Next Article in Journal
Retinal Injury Activates Complement Expression in Müller Cells Leading to Neuroinflammation and Photoreceptor Cell Death
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolic “Sense Relay” in Stem Cells: A Short But Impactful Life of PAS Kinase Balancing Stem Cell Fates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 13
10.3390/cells12131752
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Origin, Diversity, and Multiple Roles of Enzymes with Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold from Different Organisms

by
Seydina M. Diene
1,2,*,
Pierre Pontarotti
1,2,3,
Saïd Azza
2,4,
Nicholas Armstrong
2,4,
Lucile Pinault
2,4,
Eric Chabrière
1,2,
Philippe Colson
1,2,
Jean-Marc Rolain
1,2 and
Didier Raoult
2,*
1
MEPHI, IRD, AP-HM, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Aix Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France
2
IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France
3
CNRS SNC5039, 13005 Marseille, France
4
Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), IHU-Méditerranée Infection, 13005 Marseille, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(13), 1752; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131752
Submission received: 11 May 2023 / Revised: 23 June 2023 / Accepted: 28 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Metalloproteins and Metalloenzymes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
β-lactamase enzymes have generated significant interest due to their ability to confer resistance to the most commonly used family of antibiotics in human medicine. Among these enzymes, the class B β-lactamases are members of a superfamily of metallo-β-lactamase (MβL) fold proteins which are characterised by conserved motifs (i.e., HxHxDH) and are not only limited to bacteria. Indeed, as the result of several barriers, including low sequence similarity, default protein annotation, or untested enzymatic activity, MβL fold proteins have long been unexplored in other organisms. However, thanks to search approaches which are more sensitive compared to classical Blast analysis, such as the use of common ancestors to identify distant homologous sequences, we are now able to highlight their presence in different organisms including Bacteria, Archaea, Nanoarchaeota, Asgard, Humans, Giant viruses, and Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR). These MβL fold proteins are multifunctional enzymes with diverse enzymatic or non-enzymatic activities of which, at least thirteen activities have been reported such as β-lactamase, ribonuclease, nuclease, glyoxalase, lactonase, phytase, ascorbic acid degradation, anti-cancer drug degradation, or membrane transport. In this review, we (i) discuss the existence of MβL fold enzymes in the different domains of life, (ii) present more suitable approaches to better investigating their homologous sequences in unsuspected sources, and (iii) report described MβL fold enzymes with demonstrated enzymatic or non-enzymatic activities.

1. Introduction

Initially discovered in bacteria due to their effectiveness against antibiotics with therapeutic interest in humans, β-lactamases are a group of enzymes capable of degrading several β-lactam antibiotics [1,2]. They are a typical example of the artificial naming of enzymes that have, in reality, multiple potential functions, and this nomenclature has prevented the exploration of their activities and their presence in other organisms or microorganisms. Furthermore, the nomenclature used to describe proteins of the same family may vary depending on the method adopted by researchers, thus enzymes belonging to the same family may be labelled as ribonucleases (RNases), nucleases (DNases), hydrolases, or β-lactamases, depending on the automatic protein annotation, which relies on the initial sequence hits obtained through Blast analysis. The study of the ancestry of β-lactamase motifs has shown that they exhibit some of the oldest enzymatic motifs in the world [3]. Once the antiquity of this type of enzyme has been recognised, the search for sequences which are unrelated to this group of β-lactamases becomes more difficult, due to their early divergence from the ancestral structure. As such, the use of more sensitive approaches (compared with classical Blast analysis) to search for distant homologous sequence, such as the reconstruction of a common ancestor sequence, as previously reported for class A β-lactamases [4,5] and using it as a query makes it possible to identify sequences that are too far away from contemporary sequences to be identified in a functional way.
In this review, we aim to summarise the results of this approach, which we initiated a few years ago to analyse the functions, origin, and distribution of this group of enzymes, especially metallo-β-lactamases (MβL), that have multiple more or less specialised functions depending on the ecosystem within which they are established [6]. Here, we discuss the presence of these enzymes in bacteria, archaea, candidate phyla radiation (CPR), giant viruses, and eukaryotes, including human cells and the means of expressing them and analysing their roles, which are much broader than cutting out the β-lactams used in human medicine.

2. Diversity of the Superfamily of Metallo-β-Lactamase (MβL) Fold Enzymes

Within the classification of bacterial β-lactamases, which consist of four classes: A, B, C, and D [7,8], MβL enzymes alone occupy class B which is subdivided into three subclasses (subclass B1/B2/B3) as the result of divergent evolution events. They differ from the other classes by their active site which requires bivalent metal ions (such as Zn2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, or Ca2+) for their activity [7,9,10,11]. This catalytic site, characterised by a highly conserved motif (HxHxDH) and residues (H196 and H263), appears to be ancestrally shared by the superfamily of MβL fold proteins (with 34,000 proteins identified to date) with diverse biological functions including β-lactamases, nucleases, ribonucleases, lactonases, glyoxalases, hydrolases, phosphodiesterases, Aryl sulfatases, Alkylsulfatases, CMP-NeuAc hydroxylases, flavoproteins, and others which are distributed across the different domains of life including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes [12,13,14]. Moreover, as reported, the multifunctionality of these MβL fold enzymes and their affinities to different substrates are supported by the protein variable region of the enzymes (rather than the conserved motif (i.e., HxHxDH) and cofactor dependencies, which are responsible for the modulation of enzymatic activity, specificity, and oligomerisation proteins [10,15]. However, the protein similarity between enzymes of this MβL fold superfamily can be less than 20% [13,16] making it very unlikely that homologous sequences of contemporary bacterial MβLs in the other microorganisms such as Archaea, Giant viruses, Asgard, Nanoarchaeota, or Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) will be found. As reported in the “Darwinian Grandparenting” theory, we are genetically closer to our grandparents than to our cousins [17]; thus, the use of inferred common ancestor sequences as queries to identify homologous bacterial MβLs from not-yet investigated microorganisms represents one of the more pertinent approaches to identifying these enzymes in any domain of life. More sensitive approaches, including reconstruction of the common ancestor sequence [5,18], searching for Hidden Markov Models (HMM) profiles [18,19], Sequence Similarity Network analysis (SSN) [13,20], and 3D structure similarity analysis, have been used to look for homologous MβL enzymes in remote sources. As expected, these approaches appear significantly more flexible than classic Blast analysis in terms of identifying homologous MβL enzymes in unsuspected organisms and/or microorganisms.

3. MβL Fold Enzymes in Bacteria: Class B β-Lactamases

3.1. Distribution and Diversity of MβL Fold Enzymes in Bacteria

In bacteria, these MβL enzymes include more than 325 variants grouped into 63 MβL types and divided into three sub-groups: subgroup B1 (e.g., NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-1); sub-group B2 (e.g., CphA1, CphA7, and ImiS); sub-group B3 (e.g., GOB-13, LRA-1, and CAR-1) (Figure 1), based on their differences in amino acid sequences and their catalytic sites which interact with either one or two Zn2+ ions [21,22,23]. The metallo-β-lactamase enzyme was identified for the first time in 1966, in a non-pathogenic strain of Bacillus cereus with a cephalosporinase activity which was inhibited when pre-incubated with ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) [24]. Nowadays, MβL enzymes can be identified in more than 50 different bacterial species including gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae spp. and non-fermentative bacteria (such as, Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas spp.), Elizabethkingia spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., Neisseria spp., Aeromonas spp., Shewanella spp., Myroides spp., Pedobacter spp., Empedobacter spp., Bacteroides spp., Vibrio spp., Bradyrhizobium spp., Caulobacter spp., Eristalis spp., Sphingomonas spp., Massilia spp., Burkholderia spp., Pectobacterium spp., and Gemmatimona spp.) [21,22,23]. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 1, while all the bacterial B1 and B2 MβL enzymes group together separately to the other domains of life, the GOB type enzymes (sub-group B3), are strongly related with enzymes from archaea and archaea-related microorganisms (i.e., Asgard), suggestive of their origin from this domain of life, and a horizontal transfer has occurred from archaea to a single bacterial group, namely, the Flavobacteriacaea family, especially in Elizabethkingia species. All the bacterial MβLs presented in this phylogenetic tree have been reported with proof of hydrolase activity on β-lactams, especially on carbapenems, and are all described in gram-negative bacteria except one MβL type i.e., BcII MβL enzyme (with seven variants), reported in a single bacterial gram-positive species, Bacillus cereus [21,25]. However, based on the MβL signature, these proteins have also been identified in other Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, in which MβL fold proteins are recognised as choline-binding proteins, DNA uptake-related proteins (nucleases) and L-ascorbate 6-phosphate lactonase [26,27,28]. Interestingly, it has been reported that the enzymatic characterisation of the L-ascorbate 6-phosphate lactonase enzyme from S. pneumoniae ATCC 49136 shows a β-lactamase activity since the purified enzyme is able to hydrolyse both nitrocefin and ampicillin-based antibiotics [27].

3.2. Reported Activities of Bacterial MβL Enzymes Other Than β-Lactams Hydrolysis

Besides their hydrolytic activities on β-lactam antibiotics, some bacterial MβL enzymes have been reported with other enzymatic activities as a result of the striking similarity between their protein structures and other enzymes including ribonuclease, nuclease, and lactonase enzymes. Indeed, as reported recently, the classical bacterial MβL IMP-1 enzyme, which hydrolyses all β-lactams including carbapenems, exhibits significant protein structure similarity with tRNase Z, a tRNA 3′ processing endoribonuclease of the MβL superfamily from Thermotoga maritima. Its enzymatic characterisation demonstrates a significant RNA-hydrolysing activity on both cellular RNA and synthetic small unstructured RNAs [29]. Interestingly, while this study was being published, our research was beginning to reveal the ribonuclease and nuclease ability of the IMP-1 homologous enzyme i.e., class B NDM-1, described in almost all gram-negative bacteria, which significantly hydrolyses in vitro bacterial RNA and single-strand DNA substrates (Supplementary Figure S1). Moreover, while both bacterial MβL enzymes mentioned above can interact with RNA and/or DNA, others such as the ThnS enzyme can exhibit additional activities, such as the hydrolysis of ascorbic acid, as a result of its similarity with UlaG enzymes [30]. Indeed, as we reported recently, while the thnS gene, part of the thienamycin (now chemically modified into imipenem in human medicine) biosynthesis gene cluster from Streptomyces cattleya, is annotated as putative β-lactamase with no reported proof of this activity. We demonstrated its specific hydrolase activity and UlaG high affinity with imipenem in comparison with the other β-lactams (e.g., penicillin G and cefotaxime). As a result of the phylogenetic tree and conserved motif analyses, the ThnS enzyme appears to be a member of the superfamily of MβL fold enzymes, showing additional activities of ribonuclease, nuclease, and hydrolysis of ascorbic acid [30].
Recently, an MβL fold enzyme (BLEG-1) has been reported in the Bacillus lehensis G1 strain, exhibiting significant sequence similarity and activity with the B3 subclass of bacterial MβLs, despite its evolutionary divergence from them [31,32] (Table 1). Upon analysing the phylogenetic tree and comparing the protein structures, it was discovered that the enzyme possessed an active site that was remarkably similar to those found in both the L1 B3 MβL from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and the glyoxalase II enzymes (YcbL and GloB) from Salmonella enterica. Interestingly, the enzymatic characterisation of the purified BLEG-1 protein demonstrates its dual β-lactams hydrolysis (e.g., ampicillin hydrolysis) and glyoxalase activities [31]. The authors identify an insertion of two amino acids into the active-site loop at the N-terminal region of the BLEG-1 protein and suggested an evolution of the BLEG-1 enzyme from glyoxalase II to the adopted MβL fold activity through this insertion of amino acids [31].
Recently, another atypical enzymatic activity of two MβL fold proteins has also been described from a functional metagenomic study of forest soil [34]. In this study, while the authors performed a function-based screening of libraries generated from the whole metagenomic sequence data of forest soil to identify positive phytase activity in E. coli clones, two clones were positive for this phytase activity. Surprisingly, while phytic acid degradation activity has been restricted to only four protein superfamilies, including histidine phosphatases, tyrosine phosphatases, purple acid phosphatases, and β-propeller phosphatases [47,48], the two obtained proteins (MβLp01 and MβLp02) from this metagenome were annotated and identified as genes encoding for metallo-β-lactamase proteins. Sequence analysis confirmed their membership of the MβL fold superfamily of proteins due to their close protein structure homology with the MβL ZipD from E. coli, a zinc phosphodiesterase with a tRNA-processing endonuclease activity [49]. Based on this discovery, the two proteins were subcloned, expressed, and enzymatically tested. As expected, the enzymatic characterisation revealed for both purified proteins an activity on the majority of tested phosphorylated substrates including phytate. Moreover, both purified enzymes were able to confer to recombinant E. coli strains less sensitivity to β-lactam antibiotics, suggestive of a β-lactamase activity, and qualified by the authors as promiscuous activity [34]. This promiscuous β-lactamase activity was also reported from the discovered and identified subclass B3 MβL protein, PNGM-1 from a conducted functional metagenomic analyses of deep-sea sediments predating the era of antibiotics [35,50]. Indeed, the phylogenetic and protein structure analyses of the PNGM-1 protein revealed its membership of the MβL fold superfamily and its structural similarity with the tRNA Z enzyme, and the activities test confirmed a dual enzymatic β-lactamase and ribonuclease activity of this PNGM-1 protein [35].
Another example of bacterial MβL fold enzymes with activities other than β-lactam hydrolase is that of lactonase enzymes. Recognised as members of the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily as a result of their conserved HxHxDH MβL motif [51,52], these enzymes are involved in the bacterial quorum sensing mechanism, especially by disrupting bacterial signalling via the enzymatic degradation of acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) molecules [14,52]. The quorum sensing mechanism is described as a communication system used by bacteria to manage large panels of biological processes often related to pathogenicity, such as the production of proteases, or antimicrobial compounds, such as violacein [53]. These enzymes have been reported in various and atypical bacterial species such as thermoacidophilic bacteria including Alicyclobacter acidoterrestris, Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus, Chromobacterium spp., Bacillus thuringiensis, Escherichia coli, Ruegeria mobilis, Microbacterium testaceum, Muricauda olearia, Arthrobacter sp. and Chryseobacterium spp. [28,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].

4. MβL Fold Enzymes in Archaea

4.1. Reconstruction of Common Ancestral Sequences and Blast Analyses

In our previous research, to investigate MβL sequences from unsuspected microorganisms such as archaea, which are naturally resistant to all antibiotics including β-lactams because they lack peptidoglycans, we performed the reconstruction of ancestral bacterial β-lactamases, especially class B metallo-β-lactamases based on the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree analysis using 174 class B MβL variants retrieved from the Arg-annot database [60]. Using an inferred MβL fold ancestor sequence as the query term in a BlastP analysis performed against the archaea database, we were able to identify a huge number of archaeal MβL fold sequences, while BlastP analysis, using contemporary bacterial sequences did not detect these archaeal sequences [6]. All detected MβL fold sequences exhibited the MβL signature (i.e., the conserved “HxHxDH” motif) and are widely distributed in different archaeal groups including Methanomicrobia, Thermococci, Archaeoglobi, Methanococci, Thermoplasmata, Thermoprotei, Methanobacteria, Thaumarchaeota, and Asgardarchaeota (Figure 1).

4.2. The Presence of MβL Fold Enzymes in Subgroups of Archaea: Nanoarchaeota and Asgard Groups

As proof of concept, we once again used a MβL fold ancestor sequence (120 aa in size) from a constructed Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree with sequences from bacteria, archaea, humans, and CPRs to confirm the existence of these enzymes in archaea-related groups such as Asgard and Nanoarchaeota. As expected, by conducting a BlastP analysis using the inferred MβL fold ancestor sequence as the query term, we were able to detect the presence of these MβL fold enzymes in these groups of microorganisms (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). In the Asgard group, MβL fold sequences exhibited protein similarity of between 25% and 46.25%, and alignment of between 48% and 100% with the ancestral MβL fold protein sequence. These were distributed across different Asgard sub-groups such as Helarchaeota, Lokiarchaeota, Heimdallarchaeota, Thorarchaeota, Lokiarchaeum, and Odinarchaeota (Supplementary Table S1). In Nanoarchaeota, our analysis identified homologous sequences with similarity of between 26.82% and 40.32% and length alignment from 56% to 100% with the ancestral MβL fold and were detected in only Nanoarchaeota archaeon (Supplementary Table S2). Interestingly, while the MβL signature can be recognised within these sequences (Figure 2), almost all were annotated by default as MβL fold metallo-hydrolases (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 and Figure 1).

4.3. Reported Activities of Archaeal MβL Fold Enzymes

Despite the wide presence and distribution of the MβL fold enzymes in the Archaea domain so far, few of these enzymes have been reported in the literature to have proven enzymatic activity such as the that described from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii species [38]. Indeed, this S. tokodaii MβL fold enzyme, exhibiting protein structure similarity with the PqsE enzyme from P. aeruginosa involved in the quorum sensing mechanism [61], has been suggested as being involved in as yet undescribed quorum sensing mechanism in archaea using the quinolone antibiotic as a signalling factor [38] (Table 1). Another archaeal MβL fold enzyme from Haloferax volcanii, exhibiting sequence similarity with a MβL tRNase Z (a tRNA 3′-endonuclease) has been characterised from the transcriptome analysis of generated mutants [37] (Table 1). Despite its similarity with the tRNase Z enzyme, the H. volcanii MβL fold enzyme has not shown tRNA 3′ processing or exonuclease activity, although its activity associated with the membrane transport mechanism has been proven [37] (Table 1). In another archaeal species, Methanosarcina mazei, the reported enzyme was a MβL tRNase Z involved in tRNA maturation (cleavage and polyadenylation of the mRNA) [39] (Table 1). From the archaeal species, i.e., Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, three MβL fold enzymes have been reported with distinct enzymatic activities [41]. In the genome of this methanogenic archaeon M. jannaschii, the three genes (mjRNase J1, mjRNase J2, and mjRNase J3), as a result of the exhibited HxHxDH motif, have been recognised as members of the MβL fold superfamily and their characterisation revealed homologous proteins related to ribonuclease Rnase J enzymes, initially discovered in Bacillus subtilis, which are able to exhibit both endo- and 5′→3′ exo-ribonucleolytic activities [62]. Interestingly, their enzymatic characterisation demonstrates optimal activity at 60 °C and 5′→3′ exonucleolytic activity for purified mjRNase J1 and mjRNase J3 enzymes while mjRNase J2 protein exhibited endonuclease activity (degrade ssDNA substrate) [41]. Apart from these archaeal MβL fold enzymes with reported activity in the literature, the MβL sequences identified by our BlastP analysis using a common ancestor sequence, are annotated either as MβL fold metallo-hydrolases, hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolases (detoxification glyoxalase II enzymes), or L-ascorbate metabolism protein UlaG (Figure 1).
Interestingly, while all these archaeal enzymes are annotated as “metallo-β-lactamases”, none so far have been tested for their hydrolytic activity on β-lactam antibiotics. This was the goal of our recent study, in which the MβL sequence identified from M. barkeri (MetbaB) (Table 1) was synthesised, cloned into the E. coli BL21(DE3) strain, and expressed in order to evaluate its different putative enzymatic activities including β-lactamase, ribonuclease, nuclease, and glyoxalase [6]. Comparison of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the expressed protein revealed its high structural similarity with the bacterial New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) from Klebsiella pneumonaie. As expected, the expressed protein was able to significantly hydrolyse β-lactam substrates including nitrocefin (a chromogenic cephalosporin) and penicillin G. In addition to the β-lactamase activity which was detected, this M. barkeri MβL fold enzyme was also able to significantly hydrolyse bacterial and synthetic RNA substrates, while no nuclease activity was found [6]. As reported in this study, the conducted phylogenetic analysis reveals that the studied archaeal MβL fold protein appeared phylogenetically related to glyoxalase II enzymes. As a result of this relationship, the MetbaB enzyme was tested and weak glyoxalase activity was detected [6].

5. MβL Fold Enzymes in Eukaryotes

5.1. MβL Fold Enzymes Described in the Eukaryote Domain of Life

In the literature, MβL fold proteins such as hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase (glyoxalase II), arylsulfatase, DNA and RNA interacting enzymes, nucleotide phosphodiesterases, and CMP-N-acetylneuraminate monooxygenases, have been identified in different eukaryotes including Arabidopsis thaliana, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, Bos taurus, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens [26,63]. In 2016, eighteen MβL fold enzymes had been mentioned in the literature as being present in human cells [44]. These enzymes are polycistronic proteins in which the MβL fold domain can be recognised as a result of their MβL signature, as shown in Figure 2. These 18 human MβLs (hMβLs) are reported in three groups of enzymes: Group 1 relates to the glyoxalase II subfamily and consists of seven enzymes (HAGH, HAGHL, ETHE1, LACTB2, MβLAC1, MβLAC2, and PNKD enzymes) and is constitutively involved in cellular detoxification processes; Group 2 relates to the DNA/RNA interacting subfamily of enzymes composed of nine enzymes (SNM1A, SNM1B, SNM1C, ELAC1, ELAC2, CPSF73, CPSF100, CPSF73L, and INTS9), and Group 3 relates to other hMβLs, in which two enzymes have been reported, namely the NAPE-PLD gene encoding for N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine-hydrolysing phospholipase D (NAPE-PLD), and the CMAH gene, encoding for cytidine monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase [44].

5.2. Reported Enzymatic Activities of Human MβL Fold Enzymes

Interestingly, in addition to their natural activities in human cells, some of these hMβLs, including the SNM1A and SMN1B enzymes, have been described alongside other enzymatic activities such as the hydrolase activity on anti-cancer drugs like mitomycin C and cisplatin [64,65]. Surprisingly, while the term “metallo-β-lactamase” has been used to annotate these proteins, even for human proteins, their activity against β-lactam antibiotics has thus far not been reported.
In the same way, as we did for archaea, we reported the evaluation of enzymatic activities of four selected hMβL proteins, as a result of their conserved MβL “HxHxDH” motif and histidine residues (H196 and H263), as seen in bacterial MβLs (Table 1) [43]. These four hMβL enzymes were the MΒLAC2 protein associated with the biosynthesis of B-cell exosomes [42], the endoribonuclease LACTB2 protein [66], SNM1A, and SNM1B, with a function of DNA cross-link repair enzymes (nucleases) [67]. In this study, the proteins which were synthetised and optimised for expression in E. coli BL21(DE3) strains were tested against β-lactam antibiotics and, as expected, while, no activity was detected for the LACTB2 protein, the MΒLAC2, SNM1A, and SNM1B proteins were able to significantly hydrolyse nitrocefin and penicillin G, and this activity was inhibited by a β-lactamase inhibitor (sulbactam) [43].

6. MβL Fold Enzymes in Giant Viruses

6.1. Discovery of MβL Fold Enzymes in Giant Viruses

With the existence of evidence of MβL fold enzymes in all domains of life, including Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes, as mentioned above, we similarly conducted, as part of our research into these MβL fold enzymes, a search for MβL fold enzymes in Giant viruses. By searching for the conserved MβL motif against a protein database of giant viruses retrieved from the NCBI (n = 72,993 proteins), we were able to identify fifteen confirmed MβL fold sequences (based on a protein length of at least 200 aa). Default protein annotations of these gvMβL sequences from the NCBI database included ribonuclease Z, the ribonuclease BN/tRNA processing enzyme, the MβL fold metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase superfamily, the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily protein, the Ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein, and proteins with unknown function. However, as shown in Figure 1, while most of these gvMβL sequences grouped together within the phylogenetic tree, interestingly three gvMβLs branched within bacterial MβLs, suggestive of a horizontal exchange between bacteria and giant viruses, especially Pandoravirus dulcis and Pandoravirus salinus. Two other gvMβLs appear to be clustered with sequences from humans and one gvMβL grouped with Asgard MβL fold sequences (Figure 1).

6.2. Description of Dual Enzymatic Activity of a Giant Virus MβL Fold Enzyme

To the best of our knowledge, no studies have yet reported the activities of these MβL fold enzymes from a giant virus. Thus, in our recent work, we characterised the enzymatic activities of a MβL fold protein from giant Tupanvirus deep ocean (TupBlac protein), naturally involved in translation mechanisms in giant viruses. Protein analysis using a conserved domain search (CD Search) tool [68] revealed its membership of the ribonuclease Z group (the tRNA-processing endonuclease enzymes) and conserved motif analysis revealed its MβL signature (HxHxDH motif) and conserved residues (H60-H62-H65) [45]. As described in that study, the expressed TupBlac protein from the E. coli BL21(DE3) strain and its enzymatic characterisation demonstrated a dual β-lactamase and ribonuclease activity, since the TupBlac protein was able to hydrolyse nitrocefin, penicillin G, and RNA substrate (of bacteria or Acanthamoeba castellanii) [45] (Table 1).

7. MβL Fold Enzymes in Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR)

7.1. Wide Diversity of MβL Fold Enzymes in the CPR Domain

As described in 2015, as a result of the power of deep sequencing methods and bioinformatic analyses, a new branch of microorganisms from the tree of life was discovered and named Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) [69,70]. This group of microorganisms, in addition to their symbiotic lifestyle with bacteria, is characterised by their small size (100 to 300 nm), reduced genomes (≈1-Mb), the lack of biosynthetic pathways, and their abundance in all environments and various human microbiomes [46,69]. As recently reported, we investigated the existence of the MβL fold enzymes in this new domain of life as part of the investigation into the resistomes of CPR microorganisms. Indeed, the in silico analyses, based on BlastP and functional domain prediction of 4062 CPR genomes to look for the presence of antibiotic resistance (AR)-like enzymes revealed highly equipped microorganisms with more than 85 different AR-like enzymes against 14 different classes of antimicrobials including aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, and β-lactams [71]. Among these AR-like enzymes, especially β-lactam resistance proteins, the search for an MβL signature (HxHxDH) revealed their existence in this domain of life, as shown in Figure 2 for representative sequences. The default annotations of these CPR proteins from the NCBI database are mainly “MβL fold metallo-hydrolase”, “β-lactamase domain protein”, or “RNA-metabolising metallo-β-lactamase”. Interestingly, as shown in Figure 1, the identified MβL fold sequences in CPR microorganisms constitute one branch from the phylogenetic tree in which archaeal and Asgard sequences can be identified, and one of them, from Sulfolobus tokodaii, was reported to have a function associated with the quorum sensing mechanism [38]. This may suggest a native function of these CPR MβL fold enzymes, associated with communication processes with bacteria, with which they share an obligate symbiotic lifestyle, as reported in the literature [70].

7.2. Reported Enzymatic Activity of CPR MβL Fold Enzymes on β-Lactam Antibiotics

Despite the default annotation of these enzymes, which may suggest a hydrolytic activity on antibiotics or RNA/DNA substrates, no studies have thus far reported enzymatic characterisation of these proteins. Thus, after we reported the presence and wide distribution of the MβL fold sequences in CPR microorganisms, we experimentally expressed, purified, and tested the enzymatic activity of five selected β-lactamase proteins, including class A and class B metallo-β-lactamases from CPR, to evaluate their ability to hydrolyse various substrates including β-lactams, RNA, and DNA [46] (Table 1). The three-dimensional (3D) structural analysis of these five CPR β-lactamases confirms (with 100% confidence) their structural similarity with bacterial class A β-lactamase, metal-dependent hydrolases of the β-lactamase superfamily II, human metallo-β-lactamase containing protein 1, ribonuclease J1, and dual endo- and exonuclease enzymes [46]. This study is the first and only piece of research that has reported on the β-lactam and RNA hydrolysing activity of MβL fold proteins from CPR groups.

8. Discussion

In this review, we have highlighted the considerable extension of core genes for β-lactamases into all domains of life, as shown in Figure 3A. Metallo-β-lactamase fold proteins appear to be “multifunctional enzymes” with hydrolytic, non-hydrolytic, or non-enzymatic activities, as the literature reports at least thirteen demonstrated and distinct activities (Figure 4), and it is difficult to know what the initial activity was. It can be speculated that the primary activity was that of nuclease/ribonuclease, the first role of which was to digest unused or parasitic DNA/RNA in cellular metabolism as reported in bacteria, in humans, and in archaea [41,72,73]. The potential of these hydrolases was later used for different functions. β-lactamases are one of the most interesting examples in the history of science, as they were first discovered for their activity on β-lactam antibiotics, explaining bacterial resistance against these drugs [1,2]. It is plausible that the nomenclature of these enzymes has prevented the exploration of their real functions in organisms/microorganisms other than bacteria. β-lactamase fold sequences were recently identified for the first time in the human genome, while their default functions have been associated with various biological processes [44,66]. Indeed, the identification of genes encoding for β-lactamases in human genomes has not been explored for long, which has prevented the existence of β-lactamase activity in human cells that could inactivate penicillin G in these cells [43]. A great deal of confusion can be seen in the naming of these MβL fold enzymes as, according to the first Blast hit during the initial protein annotation, these latter are considered to have a unique and essential enzymatic activity instead taking into account other potential activities of these enzymes. For example, we initially had great difficulty in publishing the metallo-β-lactamase fold enzyme from archaea (from Methanosarcina barkeri) [6], given that it made no sense for archaea microorganisms to host β-lactamase enzymes, which were naturally resistant to β-lactams, based on the lack of β-lactam targets in their cell wall [74,75]. We can speculate that the existence or role of these MβL fold enzymes in archaea may be associated with other biological functions such as the RNA/DNA metabolism or the use of β-lactam antibiotics after enzymatic degradation as a source of carbon for nutrients, as described in some bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Pandoreae [76,77].
Our recent work highlights a wide distribution and great conservation of the MβL fold proteins in archaea [6]. By using a more sensitive search approach such as the use of common ancestor sequences in blast analysis, we can identify these MβL fold proteins in archaea-related microorganisms such as Nanoarchaeota and Asgard, as highlighted in this review (Figure 1). This approach demonstrates and confirms the power of using a common ancestor to identify distant homologous sequences hosted by unsuspected microorganisms as demonstrated for giant viruses for which the distance between the reconstructed RNA polymerase (RNAP) ancestor and RNAPs of bacteria, archaea, eukarya, and megavirales were significantly shorter than the distance between RNAPs from each organism [84]. Indeed, as can be seen in Figure 3B, the pairwise comparison performed on the similarity between MβL sequences from the different domains of life with the inferred common MβL fold ancestor sequence demonstrated a higher percentage of similarity between the ancestor MβL and sequences from the different organisms in comparison with any pairs of sequences from two different organisms.

9. Conclusions

The evidence of several activities including β-lactamase, nuclease, ribonuclease, lactonase, glyoxalase, phytase, and potentially other unidentified hydrolase activities from enzymes of the same family highlights the significance of accurately naming enzymes in order to understand their nuclear reactivity. This is particularly challenging due to the scarcity of competent reviewers outside the bacterial world able to evaluate knowledge extension beyond the initial enzyme activity identification, which remains extremely problematic. Classical Blast analyses present some limitations, for example, when it comes to identifying remote homologous sequences, because of the few similarities between them. This is why alternative search tools are now being proposed by NCBI to improve the shortcomings of the classical BlastP (i.e., PSI-BLAST: Position-Specific Iterated BLAST; PHI-BLAST: Pattern Hit Initiated BLAST; DELTA-BLAST: Domain Enhanced Lookup Time Accelerated BLAST). More sensitive search approaches including the search for Hidden Markov Models (HMM) profile, Sequence Similarity Network analysis (SSN), and the use of inferred common ancestor sequences as targets are more appropriate and more useful when it comes to detecting and identifying homologous sequences in any organism. This review highlights a great example of the misleading annotations of proteins in public sequence databases, which is not only limited to MβL fold proteins but applied to many classes of sequences proteins as previously reported, greatly reducing our perception of the multifunctionality of some proteins, due to the unique attributed function by the default protein annotation [85]. In essence, this history of β-lactamases has epistemological importance which we believe is essential.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12131752/s1, Figure S1: Ribonuclease and nuclease activities of the New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1). (A) bacterial RNA substrate hydrolysed by the NDM-1 enzyme in the presence and absence of inhibitor (i.e., sulbactam and EDTA). (B) Single strand bacterial DNA (ssDNA forward and reverse) hydrolysed by the NDM-1 enzyme while double strand DNA (dsDNA) was not hydrolysed. H2O, Blank, and GO (Glycine oxidase) have been used as negative controls, and bacterial DNase has been used as positive control. The methodology and material used for this experiment have been reported in our previous work [30]. Table S1: BlastP result of the MβL fold ancestor (120 aa) sequence against the Asgard group database (NCBI) (94 hits); Table S2: BlastP results of the MβL fold ancestor (120 aa) against the Nanoarchaeota database (NCBI) (40 hits).

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, D.R.; methodology, S.M.D., L.P., N.A. and S.A., writing—original draft preparation, S.M.D. and D.R.; writing—review and editing, S.M.D., P.P. and J.-M.R.; supervision, D.R., P.P., J.-M.R., E.C. and P.C.; funding acquisition, D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Agency under the Investissements d’Avenir programme and Fondation Méditerranée Infection (reference 10-IAHU-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the IHU-Méditerranée Infection.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors approved the publication of this review and have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

  1. Jacoby George, A. β-Lactamase Nomenclature. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Garau, J. Beta-lactamases: Current situation and clinical importance. Intensive Care Med. 1994, 20, S5–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Caetano-Anollés, D.; Kim, K.M.; Mittenthal, J.E.; Caetano-Anollés, G. Proteome evolution and the metabolic origins of translation and cellular life. J. Mol. Evol. 2011, 72, 14–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Risso, V.A.; Gavira, J.A.; Mejia-Carmona, D.F.; Gaucher, E.A.; Sanchez-Ruiz, J.M. Hyperstability and substrate promiscuity in laboratory resurrections of precambrian β-lactamases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2899–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thornton, J.W. Resurrecting ancient genes: Experimental analysis of extinct molecules. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Diene, S.M.; Pinault, L.; Armstrong, N.; Azza, S.; Keshri, V.; Khelaifia, S.; Chabrière, E.; Caetano-Anolles, G.; Rolain, J.M.; Pontarotti, P.; et al. Dual rnase and β-lactamase activity of a single enzyme encoded in archaea. Life 2020, 10, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bush, K. The ABCD’s of β-lactamase nomenclature. J. Infect. Chemother. 2013, 19, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bush, K. Past and Present Perspectives on beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01076-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bebrone, C. Metallo-beta-lactamases (classification, activity, genetic organization, structure, zinc coordination) and their superfamily. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 1686–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fröhlich, C.; Chen, J.Z.; Gholipour, S.; Erdogan, A.N.; Tokuriki, N. Evolution of β-lactamases and enzyme promiscuity. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2021, 34, gzab013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marasinghe, G.P.K.; Sander, I.M.; Bennett, B.; Periyannan, G.; Yang, K.W.; Makaroff, C.A.; Crowder, M.W. Structural studies on a mitochondrial glyoxalase II. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 40668–40675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Aravind, L. An evolutionary classification of the metallo-beta-lactamase fold proteins. Silico Biol. 1999, 1, 69–91. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baier, F.; Tokuriki, N. Connectivity between catalytic landscapes of the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily. J. Mol. Biol. 2014, 426, 2442–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bergonzi, C.; Schwab, M.; Naik, T.; Daudé, D.; Chabrière, E.; Elias, M. Structural and Biochemical Characterization of AaL, a Quorum Quenching Lactonase with Unusual Kinetic Properties. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Perez-Garcia, P.; Kobus, S.; Gertzen, C.G.W.; Hoeppner, A.; Holzscheck, N.; Strunk, C.H.; Huber, H.; Jaeger, K.E.; Gohlke, H.; Kovacic, F.; et al. A promiscuous ancestral enzyme’s structure unveils protein variable regions of the highly diverse metallo-β-lactamase family. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Palzkill, T. Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1277, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Laham, S.M.; Gonsalkorale, K.; Von Hippel, W. Darwinian grandparenting: Preferential investment in more certain kin. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 31, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Keshri, V.; Panda, A.; Levasseur, A.; Rolain, J.-M.; Pontarotti, P.; Raoult, D. Phylogenomic Analysis of β-Lactamase in Archaea and Bacteria Enables the Identification of Putative New Members. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018, 10, 1106–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Johnson, L.S.; Eddy, S.R.; Portugaly, E. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Atkinson, H.J.; Morris, J.H.; Ferrin, T.E.; Babbitt, P.C. Using sequence similarity networks for visualization of relationships across diverse protein superfamilies. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Somboro, A.M.; Sekyere, J.O.; Amoako, D.G.; Essack, S.Y.; Bester, L.A. Diversity and proliferation of metallo-β-lactamases: A clarion call for clinically effective metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00698-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Salahuddin, P.; Kumar, A.; Khan, A.U. Structure, Function of Serine and Metallo-β-lactamases and their Inhibitors. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2018, 19, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heinz, U.; Adolph, H.W. Metallo-β-lactamases: Two binding sites for one catalytic metal ion? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 2827–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sabath, L.D.; Abraham, E.P. Zinc as a cofactor for cephalosporinase from Bacillus cereus 569. Biochem. J. 1966, 98, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Carfi, A.; Pares, S.; Duée, E.; Galleni, M.; Duez, C.; Frère, J.M.; Dideberg, O. The 3-D structure of a zinc metallo-β-lactamase from Bacillus cereus reveals a new type of protein fold. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 4914–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Daiyasu, H.; Osaka, K.; Ishino, Y.; Toh, H. Expansion of the zinc metallo-hydrolase family of the β-lactamase fold. FEBS Lett. 2001, 503, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Chang, C.Y.; Lin, H.J.; Li, B.R.; Li, Y.K. A Novel metallo-β-lactamase involved in the ampicillin resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49136 strain. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Garces, F.; Fernández, F.J.; Montellà, C.; Penya-Soler, E.; Prohens, R.; Aguilar, J.; Baldomà, L.; Coll, M.; Badia, J.; Vega, M.C. Molecular architecture of the Mn2+-dependent lactonase UlaG reveals an RNase-like metallo-β-lactamase fold and a novel quaternary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 398, 715–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kato, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Seki, M.; Nashimoto, M.; Shimizu-Ibuka, A. RNA-hydrolyzing activity of metallo-βlactamase IMP-1. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diene, S.M.; Pinault, L.; Baron, S.A.; Azza, S.; Armstrong, N.; Hadjadj, L.; Chabrière, E.; Rolain, J.-M.; Pontarotti, P.; Raoult, D. A metallo-β-lactamase enzyme for internal detoxification of the antibiotic thienamycin. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Au, S.X.; Dzulkifly, N.S.; Noor, N.D.M.; Matsumura, H.; Rahman, R.N.Z.R.A.; Normi, Y.M. Dual activity bleg-1 from bacillus lehensis g1 revealed structural resemblance to b3 metallo-β-lactamase and glyoxalase ii: An insight into its enzyme promiscuity and evolutionary divergence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tan, S.H.; Normi, Y.M.; Leow, A.T.C.; Salleh, A.B.; Murad, A.M.A.; Mahadi, N.M.; Abdul Rahman, M.B. Danger lurking in the “unknowns”: Structure-to-Function Studies of Hypothetical Protein Bleg1_2437 from Bacillus lehensis G1 Alkaliphile Revealed an Evolutionary Divergent B3 Metallo-beta-lactamase. J. Biochem. Adv. 2016, 161, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, D.; Thomas, P.W.; Momb, J.; Hoang, Q.Q.; Petsko, G.A.; Ringe, D.; Fast, W. Structure and Specificity of a Quorum-Quenching Lactonase ( AiiB ) from. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 11789–11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Castillo Villamizar, G.A.; Funkner, K.; Nacke, H.; Foerster, K.; Daniel, R. Functional Metagenomics Reveals a New Catalytic Domain, the Metallo-β-Lactamase Superfamily Domain, Associated with Phytase Activity. mSphere 2019, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lee, J.H.; Takahashi, M.; Jeon, J.H.; Kang, L.-W.; Seki, M.; Park, K.S.; Hong, M.-K.; Park, Y.S.; Kim, T.Y.; Karim, A.M.; et al. Dual activity of PNGM-1, a metallo-β-lactamase and tRNase Z, pinpoints the evolutionary origin of subclass B3 metallo-β-lactamases. bioRxiv 2019, bioRxiv:575373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Liang, Y.; Gao, Z.; Dong, Y.; Liu, Q. Structural and functional analysis show that the Escherichia coli uncharacterized protein YjcS is likely an alkylsulfatase. Protein Sci. 2014, 23, 1442–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Fischer, S.; John von Freyend, S.; Sabag-Daigle, A.; Daniels, C.J.; Allers, T.; Marchfelder, A. Assigning a function to a conserved archaeal metallo-β-lactamase from Haloferax volcanii. Extremophiles 2012, 16, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shimada, A.; Ishikawa, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Kuramitsu, S.; Masui, R. The first crystal structure of an archaeal metallo-β-lactamase superfamily protein; ST1585 from Sulfolobus tokodaii. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2010, 78, 2399–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mir-Montazeri, B.; Ammelburg, M.; Forouzan, D.; Lupas, A.N.; Hartmann, M.D. Crystal structure of a dimeric archaeal Cleavage and Polyadenylation Specificity Factor. J. Struct. Biol. 2011, 173, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ishikawa, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Kuramitsu, S.; Masui, R. Crystal structure of TTHA0252 from Thermus thermophilus HB8, a RNA degradation protein of the metallo-??-lactamase superfamily. J. Biochem. 2006, 140, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Levy, S.; Portnoy, V.; Admon, J.; Schuster, G. Distinct activities of several RNase J proteins in methanogenic archaea. RNA Biol. 2011, 8, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Buschow, S.I.; van Balkom, B.W.M.; Aalberts, M.; Heck, A.J.R.; Wauben, M.; Stoorvogel, W. MHC class II-associated proteins in B-cell exosomes and potential functional implications for exosome biogenesis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2010, 88, 851–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Diene, S.M.; Pinault, L.; Keshri, V.; Armstrong, N.; Khelaifia, S.; Chabrière, E.; Caetano-Anolles, G.; Colson, P.; La Scola, B.; Rolain, J.-M.; et al. Human metallo-β-lactamase enzymes degrade penicillin. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Pettinati, I.; Brem, J.; Lee, S.Y.; McHugh, P.J.; Schofield, C.J. The Chemical Biology of Human Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold Proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 338–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Colson, P.; Pinault, L.; Azza, S.; Armstrong, N.; Chabriere, E.; La Scola, B.; Pontarotti, P.; Raoult, D. A protein of the metallo-hydrolase/oxidoreductase superfamily with both beta-lactamase and ribonuclease activity is linked with translation in giant viruses. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maatouk, M.; Ibrahim, A.; Pinault, L.; Armstrong, N.; Azza, S.; Rolain, J.M.; Bittar, F.; Raoult, D. New Beta-lactamases in Candidate Phyla Radiation: Owning Pleiotropic Enzymes Is a Smart Paradigm for Microorganisms with a Reduced Genome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhao, H.; Meng, K.; Zhao, J.; Shi, P.; Yang, P.; Luo, H.; Wang, Y.; Yao, B. Genetic diversity and expression profiles of cysteine phytases in the sheep rumen during a feeding cycle. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 59, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dersjant-Li, Y.; Awati, A.; Schulze, H.; Partridge, G. Phytase in non-ruminant animal nutrition: A critical review on phytase activities in the gastrointestinal tract and influencing factors. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 878–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Kostelecky, B.; Pohl, E.; Vogel, A.; Schilling, O.; Meyer-Klaucke, W. The crystal structure of the zinc phosphodiesterase from Escherichia coli provides insight into function and cooperativity of tRNase Z-family proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1607–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Park, K.S.; Kim, T.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Jeon, J.H.; Karim, A.M.; Malik, S.K.; Lee, S.H. PNGM-1, a novel subclass B3 metallo-β-lactamase from a deep-sea sediment metagenome. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 14, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bergonzi, C.; Schwab, M.; Chabriere, E.; Elias, M. The quorum-quenching lactonase from Alicyclobacter acidoterrestris: Purification, kinetic characterization, crystallization and crystallographic analysis. Acta Cryst. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2017, 73, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, D.; Lepore, B.W.; Petsko, G.A.; Thomas, P.W.; Stone, E.M.; Fast, W.; Ringe, D. Three-dimensional structure of the quorum-quenching N-acyl homoserine lactone hydrolase from Bacillus thuringiensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11882–11887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mion, S.; Carriot, N.; Lopez, J.; Plener, L.; Ortalo-Magné, A.; Chabrière, E.; Culioli, G.; Daudé, D. Disrupting quorum sensing alters social interactions in Chromobacterium violaceum. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bergonzi, C.; Schwab, M.; Elias, M. The quorum-quenching lactonase from Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus: Purification, characterization, crystallization and crystallographic analysis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. Struct. Biol. Commun. 2016, 72, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cai, X.; Yu, M.; Shan, H.; Tian, X.; Zheng, Y.; Xue, C.; Zhang, X.H. Characterization of a novel N-acylhomoserine lactonase RmmL from Ruegeria mobilis YJ3. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, T.K.; Oh, J.W.; Koo, B.T.; Yum, D.Y.; Lee, J.K. AhlD, an N-acylhomoserine lactonase in Arthrobacter sp., and predicted homologues in other bacteria. Microbiology 2003, 149, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Tang, K.; Su, Y.; Brackman, G.; Cui, F.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, X.; Coenye, T.; Zhang, X.H. MomL, a novel marine-derived N-Acyl homoserine lactonase from Muricauda olearia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, W.Z.; Morohoshi, T.; Ikenoya, M.; Someya, N.; Ikeda, T. AiiM, a Novel Class ot N-Acylhomosenne Lactonase from the Leaf-Associated Bacterium Microbacterium testaceum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wang, W.Z.; Morohoshi, T.; Someya, N.; Ikeda, T. Aidc, a Novel N-Acylhomoserine Lactonase from the Potato Root-Associated Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroides (CFB) Group Bacterium Chryseobacterium sp. Strain strb126. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7985–7992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Gupta, S.K.; Padmanabhan, B.R.; Diene, S.M.; Lopez-Rojas, R.; Kempf, M.; Landraud, L.; Rolain, J.-M. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yu, S.; Jensen, V.; Seeliger, J.; Feldmann, I.; Weber, S.; Schleicher, E.; Häussler, S.; Blankenfeldt, W. Structure elucidation and preliminary assessment of hydrolase activity of PqsE, the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) response protein. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 10298–10307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Condon, C. What is the role of RNase J in mRNA turnover? RNA Biol. 2010, 7, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Garau, G.; Marie, A.; Guilmi, D.; Hall, B.G. Structure-Based Phylogeny of the Metallo-β-Lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2778–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Dronkert, M.L.G.; de Wit, J.; Boeve, M.; Vasconcelos, M.L.; van Steeg, H.; Tan, T.L.R.; Hoeijmakers, J.H.J.; Kanaar, R. Disruption of Mouse SNM1 Causes Increased Sensitivity to the DNA Interstrand Cross-Linking Agent Mitomycin C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 4553–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ishiai, M.; Kimura, M.; Namikoshi, K.; Yamazoe, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Arakawa, H.; Agematsu, K.; Matsushita, N.; Takeda, S.; Buerstedde, J.-M.; et al. DNA Cross-Link Repair Protein SNM1A Interacts with PIAS1 in Nuclear Focus Formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 10733–10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Levy, S.; Allerston, C.K.; Liveanu, V.; Habib, M.R.; Gileadi, O.; Schuster, G. Identification of LACTB2, a metallo-β-lactamase protein, as a human mitochondrial endoribonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 1813–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Allerston, C.K.; Lee, S.Y.; Newman, J.A.; Schofield, C.J.; Mchugh, P.J.; Gileadi, O. The structures of the SNM1A and SNM1B/Apollo nuclease domains reveal a potential basis for their distinct DNA processing activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 11047–11060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Zheng, C.; Chitsaz, F.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; Gonzales, N.R.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; Lanczycki, C.J.; et al. CDD: Conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Brown, C.T.; Hug, L.A.; Thomas, B.C.; Sharon, I.; Castelle, C.J.; Singh, A.; Wilkins, M.J.; Wrighton, K.C.; Williams, K.H.; Banfield, J.F. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 2015, 523, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hug, L.A.; Baker, B.J.; Anantharaman, K.; Brown, C.T.; Probst, A.J.; Castelle, C.J.; Butterfield, C.N.; Hernsdorf, A.W.; Amano, Y.; Ise, K.; et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Maatouk, M.; Ibrahim, A.; Rolain, J.-M.; Merhej, V.; Bittar, F. Small and Equipped: The Rich Repertoire of Antibiotic. mSystems 2021, 6, e00898-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dominski, Z. Nucleases of the Metallo-β-lactamase Family and Their Role in DNA and RNA Metabolism. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 42, 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Fernandez, F.J.; Lopez-Estepa, M.; Vega, M.C. Nucleases of Metallo-β-Lactamase and Protein Phosphatase Families in DNA Repair. In DNA Repair: On the Pathways to Fixing DNA Damage and Errors; Intech: Acton, MA, USA, 2011; Available online: www.intechopen.com (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  74. Visweswaran, G.R.R.; Dijkstra, B.W.; Kok, J. Murein and pseudomurein cell wall binding domains of bacteria and archaea-a comparative view. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 92, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Dridi, B.; Fardeau, M.L.; Ollivier, B.; Raoult, D.; Drancourt, M. The antimicrobial resistance pattern of cultured human methanogens reflects the unique phylogenetic position of archaea. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2038–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Crofts, T.S.; Wang, B.; Spivak, A.; Gianoulis, T.A.; Forsberg, K.J.; Gibson, M.K.; Johnsky, L.A.; Broomall, S.M.; Rosenzweig, C.N.; Skowronski, E.W.; et al. Shared strategies for β-lactam catabolism in the soil microbiome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Woappi, Y.; Gabani, P.; Singh, A.; Singh, O.V. Antibiotrophs: The complexity of antibiotic-subsisting and antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 42, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Robertson, C.E. Electron Microscopy of Archaea. Methods Cell Biol. 2007, 79, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Imachi, H.; Nobu, M.K.; Nakahara, N.; Morono, Y.; Ogawara, M.; Takaki, Y.; Takano, Y.; Uematsu, K.; Ikuta, T.; Ito, M.; et al. Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface. Nature 2020, 577, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Luef, B.; Frischkorn, K.R.; Wrighton, K.C.; Holman, H.Y.N.; Birarda, G.; Thomas, B.C.; Singh, A.; Williams, K.H.; Siegerist, C.E.; Tringe, S.G.; et al. Diverse uncultivated ultra-small bacterial cells in groundwater. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Saier, M.H. Bacterial and archaeal cell membranes. Encycl. Microbiol. 2019, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Boyer, M.; Yutin, N.; Pagnier, I.; Barrassi, L.; Fournous, G.; Espinosa, L.; Robert, C.; Azza, S.; Sun, S.; Rossmann, M.G.; et al. Giant Marseillevirus highlights the role of amoebae as a melting pot in emergence of chimeric microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21848–21853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Diene, S.M.; Merhej, V.; Henry, M.; El Filali, A.; Roux, V.; Robert, C.; Azza, S.; Gavory, F.; Barbe, V.; La Scola, B.; et al. The rhizome of the multidrug-resistant Enterobacter aerogenes genome reveals how new “killer bugs” are created because of a sympatric lifestyle. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Sharma, V.; Colson, P.; Giorgi, R.; Pontarotti, P.; Raoult, D. DNA-dependent RNA polymerase detects hidden giant viruses in published databanks. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Schnoes, A.M.; Brown, S.D.; Dodevski, I.; Babbitt, P.C. Annotation error in public databases: Misannotation of molecular function in enzyme superfamilies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, e1000605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 12 01752 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of MβL fold enzymes from the different domains of life, including Bacteria, Archaea, Asgard, Nanoarchaeota, Giant viruses, Candidate Phyla Radiation, and Humans.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of MβL fold enzymes from the different domains of life, including Bacteria, Archaea, Asgard, Nanoarchaeota, Giant viruses, Candidate Phyla Radiation, and Humans.
Cells 12 01752 g001
Cells 12 01752 g002 550
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment highlighting conserved motif (“HxHxDH”) and residues (H196 and H263) from the catalytic site of MβL fold enzymes.
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment highlighting conserved motif (“HxHxDH”) and residues (H196 and H263) from the catalytic site of MβL fold enzymes.
Cells 12 01752 g002
Cells 12 01752 g003 550
Figure 3. The phylogenetic tree and the pairwise comparison of protein similarity of representative MβL sequences from the different domains of life including Bacteria, Archaea, Asgard, Nanoarchaeota, Humans, Giant viruses, and Candidate phyla radiation (CPR). (A) Phylogenetic tree analysis using the Maximum likelihood (ML) method. From this tree, the common MβL fold ancestor has been inferred at the node indicated by arrow. (B) The pairwise comparison of the percentage of similarity of representative MβLs including the inferred MβL fold ancestor sequence. Pictures of each organism/microorganism have been retrieved from the literature [78,79,80,81,82,83].
Figure 3. The phylogenetic tree and the pairwise comparison of protein similarity of representative MβL sequences from the different domains of life including Bacteria, Archaea, Asgard, Nanoarchaeota, Humans, Giant viruses, and Candidate phyla radiation (CPR). (A) Phylogenetic tree analysis using the Maximum likelihood (ML) method. From this tree, the common MβL fold ancestor has been inferred at the node indicated by arrow. (B) The pairwise comparison of the percentage of similarity of representative MβLs including the inferred MβL fold ancestor sequence. Pictures of each organism/microorganism have been retrieved from the literature [78,79,80,81,82,83].
Cells 12 01752 g003
Cells 12 01752 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the at least thirteen reported and demonstrated enzymatic or non-enzymatic activities of MβL fold proteins from the different domains of life. The figure was created in BioRender.com (https://app.biorender.com (accessed on 2 November 2022) and manually adapted.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the at least thirteen reported and demonstrated enzymatic or non-enzymatic activities of MβL fold proteins from the different domains of life. The figure was created in BioRender.com (https://app.biorender.com (accessed on 2 November 2022) and manually adapted.
Cells 12 01752 g004
Table
Table 1. β-lactamase fold enzymes with reported enzymatic activity from the different domains of life.
Table 1. β-lactamase fold enzymes with reported enzymatic activity from the different domains of life.
KingdomAcc. NumberSpeciesGene NameSize (aa)Default AnnotationReported ActivitiesReferences
BacteriaAGM20433Enterobacter cloacaeIMP-1247Imipenem hydrolysing
β-lactamase		β-lactamase;
Ribonuclease		[29]
AEW99090Streptomyces cattleyaThnS330Putative β-lactamaseImipenemase;
Ascorbic acid degradation;
Nuclease; Ribonuclease 		[30]
HQ328085Klebsiella pneumoniaeNDM-1270New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase β-lactamase; RibonucleaseIn this study
NAStreptococcus pneumoniae-363L-ascorbate 6-phosphate lactonaseβ-lactamase[27]
P39300.2Escherichia coliUlaG354L-ascorbate-6-phosphate lactonaseβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease[28]
WP_010974862Agrobacterium tumefaciensAiiB276Zn-dependent hydrolasesQuorum-quenching lactonase[33]
PDB: 7EV5_ABacillus lehensisBLEG-1210β-lactamase domain containing proteinβ-lactamase; Glyoxalase II[31]
NASoil metagenomeMβLp01312Metallo-β-lactamase fold proteinβ-lactamase; Phytase[34]
NASoil metagenomeMβLP02355Metallo-β-lactamase fold proteinβ-lactamase; Phytase[34]
PDB: 7BZ4_BDeep-seep sediments metagenomePNGM-1372Metallo-β-lactamaseβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease[35]
WP_063100708Escherichia coliYjcS661Uncharacterised proteinAlkyl sulfatase[36]
ArchaeaELY35639Haloferax volcaniiHVO_2763278Zn-dependent hydrolases of the β-lactamase foldMembrane transport;
Static and dynamic osmo-response		[37]
851225341Methanosarcina barkeriMetbaB214MβL fold metallo-hydrolaseβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease;
and D-lactate hydrolase		[6]
15623131Sulfolobus tokodaii-200Putative hydrolaseQuorum sensing activity[38]
AAM30391Methanosarcina mazei-638Metal-dependent RNase, contains metallo-β-lactamase and KH domainsCleavage and Polyadenylation
of mRNA		[39]
BAD70075Thermus thermophilusTTHA0252 Metallo-β-lactamase superfamilyRibonuclease (RNase)[40]
NAMethanocaldococcus jannaschiiMjRNase J1 Ribonuclease Rnase JRibonuclease (RNase)[41]
NAMethanocaldococcus jannaschiiMjRNase J2 Ribonuclease Rnase JRibonuclease (RNase); Nuclease
NAMethanocaldococcus jannaschiiMjRNase J3 Ribonuclease Rnase JRibonuclease (RNase); Nuclease
HumanNP_981951Homo sapiensMβLAC2280Metallo-β-lactamase domainExosome biogenesis enzyme;
β-lactamase		[42,43]
Q6PJP8Homo sapiensSNM1A365DNA cross-link repair 1ACisplatin or Mitomycin
hydrolase; β-lactamase		[43,44]
Q9H816Homo sapiensSNM1B3355′ exonuclease Apollo isoform X1β-lactamase[43]
Giant virusesAUL78925Tupanvirus deep oceanTupBlac322β-lactamase superfamily domainβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease[45]
Candidate Phyla
Radiation (CPR)		KKR15801Candidatus Levybacteria-287β-lactamase class A-like proteinβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease[46]
KKR17584Candidatus Levybacteria-303β-lactamase class A-like proteinβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease
OGK62163Candidatus Roizmanbacteria-263Hypothetical proteinβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease
OGZ64179Candidatus Staskawiczbacteria-251Hypothetical proteinβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease
QHU90009Candidatus Saccharibacteria-722RNase J family beta-CASP ribonucleaseβ-lactamase; Ribonuclease
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diene, S.M.; Pontarotti, P.; Azza, S.; Armstrong, N.; Pinault, L.; Chabrière, E.; Colson, P.; Rolain, J.-M.; Raoult, D. Origin, Diversity, and Multiple Roles of Enzymes with Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold from Different Organisms. Cells 2023, 12, 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131752

AMA Style

Diene SM, Pontarotti P, Azza S, Armstrong N, Pinault L, Chabrière E, Colson P, Rolain J-M, Raoult D. Origin, Diversity, and Multiple Roles of Enzymes with Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold from Different Organisms. Cells. 2023; 12(13):1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diene, Seydina M., Pierre Pontarotti, Saïd Azza, Nicholas Armstrong, Lucile Pinault, Eric Chabrière, Philippe Colson, Jean-Marc Rolain, and Didier Raoult. 2023. "Origin, Diversity, and Multiple Roles of Enzymes with Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold from Different Organisms" Cells 12, no. 13: 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131752

APA Style

Diene, S. M., Pontarotti, P., Azza, S., Armstrong, N., Pinault, L., Chabrière, E., Colson, P., Rolain, J. -M., & Raoult, D. (2023). Origin, Diversity, and Multiple Roles of Enzymes with Metallo-β-Lactamase Fold from Different Organisms. Cells, 12(13), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12131752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop