Next Article in Journal
Expression of a Truncated Yeast Ccc1 Vacuolar Transporter Increases the Accumulation of Endogenous Iron
Next Article in Special Issue
HD-ZIP Gene Family: Potential Roles in Improving Plant Growth and Regulating Stress-Responsive Mechanisms in Plants
Previous Article in Journal
T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Biomarkers and Their Clinical Usefulness
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Seed Development Factors TT2 and MYB5 Regulate Heat Stress Response in Arabidopsis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/genes12081119
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biochemical and Molecular Effects Induced by Triacontanol in Acquired Tolerance of Rice to Drought Stress

by
Basmah M. Alharbi
1,
Awatif Mahfouz Abdulmajeed
2 and
Heba Hassan
3,*
1
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71421, Saudi Arabia
2
Biology Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Umluj 46429, Saudi Arabia
3
Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(8), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081119
Submission received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Evolution of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To assess the effect of triacontanol (TRIA) on rice plants grown under normal or drought conditions, rice seeds were presoaked in TRIA (35 ppm) for two hours. After 20 days of sowing, rice seedlings developed from TRIA-treated or untreated seeds were subjected to drought stress. After 10 days of plant exposure to drought stress, data of major growth attributes and the content of photosynthetic pigments were recorded. Moreover, the effect of drought stress on stomatal conductance and the photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) were followed. The data obtained indicated that the species of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Giza 177 under investigation was sensitive to drought stress where there were significant decreases in the fresh and dry weights of shoots and roots and in stomatal conductance, as well as in the content of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids. Seed priming with TRIA enhanced both growth and acquired plant tolerance to drought stress. Thus, TRIA via the enhancement of stomatal conductance through the regulation of stomatal closure, the rate of water loss, ABA metabolism, the accumulation of osmolytes, and the regulation of aquaporins genes improved the water status of plants grown under water scarcity. Moreover, TRIA via increasing the content of free amino acids and sugars under drought stress may increase the chance of plant tissues to retain more water under scarcity conditions.

1. Introduction

Drought is one of the major environmental constrictions limiting plant development and productivity [1]. Drought menaces about 70% of arable land worldwide. Consequently, the major crops will exhibit over 65% reduction in their yield by 2050 because of drought all over the world [2,3]. Rice is one of the major staple food crops for most of world population, and belongs to semi-aquatic plants, so it requires a high soil moisture level [4]. Thus, rice plants are susceptible to water scarcity, which induces a variety of morphological, molecular, and physiological changes [5]. It was reported that major growth attributes of important crops are severely affected by drought stress [6]. It was also reported that drought stress disturbs the leaf water potential, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance [7]. Moreover, drought induces oxidative stress that destroys various macromolecules as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids concomitant with cell membranes damage [8]. It was recorded that seedling growth, dry weight, and vegetative growth were reduced under drought stress in various important crops including pea (Pisum sativum L.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) [6,9,10].
Plants can tolerate drought stress by developing different structural, biochemical, and molecular strategies including accumulation of certain osmolytes and proteins [11]. Indeed, drought stress accelerates abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, which plays a crucial role in stomatal conductance [12,13]. In this connection, the accumulation of root ABA under drought stress was reported in many plants such as rice, beans, and potato [14,15,16].
Furthermore, plants can cope with drought stress by stimulating the expression of various genes as genes of some protective proteins, water channel proteins (aquaporins), enzymes catalyzing osmolyte biosynthesis, proteases, and detoxification enzymes. Similarly, genes encode various proteins such as kinases, transcription factors, phosphatases, and enzymes that regulate certain pathways including ABA biosynthesis and phospholipid metabolism were also regulated under drought condition [11,17]. Aquaporins (AQPs) are a class of intrinsic proteins that play an important role in regulating the transmembrane transport of water [18,19] and small molecules like glycerol, urea, and CO2 [20,21]. Many types of AQPs are known in plants for their importance in stabilizing cell membrane homeostasis and keeping movement of water through the plant body under drought conditions. Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIP) belong to one of the subfamilies of AQPs, and PIPs are further subdivided into two phylogenetic subgroups: PIP1s and PIP2s [22].
Triacontanol (TRIA), the material used as a seed primer in the present work, is a saturated primary alcohol classified as a plant growth regulator (PGR) that stimulates many physiological and biochemical processes in crop plants [23,24]. Triacontanol at relatively low concentrations enhances the growth of most crops such as rice (O. sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) [25,26]. Currently, TRIA has been used to improve plant tolerance against abiotic stresses such as chilling, drought, and heavy metal and salt stresses [25,27,28]. Notably, under abiotic stresses, exogenously applied TRIA stimulates growth, increases the content of photosynthetic pigments, and increases compatible osmolyte accumulation [29,30]. Additionally, it enhances enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense systems [27,30,31,32,33]. TRIA can also mitigate stress hazards via the regulation of the expression of some genes [28,32]. The present work investigates the efficiency of TRIA in enhancing drought tolerance of rice plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Growth Conditions

Grains of rice (O. sativa L.) cultivar Giza 177 were obtained from the Agriculture Research Center, Rice Research Institute in Giza, Egypt. Triacontanol (TRIA) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Lot 637238, St. Louis, MO, USA). This research was conducted at Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Egypt using two controlled growth chambers, model V3-DM, Vision scientific company, Korea. The grains were surface sterilized by immersion in 1% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, then washed three times with sterile distilled water prior to an experimental procedure to prevent fungal contamination.

2.2. Imposition of Treatments

The sterilized grains were divided into two groups, which were soaked either in water or TRIA (35 ppm) for 2 h. The experiment was conducted in a naturally lit greenhouse (day/night temperatures about 27/32 ± 2 °C and a 14 h photoperiod) of the Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University. This experiment was carried out in a complete randomized design with three replicates. The sterilized rice grains of the two groups were sown in plastic pots (25 × 25 cm2) filled with homogenous soil (50 pots for each group). The physical and chemical analysis of soil are given in Table 1.
The irrigation of all pots was carried out using the same volume of water based on the maximum water-holding capacity of the soil used in the present work. After 15 days of sowing, thinning was done so that 10 uniform seedlings were left in each pot. After 20 days of sowing, drought stress was imposed on half of each group by withholding irrigation. After 10 days of rice seedling exposure to drought stress, the experiment was terminated as severe growth retardation was observed, compared with the control or with seedlings developed from pre-soaked grains in TRIA. Both shoots and roots were collected directly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C for biochemical analyses.

2.3. Methods

2.3.1. Measurement of Number of Stomata

Direct microscopic measurements of number of stomata were carried out following the method described by [34]. Leaf epidermal strips were obtained from a fully expanded leaf and immediately immersed in absolute alcohol for fixation and preservation. The epidermal strip was prepared on a slide and then covered with a cover slip. The total number of stomata as well as number of open stomata per µm2 on the upper and lower epidermis were counted using an eye-piece graticule, which is calibrated by using stage micrometer scale.

2.3.2. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements

The chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement was assessed in leaves in the morning hours. The intact flag leaves were dark adapted for 30 min using light-withholding clips. Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was measured simultaneously using a pulse amplitude modulation portable fluorometer (Handy PEA, Hansatech, Norfolk, UK). After the adaptation of leaves to darkness, a single, strong, 1 s light pulse (3500 μmol m2 s) was applied. Three replicates were used for each treatment. The fast fluorescence kinetics (F0 to Fm) value was recorded during 10 μs to 1 s [35]. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (Fv/Fm) was calculated according to the equation:
Fv/Fm = (Fm − F0)/Fm
where F0 means fluorescence intensity at 50 μs, Fm represents maximal fluorescence intensity, and Fv represents variable fluorescence.

2.3.3. Measurement of Photosynthetic Pigments

The photosynthetic pigments chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, and carotenoids were extracted and determined according to the method of [36]. Fresh leaves (1 g) were homogenized in 85% aqueous acetone for 5 min. Then, the homogenate was centrifuged, and the supernatant was made up to 100 mL with 85% acetone. The extinction was measured against a blank of pure 85% aqueous acetone at three different wave lengths (452.5, 644, and 663 nm) by using spectrophotometer (Spectronic 601, Milton Roy Company, Ivyland, PA, USA)

2.3.4. Measurement of Total Soluble Sugars

Total soluble sugars were analyzed by reacting 0.1 mL of the ethanolic extract with 3 mL of freshly prepared anthrone reagent (150 mg anthrone + 100 mL 72% H2SO4) in boiling water bath for 10 min. After cooling, the absorbance was measured at 620 nm by using a spectrophotometer [37].

2.3.5. Measurement of Free Amino Acids

Free amino acids were determined according to [38] by grinding the plant tissue (0.5 g) in water; then, 0.1 mL of the water extract was added to 1.5 mL (ethanol/acetone) of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of 0.1 mL phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 2 mL ninhydrin reagent (0.5% in n-butanol). Then, the mixture was placed in a boiling water bath for 20 min, and then cooled immediately in ice water, and methanol was added to 10 mL. The absorbance was measured directly at 580 nm by using spectrophotometer.

2.3.6. Determination of Free Proline

The total free proline was assessed by the method described by [39] using ninhydrin reagent. The plant tissue (0.5 g) was grinded in 6 mL of 3% (w/v) sulfosalicylic acid solution. Then, the filtrate (2 mL) was reacted with 2 mL ninhydrin reagent and 2 mL glacial acetic acid, and the mixture was kept in boiling water bath for 1 h. Then, the mixture was cooled in ice and was separated using a separating funnel. The absorbance of the upper phase was read at 520 nm by using spectrophotometer.

2.3.7. Determination of Electrolyte Leakage (EL)

The stress injury was measured by electrolyte leakage as described by [40]. Leaf samples (0.5 g) were incubated with 20 mL of deionized water for 24 h at 25 °C. Then, the electrical conductivity of the solution (L1) was quantified using a conductivity meter (HI 8733, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, RI, USA). Samples were then autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min and then the final conductivity (L2) was assessed after equilibration at 25 °C. The EL was determined according to the following equation:
EL% = (L1/L2) × 100

2.3.8. Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA) produced by the thiobarbituric acid reaction as described by [41]. The plant tissue (0.5 g) was grinded in water then the crude extract was mixed with the same volume of a 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid solution containing 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The mixture was heated at 95 °C for 30 min and then quickly cooled in an ice-bath. The mixture was centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min and the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 and 600 nm by using a spectrophotometer.

2.3.9. Relative Water Content (RWC)

The relative water content was measured following the method described by [42]. Leaf discs from the fully expanded and uniform leaves were taken. The fresh mass (FM) of leaf discs was measured, and then samples were placed in a Petri dish with distilled water for 4 h. The water saturated mass (WSM) was then measured, and the leaf samples were placed in an oven at 80 °C for 48 h to determine the dry mass (DM). Leaf RWC was calculated as:
RWC [%] = [(FM − DM)/(WSM − DM] × 100

2.3.10. Extraction, Separation, and Determination of Abscisic Acid (ABA)

The method of hormones extraction was essentially similar to that adopted by [43]. The frozen tissue was homogenized in cold 85% ethanol by an electric automixer and then extracted by an electric stirrer with 85% ethanol at about 0 °C. The solvent was changed three times. After filtration, the three extracts were combined together and concentrated under a vacuum at 20–25 °C to a few mL. The concentrated aqueous phase was adjusted to pH 8.8 by using 1% NaOH. The alkaline aqueous phase was shaken three times with equal quantities of ethyl acetate using a separating funnel. The combined ethyl acetate fraction was evaporated to dryness and held for further purification. The aqueous fraction was acidified to pH 2.8 with 1% HCI and shaken three times with equal volumes of ethyl acetate. The remaining aqueous phase was discarded. The combined acidic ethyl acetate phase was reduced to a certain volume to determine the abscisic acid (ABA) by using gas chromatography (GC). The dried basic ethyl acetate fraction was dissolved in 80% methanol.

2.3.11. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

The total RNA was extracted from rice tissue (100 mg) of all treatments with 30% PEG6000 using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The total RNA (1 µg) from each sample was transformed into cDNA by the reverse transcription using the c.DNA Kit (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR was conducted on an ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, New York, NY, USA) using a TransStart™ Green qRT-PCR Super Mix Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). OsActin rRNA was used as a reference gene to standardize the relative transcriptional abundance and to minimize different copy numbers of cDNA templates [44]. All data were calculated from three replicates based on the 2−∆∆Ct method [45]. The primers of the PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5 genes (Table 2) used in the qRT-PCR excluded the highly conserved protein domain and had high efficiency and specificity.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data presented in this work were statistically analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS v20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) analyzing software. Statistical significances of the means were compared with Duncan’s test at p ≤ 0.05 levels and the standard error (SE) of the means are shown in tables and figures as mean ± SE, with the number of degrees of freedom (n) = 3.

3. Results

TRIA treatment of unstressed rice seedlings led to significant increases in the fresh and dry weights of shoots and roots as compared with the unstressed control (Figure 1a,b). Meanwhile, the imposition of drought stress induced a significant decrease in the fresh and dry weights of both shoots and roots as compared with the unstressed control, while stressed plants treated with TRIA showed an increase in the fresh and dry weights as compared with the stressed control (Figure 1a,b).
Moreover, the results obtained showed that the relative water content was decreased in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to drought. On the other hand, the pretreatment with TRIA significantly increased the relative water content of stressed leaves (Figure 1c).
Likewise, drought stress induced a significant decrease in the leaf content of Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids (Table 3). Notably, TRIA pretreatment induced a significant increase in Chl a, Chl b, and the contents of leaves of drought-stressed seedlings, compared with the untreated stressed controls (Table 3). TRIA increased the photosynthetic pigments concomitant with increments in the Fv/Fm values of the leaves of stressed rice seedlings (Table 3).
Moreover, in this study, drought obviously induced a significant decrease in percentage of open stomata (Figure 2) as compared with the unstressed control. The pretreatment of rice with TRIA significantly reduced the percentage of stomatal openings on both the upper and lower surface of rice leaves by 26% and 23.9%, respectively, as compared with the stressed control.
The current data also revealed that exposure to drought stress significantly increased and decreased the ABA content of the roots and shoots, respectively (Figure 3a). In addition, proline and amino acids showed a significant increase in both the shoots and roots of drought-stressed seedlings as compared with the unstressed control (Figure 3b,c).
Meanwhile, the total soluble sugars recorded a non-significant decrease and a significant increase in the shoots and roots of drought-stressed seedlings, respectively (Figure 3d). On the other hand, TRIA treatment of drought-stressed rice seedlings led to a significant increase in ABA, proline, amino acids, and total soluble sugar contents in both the shoots and roots (Figure 3a–d).
Furthermore, drought stress induced a significant increase in the lipid peroxidation product, concomitant with a significant increase in the electrolyte leakage value (Figure 4a,b), respectively, as compared with those of the unstressed plants. The pretreatment with TRIA significantly reduced the lipid peroxidation product and electrolyte leakage of drought-stressed rice seedlings (Figure 4a,b).
Notably, the RT-PCR analysis showed that drought downregulated PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5 expressions (Figure 5a–d). Meanwhile, TRIA pretreatment stimulated the overexpression of PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5 of drought-stressed rice shoots and roots (Figure 5a–d) as compared with the stressed, untreated plants. The maximum expressions of PIP1,1, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5 were observed in TRIA-primed stressed leaves; however, the greatest expression of PIP1,2, was assayed in TRIA-primed stressed roots.

4. Discussion

Drought stress adversely affects plant growth and development. On the other hand, the ability to survive the drought state is a result of adaptations that prevent or decrease cellular destruction that occurs with the scarcity of water. The results presented in Figure 1a,b showed a significant decrease in both the fresh and dry weighs of shoots and roots of rice exposed to drought conditions. Such an effect was concomitant with a significant decrease in the relative water content (RWC) of rice leaves (Figure 1c), which may reduce the cell turgor pressure and, thus, cause growth retardation [46,47]. The drop in RWC of drought-stressed seedlings may be attributed to a decline in water uptake by roots, which was recorded by [48]. Moreover, drought adversely affects the photosynthetic process, as it caused a decline in the photosynthetic pigments content in our study (Table 3). This effect may be attributed to destruction or photooxidation of chlorophyll and/or inhibition of Chl synthesis, or to an increase in the activity of chlorophyllase [48,49].
Triacontanol (TRIA) is a promising plant growth regulator, as it plays an active role in the upregulation of major physiological activities required in different stages of plant growth [50,51]. In the present study, the priming of rice grains with TRIA (35 ppm) increased the fresh and dry weights of the shoots and roots of rice grown under well-watered conditions (Figure 1a,b) compared with plants exposed to drought stress. Similarly, TRIA enhanced the growth of several crops like ginger [23], tomato [52], rice [53], and viviparous [54]. The significant promoting effects of TRIA on the fresh and dry weights of TRIA-treated rice seedlings concomitant with increases in the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid contents of leaves (Table 3) demonstrated the motivating effect of TRIA on the photosynthetic efficiency, which, sequentially, improved the assimilation rate and the accumulation of photosynthates. In this regard, it has been reported by many researchers that TRIA stimulated photosynthesis in several crops such as Papaver somniferum L. [55], Vigna radiata L. [56], and Lablab purpureus L. [57]. Given this connection, it was reported that TRIA may enhance the photosynthetic process via increasing the rate of chlorophyll synthesis, as well as the number and size of chloroplasts [58,59,60]. Moreover, Fv/Fm values were markedly increased in TRIA-treated rice seedlings (Table 3), and thereby, may contribute to improving the photosynthetic efficiency of PSII and to lessening the degree of photoinhibition [59,61]. In addition, TRIA may increase photosynthesis via enhancing the activity of the Rubisco enzyme, photosynthetic pigments, and the upregulation of many photosynthetic genes [23,62].
Now it has been well documented that TRIA functions as a signaling molecule and accelerates plant tolerance against various abiotic stresses [25,63]. TRIA clearly improved seedling growth, as measured by both the fresh and dry weights of rice seedlings exposed to drought stress as compared with the stressed control ones (Figure 1a,b). Similar results were obtained by [64,65] on drought-stressed V. radiata L and rice seedlings, respectively. The increments in the previous parameters may be attributed to the significant increase obtained in the RWC (Figure 1c) and the significant decrease obtained in the percentage of stomatal opening (Figure 2), which may have played a crucial role in controlling water loss. The stomatal closure is an important strategy to avoid water loss and help plants tolerate drought conditions [7,66]. TRIA as a constituent of wax in the cuticle of plants [67] might have a role in controlling the rate of water loss and might have counteracted the drought-induced disturbance in the leaf water potential. Moreover, TRIA treatment increased the abscisic acid content (ABA) of the shoots and roots of drought-stressed rice seedlings as compared with the control (Figure 3a). ABA is among the hormones that affect the water status of plants via regulation of the stomatal function [68,69].
In addition, the results obtained suggested that TRIA priming helped plants to improve the water status under drought stress through osmotic adjustment, as attained by the accumulation of some osmolytes, including proline, free amino acids, and total soluble sugars (Figure 3b–d). The accumulation of proline, total soluble sugars, and free amino acids helps in reducing the cell osmotic potential, thereby diminishing water loss under water scarcity [70]. In the present investigation, the priming of rice grains with TRIA stimulated the accumulation of high levels of proline under stressed conditions (Figure 3b). Proline is a significant indicator for finding out how tolerant plants are under water-restrictive conditions [71]. Proline protects plants from the hazards of dehydration stress via maintaining osmotic adjustment, maintains membrane integrity, and enhances the antioxidant defense system [72,73]. Proline accumulation in TRIA-treated seedlings exposed to either drought or salt stress has been reported by [31,74].
In the present work, rice exposure to drought stress led to oxidative imbalance as indicated from the marked increase in the percentage of electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Figure 4), as well as the significant decrease in photosynthetic pigments, which may be a result of its photo-oxidation and degradation under the effect of accumulated free radicals, induced by oxidative stress [75]. In response to TRIA priming, the reverse was true.
Hence, it was reported that a major requirement for plants to tolerate drought stress is the ability to withstand and/or counteract the oxidative imbalance associated with the decrease in available water. TRIA, in this regard, played a crucial role in lessening the hazards of oxidative stress via increasing the content of free amino acids in stressed plants, which among other effects, could mitigate oxidative stress via reducing reactive oxygen species [76]. The increase in total soluble sugars and free amino acids may be attributed to the acceleration of the photosynthesis process via increasing the photosynthetic pigment contents. In this context, the current study showed that TRIA increased the Chl a and Chl b contents compared with the stressed plants. Such an effect of TRIA may be attributed to its role in protecting the chlorophyll from oxidation by increasing the carotenoid content in TRIA-treated plants (Table 3). Carotenoids act as an important antioxidant protecting pigments from the oxidation induced by the stressful condition [77]. Chlorophyll fluorescence is a good indicator of stress tolerance [78], and in the current study, TRIA treatment showed an increment in Fv/Fm values under drought stress conditions, which refers to a higher photochemical efficiency of PSII [59]. It was reported that TRIA has also increased the Fv/Fm values under various abiotic stresses, such as salt and chilling stresses [29,30].
Predicted functions of sugars and amino acids, particularly of those which are hydrophilic, for the improvement of the water status of plants subjected to drought stress include the following: water replacement molecules, when acting as protectants, and stabilizing subcellular structures in drought conditions [79]. Moreover, some of these amino acids and sugars, which have polar groups within their structures, may coat intracellular macromolecules with a cohesive water layer providing preferential hydration to these molecules and, hence, more retention of water under its scarcity [80].
The alleviation of oxidative stress by TRIA in drought-stressed plants could be achieved via reducing membrane injury [81]. Likewise, the present study showed that TRIA notably decreased EL in association with a decrease in the lipid peroxidation product MDA content as compared with drought-stressed plants (Figure 4a,b). In this context, TRIA has been observed to reduce membrane permeability and MDA contents in maize seedlings under salinity stress [32]. Such an effect of TRIA may be attributed to the activation of some antioxidant enzymes that contribute to buffering the excess reactive oxygen species (ROS), which results in alleviating the stress damage effects on plants. It was reported in many studies that TRIA stimulated the activity of some antioxidant enzymes under drought and salinity stresses [31,65,82].
Aquaporins (AQPs) play a crucial role in regulation of water transport through plants; hence, they take part in drought stress tolerance. Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIP) belong to one of the subfamilies of AQPs, and PIPs are further subdivided into two phylogenetic subgroups: PIP1s and PIP2s. In the current study, the increase in water content in TRIA-treated plants was accompanied with the upregulation of PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5 genes (Figure 5a–d) in both the shoots and roots of plants, either under normal or drought conditions. In this context, it was reported that TRIA can alleviate the toxic effects of stress by regulating the gene expression [28,32]. Generally, the downregulation of specific PIP isoforms leads to a decrease in water permeability of protoplasts, and consequently increases susceptibility to drought and osmotic stress [83,84]. Hence, PIP isoform overexpression participates in the increments of root osmotic hydraulic conductivity [85,86]. Moreover, the overexpression of PIPs genes in TRIA-treated plants may be attributed to the accumulation of ABA [87,88]. It was reported in many studies that the application of exogenous ABA increased PIP gene expression under normal water supply [89,90,91]. In addition, the accumulation of ABA under drought stress plays a crucial role in regulating AQP gene expression [87,88].

5. Conclusions

The current results provide molecular and physiological evidence supporting the vital roles of triacontanol in improving the water status in drought-stressed rice seedlings, which may play a beneficial role in horticultural crop management to tolerate climatic fluctuations. The obtained results showed that TRIA alleviated the adverse effects caused by drought stress through molecular and physiological strategies, which contribute to improving the water status. Moreover, TRIA via increasing the content of free amino acids and soluble sugars under drought stress may increase the efficiency of stressed plants to retain water under its scarcity. Such an effect of TRIA was evident by the increase in the RWC and decrease in the MDA content and EL. In addition, TRIA highly induced the expression of aquaporin-related genes (PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4, and PIP2,5) that might be involved in the regulation of water transport.

Author Contributions

H.H., B.M.A., and A.M.A. conceived and planned the experiments. H.H. performed the experiments. B.M.A. and A.M.A. contributed to sample preparation and formal analysis. H.H. contributed to the interpretation of the results and writing—review and editing of the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Chl achlorophyll a
Chl bchlorophyll b
ELelectrolyte leakage
Fv/Fmthe maximal photochemical efficiency
ABAAbscisic acid
AQPsAquaporins
PIP1,1, PIP1,2, PIP2,4 and PIP2,5     Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins 1,1; 1,2; 2,4; and 2,5 genes
TRIAtriacontanol
RWCrelative water content

References

  1. Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Yadav, A.N.; Sheikh, I.; Kumar, V.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Saxena, A.K. Amelioration of drought stress in Foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) by P-solubilizing drought-tolerant microbes with multifarious plant growth promoting attributes. Environ. Sustain. 2020, 3, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sharma, M.; Gupta, S.K.; Majumder, B.; Maurya, V.K.; Deeba, F.; Alam, A.; Pandey, V. Salicylic acid mediated growth, physiological and proteomic responses in two wheat varieties under drought stress. J. Proteom. 2017, 163, 28–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, S.; Mujumdar, P. Increasing frequency and spatial extent of concurrent meteorological droughts and heat waves in India. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mckersie, B.D.; Ya’acov, Y.L. Oxidative stress. In Stress and Stress Coping in Cultivated Plants; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994; pp. 15–54. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bray, E.A. Molecular responses to water deficit. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Okçu, G.; Kaya, M.D.; Atak, M. Effects of salt and drought stresses on germination and seedling growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Turk. J. Agric. For. 2005, 29, 237–242. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Kobayashi, N.; Fujita, D.; Basra, S.M.A. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 185–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chong, P.; Li, H.; Li, Y. Physiological responses of seedling roots of the desert plant Reaumuria soongorica to drought stress. Acta Pratacult. Sin. 2015, 24, 72–80. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeid, I.M.; Shedeed, Z.A. Response of alfalfa to putrescine treatment under drought stress. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manickavelu, A.; Nadarajan, N.; Ganesh, S.K.; Gnanamalar, R.P.; Babu, R.C. Drought tolerance in rice: Morphological and molecular genetic consideration. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 50, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 781–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Jacobsen, S.E.; Liu, F.; Jensen, C.R. Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, W.; Jia, L.; Shi, W.; Liang, J.; Zhou, F.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J. Abscisic acid accumulation modulates auxin transport in the root tip to enhance proton secretion for maintaining root growth under moderate water stress. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Puertolas, J.; Alcobendas, R.; Alarcón, J.J.; Dodd, I.C. Long-distance abscisic acid signalling under different vertical soil moisture gradients depends on bulk root water potential and average soil water content in the root zone. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1465–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Puértolas, J.; Conesa, M.R.; Ballester, C.; Dodd, I.C. Local root abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation depends on the spatial distribution of soil moisture in potato: Implications for ABA signalling under heterogeneous soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2325–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Khattab, H.I.; Emam, M.A.; Emam, M.M.; Helal, N.M.; Mohamed, M.R. Effect of selenium and silicon on transcription factors NAC5 and DREB2A involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luu, D.T.; Maurel, C. Aquaporins in a challenging environment: Molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hassan, M.U.; Aamer, M.; Chattha, M.U.; Ullah, M.A.; Sulaman, S.; Nawaz, M.; Zhiqiang, W.; Yanqin, M.; Guoqin, H. The role of potassium in plants under drought stress: Mini review. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2017, 13, 268–271. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maurel, C.; Verdoucq, L.; Luu, D.T.; Santoni, V. Plant aquaporins: Membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 595–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Uehlein, N.; Lovisolo, C.; Siefritz, F.; Kaldenhoff, R. The tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is a membrane CO2 pore with physiological functions. Nature 2003, 425, 734–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hachez, C.; Moshelion, M.; Zelazny, E.; Cavez, D.; Chaumont, F. Localization and quantification of plasma membrane aquaporin expression in maize primary root: A clue to understanding their role as cellular plumbers. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 305–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Singh, M.; Khan, M.M.; Moinuddin, N.M. Augmentation of nutraceuticals, productivity and quality of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) through triacontanol application. Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. Asp. Plant Biol. 2012, 146, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karam, E.A.; Keramat, B. Foliar spray of triacontanol improves growth by alleviating oxidative damage in coriander under salinity. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 22, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Naeem, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Moinuddin. Triacontanol: A potent plant growth regulator in agriculture. J. Plant Interact. 2012, 7, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahmad, H.F.S.; Hassan, H.M.; El-Shafey, A.S. Effect of cadmium on growth, flowering and fruiting of Zea mays L. and possible roles of triacontanol in alleviating cadmium toxicity. Egypt. J. Bot. 2013, 53, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zaid, A.; Mohammad, F.; Fariduddin, Q. Plant growth regulators improve growth, photosynthesis, mineral nutrient and antioxidant system under cadmium stress in menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Islam, S.; Zaid, A.; Mohammad, F. Role of triacontanol in counteracting the ill effects of salinity in plants: A review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Borowski, E.; Blamowski, Z.K. The effect of triacontanol ‘TRIA’ and Asahi-SL on the development and metabolic activity of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) plants treated with chilling. Folia Hortic. 2009, 21, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Perveen, S.; Shahbaz, M.; Ashraf, M. Influence of foliar-applied triacontanol on growth, gas exchange characteristics, and chlorophyll fluorescence at different growth stages in wheat under saline conditions. Photosynthetica 2013, 51, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Perveen, S.; Iqbal, M.; Nawaz, A.; Parveen, A.; Mahmood, S. Induction of drought tolerance in Zea mays L. by foliar application of triacontanol. Pak. J. Bot. 2016, 48, 907–915. [Google Scholar]
  32. Perveen, S.; Iqbal, M.; Parveen, A.; Akram, M.S.; Shahbaz, M.; Akber, S.; Mehboob, A. Exogenous triacontanol-mediated increase in phenolics, proline, activity of nitrate reductase, and shoot k+ confers salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Braz. J. Bot. 2017, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maresca, V.; Sorbo, S.; Keramat, B.; Basile, A. Effects of triacontanol on ascorbate-glutathione cycle in Brassica napus L. exposed to cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 268–274. [Google Scholar]
  34. El-Shehaby, O.A. The effect of water stress-induced by polyethylene glycol on stomata and photosynthesis in Lupinus termis plants. Egypt. J. Physiol. Sci. 1994, 18, 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  35. Strasser, R.J.; Tsimilli-Michael, M.; Srivastava, A. Analysis of the fluorescence transient. In Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration Series; George, C., Papageorgiou, C., Govindjee, G., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 321–362. [Google Scholar]
  36. Metzner, H.; Rau, H.; Senger, H. Untersuchungen zur synchronisierbarkeit einzelner pigmentmangel-mutanten von Chlorella. Planta 1965, 65, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fairbairn, N.J. A modified anthrone reagent. Chem. Ind. 1953, 4, 285–313. [Google Scholar]
  38. Muting, D.; Kaiser, E. Spectrophotometric method of determining of amino-N in biological material by means of the ninhydrin reaction. Hoppe-Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 1963, 323, 276–332. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free prolin for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valentovič, P.; Luxová, M.; Kolarovič, L.; Gašparíková, O. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in maize cultivars. Plant Soil Environ. 2006, 52, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pieczynski, M.; Marczewski, W.; Hennig, J.; Dolata, J.; Bielewicz, D.; Piontek, P.; Wyrzykowska, A.; Krusiewicz, D.; Strzelczyk-Zyta, D.; Konopka-Postupolska, D.; et al. Downregulation of CBP80 gene expression as a strategy to engineer a drought-tolerant potato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wasfi, W.S.; Orrin, E.S. Identification of plant hormones from cotton ovules. Plant Physiol. 1975, 55, 550–554. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tenea, G.N.; Bota, A.P.; Raposo, F.C.; Maquet, A. Reference genes for gene expression studies in wheat flag leaves grown under different farming conditions. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kabiri, R.; Hatami, A.; Oloumi, H.; Naghizadeh, M.; Nasibi, F.; Tahmasebi, Z. Foliar application of melatonin induces tolerance to drought stress in Moldavian balm plants (Dracocephalum moldavica) through regulating the antioxidant system. Folia Hortic. 2018, 30, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Delfine, S.; Tognetti, R.; Loreto, F.; Alvino, A. Physiological and growth responses to water stress in field-grown bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kabiri, R.; Nasibi, F.; Farahbakhsh, H. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid on some physiological parameters and alleviation of drought stress in Nigella sativa plant under hydroponic culture. Plant Prot. Sci. 2014, 50, 43–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Hu, W.E.; Huang, C.; Deng, X.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.I.; Wang, C.; Ma, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, Y.A.; et al. TaASR1, a transcription factor gene in wheat, confers drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1449–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shahbaz, M.; Noreen, N.; Perveen, S. Triacontanol modulates photosynthesis and osmoprotectants in canola (Brassica napus L.) under saline stress. J. Plant Interact. 2013, 8, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ramos-Zambrano, E.; Juárez-Yáñez, T.E.; Tapia-Maruri, D.; Camacho-Díaz, B.H.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A.R.; Martínez-Ayala, A.L. Effects of triacontanol and light on stomatal and photochemical responses in Solanum lycopersicum L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khan, M.M.; Bhardwaj, G.; Naeem, M.; Mohammad, F.; Singh, M.; Nasir, S.; Idrees, M. Response of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to application of potassium and triacontanol. XI Int. Symp. Process. Tomato 2008, 823, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pandey, N.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Tripathi, R.S. Effect of plant growth regulators and fertiuty levels on growth and yield of transplanted rice. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2001, 35, 205–207. [Google Scholar]
  54. Moorthy, P.; Kathiresan, K. Physiological responses of mangrove seedling to triacontanol. Biol. Plant. 1993, 35, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Srivastava, N.K.; Sharma, S. Effect of triacontanol on photosynthesis, alkaloid content and growth in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). Plant Growth Regul. 1990, 9, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumaravelu, G.; Livingstone, V.D.; Ramanujam, M.P. Triacontanol-induced changes in the growth, photosynthetic pigments, cell metabolites, flowering and yield of green gram. Biol. Plant. 2000, 43, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Naeem, M.; Khan, M.M.; Siddiqui, M.H. Triacontanol stimulates nitrogen-fixation, enzyme activities, photosynthesis, crop productivity and quality of hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L.). Sci. Hortic. 2009, 121, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Borowski, E.; Blamowski, Z.K.; Michałek, W. Effects of Tomatex/Triacontanol/on chlorophyll fluorescence and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) yields. Acta Physiol. Plant 2000, 22, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, X.; Yuan, H.; Chen, R.; Zhu, L.; He, G. Biochemical and photochemical changes in response to triacontanol in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 40, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Muthuchelian, K.; Velayutham, M.; Nedunchezhian, N. Ameliorating effect of triacontanol on acidic mist-treated Erythrina variegata seedlings: Changes in growth and photosynthetic activities. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 1253–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, X.; Yuan, H.; Chen, R.; Zhu, L.; Du, B.; Weng, Q.; He, G. Isolation and characterization of triacontanol-regulated genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Possible role of triacontanol as a plant growth stimulator. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Trewavas, A.J.; Gilory, S. Signal transduction in plant cells. Trends Genet. 1991, 7, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Waqas, M.; Shahzad, R.; Khan, A.L.; Asaf, S.; Kim, Y.H.; Kang, S.M.; Bilal, S.; Hamayun, M.; Lee, I.J. Salvaging effect of triacontanol on plant growth, thermotolerance, macro-nutrient content, amino acid concentration and modulation of defense hormonal levels under heat stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 99, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sanadhya, D.; Kathuria, E.; Malik, C.P. Effect of drought stress and its interaction with two phytohormones on Vigna radiata seed germination and seedling growth. LS Int. J. Life Sci. 2012, 1, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Suman, K.; Kondamudi, R.; Rao, Y.V.; Kiran, T.V.; Swamy, K.N.; Rao, P.R.; Subramanyam, D.; Voleti, S.R. Effect of triacontanol on seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme in rice under poly ethylene glycol induced drought stress. Agric. J. 2013, 60, 132–137. [Google Scholar]
  66. Franks, P.J. Passive and active stomatal control: Either or both? New Phytol. 2013, 198, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kolattukudy, P.E.; Walton, T.J. The biochemistry of plant cuticular lipids. Prog. Chem. Fats Other Lipids 1973, 13, 119–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Plant Physiology, 4th ed.; Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  69. Dodd, I.C. Hormonal interactions and stomatal responses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 22, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Thakur, A.; Thakur, P.S.; Singh, R.P. Influence of paclobutrazol and triacontanol on growth and water relations in olive varieties under water stress. Indian J. Plant. Physiol. 1998, 3, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rahdari, P.; Hosseini, S.M.; Tavakoli, S. The studying effect of drought stress on germination, proline, sugar, lipid, protein and chlorophyll content in purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) leaves. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar]
  72. Demiral, T.; Türkan, I. Does exogenous glycinebetaine affect antioxidative system of rice seedlings under NaCl treatment? Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tripathi, B.N.; Gaur, J.P. Relationship between copper-and zinc-induced oxidative stress and proline accumulation in Scenedesmus sp. Planta 2004, 219, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sarwar, M.B.; Sadique, S.; Hassan, S.; Sania, R.I.; Rashid, B.; Mohamed, B.B.; Husnain, T. Physio-biochemical and molecular responses in transgenic cotton under drought stress. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 23, 157–166. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tahkokorpi, M.; Taulavuori, K.; Laine, K.; Taulavuori, E. After-effects of drought-related winter stress in previous and current year stems of Vaccinium myrtillus L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sandhya, V.S.; Ali, S.Z.; Grover, M.; Reddy, G.; Venkateswarlu, B. Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 62, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Silva, E.N.; Vieira, S.A.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Ponte, L.F.; Ferreira-Silva, S.L.; Silveira, J.A. Contrasting physiological responses of Jatropha curcas plants to single and combined stresses of salinity and heat. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 32, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mehta, P.; Jajoo, A.; Mathur, S.; Bharti, S. Chlorophyll a fluorescence study revealing effects of high salt stress on Photosystem II in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lane, B.G. Cellular desiccation and hydration: Developmentally regulated proteins, and the maturation and germination of seed embryos. FASEB J. 1991, 5, 2893–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hoekstra, F.A.; Golovina, E.A.; Buitink, J. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rajasekaran, L.R.; Blake, T.J. New plant growth regulators protect photosynthesis and enhance growth under drought of jack pine seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1999, 18, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Khanam, D.; Mohammad, F. Plant growth regulators ameliorate the ill effect of salt stress through improved growth, photosynthesis, antioxidant system, yield and quality attributes in Mentha piperita L. Acta Physiol. Plant 2018, 40, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Martre, P.; Morillon, R.; Barrieu, F.; North, G.B.; Nobel, P.S.; Chrispeels, M.J. Plasma membrane aquaporins play a significant role during recovery from water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 2101–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Siefritz, F.; Tyree, M.T.; Lovisolo, C.; Schubert, A.; Kaldenhoff, R. PIP1 plasma membrane aquaporins in tobacco: From cellular effects to function in plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 869–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Aharon, R.; Shahak, Y.; Wininger, S.; Bendov, R.; Kapulnik, Y.; Galili, G. Overexpression of a plasma membrane aquaporin in transgenic tobacco improves plant vigor under favorable growth conditions but not under drought or salt stress. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lian, H.L.; Yu, X.; Ye, Q.; Ding, X.S.; Kitagawa, Y.; Kwak, S.S.; Su, W.A.; Tang, Z.C. The role of aquaporin RWC3 in drought avoidance in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Kaldenhoff, R.; Ribas-Carbo, M.I.; Sans, J.F.; Lovisolo, C.; Heckwolf, M.; Uehlein, N. Aquaporins and plant water balance. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Parent, B.; Hachez, C.; Redondo, E.; Simonneau, T.; Chaumont, F.; Tardieu, F. Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: A trans-scale approach. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 2000–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Jang, J.Y.; Kim, D.G.; Kim, Y.O.; Kim, J.S.; Kang, H. An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2004, 54, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhu, C.; Schraut, D.; Hartung, W.; Schäffner, A.R. Differential responses of maize MIP genes to salt stress and ABA. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 2971–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lian, H.L.; Yu, X.; Lane, D.; Sun, W.N.; Tang, Z.C.; Su, W.A. Upland rice and lowland rice exhibited different PIP expression under water deficit and ABA treatment. Cell Res. 2006, 16, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 12 01119 g001a 550Genes 12 01119 g001b 550
Figure 1. Effect of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) fresh weight, (b) dry weight, and (c) relative water content of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1. Effect of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) fresh weight, (b) dry weight, and (c) relative water content of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 12 01119 g001aGenes 12 01119 g001b
Genes 12 01119 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on percentage of stomatal openings on both the upper and lower surface of leaves of drought-stressed rice. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on percentage of stomatal openings on both the upper and lower surface of leaves of drought-stressed rice. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 12 01119 g002
Genes 12 01119 g003a 550Genes 12 01119 g003b 550
Figure 3. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) abscisic acid, (b) free proline, (c) free amino acids, and (d) total soluble sugars of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) abscisic acid, (b) free proline, (c) free amino acids, and (d) total soluble sugars of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 12 01119 g003aGenes 12 01119 g003b
Genes 12 01119 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) malondialdehyde (MDA) content and (b) the percentage of electrolytes leakage (EL) of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on (a) malondialdehyde (MDA) content and (b) the percentage of electrolytes leakage (EL) of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 12 01119 g004
Genes 12 01119 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on mRNA expression of plasma membrane intrinsic protein (a) PIP1,1, (b) PIP1,2, (c) PIP2,4, and (d) PIP2,5 of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 5. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) treatment on mRNA expression of plasma membrane intrinsic protein (a) PIP1,1, (b) PIP1,2, (c) PIP2,4, and (d) PIP2,5 of drought-stressed rice seedlings. Each value is the mean of three replicates ± SE. Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Genes 12 01119 g005
Table
Table 1. Some physical and chemical properties of soil.
Table 1. Some physical and chemical properties of soil.
pHElectrical Conductivity (EC)
(dS m−1)		Clay
(%)		Silt
(%)		Sand
(%)		Texture
8.22.853.331.415.3Clayey
Table
Table 2. The primers used for real-time PCR analysis.
Table 2. The primers used for real-time PCR analysis.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence 5′-3′Gene Accession Number
PIP1,1 F′TGCGCAGCCGACGACATGAK061769
PIP1,1 RCATACAGTGACTGAGTACTGGATTAC
PIP1,2 FCTGTCAAGATGCCAATCCAGAGAK098849
PIP1,2 RGAACCGAACTCCAATAGGAGGA
PIP2,4 FGAGCTCGTCTGGTGATATCCAK072632
PIP2,4 RCATGAAGACAACAGAGGGACAG
PIP2,5 FGCTTAAGCCGCAATCAAATGTGCAK107700
PIP2,5 RCGATCGAACAATGTCACACTTGC
OsActin FCTGGGTTCGCCGGAGATGATXM_015774830.2
OsActin RTGAGATCACGCCCAGCAAGG
Table
Table 3. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) on photosynthetic pigment contents (µg/g FW) and the maximal photochemical efficiency of the primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) of the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to drought stress. Data are means of three replicates ± SE.
Table 3. Effects of TRIA (35 ppm) on photosynthetic pigment contents (µg/g FW) and the maximal photochemical efficiency of the primary photochemistry (Fv/Fm) of the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to drought stress. Data are means of three replicates ± SE.
TreatmentsChl (a)Chl (b)CarotenoidFv/Fm
Control0.59 ± 0.0058 b0.26 ± 0.013 c0.39 ± 0.00 b0.78 ± 0.012 c
Control-TRIA0.79 ± 0.023 a0.31 ± 0.0135 b2.4 ± 0.205 a0.93 ± 0.09 a
Drought0.29 ± 0.012 d0.25 ± 0.015 c0.24 ± 0.012 b0.04 ± 00.00 d
Drought-TRIA0.52 ± 0.015 c0.39 ± 0.006 a0.5 ± 0.006 b0.7 ± 0.006 b
Columns with different letters are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alharbi, B.M.; Abdulmajeed, A.M.; Hassan, H. Biochemical and Molecular Effects Induced by Triacontanol in Acquired Tolerance of Rice to Drought Stress. Genes 2021, 12, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081119

AMA Style

Alharbi BM, Abdulmajeed AM, Hassan H. Biochemical and Molecular Effects Induced by Triacontanol in Acquired Tolerance of Rice to Drought Stress. Genes. 2021; 12(8):1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alharbi, Basmah M., Awatif Mahfouz Abdulmajeed, and Heba Hassan. 2021. "Biochemical and Molecular Effects Induced by Triacontanol in Acquired Tolerance of Rice to Drought Stress" Genes 12, no. 8: 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop