Next Article in Journal
Mechanism-Specific Pharmacodynamics of a Novel Complex-I Inhibitor Quantified by Imaging Reversal of Consumptive Hypoxia with [18F]FAZA PET In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Kinases in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis at the Neuromuscular Synapse: Insights into BDNF/TrkB and PKC Signaling
Previous Article in Journal
RITA Is Expressed in Trophoblastic Cells and Is Involved in Differentiation Processes of the Placenta
Previous Article in Special Issue
CCN2 Mediates S1P-Induced Upregulation of COX2 Expression in Human Granulosa-Lutein Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/cells8121486
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Insights into the Mechanism of Necroptosis: The Necrosome as a Potential Therapeutic Target

by
Jing Chen
1,†,
Renate Kos
1,†,
Johan Garssen
1,2 and
Frank Redegeld
1,*
1
Division of Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Danone Nutricia Research, Uppsalaan 12, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Jing Chen and Renate Kos share first authorship.
Cells 2019, 8(12), 1486; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121486
Submission received: 30 October 2019 / Revised: 13 November 2019 / Accepted: 19 November 2019 / Published: 21 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Kinases: Signalling and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Necroptosis, or regulated necrosis, is an important type of programmed cell death in addition to apoptosis. Necroptosis induction leads to cell membrane disruption, inflammation and vascularization. It plays important roles in various pathological processes, including neurodegeneration, inflammatory diseases, multiple cancers, and kidney injury. The molecular regulation of necroptotic pathway has been intensively studied in recent years. Necroptosis can be triggered by multiple stimuli and this pathway is regulated through activation of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), RIPK3 and pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). A better understanding of the mechanism of regulation of necroptosis will further aid to the development of novel drugs for necroptosis-associated human diseases. In this review, we focus on new insights in the regulatory machinery of necroptosis. We further discuss the role of necroptosis in different pathologies, its potential as a therapeutic target and the current status of clinical development of drugs interfering in the necroptotic pathway.

1. Introduction

Programmed cell death can be regulated by different intrinsic cell death programs. It plays important roles in multiple physiological processes, including organ development, homeostasis and resilience of the immune system, and disease pathogenesis. Initially, apoptosis was defined as the only form of programmed cell death, whereas necrosis was regarded as unregulated and resulted from a damaging environmental stress response. Not until 2005, it was found that there is a regulated form of necrosis termed necroptosis, which can also be controlled by specific intrinsic programs [1]. Necroptosis can be described as cellular-suicide because of its role in several viral infections where it initiates cell death to diminish virus replication [2]. Since necroptosis has been discovered shortly, there are still many questions to be clarified on the molecular mechanism and key regulatory factors.
Necroptotic cells undergo very unique morphology changes which are distinctive from apoptosis as listed in Table 1 [3]. During necroptosis, cells endure a rapid swelling, with simultaneous swelling of organelles, rather than the cell shrinkage which occurs during apoptosis. Also, instead of blebbing of the plasma membrane, necroptotic cells undergo early plasma membrane disruption, phosphatidylserine exposure and organelle breakdown, leading to the leakage of intracellular contents and as a consequence triggering inflammation. Unlike necroptosis, necrosis is an unregulated form of cell death that occurs as a consequence of damaging environmental stress, such as extreme physiological stress and viral or toxin-mediated infections. Morphological features of necrosis are similar to necroptosis, including cell and organelle swelling that lead to release of intracellular contents and pro-inflammatory response.
Necroptosis can be induced by various stimuli, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interferon γ, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns [4]. Noteworthily, necroptosis and apoptosis can be induced by almost the same range of stimulating factors, indicating the importance of additional regulators to initiate the specific necroptotic pathway. The necroptotic pathway is regulated by multiple steps of post-transcriptional modifications including phosphorylation and ubiquitination [5,6]. The core of the necroptosis mechanism is regulation of the formation of necrosome, a complex consisting of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL [7].
Besides its role of inducing cell death, necroptosis can provoke an adaptive immune response by driving cytokine secretion asserting pro-inflammatory effects as well [8]. Necroptosis is implicated in the development of pathologies characterized by unwarranted cell loss with an inflammatory component [9]. Moreover, necroptosis is deemed to be protective against certain malignancies and to improve disease outcome [10,11].
Better understanding of the role and regulatory mechanisms of necroptosis in disease development and progression would help to advance novel mechanism-based therapeutics. In this review, we will discuss the recent findings concerning necroptosis and necrosome components. Here, we mainly focus on the activation and regulation mechanisms of key proteins which are involved in necroptosis. Furthermore, we will discuss the potential therapeutic opportunities to intervene in or to stimulate necroptosis.

2. Necroptosis Induction

Although the necroptotic pathway can be initiated by different stimuli, the molecular mechanism of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1)-mediated necroptosis remains the best-understood and therefore this pathway will be further discussed to illustrate the key signalling components.

2.1. Pro-Survival Signalling Complex I

TNFα is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine which is known to be associated with multiple inflammatory diseases including cancer. Upon binding of TNFα to TNFR1, the receptor has been found to trigger a rapid formation of a high molecular weight complex, named complex I, by recruitment of multiple proteins after which TNFR1 undergoes a conformational change [12]. These recruited proteins include: RIPK1, TNFR-associated death domain (TRADD), TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), TRAF5, and the E3 ubiquitin ligases cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1), cIAP2 and linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC). TRADD is recruited to TNFR1 through their death domains (DD) and the initial signal transduction [13]. TRAF2/5 and RIPK1 are subsequently recruited, which was found to be mediated via direct interaction with TRADD. The TRAF proteins then recruit E3 ligases cIAP1/2 and LUBAC to RIPK1. TRAF2 was found to stabilize cIAP1 by inhibiting its autoubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, thus facilitating the recruitment of cIAP1 [14]. Both cIAP1/2 and LUBAC catalyse the Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of the intermediate domain of RIPK1. NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator), also known as IKKγ, then binds specifically to the Lys63 polyubiquitin chains of RIPK1 via a specific ubiquitin-binding domain, leading to subsequent recruitment of the IĸB kinase (IKK) complex (IKKα and IKKβ) [15]. The polyubiquitination of RIPK1 is also essential for recruitment of the transforming growth factor β-activated kinase (TAK) complex [TAK1 and TAK1 binding protein (TAB) 1/2] [16]. Both the TAK and the IKK complexes activate the nuclear transcription factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway which promotes cell survival by activating the expression of multiple pro-inflammatory and pro-survival genes, such as cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (cFLIP). Furthermore, phosphorylation of RIPK1 at Ser25 by the IKKα/β directly inhibits RIPK1 kinase activity and prevents the assembly of the death-inducing signalling complex, also known as complex II [17,18]. Thus, the formation of complex I promotes cell survival through activating the NF-κB pathway, as schematically depicted in Figure 1.

2.2. Cell Death-Inducing Signalling Complex II

The transition of complex I to complex II is regulated through the RIPK1 polyubiquitination profile. Deubiquitinating enzymes cylindromatosis (CYLD) and A20, both hydrolyse Lys63-linked ubiquitin chains, are associated with the regulation and formation of the complex II [19]. Complex II abides in two different forms (IIa and IIb) depending on the protein composition and activity. It has been found that both complexes are capable of inducing apoptosis or necroptosis depending on the cell environment, as schematically depicted in Figure 1 [20,21]. Complex IIa consists of TRADD, RIPK1, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD) and caspase-8. Within hours after TNFα stimulation, complex IIa has been found to be formed after recruiting deubiquitinases, such as CYLD and A20, leading to the release of TRADD and RIPK1 from TNFR1 [19,21]. Subsequently, FADD and pro-caspase-8, both proteins associated with cell death, are recruited to complex IIa, resulting in activation of caspase-8 by cleavage [12]. The activated caspase-8-induced apoptosis is independent of RIPK1 kinase activity in complex IIa [21]. On the other hand, the absence of cIAPs (IAP antagonist or knockdown of cIAPs), and inhibition of TAK1 or IKK complex allow for the formation of complex IIb, which does not contain TRADD but still contains RIPK1, FADD, and caspase-8 [22]. In the absence of TRADD, RIPK1 kinase activity is required for caspase-8 activation to induce RIPK1-dependent apoptosis. In both complex IIa and IIb, when the levels of RIPK3 and MLKL are sufficiently high and caspase-8 is inactivated or absent, necroptosis is induced by recruitment of RIPK3 followed by necrosome formation, which is the core of the necroptosis machinery consisting of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL [20,21].
Hence, TNFR1 complex I triggers NF-κB activation and promotes cell survival. Complex IIa leads to caspase-8-mediated (RIPK1-independent) apoptosis. Complex IIb results in caspase-8-mediated apoptosis, which depends on RIPK1 kinase activity. When caspase-8 is absent or inhibited, the necrosome is formed and leads to MLKL-mediated necroptosis.

Inhibition of Caspase-8 Activity Is Essential for Necroptosis

Caspase-8 is known to initiate apoptosis downstream of death receptors such as CD95/FasR, TNFR1 and DR4/DR5 by undergoing autocatalytic activation and activating the executioner caspases. Initially, caspase-8 is recruited to FADD in its pro-caspase-8 form, leading to recruitment of more pro-caspase-8 molecules to undergo homodimerization [23]. Then, apoptosis is initiated by the cleavage of two pro-caspase-8 proteins at aspartates resulting in the maturation of pro-caspase-8 into caspase-8 [24]. Subsequently, caspase-8 activates caspase-3/7 leading to apoptosis.
The association of the anti-apoptotic protein cFLIP to the FADD-pro-caspase-8 complex has been found to determine cell fate, as depicted in Figure 1 [25]. There are two isoforms of cFLIP proteins, the long (cFLIPL) and short (cFLIPS) forms, and they exist different functions in the determination of cell fate. cFLIPS functions as a natural inhibitor of caspase-8 by blocking the oligomerization of pro-caspase-8 [24]. cFLIPL was reported to enhance apoptosis if present at a low level. However, if it is present in a high level, cFLIPL could act as an inhibitor of caspase-8 [25]. Nonetheless, the FADD-pro-caspase-8-cFLIPL complex inhibits activation of RIPK3, which subsequently inhibits necroptosis [26]. Furthermore, inhibiting caspase-8 activity, for example by pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk or viral cFLIPS mimetics, is essential for initiating RIPK1-mediated necroptosis, as schematically depicted in Figure 1.

3. RIPK1 Has Multiple Functions

Structurally, RIPK1 consists of an N-terminal kinase domain, an intermediate domain containing a RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM), and a C-terminal death domain with 6 α-helices [27,28].
RIPK1 can initiate cell-death through three pathways, which is regulated by its phosphorylation level by TAK1 (Figure 2) [29]. Transient phosphorylation of RIPK1 by TAK1 at Ser321 in the intermediate domain upon TNFα stimulation activates the RIPK1-independent apoptosis, which requires TRADD and formation of complex IIa. In the absence of TAK1 (TAK1 knockout, inhibitor of TAK1 or IAP antagonist), the intermediate domain cannot be phosphorylated. The unphosphorylated RIPK1 triggers RIPK1-dependent apoptosis via recruitment of FADD and formation of complex IIb, which is independent of TRADD. Moreover, in TNFα-treated A20/TAB2-deficient cells, hyperphosphorylation of RIPK1 by unregulated TAK1 recruits RIPK3 and induces MLKL-mediated necroptosis [29].
Furthermore, RIPK1 can also be activated to induce necroptosis via auto-phosphorylation by its kinase function itself [30]. Upon blockage of the RIPK1 kinase activity via an Asp138Asn mutation in a mouse model (Ripk1D138N/D138N mice), fibroblasts are protected against necroptosis but induction of similar levels of apoptosis like in wildtype was observed. The kinase-inactive form of RIPK1 was found to protect against necroptotic cell death [31,32]. All these findings suggest that the kinase activity of RIPK1 is essential for activating the necroptotic pathway.
Moreover, the dimerization of the DD is essential for necroptosis induction. This dimerization is dependent of Lys599 in human (Lys843 in murine species), and Lys599Arg/Lys843Arg mutations blocked induction of necroptosis both in vitro and in vivo [33].
Finally, ubiquitination of RIPK1 is essential for its regulation and the interaction with RIPK3. Besides the polyubiquitination by cIAPs and LUBAC to form complex I, and the deubiquitination by CYLD and A20 to form complex II, pellino E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase 1 (PELI1) also regulates the function of RIPK1 [34]. Deficiency of PELI1 disrupts the interaction between RIPK1 and RIPK3 and abrogates necroptosis, suggesting that PELI1 might function as a mediator in this process. PELI1-induced Lys63 ubiquitination of RIPK1 on Lys115 was confirmed, which was dependent of the RIPK1 kinase activity [34]. Taken together, this implies that phosphorylation, dimerization and ubiquitination of RIPK1 are essential for inducing necroptosis.
In addition to its kinase activity, RIPK1 was reported to show other miscellaneous functions [35]. Several studies have been attempted to elucidate triggers and functionalities of RIPK1 [36,37]. It has been shown that knockdown of RIPK1 cannot prevent the LPS-induced necroptosis, but did inhibit TNFα-induced necroptosis, whereas RIPK3 knockdown prevented both LPS- and TNFα-induced necroptosis [36]. These findings suggest that activation of necroptosis is not fully dependent on RIPK1. Besides the known role of RIPK1 in activating necroptosis, RIPK1 can also suppress the necroptosis by inhibiting other RIPK3 potentiators [37]. This is regulated via the RHIM domain of RIPK1, which mediates the protein interactions with RIPK3, as it competes and interacts with other RHIM domain containing proteins. Z-DNA binding protein-1 (ZBP1) is a RHIM domain containing protein that can be induced by IFNs. It was found to be involved in viral DNA-mediated type I IFN induction and NF-κB activation. Upon mutation of the RHIM domain of RIPK1, ZBP1 binds to RIPK3 and induces necroptosis; reconstitution of the RIPK1 RHIM domain is protective against this and blocks subsequent cell death [37,38]. This suggests that the RHIM domain of RIPK1 shows a protective role against ZBP1-mediated necroptosis. Another function of RIPK1 is exerted independent of its kinase activity. If the kinase-inactivated RIPK1 (with Asp138Asn mutation) is present, mice with such mutation are still viable rather than mice which are RIPK1 deficient [31]. Mice lacking RIPK1 kinase activity were also shown to be resistant to the induction of immune-mediated liver injury similar to wild type mice. In contrast, RIPK1-deficient mice were sensitive to the immune-mediated liver injury [39]. Thus, it suggests that RIPK1 might have a kinase-independent function that is able to protect to injury. In summary, RIPK1 can induce apoptosis or necroptosis, inhibit necroptosis, and exerts kinase-independent protective functions under specific conditions.
Currently, necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) is the most potent and specific inhibitor of RIPK1 and it is commonly used in necroptosis inhibition studies (Table 2) [1]. RIPA-56, a novel small molecule, has been developed to inhibit RIPK1 by direct targeting resulted in inactivating the kinase activity [40]. RIPK1 inhibitors such as GSK2982772 and GSK3145095 are currently evaluated in several clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (NCT02858492), psoriasis (NCT02776033), ulcerative colitis (NCT02903966) and cancer (NCT03681951) (Clinicaltrials.gov). Another RIPK1 inhibitor DNL747 is currently in clinical development for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases including Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (NCT03757351) and Alzheimer’s disease (NCT03757325) (Table 3).

4. RIPK3 Plays a Key Role in Necroptosis

Like RIPK1, RIPK3 has an N-terminal kinase domain, followed by an intermediate domain containing the RHIM motif. Unlike RIPK1, RIPK3 does not have a C-terminal death domain [27]. The RHIM motif, which is also present in the intermediate domain of RIPK1, mediates the interaction with RIPK1 and then induces necrosome formation.
Upon necroptosis induction, RIPK3 is recruited to RIPK1 and then becomes phosphorylated and activated, leading to necrosome formation and eventual to cell death. The formation of the initial heterodimer of RIPK1 and RIPK3 recruits more RIPK3 and induces homodimerization of RIPK3, which leads to its auto-phosphorylation and activation. Phosphorylation of RIPK3 at Ser227 (Thr231/Ser232 for mouse RIPK3) plays a crucial role in recruiting and activating its downstream substrate MLKL. The mechanism by which RIPK3 induces cell death is depicted in Figure 3. The activity of RIPK3 is also controlled by its phosphorylation. Recently, a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) has been shown to be essential in this phosphorylation process. The phosphorylated-RIPK3 then recruits and phosphorylates MLKL, eventually leading to necroptosis. Knockdown of ADAM17 could block RIPK3 phosphorylation and subsequent necroptosis [51]. Nonetheless, upon blockage of the kinase activity of RIPK3 via an Asp161Asn mutation in a mouse model, mice are unable to survive due to induction of RIPK1-dependent apoptosis [32]. This indicates that another kinase-independent trigger of RIPK3 induced cell death, as viral infection lead to FADD-dependent, but RIPK3-independent apoptosis [44].
Furthermore, ubiquitination also regulates RIPK3 activity in necroptosis. RIPK3 is ubiquitinated at Lys5 after necroptosis induction. RIPK3 with Lys5 mutated to Ala is not able to be ubiquitinated and form RIPK1-RIPK3 complex, resulting in the inhibition of necroptosis [52]. The ubiquitination of RIPK3 can be abrogated by A20 through its deubiquitinating motif. Higher level ubiquitination of RIPK3 and faster assembly of RIPK1-RIPK3 heterodimer were observed in A20-deficient cells, indicating that A20 also plays a negative role in necroptosis besides its role in the complex II formation [52]. In addition, RIPK3 can be ubiquitinated at Lys55 and Lys363 by chaperone-assisted E3 ligase C-terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP). This ubiquitination functions as a lysosomal degradation signal for RIPK3 and prevents necroptosis. Knockdown of CHIP enhanced TNFα-induced necroptosis [53]. This finding suggests that CHIP acts as a negative regulator in necroptosis.
Moreover, proteasome inhibitors MG132 and bortezomib were found to induce RIPK3-dependent necroptosis in mouse fibroblasts and human leukemia cells, which was independent of kinase activity but acted via the RHIM domain [54]. Proteasome inhibition induces the accumulation of Lys48-linked polyubiquitination of RIPK3 at Lys264, perhaps, resulting in release of the RHIM domain. Then released-RIPK3 forms a homo-oligomer and further recruits MLKL to trigger necroptosis. Unlike TNFR-mediated necroptosis, proteasome inhibitor-induced necroptosis does not require caspase-8 inhibition [54]. Hence, depending on the position of the ubiquitination, it can either tag RIPK3 for degradation or prime RIPK3 for necroptosis initiation.
Hence, phosphorylation and ubiquitination play pivotal roles in RIPK3-mediated necroptosis. After activation of RIPK3, in the absence of caspase-8 activity, MLKL is recruited to RIPK3 and induces necroptosis [55]. For necroptotic induction, caspase-8 activity must be blocked (the exception being with influenza A virus as referenced by Nogusa et al.) and that would also block apoptosis.
GlaxoSmithKline has developed a class of potent RIPK3 inhibitors to rescue cells from necroptotic cell death, including GSK’840, GSK’843 and GSK’872 [44,45]. Furthermore, the B-Raf inhibitor dabrafenib has been found to be able to inhibit RIPK3 activity and rescue necroptosis but not apoptosis [46]. GW440139B, screened from a library of 8904 bioactive compounds, was identified as a RIPK3 inhibitor by blocking RIPK3-mediated MLKL phosphorylation and inhibiting the following MLKL oligomerization [56]. Dabrafenib has been advanced into clinical trials for melanoma treatment (Table 3). Recently, HS-1371 was identified as a novel specific RIPK3 inhibitor which binds to the ATP-binding pocket of RIPK3 and inhibits kinase activity [47]. In addition, ponatinib and pazopanib have been found to specifically block necroptosis, but not apoptosis by targeting RIPK1/3 in human cells [43], and they were also recently proposed as possible candidates in clinical therapy of various cancer types as listed in Table 3.

5. MLKL Is the Effector Protein in Necroptosis

Structurally, MLKL consists of an N-terminal four-helical bundle domain (NTD), a brace region (BR) with two α-helices, and a C-terminal kinase like domain (KLD) containing a helical activation loop and an ATP binding pocket [57].
MLKL functions as an executor of necroptosis by its oligomerization and membrane translocation, and subsequent formation of membrane-disrupting pores (Figure 4). Intriguingly, recent work showed that the NTD of MLKL is required and sufficient to induce its oligomerization and trigger necroptosis by ectopic expression of truncated MLKL in human cells [58]. Furthermore, this mechanism was also demonstrated in murine cells [59]. However, so far, there is no information about whether the N-terminal fragment of MLKL is formed and present endogenously to induce necroptosis under (patho)physiological conditions.
The phosphorylation, oligomerization and membrane translocation of MLKL are key events to execute necroptosis. Phosphorylated MLKL is sufficient to activate necroptosis when RIPK3, MLKL and other necroptotic stimuli are not present [60]. The murine MLKL can be phosphorylated at Ser345, Ser347 and Thr349 in the KLD by RIPK3; and for human MLKL at Thr357 and Ser358. Single-site mutation analysis in murine cells showed that phosphorylation of Ser345 is critical for the RIPK3-mediated MLKL activation and the following necroptosis, whereas phosphorylation of Ser347 and Thr349 are dispensable for its activation. Nonetheless, the phosphorylation at Ser347 of MLKL did aid in activation of necroptosis [44]. Upon phosphorylation, MLKL undergoes conformational changes resulting in the unfolding and release of the BR. MLKL finally forms oligomers and incites binding of the NTD to the plasma membrane [61]. The phosphorylation-dependent oligomerization of MLKL starts from forming tetramers which serves as building blocks for larger polymers [62]. It has been reported that MLKL forms an octamer through two tetramers with disulphide bonds at α-helices 4 and 5 within the KLD [63]. These disulphide bonds are only required for MLKL tetramerization but not octamerization which is essential for necroptosis. These octamers are formed in the necrosome in association with RIPK3 and are thereafter released to translocate to the membrane [63]. At present our understanding of the mechanism of MLKL oligomers induced-membrane disruption is very limited and remains unclear. Some studies showed that the NTD of MLKL binds to the plasma membrane directly through low-affinity phospholipid binding sites. The initial bound MLKL undergoes a conformational change and provides additional higher-affinity phospholipid binding sites. This induces a robust association of MLKL to the plasma membrane [61]. Calcium and sodium influx [64,65] were also reported to be required in MLKL mediated-plasma membrane rupture during necroptosis. The MLKL octamer spans across the plasma membrane with its N-terminal and C-terminal ends at the intracellular side [63]. So, after phosphorylation and oligomerization of MLKL, it can exert its pore-forming function to disrupt the plasma membrane.
Apart from the membrane translocation of MLKL, phosphorylated MLKL can translocate into the nucleus along with RIPK1 and RIPK3. This nuclear translocation is caused by the conformational changes after phosphorylation, which exposes the C-terminal nuclear localization sequence that allows MLKL to be imported into the nucleus [66]. The nuclear translocation of activated MLKL is not required for necroptosis, but contributes to necroptosis indirectly by regulating cytosolic necrosome formation and subsequent cell death [67].
Besides the phosphorylation-dependent activation, MLKL could potentially regulate necroptosis via its ATP-binding pocket within the KLD. The Glu351Lys mutation of human MLKL, which was discovered to lead to enhancement of ATP binding, disrupts the formation of MLKL tetramers and thus subsiding octamers. On the contrary, phosphomimic mutations at Thr357 and Ser358 in the human MLKL stabilize the tetramers, indicating that phosphorylation of MLKL protects from ATP-induced dissociation of oligomers [68]. However, human MLKL with mutations of Lys230Met/Gln356Ala in its ATP-binding pocket can still activate itself and translocate to the plasma membrane to induce necroptosis [69].
Recently, inositol-polyphosphate (IP) kinases was also found to be able to regulate necroptosis. Cells with depletion of IP multikinase (IPMK) and inositol-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase (ITPK1) which are critical for synthesis of cellular IPs were unable to show MLKL membrane association by necroptosis induction, despite the presence of phosphorylated MLKL. In IPMK and ITPK1 complemented cells, the membrane disruption and subsequent necroptosis were restored [70]. Thus, this indicates that IP kinases regulate necroptosis by influencing the plasma membrane association of phosphorylated MLKL.
Besides the role of MLKL as executioner of necroptosis by disrupting the plasma membrane, it was also found to have other functions. MLKL-depleted cells showed a marked reduction in the rate of intracellular degradation of TNF after its binding to the TNF receptor in the absence of RIPK3, which led to alteration of NF-ĸB activity and the induction of TNF-induced genes including some inflammatory genes [71]. Also, MLKL depletion can slow down the intracellular degradation of epidermal growth factor receptor, which indicates a mechanism that MLKL might exert a general effect on receptor uptake and degradation. In addition, MLKL has been found to regulate endosomal trafficking, which is mediated independently of its phosphorylation by RIPK3. Furthermore, RIPK3 boosts release of phospho-MLKL-containing vesicles from cells. This release appears to withhold necroptotic cell death and might contribute to cellular communication [71]. Consequently, MLKL exerts a dual function both excitatory and inhibitory of cell-death, possibly indicating a feedback loop regulating cell fate.
Over the past years several MLKL inhibitors have been developed. The most commonly used MLKL inhibitor is necrosulfonamide (NSA), which binds to Cys86 of human MLKL and forms a covalent adduct to block MLKL oligomerization and inhibits subsequent necroptosis [49]. Recently, thioredoxin-1 (Trx1), a small redox protein, was reported as a MLKL inhibitor. Trx1 binds to monomeric MLKL molecules and prevents the oligomerization of monomeric MLKL and following necroptosis [72]. These inhibitors abrogate the plasma membrane association, which is vital for MLKL functioning. GW806742X was found to be able to directly bind the KLD of MLKL and therefore block MLKL phosphorylation, oligomerization and plasma membrane translocation [48].
In addition, heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), a molecular chaperone which functions in the stabilization and activation of multiple kinases, was reported to be essential for necroptosis by direct interacting with MLKL and stabilizing necroptotic proteins [73]. It was identified as an indispensable assistant for the necrosome assembly. HSP90 inhibitor 17AAG inhibited TNFα-induced necroptotic cell death by blocking the necrosome formation, MLKL oligomerization and subsequent membrane translocation [50]. Hence, interfering with HSP90 activity by specific inhibitors might be a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of necroptosis-associated human diseases. HSP90 inhibitors, including 17AAG and IPI-504, have been tested in clinical trials in patients with range of cancer types (Table 3).

6. The Necroptotic Pathway as Therapeutic Target

Necroptosis is a tightly regulated process and faulty regulation of necroptosis is implicated in the development of various human diseases associated with unwarranted cell loss and inflammatory responses [9]. In the next sections, we will summarize the activation and regulation of necrosome components in some necroptosis-associated diseases and discuss the latest insights into the therapeutic opportunities.

6.1. Necroptosis in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Necroptosis has been implicated in the development of some neurodegenerative diseases [74]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a degenerative brain disease and is characterized by the damage and loss of neurons. It was shown that necroptosis was activated in human AD brain [41]; as well as in the brain of an AD mouse model [75]. The level of necroptosis markers including RIPK1, MLKL, necrosome complex and MLKL oligomers were significantly higher in AD brains [41]. Treating mice bearing AD brain with the necroptosis inhibitor 7-Cl-O-necrostatin remarkably suppressed necroptosis and prevented neuronal loss [41]. This suggests that interfering in necroptosis through inhibiting activities of necrosome components could be an interesting new strategy in the treatment of AD.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with the loss of motor neurons. Compared to healthy control spinal cords, the ALS spinal cords showed a significant increase in necrosome components including RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL in a mouse model of ALS [76]. Furthermore, loss of optineurin, an established ALS-related gene, caused sensitization for necroptosis. Inhibition of RIPK1 by Nec-1 or knock-out of RIPK3 protected against demyelination and lead to a decrease in axonal pathology hallmarks, in both a sporadic (optineurin-deficient) and familial (SOD1G93A) ALS mouse model [76]. This indicates that the necroptosis is activated in ALS and inhibition of necroptosis could be of potential therapeutic value. Moreover, upon inhibition of RIPK1 by Nec-1, neuronal degradation was reduced to only half compared to untreated cells in a Parkinson disease (PD) model [77]. The necroptosis marker p-MLKL has been observed to be activated in the brain of a PD mouse model and PD patients [78,79]. Thus, RIPK1 and RIPK3, by promoting inflammation and cell death, induce axonal degradation and act as mediators of ALS and PD. Moreover, the protective effect of Nec-1 indicates the therapeutic potential of this drug in ALS and PD. Likewise, inhibition of RIPK3 could possibly be exploited for treatment of these diseases.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is another chronic neurodegenerative disease, which is characterized by the loss of oligodendrocytes and demyelination. Necroptosis markers, including phosphorylation of RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL, were highly detected in pathological samples from MS patients, and there was a pronounced increase of MLKL oligomers in MS pathological samples compared to control [80]. This indicates that necroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of MS. Oral administration of RIPK1 inhibitor 7-Cl-O-Nec-1inhibited oligodendrocyte degeneration and reduced the disease severity in a mouse model of MS [80]. In a recent study, it was shown that inhibition of RIPK1 by RIPA-56 inhibited progression of demyelination and disease development in a cuprizone-induced model for MS. Interestingly, a RIPK3-independent function of MLKL also appeared to be involved in the demyelination process [81]. These finding reveals that inhibiting RIPK1 might be a valuable therapeutic option in the treatment of MS.
In hernia disease, nucleus pulposus cells under mechanical stress by compression showed unique necroptosis hallmarks such as severe vacuolation and serious disruption of the plasma membrane. This indicates that apart from the inflammatory profile often described, necroptosis also plays a vital role in inducing cell death during mechanical stress. Specific inhibitors of the necrosome components, such as Nec-1 of RIPK1, GSK’872 of RIPK3 and NSA of MLKL, all showed protective effects on cell death under mechanical stress, with reduced necroptosis hallmarks and increased cell viability [82]. Therefore, inhibitors targeting various players in the necrosome might have a therapeutic value for the treatment of hernia diseases with cell death due to mechanical stress.

6.2. Necroptosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases, which is characterized by joint inflammation and osteoclastogenesis. The key regulators of necroptosis, RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL were potently increased in the synovium of a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model [83], indicating that necroptosis might be involved in the pathogenesis of RA. RIPK1 inhibitor Nec-1 significantly decreased the expression of these key regulators and suppressed the expression of IL-17, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα in the mouse model [84]. Therefore, inhibiting RIPK1 might be a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of RA.

6.3. Necroptosis in Kidney Injury

Necroptosis is also involved in kidney diseases. RIPK3 and MLKL are activated during acute kidney injury, where MLKL is expressed on the apical membrane of proximal tubules [85]. Thus, this suggests that the necrosome is an active mediator of kidney injury. Upon inhibition of kinase activities of RIPK1 and RIPK3 by specific inhibitors, membrane-located MLKL is reduced and cell viability is increased [85,86,87]. Furthermore, the SNx rat model for early progression of chronic kidney disease showed that RIPK1 inhibition by Nec-1 increased cell viability and reduced serum creatine and blood urea nitrogen [88]. It has also been demonstrated that crystal formation, as with calcium in kidney stones, activates the necrosome formation. Knockdown of RIPK3 or MLKL near completely inhibited the crystal-induced cytotoxicity [89]. Thus, inhibition of the necrosome has the potential to attenuate kidney injury of multiple sorts. Nonetheless, study of therapeutic efficacy of necroptosis inhibitors in preclinical models is necessary to further determine their usefulness in kidney diseases.

6.4. Necroptosis in Circulatory System Diseases

The necrosome has been found to be activated during cardiac injury. In both mouse and guinea-pig models studies of cardiac injury, it was found that inhibiting RIPK1 with Nec-1 was able to reduce infarct size and cardiac performance was preserved in these models, indicating that RIPK1 might be a feasible therapeutic target for cardiac injury [90,91]. Furthermore, it was also observed that under ER-stress conditions RIPK3 can migrate onto the ER and increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [92]. The elevated ROS lead to opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, which causes cardiomyocytes to swell and rupture due to energy shortage. The level of ROS can be reduced to a normal level by RIPK3 depletion [92]. Based on the fact that RIPK3 induces ROS, targeting RIPK3 could be of therapeutic interest for prevention and treatment of cardiac injury.
The necrosome has also been observed to be activated in atherosclerotic plaques. Necrosome components, such as RIPK3 and MLKL, are highly expressed and activated in atherosclerotic plaques [93]. Furthermore, inhibiting RIPK1 with Nec-1 or downregulating RIPK3 were shown to be able to reduce advanced atherosclerotic lesions and the recruitment of macrophages [93,94], which indicates that targeting the different necrosome components could benefit patients with advanced atherosclerosis.

6.5. Necroptosis in Diabetes

Necroptosis was also found to be intimately involved in type 2 diabetes (T2D) with remarkable expression of the core components of necroptosis in specific obesity-associated tissues. High levels of RIPK1 and MLKL were detected in liver, adipose tissue and muscle in diabetic mice, whereas RIPK3 was only significantly upregulated in adipose tissue [95]. Furthermore, RIPK3 was also found to be highly expressed in the visceral white adipose tissue of obese humans [96]. T2D is a multifactorial metabolic disease characterized by the development of insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Treating diabetic mice with RIPK1 inhibitor Nec-1 or depletion of MLKL prevented insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, but showed no effect on inflammation and cell death which are known as physiological consequences of necroptosis [95]. Both specific knockdown of RIPK1, RIPK3 or MLKL and the addition of chemical inhibitors Nec-1 or GSK’872 activated insulin-stimulated AKT signalling pathway, which plays an important role in glucose homeostasis. These findings suggest that the inhibitors of necrosome components might have therapeutic potentials for the treatment of T2D.

6.6. Necroptosis in Cancers

Necroptosis is often abrogated in multiple cancers. While the role of necroptosis in tumorigenesis has been well discussed [97], recent findings add to this picture. In colon cancer, the expression of RIPK1 and RIPK3 is significantly decreased due to hypoxia [98]. This suggests that down-regulation of necroptosis may contribute to tumorigenesis. Moreover, edelfosine, an antineoplastic drug, induced cell death in human glioblastoma cells by activating necroptosis. Inhibiting RIPK1 with Nec-1 or downregulating of RIPK3 abrogated edelfosine-induced cell death and increased cancer cell viability [99]. Also, it has been found that combining cell stress-inducing compounds with NF-κB inhibitors induced cell death by necroptosis in osteosarcoma cells [100]. This indicates that direct or indirect stimulation of necroptosis can be exploited for cancer treatment to induce cancer cell death. Furthermore, polymorphisms of RIPK1 have been found to be associated with differences in disease progression and correlated with overall survival and disease-free survival [101], suggesting that evaluation of RIPK1 polymorphism may be useful as a prognostic biomarker for tumor development.
Melanoma cell lines are resistant against necroptosis induction because they lack RIPK3 expression [102]. Overexpressing RIPK3 in these cell lines induced necroptosis via phosphorylation and activation of MLKL [102]. Furthermore, RIPK3-deficiency leads to activation of the NF-κB pathway in colon cancer. These cells have a high expression of IL-6, which is responsible for tumor progression through IL-6-induced Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signalling [103]. Thus, this shows a protective role for RIPK3 against tumor progression that could potentially be used for cancer therapy. Moreover, elevated expression of RIPK3 was found in cervical cancer cell lines [104]. PolyIC induced cervical cancer cells necroptosis and increased IL-1α secretion, which in turn activated dendritic cells. Subsequently, IL-1α could cause the release of IL-12 which is important for anti-tumor response [104]. This further illuminates the supportive role of RIPK3 in tumorigenesis. Although there is emerging evidence that necroptosis is abrogated in several cancer cells including melanoma, colon cancer, and cervical cancer, investigating the mechanisms behind this phenomenon would help find novel therapeutic strategies against these types of cancer.

7. Conclusions

It has been only 15 years since necroptosis was first described, but molecular insights into the mechanism and its relevance to diseases have been increased substantially during the last period. The necrosome components, MLKL, RIPK1 and RIPK3, are critical regulators of necroptotic cell death. MLKL functions as the executioner of necroptosis, depending on its phosphorylation, oligomerization and membrane translocation. RIPK1 acts rather as a traffic cop for different cell-death mechanisms but is not essential for inducing cell death. Current understandings illustrate a pathway in which RIPK3 activation, possibly mediated by RIPK1, induces MLKL activation leading to subsequent permeabilization of the plasma membrane and cell death. Despite the current knowledge of the activation and regulation of necroptosis, there remain many questions to be fully answered. For example, what are the specific events and enzymes involved in ubiquitination and activation of RIPK1/3, and what drives the exact effector mechanism of MLKL? What is the precise mechanism underlying the MLKL-mediated plasma membrane rupture during necroptosis? Does MLKL function as a carrier protein for some proteins, which do not contain the nuclear localization sequence and transport them from the cytoplasm into the nuclei to regulate necroptotic cell death? Due to the role of necroptosis in inducing inflammation and cell death, blocking necroptosis could be beneficial for pathologies including cell degeneration. On the other hand, activating necroptosis by regulating necrosome components might be a therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, such as colon cancer, melanoma and cervical cancer. As the executioner of necroptosis, MLKL may be the most promising target for regulating necroptosis. While various small molecule inhibitors of RIPK1, RIPK3 and HSP90 are in under clinical development (Table 3), at present there are only two known MLKL inhibitors (NSA and GW806742X), and no MLKL inhibitor has been advanced into clinical trials, yet. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that agents that can specifically regulate MLKL activation may be of great interest in the treatment of necroptosis-related diseases.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC) (File No. 201506180025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Degterev, A.; Huang, Z.; Boyce, M.; Li, Y.; Jagtap, P.; Mizushima, N.; Cuny, G.D.; Mitchison, T.J.; Moskowitz, M.A.; Yuan, J. Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Upton, J.W.; Kaiser, W.J.; Mocarski, E.S. Virus inhibition of RIP3-dependent necrosis. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 302–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Almagro, M.C.; Vucic, D. Necroptosis: Pathway diversity and characteristics. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 39, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chan, F.K.; Luz, N.F.; Moriwaki, K. Programmed necrosis in the cross talk of cell death and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33, 79–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McQuade, T.; Cho, Y.; Chan, F.K. Positive and negative phosphorylation regulates RIP1- and RIP3-induced programmed necrosis. Biochem. J. 2013, 456, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grootjans, S.; Vanden Berghe, T.; Vandenabeele, P. Initiation and execution mechanisms of necroptosis: An overview. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silke, J.; Rickard, J.A.; Gerlic, M. The diverse role of RIP kinases in necroptosis and inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Riegler, A.N.; Brissac, T.; Gonzalez-Juarbe, N.; Orihuela, C.J. Necroptotic Cell Death Promotes Adaptive Immunity Against Colonizing Pneumococci. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galluzzi, L.; Kepp, O.; Chan, F.K.; Kroemer, G. Necroptosis: Mechanisms and Relevance to Disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2017, 12, 103–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koo, G.B.; Morgan, M.J.; Lee, D.G.; Kim, W.J.; Yoon, J.H.; Koo, J.S.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, S.J.; Son, M.K.; Hong, S.S.; et al. Methylation-dependent loss of RIP3 expression in cancer represses programmed necrosis in response to chemotherapeutics. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 707–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hockendorf, U.; Yabal, M.; Herold, T.; Munkhbaatar, E.; Rott, S.; Jilg, S.; Kauschinger, J.; Magnani, G.; Reisinger, F.; Heuser, M.; et al. RIPK3 Restricts Myeloid Leukemogenesis by Promoting Cell Death and Differentiation of Leukemia Initiating Cells. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Micheau, O.; Tschopp, J. Induction of TNF receptor I-mediated apoptosis via two sequential signaling complexes. Cell 2003, 114, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsu, H.; Huang, J.; Shu, H.B.; Baichwal, V.; Goeddel, D.V. TNF-dependent recruitment of the protein kinase RIP to the TNF receptor-1 signaling complex. Immunity 1996, 4, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Csomos, R.A.; Brady, G.F.; Duckett, C.S. Enhanced cytoprotective effects of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein cellular IAP1 through stabilization with TRAF2. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 20531–20539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ea, C.K.; Deng, L.; Xia, Z.P.; Pineda, G.; Chen, Z.J. Activation of IKK by TNFalpha requires site-specific ubiquitination of RIP1 and polyubiquitin binding by NEMO. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Blonska, M.; You, Y.; Lin, X. Ubiquitination of RIP is required for tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 13636–13643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dondelinger, Y.; Jouan-Lanhouet, S.; Divert, T.; Theatre, E.; Bertin, J.; Gough, P.J.; Giansanti, P.; Heck, A.J.; Dejardin, E.; Vandenabeele, P.; et al. NF-kappaB-Independent Role of IKKalpha/IKKbeta in Preventing RIPK1 Kinase-Dependent Apoptotic and Necroptotic Cell Death during TNF Signaling. Mol. Cell 2015, 60, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dondelinger, Y.; Delanghe, T.; Priem, D.; Wynosky-Dolfi, M.A.; Sorobetea, D.; Rojas-Rivera, D.; Giansanti, P.; Roelandt, R.; Gropengiesser, J.; Ruckdeschel, K.; et al. Serine 25 phosphorylation inhibits RIPK1 kinase-dependent cell death in models of infection and inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amin, P.; Florez, M.; Najafov, A.; Pan, H.; Geng, J.; Ofengeim, D.; Dziedzic, S.A.; Wang, H.; Barrett, V.J.; Ito, Y.; et al. Regulation of a distinct activated RIPK1 intermediate bridging complex I and complex II in TNFalpha-mediated apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E5944–E5953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pasparakis, M.; Vandenabeele, P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature 2015, 517, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Du, F.; Wang, X. TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell 2008, 133, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feoktistova, M.; Geserick, P.; Kellert, B.; Dimitrova, D.P.; Langlais, C.; Hupe, M.; Cain, K.; MacFarlane, M.; Hacker, G.; Leverkus, M. cIAPs block Ripoptosome formation, a RIP1/caspase-8 containing intracellular cell death complex differentially regulated by cFLIP isoforms. Mol. Cell 2011, 43, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fu, T.M.; Li, Y.; Lu, A.; Li, Z.; Vajjhala, P.R.; Cruz, A.C.; Srivastava, D.B.; DiMaio, F.; Penczek, P.A.; Siegel, R.M.; et al. Cryo-EM Structure of Caspase-8 Tandem DED Filament Reveals Assembly and Regulation Mechanisms of the Death-Inducing Signaling Complex. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hughes, M.A.; Powley, I.R.; Jukes-Jones, R.; Horn, S.; Feoktistova, M.; Fairall, L.; Schwabe, J.W.; Leverkus, M.; Cain, K.; MacFarlane, M. Co-operative and Hierarchical Binding of c-FLIP and Caspase-8: A Unified Model Defines How c-FLIP Isoforms Differentially Control Cell Fate. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 834–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Irmler, M.; Thome, M.; Hahne, M.; Schneider, P.; Hofmann, K.; Steiner, V.; Bodmer, J.L.; Schroter, M.; Burns, K.; Mattmann, C.; et al. Inhibition of death receptor signals by cellular FLIP. Nature 1997, 388, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dillon, C.P.; Oberst, A.; Weinlich, R.; Janke, L.J.; Kang, T.B.; Ben-Moshe, T.; Mak, T.W.; Wallach, D.; Green, D.R. Survival function of the FADD-CASPASE-8-cFLIP(L) complex. Cell Rep. 2012, 1, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, D.; Lin, J.; Han, J. Receptor-interacting protein (RIP) kinase family. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 7, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duprez, L.; Bertrand, M.J.; Vanden Berghe, T.; Dondelinger, Y.; Festjens, N.; Vandenabeele, P. Intermediate domain of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) determines switch between necroptosis and RIPK1 kinase-dependent apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 14863–14872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geng, J.; Ito, Y.; Shi, L.; Amin, P.; Chu, J.; Ouchida, A.T.; Mookhtiar, A.K.; Zhao, H.; Xu, D.; Shan, B.; et al. Regulation of RIPK1 activation by TAK1-mediated phosphorylation dictates apoptosis and necroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shutinoski, B.; Alturki, N.A.; Rijal, D.; Bertin, J.; Gough, P.J.; Schlossmacher, M.G.; Sad, S. K45A mutation of RIPK1 results in poor necroptosis and cytokine signaling in macrophages, which impacts inflammatory responses in vivo. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1628–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Polykratis, A.; Hermance, N.; Zelic, M.; Roderick, J.; Kim, C.; Van, T.M.; Lee, T.H.; Chan, F.K.M.; Pasparakis, M.; Kelliher, M.A. Cutting edge: RIPK1 Kinase inactive mice are viable and protected from TNF-induced necroptosis in vivo. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Newton, K.; Dugger, D.L.; Wickliffe, K.E.; Kapoor, N.; de Almagro, M.C.; Vucic, D.; Komuves, L.; Ferrando, R.E.; French, D.M.; Webster, J.; et al. Activity of protein kinase RIPK3 determines whether cells die by necroptosis or apoptosis. Science 2014, 343, 1357–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Meng, H.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Jin, T.; Wu, G.; Shan, B.; Christofferson, D.E.; Qi, C.; Yu, Q.; et al. Death-domain dimerization-mediated activation of RIPK1 controls necroptosis and RIPK1-dependent apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E2001–E2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, H.; Meng, H.; Li, X.; Zhu, K.; Dong, K.; Mookhtiar, A.K.; Wei, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, S.C.; Yuan, J. PELI1 functions as a dual modulator of necroptosis and apoptosis by regulating ubiquitination of RIPK1 and mRNA levels of c-FLIP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 11944–11949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wegner, K.W.; Saleh, D.; Degterev, A. Complex Pathologic Roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3: Moving Beyond Necroptosis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 202–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kearney, C.J.; Cullen, S.P.; Clancy, D.; Martin, S.J. RIPK1 can function as an inhibitor rather than an initiator of RIPK3-dependent necroptosis. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 4921–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lin, J.; Kumari, S.; Kim, C.; Van, T.M.; Wachsmuth, L.; Polykratis, A.; Pasparakis, M. RIPK1 counteracts ZBP1-mediated necroptosis to inhibit inflammation. Nature 2016, 540, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Newton, K.; Wickliffe, K.E.; Maltzman, A.; Dugger, D.L.; Strasser, A.; Pham, V.C.; Lill, J.R.; Roose-Girma, M.; Warming, S.; Solon, M.; et al. RIPK1 inhibits ZBP1-driven necroptosis during development. Nature 2016, 540, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Suda, J.; Dara, L.; Yang, L.; Aghajan, M.; Song, Y.; Kaplowitz, N.; Liu, Z.X. Knockdown of RIPK1 Markedly Exacerbates Murine Immune-Mediated Liver Injury through Massive Apoptosis of Hepatocytes, Independent of Necroptosis and Inhibition of NF-kappaB. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 3120–3129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ren, Y.; Su, Y.; Sun, L.; He, S.; Meng, L.; Liao, D.; Liu, X.; Ma, Y.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; et al. Discovery of a Highly Potent, Selective, and Metabolically Stable Inhibitor of Receptor-Interacting Protein 1 (RIP1) for the Treatment of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 972–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caccamo, A.; Branca, C.; Piras, I.S.; Ferreira, E.; Huentelman, M.J.; Liang, W.S.; Readhead, B.; Dudley, J.T.; Spangenberg, E.E.; Green, K.N.; et al. Necroptosis activation in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2017, 20, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Harris, P.A.; Berger, S.B.; Jeong, J.U.; Nagilla, R.; Bandyopadhyay, D.; Campobasso, N.; Capriotti, C.A.; Cox, J.A.; Dare, L.; Dong, X.; et al. Discovery of a First-in-Class Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (RIP1) Kinase Specific Clinical Candidate (GSK2982772) for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 1247–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fauster, A.; Rebsamen, M.; Huber, K.V.; Bigenzahn, J.W.; Stukalov, A.; Lardeau, C.H.; Scorzoni, S.; Bruckner, M.; Gridling, M.; Parapatics, K.; et al. A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nogusa, S.; Thapa, R.J.; Dillon, C.P.; Liedmann, S.; Oguin III, T.H.; Ingram, J.P.; Rodriguez, D.A.; Kosoff, R.; Sharma, S.; Sturm, O.; et al. RIPK3 Activates Parallel Pathways of MLKL-Driven Necroptosis and FADD-Mediated Apoptosis to Protect against Influenza A Virus. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kaiser, W.J.; Sridharan, H.; Huang, C.; Mandal, P.; Upton, J.W.; Gough, P.J.; Sehon, C.A.; Marquis, R.W.; Bertin, J.; Mocarski, E.S. Toll-like receptor 3-mediated necrosis via TRIF, RIP3, and MLKL. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31268–31279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Li, J.X.; Feng, J.M.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.H.; Chen, X.X.; Su, Y.; Shen, Y.Y.; Chen, Y.; Xiong, B.; Yang, C.H.; et al. The B-Raf(V600E) inhibitor dabrafenib selectively inhibits RIP3 and alleviates acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Park, H.H.; Park, S.Y.; Mah, S.; Park, J.H.; Hong, S.S.; Hong, S.; Kim, Y.S. HS-1371, a novel kinase inhibitor of RIP3-mediated necroptosis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yan, B.; Liu, L.; Huang, S.; Ren, Y.; Wang, H.; Yao, Z.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z. Discovery of a new class of highly potent necroptosis inhibitors targeting the mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 3637–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; He, S.; Chen, S.; Liao, D.; Wang, L.; Yan, J.; Liu, W.; Lei, X.; et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell 2012, 148, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Jacobsen, A.V.; Lowes, K.N.; Tanzer, M.C.; Lucet, I.S.; Hildebrand, J.M.; Petrie, E.J.; van Delft, M.F.; Liu, Z.; Conos, S.A.; Zhang, J.G.; et al. HSP90 activity is required for MLKL oligomerisation and membrane translocation and the induction of necroptotic cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fuchslocher Chico, J.; Falk-Paulsen, M.; Luzius, A.; Saggau, C.; Ruder, B.; Bolik, J.; Schmidt-Arras, D.; Linkermann, A.; Becker, C.; Rosenstiel, P.; et al. The enhanced susceptibility of ADAM-17 hypomorphic mice to DSS-induced colitis is not ameliorated by loss of RIPK3, revealing an unexpected function of ADAM-17 in necroptosis. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 12941–12958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Onizawa, M.; Oshima, S.; Schulze-Topphoff, U.; Oses-Prieto, J.A.; Lu, T.; Tavares, R.; Prodhomme, T.; Duong, B.; Whang, M.I.; Advincula, R.; et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 restricts ubiquitination of the kinase RIPK3 and protects cells from necroptosis. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Seo, J.; Lee, E.W.; Sung, H.; Seong, D.; Dondelinger, Y.; Shin, J.; Jeong, M.; Lee, H.K.; Kim, J.H.; Han, S.Y.; et al. CHIP controls necroptosis through ubiquitylation- and lysosome-dependent degradation of RIPK3. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Moriwaki, K.; Chan, F.K. Regulation of RIPK3- and RHIM-dependent Necroptosis by the Proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 5948–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cook, W.D.; Moujalled, D.M.; Ralph, T.J.; Lock, P.; Young, S.N.; Murphy, J.M.; Vaux, D.L. RIPK1- and RIPK3-induced cell death mode is determined by target availability. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 1600–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rodriguez, D.A.; Weinlich, R.; Brown, S.; Guy, C.; Fitzgerald, P.; Dillon, C.P.; Oberst, A.; Quarato, G.; Low, J.; Cripps, J.G.; et al. Characterization of RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation of the activation loop of MLKL during necroptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Murphy, J.M.; Czabotar, P.E.; Hildebrand, J.M.; Lucet, I.S.; Zhang, J.G.; Alvarez-Diaz, S.; Lewis, R.; Lalaoui, N.; Metcalf, D.; Webb, A.I.; et al. The pseudokinase MLKL mediates necroptosis via a molecular switch mechanism. Immunity 2013, 39, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Dondelinger, Y.; Declercq, W.; Montessuit, S.; Roelandt, R.; Goncalves, A.; Bruggeman, I.; Hulpiau, P.; Weber, K.; Sehon, C.A.; Marquis, R.W.; et al. MLKL compromises plasma membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hildebrand, J.M.; Tanzer, M.C.; Lucet, I.S.; Young, S.N.; Spall, S.K.; Sharma, P.; Pierotti, C.; Garnier, J.M.; Dobson, R.C.; Webb, A.I.; et al. Activation of the pseudokinase MLKL unleashes the four-helix bundle domain to induce membrane localization and necroptotic cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15072–15077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tanzer, M.C.; Tripaydonis, A.; Webb, A.I.; Young, S.N.; Varghese, L.N.; Hall, C.; Alexander, W.S.; Hildebrand, J.M.; Silke, J.; Murphy, J.M. Necroptosis signalling is tuned by phosphorylation of MLKL residues outside the pseudokinase domain activation loop. Biochem. J. 2015, 471, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Quarato, G.; Guy, C.S.; Grace, C.R.; Llambi, F.; Nourse, A.; Rodriguez, D.A.; Wakefield, R.; Frase, S.; Moldoveanu, T.; Green, D.R. Sequential Engagement of Distinct MLKL Phosphatidylinositol-Binding Sites Executes Necroptosis. Mol. Cell 2016, 61, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Johnston, A.; Hanna-Addams, S.; Reynoso, E.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, Z. MLKL forms disulfide bond-dependent amyloid-like polymers to induce necroptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E7450–E7459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Huang, D.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Z.A.; Chen, X.; He, W.T.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.G.; Zhao, H.; Shi, W.; Wang, X.; et al. The MLKL Channel in Necroptosis Is an Octamer Formed by Tetramers in a Dyadic Process. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2017, 37, e00497-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, X.; Li, W.; Ren, J.; Huang, D.; He, W.T.; Song, Y.; Yang, C.; Li, W.; Zheng, X.; Chen, P.; et al. Translocation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein to plasma membrane leads to necrotic cell death. Cell Res. 2014, 24, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cai, Z.; Jitkaew, S.; Zhao, J.; Chiang, H.C.; Choksi, S.; Liu, J.; Ward, Y.; Wu, L.G.; Liu, Z.G. Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Yoon, S.; Bogdanov, K.; Kovalenko, A.; Wallach, D. Necroptosis is preceded by nuclear translocation of the signaling proteins that induce it. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Weber, K.; Roelandt, R.; Bruggeman, I.; Estornes, Y.; Vandenabeele, P. Nuclear RIPK3 and MLKL contribute to cytosolic necrosome formation and necroptosis. Commun. Biol. 2018, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Petrie, E.J.; Sandow, J.J.; Jacobsen, A.V.; Smith, B.J.; Griffin, M.D.W.; Lucet, I.S.; Dai, W.; Young, S.N.; Tanzer, M.C.; Wardak, A.; et al. Conformational switching of the pseudokinase domain promotes human MLKL tetramerization and cell death by necroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ma, B.; Marcotte, D.; Paramasivam, M.; Michelsen, K.; Wang, T.; Bertolotti-Ciarlet, A.; Jones, J.H.; Moree, B.; Butko, M.; Salafsky, J.; et al. ATP-Competitive MLKL Binders Have No Functional Impact on Necroptosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dovey, C.M.; Diep, J.; Clarke, B.P.; Hale, A.T.; McNamara, D.E.; Guo, H.; Brown, N.W., Jr.; Cao, J.Y.; Grace, C.R.; Gough, P.J.; et al. MLKL Requires the Inositol Phosphate Code to Execute Necroptosis. Mol. Cell 2018, 70, 936–948.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Yoon, S.; Kovalenko, A.; Bogdanov, K.; Wallach, D. MLKL, the Protein that Mediates Necroptosis, Also Regulates Endosomal Trafficking and Extracellular Vesicle Generation. Immunity 2017, 47, 51–65.e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Reynoso, E.; Liu, H.; Li, L.; Yuan, A.L.; Chen, S.; Wang, Z. Thioredoxin-1 actively maintains the pseudokinase MLKL in a reduced state to suppress disulfide bond-dependent MLKL polymer formation and necroptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 17514–17524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zhao, X.M.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, J.B.; Zhang, P.P.; Pu, Y.F.; Jiang, S.H.; Hou, J.J.; Cui, Y.M.; Jia, X.L.; Zhang, S.Q. Hsp90 modulates the stability of MLKL and is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chi, H.; Chang, H.Y.; Sang, T.K. Neuronal Cell Death Mechanisms in Major Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ofengeim, D.; Mazzitelli, S.; Ito, Y.; DeWitt, J.P.; Mifflin, L.; Zou, C.; Das, S.; Adiconis, X.; Chen, H.; Zhu, H.; et al. RIPK1 mediates a disease-associated microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E8788–E8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ito, Y.; Ofengeim, D.; Najafov, A.; Das, S.; Saberi, S.; Li, Y.; Hitomi, J.; Zhu, H.; Chen, H.; Mayo, L.; et al. RIPK1 mediates axonal degeneration by promoting inflammation and necroptosis in ALS. Science 2016, 353, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Iannielli, A.; Bido, S.; Folladori, L.; Segnali, A.; Cancellieri, C.; Maresca, A.; Massimino, L.; Rubio, A.; Morabito, G.; Caporali, L.; et al. Pharmacological Inhibition of Necroptosis Protects from Dopaminergic Neuronal Cell Death in Parkinson’s Disease Models. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2066–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Lin, Q.S.; Chen, P.; Wang, W.X.; Lin, C.C.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, L.H.; Lin, Y.X.; Xu, Y.F.; Kang, D.Z. RIP1/RIP3/MLKL mediates dopaminergic neuron necroptosis in a mouse model of Parkinson disease. Lab. Invest. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Onate, M.; Catenaccio, A.; Salvadores, N.; Saquel, C.; Martinez, A.; Moreno-Gonzalez, I.; Gamez, N.; Soto, P.; Soto, C.; Hetz, C.; et al. The necroptosis machinery mediates axonal degeneration in a model of Parkinson disease. Cell Death Differ. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ofengeim, D.; Ito, Y.; Najafov, A.; Zhang, Y.; Shan, B.; DeWitt, J.P.; Ye, J.; Zhang, X.; Chang, A.; Vakifahmetoglu-Norberg, H.; et al. Activation of necroptosis in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 1836–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Zhang, S.; Su, Y.; Ying, Z.; Guo, D.; Pan, C.; Guo, J.; Zou, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, Z.; et al. RIP1 kinase inhibitor halts the progression of an immune-induced demyelination disease at the stage of monocyte elevation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 5675–5680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Chen, S.; Lv, X.; Hu, B.; Shao, Z.; Wang, B.; Ma, K.; Lin, H.; Cui, M. RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL-mediated necroptosis contributes to compression-induced rat nucleus pulposus cells death. Apoptosis Int. J. Program. Cell Death 2017, 22, 626–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lee, S.H.; Kwon, J.Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Jung, K.; Cho, M.L. Interferon-gamma regulates inflammatory cell death by targeting necroptosis in experimental autoimmune arthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jhun, J.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Ryu, J.; Kwon, J.Y.; Na, H.S.; Jung, K.; Moon, S.J.; Cho, M.L.; Min, J.K. RIPK1 inhibition attenuates experimental autoimmune arthritis via suppression of osteoclastogenesis. J. Transl. Med. 2019, 17, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, W.; Chen, B.; Wang, Y.; Meng, C.; Huang, H.; Huang, X.R.; Qin, J.; Mulay, S.R.; Anders, H.J.; Qiu, A.; et al. RGMb protects against acute kidney injury by inhibiting tubular cell necroptosis via an MLKL-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1475–E1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shen, B.; Mei, M.; Pu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Tang, M.; Pan, Q.; He, Y.; Wu, X.; Zhao, H. Necrostatin-1 Attenuates Renal Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury via Meditation of HIF-1alpha/mir-26a/TRPC6/PARP1 Signaling. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 17, 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wang, J.N.; Liu, M.M.; Wang, F.; Wei, B.; Yang, Q.; Cai, Y.T.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.Q.; Jiang, L.; Li, C.; et al. RIPK1 inhibitor Cpd-71 attenuates renal dysfunction in cisplatin-treated mice via attenuating necroptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress. Clin. Sci. 2019, 133, 1609–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhu, Y.; Cui, H.; Xia, Y.; Gan, H. RIPK3-Mediated Necroptosis and Apoptosis Contributes to Renal Tubular Cell Progressive Loss and Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Rats. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Mulay, S.R.; Desai, J.; Kumar, S.V.; Eberhard, J.N.; Thomasova, D.; Romoli, S.; Grigorescu, M.; Kulkarni, O.P.; Popper, B.; Vielhauer, V.; et al. Cytotoxicity of crystals involves RIPK3-MLKL-mediated necroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Oerlemans, M.I.; Liu, J.; Arslan, F.; den Ouden, K.; van Middelaar, B.J.; Doevendans, P.A.; Sluijter, J.P. Inhibition of RIP1-dependent necrosis prevents adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in vivo. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2012, 107, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Koshinuma, S.; Miyamae, M.; Kaneda, K.; Kotani, J.; Figueredo, V.M. Combination of necroptosis and apoptosis inhibition enhances cardioprotection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Anesth. 2014, 28, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Zhu, P.; Hu, S.; Jin, Q.; Li, D.; Tian, F.; Toan, S.; Li, Y.; Zhou, H.; Chen, Y. Ripk3 promotes ER stress-induced necroptosis in cardiac IR injury: A mechanism involving calcium overload/XO/ROS/mPTP pathway. Redox Biol. 2018, 16, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Karunakaran, D.; Geoffrion, M.; Wei, L.; Gan, W.; Richards, L.; Shangari, P.; DeKemp, E.M.; Beanlands, R.A.; Perisic, L.; Maegdefessel, L.; et al. Targeting macrophage necroptosis for therapeutic and diagnostic interventions in atherosclerosis. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Lin, J.; Li, H.; Yang, M.; Ren, J.; Huang, Z.; Han, F.; Huang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; et al. A role of RIP3-mediated macrophage necrosis in atherosclerosis development. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Xu, H.; Du, X.; Liu, G.; Huang, S.; Du, W.; Zou, S.; Tang, D.; Fan, C.; Xie, Y.; Wei, Y.; et al. The pseudokinase MLKL regulates hepatic insulin sensitivity independently of inflammation. Mol. Metab. 2019, 23, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gautheron, J.; Vucur, M.; Schneider, A.T.; Severi, I.; Roderburg, C.; Roy, S.; Bartneck, M.; Schrammen, P.; Diaz, M.B.; Ehling, J.; et al. The necroptosis-inducing kinase RIPK3 dampens adipose tissue inflammation and glucose intolerance. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Najafov, A.; Chen, H.; Yuan, J. Necroptosis and Cancer. Trends Cancer 2017, 3, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Moriwaki, K.; Bertin, J.; Gough, P.J.; Orlowski, G.M.; Chan, F.K. Differential roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3 in TNF-induced necroptosis and chemotherapeutic agent-induced cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Melo-Lima, S.; Celeste Lopes, M.; Mollinedo, F. Necroptosis is associated with low procaspase-8 and active RIPK1 and -3 in human glioma cells. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 649–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhou, J.; Du, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, N.; Wu, D.; Xu, B. Enzymatic Self-Assembly Confers Exceptionally Strong Synergism with NF-kappaB Targeting for Selective Necroptosis of Cancer Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2301–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yao, C.; Li, G.; Cai, M.; Qian, Y.; Wang, L.; Xiao, L.; Thaiss, F.; Shi, B. Expression and genetic polymorphism of necroptosis related protein RIPK1 is correlated with severe hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and prognosis after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Biomark. Sect. A Dis. Markers 2017, 20, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Geserick, P.; Wang, J.; Schilling, R.; Horn, S.; Harris, P.A.; Bertin, J.; Gough, P.J.; Feoktistova, M.; Leverkus, M. Absence of RIPK3 predicts necroptosis resistance in malignant melanoma. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Bozec, D.; Iuga, A.C.; Roda, G.; Dahan, S.; Yeretssian, G. Critical function of the necroptosis adaptor RIPK3 in protecting from intestinal tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 46384–46400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Schmidt, S.V.; Seibert, S.; Walch-Ruckheim, B.; Vicinus, B.; Kamionka, E.M.; Pahne-Zeppenfeld, J.; Solomayer, E.F.; Kim, Y.J.; Bohle, R.M.; Smola, S. RIPK3 expression in cervical cancer cells is required for PolyIC-induced necroptosis, IL-1alpha release, and efficient paracrine dendritic cell activation. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 8635–8647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cells 08 01486 g001 550
Figure 1. TNFR1-mediated survival and cell death pathways. The binding of TNFα to TNFR1 triggers multiple signaling pathways, including NF-κB, apoptosis and necroptosis. Upon stimulation, TNFα induces the formation of a membrane-associated complex I, which consists of RIPK1, TRADD, TRAF2/5, LUBAC and cIAP1/2. Within complex I, cIAP1/2 and LUBAC induce Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of RIPK1. The polyubiquitin chain of RIPK1 serves as a scaffold for further recruitment of IKK (IKKα, IKKβ and NEMO) and TAK1(TAK1, TAB1 and TAB2) complexes, eventually leading to activation of NF-κB pathway and cell survival. Deubiquitination of RIPK1 by CYLD or A20 induces the dissociation of TRADD and RIPK1 from TNFR1, which leads to the formation of either of complex IIa or complex IIb. FADD and pro-caspase-8 are recruited to TRADD and RIPK1 to form complex IIa, resulting in the activation of caspase-8 by oligomerization and cleavage. In the absence of cIAP1/2, TAK1 or IKK complex, complex IIb, which contains RIPK1, FADD and pro-caspase-8 except TRADD, is formed and then activate caspase-8. Then, caspase-8 induces apoptosis. RIPK3-dependent necroptosis is induced when caspase-8 activity is blocked, for example by cFLIP or the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk.
Figure 1. TNFR1-mediated survival and cell death pathways. The binding of TNFα to TNFR1 triggers multiple signaling pathways, including NF-κB, apoptosis and necroptosis. Upon stimulation, TNFα induces the formation of a membrane-associated complex I, which consists of RIPK1, TRADD, TRAF2/5, LUBAC and cIAP1/2. Within complex I, cIAP1/2 and LUBAC induce Lys63-linked polyubiquitination of RIPK1. The polyubiquitin chain of RIPK1 serves as a scaffold for further recruitment of IKK (IKKα, IKKβ and NEMO) and TAK1(TAK1, TAB1 and TAB2) complexes, eventually leading to activation of NF-κB pathway and cell survival. Deubiquitination of RIPK1 by CYLD or A20 induces the dissociation of TRADD and RIPK1 from TNFR1, which leads to the formation of either of complex IIa or complex IIb. FADD and pro-caspase-8 are recruited to TRADD and RIPK1 to form complex IIa, resulting in the activation of caspase-8 by oligomerization and cleavage. In the absence of cIAP1/2, TAK1 or IKK complex, complex IIb, which contains RIPK1, FADD and pro-caspase-8 except TRADD, is formed and then activate caspase-8. Then, caspase-8 induces apoptosis. RIPK3-dependent necroptosis is induced when caspase-8 activity is blocked, for example by cFLIP or the pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk.
Cells 08 01486 g001
Cells 08 01486 g002 550
Figure 2. Cell death induction by RIPK1 regulation. (A) Scheme of RIPK1 structure. RIPK1 consists of an N-terminal kinase domain (KD), a RHIM containing intermediate domain (ID), and a C-terminal death domain (DD). (B) RIPK1-mediated cell death is regulated by TAK1. TAK1-induced phosphorylation of ID domain within RIPK1 initiates RIPK1-independent apoptosis via complex IIa. In the absence of TAK1, RIPK1-dependent apoptosis is induced via complex IIb. When RIPK1 is hyperphosphorylated by TAK1, RIPK3-dependent necroptosis is induced through DD dimerization. Necroptosis can be inhibited by RIPK1 inhibitors, such as necrostatins, GSK2982772, GSK3145095, RIPA-56, DNL747, ponatinib and pazopanib. E3-ligase PELI1 induces polyubiquitination of RIPK1, which in turn regulates the interaction of RIPK1 with RIPK3 and promotes necroptosis. Besides induction of cell death, RIPK1 also exerts necroptosis-inhibitory functions by inhibiting RIPK3 activation through other RHIM containing proteins, such as ZBP1.
Figure 2. Cell death induction by RIPK1 regulation. (A) Scheme of RIPK1 structure. RIPK1 consists of an N-terminal kinase domain (KD), a RHIM containing intermediate domain (ID), and a C-terminal death domain (DD). (B) RIPK1-mediated cell death is regulated by TAK1. TAK1-induced phosphorylation of ID domain within RIPK1 initiates RIPK1-independent apoptosis via complex IIa. In the absence of TAK1, RIPK1-dependent apoptosis is induced via complex IIb. When RIPK1 is hyperphosphorylated by TAK1, RIPK3-dependent necroptosis is induced through DD dimerization. Necroptosis can be inhibited by RIPK1 inhibitors, such as necrostatins, GSK2982772, GSK3145095, RIPA-56, DNL747, ponatinib and pazopanib. E3-ligase PELI1 induces polyubiquitination of RIPK1, which in turn regulates the interaction of RIPK1 with RIPK3 and promotes necroptosis. Besides induction of cell death, RIPK1 also exerts necroptosis-inhibitory functions by inhibiting RIPK3 activation through other RHIM containing proteins, such as ZBP1.
Cells 08 01486 g002
Cells 08 01486 g003 550
Figure 3. RIPK3-mediated necroptosis. (A) Scheme of RIPK3 structure. RIPK3 consists of an N-terminal kinase domain (KD), a RHIM containing intermediate domain (ID). (B) The association of RIPK1 with RIPK3 induces the phosphorylation and activation of RIPK3 by its kinase-activity and ADAM17. Upon inhibition of RIPK3 by specific inhibitors, such as GSK’840, GSK’843, GSK’872, GW440139B, HS-1371, ponatinib and dabrafenib (a B-raf inhibitor), RIPK3-dependent apoptosis is initiated, which can also be induced by viruses. Ubiquitination of RIPK3 also regulates RIPK3 activity. Upon necroptosis induction, RIPK3 is ubiquitinated at Lys5. Deubiquitination of RIPK3 Lys5 by A20 can inhibit necroptosis by blocking the interaction of RIPK1 and RIPK3 and the necrosome formation. In addition, ubiquitination of RIPK3 by CHIP at Lys55 and Lys363 can also block necroptosis by triggering lysosomal degradation. Proteasome inhibitors MG132 and bortezomib can induce necroptosis through the accumulation of polyubiquitination of RIPK3 at Lys264 without caspase-8 inhibition.
Figure 3. RIPK3-mediated necroptosis. (A) Scheme of RIPK3 structure. RIPK3 consists of an N-terminal kinase domain (KD), a RHIM containing intermediate domain (ID). (B) The association of RIPK1 with RIPK3 induces the phosphorylation and activation of RIPK3 by its kinase-activity and ADAM17. Upon inhibition of RIPK3 by specific inhibitors, such as GSK’840, GSK’843, GSK’872, GW440139B, HS-1371, ponatinib and dabrafenib (a B-raf inhibitor), RIPK3-dependent apoptosis is initiated, which can also be induced by viruses. Ubiquitination of RIPK3 also regulates RIPK3 activity. Upon necroptosis induction, RIPK3 is ubiquitinated at Lys5. Deubiquitination of RIPK3 Lys5 by A20 can inhibit necroptosis by blocking the interaction of RIPK1 and RIPK3 and the necrosome formation. In addition, ubiquitination of RIPK3 by CHIP at Lys55 and Lys363 can also block necroptosis by triggering lysosomal degradation. Proteasome inhibitors MG132 and bortezomib can induce necroptosis through the accumulation of polyubiquitination of RIPK3 at Lys264 without caspase-8 inhibition.
Cells 08 01486 g003
Cells 08 01486 g004 550
Figure 4. MLKL translocation and membrane association induce necroptosis. (A) Scheme of MLKL structure. MLKL contains an N-terminal α-helices domain (NTD), a brace region (BR), and a C-terminals pseudokinase domain (PKD). (B) Upon necroptosis induction, MLKL forms a necrosome with RIPK1 and RIPK3, where it is activated by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of MLKL leads to release of the BR and NTD, followed by the formation of tetramers and subsequent octamers. After the MLKL octamer is dissociated from the necrosome, it translocates to the plasma membrane to disrupt membrane integrity and induces necroptosis. The membrane association of phosphorylated-MLKL can be regulated by IP kinases IPMK and ITPK1. HSP90 is indispensable for necrosome formation. Necroptosis can be inhibited by MLKL inhibitors NSA, GW806742X and protein Trx1.
Figure 4. MLKL translocation and membrane association induce necroptosis. (A) Scheme of MLKL structure. MLKL contains an N-terminal α-helices domain (NTD), a brace region (BR), and a C-terminals pseudokinase domain (PKD). (B) Upon necroptosis induction, MLKL forms a necrosome with RIPK1 and RIPK3, where it is activated by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation. The phosphorylation of MLKL leads to release of the BR and NTD, followed by the formation of tetramers and subsequent octamers. After the MLKL octamer is dissociated from the necrosome, it translocates to the plasma membrane to disrupt membrane integrity and induces necroptosis. The membrane association of phosphorylated-MLKL can be regulated by IP kinases IPMK and ITPK1. HSP90 is indispensable for necrosome formation. Necroptosis can be inhibited by MLKL inhibitors NSA, GW806742X and protein Trx1.
Cells 08 01486 g004
Table
Table 1. Comparison between cellular characteristics in apoptosis, necroptosis and necrosis.
Table 1. Comparison between cellular characteristics in apoptosis, necroptosis and necrosis.
ApoptosisNecroptosisNecrosis
Regulated Regulated Unregulated
Triggered by specific cytokinesTriggered by specific cytokinesInduced by damaging environmental stress (such as extreme physiological stress and viral or toxin-mediated infections)
Shrinkage of cellRapid swelling of cellCell swelling
-Swelling of organellesSwelling of organelles
Blebbing of plasma membraneDisruption of plasma membraneLoss of membrane integrity
Formation of apoptotic bodiesOrganelle breakdown
-Release of cellular contentsRelease of cellular contents
-Pro-inflammatory responsePro-inflammatory response
Table
Table 2. Necroptosis inhibitors.
Table 2. Necroptosis inhibitors.
Compound NameTargetReferences
Necrostatins
(necrostatin-1, 7-Cl-O-necrostatin)		RIPK1[1,41]
GSK2982772RIPK1[42]
GSK3145095RIPK1(Clinicaltrials.gov)
RIPA-56RIPK1[40]
PonatinibRIPK1/RIPK3[43]
PazopanibRIPK1[43]
DNL747RIPK1(Clinicaltrials.gov)
GSK’840, GSK’843 and GSK’872RIPK3[44,45]
DabrafenibRIPK3[46]
HS-1371RIPK3[47]
GW806742XMLKL[48]
Necrosulfonamide (NSA)MLKL[49]
17AAGHSP90[50]
Table
Table 3. Necroptosis inhibitors under clinical development.
Table 3. Necroptosis inhibitors under clinical development.
Compound NameTargetPhaseDisease ConditionIdentifierStudy TypeStatus (Oct 2019)
GSK2982772 RIPK1 IIUlcerative colitisNCT02903966With placeboCompleted
IRheumatoid arthritisNCT02858492With placeboCompleted
IIPsoriasisNCT02776033With placeboCompleted
GSK3145095ISolid tumorsNCT03681951With PembrolizumabTerminated
DabrafenibRIPK3IVMelanoma
Non-small cell lung cancer
Solid tumor
Rare cancers
High grade glioma		NCT03340506With trametinibRecruiting
IIMetastatic colorectal cancerNCT03668431With trametinib and PDR001Recruiting
IIMelanomaNCT01682213Single agentCompleted
IIBRAF Mutation-Positive Malignant Melanoma and Brain MetastasesNCT02974803With trametinib and stereotactic radiationActive, not recruiting
IIMetastatic Melanoma (Carrying BRAF V600 Mutation)NCT02052193With vemurafenibTerminated
IIIMalignant MelanomaNCT03551626With trametinibRecruiting
Ponatinib RIPK/RIPK3 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL)		NCT01592136Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
IINon-small cell lung cancerNCT01813734Single agentCompleted
IILeukemiaNCT01570868Single agentTerminated
II/IIINon-small cell lung cancer head and neck CancerNCT01761747Single agentTerminated
I/IIAcute myeloid leukemiaNCT02428543With cytarabineRecruiting
IIMedullary thyroid cancerNCT03838692Single agentNot yet recruiting
PazopanibRIPK1 IRenal cell carcinoma
Soft tissue sarcoma
Metastatic disease		NCT02795819With AR-42Terminated
IIRenal Cell carcinoma NCT01545817Pazopanib followed by everolimusTerminated
DNL747RIPK1IADNCT03757325With PlaceboRecruiting
IALSNCT03757351With PlaceboRecruiting
17AAGHSP90IIAnaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
Recurrent Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma
Recurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma		NCT00117988Single agentCompleted
IUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificNCT00121264With sorafenib tosylateCompleted
IRelapsed or Refractory Hematologic CancerNCT00103272With bortezomibTerminated
IPI-504HSP90ISolid TumorsNCT00606814With DocetaxelCompleted
IMultiple MyelomaNCT00113204Single agentCompleted
IIProstate CancerNCT00564928Single agentCompleted

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Kos, R.; Garssen, J.; Redegeld, F. Molecular Insights into the Mechanism of Necroptosis: The Necrosome as a Potential Therapeutic Target. Cells 2019, 8, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121486

AMA Style

Chen J, Kos R, Garssen J, Redegeld F. Molecular Insights into the Mechanism of Necroptosis: The Necrosome as a Potential Therapeutic Target. Cells. 2019; 8(12):1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jing, Renate Kos, Johan Garssen, and Frank Redegeld. 2019. "Molecular Insights into the Mechanism of Necroptosis: The Necrosome as a Potential Therapeutic Target" Cells 8, no. 12: 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121486

APA Style

Chen, J., Kos, R., Garssen, J., & Redegeld, F. (2019). Molecular Insights into the Mechanism of Necroptosis: The Necrosome as a Potential Therapeutic Target. Cells, 8(12), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8121486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop