Next Article in Journal
Berberine Inhibits the Inflammatory Response Induced by Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Atopic Eczema Patients via the TNF-α/Inflammation/RAGE Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Cardio-Renal Inflammation in Deciding the Fate of the Arteriovenous Fistula in Haemodialysis Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues

by
Claudia Tanja Mierke
Faculty of Physics and Earth System Science, Peter Debye Institute of Soft Matter Physics, Biological Physics Division, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Cells 2024, 13(19), 1638; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13191638
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 25 September 2024 / Accepted: 1 October 2024 / Published: 1 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cellular Biophysics)

Abstract

The 3D bioprinting technique has made enormous progress in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and research into diseases such as cancer. Apart from individual cells, a collection of cells, such as organoids, can be printed in combination with various hydrogels. It can be hypothesized that 3D bioprinting will even become a promising tool for mechanobiological analyses of cells, organoids and their matrix environments in highly defined and precisely structured 3D environments, in which the mechanical properties of the cell environment can be individually adjusted. Mechanical obstacles or bead markers can be integrated into bioprinted samples to analyze mechanical deformations and forces within these bioprinted constructs, such as 3D organoids, and to perform biophysical analysis in complex 3D systems, which are still not standard techniques. The review highlights the advances of 3D and 4D printing technologies in integrating mechanobiological cues so that the next step will be a detailed analysis of key future biophysical research directions in organoid generation for the development of disease model systems, tissue regeneration and drug testing from a biophysical perspective. Finally, the review highlights the combination of bioprinted hydrogels, such as pure natural or synthetic hydrogels and mixtures, with organoids, organoid–cell co-cultures, organ-on-a-chip systems and organoid-organ-on-a chip combinations and introduces the use of assembloids to determine the mutual interactions of different cell types and cell–matrix interferences in specific biological and mechanical environments.
Keywords: collagen; viscosity; cell–matrix bidirectional interaction; 4D bioprinting; organoids; cancer; polymers; stiffness; assembloids; tumoroids collagen; viscosity; cell–matrix bidirectional interaction; 4D bioprinting; organoids; cancer; polymers; stiffness; assembloids; tumoroids

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mierke, C.T. Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues. Cells 2024, 13, 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13191638

AMA Style

Mierke CT. Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues. Cells. 2024; 13(19):1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13191638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mierke, Claudia Tanja. 2024. "Bioprinting of Cells, Organoids and Organs-on-a-Chip Together with Hydrogels Improves Structural and Mechanical Cues" Cells 13, no. 19: 1638. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13191638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop