Next Article in Journal
Cohesin-Mediated Genome Architecture Does Not Define DNA Replication Timing Domains
Previous Article in Journal
Halobacterium salinarum virus ChaoS9, a Novel Halovirus Related to PhiH1 and PhiCh1
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/genes10030195
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cytological Evaluations of Advanced Generations of Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum Showing Resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium

by
Natalia Kudryavtseva
1,
Michael J. Havey
2,
Lowell Black
3,
Peter Hanson
4,
Pavel Sokolov
1,
Sergey Odintsov
1,
Mikhail Divashuk
1 and
Ludmila Khrustaleva
1,*
1
Center of Molecular Biotechnology, Russian State Agrarian University-Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy (RGAU-MTAA), 49, Timiryazevskaya Str., 127550 Moscow, Russia
2
USDA-ARS and Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
3
Seminis Vegetable Seeds, DeForest, WI 53532, USA
4
The World Vegetable Center, P.O. Box 42, Shanhua Tainan 74199, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(3), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030195
Submission received: 13 December 2018 / Revised: 20 February 2019 / Accepted: 27 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Interspecific crossing is a promising approach for introgression of valuable traits to develop cultivars with improved characteristics. Allium fistulosum L. possesses numerous pest resistances that are lacking in the bulb onion (Allium cepa L.), including resistance to Stemphylium leaf blight (SLB). Advanced generations were produced by selfing and backcrossing to bulb onions of interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum that showed resistance to SLB. Molecular classification of the cytoplasm established that all generations possessed normal (N) male−fertile cytoplasm of bulb onions. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) was used to study the chromosomal composition of the advanced generations and showed that most plants were allotetraploids possessing the complete diploid sets of both parental species. Because artificial doubling of chromosomes of the interspecific hybrids was not used, spontaneous polyploidization likely resulted from restitution gametes or somatic doubling. Recombinant chromosomes between A. cepa and A. fistulosum were identified, revealing that introgression of disease resistances to bulb onion should be possible.

1. Introduction

Stemphylium leaf blight (SLB), caused by Stemphylium vesicarium (Wallr.) Simmons, is a serious fungal disease of bulb onion (Allium cepa L.) occurring worldwide, which may result in 100% losses of the bulb crop [1]. SLB has also been reported in garlic [2], asparagus [3], sunflowers [4], pear [5], radish [6], and tomato [7]. Research has been undertaken to identify sources of resistance to SLB in Allium species and determine its genetic basis [8]. Allium fistulosum L. is a source of desirable traits for improvement of the bulb onion [9] and shows resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium which may be conditioned by a single dominant gene [8]. In 2001, hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum were produced to initiate introgression of resistance to SLB into the bulb onion [8]. Although the first interspecific hybrids between A. fistulosum and A. cepa were obtained in 1935 [9], hybrids are highly sterile, and numerous attempts to transfer beneficial traits from A. fistulosum into the bulb onion have not been successful. The first fertile advanced backcross plants between A. cepa and A. fistulosum were obtained by Hou and Peffley [10]; however, no commercial cultivar of the bulb onion has ever been developed with a desirable trait from A. fistulosum.
Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) is a reliable technique for the identification of parental genomes at the chromosomal level and for the monitoring of alien gene introgression via interspecific hybrids [11,12,13]. However, the technique is often not used in breeding because of its labor intensity and low-throughput. Molecular markers are an effective method for tracking of valuable traits allowing acceleration of the breeding process. However, molecular markers provide information only across chromosomal regions in linkage disequilibrium with the target trait. A huge number of molecular markers are required to analyze chromosomal introgression from one species to another. GISH provides information at the chromosome level and does not require any knowledge about genome sequences and can confirm copy numbers of homologous chromosomes in polyploid hybrids, which is difficult using molecular markers.
In this paper we present the results of a cytological study of advanced generations derived from hybrids between A. cepa × A. fistulosum that show resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Seeds of parental species (A. cepa and A. fistulosum) and advanced generations derived from interspecific hybrids [8] were provided by the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center in Taiwan (Table 1). A landrace (‘Tuwel’) of Allium fistulosum from Indonesia (accession AF468) was used as a male parent and A. cepa cultivar ‘Rouge de Tana’ (TA207) as the female parent to produce the interspecific hybrid, which was self-pollinated to the S5 generation (AVON1275). Backcross generations were produced using AVON1275 and the open-pollinated onion cultivar ‘Arka Niketan’ (AC464), developed by the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research. After backcrossing to Arka Niketan, embryos were rescued [14] and resulting plants were evaluated for Stemphylium leaf blight (SLB) resistance after artificial inoculation (described below). Backcross progenies from the same family that showed resistance to SLB were intercrossed. Plants were grown in pots in greenhouses at RGAU-MTAA (Russia) or the University of Wisconsin (USA).

2.2. Chromosome Preparations

Mitotic chromosomes were prepared from young root meristems using the squash method according to Khrustaleva and Kik [15] with slight modifications. Young root tips were pretreated overnight with an aqueous saturated solution of 1-bromnaphtalene at 4 °C, fixed in 3:1 (v/v) ethanol-acetic acid for at least 1 h at room temperature and then stored at −20 °C, rinsed four times in distilled water, and finally incubated in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.8) containing 0.1% (w/v) Pectolyase Y-23 (Kikkoman, Tokyo, Japan), 0.1% (w/v) Cellulase Onozuka R-10 (Yakult Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 0.1% (w/v) Cytohelicase (Sigma-Aldrich, France) for 50 min at 37 °C. The macerated root tips were spread by dissecting and squashing in a drop of 45% acetic acid.

2.3. Analysis of Fertility

Pollen morphology was studied using an acetocarmine staining method [16] from flowering plants from AVON 1275, AVON 1290, AVON 1291, AVON 1501, and AVON 1502. The other hybrid lines did not flower under our greenhouse conditions. We analyzed five flowers per accession when flowers were at peak anther maturity. Two anthers from each flower were squashed in 1% acetocarmine on separate microscope slides and analyzed using phase−contrast microscopy with ocular ×12 and objective ×10 magnification.

2.4. Genomic DNA Isolation and Probes Preparation

Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves of the parental species (A. cepa TA207and AC464, and A. fistulosum AF468) according to the protocol of Rogers and Bendich [17]. Genomic DNA of A. fistulosum was sonicated to 1–3 kb fragments and used for the labeled probe preparation. DNA from A. cepa was sonicated to 200–400 bp fragments and used as the blocking DNA. Probe DNA was labeled with digoxigenin (DIG)-11-dUTP by nick-translation (Roche, Diagnostics Gmbh, Mannheim, Germany).

2.5. GISH

In situ hybridization, immunological detection, and counterstaining procedures were the same as previously described by Khrustaleva and Kik [15]. The hybridization mixture contained: 50% (v/v) formamide, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 2×SSC, 0.25% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50 ng/µL of labeled probe (DIG)-11- dUTP DNA (A. fistulosum), and 1500 ng/µL of blocking DNA (A. cepa). In the hybridization mixture, we used a ratio of 1:30 of probe and block DNA, and washes at 78% stringency were applied. GISH analyses were performed on 3 to 5 plants from each accession.

2.6. Microscopy, Image Analysis, and Karyotyping

GISH preparations were visualized using a fluorescent microscope, Zeiss Axio Imager (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Jena, Germany), conjugated with black−white sensitive digital camera Axiocam, and with Axio Vision software v. 4.6.3. The final optimization of images was performed using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Karyotype analysis and identification of individual chromosomes with fluorescent signals were performed according to bulb onion nomenclature [18] and previously published karyotypes of closely related Allium species [19]. The relative position of the recombination site on the relevant chromosome arm was a ratio between its arm length and distance from centromere to the recombination point.

2.7. Cytoplasmic Evaluations

Genomic DNA was isolated from the pooled leaf tissue of all accessions and cytoplasms were classified using high-resolution melting (HRM) of an indel in the chloroplast accD gene [20]. Controls included previously isolated genomic DNA from A. cepa (N-cytoplasmic inbred B1750B and S-cytoplasmic B1750A), A. fistulosum, and A. galanthum.

2.8. Stemphyllium Screening

The AVON accessions listed in Table 1 were developed in fields under natural heavy disease pressure at the World Vegetable Center in Shanhua, Taiwan. Seven of the accessions (AVON 1275, 1278, 1282, 1283, 1284, 1290, and 1291), the cultivar ‘Green Banner’ (A. fistulosum), and four cultivars of bulb onion were evaluated for SLB in greenhouses/mist chambers at Seminis Vegetable Seeds in Deforest, WI. Plants were grown in Fafard 4P® mix (Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA) in trays with 5-cm cells in a greenhouse at 24 to 27 °C with 12 h lights. Four replications of 18 plants of each accession were sprayed three times at 8, 9, and 10 weeks after sowing with 1 × 105 conidia of S. vesicarium per mL in 0.01% tween-20. Plants were then placed into a mist chamber to maintain leaf wetness for 48 h, and then returned to the greenhouse. Eight days after the third inoculation, disease severity in each replication was visually rated by four individuals using a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = no symptoms to 5 = severe leaf blight or dead plants. Disease severity ratings were averaged over replications. RStudio was used for statistical analyses [21]. One-way ANOVA was calculated based on four replications of each accession, and the least significant differences were calculated using RStudio.

3. Results

3.1. Stemphylium Leaf Blight Evaluations

During development, the interspecific hybrid, derived accessions (Table 1), and cultivars of A. fistulosum and A. cepa were planted in the field at the World Vegetable Center (Shanhua, Taiwan) and subjected to natural disease pressure by S. vesicarium. In these fields, AVON 1275 and derived accessions (Table 1), as well as the original A. fistulosum parent (AF468), appeared resistant to SLB, while all cultivars of A. cepa appeared susceptible. In greenhouse evaluations, there were significantly different (P < 0.001) disease severity reactions (DSRs), which ranged from 1.3 to 2.3 for A. fistulosum and derived accessions, whereas cultivars of A. cepa had significantly higher DSRs ranging from 2.8 to 4.6 (Table 2). Because A. fistulosum, AVON 1275, and many derived lines had significantly higher resistance to SLB than A. cepa, resistance from A. fistulosum appears to show some level of dominance over susceptibility of the bulb onion (Table 2).

3.2. GISH Analysis

3.2.1. Chromosome Complement of Amphidiploid S5 Generation

The F1 interspecific hybrid was self-pollinated for five generations (S5) and GISH evaluation of all progenies (AVON 1275) showed that the all hybrids were allotetraploids (2n = 4x = 32) possessing 16 chromosomes from A. cepa (16C) and 16 chromosomes from A. fistulosum (16F) (Figure 1a). No recombination was detected between the chromosomes of A. cepa and A. fistulosum. Karyotype analysis (Figure 1a’) confirmed the presence of complete diploid sets of both parental species: 2n = 4x = 32 (16C + 16F).

3.2.2. Chromosome Complement of Amphidiploid Backcross Progenies

Amphidiploid AVON 1275 was backcrossed as the female parent with A. cepa. GISH analysis of AVON 1278 (S5BC1) showed that the hybrids were allotetraploid with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum (Figure 1b) and no recombinant chromosomes. Karyotype analysis (Figure 1b’) showed the presence of complete diploid sets of both parental species: 2n = 4x = 32 (16C + 16F).
GISH analysis of AVON 1282, 1290, 1501, and 1502 (all S4BC1 families) showed that the hybrids possessed 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum (Figure 1c–f) with no recombinant chromosomes. Karyotype analysis (Figure 1c’–f’) showed the presence of complete diploid sets of both parental species: 2n = 4x = 32 (16C + 16F). These results indicate that progenies were not derived from backcrossing to bulb onion, but from self-pollination of the amphidiploid parent.

3.2.3. Backcross Progenies with Missing Chromosomes

GISH analysis of AVON 1283 (S4BC1) showed that plants possessed 30 chromosomes, 16 chromosomes from A. cepa and 14 from A. fistulosum (Figure 2a). Karyotype analysis (Figure 2a’) revealed the presence of a complete diploid set of chromosomes from A. cepa, and seven pairs of chromosomes from A. fistulosum, with one pair of chromosome 5 missing (2n = 4x − 2 = 30) (16C + 14F). GISH analysis of AVON 1284 (S3BC1) revealed that the hybrid also contained 30 chromosomes (2n = 4x − 2 = 30) and karyotype analysis (Figure 2b,b’) showed the presence of a complete diploid set of chromosomes of A. cepa and seven pairs from A. fistulosum, also missing the pair of homologous chromosomes 5 (16C + 14F).

3.2.4. Backcross Progenies with Recombinant Chromosomes

GISH analysis of AVON 1291 (S4BC1) showed that the hybrids were allotetraploid, possessing 16 chromosomes from A. cepa, 15 chromosomes from A. fistulosum, and one recombinant chromosome between A. cepa and A. fistulosum (2n = 4x = 32) (Figure 3a). Karyotype analysis (Figure 3a’) showed the presence of complete diploid set of A. cepa (8 pairs of homologous chromosomes), 7 pairs of A. fistulosum homologous chromosomes, and one pair of A. fistulosum chromosome 2, which contained one recombinant chromosome with a centromeric region belonging to A. fistulosum and one non-recombinant chromosome (16C + 15F + 1F/C). The recombination site was located on the long arm of chromosome 2. The relative position of recombination site from the centromere was 83.6% ± 0.6 (SD, n = 8). GISH analysis of AVON 1504 (S4BC1) showed that the hybrids were allotetraploids possessing 16 chromosomes from A. fistulosum, 14 chromosomes from A. cepa, and 2 recombinant chromosomes between A. cepa and A. fistulosum (2n = 4x = 32) (Figure 3b). Karyotype analysis (Figure 3b’) showed the presence of complete diploid sets of A. fistulosum, 7 pairs of the A. cepa homologous chromosomes and one pair of recombinant chromosome 7 with the centromeric region from A. cepa (16F + 14C + 2C/F). The recombination site is located in the short arm of chromosome 7, and the relative positions of recombination sites on both chromosomes were the same at 49.7% ± 0.3 (SD, n = 5). These results clearly demonstrate recombination between chromosomes from A. cepa and A. fistulosum, supporting larger backcrossing efforts towards introgression of beneficial traits into the bulb onion.

3.3. Pollen Fertility

Pollen fertility of the advanced generations from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum was evaluated using acetocarmine stained pollen. The plants were male−fertile, with fertility ranging from 60 to 95% (Table 3). Plants from AVON 1291 which possessed one recombinant chromosome 2 showed 93% stainable pollen, revealing that the recombinant chromosome did not significantly reduce male fertility.

3.4. Cytoplasms of Plants Derived from Interspecific Crosses between A. cepa and A. fistulosum

Cytoplasms of plants from advanced generations from interspecific hybrids were determined using high-resolution melting (HRM) of an indel in the chloroplast accD gene [20]. This marker distinguishes normal (N) male−fertile cytoplasm from male−sterile (S) cytoplasm of onion, as well as the cytoplasms of A. fistulosum and A. galanthum (Figure 4). None of the accessions originating from the original interspecific cross possessed the cytoplasm of A. fistulosum. Most interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum have been produced using A. fistulosum as the female parent, which limits introgression due to deleterious nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions [22]. In theory, chromosome regions carrying disease or pest resistance(s) in these accessions should avoid this deleterious interaction because they possess N cytoplasm of A. cepa.

4. Discussion

GISH clearly distinguished chromosomes from A. cepa and A. fistulosum despite the presence of similar DNA sequences in their genomes, such as a subtelomeric tandem repeat showing 80% identity [23,24]. Additionally, retrotransposons are abundant in the Allium genomes [25] and are dispersed along entire chromosomes, which may contribute to cross-hybridization. GISH analyses of interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum revealed that spontaneous chromosome duplication produced allotetraploids. These results agree with Levan [26], who reported polyploid F2 plants from crosses between A. cepa and A. fistulosum without artificial chromosome duplication. S5 plants of AVON1275 were allotetraploids with complete diploid chromosome sets from both parents and were used as the female parent for backcrossing with A. cepa. Most of the progenies from the backcross generations were allotetraploids (2n = 4x = 32) with complete diploid sets from both parental species (16C + 16F). Equal chromosome numbers from both parents indicates that progenies were from self-pollination and not from backcrosses to A. cepa. The same observation was reported by Budylin et al. [27] who completed GISH analyses of advanced generations of hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum showing resistance to downy mildew. These authors revealed spontaneous polyploidization and absence of predominantly A. cepa chromosomes in backcross generations. The absence of backcrossing in diploid F1BC3 hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum was also reported by Hou and Peffley [10]. Our observations indicate that the amphidiploid plants of S4BC1 lines AVON 1282, 1290, 1501, and 1502 were derived from the selfing of the amphidiploid female parent as opposed to backcrossing.
Plants from AVON 1283 (S4BC1) and 1284 (S3BC1) possessed a complete diploid set of chromosomes from A. cepa and seven pairs of A. fistulosum chromosomes, with one pair of chromosome 5 missing (16C + 14F − 2Ch5). Because both AVON 1283 and 1284 are resistant to SLB, this indicates that SLB resistance from A. fistulosum is not carried on chromosome 5.
Plants from AVON 1291 (S4BC1) and AVON 1504 (S4BC1) possessed recombinant chromosomes. In AVON1291, one recombinant chromosome 2 was observed and its homolog was non-recombinant chromosome 2 of A. cepa. It is likely that a crossing over event occurred between A. cepa and A. fistulosum chromosomes at the allotetraploid stage. Homeologous recombination has been detected in both recently formed natural polyploids and synthetic interspecific polyploids [28]. Recombination between chromosomes of A. cepa and A. fistulosum has been documented [10,13,29], and intergenomic pairing and recombination have been documented for allotetraploid hybrids of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus), Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum lycopersicoides, and for allopolyploids in asterids [30]. Two recombinant chromosome 7 were revealed in AVON 1504 with the centromeric region belonging to A. cepa. The size of the A. cepa region within both recombinant chromosomes 7 was the same, at 49.7% ± 0.3 (SD, n = 5), which indicates the presence of two sister chromatids that did not segregate during the second meiotic division and remained in the same gamete. This suggests that spontaneous polyploidization in the interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum was caused by second division restitution, resulting in 2n-gamete formation. Alternatively, the presence of two identical recombinant chromosomes 7 could be the result of the somatic doubling of the complement in the zygote. The recombinant chromosome could have been formed during meiosis in the interspecific hybrid, either in a pollen mother cell or in a macrospore mother cell and underwent somatic doubling. Another interesting observation from the GISH analysis of AVON 1504 was the lack of genetic material from A. cepa in the distal region on the short arm of the recombinant chromosomes 7, which has been replaced with genetic material of A. fistulosum (Figure 3b,b’,b”). It is known that 5S rDNA is located on the short arm of chromosome 7 in both species [31,32] and the lengths and sequences of the coding 5S rRNA gene segments are conserved among Allium species [33]. Based on this observation, we conclude that this part of the A. cepa genome can be replaced by A. fistulosum and function in the cytoplasm of A. cepa.
Spontaneous chromosome doubling in interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum was observed in our materials and has been previously reported [26]. This could be caused by fusion of 2n gametes, what led to the formation of allotetraploid progeny possessing complete diploid sets from both parental species. However, the formation of restitution gametes is rare in A. cepa [34]. Even if we assume the formation of restitution gametes, the probability of fusion of 2n-egg with 2n-sperm is unlikely. An alternative hypothesis may be that facultative apomixes occurred, which has been reported for several species of genus Allium [35,36]. Spontaneous polyploidization could be also caused by cytomixis, which involves the transfer of nuclear material from one cell to another via cytomictic channels [37]. Cytomixis has been observed in the pollen mother cells of A. cepa and A. fistulosum [38,39].

5. Conclusions

Spontaneous polyploidization and no evidence of backcrossing were revealed in backcross progenies from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum. The mechanism of spontaneous polyploidization is not clear, and it will be of great interest to determine if it results from somatic or meiotic chromosome doubling. Clear evidence for recombination between the chromosomes of A. cepa and A. fistulosum supports continued research to introgress beneficial traits, such as SLB resistance, from A. fistulosum into the bulb onion.

Author Contributions

N.K. performed GISH experiments, microscopy, karyotyping, data analysis, and visualization; M.J.H. performed HRM experiments, review, and editing; L.B. Stemphyllium screening; P.H. resources, visualization; P.S., S.O. and M.D., installation of the advance generation populations and visualization; L.K. performed GISH experiments, data curation, project administration, and original draft preparation.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number: 16-16-10031). Partially the project was financed by the World Vegetable Center (AVRDC), 2015-Grants-001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, D.; Dhiman, J.S.; Sidhu, A.S.; Hari Singh, D.; Singh, H. Current status of onions in India: Strategies for disease resistance breeding for sustained production. Onion Newslett. Trop. 1992, 4, 43–44. [Google Scholar]
  2. Polat, Z.; Besirli, G.; Sönmez, I.; Yavuz, B. First report of Stemphylium leaf blight of garlic (Allium sativum) caused by Stemphylium vesicarium in Turkey. New Dis. Rep. 2012, 25, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Johnson, D.A.; Lunden, J.D. First report of purple spot (Stemphylium vesicarium) of asparagus in Washington. Plant Dis. 1984, 68, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arzanlou, M.; Khodaei, S.; Babai-Ahari, A. Helianthus annuus as a natural host for Stemphylium vesicarium in Iran. Australas. Plant Dis. Notes 2012, 7, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Llorente, I.; Montesinos, E. Effect of relative humidity and interrupted wetness periods on brown spot severity of pear caused by Stemphylium vesicarium. Phytopathology 2002, 92, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Belisario, A.; Vitale, S.; Luongo, L.; Nardi, S.; Talevi, S.; Corvi, F. First report of Stemphylium vesicarium as causal agent of wilting and root rotting of radish sprouts in Italy. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Behare, J.; Laterrot, H.; Sarfatti, M.; Zamir, D. Restriction fragment length polymorphism mapping of the Stemphylium resistance gene in tomato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1991, 4, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pathak, C.S.; Black, L.L.; Cheng, S.J.; Wang, T.C.; Ko, S.S. Breeding onions for Stemphylium leaf blight resistance. Acta Hortic. 2001, 555, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Emsweller, S.L.; Jones, H.A. An interspecifc hybrid in Allium. Hilgardia 1935, 9, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hou, A.; Peffley, E.B. Recombinant chromosomes of advanced backcross plants between Allium cepa L. and A. fistulosum L. revealed by in situ hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 1190–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schwarzacher, T.; Leitch, A.R.; Bennett, M.D.; Heslop-Harrison, J.S. In situ localization of parental genomes in a wide hybrid. Ann. Bot. 1989, 64, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, F.; Novy, R.G.; Helgeson, J.P.; Jiang, J. Cytological characterization of potato-Solanum etuberosum somatic hybrids and their backcross progenies by genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 1999, 42, 987–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khrustaleva, L.I.; Kik, C. Introgression of Allium fistulosum into A. cepa mediated by A. roylei. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gonzalez, L.G.; Ford-Lloyd, B.V. Facilitation of Wide-Crossing Through Embryo Rescue and Pollen Storage in Interspecific Hybridization of Cultivated Allium species. Plant Breed. 1987, 98, 318–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khrustaleva, L.I.; Kik, C. Cytogenetical studies in the bridge cross Allium cepa × (A. fistulosum × A. roylei). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 96, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jakše, M.; Hirschegger, P.; Bohanec, B.; Havey, M.J. Evaluation of Gynogenic Responsiveness and Pollen Viability of Selfed Doubled Haploid Onion Lines and Chromosome Doubling via Somatic Regeneration. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2010, 135, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rogers, S.O.; Bendich, A.J. Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Mol. Biol. 1985, 5, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. De Vries, J.N. Onion chromosome nomenclature and homoeology relationships—Workshop report. Euphytica 1990, 49, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Vries, J.N.; Jongerius, M.C. Interstitial C-bands on the chromosomes of Allium-species from section Cepa. In Proceedings of the 4th Eucarpia Allium Symposium, Wellesbourne, UK, 6–9 September 1988; pp. 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohn, V.; Kiełkowska, C.A.; Havey, J.M. Sequencing and annotation of the chloroplast DNAs of normal (N) male-fertile and male-sterile (S) cytoplasms of onion and single nucleotide polymorphisms distinguishing these cytoplasms. Genome 2013, 56, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R; RStudio, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; Available online: http://www.rstudio.com/ (accessed on 28 March 2011).
  22. Ulloa, G.M.; Corgan, J.N.; Dunford, M. Evidence for nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility between Allium fistulosum and A. cepa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 90, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Irifune, K.; Hirai, K.; Zheng, J.; Tanaka, R.; Morikawa, H. Nucleotide sequences of a highly repeated DNA sequences and its chromosomal localization in Allium fistulosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1995, 90, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pich, U.; Fritsch, R.; Shubert, I. Closely related Allium species (Alliaceae) share a very similar satellite sequence. Plant Syst. Evol. 1996, 202, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vitte, C.; Estep, M.C.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Bennetzen, J.L. Young, intact and nested retrotransposons are abundant in the onion and asparagus genomes. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 881–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Levan, A. The cytology of the species hybrid Allium cepa × fistulosum and its polyploidy derivates. Hereditas 1941, 27, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Budylin, M.V.; Kan, L.Yu; Romanov, V.S.; Khrustaleva, L.I. GISH Study of Advanced Generation of the Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa L. and Allium fistulosum L. with Relative Resistance to Downy Mildew. Russ. J. Genet. 2014, 50, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crusz, A.L.; Sigel, E.M.; Witherup, C. Homoeologous chromosome pairing across the eukaryote phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2017, 117, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stevenson, M.; Armstrong, S.J.; Ford Lloyd, B.V.; Jones, G.H. Comparative analysis of crossover exchanges and chiasmata in Allium cepa × fistulosum after genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Chromosome Res. 1998, 6, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gaeta, R.T.; Pires, J.C. Homoeologous recombination in allopolyploids: The polyploidy ratchet. New Phytol. 2010, 186, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hizume, M. Allodiploid nature of Allium wakegi Araki revealed by genomic in situ hybridization and localization of 5S and 18S rDNAs. Jpn. J. Genet. 1994, 69, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shibata, F.; Hizume, M. Evolution of 5S rDNA units and their chromosomal localization in Allium cepa and Allium schoenoprasum revealed by microdissection and FISH. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Son, J.H.; Park, K.C.; Lee, S.I.; Jeon, E.J.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, N.S. Sequence variation and comparison of the 5S rRNA sequences in Allium species and their chromosomal distribution in four Allium species. J. Plant Biol. 2012, 55, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van der Valk, P.; Kik, C.; Verstappen, F.; Everink, J.T.; de Vries, J.N. Independent segregation of two isozyme markers and inter-plant differences in nuclear DNA content in the interspecific backcross (Allium fistulosum L. × A. cepa L.) × A. cepa L. Euphytica 1991, 55, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Poulsen, N. Chives (Allium schoenoprasum). In Onions and Allied Crops; Brewster, J., Rabinowitch, H., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; Volume 3, pp. 231–250. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kojima, A.; Nagato, Y. Pseudogamous embryo genesis and the degree of parthenogenesis in Allium tuberosum. Sex. Plant Reprod. 1992, 5, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kravets, E.A. Cytomixis, its nature, value and the cytological consequences. Tsitol. Genet. 2012, 3, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheng, K.; Nien, H.; Yang, C.; Wang, I.; Chou, I.; Chen, J. Light and electron microscopical observations on cytomixis and the study of its relation to variation and evolution. Acta Bot. Sin. 1975, 17, 60–69. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang, J.; Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Zheng, G. Ultrastructural observation on the intra-and intercellular microtrabecular network of the pollen mother cells in onion (Allium cepa). Acta Bot. Sin. 2001, 43, 331–338. [Google Scholar]
Genes 10 00195 g001 550
Figure 1. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generations from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum. (a) AVON 1275 (S5), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (b) AVON 1278 (BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (c) AVON 1282 (S4BC1) 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (d) AVON 1290 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (e) AVON 1501 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (f) AVON 1502 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (a’, b’, c’, d’, e’, f’) karyotypes of the AVON1275, AVON121278, AVON 1282, AVON 1290, AVON 1501, and AVON1502 hybrids, respectively. Digoxigenin labelled probe DNA of A. fistulosum and detected with FITC (green fluorescence).
Figure 1. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generations from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum. (a) AVON 1275 (S5), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (b) AVON 1278 (BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (c) AVON 1282 (S4BC1) 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (d) AVON 1290 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (e) AVON 1501 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (f) AVON 1502 (S4BC1), 2n = 4x = 32, with 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 16 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (a’, b’, c’, d’, e’, f’) karyotypes of the AVON1275, AVON121278, AVON 1282, AVON 1290, AVON 1501, and AVON1502 hybrids, respectively. Digoxigenin labelled probe DNA of A. fistulosum and detected with FITC (green fluorescence).
Genes 10 00195 g001
Genes 10 00195 g002 550
Figure 2. GISH on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generations from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum: (a) AVON 1283 (S4BC1) contains 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 14 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (b) AVON 1284 (S3BC1) contains 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 14 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (a’,b’) karyotypes of the AVON 1283 and AVON 1284 hybrids, respectively, with missing one pair of homologous chromosomes 5 of A. fistulosum.
Figure 2. GISH on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generations from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum: (a) AVON 1283 (S4BC1) contains 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 14 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (b) AVON 1284 (S3BC1) contains 16 chromosomes of A. cepa and 14 chromosomes of A. fistulosum; (a’,b’) karyotypes of the AVON 1283 and AVON 1284 hybrids, respectively, with missing one pair of homologous chromosomes 5 of A. fistulosum.
Genes 10 00195 g002
Genes 10 00195 g003 550
Figure 3. GISH on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generation progenies from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum. (a) AVON 1291, (S4BC1) with complete diploid set of A. cepa, and 7 pairs of A. fistulosum homologous chromosomes and one homologous chromosome 2 of A. fistulosum, and another one was recombinant; (b) AVON 1504 (S4BC1) with complete diploid sets of A. fistulosum, 7 pairs of A. cepa homologous chromosomes and two recombinant chromosomes 7; Digoxigenin labelled probe DNA of A. fistulosum and detected with FITC (green fluorescence); (a’), karyotype of the AVON1291 hybrid with one recombinant chromosome 2; (b’) karyotype of the AVON1504 hybrid with two recombinant chromosomes 7; (a”) recombinant chromosome 2: top — the merged DAPI and FITC filter images, below — the FITC filter image; (b”) two recombinant chromosomes 7: left — the FITC filter image, right — the merged DAPI and FITC filter image; arrows indicate recombinant chromosomes.
Figure 3. GISH on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of advanced generation progenies from interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum. (a) AVON 1291, (S4BC1) with complete diploid set of A. cepa, and 7 pairs of A. fistulosum homologous chromosomes and one homologous chromosome 2 of A. fistulosum, and another one was recombinant; (b) AVON 1504 (S4BC1) with complete diploid sets of A. fistulosum, 7 pairs of A. cepa homologous chromosomes and two recombinant chromosomes 7; Digoxigenin labelled probe DNA of A. fistulosum and detected with FITC (green fluorescence); (a’), karyotype of the AVON1291 hybrid with one recombinant chromosome 2; (b’) karyotype of the AVON1504 hybrid with two recombinant chromosomes 7; (a”) recombinant chromosome 2: top — the merged DAPI and FITC filter images, below — the FITC filter image; (b”) two recombinant chromosomes 7: left — the FITC filter image, right — the merged DAPI and FITC filter image; arrows indicate recombinant chromosomes.
Genes 10 00195 g003
Genes 10 00195 g004 550
Figure 4. High resolution melting (HRM) analysis of the accD indel distinguishing normal (N) male−fertile cytoplasm of onion (blue) from the cytoplasms of male−sterile (S) onion (green), Allium fistulosum (red) and Allium galanthum (violet). Lines from more than one DNA may plot together.
Figure 4. High resolution melting (HRM) analysis of the accD indel distinguishing normal (N) male−fertile cytoplasm of onion (blue) from the cytoplasms of male−sterile (S) onion (green), Allium fistulosum (red) and Allium galanthum (violet). Lines from more than one DNA may plot together.
Genes 10 00195 g004
Table
Table 1. Parental Allium species and advanced generations derived from interspecific hybrids used for cytogenetic studies.
Table 1. Parental Allium species and advanced generations derived from interspecific hybrids used for cytogenetic studies.
AccessionPedigreeGeneration
AVON 1275TA207 × AF468S5
AVON 1278AVON 1275 × AC464S5BC1
AVON 1284AVON 1275 × AC464S3BC1
AVON 1282AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1283AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1290AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1291AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1501AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1502AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1503AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AVON 1504AVON 1275 × AC464S4BC2
AF468Allium fistulosum ‘Tuwel’
AC464Allium cepa ‘Arka Niketan’
TA207Allium cepa ‘Rouge de Tana’
Table
Table 2. Mean disease severity ratings (DSRs) ± standard deviations (sd) for reactions to Stemphyllium vesicarium by Allium fistulosum, A. cepa, and accessions derived from AVON 1275.
Table 2. Mean disease severity ratings (DSRs) ± standard deviations (sd) for reactions to Stemphyllium vesicarium by Allium fistulosum, A. cepa, and accessions derived from AVON 1275.
Accession 1CultivarMean DSR ± SD 2
A. fistulosumGreen Banner1.3 ± 0.5 a
AVON 1282 1.3 ± 0.3 a
AVON 1278 1.6 ± 0.5 ab
AVON 1283 1.6 ± 0.6 ab
AVON 1291 1.8 ± 0.5 ab
AVON 1284 2.0 ± 0.4 ab
AVON 1290 2.0 ± 0.7 ab
AVON 1275 2.3 ± 0.9 abc
A. cepa1620 2.8 ± 0.6 abc
A. cepa1606 3.1 ± 0.6 bcd
A. cepaGranex 33 3.8 ± 0.9 cd
A. cepa17074.6 ± 0.5 d
1 Origins of AVON accession are listed in Table 1. Accessions of A. cepa are proprietary lines of Seminis Seed Company (Woodland, CA, USA); 2 DSR of 1 = no symptoms and 5 = very severe blight or dead plants. Means followed by the same letter were not significantly different based on least significant difference at P = 0.5.
Table
Table 3. Pollen fertility (percentage of dark red stained pollen grains) of advanced generations of interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum.
Table 3. Pollen fertility (percentage of dark red stained pollen grains) of advanced generations of interspecific hybrids between A. cepa and A. fistulosum.
AccessionPollen Fertility, %
AVON 1275 (S5)94.1
AVON 1290 (S4BC2)85.3
AVON 1291 (S4BC2)92.9
AVON 1501 (S4BC2)63.1
AVON 1502 (S4BC2)94.7

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kudryavtseva, N.; Havey, M.J.; Black, L.; Hanson, P.; Sokolov, P.; Odintsov, S.; Divashuk, M.; Khrustaleva, L. Cytological Evaluations of Advanced Generations of Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum Showing Resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium. Genes 2019, 10, 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030195

AMA Style

Kudryavtseva N, Havey MJ, Black L, Hanson P, Sokolov P, Odintsov S, Divashuk M, Khrustaleva L. Cytological Evaluations of Advanced Generations of Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum Showing Resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium. Genes. 2019; 10(3):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kudryavtseva, Natalia, Michael J. Havey, Lowell Black, Peter Hanson, Pavel Sokolov, Sergey Odintsov, Mikhail Divashuk, and Ludmila Khrustaleva. 2019. "Cytological Evaluations of Advanced Generations of Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum Showing Resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium" Genes 10, no. 3: 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030195

APA Style

Kudryavtseva, N., Havey, M. J., Black, L., Hanson, P., Sokolov, P., Odintsov, S., Divashuk, M., & Khrustaleva, L. (2019). Cytological Evaluations of Advanced Generations of Interspecific Hybrids between Allium cepa and Allium fistulosum Showing Resistance to Stemphylium vesicarium. Genes, 10(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10030195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop