Next Article in Journal
NETs Are Double-Edged Swords with the Potential to Aggravate or Resolve Periodontal Inflammation
Next Article in Special Issue
CALINCA—A Novel Pipeline for the Identification of lncRNAs in Podocyte Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Infection of Mammals and Mosquitoes by Alphaviruses: Involvement of Cell Death
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Propagation and Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells: A Major Influence of the Long Non-Coding RNA H19

Univ. Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, UMR 9020 – UMR 1277 – Canther – Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(12), 2613; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122613
Submission received: 20 November 2020 / Revised: 2 December 2020 / Accepted: 3 December 2020 / Published: 5 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Long Noncoding RNAs in Disease)

Abstract

:
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a rare population of tumor cells that exhibit stem cell properties with the abilities of self-renewal and differentiation. These cells are now widely accepted to be responsible for tumor initiation, development, resistance to conventional therapies, and recurrence. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the control of CSCs is essential to improve patient management in terms of diagnostics and therapies. CSCs are regulated by signals of the tumor microenvironment as well as intrinsic genetic and epigenetic modulators. H19, the first identified lncRNA is involved in the development and progression of many different cancer types. Recently, H19 has been demonstrated to be implicated in the regulation of CSCs in different types of cancers. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the role and mechanisms of action of H19 in the regulation of CSCs. We summarize how H19 may regulate CSC division and cancer cell reprogramming, thus affecting metastasis and drug resistance. We also discuss the potential clinical implications of H19.

1. Introduction

Despite recent progress in early detection and therapeutics outcomes, cancer remains a major medical issue. Increasing data highlight the implication of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in tumorigenicity and cancer progression. CSC concept states that tumor growth, analogous to the renewal of healthy tissues, is fueled by a small number of dedicated stem cells according to a hierarchic model. At the top of the model, CSCs, through symmetric or asymmetric divisions, will give rise to self-renewal daughter CSCs and more differentiated transient amplifying cells to regenerate a heterogeneous tumor population. CSCs can be derived from adult normal stem/progenitor cells after (epi)genetic alterations. The mutated CSCs exhibit enhanced immune evasion capacity and reduced apoptosis, resulting in tumor initiation. Due to their unlimited division potential, CSCs will accumulate additional (epi)genetic alterations, leading to the appearance of diverse phenotypes of CSCs, tumor progression, and metastasis formation [1].
The evolving phenotype of CSCs is found to be tightly associated to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancers of epithelial origin [2,3,4]. EMT is a developmental process wherein epithelial cells transdifferentiate into mesenchymal cells. This process is characterized by molecular reprogramming, leading to cytoskeleton reorganization, cellular junction disruption, and increased abilities of cells to migrate and invade adjacent tissue. It was shown that tumor cells expressing high levels of the EMT master transcription factor SNAI1 display enhanced tumor-initiating capacity and metastatic potential in mouse and human models [4]. Similarly, another EMT inducer, ZEB1, was described to regulate the transit of basal breast cancer cells between non-CSC and CSC states [5]. In addition, the genetic reprogramming orchestrated by EMT affects intracellular mechanisms such as glucose, lipid, glutamine, and nucleotide metabolisms [6], sustaining the acquisition and maintenance of CSC characteristics.
Apart from EMT, differentiated cancer cells have been largely reported to be directly reprogrammed to CSCs by extracellular cues from the tumor microenvironment including hypoxia, ROS, and cytokines [7,8], as well as by ectopic expression of pluripotent transcriptional factors OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and cMYC [9]. Moreover, radio- and chemotherapies are also able to increase CSCs by reprogramming mechanisms [10,11,12]. From a clinical point of view, this is of major importance, as CSCs present endogenous resistance mechanisms against radiation and chemotherapy, which confers CSCs as a survival advantage over differentiated counterparts. In addition, CSCs can generate various subclones, increasing the risk of a more resistant fraction after anti-cancer therapy [11].
Whatever the origins, CSCs are controlled by both extracellular stimuli common to normal stem cells (Wnt, hedgehog, Notch, and TGF-β) and specific to tumor microenvironment (cytokines, ROS, hypoxia). Intrinsic regulations including core stemness transcriptional factors, epigenetic alterations such as telomerase reactivation [13,14] and deregulated dynamics of chromatin (de)compaction lead to stemness-related gene expression and differentiation-related gene repression. To complexify the aforementioned interconnected extracellular and intracellular networks, it is increasingly described that non-coding RNAs including long non-coding RNAs and microRNAs contribute to the regulation of CSCs by various mechanisms [15,16,17].
In this review, we will first describe H19 and its action in cancer development in a general way, and then overview how H19 may regulate CSC division and cancer cell reprogramming. We will also discuss the potential clinical implications of H19.

2. The Long Non-Coding RNA H19 and Its Pleiotropic Oncogenic Actions in Different Cancers

At the beginning of the 2000s, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) consortium showed that about 80% of the genome is transcribed into functional RNAs, but only 2% are translated into proteins [18,19,20]. From the results of this project, a “transcriptional background noise’’ therefore would exist, but also transcribed but not translated genes that produce non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). These ncRNAs are classified according to their length in small ncRNAs (less than 200 nt) and long ncRNAs (more than 200 nt). Nowadays, about 20,000 lncRNAs have been identified and characterized [21]. They show classical features of mRNAs like transcription by RNA polymerase II, 5′ capping, 3′ polyadenylation, and splicing [22,23]. LncRNAs are described to be involved in both normal and pathological development, including cancer [24,25,26,27].
The long non-coding RNA H19 is the first discovered lncRNA. The H19 RNA is transcribed from the H19 gene, which is subject to genomic imprinting and is maternally expressed [28]. The H19 gene is located on the human 11p15.5 locus, near the IGF2 (Insulin-like growth factor 2) gene. This gene is composed of 5 exons and codes for a mature RNA of 2.3 kb transcribed by the RNA polymerase II. The transcript is normally spliced, polyadenylated, capped, and exported to the cytosol. Brannan et al. showed that no protein is associated to this transcript, and proposed that H19 could act as a non-coding RNA [29].
H19 is highly expressed during embryogenesis and sharply downregulated after birth for the majority of adult tissues [30]. H19 is found to play important roles during embryogenesis and normal tissue homeostasis. For instance, it has been described that loss of H19 lncRNA in embryonic endothelial precursors and pre-hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) results in failed HSC generation, indicating a pivotal role of H19 in HSC formation from embryonic SCs [31]. Furthermore, H19 is found to be preferentially expressed in long-term HSCs compared to short-term HSCs or multipotent progenitors in the adult blood system where H19 is found to maintain HSCs quiescence [32]. Similarly, H19 contributes to maintain the SC phenotype of normal prostate cells [33] and prevents adipogenesis of bone marrow SCs [34].
H19 is widely described to be involved in tumorigenesis and cancer progression [35]. H19 is overexpressed in both leukemia and different types of solid cancers including glioma, melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers, as well as cancers of digestive (tongue, stomach, colon, liver, pancreas) and urinary systems (kidney, bladder) [35]. H19 favors tumorigenesis by promoting genomic stability [36], enabling replicative immortality [37] and sustaining cell growth [38,39], migration, and invasion, as well as increased resistance to chemotherapies [40,41,42]. Furthermore, H19 is also reported to be able to promote angiogenesis and tumor inflammation as well as avoid immune suppression [43,44,45]. H19 has been demonstrated to exert its oncogenic actions at transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and post-translational levels. At the transcriptional regulation level, H19 can activate transcription factors like E2F1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, leading to increased cell proliferation [46]; H19 can also interact with the PRC2 complex to recruit it to its target genes promoters, leading to the modulation of chromatin condensation and the inaccessibility of gene promoters to transcription factors [47]. The post-transcriptional regulation by H19 involves the contribution of microRNAs (miRNAs). Interestingly, the interaction of H19 with miRNAs pathways is dual: on one hand, H19 is able to act as a ‘‘sponge’’ to sequester miRNAs and impede their action [48]. On the other hand, H19 is itself the precursor of the miR-675 [49], which will in turn regulate several targets, including the growth suppressors RB and RUNX1 [50,51,52]. Concerning the post-translational regulation, the action of H19 has been spotted out outside the nucleus. Indeed, H19 can physically interact with proteins like p53 to impair its activity in gastric cancer cells and promote cell proliferation [39].
During the past years, along with the fundamental and clinical data highlighting the implication of CSCs in tumorigenicity and cancer progression, more and more studies show that H19 is able to regulate CSCs. In breast cancer, our team showed that both H19 and its miR-675 are involved in CSC enrichment [53]. In the following sections, we will discuss how H19 interconnects to the maze of CSCs.

3. The Long Non-Coding RNA H19 Promotes Symmetric Renewal of CSCs

As aforementioned, CSCs in a bulk tumor cell population may undergo asymmetric or symmetric divisions. Asymmetric division gives rise to a stem cell (SC) and a progenitor or committed cell (also called transient amplifying cell), while symmetric division leads to the generation of two identical daughter cells which are either CSCs (symmetric renewal) or committed cells [1]. Upon deregulated extrinsic and/or intrinsic cues, CSCs may preferentially undergo symmetric renewal to enlarge the pool of CSCs and sustain cancer progression [54]. In this way, H19 is found to promote the symmetric renewal of CSCs through the regulation of several intrinsic intermediates including let-7, LIN28, or p53 [55]. Moreover, CSC symmetric renewal activity of H19 is further amplified by the existence of positive regulatory loops between H19 and extrinsic actors such as estrogen receptor β. For instance, estradiol (E2) treatment enhances H19 expression in breast cancer cells [55,56]. H19 will in turn promote the upregulation of estrogen receptor β (ERβ) expression in these cells [55]. Similar data have been shown in papillary thyroid carcinoma cells in which estradiol (E2) significantly promotes H19 transcription via ERβ and elevates H19 expression. On the other hand, H19 acts as a competitive RNA to sequester miR-3126-5p, leading to enhanced ERβ expression. Depletion of H19 reverses E2-induced stem-like properties, indicating the importance of the positive feedback loop in the enrichment of papillary thyroid carcinoma stem cells [57] (Figure 1A). In these models, the enhanced ERβ activity will thus promote symmetric division of CSCs and perpetuate the CSC pool within the tumor.
To go further, the mechanisms underlying this process showed an involvement of the let-7 miRNAs family. Let-7c inhibits the symmetric division and therefore stem-like phenotypes such as sphere-forming capacities of breast CSCs. Because of its overexpression due to enhanced Wnt signaling in this model, H19 is able to sponge let-7c, thus allowing to counter its negative regulation and promote symmetric division of CSCs [55] (Figure 1B). Still in breast cancer, a similar mechanism has been highlighted: miR-146a expression indirectly upregulates let-7c to promote asymmetric division of breast CSCs. This goes through the post-translational targeting and degradation of LIN28. LIN28 is a transcription factor that can regulate gene expression either by binding to mRNAs or by blocking miRNA biogenesis, especially for the let-7 family [58]. Here, the degradation of LIN28 by miR-146a decreases Wnt signaling activation, and represses H19 expression. Let-7c upregulation will thus block the symmetric division of breast CSCs that will in turn impact the CSCs pool [59] (Figure 1B).
One other thing concerning the symmetrical division of CSCs is the implication of p53 protein. The TP53 gene codes for a protein involved in many cellular processes, hence its name of ‘‘cellular regulation platform’’. Indeed, p53 is found to act in response to several stresses such as DNA damage to regulate cell cycle, senescence, apoptosis, or genetic stability. Linked to this, it has been shown that SCs are resistant to DNA damage-induced apoptosis or senescence. This is notably due to the inactivation of p53 protein and activation of DNA repairing mechanisms [60]. The inactivation of p53 leads to cell cycle entry and symmetric division of SCs [61], and in the longer term might favor accumulation of SCs harboring DNA mutations, which can reduce their functional efficiency (aging) [62], and even favor transformation of normal SCs into CSCs.
In addition, it has been shown that H19 is able to inhibit p53 activity, leading to the upregulation of gastric cancer cells proliferation [39]. Moreover, CSC treatment with a p53 pathway activator stimulates the asymmetric division [55]. It is thus possible that H19 could promote symmetric divisions of CSCs by inhibiting p53 (Figure 1C).

4. H19 Contributes to the Enrichment and Maintenance of CSCs

The origin of SCs has been studied as part of the cell reprogramming mechanism. Indeed, it has been shown that the transfection of transcription factors like Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc is sufficient to induce de-differentiation of murine fibroblasts. These fibroblasts are then reprogrammed to a pluripotent state that express a stem cell-like phenotype [63]. The phenotypic characterization of these induced-pluripotent stem (IPS) cells showed similar morphologic and growth properties when compared to embryonic SCs, and confirmed the expression of SC marker genes. In addition, authors showed that these IPS cells transplanted into nude mice are able to give rise to heterogeneous tumors. The reprogramming process starts with a set of cellular divisions, followed by epigenetic alterations: this is favored by little or no activity of caretakers genes such as TP53 [64]. Among those epigenetic alterations, the influence of microenvironment through radiotherapy-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been established [12,65]. Indeed, ROS activity leads to variations in the concentration of metabolic intermediates that are essential for histones post-translational modification, thus modulating the chromatin compaction level and so, gene expression.
It is well known in the literature that H19 is functionally involved in the regulation of both SCs and CSCs. For instance, H19 is found to maintain hematopoietic SCs quiescence, a mechanism in favor of the SC state. Indeed, the differentially methylated region (DMR) upstream of H19 regulates the reciprocal expression of H19 from the maternal allele and Igf2 from the paternal allele. Deletion of the maternal but not the paternal H19-DMR alters hematopoietic SC quiescence and function [32]. Furthermore, H19 expression is negatively correlated with adipocyte differentiation; conversely, overexpression of H19 in bone marrow SCs prevents adipogenesis through post-translational inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs) 4-6 [34]. In prostate cancer, H19 overexpression has been positively correlated with the expression of the well-known stemness-related factors Oct4 and Sox2, and with cellular sphere-forming capacity [33] Furthermore, H19 expression has been shown to be higher in papillary thyroid CSCs enriched by sphere formation than in monolayer cells. Moreover, these spheroid cells are characterized by both enhanced expression of Nanog and Sox2 and reduced expression of differentiation markers. This suggests that H19 is able to promote the reprogramming process, leading to the increase of cellular stemness [57].
The long non-coding RNA H19 also participates to the maintenance of the CSC pool. For instance, microarray analysis showed an increased expression of H19 and the pluripotent transcriptional factors Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog in the bulk acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells compared to early progenitors [66]. In addition, our team recently highlighted a stem cell gene signature (Aldh1a1+; CD44+/CD24−) in breast tumors expressing higher H19. Moreover, these gene signatures were also associated with enhanced H19-derived miR-675 expression, suggesting a role for both H19 and miR-675 in the enrichment of breast CSCs [53].
However, many studies describe the involvement of H19 in reprogramming mainly through its role of miRNA sponge. Of interest, the above described loop regulation between H19 and LIN28 in the promotion of CSCs symmetric division is also involved in reprogramming: indeed, in patient lung cancer samples, there exists a positive correlation between H19 and LIN28 expressions, and further analysis showed an increase of LIN28 expression by H19. This is due to the sponging of miR-196b by H19, that normally supresses LIN28 mRNA translation. LIN28 expression allowed by H19 leads to the promotion of lung cancer cell proliferation [67]. Similarly, H19 has been found to sponge miR-3126-5p to allow the expression of ERβ receptor in papillary thyroid carcinoma, but also to sponge miR-193b in hepatocellular carcinoma, leading to the activation of MAPK1 and other oncogenes [57,68]. Furthermore, the complex regulation of miR-let-7 by H19 can be also found involved in breast CSC reprogramming, echoing the regulation loop involved in CSC (a)symmetric division (Figure 2). Under hypoxic condition (which reflects intra-tumoral conditions), the expression of both HIF-1α and H19 is enhanced. One of the downstream targets of HIF-1α is the PDK1 gene, that codes for a glycolytic enzyme. PDK1 protein promotes glycolysis in breast CSCs, which is demonstrated to maintain cellular stemness with enhanced expression of reprogramming factors (Oct4, Lin28), enhanced ALDH1 activity and sphere-forming capacity (Figure 2A). However, in this model, HIF-1α expression was repressed. Further analysis showed that HIF-1α mRNA possesses in its 3′ UTR sequence a miR-let-7 response element: let-7 was thus responsible for HIF-1α degradation and low stem-like phenotypes in breast cancer cells. The authors showed that H19 is able to sponge let-7 in order to overcome these effects, leading to the upregulation of HIF-1α and PDK1, contributing to breast CSC maintenance [69] (Figure 2A).
Still, in breast CSCs subpopulation, H19 enhances ALDH1 activity, clone-forming, and sphere-forming capacities. These phenomena involve once again the enhancing of reprogramming factor LIN28 expression. To induce LIN28 expression, H19 has to act as a competing endogenous RNA and sponge miR-let-7 (Figure 2B). However, it has been shown that LIN28 also suppresses let-7 production, and that H19 can be downregulated by its own target let-7 in breast cancer cells. The authors therefore hypothesized that a cellular accumulation of LIN28 can indirectly enhance H19 expression through inhibiting let-7 production. This highlights an interesting negative feedback loop involved in breast CSC maintenance. To reinforce this idea, this loop exhibits strong correlations in primary breast carcinomas [70]. In breast CSCs, the Wnt signaling pathway is strongly activated, leading to the enhanced expression of H19. Treatment of cells with Axitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in clinical trials, revealed that the inhibition of Wnt activity was associated with both inhibition of H19 expression and increase of asymmetric division rate [55]. However, in this model, Wnt signaling has been reported to be ‘‘naturally’ activated, as is H19 expression. Further analysis has uncovered a positive feedback loop between H19 expression and LIN28/let-7c axis. Indeed, Snail, a transcription factor involved in EMT, is able to indirectly promote miR-146a maturation through Wnt activity. In turn, miR-146a represses Wnt signaling activation through participating in the let-7c/Wnt/H19 feedback loop (Figure 2C). Thus, the mechanisms involving miR-146a/Wnt and let-7c/Wnt contribute to form a complex and precise feedback loop of the miR-146a/let-7c/Wnt cascade. This feedback loop regulates the downstream expression of both let-7c and H19: the balance between these actors will thus determine the functional status of breast CSCs [59].
As described above (Figure 1B), increased let-7 production by miR-146a leads to the degradation of LIN28, and the downstream inhibition of the Wnt pathway, which in turn regulates H19 expression [55,59] (Figure 2C). Thus, depending of the functional status of H19, this double regulation loop influences the CSC expansion. Sponging of let-7 by H19 has also been described in glioblastoma. In this model, the inhibition of let-7 leads to the enhanced expression of its target HMGA2, which acts as an oncogene in several cancers. Re-expression of HMGA2 enhances mesenchymal transition of glioblastoma and self-renewal of glioblastoma SCs. For further investigations, the authors used phenformin, a mitochondrial complex I inhibitor used to inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis of glioblastoma SCs. They showed that phenformin increases let-7 expression and thus represses H19-mediated stem-like phenotypes due to HMGA2 inhibition [71].
In other models such as hepatocellular carcinoma, H19 has been demonstrated to induce both stemness and EMT to accelerate invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Indeed, as described above, it is known that EMT plays an important role in both inducing CSC characteristics and promoting cellular resistance to treatment [72,73]. In this model, H19 sponges miR-193b, which will promote MAPK1 expression and de-repress several oncogenes like EGFR, KRAS, PTEN, and IGF1R. This is associated with enhanced expression of stemness genes such as Lin28, Sox2, Notch1, Nanog, and Oct4. All these events will thus trigger hepatocellular carcinoma progression and initiate the metastatic development [68]. The role of H19 in the balance between both epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes has also been shown by our team in the breast cancer model: thus, the mechanisms described in hepatocellular carcinoma could be transposed in the regulation of breast CSCs [74].

5. H19 Enhances Drug Resistance of CSCs

Drug resistance is a major cause of low recurrence-free survival in various cancers. Cancer cells chemoresistance is multifactorial: it involves key factors such as cell behavior and growth kinetics, tumor heterogeneity, physical obstacles, and tumor microenvironment. Applying theses therapeutic pressures to cancer cells can also lead to tumor functional and adaptive reorganization, in order to persist despite the treatment. Particularly, within the tumor, CSCs are inherently more resistant to chemotherapy treatments, and have been proven to contribute to cancer relapse. Indeed, both chemotherapy and radiotherapy may promote CSC self-renewal through cytokine production and DNA repair mechanisms [75,76,77]. This is mainly due to the responsibility of CSCs in tumor heterogeneity. Thus, a high cellular proportion expressing CSC markers is correlated to poor prognosis and low response to treatments [78,79].
In addition, much evidence shows that H19 is involved in drug resistance. Overexpression of H19 in many cancers is associated with acquired chemoresistance and cancer cell survival, involving various mechanisms of action such as oncogene expression, epigenetic gene silencing, enhanced cell proliferation, apoptosis inhibition, and metastasis [80,81,82,83]. Furthermore, links between H19, CSCs, and drug resistance have also been established. In prostate CSCs, H19 expression has been shown to promote both resistance to the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the induction of highly metastatic form of prostate cancer [66]. In glioblastoma, knockdown of H19 expression leads to decreased cellular proliferation and a higher apoptotic rate after induction by chemotherapy (temozolomide). This is accompanied by a downregulation of the CSC markers CD133, Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2, and thus the loss of glioblastoma cellular stemness. This is the proof that H19 expression reinforces both stemness and chemoresistance of glioblastoma cells [84]. Moreover, H19 is also associated with the stemness of colorectal cancer cells. High H19 expression rates are found in patient samples at different tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, and correlated with chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo after treatment with oxaliplatin. Indeed, H19 expression enhances the populations of ALDH1high cancer cells, the sphere-forming capacity of colorectal cancer cells, and the expression of pluripotency transcription factors Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2. In addition, resistance to oxaliplatin in H19 overexpressing cells has been reported to be further enhanced [85]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, MDR1 (multidrug resistance 1) and GST-π (glutathione S-transferase-π) high protein expression levels were detected in CD133+ CSCs, in association with an overexpression of H19. In these cell lines, H19 has been shown to affect the degree of oxidative stress by reducing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. In this model, inhibition of H19 expression reduces CD133+ CSC chemoresistance through the enhancement of ROS production, the promotion of cell apoptosis and the blocking of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway [86]. In liver CSCs, another non-coding RNA named CUDR (cancer up-regulated drug resistant) has been reported to confer cellular resistance to doxorubicin treatment [87]. Consequently, to its expression and activation after doxorubicin treatment, CUDR is able to increase both proliferation and malignant transformation of liver CSCs. This goes through the association of both cyclin D1 and PTEN in an inactive trimeric complex. PTEN knockdown leads to increase in the binding capacity of CUDR to cyclin D1, thus forming an active CUDR/cyclin D1 dimer that demethylates H19 promoter and the downstream increase of telomerase activity. However, H19 has been reported to regulate telomerase activity according to cell context, as H19 would rather function as a molecular chaperone promoting either the association or the dissociation of telomerase subunits (TERT and TERC) [88]. In any cases, the expression of H19 due to the demethylation of its promoter leads to the enhancement of liver CSC activity, and thus the tumor resistance to doxorubicine treatment. H19 expression will also influence the telomerase activity and thus the long-term self-renewal capacity of liver CSCs [37].

6. H19 Expression Is Propagated in the Tumor Micro-Environment to Promote Stemness

In addition to the maintenance of CSCs population, H19 is found to promote and spread cellular stemness within a tissue or an organism. To do so, a transport means is needed to propagate H19 within the extracellular environment. One of the possible options is the use of intercellular communication through extracellular vesicles, particularly the production of exosomes. Exosomes are a specific type of microvesicles produced in the endosomal compartment. They are characterized by their fusion with the cell surface to directly release their content (including proteins, lipids, and RNAs) in the extracellular medium [89]. Exosomes are present in many tissues and can also be found in blood. Moreover, they are also released in vitro by cultured cells into their growth medium [90].
Recently, exosomes released from cancer cells have been proposed to play a role in cancer progression. For example, exosomes are able to promote metastasis in initiating pre-metastatic niches in various cancers [91,92,93]. Furthermore, it has been shown that cancer cells and cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) can secrete exosomes [94,95]. According to their tumoral or stromal origin, those exosomes contribute to the crosstalk between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. In that manner, exosomes can be considered as critical intermediaries in tumor progression and metastasis.
Among the markers expressed by those exosomes, several molecules have been identified, including long non-coding RNAs like H19 (Figure 3). Indeed, H19 can act not only as an intrinsic factor, but can also act on neighboring cells. For instance, the involvement of the exosomes-derived expression of H19 has been demonstrated in specific phenomena and pathologies such as trophoblast cell invasion, diabetic foot ulcers, and chronic cholestatic liver diseases, supporting our idea that exosomal H19 can extend its action to surrounding cells [96,97,98]. In cancer models, it has been demonstrated that H19 expression is upregulated in non-small cells lung cancer, particularly in gefitinib-resistant cells. Moreover, in these cells, H19 is packaged into exosomes and secreted in the extracellular medium, to be then taken up by recipient cells and promote their gefitinib resistance [41].
Concerning the regulation of CSCs, it has been shown that colorectal cancer cells treated with conditioned medium derived from CAFs present an increase of sphere propagating capacity, cell viability, and activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. More importantly, H19 expression was found in CAFs-derived exosomes: this demonstrates the transport of H19 from cells to others through exosomes [85]. In other models such as liver cancer, exosomes isolated from CD90+ cells promoted angiogenic phenotype and cell adhesion. CD90+ liver cancer cells are described as cancer stem cell-like, characterized with aggressive and metastatic phenotype. Further analysis of exosomes content showed an enrichment in H19, and that H19 plays an major role in exosome-mediated phenotype of endothelial cells [99].
More importantly, it has been shown for bladder cancer diagnosis and prognosis that the concentration of circulating H19 was significantly higher in serum exosomes than in exosomes-depleted supernatants in serum or tissue samples. Moreover, exosomes H19 level was significantly increased in serum of bladder cancer patients when compared to healthy people or benign disease patients. Exosomes H19 level was also correlated with poor survival. The detection of serum exosomal H19 could thus be used as a new non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for bladder cancer patients [100]. Combined with the proof of CSC regulation by H19, this highlights the importance of exosomal transportation of H19 within the tumor.

7. Discussion

Both H19 and H19-derived miR-675 are overexpressed in human bone marrow mesenchymal SCs. In this model, the downregulation of H19 and miR-675 is correlated with the upregulation of IGFR1 (insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1) during neural differentiation [101]. miR-675 action in SCs is transposable in cancer as our team showed that miR-675 expression is associated with that of stem cell marker genes and that this miR is able to enhance stem-like phenotypes such as sphere-forming capacity [53]. From a clinical point of view, plasma levels of H19 have been highlighted as predictive markers for breast, stomach, and lung cancers, but also as a way to follow the evolution of cancers [102,103,104]. Interestingly, the clinically approved medicine aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is able to inhibit H19 expression and so repress expression of Oct4 and c-Myc in breast CSCs [69]. Similarly, H19 is overexpressed in papillary thyroid carcinoma cells through estradiol (E2); H19 overexpression is associated with increased stemness-related factors expression, increased ADLH+ population, and sphere forming capacity as well as enhanced tumor growth. In this model, aspirin attenuates E2-induced CSCs-like characteristics through decreasing both H19 and ERβ expression.
The accumulated data demonstrating the role of H19 and more recent findings of the involvement of miR-675 in CSC regulation complexify the regulatory network of CSCs (Figure 4). Further studies are warranted to verify if H19 and miR-675 could be used as new markers of CSCs and therapeutic targets in the medical care of patients.

Funding

This work was supported by INSERM and grants from ‘‘Cancéropôle Nord-Ouest (2017)’’ and ‘‘Ligue contre le cancer (2018)’’. CL and EP were supported by doctoral fellowships from the University of Lille.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of laboratory for helpful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Abbreviations

ADTAndrogen deprivation therapy
ALDHAldehyde dehydrogenase
BMPBone morphogenetic protein
CAFCancer-associated fibroblasts
CSCCancer stem cell
CUDRCancer up-regulated drug resistant
DMRDifferentially methylated region
EGFREpidermal growth factor receptor
EMTEpidermal-to-mesenchymal transition
ERβEstrogen receptor β
GST-πGlutathione S-transferase-π
HDACHistone deacetylase
HIF-1αHypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha
HMGA2High mobility group AT-hook 2
HSCHematopoietic stem cells
IGF1RInsulin-like growth factor 1 receptor
IGF2Insulin-like growth factor 2
IPSInduced-pluripotent cells
KRASV-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog
LncRNALong non-coding RNA
MDR1Multidrug resistance 1
miRNAMicroRNA
PDK1Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1
PRC2Polycomb repressive complex 2
PTENPhosphatase and tensin homolog
RBRetinoblastoma protein
ROSReactive oxygen species
RUNX1Runt-related transcription factor 1
SCStem cell
TNMTumor node metastasis

References

  1. Sugihara, E.; Saya, H. Complexity of cancer stem cells. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, X.; Fan, D. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells: Functional and mechanistic links. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mani, S.A.; Guo, W.; Liao, M.-J.; Eaton, E.N.; Ayyanan, A.; Zhou, A.Y.; Brooks, M.; Reinhard, F.; Zhang, C.C.; Shipitsin, M.; et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 2008, 133, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ye, X.; Tam, W.L.; Shibue, T.; Kaygusuz, Y.; Reinhardt, F.; Ng Eaton, E.; Weinberg, R.A. Distinct EMT programs control normal mammary stem cells and tumour-initiating cells. Nature 2015, 525, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Chaffer, C.L.; Marjanovic, N.D.; Lee, T.; Bell, G.; Kleer, C.G.; Reinhardt, F.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Young, R.A.; Weinberg, R.A. Poised chromatin at the ZEB1 promoter enables breast cancer cell plasticity and enhances tumorigenicity. Cell 2013, 154, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sciacovelli, M.; Frezza, C. Metabolic reprogramming and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 3132–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kreso, A.; Dick, J.E. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Eun, K.; Ham, S.W.; Kim, H. Cancer stem cell heterogeneity: Origin and new perspectives on CSC targeting. BMB Rep. 2017, 50, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hwang, J.W.; Desterke, C.; Féraud, O.; Richard, S.; Ferlicot, S.; Verkarre, V.; Patard, J.J.; Loisel-Duwattez, J.; Foudi, A.; Griscelli, F.; et al. iPSC-Derived Embryoid Bodies as Models of c-Met-Mutated Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, X.; Liao, R.; Li, D.; Sun, J. Induced cancer stem cells generated by radiochemotherapy and their therapeutic implications. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17301–17312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mukherjee, P.; Gupta, A.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Chatterji, U. Modulation of SOX2 expression delineates an end-point for paclitaxel-effectiveness in breast cancer stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lagadec, C.; Vlashi, E.; Donna, L.D.; Dekmezian, C.; Pajonk, F. Radiation-induced reprograming of breast cancer cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 833–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Counter, C.M.; Avilion, A.A.; LeFeuvre, C.E.; Stewart, N.G.; Greider, C.W.; Harley, C.B.; Bacchetti, S. Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 1921–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, N.; Piatyszek, M.; Prowse, K.; Harley, C.; West, M.; Ho, P.; Coviello, G.; Wright, W.; Weinrich, S.; Shay, J. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 1994, 266, 2011–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Wang, F.; Guan, Z.; Ge, Y.; Yang, X.; Cai, J. LncRNAs and their role in cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 110685–110692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rasmussen, T.P. Parallels between artificial reprogramming and the biogenesis of cancer stem cells: Involvement of lncRNAs. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019, 57, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, A.Q.; Ahmed, E.I.; Elareer, N.R.; Junejo, K.; Steinhoff, M.; Uddin, S. Role of miRNA-Regulated Cancer Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human Malignancies. Cells 2019, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kapranov, P.; Cheng, J.; Dike, S.; Nix, D.A.; Duttagupta, R.; Willingham, A.T.; Stadler, P.F.; Hertel, J.; Hackermüller, J.; Hofacker, I.L.; et al. RNA Maps Reveal New RNA Classes and a Possible Function for Pervasive Transcription. Science 2007, 316, 1484–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Qu, H.; Fang, X. A Brief Review on the Human Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) Project. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2013, 11, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. The ENCODE Project Consortium Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 2007, 447, 799–816. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hon, C.-C.; Ramilowski, J.A.; Harshbarger, J.; Bertin, N.; Rackham, O.J.L.; Gough, J.; Denisenko, E.; Schmeier, S.; Poulsen, T.M.; Severin, J.; et al. An atlas of human long non-coding RNAs with accurate 5′ ends. Nature 2017, 543, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wu, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.-L. The Diversity of Long Noncoding RNAs and Their Generation. Trends Genet. 2017, 33, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Quinn, J.J.; Chang, H.Y. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, Q.; Chen, Y. Long noncoding RNAs and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Investig. Aging 2016, 11, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Huang, X.; Luo, Y.; Mao, Y.; Ji, J. The link between long noncoding RNAs and depression. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 73, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mirza, A.H.; Kaur, S.; Pociot, F. Long non-coding RNAs as novel players in β cell function and type 1 diabetes. Hum. Genom. 2017, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bhan, A.; Soleimani, M.; Mandal, S.S. Long Noncoding RNA and Cancer: A New Paradigm. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3965–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bartolomei, M.S.; Zemel, S.; Tilghman, S.M. Parental imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Nature 1991, 351, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brannan, C.I.; Dees, E.C.; Ingram, R.S.; Tilghman, S.M. The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gabory, A.; Ripoche, M.-A.; Digarcher, A.L.; Watrin, F.; Ziyyat, A.; Forné, T.; Jammes, H.; Ainscough, J.F.X.; Surani, M.A.; Journot, L.; et al. H19 acts as a trans regulator of the imprinted gene network controlling growth in mice. Development 2009, 136, 3413–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhou, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Ma, Y.; Wen, X.; Hao, J.; Li, Z.; Ni, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Combined Single-Cell Profiling of lncRNAs and Functional Screening Reveals that H19 Is Pivotal for Embryonic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Development. Cell Stem Cell 2019, 24, 285–298.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Venkatraman, A.; He, X.C.; Thorvaldsen, J.L.; Sugimura, R.; Perry, J.M.; Tao, F.; Zhao, M.; Christenson, M.K.; Sanchez, R.; Yu, J.Y.; et al. Maternal-imprinting at H19-Igf2 locus maintains adult hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Nature 2013, 500, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bauderlique-Le Roy, H.; Vennin, C.; Brocqueville, G.; Spruyt, N.; Adriaenssens, E.; Bourette, R.P. Enrichment of Human Stem-Like Prostate Cells with s-SHIP Promoter Activity Uncovers a Role in Stemness for the Long Noncoding RNA H19. Stem Cells Dev. 2015, 24, 1252–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Huang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jin, C.; Li, X.; Jia, L.; Li, W. Long Non-coding RNA H19 Inhibits Adipocyte Differentiation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Epigenetic Modulation of Histone Deacetylases. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lecerf, C.; Le Bourhis, X.; Adriaenssens, E. The long non-coding RNA H19: An active player with multiple facets to sustain the hallmarks of cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 4673–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saito, K.; Kawakami, K.; Matsumoto, I.; Oda, M.; Watanabe, G.; Minamoto, T. Long Interspersed Nuclear Element 1 Hypomethylation Is a Marker of Poor Prognosis in Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 2418–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pu, H.; Zheng, Q.; Li, H.; Wu, M.; An, J.; Gui, X.; Li, T.; Lu, D. CUDR promotes liver cancer stem cell growth through upregulating TERT and C-Myc. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 40775–40798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berteaux, N.; Lottin, S.; Monté, D.; Pinte, S.; Quatannens, B.; Coll, J.; Hondermarck, H.; Curgy, J.-J.; Dugimont, T.; Adriaenssens, E. H19 mRNA-like Noncoding RNA Promotes Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation through Positive Control by E2F1. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 29625–29636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yang, F.; Bi, J.; Xue, X.; Zheng, L.; Zhi, K.; Hua, J.; Fang, G. Up-regulated long non-coding RNA H19 contributes to proliferation of gastric cancer cells. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 3159–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, T.; Shi, P.; Tian, X.; Guo, Y. Correlation between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) H19 expression and trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 15, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lei, Y.; Guo, W.; Chen, B.; Chen, L.; Gong, J.; Li, W. Tumor-released lncRNA H19 promotes gefitinib resistance via packaging into exosomes in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 3438–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Huang, Y.; Shen, X.; Jing, R.; Pu, J.; Wang, X.; Ju, S.; Cong, H.; et al. LncRNA H19 overexpression induces bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma by targeting MCL-1 via miR-29b-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Jia, P.; Cai, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, P.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, J.; Xue, Y. Long non-coding RNA H19 regulates glioma angiogenesis and the biological behavior of glioma-associated endothelial cells by inhibiting microRNA-29a. Cancer Lett. 2016, 381, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, W.-T.; Ye, H.; Wei, P.-P.; Han, B.-W.; He, B.; Chen, Z.-H.; Chen, Y.-Q. LncRNAs H19 and HULC, activated by oxidative stress, promote cell migration and invasion in cholangiocarcinoma through a ceRNA manner. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sun, J.; Lian, M.; Ma, H.; Wang, R.; Ma, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhai, J.; Meng, L.; Feng, L.; Bai, Y.; et al. Competing endogenous RNA network analysis of CD274, IL‑10 and FOXP3 co‑expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 3859–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, L.; Tian, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Du, C.; Xie, X.; Kornmann, M.; Yang, Y. The long noncoding RNA H19 promotes cell proliferation via E2F-1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2016, 17, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Luo, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Qiu, J. Long non-coding RNA H19 increases bladder cancer metastasis by associating with EZH2 and inhibiting E-cadherin expression. Cancer Lett. 2013, 333, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kallen, A.N.; Zhou, X.-B.; Xu, J.; Qiao, C.; Ma, J.; Yan, L.; Lu, L.; Liu, C.; Yi, J.-S.; Zhang, H.; et al. The Imprinted H19 LncRNA Antagonizes Let-7 MicroRNAs. Mol. Cell 2013, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cai, X.; Cullen, B.R. The imprinted H19 noncoding RNA is a primary microRNA precursor. RNA 2007, 13, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, G.; Xiang, T.; Wu, Q.-F.; Wang, W.-X. Long Noncoding RNA H19-Derived miR-675 Enhances Proliferation and Invasion via RUNX1 in Gastric Cancer Cells. Oncol. Res. Featur. Preclin. Clin. Cancer Ther. 2016, 23, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tsang, W.P.; Ng, E.K.O.; Ng, S.S.M.; Jin, H.; Yu, J.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Kwok, T.T. Oncofetal H19-derived miR-675 regulates tumor suppressor RB in human colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hernandez, J.M.; Elahi, A.; Clark, C.W.; Wang, J.; Humphries, L.A.; Centeno, B.; Bloom, G.; Fuchs, B.C.; Yeatman, T.; Shibata, D. miR-675 Mediates Downregulation of Twist1 and Rb in AFP-Secreting Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 20, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Peperstraete, E.; Lecerf, C.; Collette, J.; Vennin, C.; Raby, L.; Völkel, P.; Angrand, P.-O.; Winter, M.; Bertucci, F.; Finetti, P.; et al. Enhancement of Breast Cancer Cell Aggressiveness by lncRNA H19 and its Mir-675 Derivative: Insight into Shared and Different Actions. Cancers 2020, 12, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Morrison, S.J.; Kimble, J. Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 2006, 441, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Xiao, G.-D.; Zheng, X.-Q.; Wang, J.-C.; Xu, C.-W.; Qin, S.; Ren, H.; Tang, S.-C.; Sun, X. H19 regulation of oestrogen induction of symmetric division is achieved by antagonizing Let-7c in breast cancer stem-like cells. Cell Prolif. 2019, 52, e12534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Adriaenssens, E.; Lottin, S.; Dugimont, T.; Fauquette, W.; Coll, J.; Dupouy, J.P.; Boilly, B.; Curgy, J.J. Steroid hormones modulate H19 gene expression in both mammary gland and uterus. Oncogene 1999, 18, 4460–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, M.; Chai, H.-F.; Peng, F.; Meng, Y.-T.; Zhang, L.-Z.; Zhang, L.; Zou, H.; Liang, Q.-L.; Li, M.-M.; Mao, K.-G.; et al. Estrogen receptor β upregulated by lncRNA-H19 to promote cancer stem-like properties in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Balzeau, J.; Menezes, M.R.; Cao, S.; Hagan, J.P. The LIN28/let-7 Pathway in Cancer. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Liang, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Tang, S.-C.; Xiao, G.; Sun, X.; Li, G.; Du, N.; Liu, D.; Ren, H. MiR-146a promotes the asymmetric division and inhibits the self-renewal ability of breast cancer stem-like cells via indirect upregulation of Let-7. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Insinga, A.; Cicalese, A.; Faretta, M.; Gallo, B.; Albano, L.; Ronzoni, S.; Furia, L.; Viale, A.; Pelicci, P.G. DNA damage in stem cells activates p21, inhibits p53, and induces symmetric self-renewing divisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3931–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cicalese, A.; Bonizzi, G.; Pasi, C.E.; Faretta, M.; Ronzoni, S.; Giulini, B.; Brisken, C.; Minucci, S.; Di Fiore, P.P.; Pelicci, P.G. The Tumor Suppressor p53 Regulates Polarity of Self-Renewing Divisions in Mammary Stem Cells. Cell 2009, 138, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Rübe, C.E.; Fricke, A.; Widmann, T.A.; Fürst, T.; Madry, H.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Rübe, C. Accumulation of DNA Damage in Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells during Human Aging. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Yi, L.; Lu, C.; Hu, W.; Sun, Y.; Levine, A.J. Multiple roles of p53-related pathways in somatic cell reprogramming and stem cell differentiation. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5635–5645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Bigarella, C.L.; Liang, R.; Ghaffari, S. Stem cells and the impact of ROS signaling. Development 2014, 141, 4206–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Singh, N.; Padi, S.K.R.; Bearss, J.J.; Pandey, R.; Okumura, K.; Beltran, H.; Song, J.H.; Kraft, A.S.; Olive, V. PIM protein kinases regulate the level of the long noncoding RNA H19 to control stem cell gene transcription and modulate tumor growth. Mol. Oncol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ren, J.; Fu, J.; Ma, T.; Yan, B.; Gao, R.; An, Z.; Wang, D. LncRNA H19-elevated LIN28B promotes lung cancer progression through sequestering miR-196b. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ye, Y.; Guo, J.; Xiao, P.; Ning, J.; Zhang, R.; Liu, P.; Yu, W.; Xu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, J. Macrophages-induced long noncoding RNA H19 up-regulation triggers and activates the miR-193b/MAPK1 axis and promotes cell aggressiveness in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2020, 469, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Peng, F.; Wang, J.-H.; Fan, W.-J.; Meng, Y.-T.; Li, M.-M.; Li, T.-T.; Cui, B.; Wang, H.-F.; Zhao, Y.; An, F.; et al. Glycolysis gatekeeper PDK1 reprograms breast cancer stem cells under hypoxia. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1062–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Peng, F.; Li, T.-T.; Wang, K.-L.; Xiao, G.-Q.; Wang, J.-H.; Zhao, H.-D.; Kang, Z.-J.; Fan, W.-J.; Zhu, L.-L.; Li, M.; et al. H19/let-7/LIN28 reciprocal negative regulatory circuit promotes breast cancer stem cell maintenance. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Jiang, W.; Finniss, S.; Cazacu, S.; Xiang, C.; Brodie, Z.; Mikkelsen, T.; Poisson, L.; Shackelford, D.B.; Brodie, C. Repurposing phenformin for the targeting of glioma stem cells and the treatment of glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 56456–56470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. La Fleur, L.; Johansson, A.-C.; Roberg, K. A CD44high/EGFRlow Subpopulation within Head and Neck Cancer Cell Lines Shows an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Phenotype and Resistance to Treatment. PLoS ONE 2012, e44071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Morel, A.-P.; Lièvre, M.; Thomas, C.; Hinkal, G.; Ansieau, S.; Puisieux, A. Generation of breast cancer stem cells through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Adriaenssens, E.; Lottin, S.; Berteaux, N.; Hornez, L.; Fauquette, W.; Fafeur, V.; Peyrat, J.-P.; Le Bourhis, X.; Hondermarck, H.; Coll, J.; et al. Cross-Talk between Mesenchyme and Epithelium Increases H19 Gene Expression during Scattering and Morphogenesis of Epithelial Cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2002, 275, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Phillips, T.M.; McBride, W.H.; Pajonk, F. The Response of CD24 −/low /CD44 + Breast Cancer–Initiating Cells to Radiation. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 1777–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Li, X.; Lewis, M.T.; Huang, J.; Gutierrez, C.; Osborne, C.K.; Wu, M.-F.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Pavlick, A.; Zhang, X.; Chamness, G.C.; et al. Intrinsic Resistance of Tumorigenic Breast Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008, 100, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Maugeri-Sacca, M.; Bartucci, M.; De Maria, R. DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Cancer Stem Cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 1627–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Ginestier, C.; Hur, M.H.; Charafe-Jauffret, E.; Monville, F.; Dutcher, J.; Brown, M.; Jacquemier, J.; Viens, P.; Kleer, C.G.; Liu, S.; et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lagadec, C.; Vlashi, E.; Bhuta, S.; Lai, C.; Mischel, P.; Werner, M.; Henke, M.; Pajonk, F. Tumor cells with low proteasome subunit expression predict overall survival in head and neck cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Guo, G.; Kang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Tan, L.; Chen, J.-L. High expression of long non-coding RNA H19 is required for efficient tumorigenesis induced by Bcr-Abl oncogene. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 1780–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Zhu, Z.; Song, L.; He, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Zou, X. Ectopic expressed long non-coding RNA H19 contributes to malignant cell behavior of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 10082–10091. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, Q.; Cheng, N.; Li, X.; Pan, H.; Li, C.; Ren, S.; Su, C.; Cai, W.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, L.; et al. Correlation of long non-coding RNA H19 expression with cisplatin-resistance and clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 8, 2558–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Si, X.; Zang, R.; Zhang, E.; Liu, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, E.; Shao, L.; Li, A.; Yang, N.; Han, X.; et al. LncRNA H19 confers chemoresistance in ERα-positive breast cancer through epigenetic silencing of the pro-apoptotic gene BIK. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81452–81462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Li, W.; Jiang, P.; Sun, X.; Xu, S.; Ma, X.; Zhan, R. Suppressing H19 Modulates Tumorigenicity and Stemness in U251 and U87MG Glioma Cells. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 36, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ren, J.; Ding, L.; Zhang, D.; Shi, G.; Xu, Q.; Shen, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Hou, Y. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promote the stemness and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by transferring exosomal lncRNA H19. Theranostics 2018, 8, 3932–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ding, K.; Liao, Y.; Gong, D.; Zhao, X.; Ji, W. Effect of long non-coding RNA H19 on oxidative stress and chemotherapy resistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells via the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 502, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tsang, W.P.; Wong, T.W.L.; Cheung, A.H.H.; Co, C.N.N.; Kwok, T.T. Induction of drug resistance and transformation in human cancer cells by the noncoding RNA CUDR. RNA 2007, 13, 890–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. El Hajj, J.; Nguyen, E.; Liu, Q.; Bouyer, C.; Adriaenssens, E.; Hilal, G.; Ségal-Bendirdjian, E. Telomerase regulation by the long non-coding RNA H19 in human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Skog, J.; Wurdinger, T.; van Rijn, S.; Meijer, D.; Gainche, L.; Sena-Esteves, M.; Curry, W.T.; Carter, R.S.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Breakefield, X.O. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and protein that promote tumor growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hessvik, N.P.; Llorente, A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Peinado, H.; Alečković, M.; Lavotshkin, S.; Matei, I.; Costa-Silva, B.; Moreno-Bueno, G.; Hergueta-Redondo, M.; Williams, C.; García-Santos, G.; Nitadori-Hoshino, A.; et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Costa-Silva, B.; Aiello, N.M.; Ocean, A.J.; Singh, S.; Zhang, H.; Thakur, B.K.; Becker, A.; Hoshino, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hoshino, A.; Costa-Silva, B.; Shen, T.-L.; Rodrigues, G.; Hashimoto, A.; Tesic Mark, M.; Molina, H.; Kohsaka, S.; Di Giannatale, A.; Ceder, S.; et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 2015, 527, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Melo, S.A.; Sugimoto, H.; O’Connell, J.T.; Kato, N.; Villanueva, A.; Vidal, A.; Qiu, L.; Vitkin, E.; Perelman, L.T.; Melo, C.A.; et al. Cancer Exosomes Perform Cell-Independent MicroRNA Biogenesis and Promote Tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 707–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Sun, Z.; Yang, S.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, G.; Song, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Xia, K.; Chang, Y.; et al. Emerging role of exosome-derived long non-coding RNAs in tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chen, Y.; Ding, H.; Wei, M.; Zha, W.; Guan, S.; Liu, N.; Li, Y.; Tan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, F. MSC-Secreted Exosomal H19 Promotes Trophoblast Cell Invasion and Migration by Downregulating let-7b and Upregulating FOXO1. Mol. Nucleic Acids 2019, 19, 1237–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, B.; Luan, S.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhai, A.; Bi, C. The MSC-Derived Exosomal lncRNA H19 Promotes Wound Healing in Diabetic Foot Ulcers by Upregulating PTEN via MicroRNA-152-3p. Mol. Nucleic Acids 2019, 19, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liu, R.; Li, X.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, D.; Wang, X.; Gurley, E.C.; Liang, G.; Chen, W.; Lai, G.; et al. Cholangiocyte-Derived Exosomal Long Noncoding RNA H19 Promotes Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation and Cholestatic Liver Fibrosis. Hepatology 2019, 70, 1317–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Conigliaro, A.; Costa, V.; Lo Dico, A.; Saieva, L.; Buccheri, S.; Dieli, F.; Manno, M.; Raccosta, S.; Mancone, C.; Tripodi, M.; et al. CD90+ liver cancer cells modulate endothelial cell phenotype through the release of exosomes containing H19 lncRNA. Mol. Cancer 2015, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, J.; Yang, K.; Yuan, W.; Gao, Z. Determination of Serum Exosomal H19 as a Noninvasive Biomarker for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 9307–9316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Farzi-Molan, A.; Babashah, S.; Bakhshinejad, B.; Atashi, A.; Taha, M.F. Down-regulation of the non-coding RNA H19 and its derived miR-675 is concomitant with up-regulation of insulin-like growth factor receptor type 1 during neural-like differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2018, 42, 940–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhang, K.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, L.; Liu, L.; Yang, J.; Song, X.; Liu, J. Circulating lncRNA H19 in plasma as a novel biomarker for breast cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2016, 17, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhou, X.; Yin, C.; Dang, Y.; Ye, F.; Zhang, G. Identification of the long non-coding RNA H19 in plasma as a novel biomarker for diagnosis of gastric cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Luo, J.; Li, Q.; Pan, J.; Li, L.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Y. Expression level of long noncoding RNA H19 in plasma of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and its clinical significance. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 14, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The long non-coding RNA H19 promotes symmetric division of cancer stem cells (CSCs). (A) The activation of ERβ by the binding of its ligand (estradiol; E2) enhances H19 expression, thus favoring miR-3126-5p sponging. H19 can in turn promote ERβ to generate an activation loop [55,57]. (B) In breast CSCs, H19 sponges let-7c and allows the de-repression of LIN28. The functional status and symmetric/asymmetric division of CSCs will thus be determined by the balance between H19 and let-7 expressions [55,59]. (C) It has been shown that H19 sequesters p53 to inhibit its activity and enhance gastric cancer cells proliferation [39]. Moreover, inactivation of p53 is associated with symmetric division of SCs [61]. We can thus hypothesize that H19 could inactivate p53 to promote CSCs symmetric division.
Figure 1. The long non-coding RNA H19 promotes symmetric division of cancer stem cells (CSCs). (A) The activation of ERβ by the binding of its ligand (estradiol; E2) enhances H19 expression, thus favoring miR-3126-5p sponging. H19 can in turn promote ERβ to generate an activation loop [55,57]. (B) In breast CSCs, H19 sponges let-7c and allows the de-repression of LIN28. The functional status and symmetric/asymmetric division of CSCs will thus be determined by the balance between H19 and let-7 expressions [55,59]. (C) It has been shown that H19 sequesters p53 to inhibit its activity and enhance gastric cancer cells proliferation [39]. Moreover, inactivation of p53 is associated with symmetric division of SCs [61]. We can thus hypothesize that H19 could inactivate p53 to promote CSCs symmetric division.
Cells 09 02613 g001
Figure 2. The balance between H19 and let-7 expression controls the reprogramming of non-CSCs into CSCs. (A) Under hypoxic conditions HIF-1α expression is enhanced. Combined with the sponging of let-7 by H19, this leads to the enhanced expression of PDK1, which will in turn promote glycogenesis and expression of stemness phenotype [69]. (B) In breast and lung cancers, H19 enhances the expression of the reprogramming factor LIN28 through the sponging of let-7 and miR-196b respectively [67,69]. (C) In breast cancer, the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway increases miR-146a production, which in turn promotes let-7 expression and so, the inhibition of reprogramming factors [55,59].
Figure 2. The balance between H19 and let-7 expression controls the reprogramming of non-CSCs into CSCs. (A) Under hypoxic conditions HIF-1α expression is enhanced. Combined with the sponging of let-7 by H19, this leads to the enhanced expression of PDK1, which will in turn promote glycogenesis and expression of stemness phenotype [69]. (B) In breast and lung cancers, H19 enhances the expression of the reprogramming factor LIN28 through the sponging of let-7 and miR-196b respectively [67,69]. (C) In breast cancer, the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway increases miR-146a production, which in turn promotes let-7 expression and so, the inhibition of reprogramming factors [55,59].
Cells 09 02613 g002
Figure 3. The long non-coding RNA H19 disseminates into extracellular environment through exosomes, propagating its action in both normal and cancer cells.
Figure 3. The long non-coding RNA H19 disseminates into extracellular environment through exosomes, propagating its action in both normal and cancer cells.
Cells 09 02613 g003
Figure 4. The long non-coding RNA H19 promotes cancer stem cells phenotypes. H19 is expressed by cancer stem cells and is exported to the extracellular medium through exosomes [85]. H19 is then captured and internalized by surrounding cells. Within those cells, H19 can act in different ways: H19 can be translocated into the nucleus where it sponges miRNAs such as let-7. This allows the expression of reprogrammation factors and promotes stemness phenotypes [70]. In addition, H19 can regulate the activity of factors such as p53 in order to promote symmetric division of CSCs [39,61]. Downstream, all these mechanisms will lead to the promotion of stem cells phenotype (symmetric division, reprogramming) in order to progress in the tumoral development and to reinforce CSCs’ resistance to therapies. Illustrations of this figure are from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/).
Figure 4. The long non-coding RNA H19 promotes cancer stem cells phenotypes. H19 is expressed by cancer stem cells and is exported to the extracellular medium through exosomes [85]. H19 is then captured and internalized by surrounding cells. Within those cells, H19 can act in different ways: H19 can be translocated into the nucleus where it sponges miRNAs such as let-7. This allows the expression of reprogrammation factors and promotes stemness phenotypes [70]. In addition, H19 can regulate the activity of factors such as p53 in order to promote symmetric division of CSCs [39,61]. Downstream, all these mechanisms will lead to the promotion of stem cells phenotype (symmetric division, reprogramming) in order to progress in the tumoral development and to reinforce CSCs’ resistance to therapies. Illustrations of this figure are from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/).
Cells 09 02613 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lecerf, C.; Peperstraete, E.; Le Bourhis, X.; Adriaenssens, E. Propagation and Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells: A Major Influence of the Long Non-Coding RNA H19. Cells 2020, 9, 2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122613

AMA Style

Lecerf C, Peperstraete E, Le Bourhis X, Adriaenssens E. Propagation and Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells: A Major Influence of the Long Non-Coding RNA H19. Cells. 2020; 9(12):2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122613

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lecerf, Clément, Evodie Peperstraete, Xuefen Le Bourhis, and Eric Adriaenssens. 2020. "Propagation and Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells: A Major Influence of the Long Non-Coding RNA H19" Cells 9, no. 12: 2613. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9122613

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop