Next Article in Journal
Intercropping of Leguminous and Non-Leguminous Desert Plant Species Does Not Facilitate Phosphorus Mineralization and Plant Nutrition
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (NADPH) Oxidase and Erythropoietin, and Their Interactions in Angiogenesis: Implications in Retinopathy of Prematurity
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel 3D Culture System Using a Chitin-Based Polysaccharide Material Produces High-Quality Allogeneic Human UCMSCs with Dispersed Sphere Morphology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/cells11060996
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

VEGFA Haplotype and VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 Protein Associations with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration

by
Alvita Vilkeviciute
1,*,
Dzastina Cebatoriene
2,
Loresa Kriauciuniene
1 and
Rasa Liutkeviciene
1
1
Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Eiveniu St. 2, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus St. 9, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(6), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11060996
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 7 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 15 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Retinal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Our study aimed to reveal the associations between VEGFA SNPs (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323), their haplotypes, VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 serum concentrations, and early and exudative AMD. A total of 339 subjects with early AMD and 419 with exudative AMD groups, and 374 healthy subjects, were genotyped for four VEGFA SNPs (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323). VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 serum concentrations were measured in exudative AMD and controls. The results revealed that rs3025033 G allele was significantly associated with lower odds of exudative AMD under the dominant model (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49–0.80; p = 0.0088) and additive (OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.54–0.90; p = 0.0058) models after Bonferroni correction. In the female group, rs3025033 AG genotype was associated with exudative AMD under the codominant model (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37–0.87; p = 0.009) and G allele under the dominant (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37–0.82; p = 0.0032) and additive models (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.42–0.84; p = 0.0028). Haplotype analysis revealed that individuals carrying rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323 haplotype A-A-G-A had decreased risk of exudative AMD (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23–0.90; p = 0.023). The VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 serum concentrations did not differ between study groups; we found that patients with exudative AMD carrying at least one C allele at rs699947 have statistically significantly higher VEGF-A serum concentrations compared to AA genotype carriers (485.95 (945.93) vs. 194.97 (-), respectively, p = 0.046). In conclusion, we found that VEGFA rs3025033 and haplotype rs1570360A-rs699947A-rs3025033G- rs2146323A play a protective role for exudative AMD in the Caucasian population. Furthermore, rs699947 is associated with elevated VEGF-A serum concentrations in exudative AMD.

1. Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is widely described as a multifactorial, progressive, neurodegenerative disease of the macula, causing loss of visual functions leading to blindness. The macula is a part of the retina where the photoreceptors, responsible for visual acuity and colour perception, are concentrated [1]. Most eye function impairments are associated with age-related alterations and, together with the other risk factors such as environmental and genetic factors, lead to severe eye conditions [2]. Exponential population ageing is a recent worldwide problem affecting human health, including eye diseases. It is known that AMD affects about 10% of people older than 65 years and more than 25% of people older than 75 years in developed countries [2]. The previous study’s projection shows that the number of people with early AMD will increase up to 21.5 million and late AMD up to 4.8 million in Europe [3], while worldwide the numbers are expected to increase dramatically, even up to 288 million in 2040 [3].
AMD can be classified based on histopathological changes [4]. Early and intermediate AMD often may not cause any symptoms. Early AMD signs include small drusen (protein and lipid deposit) formation between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch’s membrane [2]. The intermediate form is described as a presence of at least one large drusen, numerous medium-sized drusen, or geographic atrophy (GA) without extension to the center of the macula with mild symptoms, such as mild blurriness, in their central vision or trouble seeing in low lighting. The advanced AMD is divided into dry or atrophic AMD with the GA of the RPE, and neovascular or exudative AMD is diagnosed when choroidal neovascularization with detachments in the RPE haemorrhages and/or scars appear and cause progressive blurring or other central vision impairments [5].
Considering the multifactorial AMD pathogenesis, drusogenesis and oxidative stress remain the essential processes [6]. Accumulation of molecular debris, including lipid and protein particles as well as reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to chronic inflammation, cause the irreversible damage of RPE cells and photoreceptors in the macula [7,8], and also the breakdown of the blood–ocular barrier, which is a normal function to protect the eye [9].
The above-mentioned pathological alterations cause ocular damage, resulting in cytokine release and pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factor disbalance, including increased vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) production, which plays a crucial role in angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Moreover, vascular leakage and inflammation caused by excessive VEGFA release were found to play a critical role for choroidal neovascularisation and exudative AMD development [7,10].
VEGFA can regulate angiogenesis in the vascular endothelium binding two types of VEGF family receptors: VEGF-R1, encoded by FMS-related tyrosine kinase 1; FLT1 gene (OMIM* 165070) and VEGF-R2, encoded by kinase insert domain receptor; KDR gene (OMIM* 191306) [11]. One of these high-affinity receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGF-R2, is a primary angiogenic receptor associated with VEGFA-stimulated vascular permeability [12,13], and the VEGF-R1 focuses on endogenous VEGFA inhibition [12,14].
While only the exudative AMD is already treated with anti-VEGFA inhibitors, in recent years, the VEGFA and its signaling pathway have been targeted for the most effective therapy development [15], including the other molecules based on the pathogenic processes in which they are involved [16].
Although AMD involves many risk factors, a substantial genetic contribution reveals the genetic marker associations with AMD susceptibility [17], including a relationship between the VEGFA and VEGFR2 gene variants and AMD as well [18,19,20,21]. Regarding the significant associations and conflicting results between genetic markers and AMD [22] in previous studies, we aimed to investigate the associations between four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGFA (OMIM* 192240), and VEGF-A and VEGFR-2/KDR protein roles in AMD in the Caucasian population to focus on a potential tool for early diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Groups

This study was conducted after the approval of the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (No. BE-2-/48; 8 October 2018).
Study groups consisted of subjects admitted to the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Ophthalmology Department for ophthalmological evaluation. In our study, 1132 participants were enrolled: 339 subjects in early AMD and 419 in the exudative AMD group. The Control group was formed of 374 healthy subjects (Table 1). Using the global AMD prevalence (8.7%) [23] and the minor allele frequencies from [24], we calculated that our collected sample sizes for the early, exudative AMD and control groups were sufficient to reach 80% or higher statistical power for the selected VEGFA SNP analysis.
An ophthalmological evaluation was performed for all the study subjects, and data about general health and other diseases were obtained from study subjects. All study subjects agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form.

2.2. AMD Groups

All the AMD patients underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT), and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) was performed in patients suspected of having late AMD after the OCT examination. Exudative AMD was diagnosed in one eye of the study subjects.
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification was used for AMD diagnosis and has been described previously [25].
Early AMD was defined as a combination of multiple small drusen and several intermediate drusen (63–124 μm in diameter) or retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities.
Intermediate AMD was characterized by the presence of extensive intermediate drusen and at least one large (giant) druse (≥125 μm in diameter) or geographic atrophy (GA) not involving the center of the fovea.
Advanced AMD was characterized by GA involving the fovea and/or any of the features of neovascular AMD.

2.3. The Control Group

Subjects without ophthalmologic pathologies and patients after senile cataract surgeries (without any other ocular comorbidities) were included in the control group. The following exclusion criteria were also described in previous publications [26]:
(1)
unrelated eye disorders, e.g., high refractive error, cloudy cornea, lens opacity (nuclear, cortical, or posterior subcapsular cataract) except minor opacities, keratitis, acute or chronic uveitis, glaucoma, or diseases of the optic nerve;
(2)
systemic illnesses, e.g., diabetes mellitus, malignant tumors, systemic connective tissue disorders, chronic infectious diseases, hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke or conditions following organ or tissue transplantation;
(3)
ungraded colour fundus photographs resulting from obscuring the ocular optic system or because of fundus photograph quality.

2.4. DNA Extraction

DNA extraction was carried out at the Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Neuroscience Institute, LUHS. The DNA was extracted from 200 µL peripheral venous blood samples utilizing silica-based membrane technology, using a genomic DNA extraction kit (GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania), based on the manufacturer’s recommendations.

2.5. SNP Selection

In the present study, two tag SNPs (intronic variants rs3025033A/G and rs2146323A/C) covering two haploblocks (Figure 1) (rs833068 have already been analyzed in our previous research study) [26] were selected from the CEU population using the public HapMap database. The pairwise option of the online Tag SNP tool was used with the following settings: r2 = 0.8 set and the minimum number of SNPs tagged by each tag SNP was 2.
Two other VEGFA promoter polymorphisms, −2578C/A (rs699947) and −1154G/A (rs1570360), were selected additionally based on the previous inconsistent results [27] and potential multiple SNP associations with the AMD [19].
Finally, 4 SNPs in VEGFA gene were selected for genotyping and further analysis: rs1570360 (chromosome6:43770093 (GRCh38)), rs699947 (chromosome6:43768652 (GRCh38)), rs3025033 (chromosome6:43783338 (GRCh38)), rs2146323 (chromosome6:43777358 (GRCh38)).

2.6. Genotyping

The genotyping of four VEGFA gene polymorphisms, rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323, was carried out at the Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Neuroscience Institute, LUHS. The identification of all single-nucleotide polymorphisms was performed on a “StepOnePlus” real-time PCR quantification system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Singapore) using predesigned TaqMan® Genotyping assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pleasanton, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer‘s recommendations. Genotyping results were obtained using Genotyping program on the StepOne software.

2.7. Quality Control of Genotyping

A total of 5% randomly chosen samples were repetitively genotyped for all four SNPs to confirm the same rate of genotypes from initial and repetitive genotyping.

2.8. Serum VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 Concentration Measurement

Obtained serum was partitioned into 200 μL aliquots to Eppendorf tubes and frozen at −80 °C. Serum VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 concentrations were determined by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, using the Human VEGF-A ELISA (Cat. No. BMS277-2) and VEGF-R2/KDR ELISA (Cat. No. BMS2019) kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were observed using a Multiskan FC microplate photometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 450 nm. VEGF-A assay sensitivity was 7.9 pg/mL, VEGF-R2/KDR—7 pg/mL.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS/W 27.0 software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data (age, protein serum level data distributions were evaluated for normality by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables presented as median with interquartile range (IQR) based on data distribution. The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare two groups for non-normally distributed data.
Categorical data (gender, genotype, and allele distributions) are presented as absolute numbers with percentages in brackets and compared between the early, exudative, AMD, and control groups using the chi-square (χ2) test. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was evaluated to compare the observed and expected frequencies of VEGFA rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323 using χ2 test in the control group as well.
The impact of SNPs on early and exudative AMD was evaluated using binomial logistic regression analysis. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and adjusted by covariate effect for age in the exudative AMD groups. Logistic regression analysis results were expressed as genetic models (codominant: heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes and minor allele homozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes; dominant: minor allele homozygotes and heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes; recessive: minor allele homozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes and heterozygotes; overdominant: heterozygotes vs. major allele homozygotes and minor allele homozygotes); the additive model was used to evaluate the impact of each minor allele on AMD: major allele homozygotes vs. heterozygotes vs. minor allele homozygotes. The best genetic model selection was based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC); therefore, the best genetic models had the lowest AIC values. We introduced an adjusted significance threshold for multiple comparisons alpha = 0.0125 (0.05/4, since we analyzed four SNPs in the VEGF-A gene) [28].
Haplotype analysis was performed in the early AMD and control groups, and exudative AMD and control groups separately, using online SNPStats software (https://www.snpstats.net/snpstats/ (accessed on 15 December 2021)) [29]. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was assessed by D’ and r2 measures. The associations between the haplotypes and different AMD forms were calculated by logistic regression and presented as ORs and 95% CI and values adjusted for age in exudative AMD analysis. Haplotypes with less than 1% frequencies were pooled into one group and described as “rare”. A two-sided test with a value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Graphs were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Mac, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA, www.graphpad.com (accessed on 21 February 2022).

3. Results

3.1. VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) Genotype and Allele Associations with Early and Exudative AMD

VEGFA SNPs’ genotype distributions were evaluated in the control group using Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). Three SNPs were in HWE (p > 0.05), but rs1570360 did not conform the HWE requirements (p < 0.001) (Table 2).
Analysis of genotype and allele distributions showed statistically significant differences of rs3025033 genotypes (AA, AG, and GG) between exudative AMD and control groups (69.2%, 27.7% and 3.1% vs. 61%, 33.4%, and 5.6%, respectively, p = 0.029) (Table 2). Still, these results did not survive Bonferroni correction.
Allele frequency analysis showed that G allele at rs3025033 was statistically significantly less frequent in the exudative AMD group than controls (16.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively, p = 0.007) (Table 2).
Binomial logistic regression revealed that G allele at rs3025033 was significantly associated with lower odds of exudative AMD under the dominant model (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49–0.80; p = 0.0088) and additive (OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.54–0.90; p = 0.0058) model as best according to AIC value, even after Bonferroni correction (Table 3).

3.2. VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) Genotype and Allele Associations with Early and Exudative AMD by Gender

We analyzed VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) genotype and allele associations with early and exudative AMD by gender and found that rs3025033 association with exudative AMD remained only in females (Supplementary Material, Tables S1 and S2), but not in males (Supplementary Material S1, Tables S3 and S4). After the strict Bonferroni correction, three significant results remained. We found association between rs3025033 AG genotype and exudative AMD under the codominant model (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37–0.87; p = 0.009); we also revealed that G allele is associated with lower odds of exudative AMD for females under the dominant (OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37–0.82; p = 0.0032) and additive models (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.42–0.84; p = 0.0028) (Supplementary Material, Table S2). AIC value shows that the additive model was best for revealing rs3025033 association with exudative AMD in females (Supplementary Material, Table S2).
While the logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between rs2146323 and exudative AMD in females, the results did not survive Bonferroni correction (Supplementary Material, Table S2). No associations were found between rs2146323 and early AMD in females (Supplementary Material S1, Tables S1 and S2) nor males (Supplementary Material, Tables S3 and S4).
We also compared the genotype and allele frequencies between females with early AMD and exudative AMD and males with early AMD and exudative AMD. We found that allele G at rs3025033 was less frequent in females with exudative AMD than in females with early AMD (14.4% vs. 20%, respectively p = 0.019). Still, the result did not survive Bonferroni correction (Supplementary Material, Table S1).

3.3. Haplotype Analysis

Haplotype analysis was performed in separate groups of AMD. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between studied polymorphisms was observed (Table 4).
Haplotype analysis revealed that there is no association between VEGFA haplotypes and early AMD (Table 5), but individuals carrying rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323 haplotype A-A-G-A had decreased risks of exudative AMD (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23–0.90; p = 0.023) (Table 6).

3.4. VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR Serum Concentration Analysis

Serum protein concentrations were measured in 20 patients with exudative AMD before treatment and 21 control group samples. The Control group for VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentration measurement consisted of subjects considering the age and gender distributions based on the exudative AMD group.
We compared the VEGF-A serum concentrations between exudative AMD and control groups but did not find a significant difference (422.674 (677.02) vs. 615.489 (425.49), respectively, p = 0.424) (Figure 2).
We also compared the VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentrations between exudative AMD and control groups, but there was also no statistical difference (12,759.2 (5358.85) vs. 15,428.35 (6698.03), respectively, p = 0.183) (Figure 3).

3.5. VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR Concentrations by VEGFA Genotypes

We also performed VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentration and VEGFA rs1570360, rs699947, rs302503, and rs2146323 genotype association analysis and found that patients with exudative AMD carrying at least one C allele at rs699947 have statistically significantly higher VEGF-A serum concentrations compared to wild-type allele A homozygous genotypes carriers (485.95 (945.93) vs. 194.97 (-), respectively, p = 0.046) (Table 7). However, there were only two subjects with the AA genotype.

4. Discussion

This study analyzed four SNPs in the VEGFA gene and their associations with early and exudative AMD. Study results revealed that the G allele at rs3025033 was significantly associated with lower odds of exudative AMD. We also found that these associations with exudative AMD remained only in females but not in males, suggesting the potential gender role in AMD development. Furthermore, the differences of rs3025033 allele G frequencies were observed between females with exudative AMD and females with early AMD, but the results did not survive Bonferroni correction. Moreover, associations between rs2146323 and exudative AMD in females were found, but the results did also not survive Bonferroni correction.
A haplotype of VEGFA SNPs analysis revealed that individuals carrying rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323 haplotype A-A-G-A had decreased risk of exudative AMD, showing a protective role of this haplotype. No studies have previously included all these SNPs in AMD analysis. Only Mori et al. (2010) analyzed VEGFA −116A, rs1570360 associations with AMD, but did not reveal significant results [27]. Another three studies examined rs1570360 associations with exudative AMD treatment efficacy but not with the AMD occurrence [30,31,32].
VEGFA promoter polymorphism −2578C/A (rs699947) is widely studied in a large number of angiogenesis-associated diseases, including many different types of cancers [33,34,35] and their response to anti-VEGFA agent treatment [36].
This SNP was also studied in patients with AMD, but statistically significant differences in the genotypic distribution of VEGFA rs699947 were not found, and any significant associations were revealed [20,27,37,38]. Scientists also tried to find the differences between the AMD subtypes comparing neovascular and atrophic AMD groups but did not reveal significant results [39].
Previous results were found in much smaller study groups. Still, our study confirmed those findings in bigger samples groups, including 339 subjects in early AMD and 419 in the exudative AMD groups, and 374 subjects in the control group.
Other research studies have analyzed rs699947 associations with anti-VEGFA treatment [30,31,40,41,42] or photodynamic therapy response [32,43,44] but conflicting results suggest that other risk factors [45] or SNP combinations may be associated with the AMD treatment as well [46,47]. Our analysis of SNPs and VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 serum concentrations revealed that carriers of at least one C allele at rs699947 have statistically significantly higher VEGF-A serum concentrations compared to wild-type allele A homozygous genotype carriers (485.95 (945.93) vs. 194.97 (-), respectively, p = 0.046).
Bulgu et al. (2014) included in their study an intronic VEGFA variant rs3025033 and genotyped it for 82 AMD patients and 80 controls. Unfortunately, about 98% of genotypes were determined as AA, so no further statistical analysis was performed [48].
Li et al. (2021) analyzed the rs3025033 effect on VEGF165b protein production but did not reveal significant results; on the other hand, they showed that this SNP promoted cell proliferation in human retinal vascular endothelial cells (hRVECs) [49].
Another study performed by Immonen et al. (2010) analyzed the associations between rs3025033 and photodynamic therapy response, but no associations were revealed [44].
In contrast, the frequencies of the VEGFA +5092, rs2146323 were significantly different in photodynamic therapy non-responders and responders [44]. However, similar frequencies of this SNP were found between the exudative AMD patients and controls [37] and any AMD patients and controls [48]. Furthermore, it was shown that rs2146323 C allele was protective against dry AMD, and the allele A was associated with the disease. Moreover, there was a significant difference in the genotype frequencies of this SNP between the wet type of AMD and dry type AMD [48]. Our study results showed associations between rs2146323 and exudative AMD only in females, but these results did not survive when we applied strict Bonferroni correction. Furthermore, we did not find any associations between this SNP and VEGF-A or VEGF-R2 serum concentrations.
Other widely studied SNPs show significant associations with the AMD and highlight the possible VEGFA rs1413711 and rs833061 polymorphisms contributions to AMD susceptibility [50].
Bulgu et al. (2014) found that the presence of ancestral allele (G) in rs1413711 was protective for all AMD patients, and the AA genotype was a risk factor for AMD and even a highly increased risk factor for dry AMD [48]. Opposite results were shown in another study: SNP +674, rs1413711 CC genotype was significantly associated with a higher risk of exudative AMD [19]. The conflicting results of these studies may be explained by differences in the size of study groups and populations (Turkish and Caucasian of Northern European origin).
Habibi et al. (2014) showed that VEGFA +405, rs2010963 CC and VEGFA +936, rs3025039 TT genotype frequencies were higher in Tunisian AMD patients than in controls [51].
These results confirmed the previous associations between VEGFA +936, rs3025039, and wet AMD in the Japanese population [52]. Deeper analysis showed that genotype TT for rs3025039 was associated with elevated VEGF-A protein serum levels [20].
Moreover, an extensive analysis of VEGFA promoter and gene polymorphisms showed that SNPs +674, +4618, +5092, +9162, and +9512 their haplotypes, CTCCT and TCACC, were associated with a 15-fold increased risk of exudative AMD and the promoter SNPs −460T, −417T, −172C, −165C, −160C, −152G, −141A, −116A, +405C haplotype was associated with about an 18-fold greater risk [19]. Two of these polymorphisms were included in our study and, together with another two SNPs, revealed a protective haplotype for exudative AMD. It is important to elucidate the SNP combinations and their role in AMD to understand the pathogenesis and possible treatment strategies better.
VEGF-A serum levels, as well as VEGFA SNPs, are widely studied in AMD patients. While we did not find any statistical differences in VEGF-A serum levels between the exudative AMD patients and controls, we confirmed results from several other studies which included total AMD patients or only exudative AMD patients, consisting of 27 to 71 samples per group in different populations [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. Further studies revealed significantly elevated VEGF-A levels in exudative AMD patients compared to controls [61,62]. Significantly elevated VEGF-A levels in total AMD patients compared to controls were also found in a few studies [20,51,63].
VEGF-R2 protein associations are not so widely analyzed as VEGF-A, but conflicting results were also found. Örnek et al. (2016) found that decreased VEGFR-2 serum levels were associated with both dry and wet type AMD. Furthermore, negative correlations between VEGFR-2 with foveal retinal thickness in AMD patients and a significant positive correlation with subfoveal choroidal thickness revealed the possible VEGF-R2 role in AMD development [64]. Another two studies showed opposite associations and found elevated VEGFR2 protein levels in patients with exudative AMD group than in the controls [65,66], suggesting the role of VEGFR-2 in the pathogenesis of AMD.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that rs3025033 polymorphism of VEGFA and the haplotype rs1570360A-rs699947A-rs3025033G-rs2146323A can play a protective role for exudative AMD in our population. Furthermore, the C allele at rs699947 is associated with elevated VEGF-A serum concentrations in exudative AMD patients. Since the genetic variations were associated with exudative AMD, our findings need to be replicated in additional studies. While the main strength of our study was a large number of early and exudative AMD patients, further studies are still needed to investigate the pharmacologic role of these angiogenesis-related markers in AMD therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11060996/s1, Table S1: Frequencies of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033 and rs2146323) genotypes and alleles in females with early AMD and exudative AMD, and controls, Table S2: Binomial logistic regression analysis of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) in females with early and exudative AMD and controls, Table S3: Frequencies of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) genotypes and alleles in males with early AMD and exudative AMD, and controls, Table S4: Binomial logistic regression analysis of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) in males with early and exudative AMD and controls.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L. and A.V.; methodology, A.V., D.C., L.K. and R.L.; validation, A.V., D.C. and R.L.; formal analysis, D.C., L.K. and R.L.; investigation, A.V. and D.C.; resources, L.K. and R.L.; data curation, A.V., R.L. and D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.; writing—review and editing, A.V. and R.L.; supervision, R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (No. BE-2-/48; 8 October 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. van Lookeren Campagne, M.; Lecouter, J.; Yaspan, B.L.; Ye, W. Mechanisms of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Therapeutic Opportunities. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Smith, W.; Assink, J.; Klein, R.; Mitchell, P.; Klaver, C.C.W.; Klein, B.E.K.; Hofman, A.; Jensen, S.; Wang, J.J.; de Jong, P.T.V.M. Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Pooled Findings from Three Continents. Ophthalmology 2001, 108, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Colijn, J.M.; Buitendijk, G.H.S.; Prokofyeva, E.; Alves, D.; Cachulo, M.L.; Khawaja, A.P.; Cougnard-Gregoire, A.; Merle, B.M.J.; Korb, C.; Erke, M.G.; et al. Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe: The Past and the Future. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 1753–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study System for Classifying Age-Related Macular Degeneration from Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photographs: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report Number 6. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2001, 132, 668–681. [CrossRef]
  5. Wilkinson, P.C.; Wiedemann, P. Retina, 4th ed.; Stephen, J.R., Ed.; Elsevier-Health Sciences Division: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  6. Green, W.R.; Key, S.N. Senile Macular Degeneration: A Histopathologic Study. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1978, 75, 180–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Freund, K.B.; Yannuzzi, L.A.; Sorenson, J.A. Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Choroidal Neovascularization. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 115, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beatty, S.; Koh, H.H.; Phil, M.; Henson, D.; Boulton, M. The Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2000, 45, 115–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cunha-Vaz, J.; Bernardes, R.; Lobo, C. Blood-Retinal Barrier. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 21 (Suppl. S6), 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ferrara, N.; Gerber, H.P.; LeCouter, J. The Biology of VEGF and Its Receptors. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Veikkola, T.; Alitalo, K. VEGFs, Receptors and Angiogenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1999, 9, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grisanti, S.; Tatar, O. The Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Other Endogenous Interplayers in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2008, 27, 372–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haines, J.L.; Schnetz-Boutaud, N.; Schmidt, S.; Scott, W.K.; Agarwal, A.; Postel, E.A.; Olson, L.; Kenealy, S.J.; Hauser, M.; Gilbert, J.R.; et al. Functional Candidate Genes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Significant Association with VEGF, VLDLR, and LRP6. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Shibuya, M. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Its Receptor System: Physiological Functions in Angiogenesis and Pathological Roles in Various Diseases. J. Biochem. 2013, 153, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Fogli, S.; del Re, M.; Rofi, E.; Posarelli, C.; Figus, M.; Danesi, R. Clinical Pharmacology of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs. Eye 2018, 32, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nashine, S. Potential Therapeutic Candidates for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Cells 2021, 10, 2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Heesterbeek, T.J.; Lorés-Motta, L.; Hoyng, C.B.; Lechanteur, Y.T.E.; den Hollander, A.I. Risk Factors for Progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. J. Br. Coll. Ophthalmic Opt. Optom. 2020, 40, 140–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Galan, A.; Ferlin, A.; Caretti, L.; Buson, G.; Sato, G.; Frigo, A.C.; Foresta, C. Association of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Polymorphisms in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Its Receptor. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 1769–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Churchill, A.J.; Carter, J.G.; Lovell, H.C.; Ramsden, C.; Turner, S.J.; Yeung, A.; Escardo, J.; Atan, D. VEGF Polymorphisms Are Associated with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, 2955–2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ambreen, F.; Ismail, M.; Qureshi, I.Z. Association of Gene Polymorphism with Serum Levels of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Factors in Pakistani Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Mol. Vis. 2015, 21, 985. [Google Scholar]
  21. Courtenay, M.D.; Cade, W.H.; Schwartz, S.G.; Kovach, J.L.; Agarwal, A.; Wang, G.; Haines, J.L.; Pericak-Vance, M.A.; Scott, W.K. Set-Based Joint Test of Interaction between SNPs in the VEGF Pathway and Exogenous Estrogen Finds Association with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 4873–4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hagstrom, S.A.; Ying, G.S.; Pauer, G.J.T.; Sturgill-Short, G.M.; Huang, J.; Maguire, M.G.; Martin, D.F. VEGFA and VEGFR2 Gene Polymorphisms and Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy: Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT). JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014, 132, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wong, W.L.; Su, X.; Li, X.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Klein, R.; Cheng, C.Y.; Wong, T.Y. Global Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Disease Burden Projection for 2020 and 2040: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2014, 2, E106–E116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Home–SNP–NCBI. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ (accessed on 23 February 2022).
  25. Vilkeviciute, A.; Cebatoriene, D.; Kriauciuniene, L.; Zemaitiene, R.; Liutkeviciene, R. IL-9 and IL-10 Single-Nucleotide Variants and Serum Levels in Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Caucasian Population. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 6622934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liutkeviciene, R.; Vilkeviciute, A.; Gedvilaite, G.; Kaikaryte, K.; Kriauciuniene, L. Haplotypes of HTRA1 Rs1120638, TIMP3 Rs9621532, VEGFA Rs833068, CFI Rs10033900, ERCC6 Rs3793784, and KCTD10 Rs56209061 Gene Polymorphisms in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Dis. Markers 2019, 2019, 9602949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mori, K.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Gehlbach, P.L.; Takita, H.; Kabasawa, S.; Kawasaki, I.; Ohkubo, T.; Kurihara, S.; Iizuka, H.; Miyashita, Y.; et al. Phenotype and Genotype Characteristics of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Japanese Population. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vilkeviciute, A.; Bastikaityte, N.; Mockute, R.; Cebatoriene, D.; Kriauciuniene, L.; Balciuniene, J.; Zemaitiene, R.; Liutkeviciene, R. The Role of SNPs in IL1RL1 and IL1RAP Genes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Development and Treatment Efficacy. In Vivo 2020, 34, 2443–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Solé, X.; Guinó, E.; Valls, J.; Iniesta, R.; Moreno, V. SNPStats: A Web Tool for the Analysis of Association Studies. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1928–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Imai, D.; Mori, K.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Gehlbach, P.L.; Awata, T.; Inoue, S.; Yoneya, S. CFH, VEGF, and PEDF Genotypes and the Response to Intravitreous Injection of Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. J. Ocul. Biol. Dis. Inform. 2010, 3, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Papachristos, A.; Karatza, E.; Kalofonos, H.; Sivolapenko, G. Pharmacogenetics in Model-Based Optimization of Bevacizumab Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsuchihashi, T.; Mori, K.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Gehlbach, P.L.; Kabasawa, S.; Takita, H.; Ueyama, K.; Okazaki, Y.; Inoue, S.; Awata, T.; et al. Complement Factor H and High-Temperature Requirement A-1 Genotypes and Treatment Response of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Song, Y.; Hu, J.; Chen, Q.; Guo, J.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.; Hu, W.; Huang, P. Association between Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Rs699947 Polymorphism and the Risk of Three Major Urologic Neoplasms (Bladder Cancer, Prostate Cancer, and Renal Cell Carcinoma): A Meta-Analysis Involving 11,204 Subjects. Gene 2018, 679, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tu, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, J.; Sheng, L.; Sheng, Y.; Chen, H.; Tian, J. Rs833061 and Rs699947 on Promoter Gene of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Associated Lung Cancer Susceptibility and Survival: A Meta-Analysis. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2014, 20, 2520–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Song, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, X. Association between Five Polymorphisms in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene and Urinary Bladder Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Involving 6671 Subjects. Gene 2019, 698, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Leone, J.P.; Emblem, K.E.; Weitz, M.; Gelman, R.S.; Schneider, B.P.; Freedman, R.A.; Younger, J.; Pinho, M.C.; Sorensen, A.G.; Gerstner, E.R.; et al. Phase II Trial of Carboplatin and Bevacizumab in Patients with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Breast Cancer Res. 2020, 22, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kepez Yildiz, B.; Ozdek, S.; Ergun, M.A.; Ergun, S.; Yaylacioglu Tuncay, F.; Elbeg, S. CFH Y402H and VEGF Polymorphisms and Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmic Res. 2016, 56, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cruz-González, F.; Cieza-Borrella, C.; Cabrillo-Estévez, L.; Cañete-Campos, C.; Escudero-Domínguez, F.; González-Sarmiento, R. VEGF A (Rs699947 and Rs833061) and VEGFR2 (Rs2071559) Gene Polymorphisms Are Not Associated with AMD Susceptibility in a Spanish Population. Curr. Eye Res. 2013, 38, 1274–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cruz-González, F.; Cabrillo Estévez, L.; Cañete Campos, C.; Sánchez-Jara Sánchez, A.; Juan Marcos, L.; González-Sarmiento, R. The Presence of CFH, HTRA1, ARMS2, VEGF-A and VEGF-R and the Appearance of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Sub-Types. Arch. De La Soc. Esp. De Oftalmol. 2016, 91, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cruz-Gonzalez, F.; Cabrillo-Estévez, L.; López-Valverde, G.; Cieza-Borrella, C.; Hernández-Galilea, E.; González-Sarmiento, R. Predictive Value of VEGF A and VEGFR2 Polymorphisms in the Response to Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treatment for Wet AMD. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch. Fur Klin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2014, 252, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cobos, E.; Recalde, S.; Anter, J.; Hernandez-Sanchez, M.; Barreales, C.; Olavarrieta, L.; Valverde, A.; Suarez-Figueroa, M.; Cruz, F.; Abraldes, M.; et al. Association between CFH, CFB, ARMS2, SERPINF1, VEGFR1 and VEGF Polymorphisms and Anatomical and Functional Response to Ranibizumab Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, e201–e212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Park, U.C.; Shin, J.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Shin, E.S.; Lee, J.E.; McCarthy, L.C.; Newcombe, P.J.; Xu, C.F.; Chung, H.; Yu, H.G. Genetic Factors Associated with Response to Intravitreal Ranibizumab in Korean Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Retina 2014, 34, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tsuchihashi, T.; Mori, K.; Horie-Inoue, K.; Okazaki, Y.; Awata, T.; Inoue, S.; Yoneya, S. Prognostic Phenotypic and Geno-typic Factors Associated with Photodynamic Therapy Response in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Clin. Ophthalmol. (Auckland N.Z.) 2014, 8, 2471–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Immonen, I.; Seitsonen, S.; Tommila, P.; Kangas-Kontio, T.; Kakko, S.; Savolainen, E.R.; Savolainen, M.J.; Liinamaa, M.J. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Variation and the Response to Photodynamic Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boltz, A.; Ruiß, M.; Jonas, J.B.; Tao, Y.; Rensch, F.; Weger, M.; Garhöfer, G.; Frantal, S.; El-Shabrawi, Y.; Schmetterer, L. Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Polymorphisms in the Treatment Success in Patients with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1615–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fauser, S.; Lambrou, G.N. Genetic Predictive Biomarkers of Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2015, 60, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Habibi, I.; Kort, F.; Sfar, I.; Chebil, A.; Bouraoui, R.; ben Abdallah, T.; Gorgi, Y.; el Matri, L. Effect of Risk Alleles in CFH, C3, and VEGFA on the Response to Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Tunisian Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Klin. Mon. Augenheilkd. 2016, 233, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bulgu, Y.; Cetin, G.O.; Caner, V.; Cetin, E.N.; Yaylali, V.; Yildirim, C. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Polymorphisms in Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Turkish Population. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 7, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, H.; Xie, J.; Zeng, J.; Wu, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, W. VEGF Gene Polymorphisms Regulate Human Retinal Vascular Endothelial Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis through ASF/SF2-Associated Alternative Splicing. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 2021, 112067212110580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, C.; Xu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, W. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Polymorphisms and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 1211. [Google Scholar]
  51. Habibi, I.; Sfar, I.; Chebil, A.; Kort, F.; Bouraoui, R.; Jendoubi-Ayed, S.; Makhlouf, M.; Abdallah, T.B.; el Matri, L.; Gorgi, Y. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Genetic Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Tunisian Population. Biomark. Res. 2014, 2, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lin, J.M.; Wan, L.; Tsai, Y.Y.; Lin, H.J.; Tsai, Y.; Lee, C.C.; Tsai, C.H.; Tseng, S.H.; Tsai, F.J. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Polymorphisms in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 145, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Haas, P.; Steindl, K.; Aggermann, T.; Schmid-Kubista, K.; Krugluger, W.; Hageman, G.S.; Binder, S. Serum VEGF and CFH in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Curr. Eye Res. 2011, 36, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gu, X.; Yu, X.; Dai, H. Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab for Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Effects on Serum VEGF Concentration. Curr. Eye Res. 2014, 39, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Battu, P.; Sharma, K.; Rain, M.; Singh, R.; Anand, A. Serum Levels of ARMS2, COL8A1, RAD51B, and VEGF and Their Correlations in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Curr. Neurovascular Res. 2021, 18, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vural, E.; Hazar, L.; Karakukçu, C.; Arslan, M.E.; Sirem, M.R.; Sirakaya, E.; Ozsayglll, C.; Çiçek, A. Apelin-13: A Promising Biomarker for Age-Related Macular Degeneration? Ophthalmol. J. Int. D’ophtalmol. Int. J. Ophthalmol. Z. Augenheilkd. 2021, 244, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liukkonen, M.P.K.; Paterno, J.J.; Kivinen, N.; Siintamo, L.; Koskela, A.K.J.; Kaarniranta, K. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition-Related Serum Markers ET-1, IL-8 and TGF-Β2 Are Elevated in a Finnish Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration Cohort. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gonçalves, F.T.I.; Cezario, S.M.; Calastri, M.C.J.; Oliveira, C.I.F.; Souza, D.R.S.; Pinhel, M.A.d.S.; Cotrim, C.C.; Jorge, R.; Siqueira, R.C. Influence of VEGF-C936T Genetic Variant on Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Arq. Bras. De Oftalmol. 2015, 78, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Carneiro, Â.M.; Costa, R.; Falcão, M.S.; Barthelmes, D.; Mendonça, L.S.; Fonseca, S.L.; Gonçalves, R.; Gonçalves, C.; Falcão-Reis, F.M.; Soares, R. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Plasma Levels before and after Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Bevacizumab or Ranibizumab. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012, 90, e25–e30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zehetner, C.; Kralinger, M.T.; Modi, Y.S.; Waltl, I.; Ulmer, H.; Kirchmair, R.; Bechrakis, N.E.; Kieselbach, G.F. Systemic Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor before and after Intravitreal Injection of Aflibercept or Ranibizumab in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomised, Prospective Trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015, 93, e154–e159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sato, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Karasawa, Y.; Enoki, T.; Ito, M. Intraocular Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration before and after Initiation of Intravitreal Injection of Anti-VEGF Inhibitor. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tsai, D.C.; Charng, M.J.; Lee, F.L.; Hsu, W.M.; Chen, S.J. Different Plasma Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Nitric Oxide between Patients with Choroidal and Retinal Neovascularization. Ophthalmol. J. Int. D’ophtalmol. Int. J. Ophthalmol. Z. Augenheilkd. 2006, 220, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sharma, K.; Sharma, N.K.; Singh, R.; Anand, A. Exploring the Role of VEGF in Indian Age Related Macular Degeneration. Ann. Neurosci. 2015, 22, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Örnek, N.; Örnek, K.; Aydin, S.; Yilmaz, M.; Ölmez, Y. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 and Adropin Levels in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kamal Sharma, N.; Gupta, A.; Prabhakar, S.; Singh, R.; Sharma, S.; Anand, A. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism and Serum Levels of VEGFR2 Are Associated with Age Related Macular Degeneration. Curr. Neurovascular Res. 2012, 9, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, Y.Y.; Bin, Y.; Wang, X.; Peng, H. Increased Serum Levels of Soluble CD146 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 in Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 12, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 00996 g001 550
Figure 1. Haploblocks in CEU population, HapMap data. r2 = 0.8 set; a minimum number of SNPs tagged by each tag SNP = 2.
Figure 1. Haploblocks in CEU population, HapMap data. r2 = 0.8 set; a minimum number of SNPs tagged by each tag SNP = 2.
Cells 11 00996 g001
Cells 11 00996 g002 550
Figure 2. VEGF-A serum concentrations between groups. The bars represent the median with interquartile range (first quartile and third quartile) and whiskers from min to maximum values. VEGF-A serum concentration in exudative AMD group: 422.674 (677.02) pg/mL and control group: 615.489 (425.49) pg/mL. Mann–Whitney-U test, p = 0.424.
Figure 2. VEGF-A serum concentrations between groups. The bars represent the median with interquartile range (first quartile and third quartile) and whiskers from min to maximum values. VEGF-A serum concentration in exudative AMD group: 422.674 (677.02) pg/mL and control group: 615.489 (425.49) pg/mL. Mann–Whitney-U test, p = 0.424.
Cells 11 00996 g002
Cells 11 00996 g003 550
Figure 3. VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentrations between groups. The bars represent the median with interquartile range (first quartile and third quartile) and whiskers from minimum to maximum. VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentration in exudative AMD group: (12,759.2 (5358.85) pg/mL and control group: 15,428.35 (6698.03) pg/mL. Mann–Whitney-U test, p = 0.183.
Figure 3. VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentrations between groups. The bars represent the median with interquartile range (first quartile and third quartile) and whiskers from minimum to maximum. VEGF-R2/KDR serum concentration in exudative AMD group: (12,759.2 (5358.85) pg/mL and control group: 15,428.35 (6698.03) pg/mL. Mann–Whitney-U test, p = 0.183.
Cells 11 00996 g003
Table
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study groups.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study groups.
CharacteristicEarly AMD
N = 339		Exudative AMD
N = 419		Control Group
N = 374		p Value
Gender
Males, n (%)
Females, n (%)
104 (30.7)
235 (69.3)
149 (35.6)
270 (64.4)
139 (37.2)
235 (62.8)		0.068 *
0.639 **
Age, median (IQR)73 (13)77 (10)72 (10)0.382 *
<0.001 **
IQR—interquartile range; p—significance level when p = 0.05; * Early AMD vs. Control group; ** Exudative AMD vs. Control group.
Table
Table 2. Frequencies of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) genotypes and alleles in early AMD, exudative AMD, and control groups.
Table 2. Frequencies of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) genotypes and alleles in early AMD, exudative AMD, and control groups.
SNP
Genotype/Allele		Early AMD
N = 339
n (%)		Exudative AMD
N = 419
n (%)		Control Group
N = 374
n (%)		HWE
p Value		p Value *p Value **p Value ***
rs1570360 <0.0010.1860.1360.512
GG162 (47.8)183 (43.7)177 (47.3)
AG128 (37.8)168 (40.1)125 (33.4)
AA49 (14.5)68 (16.2)72 (19.3)
G452 (66.7)534 (63.7)479 (64)0.2980.8970.234
A226 (33.3)304 (36.3)269 (36)
rs699947 0.1680.3170.5890.183
AA86 (25.4)119 (28.4)112 (29.9)
AC174 (51.3)187 (44.6)173 (46.30
CC79 (23.3)113 (27)89 (23.8)
A346 (51)425 (50.7)397 (53.1)0.4410.3480.902
C332 (49)413 (49.3)351 (46.9)
rs3025033 0.4820.3990.0290.242
AA215 (63.4)290 (69.2)228 (61)
AG112 (33)116 (27.7)125 (33.4)
GG12 (3.5)13 (3.1)21 (5.6)
A542 (80)696 (83.1)581 (77.7)0.2960.0070.119
G136 (20)142 (16.9)167 (22.3)
rs2146323 0.060.2480.6030.236
CC142 (41.9)191 (45.6)158 (42.2)
AC157 (46.3)169 (40.3)157 (42)
AA40 (11.8)59 (14.1)59 (15.8)
C441 (65)551 (65.8)473 (63.2)0.4770.2960.773
A237 (35)287 (34.2)275 (36.8)
HWE p value—Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium significance level p = 0.05; p—significance level and Bonferroni corrected significance level when p < 0.05/4; p-values marked with bold indicate statistically significant p-values. * Early AMD vs. Control group; ** Exudative AMD vs. Control group; *** Early AMD vs. Exudative AMD.
Table
Table 3. Binomial logistic regression analysis of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) in early and exudative AMD and control groups.
Table 3. Binomial logistic regression analysis of VEGFA (rs1570360, rs699947, rs3025033, and rs2146323) in early and exudative AMD and control groups.
rs1570360
Early AMD vs. Control GroupExudative AMD vs. Control Group
ModelGenotype/AlleleOR (95% CI)p ValueAICOR (95% CI) *p ValueAIC
rs1570360
CodominantGG1 1 1045.7
AG1.12 (0.81–1.55)0.499989.31.25 (0.91–1.73)0.171
AA0.74 (0.49–1.13)0.168 0.94 (0.63–1.41)0.763
DominantGG1 10.381045.5
AG + AA0.98 (0.73–1.32)0.9990.71.14 (0.85–1.52)
RecessiveGG + AG1 10.41045.6
AA0.71 (0.48–1.05)0.087987.80.85 (0.58–1.24)
OverdominantGG + AA1 10.111043.8
AG1.21 (0.89–1.64)0.23989.21.27 (0.94–1.72)
AdditiveA0.91 (0.75–1.11)0.34989.81.02 (0.84–1.23)0.881046.2
rs699947
CodominantAA1 1
AC1.31 (0.92–1.86)0.132990.40.97 (0.69–1.37)0.871045.9
CC1.16 (0.76–1.75)0.492 1.28 (0.86–1.89)0.226
DominantAA1 1
AC + CC1.26 (0.90–1.75)0.17988.81.07 (0.78–1.47)0.671046.1
RecessiveAA + AC1 1
CC0.97 (0.69–1.38)0.88990.71.30 (0.93–1.81)0.131043.9
OverdominantAA-CC1 1
AC1.23 (0.91–1.64)0.18988.90.87 (0.65–1.16)0.341045.4
AdditiveC1.08 (0.88–1.33)0.45990.11.12 (0.92–1.37)0.251044.9
rs3025033
CodominantAA1 1
AG0.95 (0.69–1.30)0.751990.80.69 (0.51–0.95)0.0251040.7
GG0.61 (0.29–1.26)0.181 0.50 (0.24–1.03)0.061
DominantAA1 1
AG + GG0.90 (0.67–1.22)0.5990.30.67 (0.49–0.90)0.00881039.4
RecessiveAA + AG1 1
GG0.62 (0.30–1.27)0.18988.90.56 (0.27–1.15)0.111043.7
OverdominantAA + GG1 1
AG0.98 (0.72–1.340.91990.70.73 (0.53–0.99)0.0451042.3
AdditiveG0.87 (0.68–1.13)0.3989.60.70 (0.54–0.90)0.00581038.7
rs2146323
CodominantCC1 1
AC1.11 (0.81–1.53)0.509989.90.84 (0.61–1.15)0.281046.5
AA0.75 (0.48–1.20)0.231 0.79 (0.51–1.21)0.28
DominantCC1 1
AC + AA1.01 (0.75–1.370.92990.70.83 (0.62–1.11)0.21044.6
RecessiveCC + AC1 1
AA0.71 (0.46–1.10)0.12988.30.86 (0.57–1.28)0.451045.7
OverdominantCC + AA1 1
AC1.19 (0.89–1.60)0.24989.40.89 (0.67–1.20)0.451045.7
AdditiveA0.93 (0.75–1.15)0.49990.20.88 (0.72–1.07)0.21044.7
OR—odds ratio; CI—confident interval; p—significance level and Bonferroni corrected significance level when p < 0.05/4; p-values marked with bold indicate statistically significant p-values; AIC—Akaike information criteria; * Ods adjusted for age in exudative AMD analysis.
Table
Table 4. Linkage disequilibrium between the four VEGFA SNPs.
Table 4. Linkage disequilibrium between the four VEGFA SNPs.
SNPsEarly AMD vs. ControlsExudative AMD vs. Controls
D’r2p ValueD’r2p Value
rs1570360–rs6999470.071820.25210.00.70870.26410.0
rs1570360–rs30250330.37710.02040.00.39190.02100.0
rs1570360–rs21463230.08980.00770.0010.11910.01380.0
rs699947–rs30250330.15030.00660.00210.03890.00040.4298
rs699947–rs21463230.99040.50510.00.98710.49700.0
rs3025033–rs21463230.08660.00360.02320.18440.01500.0
SNP—single nucleotide polymorphism; D’ is the deviation between the expected haplotype frequency and the observed frequency (D’ scale: 0,1). r2 is the squared correlation coefficient of the haplotype frequencies (r2 scale: 0,1); p—significance level; significant when p < 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Associations between VEGFA haplotypes and risk of early AMD.
Table 5. Associations between VEGFA haplotypes and risk of early AMD.
HaplotypeSNP1SNP2SNP3SNP4Frequency (%)OR (95% CI)p Value
Early AMDControlsTotal
1GCAC31.1331.7131.431.00-
2GAAA18.8715.2216.981.30 (0.92–1.84)0.14
3AAAC16.0815.5515.81.08 (0.78–1.50)0.64
4GCGC13.1410.3511.681.31 (0.87–1.97)0.19
5AAAA9.1710.019.590.96 (0.63–1.46)0.86
6GAGA3.536.144.880.61 (0.33–1.13)0.12
7ACAC4.74.564.631.14 (0.64–2.01)0.66
8AAGA3.395.094.290.63 (0.34–1.17)0.14
rare****NANA0.720.00 (-)1
OR—odds ratio; CI—confident interval; p—significance level; significant when p < 0.05; p-values marked with bold indicate statistically significant p-values; AIC—Akaike information criteria; SNP1 rs1570360; SNP2 rs699947; SNP3 rs3025033; SNP4 rs2146323; rare—pooled haplotypes with frequencies < 1 %. *—allele of rare haplotype. Global haplotype association p value: 0.025.
Table
Table 6. Associations between VEGFA haplotypes and risk of exudative AMD.
Table 6. Associations between VEGFA haplotypes and risk of exudative AMD.
HaplotypeSNP1SNP2SNP3SNP4Frequency (%)OR (95% CI)p Value
Exudative AMDControlsTotal
1GCAC35.131.7133.521.00-
2AAAC16.215.5515.890.93 (0.68–1.27)0.65
3GAAA14.6515.2214.880.86 (0.61–1.22)0.4
4AAAA11.410.0110.761.07 (0.73–1.57)0.73
5GCGC8.6210.359.380.81 (0.53–1.23)0.32
6GAGA5.086.145.580.69 (0.40–1.20)0.19
7ACAC5.444.565.041.17 (0.69–1.98)0.56
8AAGA2.995.093.980.46 (0.23–0.90)0.023
rare****NANA0.950.36 (0.09–1.46)0.15
OR—odds ratio; CI—confident interval; p—significance level; significant when p < 0.05; p-values marked with bold indicate statistically significant p-values; AIC—Akaike information criteria; SNP1 rs1570360; SNP2 rs699947; SNP3 rs3025033; SNP4 rs2146323; rare—haplotypes with frequencies < 1 %;. *—allele of rare haplotype. Global haplotype association p value: 0.13.
Table
Table 7. VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR concentration associations with VEGFA polymorphisms in exudative AMD and controls.
Table 7. VEGF-A and VEGF-R2/KDR concentration associations with VEGFA polymorphisms in exudative AMD and controls.
ModelVEGF-AVEGF-R2/KDR
Exudative AMD (pg/mL), Median (IQR)p ValueControl Group (pg/mL), Median (IQR)p ValueExudative AMD (pg/mL), Median (IQR)p ValueControl Group (pg/mL), Median (IQR)p Value
rs1570360
Dominant
AG + AA vs. GG		383.55 (427.3) vs. 640.36 (1234.32)0.142711.25 (472.66) vs. 526.14 (391.91)0.18112,588.6 (6294.67) vs. 13,402.08 (5875.31)0.56914,435.95 (7035.44) vs. 16,211.6 (7547.35)0.916
Recessive
AA vs. AG + GG		726.99 (-) vs. 421.42 (646.25)0.737727.89 (-) vs. 581.23 (518.70)0.61517,876.6 (-) vs. 12,673.9 (4531.86)0.56015,428.35 (-) vs. 15,473.4 (7038.14)0.451
rs699947
Dominant
AC + CC vs. AA		485.95 (945.93) vs. 194.97 (-)0.046546.82 (553.1) vs. 711.25 (272.64)0.53113,357.85 (5451.18) vs. 11,403.18 (-)0.13014,735.2 (7207.88) vs. 16,872.8 (10,171.29)0.347
Recessive
CC vs. AC + AA		422.67 (1231.86) vs. 434.75 (678.21)0.447526.14 (9396.71) vs. 711.254 (479.99)0.15614,044.95 (7679.2) vs. 12,418.33 (4638.02)0.23116,211.6 (6731.85) vs. 14,435.95 (7038.14)0.654
rs3025033
Dominant
AG + GG vs. AA		401.86 (734.59) vs. 517.55 (1022.04)0.935629.32 (336.84) vs. 526.14 (621.82)0.94412,588.6 (1324.06) vs. 17,349.15 (7709.45)0.62314,089.38 (6374.95) vs. 17,524.8 (8218.45)0.307
Recessive
GG vs. AG + AA		- (-) vs. 454.31 (819.36)-- (-) vs. 581.23 (377.25)-- (-) vs. 12,673.9 (5468.76)-- (-) vs. 15,819.96 (6356.65)-
rs2146323
Dominant
AC + AA vs. CC		383.55 (1282.99) vs. 454.311 (527.24)0.866735.12 (743.12) vs. 536.48 (318.29)0.22713,357.85 (5271.05) vs. 12,673.9 (5624.84)0.87413,443.55 (7708) vs. 15,819.98 (7312.38)0.270
Recessive
AA vs. AC + CC		- (-) vs. 42.67 (677.02)-739.89 (-) vs. 546.82 (484.33)0.402- (-) vs. 12,759.2 (5358.85)-15,880.4 (-) vs. 15,428.35 (6868.4)0.952
IQR—interquartile range; any missing IQR value is due to the small sample size in the study subgroup; p—significance level; significant when p < 0.05; p-values marked with bold indicate statistically significant p-values.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vilkeviciute, A.; Cebatoriene, D.; Kriauciuniene, L.; Liutkeviciene, R. VEGFA Haplotype and VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 Protein Associations with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Cells 2022, 11, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11060996

AMA Style

Vilkeviciute A, Cebatoriene D, Kriauciuniene L, Liutkeviciene R. VEGFA Haplotype and VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 Protein Associations with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Cells. 2022; 11(6):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11060996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vilkeviciute, Alvita, Dzastina Cebatoriene, Loresa Kriauciuniene, and Rasa Liutkeviciene. 2022. "VEGFA Haplotype and VEGF-A and VEGF-R2 Protein Associations with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration" Cells 11, no. 6: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11060996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop