Next Article in Journal
Src-Family Protein Kinase Inhibitors Suppress MYB Activity in a p300-Dependent Manner
Previous Article in Journal
Proteomics Approach Highlights Early Changes in Human Fibroblasts-Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Crosstalk
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/cells11071161
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemerin Effect on the Endometrial Proteome of the Domestic Pig during Implantation Obtained by LC-MS/MS Analysis

by
Kinga Orzechowska
1,
Kamil Dobrzyń
2,
Marta Kieżun
1,
Agata Malinowska
3,
Bianka Świderska
3,
Tadeusz Kamiński
1 and
Nina Smolińska
1,*
1
Department of Animal Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego St. 1A, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego St. 5, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland
3
Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics PAS, 5a Pawińskiego St., 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2022, 11(7), 1161; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071161
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 23 March 2022 / Accepted: 28 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Reproductive Cells and Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chemerin (CHEM) is a hormone mainly expressed in adipocytes involved in the regulation of energy homeostasis and inflammatory response. CHEM expression has been demonstrated in the structures of the porcine hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, as well as in the uterus, trophoblasts and conceptuses of pigs. In this study, we performed high-throughput proteomic analyses (liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, LC-MS/MS) to examine the influence of CHEM (400 ng/mL) on differentially regulated proteins (DRPs) in the porcine endometrial tissue explants during implantation (15 to 16 days of gestation). Among all 352 DRPs, 164 were up-regulated and 188 were down-regulated in CHEM-treated group. DRPs were assigned to 47 gene ontology (GO) terms (p-adjusted < 0.05). Validation of four DRPs (IFIT5, TGFβ1, ACO1 and PGRMC1) by Western blot analysis confirmed the veracity and accuracy of the LC-MS/MS method used in the present study. We suggest that CHEM, by modulating various protein expressions, takes part in the endometrial cell proliferation, migration and invasion at the time of implantation. It also regulates the endometrial immune response, sensitivity to P4 and the formation of new blood vessels. Additionally, CHEM appears to be an important factor involved in endothelial cell dysfunction during the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The identification of a large number of DRPs under the influence of CHEM provides a valuable resource for understanding the molecular mechanisms of this hormone action during implantation, which is a prerequisite for better control of pig reproduction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Secretory products from maternal uterine epithelia and precise cell-specific molecular signaling between embryos and the endometrium are critical to conceptus growth and development, pregnancy recognition signaling and implantation [1]. Regulation of the uterine receptivity and conceptus adhesion to the endometrium is critical for placentation. Alternations of these signaling cascades can lead to an abnormal exchange of nutrients and pregnancy failure. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing conceptus implantation is critical for the improvement of the fertility and reproductive health of pigs [2,3]. The roles of various feto-maternal signals, such as progesterone, estrogens, prostaglandins, interleukins, interferons and growth factors have been demonstrated to be involved in the implantation process [4]. In addition to the above molecules, there are many more unique proteins within the uterine environment of pigs that take part in the establishment of pregnancy. For example, studies indicated that thyroid hormones, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and thyroid hormone receptors (α1, α2, and β1) are present in the endometrium and influence implantation taking part in crosstalk between the competent blastocyst and the receptive endometrium [5,6]. Plenty of studies have shown that the hormones produced by adipose tissue, like leptin [7] and chemerin [8], also take part in the control of reproduction.
Chemerin (CHEM) is a hormone mainly expressed in adipocytes [9]. CHEM exerts its physiological functions through binding to three G protein-coupled receptors: chemokine like receptor 1 (CMKLR1), G protein-coupled receptor 1 (GPR1) and CC motif chemokine receptor-like 2 (CCRL2) [10]. It plays a pleiotropic role as a cytokine and adipokine (a hormone produced by the adipose tissue). CHEM regulates inflammatory response and energy homeostasis [11]. Recent studies indicated that CHEM also takes part in the control of reproduction by the modulation of, among others, uterine and ovarian steroidogenesis during both the early pregnancy and the estrous cycle [8,12,13,14]. CHEM expression has been demonstrated in the structures of the porcine hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, as well as in the uterus, trophoblasts and conceptuses of pigs [15,16,17,18,19].
CHEM, as a cytokine and adipokine, is a very interesting research object and can play an essential role in the implantation process. Gudelska et al. [19] confirmed that the implantation/embryo attachment was the stage of the highest CHEM protein expression in the porcine endometrium, focusing our attention on the role of CHEM in this process. Moreover, Yang et al. [20] reported that the expression of CHEM in the human decidua correlates with early spontaneous abortion. The above reports suggest that CHEM may be an important factor in the maintenance of early pregnancy. However, there is a lack of information on the exact roles that CHEM may play during implantation.
Recent studies have shown molecular changes in the porcine endometrium during the peri-implantation period and revealed sixteen differentially expressed proteins involved in the recognition and establishment of early gestation in pigs [21]. It has been hypothesized that CHEM may affect the proteome of the porcine uterus during implantation, and consequently influence the production of many factors essential for the proper course of gestation. Accordingly, in this work, using the tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomics method based on TMT-isobaric mass tag labeling and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis, we present for the first time the proteome profile of the porcine endometrial explants affected by CHEM during the peri-implantation period (days 15 to 16 of gestation).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Samples

According to the Polish (Journal of Laws, 2015; item 266) and European (Directive 2010/63/Eu) regulations on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes, the experiments did not require the consent of the competent ethics committee for animal experiments. The present study was conducted on five female crossbreed pigs (Large White × Polish Landrace, seven to eight months of age and 120 to 130 kg in weight), acquired from a private breeding farm. The animals were on days 15 to 16 of pregnancy (the beginning of implantation). Females were verified for estrus behavior in the presence of a boar daily. Insemination, by natural mating, was conducted on days one to two of the estrous cycle. The day after coition was indicated as the first day of pregnancy. Uteri were gathered immediately after slaughter, placed in ice-cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and carried to the laboratory on ice.

2.2. Tissue Cultures

Uterine tissue cultures were performed as described by Smolinska et al. [22]. The explants were preincubated for 2 h at a rocking platform in a water bath at 37 °C (95% O2 and 5% CO2) and then treated for 24 h with human recombinant CHEM (cat. no. 268e10032; RayBiotech Life, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) at the concentration of 400 ng/mL. Tissue explants incubated with medium alone were used as controls. The dose of CHEM was selected based on ULFs CHEM concentrations indicated in our previous study [19]. All cultures were performed in duplicates, in five independent experiments (n = 5). After incubation, the endometrial slices were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until the total protein extraction. The viability of tissue explants was monitored by quantifying lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity as we described in Dobrzyn et al. [23]. The average activity of LDH in the cultured tissue explants after the treatment period was 128.7 ± 35.6 U/L (0.67% of maximal release of LDH after the total endometrial cells destruction).

2.3. Protein Extraction

Protein extraction was performed by homogenizing 15–20 mg of endometrial tissue in 150–200 μL of lysis buffer (30 mM TrisHCl pH 8, 8 M urea and 2% CHAPS) on ice three times for 15 s using TissueRuptor (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Protein extracts were incubated on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged (10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C). The supernatants were quantified using a Bradford dye-binding procedure with 0.5 mg/mL BSA as a standard. All analyses were performed in duplicate. Probes were stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

2.4. Protein’s Digestion

A proteomics analysis was performed by the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory at the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of the Polish Academy of Sciences. 100 µg of each endometrial sample and pulled internal standard was diluted with 200 µL 8 M urea solution in a 200 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer (TEAB, pH 8.5). Cysteine bridges were reduced by incubation with 20 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) (1 h at 37 °C). Proteins were transferred into Vivacon 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off filter (Sartorius Stedim, Göttingen, Germany) and digested according to a filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) protocol with minor modifications. Samples were spun at 14,500× g for 30 min and washed with 100 µL urea solution before cysteine blocking by 15 min incubation with 50 mM s-methylmethanethiosulfonate (MMTS) at RT. Proteins were washed three times with 8 M urea buffer and 200 mM TEAB. After each addition, the samples were centrifuged until the cut-off filter was dry. Digestion was carried out using a trypsin/LysC mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in 1:25 enzyme-to-protein ratio overnight at 37 °C. Peptides were eluted from spin filters by two washes with 200 mM TEAB and one wash with 500 mM NaCl. Dried peptides were resuspended in 85 µL of 200 mM TEAB buffer and labelled with TMT10plex (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) tags in 41 µL acetonitrile for 1 h on vortex. Internal standards were labelled with TMT10-126 label reagent. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 8 µL 5% hydroxylamine. The labelling efficiency was checked, and combined samples for each TMT set were desalted using two 30 mg Oasis HLB columns (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Briefly, cartridges were preconditioned with 1 mL methanol and 1 mL MS-grade water. After the sample was loaded and rinsed with 1 mL water, peptides were eluted from columns with 400 µL of 80% acetonitrile (ACN) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Aliquots were dried and resuspended in 500 µL 10 mM ammonium hydroxide.

2.5. Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation at High pH

TMT labelled peptides were fractionated using high-pH reverse-phase chromatography on an XBridge Peptide BEH C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 130 Å, 5 µm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Separation was performed at 1 mL/min flow rate for 27 min on a Waters Acquity UPLC H-class system. Mobile phases consisted of water (A), ACN (B) and 100 mM ammonium hydroxide solution (C). The percentage of phase C was kept at a constant 10% through the entire gradient. Fractions were collected every 1 min starting from the third minute of the run. The following gradient was applied: 3 to 5% solvent B for 0.5 min, 5 to 22% for 17 min, 22 to 28% for 2 min, 28 to 45% for 1.5 min, 45 to 90% for 0.5 min, 2.5 min isocratic hold at 90% and final column equilibration at 3% phase B for 3 min. The peptide elution profile was monitored at 214 nm by UV detector. Twenty-five fractions from each TMT set were dried in Speedvac and reconstituted in 100 uL 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and 2% acetonitrile before LC-MS/MS analysis.

2.6. Mass Spectrometry

Fractions were analyzed using an LC-MS/MS system comprised of an ACQUITY UPLC M-Class System (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) directly coupled to a QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides were trapped on a C18 pre-column (180 µm × 20 mm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using 0.1% FA in water as a mobile phase and transferred to a nanoAcquity BEH C18 column (75 µm × 250 mm, 1.7 µm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) using ACN gradient (0–35% ACN in 160 min) in the presence of 0.1% FA at a flow rate of 250 nL/min. Data acquisition was carried out using a data-dependent method with the top 12 precursors selected for MS2 analysis after collisional induced fragmentation (CID) with normalized collision energy (NCE) of 27. Full MS scans covering the mass range of 300–1600 m/z (mass-to-charge ratio) were acquired at a resolution of 70,000 with a maximum injection time of 60 ms and an AGC target value of 1e6. MS2 scans were acquired with a maximum injection time of 120 ms and an AGC target value of 5e5 with a resolution of 35,000. The isolation window was set to 1.2 m/z and a dynamic exclusion was set to 30 s.

2.7. Data Analysis

Offline recalibration, as well as peptides and proteins identification, was performed in the MaxQuant/Andromeda software suite (version 1.6.17.0) [24] using a Sus scrofa full Uniprot database (versions 2020_10). The search included tryptic and LysC-generated peptides, and Metylthio (C) was set as a fixed modification and oxidation (M) as a variable one. Reporter MS2 quantification was specified in order to obtain values for quantitative analysis. TMT 10plex correction factors were specified for each labelling set according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A reverse database was used for target/decoy statistical results validation. Protein groups along with quantitative data were further analyzed in Perseus (version 1.6.13) [25]. Hits from the reversed database and proteins only identified by site and contaminants were removed. TMT reporter values were normalized with internal reference scaling (IRS) [26]. Reporter intensities were log2 transformed and proteins with less than 3 values in at least one biological group were filtered out. Missing values were replaced with data from normal distribution (width 0.3, down shift 1.8) separately for each column. The significance threshold for p-value resulting from a Student’s t-test was 0.05 and the fold-change cut-off was ±1.2.

2.8. Network and Functional Analysis

To analyze the involvement of DRPs in the common biological processes, an enrichment ontology and pathway analysis was performed with the use of g:Profiler software (version e104_eg51_p15_3922dba) [27] based on GO [28], and KEGG [29] databases (p-adjusted < 0.05).

2.9. Validation of LC-MS/MS Results by Western Blot

In order to validate the LC-MS/MS results, we have performed a Western blot analysis for four chosen proteins (IFIT5, ACO1, TGFβ1, PGRMC1) selected from the list of proteins with the expression significantly changed under the influence of CHEM. The samples for Western blot analysis were homogenized on ice, with T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) enriched with protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The lysates were cleared by centrifugation (10,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C). Western blot analysis was conducted according to Smolinska et al. [15], with modifications. Actin protein was used as a control for equal loading and to quantify the relative abundance of the examined proteins. 40 μg of total protein isolates were solubilized in a sample buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue and 200 mM dithiothreitol, pH = 6.8) and incubated for 3 min at 99.9 °C. Next, samples were separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis in a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel (100 V) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (PVDF) (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). A 5% BSA solution in TBST was used to block nonspecific binding. Next, the membranes were incubated at 4 °C overnight with specific primary antibodies: IFIT5 (1:500; ab220954; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), PGRMC1 (1:500; sc-393015; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), ACO1 (1:1000; orb330127; Biorbyt, Cambridge, UK), TGFβ1 (1:500; PA1-29032; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and actin (1:2000; A2066; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). After washing, membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (1.5 h, RT): goat anti-rabbit IgG (AP156P; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) for IFIT5, ACO1, TGFβ1 (1:5000) and actin (1:20,000), and goat anti-mouse IgG for PGRMC1 (1:5000; 115-035-003; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). The visualization of immunocomplexes was carried out using chemiluminescence HRP substrate (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and visualized with an Azure 280 Imaging System (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA). The results of the analysis were quantified by optical density (OD) analysis of immunocomplexes with Image Studio Lite v.5.2 (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Data were presented as a ratio of examined protein relative to actin protein in arbitrary OD units. The normality of Western blot data distributions was confirmed using a Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05), and the results were statistically checked by a Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) using Statistica software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Data were presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5).

3. Results

3.1. Differentially Regulated Proteins and Functional Annotations (GO and KEGG)

A total of 1499 proteins were identified in the current study (Table S1). After relative quantification, filters (fold change cutoff 1.2 and p < 0.05) were applied to the results to obtain the final list of 352 differentially regulated proteins (DRPs). DRPs were visualized in the Volcano plot (Figure 1).
Among all DRPs, 164 were up-regulated and 188 were down-regulated in the CHEM-treated group (Table S2). The fold change values for DRPs ranged from −2.16 (SCD5) to 3.01 (HLA-DQB1). To discover possible functions of 352 annotated DRPs identified in the CHEM-treated porcine endometrial explants, the proteins were classified into three main categories: ‘biological processes’ (BP), ‘cellular components’ (CC) and ‘molecular function’ (MF) (Table S3). DRPs were assigned to 47 gene ontology (GO) terms (p-adjusted < 0.05); within these GO terms, 24 were ascribed to BP, 14 to CC and 9 to MF category (Figure 2).
Most of the DRPs from the BP category were allocated to ‘cell motility’ (GO:0048870; 43 DRPs), ‘localization of cell’ (GO:0051674; 43 DRGs), ‘cell migration’ (GO:0016477; 42 DRPs) and ‘carboxylic acid metabolic process’ (GO:0019752; 29 DRPs). Within the BP category, the most interesting DRPs were enriched to several subcategories: leukocyte cell-cell adhesion’ (GO:0007159; 11 DRPs), ‘regulation of cell migration’ (GO:0030334; 23 DRPs) and ‘regulation of T cell proliferation’ (GO:0042129; 6 DRPs) (Figure 3).
Most of the proteins assigned to the CC category were annotated to ‘cell junction’ (GO:0030054; 44 DRPs) and ‘anchoring junction’ (GO:0070161; 31 DRPs). The proteins were CC of e.g., cell-cell junction, cytoskeleton, cell leading edge, and polymeric cytoskeletal fiber.
The most enriched GO term in the MF category was ‘identical protein binding’ (GO:0042802; 59 DRPs). The MF aspect encompassed proteins annotated to ‘phospholipid binding’ (GO:0005543; 19 DRPs), ‘protein-containing complex binding’ (GO:0044877; 15 DRPs), ‘structural constituent of cytoskeleton’ (GO:0005200; 5 DRPs).
The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis revealed the modulation of two signaling pathways, activated by DRPs. The enrichment analysis qualified well-documented pathways that are linked with CHEM activation, e.g., ‘hypertrophic cardiomyopathy’ (KEGG:05410; 9 DRPs) and ‘dilated cardiomyopathy’ (KEGG:05414; 6 DRPs).

3.2. Western Blot

To validate the obtained LC-MS/MS results, four DRPs were selected for western blot analysis. In the endometrial tissue treated in vitro with CHEM, when compared to the control, the abundances of Interferon Induced Protein With Tetratricopeptide Repeats 5 (IFIT5) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGFβ1) were up-regulated (p < 0.05). CHEM administration was related to a decreased protein content of Aconitase 1 (ACO1) and membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1 (PGRMC1) (p < 0.05). The expression patterns of the selected DRPs agreed with the LC-MS/MS results (Figure 4). Validation of the results confirmed the veracity and accuracy of the LC-MS/MS method used in the present study.

4. Discussion

In the present study, for the first time, an LC-MS/MS analysis was performed to investigate DRPs in the cultured porcine endometrial explants exposed to CHEM (400 ng/mL) collected during the implantation period. In the current study, among all 352 DRPs, 164 were up-regulated and 188 were down-regulated in the CHEM-treated group. DRPs were assigned to 47 functional annotations. The above proteins were classified by GO functional annotation to processes connected to, among others, the regulation of cell migration and motility, the integrin-mediated signaling pathway, and the leukocyte cell-cell adhesion. Furthermore, we have confirmed the results obtained using high-throughput LC-MS/MS by the evolution of the CHEM effect on four chosen DRPs abundance in the porcine endometrium by the western blot method.
Progesterone (P4) is an important factor regulating the functioning of the endometrium. It participates in the preparation of the endometrium for implantation, and then maintains the pregnancy by inhibiting uterine muscle contractions, stimulating uterine growth and modulating the mother’s immune system [30]. P4 acts through the classical signaling pathway via nuclear P4 receptors (PRs) and also through non-classical signaling pathways [31]. In our in vitro study, one of the DRPs that down-regulated under the influence of CHEM was PGRMC1, which is a membrane-associated non-classical P4 receptor [32]. The PGRMC1 protein has been suggested to be important in early pregnancy because its expression is present in the human decidua at the maternal-fetal interface and associated membranes, with the highest expression being in the smooth muscle of placental blood vessels, villous capillaries, and in the syncytiotrophoblasts. In addition, it was shown that the expression of PGRMC1 protein depends on the stage of the estrous cycle and increases in endometrial cells undergoing steroid-dependent terminal differentiation [33]. Another study indicated that the mRNA level of PGRMC1 significantly increased during gestation in the bovine endometrium [34]. It can be assumed that PGRMC1 is involved in cell differentiation. Lyzikova et al. [35] pointed to PGRMC1 as a potential factor involved in recurrent miscarriage. In the cases of recurrent miscarriage, endometrial protein expression of PGRMC1 is inversely correlated with infiltrated immune cells. It is suggested that PGRMC1 may regulate the immune response of the uterus [35]. The latest reports confirm that CHEM is involved in the regulation of steroidogenesis, including P4 secretion in the porcine endometrium [8]. In the light of these facts, we may assume that CHEM, except a direct impact on P4 secretion, in modulating endometrial PGRMC1 content may also be responsible for the proper sensitivity of tissues to the action of P4, which is necessary for the maintenance of pregnancy.
Regulation of the cell migration process is crucial in the control of trophoblast attachment [36]. Stanniocalcin 1 (STC1) is a glycoprotein assigned to the ‘regulation of cell migration’ category (GO:0030334), that reduces calcium levels and increases phosphate levels in the cells and tissues. STC1 is involved in many processes, including angiogenesis, mineral homeostasis, cell proliferation, inflammation, and apoptosis [37,38]. In our experiment, CHEM increased the level of this protein. Song et al. [37] showed that the STC1 gene and protein are present in the porcine endometrium and ULFs (uterine luminal flushing) during the estrus cycle and pregnancy. In addition, STC1 mRNA expression has been shown to increase in the luminal epithelium (LE) between days 12 and 20 of pregnancy, possibly due to the increasing concentration of P4, which positively correlates with STC1 expression [37]. Studies on the human endometrium demonstrated that STC1 showed a similar expression with receptivity markers during the window of implantation [39]. The authors of the above studies suggest that STC1 may be a unique marker of implantation. CHEM, by stimulating STC1 content, may affect implantation through the effects on uterine receptivity.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) builds the intercellular network of collagen and proteoglycans through which it is possible to spread nutrients, metabolites, cytokines and growth factors. Degradation of ECM is essential for tissue development, morphogenesis and repair. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), by regulating the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), are the most important mediators in ECM remodeling [40]. Our in vitro study has shown that CHEM diminished TIMP2 protein levels in the porcine endometrium during implantation. Ledgard et al. [41] indicated that TIMP2 protein was present in ULFs in lower amounts in pregnant compared with non-pregnant animals. The authors suggested that TIMP2 is involved in the maternal recognition of pregnancy [41]. On the other hand, another study has shown that the presence of conceptus induced endometrial TIMP2 mRNA expression. Additionally, increased TIMP2 protein abundance in ULFs during embryo elongation was observed [42]. The presence of TIMP2 was also reported in the human decidua and placenta [43,44,45]. Tropomyosin alpha-4 chain (TPM4), up-regulated in this study by CHEM, is likewise associated with the cytoskeletal remodeling essential for pregnancy establishment. It has been shown that TPM4 protein is increased in the decidualized stromal cells during the late secretory phase of the menstrual cycle in women. The presence of this protein has also been confirmed in the decidual cells on the fetal-maternal interface in the first trimester of pregnancy [46]. Taking into consideration that CHEM modulated TIMP2 and TPM4 protein abundance, we can imply that CHEM may be involved in the control of endometrial remodeling during trophoblast invasion.
Subsequent DRPs identified in this study under CHEM influence, classified in the ‘regulation of cell migration’ category (GO:0030334), are TGFβ1 and its receptor Endoglin (ENG). TGFβ1 is one of the many growth factors identified in the porcine endometrium during the peri-implantation period [47,48]. Much research supports the finding that the porcine conceptus and endometrium are sources of secreted TGFβ1 during implantation, which suggests its possible roles in early embryo growth and maternal-conceptuses interactions [47,48,49,50,51]. The obtained results revealed the stimulatory effect of CHEM on TGFβ1 and ENG protein expression. Transgenic mice with inappropriate expression of TGFβ1 receptors in the uterus during early pregnancy were characterized by a delay in the attachment phase of implantation [52]. A study on the murine uterus has shown that the epithelial-derived TGFβ1 takes part in stromal differentiation at the time of implantation [53]. Other studies conducted on pregnant pigs on day 15 of gestation indicated that TGFβ1 plays also an immunosuppressive function [54]. Interestingly, Chadchan et al. [55] have observed up-regulated ENG protein and mRNA expression throughout the window of endometrial receptivity for mice embryo implantation. TGFβ1 and its receptor ENG are important for the normal implantation process, and we suggest that CHEM, by the stimulation of TGFβ1 and ENG levels, is an important regulating factor at the conceptus-maternal interface during the peri-implantation period in pigs.
In pigs, the maternal and fetal sides are connected by the placental microvasculature, thus there is a maternal-fetal exchange between the trophoblast and uterine luminal epithelium [56]. The dominant lymphocytes that accumulate at the interface between mother and fetus are the natural killers (NK). They play a key role in the maternal and fetal immune recognition and angiogenesis of the placenta. Any abnormalities in the migration of NK cells may lead to disturbances in the transformation of the uterine spiral arteries and adequate fetoplacental perfusion [57]. Carlino et al. [58] demonstrated that CHEM mRNA and protein are up-regulated during decidualization in the human endometrium and might contribute to NK cell accumulation and vascular remodeling during early gestation. Zhang et al. [59] proved that increased levels of TGFβ1 (described above) inhibit the activation of NK and their angiogenic properties. Moreover, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), down-regulated in this study by CHEM, is a transmembrane glycoprotein that promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion [60,61]. Münz et al. [60] indicated that the inhibition of EpCAM expression strongly decreased proliferation and metabolism in human carcinoma cells. Studies on gliomas have shown that EpCAM overexpression significantly correlates with microvessel density, which indicates the participation of this protein in angiogenesis [62]. Other cancer studies also link EpCAM to the formation of new blood vessels [63,64,65]. Interestingly, EpCAM is expressed in the human [66] and mouse [67] endometrial epithelia and rat embryos [68]. Endothelial cell-selective adhesion molecule (ESAM) is the next cell adhesion molecule identified in this study to be up-regulated under the CHEM influence. ESAM is primarily expressed in the embryo-developing vasculature and takes part in cell-cell interactions [69]. It has been proven that tumor growth in ESAM knockout mice is retarded. The above phenomenon was related to less migratory and angiogenic activity [70]. Another enhanced cell adhesion molecule identified in this study is platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM1). PECAM1 is suggested to play a role in angiogenesis and leukocyte-endothelial interactions in the process of leukocyte margination during inflammation [71,72]. It is worth noting that EpCAM, ESAM, and PECAM1 are three of the 24 DRPs identified in this study, classified in the ‘cell-cell junction’ GO category (GO:0005911). During penetration of the uterine basal lamina by the trophoblasts, junctional complexes are formed between the syncytial trophoblast and maternal endothelial cells of blood vessels [1]. CHEM, by modulating the TGFβ1, EpCAM, ESAM, and PECAM1 proteins content in the endometrium, may control endothelial cell migration and tube formation intensity, which are crucial for endometrial cell differentiation during implantation. The above reports, together with the DRPs discussed in the previous paragraph, confirm the important role of CHEM in the endometrial remodeling and preparation for embryo implantation.
TGFβ1 and Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (VCAM1) up-regulated in this study by CHEM, are both classified in the ‘leukocyte cell-cell adhesion’ category (GO:0007159). Both proteins play a key role in the activation of NK cells, which may have a direct impact on the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [59,73]. Preeclampsia is a common disorder that develops during pregnancy (4–5% of human pregnancies). It is characterized by elevated blood pressure and an intensified systemic inflammatory reaction. It has been suggested that the abnormal invasion of trophoblasts into the uterine blood vessels and the immunological intolerance between the fetal-placental and maternal tissues are responsible for the occurrence of this disease [74]. Recent reports confirmed the role of CHEM in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Tan et al. [75] indicated that placental CHEM expression and release increased in women with this disorder. It has been shown that CHEM reduced vascular endothelial factor-A and inhibited trophoblast migration and invasion. Moreover, according to the same authors, trophoblast CHEM overexpression in mice contributed to fetal growth restriction [75]. In the present study, CHEM, by increasing the expression of TGFβ1 protein in the endometrium, may contribute to the inadequate activation of NK cells and the development of preeclampsia. Cell adhesion molecules, due to their role in the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells and the migration of leukocytes to the perivascular tissue, are believed to be subsequent indicators of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia [76]. VCAM1 has become the subject of many studies in terms of its involvement in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Various research suggests an increase in VCAM1 plasma concentration in preeclamptic patients compared with normal pregnancy [76,77,78,79]. It can be assumed that CHEM may regulate cytotrophoblast invasion in the spiral arteries and endothelial cell dysfunction during the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Two other proteins associated with the development of preeclampsia and affected by CHEM in this study are Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like 1 (TINAGL1) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 2 (ERAP2). TINAGL1 is a matricellular protein up-regulated in this study by CHEM interacting with structural matrix proteins and promoting cell adhesion [80]. The presence of the TINAGL mRNA and protein has been demonstrated in the mouse uterus [81] and embryos [82]. The expression of TINAGL1 was increased just before implantation in embryos and the postimplantation period in the decidual endometrium [81,82]. Mary et al. [83] reported that TINAGL1 was present in the human placenta and down-regulated under preeclamptic conditions. ERAP2 is known for its involvement in processes regulating immune recognition, angiogenesis, and blood pressure. Moreover, studies reported that ERAP2 abundance is lower in the placenta of women with preeclampsia [84,85]. Additionally, the reports of other teams also confirmed the correlation between the CHEM serum concentration with preeclampsia [86,87]. The above suggest CHEM involvement in the broadly understood pathogenesis of this disorder.
Considering the above-described roles of proteins differentially regulated under the influence of CHEM, we suggest that the adipokine takes part in the endometrial cell proliferation, migration and invasion at the time of implantation. It also regulates the endometrial immune response, sensitivity to P4, and the formation of new blood vessels. Additionally, CHEM appears to be an important factor involved in endothelial cell dysfunction during the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Our results support the hypothesis that a balanced expression of CHEM is important for matrix remodeling and controlled trophoblast attachment during the implantation period. The obtained results provide a platform for a better understanding of the influence of CHEM on the porcine endometrium during implantation. However, future studies must be carried out to identify the exact mechanism of CHEM action.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11071161/s1, Table S1. Total proteome changes in the porcine endometrial tissues induced by chemerin treatment; Table S2. The differentially regulated proteins in endometrial tissues after chemerin treatment; Table S3. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes signaling pathways enrichment analysis results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.O. and N.S.; methodology, K.O. and N.S.; validation, K.O.; formal analysis, K.O. and B.Ś.; investigation, K.O., K.D., M.K. and N.S.; resources, T.K. and N.S.; data curation, K.O. and A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.O.; writing—review and editing, K.O., N.S. and T.K.; visualization, K.O; supervision, T.K. and N.S.; project administration, N.S.; funding acquisition, N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Center (Poland) grant number [2017/25/B/NZ9/00040]. The equipment used was sponsored in part by the Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), a project co-sponsored by European Regional Development Fund and Innovative Economy, The National Cohesion Strategy of Poland. Kinga Orzechowska is a recipient of a scholarship from the Program Interdisciplinary Doctoral Studies in Biology and Biotechnology (POWR.03.05.00-00-Z310/17), which is funded by the European Social Fund. “Development Program of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn”, POWR.03.05.00-00-Z310/17, co-financed by the European Union under the European Social Fund from the Operational Program Knowledge Education Development.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Polish Act of the protection of animals used for educational or scientific purposes of 15 January 2015 and directive 2010/63/EU (Journal of Laws Dz.U. 2015 No. item 266) of the European Parliament of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for scientific objectives, so this study did not require the consent of the competent ethics committee for animal experiments.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [88] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD031795. Other data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bazer, F.W.; Spencer, T.E.; Johnson, G.A.; Burghardt, R.C.; Wu, G. Comparative aspects of implantation. Reproduction 2009, 138, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bazer, F.W.; Johnson, G.A.; Wu, G. Amino Acids and Conceptus Development During the Peri-Implantation Period of Pregnancy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 843, 23–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stenhouse, C.; Seo, H.; Wu, G.; Johnson, G.A.; Bazer, F.W. Insights into the Regulation of Implantation and Placentation in Humans, Rodents, Sheep, and Pigs. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2022, 1354, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bazer, F.W.; Johnson, G.A. Pig blastocyst-uterine interactions. Differentiation 2014, 87, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Piccirilli, D.; Baldini, E.; Massimiani, M.; Camaioni, A.; Salustri, A.; Bernardini, R.; Centanni, M.; Ulisse, S.; Moretti, C.; Campagnolo, L. Thyroid hormone regulates protease expression and activation of Notch signaling in implantation and embryo development. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 236, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aghajanova, L.; Stavreus-Evers, A.; Lindeberg, M.; Landgren, B.M.; Sparre, L.S.; Hovatta, O. Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and thyroid hormone receptors are involved in human endometrial physiology. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 230–237e.2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Castellucci, M.; De Matteis, R.; Meisser, A.; Cancello, R.; Monsurrò, V.; Islami, D.; Sarzani, R.; Marzioni, D.; Cinti, S.; Bischof, P. Leptin modulates extracellular matrix molecules and metalloproteinases: Possible implications for trophoblast invasion. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 6, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gudelska, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Kiezun, M.; Kisielewska, K.; Rytelewska, E.; Kaminski, T.; Smolinska, N. Chemerin affects P4 and E2 synthesis in the porcine endometrium during early pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goralski, K.B.; McCarthy, T.C.; Hanniman, E.A.; Zabel, B.A.; Butcher, E.C.; Parlee, S.D.; Muruganandan, S.; Sinal, C.J. Chemerin, a novel adipokine that regulates adipogenesis and adipocyte metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 28175–28188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Helfer, G.; Wu, Q.F. Chemerin: A multifaceted adipokine involved in metabolic disorders. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 238, R79–R94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mattern, A.; Zellmann, T.; Beck-Sickinger, A.G. Processing, signaling, and physiological function of chemerin. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rytelewska, E.; Kiezun, M.; Kisielewska, K.; Gudelska, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Kaminska, B.; Kaminski, T.; Smolinska, N. Chemerin as a modulator of ovarian steroidogenesis in pigs: An in vitro study. Theriogenology 2021, 160, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Q.; Kim, J.Y.; Xue, K.; Liu, J.Y.; Leader, A.; Tsang, B.K. Chemerin, a novel regulator of follicular steroidogenesis and its potential involvement in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 5600–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Reverchon, M.; Bertoldo, M.J.; Ramé, C.; Froment, P.; Dupont, J. CHEMERIN (RARRES2) decreases in vitro granulosa cell steroidogenesis and blocks oocyte meiotic progression in bovine species. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Smolinska, N.; Kiezun, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Rytelewska, E.; Kisielewska, K.; Gudelska, M.; Zaobidna, E.; Bogus-Nowakowska, K.; Wyrebek, J.; Bors, K.; et al. Expression of chemerin and its receptors in the porcine hypothalamus and plasma chemerin levels during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kisielewska, K.; Rytelewska, E.; Gudelska, M.; Kiezun, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Bogus-Nowakowska, K.; Kaminska, B.; Smolinska, N.; Kaminski, T. Expression of chemerin receptors CMKLR1, GPR1 and CCRL2 in the porcine pituitary during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy and the effect of chemerin on MAPK/Erk1/2, Akt and AMPK signalling pathways. Theriogenology 2020, 157, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kisielewska, K.; Rytelewska, E.; Gudelska, M.; Kiezun, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Bogus-Nowakowska, K.; Kaminska, B.; Smolinska, N.; Kaminski, T. Relative abundance of chemerin mRNA transcript and protein in pituitaries of pigs during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy and associations with LH and FSH secretion during the estrous cycle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 219, 106532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rytelewska, E.; Kisielewska, K.; Kiezun, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Gudelska, M.; Rak, A.; Dupont, J.J.; Kaminska, B.; Kaminski, T.; Smolinska, N. Expression of chemerin and its receptors in the ovaries of prepubertal and mature gilts. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 87, 739–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gudelska, M.; Dobrzyn, K.; Kiezun, M.; Rytelewska, E.; Kisielewska, K.; Kaminska, B.; Kaminski, T.; Smolinska, N. The expression of chemerin and its receptors (CMKLR1, GPR1, CCRL2) in the porcine uterus during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy and in trophoblasts and conceptuses. Animal 2020, 14, 2116–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, X.; Yao, J.; Wei, Q.; Ye, J.; Yin, X.; Quan, X.; Lan, Y.; Xing, H. Role of chemerin/CMKLR1 in the maintenance of early pregnancy. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pierzchała, D.; Liput, K.; Korwin-Kossakowska, A.; Ogłuszka, M.; Poławska, E.; Nawrocka, A.; Urbański, P.; Ciepłoch, A.; Juszczuk-Kubiak, E.; Lepczyński, A.; et al. Molecular characterisation of uterine endometrial proteins during early stages of pregnancy in pigs by MALDI TOF/TOF. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Smolinska, N.; Dobrzyn, K.; Kiezun, M.; Szeszko, K.; Maleszka, A.; Kaminski, T. Effect of adiponectin on the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, P450 side chain cleavage enzyme and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene expression, progesterone and androstenedione production by the porcine uterus during early pregnancy. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 67, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Dobrzyn, K.; Kiezun, M.; Szeszko, K.; Kisielewska, K.; Rytelewska, E.; Gudelska, M.; Zaobidna, E.; Bors, K.; Kopij, G.; Szymanska, K.; et al. Orexin B affects the transcriptome of incubated in vitro porcine endometrial explants from the early-implantation period. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2021, 56, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 2301–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Plubell, D.L.; Wilmarth, P.A.; Zhao, Y.; Fenton, A.M.; Minnier, J.; Reddy, A.P.; Klimek, J.; Yang, X.; David, L.L.; Pamir, N. Extended multiplexing of Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) labeling reveals age and high fat diet specific proteome changes in mouse epididymal adipose tissue. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 873–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Reimand, J.; Arak, T.; Adler, P.; Kolberg, L.; Reisberg, S.; Peterson, H.; Vilo, J. g:Profiler-a web server for functional interpretation of gene lists (2016 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W83–W89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T.; et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Sato, Y.; Morishima, K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D353–D361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Graham, J.D.; Clarke, C.L. Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues. Endocr. Rev. 1997, 18, 502–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Garg, D.; Ng, S.S.M.; Baig, K.M.; Driggers, P.; Segars, J. Progesterone-mediated non-classical signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cahill, M.A. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1: An integrative review. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 105, 16–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, L.; Kanda, Y.; Roberts, D.J.; Ecker, J.L.; Losel, R.; Wehling, M.; Peluso, J.J.; Pru, J.K. Expression of progesterone receptor membrane component 1 and its partner serpine 1 mRNA binding protein in uterine and placental tissues of the mouse and human. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008, 287, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kowalik, M.K.; Slonina, D.; Rekawiecki, R.; Kotwica, J. Expression of progesterone receptor membrane component (PGRMC) 1 and 2, serpine mRNA binding protein 1 (SERBP1) and nuclear progesterone receptor (PGR) in the bovine endometrium during the estrous cycle and the first trimester of pregnancy. Reprod. Biol. 2013, 13, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lyzikova, Y.A.; Zinovkin, D.A.; Pranjol, M.Z.I. Increase in FoxP3, CD56 immune cells and decrease in glands PGRMC1 expression in the endometrium are associated with recurrent miscarriages. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 245, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bazer, F.W.; Wu, G.; Spencer, T.E.; Johnson, G.A.; Burghardt, R.C.; Bayless, K. Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 16, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Song, G.; Dunlap, K.A.; Kim, J.; Bailey, D.W.; Spencer, T.E.; Burghardt, R.C.; Wagner, G.F.; Johnson, G.A.; Bazer, F.W. Stanniocalcin 1 is a luminal epithelial marker for implantation in pigs regulated by progesterone and estradiol. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bishop, A.; Cartwright, J.E.; Whitley, G.S. Stanniocalcin-1 in the female reproductive system and pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update 2021, 27, 1098–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Allegra, A.; Marino, A.; Coffaro, F.; Lama, A.; Rizza, G.; Scaglione, P.; Sammartano, F.; Santoro, A.; Volpes, A. Is there a uniform basal endometrial gene expression profile during the implantation window in women who became pregnant in a subsequent ICSI cycle? Hum. Reprod. 2009, 24, 2549–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Nagase, H.; Visse, R.; Murphy, G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 69, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ledgard, A.M.; Lee, R.S.-F.; Peterson, A.J.; Ralph Gwatkin Editor in Chief, B. Bovine endometrial legumain and TIMP-2 regulation in response to presence of a conceptus. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2009, 76, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ulbrich, S.E.; Meyer, S.U.; Zitta, K.; Hiendleder, S.; Sinowatz, F.; Bauersachs, S.; Büttner, M.; Fröhlich, T.; Arnold, G.J.; Reichenbach, H.-D.; et al. Bovine endometrial metallopeptidases MMP14 and MMP2 and the metallopeptidase inhibitor TIMP2 participate in maternal preparation of pregnancy. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010, 332, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Marzusch, K.; Ruck, P.; Dietl, J.A.; Horny, H.P.; Kaiserling, E. Immunohistochemical localization of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) in first trimester human placental decidua. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1996, 68, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ruck, P.; Marzusch, B.K.; Horny, H.P.; Dietl, J.; Kaiserling, E. The distribution of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) in the human placenta. Placenta 1996, 17, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seval, Y.; Akkoyunlu, G.; Demir, R.; Asar, M. Distribution patterns of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9 and their inhibitors (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) in the human decidua during early pregnancy. Acta Histochem. 2004, 106, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paule, S.; Li, Y.; Nie, G. Cytoskeletal remodelling proteins identified in fetal-maternal interface in pregnant women and rhesus monkeys. J. Mol. Histol. 2011, 42, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gupta, A.; Ing, N.H.; Bazer, F.W.; Bustamante, L.S.; Jaeger, L.A. Beta transforming growth factors (TGFss) at the porcine conceptus-maternal interface. Part I: Expression of TGFbeta1, TGFbeta2, and TGFbeta3 messenger ribonucleic acids. Biol. Reprod. 1998, 59, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gupta, A.; Dekaney, C.M.; Bazer, F.W.; Madrigal, M.M.; Jaeger, L.A. Beta transforming growth factors (TGFbeta) at the porcine conceptus-maternal interface. Part II: Uterine TGFbeta bioactivity and expression of immunoreactive TGFbetas (TGFbeta1, TGFbeta2, and TGFbeta3) and their receptors (type I and type II). Biol. Reprod. 1998, 59, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Moussad, E.E.-D.A.; Rageh, M.A.E.; Wilson, A.K.; Geisert, R.D. Temporal and spatial expression of connective tissue growth factor (CCN2; CTGF) and transforming growth factor β type 1 (TGF-β1) at the utero-placental interface during early pregnancy in the pig. J. Clin. Pathol. Mol. Pathol. 2002, 55, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Massuto, D.A.; Kneese, E.C.; Johnson, G.A.; Burghardt, R.C.; Hooper, R.N.; Ing, N.H.; Jaeger, L.A. Transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling is activated during porcine implantation: Proposed role for latency-associated peptide interactions with integrins at the conceptus-maternal interface. Reproduction 2010, 139, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gupta, A.; Bazer, F.W.; Jaeger, L.A. Differential expression of beta transforming growth factors (TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3) and their receptors (Type I and Type II) in peri-implantation porcine conceptuses. Biol. Reprod. 1996, 55, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Das, S.K.; Lim, H.; Wang, J.; Paria, B.C.; BazDresch, M.; Dey, S.K. Inappropriate expression of human transforming growth factor (TGF)-α in the uterus of transgenic mouse causes downregulation of TGF-β receptors and delays the blastocyst-attachment reaction. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1997, 18, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tamada, H.; McMaster, M.T.; Flanders, K.C.; Andrews, G.K.; Dey, S.K. Cell type-specific expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in the mouse uterus during the periimplantation period. Mol. Endocrinol. 1990, 4, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Segerson, E.C. Immunosuppressive activity of a porcine high-molecular weight uterine macromolecule is associated with transforming growth factor-β. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1995, 29, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chadchan, S.B.; Kumar, V.; Maurya, V.K.; Soni, U.K.; Jha, R.K. Endoglin (CD105) coordinates the process of endometrial receptivity for embryo implantation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 425, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dantzer, V.; Leiser, R. Initial vascularisation in the pig placenta: I. Demonstration of nonglandular areas by histology and corrosion casts. Anat. Rec. 1994, 238, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kieckbusch, J.; Gaynor, L.M.; Moffett, A.; Colucci, F. MHC-dependent inhibition of uterine NK cells impedes fetal growth and decidual vascular remodelling. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Carlino, C.; Trotta, E.; Stabile, H.; Morrone, S.; Bulla, R.; Soriani, A.; Iannitto, M.L.; Agostinis, C.; Mocci, C.; Minozzi, M.; et al. Chemerin regulates NK cell accumulation and endothelial cell morphogenesis in the decidua during early pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 3603–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhang, J.; Dunk, C.E.; Shynlova, O.; Caniggia, I.; Lye, S.J. TGFb1 suppresses the activation of distinct dNK subpopulations in preeclampsia. EBioMedicine 2019, 39, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Münz, M.; Kieu, C.; Mack, B.; Schmitt, B.; Zeidler, R.; Gires, O. The carcinoma-associated antigen EpCAM upregulates c-myc and induces cell proliferation. Oncogene 2004, 23, 5748–5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Trzpis, M.; McLaughlin, P.M.J.; De Leij, L.M.F.H.; Harmsen, M.C. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: More than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, X.; Ma, W.Y.; Xu, S.C.; Liang, Y.; Fu, Y.B.; Pang, B.; Xin, T.; Fan, H.T.; Zhang, R.; Luo, J.G.; et al. The overexpression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) in glioma. J. Neurooncol. 2014, 119, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Martowicz, A.; Spizzo, G.; Gastl, G.; Untergasser, G. Phenotype-dependent effects of EpCAM expression on growth and invasion of human breast cancer cell lines. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sankpal, N.V.; Fleming, T.P.; Gillanders, W.E. EpCAM modulates NF-κB signaling and interleukin-8 expression in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2013, 11, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Barzaman, K.; Samadi, M.; Moradi-kalbolandi, S.; Majidzadeh, A.K.; Salehi, M.; Jalili, N.; hadi Jazayeri, M.; Khorammi, S.; Darvishi, B.; Siavashi, V.; et al. Development of a recombinant anti-VEGFR2-EPCAM bispecific antibody to improve antiangiogenic efficiency. Exp. Cell Res. 2021, 405, 112685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chan, R.W.S.; Schwab, K.E.; Gargett, C.E. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 70, 1738–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Janzen, D.M.; Cheng, D.; Schafenacker, A.M.; Paik, D.Y.; Goldstein, A.S.; Witte, O.N.; Jaroszewicz, A.; Pellegrini, M.; Memarzadeh, S. Estrogen and progesterone together expand murine endometrial epithelial progenitor cells. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Tarmann, T.; Dohr, G.; Schiechl, H.; Barth, S.; Hartmann, M. Immunohistochemical Detection of an Epithelial Membrane Protein in Rat Embryos at Different Stages of Development. Cells Tissues Organs 1990, 137, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hirata, K.I.; Ishida, T.; Penta, K.; Rezaee, M.; Yang, E.; Wohlgemuth, J.; Quertermous, T. Cloning of an immunoglobulin family adhesion molecule selectively expressed by endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 16223–16231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Ishida, T.; Kundu, R.K.; Yang, E.; Hirata, K.I.; Ho, Y.D.; Quertermous, T. Targeted disruption of endothelial cell-selective adhesion molecule inhibits angiogenic processes in vitro and in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 34598–34604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Muller, W.A.; Weigl, S.A.; Deng, X.; Phillips, D.M. PECAM-1 is required for transendothelial migration of leukocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1993, 178, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Newman, P.J.; Berndt, M.C.; Gorski, J.; White, G.C.; Lyman, S.; Paddock, C.; Muller, W.A. PECAM-1 (CD31) cloning and relation to adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. Science 1990, 247, 1219–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fogler, W.E.; Volker, K.; McCormick, K.L.; Watanabe, M.; Ortaldo, J.R.; Wiltrout, R.H. NK cell infiltration into lung, liver, and subcutaneous B16 melanoma is mediated by VCAM-1/VLA-4 interaction. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 4707–4714. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Sibai, B.M. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 102, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tan, L.; Chen, Z.; Sun, F.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, B.; Wang, B.; Chen, J.; Li, M.; Xiao, T.; Neuman, R.I.; et al. Placental trophoblast-specific overexpression of chemerin induces preeclampsia-like symptoms. Clin. Sci. 2022, 136, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Farzadnia, M.; Ayatollahi, H.; Hasan-zade, M.; Rahimi, H.R. A comparative study of serum level of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1(ICAM-1) and high sensitive C—Reactive protein (hs-CRP) in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2013, 16, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Krauss, T.; Azab, H.; Dietrich, M.; Augustin, H.G. Fetal plasma levels of circulating endothelial cell adhesion molecules in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1998, 78, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Higgins, J.R.; Papayianni, A.; Brady, H.R.; Darling, M.R.N.; Walshe, J.J. Circulating vascular cell adhesion molecule–1 in pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, and normal pregnancy: Evidence of selective dysregulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule–1 homeostasis in pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 179, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Madazli, R.; Budak, E.; Calay, Z.; Aksu, M.F. Correlation between placental bed biopsy findings, vascular cell adhesion molecule and fibronectin levels in pre-eclampsia. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000, 107, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sakurai, M.; Sato, Y.; Mukai, K.; Suematsu, M.; Fukui, E.; Yoshizawa, M.; Tanemura, K.; Hoshino, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Sato, E. Distribution of tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like 1 and structural matrix proteins in mouse embryos during preimplantation development in vivo and in vitro. Zygote 2012, 22, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Igarashi, T.; Tajiri, Y.; Sakurai, M.; Sato, E.; Li, D.; Mukai, K.; Suematsu, M.; Fukui, E.; Yoshizawa, M.; Matsumoto, H. Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like 1 is expressed in the uterus and binds with integrins in decidualized endometrium during postimplantation in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Igarashi, T.; Tajiri, Y.; Sakurai, M.; Sato, E.; Li, D.; Mukai, K.; Suematsu, M.; Fukui, E.; Yoshizawa, M.; Matsumoto, H. Tubulointerstitial Nephritis Antigen-Like 1 is expressed in extraembryonic tissues and interacts with laminin 1 in the reichert membrane at postimplantation in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Mary, S.; Kulkarni, M.J.; Mehendale, S.S.; Joshi, S.R.; Giri, A.P. Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like 1 protein is downregulated in the placenta of pre-eclamptic women. Clin. Proteom. 2017, 14, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Johnson, M.P.; Roten, L.T.; Dyer, T.D.; East, C.E.; Forsmo, S.; Blangero, J.; Brennecke, S.P.; Austgulen, R.; Moses, E.K. The ERAP2 gene is associated with preeclampsia in Australian and Norwegian populations. Hum. Genet. 2009, 126, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Seamon, K.; Kurlak, L.O.; Warthan, M.; Stratikos, E.; Strauss, J.F.; Mistry, H.D.; Lee, E.D. The differential expression of ERAP1/ERAP2 and immune cell activation in pre-eclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, L.; Yang, T.; Ding, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Yu, L.; Peng, M. Chemerin plays a protective role by regulating human umbilical vein endothelial cell-induced nitric oxide signaling in preeclampsia. Endocrine 2015, 48, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Stepan, H.; Philipp, A.; Roth, I.; Kralisch, S.; Jank, A.; Schaarschmidt, W.; Lössner, U.; Kratzsch, J.; Blüher, M.; Stumvoll, M.; et al. Serum levels of the adipokine chemerin are increased in preeclampsia during and 6months after pregnancy. Regul. Pept. 2011, 168, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Bai, J.; Bandla, C.; García-Seisdedos, D.; Hewapathirana, S.; Kamatchinathan, S.; Kundu, D.J.; Prakash, A.; Frericks-Zipper, A.; Eisenacher, M.; et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: A hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D543–D552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 11 01161 g001 550
Figure 1. Volcano plot of the proteins identified by LC–MS/MS in CHEM vs. CTR comparison. The volcano plot shows the fold-change (x-axis) versus the significance (y-axis) of the identified differentially regulated proteins (DRPs) under the influence of CHEM. The significance (non-adjusted p-value) and the fold-change are converted to −Log10(p-value) and Log2(fold-change), respectively. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines show the cut-off of fold-change = ±1.2, and of p-value = 0.05, respectively. The chosen DRPs are labeled by the gene symbols.
Figure 1. Volcano plot of the proteins identified by LC–MS/MS in CHEM vs. CTR comparison. The volcano plot shows the fold-change (x-axis) versus the significance (y-axis) of the identified differentially regulated proteins (DRPs) under the influence of CHEM. The significance (non-adjusted p-value) and the fold-change are converted to −Log10(p-value) and Log2(fold-change), respectively. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines show the cut-off of fold-change = ±1.2, and of p-value = 0.05, respectively. The chosen DRPs are labeled by the gene symbols.
Cells 11 01161 g001
Cells 11 01161 g002 550
Figure 2. The g:Profiler analysis of differentially regulated proteins (DRPs). Manhattan plot that illustrates the enrichment analysis results. The functional terms are grouped and color-coded by data sources, i.e., molecular function (MF) are red, biological processes (BP) are orange, cellular components (CC) are green, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) are pink.
Figure 2. The g:Profiler analysis of differentially regulated proteins (DRPs). Manhattan plot that illustrates the enrichment analysis results. The functional terms are grouped and color-coded by data sources, i.e., molecular function (MF) are red, biological processes (BP) are orange, cellular components (CC) are green, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) are pink.
Cells 11 01161 g002
Cells 11 01161 g003 550
Figure 3. Visualization of the differentially regulated proteins (DRPs) determined to be statistically significant and their enrichment in the ontology terms detected by g:Profiler tool. (A) The circular plot illustrates the five most interesting GO biological processes enriched by DRPs. The outer track shows upregulated (red dots) and downregulated DRPs (blue dots) annotated in the particular GO terms. The inner track depicts the ratio of up- and downregulated proteins engaged in GO terms. A more intense red color shows the greater involvement of overexpressed proteins. (B) The circular plot shows the selected GO terms enriched by DRPs evaluated in the endometrium treated with CHEM.
Figure 3. Visualization of the differentially regulated proteins (DRPs) determined to be statistically significant and their enrichment in the ontology terms detected by g:Profiler tool. (A) The circular plot illustrates the five most interesting GO biological processes enriched by DRPs. The outer track shows upregulated (red dots) and downregulated DRPs (blue dots) annotated in the particular GO terms. The inner track depicts the ratio of up- and downregulated proteins engaged in GO terms. A more intense red color shows the greater involvement of overexpressed proteins. (B) The circular plot shows the selected GO terms enriched by DRPs evaluated in the endometrium treated with CHEM.
Cells 11 01161 g003
Cells 11 01161 g004 550
Figure 4. Western blot validation of the LC-MS results for differentially regulated proteins under the CHEM influence in the endometrium. Validation was performed for IFIT5, ACO1, TGFβ1 and PGRMC1 proteins with reference protein (actin) (p-value < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 5). Bars with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. K—samples from the control groups; CHEM—samples from the CHEM-treated groups. IFIT5—Interferon Induced Protein With Tetratricopeptide Repeats 5; ACO1—Aconitase 1; TGFβ1—Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1; PGRMC1—membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1.
Figure 4. Western blot validation of the LC-MS results for differentially regulated proteins under the CHEM influence in the endometrium. Validation was performed for IFIT5, ACO1, TGFβ1 and PGRMC1 proteins with reference protein (actin) (p-value < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 5). Bars with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. K—samples from the control groups; CHEM—samples from the CHEM-treated groups. IFIT5—Interferon Induced Protein With Tetratricopeptide Repeats 5; ACO1—Aconitase 1; TGFβ1—Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1; PGRMC1—membrane-associated progesterone receptor component 1.
Cells 11 01161 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Orzechowska, K.; Dobrzyń, K.; Kieżun, M.; Malinowska, A.; Świderska, B.; Kamiński, T.; Smolińska, N. Chemerin Effect on the Endometrial Proteome of the Domestic Pig during Implantation Obtained by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Cells 2022, 11, 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071161

AMA Style

Orzechowska K, Dobrzyń K, Kieżun M, Malinowska A, Świderska B, Kamiński T, Smolińska N. Chemerin Effect on the Endometrial Proteome of the Domestic Pig during Implantation Obtained by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Cells. 2022; 11(7):1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Orzechowska, Kinga, Kamil Dobrzyń, Marta Kieżun, Agata Malinowska, Bianka Świderska, Tadeusz Kamiński, and Nina Smolińska. 2022. "Chemerin Effect on the Endometrial Proteome of the Domestic Pig during Implantation Obtained by LC-MS/MS Analysis" Cells 11, no. 7: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071161

APA Style

Orzechowska, K., Dobrzyń, K., Kieżun, M., Malinowska, A., Świderska, B., Kamiński, T., & Smolińska, N. (2022). Chemerin Effect on the Endometrial Proteome of the Domestic Pig during Implantation Obtained by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Cells, 11(7), 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop