Next Article in Journal
PGNneo: A Proteogenomics-Based Neoantigen Prediction Pipeline in Noncoding Regions
Next Article in Special Issue
HnRNP Pathologies in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Sex Differences between Neuronal Loss and the Early Onset of Amyloid Deposits and Behavioral Consequences in 5xFAD Transgenic Mouse as a Model for Alzheimer’s Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in the Understanding of Frontotemporal Dementia

1
Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, 1 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PJ, UK
2
Queen Square Brain Bank, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, UCL Institute of Neurology, 1 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(5), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050781
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 27 February 2023 / Published: 1 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Understanding of Frontotemporal Dementia)
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a group of clinically, genetically and pathologically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorders that mainly affect people under the age of 64 years. However, around 25% of those affected have a later age of onset. FTD represents 10–20% of all dementia cases [1]. It is predominantly characterized by the progressive atrophy of the frontal and temporal lobes [2]. Disease duration ranges between 2 and 20 years, with 8 years being the mean following the onset of symptoms. FTD treatment is restricted to symptom control, and no disease-modifying treatments are available.
The clinical hallmarks of FTD include gradual yet progressive deficits in behaviour and/or language with the relative preservation of memory. Subtypes of FTD are identified clinically according to the symptoms that appear prominently at presentation. Clinical diagnoses include behavioral variant FTD (bVFTD), which accounts for nearly 60% of cases; primary progressive aphasia (PPA), which affects language; and the movement disorders progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) [2]. With disease progression, the debilitating symptoms cause marked impairments of social and/or occupational functioning. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for the streamlining and development of any disease-modifying treatment therapies.
A third of FTD cases are genetically linked with mutations occurring in C9orf72, progranulin (GRN) and MAPT, with C9orf72 repeat expansions being the most common. Neuropathologically, TAR DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43), fused in sarcoma (FUS) and tau are three major proteins that cause pathological deposits in FTD post-mortem brains [2]. Those with C9orf72 expansions also have an additional pathology where di-peptide repeat proteins are also found deposited in patients. It is thought that disease pathogenesis is caused either by a gain of toxic function or a loss of nuclear function associated with protein dislocation from the nucleus, which in turn may lead to neuronal degeneration. FUS regulates the transcription of multiple genes, including the MAPT gene [3,4]. Recent studies have highlighted the molecular pathways associated with lysosomal dysfunction, lipid dysregulation, RNA splicing aberrations, synaptic loss and neuroinflammation as putative causes of sporadic forms of FTD. The disease mechanisms are far from understood in FTD, especially the cellular changes occurring in the early disease stages. Continued research with improved animal models, iPS technologies, clinicopathological correlations with donated human brain tissue and the discovery of early biomarkers of disease progression should enable us to rationalize the mechanisms involved in these neurodegenerative diseases and identify much-needed therapeutic targets. This Special Issue will collect articles relating to all advances in FTD research, both clinical and non-clinical.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olney, N.T.; Spina, S.; Miller, B.I. Frontotemporal dementia. Neurol. Clin. 2017, 35, 339–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lashley, T.; Rohrer, J.D.; Mead, S.; Revesz, T. An update on clinical, genetic and pathological aspects of frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2015, 41, 858–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ishigaki, S.; Fujioka, Y.; Okada, Y.; Riku, Y.; Udagawa, T.; Honda, D.; Yokoi, S.; Endo, K.; Ikenaka, K.; Takagi, S.; et al. Altered trau isoforms ratio caused by Loss of FUS and SFPQ function leads to FTLD-like phenotypes. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 1118–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sobue, G.; Ishigaki, S.; Watanabe, H. Pathogenesis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Insights from loss of function theory and early involvement of the caudate nucleus. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bandopadhyay, R.; Gatt, A.; Lashley, T. Advances in the Understanding of Frontotemporal Dementia. Cells 2023, 12, 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050781

AMA Style

Bandopadhyay R, Gatt A, Lashley T. Advances in the Understanding of Frontotemporal Dementia. Cells. 2023; 12(5):781. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bandopadhyay, Rina, Ariana Gatt, and Tammaryn Lashley. 2023. "Advances in the Understanding of Frontotemporal Dementia" Cells 12, no. 5: 781. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12050781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop