Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations Food and Agriculture Board. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 25 February 2020).
- Knox, R.V. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodríguez, A.; Sanz, E.; De Mercado, E.; Gomez, E.; Martin, M.; Carrascosa, C.; Gomez-Fidalgo, E.; Villagomez, D.A.F.; Sanchez-Sanchez, R. Reproductive consequences of a reciprocal chromosomal translocation in two Duroc boars used to provide semen for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J.; Šoštarić, E.; Feitsma, H.; Gadella, B.M. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J.; Šoštarić, E.; Feitsma, H.; Gadella, B.M. Additional value of computer assisted semen analysis (CASA) compared to conventional motility assessments in pig artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 1473–1486.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamphuis, C.; Duenk, P.; Veerkamp, R.F.; Visser, B.; Singh, G.; Nigsch, A.; De Mol, R.M.; Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J. Machine learning to further improve the decision which boar ejaculates to process into artificial insemination doses. Theriogenology 2020, 144, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kastelic, J.P.; Thundathil, J.C. Breeding soundness evaluation and semen analysis for predicting bull fertility. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board). The BPEX Yearboook 2017–18; AHDB: Warwickshire, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Ducos, A.; Berland, H.M.; Bonnet, N.; Calgaro, A.; Billoux, S.; Mary, N.; Garnier-Bonnet, A.; Darre, R.; Pinton, A. Chromosomal control of pig populations in France: 2002–2006 Survey. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2007, 39, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Grahofer, A.; Letko, A.; Häfliger, I.M.; Jagannathan, V.; Ducos, A.; Richard, O.; Peter, V.; Nathues, H.; Drögemüller, C. Chromosomal Imbalance in pigs showing a syndromic form of cleft palate. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- O’Connor, R.E.; Fonseka, G.; Frodsham, R.; Archibald, A.L.; Lawrie, M.; Walling, G.A.; Griffin, D.K. Isolation of subtelomeric sequences of porcine chromosomes for translocation screening reveals errors in the pig genome assembly. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Estrada, E. Artificial insemination in boar reproduction. In Boar Reproduction: Fundamentals and New Biotechnological Trends; Bonet, S., Casas, I., Holt, W.V., Yeste, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 589–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gustavsson, I. Chromosomes of the pig. Adv. Vet. Sci. Comp. Med. 1990, 34, 73–107. [Google Scholar]
- Pinton, A.; Ducos, A.; Berland, H.; Seguela, A.; Brun-Baronnat, C.; Darre, A.; Darre, R.; Schmitz, A.; Yerle, M. Chromosomal abnormalities in hypoprolific boars. Hereditas 2000, 132, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ducos, A.; Revay, T.; Kovas, A.; Hidas, A.; Pinton, A.; Bonnet-Garnier, A.; Molteni, L.; Slota, E.; Switonski, M.; Arruga, M.V.; et al. Cytogenetic screening of livestock populations in Europe: An Overview. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 120, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gustavsson, I. Standard karyotype of the domestic pig. Hereditas 1988, 109, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ritchie, H.; Roser, M. Meat and Dairy Production. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production (accessed on 27 January 2021).
- OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hess, A. National Hog Farmer, Genesus unveil 2019 Global Mega Producer List. Available online: https://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/business/national-hog-farmer-genesus-unveil-2019-global-mega-producer-list (accessed on 25 July 2020).
- BCC Research. Food and Beverages Market. Research Report; BCC Research: Wellesley, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- McGlone, J.; Pond, W.G. Pig Production: Biological Principles and Applications; Thomson/Delmar Learning: Clifton Park, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Mikesell, S. New Economic Study: African Swine Fever Outbreak in the US Could Cost $50 Billion. Available online: https://www.thepigsite.com/articles/new-economic-study-african-swine-fever-outbreak-in-the-us-could-cost-50-billion (accessed on 20 July 2020).
Chromosome Abnormality | Number of Cases | Identifiable with Karyotyping? |
---|---|---|
t(5;6) | 1 | No |
t(3;9) | 2 | Yes |
t(7;10) | 20 | Yes |
t(3;7) | 1 | Yes |
t(16;17) | 1 | Yes |
t(9;13) | 1 | Yes |
t(3;9) | 1 | Yes |
t(1;13) | 1 | No |
t(1;17) | 1 | Yes |
t(2;14) | 1 | Yes (Figure 2) |
t(4;5) | 14 | No |
t(7;10) | 1 | Yes |
t(9;10) | 1 | No |
t(9;12) | 1 | No (Figure 3) |
t(10;15) | 1 | Yes |
XX/XY chimeric | 4 | N/A |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
O’Connor, R.E.; Kiazim, L.G.; Rathje, C.C.; Jennings, R.L.; Griffin, D.K. Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated. Cells 2021, 10, 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020250
O’Connor RE, Kiazim LG, Rathje CC, Jennings RL, Griffin DK. Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated. Cells. 2021; 10(2):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020250
Chicago/Turabian StyleO’Connor, Rebecca E, Lucas G Kiazim, Claudia C Rathje, Rebecca L Jennings, and Darren K Griffin. 2021. "Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated" Cells 10, no. 2: 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020250
APA StyleO’Connor, R. E., Kiazim, L. G., Rathje, C. C., Jennings, R. L., & Griffin, D. K. (2021). Rapid Multi-Hybridisation FISH Screening for Balanced Porcine Reciprocal Translocations Suggests a Much Higher Abnormality Rate Than Previously Appreciated. Cells, 10(2), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020250