tauseef, M.; Yazbeck, P.; Mehta, D. Mechanisms regulating endothelial permeability. Pulm. Circ. 2014, 4, 535–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Tseng, E.; Yee Teoh, S.S.; Wang, Y.; Nie, G. Elevated protease HtrA4 in the maternal circulation of preeclampsia may contribute to endothelial barrier disruption by cleaving key junctional protein VE-cadherin. Placenta 2019, 76, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, Y.; Lewis, D.F.; Alexander, J.S.; Granger, D.N. Endothelial barrier function in preeclampsia. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 2412–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Hayman, R.; Warren, A.; Brockelsby, J.; Johnson, I.; Baker, P. Plasma from women with pre-eclampsia induces an in vitro alteration in the endothelium-dependent behaviour of myometrial resistance arteries. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000, 107, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. McIntosh, J.J.; Derayunan, A.; Hader, S.; Lohr, N.; Beyer, A.; Gutterman, D. Impaired Microvascular Endothelial Function in Preeclampsia. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chambers, J.C.; Fusi, L.; Malik, I.S.; Haskard, D.O.; De Swiet, M.; Kooner, J.S. Association of maternal endothelial dysfunction with preeclampsia. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2001, 285, 1607–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Sandgren, J.A.; Deng, G.; Linggonegoro, D.W.; Scroggins, S.M.; Perschbacher, K.J.; Nair, A.R.; Nishimura, T.E.; Zhang, S.Y.; Agbor, L.N.; Wu, J.; et al. Arginine vasopressin infusion is sufficient to model clinical features of preeclampsia in mice. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e99403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Vanwijk, M.J.; Kublickiene, K.; Boer, K.; VanBavel, E. Vascular function in preeclampsia. Cardiovasc. Res. 2000, 47, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Schrier, R.W. Pathogenesis of sodium and water retention in high-output and low-output cardiac failure, nephrotic syndrome, cirrhosis, and pregnancy (1). N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 319, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Tkachenko, O.; Shchekochikhin, D.; Schrier, R.W. Hormones and hemodynamics in pregnancy. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 12, e14098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Vricella, L.K. Emerging understanding and measurement of plasma volume expansion in pregnancy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1620S–1625S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Silver, H.M.; Seebeck, M.; Carlson, R. Comparison of total blood volume in normal, preeclamptic, and nonproteinuric gestational hypertensive pregnancy by simultaneous measurement of red blood cell and plasma volumes. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1998, 179, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Salas, S.P.; Marshall, G.; Gutiérrez, B.L.; Rosso, P. Time Course of Maternal Plasma Volume and Hormonal Changes in Women With Preeclampsia or Fetal Growth Restriction. Hypertension 2006, 47, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Soffronoff, E.C.; Kaufmann, B.M.; Connaughton, J.F. Intravascular volume determinations and fetal outcome in hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1977, 127, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Arias, F. Expansion of intravascular volume and fetal outcome in patients with chronic hypertension and pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1975, 123, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Anthony, J.; Schoeman, L.K. Fluid management in pre-eclampsia. Obs. Med. 2013, 6, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Uddin, M.N.; McLean, L.B.; Hunter, F.A.; Horvat, D.; Severson, J.; Tharakan, B.; Childs, E.W.; Puschett, J.B. Vascular leak in a rat model of preeclampsia. Am. J. Nephrol. 2009, 30, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Singh, H.; Zhao, M.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Kaitu’u-Lino, T.J.; Tong, S.; Nie, G. Human HtrA4 Expression Is Restricted to the Placenta, Is Significantly Up-Regulated in Early-Onset Preeclampsia, and High Levels of HtrA4 Cause Endothelial Dysfunction. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E936–E945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Wang, Y.; Gu, Y.; Lewis, D.F.; Alexander, J.S.; Granger, D.N. Elevated plasma chymotrypsin-like protease (chymase) activity in women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2010, 29, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Gu, Y.; Groome, L.J.; Alexander, J.S.; Wang, Y. PAR-2 triggers placenta-derived protease-induced altered VE-cadherin reorganization at endothelial junctions in preeclampsia. Placenta 2012, 33, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Robertson, G.L.; Shelton, R.L.; Athar, S. The osmoregulation of vasopressin. Kidney Int. 1976, 10, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  170. Dunn, F.L.; Brennan, T.J.; Nelson, A.E.; Robertson, G.L. The role of blood osmolality and volume in regulating vasopressin secretion in the rat. J. Clin. Investig. 1973, 52, 3212–3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Santillan, M.K.; Santillan, D.A.; Scroggins, S.M.; Min, J.Y.; Sandgren, J.A.; Pearson, N.A.; Leslie, K.K.; Hunter, S.K.; Zamba, G.K.D.; Gibson-Corley, K.N.; et al. Vasopressin in preeclampsia: A novel very early human pregnancy biomarker and clinically relevant mouse model. Hypertension 2014, 64, 852–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Lopes van Balen, V.A.; van Gansewinkel, T.A.G.; de Haas, S.; van Kuijk, S.M.J.; van Drongelen, J.; Ghossein-Doha, C.; Spaanderman, M.E.A. Physiological adaptation of endothelial function to pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 697–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Choi, J.W.; Im, M.W.; Pai, S.H. Nitric oxide production increases during normal pregnancy and decreases in preeclampsia. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2002, 32, 257–263. [Google Scholar]
  174. Seligman, S.P.; Buyon, J.P.; Clancy, R.M.; Young, B.K.; Abramson, S.B. The role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994, 171, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lind, L. Endothelium-dependent Vasodilation in Hypertension: A Review. Blood Press. 2000, 9, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Boeldt, D.S.; Krupp, J.; Yi, F.-X.; Khurshid, N.; Shah, D.M.; Bird, I.M. Positive versus negative effects of VEGF165 on Ca2+ signaling and NO production in human endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. -Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016, 312, H173–H181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Fleming, I.; Busse, R. Signal transduction of eNOS activation. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 43, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Cale, J.M.; Bird, I.M. Dissociation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation and activity in uterine artery endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Boeldt, D.S.; Yi, F.X.; Bird, I.M. eNOS activation and NO function: Pregnancy adaptive programming of capacitative entry responses alters nitric oxide (NO) output in vascular endothelium-new insights into eNOS regulation through adaptive cell signaling. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 210, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  180. Boeldt, D.S.; Grummer, M.A.; Yi, F.X.; Magness, R.R.; Bird, I.M. Phosphorylation of Ser-279/282 and Tyr-265 positions on Cx43 as possible mediators of VEGF-165 inhibition of pregnancy-adapted Ca2+ burst function in ovine uterine artery endothelial cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 412, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Feliers, D.; Chen, X.; Akis, N.; Choudhury, G.G.; Madaio, M.; Kasinath, B.S. VEGF regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in glomerular endothelial cells. Kidney Int. 2005, 68, 1648–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Craici, I.M.; Wagner, S.J.; Weissgerber, T.L.; Grande, J.P.; Garovic, V.D. Advances in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and related podocyte injury. Kidney Int. 2014, 86, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Kolluru, G.K.; Shen, X.; Kevil, C.G. A tale of two gases: NO and H2S, foes or friends for life? Redox Biol. 2013, 1, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Naik, J.S.; Osmond, J.M.; Walker, B.R.; Kanagy, N.L. Hydrogen sulfide-induced vasodilation mediated by endothelial TRPV4 channels. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016, 311, H1437–H1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Coletta, C.; Papapetropoulos, A.; Erdelyi, K.; Olah, G.; Módis, K.; Panopoulos, P.; Asimakopoulou, A.; Gerö, D.; Sharina, I.; Martin, E.; et al. Hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide are mutually dependent in the regulation of angiogenesis and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9161–9166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Li, X.-H.; Xue, W.-L.; Wang, M.-J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.-C.; Sun, C.; Zhu, L.; Liang, K.; Chen, Y.; Tao, B.-B.; et al. H2S regulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein stability by promoting microRNA-455-3p expression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Bir, S.C.; Kolluru, G.K.; McCarthy, P.; Shen, X.; Pardue, S.; Pattillo, C.B.; Kevil, C.G. Hydrogen sulfide stimulates ischemic vascular remodeling through nitric oxide synthase and nitrite reduction activity regulating hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and vascular endothelial growth factor-dependent angiogenesis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2012, 1, e004093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Ahmed, A. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications of the carbon monoxide/hmox1 and the hydrogen sulfide/CSE pathways in the prevention of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014, 4, 243–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Wang, K.; Ahmad, S.; Cai, M.; Rennie, J.; Fujisawa, T.; Crispi, F.; Baily, J.; Miller, M.R.; Cudmore, M.; Hadoke, P.W.; et al. Dysregulation of hydrogen sulfide producing enzyme cystathionine γ-lyase contributes to maternal hypertension and placental abnormalities in preeclampsia. Circulation 2013, 127, 2514–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Possomato-Vieira, J.S.; Palei, A.C.; Pinto-Souza, C.C.; Cavalli, R.; Dias-Junior, C.A.; Sandrim, V. Circulating levels of hydrogen sulphide negatively correlate to nitrite levels in gestational hypertensive and preeclamptic pregnant women. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 2021, 48, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Rajendran, S.; Shen, X.; Glawe, J.; Kolluru, G.K.; Kevil, C.G. Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide Regulation of Ischemic Vascular Growth and Remodeling. Compr. Physiol. 2019, 9, 1213–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Holwerda, K.M.; Bos, E.M.; Rajakumar, A.; Ris-Stalpers, C.; van Pampus, M.G.; Timmer, A.; Erwich, J.J.; Faas, M.M.; van Goor, H.; Lely, A.T. Hydrogen sulfide producing enzymes in pregnancy and preeclampsia. Placenta 2012, 33, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Wang, R.; Szabo, C.; Ichinose, F.; Ahmed, A.; Whiteman, M.; Papapetropoulos, A. The role of H2S bioavailability in endothelial dysfunction. Trends Pharm. Sci 2015, 36, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Sankaralingam, S.; Xu, H.; Davidge, S.T. Arginase contributes to endothelial cell oxidative stress in response to plasma from women with preeclampsia. Cardiovasc. Res. 2010, 85, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Speer, P.D.; Powers, R.W.; Frank, M.P.; Harger, G.; Markovic, N.; Roberts, J.M. Elevated asymmetric dimethylarginine concentrations precede clinical preeclampsia, but not pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 198, 112.e111–112.e127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Braekke, K.; Ueland, P.M.; Harsem, N.K.; Staff, A.C. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine in the Maternal and Fetal Circulation in Preeclampsia. Pediatric Res. 2009, 66, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Davidge, S.T.; Baker, P.N.; Roberts, J.M. NOS expression is increased in endothelial cells exposed to plasma from women with preeclampsia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 1995, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Aggarwal, P.K.; Chandel, N.; Jain, V.; Jha, V. The relationship between circulating endothelin-1, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and soluble endoglin in preeclampsia. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2012, 26, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Gant, N.F.; Daley, G.L.; Chand, S.; Whalley, P.J.; MacDonald, P.C. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J. Clin. Investig. 1973, 52, 2682–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  200. Lüscher, T.F. Angiotensin, ACE-inhibitors and endothelial control of vasomotor tone. Basic Res. Cardiol. 1993, 88 (Suppl 1), 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Leaños-Miranda, A.; Inova, C.-G.; Méndez-Aguilar, F.; Molina-Pérez, C.J.; Ramírez-Valenzuela, K.L.; Sillas-Pardo, L.J.; Uraga-Camacho, N.C.; Isordia-Salas, I.; Berumen-Lechuga, M.G. Lower circulating angiotensin II levels are related to the severity of preeclampsia and its risk as disclosed by a specific bioassay. Medicine 2018, 97, e12498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Stanhewicz, A.E.; Jandu, S.; Santhanam, L.; Alexander, L.M. Increased angiotensin II sensitivity contributes to microvascular dysfunction in women who have had preeclampsia. Hypertension 2017, 70, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Jain, A. Endothelin-1: A key pathological factor in pre-eclampsia? Reprod. Biomed. Online 2012, 25, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Taddei, S.; Virdis, A.; Ghiadoni, L.; Sudano, I.; Magagna, A.; Salvetti, A. Role of Endothelin in the Control of Peripheral Vascular Tone in Human Hypertension. Heart Fail. Rev. 2001, 6, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Dechanet, C.; Fort, A.; Barbero-Camps, E.; Dechaud, H.; Richard, S.; Virsolvy, A. Endothelin-Dependent Vasoconstriction in Human Uterine Artery: Application to Preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Saleh, L.; Verdonk, K.; Visser, W.; van den Meiracker, A.H.; Danser, A.H.J. The emerging role of endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016, 10, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Alexander, B.T.; Rinewalt, A.N.; Cockrell, K.L.; Massey, M.B.; Bennett, W.A.; Granger, J.P. Endothelin type a receptor blockade attenuates the hypertension in response to chronic reductions in uterine perfusion pressure. Hypertension 2001, 37, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Thorin, E.; Webb, D.J. Endothelium-derived endothelin-1. Pflug. Arch. 2010, 459, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wynne, B.M.; Chiao, C.-W.; Webb, R.C. Vascular smooth muscle cell signaling mechanisms for contraction to angiotensin II and endothelin-1. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens 2009, 3, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Hoffert, J.D.; Pisitkun, T.; Saeed, F.; Song, J.H.; Chou, C.-L.; Knepper, M.A. Dynamics of the G protein-coupled vasopressin V2 receptor signaling network revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2012, 11, M111.014613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Kimple, A.J.; Bosch, D.E.; Giguère, P.M.; Siderovski, D.P. Regulators of G-protein signaling and their Gα substrates: Promises and challenges in their use as drug discovery targets. Pharm. Rev. 2011, 63, 728–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Osei-Owusu, P.; Blumer, K.J. Regulator of G protein signaling 2: A versatile regulator of vascular function. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015, 133, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  213. Perschbacher, K.J.; Deng, G.; Sandgren, J.A.; Walsh, J.W.; Witcher, P.C.; Sapouckey, S.A.; Owens, C.E.; Zhang, S.Y.; Scroggins, S.M.; Pearson, N.A. Reduced mRNA Expression of RGS2 (Regulator of G Protein Signaling-2) in the Placenta Is Associated With Human Preeclampsia and Sufficient to Cause Features of the Disorder in Mice. Hypertension 2020, 75, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Perschbacher, K.J.; Deng, G.; Fisher, R.A.; Gibson-Corley, K.N.; Santillan, M.K.; Grobe, J.L. Regulators of G protein signaling in cardiovascular function during pregnancy. Physiol. Genom. 2018, 50, 590–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Koch, J.N.; Dahlen, S.A.; Owens, E.A.; Osei-Owusu, P.; Osei-Owusu, P.; N, K.J.; A, D.S.; A, O.E.; Patrick, O.O. Regulator of G protein signaling 2 facilitates uterine artery adaptation during pregnancy in mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e010917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Osei-Owusu, P.; Sabharwal, R.; Kaltenbronn, K.M.; Rhee, M.H.; Chapleau, M.W.; Dietrich, H.H.; Blumer, K.J. Regulator of G protein signaling 2 deficiency causes endothelial dysfunction and impaired endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated relaxation by dysregulating G i/o signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 12541–12549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Vento-Tormo, R.; Efremova, M.; Botting, R.A.; Turco, M.Y.; Vento-Tormo, M.; Meyer, K.B.; Park, J.E.; Stephenson, E.; Polański, K.; Goncalves, A.; et al. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal–fetal interface in humans. Nature 2018, 563, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  218. Lu, Y.-P.; Hasan, A.A.; Zeng, S.; Hocher, B. Plasma ET-1 concentrations are elevated in pregnant women with hypertension -meta-analysis of clinical studies. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2017, 42, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Shah, D.M. The role of RAS in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2006, 8, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Eastabrook, G.; Brown, M.; Sargent, I. The origins and end-organ consequence of pre-eclampsia. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Obs. Gynaecol. 2011, 25, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Lambert, G.; Brichant, J.F.; Hartstein, G.; Bonhomme, V.; Dewandre, P.Y. Preeclampsia: An update. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg. 2014, 65, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  222. Can, M.; Guven, B.; Bektas, S.; Arikan, I. Oxidative stress and apoptosis in preeclampsia. Tissue Cell 2014, 46, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Cornelius, D.C. Preeclampsia: From inflammation to immunoregulation. Clin. Med. Insights Blood Disord. 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  224. Toniolo, A.; Buccellati, C.; Pinna, C.; Gaion, R.M.; Sala, A.; Bolego, C. Cyclooxygenase-1 and prostacyclin production by endothelial cells in the presence of mild oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Brock, T.G.; McNish, R.W.; Peters-Golden, M. Arachidonic acid is preferentially metabolized by cyclooxygenase-2 to prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 11660–11666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Walsh, S.W. Preeclampsia: An imbalance in placental prostacyclin and thromboxane Production. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1985, 152, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Atallah, A.; Lecarpentier, E.; Goffinet, F.; Doret-Dion, M.; Gaucherand, P.; Tsatsaris, V. Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia. Drugs 2017, 77, 1819–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  228. Lewis, D.F.; Canzoneri, B.J.; Gu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y. Maternal Levels of Prostacyclin, Thromboxane, ICAM, and VCAM in Normal and Preeclamptic Pregnancies. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 64, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Walsh, S.W. Low-Dose Aspirin: Treatment for the Imbalance of Increased Thromboxane and Decreased Prostacyclin in Preeclampsia. Am. J. Perinatol. 1989, 6, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Tannetta, D.S.; Hunt, K.; Jones, C.I.; Davidson, N.; Coxon, C.H.; Ferguson, D.; Redman, C.W.; Gibbins, J.M.; Sargent, I.L.; Tucker, K.L. Syncytiotrophoblast Extracellular Vesicles from Pre-Eclampsia Placentas Differentially Affect Platelet Function. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0142538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Duley, L.; Meher, S.; Hunter, K.E.; Seidler, A.L.; Askie, L.M. Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, CD004659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 743: Low-Dose Aspirin Use During Pregnancy. Obs. Gynecol 2018, 132, e44–e52. [CrossRef]
  233. Periayah, M.H.; Halim, A.S.; Saad, A.Z.M. Mechanism action of platelets and crucial blood coagulation pathways in Hemostasis. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 11, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  234. Jakobsen, C.; Larsen, J.B.; Fuglsang, J.; Hvas, A.M. Platelet function in preeclampsia–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Platelets 2019, 30, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Goksu Erol, A.Y.; Nazli, M.; Yildiz, S.E. Significance of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expressions in preeclamptic placentae. Endocrine 2012, 42, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Reese, J.A.; Peck, J.D.; Deschamps, D.R.; McIntosh, J.J.; Knudtson, E.J.; Terrell, D.R.; Vesely, S.K.; George, J.N. Platelet counts during pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Reese, J.A.; Peck, J.D.; Yu, Z.; Scordino, T.A.; Deschamps, D.R.; McIntosh, J.J.; Terrell, D.R.; Vesely, S.K.; George, J.N. Platelet sequestration and consumption in the placental intervillous space contribute to lower platelet counts during pregnancy. Am. J. Hematol. 2019, 94, E8–E11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  238. Cines, D.B.; Levine, L.D. Thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Blood 2017, 130, 2271–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Ciobanu, A.M.; Colibaba, S.; Cimpoca, B.; Peltecu, G.; Panaitescu, A.M. Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy. Maedica 2016, 11, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  240. Heilmann, L.; Rath, W.; Pollow, K. Hemostatic abnormalities in patients with severe preeclampsia. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2007, 13, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Han, L.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; Zou, J.; Yang, Z.; Han, J.; Huang, W.; Yu, L.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L. Blood coagulation parameters and platelet indices: Changes in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies and predictive values for preeclampsia. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Youssef, L.; Miranda, J.; Blasco, M.; Paules, C.; Crovetto, F.; Palomo, M.; Torramade-Moix, S.; García-Calderó, H.; Tura-Ceide, O.; Dantas, A.P.; et al. Complement and coagulation cascades activation is the main pathophysiological pathway in early-onset severe preeclampsia revealed by maternal proteomics. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Higgins, J.R.; Bonnar, J.; Norris, L.A.; Darling, M.R.; Walshe, J.J. The effect of pre-eclampsia on coagulation and fibrinolytic activation in the neonate. Thromb. Res. 2000, 99, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Shokolenko, I.; Venediktova, N.; Bochkareva, A.; Wilson, G.L.; Alexeyev, M.F. Oxidative stress induces degradation of mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 2539–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Tenório, M.B.; Ferreira, R.C.; Moura, F.A.; Bueno, N.B.; de Oliveira, A.C.M.; Goulart, M.O.F. Cross-Talk between Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Preeclampsia. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 8238727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Walsh, S.W. Plasma from preeclamptic women stimulates transendothelial migration of neutrophils. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 16, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Williamson, R.D.; McCarthy, F.P.; Kenny, L.C.; McCarthy, C.M. Activation of a TLR9 mediated innate immune response in preeclampsia. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Lemasters, J.J.; Nieminen, A.L.; Qian, T.; Trost, L.C.; Elmore, S.P.; Nishimura, Y.; Crowe, R.A.; Cascio, W.E.; Bradham, C.A.; Brenner, D.A.; et al. The mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death: A common mechanism in necrosis, apoptosis and autophagy. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1998, 1366, 177–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Van Houten, B.; Hunter, S.E.; Meyer, J.N. Mitochondrial DNA damage induced autophagy, cell death, and disease. Front. Biosci. 2016, 21, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Thurairajah, K.; Briggs, G.D.; Balogh, Z.J. The source of cell-free mitochondrial DNA in trauma and potential therapeutic strategies. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2018, 44, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Chockalingam, A.; Brooks, J.C.; Cameron, J.L.; Blum, L.K.; Leifer, C.A. TLR9 traffics through the Golgi complex to localize to endolysosomes and respond to CpG DNA. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2009, 87, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  252. Goulopoulou, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Bomfim, G.F.; Webb, R.C. Toll-like receptor 9 activation: A novel mechanism linking placenta-derived mitochondrial DNA and vascular dysfunction in pre-eclampsia. Clin. Sci. 2012, 123, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  253. Bao, W.; Xia, H.; Liang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Lu, Y.; Xu, X.; Duan, A.; He, J.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Y.; et al. Toll-like Receptor 9 Can be Activated by Endogenous Mitochondrial DNA to Induce Podocyte Apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  254. Marschalek, J.; Wohlrab, P.; Ott, J.; Wojta, J.; Speidl, W.; Klein, K.U.; Kiss, H.; Pateisky, P.; Zeisler, H.; Kuessel, L. Maternal serum mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels are elevated in preeclampsia–a matched case-control study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018, 14, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Panda, B.; Panda, A.; Ueda, I.; Abrahams, V.M.; Norwitz, E.R.; Stanic, A.K.; Young, B.C.; Ecker, J.L.; Altfeld, M.; Shaw, A.C.; et al. Dendritic cells in the circulation of women with preeclampsia demonstrate a pro-inflammatory bias secondary to dysregulation of TLR receptors. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 94, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Redman, C. Pre-eclampsia: A complex and variable disease. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014, 4, 241–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Barrientos, G.; Pussetto, M.; Rose, M.; Staff, A.C.; Blois, S.M.; Toblli, J.E. Defective trophoblast invasion underlies fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia-like symptoms in the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2017, 23, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Ma, Y.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ruan, C.C.; Gao, P.J. Immune imbalance is associated with the development of preeclampsia. Medicine 2019, 98, e15080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Raijmakers, M.T.; Dechend, R.; Poston, L. Oxidative stress and preeclampsia: Rationale for antioxidant clinical trials. Hypertension 2004, 44, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Enkhmaa, D.; Wall, D.; Mehta, P.K.; Stuart, J.J.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.; Merz, C.N.B.; Shufelt, C. Preeclampsia and Vascular Function: A Window to Future Cardiovascular Disease Risk. J. Womens Health 2016, 25, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  261. Romundstad, P.R.; Magnussen, E.B.; Smith, G.D.; Vatten, L.J. Hypertension in pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk: Common antecedents? Circulation 2010, 122, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Redman, C.W. Stress responses and pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens 2013, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Roman, D.L.; Traynor, J.R. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins as drug targets: Modulating G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signal transduction. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 7433–7440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  264. Vangrieken, P.; Al-Nasiry, S.; Bast, A.; Leermakers, P.A.; Tulen, C.B.M.; Schiffers, P.M.H.; van Schooten, F.J.; Remels, A.H.V. Placental Mitochondrial Abnormalities in Preeclampsia. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 28, 2186–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Cushen, S.C.; Osikoya, O.; Blessing, A.; Phillips, N.R.; Goulopoulou, S. Placental Exposure to Hypoxia and Oxidative Stress Causes Mitochondrial DNA Release into the Extracellular Space. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Marín, R.; Chiarello, D.I.; Abad, C.; Rojas, D.; Toledo, F.; Sobrevia, L. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Turco, M.Y.; Gardner, L.; Kay, R.G.; Hamilton, R.S.; Prater, M.; Hollinshead, M.S.; McWhinnie, A.; Esposito, L.; Fernando, R.; Skelton, H.; et al. Trophoblast organoids as a model for maternal-fetal interactions during human placentation. Nature 2018, 564, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Spectrum of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and their prevalence [9,10,11]. Gestational hypertension is defined by new-onset elevations in blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) after 20 weeks of gestation, whereas preeclampsia is also accompanied by proteinuria and end-organ dysfunction. Chronic hypertension is present prior to 20 weeks of gestation or continues >12 weeks into the postnatal period and can occur in concert with preeclampsia. Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome is classified as a subset of preeclampsia, and eclampsia is a complication of preeclampsia characterized by the addition of seizures.
Figure 1. Spectrum of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and their prevalence [9,10,11]. Gestational hypertension is defined by new-onset elevations in blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) after 20 weeks of gestation, whereas preeclampsia is also accompanied by proteinuria and end-organ dysfunction. Chronic hypertension is present prior to 20 weeks of gestation or continues >12 weeks into the postnatal period and can occur in concert with preeclampsia. Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome is classified as a subset of preeclampsia, and eclampsia is a complication of preeclampsia characterized by the addition of seizures.
Cells 10 03055 g001
Figure 2. Identified and proposed mechanisms for abnormal placental development in preeclampsia [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] (circHIPK3, circular RNA homeodomain interacting protein kinase 3; LAMA5, laminin subunit alpha-5; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; pAKT, phosphorylated protein kinase B; pMTOR, phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin; TFPI-2, tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; HIF-2α, hypoxia-induced factor-2α; ↑ refers to upregulation; ↓ refers to downregulation).
Figure 2. Identified and proposed mechanisms for abnormal placental development in preeclampsia [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59] (circHIPK3, circular RNA homeodomain interacting protein kinase 3; LAMA5, laminin subunit alpha-5; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; pAKT, phosphorylated protein kinase B; pMTOR, phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin; TFPI-2, tissue factor pathway inhibitor-2; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; HIF-2α, hypoxia-induced factor-2α; ↑ refers to upregulation; ↓ refers to downregulation).
Cells 10 03055 g002
Figure 3. Circulating and placenta-derived vascular substances associated with preeclampsia and their downstream cellular effects [54,101,102,104,105,106,107,114,115,122,123,125,126,130,131,133]. PlGF, VEGFA, and ENG are considered “proangiogenic” factors, whereas sFLT-1 and ENG are “antiangiogenic.” sFLT-1 sequesters PlGF and VEGFA, and sENG blocks TGF-β binding to the ENG receptor (PlGF, placental growth factor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; sFLT-1, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1; ENG, endoglin; sENG, soluble endoglin; VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 and 2; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; PLCλ, phospholipase C gamma; PKC, protein kinase C; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase).
Figure 3. Circulating and placenta-derived vascular substances associated with preeclampsia and their downstream cellular effects [54,101,102,104,105,106,107,114,115,122,123,125,126,130,131,133]. PlGF, VEGFA, and ENG are considered “proangiogenic” factors, whereas sFLT-1 and ENG are “antiangiogenic.” sFLT-1 sequesters PlGF and VEGFA, and sENG blocks TGF-β binding to the ENG receptor (PlGF, placental growth factor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; sFLT-1, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1; ENG, endoglin; sENG, soluble endoglin; VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 and 2; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; PLCλ, phospholipase C gamma; PKC, protein kinase C; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; AKT, protein kinase B; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase).
Cells 10 03055 g003
Figure 4. An imbalance in coagulation factors promotes a more prothrombotic environment during preeclampsia [226,227,228]. Prostacyclin is a vasodilatory product of arachidonic acid metabolism derived from endothelial cells [225]. Prostacyclin and aspirin oppose the actions of thromboxane, and the ratio of prostacyclin to thromboxane decreases in preeclampsia [226,229]. The accumulation of placental stress can lead to the release of SDEVs into maternal circulation. SDEVs can promote platelet activation, a precursory step to platelet aggregation and the formation of blood clots [29,230] (SDEV, syncytiotrophoblast-derived extracellular vesicle; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; AA, arachidonic acid).
Figure 4. An imbalance in coagulation factors promotes a more prothrombotic environment during preeclampsia [226,227,228]. Prostacyclin is a vasodilatory product of arachidonic acid metabolism derived from endothelial cells [225]. Prostacyclin and aspirin oppose the actions of thromboxane, and the ratio of prostacyclin to thromboxane decreases in preeclampsia [226,229]. The accumulation of placental stress can lead to the release of SDEVs into maternal circulation. SDEVs can promote platelet activation, a precursory step to platelet aggregation and the formation of blood clots [29,230] (SDEV, syncytiotrophoblast-derived extracellular vesicle; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cell; AA, arachidonic acid).
Cells 10 03055 g004
Figure 5. Maternal factors, including TLR9-induced proinflammatory cytokine release and placental hypoxia, promote a cascade of oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA damage, cell-free DNA release, TLR9 activation, and subsequent TLR9 activation within the placenta [83,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,254,255]. Animal and cell culture models indicate that TLR9-related signaling results in decreased angiogenic factors, increased antiangiogenic factors, and impaired trophoblast function [83] (TLR9, toll-like receptor 9; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; IFN, interferon; NFκB, nuclear factor kappa B; AP-1, activator protein-1; ↑ refers to upregulation; ↓ refers to downregulation).
Figure 5. Maternal factors, including TLR9-induced proinflammatory cytokine release and placental hypoxia, promote a cascade of oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA damage, cell-free DNA release, TLR9 activation, and subsequent TLR9 activation within the placenta [83,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,254,255]. Animal and cell culture models indicate that TLR9-related signaling results in decreased angiogenic factors, increased antiangiogenic factors, and impaired trophoblast function [83] (TLR9, toll-like receptor 9; ROS, reactive oxygen species; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; IFN, interferon; NFκB, nuclear factor kappa B; AP-1, activator protein-1; ↑ refers to upregulation; ↓ refers to downregulation).
Cells 10 03055 g005
Table 1. Immune components altered in human preeclampsia and the effects of manipulation in cell culture and animal models.
Table 1. Immune components altered in human preeclampsia and the effects of manipulation in cell culture and animal models.
PreeclampsiaPhysiological EffectsReference
↑ TLR3Elevated systolic blood pressure[81]
Reduced aortic vasodilation[81]
Increased urinary protein concentrations[81]
↑ TLR4Impaired endovascular spiral artery structure[80]
Suppressed trophoblast migration[82]
↑ TLR9Suppressed trophoblast migration[83]
Decreased VEGFA, increased sFLT-1[83]
↓ IL-10Decreased buffering of antiangiogenic factors[84]
Increased endoplasmic reticulum stress[85]
↓ Treg cellsIncreased uterine artery vasoconstriction[86]
Elevated endothelin-1 production[86]
TLR, toll-like receptor; VEGFA, vascular endothelial growth factor A; sFLT-1, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1; IL-10, interleukin 10; Treg, regulatory T cell; ↑ refers to upregulation; ↓ refers to downregulation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Opichka, M.A.; Rappelt, M.W.; Gutterman, D.D.; Grobe, J.L.; McIntosh, J.J. Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. Cells 2021, 10, 3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113055

AMA Style

Opichka MA, Rappelt MW, Gutterman DD, Grobe JL, McIntosh JJ. Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. Cells. 2021; 10(11):3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Opichka, Megan A., Matthew W. Rappelt, David D. Gutterman, Justin L. Grobe, and Jennifer J. McIntosh. 2021. "Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia" Cells 10, no. 11: 3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113055

APA Style

Opichka, M. A., Rappelt, M. W., Gutterman, D. D., Grobe, J. L., & McIntosh, J. J. (2021). Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia. Cells, 10(11), 3055. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10113055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop