Next Article in Journal
DNA Methylation of Pig FUT3 Promoter Alters mRNA Expression to Regulate E. coli F18 Susceptibility
Next Article in Special Issue
MiT/TFE Family Renal Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Journal
Compound Heterozygote of Point Mutation and Chromosomal Microdeletion Involving OTUD6B Coinciding with ZMIZ1 Variant in Syndromic Intellectual Disability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation and Management of Apparently Sporadic Central Nervous System Haemangioblastoma for Evidence of Von Hippel–Lindau Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/genes12101585
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

by
Elizabeth P. Henske
1,*,
Kristine M. Cornejo
2 and
Chin-Lee Wu
2
1
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(10), 1585; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101585
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 1 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 October 2021 / Published: 8 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Inherited Kidney Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant disorder in which renal manifestations are prominent. There are three major renal lesions in TSC: angiomyolipomas, cysts, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Major recent advances have revolutionized our understanding of TSC-associated RCC, including two series that together include more than 100 TSC-RCC cases, demonstrating a mean age at onset of about 36 years, tumors in children as young as 7, and a striking 2:1 female predominance. These series also provide the first detailed understanding of the pathologic features of these distinctive tumors, which include chromophobe-like features and eosinophilia, with some of the tumors unclassified. This pathologic heterogeneity is distinctive and reminiscent of the pathologic heterogeneity in Birt–Hogg–Dube-associated RCC, which also includes chromophobe-like tumors. Additional advances include the identification of sporadic counterpart tumors that carry somatic TSC1/TSC2/mTOR mutations. These include unclassified eosinophilic tumors, eosinophilic solid cystic RCC (ESC-RCC), and RCC with leiomyomatous stroma (RCCLMS). A variety of epithelial renal neoplasms have been identified both in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and in the nonsyndromic setting associated with somatic mutations in the TSC1 and TSC2 genes. Interestingly, whether tumors are related to a germline or somatic TSC1/2 mutation, these tumors often display similar morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Finally, recent work has identified molecular links between TSC and BHD-associated tumors, involving the TFEB/TFE3 transcription factors.

1. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Genetic and Clinical Features

1.1. TSC Overview

TSC is caused by germline loss-of-function mutations of either the TSC1 or TSC2 gene. TSC affects multiple organs, including the brain (subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs), cerebral cortical tubers), heart (rhabdomyomas), kidney (angiomyolipomas (AMLs), cysts, renal cell carcinomas), lung (lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)), and skin (angiofibromas). TSC patients can also develop seizures, autism, and cognitive disability. Approximately 60% of germline TSC gene mutations are de novo and 40% are inherited. Tumors in TSC, including angiomyolipomas and renal cell carcinomas, develop after somatic “second hit” inactivation of the remaining wild-type allele of TSC1 or TSC2. The TSC complex integrates signals from the cellular environment, including growth factors and nutrients, to regulate the activity of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). mTORC1 controls numerous essential metabolic processes, including protein and lipid synthesis, glycolysis, ATP production, lysosomal biogenesis, mitochondrial function and biogenesis, and autophagy (to name just a few). In cells with biallelic inactivation of either TSC1 or TSC2, mTORC1 is hyperactive, leading to increased cell growth, tumorigenesis, and extensive metabolic reprogramming. Pivotal clinical trials have demonstrated that the mTORC1 inhibitors sirolimus (rapamycin) and everolimus (Afinitor) partially decrease the size of AML and SEGA [1,2] and prevent loss of lung function in LAM [3,4]. When mTORC1 inhibitory therapy is stopped, the AML and SEGA tend to regrow and lung function decline resumes. Therefore, continuous (and perhaps lifelong) therapy is required to suppress disease.

1.2. Renal Manifestations of TSC

Renal disease is a major source of morbidity and mortality in TSC [5,6,7] and was the leading cause of TSC-associated death in a series of 284 TSC patients in the UK [8]. Renal disease in TSC usually begins in childhood. A recent analysis of 80 children in Belgium highlights the burden of renal disease; among 80 children with TSC, with median age of 0.8 years at first presentation and median f/u of 10.2 years, 75% had renal manifestations and 7.5% developed end-stage renal disease during the time period of the study [9].
The renal manifestations of TSC, which have been reviewed elsewhere [6,10,11,12,13,14], include angiomyolipomas, epithelial cysts which can resemble polycystic kidney disease (PKD), and RCC. Angiomyolipomas are benign tumors with three distinct components: vessels (often tortuous and dilated, with thickened asymmetric walls), abnormal smooth muscle-like cells that express melanocytic proteins, and adipose cells. Interestingly, genetic analyses have revealed all three of these cellular elements arise from a common precursor cell [15]. Renal cysts are common in TSC, with onset often in childhood, and usually have no clinical consequences. However, some individuals with TSC have germline contiguous deletion of TSC2 and the adjacent PKD1 gene on chromosome 16p13. This contiguous gene syndrome can lead to early-onset polycystic kidney disease (sometimes evident at birth, with abdominal distention from kidney cystogenesis) and a high risk of renal insufficiency. This contiguous gene syndrome was critical to the positional cloning of the TSC2 gene [10,16]. The third renal manifestation of TSC and the focus of this review is TSC-associated RCC (TSC-RCC). We used the search terms tuberous sclerosis complex and renal cell carcinoma to identify publications relevant to this topic in PubMed. We include RCC that occurs in individuals with TSC as well as sporadic tumors with TSC1 or TSC2 gene mutations.

2. TSC-RCC, Clinical and Pathologic Features

The first series of TSC-RCC, consisting of six patients, was published in 1996 [13]. This small study revealed an early age at onset compared with sporadic RCC (36 years in TSC vs. 60–65 years in the general population), a female predominance (with RCC in the general population having a male predominance), and variable pathologic features. Nearly 20 years after this first series, two analyses of TSC-RCC, one from the Cleveland Clinic and the other from Massachusetts General Hospital, have allowed the histologic and clinical features of TSC-RCC to be systematically defined for the first time (Table 1).
Guo et al. [17] studied 57 RCC from 18 TSC patients with a striking female predominance (13 female and 5 male). The mean age at the time of surgery was 42 years (range 7–65 years). Nine patients had multiple tumors (ranging from 2–20). No distant metastatic disease had occurred in the 15 patients for whom follow-up was available. Three major morphologies were observed. The predominant morphology (59%) was “chromophobe-like”, although the authors note that in some cases, this pattern could have also been classified as hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT). The second most common pattern was renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor (RAT) or RCC with smooth muscle stroma. These tumors had nests of large cells with abundant clear cytoplasm surrounded by thick bundles of smooth muscle cells. The third most common morphology was unclassified, with eosinophilic tumor cells that formed both solid foci and cysts. Importantly, none of the tumors was HMB-45-positive, clearly distinguishing them from angiomyolipoma. Yang et al. [18] studied 46 RCCs from 19 TSC patients, also with a marked female predominance (12 female, 6 male). The mean age was 30 years (range from 7–59 years). No distant metastasis had occurred in the 14 patients for whom follow-up was available. The predominant histologic pattern was termed TSC-associated papillary RCC (PRCC). These tumors tended to have a branching papillary architecture, although some had a nested pattern. The tumor cells were large with clear cytoplasm; cells with finely granular, eosinophilic cytoplasm were also present in many of the tumors. The second most common pattern was HOCT, with tumor cells that had eosinophilic cytoplasm and centrally placed round nuclei (resembling oncocytoma) admixed with tumor cells exhibiting perinuclear cytoplasmic clearing (resembling ChRCC). The third pattern was unclassified, with eosinophilic cytoplasm.
Table
Table 1. Subtypes of TSC-associated renal cell carcinoma.
Table 1. Subtypes of TSC-associated renal cell carcinoma.
AuthorsTypes of RCC Seen in TSC Patients# Type of Tumor/Total%
Yang et al. [18] TSC-associated papillary RCC24/4652
Hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumor15/4632
Unclassifiable7/4615
Guo et al. [17] Chromophobe 34/5759
Eosinophilic hybrid macrocystic 6/5710
RCC with smooth muscle stroma17/5729
#, Number.
Together, these studies have allowed TSC-RCCs to be placed into three major categories: TSC-associated papillary RCC, HOCT/chromophobe-like RCC, and unclassified/eosinophilic variants.

2.1. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (TSC-Associated PRCC)

TSC-associated PRCCs are often encapsulated by a prominent fibromuscular stroma and composed of tumor cells with voluminous clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm forming complex branching architecture and less commonly display solid/nested or tubuloalveolar growth (Figure 1). The tumors typically exhibit features of either the International Society of Urology Pathology (ISUP)/World Health Organization (WHO) nuclear grade 2 (54%) or grade 3 (46%). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CK7, CAIX, and PAX8, with absence of staining for CD117 and SDHB [18]. Later, the absent or weak SDHB staining was felt to relate to the abundant clear cytoplasm typically identified in these neoplasms, which relates to the presence of intracellular mitochondria, accounting for a false negative immunohistochemical staining pattern and not a result of a true genetic defect in the succinate dehydrogenase gene [19]. This group of tumors were also described in a separate study as renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma (RCC-LMS) also known as renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor (RAT), which encompasses a subset of RCCs composed of tumor cells displaying abundant clear cytoplasm with well-defined cell membranes of which the majority are of ISUP/WHO nuclear grade 2. The tumor cells are commonly arranged in solid nests and tubules and occasionally show papillary architecture. They contain thick bundles of smooth muscle within the neoplasm, often surrounding and encircling islands of tumor, resulting in a multinodular appearance. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CK7, CAIX, and PAX8, with absence of staining for CD117 [17].
Upon closer inspection, it appears TSC-associated PRCC and RCC-LMS/RAT neoplasms described in TSC show overlapping morphological and immunophenotypic features including abundant clear cytoplasm of tumor cells which show a predominantly tubulopapillary and solid growth pattern, the presence of a prominent fibromuscular stroma, and positivity for CK7 and CAIX without staining for CD117. Interestingly, only the tumors that display this morphology in patients with TSC have been found to metastasize, including a case in which images were not provided but described as displaying clear cell features [13,17,18].

2.2. Hybrid Oncocytic/Chromophobe Tumor (HOCT); Chromophobe-Like RCC

HOCTs are renal epithelial neoplasms that display morphologic characteristics of both an oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) in varying amounts (Figure 2). Tumors described as HOCT display two main histologic patterns; the first comprises polygonal tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round centrally located nuclei resembling an oncocytoma but exhibiting perinuclear halos or clearing, similar to ChRCC. The second mosaic pattern shows an admixing of areas with features characteristic of ChRCC and oncocytoma. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CD117 and typically immunoreactive for CK7 in the majority of cases, with absence of staining for CAIX [18].
The tumors described as chromophobe-like RCC display sheets and nests of round cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, irregular nuclear membranes, binucleation, and perinuclear halos, of which the majority resemble the eosinophilic variant of ChRCC. Areas that showed oncocytoma-like nuclear features were also noted in all cases. Immunohistochemically, the tumors are positive for CK7 in the majority of cases, with CD117 staining in a small subset (17%) and absence of staining for CAIX [17].

2.3. Unclassified Renal Cell Carcinoma (Unclassified RCC); Granular Eosinophilic Macrocystic RCC

The tumors described as having granular eosinophilic macrocystic morphology display cysts of varying sizes admixed with solid nests of tumor cells with abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, round nuclei, and prominent nucleoli (Figure 3). The cysts are often lined by a single layer of tumor cells, frequently with a hobnail morphology. Immunohistochemically, these tumors show variable CK7 staining and are negative for CAIX and CD117 [17,20].
A subset of tumors that were labeled as unclassified RCC similarly display solid nests of tumor cells with voluminous eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm associated with cysts of varying sizes which show a hobnail appearance. Immunohistochemically, these tumors predominantly show an absence of staining for CK7, CAIX, and CD117 [18].
Tumors with this morphology were later termed eosinophilic solid cystic RCC (ESC-RCC) (see below).

2.4. Conclusions from Two Large TSC-RCC Series

What are the take-home messages from these two series that together examined 103 cases of TSC-RCC?
First, these series put to rest any concern that RCC in TSC represents a misdiagnosis (for example, AML mimicking RCC) since all of the tumors in these two series were HMB-45-negative.
Second, these series confirm the finding of the original smaller series that TSC-RCC occurs at a much earlier age than sporadic RCC and affects children and young adults. The median age at onset of RCC in the combined series was 36 years, and tumors occurred in children as young as age 7 in both series.
Third, these series confirm that TSC-RCC has a 2:1 female predominance; this contrasts with the general population, in which RCC has a male predominance.
Fourth, RCC in TSC has a heterogeneous histologic appearance, with at least three distinct morphologies (Table 1). This represents a striking contrast to other hereditary syndromes, including von Hippel–Lindau disease, SDH-associated RCC, and hereditary papillary RCC, in which a single histology predominates. Interestingly, RCC in BHD also exhibits heterogeneous histology, with HOCT as a predominant histology, highlighting potential parallels in the pathogenesis that will be discussed later. An improved understanding of how these tumors relate to rare and/or unclassified sporadic RCC is important, as discussed below.

3. Genetic Features of TSC-RCC

The TSC1 and TSC2 genes behave as classical tumor suppressor genes, with germline loss-of-function mutations accompanied by somatic loss-of-function of the remaining wild-type allele in tumors including angiomyolipomas [10,21]. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) for either TSC1 or TSC2 in TSC-RCC was first reported by Bjornsson et al. [13], with LOH identified in three of the five tumors analyzed. This LOH is consistent with the two-hit tumor suppressor mechanism that also underlies the development of angiomyolipomas [22,23].
Kwiatkowski et al. [24] performed whole exome sequencing on seven RCCs from two patients with germline TSC2 mutations. Second hit events were found in six of the seven tumors (loss of heterozygosity in five and a TSC2 missense mutation in the sixth), confirming the two-hit mechanism. The second hit events appeared to be distinct in different tumors from the same patient, consistent with a multifocal origin. Bah et al. [25] studied a family with a germline TSC2 missense variant (p.Arg905Gln) and found evidence of genetic second hit events in 5/6 TSC-RCCs, again confirming that loss of both alleles of TSC1 or TSC2 underlies renal tumorigenesis in TSC.
Kwiatkowski et al. performed the first whole exome sequencing on TSC-RCC [24]. This analysis of seven tumors revealed no additional “driver” mutational events. This important result suggests that loss of both alleles of TSC1 or TSC2 is sufficient to drive RCC in TSC. This is intriguing since multiple additional genetic events drive tumor progression in clear cell RCC.

4. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic RCC

The fact that TSC patients develop RCC leads to the obvious question: do TSC gene mutations occur in sporadic RCC?

4.1. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic ccRCC and chRCC

TSC1 and TSC2 mutations occur in clear cell RCC, although at a low frequency (2–5% [26,27,28,29,30], Table 2). TSC1 and TSC2 mutations also occur at a low frequency in sporadic chromophobe RCC [31,32] (4–10%, Table 3).

4.2. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic Unclassified Eosinophilic RCC

Unclassified RCC represents about 10% of all RCC. An important recent development has been the discovery that the TSC genes are mutated in novel eosinophilic subtypes of RCC, some of which were previously unclassified (Table 3). Chen et al. [35] studied seven patients with a mean age of 54 and morphologically distinct sporadic RCCs with eosinophilic features and vacuolated cytoplasm that were unclassified. TSC2 inactivating mutations were discovered in three of the tumors, and mTOR activating mutations were discovered in two others, associated with increased phospho-S6 and phospho-4EBP1. Cathepsin K was positive in five of the seven tumors, but HMB45, MelanA, and TFE3 were negative. Tjota et al. performed genomic sequencing on 18 cases of eosinophilic RCC with unusual morphologic features and found loss-of-function TSC1 mutations in 6 and TSC2 mutations in 8 [38] (Table 2). In a second paper, Tjota et al. [37] analyzed eight more cases of RCC with abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, originally diagnosed as ChRCC, and found mutations in TSC1 in 1/8 (12%), in TSC2 in 3/8 (37%), and in mTOR in 4/8 (50%) cases. Williamson et al. [39] studied an RCC that mimicked a translocation RCC, with mixed clear and eosinophilic cytoplasm, but was negative for TFE3 and TFEB translocation/amplification by in situ hybridization and a gene fusion assay. This tumor was found to have a truncating mutation in TSC1.

4.3. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic RCC-LMS (RCC with Leiomyomatous Stroma)

RCCLMS is an emerging subtype of RCC in which tumor nodules are separated by a distinct mesenchymal smooth muscle stroma [19,42]. Shah et al. studied 23 RCCLMS cases [36]. The patients had a mean age of 52 years, with a 2:1 female predominance and an average tumor size of 2.3 cm. The tumor nodules were separated by smooth muscle stroma and were CK7-positive. Mutations in TSC1 (4), TSC2 (4), mTOR (6), or ELOC (2) were detected (Table 3). The authors conclude that these tumors represent the sporadic counterpart of morphologically identical tumors occurring in TSC patients.

4.4. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESC-RCC)

These RCCs display solid and cystic architecture composed of tumor cells with round nuclei and voluminous eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm with cytoplasmic stippling, which represent aggregates of rough endoplasmic reticulum [43,44,45]. The cysts are typically lined by cells with hobnail arrangement. These tumors are morphologically identical to those previously described as granular eosinophilic macrocystic RCC that arise in patients with TSC [43,44,46].
In the sporadic setting, ESC-RCCs are found predominantly in females and are associated with biallelic loss or mutations of either the TSC1 or TSC2 gene [34,38,46,47,48] (Table 3). Mehra et al. studied seven ESC-RCCs and found biallelic loss of TSC1 or TSC2 in six of the seven cases, with evidence of mTOR activation by IHC, leading the authors to conclude that there is a pathognomic role for TSC mutations in ESC-RCC [47]. Palsgrove et al. [34] also found TSC1/2 mutations in 8/9 pediatric and 6/6 adult ESC-RCCs, and Munari et al. [48] found TSC1/2 mutations in 3/3 sporadic ESC-RCCs (interestingly, all were TSC1 mutations). They also report an ESC-RCC in a TSC patient.
ESC-RCCs are typically diagnosed at a low stage and exhibit indolent behavior, but there have been rare cases with adverse prognosis [34,43,44,46,49,50]. The few patients with reported metastatic disease all lacked clinical features of TSC [49,50,51]. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CK20, at least focally, in the majority of cases. [43,44,45,46]. Additionally, they are usually negative for CK7, CAIX, and CD117 [38,43,44,45].

4.5. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic Hybrid Oncocytic/Chromophobe Tumor (HOCT) and Chromophobe-Like RCC

HOCTs are morphologically similar to the tumors described in patients with TSC; the eosinophilic renal tumors that fit into these categories were also found to harbor mutations in TSC1, TSC2, or MTOR by next-generation sequencing [38]. Immunohistochemically, these tumors displayed variable CK7 and CD117 staining but lacked positivity for CK20 in most tumors [38].
TSC1 and TSC2 mutations occur in sporadic high-grade oncocytic tumor (HOT) of the kidney and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of the kidney. The majority of these tumors are sporadic, arising in patients with no clinical features or family history of a syndromic association, with the exception of only one case identified in a TSC patient [35,45,52,53]. These encompass a group of nested or solid tumors composed predominantly of high-grade nuclei with oncocytic cells, often exhibiting very large nucleoli and striking intracytoplasmic vacuoles. The neoplastic cells lack the irregular raisinoid nuclei or perinuclear clearing typically seen in ChRCC and often display nuclear features equivalent to ISUP/WHO grade 3 [35,45,52]. Immunohistochemically, these tumors are frequently positive for CD117; cathepsin K, at least focally if not diffusely; and CD10, while usually negative or with rare staining for CK7 and CK20 [45,52]. Next-generation sequencing has identified somatic mutations in TSC2 and mTOR in a subset of cases [35,54]. All of these tumors thus far present with a low stage and appear to behave indolently [45].

4.6. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Sporadic Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor (LOT) of the Kidney

LOTs are often small, solitary sporadic tumors that are typically identified in older patients in a nonsyndromic setting [45,55]. More recently, multiple tumors have been identified in a patient with clinically silent TSC who was found to harbor a germline TSC1 mutation [56]. This is a group of tumors that display overlapping morphologic features with ChRCC and oncocytoma but do not entirely fit into either of these entities. Morphologically, the tumor cells are composed of oncocytic cells with low-grade round to oval nuclei and perinuclear halos. Significantly irregular nuclear membranes or raisinoid nuclei are typically not seen [45]. Immunohistochemically, they have a characteristic profile showing diffuse positivity for CK7 and absence of staining for CD117 [45,55]. Recently, a group of tumors that correlate with LOT were found to harbor TSC1/2 and MTOR mutations [37,56]. All of these tumors to date appear to behave indolently and present at a low stage [45,55]. Kapur et al. performed whole exome sequencing on six LOTs that were previously classified as chromophobe RCC, eosinophilic variant. One had a TSC1 mutation that was discovered to be a germline mutation. Four had mTOR mutations, and one had a Rheb mutation [41].

4.7. TSC1 and TSC2 Mutations in Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor (EVT)

Mihaela et al. sequenced 19 EVTs (also called high-grade oncocytic tumors) and found nonoverlapping mutations in TSC1 (4), TSC2 (7), and mTOR (8) [40].

5. Pathogenesis of TSC-RCC: Links to TFEB/TFE3 and BHD

Recent work has identified a potential link between the TFEB/TFE3 transcriptional factors and TSC-RCC. The TFEB/TFE3 transcription factors are master regulators of lysosomal biogenesis via binding to “CLEAR” elements in the promoters of lysosomal genes [57]. mTORC1 phosphorylates TFEB and TFE3, leading to 14-3-3 binding and cytoplasmic sequestration [58]. TSC-RCCs express high levels of lysosomal proteins, including NPC1, and surprisingly have nuclear localization of TFEB, despite high mTORC1 activity [59]. In cellular models of TSC, TFEB and TFE3 are also found to be nuclear-localized (where they drive the expression of lysosomal genes and proteins), despite high levels of mTORC1 activity. Interestingly, TSC-RCCs were once described as TFE mimics. If TFE3/TFEB are drivers of TSC-RCC, this might explain some of the histologic phenotypes of TSC-RCC, including the eosinophilia, since TFE3/TFEB promote mitochondrial biogenesis [60]. Mouse models also support a link between TSC-RCC and BHD-RCC. As noted earlier, HOCTs occur in both TSC and BHD, suggesting a pathogenic link, but the mechanisms are unknown since TSC and FLCN have opposing effects on mTORC1 [61,62]. Recent data suggest that this “missing link” between BHD and TSC may involve TFEB. In a model in which FLCN is deleted in mouse kidney using the KSP-cadherin promoter, resulting in markedly enlarged cystic kidneys, deletion of TFEB almost completely normalizes kidney size and histology [63].

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, recent work has clarified the histologic features of TSC-associated RCC, based on more than 100 tumors in two large series. In parallel, sporadic RCCs with loss of function mutations in TSC1 or TSC2 have been identified, with some histologies such as eosinophilic solid cystic (ESC) and RCC with leiomyomatous stroma (RCCLS) showing high-frequency TSC1 or TSC2 mutations, and ESC-RCC is believed to be potentially pathognomonic for TSC gene mutations. The recent discovery that the TFEB/TFE3 transcription factors are hyperactive in both TSC and BHD provides a molecular link between TSC-associated RCC and BHD-associated RCC, both of which can include hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumors. Critical next steps include the identification of targeted therapeutic strategies for individuals with unresectable or metastatic forms of these rarer subtypes of RCC.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, E.P.H., K.M.C. and C.-L.W.; writing—review and editing, E.P.H., K.M.C. and C.-L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by NCI grant 5P01CA120964.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bissler, J.J.; Kingswood, J.C.; Radzikowska, E.; A Zonnenberg, B.; Frost, M.; Belousova, E.D.; Sauter, M.; Nonomura, N.; Brakemeier, S.; de Vries, P.J.; et al. Everolimus for angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Franz, D.N.; Belousova, E.D.; Sparagana, S.; Bebin, E.M.; Frost, M.; Kuperman, R.; Witt, O.; Kohrman, M.H.; Flamini, J.R.; Wu, J.Y.; et al. Efficacy and safety of everolimus for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (EXIST-1): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McCormack, F.X.; Inoue, Y.; Moss, J.; Singer, L.G.; Strange, C.; Nakata, K.; Barker, A.F.; Chapman, J.T.; Brantly, M.L.; Stocks, J.M.; et al. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus in lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 1595–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bissler, J.J.; McCormack, F.; Young, L.R.; Elwing, J.M.; Chuck, G.; Leonard, J.M.; Schmithorst, V.J.; Laor, T.; Brody, A.S.; Bean, J.; et al. Sirolimus for Angiomyolipoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex or Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zöllner, J.P.; Franz, D.N.; Hertzberg, C.; Nabbout, R.; Rosenow, F.; Sauter, M.; Schubert-Bast, S.; Wiemer-Kruel, A.; Strzelczyk, A. A systematic review on the burden of illness in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2020, 15, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Trnka, P.; Kennedy, S.E. Renal tumors in tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2020, 36, 1427–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kingswood, J.C.; Belousova, E.; Benedik, M.P.; Carter, T.; Cottin, V.; Curatolo, P.; Dahlin, M.; Amato, L.D.; D’Augères, G.B.; De Vries, P.J.; et al. Renal angiomyolipoma in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: Findings from the TuberOus SClerosis registry to increase disease Awareness. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 34, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Amin, S.; Lux, A.; Calder, N.; Laugharne, M.; Osborne, J.; O’Callaghan, F. Causes of mortality in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2016, 59, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Janssens, P.; Van Hoeve, K.; De Waele, L.; De Rechter, S.; Claes, K.J.; Van De Perre, E.; Wissing, K.M.; Bammens, B.; Jansen, A.; Mekahli, D. Renal progression factors in young patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: a retrospective cohort study. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2018, 33, 2085–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lam, H.C.; Siroky, B.J.; Henske, E.P. Renal disease in tuberous sclerosis complex: Pathogenesis and therapy. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018, 14, 704–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Henske, E.P. Tuberous sclerosis and the kidney: From mesenchyme to epithelium, and beyond. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2005, 20, 854–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Henske, E.P.; Jozwiak, S.; Kingswood, J.C.; Sampson, J.R.; Thiele, E.A. Tuberous sclerosis complex. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bjornsson, J.; Short, M.P.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; Henske, E.P. Tuberous sclerosis-associated renal cell carcinoma. Clinical, pathological, and genetic features. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 149, 1201–1208. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bissler, J.J.; Kingswood, J.C. Renal manifestation of tuberous sclerosis complex. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Semin. Med. Genet. 2018, 178, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karbowniczek, M.; Henske, E.P. The role of tuberin in cellular differentiation: Are B-Raf and MAPK involved? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1059, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. The European Chromosome 16 Tuberous Sclerosis Consortium, Identification and characterization of the tuberous sclerosis gene on chromosome 16. Cell 1993, 75, 1305–1315. [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, J.; Tretiakova, M.S.; Troxell, M.L.; Osunkoya, A.O.; Fadare, O.; Sangoi, A.R.; Shen, S.S.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; Mehra, R.; Heider, A.; et al. Tuberous sclerosis-associated renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 57 separate carcinomas in 18 patients. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014, 38, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yang, P.; Cornejo, K.M.; Sadow, P.; Cheng, L.; Wang, M.; Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Oliva, E.; Jozwiak, S.; Nussbaum, R.L.; et al. Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2014, 38, 895–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Williamson, S.R.; Hornick, J.L.; Eble, J.N.; Gupta, N.S.; Rogers, C.G.; True, L.; Grignon, D.J.; Cheng, L. Renal cell carcinoma with angioleiomyoma-like stroma and clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: Exploring SDHB protein immunohistochemistry and the relationship to tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 75, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schreiner, A.; Daneshmand, S.; Bayne, A.; Countryman, G.; Corless, C.L.; Troxell, M.L. Distinctive Morphology of Renal Cell Carcinomas in Tuberous Sclerosis. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2009, 18, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lam, H.C.; Nijmeh, J.S.; Henske, E.P. New developments in the genetics and pathogenesis of tumours in tuberous sclerosis complex. J. Pathol. 2016, 241, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Henske, E.P.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Short, M.P.; Wollmann, R.; Nahmias, J.; Hornigold, N.; Van Slegtenhorst, M.; Welsh, C.T.; Kwiatkowski, D.J. Allelic loss is frequent in tuberous sclerosis kidney lesions but rare in brain lesions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996, 59, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Henske, E.P.; Wessner, L.L.; Golden, J.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Vortmeyer, A.O.; Zhuang, Z.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; Yeung, R.S. Loss of tuberin in both subependymal giant cell astrocytomas and angiomyolipomas supports a two-hit model for the pathogenesis of tuberous sclerosis tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 1997, 151, 1639–1647. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Tyburczy, M.E.; Jozwiak, S.; Malinowska, I.A.; Chekaluk, Y.; Pugh, T.; Wu, C.-L.; Nussbaum, R.L.; Seepo, S.; Dzik, T.; Kotulska, K.; et al. A shower of second hit events as the cause of multifocal renal cell carcinoma in tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 24, 1836–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bah, I.; Fahiminiya, S.; Bégin, L.R.; Hamel, N.; D’Agostino, M.D.; Tanguay, S.; Foulkes, W.D. Atypical tuberous sclerosis complex presenting as familial renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2018, 4, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kucejova, B.; Peña-Llopis, S.; Yamasaki, T.; Sivanand, S.; Tran, T.A.T.; Alexander, S.; Wolff, N.C.; Lotan, Y.; Xie, X.-J.; Kabbani, W.; et al. Interplay Between pVHL and mTORC1 Pathways in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Res. 2011, 9, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sato, Y.; Yoshizato, T.; Shiraishi, Y.; Maekawa, S.; Okuno, Y.; Kamura, T.; Shimamura, T.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Nagae, G.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Integrated molecular analysis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 2013, 499, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Casuscelli, J.; Weinhold, N.; Gundem, G.; Wang, L.; Zabor, E.C.; Drill, E.; Wang, P.I.; Nanjangud, G.J.; Redzematovic, A.; Nargund, A.M.; et al. Genomic landscape and evolution of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. JCI Insight 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Durinck, S.; Stawiski, E.W.; Pavía-Jiménez, A.; Modrusan, Z.; Kapur, P.; Jaiswal, B.S.; Zhang, N.; Toffessi-Tcheuyap, V.; Nguyen, T.; Pahuja, K.B.; et al. Spectrum of diverse genomic alterations define non–clear cell renal carcinoma subtypes. Nat. Genet. 2014, 47, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Linehan, W.M.; Ricketts, C.J. The Cancer Genome Atlas of renal cell carcinoma: findings and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2019, 16, 539–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Davis, C.; Ricketts, C.J.; Wang, M.; Yang, L.; Cherniack, A.D.; Shen, H.; Buhay, C.; Kang, H.; Kim, S.C.; Fahey, C.C.; et al. The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Scelo, G.; Riazalhosseini, Y.; Greger, L.; Greger, L.; Letourneau, L.; Gonzàlez-Porta, M.; Wozniak, M.B.; Bourgey, M.; Harnden, P.; Egevad, L.; et al. Variation in genomic landscape of clear cell renal cell carcinoma across Europe. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Palsgrove, D.N.; Li, Y.; Pratilas, C.A.; Lin, M.T.; Pallavajjalla, A.; Gocke, C.; De Marzo, A.M.; Matoso, A.; Netto, G.J.; Epstein, J.I.; et al. Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic (ESC) Renal Cell Carcinomas Harbor TSC Mutations: Molecular Analysis Supports an Expanding Clinicopathologic Spectrum. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, 1166–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, Y.-B.; Mirsadraei, L.; Jayakumaran, G.; Al-Ahmadie, H.A.; Fine, S.W.; Gopalan, A.; Sirintrapun, S.J.; Tickoo, S.K.; Reuter, V.E. Somatic Mutations of TSC2 or MTOR Characterize a Morphologically Distinct Subset of Sporadic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Eosinophilic and Vacuolated Cytoplasm. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shah, R.B.; Stohr, B.A.; Tu, Z.J.; Gao, Y.; Przybycin, C.G.; Nguyen, J.; Cox, R.M.; Rashid-Kolvear, F.; Weindel, M.D.; Farkas, D.H.; et al. “Renal Cell Carcinoma With Leiomyomatous Stroma” Harbor Somatic Mutations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR, and/or ELOC (TCEB1): Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of 18 Sporadic Tumors Supports a Distinct Entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 44, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tjota, M.Y.; Wanjari, P.; Segal, J.; Antic, T. TSC/MTOR-mutated eosinophilic renal tumors are a distinct entity that is CK7+/CK20-/vimentin-: a validation study. Hum. Pathol. 2020, 115, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tjota, M.; Chen, H.; Parilla, M.; Wanjari, P.; Segal, J.; Antic, T. Eosinophilic Renal Cell Tumors With a TSC and MTOR Gene Mutations Are Morphologically and Immunohistochemically Heterogenous: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Study. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 44, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Williamson, S.R.; Cardili, L.; Whiteley, L.J.; Bs, J.S.; Kis, O.; Ba, L.J.W. Sclerosing TSC1 mutated renal cell carcinoma: An unusual pattern mimicking MITF family translocation renal cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2020, 59, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mihaela, F.; Zoran, G.; Kiril, T.; Jeffrey, S.; Ming, Z.; Reza, A.; Williamson, S.R.; Cristina, M.-G.; Gill, A.J.; Maria, T.; et al. Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/MTOR mutations: Next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kapur, P.; Gao, M.; Zhong, H.; Chintalapati, S.; Mitui, M.; Barnes, S.D.; Zhou, Q.; Miyata, J.; Carrillo, D.; Malladi, V.S.; et al. Germline and sporadic mTOR pathway mutations in low-grade oncocytic tumor of the kidney. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. A Yeh, Y.; Constantinescu, M.; Chaudoir, C.; Tanner, A.; Serkin, F.; Yu, X.; Fazili, T.; A Lurie, A. Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma: a review of an emerging entity distinct from clear cell conventional renal cell carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2019, 7, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Trpkov, K.; Abou-Ouf, H.; Hes, O.; Lopez, J.I.; Nesi, G.; Comperat, E.; Sibony, M.; Osunkoya, A.O.; Zhou, M.; Gokden, N.; et al. Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESC RCC): Further Morphologic and Molecular Characterization of ESC RCC as a Distinct Entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Trpkov, K.; Hes, O.; Bonert, M.; Lopez, J.I.; Bonsib, S.M.; Nesi, G.; Comperat, E.; Sibony, M.; Berney, D.M.; Martinek, P.; et al. Eosinophilic, Solid, and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic Study of 16 Unique, Sporadic Neoplasms Occurring in Women. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Siadat, F.; Trpkov, K. ESC, ALK, HOT and LOT: Three Letter Acronyms of Emerging Renal Entities Knocking on the Door of the WHO Classification. Cancers 2020, 12, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Parilla, M.; Kadri, S.; Patil, S.A.; Ritterhouse, L.; Segal, J.; Henriksen, K.J.; Antic, T. Are Sporadic Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinomas Characterized by Somatic Tuberous Sclerosis Gene Mutations? Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mehra, R.; Vats, P.; Cao, X.; Su, F.; Lee, N.D.; Lonigro, R.; Premkumar, K.; Trpkov, K.; McKenney, J.K.; Dhanasekaran, S.M.; et al. Somatic Bi-allelic Loss of TSC Genes in Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 2018, 74, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Munari, E.; Settanni, G.; Caliò, A.; Segala, D.; Lonardi, S.; Sandrini, S.; Vacca, P.; Tumino, N.; Marconi, M.; Brunelli, M.; et al. TSC loss is a clonal event in eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: a multiregional tumor sampling study. Mod. Pathol. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McKenney, J.K.; Przybycin, C.G.; Trpkov, K.; Magi-Galluzzi, C. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas have metastatic potential. Histopathology 2017, 72, 1066–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tretiakova, M.S. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma mimicking epithelioid angiomyolipoma: Series of 4 primary tumors and 2 metastases. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 80, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Reuter, V.E.; Matoso, A.; Netto, G.J.; Epstein, J.I.; Argani, P. Re-evaluation of 33 ‘unclassified’ eosinophilic renal cell carcinomas in young patients. Histopathology 2018, 72, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. He, H.; Trpkov, K.; Martinek, P.; Isikci, O.T.; Maggi-Galuzzi, C.; Alaghehbandan, R.; Gill, A.J.; Tretiakova, M.; Lopez, J.I.; Williamson, S.R.; et al. “High-grade oncocytic renal tumor”: Morphologic, immuno-histochemical, and molecular genetic study of 14 cases. Virchows Arch. 2018, 473, 725–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Trpkov, K.; Bonert, M.; Gao, Y.; Kapoor, A.; He, H.; Yilmaz, A.; Gill, A.J.; Williamson, S.R.; Comperat, E.; Tretiakova, M.; et al. High-grade oncocytic tumour (HOT) of kidney in a patient with tuberous sclerosis complex. Histopathology 2019, 75, 440–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kapur, P.; Gao, M.; Zhong, H.; Rakheja, D.; Cai, Q.; Pedrosa, I.; Margulis, V.; Xu, L.; Kinch, L.; Brugarolas, J. Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumor of the Kidney: A Review of Evolving Concepts in This Novel Subtype With Additional Insights From a Case With MTOR Mutation and Concomitant Chromosome 1 Loss. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2021, 28, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Trpkov, K.; Williamson, S.R.; Gao, Y.; Martinek, P.; Cheng, L.; Sangoi, A.R.; Yilmaz, A.; Wang, C.; San Miguel Fraile, P.; Perez Montiel, D.M.; et al. Low-grade oncocytic tumour of kidney (CD117-negative, cytokeratin 7-positive): a distinct entity? Histopathology 2019, 75, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Lerma, L.A.; Schade, G.R.; Tretiakova, M.S. Co-existence of ESC-RCC, EVT, and LOT as synchronous and metachronous tumors in six patients with multifocal neoplasia but without clinical features of tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum. Pathol. 2021, 116, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Puertollano, R.; Ferguson, S.M.; Brugarolas, J.; Ballabio, A. The complex relationship between TFEB transcription factor phosphorylation and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2018, 37, e98804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Roczniak-Ferguson, A.; Petit, C.S.; Fröhlich, F.; Qian, S.; Ky, J.; Angarola, B.; Walther, T.; Ferguson, S.M. The Transcription Factor TFEB Links mTORC1 Signaling to Transcriptional Control of Lysosome Homeostasis. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra42-ra42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Alesi, N.; Akl, E.W.; Khabibullin, D.; Liu, H.-J.; Nidhiry, A.S.; Garner, E.R.; Filippakis, H.; Lam, H.C.; Shi, W.; Viswanathan, S.R.; et al. TSC2 regulates lysosome biogenesis via a non-canonical RAGC and TFEB-dependent mechanism. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Perera, R.M.; Di Malta, C.; Ballabio, A. MiT/TFE Family of Transcription Factors, Lysosomes, and Cancer. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2019, 3, 203–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ben-Sahra, I.; Manning, B.D. mTORC1 signaling and the metabolic control of cell growth. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2017, 45, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Liu, G.Y.; Sabatini, D.M. mTOR at the nexus of nutrition, growth, ageing and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Napolitano, G.; Di Malta, C.; Esposito, A.; de Araujo, M.E.G.; Pece, S.; Bertalot, G.; Matarese, M.; Benedetti, V.; Zampelli, A.; Stasyk, T.; et al. A substrate-specific mTORC1 pathway underlies Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome. Nature 2020, 585, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 12 01585 g001 550
Figure 1. TSC-associated papillary RCC. (A–D) Low- and high-power views showing tumor cells with voluminous clear cytoplasm and complex branching architecture encapsulated by a prominent fibromuscular stroma (H&E 20×, 100×, 400×, 200×).
Figure 1. TSC-associated papillary RCC. (A–D) Low- and high-power views showing tumor cells with voluminous clear cytoplasm and complex branching architecture encapsulated by a prominent fibromuscular stroma (H&E 20×, 100×, 400×, 200×).
Genes 12 01585 g001
Genes 12 01585 g002 550
Figure 2. Hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT). (A–C) Low- and high-power views showing polygonal tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round centrally located nuclei resembling an oncocytoma but with perinuclear halos or clearing, seen in ChRCC (H&E 20×, 100×, 400×), and (D) characteristic positivity for CD117 (100×).
Figure 2. Hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor (HOCT). (A–C) Low- and high-power views showing polygonal tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round centrally located nuclei resembling an oncocytoma but with perinuclear halos or clearing, seen in ChRCC (H&E 20×, 100×, 400×), and (D) characteristic positivity for CD117 (100×).
Genes 12 01585 g002
Genes 12 01585 g003 550
Figure 3. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC (ESC-RCC). (A–C) Low- and high-power views showing a solid and cystic tumor with granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, round nuclei, and prominent nucleoli (H&E 40×, 100×, 200×). (D) Tumor cells typically display CK20 positivity (100×).
Figure 3. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC (ESC-RCC). (A–C) Low- and high-power views showing a solid and cystic tumor with granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, round nuclei, and prominent nucleoli (H&E 40×, 100×, 200×). (D) Tumor cells typically display CK20 positivity (100×).
Genes 12 01585 g003
Table
Table 2. TSC1, TSC2, and mTOR mutations in sporadic clear cell carcinoma.
Table 2. TSC1, TSC2, and mTOR mutations in sporadic clear cell carcinoma.
Authors, Journal, YearHistology# TSC1 Mutations # (%)TSC2 Mutations # (%)mTOR Mutations # (%)
Davis et al., Cancer Cell, 2014 [32] ccRCC4484 (0.9%)6 (1.2%)32 (7%)
Sato et al., Nat Gen, 2013 [27]ccRCC1062 (2%)2 (2%)6 (6%)
Kucejova et al., Mol Cancer Res, 2011 [26]ccRCC774 (5%)0 (0%)not done
Scelo et al., Nat Comm, 2014 [33]ccRCC94not donenot done8 (8.5%)
Abbreviation: ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma; #, number.
Table
Table 3. TSC1, TSC2, and mTOR in other subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.
Table 3. TSC1, TSC2, and mTOR in other subtypes of renal cell carcinoma.
Authors, Journal, YearHistology# TSC1 Mutations # (%)TSC2 Mutations # (%)mTOR Mutations # (%)
Davis et al., Cancer Cell, 2014 [32]ChRCC663 (5%)3 (5%)2 (3%)
Durinck et al., Nat Gen, 2015 [30]ChRCC491 (2%)1 (2%)2 (4%)
Casuscelli et al., JCI Insight, 2017 [29]ChRCC792 (2.5%)4 (5%)4(5%)
Bah et al., J Pathol Clin Res, 2018 [25]RCCLS505 (100%)not done
Palsgrove et al., Am J Surg Pathol, 2018 [34]ESC-RCC156 (40%)8 (53%)not done
Unclassified ESC-like 31 (33%)1 (33%)not done
Oncocytoid RCC 10%1 (100%)not done
Chen et al., Am J Surg Pathol, 2019 [35]ESC-RCC704 (42%)2 (28%)
Shah et al., Am J Surg Pathol, 2020 [36]RCCLS184 (22%)4 (22%)6 (33%)
Tjota et al., Hum Pathol, 2020 [37]ChRCC, eosinophilic variant61 (16%)2 (33%)3 (50%)
ChRCC201(50%)1 (50%)
Tjota et al., Am J Surg Pathol, 2020 [38]ChRCC, eosinophilic variant41 (25%)2 (50%)1(25%)
Unclassified RCC81 (12%)5 (62%)1(12%)
CHRCC32 (66%)1 (33%)0
Renal oncocytoma22 (100%)00
Williamson et al., Genes Chromosome Cancer, 2020 [39]ESC-RCC or HOCT11 (100%)00
Mihaela et al., Mod Pathology, 2021 [40]Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT)194 (21%)7 (36%)0
Kapur et al., Mod Pathology, 2021 [41]Low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT)211 (4%)07 (33%)
Abbreviation: RCCLS, renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma; ChRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; ESC-RCC, eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC; HOCT, hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor; #, number.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Henske, E.P.; Cornejo, K.M.; Wu, C.-L. Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Genes 2021, 12, 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101585

AMA Style

Henske EP, Cornejo KM, Wu C-L. Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Genes. 2021; 12(10):1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Henske, Elizabeth P., Kristine M. Cornejo, and Chin-Lee Wu. 2021. "Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex" Genes 12, no. 10: 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101585

APA Style

Henske, E. P., Cornejo, K. M., & Wu, C.-L. (2021). Renal Cell Carcinoma in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Genes, 12(10), 1585. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop