Next Article in Journal
The Network of Angiotensin Receptors in Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Profiling of Plasma and Erythrocytes in Sickle Mice Points to Altered Nociceptive Pathways
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/cells9061335
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration after Optic Nerve Transection is Driven by Cellular Intravitreal Sciatic Nerve Grafts

by
Zubair Ahmed
*,
Ellen L. Suggate
,
Ann Logan
and
Martin Berry
Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2020, 9(6), 1335; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061335
Submission received: 30 April 2020 / Revised: 25 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 27 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Cells of the Nervous System)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neurotrophic factors (NTF) secreted by Schwann cells in a sciatic nerve (SN) graft promote retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon regeneration after either transplantation into the vitreous body of the eye or anastomosis to the distal stump of a transected optic nerve. In this study, we investigated the neuroprotective and growth stimulatory properties of SN grafts in which Schwann cells had been killed (acellular SN grafts, ASN) or remained intact (cellular SN grafts, CSN). We report that both intravitreal (ivit) implanted and optic nerve anastomosed CSN promote RGC survival and when simultaneously placed in both sites, they exert additive RGC neuroprotection. CSN and ASN were rich in myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and axon growth-inhibitory ligand common to both the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) myelin. The penetration of the few RGC axons regenerating into an ASN at an optic nerve transection (ONT) site is limited into the proximal perilesion area, but is increased >2-fold after ivit CSN implantation and increased 5-fold into a CSN optic nerve graft after ivit CSN implantation, potentiated by growth disinhibition through the regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) of p75NTR (the signalling trans-membrane moiety of the nogo-66 trimeric receptor that binds MAG and associated suppression of RhoGTP). Mϋller cells/astrocytes become reactive after all treatments and maximally after simultaneous ivit and optic nerve CSN/ASN grafting. We conclude that simultaneous ivit CSN plus optic nerve CSN support promotes significant RGC survival and axon regeneration into CSN optic nerve grafts, despite being rich in axon growth inhibitory molecules. RGC axon regeneration is probably facilitated through RIP of p75NTR, which blinds axons to myelin-derived axon growth-inhibitory ligands present in optic nerve grafts.

1. Introduction

Axons readily regrow in the damaged peripheral nervous system (PNS) but fail to do so in the injured central nervous system (CNS). This differential injury response is attributed to the presence in the PNS of neurotrophic factors (NTFs) derived from Schwann cells [1,2,3] and the growth compatible substrate of their laminin-rich basal lamina tubes and, in the injured CNS, to a lack of NTF support and the presence of axon growth-inhibitory ligands. The latter comprise molecules released from meningeal fibroblasts migrating into the incipient scar, reactive astrocytes, and degraded CNS myelin. Paradoxically, the potent axon growth-inhibitory ligands, chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan (CSPG), and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), are components of PNS extracellular matrix (ECM) and myelin, respectively [4,5,6] which, after binding to GT1b [7] and/or the Nogo-66 receptor (NgR1) [8], signal axon growth collapse through p75NTR transmembrane NgR1 co-receptor activation of the RhoGTP/LIMK/cofilin pathway [9].
The failure of PNS CSPG/MAG to inhibit regeneration may be explained by the efficient removal of ECM/myelin debris by macrophages and Schwann cells [10,11,12], supported by the observation that axon growth inhibition in the PNS has been overcome by degrading CSPG with chondroitinase ABC treatment [13]. The possibility that Schwann cell basal lamina tube laminin may override the growth inhibitory activity of MAG and both Schwann cell-derived matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-2 degradation of PNS inhibitors [14] and NTF-induced activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway [15,16,17,18] may all lead to inactivation of down-stream glycogen synthase kinase (GSK3)-β and the triggering of regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) of the p75NTR/NgR1 signalling co-receptor [19,20], thereby protecting against axon growth cone collapse and preserving their mobility.
Although PNS axons readily regenerate into cellular sciatic nerve (SN) (CSN) grafts, they grow sparingly and for very short distances into acellular SN (ASN) grafts [21,22,23] and in-growth failure persists after blocking Schwann proliferation in the proximal PNS stump [21]. Nonetheless, PNS axons do enter ASN grafts after the removal of CSPG/MAG-rich debris by Schwann cells and macrophages; however, pre-degeneration before freeze–thawing of the SN promotes some axon regeneration into ASN [14,24], suggesting that inhibitory ligands are preserved in ASN. Moreover, repopulation of ASN by Schwann cells after migration from the proximal peripheral nerve (PN) stump [21,25,26], or pre-seeding in culture [27] or sub-perineural injection [28] promotes entry of PNS axons; observations that support the concept that Schwann cells are leaders not followers of PNS axons regenerating into Schwann cell basal lamina tubes [25,29,30].
Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons regenerate into CSN but not ASN grafts anastomosed to the proximal optic nerve stump after optic nerve transection (ONT) [31,32,33]. Similarly, RGC axons regenerate across an optic nerve crush site after intravitreal (ivit) CSN but not ivit ASN implantation [34,35,36]. Interestingly, RGC neuroprotective factors are released from both CSN and ASN at ONT sites and promote RGC survival after retrograde transport to RGC [32]. RGC axons are probably attracted into the basal lamina tubes of CSN by NTF secreted by resident Schwann cells [1] and readily elongate over their plasmalemma and the laminin rich inner basal lamina tube surface [37,38,39]. Whereas failure of RGC axons to enter ASN grafts may be explained by an absence of Schwann cell-derived NTF and the persistence of CSPG/MAG inhibitory ligands, i.e., the constitution of ASN is essentially similar to that of the optic nerve through which axons also will not grow after injury. In this study, we tested this hypothesis by evaluating the growth of RGC axons into ASN grafted onto a proximal optic nerve stump after ivit CSN implantation, predicting that CSN-derived NTF will induce disinhibited growth of RGC axons into the inhibitory environment of an ASN graft, as they do through an optic nerve crush site [19,20,32]. We also investigated the RGC neuroprotective properties of ASN by comparing their neurotrophic potency as ivit as well as optic nerve grafts and evaluate the contribution of reactive Mϋller cells/astrocytes and macrophages to these responses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

We used adult male Fischer rats (Charles River, Maidstone, UK) weighing 170–250 g for all experiments in this study. Animals were fed a commercial diet and water ad libitum under controlled conditions (22 ± 2 °C, 55% ± 5% humidity, and a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle). All surgical procedures were licensed by the UK Home Office and approved by the University of Birmingham’s Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (PPL: 70/08542; date of approval: 12/03/2015). All animal surgeries were carried out in strict accordance with the guidelines of the UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act, 1986, the Revised European Directive 1010/63/EU, and conformed to the guidelines and recommendations of the use of animals by the Federation of the European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). Every effort was made to reduce the number of animals employed and to minimize animal discomfort. Pre- and post-operative analgesia was used as standard and with guidance from the named veterinary surgeon.

2.2. Experimental Design

All animals were randomly assigned to experimental groups with the experimenter masked to the treatment conditions. The optic nerve of adult male Fischer rats was crushed bilaterally [20,34,35,40,41,42,43] and CSN and ASN implanted ivit and/or anastomosed to the cut end of the transected optic nerve to study their effects on RGC survival and axon regeneration. Unless otherwise stated, experimental groups comprised 8 rats in each group (i.e., 16 optic nerves and 16 retinae/group): (i), after Sterispon (S) plugging of a scleral incision through the retina into the vitreous body—sham ivit implantation group (Control (CON)/ivitS/ONT); (ii) an ASN was implanted ivit immediately after ONT—ivitASN/ONT group; (iii) after sham ivit implantation, an ASN was anastomosed to the proximal ONT site—ivitS/ONTASN group; (iv), an ASN was implanted ivit immediately after ONT and an ASN was anastomosed to the proximal ONT site—ivitASN/ONTASN group; (v), a CSN was grafted ivit immediately after ONT—ivitCSN/ONT group; (vi), a CSN was implanted ivit after ONT and an ASN graft anastomosed to the proximal ONT stump—ivitCSN/ONTASN group; (vii), an ASN was implanted ivit and a CSN graft immediately anastomosed to the proximal ONT stump—ivitASN/ONTASN group; (viii), a CSN was implanted ivit and also immediately anastomosed to the proximal ONT stump—ivitCSN/ONTCSN group. Uninjured rats were used to control for baseline parameters where indicated—intact groups (Figure 1). Optic nerves and retinae were processed for immunohistochemistry and western blot at 21 days after surgery, as described below.

2.3. Preparation of Sciatic Nerve (SN) Grafts

All grafts were prepared from adult Fischer rat SN segments from which the lumbar dorsal and ventral roots rostrally and the distal nerve branches from the origin of the peroneal nerve caudally were removed. SN segments for anastomosis to the proximal ONT stump were prepared from 5 mm lengths which either remained intact as CSN or were freeze/thawed x3 to kill all Schwann cells as ASN, as described by us [44]. For ivit implantation, 2 mm lengths of CSN and ASN were prepared as pellets by teasing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
After immunohistochemistry with the antibody marker p75NTR for Schwann cells and laminin for Schwann cell basal lamina tubes (Table 1), we confirmed that p75NTR+ Schwann cells, with typical spindle morphology, were abundant in CSN (Figure S1A) but absent in ASN (Figure S1B) at 21 days after surgery, and that Schwann cell laminin+ basal lamina tubes were preserved in both CSN and ASN (Figure S1C,D, respectively).

2.4. Surgery

Details of the grafting and optic nerve surgery are given by us previously [32,33,34]. Briefly, ivit implantation of CSN and ASN pellets was performed by an intra-orbital approach through the upper lid. A vertical 1 mm incision in the superior hemi-scleral surface allowed insertion through the retina into the vitreous body of the grafts which were retained by absorbable gelatin sponge (Sterispon, Allen and Hanbury, London, UK) plugs. For anastomosis of 5 mm long CSN and ASN to ONT, the optic nerve was transected 2 mm from the lamina cribrosa and grafts sutured to the proximal cut end of the optic nerve with 10/0 resorbable sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA). For intra-orbital ONT, the optic nerve was exposed through the upper lid, transected, within the dural sheath 2 mm from the lamina cribrosa and the cut ends sutured with 10/0 resorbable sutures (Ethicon).

2.5. Fluorogold (FG) Labelling, Retinal Wholemounts, and Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Counting

RGC were retrogradely labelled with FG (Cambridge Bioscience, Cambridge, UK) by injecting 2 μL of a 4% FG solution into the optic nerve, proximal to the ONT site, 48 h before enucleation [34,35,42,43]. Retinae (n = 16/group) were immersion-fixed for 2 h in 4% formaldehyde (TAAB Laboratories, Berkshire, UK), adhered onto Superfrost Plus microscope slides (VWR international, Leicestershire, UK) as whole mounts and cover slipped in Vectashield fluorescent mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). Retinae were randomized and examined using an epifluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Hertfordshire, UK) and photographed with an AxioCam HRc digital camera controlled by Axiovision 4 software (all from Zeiss). FG+ RGC were counted using the automated function in ImagePro Software, version 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, USA) from images of 12 rectangular areas (0.36 × 0.24 mm), 3 from each quadrant of each retina, placed at standard radial distances from the centre of the optic disc at the inner (1/6 eccentricity), mid-periphery (1/2 eccentricity), and peripheral retina (5/6 eccentricity) and RGC densities computed as mean RGC density/mm2 (n = 8 rats/group, 16 retinae/group) [41].

2.6. Tissue Harvesting, Sectioning, and Immunohistochemistry

Animals were killed by CO2 overdose followed by perfusion fixation with 4% formaldehyde (TAAB Laboratories) [42,43]. Eyes and optic nerves were removed and immersed in 4% formaldehyde before cryoprotection in graded concentrations of sucrose (10%, 20%, and 30% in PBS). Tissues were embedded in OCT embedding medium (R.A. Lamb Laboratory Supplies, Eastbourne, UK) and stored at −80 °C until required. Parasagittal sections of eyes and longitudinal sections of the optic nerve (both 15 μm thick) were cut on a cryostat (Bright Instrument Company, Huntingdon, UK) and adhered onto Superfrost® Plus electrostatically charged microscope slides (VWR International), air-dried and stored at −20 °C until required.
After thawing at room temperature for 30 min, at least 6 sections/rat/antibody, from equivalent areas of the eye globe (n = 8 rats/group (i.e., 16 retinae/group)) were washed 2× in PBS, permeabilized in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, washed 3× in PBS and blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) in PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T-BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight (16–18 h) at 4 °C with the relevant primary antibody (Table 1) diluted in PBS-T-BSA. For fluorescent immunohistochemistry, sections were washed 3× in PBS and incubated with relevant fluorescent Alexa 488 or Texas Red-labelled fluorescent secondary antibodies (Table 1) before washing 3× in PBS and mounting in Vectashield fluorescent mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Controls including sections incubated with primary antibody omitted were included in each run and were used to set the background threshold before image capture.
For immunodetection using the 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate, sections were incubated overnight in primary antibody, washed, and incubated with HRP-labelled secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing in PBS 3×, sections were incubated in Avidin-Biotin complex (Vector Laboratories) for 30 min, followed by 3× washes in PBS. Immuno-positive staining was developed for 3 min using the DAB substrate (Vector Laboratories). Sections were then washed in PBS, followed by tap water, dehydrated through a graded series of alcohols, cleared in Histoclear, and mounted in Vectamount medium (Vector Laboratories) and images captured using AxioCam HRc and Axiovision 4 software attached to either a fluorescent or light microscope (all from Zeiss).

2.7. Evaluation of Müller Cell/Astrocyte and Macrophage Responses

Müller cell/astrocyte activation was monitored using immunohistochemistry for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as described above (Table 1). Müller cell activation was quantified in GFAP stained retinal sections as described previously [42]. Briefly, a 250 µm long sampling line set orthogonal to the radial plane through the middle of the inner plexiform layer was used to count the number of GFAP+ Müller cell processes and mean counts were then calculated for each condition (n = 3 retinal sections/rat/condition (n = 8 rats/group (i.e., 24 retinal sections/group)) and expressed as mean ± SEM.
Macrophage responses to the various grafting paradigms were assessed in retinal and ONT grafting sites using ED1 (Table 1) as a marker.

2.8. Detection of Regenerating Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Axons

2.8.1. Anterograde Tracing

Rhodamine B (RhB, Sigma, Poole, UK) (5 μL of a 2% solution diluted in 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)) was injected into the vitreous body 48 h before optic nerve harvesting at 21 days. Animals (n = 6 rats/group (i.e., 12 optic nerves/group)) were killed by CO2 overdose, perfusion fixed in 4% formaldehyde (TAAB Laboratories) and their optic nerve cryoprotected in a graded series of sucrose, embedded in OCT (R.A. Lamb) and 15 μm thick longitudinal sections cut on a cryostat, as described above. Optic nerve sections were then washed 2× in PBS, mounted using Vectashield fluorescent mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and RhB+ axons visualized using an epifluorescent microscope (Zeiss).

2.8.2. Growth-Associated Protein 43 (GAP43) Immunohistochemistry

Longitudinal optic nerve sections were washed 2× in PBS, blocked in PBS-T-BSA for 1 h, and incubated with primary GAP43 antibody overnight (Table 1). Sections were then washed 3× in PBS and incubated with Alexa 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature before washing 3× in PBS and mounting in Vectashield fluorescent mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Scarring at the ONT site was monitored by exposing GAP43-stained sections to GFAP and laminin antibodies and processing as above.

2.9. Quantification of Axon Regeneration

Regenerating GAP43+ or RhB traced axons were counted in optic nerve sections using previously published methods [45,46]. GAP43+ axons were counted at 400, 800, and 1200 μm distal to the ONT sites in 4 longitudinal optic nerve sections (n = 8 rats/group (i.e., 16 optic nerves/group)). The diameter (d) of each optic nerve at the 3 specific counting sites (d1, 2, 3) was also measured using Axiovision Software (Zeiss) and the number of axons/mm of optic nerve width calculated. The average total number of axons (Σad1,2,3) in the optic nerve of radius r, extending a distance d calculated by summing over all sections of thickness t (15 μm):
Σad1, 2, 3 = πr2 × (average number of axons/mm width)/(section thickness (0.015 mm))

2.10. Separation of Retina and Vitreous Body for RNA Isolation and Oncomodulin PCR

The vitreous body was isolated before RNA extraction and qPCR for oncomodulin as described previously [47]. Briefly, retinae together with their vitreous bodies were isolated, quickly flat-mounted on nitrocellulose filters, transferred to Whatman filter paper. The vitreous body sticking on top of the retina was carefully separated from the retina and transferred to an Eppendorf tube before RNA extraction using the RNeasy-kit (Qiagen, Watford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Oncomodulin expression was quantified using the Synergy Brands (SYBR) green reverse transcription (RT) PCR using the LightCycler instrument. Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA from each vitreous was reverse transcribed and the cDNA amplified with specific primers for 50 cycles according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All reactions were performed in duplicate using n = 4 independent samples/group/condition (from n = 4 different eyes). Quantitative analysis was performed using the LightCycler software and the specificity of the PCR products in each analysis was verified with the melting-curve analysis feature of LightCycler software. Two different sets of primers were used for OM gene amplification: custom made primers, Rn_Ocm_1_SG QuantiTect® and GAPDH_RN_Gapd_1 SG QuantiTect® (Qiagen); and a second set, 5′-AAGACCCAGACACCTTTGAAC-3′ and 5′-GAACTTCTGTAGGAAATACTTGAGC-3′. Rat Morris-hepatoma cells (ATCC CRL-1601), which we confirmed to express high levels of oncomodulin, were used as a positive control.

2.11. Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) mRNA Expression and ELISA in Retinae

Total RNA from retinae (n = 4 retinae/group) was extracted as described above and subjected to qRT-PCR using a pre-validated rat CNTF primers (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat no. 4331182, Rn00755092_m1). Rat GAPDH primers were used as controls (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat no. 4331182, Rn01775763_g1).
After extraction of total protein by homogenization in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 1% NP-40, all from Sigma), a CNTF ELISA kit was used to determine the concentration of CNTF in retinal lysates, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems Europe, Abingdon, UK).

2.12. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Animals were killed by CO2 overdose, retinae/optic nerves immediately harvested, and total protein extracted by homogenization in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 1% NP-40, all from Sigma). Samples were normalized for protein content using a colorimetric DC protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK), resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and processed for western blotting as previously described [41,42,43]. Western blots were probed overnight at 4 °C with relevant antibodies (Table 1) and bands stained with an appropriate HRP-labelled secondary antibody (Table 1) (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL) (GE Healthcare). Western blots were stripped and probed with a rabbit monoclonal antibody to GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 1:1000 dilution and used as a loading control.

2.13. Evaluation of Neurite Outgrowth Inhibior-A (Nogo-A), Nogo-C, Myelin Associated Glyocprotein (MAG), and Chondroitin Sulphate Proteoglycan (CSPG) Content of Optic Nerve, CSN, and ASN

Nogo-A, Nogo-C, MAG, and CSPG content of optic nerves, CSN, and ASN were analysed by Western blot using tissues lysates exposed to specific antibodies (Table 1). Blots (n = 3/sample, 3 independent repeats) were then quantified by densitometry as described later.

2.14. Rho Activation Assay

GTP bound Rho was detected using a Rho activation assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Upstate Biotechnology, Milton Keynes, UK) and as described by us previously (e.g., [20,41,42,48].

2.15. Densitometry

Western blots were quantified by densitometry after scanning blots into Adobe Photoshop as TIFF files and analysed using built-in gel plotting macros in ImageJ (NIH, Maryland, USA), as described by us previously (e.g., [20,41,42,43]) and the integrated densities of relevant bands calculated from 3 separate blots from 3 independent experiments.

2.16. Statistical Analysis

Significant differences between sample means were calculated using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., Version 4.0, CA, San Diego, USA) by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc testing with Dunnett’s method. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Survival

Details of the RGC counts at 21 d after grafting are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2A,B. (i), After ivit grafting: RGC numbers declined significantly by ~90% in the CON/ivitS/ONT group to 11% of the value of the Intact controls and did not recover in the ivitASN/ONT (9%) implying that ivitASN grafts are not neuroprotective. By contrast, ivitCSN/ONT implants were ~25% RGC neuroprotective. (ii), After optic nerve grafting: Only 13% RGC survived in the ivitS/ONTASN group, not significantly different from CON/ivitS/ONT group values, although significant RGC neuroprotection of 15% was recorded in the ivitS/ONTCSN group. (iii) After both ivit and optic nerve grafting: The greatest RGC neuroprotection of ~58% was achieved in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group, i.e., >50% RGC survival compared to the numbers of RGC surviving after ivitCSN/ONT (25%) and ivitS/ONTCSN (15%), suggesting that combined ivitCSN/ONTCSN grafting had a synergistic effect on RGC survival. Whereas, in the ivitCSN/ONTASN group, RGC survival was similar to that seen in the ivitCSN/ONT (28% and 25%, respectively), indicating that combined ivitCSN/ONTASN grafting had no additive effect above that offered by single ivitCSN grafting. These results suggest that ivitCSN grafts promote significant RGC survival after ONT whilst a combination of ivitCSN/ONTCSN is additive and promotes the survival of 58% of RGC.

3.2. The Effect of Cellular (CSN) and Acellular Sciatic Nerve (ASN) Grafts on Müller Cell/astrocyte Activation at 21 Days After Grafting

(i), Controls: In the CON/intact group, GFAP+ staining was restricted to astrocyte and Müller cell end-feet in the fibre layer and ganglion cell layer (GCL); no GFAP+ Müller cell processes were seen in the retina (Figure 3A,J). In the CON/ivitS/ONT group there was muted but significant (p < 0.001) generalized retinal glia reactivity, which became more intense at the scarred sham implantation site where no Sterispon remained compared to CON/intact groups (Figure 3B,J). (ii), optic nerve grafts: The level of GFAP+ Müller cell/astrocyte activation in the ivitS/ONTASN (Figure 3C,J) and ivitS/ONTCSN groups (Figure 3D,J) was similar to that in the CON/ivitS/ONT group. (iii), Ivit grafts: In the ivitASN/ONT group (Figure 3E,J), Müller cell/astrocyte activation was similar to that observed for CON/ivitS/ONT and other groups of animals receiving optic nerve grafts; however, in the ivitCSN/ONT (Figure 3F,J) and ivitCSN/ONTASN (Figure 3G,J) groups there was a significant increase (1.8-fold; p < 0.0001) in Müller cell/astrocyte activation compared to CON/ivitS/ONT or other groups of animals receiving ON grafts. Müller cell/astrocyte activation in the ivitASN/ONTCSN group (Figure 3H,J) was not significantly different to CON/ivitS/ONT or other groups of animals receiving ON grafts but in ivitCSN/ONTCSN (Figure 3I,J) groups there was a significant (p < 0.0001) >1.6-fold increase in Müller cell/astrocyte activation over the entire retina compared ivitCSN/ONT and ivitCSN/ONTASN groups.
The switch to axon regeneration in RGC to lens injury was closely correlated with Müller cell/astrocyte activation and injury-induced stimulation and release of CNTF from retinal glia were shown to switch mature RGCs to a regenerate state [47]. In our injury paradigms, there was a slight increase in CNTF mRNA in the retina in CON/ivitS/ONT and in ivitASN paradigms but a significant increase in all ivitCSN paradigms over the first seven days (Figure S2).
These results indicate that ivitCSN grafts induce greater levels of Müller cell/astrocyte activation throughout the retina compared to optic nerve grafts, with the greatest levels of Müller cells/astrocyte activation observed with simultaneous ivitCSN/ONTCSN grafts. The levels of CNTF mRNA also correlates with these increases in Müller cell/astrocyte activation in the ivitCSN group.

3.3. Macrophage Activation after Grafting

(i), Controls: No ED1+ macrophages were present in the retinae/vitreous bodies of CON/intact (Figure 4A). In the CON/ivitS/ONT group a few macrophages were seen in the retina at the sham implantation site where the scleral incision had healed and the Sterispon plug had disappeared, but there was no generalised invasion of macrophages into the vitreous body or retina (Figure 4B). (ii), After optic nerve grafting: In the ivitASN/ONT and ivitS/ONTASN groups, no ED1+ macrophages were found in the retina/vitreous body (Figure 4C,D) (iii), After ivit grafting: In ivitCSN/ONT, ivitCSN/ONT, ivitCSN/ONTASN, and ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups, ED1+ macrophages had invaded the retina/vitreous body but were absent in ivitASN/ONTCSN groups (Figure 4E–I). ED1+ macrophages had also accumulated in both ivitCSN (Figure 4J) and ivitASN implants (Figure 4K). At the site of anastomosis in the optic nerve, similar levels of ED1+ immunoreactivity (red) was observed in ivitCSN/ONTCSN, ivitCSN/ONTASN, and ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups (Figure 4L–N).
Despite the detection of large numbers of ED1+ macrophages in ivitCSN paradigms, there was no difference in oncomodulin mRNA, in any of the ivitCSN groups compared to CON/Intact groups (Figure S3). Oncomodulin is a macrophage-derived factor that has been shown to promote significant RGC survival and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury [49,50,51,52].
These results suggest that only ivitCSN grafts promoted ingress of macrophages into the eye despite macrophages being present in both CSN and ASN implants and that OM levels do not change in ivitCSN paradigms compared to CON/Intact groups.

3.4. Presence of Axon Growth Inhibitory Ligands in Cellular (CSN) and Acellular Sciatic Nerve (ASN) Grafts

Nogo-A, MAG, and CSPG were detected by western blot in ON lysates and lysates from CSN and ASN grafts whilst Nogo-C was restricted to CSN and ASN grafts (Figure 5A,B). In addition, significantly lower levels of both Nogo-A and CSPG (p < 0.01) were observed in ASN grafts compared to CSN grafts (Figure 5A,B) suggesting that the freeze–thawing process may have removed some of these molecules. The levels of MAG and Nogo-C were unaffected by freeze–thawing.
These results suggest that significant levels of axon growth inhibitory molecules are present in both CSN and ASN grafts, which regenerating ON axons have to overcome.

3.5. Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Axon Regeneration 21 Days After Grafting

RhB+ RGC axons were detected in the proximal optic nerve stump of all groups. Correlating with RGC survival, axon frequency in the proximal optic nerve segment was highest in the ivitCSN/ONT, ivitS/ONTCSN, ivitCSN/ONTCSN, and ivitCSN/ONTASN groups and least in the CON/ivitS/ONT, ivitASN/ONT, and ivitS/ONTASN groups (not shown). (i), Growth into ONT: No RGC axons entered the distal optic nerve stump in CON/ivitS/ONT, ivitASN/ONT, and ivitCSN/ONT groups (not shown) (ii), Growth into ONTASN grafts: No RGC axons grew into ONTASN nor after ivitASN (not shown). In the ivitCSN/ONTASN group, some RGC axons crossed the site of anastomosis site into the ONTASN graft, but very few penetrated farther than 400 μm (Figure 6A,C) and no optic nerve astrocyte processes entered the ONTASN grafts (Figure 6A inset). (iii), Growth into ONTCSN grafts: No axons grew into ivitS/ONTCSN grafts (not shown); however, in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group, there was almost a 5-fold increase in the number of axons extending 400 μm (p < 0.001) and significantly more axons regenerated for distances of 800 and 1200 μm within the ONTCSN graft compared to ivitCSN/ONTASN groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 6B,C). Astrocyte processes invaded the ONTCSN for up to 500 µm (Figure 6B inset). Details of the ONTCSN anastomosis site (Figure 6D,E) show the demarcation between the Schwann cell laminin+ basal lamina tubes of the CSN graft and optic nerve (Figure 6D). RhB+ axons (open arrowhead) associated with GFAP+ astrocyte processes (arrowhead), which had invaded the proximal region of the ONTCSN and regenerated throughout the graft within Schwann cell basal lamina tubes (Figure 6E; arrows).
These results show that robust RGC axon regeneration is only promoted into ONTCSN and not into ONTASN grafts by ivitCSN implants, suggesting that: (1), Schwann cell and macrophage-derived trophic factors in the retina drive the regeneration of RGC axons into ONTCSN and ONTASN grafts; (2) the growth of RGC axons within Schwann cell basal lamina tubes is not sustained in the absence of Schwann cells; (3), the additive axogenic effect of ivitCSN and ONTCSN seen in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN compared to ivitCSN/ONTASN group is attributable to Schwann cell-derived factors originating from both sources.

3.6. Correlation of Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Axon Regeneration with RIP of p75NTR and Suppression of RhoGTP

(1) Regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) of p75NTR: (i) in the retina: Levels of full-length p75NTR (75kDa) and the extracellular domains (ECD), p75ECD (≈55kDa), were up-regulated in ivitS/ONT, and ivitASN/ONTCSN compared to CON/intact lysates, but levels of the intracellular domain (ICD), p57ICD (≈25kDa), were unchanged (Figure 7A,B) and, in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group, full-length p75NTR was unchanged but both p75ECD and p75ICD were significantly elevated (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to levels in the ivitASN/ONTCSN group (Figure 7A,B). (ii) In the optic nerve: Levels of full length and fragmented p75NTR were similar in the ON of all groups, except in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group in which p75ICD had increased significantly (p < 0.0001; Figure 7C,D).
(2) Suppression of Rho activation: (i) in the retina: There was significant activation of RhoGTP in the ivitS/ONT and ivitASN/ONTCSN groups compared to CON/intact groups, with higher levels present in the former than the latter, but activation was significantly reduced (p < 0.0001) in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group (Figure 7E). (ii) In the optic nerve: Levels of RhoGTP were elevated in the ON only in the CON/ivitS/ONT group and significantly reduced (p < 0.01) in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group (Figure 7E).
Thus, in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN paradigm, p75ECD shedding by RIP of p75NTR with associated suppression of RhoGTP activity is likely to disable LIMK/cofilin-mediated axon growth cone collapse and correlate with enhanced RGC axon regeneration.

4. Discussion

We show here that Schwann cell-derived factor (SCDF)-rich CSN grafts transplanted into the vitreous enhance the survival of RGC after ONT, promoting the survival of 25% of RGC. The addition of a CSN graft, anastomosed to the cut end of the optic nerve, as well as an intravitreal CSN graft, was additive and promoted 58% RGC survival. In addition, intravitreal CSN grafts promoted the greatest activation of Müller cells/astrocytes and promoted ingress of macrophages into the retina. Intravitreal CSN combined with a CSN anastomosed to the cut end of the optic nerve promoted RGC axon regeneration into grafts, with axons in a CSN graft growing for longer distances than those in ASN grafts. The regenerative response to intravitreal CSN grafting and ivitCSN+ONTCSN correlated with RIP of p75NTR and suppressed RhoA activation, indicative of SCDF-dependent modulation of axon growth-inhibitory signalling.

4.1. The Effect of Schwann-cell-Derived Factor (SCDF) on the Survival of Axotomised RGC In Vivo

In the initial stages after optic nerve injury, NTF is supplied by reactive optic nerve astrocytes and macrophages/activated microglia [53,54,55], but the supply becomes exhausted, ultimately leading to RGC death. Consistent with this, RGC survival was reduced to <10% at 21 d after ONT, while ASN implanted intravitreally or anastomosed to the proximal optic nerve stump had no beneficial effects on axotomy-induced RGC death. In contrast, the grafting of an SCDF-rich CSN to the vitreous or vitreous plus the proximal ON stump enhanced RGC survival after ONT, supporting previous observations [31,33]. Intravitreal transplants of purified Schwann cells enhanced the survival of axotomised RGC in rats [56], confirming a role for SCDF in rat RGC survival. Schwann cells are a source of numerous NTF, including glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin (NT)-4/5, and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) that can all promote RGC survival in vitro and in vivo [15,16,17,18]. RGC readily express tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk)A, TrkB, and TrkC receptors and these are transiently up-regulated after optic nerve injury, increasing RGC responsiveness to NTF, thus promoting RGC survival immediately after injury [57]. An ivitCSN, however, enhanced the long-term expression of Trk receptors after axotomy [57] and hence, Schwann cells are likely to be responsible for the survival effects observed after CSN grafting in this study by: (1) SCDF signalling to rescue RGC from death; (2) enhancing Trk receptor expression, thereby enhancing NTF-mediated survival signals.
Our results also show that, although RGC survival is influenced by SCDF at the somata and axonal growth cones, the presence of Schwann cells in the vitreous promotes greater survival than their presence at the proximal stump of a transected optic nerve. This could imply a differential ability of SCDF to promote RGC survival when present at the somata or the injury site. It is possible that SCDF acting on RGC via growth cones require retrograde signalling to the somata, and are consequently less efficient at activating survival signals than SCDF acting on the somata directly.

4.2. The Effect of Sciatic Nerve (SN) Grafting on Müller Cells and Macrophages in the Retina

Schwann cells may indirectly influence the survival and regenerative responses of RGC axons, and it has previously been suggested that the response of RGC axons to intravitreal CSN grafting may be dependent on macrophage-derived NTF and/or stimulation of retinal glia to produce glial-derived NTF, which may, in turn, act upon RGC [49,58,59,60,61,62]. Retinal Müller cells express the NT receptors TrkB and TrkC, and produce NTF, including NGF, BDNF, NT-3, and CNTF [63,64]. Thus, NTF-activated Müller cells may produce NTF to support RGC survival and axon growth; however, the degree of Müller cell activation induced by ivitCSN was significantly greater than that observed with ivitASN intravitreal SCDF activate Müller cell/astrocyte activation and that intravitreal SCDF-mediated RGC survival and axon regeneration is mediated partly through these activated retinal glia. Interestingly, the grafting of CSN to a transected optic nerve enhanced Müller cell activation above that observed after ASN grafting, suggesting that RGC effects mediated by SCDF at the injury site involve modulation by retinal glia.
After optic nerve injury, peripheral macrophages invade the injury site, and microglia become activated in both the retina and optic nerve, where they are transformed into phagocytic cells, termed microglia-derived macrophages. Activated microglia release potentially cytotoxic substances in vitro, including nitrogen monoxide, oxygen free-radicals, proteases, and excitatory amino acids [65], indicating that they accelerate neuronal degeneration; however, in addition to their phagocytic role in removing cell debris, both peripheral and microglia-derived macrophages secrete cytokines and NTF, including BDNF, GDNF [55], and oncomodulin [59]. The involvement of NTF secreted from intravitreal macrophages has been implicated in promoting RGC axon regeneration; retinal macrophage ingress has been proposed to play a role in the regenerative response to lens injury [58,59,60], and macrophage activation by intravitreal delivery of Zymosan, a yeast cell wall extract, supports axon regeneration [58,59,60].
The presence of macrophages in the vitreous and retina after ivitCSN and not ivitASN grafting may suggest that these cells do play a role in the regenerative response observed in our present study. Macrophage-derived factors such as oncomodulin after inflammatory stimulation or lens injury have been shown to play a role in RGC survival and axon regeneration after ONT [49,50,51,52]; however, the role of oncomodulin in promoting RGC survival and axon regeneration is controversial and at best, limited [47,66]. In agreement with these latter studies, we detected no changes in oncomodulin mRNA over the first 7 days, in ivitCSN paradigms where detected ED1+ macrophages were detected. This suggests that oncomodulin does not affect ivitCSN-mediated RGC survival and axon regeneration. In other studies, astrocyte-derived CNTF was shown to promote robust RGC axon regeneration after inflammatory stimulation and did not depend on oncomodulin or the presence of large numbers of activated macrophages in the retina [47,62]. In agreement with these studies, we detected significant levels of CNTF in the retina in the ivitCSN paradigms, which may contribute to the net RGC survival and axon regenerative effects of CSN grafts.

4.3. The Effect of Schwann-Cell-Derived Factors (SCDFs) on Retinal Ganglion Cell (RGC) Axon Regeneration In Vivo

Despite the presence of intact laminin-rich basal lamina tubes in both CSN and ASN, RGC axons regenerated into SN grafts anastomosed onto the transected optic nerve, only in the presence of Schwann cells. These results support previous findings that the basal lamina alone is not capable of promoting RGC axon regeneration and that Schwann cells provide essential trophic support for axon growth [32,33,67]. Furthermore, RGC axons regenerated into an ASN graft after intravitreal CSN implantation, thus it can be concluded that SCDF, when delivered intravitreally, supports both axon growth within the inhibitory environment of the optic nerve and within the passive environment of the freeze–thawed ASN.
Axotomized RGC axons readily grow into artificial Schwann cell grafts anastomosed to the proximal transected optic nerve stump, further supporting a role for Schwann cells in promoting RGC axon regeneration [68]. Several NTF, particularly CNTF, produced by Schwann cells promote the growth of RGC axons. CNTF has been identified as a major RGC axogenic factor derived from SN [69] and CNTF promotes RGC neurite/axon growth in vitro [69,70,71] and in vivo [70,72,73]. In addition to diffusible NTF, cellular adhesion molecules expressed by Schwann cells may support axon growth into a CSN graft. RGC axons regenerating into a CSN graft are in direct contact with Schwann cells [67], probably through CAM interactions, and particularly the immunoglobulins L1 and neuronal cellular adhesion molecule have been associated with RGC regeneration into SN grafts [39]. Additionally, although the present study showed that components of the basal lamina alone do not promote RGC axon regeneration, ECM substrates such as laminin, collagen, and fibronectin support RGC axon growth during development [74], and may play a role in the guidance of regenerating axons.
There is an accumulation of evidence to indicate that the regenerative response of RGC to NTF is not simply a consequence of enhanced survival. In mice, overexpressing the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, prevents axotomy-induced RGC death but RGC does not regenerate their axons [75]. Moreover, differential survival and regenerative responses are confirmed by the observation that intravitreal delivery of BDNF promotes the survival of RGC, but not the regeneration of their axons [76]. Likewise, we have shown previously that intravitreal inflammation elicited by intravitreal zymosan injection promotes RGC survival, as does intra-optic nerve zymosan injection but only intravitreal zymosan injection supports RGC axon regeneration [42]. These results suggest that although the survival cues derived from the retina and optic nerve may be the same, the cues for RGC axon regeneration are different may require an intravitreal glial component [42].

4.4. Schwann-Cell-Derived Factor (SCDF)-Induced Modulation of Growth-Inhibitory Signaling Molecules in the Retina and ON

The SN grafting experiments in this manuscript demonstrate that axons can regenerate through the inhibitory environment of a CSN graft when SCDFs are supplied to the RGC somata. One explanation may lie in the proposal that SCDFs enhance the expression and secretion of MMPs and modulate the production of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases (TIMPs) in reactive astrocytes of the optic nerve [40]. MMPs are a family of enzymes that degrade proteinaceous ECM molecules, including fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and CSPG [77], thus causing dissolution of scar tissue and facilitating the passage of regenerating axons. In support of this proposal, RGC axon regeneration caused by ivitCSN correlated with the absence of an inhibitory accessory glial limitans.
A second proposal is that SCDFs render growth cones insensitive to the growth inhibitory environment by down-regulating components of the axon growth-inhibitory signalling cascade [20,48]. For example, we have previously shown that the promotion of RGC axon regeneration by intravitreal SCDF after optic nerve crush injury causes RIP of p75NTR and suppression of RhoA, thus disabling the RhoA-dependent axon growth-inhibitory cascade [20]. RIP of p75NTR was mediated by NTF-mediated up-regulation of tumour necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (TACE) and γ-secretase [19,20], two enzymes that mediate RIP of p75NTR [78,79,80]. The full-length p75NTR molecule is processed into the 55kDa extracellular fragment (ECD) of p75NTR (p75ECD) by tumour necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (TACE) which then activates γ-secretase to cleave the 25kDa intracellular domain (p75ICD) [48,80]. In the current study, we also observed similar RIP of p75NTR after intravitreal SCDF (i.e., ivitCSN), yielding significantly increased levels of p75ECD and p75ICD in both retinae and optic nerve, and correlating with suppressed RhoGTP levels. We suggest that RGC axon growth into a CSN graft, driven by SCDF in an ivitCSN graft is also mediated through RIP of p75NTR and thus blinding of axons to the inhibitory environment of the distal nerve [19,20].

5. Conclusions

We show that SCDFs from CSN grafts are required to support RGC survival after ONT and that RGC survival can further be enhanced using a CSN graft anastomosed onto the cut end of the transected optic nerve. In addition, limited numbers of RGC axons regenerate into an ASN graft after ONT but RGC axon regeneration is significantly enhanced when an ivitCSN is combined with an ONTCSN graft. Moreover, RGC axon regeneration promoted by an ivitCSN/ONTCSN causes RIP of p75NTR, suppressed RhoA activation, and thus disablement of the axon growth-inhibitory cascade, blinding axons to potential myelin-derived axon growth-inhibitory ligands.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/6/1335/s1, Figure S1: Schwann cells are absent from SN after freeze–thawing but basal lamina tubes remain intact, Figure S2: Relative levels of CNTF expression at different time points after grafting, Figure S3: Relative levels of oncomodulin at different time-points after grafting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.A., A.L., and M.B.; methodology, Z.A., E.L.S., and M.B., formal analysis, Z.A. and E.L.S.; investigation, Z.A., E.L.S., and M.B.; resources, Z.A. and A.L.; data curation, Z.A. and E.L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.A. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, Z.A., A.L., and M.B.; supervision, Z.A., A.L., and M.B.; project administration, Z.A. and A.L.; funding acquisition, Z.A. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was funded by the Wellcome Trust, grant nos. 0695920 (to A.L. and M.B.) and 092539/Z/10/Z (to Z.A.).

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Adam Thompson for technical assistance with anaesthesia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Reynolds, M.L.; Woolf, C.J. Reciprocal Schwann cell-axon interactions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1993, 3, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gordon, T. The role of neurotrophic factors in nerve regeneration. Neurosurg. Focus 2009, 26, E3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kanno, H.; Pearse, D.D.; Ozawa, H.; Itoi, E.; Bunge, M.B. Schwann cell transplantation for spinal cord injury repair: Its significant therapeutic potential and prospectus. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 26, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. McKerracher, L.; David, S.; Jackson, D.L.; Kottis, V.; Dunn, R.J.; Braun, P.E. Identification of myelin-associated glycoprotein as a major myelin-derived inhibitor of neurite growth. Neuron 1994, 13, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McKerracher, L.; Rosen, K.M. MAG, myelin and overcoming growth inhibition in the CNS. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mukhopadhyay, G.; Doherty, P.; Walsh, F.S.; Crocker, P.R.; Filbin, M.T. A novel role for myelin-associated glycoprotein as an inhibitor of axonal regeneration. Neuron 1994, 13, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vyas, A.A.; Patel, H.V.; Fromholt, S.E.; Heffer-Lauc, M.; Vyas, K.A.; Dang, J.; Schachner, M.; Schnaar, R.L. Gangliosides are functional nerve cell ligands for myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), an inhibitor of nerve regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8412–8417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fournier, A.E.; GrandPre, T.; Strittmatter, S.M. Identification of a receptor mediating Nogo-66 inhibition of axonal regeneration. Nature 2001, 409, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yamashita, T.; Higuchi, H.; Tohyama, M. The p75 receptor transduces the signal from myelin-associated glycoprotein to Rho. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 157, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Perry, V.H.; Brown, M.C.; Gordon, S. The macrophage response to central and peripheral nerve injury. A possible role for macrophages in regeneration. J. Exp. Med. 1987, 165, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gaudet, A.D.; Popovich, P.G.; Ramer, M.S. Wallerian degeneration: Gaining perspective on inflammatory events after peripheral nerve injury. J. Neuroinflammation 2011, 8, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Vargas, M.E.; Watanabe, J.; Singh, S.J.; Robinson, W.H.; Barres, B.A. Endogenous antibodies promote rapid myelin clearance and effective axon regeneration after nerve injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11993–11998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Udina, E.; Ladak, A.; Furey, M.; Brushart, T.; Tyreman, N.; Gordon, T. Rolipram-induced elevation of cAMP or chondroitinase ABC breakdown of inhibitory proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix promotes peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp. Neurol. 2010, 223, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Krekoski, C.A.; Neubauer, D.; Graham, J.B.; Muir, D. Metalloproteinase-dependent predegeneration in vitro enhances axonal regeneration within acellular peripheral nerve grafts. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 10408–10415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Meyer, M.; Matsuoka, I.; Wetmore, C.; Olson, L.; Thoenen, H. Enhanced synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the lesioned peripheral nerve: Different mechanisms are responsible for the regulation of BDNF and NGF mRNA. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Friedman, B.; Scherer, S.S.; Rudge, J.S.; Helgren, M.; Morrisey, D.; McClain, J.; Wang, D.Y.; Wiegand, S.J.; Furth, M.E.; Lindsay, R.M.; et al. Regulation of ciliary neurotrophic factor expression in myelin-related Schwann cells in vivo. Neuron 1992, 9, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Springer, J.E.; Seeburger, J.L.; He, J.; Gabrea, A.; Blankenhorn, E.P.; Bergman, L.W. cDNA sequence and differential mRNA regulation of two forms of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Schwann cells and rat skeletal muscle. Exp. Neurol. 1995, 131, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Watabe, K.; Fukuda, T.; Tanaka, J.; Honda, H.; Toyohara, K.; Sakai, O. Spontaneously immortalized adult mouse Schwann cells secrete autocrine and paracrine growth-promoting activities. J. Neurosci. Res. 1995, 41, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ahmed, Z.; Mazibrada, G.; Seabright, R.J.; Dent, R.G.; Berry, M.; Logan, A. TACE-induced cleavage of NgR and p75NTR in dorsal root ganglion cultures disinhibits outgrowth and promotes branching of neurites in the presence of inhibitory CNS myelin. Faseb. J. 2006, 20, 1939–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmed, Z.; Suggate, E.L.; Brown, E.R.; Dent, R.G.; Armstrong, S.J.; Barrett, L.B.; Berry, M.; Logan, A. Schwann cell-derived factor-induced modulation of the NgR/p75NTR/EGFR axis disinhibits axon growth through CNS myelin in vivo and in vitro. Brain 2006, 129, 1517–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hall, S.M. Regeneration in cellular and acellular autografts in the peripheral nervous system. Neuropathol Appl. Neurobiol. 1986, 12, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gulati, A.K. Evaluation of acellular and cellular nerve grafts in repair of rat peripheral nerve. J. Neurosurg. 1988, 68, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nadim, W.; Anderson, P.N.; Turmaine, M. The role of Schwann cells and basal lamina tubes in the regeneration of axons through long lengths of freeze-killed nerve grafts. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1990, 16, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Danielsen, N.; Kerns, J.M.; Holmquist, B.; Zhao, Q.; Lundborg, G.; Kanje, M. Predegeneration enhances regeneration into acellular nerve grafts. Brain Res. 1995, 681, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feneley, M.R.; Fawcett, J.W.; Keynes, R.J. The role of Schwann cells in the regeneration of peripheral nerve axons through muscle basal lamina grafts. Exp. Neurol 1991, 114, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moore, A.M.; MacEwan, M.; Santosa, K.B.; Chenard, K.E.; Ray, W.Z.; Hunter, D.A.; Mackinnon, S.E.; Johnson, P.J. Acellular nerve allografts in peripheral nerve regeneration: A comparative study. Muscle Nerve 2011, 44, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gulati, A.K. Immunological fate of Schwann cell-populated acellular basal lamina nerve allografts. Transplantation 1995, 59, 1618–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jesuraj, N.J.; Santosa, K.B.; Macewan, M.R.; Moore, A.M.; Kasukurthi, R.; Ray, W.Z.; Flagg, E.R.; Hunter, D.A.; Borschel, G.H.; Johnson, P.J.; et al. Schwann cells seeded in acellular nerve grafts improve functional recovery. Muscle Nerve 2014, 49, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fawcett, J.W.; Keynes, R.J. Peripheral nerve regeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1990, 13, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anderson, P.N.; Nadim, W.; Turmaine, M. Schwann cell migration through freeze-killed peripheral nerve grafts without accompanying axons. Acta Neuropathol. 1991, 82, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Villegas-Perez, M.P.; Vidal-Sanz, M.; Bray, G.M.; Aguayo, A.J. Influences of peripheral nerve grafts on the survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. J. Neurosci. 1988, 8, 265–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Berry, M.; Hall, S.; Follows, R.; Rees, L.; Gregson, N.; Sievers, J. Response of axons and glia at the site of anastomosis between the optic nerve and cellular or acellular sciatic nerve grafts. J. Neurocytol. 1988, 17, 727–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Berry, M.; Rees, L.; Hall, S.; Yiu, P.; Sievers, J. Optic axons regenerate into sciatic nerve isografts only in the presence of Schwann cells. Brain Res. Bull. 1988, 20, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berry, M.; Carlile, J.; Hunter, A. Peripheral nerve explants grafted into the vitreous body of the eye promote the regeneration of retinal ganglion cell axons severed in the optic nerve. J. Neurocytol. 1996, 25, 147–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berry, M.; Carlile, J.; Hunter, A.; Tsang, W.; Rosenstiel, P.; Sievers, J. Optic nerve regeneration after intravitreal peripheral nerve implants: Trajectories of axons regrowing through the optic chiasm into the optic tracts. J. Neurocytol. 1999, 28, 721–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, K.S.; Chung, S.K.; Yip, H.K.; So, K.F. Differential effects of intravitreal optic nerve and sciatic nerve grafts on the survival of retinal ganglion cells and the regeneration of their axons. J. Neurocytol. 2001, 30, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schwab, M.E.; Thoenen, H. Dissociated neurons regenerate into sciatic but not optic nerve explants in culture irrespective of neurotrophic factors. J. Neurosci. 1985, 5, 2415–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hall, S.; Berry, M. Electron microscopic study of the interaction of axons and glia at the site of anastomosis between the optic nerve and cellular or acellular sciatic nerve grafts. J. Neurocytol. 1989, 18, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dezawa, M.; Nagano, T. Immunohistochemical localization of cell adhesion molecules and cell-cell contact proteins during regeneration of the rat optic nerve induced by sciatic nerve autotransplantation. Anat. Rec. 1996, 246, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmed, Z.; Dent, R.G.; Leadbeater, W.E.; Smith, C.; Berry, M.; Logan, A. Matrix metalloproteases: Degradation of the inhibitory environment of the transected optic nerve and the scar by regenerating axons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2005, 28, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Douglas, M.R.; Morrison, K.C.; Jacques, S.J.; Leadbeater, W.E.; Gonzalez, A.M.; Berry, M.; Logan, A.; Ahmed, Z. Off-target effects of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists mediate retinal ganglion cell disinhibited axon growth. Brain 2009, 132, 3102–3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ahmed, Z.; Aslam, M.; Lorber, B.; Suggate, E.L.; Berry, M.; Logan, A. Optic nerve and vitreal inflammation are both RGC neuroprotective but only the latter is RGC axogenic. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 37, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ahmed, Z.; Kalinski, H.; Berry, M.; Almasieh, M.; Ashush, H.; Slager, N.; Brafman, A.; Spivak, I.; Prasad, N.; Mett, I.; et al. Ocular neuroprotection by siRNA targeting caspase-2. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Berry, M.; Hunter, A.S.; Duncan, A.; Lordan, J.; Kirvell, S.; Tsang, W.L.; Butt, A.M. Axon-glial relations during regeneration of axons in the adult rat anterior medullary velum. J. Neurocytol. 1998, 27, 915–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leon, S.; Yin, Y.; Nguyen, J.; Irwin, N.; Benowitz, L.I. Lens injury stimulates axon regeneration in the mature rat optic nerve. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 4615–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lorber, B.; Howe, M.L.; Benowitz, L.I.; Irwin, N. Mst3b, an Ste20-like kinase, regulates axon regeneration in mature CNS and PNS pathways. Nature neuroscience 2009, 12, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hauk, T.G.; Muller, A.; Lee, J.; Schwendener, R.; Fischer, D. Neuroprotective and axon growth promoting effects of intraocular inflammation do not depend on oncomodulin or the presence of large numbers of activated macrophages. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 209, 469–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Logan, A.; Ahmed, Z.; Baird, A.; Gonzalez, A.M.; Berry, M. Neurotrophic factor synergy is required for neuronal survival and disinhibited axon regeneration after CNS injury. Brain 2006, 129, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yin, Y.; Henzl, M.T.; Lorber, B.; Nakazawa, T.; Thomas, T.T.; Jiang, F.; Langer, R.; Benowitz, L.I. Oncomodulin is a macrophage-derived signal for axon regeneration in retinal ganglion cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yin, Y.; Cui, Q.; Gilbert, H.Y.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Berlinicke, C.; Li, Z.; Zaverucha-do-Valle, C.; He, H.; Petkova, V.; et al. Oncomodulin links inflammation to optic nerve regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19587–19592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kurimoto, T.; Yin, Y.; Omura, K.; Gilbert, H.Y.; Kim, D.; Cen, L.P.; Moko, L.; Kugler, S.; Benowitz, L.I. Long-distance axon regeneration in the mature optic nerve: Contributions of oncomodulin, cAMP, and pten gene deletion. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 15654–15663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Kurimoto, T.; Yin, Y.; Habboub, G.; Gilbert, H.Y.; Li, Y.; Nakao, S.; Hafezi-Moghadam, A.; Benowitz, L.I. Neutrophils express oncomodulin and promote optic nerve regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 14816–14824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Schwartz, J.P.; Nishiyama, N. Neurotrophic factor gene expression in astrocytes during development and following injury. Brain Res. Bull. 1994, 35, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kirsch, M.; Schneider, T.; Lee, M.Y.; Hofmann, H.D. Lesion-induced changes in the expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptor in rat optic nerve. Glia 1998, 23, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Batchelor, P.E.; Liberatore, G.T.; Wong, J.Y.; Porritt, M.J.; Frerichs, F.; Donnan, G.A.; Howells, D.W. Activated macrophages and microglia induce dopaminergic sprouting in the injured striatum and express brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 1708–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Li, S.; Hu, B.; Tay, D.; So, K.F.; Yip, H.K. Intravitreal transplants of Schwann cells and fibroblasts promote the survival of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in rats. Brain Res. 2004, 1029, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cui, Q.; Tang, L.S.; Hu, B.; So, K.F.; Yip, H.K. Expression of trkA, trkB, and trkC in injured and regenerating retinal ganglion cells of adult rats. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 1954–1964. [Google Scholar]
  58. Fischer, D.; Petkova, V.; Thanon, S.; Benowitz, L.I. Switching mature retinal ganglion cells to a robust growth state in vivo: Gene expression and synergy with RhoA inactivation. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 8726–8740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yin, Y.; Cui, Q.; Li, Y.; Irwin, N.; Fischer, D.; Harvey, A.R.; Benowitz, L.I. Macrophage-derived factors stimulate optic nerve regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 2284–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lorber, B.; Berry, M.; Logan, A. Lens injury stimulates adult mouse retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration via both macrophage- and lens-derived factors. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 21, 2029–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Berry, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Lorber, B.; Douglas, M.; Logan, A. Regeneration of axons in the visual system. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2008, 26, 147–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Muller, A.; Hauk, T.G.; Fischer, D. Astrocyte-derived CNTF switches mature RGCs to a regenerative state following inflammatory stimulation. Brain 2007, 130, 3308–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Oku, H.; Ikeda, T.; Honma, Y.; Sotozono, C.; Nishida, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Kida, T.; Kinoshita, S. Gene expression of neurotrophins and their high-affinity Trk receptors in cultured human Muller cells. Ophthalmic. Res. 2002, 34, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sarup, V.; Patil, K.; Sharma, S.C. Ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptors are differentially expressed in the optic nerve transected adult rat retina. Brain Res. 2004, 1013, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Banati, R.B.; Gehrmann, J.; Schubert, P.; Kreutzberg, G.W. Cytotoxicity of microglia. Glia 1993, 7, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Harel, R.; Iannotti, C.A.; Hoh, D.; Clark, M.; Silver, J.; Steinmetz, M.P. Oncomodulin affords limited regeneration to injured sensory axons in vitro and in vivo. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 233, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Dezawa, M.; Adachi-Usami, E. Role of Schwann cells in retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2000, 19, 171–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Negishi, H.; Dezawa, M.; Oshitari, T.; Adachi-Usami, E. Optic nerve regeneration within artificial Schwann cell graft in the adult rat. Brain Res. Bull. 2001, 55, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jo, S.A.; Wang, E.; Benowitz, L.I. Ciliary neurotrophic factor is an axogenesis factor for retinal ganglion cells. Neuroscience 1999, 89, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cui, Q.; Lu, Q.; So, K.F.; Yip, H.K. CNTF, not other trophic factors, promotes axonal regeneration of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in adult hamsters. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999, 40, 760–766. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lorber, B.; Berry, M.; Logan, A.; Tonge, D. Effect of lens lesion on neurite outgrowth of retinal ganglion cells in vitro. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2002, 21, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mey, J.; Thanos, S. Intravitreal injections of neurotrophic factors support the survival of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in adult rats in vivo. Brain Res. 1993, 602, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, C.W.; Lu, Q.; You, S.W.; Zhi, Y.; Yip, H.K.; Wu, W.; So, K.F.; Cui, Q. CNTF and BDNF have similar effects on retinal ganglion cell survival but differential effects on nitric oxide synthase expression soon after optic nerve injury. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hall, D.E.; Neugebauer, K.M.; Reichardt, L.F. Embryonic neural retinal cell response to extracellular matrix proteins: Developmental changes and effects of the cell substratum attachment antibody (CSAT). J. Cell Biol 1987, 104, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chierzi, S.; Strettoi, E.; Cenni, M.C.; Maffei, L. Optic nerve crush: Axonal responses in wild-type and bcl-2 transgenic mice. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 8367–8376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Leaver, S.G.; Cui, Q.; Plant, G.W.; Arulpragasam, A.; Hisheh, S.; Verhaagen, J.; Harvey, A.R. AAV-mediated expression of CNTF promotes long-term survival and regeneration of adult rat retinal ganglion cells. Gene Ther. 2006, 13, 1328–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Yong, V.W.; Krekoski, C.A.; Forsyth, P.A.; Bell, R.; Edwards, D.R. Matrix metalloproteinases and diseases of the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jung, K.M.; Tan, S.; Landman, N.; Petrova, K.; Murray, S.; Lewis, R.; Kim, P.K.; Kim, D.S.; Ryu, S.H.; Chao, M.V.; et al. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis of the p75 neurotrophin receptor modulates its association with the TrkA receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 42161–42169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kanning, K.C.; Hudson, M.; Amieux, P.S.; Wiley, J.C.; Bothwell, M.; Schecterson, L.C. Proteolytic processing of the p75 neurotrophin receptor and two homologs generates C-terminal fragments with signaling capability. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 5425–5436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Weskamp, G.; Schlondorff, J.; Lum, L.; Becherer, J.D.; Kim, T.W.; Saftig, P.; Hartmann, D.; Murphy, G.; Blobel, C.P. Evidence for a critical role of the tumor necrosis factor alpha convertase (TACE) in ectodomain shedding of the p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR). J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 4241–4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 09 01335 g001 550
Figure 1. Control and experimental groupings (see text). (i) Control (CON)/intravitreal (ivit) Sterispon (S)/optic nerve transection (ONT), (ii) ivit acellular sciatic nerve grafts (ASN)/ONT; (iii) ivitS/ONTASN; (iv) ivitASN/ONTASN; (v) ivit cellular sciatic nerve grafts (CSN)/ONT; (vi) ivitCSN/ONTASN; (vii) ivitASN/ONTCSN; (viii) ivitCSNONTCSN.
Figure 1. Control and experimental groupings (see text). (i) Control (CON)/intravitreal (ivit) Sterispon (S)/optic nerve transection (ONT), (ii) ivit acellular sciatic nerve grafts (ASN)/ONT; (iii) ivitS/ONTASN; (iv) ivitASN/ONTASN; (v) ivit cellular sciatic nerve grafts (CSN)/ONT; (vi) ivitCSN/ONTASN; (vii) ivitASN/ONTCSN; (viii) ivitCSNONTCSN.
Cells 09 01335 g001
Cells 09 01335 g002 550
Figure 2. Fluorogold (FG)+ retinal ganglion cells (RGC) at 21 days after grafting in retinal wholemounts from: (A) CON/intact, CON/ivitS/ONT, ivitASN/ONT, ivitS/ONTASN, ivitS/ONTCSN, ivitCSN/ONT, ivitCSN/ONTASN, ivitASN/ONTCSN, and ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. Note that the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group show the greatest RGC neuroprotection (scale bars = 20 μm). (B) Quantification of numbers of FG+ RGC in retinal wholemounts confirms that RGC survival is increased in all ivitCSN paradigms with the greatest survival observed in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group. n = 16 retinae/group; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA.
Figure 2. Fluorogold (FG)+ retinal ganglion cells (RGC) at 21 days after grafting in retinal wholemounts from: (A) CON/intact, CON/ivitS/ONT, ivitASN/ONT, ivitS/ONTASN, ivitS/ONTCSN, ivitCSN/ONT, ivitCSN/ONTASN, ivitASN/ONTCSN, and ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. Note that the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group show the greatest RGC neuroprotection (scale bars = 20 μm). (B) Quantification of numbers of FG+ RGC in retinal wholemounts confirms that RGC survival is increased in all ivitCSN paradigms with the greatest survival observed in the ivitCSN/ONTCSN group. n = 16 retinae/group; ** p < 0.001; *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA.
Cells 09 01335 g002
Cells 09 01335 g003 550
Figure 3. Müller cell/astrocyte activation in the retina at 21 days after grafting. Representative images of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)+ astrocytes (arrowheads) and activated Müller cell processes (arrows) in: (A) CON/intact, (B) CON/ivitS/ONT, (C) ivitASN/ONT, (D) ivitS/ONTASN, (E) ivitS/ONTCSN, (F) ivitCSN/ONT, (G) ivitCSN/ONTASN, (H) ivitASN/ONTCSN, and (I) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. Note the increased glial activation after ivitCSN grafting (scale bars = 50 μm). (J) Quantification of the number of Müller cell processes confirms that ivitCSN promotes glial activation in the retina. n = 16 retinae/group; *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA.
Figure 3. Müller cell/astrocyte activation in the retina at 21 days after grafting. Representative images of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)+ astrocytes (arrowheads) and activated Müller cell processes (arrows) in: (A) CON/intact, (B) CON/ivitS/ONT, (C) ivitASN/ONT, (D) ivitS/ONTASN, (E) ivitS/ONTCSN, (F) ivitCSN/ONT, (G) ivitCSN/ONTASN, (H) ivitASN/ONTCSN, and (I) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. Note the increased glial activation after ivitCSN grafting (scale bars = 50 μm). (J) Quantification of the number of Müller cell processes confirms that ivitCSN promotes glial activation in the retina. n = 16 retinae/group; *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA.
Cells 09 01335 g003
Cells 09 01335 g004 550
Figure 4. Macrophages accumulate in the retina in eyes containing ivitCSN implants at 21 days after grafting. ED1-HRP+ macrophages in the vitreous body and retina in: (A) CON/intact, (B) CON/ivitS/ONT, (C) ivitASN/ONT, (D) ivitS/ONTASN, (E) ivitS/ONTCSN, (F) ivitCSN/ONT, (G) ivitCSN/ONTASN, (H) ivitASN/ONTCSN, and (I) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. ED1+ macrophages were present in both (J) ivitCSN, and (K) ivitASN implants; ED1+ macrophages (red) at the anastomosis site of (L) ONTCSN; (M) ivitCSN/ONTASN; (N) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups (scale bars in A–K = 50 μm; in L–N = 100 μm). n = 16 retinae/group.
Figure 4. Macrophages accumulate in the retina in eyes containing ivitCSN implants at 21 days after grafting. ED1-HRP+ macrophages in the vitreous body and retina in: (A) CON/intact, (B) CON/ivitS/ONT, (C) ivitASN/ONT, (D) ivitS/ONTASN, (E) ivitS/ONTCSN, (F) ivitCSN/ONT, (G) ivitCSN/ONTASN, (H) ivitASN/ONTCSN, and (I) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups. ED1+ macrophages were present in both (J) ivitCSN, and (K) ivitASN implants; ED1+ macrophages (red) at the anastomosis site of (L) ONTCSN; (M) ivitCSN/ONTASN; (N) ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups (scale bars in A–K = 50 μm; in L–N = 100 μm). n = 16 retinae/group.
Cells 09 01335 g004
Cells 09 01335 g005 550
Figure 5. Growth inhibitory ligands in the optic nerve, cellular sciatic nerve (CSN), and acellular sciatic nerve (ASN) grafts at 21 days after grafting. (A) Nogo-A, MAG, and CSPG were all present in optic nerve, CSN, and ASN whilst Nogo-C was not present in optic nerve. (B) Densitometry to confirm the levels of Nogo-A, Nogo-C, MAG, and CSPG in optic nerve, ASN, and CSN lysates (n = 6/per group, 3 independent repeats). ** p < 0.001, ANOVA. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 5. Growth inhibitory ligands in the optic nerve, cellular sciatic nerve (CSN), and acellular sciatic nerve (ASN) grafts at 21 days after grafting. (A) Nogo-A, MAG, and CSPG were all present in optic nerve, CSN, and ASN whilst Nogo-C was not present in optic nerve. (B) Densitometry to confirm the levels of Nogo-A, Nogo-C, MAG, and CSPG in optic nerve, ASN, and CSN lysates (n = 6/per group, 3 independent repeats). ** p < 0.001, ANOVA. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Cells 09 01335 g005
Cells 09 01335 g006 550
Figure 6. Regeneration of rhodamine B (RhB)+ RGC axons (red) into cellular sciatic nerve (CSN) or acellular sciatic nerve (ASN) grafts at 21 days after optic nerve transection (ONT). Representative images of longitudinal sections of optic nerve and graft in (A), ivitCSN/ONTASN and (B), ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups—note the presence throughout the length of the ONTCSN graft of RhB+ (red) regenerating RGC axons (open arrows) and their limited penetration into the ONTASN graft (A,B insets), optic nerve GFAP+ astrocyte processes (green) do not enter ONTASN grafts, but do enter the proximal region of the ONTCSN graft (closed arrow) (scale bars in A, B, and D = 200 µm; broken line indicates anastomosis site). (C) Quantification of the number of axons extending 400, 800, and 1200 μm past the anastomosis site into the ONTCSN graft (*** p < 0.0001). A few axons penetrate the junctional zone of ONTASN grafts compared to the numbers extending for long distances into ONTCSN grafts. (D), anastomosis site in an ivitCSN/ONTCSN rat showing the laminin+ basal lamina of the optic nerve vasculature (arrow heads) and Schwann cell basal lamina tubes aligned in parallel arrays in the ONTCSN graft (arrow), with which (E) regenerating RGC axons are associated with the extent of GFAP+ astrocyte process (green) invasion and the growth of RhB+ RGC axons (red) (scale bars = 150 µm; the broken line indicates the anastomosis site).
Figure 6. Regeneration of rhodamine B (RhB)+ RGC axons (red) into cellular sciatic nerve (CSN) or acellular sciatic nerve (ASN) grafts at 21 days after optic nerve transection (ONT). Representative images of longitudinal sections of optic nerve and graft in (A), ivitCSN/ONTASN and (B), ivitCSN/ONTCSN groups—note the presence throughout the length of the ONTCSN graft of RhB+ (red) regenerating RGC axons (open arrows) and their limited penetration into the ONTASN graft (A,B insets), optic nerve GFAP+ astrocyte processes (green) do not enter ONTASN grafts, but do enter the proximal region of the ONTCSN graft (closed arrow) (scale bars in A, B, and D = 200 µm; broken line indicates anastomosis site). (C) Quantification of the number of axons extending 400, 800, and 1200 μm past the anastomosis site into the ONTCSN graft (*** p < 0.0001). A few axons penetrate the junctional zone of ONTASN grafts compared to the numbers extending for long distances into ONTCSN grafts. (D), anastomosis site in an ivitCSN/ONTCSN rat showing the laminin+ basal lamina of the optic nerve vasculature (arrow heads) and Schwann cell basal lamina tubes aligned in parallel arrays in the ONTCSN graft (arrow), with which (E) regenerating RGC axons are associated with the extent of GFAP+ astrocyte process (green) invasion and the growth of RhB+ RGC axons (red) (scale bars = 150 µm; the broken line indicates the anastomosis site).
Cells 09 01335 g006
Cells 09 01335 g007 550
Figure 7. Axon regeneration promoted by ivitCSN is correlated with reduced levels of RhoGTP and regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) of p75NTR in the optic nerve and retina. In both the retina (A,C) and optic nerve (B,D) p75 intracellular domain (p75ICD) accumulates only in ivitCSN/ONTCSN group. RhoGTP is activated in the retina and optic nerve and remains high in ivitASN/ONTCSN group and significantly suppressed in ivitCSN/ONTCSN group (E). β-actin was used as a loading control. *** p < 0.0001, n = 8 retinae/ON pooled/treatment, three independent repeats).
Figure 7. Axon regeneration promoted by ivitCSN is correlated with reduced levels of RhoGTP and regulated intramembranous proteolysis (RIP) of p75NTR in the optic nerve and retina. In both the retina (A,C) and optic nerve (B,D) p75 intracellular domain (p75ICD) accumulates only in ivitCSN/ONTCSN group. RhoGTP is activated in the retina and optic nerve and remains high in ivitASN/ONTCSN group and significantly suppressed in ivitCSN/ONTCSN group (E). β-actin was used as a loading control. *** p < 0.0001, n = 8 retinae/ON pooled/treatment, three independent repeats).
Cells 09 01335 g007
Table
Table 1. List of antibodies used in this study.
Table 1. List of antibodies used in this study.
AntibodySpecificityDilutionSource
Primary Antibodies
Mouse anti-cluster differentiation 68 (ED1)Rat macrophages 1:200Serotec, Kidlington, UK
Mouse anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)Astrocyte 1:400Sigma, Poole, U
Mouse anti-growth associated protein-43 (GAP-43)Regenerating axons 1:500Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
Mouse anti-myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG)MAG1:400Abcam, Cambridge, UK
Mouse anti-chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans (CSPG)CSPG 1:500Abcam, Cambridge, UK
Rabbit anti-lamininBasal lamina/glia limitans and blood vessels1:500Sigma, Poole, UK
Rabbit anti-p75 neurotrophic receptorLow affinity neurotrophin receptor/Schwann cells1:400Sigma, Poole, UK
Rabbit anti-neurite outgrowth inhibitor A (Nogo-A)Nogo-A1:400Abcam, Cambridge, UK
Sheep anti-Nogo-CNogo-C1:500R&D systems Europe, Oxford, UK
Secondary Antibodies
Alexa 488 anti-mouseMouse IgG1:400Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
Texas Red anti-mouseMouse IgG1:400Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
Alexa 488 anti-rabbitRabbit IgG1:400Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
Texas Red anti-rabbitRabbit IgG1:400Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
HRP-labelled anti-ratRat IgG1:400Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK
HRP-labelled anti-rabbitRabbit IgG1:400Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK
HRP-labelled anti-sheepSheep IgG1:400Invitrogen, Paisley, UK
Table
Table 2. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival after treatment with or without cellular (CSN) or acellular (ASN) intravitreal (ivit) sciatic nerve grafts after optic nerve transection (ONT). (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA).
Table 2. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival after treatment with or without cellular (CSN) or acellular (ASN) intravitreal (ivit) sciatic nerve grafts after optic nerve transection (ONT). (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0001, ANOVA).
ConditionGroupRGC CountRGC DeathRGC Survival
ControlsCON/Intact1953 ± 84
CON/ivitS/ONT211 ± 1089%11%
Ivit graftsivitCSN/ONT510 ± 2375%25% **
ivitASN/ONT171 ± 5591%9%
ON graftsivitS/ONTCSN255 ± 2187%13%
ivitS/ONTASN170 ± 2291%9%
Ivit+ON graftsIvitASN/ONTCSN325 ± 3583%17%
ivitCSN/ONTASN552 ± 4072%28% **
ivitCSN/ONTCSN1000 ± 7042%58% ***

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, Z.; Suggate, E.L.; Logan, A.; Berry, M. Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration after Optic Nerve Transection is Driven by Cellular Intravitreal Sciatic Nerve Grafts. Cells 2020, 9, 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061335

AMA Style

Ahmed Z, Suggate EL, Logan A, Berry M. Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration after Optic Nerve Transection is Driven by Cellular Intravitreal Sciatic Nerve Grafts. Cells. 2020; 9(6):1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Zubair, Ellen L. Suggate, Ann Logan, and Martin Berry. 2020. "Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axon Regeneration after Optic Nerve Transection is Driven by Cellular Intravitreal Sciatic Nerve Grafts" Cells 9, no. 6: 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061335

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop