Next Article in Journal
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Targeted Therapies: Challenges upon Infectious Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Dual Effects of miR-181b-2-3p/SOX21 Interaction on Microglia and Neural Stem Cells after Gamma Irradiation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/cells12040647
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Preeclampsia

by
Iason Psilopatis
1,2,
Kleio Vrettou
2,
Florian Nima Fleckenstein
1,3,* and
Stamatios Theocharis
2,*
1
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
2
First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 75 Mikras Asias Street, Bld 10, Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
3
BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, 10117 Berlin, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(4), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040647
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 16 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preeclampsia and Eclampsia: The Multifaceted Pathophysiology Landscapes)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder. Often presenting as preexisting or new-onset hypertension complicated by proteinuria and/or end-organ dysfunction, preeclampsia significantly correlates with maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptor proteins that regulate gene expression. In order to investigate the role of PPARs in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, we conducted a literature review using the MEDLINE and LIVIVO databases. The search terms “peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor”, “PPAR”, and “preeclampsia” were employed and we were able to identify 35 relevant studies published between 2002 and 2022. Different study groups reached contradictory conclusions in terms of PPAR expression in preeclamptic placentae. Interestingly, PPARγ agonists alone, or in combination with well-established pharmaceutical agents, were determined to represent novel, potent anti-preeclamptic treatment alternatives. In conclusion, PPARs seem to play a significant role in preeclampsia.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia is a form of pregnancy disorder characterized by the onset of hypertension, proteinuria and/or end-organ dysfunction after 20 weeks’ gestation [1]. Affecting circa 2–8% of pregnancies globally, preeclampsia represents one of the most common causes of both maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [2,3]. Clinically, preeclampsia typically presents with new-onset hypertension and proteinuria at ≥34 weeks of gestation, with severe clinical features ranging from persistent headache, nausea, or vomiting to visual abnormalities, abdominal discomfort, and altered mental status [2,4]. Diagnostic evaluation includes, apart from a detailed history and physical exam, a urine analysis, complete blood count, a complete metabolic panel, as well as close control of renal retention parameters [5]. According to level-A guideline recommendations published by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), women with preeclampsia should receive magnesium sulfate as prophylaxis and/or treatment of seizures, whereas (preterm) delivery is suggested for patients with preeclampsia without severe clinical symptoms at or beyond 37 0/7 weeks of gestation [3]. To date, the exact pathomechanisms of preeclampsia still remain unknown, with various theories proposing abnormal placentation, immunologic factors, inflammation, genetics, as well as acquired risk factors as the most relevant causes [6].
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are fatty acid-activated nuclear receptors that comprise of three isoforms with distinct metabolic regulatory activities, tissue distribution, and ligand-binding assets: α, β/δ, and γ [7,8,9]. PPARs play a regulatory role in fatty acid disposition and metabolism, energy homeostasis, cellular biology functions, cell differentiation, as well as immunity pathways [10,11]. More precisely, PPARα and PPARβ/δ are mainly involved in energy combustion, whereas PPARγ enhances adipogenesis [12]. Importantly, PPAR isotypes have been described to be expressed in the placenta and to influence placental development, homeostasis, endometrium decidualization, fetal implantation, trophoblast physiological conditions, and oxidative pathways [13,14,15].
Given the involvement of PPARs in various placental functions, a literature review was conducted in order to investigate the their role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. The literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and LIVIVO databases. Solely original research articles and scientific abstracts written in the English language that explicitly reported on the role of PPARs in the preeclamptic pathogenesis were included in the data analysis. Studies emphasizing the involvement of PPARs in uncomplicated human pregnancy or obstetric and gynecologic disorders other than preeclampsia (e.g., polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, intrauterine growth restriction, gestational diabetes) were excluded. The search terms “peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor”, “PPAR”, and “preeclampsia” were employed, and we were able to identify a total of 94 articles published between 2000 and 2022, after the exclusion of duplicates. A total of 49 were discarded in the initial selection process after abstract review. The full texts of the remaining 45 publications were evaluated, and after detailed analysis, a total of 35 relevant studies published between 2002 and 2022 that met the inclusion criteria were selected for the literature review. Figure 1 presents an overview of the aforementioned selection process.

2. PPAR Structure and Mechanism of Action

PPARs consist of four functional (A/B, C, D and E/F) [16] and two binding domains (a DNA binding domain in the N-terminus and a ligand binding domain in the C-terminus) [17]. By binding to specific DNA response elements within promoters as heterodimers with the retinoid X receptors (RXRs), PPARs represent ligand-regulated transcription factors which promote or inhibit the expression of the target gene (Figure 2) [18]. These DNA regions of PPAR-responsive genes are termed peroxisome proliferator hormone response elements (PPREs) [18]. Transcription of PPAR-regulated genes is amplified by co-activators that either remodel chromatin structure by the intrinsic histone acetyltransferase, methyltransferase or helicase activities (i.e., Steroid Receptor Co-activator (SRC), CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300, PPAR-interacting protein (PRIP) with methyltransferase domain (PIMT)/Nuclear receptor co-activator 6 (NCoA6)-interacting protein (NCoA6IP), PPARα-receptor interacting co-factor (PRIC), co-activator-associated arginine methyl-transferase 1 (CARM1), SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF)), or do not possess any known enzymatic functions but recruit multisubunit protein transcriptional complexes (i.e., Mediator complex subunit 1 (MED1), PPARγ co-activator 1 (PGC1), PRIP/NCoA6, BRG1/BRM-associated factor 60 (BAF60)) [19,20].
With the size of the PPAR ligand binding cavity being significantly larger than that of other nuclear receptors, PPARs succeed in binding numerous natural and synthetic ligands [17,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. These ligands may trigger an exchange of co-repressors for co-activators that stimulate the function of PPARs [31]. PPARα is highly expressed in the liver, heart, intestine, kidneys, skeletal muscles, and brown adipose tissue, and influences fatty acid metabolism. PPARβ/δ is expressed ubiquitously, and participates in fatty acid oxidation, as well as regulation of blood cholesterol and glucose levels. On the contrary, PPARγ displays highest expression levels in adipocytes, and plays a key role in adipogenesis, lipid biosynthesis, lipoprotein metabolism and insulin sensitivity (Table 1) [16,17].

3. The Role of PPARs in Hypertension

PPARs have been reported to play a significant role in the (dys-)regulation of blood pressure.
PPARα is widely known for its pivotal contributions in terms of lipid metabolism, which by extension undoubtedly affects arterial blood pressure [17]. Considering this fact, the PPARα agonists clofibrate and fenofibrate have been shown to effectively reduce blood pressure by interfering with the renin–angiotensin system and consecutively improving the renal function [32,33]. Furthermore, PPARα agonists may inhibit vasoconstriction and induce vasodilatation by either promoting expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in endothelium or suppressing agonist-induced endothelin-1 secretion from endothelial cells [34,35]. Of note, PPARα may even mediate transactivation of uncoupling protein 2 or reduction in oxidative stress in specific brain regions responsible for the regulation of blood pressure [36], while PPARα agonist-mediated T cell treatment attenuates secretion of pro-atherogenic cytokines via nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) repression induction [37].
Pharmacological PPARβ/δ activation seems to be associated with end-organ damage protection by increasing G protein-coupled signaling regulators, exerting acute nongenomic vasodilator effects, ameliorating the endothelial dysfunction, as well as down-regulating vascular inflammation, vasoconstrictor responses, and sympathetic outflow from the central nervous system [38]. This regulation of both the lipid metabolism and the energy homeostasis might, hence, result in the at least partial regulation of elevated arterial blood pressure, limitation of cardiovascular remodeling and inflammation, nitrogen oxide bioavailability and endothelial function improvement, as well as restriction of oxidative stress and proliferative signaling. Additionally, PPARβ/δ may mediate prostacyclin-induced vasodilatation in renal microvessels, hence contributing to the successful maintenance of renal blood flow [39], whereas PPARβ/δ agonists decrease plasma levels of pro-atherogenic cytokines and autoantibodies [40].
PPARγ is evidently the PPAR isoform with the strongest influence on blood pressure regulation. More precisely, severe hypertension, along with other health conditions including insulin resistance, diabetes, or dyslipidemia, may be partly attributed to the loss of basal transcriptional activity caused by mutations in the wildtype PPARγ [41]. Interestingly, PPARγ has been also suggested to represent a locus interacting at the level of chromatin that could be regarded as a distal associated gene which correlates with blood pressure traits [42]. Furthermore, the PPARγ agonists troglitazone, rosiglitazone, as well as pioglitazone, alone or in combination with different therapeutic agents, may not only improve glycemic control or insulin sensitivity, but also counteract hypertension by lowering blood pressure, as revealed in numerous relevant clinical trials [43,44,45,46]. Recently, Fang et al. published a comprehensive review article on the role of PPARs in hypertension with a special focus on the PPARγ-associated mechanisms of action, and extensively reviewed evidence for its beneficial and very diverse tissue-specific effects in the vasculature, central nervous system, kidney, and immune system on hypertension. In summary, PPARγ activators may regulate blood pressure in the face of volume expansion, interact with specific brain regions directly linked to the short- and long-term regulation of blood pressure, mediate salt/fluid reabsorption, as well as play multiple roles in the regulation of the immune functions involved in the development of hypertension [47].

4. The Role of PPARs in Trophoblast Functions and Fetal Origins

All three PPAR isoforms may be expressed in the amnion, decidua, and villous placenta, but are mainly represented in cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts in the first trimester of the placenta, signifying their exclusive contributions to trophoblast differentiation and functions of the placenta [48]. PPARβ plays an essential role in embryonic implantation and placentation by promoting the differentiation of trophoblast giant cells through the activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway, as well as the regulation of the expression of transcription factor I-MFA [49]. With the chorion-specific transcription factor-1 (GCM-1) and the chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit (hCGβ) being the biochemical markers of trophoblast differentiation [50], PPARγ increases hCGβ secretion in the first- and third-trimester primary villous trophoblasts and, consecutively, indirectly stimulates cytotrophoblast differentiation into syncytiotrophoblasts [51,52]. Notably, PPARγ evidently activates the increase in the hCG α- and β-subunit transcript levels in villous cytotrophoblasts, but decreases their expression levels in extra-villous trophoblasts, respectively [53]. During the trophoblast stem cell differentiation, PPARγ even targets different genes and is diversely expressed in different trophoblast subsets and times [54]. Furthermore, microRNA-1246 has been shown to up-regulate the expression of PPARγ and induce syncytiotrophoblast differentiation through the inhibition of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway [55], while hypoxia has been suggested to have a negative effect on the expression of PPARγ with the inactivation of both hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), which hinders the trophoblast differentiation [56]. Collectively, PPARγ seems to both spatially and temporally affect any subtype of trophoblast lineage differentiation during pregnancy.
In terms of trophoblast secretion, PPARγ signaling pathways have been described to promote the energy metabolism of trophoblast cells through the secretion of inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-γ and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [57]. Both PPARβ and PPARγ are also associated with trophoblast cell fusion and syncytiotrophoblast formation via direct modulation of the target gene syncytin-1 [58,59]. In the context of trophoblast invasion, the molecular mechanism of PPARγ may efficiently decrease pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and avert the secretion of insulin-like growth factor (IFGII) [60].
Moreover, PPARs are involved in the modulation of trophoblastic fat transport, fat storage, and fat metabolism by up-regulating the lipid droplet that is associated with the protein adipophilin [61]. Importantly, PPARγ is necessary for adipogenesis and normal insulin sensitivity. Hyperglycemia enhances PPARγ pathways, thus diminishing the human cytotrophoblast invasion, increasing interleukin-6 and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFIt-1), as well as inhibiting urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) [62].
All three PPAR isoforms have been reported to be expressed in cells of the endoderm and mesoderm at early time points during the development of the human embryo and fetus [63], with PPARα and PPARγ exhibiting first placental and then fetal expression [64]. As with adult tissues, PPARα plays a significant role in lipid catabolism in the fetal liver and heart [65,66]. PPARβ/δ is expressed in the early stages of organogenesis [67] and effectively contributes to the closure of the neural tube [68]. PPARγ seems to have potent anti-inflammatory effects by preventing the overproduction of both nitric oxide and matrix metalloproteinases in fetuses from diabetic rats [69]. Recently, Barbieri et al. studied the association of selected PPARγ single-nucleotide polymorphisms with intrauterine growth restriction through an unmatched case-control study nested in a prospective cohort study in a cohort of live births in Ribeirão Preto. Surprisingly, even after controlling for non-genetic confounding factors, the PPARγ single-nucleotide polymorphism rs41516544, which has been associated with type 2 diabetes with an elevated risk of metabolic complications (e.g., insulin resistance, obesity, etc.), was suggested to augment the risk of intrauterine growth restriction for both male and female offspring [70]. Altogether, PPAR methylation pattern alterations during early development may manifest in fetuses and be maintained throughout the life course and even across generations [71].

5. The Role of PPARs in Uterine and Placental Angiogenesis

PPARs have been suggested to exhibit an interplay between endothelial aging and angiogenesis [72]. PPARα triggers the caspase pathway by up-regulating thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) expression, and, therefore, results in apoptosis of endothelial cells, angiogenesis inhibition, as well as downregulation of tumor progression. Gypenoside 140 (GP-140) up-regulation results in reduced promoter luciferase secretion of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene, which moderates the process of angiogenesis, respectively [73]. Moreover, PPARα has an inhibitory effect on vascular smooth muscle proliferation through the activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16(INK4a) which results in cell cycle arrest and reduced endothelial proliferation [74]. In the case of PPARβ/δ, the angiogenic profile of endothelial progenitor cells is directly related to the activity of this PPAR isoform, as well as the activation of matrix metalloproteinases [75,76]. In terms of PPARγ contributions, the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone was applied in wild-type mice during later stages of embryonic development, hence disorganizing the placental layers, altering placental microvasculature, as well as leading to a decreased expression of proangiogenic genes ranging from Prl2c2 or VEGF to Platelet and Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (Pecam1) [77]. Similarly, the partial agonist of PPARγ and angiotensin-II receptor antagonist telmisartan has been described to reduce functional microvessel density and blood perfusion, down-regulate immune cell infiltration and cell proliferation, and correlate with the pathogenesis of smaller endometriotic lesion sizes [78]. Of note, Zhang et al. recently investigated the expression of PPARγ in porcine uteroplacental tissues at three different gestational days, and employed both a cell model of porcine umbilical vein endothelial cells and a mouse xenograft model to assess angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. The main PPARγ locations were described to be in the glandular epithelium, trophoblast, amniotic chorion epithelium and vascular endothelium, while PPARγ expression was determined to exhibit significant down-regulation in placenta with dead fetus. In porcine umbilical vein endothelial cells, PPARγ knock-out significantly repressed proliferation, migration and tube formation in vitro. In vivo, capillary formation in mouse xenograft models was hindered by blocking S-phase, promoting apoptosis and down-regulating the VEGF angiogenic factors along with its receptors [79].

6. The Role of PPARα in Preeclampsia

Several studies have investigated the role of PPARα in preeclampsia.
Both Chang et al. and Dekker Nitert et al. examined PPARα levels in human placentae, and discovered a significantly lower PPARα mRNA and protein expression in preeclamptic placentae [80,81]. On the contrary, He et al. reported significantly higher PPARα mRNA and protein expression levels that inversely correlated with the 11β-HSD2 protein level in preeclamptic placentae [82], while Holdsworth-Carson et al. showed that placental PPARα protein was significantly increased in placentae from women that delivered preterm with co-existing intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia [83].
Santana-Garrido et al. obtained placenta samples from normal pregnant and preeclamptic rats, and described significant depletion for PPARα gene/protein expression in preeclampsia [84].

7. The Role of PPARβ/δ in Preeclampsia

Rodie et al. performed immunohistochemistry in third trimester preeclamptic placentae and reported that PPARδ was localized to the syncytium and cells within the stroma. Of note, there was no difference in PPARδ mRNA and protein expression between preeclamptic placentae and placentae from uncomplicated pregnancies [85]. On the other hand, He et al. reported significantly higher PPARβ mRNA and protein expression levels in preeclamptic placentae [82].

8. The Role of PPARγ in Preeclampsia

PPARγ is undoubtedly the most studied PPAR in preeclampsia.
A great number of studies has explored the role of PPARγ in preeclamptic human placentae. Different study groups reported that PPARγ seems to be down-regulated in preeclamptic placentae [58,82,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Of note, placental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2) and specificity protein 1 (Sp-1) protein levels were positively associated with PPARγ [82], omega-3 fatty acid supplementation promoted PPARγ protein expression in late-onset preeclampsia [88], PPARγ expression positively correlated with the epigenetic modification via trimethylated lysine 4 of the histone H3 (H3K4me3) and acetylated lysine 9 of the histone H3 (H3K9ac) [91], while PPARγ was negatively associated with micro-RNA-27b-3p and showed good predictive value on preeclampsia [94]. Hastie et al. determined the mRNA expression of the PPARγ co-activator 1 (PGC1α) to be also reduced in preeclamptic placentae [95]. On the contrary, Holdsworth-Carson et al. showed that placental PPARγ mRNA and protein were significantly increased in placentae from women that delivered preterm with co-existing intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia [83], while Jia et al. noted high PPARγ protein expression levels in preeclamptic placental tissues, with the rs201018 polymorphism in the PPARγ promoter region significantly correlating with the development of preeclampsia [96]. Liu et al. showed that the C1431T variant of PPARγ significantly correlates with preeclamptic susceptibility [97]. In addition, Permadi et al. exposed primary trophoblastic cells obtained from normal pregnancy to serum from normal pregnancy, early-onset, or late-onset preeclampsia, and highlighted that exposure to serum from only late-onset preeclampsia induced high PPARγ expression [98]. Certain research groups could, however, not detect any correlation between PPARγ (polymorphism) and the occurrence of preeclampsia [81,85,99], with the clinical course of preeclampsia not differing among PPARγ genotypes [99]. Ghorbani et al. studied the gene variants in preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women using polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), and underlined the missing correlation of the gene variants of PPARγ Pro12Ala and RXR-α with the risk of preeclampsia [100].
Armistead et al. cultured preeclamptic placentae that displayed decreased PPARγ protein expression. After administration of rosiglitazone, both PPARγ and Glial Cell Missing 1 (GCM1) expression were restored, while sFIt-1 expression was down-regulated [101]. Additionally, Kohan-Ghadr et al. incubated term preeclamptic placental explants with rosiglitazone, which induced Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) scavenger expression [102]. Similarly, Luminex assay results supported the notion that rosiglitazone-induced PPARγ activation in preeclamptic placentae, on the one hand, significantly reduces Angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2) and soluble Endoglin (sEng), but, on the other hand, increases placental growth factor (PIGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), and follistatin (FST) protein secretion, hence improving the overall placental angiogenic profile [103]. Furthermore, Liu et al. investigated the effect of a bioactive food compound on preeclampsia in placental explant cultures and RUPP rat model, and demonstrated that procyanidin B2 induced PPARγ expression, thus inhibiting sFLT1 expression via the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/PPARγ axis [104].
Different study groups have examined the role of PPARγ in preeclamptic pregnant animal models as well. After obtaining placenta samples from normal pregnant and preeclamptic rats, Santana-Garrido et al. described significant PPARγ gene/protein expression depletion in preeclampsia [84]. El-Saka et al. experimentally induced preeclampsia in Wistar rats, and described a significant PPARγ expression decrease that significantly improved after angiotensin 1–7 treatment [105]. Moreover, Nema et al. showed that placental PPARγ levels were significantly lower in Vitamin D-deficient than in Vitamin D-supplemented female rats with preeclampsia [106], while Ueki et al. concluded that plasma from Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT)-deficient pregnant mice exhibited low PPARγ transcriptional activity, and correlated with elevated angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) levels [107].
Interestingly, some research groups also chose to study the effects of rosiglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, in preeclamptic animal models. Allam et al. treated preeclamptic pregnant rats with rosiglitazone from days 14 to 20, and reported blood pressure reduction, renal function amelioration, endothelin-1, angiotensin-II, and interleukin-6 decrease, nitric oxide level increase, as well as fetal weight gain [108]. Furthermore, McCarthy et al. simultaneously treated reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP) preeclamptic rats with rosiglitazone and the heme oxygenase 1 inhibitor tinprotoporphyrin IX, and proved their synergistic positive effects on hypertension and endothelial function [109]. In an attempt to further endorse their assertion, the same study group administered the PPARγ antagonist T0070907 to healthy pregnant rats, and determined that the inhibition of PPARγ-associated pathways resulted in hypertension, intrauterine growth restriction, proteinuria, vascular dysfunction, as well as elevated platelet aggregation [110]. Notably, Zhang et al. employed Sprague–Dawley rats, and, after administration of different doses of aspirin in presence or absence of T0070907, suggested that aspirin potently reverses the pro-preeclamptic effects of the PPARγ antagonist [111]. Similarly, Guo et al. administered low-dose aspirin to a PPARγ-antagonist-treated mouse model of preeclampsia, and reported effective blood pressure and urinary protein level decrease, endoglin and interleukin-β inhibition, as well as placental lesion alleviation and weight increase [112]. Moreover, Holobotovskyy et al. employed Regulator of G protein Signaling 5 (RGS5) heterozygote knockout mice, and treated them with the PPARγ agonist troglitazone, thus achieving vascular function, blood pressure, as well as birth weight normalization [113].
Table 2 summarizes the role of PPARs in preeclampsia.
Figure 3 depicts the effects of PPARγ-modulating treatment agents in preeclampsia.

9. Conclusions

To date, several review articles have been published on the role of PPARs in trophoblast differentiation and healthy placental development [13,14,114]. However, these publications mainly focus on the metabolic regulation of PPARs affecting trophoblast physiological conditions, but do not deeply investigate the influence of PPAR dysfunctions in trophoblasts on pregnancy diseases. Notably, the present article represents the most comprehensive up-to-date literature review incorporating a total of 35 original research articles on the role of PPARs in preeclampsia, a potentially life-threatening risk factor for disturbed pregnancy. Not only does it provide a detailed insight into the PPAR-associated preeclamptic pathogenesis, but it also examines the therapeutic effect of PPAR-modulating drugs in preeclampsia.
PPARs seem to play a significant role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Compared to PPARγ, only a handful of studies have reported on the expression of PPARα and PPARβ/δ in preeclamptic placentae. Despite the limited number of available publications, study results are contradictory, thus not allowing for a conclusive statement on the up- or down-regulation of these receptors in preeclampsia yet.
On the contrary, a significantly greater number of studies have investigated the role of PPARγ in preeclampsia, with the majority of these studies reporting a reduction in PPARγ in preeclampsia. Nevertheless, several study groups did not detect differences between healthy and preeclamptic placentae, while some authors even suggested PPARγ up-regulation in preeclampsia. A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be the lack of large-scale studies incorporating numerous study samples that would allow for reliable and statistically robust observations.
Importantly, several research groups have evaluated the effects of PPARγ agonists alone, or in combination with other pharmaceutical agents, in preeclamptic placental explant cultures and mouse models, and underlined their promising therapeutic effects. Among them, rosiglitazone, an insulin sensitizer in the thiazolidinedione class, represents the most studied treatment agent, which, except for its mighty antidiabetic effects, could potentially revolutionize anti-preeclamptic therapy. Consequently, the verification of these findings in large-scale clinical trials might lay the basis for groundbreaking novel treatment alternatives for preeclamptic pregnancies.
In summary, this review highlights the crucial role of PPARs in preeclampsia and paves the way for future research directions.

Author Contributions

Literature analysis and conceptualization, I.P.; original draft preparation and writing, I.P.; art work, I.P.; review and supervision, K.V., F.N.F. and S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wojczakowski, W.; Kimber-Trojnar, Z.; Dziwisz, F.; Slodzinska, M.; Slodzinski, H.; Leszczynska-Gorzelak, B. Preeclampsia and Cardiovascular Risk for Offspring. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Steegers, E.A.; von Dadelszen, P.; Duvekot, J.J.; Pijnenborg, R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010, 376, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, e237–e260. [CrossRef]
  4. Sibai, B.M. Maternal and uteroplacental hemodynamics for the classification and prediction of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2008, 52, 805–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Karrar, S.A.; Hong, P.L. Preeclampsia; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ives, C.W.; Sinkey, R.; Rajapreyar, I.; Tita, A.T.N.; Oparil, S. Preeclampsia-Pathophysiology and Clinical Presentations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 1690–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Auwerx, J.; Baulieu, E.; Beato, M.; Becker-Andre, M.; Burbach, P.H.; Camerino, G.; Chambon, P.; Cooney, A.; Dejean, A.; Dreyer, C.; et al. Nuclear Receptors Nomenclature C. A unified nomenclature system for the nuclear receptor superfamily. Cell 1999, 97, 161–163. [Google Scholar]
  8. Han, L.; Shen, W.J.; Bittner, S.; Kraemer, F.B.; Azhar, S. PPARs: Regulators of metabolism and as therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease. Part II: PPAR-beta/delta and PPAR-gamma. Future Cardiol. 2017, 13, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wagner, K.D.; Wagner, N. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) acts as regulator of metabolism linked to multiple cellular functions. Pharm. Ther. 2010, 125, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Brunmeir, R.; Xu, F. Functional Regulation of PPARs through Post-Translational Modifications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Bensinger, S.J.; Tontonoz, P. Integration of metabolism and inflammation by lipid-activated nuclear receptors. Nature 2008, 454, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rao, M.S.; Papreddy, K.; Musunuri, S.; Okonkwo, A. Prevention/reversal of choline deficiency-induced steatohepatitis by a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha ligand in rats. In Vivo 2002, 16, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Szilagyi, J.T.; Avula, V.; Fry, R.C. Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) and Their Effects on the Placenta, Pregnancy, and Child Development: A Potential Mechanistic Role for Placental Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs). Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2020, 7, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Peng, L.; Yang, H.; Ye, Y.; Ma, Z.; Kuhn, C.; Rahmeh, M.; Mahner, S.; Makrigiannakis, A.; Jeschke, U.; von Schönfeldt, V. Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) in Trophoblast Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giaginis, C.; Spanopoulou, E.; Theocharis, S. PPAR-gamma signaling pathway in placental development and function: A potential therapeutic target in the treatment of gestational diseases. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2008, 12, 1049–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Christofides, A.; Konstantinidou, E.; Jani, C.; Boussiotis, V.A. The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) in immune responses. Metabolism 2021, 114, 154338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grygiel-Gorniak, B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and their ligands: Nutritional and clinical implications—A review. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Berger, J.; Moller, D.E. The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu. Rev. Med. 2002, 53, 409–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Viswakarma, N.; Jia, Y.; Bai, L.; Vluggens, A.; Borensztajn, J.; Xu, J.; Reddy, J.K. Coactivators in PPAR-Regulated Gene Expression. PPAR Res. 2010, 2010, 250126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yu, S.; Reddy, J.K. Transcription coactivators for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007, 1771, 936–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Giaginis, C.; Giagini, A.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands as potential therapeutic agents to treat arthritis. Pharm. Res. 2009, 60, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giaginis, C.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands as bone turnover modulators. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Giaginis, C.; Theocharis, S.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. A consideration of PPAR-gamma ligands with respect to lipophilicity: Current trends and perspectives. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Margeli, A.; Kouraklis, G.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands and angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2003, 6, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Giaginis, C.; Theocharis, S.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. Structural basis for the design of PPAR-gamma ligands: A survey on quantitative structure- activity relationships. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giaginis, C.; Margeli, A.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligands as investigational modulators of angiogenesis. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2007, 16, 1561–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giaginis, C.; Tsourouflis, G.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands: Novel pharmacological agents in the treatment of ischemia reperfusion injury. Curr. Mol. Med. 2008, 8, 562–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Giaginis, C.; Theocharis, S.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. Investigation of the lipophilic behaviour of some thiazolidinediones. Relationships with PPAR-gamma activity. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 857, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giaginis, C.; Theocharis, S.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for PPAR-gamma binding and gene transactivation of tyrosine-based agonists using multivariate statistics. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 72, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giaginis, C.; Tsantili-Kakoulidou, A.; Theocharis, S. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-gamma Ligands: Potential Pharmacological Agents for Targeting the Angiogenesis Signaling Cascade in Cancer. PPAR Res. 2008, 2008, 431763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Feige, J.N.; Gelman, L.; Michalik, L.; Desvergne, B.; Wahli, W. From molecular action to physiological outputs: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are nuclear receptors at the crossroads of key cellular functions. Prog. Lipid Res. 2006, 45, 120–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yousefipour, Z.; Newaz, M. PPARalpha ligand clofibrate ameliorates blood pressure and vascular reactivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Acta Pharm. Sin. 2014, 35, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Koh, K.K.; Quon, M.J.; Han, S.H.; Chung, W.J.; Ahn, J.Y.; Kim, J.A.; Lee, Y.; Shin, E.K. Additive beneficial effects of fenofibrate combined with candesartan in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemic hypertensive patients. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Goya, K.; Sumitani, S.; Xu, X.; Kitamura, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Kurebayashi, S.; Saito, H.; Kouhara, H.; Kasayama, S.; Kawase, I. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists increase nitric oxide synthase expression in vascular endothelial cells. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 658–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Delerive, P.; Martin-Nizard, F.; Chinetti, G.; Trottein, F.; Fruchart, J.C.; Najib, J.; Duriez, P.; Staels, B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators inhibit thrombin-induced endothelin-1 production in human vascular endothelial cells by inhibiting the activator protein-1 signaling pathway. Circ. Res. 1999, 85, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Guan, J.; Zhao, M.; He, C.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Wang, W.; Cui, Y.L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.Y.; et al. Anti-Hypertensive Action of Fenofibrate via UCP2 Upregulation Mediated by PPAR Activation in Baroreflex Afferent Pathway. Neurosci. Bull. 2019, 35, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Selim, E.; Frkanec, J.T.; Cunard, R. Fibrates upregulate TRB3 in lymphocytes independent of PPAR alpha by augmenting CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBP beta) expression. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 1218–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Toral, M.; Romero, M.; Perez-Vizcaino, F.; Duarte, J.; Jimenez, R. Antihypertensive effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta activation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2017, 312, H189–H200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kirkby, N.S.; Sampaio, W.; Etelvino, G.; Alves, D.T.; Anders, K.L.; Temponi, R.; Shala, F.; Nair, A.S.; Ahmetaj-Shala, B.; Jiao, J.; et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 Selectively Controls Renal Blood Flow Through a Novel PPARbeta/delta-Dependent Vasodilator Pathway. Hypertension 2018, 71, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Romero, M.; Toral, M.; Robles-Vera, I.; Sánchez, M.; Jiménez, R.; O’Valle, F.; Rodriguez-Nogales, A.; Pérez-Vizcaino, F.; Gálvez, J.; Duarte, J. Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptor beta/delta Improves Endothelial Dysfunction and Protects Kidney in Murine Lupus. Hypertension 2017, 69, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Barroso, I.; Gurnell, M.; Crowley, V.E.F.; Agostini, M.; Schwabe, J.W.; Soos, M.A.; Maslen, G.L.; Williams, T.D.M.; Lewis, H.; Schafer, A.J.; et al. Dominant negative mutations in human PPARgamma associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Nature 1999, 402, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Evangelou, E.; Warren, H.R.; Mosen-Ansorena, D.; Mifsud, B.; Pazoki, R.; Gao, H.; Ntritsos, G.; Dimou, N.; Cabrera, C.P.; Karaman, I.; et al. Publisher Correction: Genetic analysis of over 1 million people identifies 535 new loci associated with blood pressure traits. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fullert, S.; Schneider, F.; Haak, E.; Rau, H.; Badenhoop, K.; Lubben, G.; Usadel, K.H.; Konrad, T. Effects of pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with arterial hypertension: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 5503–5506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ogihara, T.; Rakugi, H.; Ikegami, H.; Mikami, H.; Masuo, K. Enhancement of insulin sensitivity by troglitazone lowers blood pressure in diabetic hypertensives. Am. J. Hypertens. 1995, 8, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dormandy, J.A.; Charbonnel, B.; Eckland, D.J.A.; Erdmann, E.; Massi-Benedetti, M.; Moules, I.K.; Skene, A.M.; Tan, M.H.; Lefèbvre, P.J.; Murray, G.D.; et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366, 1279–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Komajda, M.; Curtis, P.; Hanefeld, M.; Beck-Nielsen, H.; Pocock, S.J.; Zambanini, A.; Jones, N.P.; Gomis, R.; Home, P.D. Effect of the addition of rosiglitazone to metformin or sulfonylureas versus metformin/sulfonylurea combination therapy on ambulatory blood pressure in people with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial (the RECORD study). Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2008, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Fang, S.; Livergood, M.C.; Nakagawa, P.; Wu, J.; Sigmund, C.D. Role of the Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors in Hypertension. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1021–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Berry, E.B.; Eykholt, R.; Helliwell, R.J.; Gilmour, R.S.; Mitchell, M.D.; Marvin, K.W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor isoform expression changes in human gestational tissues with labor at term. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 64, 1586–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nadra, K.; Anghel, S.I.; Joye, E.; Tan, N.S.; Basu-Modak, S.; Trono, D.; Wahli, W.; Desvergne, B. Differentiation of trophoblast giant cells and their metabolic functions are dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 3266–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Handschuh, K.; Guibourdenche, J.; Tsatsaris, V.; Guesnon, M.; Laurendeau, I.; Evain-Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Human chorionic gonadotropin produced by the invasive trophoblast but not the villous trophoblast promotes cell invasion and is down-regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 5011–5019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Yang, M.; Lei, Z.M.; Rao Ch, V. The central role of human chorionic gonadotropin in the formation of human placental syncytium. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 1108–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fournier, T.; Guibourdenche, J.; Handschuh, K.; Tsatsaris, V.; Rauwel, B.; Davrinche, C.; Evain-Brion, D. PPARgamma and human trophoblast differentiation. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 90, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Handschuh, K.; Guibourdenche, J.; Cocquebert, M.; Tsatsaris, V.; Vidaud, M.; Evain-Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Expression and regulation by PPARgamma of hCG alpha- and beta-subunits: Comparison between villous and invasive extravillous trophoblastic cells. Placenta 2009, 30, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shalom-Barak, T.; Zhang, X.; Chu, T.; Schaiff, W.T.; Reddy, J.K.; Xu, J.; Sadovsky, Y.; Barak, Y. Placental PPARgamma regulates spatiotemporally diverse genes and a unique metabolic network. Dev. Biol. 2012, 372, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Muralimanoharan, S.; Kwak, Y.T.; Mendelson, C.R. Redox-Sensitive Transcription Factor NRF2 Enhances Trophoblast Differentiation via Induction of miR-1246 and Aromatase. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 2022–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Tache, V.; Ciric, A.; Moretto-Zita, M.; Li, Y.; Peng, J.; Maltepe, E.; Milstone, D.S.; Parast, M.M. Hypoxia and trophoblast differentiation: A key role for PPARgamma. Stem Cells Dev. 2013, 22, 2815–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Blitek, A.; Szymanska, M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta and gamma agonists differentially affect prostaglandin E2 and cytokine synthesis and nutrient transporter expression in porcine trophoblast cells during implantation. Theriogenology 2020, 152, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ruebner, M.; Langbein, M.; Strissel, P.L.; Henke, C.; Schmidt, D.; Goecke, T.W.; Faschingbauer, F.; Schild, R.L.; Beckmann, M.W.; Strick, R. Regulation of the human endogenous retroviral Syncytin-1 and cell-cell fusion by the nuclear hormone receptors PPARgamma/RXRalpha in placentogenesis. J. Cell Biochem. 2012, 113, 2383–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ding, H.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Yuan, H.; Qu, J.; Shen, R. Activation of peroxisome proliferator activator receptor delta in mouse impacts lipid composition and placental development at early stage of gestation. Biol Reprod. 2014, 91, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Handschuh, K.; Guibourdenche, J.; Guesnon, M.; Laurendeau, I.; Evain-Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Modulation of PAPP-A expression by PPARgamma in human first trimester trophoblast. Placenta 2006, 27 (Suppl. SA), S127–S134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bildirici, I.; Roh, C.R.; Schaiff, W.T.; Lewkowski, B.M.; Nelson, D.M.; Sadovsky, Y. The lipid droplet-associated protein adipophilin is expressed in human trophoblasts and is regulated by peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-gamma/retinoid X receptor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 6056–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Cawyer, C.R.; Horvat, D.; Leonard, D.; Allen, S.R.; Jones, R.O.; Zawieja, D.C.; Kuehl, T.J.; Uddin, M.N. Hyperglycemia impairs cytotrophoblast function via stress signaling. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 211, 541.e1–541.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Huin, C.; Corriveau, L.; Bianchi, A.; Keller, J.M.; Collet, P.; Krémarik-Bouillaud, P.; Domenjoud, L.; Bécuwe, P.; Schohn, H.; Ménard, D.; et al. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in the developing human fetal digestive tract. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000, 48, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wieser, F.; Waite, L.; Depoix, C.; Taylor, R.N. PPAR Action in Human Placental Development and Pregnancy and Its Complications. PPAR Res. 2008, 2008, 527048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lindegaard, M.L.; Nielsen, L.B. Maternal diabetes causes coordinated down-regulation of genes involved with lipid metabolism in the murine fetal heart. Metabolism 2008, 57, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ringseis, R.; Gutgesell, A.; Dathe, C.; Brandsch, C.; Eder, K. Feeding oxidized fat during pregnancy up-regulates expression of PPARalpha-responsive genes in the liver of rat fetuses. Lipids Health Dis. 2007, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Braissant, O.; Wahli, W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, -beta, and -gamma during rat embryonic development. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 2748–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Higa, R.; Gonzalez, E.; Pustovrh, M.C.; White, V.; Capobianco, E.; Martinez, N.; Jawerbaum, A. PPARdelta and its activator PGI2 are reduced in diabetic embryopathy: Involvement of PPARdelta activation in lipid metabolic and signalling pathways in rat embryo early organogenesis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 13, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Pustovrh, M.C.; Capobianco, E.; Martinez, N.; Higa, R.; White, V.; Jawerbaum, A. MMP/TIMP balance is modulated in vitro by 15dPGJ(2) in fetuses and placentas from diabetic rats. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 39, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Barbieri, M.R.; Fontes, A.M.; Barbieri, M.A.; Saraiva, M.D.C.P.; Simões, V.M.F.; da Silva, A.A.M.; Abraham, K.J.; Bettiol, H. Effects of FTO and PPARgamma variants on intrauterine growth restriction in a Brazilian birth cohort. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2021, 54, e10465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lendvai, A.; Deutsch, M.J.; Plosch, T.; Ensenauer, R. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors under epigenetic control in placental metabolism and fetal development. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E797–E810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Wagner, N.; Wagner, K.D. PPARs and Angiogenesis-Implications in Pathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Good, D.J.; Polverini, P.J.; Rastinejad, F.; Le Beau, M.M.; Lemons, R.S.; Frazier, W.A.; Bouck, N.P. A tumor suppressor-dependent inhibitor of angiogenesis is immunologically and functionally indistinguishable from a fragment of thrombospondin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 6624–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Gizard, F.; Amant, C.; Barbier, O.; Bellosta, S.; Robillard, R.; Percevault, F.; Sevestre, H.; Krimpenfort, P.; Corsini, A.; Rochette, J.; et al. PPAR alpha inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation underlying intimal hyperplasia by inducing the tumor suppressor p16INK4a. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 3228–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. He, T.; Lu, T.; d’Uscio, L.V.; Lam, C.F.; Lee, H.C.; Katusic, Z.S. Angiogenic function of prostacyclin biosynthesis in human endothelial progenitor cells. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Han, J.K.; Kim, H.L.; Jeon, K.H.; Choi, Y.E.; Lee, H.S.; Kwon, Y.W.; Jang, J.J.; Cho, H.J.; Kang, H.J.; Oh, B.H.; et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta activates endothelial progenitor cells to induce angio-myogenesis through matrix metallo-proteinase-9-mediated insulin-like growth factor-1 paracrine networks. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 1755–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Nadra, K.; Quignodon, L.; Sardella, C.; Joye, E.; Mucciolo, A.; Chrast, R.; Desvergne, B. PPARgamma in placental angiogenesis. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 4969–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Nenicu, A.; Korbel, C.; Gu, Y.; Menger, M.D.; Laschke, M.W. Combined blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma by telmisartan effectively inhibits vascularization and growth of murine endometriosis-like lesions. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29, 1011–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Zhang, J.; Xue, L.; Nie, A.; Yang, Q.; Peng, X.; Chen, Z.; Yang, L.; Xie, Y.; Yuan, A.; Xu, J. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of PPARgamma expression in porcine uteroplacenta for regulating of placental angiogenesis through VEGF-mediated signalling. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2020, 55, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, T.T.; Shyu, M.K.; Huang, M.C.; Hsu, C.C.; Yeh, S.Y.; Chen, M.R.; Lin, C.J. Hypoxia-mediated down-regulation of OCTN2 and PPARalpha expression in human placentas and in BeWo cells. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dekker Nitert, M.; Scholz-Romero, K.; Kubala, M.H.; McIntyre, H.D.; Callaway, L.K.; Barrett, H.L. Placental fibroblast growth factor 21 is not altered in late-onset preeclampsia. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2015, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. He, P.; Chen, Z.; Sun, Q.; Li, Y.; Gu, H.; Ni, X. Reduced expression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in preeclamptic placentas is associated with decreased PPARgamma but increased PPARalpha expression. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Holdsworth-Carson, S.; Lim, R.; Mitton, A.; Whitehead, C.; Rice, G.; Permezel, M.; Lappas, M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are altered in pathologies of the human placenta: Gestational diabetes mellitus, intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia. Placenta 2010, 31, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Santana-Garrido, A.; Reyes-Goya, C.; Espinosa-Martín, P.; Sobrevia, L.; Beltrán, L.M.; Vázquez, C.M.; Mate, A. Oxidative and Inflammatory Imbalance in Placenta and Kidney of sFlt1-Induced Early-Onset Preeclampsia Rat Model. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rodie, V.A.; Young, A.; Jordan, F.; Sattar, N.; Greer, I.A.; Freeman, D.J. Human placental peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and gamma expression in healthy pregnancy and in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2005, 12, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Guo, Y.; Song, W.; Yang, Y. Inhibition of ALKBH5-mediated m(6) A modification of PPARG mRNA alleviates H/R-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in placenta trophoblast. Environ. Toxicol. 2022, 37, 910–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Huang, L.; Ma, Y.; Chen, L.; Chang, J.; Zhong, M.; Wang, Z.; Sun, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, F.; Xiao, L.; et al. Maternal RND3/RhoE deficiency impairs placental mitochondrial function in preeclampsia by modulating the PPARgamma-UCP2 cascade. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kasture, V.; Sundrani, D.; Dalvi, S.; Swamy, M.; Kale, A.; Joshi, S. Maternal omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin E improve placental angiogenesis in late-onset but not early-onset preeclampsia. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2019, 461, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Liu, L.; Zhuang, X.; Jiang, M.; Guan, F.; Fu, Q.; Lin, J. ANGPTL4 mediates the protective role of PPARgamma activators in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Mahendra, J.; Parthiban, P.S.; Mahendra, L.; Balakrishnan, A.; Shanmugam, S.; Junaid, M.; Romanos, G.E. Evidence Linking the Role of Placental Expressions of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-gamma and Nuclear Factor-Kappa B in the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia Associated with Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2016, 87, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Meister, S.; Hahn, L.; Beyer, S.; Paul, C.; Mitter, S.; Kuhn, C.; von Schönfeldt, V.; Corradini, S.; Sudan, K.; Schulz, C.; et al. Regulation of Epigenetic Modifications in the Placenta during Preeclampsia: PPARgamma Influences H3K4me3 and H3K9ac in Extravillous Trophoblast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rahardjo, B.; Widjajanto, E.; Sujuti, H.; Keman, K. Different levels of IL-1alpha, IL-6, TNF-alpha, NF-kappaB and PPAR-gamma in monocyte cultures exposed by plasma preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014, 4, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Waite, L.L.; Louie, R.E.; Taylor, R.N. Circulating activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are reduced in preeclamptic pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Yang, Y.; Tang, F.; Zhao, X. miR-27b-3p is Highly Expressed in Serum of Patients with Preeclampsia and has Clinical Significance. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2022, 22, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Hastie, R.; Brownfoot, F.C.; Pritchard, N.; Hannan, N.J.; Cannon, P.; Nguyen, V.; Palmer, K.; Beard, S.; Tong, S.; Kaitu’U-Lino, T.J. EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) Signaling and the Mitochondria Regulate sFlt-1 (Soluble FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1) Secretion. Hypertension 2019, 73, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jia, J.P.; Wu, J.H.; Hu, J.R. Correlations of MMP-9 and PPARgamma gene polymorphisms with occurrence of preeclampsia. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 771–778. [Google Scholar]
  97. Liu, F.; Rouault, C.; Clément, K.; Zhu, W.; Degrelle, S.A.; Charles, M.A.; Heude, B.; Fournier, T. C1431T Variant of PPARgamma Is Associated with Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women. Life 2021, 11, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Permadi, W.; Mantilidewi, K.I.; Khairani, A.F.; Lantika, U.A.; Ronosulistyo, A.R.; Bayuaji, H. Differences in expression of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-gamma in early-onset preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Laasanen, J.; Heinonen, S.; Hiltunen, M.; Mannermaa, A.; Laakso, M. Polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma gene in women with preeclampsia. Early Hum. Dev. 2002, 69, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ghorbani, Z.; Shakiba, M.; Rezavand, N.; Rahimi, Z.; Vaisi-Raygani, A.; Rahimi, Z.; Shakiba, E. Gene variants and haplotypes of Vitamin D biosynthesis, transport, and function in preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy 2021, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Armistead, B.; Kadam, L.; Siegwald, E.; McCarthy, F.P.; Kingdom, J.C.; Kohan-Ghadr, H.R.; Drewlo, S. Induction of the PPARgamma (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma)-GCM1 (Glial Cell Missing 1) Syncytialization Axis Reduces sFLT1 (Soluble fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 1) in the Preeclamptic Placenta. Hypertension 2021, 78, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kohan-Ghadr, H.R.; Kilburn, B.A.; Kadam, L.; Johnson, E.; Kolb, B.L.; Rodriguez-Kovacs, J.; Hertz, M.; Armant, D.R.; Drewlo, S. Rosiglitazone augments antioxidant response in the human trophoblast and prevents apoptosisdagger. Biol. Reprod. 2019, 100, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Grimaldi, B.; Kohan-Ghadr, H.R.; Drewlo, S. The Potential for Placental Activation of PPARgamma to Improve the Angiogenic Profile in Preeclampsia. Cells 2022, 11, 3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, L.; Wang, R.; Xu, R.; Chu, Y.; Gu, W. Procyanidin B2 ameliorates endothelial dysfunction and impaired angiogenesis via the Nrf2/PPARgamma/sFlt-1 axis in preeclampsia. Pharmacol. Res. 2022, 177, 106127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. El-Saka, M.H.; Madi, N.M.; Ibrahim, R.R.; Alghazaly, G.M.; Elshwaikh, S.; El-Bermawy, M. The ameliorative effect of angiotensin 1-7 on experimentally induced-preeclampsia in rats: Targeting the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma expression & asymmetric dimethylarginine. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 671, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Nema, J.; Randhir, K.; Wadhwani, N.; Sundrani, D.; Joshi, S. Maternal vitamin D deficiency reduces docosahexaenoic acid, placental growth factor and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma levels in the pup brain in a rat model of preeclampsia. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat. Acids 2021, 175, 102364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ueki, N.; Kanasaki, K.; Kanasaki, M.; Takeda, S.; Koya, D. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Deficiency Leads to Hypersensitivity of the Pressor Response Against Angiotensin II. Hypertension 2017, 69, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Allam, H.I.G.; Masri, A.A.A. The Potential Therapeutic Role of Peroxisome ProliferatorActivated Receptors Agonist in Preeclamptic Pregnant Rats. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2018, 28, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. McCarthy, F.P.; Drewlo, S.; Kingdom, J.; Johns, E.J.; Walsh, S.K.; Kenny, L.C. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2011, 58, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. McCarthy, F.P.; Drewlo, S.; English, F.A.; Kingdom, J.; Johns, E.J.; Kenny, L.C.; Walsh, S.K. Evidence implicating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2011, 58, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Zhang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zuo, C. Aspirin Ameliorates Preeclampsia Induced by a Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Antagonist. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 25, 1655–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Guo, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H. The preventive effect of low-dose aspirin in a PPAR-gamma antagonist treated mouse model of preeclampsia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Holobotovskyy, V.; Chong, Y.S.; Burchell, J.; He, B.; Phillips, M.; Leader, L.; Murphy, T.V.; Sandow, S.L.; McKitrick, D.J.; Charles, A.K.; et al. Regulator of G protein signaling 5 is a determinant of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 290ra88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Pham, J.; Arul Nambi Rajan, K.; Li, P.; Parast, M.M. The role of Sirtuin1-PPARgamma axis in placental development and function. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018, 60, R201–R212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 12 00647 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram visually summarizing the screening process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram visually summarizing the screening process.
Cells 12 00647 g001
Cells 12 00647 g002 550
Figure 2. PPAR signaling pathway. Upon activation of PPARs and ligands, a heterodimer with RXR is formed, which binds to the PPRE upstream of the target gene promoter, hence regulating the transcription of target genes responsible for energy production, lipid metabolism, cellular functions, and inflammation. Co-activators influence the functioning of many regulators and affect gene transcription. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 27 December 2022.
Figure 2. PPAR signaling pathway. Upon activation of PPARs and ligands, a heterodimer with RXR is formed, which binds to the PPRE upstream of the target gene promoter, hence regulating the transcription of target genes responsible for energy production, lipid metabolism, cellular functions, and inflammation. Co-activators influence the functioning of many regulators and affect gene transcription. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 27 December 2022.
Cells 12 00647 g002
Cells 12 00647 g003 550
Figure 3. The effects of PPARγ-modulating treatment agents in preeclampsia. By inducing PPARγ activation, diverse treatment agents may improve the overall placental angiogenic profile, thus exhibiting anti-preeclamptic effects.
Figure 3. The effects of PPARγ-modulating treatment agents in preeclampsia. By inducing PPARγ activation, diverse treatment agents may improve the overall placental angiogenic profile, thus exhibiting anti-preeclamptic effects.
Cells 12 00647 g003
Table
Table 1. Expression sites, functions and ligands of PPARs.
Table 1. Expression sites, functions and ligands of PPARs.
PPARsExpression SitesFunctionsNatural LigandsSynthetic Ligands
PPARαLiver, Heart,
Intestine,
Kidneys,
Skeletal
muscles, Brown adipose
tissue		Fatty acid
metabolism		Unsaturated fatty acids
Leukotrienes
Eicosatetraenoic acids		Fibrates
PPARβ/δUbiquitouslyFatty acid
oxidation, Blood cholesterol and glucose level
regulation		Unsaturated fatty acids
Prostacyclins
Very low-density lipoproteins		GW501516
PPARγAdipocytesAdipogenesis,
Lipid biosynthesis, Lipoprotein
metabolism,
Insulin sensitivity		Unsaturated fatty acids
Eicosatetraenoic acids
Octadecadienoic acids
Prostaglandins		(Non-)Thiazolidinedioneinsulin sensitizers
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Synthetic cannabinoids
Table
Table 2. The role of PPARs in preeclampsia.
Table 2. The role of PPARs in preeclampsia.
PPARsModelsExpression LevelsTreatment AgentsReferences
PPARαRat, Human↓None[80,81,84]
Human↑[82,83]
PPARβ/δHuman↔None[85]
Human↑[82]
PPARγMouse, Rat, Human↓Rosiglitazone,
Troglitazone,
Angiotensin 1–7,
Tinprotoporphyrin IX,
Aspirin,
Omega-3 fatty acid,
Vitamin D,
Procyanidin B2		[58,82,84,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113]
Human↑None[83,96,98]
Human↔[81,85,99,100]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Psilopatis, I.; Vrettou, K.; Fleckenstein, F.N.; Theocharis, S. The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Preeclampsia. Cells 2023, 12, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040647

AMA Style

Psilopatis I, Vrettou K, Fleckenstein FN, Theocharis S. The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Preeclampsia. Cells. 2023; 12(4):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Psilopatis, Iason, Kleio Vrettou, Florian Nima Fleckenstein, and Stamatios Theocharis. 2023. "The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Preeclampsia" Cells 12, no. 4: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040647

APA Style

Psilopatis, I., Vrettou, K., Fleckenstein, F. N., & Theocharis, S. (2023). The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Preeclampsia. Cells, 12(4), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12040647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop