Next Article in Journal
An Insight into the Chromosomal Evolution of Lebiasinidae (Teleostei, Characiformes)
Previous Article in Journal
Narrowing Down a Major QTL Region Conferring Pod Fiber Contents in Yardlong Bean (Vigna unguiculata), a Vegetable Cowpea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Responses of LINE-1 in the Dentate Gyrus, Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Chronic Neurotoxic Methamphetamine: A Study in Rat Brain

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences/College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
Genes 2020, 11(4), 364; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040364
Submission received: 12 February 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 25 March 2020 / Published: 28 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Methamphetamine (METH) is a widely abused psychostimulant with the potential to cause a broad range of severe cognitive deficits as well as neurobehavioral abnormalities when abused chronically, particularly at high doses. Cognitive deficits are related to METH neurotoxicity in the striatum and hippocampus. The activation of transposable Long INterspersed Nuclear Element 1 (LINE-1) is associated with several neurological diseases and drug abuse, but there are very limited data regarding the effects of high-dose METH on the activity of LINE-1 in the adult brain. Using real-time quantitative PCR, the present study demonstrates that the chronic administration of neurotoxic METH doses results in the increased expression of LINE-1-encoded Open Reading Frame 1 (ORF-1) in rat striatum shortly after the last dose of the drug and decreased ORF-1 expression during METH withdrawal, with dentate gyrus potentially developing “tolerance” to these METH effects. LINE-1 activation may be a new factor mediating the neurotoxic effects of chronic METH in the striatum and, therefore, a new drug target against METH-induced psychomotor impairments in chronic METH users.

1. Introduction

Methamphetamine (METH) is a potent central nervous system (CNS) psychostimulant, the abuse of which remains a major public health concern worldwide. According to the SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) 2018 report, there are more than 700,000 current users of METH in the United States. Alarmingly, deaths from METH overdose doubled between 2013 and 2017 and keep rising [1,2]. METH abuse causes a broad range of cognitive deficits [3], as well as neurobehavioral abnormalities [4]. Furthermore, chronic exposure to METH early in life increases the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease later on [5,6,7]. There is no FDA-approved medication for METH use disorder or specific medication that counteracts the damaging effects of METH on the adult brain [8,9]. Consequently, new drug targets are needed, particularly for heavy METH users, who suffer the most from METH abuse-related neuropsychological problems [10,11,12], are less likely to seek treatment than moderate METH users [13], and are at high risk of dying from a METH overdose [14].
METH effects on the brain are related to METH neurotoxicity, which is manifested by long-term decreases in dopaminergic and serotonergic markers in the brain, particularly in the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway [15,16,17,18,19]. The deficits in dopaminergic markers in the striatum correlate with cognitive decline and poor psychomotor functioning in abstinent METH users [20]. In contrast to striatal monoaminergic terminals, striatal neurons and interneurons in the brains of rats and humans appear not to degenerate, or show deficits in their neurotransmitters, after the administration of neurotoxic METH doses (but see mice studies [21,22]). Their function is impaired, however, due to oxidative stress and apoptotic events, including DNA oxidation and breakage [23,24,25,26]. In the hippocampus, particularly when administered at high doses, METH dysregulates neurogenesis and induces apoptosis, which is often followed by the death of pyramidal neurons and granular cells, which may contribute to the decreased hippocampal volume observed in experimental animals and humans [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. These molecular events are thought to underlie a variety of cognitive impairments observed in chronic human METH users [3] and decreased spatial memory in rodents [35,36]. The prefrontal cortex is also affected by METH neurotoxicity [31,33,37], which results in impairment of executive functions in METH addicts [38].
Transposable elements are repetitive DNA sequences which have been implicated in substance use disorder [39,40,41] and, therefore, are potential drug targets in this disorder. LINE-1 belongs to the family of Long INterspersed Elements (LINEs) and is the most abundant, most active, and most intensely studied of the autonomous repetitive DNA elements [42]. LINE-1 has been implicated in several cancers [43] and in several neurodegenerative diseases [44]. LINE-1 has also been implicated in addiction. Thus, increased LINE-1 expression has been found in the mouse nucleus accumbens, after chronic exposure to psychostimulant cocaine [39], and in cultured DAergic PC12 cells chronically treated with morphine [41]. In humans, increased LINE-1 expression has been found in several brain areas of alcoholics [40]. Our group has shown that METH overdoses increase LINE-1 expression in rat neurogenic zones (subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus and subventricular zone (SVZ)) [45]. Altogether, these results suggest a common pathway of LINE-1 induction by drugs of abuse. This common pathway likely involves oxidative stress and apoptosis [41,46].
The goal of the present study was to determine whether the chronic administration of neurotoxic METH doses had similar effects on LINE-1 activity in the dentate gyrus and dorsal striatum as did METH overdose, in the rat. We have chosen this species because the profile of METH neurotoxicity is similar between rats and humans [47] and because LINE-1 is highly conserved in human and rodent DNA [48,49]. The LINE-1 element consists of the promoter-containing 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR), two open reading frames, ORF-1 and ORF-2, that encode an RNA-binding protein and a protein with reverse transcriptase and endonuclease activity, respectively, and a 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR), with a polyA tail [50]. Both ORF proteins are required for the retrotransposition of LINE-1 and non-autonomous retrotransposons. The proteins and LINE-1RNA assemble together to form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes in the cytoplasm, which later move to the nucleus for reintegration into the host genome. ORF-1 protein (ORF-1p) is a nucleic acid-binding protein that lacks sequence similarity with any other known protein and its function in the brain is still unclear. It is known that ORF-1p can act as an RNA chaperone to LINE-1 RNA and other RNAs (reviewed in [51]). In addition to binding RNA, ORF-1p binds single-stranded DNA. ORF-1p is distinctive in localizing to stress granules [52], which are discrete cytoplasmic aggregates that can be induced by a range of stress conditions. In neurons, stress granules contain components required for synaptic plasticity and local protein translation [53]. ORF-2p has been shown to have a cytotoxic potential—it can break DNA via its endonuclease activity and induce apoptosis [54,55].
LINE-1 activation is often induced by hypomethylation of its promoter region [56,57]. Novel LINE-1 copies can be generated by retrotransposition that involves target-primed reverse transcription [58]. To assess LINE-1 activity after chronic METH administration, we measured ORF-1 mRNA, ORF-1 genomic DNA (gDNA) copy number and LINE-1 promoter methylation. The expression of ORF-2p was examined in the beginning and at the end of chronic METH treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The animals used in this investigation were young adult (~2-month-old) male Sprague–Dawley outbred rats, purchased at Harlan Laboratories (currently Envigo, Madison, WI, USA). We employed only male rats in order to compare the data from this study to the data from our already published study in binge METH-exposed male rats [45]. Binge METH (overdose) and chronic METH studies were conducted over approximately 2 years and involved multiple cohorts. The total number of rats that participated in the study was N = 90. Some rats died due to toxic effects of METH; however, the mortality rate was low (~6%). Some rats were removed from the study due to extensive weight loss. Upon arrival, the rats weighed 250–300 g. They were pair-housed under a 12 h light/dark cycle in a temperature-controlled (20–22 °C) and humidity-controlled room throughout the study. They had food and water available ad libitum. The animals acclimatized for 7 days before the start of the study. All animal procedures were conducted between 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M., in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Wayne State University (animal protocol #16-03-067). The description of animal procedures meets the ARRIVE recommended guidelines described by The National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research [59].

2.2. Administration of Methamphetamine

METH metabolism in rats is much faster than in humans. Consequently, the plasma METH half-life is 10–12 h in humans vs. 60–70 min in rats. To achieve plasma METH levels in rats that are close to those in humans, higher METH doses have to be administered and/or interval between METH injections shortened in studies employing rats. To simulate heavy METH abuse in humans, rats were administered daily doses of (+)-METH hydrochloride (20 mg/kg free base) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 days via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections. Control rats received saline (1 mL/kg) at the same time. This METH dosing induces neurotoxicity [19]. METH neurotoxicity is associated with hyperthermia, which peaks at approximately 1 h after each injection. Therefore, core body temperatures were measured with a rectal probe digital thermometer (Thermalert TH-8; Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ, USA), before the beginning of the treatment (baseline temperatures) and at 1 h after each METH or saline injection. Rats were sacrificed by decapitation on the 3rd day of chronic METH treatment (for ORF-2p analysis), or after the treatment: at 1 h (for LINE-1 methylation analysis), 24 h or 7 days (for LINE-1 methylation, expression and/or gDNA copy# analysis) after the last injection of the drug or saline. The experimental design is presented in Figure 1.

2.3. Tissue Collection

The brains were removed, dissected out into discrete brain areas (striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum) and stored at −80 °C until assayed. The SVZ was dissected out together with the striatum, whereas the SGZ was dissected out together with the dentate gyrus, using punch sampling technique. Muscle tissue was also collected and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.4. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Pyrosequencing

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was employed to measure the levels of ORF-1 mRNA and ORF-1 gDNA copy number in the dissected brain areas from METH- or saline-treated rats that were sacrificed on the 1st or 7th day of METH withdrawal (Figure 1). A pyrosequencing technique was employed to determine the methylation of the first ten CpG sites within the LINE-1 promoter region in rats sacrificed at 1 h, 24 h or 7 days after METH (Figure 1). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) was used as a reference gene. The analyses were conducted at EpigenDx Inc. (Hopkinton, MA, USA). The details of these analyses can be found in a previously published manuscript [45]. The data are expressed as LINE-1/GADPH ratios normalized to saline controls (mean ± SEM). This approach normalizes the differences between runs.

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemistry, another cohort of young adult male rats was administered METH or saline, as described above. These rats were sacrificed by decapitation on the 3rd day of chronic METH treatment (Figure 1). The brains were dissected out, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected by incubation with 20% and 30% glycerol, snap-frozen, and stored at −80 °C. Every other of the coronal sections (20 μm, 3/rat) from the striatum/SVZ (1.18–0.26 from Bregma) and the dentate gyrus/SGZ (−3.12 to −4.68 from Bregma) was collected for analysis. Sections were pretreated with 1× citrate buffer for 40 min at 70 °C, then allowed to cool to room temperature, before being blocked in a blocking buffer (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)) for 1 h at room temperature. These sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with a chicken anti-ORF-2p (1:200, Rockland Immunochemicals Inc., Limerick, PA, USA) primary antibody. Of note, we did not employ an ORF-1p antibody in the present investigation, because this antibody did not work in our hands. The coronal sections were next incubated with anti-chicken secondary antibody (Alexa-488, 1:1000, 3 h at room temperature). The nuclei were labeled with DRAQ5 dye (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The sections were mounted on slides using Fluoromount mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Immunofluorescence on each slice was measured under the same settings, using Leica TCS SPE-II confocal microscope with spectral detector and Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software. All data were averaged first per slice and then per rat, and normalized to saline-treated controls after each experiment. This approach normalized differences across the experimental days and allowed for standardization across the treatment groups.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The comparisons made in the study were pre-planned comparisons. We established a priori the dentate gyrus/SGZ and striatum/SVZ as potentially affected brain regions in chronic METH-exposed rats and chose other samples based on existing knowledge regarding METH neurotoxicity and LINE-1 effects on the brain and muscle. Significant differences between the control group and METH group were determined using multiple unpaired two-tailed t-tests, followed by the Holm-Sidak method (p < 0.05 was corrected to adjust for the probability of type I errors in multiple comparisons). A consistent standard deviation was assumed for each brain area. A two-way repeated-measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by the Sidak post hoc test, was performed on the temperature data. Correlations were determined using Pearson’s analysis. The data sets are expressed as the mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean).

3. Results

3.1. Chronic METH Treatment Increases ORF-1 mRNA Levels in the Striatum of Adult Rat Brain

We have previously determined that neurotoxic METH overdose (4 × 10 mg/kg, i.p., every 2 h) increases LINE-1 DNA transcription in the striatum/SVZ and dentate gyrus/SGZ at 24 h after METH (1.8- and 2.3-fold, respectively), but not in the prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, or control muscle [45]. Our group and others showed that chronic high-dose METH administration (dose range: 5–50 mg/kg for 4–12 days) is also neurotoxic; it causes significant depletion of dopaminergic and serotonergic markers as well as neuronal apoptosis and/or necrosis in rat striatum, prefrontal cortex, and hippocampus [17,19,27,60,61,62,63,64,65]. In this study, we employed our rat model of neurotoxicity of chronic METH [19] and assessed indices of LINE-1 activity. Statistical analysis of ORF-1 mRNA levels in the striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum of rats treated with neurotoxic chronic METH or saline revealed induction of ORF-1 transcription to mRNA at 24 h after chronic METH (2-fold, p = 0.005, t = 2.93, df = 66, n = 4–13, individual t-tests with Holm–Sidak correction for multiple comparisons), but not in the dentate gyrus (Figure 2a). Chronic neurotoxic METH treatment produced variable responses in the striatum (high standard deviation in the METH group); however, a subgroup of METH rats showed a definitive increase in ORF-1 expression (Figure 2b). The ORF-1 mRNA levels in the prefrontal cortex and cerebellum did not differ between chronic METH-treated rats and chronic saline-treated controls (Figure 2a). Relative to induced LINE-1 mRNA production by chronic METH treatment in brain tissue, no induction by METH was detected in negative control muscle tissue (SAL: 0.066 ± 0.021; METH: 0.070 ± 0.014, p > 0.1, Student’s t-test, t = 0.143, df = 7; n = 4–5). To determine whether the increased LINE-1 transcription is accompanied by increased LINE-1 mRNA translation, the levels of ORF-2p protein were measured by immunohistochemistry. The ORF-2p signal was present within the SVZ and was higher in some METH-treated rats as compared to saline controls. Figure 2c shows an example of increased ORF-2p immunoreactivity in the SVZ.

3.2. Expression of ORF-2p is Increased on the Third Day of Chronic Methamphetamine Treatment

It has been reported that oxidative stress induces increased LINE-1 expression [66]. A dose of 40 mg/kg METH administered in two doses over two days could induce less severe oxidative stress than the same total dose administered over 6 h (binge METH). Consequently, assuming oxidative stress upstream of LINE-1 activation needs to reach a threshold, LINE-1 activation may not have occurred in the dentate gyrus, thus explaining the lack of an increase in ORF-1 mRNA later on. Alternatively, METH induced an increase in ORF-1 mRNA in the beginning of chronic administration of the drug, but “tolerance” developed to this effect over time. To test this hypothesis, rats were treated with 20 mg/kg METH, or saline, per day for two days, and sacrificed 24 h later (Figure 1). Immunoreactivity of ORF-2p was found to be increased in the SVZ (1.8-fold, p = 0.091, t = 1.46, df = 8, n = 5) and dentate gyrus/SGZ (3.3-fold, p = 0.009, t = 2.99, df = 8, n = 5) at 24 h after the second METH dose as compared to saline controls (Figure 3), indicating that LINE-1 was activated in these areas in the beginning of the chronic METH administration. ORF-2p localized to the cytoplasm.

3.3. Chronic METH Treatment Leads to a Persistent Decrease in ORF-1 mRNA Levels in the Striatum of Adult Rat Brain

At 24 h after METH treatment, the effects of the last METH injection can be mixed with the chronic effects of the drug. To determine the effects of chronic METH alone on ORF-1 expression, another cohort of rats was treated with chronic METH or chronic saline, and sacrificed on the seventh day of METH withdrawal. The striatum displayed a significant decrease in ORF-1 mRNA levels (−76%, p = 0.018, t-test corrected for four comparisons by Holm–Sidak method, t = 2.52, df = 25, n = 4–7), while ORF-1 mRNA levels in the dentate gyrus were not different from saline-treated controls (Figure 4). Since we previously reported that ORF-1 mRNA levels in the striatum were significantly but moderately (−57%) decreased in binge METH-treated rats, compared to saline controls at seven days after the last METH dose [45], the present finding suggested the further chronic METH-induced adaptive down-regulation of LINE-1 transcription in the striatum. Chronic neurotoxic METH did not significantly change in the ORF-1 mRNA levels in the prefrontal cortex or cerebellum (Figure 4). Likewise, no ORF-1 transcription induction by METH was detected in muscle tissue (SAL: 1.00 ± 0.08; METH: 0.98 ± 0.14, p > 0.1, Student’s t-test, t = 0.086, df = 5; n = 4).

3.4. Chronic METH Has no Significant Effect on the ORF-1 gDNA Levels in the Striatum and Dentate Gyrus of Adult Rat Brain

The most identified function of LINE-1 RNA is working as a template for copying itself through reverse transcription, and therefore directing the paste process of integrating itself into gDNA [61]. LINE-1 undergoes retrotransposition via a copy-and-paste mechanism, and thereby increases its copy number within gDNA [62]. To assess whether the increase in LINE-1 mRNA production induced by chronic METH treatment was potentially followed by LINE-1 transposition into the gDNA, we quantified ORF-1 gDNA copy numbers in the brains of rats treated with chronic METH or saline and sacrificed after a seven-day-long withdrawal from METH. Statistical analysis of the dissected brain areas by individual t-tests and corrected for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Sidak method did not reveal statistically significant changes in ORF-1 gDNA copy number in the striatum or dentate gyrus (striatum: p = 0.291, t = 1.08, df = 53; dentate gyrus: p = 0.102, t = 1.69, df = 24; n = 4) (Figure 5). When the dentate gyrus and striatum were combined into one neurogenic group, the ORF-1 gDNA levels were significantly decreased in METH-treated rats compared to the saline controls (−28%, p < 0.05, Student’s t-test, t = 3.49, df = 6, n = 4). This finding suggested ORF-1-containing cell loss within these two brain regions. The prefrontal cortex and cerebellum had basal levels of ORF-1 gDNA at 7 days after chronic METH regiment (Figure 5). The levels of ORF-1 mRNA in muscle tissue also did not significantly differ between METH- and saline-treated rats (SAL: 1.00 ± 0.23; METH: 1.21 ± 0.17, p > 0.1, Student’s t-test, t = 0.697, df = 6; n = 4).

3.5. Chronic METH-Triggered Activation of LINE-1 Is Not Accompanied by Hypomethylation of LINE-1 Promoter

LINE-1 activation is often induced by the hypomethylation of its promoter region [56,57]. The examination of the first 10 CpG sites within the promoter region-containing 5’ UTR of LINE-1 revealed no statistically significant changes in the average methylation of these sites in the striatum or dentate gyrus of chronic METH-exposed rats relative to saline controls at 1 h or 24 h after chronic METH. Similarly, no decreases were observed at individual CpGs in the striatum or dentate gyrus (Figure 6a–d). Methylation of the LINE-1 promoter at the seven-day time point was assessed, to determine whether hypermethylation accompanied the decrease in striatal ORF-1 mRNA. No statistically significant changes were observed in the striatum (Figure 6e). A single statistically significant change found was the hypermethylation of CpG-1 site in the dentate gyrus (Figure 6f). Of note, methylation status of LINE-1 was not significantly altered by binge METH in any brain region at 1 h, 24 h or 7 d, with the exception of the dentate gyrus (−1%, 24 h after METH overdose [45]).

3.6. Methamphetamine-Induced Hyperthermia Does Not Contribute to LINE-1 Activation

METH-induced hyperthermia is an important contributor to METH neurotoxicity [67] and, therefore, can potentially contribute to LINE-1 activation. Rat core body temperatures were recorded at 1 h after each METH or saline injection, and the data are presented in Figure 7a. As expected, METH induced statistically significant increases in core body temperatures compared to saline (38.5–39.9 °C vs. 36.9–37.9 °C). There was a significant main effect of the treatment (F(1,14) = 31.0, p < 0.0001) and time (F(9,126) = 5.24, p < 0.001), as well as significant treatment × time interaction (F(9,126) = 2.71, p < 0.01), as determined by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by Sidak’s post hoc test. There was no correlation between ORF-1 24 h-mRNA levels and hyperthermia in the striatum (Pearson’s two-tailed correlation analysis, r2 = −0.122, p = 0.772) (Figure 7b), suggesting that the increase in ORF-1 mRNA levels at 24 h was not caused by the increase in core body temperature.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates that the systemic chronic administration of neurotoxic METH doses to young adult male rats increases striatal ORF-1 mRNA levels at 24 h after the last dose of the drug, in a LINE-1 promoter hypomethylation- and hyperthermia-independent manner, and leads to their decrease during withdrawal from the drug. The study also demonstrates that the dentate gyrus develops a “tolerance” to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH during chronic administration of the drug and that chronic METH administration does not lead to significant increases in striatal ORF-1 DNA copy number at 7 d after the last METH injection, in either region. Lastly, the study reports no signs of METH-induced LINE-1 activation in the prefrontal cortex.
We have previously demonstrated that that high-dose binge METH (4 × 10 mg/kg, over 6 h) increases ORF-1 mRNA and ORF-2p levels within the neuronal cytoplasm of the dentate gyrus/SGZ and striatum/SVZ, at 24 h after the last METH injection [45]. A lack of increase in dentate gyrus ORF-1 mRNA observed in the current study at 24 h after chronic METH could have been due to the lack of LINE-1 activation by daily 20 mg/kg METH doses, as opposed to 40 mg/kg METH binge administered over 6 h. Against this scenario, we found increased ORF-2p levels in the dentate gyrus/SGZ and in the SVZ on the third day of chronic METH treatment. Thus, the present finding of high-dose chronic METH increasing ORF-1 mRNA in the striatum but not in the dentate gyrus at 24 h suggests that “tolerance” develops to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effects of METH in the dentate gyrus/SGZ, but not in the striatum/SVZ, during 10 d of chronic administration of the drug. This “tolerance” may have involved effective attenuation of oxidative stress [19,68], which is upstream of LINE-1 activation [46,66,69], and/or accelerated LINE-1 RNA decay/mRNA degradation in response to METH-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis [70,71,72].
Increased LINE-1 expression (nuclear RNA) at the 24 h time point has also been found in the mouse nucleus accumbens after chronic exposure to another psychostimulant, cocaine [39]. In vitro, LINE-1 was activated upon exposure to METH, cocaine [73], morphine [41], or nicotine [74]. In human studies, signs of increased LINE-1 activity were detected in the amygdala and the superior frontal cortex of alcoholics [40], the medial prefrontal cortex of cocaine users [75] and the cell-free DNA of cigarette smokers [76]. These results suggest a common pathway of LINE-1 induction by these substances. The available data implicate an imbalance in redox status as a common pathway leading to LINE-1 activation. Thus, METH, cocaine, morphine, cigarette smoke and alcohol can all induce oxidative stress and deficit in antioxidant glutathione [19,41,77,78]. Oxidative stress, or glutathione deficiency, increase LINE-1 mRNA levels in cell culture [46,69] and in vivo [66]. Conversely, the reduction of LINE-1 activity protects neurons against oxidative stress in vitro and in vivo [66]. Furthermore, it has been reported that the inhibition of LINE-1 expression in the heart decreased ischemic damage by activation of Akt/PKB signaling [79], which is regulated by oxidative stress [80]. The notion of imbalanced redox status playing a role in LINE-1 activation is also supported by recent reports of increased LINE-1 activity in aging [81], a life stage during which antioxidant defenses decrease while oxidative stress level rises. The aforementioned studies measured LINE-1 activation by different assays (hypomethylation, retrotransposition, RNA levels et al.); increased ORF-1 expression after METH was reported by Okudaira and colleagues (ORF-1 protein levels) [73] and by our group (ORF-1 mRNA) [45].
Some tolerance does develop to METH hyperthermia (Figure 7), as well as to the neurotoxic effects of METH in the striatum, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex upon repeated administration of the drug [19,82,83], with the tolerance to METH-induced neurotoxicity shown not being due to the attenuation of METH-induced hyperthermia [82]. Our present results also suggest that mechanisms underlying “tolerance” to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH are not mediated by hyperthermia. However, these mechanisms may also be different than mechanisms contributing to the tolerance to METH neurotoxicity at the molecular level, because tolerance to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH was not observed in the striatum. High-dose binge METH decreased glutathione levels in rat striatum at 3 h, while chronic high-dose METH (20 mg/kg, 10 d, i.p.) did not have this effect [19], indicating tolerance to METH-induced oxidative stress and/or recovery of glutathione synthesis in this brain area during 10 d of chronic METH treatment. Consequently, even though glutathione deficit may play a role in initial LINE-1 activation, it is rather, not a factor keeping ORF-1 mRNA levels increased at 24 h after METH in the striatum/SVZ. It is plausible that ORF-1 mRNA went up higher and/or stayed up longer in the striatum/SVZ than in the dentate gyrus/SGZ, due to regional differences in LINE-1 RNA metabolism or stress granules dynamics. Stress granules store translation-dormant mRNAs that may be directed for degradation. Stress granules also contain LINE-1 RNA which can be directed to decay via interaction with MOV10 helicase [70,84]. Consequently, “tolerance” to the ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH may be due to accelerated decrease in these RNAs. Chronic METH can induce apoptosis and cell death in the hippocampus [27,85]; therefore, it is also possible that ORF-1 mRNA decreased in this brain region, due to the accelerated death of cells containing ORF-1 mRNA during chronic treatment with METH.
The striatum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, as well as SGZ and SVZ, contain dopaminergic and glutamatergic innervations [86,87,88]. High-dose METH triggers dopamine and glutamate release in the striatum and hippocampus [89,90], followed by oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, compromised antioxidant glutathione system and, finally, nerve terminal degeneration in these brain areas (striatum [19,23,24,25,26,29,91] and hippocampus [29,91,92,93,94]). What sets apart these two brain regions the most in relation to METH neurotoxicity is dopamine content. The striatum is more dopamine-rich compared to the hippocampus. Consequently, dopamine release and post-synaptic signaling is the highest in the striatum after administration of the same dose of METH. In view of our data, this implicates that “tolerance” to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH is not mediated by dopamine, but perhaps a sustained increase in the ORF-1 mRNA is mediated. Thus, a simple explanation for our finding is that ORF-1 mRNA increased more in the striatum than in the dentate gyrus, and did not fall to the basal levels in the former by 24 h after the last METH dose. The prefrontal cortex contains about 100 times less dopamine than the striatum and, therefore, it is less affected by binge or chronic METH, due to lower DA release and related oxidative stress [47]. Moreover, glutamate release is not increased in the prefrontal cortex by repeated METH dosing [83], as it is in the striatum [95] and hippocampus [90], which may explain the lack of LINE-1 activation in this area. We have previously found that both dopamine and glutamate increase LINE-1 retrotransposition in vitro, with glutamate having a stronger effect [45]. Consequently, regional differences in LINE-1 responses to chronic METH can be due to differences in extracellular glutamate levels as well. Along these lines, regional differences have been observed between the prefrontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus in glutamatergic system responses to acute and repeated METH. For example, chronic exposure to medium-dose METH (4 mg/kg/d, i.p. for 14 d) resulted in differential changes in glutamate transporter EAAT3: a 39% decrease in the striatum, 25% decrease in the prefrontal cortex and 72% increase in the hippocampus [96]. Dopamine transporter was also differentially affected by chronic METH, with dorsal striatum showing a higher deficit than the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus showing no deficit [97]. Thus, increased glutamate uptake in the hippocampus may be responsible, at least in part, for the “tolerance” to ORF-1 mRNA-increasing effect of METH in the present study. The METH-triggered increase in glutamate is paralleled by an up-regulation in the expression of vesicular glutamate monoamine transporter 1 in the striatum [98]. Due to the fact that this transporter determines the amount of glutamate loaded into storage vesicles and consequently determines the release of glutamate [99], its increased expression may contribute to the prolonged release of glutamate in the striatum/SVZ following high-dose METH and the prolonged activation of LINE-1 in the SVZ.
Binge administration of high METH doses resulted in increased ORF-1 DNA copy number within the dentate gyrus and striatum on the seventh day of forced METH withdrawal [45]. Chronic administration of high METH doses did not lead to increases in ORF-1 DNA copy number at this time point, suggesting no retrotransposition of LINE-1 upon exposure to this METH regiment. Since we previously observed increased ORF-1 copy number 24 h after binge METH, an alternative hypothetical explanation for our current observation is initial LINE-1 retrotransposition, followed by the death of SVZ cells that underwent LINE-1 retrotransposition. Another potential interpretation of the observed results is that LINE-1 expression is induced without subsequent retrotransposition of the element. Chronic oxidative stress leads to the accumulation of stress granules [100]. Stress granules contain ORF-1p and have been suggested to regulate LINE-1 retrotransposition. Consequently, an increase in the stress granule number during chronic METH treatment could have restricted the number of LINE-1 retrotransposition events, as suggested by Goodier and colleagues [52]. Alternatively, it is plausible that DNA repair enzymes were able to prevent LINE-1 retrotransposition due to sub-threshold level of oxidative stress [66]. Finally, it is possible that METH-induced increases in ORF-1 copy number were extrachromosomal [101,102,103,104] and dissipated by the 7th day of withdrawal from METH.
Rat LINE-1 is strongly methylated at CpG-dinucleotides in most genomic copies of various somatic tissues, including the brain [105]. Compelling research data indicate that the methylation of the internal promoter located in LINE-1′s 5′ UTR determines LINE-1 transcription, especially the methylation status of the first few CpGs being identified as a sufficient and necessary factor for controlling LINE-1 promoter activity [56]. We did not detect decreases in striatal or dentate gyrus LINE-1 methylation, either at 1 h or 24 h after the last METH injection, as compared to saline-treated rats. We also did not detect the altered methylation of LINE-1 promoter at 7 d after chronic METH administration. It can be argued that the hypomethylation of the element occurred in the beginning of chronic METH treatment. Against this argument, we previously observed a lack of significant LINE-1 hypomethylation at 1 h or 24 h after binge METH administration [45]. In summary, our previous and current results, together with the finding that morphine-increased LINE-1 expression did not correlate with LINE-1 hypomethylation [41], point to mechanisms independent of cytosine methylation at the LINE-1 promoter CpG sites. Potential mechanisms regulating LINE-1 activation and transcription during METH administration include LINE-1 hydroxymethylation [106], as well as HDACs-mediated histone modifications, small interfering RNAs, small piRNAs, P1-LINE-1 RNA, DNA-editing proteins, and WTN pathway [50,105,107,108,109,110,111]. As compared to saline controls, rats that self-administered high doses of METH showed differential DNA hydroxymethylation within LINE; therefore, this mechanism is the one most likely responsible for METH-triggered LINE-1 activation. Histone-mediated LINE-1 activation is another possibility, as METH induces multiple histone modifications [112]. Changes in the LINE-1 allele methylation pattern have recently been applied to the assessment of LINE-1 methylation in chronic human METH users and detected changes in partial LINE-1 methylation [113,114]. This finding introduces a possibility of similar changes in chronic METH-exposed rats.

5. Conclusions

Overall, our data suggest that the chronic administration of high METH doses persistently activates LINE-1 in the SVZ and leads to the decreased transcription of LINE-1-encoded ORF-1 gene, accelerated removal of LINE-1 RNA or ORF-1 mRNA, or ORF-1-positive cell death within the SVZ during the withdrawal. Our data also suggest that some of these processes may occur earlier in the dentate gyrus/SGZ than in the SVZ. LINE-1 activation might be a new factor of mediating the neurotoxic effects of chronic METH in the striatum, which are manifested by persistent psychomotor impairments in human METH users and can lead to Parkinson’s disease. The development of “tolerance” to METH-induced increase in ORF-1 mRNA by the dentate gyrus/SGZ, as well as the lack of signs for the LINE-1 activation in the prefrontal cortex, suggests that LINE-1 in the striatum/SVZ, dentate gyrus/SVZ and the prefrontal cortex respond in a different manner to chronic METH administration. These differential responses are likely due to, at least in part, differences in the extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate after exposure to METH, summarized in Table 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design of the study, formal analysis of the data and data interpretation, writing of the manuscript: A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to EpigenDx Inc. for analyzing the LINE-1 promoter methylation status, ORF-1 expression, and ORF-1 copy number. Thanks to Ping Qiu for treating animals with methamphetamine, and Dongyue Yu for immunohistochemical labelling.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jalal, H.; Buchanich, J.M.; Roberts, M.S.; Balmert, L.C.; Zhang, K.; Burke, D.S. Changing dynamics of the drug overdose epidemic in the United States from 1979 through 2016. Science 2018, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. NIDA. Overdose Death Rates; National Institute on Drug Abuse: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018.
  3. Hart, C.L.; Marvin, C.B.; Silver, R.; Smith, E.E. Is cognitive functioning impaired in methamphetamine users? A critical review. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 586–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Richards, J.R.; Bretz, S.W.; Johnson, E.B.; Turnipseed, S.D.; Brofeldt, B.T.; Derlet, R.W. Methamphetamine abuse and emergency department utilization. West. J. Med. 1999, 170, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Callaghan, R.C.; Cunningham, J.K.; Sajeev, G.; Kish, S.J. Incidence of Parkinson’s disease among hospital patients with methamphetamine-use disorders. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 2333–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Callaghan, R.C.; Cunningham, J.K.; Sykes, J.; Kish, S.J. Increased risk of Parkinson’s disease in individuals hospitalized with conditions related to the use of methamphetamine or other amphetamine-type drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012, 120, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Todd, G.; Pearson-Dennett, V.; Wilcox, R.A.; Chau, M.T.; Thoirs, K.; Thewlis, D.; Vogel, A.P.; White, J.M. Adults with a history of illicit amphetamine use exhibit abnormal substantia nigra morphology and parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2016, 25, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ciccarone, D. Stimulant abuse: Pharmacology, cocaine, methamphetamine, treatment, attempts at pharmacotherapy. Prim. Care 2011, 38, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Courtney, K.E.; Ray, L.A. Methamphetamine: An update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014, 143, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Logan, B.K. Methamphetamine—Effects on human performance and behavior. Forensic. Sci. Rev. 2002, 14, 133–151. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stock, A.K.; Radle, M.; Beste, C. Methamphetamine-associated difficulties in cognitive control allocation may normalize after prolonged abstinence. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2019, 88, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rusyniak, D.E. Neurologic manifestations of chronic methamphetamine abuse. Neurol. Clin. 2011, 29, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Brecht, M.L.; Lovinger, K.; Herbeck, D.M.; Urada, D. Patterns of treatment utilization and methamphetamine use during first 10 years after methamphetamine initiation. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2013, 44, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. UN Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report; UN Office on Drugs and Crime: Vienna, Austria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ricaurte, G.A.; Guillery, R.W.; Seiden, L.S.; Schuster, C.R.; Moore, R.Y. Dopamine nerve terminal degeneration produced by high doses of methylamphetamine in the rat brain. Brain Res. 1982, 235, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilson, J.M.; Kalasinsky, K.S.; Levey, A.I.; Bergeron, C.; Reiber, G.; Anthony, R.M.; Schmunk, G.A.; Shannak, K.; Haycock, J.W.; Kish, S.J. Striatal dopamine nerve terminal markers in human, chronic methamphetamine users. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 699–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wagner, G.C.; Ricaurte, G.A.; Seiden, L.S.; Schuster, C.R.; Miller, R.J.; Westley, J. Long-lasting depletions of striatal dopamine and loss of dopamine uptake sites following repeated administration of methamphetamine. Brain Res. 1980, 181, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hotchkiss, A.J.; Gibb, J.W. Long-term effects of multiple doses of methamphetamine on tryptophan hydroxylase and tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rat brain. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1980, 214, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moszczynska, A.; Turenne, S.; Kish, S.J. Rat striatal levels of the antioxidant glutathione are decreased following binge administration of methamphetamine. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 255, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Volkow, N.D.; Chang, L.; Wang, G.J.; Fowler, J.S.; Leonido-Yee, M.; Franceschi, D.; Sedler, M.J.; Gatley, S.J.; Hitzemann, R.; Ding, Y.S.; et al. Association of dopamine transporter reduction with psychomotor impairment in methamphetamine abusers. Am. J. Psychiatry 2001, 158, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tulloch, I.; Afanador, L.; Mexhitaj, I.; Ghazaryan, N.; Garzagongora, A.G.; Angulo, J.A. A single high dose of methamphetamine induces apoptotic and necrotic striatal cell loss lasting up to 3 months in mice. Neuroscience 2011, 193, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tulloch, I.K.; Afanador, L.; Zhu, J.; Angulo, J.A. Methamphetamine induces striatal cell death followed by the generation of new cells and a second round of cell death in mice. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2011, 9, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tokunaga, I.; Ishigami, A.; Kubo, S.; Gotohda, T.; Kitamura, O. The peroxidative DNA damage and apoptosis in methamphetamine-treated rat brain. J. Med. Investig. 2008, 55, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jayanthi, S.; Deng, X.; Noailles, P.A.; Ladenheim, B.; Cadet, J.L. Methamphetamine induces neuronal apoptosis via cross-talks between endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria-dependent death cascades. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kitamura, O.; Tokunaga, I.; Gotohda, T.; Kubo, S. Immunohistochemical investigation of dopaminergic terminal markers and caspase-3 activation in the striatum of human methamphetamine users. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2007, 121, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Beauvais, G.; Atwell, K.; Jayanthi, S.; Ladenheim, B.; Cadet, J.L. Involvement of dopamine receptors in binge methamphetamine-induced activation of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial stress pathways. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mandyam, C.D.; Wee, S.; Crawford, E.F.; Eisch, A.J.; Richardson, H.N.; Koob, G.F. Varied access to intravenous methamphetamine self-administration differentially alters adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 64, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Thompson, P.M.; Hayashi, K.M.; Simon, S.L.; Geaga, J.A.; Hong, M.S.; Sui, Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Toga, A.W.; Ling, W.; London, E.D. Structural abnormalities in the brains of human subjects who use methamphetamine. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 6028–6036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deng, X.; Wang, Y.; Chou, J.; Cadet, J.L. Methamphetamine causes widespread apoptosis in the mouse brain: Evidence from using an improved TUNEL histochemical method. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 2001, 93, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hori, N.; Kadota, M.T.; Watanabe, M.; Ito, Y.; Akaike, N.; Carpenter, D.O. Neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine on rat hippocampus pyramidal neurons. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2010, 30, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Teuchert-Noodt, G.; Dawirs, R.R.; Hildebrandt, K. Adult treatment with methamphetamine transiently decreases dentate granule cell proliferation in the gerbil hippocampus. J. Neural Transm. 2000, 107, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kochman, L.J.; Fornal, C.A.; Jacobs, B.L. Suppression of hippocampal cell proliferation by short-term stimulant drug administration in adult rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 2157–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kuczenski, R.; Everall, I.P.; Crews, L.; Adame, A.; Grant, I.; Masliah, E. Escalating dose-multiple binge methamphetamine exposure results in degeneration of the neocortex and limbic system in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 207, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Thanos, P.K.; Kim, R.; Delis, F.; Ananth, M.; Chachati, G.; Rocco, M.J.; Masad, I.; Muniz, J.A.; Grant, S.C.; Gold, M.S.; et al. Chronic methamphetamine effects on brain structure and function in rats. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Recinto, P.; Samant, A.R.; Chavez, G.; Kim, A.; Yuan, C.J.; Soleiman, M.; Grant, Y.; Edwards, S.; Wee, S.; Koob, G.F.; et al. Levels of neural progenitors in the hippocampus predict memory impairment and relapse to drug seeking as a function of excessive methamphetamine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37, 1275–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schroder, N.; O’Dell, S.J.; Marshall, J.F. Neurotoxic methamphetamine regimen severely impairs recognition memory in rats. Synapse 2003, 49, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ladenheim, B.; Krasnova, I.N.; Deng, X.; Oyler, J.M.; Polettini, A.; Moran, T.H.; Huestis, M.A.; Cadet, J.L. Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity is attenuated in transgenic mice with a null mutation for interleukin-6. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 58, 1247–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Scott, J.C.; Woods, S.P.; Matt, G.E.; Meyer, R.A.; Heaton, R.K.; Atkinson, J.H.; Grant, I. Neurocognitive effects of methamphetamine: A critical review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2007, 17, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Maze, I.; Feng, J.; Wilkinson, M.B.; Sun, H.; Shen, L.; Nestler, E.J. Cocaine dynamically regulates heterochromatin and repetitive element unsilencing in nucleus accumbens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3035–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ponomarev, I.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Harris, R.A.; Mayfield, R.D. Gene coexpression networks in human brain identify epigenetic modifications in alcohol dependence. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 1884–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trivedi, M.; Shah, J.; Hodgson, N.; Byun, H.M.; Deth, R. Morphine induces redox-based changes in global DNA methylation and retrotransposon transcription by inhibition of excitatory amino acid transporter type 3-mediated cysteine uptake. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Beck, C.R.; Garcia-Perez, J.L.; Badge, R.M.; Moran, J.V. LINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2011, 12, 187–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Rodic, N. LINE-1 activity and regulation in cancer. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2018, 23, 1680–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Terry, D.M.; Devine, S.E. Aberrantly High Levels of Somatic LINE-1 Expression and Retrotransposition in Human Neurological Disorders. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Moszczynska, A.; Flack, A.; Qiu, P.; Muotri, A.R.; Killinger, B.A. Neurotoxic methamphetamine doses increase LINE-1 expression in the neurogenic zones of the adult rat brain. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Giorgi, G.; Marcantonio, P.; Del Re, B. LINE-1 retrotransposition in human neuroblastoma cells is affected by oxidative stress. Cell Tissue Res. 2011, 346, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moszczynska, A.; Callan, S.P. Molecular, behavioral, and physiological consequences of methamphetamine neurotoxicity: Implications for treatment. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2017, 362, 474–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lander, E.S.; Linton, L.M.; Birren, B.; Nusbaum, C.; Zody, M.C.; Baldwin, J.; Devon, K.; Dewar, K.; Doyle, M.; FitzHugh, W.; et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409, 860–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gibbs, R.A.; Weinstock, G.M.; Metzker, M.L.; Muzny, D.M.; Sodergren, E.J.; Scherer, S.; Scott, G.; Steffen, D.; Worley, K.C.; Burch, P.E.; et al. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 2004, 428, 493–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Erwin, J.A.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H. Mobile DNA elements in the generation of diversity and complexity in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martin, S.L. The ORF1 protein encoded by LINE-1: Structure and function during L1 retrotransposition. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2006, 2006, 45621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Goodier, J.L.; Zhang, L.; Vetter, M.R.; Kazazian, H.H., Jr. LINE-1 ORF1 protein localizes in stress granules with other RNA-binding proteins, including components of RNA interference RNA-induced silencing complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 6469–6483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, L.; Liu, B. Relationships between stress granules, oxidative stress, and neurodegenerative diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1809592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wallace, N.A.; Belancio, V.P.; Deininger, P.L. L1 mobile element expression causes multiple types of toxicity. Gene 2008, 419, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tan, H.; Wu, C.; Jin, L. A possible role for long interspersed nuclear elements-1 (LINE-1) in huntington’s disease progression. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018, 24, 3644–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hata, K.; Sakaki, Y. Identification of critical CpG sites for repression of L1 transcription by DNA methylation. Gene 1997, 189, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nur, I.; Pascale, E.; Furano, A.V. The left end of rat L1 (L1Rn, long interspersed repeated) DNA which is a CpG island can function as a promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 9233–9251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Cost, G.J.; Feng, Q.; Jacquier, A.; Boeke, J.D. Human L1 element target-primed reverse transcription in vitro. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5899–5910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ricaurte, G.A.; Schuster, C.R.; Seiden, L.S. Long-term effects of repeated methylamphetamine administration on dopamine and serotonin neurons in the rat brain: A regional study. Brain Res. 1980, 193, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kadota, T.; Kadota, K. Neurotoxic morphological changes induced in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats behaviorally sensitized to methamphetamine. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 2004, 67, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Armstrong, B.D.; Noguchi, K.K. The neurotoxic effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and methamphetamine on serotonin, dopamine, and GABA-ergic terminals: An in-vitro autoradiographic study in rats. Neurotoxicology 2004, 25, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xiong, K.; Liao, H.; Long, L.; Ding, Y.; Huang, J.; Yan, J. Necroptosis contributes to methamphetamine-induced cytotoxicity in rat cortical neurons. Toxicol. Vitro 2016, 35, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Abekawa, T.; Ito, K.; Nakagawa, S.; Nakato, Y.; Koyama, T. Olanzapine and risperidone block a high dose of methamphetamine-induced schizophrenia-like behavioral abnormalities and accompanied apoptosis in the medial prefrontal cortex. Schizophr. Res. 2008, 101, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, X.; Huang, E.; Tai, Y.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, C.; Chen, R.; Liu, C.; Lin, Z.; Wang, H.; et al. Nupr1 modulates methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neuronal apoptosis and autophagy through CHOP-Trib3-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling pathway. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Blaudin de The, F.X.; Rekaik, H.; Peze-Heidsieck, E.; Massiani-Beaudoin, O.; Joshi, R.L.; Fuchs, J.; Prochiantz, A. Engrailed homeoprotein blocks degeneration in adult dopaminergic neurons through LINE-1 repression. EMBO J. 2018, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ali, S.F.; Newport, R.R.; Holson, W.; Slikker, W., Jr.; Bowyer, J.F. Low environmental temperatures or pharmacologic agents that produce hyperthermia decrease methamphetamine neurotoxicity in mice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1995, 765, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Adeli, S.; Zahmatkesh, M.; Tavoosidana, G.; Karimian, M.; Hassanzadeh, G. Simvastatin enhances the hippocampal klotho in a rat model of streptozotocin-induced cognitive decline. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 72, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Terasaki, N.; Goodier, J.L.; Cheung, L.E.; Wang, Y.J.; Kajikawa, M.; Kazazian, H.H.; Okada, N. In Vitro screening for compounds that enhance human L1 mobilization. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Jia, R.; Cheng, V.; Xu, X.; Qiao, W.; Guo, F.; Liang, C.; Cen, S. The MOV10 helicase inhibits LINE-1 mobility. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 21148–21160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Thomas, M.P.; Liu, X.; Whangbo, J.; McCrossan, G.; Sanborn, K.B.; Basar, E.; Walch, M.; Lieberman, J. Apoptosis triggers specific, rapid, and global mrna decay with 3’ uridylated intermediates degraded by DIS3L2. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1079–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Warkocki, Z.; Krawczyk, P.S.; Adamska, D.; Bijata, K.; Garcia-Perez, J.L.; Dziembowski, A. Uridylation by TUT4/7 restricts retrotransposition of human LINE-1s. Cell 2018, 174, 1537–1548.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Okudaira, N.; Ishizaka, Y.; Nishio, H. Retrotransposition of long interspersed element 1 induced by methamphetamine or cocaine. J. Biol. Chem. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Liu, F.; Killian, J.K.; Yang, M.; Walker, R.L.; Hong, J.A.; Zhang, M.; Davis, S.; Zhang, Y.; Hussain, M.; Xi, S.; et al. Epigenomic alterations and gene expression profiles in respiratory epithelia exposed to cigarette smoke condensate. Oncogene 2010, 29, 3650–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Doyle, G.A.; Doucet-O’Hare, T.T.; Hammond, M.J.; Crist, R.C.; Ewing, A.D.; Ferraro, T.N.; Mash, D.C.; Kazazian, H.H., Jr.; Berrettini, W.H. Reading LINEs within the cocaine addicted brain. Brain Behav. 2017, 7, e00678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Erichsen, L.; Beermann, A.; Arauzo-Bravo, M.J.; Hassan, M.; Dkhil, M.A.; Al-Quraishy, S.; Hafiz, T.A.; Fischer, J.C.; Santourlidis, S. Genome-wide hypomethylation of LINE-1 and Alu retroelements in cell-free DNA of blood is an epigenetic biomarker of human aging. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Abdel-Zaher, A.O.; Mostafa, M.G.; Farghaly, H.S.; Hamdy, M.M.; Abdel-Hady, R.H. Role of oxidative stress and inducible nitric oxide synthase in morphine-induced tolerance and dependence in mice. Effect of alpha-lipoic acid. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 247, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kennedy-Feitosa, E.; Okuro, R.T.; Pinho Ribeiro, V.; Lanzetti, M.; Barroso, M.V.; Zin, W.A.; Porto, L.C.; Brito-Gitirana, L.; Valenca, S.S. Eucalyptol attenuates cigarette smoke-induced acute lung inflammation and oxidative stress in the mouse. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 41, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lucchinetti, E.; Feng, J.; Silva, R.; Tolstonog, G.V.; Schaub, M.C.; Schumann, G.G.; Zaugg, M. Inhibition of LINE-1 expression in the heart decreases ischemic damage by activation of Akt/PKB signaling. Physiol. Genom. 2006, 25, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Song, Y.S.; Narasimhan, P.; Kim, G.S.; Jung, J.E.; Park, E.H.; Chan, P.H. The role of Akt signaling in oxidative stress mediates NF-kappaB activation in mild transient focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2008, 28, 1917–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cardelli, M. The epigenetic alterations of endogenous retroelements in aging. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2018, 174, 30–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Johnson-Davis, K.L.; Fleckenstein, A.E.; Wilkins, D.G. The role of hyperthermia and metabolism as mechanisms of tolerance to methamphetamine neurotoxicity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 482, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Stephans, S.; Yamamoto, B. Methamphetamines pretreatment and the vulnerability of the striatum to methamphetamine neurotoxicity. Neuroscience 1996, 72, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Doucet, A.J.; Hulme, A.E.; Sahinovic, E.; Kulpa, D.A.; Moldovan, J.B.; Kopera, H.C.; Athanikar, J.N.; Hasnaoui, M.; Bucheton, A.; Moran, J.V.; et al. Characterization of LINE-1 ribonucleoprotein particles. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Mahmoudiasl, G.R.; Abbaszadeh, H.A.; Rezaei-Tavirani, M.; Abdollahifar, M.A.; Khoramgah, M.S.; Niknazar, S.; Darabi, S.; Roozbahany, N.A. Nod-like receptor protein 3 and nod-like receptor protein 1 inflammasome activation in the hippocampal region of postmortem methamphetamine chronic user. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2019, 120, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Haber, S.N. Corticostriatal circuitry. Dialog. Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 18, 7–21. [Google Scholar]
  87. Leranth, C.; Hajszan, T. Extrinsic afferent systems to the dentate gyrus. Prog. Brain Res. 2007, 163, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Song, M.; Yu, S.P.; Mohamad, O.; Cao, W.; Wei, Z.Z.; Gu, X.; Jiang, M.Q.; Wei, L. Optogenetic stimulation of glutamatergic neuronal activity in the striatum enhances neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of normal and stroke mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 98, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Nash, J.F.; Yamamoto, B.K. Methamphetamine neurotoxicity and striatal glutamate release: Comparison to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Brain Res. 1992, 581, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Raudensky, J.; Yamamoto, B.K. Effects of chronic unpredictable stress and methamphetamine on hippocampal glutamate function. Brain Res. 2007, 1135, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Gluck, M.R.; Moy, L.Y.; Jayatilleke, E.; Hogan, K.A.; Manzino, L.; Sonsalla, P.K. Parallel increases in lipid and protein oxidative markers in several mouse brain regions after methamphetamine treatment. J. Neurochem. 2001, 79, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Flora, G.; Lee, Y.W.; Nath, A.; Maragos, W.; Hennig, B.; Toborek, M. Methamphetamine-induced TNF-alpha gene expression and activation of AP-1 in discrete regions of mouse brain: Potential role of reactive oxygen intermediates and lipid peroxidation. Neuromol. Med. 2002, 2, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Baptista, S.; Bento, A.R.; Goncalves, J.; Bernardino, L.; Summavielle, T.; Lobo, A.; Fontes-Ribeiro, C.; Malva, J.O.; Agasse, F.; Silva, A.P. Neuropeptide Y promotes neurogenesis and protection against methamphetamine-induced toxicity in mouse dentate gyrus-derived neurosphere cultures. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62, 2413–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Goncalves, J.; Ribeiro, C.F.; Malva, J.O.; Silva, A.P. Protective role of neuropeptide Y Y(2) receptors in cell death and microglial response following methamphetamine injury. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 36, 3173–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Stephans, S.E.; Yamamoto, B.K. Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity: Roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux. Synapse 1994, 17, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kerdsan, W.; Thanoi, S.; Nudmamud-Thanoi, S. Changes in the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAT3 in rat brain after exposure to methamphetamine. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 111, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hong, S.J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.H.; Yang, P.; Wan, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, T.H.; Feng, Z.T.; Li, L.H.; Yew, D.T. Expression of dopamine transporter in the different cerebral regions of methamphetamine-dependent rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2015, 34, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mark, K.A.; Quinton, M.S.; Russek, S.J.; Yamamoto, B.K. Dynamic changes in vesicular glutamate transporter 1 function and expression related to methamphetamine-induced glutamate release. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 6823–6831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Daniels, R.W.; Collins, C.A.; Gelfand, M.V.; Dant, J.; Brooks, E.S.; Krantz, D.E.; DiAntonio, A. Increased expression of the Drosophila vesicular glutamate transporter leads to excess glutamate release and a compensatory decrease in quantal content. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 10466–10474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wolozin, B.; Ivanov, P. Stress granules and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Stetson, D.B.; Ko, J.S.; Heidmann, T.; Medzhitov, R. Trex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity. Cell 2008, 134, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Thomas, C.A.; Tejwani, L.; Trujillo, C.A.; Negraes, P.D.; Herai, R.H.; Mesci, P.; Macia, A.; Crow, Y.J.; Muotri, A.R. Modeling of TREX1-Dependent Autoimmune Disease using Human Stem Cells Highlights L1 Accumulation as a Source of Neuroinflammation. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 21, 319–331.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Jones, R.B.; Song, H.; Xu, Y.; Garrison, K.E.; Buzdin, A.A.; Anwar, N.; Hunter, D.V.; Mujib, S.; Mihajlovic, V.; Martin, E.; et al. LINE-1 retrotransposable element DNA accumulates in HIV-1-infected cells. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 13307–13320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Faulkner, G.J.; Billon, V. L1 retrotransposition in the soma: A field jumping ahead. Mob. DNA 2018, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Singh, D.K.; Rath, P.C. Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) show tissue-specific, mosaic genome and methylation-unrestricted, widespread expression of noncoding RNAs in somatic tissues of the rat. RNA Biol. 2012, 9, 1380–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Cadet, J.L.; Brannock, C.; Krasnova, I.N.; Jayanthi, S.; Ladenheim, B.; McCoy, M.T.; Walther, D.; Godino, A.; Pirooznia, M.; Lee, R.S. Genome-wide DNA hydroxymethylation identifies potassium channels in the nucleus accumbens as discriminators of methamphetamine addiction and abstinence. Mol. Psychiatry 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Omonijo, O.; Wongprayoon, P.; Ladenheim, B.; McCoy, M.T.; Govitrapong, P.; Jayanthi, S.; Cadet, J.L. Differential effects of binge methamphetamine injections on the mRNA expression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in the rat striatum. Neurotoxicology 2014, 45, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Montoya-Durango, D.E.; Liu, Y.; Teneng, I.; Kalbfleisch, T.; Lacy, M.E.; Steffen, M.C.; Ramos, K.S. Epigenetic control of mammalian LINE-1 retrotransposon by retinoblastoma proteins. Mutat. Res. 2009, 665, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Soifer, H.S.; Zaragoza, A.; Peyvan, M.; Behlke, M.A.; Rossi, J.J. A potential role for RNA interference in controlling the activity of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 846–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Marchetto, M.C.; Narvaiza, I.; Denli, A.M.; Benner, C.; Lazzarini, T.A.; Nathanson, J.L.; Paquola, A.C.; Desai, K.N.; Herai, R.H.; Weitzman, M.D.; et al. Differential L1 regulation in pluripotent stem cells of humans and apes. Nature 2013, 503, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kuwabara, T.; Hsieh, J.; Muotri, A.; Yeo, G.; Warashina, M.; Lie, D.C.; Moore, L.; Nakashima, K.; Asashima, M.; Gage, F.H. Wnt-mediated activation of NeuroD1 and retro-elements during adult neurogenesis. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Godino, A.; Jayanthi, S.; Cadet, J.L. Epigenetic landscape of amphetamine and methamphetamine addiction in rodents. Epigenetics 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Kalayasiri, R.; Kraijak, K.; Mutirangura, A.; Maes, M. Paranoid schizophrenia and methamphetamine-induced paranoia are both characterized by a similar LINE-1 partial methylation profile, which is more pronounced in paranoid schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2019, 208, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kalayasiri, R.; Kraijak, K.; Maes, M.; Mutirangura, A. Methamphetamine (MA) use induces specific changes in LINE-1 partial methylation patterns, which are associated with MA-induced paranoia: A multivariate and neuronal network study. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 4258–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Methamphetamine (METH) was administered to young adult male rats for 10 days at the dose of 20 mg/kg/day. The control rats received saline. The animals were sacrificed at one of the indicated times (blue arrows). Dentate gyrus and striatum were assessed for the levels of ORF-2 protein (ORF-2p), ORF-1 mRNA, ORF-1 gDNA copy number and/or LINE-1 methylation.
Figure 1. Methamphetamine (METH) was administered to young adult male rats for 10 days at the dose of 20 mg/kg/day. The control rats received saline. The animals were sacrificed at one of the indicated times (blue arrows). Dentate gyrus and striatum were assessed for the levels of ORF-2 protein (ORF-2p), ORF-1 mRNA, ORF-1 gDNA copy number and/or LINE-1 methylation.
Genes 11 00364 g001
Figure 2. (a) The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 mRNA levels in rat striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum at 24 h after the last dose of METH or saline. (b) Individual mRNA values in the striatum and dentate gyrus. (c) Representative image of increased immunofluorescence for ORF-2p in the SVZ. Abbreviations: h, hour; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline; SVZ, subventricular zone. ** Statistical significance p < 0.01, METH vs. SAL.
Figure 2. (a) The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 mRNA levels in rat striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum at 24 h after the last dose of METH or saline. (b) Individual mRNA values in the striatum and dentate gyrus. (c) Representative image of increased immunofluorescence for ORF-2p in the SVZ. Abbreviations: h, hour; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline; SVZ, subventricular zone. ** Statistical significance p < 0.01, METH vs. SAL.
Genes 11 00364 g002
Figure 3. The effect of two daily 20 mg/kg METH doses on ORF-2p immunoreactivity in rat striatum and dentate gyrus at 24 h after the 2nd injection of METH or saline. (A) No-secondary (2nd) antibody control, no-primary (1st) antibody control and graphic presentation of dissected out tissue (white ovals), with delineated subventricular and subgranular zones (SVZ and SGZ, blue lines). (B) ORF-2p immunoreactivity in the SVZ. (C) ORF-2p immunoreactivity in the SGZ and dentate gyrus. Abbreviations: METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline; SGZ, subgranular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; ORF-2p, ORF-2 protein. ** Statistical significance, p < 0.01, METH vs. SAL.
Figure 3. The effect of two daily 20 mg/kg METH doses on ORF-2p immunoreactivity in rat striatum and dentate gyrus at 24 h after the 2nd injection of METH or saline. (A) No-secondary (2nd) antibody control, no-primary (1st) antibody control and graphic presentation of dissected out tissue (white ovals), with delineated subventricular and subgranular zones (SVZ and SGZ, blue lines). (B) ORF-2p immunoreactivity in the SVZ. (C) ORF-2p immunoreactivity in the SGZ and dentate gyrus. Abbreviations: METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline; SGZ, subgranular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; ORF-2p, ORF-2 protein. ** Statistical significance, p < 0.01, METH vs. SAL.
Genes 11 00364 g003
Figure 4. The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 mRNA levels in the striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum at 7 d after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * Statistical significance p < 0.05, METH vs. SAL.
Figure 4. The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 mRNA levels in the striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum at 7 d after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * Statistical significance p < 0.05, METH vs. SAL.
Genes 11 00364 g004
Figure 5. The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 copy number within the genomic DNA (gDNA) in rat striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum, at 7 d after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline.
Figure 5. The effect of chronic METH (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on ORF-1 copy number within the genomic DNA (gDNA) in rat striatum, dentate gyrus, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum, at 7 d after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline.
Genes 11 00364 g005
Figure 6. The effect of chronic METH administration (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on LINE-1 promoter methylation in the striatum (a,c,e) and dentate gyrus (b,d,f) at 1 h (a,b), 24 h (c,d), and 7 d (e,f) after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * Statistical significance p < 0.05, METH vs. SAL.
Figure 6. The effect of chronic METH administration (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) on LINE-1 promoter methylation in the striatum (a,c,e) and dentate gyrus (b,d,f) at 1 h (a,b), 24 h (c,d), and 7 d (e,f) after the last dose of METH or saline. Abbreviations: d, day; METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * Statistical significance p < 0.05, METH vs. SAL.
Genes 11 00364 g006
Figure 7. (a) Chronic METH administration (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) induces significant core body temperature elevations, lasting throughout the treatment (10 d). (b) ORF-1 mRNA levels measured 24 h after METH treatment did not correlate with METH-induced hyperthermia. Abbreviations: METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, METH vs. SAL.
Figure 7. (a) Chronic METH administration (20 mg/kg/d, for 10 d, i.p.) induces significant core body temperature elevations, lasting throughout the treatment (10 d). (b) ORF-1 mRNA levels measured 24 h after METH treatment did not correlate with METH-induced hyperthermia. Abbreviations: METH, methamphetamine; SAL, saline. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, METH vs. SAL.
Genes 11 00364 g007
Table 1. The effects of METH on LINE-1 activity and extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the dorsal striatum, dentate gyrus, and prefrontal cortex.
Table 1. The effects of METH on LINE-1 activity and extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the dorsal striatum, dentate gyrus, and prefrontal cortex.
Brain AreaDorsal StriatumDentate GyrusPrefrontal Cortex
LINE-1 activity (binge METH) ⇑ ⇑ [45] ⇑ ⇑ [45] = [45]
Extracellular DA after binge METH ⇑ ⇑ [44] ⇑ [44] ⇑ [44]
Extracellular GLU after binge METH ⇑ ⇑ [76] ⇑ [81] = [76]
LINE-1 activity (chronic METH)==
LINE-1 “tolerance” (chronic METH)NoYesNA
GLU transporter after chronic METH ⇓ ⇓ [87] ⇑ [87] ⇓ [87]
DAT transporter after chronic METH ⇓ ⇓ [88] = [88] ⇓ [88]
⇑ ⇑: marked increase, ⇑: moderate increase, ⇓ ⇓: marked decrease, ⇓: moderate decrease, =: no change. Abbreviations: DA, dopamine; GLU, glutamate; METH, methamphetamine; NA, not applicable. Bold represents current studies.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moszczynska, A. Differential Responses of LINE-1 in the Dentate Gyrus, Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Chronic Neurotoxic Methamphetamine: A Study in Rat Brain. Genes 2020, 11, 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040364

AMA Style

Moszczynska A. Differential Responses of LINE-1 in the Dentate Gyrus, Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Chronic Neurotoxic Methamphetamine: A Study in Rat Brain. Genes. 2020; 11(4):364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040364

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moszczynska, Anna. 2020. "Differential Responses of LINE-1 in the Dentate Gyrus, Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Chronic Neurotoxic Methamphetamine: A Study in Rat Brain" Genes 11, no. 4: 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040364

APA Style

Moszczynska, A. (2020). Differential Responses of LINE-1 in the Dentate Gyrus, Striatum and Prefrontal Cortex to Chronic Neurotoxic Methamphetamine: A Study in Rat Brain. Genes, 11(4), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040364

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop