Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Profiling of DNA Damage Response in Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Cells before and after Radiation and Temozolomide Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Eosinophils in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Key Contributors to Neuro-Immune Crosstalk and Potential Implications in Disorders of Brain-Gut Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
5-Azacytidine Inhibits the Activation of Senescence Program and Promotes Cytotoxic Autophagy during Trdmt1-Mediated Oxidative Stress Response in Insulinoma β-TC-6 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increased Numbers of Enteric Glial Cells in the Peyer’s Patches and Enhanced Intestinal Permeability by Glial Cell Mediators in Patients with Ileal Crohn’s Disease
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Estrogens Play a Critical Role in Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in a Spontaneous Model of Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction

Cells 2022, 11(7), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071214
by Alison Accarie 1, Joran Toth 1, Lucas Wauters 1,2, Ricard Farré 1, Jan Tack 1,2 and Tim Vanuytsel 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cells 2022, 11(7), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071214
Submission received: 21 February 2022 / Revised: 28 March 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 4 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuro-Immune Crosstalk at Mucosal Interfaces in Health and Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Accarie et al present results on an extremely interesting and timely topic: relationship between sexual hormones and gastrointestinal symptoms in a stress-induced model. Experimental design is accurate and beta-estradiol injection experiments are well-oriented. However, some revisions are needed in order to make a stronger manuscript to be published in a Q1 journal.

 

  • Introduction: what do authors mean for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Please, could you indicate some of them, with specific examples?

 

  • Figures and Figure Legends (also for Supplementary Fig) are difficult to understand and to read. Authors should organize them by alphabetical order (A, B, C, D), from left to right.

 

  • Results are difficult to follow. Please, include more subsections that describe in a declarative manner the objective and results for each experiment. For example, instead of organizing just by the two main protocols, I suggest to subdivide this section based on main results.

 

  • Many graphs are given, but no photographs or images are presented. This is an important point to be resolved, since the manuscript relays its strength, mainly, on morphological data.

 

  • Discussion section should start with a clear summary of the objetives and results. +

 

  • A “limitations of the study” section would be highly appropriate, since this work does only present morphological and PCR gene expression data, and no functional, microbiota-related, or neuronal-related experiments and results are performed (which, definitively, should be mention as next steps and perspective). Authors do not measure any brain parameters, but they talk about DGBI. Do estrogens act directly on the gastrointestinal tract or might they be acting through theirs effects on brain? Due to the implications between maternal separation and microbiota-gut-brain axis alteration, how do authors explain that they do not evaluate this main player?

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their constructive comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Please find our point-by-point reply in attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a nicely performed and described set of studies that substantially extends our understanding of the interplay between sex, estrogen, and early life stress in this model.  I have only minor suggestions.

  1. The discussion is a bit long and could perhaps be trimmed by 10-20%.
  2. It might be nice to add a schematic summarizing the results and the scheme of interaction between these factors and the end points that the authors have studied.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for their constructive comments and have adapted the manuscript accordingly. Please find our point-by-point responses in attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop