Next Article in Journal
Inherited Proteoglycan Biosynthesis Defects—Current Laboratory Tools and Bikunin as a Promising Blood Biomarker
Next Article in Special Issue
APOE Polymorphism and Endocrine Functions in Subjects with Morbid Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
In Silico and Transcription Analysis of Trehalose-6-phosphate Phosphatase Gene Family of Wheat: Trehalose Synthesis Genes Contribute to Salinity, Drought Stress and Leaf Senescence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Del/Dup Inside SHOX/PAR1 Region in Children and Young Adults with Idiopathic Short Stature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/genes12111653
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Aberrant DNA Methylation Mediates the Transgenerational Risk of Metabolic and Chronic Disease Due to Maternal Obesity and Overnutrition

by
Yan Li
1,
Carol A. Pollock
2 and
Sonia Saad
2,*
1
Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China
2
Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(11), 1653; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111653
Submission received: 15 September 2021 / Revised: 2 October 2021 / Accepted: 17 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Epigenetics in Endocrine Disorders)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Maternal obesity is a rapidly evolving universal epidemic leading to acute and long-term medical and obstetric health issues, including increased maternal risks of gestational diabetes, hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and the future risks for offspring’s predisposition to metabolic diseases. Epigenetic modification, in particular DNA methylation, represents a mechanism whereby environmental effects impact on the phenotypic expression of human disease. Maternal obesity or overnutrition contributes to the alterations in DNA methylation during early life which, through fetal programming, can predispose the offspring to many metabolic and chronic diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. This review aims to summarize findings from human and animal studies, which support the role of maternal obesity in fetal programing and the potential benefit of altering DNA methylation to limit maternal obesity related disease in the offspring.

1. Introduction

The global epidemic of obesity has become a widespread serious health issue among children, adolescents, and adults [1]. The World Health Organization has reported that ~20 percent of adults will be obese by 2025 worldwide and obesity currently causes ~38.6 million people’s death and disability each year due to musculoskeletal disorders; cardiovascular diseases; and mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and stress [2,3]. In addition, statistical reports showed the prevalence rate of obesity in women of bearing age in the United States is 31.8%, with approximately 60% of women reported as being overweight during the gestation period [4,5]. It is known that oocyte quality declines in obese women, and both obese mothers and their offspring are liable to health problems [6]. Specifically, during pregnancy and lactation, obese mothers are susceptible to maternal–fetal metabolic complications compared to mothers with normal weight [7]. In addition, evidence indicates that offspring born to obese mothers are predisposed to a higher birth weight, higher body mass index (BMI), and more fat accumulation, which are recognized to contribute to metabolic diseases in future life [8]. Maternal obesity correlates with chronic inflammation, increased insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia [9]. Consequently, excess lipid exposure may have detrimental effects on embryonic and fetal development. Increased fat serum levels in the mothers during gestation can induce inflammation and alter lipid and glucose metabolism, eventually leading to an adverse effect on the offspring [10].
Various studies have showed that maternal obesity can either affect fetal development in utero or have persistent adverse effects on the phenotypes of multiple generations via epigenetic changes, heritable and environmental processes, which alter downstream gene transcription but without altering DNA sequence [11]. Indeed, obese mothers may transmit their metabolic phenotypes to their offspring which enhances their risk for chronic metabolic diseases [12] and at least, in part, explains the rapid increase in prevalence rate of metabolic and chronic diseases. In addition, epigenetic modification, which is known to be regulated by the intrauterine environment [13], can persist over consecutive generations, which results in long-term impacts to the offspring [14]. The majority of these epigenetic changes appear in utero during the important periods of fetal growth and may play a subsequent role in fetal programing [15]. Epigenetic modification includes DNA methylation and acetylation, RNA and histone modification, as well as regulation by non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) [16]. Among those, DNA methylation is one of the most widely observed epigenetic change in maternal and fetal programming [17] and thus its role in maternal obesity related disease on the offspring will be covered in this review.

2. Location, Writers, Erasers, Readers of DNA Methylation

DNA methylation is a universal and heritable epigenetic modification that mainly induces transcriptional repression [18]. DNA modification can theoretically occur in any of the DNA bases, although only modifications of cytosine and adenine are described to date [18]. Most of the DNA methylation occurs on cytosines nucleotide that precede a guanine nucleotide or CpG sites. Methylation of the fifth position of cytosine (5 mC) is the most studied DNA methylation [19]. Overall, CpG sites in mammalian genomes are relatively rare, which may be because 5mC can easily deaminate to thymine [20]. With the exception of CpG islands (regions of the genome that contain a large number of CpG repeats) that are mainly situated in the promoter and exon regions [21,22], the remaining CpG sites across the genome are highly methylated [21]. Methylated CpG islands recruit methyl-binding proteins, which result in stable silencing of gene expression via inhibition of transcription factor binding [23]. Although hypermethylation largely decreases the gene transcriptome level, one study has reported that DNA methylation in intragenic regions (including gene body, 5′and 3′ untranslated regions) may increase the transcriptome by blocking the initiation of alternative promoters [24]. Enzymes which participate in DNA modification are categorized as ‘writers’ (methylation), ‘erasers’ (de-methylation), and ‘readers’ (recognition). ‘Writers’ are the enzymes that play an important role in establishing and maintaining methylation. ‘Erasers’ can catalyze the removal of the methyl donors. ‘Readers’ can interpret DNA methylation and finally affect transcription [25] (Figure 1).

2.1. Writers

DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), including DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and DNMT3L, directly promote S-adenosyl methionine contribution to DNA methylation, specifically at CpG sites [26,27]. Although these enzymes share a similar structure, they have different functions and expression profiles [28]. DNMT1 methylates hemi-methylated CpGs and maintains the methylation in daughter cells [29]. Additionally, DNMT1 also has the ability to repair DNA methylation [28]. DNMT 3a and DNMT 3b function as de novo DNMTs, which methylate both native and synthetic DNA without preference for hemi-methylated DNA [30]. They are responsible for setting up genomic imprints and methylation patterns during germ cell development and embryogenesis [31].

2.2. Erasers

DNA demethylation can be divided into passive and active demethylation. Passive DNA demethylation occurs when DNMTs are reduced or absent [32]. Active DNA demethylation occurs by deamination or oxidation reactions and involves specific enzymes [33]. The ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes can catalyze the demethylation of 5mC and cause the reversal of methylation [34]. Activation-induced deaminase (AID)/APOBEC enzymes can cause 5mC or 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) to deaminate to uracil. Several intermediate products can be replaced by cytosine via the base excision repair (BER) pathway initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) family, such as thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (SMUG1), and methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD)4 [35] (Figure 1). Ultimately, 5mC oxidized bases, such as 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmU), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), as well as 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC), are recognized and excised then finally replaced by a bare cytosine regulated by TDG and SMUG1 [33]. Active DNA demethylation involves multiple enzymes and a complex process which requires further investigation.

2.3. Readers

DNA methylation is recognized by three separate kinds of proteins: the 5- methylcytosine binding domain (MBD) family; the ubiquitin-like, containing plant homeodomain and ring finger domain (UHRF) family; and the zinc-finger family. Among them, MBD family has a conservative region for the readout of DNA methylation and recruitment of methylases to methylated DNA [36]. The UHRF proteins bind to DNMT1 and then target it to hemi-methylated DNA to maintain DNA methylation [36]. Zinc-finger proteins including Kaiso, ZBTB4, and ZBTB38, like the MBD family, binds methylated DNA and repress transcription [37].

3. DNA Methylation and Maternal Obesity-Related Offspring Predisposition to Future Disease

The genome in early mouse embryo is significantly methylated. However, during the stage of preimplantation, a wave of genome-wide demethylation occurs followed by de novo methylation in somatic and extra-embryonic tissues [38]. In the progression of differentiation, methylation patterns are altered in a lineage-specific fashion. During fetal development, a second wave of demethylation occurs and is accompanied by re-establishment, especially in primordial germ cells [39,40]. DNA modification patterns are affected by the maternal environment and are formed during the periods of embryogenesis, fetal growth or early postnatal life [38]. Therefore, alteration of gene methylation in utero or during the critical period of development, which ranges from pre-conception to early childhood, can lead to permanent structural changes in an organ and development of disease in the offspring.
Maternal obesity has previously been shown to induce chronic disease in the offspring. First, maternal obesity can affect the weight of the offspring leading to obesity and increased susceptibility to chronic diseases later in life [41]. Second, maternal obesity may predispose the offspring to chronic diseases through intrauterine mechanisms, for example reshaping the uterine immune cell landscape [42]. Moreover, chronic diseases induced by maternal obesity can be transmitted to offspring through epigenetic regulation. Indeed, recent studies have indicated that maternal obesity results in the alteration of DNA methylation, histone modification as well as noncoding RNAs in oocytes and sperm [43]. A further study showed that 56 CpGs sites were significantly and differentially methylated in placental tissue of overweight mothers compared to normal weight mothers [44].
Epidemiological studies have shown that maternal obesity or overnutrition during pregnancy or lactation exerts a lasting effect on the prevalence of metabolic diseases in the next generation, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), obesity, diabetes, as well as chronic kidney disease (CKD) [45,46,47]. Human and animal studies also showed that maternal obesity or overnutrition during conception or lactation can modulate DNA methylation of different genes involved in energy metabolism, glucose homeostasis, insulin signaling and fat deposition, which support the role of DNA methylation in maternal obesity-induced risk of NAFLD, obesity, diabetes, and CKD (Table 1) [48,49,50,51,52,53].

3.1. DNA Methylation and Maternal Obesity-Related Offspring Predisposition to NAFLD

Previous studies have elucidated that intrauterine exposure to maternal obesity disrupts liver metabolic programming, characterized by alterations in hepatic fatty acid oxidation and in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and lipid metabolism [84,85]. Maternal obesity increases insulin and leptin resistance, dyslipidemia, hepatic inflammation, and steatosis in subsequent generation [85,86,87,88,89]. The effect of maternal obesity on the offspring can last over multiple generation. Indeed, offspring born to obese mothers tend to develop obesity and hepatic steatosis over three subsequent generations [12,14].
Epigenetic studies showed that exposure to obesity in utero, also resulted in hepatic hypermethylation and this was associated with alteration in DNMTs expression and enzymatic activity [90]. Epigenetic changes exert a lasting effect, particularly via DNA methylation of genes associated with mitochondrial function and lipid metabolism [91]. Maternal obesity was found to alter the methylation level of hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 alpha (HNF4A), Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator (PPARGC)-1β as well as fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 in mice offspring liver, which have crucial roles in hepatic fibrosis and lipid accumulation [92,93]. Patients with NAFLD have global DNA methylation in hepatic tissues in association with differential levels of PPARGC-1A compared to healthy liver samples [94]. In addition, maternal obesity and maternal overnutrition are associated with Leptin hypermethylation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α hypomethylation in the tissue of offspring’s oocytes and liver [54,55]. PPAR α and liver X receptor α (LXRα) which are involved in the metabolism of several important lipids, are significantly hypermethylated in the liver tissues of mice offspring born to obese mothers [56,57]. Moreover, Lipin 1, a gene involved in lipid generation, was hypermethylated in the transcription factor binding sites of the offspring’s liver tissue as a result of maternal obesity [58]. The biological processes included regulation of sterol regulatory-element binding protein (SREBP) signaling, phospholipid transport, as well as granulocyte differentiation, which are implicated in controlling lipogenesis and lipid uptake, and are known to contribute to the development of NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [95]. DNA methylation levels in the promoters of the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1 (GPAT1) is lower and the transcriptome level of GPAT1 and SREBP-1 are higher in the offspring of obese mothers compared to offspring of normal weight mothers, in association with increased hepatic triglyceride levels [59,60] also suggesting increased risk of hepatic steatosis in the offspring [96]. Peng et al. recently demonstrated that offspring born to mothers who had a high-fat diet displayed a disruption of lipid homeostasis, which is accompanied by altered methionine and abnormal one-carbon metabolism in offspring livers. This would lead to DNA hypermethylation and L-carnitine depletion associated with deactivation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling and decreased expression of PPAR-α and genes for fatty acid oxidation [97].
Offspring exposure to maternal obesity and maternal overnutrition also induced glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78 hypermethylation in association with downregulation of gene expression [61]. Reduced levels of GRP78 gene expression increases the activity of unfolded protein response (UPR) [98], which has been reported in hepatic dyslipidemia and NAFLD [99,100,101]. Furthermore, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-β, proinflammatory and profibrogenic regulator, which can act as a potential target in diagnosing and treating early stages of NAFLD fibrosis [62], was hypomethylated and upregulated transcriptionally in the offspring of obese mothers [62]. Collectively, these data strongly support the role of DNA methylation in the development of NAFLD in the offspring exposed to maternal obesity in utero.

3.2. DNA Methylation and Maternal Obesity Related Offspring Predisposition to Obesity and Metabolic Disease

Maternal obesity and overnutrition during prenatal and postnatal periods have a negative influence on offspring lipid metabolism and predisposes the offspring to increased fat mass, chronic inflammation, and oxidative stress. This effect is further amplified if the offspring consume high fat and calorie diet after the lactation period [102,103,104,105]. Therefore, the increased prevalence of maternal obesity and maternal overnutrition correlates with the risk of obesity in offspring [45,92,106].
Various studies have discovered that obesity, known as a common metabolic disease, is associated with epigenetic alterations especially DNA methylation [107,108]. Several imprinted genes involved in metabolic diseases such as PPARα [54], IGF2 [109], H19 [109], and paternally expressed gene 3 (Peg3) [110] are differentially methylated in the mammalian gametes in oocytes of control and obese animals and their offspring, which suggests that maternal obesity can induce transgenerational inheritance of metabolic disease through DNA methylation. Exposure to maternal overnutrition or maternal obesity before or during gestation or lactation, leads to an incremental increase in the mRNA level of several adipogenic genes in peripheral fat in fetal sheep such as PPARG, fatty acid synthase, lipoprotein lipase, adiponectin, and leptin which participate in energy and lipid metabolism [63,64,67]. Alteration in DNA methylation levels of those genes were also demonstrated in the visceral fat of mice offspring due to maternal obesity [111]. Furthermore, studies on rodents have revealed that maternal obesity leads to increased birth weight, increased leptin levels, and hypermethylation of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) in the promoter regions of the offspring, which has a vital role in leptin resistance [65,66]. Previous studies also observed that maternal obesity may influence the prevalence of offspring obesity, which may be mediated by the methylation of promoter DNA of three key genes related to metabolic syndrome (PPARGC1A, PPARG, and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM)), as identified in umbilical cord blood [52,67].
Additionally, offspring born to obese mothers have decreased gene methylation of key adipogenic transcription regulators, including CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBP-β) and zinc-finger proteins, which may result in elevated adipogenic tissue differentiation during embryonic and fetal growth periods and predispose to metabolic disorders [68,69]. DNA methylation array demonstrated that genes related to fatty acid oxidation (PRKAG2, ACC2, CPT1A, SDHC) were hypermethylated in the cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of obese mothers, which was positively associated with infant adiposity [70]. Moreover, MSCs in umbilical cord blood of obese mothers displayed increased lipid deposition, decreased fatty acid oxidation, in association with disrupted AMPK signaling [70]. Additional studies have found that the TAP-binding protein (TAPBP) is hypermethylated in umbilical cord blood of obese mothers, which suggests that maternal obesity can result in the development of obesity in the offspring via reducing tapasin (decreased tapasin can lower CD8 + T-cell responses in vitro) leading to impaired immune responses in offspring [71,72]. In addition, aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) was hypermethylated in the umbilical cord of obese mothers compared to lean mothers. AhRR functions as an inhibitor of adipocyte differentiation by negatively regulating PPARG during adipogenesis. Collectively, these data suggest that offspring of obese mothers are at increased risk of obesity and metabolic disease [73,74,75]. Therefore, targeting DNA methylation during the early postnatal period might provide a novel preventative measure for limiting transgenerational obesity.

3.3. DNA Methylation and Maternal Obesity Related Offspring Predisposition to Diabetes Mellitus

Epidemiological studies demonstrate that exposure to obesity during the prenatal and postnatal periods increases the risk of offspring to diabetes [112,113], as insulin resistance may be programmed in utero and exposure to insulin resistance in early life increases the risk of diabetes [114].
Maternal obesity and overnutrition results in epigenetic alterations of insulin-signaling molecules [115,116]. Genes involved in type 1 diabetes mellitus, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 were hypermethylated in the promoter region of whole blood sample from offspring born after maternal bariatric surgery compared to before bariatric surgery, and genes involved in type 2 diabetes mellitus includes POMC, IGF2, insulin receptor (INSR), fat mass- and obesity-associated protein (FTO) as well as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), were either hypermethylated (POMC, IGF2, and INSR) or hypomethylated (FTO and TNF) [76,77]. In addition, several genes involved in the immune/inflammatory pathways were differentially methylated in the peripheral blood of offspring born to obese women before bariatric surgery compared with siblings born after weight loss surgery [117]. Genes involved in immunological processes (including TNF -α, interleukin, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II signaling pathways) were also differentially methylated in offspring of obese mothers. These genes correlate with β-cell mass restriction as well as insulin resistance [78,79]. Several genes involved in immune responses in patients with type 1 diabetes were hypermethylated in umbilical cord blood-derived monocytes, including signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), T cell receptors (CD247, CD28, and CD3E), MHC I class or II subunits (HLADMB and HLA-DQB1) [79].
In addition to its role in obesity, leptin is also known to have a role in diabetes [118] and may be implicated in energy homeostasis and insulin resistance induced by epigenetic regulation [80]. Many studies reported that leptin promoters were hypermethylated in the placentas of obese mothers leading to decreased placental leptin expression while leptin deficiency is associated with hyperglycemia both in humans and animals [80,81,82]. Moreover, maternal nutrition restriction leads to the hypomethylation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1) (a rate-limiting hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme) in the promoter regions with a concomitant increment in transcriptome expression in fetal and postnatal liver [115,116,119,120]. IGF2 was overexpressed in the islets of F1 and F2 generations and was hypermethylated in different CpG sites, which may cause mitochondrial dysfunction, reduction of β-cell mass and susceptibility to diabetes over multiple generations [121]. However, to date, it is not clear whether alterations in gene methylation due to maternal obesity is a causative or occur as a consequence of diabetes.

3.4. DNA Methylation and Maternal Obesity-Related Offspring Predisposition to Chronic Kidney Diseases

The kidney is a highly metabolic organ and is vulnerable to the effect of the intrauterine environment [122]. Although few studies have addressed the role of epigenetic regulation in maternal obesity-related CKD in the offspring, it is increasingly recognized that detrimental renal effects of maternal obesity can be transmitted to subsequent generations of obese women resulting in increased susceptibility to CKD [123,124]. Additionally, maternal obesity predisposes the offspring to dysglycemia, diabetes as well as hypertension, which, in turn can induce future renal dysfunction [125].
Epigenetic regulations were shown to contribute to the development of CKD, diabetic nephropathy, and renal fibrosis [126]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, which are strongly implicated in CKD development, are also closely linked to epigenetic changes [127]. Incremental increase in oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment during the period of oocyte development laid down through epigenetic changes can also contribute to the transgenerational development of maternal obesity related CKD [47,83]. Sureshchandra et al. demonstrated that maternal obesity correlates with global hypomethylation of key immune genes (T cells, cytokine, chemokines) in umbilical cord blood-derived monocytes [79], some of which are involved in the development of inflammatory responses in kidney tissues and CKD pathology [128]. We have additionally demonstrated that maternal obesity induces global DNA methylation in the offspring kidney in association with established kidney fibrosis [129]. The evidence hence suggests that DNA methylation is involved in maternal obesity-induced CKD in offspring. Additional studies are required to identify the specific genes which are differentially methylated in renal tissue in the offspring of obese mothers and determine the mechanisms of fetal programming to CKD.

4. Epigenetic Pharmacology

DNA methylation is important for fetal development, and as discussed above, DNA hypermethylation or hypomethylation can occur in utero depending on the fetal development stage. DNA methylation, no doubt, plays an important role in the development and progression of metabolic and kidney disease, suggesting that DNA methylation modulators might have a role in disease prevention due to fetal programing. It is not clear to date whether administration of demethylating agents or supplements that induce DNA methylation during the prenatal or postnatal period or during gestation would have a detrimental or protective effect on the offspring. Whole genome methylation studies are still lacking. It is also unclear to date whether DNA methylation is causative of disease transmission due to maternal obesity or just associated with disease progression. Supplementation of methyl-donors, such as folate, choline, vitamin B12, serine, betaine, as well as methionine during gestation, regulate the production of the most important methyl-donor (S-adenosyl-methionine) as well as one-carbon metabolisms and therefore modify DNA methylation status in the offspring epigenome, leading to the alterations of gene expression [111,130,131,132,133]. In addition, having a cocktail of choline, betaine, folic acid, as well as vitamin B12 can epigenetically reduce the long-lasting effect of maternal obesity and prevent the transgenerational amplification of obesity [134,135]. Furthermore, supplementing methyl donor to lactating rats was shown to decrease maternal obesity induced hepatic adipose deposition in offspring [136], and significantly decrease blood glucose level in the next generation by downregulating the insulin resistance pathway [137]. On the other hand, we have demonstrated that administration of hydralazine, an anti-hypertensive drug, during gestation to obese dams at low dose reduces renal global DNA methylation in offspring and improves maternal obesity-induced renal fibrosis independent of blood pressure regulation [129]. Note that such effect on global DNA methylation is due to overall effects on individual genes, some of which would be differentially hyper-or hypomethylated. Regardless, altering DNA methylation during gestation and/or early postnatal period is still a challenge due to safety issues with available epigenetic modulators. In summary, the available evidence strongly supports the key role of DNA methylation in maternal obesity related disease in offspring and suggests that early intervention may be necessary to prevent/reduce the increased prevalence of metabolic and chronic disease induced by maternal obesity. Methyl supplementation or DNA demethylation agents prior to or during pregnancy may enable the change of offspring’s phenotype and prevent transgenerational amplification of maternal obesity. Such a hypothesis needs to be confirmed in animal studies before it can be extended to humans. Given that many methyl donors are extracted from different diets, maternal diet is also very crucial to prevent or reduce the development of adverse effect on the offspring due to maternal obesity.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

Maternal obesity predisposes the offspring to obesity, diabetes, CKD, and NAFLD via epigenetic regulation, particularly DNA methylation.
While the data supporting the role of maternal obesity and DNA methylation in disease development are clear, we cannot exclude the additional effect of the postnatal environment such as diet, stress, physical activity, lifestyle, etc. on epigenetic modification and disease development. Current epidemiological studies that are able to attribute the independent contribution of maternal obesity to the offspring’s phenotype are limited as it is difficult to determine the impacts of prenatal exposure to high fat diet from post-natal environmental effects. It is also unclear whether maternal obesity and post-natal overnutrition have the same effect on the offspring. Few interventional studies have follow-up data focused on weight management and remedial therapies before and during the gestation period in order to reduce detrimental effects of maternal obesity on chronic disease in the next generation. Therefore, novel interventions are required to be devised and studied, together with long time longitudinal follow-up studies to assess the effect of maternal obesity on multiple generations.
Assessing DNA methylation profiles due to maternal obesity is required to shed more light on the role of DNA methylation in disease programming. Because epigenetic modifications are considered as durable but reversible processes, interventions and strategies to prevent or reverse disease development can be carried out once the mechanisms are uncovered. Additional experiments are imperative to examine whether the effect of maternal obesity on DNA methylation are transmitted through multiple generations and whether alteration of gene methylation before the onset of pregnancy or during pregnancy/early postnatal periods can safely reverse disease programing.
Considering that most women who are overweight/obese before pregnancy will remain obese throughout their gestation period, and due to the fact that obesity induces reversible epigenetic changes to the DNA, using epigenetic modulators to regulate DNA methylation before the onset of pregnancy might be beneficial in preventing adverse effect due to maternal obesity on the offspring.
In conclusion, this review demonstrated the effect of maternal obesity/overnutrition on transgenerational transmission of metabolic and kidney disease and provides evidence for the role of DNA methylation in maternal obesity-induced disease in the offspring. We demonstrated that weight management and fat diet restriction during prenatal and postnatal periods, together with methyl donor supplements or epigenetic modulators may improve the maternal metabolic status and prevent transgenerational amplification of disease predisposition.

Author Contributions

Y.L. wrote the original draft, C.A.P. and S.S. critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mohammed, M.S.; Sendra, S.; Lloret, J.; Bosch, I. Systems and WBANs for Controlling Obesity. J. Healthc. Eng. 2018, 2018, 1564748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. Obesity Data and Statistics. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/obesity/data-and-statistics (accessed on 9 June 2021).
  3. Shiri, R.; Falah-Hassani, K.; Lallukka, T. Body mass index and the risk of disability retirement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 77, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wilson, R.M.; Messaoudi, I. The impact of maternal obesity during pregnancy on offspring immunity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 418 Pt 2, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Poston, L.; Caleyachetty, R.; Cnattingius, S.; Corvalán, C.; Uauy, R.; Herring, S.; Gillman, M.W. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: Epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016, 4, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Igosheva, N.; Abramov, A.Y.; Poston, L.; Eckert, J.J.; Fleming, T.P.; Duchen, M.R.; McConnell, J. Maternal diet-induced obesity alters mitochondrial activity and redox status in mouse oocytes and zygotes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Heslehurst, N.; Vieira, R.; Hayes, L.; Crowe, L.; Jones, D.; Robalino, S.; Slack, E.; Rankin, J. Maternal body mass index and post-term birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2017, 18, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Reynolds, R.M. Excess maternal weight gain during pregnancy is associated with overweight/obesity in offspring at age 16 years, but maternal pre-pregnancy obesity has a greater effect. Evid. Based Nurs. 2013, 16, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pendeloski, K.P.T.; Ono, E.; Torloni, M.R.; Mattar, R.; Daher, S. Maternal obesity and inflammatory mediators: A controversial association. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 77, e12674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Lawlor, D.A.; Smith, G.D.; O’Callaghan, M.; Alati, R.; Mamun, A.A.; Williams, G.M.; Najman, J.M. Epidemiologic evidence for the fetal overnutrition hypothesis: Findings from the mater-university study of pregnancy and its outcomes. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 165, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Zhou, L.Y.; Deng, M.Q.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, X.H. Early-life nutrition and metabolic disorders in later life: A new perspective on energy metabolism. Chin. Med. J. 2020, 133, 1961–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Şanlı, E.; Kabaran, S. Maternal Obesity, Maternal Overnutrition and Fetal Programming: Effects of Epigenetic Mechanisms on the Development of Metabolic Disorders. Curr. Genom. 2019, 20, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zoghbi, H.Y.; Beaudet, A.L. Epigenetics and Human Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016, 8, a019497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, J.; Huang, J.; Li, J.S.; Chen, H.; Huang, K.; Zheng, L. Accumulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipogenesis in the liver through generational effects of high fat diets. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 900–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lane, R.H. Fetal programming, epigenetics, and adult onset disease. Clin. Perinatol. 2014, 41, 815–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Hong, T.; Wang, S.; Mo, J.; Tian, T.; Zhou, X. Epigenetic modification of nucleic acids: From basic studies to medical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2844–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Larkin, B.P.; Glastras, S.J.; Chen, H.; Pollock, C.A.; Saad, S. DNA methylation and the potential role of demethylating agents in prevention of progressive chronic kidney disease. Faseb J. 2018, 32, 5215–5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kumar, S.; Chinnusamy, V.; Mohapatra, T. Epigenetics of Modified DNA Bases: 5-Methylcytosine and Beyond. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pajares, M.J.; Palanca-Ballester, C.; Urtasun, R.; Alemany-Cosme, E.; Lahoz, A.; Sandoval, J. Methods for analysis of specific DNA methylation status. Methods 2020, 187, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bird, A.P. DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 1499–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bird, A.; Taggart, M.; Frommer, M.; Miller, O.J.; Macleod, D. A fraction of the mouse genome that is derived from islands of nonmethylated, CpG-rich DNA. Cell 1985, 40, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beckerman, P.; Ko, Y.A.; Susztak, K. Epigenetics: A new way to look at kidney diseases. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc. Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2014, 29, 1821–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Zeisberg, E.M.; Zeisberg, M. The role of promoter hypermethylation in fibroblast activation and fibrogenesis. J. Pathol. 2013, 229, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maunakea, A.K.; Nagarajan, R.P.; Bilenky, M.; Ballinger, T.J.; D’Souza, C.; Fouse, S.D.; Johnson, B.E.; Hong, C.; Nielsen, C.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 2010, 466, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moore, L.D.; Le, T.; Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 38, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ren, W.; Gao, L.; Song, J. Structural Basis of DNMT1 and DNMT3A-Mediated DNA Methylation. Genes 2018, 9, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. van der Wijst, M.G.; Venkiteswaran, M.; Chen, H.; Xu, G.L.; Plösch, T.; Rots, M.G. Local chromatin microenvironment determines DNMT activity: From DNA methyltransferase to DNA demethylase or DNA dehydroxymethylase. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mortusewicz, O.; Schermelleh, L.; Walter, J.; Cardoso, M.C.; Leonhardt, H. Recruitment of DNA methyltransferase I to DNA repair sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8905–8909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Bronner, C.; Alhosin, M.; Hamiche, A.; Mousli, M. Coordinated Dialogue between UHRF1 and DNMT1 to Ensure Faithful Inheritance of Methylated DNA Patterns. Genes 2019, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Zhou, Z.; Li, H.Q.; Liu, F. DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors and their Therapeutic Potential. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2018, 18, 2448–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, E.; Zhang, Y. DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a019133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sadakierska-Chudy, A.; Kostrzewa, R.M.; Filip, M. A comprehensive view of the epigenetic landscape part I: DNA methylation, passive and active DNA demethylation pathways and histone variants. Neurotox. Res. 2015, 27, 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bhutani, N.; Burns, D.M.; Blau, H.M. DNA demethylation dynamics. Cell 2011, 146, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ito, S.; D’Alessio, A.C.; Taranova, O.V.; Hong, K.; Sowers, L.C.; Zhang, Y. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 2010, 466, 1129–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rai, K.; Huggins, I.J.; James, S.R.; Karpf, A.R.; Jones, D.A.; Cairns, B.R. DNA demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and gadd45. Cell 2008, 135, 1201–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Achour, M.; Jacq, X.; Rondé, P.; Alhosin, M.; Charlot, C.; Chataigneau, T.; Jeanblanc, M.; Macaluso, M.; Giordano, A.; Hughes, A.D.; et al. The interaction of the SRA domain of ICBP90 with a novel domain of DNMT1 is involved in the regulation of VEGF gene expression. Oncogene 2008, 27, 2187–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lopes, E.C.; Valls, E.; Figueroa, M.E.; Mazur, A.; Meng, F.G.; Chiosis, G.; Laird, P.W.; Schreiber-Agus, N.; Greally, J.M.; Prokhortchouk, E.; et al. Kaiso contributes to DNA methylation-dependent silencing of tumor suppressor genes in colon cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 7258–7263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wei, Y.; Lang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, C.R.; Zhao, Z.A.; Zhang, Y.; Du, Y.; Sun, Y. DNA methylation analysis and editing in single mammalian oocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9883–9892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gallou-Kabani, C.; Junien, C. Nutritional epigenomics of metabolic syndrome: New perspective against the epidemic. Diabetes 2005, 54, 1899–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Faulk, C.; Dolinoy, D.C. Timing is everything: The when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Josey, M.J.; McCullough, L.E.; Hoyo, C.; Williams-DeVane, C. Overall gestational weight gain mediates the relationship between maternal and child obesity. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. St-Germain, L.E.; Castellana, B.; Baltayeva, J.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal Obesity and the Uterine Immune Cell Landscape: The Shaping Role of Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ou, X.H.; Zhu, C.C.; Sun, S.C. Effects of obesity and diabetes on the epigenetic modification of mammalian gametes. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 7847–7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thakali, K.M.; Zhong, Y.; Cleves, M.; Andres, A.; Shankar, K. Associations between maternal body mass index and diet composition with placental DNA methylation at term. Placenta 2020, 93, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Eriksson, J.G.; Sandboge, S.; Salonen, M.; Kajantie, E.; Osmond, C. Maternal weight in pregnancy and offspring body composition in late adulthood: Findings from the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study (HBCS). Ann. Med. 2015, 47, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Patel, S.; Lawlor, D.A.; Callaway, M.; Macdonald-Wallis, C.; Sattar, N.; Fraser, A. Association of maternal diabetes/glycosuria and pre-pregnancy body mass index with offspring indicators of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Pediatr. 2016, 16, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Glastras, S.J.; Chen, H.; Pollock, C.A.; Saad, S. Maternal obesity increases the risk of metabolic disease and impacts renal health in offspring. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Elshenawy, S.; Simmons, R. Maternal obesity and prenatal programming. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 435, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, M.; Reynolds, C.M.; Sloboda, D.M.; Gray, C.; Vickers, M.H. Effects of taurine supplementation on hepatic markers of inflammation and lipid metabolism in mothers and offspring in the setting of maternal obesity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Morris, M.J.; Chen, H. Established maternal obesity in the rat reprograms hypothalamic appetite regulators and leptin signaling at birth. Int. J. Obes. 2009, 33, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Howie, G.J.; Sloboda, D.M.; Kamal, T.; Vickers, M.H. Maternal nutritional history predicts obesity in adult offspring independent of postnatal diet. J. Physiol. 2009, 587, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Elahi, M.M.; Cagampang, F.R.; Mukhtar, D.; Anthony, F.W.; Ohri, S.K.; Hanson, M.A. Long-term maternal high-fat feeding from weaning through pregnancy and lactation predisposes offspring to hypertension, raised plasma lipids and fatty liver in mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hjort, L.; Martino, D.; Grunnet, L.G.; Naeem, H.; Maksimovic, J.; Olsson, A.H.; Zhang, C.; Ling, C.; Olsen, S.F.; Saffery, R.; et al. Gestational diabetes and maternal obesity are associated with epigenome-wide methylation changes in children. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e122572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ge, Z.J.; Luo, S.M.; Lin, F.; Liang, Q.X.; Huang, L.; Wei, Y.C.; Hou, Y.; Han, Z.M.; Schatten, H.; Sun, Q.Y. DNA methylation in oocytes and liver of female mice and their offspring: Effects of high-fat-diet-induced obesity. Envrion. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cordero, P.; Campion, J.; Milagro, F.I.; Goyenechea, E.; Steemburgo, T.; Javierre, B.M.; Martinez, J.A. Leptin and TNF-α promoter methylation levels measured by MSP could predict the response to a low-calorie diet. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 67, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yu, H.L.; Dong, S.; Gao, L.F.; Li, L.; Xi, Y.D.; Ma, W.W.; Yuan, L.H.; Xiao, R. Global DNA methylation was changed by a maternal high-lipid, high-energy diet during gestation and lactation in male adult mice liver. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, Y.; Chan, J.F.; Cummins, C.L. Liver X Receptors as Therapeutic Targets for Managing Cholesterol: Implications for Atherosclerosis and Other Inflammatory Conditions. Clin. Lipidol. 2009, 4, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Rouschop, S.H.; Karl, T.; Risch, A.; van Ewijk, P.A.; Schrauwen-Hinderling, V.B.; Opperhuizen, A.; van Schooten, F.J.; Godschalk, R.W. Gene expression and DNA methylation as mechanisms of disturbed metabolism in offspring after exposure to a prenatal HF diet. J. Lipid Res. 2019, 60, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Guo, D.; Bell, E.H.; Mischel, P.; Chakravarti, A. Targeting SREBP-1-driven lipid metabolism to treat cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 2619–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hashimoto, K.; Ogawa, Y. Epigenetic Switching and Neonatal Nutritional Environment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1012, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Soeda, J.; Cordero, P.; Li, J.; Mouralidarane, A.; Asilmaz, E.; Ray, S.; Nguyen, V.; Carter, R.; Novelli, M.; Vinciguerra, M.; et al. Hepatic rhythmicity of endoplasmic reticulum stress is disrupted in perinatal and adult mice models of high-fat diet-induced obesity. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 68, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gutierrez Sanchez, L.H.; Tomita, K.; Guo, Q.; Furuta, K.; Alhuwaish, H.; Hirsova, P.; Baheti, S.; Alver, B.; Hlady, R.; Robertson, K.D.; et al. Perinatal Nutritional Reprogramming of the Epigenome Promotes Subsequent Development of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Hepatol. Commun. 2018, 2, 1493–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Muhlhausler, B.S.; Duffield, J.A.; McMillen, I.C. Increased maternal nutrition stimulates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ, adiponectin, and leptin messenger ribonucleic acid expression in adipose tissue before birth. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 878–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Lecoutre, S.; Deracinois, B.; Laborie, C.; Eberlé, D.; Guinez, C.; Panchenko, P.E.; Lesage, J.; Vieau, D.; Junien, C.; Gabory, A.; et al. Depot- and sex-specific effects of maternal obesity in offspring’s adipose tissue. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 230, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Marco, A.; Kisliouk, T.; Tabachnik, T.; Meiri, N.; Weller, A. Overweight and CpG methylation of the Pomc promoter in offspring of high-fat-diet-fed dams are not “reprogrammed” by regular chow diet in rats. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2014, 28, 4148–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Shi, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Su, M.; Chew, E.; Wong, E.T.; Lacza, Z.; Radda, G.K.; Tergaonkar, V.; Han, W. Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) suppresses food intake and energy expenditure in mice by directly activating the Pomc promoter. Diabetologia 2013, 56, 925–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gemma, C.; Sookoian, S.; Alvariñas, J.; García, S.I.; Quintana, L.; Kanevsky, D.; González, C.D.; Pirola, C.J. Maternal pregestational BMI is associated with methylation of the PPARGC1A promoter in newborns. Obesity 2009, 17, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, Q.Y.; Liang, J.F.; Rogers, C.J.; Zhao, J.X.; Zhu, M.J.; Du, M. Maternal obesity induces epigenetic modifications to facilitate Zfp423 expression and enhance adipogenic differentiation in fetal mice. Diabetes 2013, 62, 3727–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Borengasser, S.J.; Zhong, Y.; Kang, P.; Lindsey, F.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M.; Gomez-Acevedo, H.; Shankar, K. Maternal obesity enhances white adipose tissue differentiation and alters genome-scale DNA methylation in male rat offspring. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 4113–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Boyle, K.E.; Patinkin, Z.W.; Shapiro, A.L.B.; Bader, C.; Vanderlinden, L.; Kechris, K.; Janssen, R.C.; Ford, R.J.; Smith, B.K.; Steinberg, G.R.; et al. Maternal obesity alters fatty acid oxidation, AMPK activity, and associated DNA methylation in mesenchymal stem cells from human infants. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 1503–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gharipour, M.; Barekatain, M.; Sung, J.; Emami, N.; Sadeghian, L.; Dianatkhah, M.; Sarrafzadegan, N.; Jahanfar, S. The Epigenetic Overlap between Obesity and Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Martin, C.L.; Jima, D.; Sharp, G.C.; McCullough, L.E.; Park, S.S.; Gowdy, K.M.; Skaar, D.; Cowley, M.; Maguire, R.L.; Fuemmeler, B.; et al. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity, offspring cord blood DNA methylation, and offspring cardiometabolic health in early childhood: An epigenome-wide association study. Epigenetics 2019, 14, 325–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Burris, H.H.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Byun, H.M.; Cantoral, A.; Just, A.C.; Pantic, I.; Solano-Gonzalez, M.; Svensson, K.; Tamayo y Ortiz, M.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Offspring DNA methylation of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor gene is associated with maternal BMI, gestational age, and birth weight. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Shahin, N.N.; Abd-Elwahab, G.T.; Tawfiq, A.A.; Abdelgawad, H.M. Potential role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling in childhood obesity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ishihara, Y.; Tsuji, M.; Vogel, C.F.A. Suppressive effects of aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor on adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018, 642, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Metzger, B.E.; Persson, B.; Lowe, L.P.; Dyer, A.R.; Cruickshank, J.K.; Deerochanawong, C.; Halliday, H.L.; Hennis, A.J.; Liley, H.; Ng, P.C.; et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: Neonatal glycemia. Pediatrics 2010, 126, e1545–e1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Berglind, D.; Müller, P.; Willmer, M.; Sinha, I.; Tynelius, P.; Näslund, E.; Dahlman-Wright, K.; Rasmussen, F. Differential methylation in inflammation and type 2 diabetes genes in siblings born before and after maternal bariatric surgery. Obesity 2016, 24, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Arroyo-Jousse, V.; Garcia-Diaz, D.F.; Codner, E.; Pérez-Bravo, F. Epigenetics in type 1 diabetes: TNFa gene promoter methylation status in Chilean patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 116, 1861–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Sureshchandra, S.; Wilson, R.M.; Rais, M.; Marshall, N.E.; Purnell, J.Q.; Thornburg, K.L.; Messaoudi, I. Maternal Pregravid Obesity Remodels the DNA Methylation Landscape of Cord Blood Monocytes Disrupting Their Inflammatory Program. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 2729–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Bouchard, L.; Thibault, S.; Guay, S.P.; Santure, M.; Monpetit, A.; St-Pierre, J.; Perron, P.; Brisson, D. Leptin gene epigenetic adaptation to impaired glucose metabolism during pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 2436–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lesseur, C.; Armstrong, D.A.; Paquette, A.G.; Li, Z.; Padbury, J.F.; Marsit, C.J. Maternal obesity and gestational diabetes are associated with placental leptin DNA methylation. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2014, 211, 654.e1–654.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Yu, H.R.; Sheen, J.M.; Tiao, M.M.; Tain, Y.L.; Chen, C.C.; Lin, I.C.; Lai, Y.J.; Tsai, C.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Tsai, C.C.; et al. Resveratrol Treatment Ameliorates Leptin Resistance and Adiposity Programed by the Combined Effect of Maternal and Post-Weaning High-Fat Diet. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, e1801385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Daenen, K.; Andries, A.; Mekahli, D.; Van Schepdael, A.; Jouret, F.; Bammens, B. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2019, 34, 975–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Borengasser, S.J.; Faske, J.; Kang, P.; Blackburn, M.L.; Badger, T.M.; Shankar, K. In utero exposure to prepregnancy maternal obesity and postweaning high-fat diet impair regulators of mitochondrial dynamics in rat placenta and offspring. Physiol. Genom. 2014, 46, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Borengasser, S.J.; Lau, F.; Kang, P.; Blackburn, M.L.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M.; Shankar, K. Maternal obesity during gestation impairs fatty acid oxidation and mitochondrial SIRT3 expression in rat offspring at weaning. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shankar, K.; Harrell, A.; Liu, X.; Gilchrist, J.M.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M. Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 294, R528–R538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shankar, K.; Kang, P.; Harrell, A.; Zhong, Y.; Marecki, J.C.; Ronis, M.J.; Badger, T.M. Maternal overweight programs insulin and adiponectin signaling in the offspring. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 2577–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. McCurdy, C.E.; Bishop, J.M.; Williams, S.M.; Grayson, B.E.; Smith, M.S.; Friedman, J.E.; Grove, K.L. Maternal high-fat diet triggers lipotoxicity in the fetal livers of nonhuman primates. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Ainge, H.; Thompson, C.; Ozanne, S.E.; Rooney, K.B. A systematic review on animal models of maternal high fat feeding and offspring glycaemic control. Int. J. Obes. 2011, 35, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Seki, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Guo, X.; Glenn, A.S.; Vuguin, P.M.; Fiallo, A.; Du, Q.; Ko, Y.A.; Yu, Y.; Susztak, K.; et al. In Utero Exposure to a High-Fat Diet Programs Hepatic Hypermethylation and Gene Dysregulation and Development of Metabolic Syndrome in Male Mice. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 2860–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Hotta, K.; Kitamoto, T.; Kitamoto, A.; Ogawa, Y.; Honda, Y.; Kessoku, T.; Yoneda, M.; Imajo, K.; Tomeno, W.; Saito, S.; et al. Identification of the genomic region under epigenetic regulation during non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progression. Hepatol. Res. Off. J. Jpn. Soc. Hepatol. 2018, 48, E320–E334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Wankhade, U.D.; Zhong, Y.; Kang, P.; Alfaro, M.; Chintapalli, S.V.; Thakali, K.M.; Shankar, K. Enhanced offspring predisposition to steatohepatitis with maternal high-fat diet is associated with epigenetic and microbiome alterations. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Yilmaz, Y.; Eren, F.; Yonal, O.; Kurt, R.; Aktas, B.; Celikel, C.A.; Ozdogan, O.; Imeryuz, N.; Kalayci, C.; Avsar, E. Increased serum FGF21 levels in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 40, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pirola, C.J.; Scian, R.; Gianotti, T.F.; Dopazo, H.; Rohr, C.; Martino, J.S.; Castaño, G.O.; Sookoian, S. Epigenetic Modifications in the Biology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: The Role of DNA Hydroxymethylation and TET Proteins. Medicine 2015, 94, e1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shimano, H.; Sato, R. SREBP-regulated lipid metabolism: Convergent physiology—Divergent pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 710–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tillander, V.; Miniami, A.; Alves-Bezerra, M.; Coleman, R.A.; Cohen, D.E. Thioesterase superfamily member 2 promotes hepatic insulin resistance in the setting of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1-induced steatosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 2009–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Peng, H.; Xu, H.; Wu, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, Z.; Siwko, S.K.; Yuan, X.; Schalinske, K.L.; Alpini, G.; et al. Maternal high-fat diet disrupted one-carbon metabolism in offspring, contributing to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 2021, 41, 1305–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ron, D.; Walter, P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cao, J.; Dai, D.L.; Yao, L.; Yu, H.H.; Ning, B.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.; Cheng, W.H.; Shen, W.; Yang, Z.X. Saturated fatty acid induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human liver cells via the PERK/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 364, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Fu, S.; Watkins, S.M.; Hotamisligil, G.S. The role of endoplasmic reticulum in hepatic lipid homeostasis and stress signaling. Cell Metab. 2012, 15, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Puri, P.; Mirshahi, F.; Cheung, O.; Natarajan, R.; Maher, J.W.; Kellum, J.M.; Sanyal, A.J. Activation and dysregulation of the unfolded protein response in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chen, H.; Simar, D.; Pegg, K.; Saad, S.; Palmer, C.; Morris, M.J. Exendin-4 is effective against metabolic disorders induced by intrauterine and postnatal overnutrition in rodents. Diabetologia 2014, 57, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ribaroff, G.A.; Wastnedge, E.; Drake, A.J.; Sharpe, R.M.; Chambers, T.J.G. Animal models of maternal high fat diet exposure and effects on metabolism in offspring: A meta-regression analysis. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2017, 18, 673–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gaillard, R. Maternal obesity during pregnancy and cardiovascular development and disease in the offspring. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2015, 30, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Kruse, M.; Seki, Y.; Vuguin, P.M.; Du, X.Q.; Fiallo, A.; Glenn, A.S.; Singer, S.; Breuhahn, K.; Katz, E.B.; Charron, M.J. High-fat intake during pregnancy and lactation exacerbates high-fat diet-induced complications in male offspring in mice. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 3565–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jungheim, E.S.; Schoeller, E.L.; Marquard, K.L.; Louden, E.D.; Schaffer, J.E.; Moley, K.H. Diet-induced obesity model: Abnormal oocytes and persistent growth abnormalities in the offspring. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 4039–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Youngson, N.A.; Morris, M.J. What obesity research tells us about epigenetic mechanisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20110337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Liu, X.; Chen, Q.; Tsai, H.J.; Wang, G.; Hong, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, C.; Liu, R.; Wang, H.; et al. Maternal preconception body mass index and offspring cord blood DNA methylation: Exploration of early life origins of disease. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2014, 55, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ding, G.L.; Wang, F.F.; Shu, J.; Tian, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, N.; Luo, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, F.; et al. Transgenerational glucose intolerance with Igf2/H19 epigenetic alterations in mouse islet induced by intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes 2012, 61, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Mitchell, M.; Strick, R.; Strissel, P.L.; Dittrich, R.; McPherson, N.O.; Lane, M.; Pliushch, G.; Potabattula, R.; Haaf, T.; El Hajj, N. Gene expression and epigenetic aberrations in F1-placentas fathered by obese males. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 84, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jiao, F.; Yan, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Ma, Y.; Yue, Z.; Ou, H.; Yan, Z. Protective effects of maternal methyl donor supplementation on adult offspring of high fat diet-fed dams. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 34, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dabelea, D.; Crume, T. Maternal environment and the transgenerational cycle of obesity and diabetes. Diabetes 2011, 60, 1849–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Chu, S.Y.; Callaghan, W.M.; Kim, S.Y.; Schmid, C.H.; Lau, J.; England, L.J.; Dietz, P.M. Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 2070–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Catalano, P.M.; Presley, L.; Minium, J.; Hauguel-de Mouzon, S. Fetuses of obese mothers develop insulin resistance in utero. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Nicholas, L.M.; Rattanatray, L.; MacLaughlin, S.M.; Ozanne, S.E.; Kleemann, D.O.; Walker, S.K.; Morrison, J.L.; Zhang, S.; Muhlhäusler, B.S.; Martin-Gronert, M.S.; et al. Differential effects of maternal obesity and weight loss in the periconceptional period on the epigenetic regulation of hepatic insulin-signaling pathways in the offspring. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2013, 27, 3786–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Nijland, M.J.; Mitsuya, K.; Li, C.; Ford, S.; McDonald, T.J.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Cox, L.A. Epigenetic modification of fetal baboon hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase following exposure to moderately reduced nutrient availability. J. Physiol. 2010, 588, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Guénard, F.; Tchernof, A.; Deshaies, Y.; Cianflone, K.; Kral, J.G.; Marceau, P.; Vohl, M.C. Methylation and expression of immune and inflammatory genes in the offspring of bariatric bypass surgery patients. J. Obes. 2013, 2013, 492170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, Z.V.; Scherer, P.E. Adiponectin, the past two decades. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 8, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rozance, P.J.; Limesand, S.W.; Barry, J.S.; Brown, L.D.; Thorn, S.R.; LoTurco, D.; Regnault, T.R.; Friedman, J.E.; Hay, W.W., Jr. Chronic late-gestation hypoglycemia upregulates hepatic PEPCK associated with increased PGC1alpha mRNA and phosphorylated CREB in fetal sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 294, E365–E370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Rattanatray, L.; Muhlhausler, B.S.; Nicholas, L.M.; Morrison, J.L.; McMillen, I.C. Impact of maternal overnutrition on gluconeogenic factors and methylation of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase promoter in the fetal and postnatal liver. Pediatr. Res. 2014, 75, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Bansal, A.; Rashid, C.; Xin, F.; Li, C.; Polyak, E.; Duemler, A.; van der Meer, T.; Stefaniak, M.; Wajid, S.; Doliba, N.; et al. Sex- and Dose-Specific Effects of Maternal Bisphenol A Exposure on Pancreatic Islets of First- and Second-Generation Adult Mice Offspring. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 097022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Richter, V.F.; Briffa, J.F.; Moritz, K.M.; Wlodek, M.E.; Hryciw, D.H. The role of maternal nutrition, metabolic function and the placenta in developmental programming of renal dysfunction. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2016, 43, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wong, M.G.; The, N.L.; Glastras, S. Maternal obesity and offspring risk of chronic kidney disease. Nephrology 2018, 23 (Suppl. S4), 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Dronavalli, S.; Duka, I.; Bakris, G.L. The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 4, 444–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Glastras, S.J.; Chen, H.; Tsang, M.; Teh, R.; McGrath, R.T.; Zaky, A.; Chen, J.; Wong, M.G.; Pollock, C.A.; Saad, S. The renal consequences of maternal obesity in offspring are overwhelmed by postnatal high fat diet. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Sapienza, C.; Lee, J.; Powell, J.; Erinle, O.; Yafai, F.; Reichert, J.; Siraj, E.S.; Madaio, M. DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic differences between diabetes patients with ESRD and diabetes patients without nephropathy. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Wu, Q.; Ni, X. ROS-mediated DNA methylation pattern alterations in carcinogenesis. Curr. Drug Targets 2015, 16, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Andrade-Oliveira, V.; Foresto-Neto, O.; Watanabe, I.K.M.; Zatz, R.; Câmara, N.O.S. Inflammation in Renal Diseases: New and Old Players. Front. Pharm. 2019, 10, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Larkin, B.P.; Saad, S.; Glastras, S.J.; Nguyen, L.T.; Hou, M.; Chen, H.; Wang, R.; Pollock, C.A. Low-dose hydralazine during gestation reduces renal fibrosis in rodent offspring exposed to maternal high fat diet. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Milagro, F.I.; Mansego, M.L.; De Miguel, C.; Martínez, J.A. Dietary factors, epigenetic modifications and obesity outcomes: Progresses and perspectives. Mol. Asp. Med. 2013, 34, 782–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jacob, R.A.; Gretz, D.M.; Taylor, P.C.; James, S.J.; Pogribny, I.P.; Miller, B.J.; Henning, S.M.; Swendseid, M.E. Moderate folate depletion increases plasma homocysteine and decreases lymphocyte DNA methylation in postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. 1998, 128, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Park, H.J.; Bailey, L.B.; Shade, D.C.; Hausman, D.B.; Hohos, N.M.; Meagher, R.B.; Kauwell, G.P.; Lewis, R.D.; Smith, A.K. Distinctions in gene-specific changes in DNA methylation in response to folic acid supplementation between women with normal weight and obesity. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 11, 665–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Cooney, C.A.; Dave, A.A.; Wolff, G.L. Maternal methyl supplements in mice affect epigenetic variation and DNA methylation of offspring. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2393s–2400s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Waterland, R.A.; Travisano, M.; Tahiliani, K.G.; Rached, M.T.; Mirza, S. Methyl donor supplementation prevents transgenerational amplification of obesity. Int. J. Obes. 2008, 32, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Wolff, G.L.; Kodell, R.L.; Moore, S.R.; Cooney, C.A. Maternal epigenetics and methyl supplements affect agouti gene expression in Avy/a mice. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1998, 12, 949–957. [Google Scholar]
  136. Cordero, P.; Milagro, F.I.; Campion, J.; Martinez, J.A. Supplementation with methyl donors during lactation to high-fat-sucrose-fed dams protects offspring against liver fat accumulation when consuming an obesogenic diet. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2014, 5, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Cordero, P.; Gomez-Uriz, A.M.; Campion, J.; Milagro, F.I.; Martinez, J.A. Dietary supplementation with methyl donors reduces fatty liver and modifies the fatty acid synthase DNA methylation profile in rats fed an obesogenic diet. Genes Nutr. 2013, 8, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Genes 12 01653 g001 550
Figure 1. The dynamic and reversible processes of DNA methylation. The whole epigenetic progression of 5mC contains three aspects: de novo methylation, methylation maintenance, and demethylation. DNMT3A and DNMT3B were reported to be involved in de novo methylation, while DNMT1 was found to participate in the maintenance of DNA methylation. Besides, the process of demethylation can be divided into two parts: passive demethylation and active demethylation. Passive DNA demethylation is attributed to the absence of DNMTs, while active demethylation is due to the involvement of TET or TDG enzymes and BER repair pathway. Abbreviation: DNA methyltransferase: DNMT; Ten eleven translocation: TET; Thymine DNA glycosylase: TDG; Base excision repair: BER; Fifth position of cytosine: 5mC; 5-hydroxymethylcytosine: 5hmC; 5-formylcytosine: 5fC; 5-carboxylcytosine: 5caC.
Figure 1. The dynamic and reversible processes of DNA methylation. The whole epigenetic progression of 5mC contains three aspects: de novo methylation, methylation maintenance, and demethylation. DNMT3A and DNMT3B were reported to be involved in de novo methylation, while DNMT1 was found to participate in the maintenance of DNA methylation. Besides, the process of demethylation can be divided into two parts: passive demethylation and active demethylation. Passive DNA demethylation is attributed to the absence of DNMTs, while active demethylation is due to the involvement of TET or TDG enzymes and BER repair pathway. Abbreviation: DNA methyltransferase: DNMT; Ten eleven translocation: TET; Thymine DNA glycosylase: TDG; Base excision repair: BER; Fifth position of cytosine: 5mC; 5-hydroxymethylcytosine: 5hmC; 5-formylcytosine: 5fC; 5-carboxylcytosine: 5caC.
Genes 12 01653 g001
Table
Table 1. Association of maternal obesity with offspring metabolic diseases based on the role of DNA modification in various studies.
Table 1. Association of maternal obesity with offspring metabolic diseases based on the role of DNA modification in various studies.
DiseasesMajor FindingReference
Non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease (NAFLD)		Maternal obesity and maternal overnutrition are associated with Leptin hypermethylation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α hypomethylation in the tissue of offspring’s oocytes and liver[54,55]
PPARG and liver X receptor α(LXRα) which are involved in the metabolism of several important lipids, are significantly hypermethylated in the liver tissues of mice offspring born to obese mothers[56,57]
Lipin 1, a gene involved in lipid generation, was hypermethylated in the transcription factor binding sites of the offspring’s liver tissue as a result of maternal obesity[58]
DNA methylation levels in the promoters of the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 1 (GPAT1) is lower and the transcriptome level of GPAT1 and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) are higher in the offspring of obese mothers compared to offspring of normal weight mothers, in association with increased hepatic triglyceride levels[59,60]
Offspring exposure to maternal obesity and maternal overnutrition also induced glucose-regulated protein (GRP)-78 hypermethylation in association with downregulation of gene expression mothers[61]
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-β, a proinflammatory and profibrogenic regulator, which can act as a potential target in diagnosing and treating early stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis, was hypomethylated and upregulated transcriptionally in the offspring of obese mothers[62]
ObesityExposure to maternal overnutrition or maternal obesity before or during gestation or lactation, leads to an incremental increase in the mRNA level of several adipogenic genes in in perirenal fat in fetal sheep. The offspring such as PPARG, fatty acid synthase, lipoprotein lipase, adiponectin, and leptin which participate in energy and lipid metabolism. Alteration is the DNA methylation of those genes was also demonstrated in the in visceral fat of mice offspring due to maternal obesity[63,64]
Studies on rodents have revealed that maternal obesity leads to increased birth weight, increased leptin levels, and hypermethylation of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) in the promoter regions of the offspring, which has a vital role in leptin resistance[65,66]
Previous studies also observed that maternal obesity may influence the offspring’s metabolism and increased the prevalence of offspring obesity, and this could be affected by the promoter DNA methylation of three key genes related with metabolic syndrome (PPARGC1A, PPARG, and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM)) in umbilical cord blood[52,67]
Offspring born to obese mothers have decreased gene methylation of key adipogenic transcription regulators of adipogenesis, including CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta (C/EBP-β) and zinc-finger proteins, which may result in elevated adipogenic tissue differentiation during embryonic and fetal growth periods and result in metabolic disorders[68,69]
DNA methylation array demonstrated that genes related to fatty acid oxidation (Protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit gamma 2 (PRKAG2), acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2 (ACC2), carnitine palmitoiltransferase I (CPT1A), succinate dehydrogenase subunit C (SDHC)) were hypermethylated in the cord blood mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) of obese mothers, which was positively associated with infant adiposity[70]
TAP-binding protein (TAPBP) is hypermethylated in umbilical cord blood of obese mothers, which suggests that maternal obesity can result in the development of obesity in the offspring via reducing tapasin (decreased tapasin can lower CD8 + T-cell responses in vitro) leading to impaired immune responses in offspring[71,72]
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AhRR) was hypermethylated in the umbilical cord of obese mothers compared to lean mothers. AhRR functions as an inhibitor of adipocyte differentiation by negatively regulating PPARG during adipogenesis. Collectively, these data suggest that offspring of obese mothers are at increased risk of obesity and metabolic disease[73,74,75]
DiabetesDifferent genes are involved in type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, POMC, insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), insulin receptor (INSR), fat mass-and obesity-associated protein (FTO) as well as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), are either hypermethylated (HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, POMC, IGF2, and INSR) or hypomethylated (FTO and TNF) in the promoter region of whole blood sample from offspring born after maternal bariatric surgery compared to before bariatric surgery[76,77]
Genes involved in immunological processes (including TNF-α, interleukin, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II signaling pathways) were differentially methylated in offspring of obese mothers.[78,79]
Several genes involved in immune response in patients with type 1 diabetes were hypermethylated in umbilical cord blood-derived monocytes, including signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), T cell receptors (CD247, CD28, and CD3E), MHC I class or II subunits (HLADMB and HLA-DQB1)[79]
Leptin promoters were hypermethylated in the placentas of obese mothers leading to decreased placental leptin expression while leptin deficiency is associated with hyperglycemia both in humans and animals[80,81,82]
Chronic kidney disease (CKD)Incremental increase in oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment during the period of oocyte development laid down through epigenetic changes can also contribute to the transgenerational development of maternal obesity related CKD[47,83]
Maternal obesity correlates with global hypomethylation of key immune genes (T cells, cytokine, and chemokines) in umbilical cord blood-derived monocytes, such of which are involved in the development of inflammatory responses in kidney tissues and CKD pathology[79]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Pollock, C.A.; Saad, S. Aberrant DNA Methylation Mediates the Transgenerational Risk of Metabolic and Chronic Disease Due to Maternal Obesity and Overnutrition. Genes 2021, 12, 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111653

AMA Style

Li Y, Pollock CA, Saad S. Aberrant DNA Methylation Mediates the Transgenerational Risk of Metabolic and Chronic Disease Due to Maternal Obesity and Overnutrition. Genes. 2021; 12(11):1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yan, Carol A. Pollock, and Sonia Saad. 2021. "Aberrant DNA Methylation Mediates the Transgenerational Risk of Metabolic and Chronic Disease Due to Maternal Obesity and Overnutrition" Genes 12, no. 11: 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111653

APA Style

Li, Y., Pollock, C. A., & Saad, S. (2021). Aberrant DNA Methylation Mediates the Transgenerational Risk of Metabolic and Chronic Disease Due to Maternal Obesity and Overnutrition. Genes, 12(11), 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop