Next Article in Journal
Genomic Variation in Korean japonica Rice Varieties
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis of the USDA Olive Germplasm Using Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS)
Previous Article in Journal
m6A mRNA Methylation Regulates LKB1 to Promote Autophagy of Hepatoblastoma Cells through Upregulated Phosphorylation of AMPK
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Dissection of Growth and Eco-Physiological Traits Associated with Altitudinal Adaptation in Sakhalin Fir (Abies sachalinensis) Based on QTL Mapping
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/genes12111748
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cloning, Expression, and Tobacco Overexpression Analyses of a PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA-like (OfGLO1) Gene from Osmanthus fragrans

by
Zhanghui Zeng
,
Si Chen
,
Mingrui Xu
,
Min Wang
,
Zhehao Chen
,
Lilin Wang
and
Jiliang Pang
*
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(11), 1748; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111748
Submission received: 18 September 2021 / Revised: 27 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 30 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tree Genetics and Improvement)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
GLOBOSA (GLO), a B-class MADS-box gene, is involved in floral organ determination but has rarely been studied in Osmanthus fragrans, which is a very popular ornamental tree species in China. Here, the full-length cDNA of a homologous GLO1 gene (named OfGLO1) was cloned from a flower bud of O. fragrans using the RACE technique. The OfGLO1 has a 645 bp open reading frame, encoding 214 amino acids. Similar to other PI/GLO proteins, OfGLO1 has two conserved domains, MADS MEF2-like and K-box, and a 16-amino-acid PI motif in the C terminal region. Our phylogeny analysis classified OfGLO1 as a PI-type member of the B-class MADS-box gene family. The qRT-PCR assay showed that the expression of OfGLO1 in O. fragrans was continuously upregulated from the tight bud stage to the full flowering stage but barely expressed in the pistils, sepals, and non-floral organs, such as root, leaf, and stem. The genetic effect of OfGLO1 was assayed by ectopic expression in tobacco plants. Compared with the wild-type, OfGLO1 transformants showed reduced plant size, earlier flowering, shorter stamens, and lower seed setting rates. Furthermore, some stamens were changed into petal-like structures. These findings indicate that OfGLO1 plays an important role in the regulation of flower development. This study improved our understanding of class B gene function in woody plants.

1. Introduction

Flowers of most higher-order plants consist of four whorls: sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. The development of a floral organ is controlled by floral organ identity genes. The temporal and spatial expression patterns of these identity genes in cells determine the shape of the floral organ. Based on molecular and genetic studies in two model plants, Arabidopsis thaliana and Antirrhinum majus, Coen and Meyerowitz proposed a classical ABC model [1] to predict whether three classes of homeotic genes (encoding the A, B, and C functions) act alone or in combination to give rise to sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. This prediction can be confirmed to some extent. However, with the identification of more flowering mutants and their corresponding genes, many phenomena could not be explained using the ABC model [2]. Subsequently, other models, such as ABCDE [3], tetramer [4], boundary attenuation [5], boundary slip [6,7], and BC bifunctional genes [8], were derived. Most of the floral organ identity genes contain an MCM1/AGAMOUS/DEFICIENS/SRF (MADS)-box, which plays a crucial role in the emergence of flower structures during plant evolution [9,10,11,12]. The class B MADS-box genes in angiosperm are essential for determining petal and stamen identity and include two evolutionary lines: APETALA3/DEEICIENS (AP3/DEF) [13] and PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA (PI/GLO) [14]. Functional mutations of these genes result in obvious floral homeotic mutants, in which the petals are transformed to sepals and the stamens are replaced by carpels [14,15,16]. The PI/GLO genes have been cloned from diverse angiosperm species, including Oryza stative [17], Zea mays [18], Tulipa gesneriana [19], Asparagus officinalis [20], Phalaenopsis equetis [21], Lilium longiflorum [22], Cymbidium goeringii [23], Camellia sinensis [24], Gerbera hybrid [25], Canna indica [26], etc., and they have been confirmed to play an essential role in determining petal and stamen identity.
The rapid development of biotechnology provides possibilities and developmental opportunities for people to engineer the shape, color, and aroma of the flower and the flowering time. The study of floral development genes can not only improve our knowledge of floral development but also guide practical applications to improve human quality of life. Current molecular models used to explain floral development were established based mainly on herbaceous plants such as Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Generally, woody plants have longer growth cycles, higher heterozygosity, and larger genetic loads than those of herbaceous plants. Therefore, these models may be limited in their explanation of floral organ development in woody species. In tea plants (Camellia sinensis), the expression patterns of CsGLO1 and CsGLO2 revealed that B-class genes were expressed not only in petals and stamens but also in sepals, which are the first round of flower organs [24]. Louati et al. [27] isolated a PI-like B-class gene from the Argan Tree (Argania spinosa) and showed that this gene was involved in petal and stamen identity. In addition, in situ hybridization analysis revealed that BpMADS2, a birch homolog for PI, was expressed in stamens and carpels of birch inflorescences [28]. Overall, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of B-class genes in flower development in woody plants are limited.
Osmanthus fragrans (Oleaceae) is an important economic tree species in China. Due to its ornamental, edible, and medicinal value, its flowers have long been the focus of interest in studies of O. fragrans, which includes the flower color [29], the floral fragrance, and the compounds [30,31,32]. However, information on flower development is still limited. Few reports focus on the B-class floral organ development genes in O. fragrans. In this study, we aimed to characterize the homologous GLO1 gene in O. fragrans. Osmanthus floral buds were used as the test material, the full length of the GLO1 homologous gene (OfGLO1) was cloned using the RACE technique, and the characteristics of the expression of OfGLO1 were analyzed using qRT-PCR. The transgenic overexpression of OfGLO1 was assessed in tobacco (variety ‘yellow seedling fish’) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the potential role of OfGLO1 in floral development was analyzed and discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The sweet-scented Osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans, variety ‘thunbergii’) planted on the campus of Hangzhou Normal University was taken as the experimental material. The florescence of O. fragrans was divided into four stages: the tight bud stage (the flowers are not yet opened and are pale yellow), the early flowering stage (the flowers open slightly, and the color turns darker), the full flowering stage (the flower opens to its maximum degree, and the color is a golden yellow), and the late flowering stage (brown spots start to appear on the petals, and the petals begin to fall off). Samples of the flowers were collected from each of the four stages. The flowers in the full flowering stage were divided into petals, stamens, pistils, and receptacles with sepals (the length of the sepal was less than 1 mm (Figure S1), too small to separate out). Finally, the samples collected were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C until RNA isolation.
Tobacco seeds (variety ‘yellow seedling fish’) were surface-sterilized using 3% H2O2 for 30 min and then were thoroughly rinsed in Milli-Q water before being placed on a piece of wet filter paper in a 10 cm Petri dish. The Petri dishes were wrapped and sealed tightly with parafilm and placed inside a growth chamber for ten days in a 16 h photoperiod and day/night temperatures of 28/24 °C. The seed germination rate was calculated at the end of the tenth day.

2.2. Extraction of Total RNA and Reverse Transcription

The total RNA was extracted using TRIzol-Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, one microgram of total RNA was digested with a gDNA Remover Kit and reversely transcribed into cDNA in the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo, Kyoto, Japan) in a 20 µL reaction volume. The resultant cDNA was used directly as the template for the next PCR reaction.

2.3. OfGLO1 Gene Cloning from O. fragrans

Primers GLO1-F and GLO1-R (Table S1) were designed according to the partial CDS sequence (HQ853419) of the GLO1 gene of O. fragrans published on NCBI [33] for PCR amplification. The PCR reaction system consisted of cDNA at 2 μL, 2× Trans HiFi Mix at 12.5 μL, GLO1-F and GLO1-R at 1 μL, and ddH2O added at 25 μL. The reaction procedure is as follows: 94 °C pre-denaturation for 4 min; 94 °C denaturation for 30 s, 55 °C annealing for 30 s, 72 °C extension for 30 s, and amplification of 30 cycles; and 72 °C extension for 8 min. The intermediate fragment was purified using the fast gel DNA mini purification kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) and then was connected to the pEASY-T5 Zero vector, which was thermally transformed to Escherichia coli Trans1-T1 competent cells, and single colonies were selected for plasmid isolation and DNA sequencing (Sunny Biotech, Shanghai, China).
The amplification and synthesis of 3′ RACE cDNA were conducted according to the instructions of the First Choice® RLM-RACE Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), with minor modifications. In brief, 1 µg of RNA, 4 µL of a dNTP Mix, 2 µL of the 3′ RACE Adapter, 1 µL of DMSO, and 8 µL of RNase-free water were mixed and incubated at 65 °C for 5 min and in an ice bath for 2 min, and then the following components were added: 2 µL of a 10× RT buffer, 1 µL of an RNase inhibitor, and 1 µL of an MMLV reverse transcriptase. After incubating at 42 °C for 1 h, the resultant reaction solution was 3′ RACE cDNA. According to the intermediate fragment sequence, two 5′ end nested primers (Table S1) were designed to be nested with the primers introduced by the RACE kit and subjected to two rounds of PCR amplification. The PCR product was recovered, ligated, and identified by DNA sequencing (Sunny Biotech, Shanghai, China).
The synthesis and amplification of 5′ RACE cDNA were carried out according to the specifications of the First Choice® RLM-RACE Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), as follows: first, the total RNA was dephosphorylated using Calf Intestine Alkaline Phosphatase (CIP); second, CIP-treated RNA was treated using Tobacco Acid Pyrophosphatase (TAP); third, the CIP/TAP-treated RNA was ligated; and finally, the ligated RNA was reversely transcribed, and the resultant reaction solution was 5′ RACE cDNA. According to the intermediate fragment sequence, two 3′ end nested primers (Table S1) were designed to be nested with the primers introduced by the RACE kit and subjected to two rounds of PCR amplification. The PCR product was also confirmed by DNA sequencing.
The three-stage sequence (intermediate sequence, 3′ sequence, and 5′ sequence) obtained by splicing with SeqMan was used to predict the open reading frame (ORF) sequence. Primers with restriction sites were designed near the start codon and stop codon (Table S1). Additionally, the full-length ORF was amplified by PCR using the cDNA of O. fragrans as a template and confirmed by DNA sequencing.

2.4. Bioinformatics Analysis of Sequences

The nucleotide sequence alignment, amino acid sequence alignment, sequence splicing, ORF prediction, and domain analysis were performed on the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 6 March 2017) using the SeqMan computer program; the isoelectric point and molecular weight of the encoded protein were predicted using Compute pI/Mw software (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/, accessed on 1 June 2019); the signal peptide cleavage site was predicted using SignalP online software (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-4.1/, accessed on 5 June 2019); and the multi-sequence alignment and the construction of phylogenetic tree were performed using MEGA6.6 software. In addition, gene promoter analysis was performed using the plantCARE website (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 26 October 2021).

2.5. Organ-Specific Expression Analysis Using Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

A transcript analysis was conducted using quantitative real-time RT-PCR similar to that described by [34]. The cDNA of different floral organs at the full flowering stage and petal samples at different development stages were diluted 20-fold and amplified on a quantitative real-time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad CFX96, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction systems were prepared with an AceQ Universal SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Three biological replicates were used for transcript analysis, and three technical replicates were conducted for each cDNA sample. The constitutive expression of the cytokine gene (qActin for O. fragrans, β-Actin for tobacco plants) was used as the internal reference gene, and the relative expression levels were analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences for all genes determined are listed in the Supplementary Materials Table S1.

2.6. Vector Construction and Tobacco Transformation of OfGLO1

The vector pEASY-T5 Zero with full-length cDNA of OfGLO1 was double-digested with the enzymes of Kpn I and Xba I and then connected to the pCAMBIA13011 vector, which contained a 35S promoter. The resultant 35S::OfGLO1 expression vector was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 by the heat shock method. The tobacco (variety ‘yellow seedling fish’) was transformed using a leaf disc and double screened by 30 mg·L−1 hygromycin B and 60 mg·L−1 kanamycin. Resistant seedlings were detected by PCR for positive seedlings, transplanted into the flower pot, and cultured in an artificial climate chamber with the following conditions: 24 °C for 12 h during daytime and 18 °C for 12 h at night. The culture medium consisted of a peat-to-perlite ratio of 3:1. The transgenic tobacco seedlings (T0 generation) were transplanted for 30 days, and the leaves of the 25 transgenic tobacco plants were analyzed using RT-PCR. The growth status and floral organ phenotype were observed and compared with the wild-type tobacco plants.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence of the OfGLO1 Gene

According to a partial cDNA sequence (GeneBank accession ID: HQ853419) of the GLO1 gene of O. fragrans [33], the primers were designed for PCR amplification. A 345 bp intermediate fragment was obtained using the cDNA of floral buds of the O. fragrans as a template (Figure S2a). Target fragments of 610 bp (Figure S2b) and 481 bp (Figure S2c) at the 3′ and 5′ ends were obtained using the RACE method, respectively. Finally, a full-length 876 bp cDNA sequence, named OfGLO1 (GeneBank accession ID: KY575409), was obtained by sequence splicing.
The sequence analysis showed that OfGLO1 had a 645 bp opening reading frame (ORF) (Figure 1), with a translation initiation codon (ATG) and a stop codon (TAG). The third base upstream from the start codon ATG was A, and the base after ATG was G, conforming to the Kozak rule: A/GNNATGG. The 3′ end noncoding region was 191 bp, which contained the typical tail signal poly (A). The 645 bp ORF encoded 214 amino acids with a molecular weight of 2.5 kD. The isoelectric point of the predicted protein was calculated at 7.13. Further analysis revealed that OfGLO1 did not have a signal peptide splicing site at the N-terminal. Based on the recent release of O. fragrans genome sequence [29], the gene structure of OfGLO1 was analyzed. The annotated OfGLO1 gene is 2233 bp in full length, with seven exons and six introns (Figure S5). Promoter analysis of 3-kb 5′upstream fragment of OfGLO1 identified four putative CArG boxes (consensus sequence: CC(A/T)6GG) located at −2775 to −2765; −2501 to −2491; −1427 to −1418; −153 to −144, relative to the translation start site (Table S2). However, all of these have a conversion of one nucleotide compared with the CArG box consensus sequence, which has also been found in the promoter of birch PI/GLO [28]. In addition, an eight bp motif (TCAAGAAA, PI late expression element [35]), involved in regulating PI expression, was identified at −650 to −643 (Table S2).

3.2. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis of GLO Homologs among Different Species

The amino acid sequence alignment of OfGLO1 with other species of homologous proteins showed that the MADS MEF2-like and K-box, typical features of the MADS-box type II gene, were highly conserved. The MADS MEF2-like structure and the K-box structure in OfGLO1 are located at amino acids 2–80 and at amino acids 83–163, respectively (Figure 2a). In addition, a 16-amino-acid PI motif (MPFAFRVQPMQPNLQE) was found in the C terminal region, indicating that OfGLO1 is a PI/GLO-type member of the class B MADS-box gene. The homology search showed that OfGLO1 had the highest similarity to JmGLO1 from Jasminum mesnyi, with a homology of 91%, followed by 83% with BdGLO1 in Buddleja davidii and 81% with LcGLO1 in Lantana. Other GLO proteins from sesame, Verbena, monkey flower, and snapdragon had 86%, 85%, 85%, and 82% homologies, respectively, with OfGLO1.
To study the evolutionary relationship between the OfGLO1 and PI/GLO proteins of other plants, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method (Figure 2b). The results showed that O. fragrans, Jasminum mesnyi, and the lilac poly of Oleaceae clustered together, presenting the closest relationship, consistent with species phylogeny classification.

3.3. Organ-Specific Expression Analysis of OfGLO1 Gene

The expression profile of OfGLO1 in different floral stages, including the tight bud stage, the early flowering stage, the full-bloom stage, and the late flowering stage, was determined using quantitative real-time RT-PCR (Figure 3a,b). The results showed that the expression of OfGLO1 in O. fragrans was continuously upregulated from the tight bud stage to the full flowering stage but barely expressed in the late flowering stage (Figure 3b). OfGLO1 had the highest expression at the full-bloom stage (Figure 3b). At the full-bloom stage (Figure 3c), OfGLO1 had the highest expression in the petals (the second round of floral organs), followed by the stamens (the third round of floral organs). OfGLO1 expression could be barely detected in the pistil, sepal, receptacle, and non-floral organs, which included the roots, leaves, and stem (Figure 3c), indicating that OfGLO1 is a gene with floral-organ-specific expression. Overall, these observations support OfGLO1’s potential function as a B-class gene for floral organ determination in O. fragrans.

3.4. Phenotypic Analysis of OfGLO1 Gene-Transformed Tobacco Plants

Twenty-five tobacco plants were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of OfGLO1. The expression of OfGLO1 was detected in 16 transgenic tobacco seedlings (Figure S3). The expression level of OfGLO1 was nearly undetectable in wild-type plants but largely increased in the tested transgenic plants (Figure S4), indicating that OfGLO1 had been integrated into the tobacco genome and expressed successfully. Compared with the wild type, transgenic lines showed differences in flowering time, plant height, and floral organ phenotype (Table 1). First, transgenic tobacco plants flowered much earlier than the wild type, but the duration of the flowering process did not change. In the early growth stage (first 30 days) after transplanting, the transgenic tobacco lines displayed no obvious growth difference from the wild type. After 50 days of transplanting, about one-third of the transgenic tobacco plants began to develop flower buds, while the wild type was still in the vegetative growth phase. At 70 days, the flower bud development rate in transgenic tobacco reached 100%, while the wild type remained at zero. Only at 90 days after transplanting did the wild-type tobacco start developing flower buds. In addition, compared with the wild type, the plant height of transgenic tobacco was also reduced obviously, accompanied by narrower leaves, while the internode length and branch numbers increased. The average plant height of transgenic tobacco was about 10 cm shorter than that of the wild type. The length of the internode and the number of branches in the transgenic lines were around two and four times more, respectively, than that of the wild type. Furthermore, the number of leaves also decreased in the transgenic lines, while the leaf aspect ratio increased, and the leaf shape changed from an egg shape to lanceolate.
Three new types of flower shapes were observed in the transgenic tobacco plants (Figure 4 and Table 2). Normally, the flowers of wild-type tobacco have five petals (Figure 4a). In the first new flower type, 7.5% of flowers in the transgenic plants had less than five petals (Figure 4b and Table 2); in the second flower type, more petals were observed in the transgenic plants, with six- and eight-petal flowers accounting for 15% (Figure 4c,d and Table 2); and in the third new flower type, the transgenic stamen became a petal-like structure, which accounted for 12.5% of the flowers (Figure 4e and Table 2). These observations confirmed that OfGLO1 plays a role in the formation of the second and third rounds of floral organs, which was consistent with the qRT-PCR results that OfGLO1 is highly expressed in the second and third rounds of floral organs (Figure 3).
In addition, the average corolla diameter in transgenic tobacco was 2 cm, which was similar to that in the wild type, while the number of floral buds was lower in transgenic tobacco than that in the wild type (Table 1). A few sepals became petals in transgenic tobacco (Figure 4g). The average pistil length in transgenic tobacco was 4.18 cm, which was also similar to that in the wild type, while the transgenic stamen length was about 0.3 cm shorter than that in the wild type, which led to the pistils in transgenic tobacco being 2–5 mm longer than the stamens (Table 1).
During the growth and development of transgenic tobacco plants, we also found that the stigma in transgenic tobacco matured earlier than the anthers and that the stamen in a few flowers changed into a petal-like structure on the filament (Figure 4h,i). Notably, at the late flowering stage, transgenic tobacco plants showed a dramatic decline in the seed setting rate. The seed setting rate in transgenic tobacco was about 11%, compared with 70% in the wild type (Table 1 and Figure 4j,k). In addition, the seed germination rate in the wild-type plants was also much lower than that in the transgenic tobacco plants (Table 1). Taken together, the above results showed that the overexpression of OfGLO1 in transgenic tobacco significantly affected the development of flowers and seeds.

4. Discussion

The B-class MADS-box gene is a key regulatory factor for the determination of petals and stamens. Its original function is in the determination of plants [36]. In addition to this important function, B-class genes have also been studied as an example of gene functional differentiation (new functionalization and sub-functionalization), which included gene evolution by repetition or frameshift [9,37]. A phylogenetic analysis showed that B-class genes in angiosperms have evolved into two lineages: AP3/DEF and PI/GLO, based on their highly conserved sequence of the C terminal. The AP3/DEF gene was further divided into three branches: euAP3, paleoAP3, and TM6. The C terminal region of the euAP3 gene has a PI derivative motif (FxFRLOPSQPNLH) and an euAP3 motif (SDLTTFALLE). The C terminal region of the TM6-type gene and the paleoAP3-type gene have a PI derivative motif and a paleoAP3 motif (YGxHDLRLA). In comparison, the C terminal region of the PI-type gene only has a PI motif (MPFxFRVQPxPNLQE) [38]. The function of the B-class gene in floral development has been studied in various plants, but its expression in O. fragrans has not been reported. Based on the partial CDS sequence of Osmanthus GLO1, the full-length cDNA sequence was cloned using the RACE technique in this study (Figure 1 and Figure S1). A sequence analysis indicated that the C terminal of OfGLO1 contained PI motifs (Figure 2), thus supporting OfGLO1 as the PI-type B-class MADS-box gene.
The classical ABC model suggests that the B-class genes are generally expressed only in the second and third rounds of floral organs. Our results in this study (Figure 3) are exclusively consistent with this prediction. However, the temporal and spatial expression patterns of PI/GLO homologous genes are different across plants. In Arabidopsis, the flower developed to the third stage, PI was highly expressed in the second and third rounds of floral organs, and a little expression was found in the carpel primordia (fourth round). However, after entering the fifth stage, PI is only expressed in the petals and stamens [16]. The GLO of snapdragon can be detected from the appearance of sepal primordium. It was expressed in the petals and stamens in high abundance and had a small amount of expression in the development of the carpels [14]. The GLO homologous genes of monocotyledons such as rice (Oryza sativa) [17], Zea mays [18], and Asparagus officinalis [20], which are significantly different from petals to calyx, are also consistent with the ABC model prediction. However, this model does not apply to monocotyledons with petal-like sepals. The expression pattern of LLGLO1 in Lilium longiflorum [22] and CfGLO in Cymbidium faberi [23] showed that the B-class genes were expressed not only in petals and stamens but also in sepals. Considering the fact that the GLO gene is expressed in the fourth round of the floral organ in many angiosperms while the GLO mutation does not affect the identities of the carpels, we can propose that the function of the ancestral gene may be lost while still retaining its expression in carpel.
In addition, B-class genes also have a variety of other functions. For example, the CjGLO1 and CjGLO2 in Camelia japonica 'Shibaxueshi' were involved in the formation of the pleiopetalous flower [39], and CiGLO [26] in Canna indica helped convert the stamen into a petal-like structure. In this study, the expression levels of OfGLO1 were different in the different flower development stages (Figure 3). OfGLO1 has the highest expression at the full-flowering stage, and during this stage, OfGLO1 was highly expressed only in the second and third rounds, while no expression was detected in the fourth round and in other non-floral organs (Figure 3c). This result confirmed those of the classical ABC model, indicating that OfGLO1 was involved in the developmental regulation of petals and stamens in O. fragrans.
OfGLO1-transformed tobacco showed greatly reduced plant heights, longer internode, earlier flowering, an increased number of petals, shorter stamens, stamens that were partially changed into petal-like structures, and stigmas that were longer than the stamens by 2–5 mm (Figure 4 and Table 1 and Table 2). These results were based on the phenotyping of sixteen independent T0 OfGLO1 transgenic lines and were supported by statistical analyses. The overexpression of OfGLO1 in T0 lines was verified by semi RT-PCR and qRT-PCR, suggesting that the observed phenotypes were most likely caused by OfGLO1 over-expression. Our study reveals that OfGLO1 was involved in the regulation of the flowering time and in floral organ development. The transgenic plants flowered much earlier in this study, possibly because of the overexpression of OfGLO1 activating some flowering pathway integrators (such as LFY, SOC1, etc.). According to the boundary sliding model, the sepals of transgenic tobacco partially changed into petal-like structures, possibly due to the expression domain of OfGLO1 being extended to the first round of floral organs. In transgenic tobacco, the stamens also changed into petal-like structures, which may be because the overexpression of the OfGLO1 gene in the third round of floral organs weakened the function of C-class genes. Despite this, we believe that the current phenotyping results are generally reliable; further phenotype verification may be performed using T1 and T2 lines, which are considered to have a more stable gene expression. In addition, due to the recent publication of the reference genome of O. fragrans [29], flower development related genes in O. fragrans could be further studied in a systematic manner to allow us more insights into flower development in this important tree species.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we cloned the full-length cDNA of OfGLO1 and investigated its potential role in floral organ development. We showed that OfGLO1 plays a role in the regulation of flower transition and in petal and stamen formation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12111748/s1, Figure S1: The flowers of O. fragrans in the early flowering stage. Figure S2: Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments. Figure S3: RT-PCR detection of tobaccos transformed with the OfGLO1 gene. Figure S4: The expression level of OfGLO1 in transgenic tobacco leaves was detected using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Figure S5: The gene structure analysis of OfGLO1. Gray line, intron; black box, exon. Table S1: Primers used for cloning, vector construction, and expression analysis of OfGLO1 in O. fragrans. Table S2: Conserved elements in the promoter of OfGLO1, BpMADS2 and AtGLO1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and design of experiments, J.P.; Conducting of experiments and data analysis, Z.Z., S.C., M.X. and M.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, J.P., Z.Z. and S.C.; Writing—review and editing, Z.C. and L.W. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (grant No. 20191203B07) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant Nos. LY19C020003 and LY19C150005).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Yong Jia (Murdoch University, Australia) for language editing and Muyuan Zhu (College of Life Science, Zhejiang University) for providing the pCAMBIA13011 vector.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Coen, E.S.; Meyerowitz, E.M. The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 1991, 353, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pelaz, S.; Ditta, G.S.; Baumann, E.; Wisman, E.; Yanofsky, M.F. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 2000, 405, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soltis, D.E.; Chanderbali, A.S.; Kim, S.; Buzgo, M.; Soltis, P.S. The ABC model and its applicability to basal angiosperms. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Theissen, G.; Saedler, H. Plant biology. Floral quartets. Nature 2001, 409, 469–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buzgo, M.; Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E. Floral developmental morphology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 165, 925–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bowman, J.L. Evolutionary conservation of angiosperm flower development at the molecular and genetic levels. J. Biosci. 1997, 22, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kramer, E.M.; Di Stilio, V.S.; Schlüter, P.M. Complex patterns of gene duplication in the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA lineages of the ranunculaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Litt, A. An evaluation of A-function: Evidence from the APETALA1 and APETALA2 gene lineages. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2007, 168, 73–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hernandez-Hernandez, T.; Martinez-Castilla, L.P.; Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. Functional diversification of B MADS-box homeotic regulators of flower development: Adaptive evolution in protein-protein interaction domains after major gene duplication events. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24, 465–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Urbanus, S.L.; De Folter, S.; Shchennikova, A.V.; Kaufmann, K.; Immink, R.G.; Angenent, G.C. In planta localisation patterns of MADS domain proteins during floral development in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Murai, K. Homeotic Genes and the ABCDE Model for Floral Organ Formation in Wheat. Plants 2013, 2, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Abraham-Juarez, M.J.; Schrager-Lavelle, A.; Man, J.; Whipple, C.; Handakumbura, P.; Babbitt, C.; Bartlett, M. Evolutionary variation in MADS box dimerization affects floral development and protein abundance in maize. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 3408–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sommer, H.; Beltran, J.P.; Huijser, P.; Pape, H.; Lonnig, W.E.; Saedler, H.; Schwarz-Sommer, Z. Deficiens, a homeotic gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus: The protein shows homology to transcription factors. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tröbner, W.; Ramirez, L.; Motte, P.; Hue, I.; Huijser, P.; Lönnig, W.E.; Saedler, H.; Sommer, H.; Schwarz-Sommer, Z. GLOBOSA: A homeotic gene which interacts with DEFICIENS in the control of Antirrhinum floral organogenesis. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 4693–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jack, T.; Brockman, L.L.; Meyerowitz, E.M. The homeotic gene APETALA3 of Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a MADS box and is expressed in petals and stamens. Cell 1992, 68, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goto, K.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Function and regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene PISTILLATA. Genes Dev. 1994, 8, 1548–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Chung, Y.Y.; Kim, S.R.; Kang, H.G.; Noh, Y.S.; Park, M.C.; Finkel, D.; An, G. Characterization of two rice MADS box genes homologous to GLOBOSA. Plant Sci. 1995, 109, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Munster, T.; Wingen, L.U.; Faigl, W.; Werth, S.; Saedler, H.; Theissen, G. Characterization of three GLOBOSA-like MADS-box genes from maize: Evidence for ancient paralogy in one class of floral homeotic B-function genes of grasses. Gene 2001, 262, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kanno, A.; Saeki, H.; Kameya, T.; Saedler, H.; Theissen, G. Heterotopic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, J.H.; Ishikawa, Y.; Ochiai, T.; Kanno, A.; Kameya, T. Two GLOBOSA-like genes are expressed in second and third whorls of homochlamydeous flowers in Asparagus officinalis L. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsai, W.C.; Lee, P.F.; Chen, H.I.; Hsiao, Y.Y.; Wei, W.J.; Pan, Z.J.; Chuang, M.H.; Kuoh, C.S.; Chen, W.H.; Chen, H.H. PeMADS6, a GLOBOSA/PISTILLATA-like gene in Phalaenopsis equestris involved in petaloid formation, and correlated with flower longevity and ovary development. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1125–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, X.; Shi, J.; Xi, M.; Luo, Z.; Hu, X. A B functional gene cloned from lily encodes an ortholog of Arabidopsis PISTILLATA (PI). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 28, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiang, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Fu, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, J.; Sun, C. B and E MADS-box genes determine the perianth formation in Cymbidium goeringii Rchb.f. Physiol. Plant 2018, 162, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, K.; Cao, Q.X.; Jin, C.M.; Niu, Y.Y.; Li, G.L.; Zhang, J.J. Identification of two GLOBOSA-Like MADS-Box genes in tea plant (Camellia sinensis [L.] O. Kuntze). Mol. Biol. 2019, 53, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Broholm, S.K.; Pollanen, E.; Ruokolainen, S.; Tahtiharju, S.; Kotilainen, M.; Albert, V.A.; Elomaa, P.; Teeri, T.H. Functional characterization of B class MADS-box transcription factors in Gerbera hybrida. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fu, Q.; Liu, H.; Almeida, A.M.; Kuang, Y.; Zou, P.; Liao, J. Molecular basis of floral petaloidy: Insights from androecia of Canna indica. AoB Plants 2014, 6, plu015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Louati, M.; Salazar-Sarasua, B.; Roque, E.; Beltran, J.P.; Hannachi, A.S.; Gomez-Mena, C. Isolation and functional analysis of a PISTILLATA-like MADS-Box gene from argan tree (Argania spinosa). Plants 2021, 10, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lannenpaa, M.; Parkkinen, S.; Jarvinen, P.; Lemmetyinen, J.; Vepsalainen, S.; Savola, T.; Keinonen, K.; Keinanen, M.; Sopanen, T. The expression and promoter specificity of the birch homologs for PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA and APETALA3/DEFICIENS. Physiol. Plant 2005, 125, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, H.; Zeng, X.; Yang, J.; Cai, X.; Shi, Y.; Zheng, R.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Yi, X.; Xiao, S.; et al. Whole-genome resequencing of Osmanthus fragrans provides insights into flower color evolution. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, X.; Yue, Y.; Li, H.; Ding, W.; Chen, G.; Shi, T.; Chen, J.; Park, M.S.; Chen, F.; Wang, L. The chromosome-level quality genome provides insights into the evolution of the biosynthesis genes for aroma compounds of Osmanthus fragrans. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Fu, J.; Hou, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Bao, Z.; Zhao, H.; Hu, S. Identification of floral aromatic volatile compounds in 29 cultivars from four groups of Osmanthus fragrans by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2019, 60, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cai, X.; Mai, R.Z.; Zou, J.J.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zeng, X.L.; Zheng, R.R.; Wang, C.Y. Analysis of aroma-active compounds in three sweet osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans) cultivars by GC-olfactometry and GC-MS. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B 2014, 15, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lee, H.-L.; Irish, V.F. Gene duplication and loss in a MADS box gene transcription factor circuit. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 3367–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zeng, Z.; Han, N.; Liu, C.; Buerte, B.; Zhou, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhu, M.; et al. Functional dissection of HGGT and HPT in barley vitamin E biosynthesis via CRISPR/Cas9-enabled genome editing. Ann. Bot. 2020, 126, 929–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, X.; Riechmann, J.L.; Jia, D.; Meyerowitz, E. Minimal regions in the Arabidopsis PISTILLATA promoter responsive to the APETALA3/PISTILLATA feedback control do not contain a CArG box. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2000, 13, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.Q.; Melzer, R.; Theissen, G. Molecular interactions of orthologues of floral homeotic proteins from the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon provide a clue to the evolutionary origin of ‘floral quartets’. Plant J. 2010, 64, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhao, J.; He, C. Distinct subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization of the B-class MADS-box genes in Physalis floridana. Planta 2015, 241, 387–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kramer, E.M.; Dorit, R.L.; Irish, V.F. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: Duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics 1998, 149, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Y.; Fan, Z.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Yin, H. The APETALA1 and FRUITFUL homologs in Camellia japonica and their roles in double flower domestication. Mol. Breed. 2014, 33, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 12 01748 g001 550
Figure 1. cDNA sequence of OfGLO1 and its deduced amino acid sequence. Note: * means a stop codon. The underlined sequence is the typical tail signal poly (A). The sequence information for OfGLO1 has been submitted to the GenBank database. The accession number is KY575409.
Figure 1. cDNA sequence of OfGLO1 and its deduced amino acid sequence. Note: * means a stop codon. The underlined sequence is the typical tail signal poly (A). The sequence information for OfGLO1 has been submitted to the GenBank database. The accession number is KY575409.
Genes 12 01748 g001
Genes 12 01748 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of GLO homologs among different species. (a) Multiple alignment of amino acids. (b) Phylogenetic analysis. Completely identical amino acids are indicated with white letters against a black background; conservative amino acids are indicated with black letters against a grey background; the partly similar and non-similar amino acids are indicated by grey letters and black letters on a white background, respectively. The MADS-box, K-box, and PI motif are indicated by lines. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA6.6. The amino acid sequences were aligned as follows: AmGLO (Antirrhinum majus, Q03378); BdGLO1 (Buddleja davidii, AEM60219); CaspPI (Catalpa speciosa, AMB20847); CbPI (Catalpa bungee, AJY60427); EgGLO (Erythranthe guttata, XP_012855839); GhGLO (Glandularia x hybrid, BAE72882); JmGLO1 (Jasminum mesnyi, AEM60214); LcGLO1 (Lantana camara, AEM60216); OfGLO1 (KY575409, Osmanthus fragrans); SiGLO (Sesamum indicum, XP_011081947); and SvPI-1 (Syringa vulgaris, AAC42576).
Figure 2. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of GLO homologs among different species. (a) Multiple alignment of amino acids. (b) Phylogenetic analysis. Completely identical amino acids are indicated with white letters against a black background; conservative amino acids are indicated with black letters against a grey background; the partly similar and non-similar amino acids are indicated by grey letters and black letters on a white background, respectively. The MADS-box, K-box, and PI motif are indicated by lines. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method in MEGA6.6. The amino acid sequences were aligned as follows: AmGLO (Antirrhinum majus, Q03378); BdGLO1 (Buddleja davidii, AEM60219); CaspPI (Catalpa speciosa, AMB20847); CbPI (Catalpa bungee, AJY60427); EgGLO (Erythranthe guttata, XP_012855839); GhGLO (Glandularia x hybrid, BAE72882); JmGLO1 (Jasminum mesnyi, AEM60214); LcGLO1 (Lantana camara, AEM60216); OfGLO1 (KY575409, Osmanthus fragrans); SiGLO (Sesamum indicum, XP_011081947); and SvPI-1 (Syringa vulgaris, AAC42576).
Genes 12 01748 g002
Genes 12 01748 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression profile of OfGLO1 in different flower organs of O. fragrans. (a) The phenotypes of O. Fragrans flowers at four different floral stages. (b) The expression levels of OfGLO1 in O. Fragrans flowers at four different floral stages. (c) The expression levels of OfGLO1 in different tissues of O. fragrans at the full-bloom stage. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to determine the relative expression levels, and cytokine gene (qActin, Table S1) was used as the internal reference gene. The different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are means (±SD) from three biological replicates.
Figure 3. Expression profile of OfGLO1 in different flower organs of O. fragrans. (a) The phenotypes of O. Fragrans flowers at four different floral stages. (b) The expression levels of OfGLO1 in O. Fragrans flowers at four different floral stages. (c) The expression levels of OfGLO1 in different tissues of O. fragrans at the full-bloom stage. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to determine the relative expression levels, and cytokine gene (qActin, Table S1) was used as the internal reference gene. The different letters indicate significant differences according to ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Data are means (±SD) from three biological replicates.
Genes 12 01748 g003
Genes 12 01748 g004 550
Figure 4. New phenotype of flowers observed in OfGLO1-transformed tobacco. (a) Normal flower of the wild type with five sepals, five petals, five stamens, and one pistil. (b) A flower with four petals. (c) A flower with six petals. (d) A flower with eight petals. (e) A stamen that became petal-like. (f) Lateral view of a wild-type flower, in which the petals had been removed, showing that the pistil is shorter than the stamens. (g) The corolla cracked, and the sepals became petal-like (indicated with a white arrow). (h) The white arrow shows that one stamen became petal-like in a transgenic flower. (i) The white arrow shows that three stamens became petal-like in a transgenic flower. (j) Seeds from wild-type plants. (k) The transgenic plants yielded less seeds.
Figure 4. New phenotype of flowers observed in OfGLO1-transformed tobacco. (a) Normal flower of the wild type with five sepals, five petals, five stamens, and one pistil. (b) A flower with four petals. (c) A flower with six petals. (d) A flower with eight petals. (e) A stamen that became petal-like. (f) Lateral view of a wild-type flower, in which the petals had been removed, showing that the pistil is shorter than the stamens. (g) The corolla cracked, and the sepals became petal-like (indicated with a white arrow). (h) The white arrow shows that one stamen became petal-like in a transgenic flower. (i) The white arrow shows that three stamens became petal-like in a transgenic flower. (j) Seeds from wild-type plants. (k) The transgenic plants yielded less seeds.
Genes 12 01748 g004
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics between the OfGLO1-transformed and wild-type plants.
Table 1. Comparison of the characteristics between the OfGLO1-transformed and wild-type plants.
CharacteristicsWild TypeOfGLO1-Transformed
Differentiation rate of floral bud at 70 days0.00100.00 *
Plant height (cm)83.9073.63 *
Leaf number30.5025.75 *
Length–width ratio of leaf2.062.31 *
Internode length (cm) 2.454.48 *
Branching number2.258.38 *
Floral bud number25.0021.63 *
Stamen length (cm) 4.203.86 *
Pistil length (cm) 4.164.18
Corolla diameter (cm) 2.001.98
Seed setting rate (%) 70.0011.25 *
Seed germination rate (%)96.2528.75 *
The data were calculated at the full flowering stage, and the average value is presented. Eight wild-type plants and sixteen T0 OfGLO1-overexpressed tobacco plants were used for characteristic measurement. The T1 generation seeds (n = 80) were used for the seed germination rate test. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference between the OfGLO1-transformed and wild-type plants at p < 0.05, as determined by Student's t tests.
Table
Table 2. Three new flower types in OfGLO1-transformed tobacco.
Table 2. Three new flower types in OfGLO1-transformed tobacco.
New Phenotypes of FlowerNo. of Total Flowers Flower No. with New PhenotypePercentage (%)
No. of petals was less than 58067.5
No. of petals was more than 5801215
Stamen became petal-like801012.5
The statistics were calculated 70 days after the in vitro seedlings were transplanted.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, Z.; Chen, S.; Xu, M.; Wang, M.; Chen, Z.; Wang, L.; Pang, J. Cloning, Expression, and Tobacco Overexpression Analyses of a PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA-like (OfGLO1) Gene from Osmanthus fragrans. Genes 2021, 12, 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111748

AMA Style

Zeng Z, Chen S, Xu M, Wang M, Chen Z, Wang L, Pang J. Cloning, Expression, and Tobacco Overexpression Analyses of a PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA-like (OfGLO1) Gene from Osmanthus fragrans. Genes. 2021; 12(11):1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111748

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Zhanghui, Si Chen, Mingrui Xu, Min Wang, Zhehao Chen, Lilin Wang, and Jiliang Pang. 2021. "Cloning, Expression, and Tobacco Overexpression Analyses of a PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA-like (OfGLO1) Gene from Osmanthus fragrans" Genes 12, no. 11: 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111748

APA Style

Zeng, Z., Chen, S., Xu, M., Wang, M., Chen, Z., Wang, L., & Pang, J. (2021). Cloning, Expression, and Tobacco Overexpression Analyses of a PISTILLATA/GLOBOSA-like (OfGLO1) Gene from Osmanthus fragrans. Genes, 12(11), 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12111748

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop