Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Batch Effect Due to Sequencing Center in Population Statistics Quantifying Rare Events in the 1000 Genomes Project
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of A-to-I RNA Editing in SARS-COV-2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/genes13010042
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

HAUSP Is a Key Epigenetic Regulator of the Chromatin Effector Proteins

by
Omeima Abdullah
1 and
Mahmoud Alhosin
2,3,*
1
College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
2
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(1), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010042
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 21 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
HAUSP (herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease), also known as Ubiquitin Specific Protease 7, plays critical roles in cellular processes, such as chromatin biology and epigenetics, through the regulation of different signaling pathways. HAUSP is a main partner of the “Epigenetic Code Replication Machinery,” ECREM, a large protein complex that includes several epigenetic players, such as the ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain (PHD) and an interesting new gene (RING), finger domains 1 (UHRF1), as well as DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), histone methyltransferase G9a, and histone acetyltransferase TIP60. Due to its deubiquitinase activity and its ability to team up through direct interactions with several epigenetic regulators, mainly UHRF1, DNMT1, TIP60, the histone lysine methyltransferase EZH2, and the lysine-specific histone demethylase LSD1, HAUSP positions itself at the top of the regulatory hierarchies involved in epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. This review highlights the increasing role of HAUSP as an epigenetic master regulator that governs a set of epigenetic players involved in both the maintenance of DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications.

1. Introduction

Ubiquitination, the addition of a small protein called ubiquitin (76 amino acids) to other target proteins is a post-translational protein modification that controls almost all processes in the cell and leads to different outcomes, ranging from proteasomal protein degradation and cellular trafficking to cell proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, DNA repair, and epigenetic modulation of gene expression [1,2,3,4]. Ubiquitination results from a successful collaboration between multienzyme cascades that involve E1 activating enzymes, E2 conjugating enzymes, and E3 ubiquitin ligases [1,5,6,7].
Deubiquitinases, or deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), are enzymes that protect many proteins from ubiquitination and are active in various pathologies, including cancer [8,9,10,11]. One of the well-documented cancer-associated DUBs is HAUSP (herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease), also known as Ubiquitin Specific Protease 7 (USP7), an enzyme that is overexpressed in many solid and blood malignancies [12,13,14,15,16]. The structure of HAUSP includes seven domains: the N-terminal TRAF-like (Tumor necrosis factor Receptor–Associated Factor) domain, the intermediate catalytic core domain, and UBL1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (C-terminal ubiquitin-like domains) [17,18] (Figure 1). Through its deubiquitinase activity, HAUSP has been reported to control the activity of several oncogenic transcription factors, including NOTCH1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [19,20], N-Myc in neuroblastoma [16], β-catenin in colorectal cancer [21], and NEK2 in multiple myeloma [22], indicating that HAUSP has an oncogenic role in cancer. In several tumors, HAUSP was shown to bind to and deubiquitinate the E3 ubiquitin ligases, MDM2 [23,24,25] and MDMX [26], which are known negative regulators of the tumor suppressor gene p53 [27,28,29,30]. Blocking the deubiquitination function of HAUSP enabled the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of both MDM2 and MDMX, which subsequently stabilized and restored p53 protein levels to induce cell death [23,24,26].
HAUSP, via its different domains, interacts with several proteins implicated in coordinating various signaling pathways. HAUSP is found in many protein complexes with different functions, including the “Epigenetic Code Replication Machinery,” ECREM. Indeed, HAUSP is a main partner of ECREM, a large macromolecular complex that includes several epigenetic players, such as the ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain (PHD) and an interesting new gene (RING) finger domains 1 (UHRF1), as well as DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), histone methyltransferase G9a, and histone acetyltransferase TIP60 [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Growing evidence indicates that the silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in tumors is the result of a coordinated in-depth dialogue between DNA methylation and various histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) [39,40,41,42].
Several reports have shown that a faithful inheritance of the epigenetic patterns (DNA methylation and histone PTMs) during cell division involves temporal and spatial control of the chromatin effector proteins mainly UHRF1 and DNMT1, which govern various epigenetic events [34,39,43,44,45,46,47]. Understanding the major factors regulating the expression and activity of chromatin effector proteins UHRF1 and DNMT1 could therefore unlock new secrets regarding the transmission of epigenetic patterns during cell division. HAUSP positions itself at the top of the regulatory hierarchies involved in the epigenetic silencing of TSGs in cancer due to its deubiquitinase activity and ability to team up through direct interactions with several epigenetic players (Table 1) mainly the epigenetic reader UHRF1 [38,48]; DNMT1 [38,49]; the histone acetyltransferases TIP60 [50] and CBP (CREB binding protein) [51]; the histone lysine methyltransferases EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste 2) [52] and MLL5 (Mixed-lineage leukemia 5) [53], and the lysine specific histone demethylases LSD1 (Lysine-specific demethylase 1) [54,55] and PHF8 (PHD finger protein 8) [56] (Figure 2). The present review highlights the increasingly evident role of HAUSP as an epigenetic master regulator that governs a set of epigenetic players involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation and histone PTMs.

2. Role of HAUSP in the Maintenance of DNA Methylation

Mammalian DNA methylation patterns are established and faithfully copied to daughter cells during replication by the maintenance DNMT1, whereas DNA methylation during embryonic development is catalyzed by the de novo expression of DNA methyltransferases DNMT3a and DNMT3b [58,59]. DNMT1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and plays an important role in tumorigenesis through the epigenetic silencing of many TSGs [60,61,62]. The expression of DNMT1 is regulated by post-translational modifications, including ubiquitination and acetylation [36,38,49,63,64].

2.1. HAUSP-Dependent Regulation of DNMT1 by Ubiquitination

The deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP regulates the stability and enzymatic activity of DNMT1 through several mechanisms. HAUSP can bind to DNMT1 and stabilize it through HAUSP-mediated deubiquitination [63]. High expression levels of DNMT1 protein have been found in human colon cancers, and this overexpression was correlated with HAUSP protein expression. Interestingly, the depletion of HAUSP in both human embryonic kidney cells and colorectal cancer cells resulted in an increase in DNMT1 ubiquitination and a reduction in DNMT1 protein expression. A similar increase in DNMT1 ubiquitination levels and a decrease in its protein expression were reported when HAUSP was knocked out in colorectal cancer cells [63]. By contrast, HAUSP overexpression in HAUSP knockout cells led to deubiquitination of DNMT1 and restoration of DNMT1 protein expression, suggesting that the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP protects DNMT1 from proteasomal degradation, thereby promoting the stability and enzymatic activity of DNMT1 and the maintenance of DNA methylation [63].
One of the well-documented epigenetic regulators of the DNA methylation maintenance machinery is the epigenetic reader UHRF1, which has multiple functional domains [65,66,67]. Through its SRA domain, UHRF1 recognizes and binds hemi-methylated CpG islands, and via the same SRA domain, UHRF1 recruits DNMT1 to its correct position on chromatin to ensure faithful transmission of DNA methylation patterns during DNA replication [68,69,70]. Besides its interaction with DNMT1, UHRF1 also interacts directly with other epigenetic writers, such as G9a [71] and TIP60 [36,72,73], and epigenetic erasers, including HDAC1) [74] and HAUSP [36,38,75] to form a macromolecular complex. In this complex, the deubiquitinase HAUSP can function as a hub protein through its direct interaction with UHRF1, which leads to its deubiquitination protecting UHRF1 from proteasomal degradation, thereby allowing UHRF1 to read epigenetic marks and to recruit and guide the right enzyme, writer, or eraser to the correct position at the right time to catalyze the target epigenetic mark [39,45,75,76,77]. In this way, UHRF1 ensures a faithful inheritance of both types of epigenetic marks (DNA methylation and histone PTMs) to daughter cells and leads to the epigenetic silencing of several TSGs, such as p16INK4A, PTEN, BRCA1, and hMLH1 [32,78].
Several studies have reported that HAUSP, via its deubiquitinase activity, can regulate the stability and expression of UHRF1, as well as DNMT1, and protect both proteins from ubiquitination-mediated proteasomal degradation, thereby maintaining DNA methylation [36,38,57,75]. HAUSP has been shown to interact directly with DNMT1 and UHRF1 to form a trimeric complex on chromatin [38]. In this complex, HAUSP, via its C-terminal domain, interacted with the targeting sequence (TS) domain of DNMT1, whereas HAUSP, through its TRAF domain, interacted with the SRA domain of UHRF1, thereby promoting the stability of UHRF1 and DNMT1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination (Figure 3) [38]. Moreover, the HAUSP/DNMT1/UHRF1 complex was located at promoter regions of several TSGs, including SFRP1, IGFBP3, HHIP, and HOXA7 [38], which are known to undergo epigenetic silencing in various tumors [79,80]. Interestingly, a depletion of HAUSP was accompanied by decreased expression levels of both UHRF1 and DNMT1 proteins and a subsequent marked demethylation of target genes at their promoters [38]. These data suggest that HAUSP plays a key role in the regulation of DNMT1-dependent DNA methylation. HAUSP first interacts with DNMT1 and forms a dimeric complex. UHRF1 then joins the HAUSP/DNMT1 dimer and recruits the dimeric complex to the sites of methylation by forming a trimeric complex on the promoters of the silenced genes. In the trimeric complex, HAUSP plays a dual role by directly stimulating the enzymatic activity of DNMT1 and by regulating the protein stability of UHRF1.
HAUSP binds to UHRF1 by its TRAF domain, but it also binds via its UBL domain (residues 560–664) to a linker region encompassing amino acids 600–687 between the SRA and RING finger domains of UHRF1, and this direct interaction is required for UHRF1 stability [48]. The downregulation of HAUSP decreased the expression levels of UHRF1 protein, whereas the overexpression of wild-type HAUSP, but not the catalytically inactive mutant HAUSP (C223S), significantly decreased the ubiquitination of UHRF1 and promoted its stability [48]. These findings implicate HAUSP, via its deubiquitinase activity, in the deubiquitination and stability of UHRF1 and DNMT1 and suggest that the epigenetic silencing of TSGs detected in many tumors is due to HAUSP-mediated stabilization of the UHRF1 and DNMT1 proteins (Figure 3).
Obtaining a deep insight into how HAUSP deubiquitinase activity is involved in the stabilization of UHRF1 protein will help in understanding the regulatory role of HAUSP in the UHRF1-dependent maintenance of DNA methylation. In this regard, HAUSP was shown to regulate the stability of UHRF1 protein by targeting the ubiquitin ligase activity of the UHRF1 RING domain [38,65,81], which is used by UHRF1 to ubiquitinate itself (autoubiquitination) [65,66] or to ubiquitinate other substrates, mainly histone 3 [81,82,83]. Indeed, HAUSP, via its deubiquitinase activity, was shown to interfere with the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of the RING domain of UHRF1, thereby eliminating the autoubiquitination of UHRF1 via the removal of ubiquitin adducts [38]. This led to the stabilization of UHRF1, indicating that HAUSP regulates the maintenance of DNA methylation through a direct association with UHRF1 [38].

2.2. HAUSP-Dependent Regulation of DNMT1 by Acetylation

HAUSP can also regulate DNMT1 stability through an acetylation process [36,38,49,63,64]. HAUSP, through its UBL domains (residues 560–1102), was found to stabilize DNMT1 by binding to the KG linker (KGDNMT1) of DNMT1 (residues 1109–1119) promoting the stability of DNMT1 [49]. The depletion of HAUSP in several cancer cell lines resulted in a significant decrease in DNMT1 expression at the protein level, but not at the mRNA level. Similar findings were observed when HAUSP was knocked out in colon cancer cells, supporting the concept that HAUSP deubiquitinates and protects DNMT1 from proteasomal degradation, thereby promoting DNMT1 stability [49]. Interestingly, the inhibition of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), or the overexpression of histone acetyltransferase TIP60, increased the acetylation of the KG linker of DNMT1 and impaired DNMT1 binding to HAUSP [49]. These findings indicate that the KG linker of DNMT1 is indispensable for DNMT1 interaction with HAUSP. Hence, the acetylation of the KG linker of DNMT1 impairs the interaction between DNMT1 and HAUSP, thereby stimulating the degradation of the DNMT1 protein [49].

3. Role of HAUSP in the Regulation of Histone Post-Translational Modifications

Abnormal histone PTMs, such as methylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination, can drive the epigenetic silencing of TSGs in cancers [84,85,86,87]. Histone PTMs are decoded, deposited, and erased by a specific set of enzymes. A better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of these enzymes is essential to fully decipher the complexity of the epigenetic determinants of TSG silencing in cancer. The deubiquitinase activity of HUASP can regulate the key histone readers and modifiers that connect histone PTMs with DNA methylation.

3.1. Role of HAUSP in the Regulation of Histone Monoubiquitination

Monoubiquitination of histones, particularly H2A and H2B, is a common type of histone PTM that controls gene expression [84,88,89]. Monoubiquitination of histone H2A on lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) is a well-documented epigenetic modification linked to the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1) and is frequently associated with gene silencing [89,90,91,92]. This histone mark (H2AK119ub1) is catalyzed by the E3 ubiquitin ligase RING1B, which is overexpressed in many human tumors [93,94,95,96] and plays an important role in PRC1-mediated gene silencing through monoubiquitination of histone H2A [97,98]. HAUSP can directly interact with and specifically deubiquitinate RING1B, thereby modulating the level of ubiquitinated H2A [97]. The same effects on H2AK119ub1 were found when HAUSP was downregulated or knocked out in human colorectal carcinoma cells HCT116 [99]. Indeed, both depletion and the knockout of HAUSP in HCT116 cells resulted in a decrease in the expression of RING1B and ubiquitination levels of H2AK119. This effect was associated with an increase in the expression of the tumor suppressor gene p16INK4A and cell proliferation inhibition, indicating that HAUSP has a key regulatory role in the monoubiquitination of H2A that is associated with gene inhibition [99]. Besides its regulatory effects on the monoubiquitination of histone H2, HAUSP has been reported to induce a selective deubiquitination of H2B and this mechanism requires the binding of HAUSP to guanosine 5′-monophosphate synthetase (GMPS) [100].

3.2. Role of HAUSP in the Regulation of Histone Acetylation

The histone acetyltransferase TIP60 is a member of the ECREM complex that also includes HAUSP, UHRF1, and DNMT1, and each member has regulatory effects on the other partners (35, 49, 61, 70, 71, 73). TIP60, through its acetyltransferase, was shown to acetylate, destabilize, and trigger the ubiquitination of DNMT1 through the E3 ligase activity of UHRF1 [63]. TIP60 is also required for acetylation of histones [101,102,103] and of nonhistone proteins, such as the tumor suppressor p53 [104,105]. Thus, deciphering the mechanisms of TIP60 regulation is crucial for unraveling the complex role of this histone acetyltransferase in tumors. TIP60 is a target of the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP [50], which interacts through its TRAF domain to deubiquitinate and stabilize TIP60, leading to the subsequent induction of p53-dependent apoptosis [50]. Interestingly, the overexpression of wild-type HAUSP deubiquitinated and stabilized TIP60, whereas mutation of the catalytic cysteine residue (C223S) of HAUSP abolished the deubiquitination and promoted the degradation of TIP60 [50]. By contrast, depletion of HAUSP decreased the expression levels of the TIP60 protein, resulting in a decrease in the acetylation of key TIP60 substrates, including histones H2A at Lys 5 (H2AK5) and H4 at Lys 5 (H4K5), as well as p53 [50]. The use of P22077, a specific HAUSP inhibitor [106], also led to the destabilization and degradation of TIP60 and subsequent inhibition of apoptosis [50]. These findings indicate that HAUSP deubiquitinase activity is a prerequisite for the stabilization and acetyltransferase activity of Tip60 and enables the acetylation of the key TIP60 substrates H2AK5, H4AK5, and p53.
HAUSP can also regulate the acetylation of histone H3 at Lys 56 (H3K56Ac) by targeting the CBP histone acetyltransferase [51] which is overexpressed in cancer [107,108,109]. HAUSP, through a region encompassing amino acids 600–687, was found to interact with the CH3 domain of CBP to enhance the CPB histone acetyltransferase activity [51]. Conversely, downregulation of HAUSP reduced the expression levels of H3K56Ac in breast cancer cells and in head and neck cancer cells, indicating that the CBP histone acetyltransferase requires the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP for the specific acetylation of histone H3 at Lys 56 [51].

3.3. Role of HAUSP in the Regulation of Histone Methylation

Histone lysine methyltransferases (KMTs), such as EZH2 [110] and MLL5, [53] and lysine specific histone demethylase (KDMs), including LSD1 [111,112] and PHF8 [113,114], are two families of enzymes involved in histone methylation and demethylation, respectively. Specifically, the trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3), mediated by EZH2, is considered one of histone changes that silence target genes, thereby promoting tumor growth and metastasis in many tumors [110,115,116,117]. EZH2 is a core subunit of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), which is associated with cancer [118,119].
Recently, EZH2 was identified as a novel HAUSP partner in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells and human HCT116 colorectal cancer cells [52]. The HAUSP–EZH2 interaction is mediated by the C-terminal region of HAUSP and the 489PRKKKRK495 region in EZH2 [52]. Both the depletion of HAUSP and its knockout in HCT116 cells reduced the expression levels of EZH2 protein and H3K27me3, whereas HAUSP reintroduction to HAUSP knockout HCT116 cells increased the protein expression levels of EZH2 [52]. These findings indicate that HAUSP positively regulates the protein expression and activity of EZH2 and that the binding of EZH2 to HAUSP is essential both for the stability of EZH2 and for its function as an epigenetic writer of the trimethylation of H3 at K27 in cancer cells.
The trimethylation of histone 3 at Lys 4 (H3K4m3) is specifically mediated by histone 3 methyltransferase MLL5 [120,121]. High levels of H3K4m3 have been detected in several tumors, including renal cell carcinoma [122] and hepatocellular carcinoma [123], and this high expression was correlated with shorter survival of patients and a higher chance of tumor recurrence [124]. HAUSP via its deubiquitinase activity was found to regulate the expression levels of H3K4m3 by targeting MLL5 [53]. HAUSP through its TRAF domain was found to bind to and deubiquitinate MLL5 leading to the stability of MLL5 [53]. Depletion of HAUSP was shown to promote the degradation of MLL5 protein, whereas HAUSP overexpression decreased the ubiquitination of MLL5 and increased its stability. By contrast, a catalytically inactive C223S mutant HAUSP had no effect on MLL5 ubiquitination or stability, suggesting that the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP is important for both deubiquitination and stabilization of the MLL5 protein [53].
Similarly, the methylation of histones is constantly opposed by demethylases, which act to remove the methyl moieties from histone substrates. One of the well-documented demethylases is LSD1 (also known as KDM1A), which plays a key regulatory role in gene expression by removing the monomethyl and dimethyl groups from the methylated lysine 4 of histone H3 and the methylated lysine 9 of histone H3 [111,112,125]. Several studies have reported that LSD1 functions as an oncogene through regulating several pathways [126,127,128]. Thus, understanding how LSD1 is upregulated in cancer is important for understanding the biological activity of this enzyme. In this context, LSD1 was found to act as a specific substrate of the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP, and the interaction between the two enzymes is involved in glioma progression [54]. High expression levels of both LSD1 and HAUSP were detected in brain tissues from 150 patients with glioma compared to normal brain tissues, and the elevated expression was correlated with glioma progression [54]. By contrast, depletion of HAUSP decreased the protein levels of LSD1 without changing the LSD1 mRNA levels, and this effect was associated with an inhibition of glioblastoma cell invasiveness [54]. Interestingly, the overexpression of wild-type HAUSP, but not the catalytically inactive mutant HAUSP (C223A), increased the protein levels of LSD1 in the A172 and T98G glioblastoma cell lines, [54] suggesting that the expression and deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP is a main cause of the high expression levels of LSD1 found in tumors. In agreement with this hypothesis, LSD1 was overexpressed in samples of human breast tumors and regulated by the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP [55]. HAUSP bound to a region encompassing amino acids 520–852 of the C-terminal of LSD1, leading to the deubiquitination of LSD1 and the promotion of breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis [55]. The depletion of HAUSP in breast cancer cells or the use of P5091, a HAUSP inhibitor, resulted in a dramatic increase in LSD1 ubiquitination, a decrease in LSD1 protein levels, and an increase in the methylation of H3K4me2 and H3K9me2. These findings demonstrate that HAUSP deubiquitinates and stabilizes LSD1, thereby promoting the demethylase activity of LSD1 and increasing the demethylation of H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 [55].
The demethylase PHF8 (also known as KDM7B) catalyzes the demethylation of both mono- or dimethylated H3K9 and H3K27 [113] and binds histone H3 lysine 4 tri-methyl (H3K4me3) [114,129]. Like the LSD1 demethylase, PHF8 is overexpressed in many types of tumors and plays an oncogenic role [129,130,131]. Thus, discovering the upstream events involved in the regulation of PHF8 is important for understanding how this enzyme is stabilized and upregulated in cancer. PHF8 was found to be regulated and stabilized through the deubiquitinase activity of HAUSP [56]. HAUSP via its TRAF-like domain interacted with the C-terminal region of PHF8 promoting deubiquitination and stabilization of PHF8, which resulted in an upregulation of cyclin A2, a key cell cycle regulator in cancer [56]. Depletion of HAUSP decreased the expression of the PHF8 protein. Moreover, depletion of either HAUSP or PHF8 was associated with increased levels of H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K27me2, and H4K20me1, indicating that HAUSP controls the stability and demethylase activity of PHF8 and hence the methylation of H3 and H4 [56].

3.4. Role of HAUSP in the UHRF1-Mediated Readout of Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation

During DNA replication in the S phase of the cell cycle, UHRF1 is loaded onto replication forks via its binding affinity to hemi-methylated DNA through its SRA domain [68,69,70] and by its ability to bind to and ubiquitinate di-or tri-methylated histone H3K9 (H3K9me2,3) through a coordinated cooperation between both its TTD and PHD domains [77,132]. However, in-depth investigation of how UHRF1-mediated ubiquitination of methylated histone H3K9 is regulated is of great importance for understanding the regulation of this maintenance machinery axis.
A structural characterization of the HAUSP/UHRF1 complex showed that HAUSP, through its first two UBL domains (UBL1-2), binds to a polybasic region (PBR) in the C terminus of UHRF1 [57], a region responsible for blocking the interaction of the TTD domain of UHRF1 with the tri-methylation of lysine 9 of histone 3 (H3K9me3) [133]. The binding of HAUSP to the PBR region of UHRF1 induces an allosteric regulation of UHRF1 by disrupting the intramolecular interaction between the TTD and PBR domains of UHRF1, thereby releasing the TTD domain from its association with PBR and thus from the “TTD-occluded state” and allowing it to adopt an “open state” that promotes the association of the TTD-PHD domains of UHRF1 with chromatin and, hence, efficient H3K9me3 binding [57]. Interestingly, the dissociation of HAUSP from UHRF1 through the introduction of a HAUSP-interaction-defective mutation in UHRF1 reduced the UHRF1 association with chromatin [57]. These findings indicate that HAUSP, through its deubiquitinase activity and its interaction with UHRF1, plays a main role in the regulation of H3K9me3 via a dual regulatory role, first by inducing UHRF1 deubiquitination and then by promoting the association of UHRF1 with chromatin.

4. HAUSP Inhibitors as Promising Anticancer Agents

The important role of HAUSP in modulating several pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic genes has led to extensive efforts to develop HAUSP-selective inhibitors [134,135,136]. Moreover, the solved X-ray structure of HAUSP in complex with those molecules further advanced the structure-based design potent and reversible and irreversible inhibitors [137]. Irreversible HAUSP-small molecules inhibitors work via alkylating the catalytic Cys223, blocking its interaction with ubiquitin. However, the similarity of the catalytic site of HAUSP with other deubiqutinases reduces the selectivity of such inhibitors. On the other hand, reversible inhibitors that bind noncovalently to the site adjacent to the catalytic domain displayed better selectivity vis-à-vis other deubiquitinases [106]. HAUSP inhibitors and their anticancer activities have been recently reviewed [137].

5. Conclusions

HAUSP has been shown to deubiquitinate and stabilize several pro-proliferative and anti-apoptotic genes in many human malignancies, causing apoptosis inhibition and enhanced cell proliferation. Via its structural domains, HAUSP interacts with the epigenetic reader UHRF1, several writers such as DNMT1, TIP60, CBP, EZH2, and MLL5, and with erasers, including LSD1 and PHF8 (Figure 2). Under HAUSP deubiquitinase activity, members of this specific set of enzymes work together to catalyze epigenetic marks (DNA methylation and histone PTMs), ensuring a faithful inheritance of both types of epigenetic marks to daughter cells and leading to the epigenetic silencing of several TSGs (Figure 4). This review highlighted the increasing role of HAUSP as a key epigenetic regulator of the chromatin effector proteins and thus the importance of inhibiting HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination as a promising antitumor strategy. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms involved in the regulation of HAUSP function will allow to find new targets and explore new drugs to inhibit the expression and or activity of HAUSP, allowing cancer cells to undergo apoptosis through a reactivation of several TSGs genes.

Author Contributions

O.A. and M.A. designed and wrote the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University, grant number 19-MED-1-01-0041.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work (Grant Code: 19-MED-1-01-0041).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Rawat, R.; Starczynowski, D.T.; Ntziachristos, P. Nuclear deubiquitination in the spotlight: The multifaceted nature of USP7 biology in disease. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2019, 58, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Uckelmann, M.; Sixma, T.K. Histone ubiquitination in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair 2017, 56, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, J.; Shaik, S.; Dai, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.; Wei, W. Targeting the ubiquitin pathway for cancer treatment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1855, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Yerlikaya, A.; Kanbur, E.; Stanley, B.A.; Tümer, E. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway and Epigenetic Modifications in Cancer. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Komander, D.; Rape, M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 203–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schulman, B.A.; Harper, J.W. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: The apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ye, Y.; Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mennerich, D.; Kubaichuk, K.; Kietzmann, T. DUBs, Hypoxia, and Cancer. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 632–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Poondla, N.; Chandrasekaran, A.P.; Kim, K.S.; Ramakrishna, S. Deubiquitinating enzymes as cancer biomarkers: New therapeutic opportunities? BMB Rep. 2019, 52, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Farshi, P.; Deshmukh, R.R.; Nwankwo, J.O.; Arkwright, R.T.; Cvek, B.; Liu, J.; Dou, Q.P. Deubiquitinases (DUBs) and DUB inhibitors: A patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2015, 25, 1191–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. McClurg, U.L.; Robson, C.N. Deubiquitinating enzymes as oncotargets. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 9657–9668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Song, M.S.; Salmena, L.; Carracedo, A.; Egia, A.; Lo-Coco, F.; Teruya-Feldstein, J.; Pandolfi, P.P. The deubiquitinylation and localization of PTEN are regulated by a HAUSP-PML network. Nature 2008, 455, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Yuan, H.; Wen, X.; Sun, H. USP7, Target Validation and Drug Discovery for Cancer Therapy. Med. Chem. 2018, 14, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bhattacharya, S.; Chakraborty, D.; Basu, M.; Ghosh, M.K. Emerging insights into HAUSP (USP7) in physiology, cancer and other diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2018, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, C.D.; Dong, Y.F.; Niu, W.X.; Niu, C.S. HAUSP promoted the growth of glioma cells in vitro and in vivo via stabilizing NANOG. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 152883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tavana, O.; Li, D.; Dai, C.; Lopez, G.; Banerjee, D.; Kon, N.; Chen, C.; Califano, A.; Yamashiro, D.J.; Sun, H.; et al. HAUSP deubiquitinates and stabilizes N-Myc in neuroblastoma. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1180–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pozhidaeva, A.; Bezsonova, I. USP7, Structure, substrate specificity, and inhibition. DNA Repair 2019, 76, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Holowaty, M.N.; Sheng, Y.; Nguyen, T.; Arrowsmith, C.; Frappier, L. Protein interaction domains of the ubiquitin-specific protease, USP7/HAUSP. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 47753–47761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jin, Q.; Martinez, C.A.; Arcipowski, K.M.; Zhu, Y.; Gutierrez-Diaz, B.T.; Wang, K.K.; Johnson, M.R.; Volk, A.G.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.; et al. USP7 Cooperates with NOTCH1 to Drive the Oncogenic Transcriptional Program in T-Cell Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shan, H.; Li, X.; Xiao, X.; Dai, Y.; Huang, J.; Song, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, L.; Lei, H.; Tong, Y.; et al. USP7 deubiquitinates and stabilizes NOTCH1 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2018, 3, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Novellasdemunt, L.; Foglizzo, V.; Cuadrado, L.; Antas, P.; Kucharska, A.; Encheva, V.; Snijders, A.P.; Li, V.S.W. USP7 Is a Tumor-Specific WNT Activator for APC-Mutated Colorectal Cancer by Mediating β-Catenin Deubiquitination. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 612–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Franqui-Machin, R.; Hao, M.; Bai, H.; Gu, Z.; Zhan, X.; Habelhah, H.; Jethava, Y.; Qiu, L.; Frech, I.; Tricot, G.; et al. Destabilizing NEK2 overcomes resistance to proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 2877–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tavana, O.; Sun, H.; Gu, W. Targeting HAUSP in both p53 wildtype and p53-mutant tumors. Cell Cycle 2018, 17, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Brooks, C.L.; Li, M.; Hu, M.; Shi, Y.; Gu, W. The p53–Mdm2–HAUSP complex is involved in p53 stabilization by HAUSP. Oncogene 2007, 26, 7262–7266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bhattacharya, S.; Ghosh, M.K. HAUSP, a novel deubiquitinase for Rb-MDM2 the critical regulator. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 3061–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Meulmeester, E.; Pereg, Y.; Shiloh, Y.; Jochemsen, A.G. ATM-mediated phosphorylations inhibit Mdmx/Mdm2 stabilization by HAUSP in favor of p53 activation. Cell Cycle 2005, 4, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Harris, S.L.; Levine, A.J. The p53 pathway: Positive and negative feedback loops. Oncogene 2005, 24, 2899–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Karni-Schmidt, O.; Lokshin, M.; Prives, C. The Roles of MDM2 and MDMX in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2016, 11, 617–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Marine, J.C.; Jochemsen, A.G. Mdmx as an essential regulator of p53 activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 331, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Melo, A.N.; Eischen, C.M. Protecting the genome from mdm2 and mdmx. Genes Cancer 2012, 3, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Reverter, D. Molecular Mechanisms of DUBs Regulation in Signaling and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alhosin, M.; Sharif, T.; Mousli, M.; Etienne-Selloum, N.; Fuhrmann, G.; Schini-Kerth, V.B.; Bronner, C. Down-regulation of UHRF1, associated with re-expression of tumor suppressor genes, is a common feature of natural compounds exhibiting anti-cancer properties. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, CR 30, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Xue, B.; Zhao, J.; Feng, P.; Xing, J.; Wu, H.; Li, Y. Epigenetic mechanism and target therapy of UHRF1 protein complex in malignancies. OncoTargets Ther. 2019, 12, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abdullah, O.; Omran, Z.; Hosawi, S.; Hamiche, A.; Bronner, C.; Alhosin, M. Thymoquinone Is a Multitarget Single Epidrug That Inhibits the UHRF1 Protein Complex. Genes 2021, 12, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Unoki, M. Current and potential anticancer drugs targeting members of the UHRF1 complex including epigenetic modifiers. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2011, 6, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahmad, T.; Ashraf, W.; Ibrahim, A.; Zaayter, L.; Muller, C.D.; Hamiche, A.; Mély, Y.; Bronner, C.; Mousli, M. TIP60 governs the auto-ubiquitination of UHRF1 through USP7 dissociation from the UHRF1/USP7 complex. Int. J. Oncol. 2021, 59, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Choudhry, H.; Zamzami, M.A.; Omran, Z.; Wu, W.; Mousli, M.; Bronner, C.; Alhosin, M. Targeting microRNA/UHRF1 pathways as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Felle, M.; Joppien, S.; Németh, A.; Diermeier, S.; Thalhammer, V.; Dobner, T.; Kremmer, E.; Kappler, R.; Längst, G. The USP7/Dnmt1 complex stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt1 and regulates the stability of UHRF1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 8355–8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bronner, C.; Alhosin, M.; Hamiche, A.; Mousli, M. Coordinated Dialogue between UHRF1 and DNMT1 to Ensure Faithful Inheritance of Methylated DNA Patterns. Genes 2019, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Du, J.; Johnson, L.M.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Patel, D.J. DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ren, W.; Fan, H.; Grimm, S.A.; Guo, Y.; Kim, J.J.; Yin, J.; Li, L.; Petell, C.J.; Tan, X.F.; Zhang, Z.M.; et al. Direct readout of heterochromatic H3K9me3 regulates DNMT1-mediated maintenance DNA methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 18439–18447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cedar, H.; Bergman, Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: Patterns and paradigms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bronner, C.; Krifa, M.; Mousli, M. Increasing role of UHRF1 in the reading and inheritance of the epigenetic code as well as in tumorogenesis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 86, 1643–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kilin, V.; Gavvala, K.; Barthes, N.P.; Michel, B.Y.; Shin, D.; Boudier, C.; Mauffret, O.; Yashchuk, V.; Mousli, M.; Ruff, M.; et al. Dynamics of Methylated Cytosine Flipping by UHRF1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2520–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bronner, C.; Fuhrmann, G.; Chédin, F.L.; Macaluso, M.; Dhe-Paganon, S. UHRF1 Links the Histone code and DNA Methylation to ensure Faithful Epigenetic Memory Inheritance. Genet. Epigenet. 2010, 2009, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Li, T.; Wang, L.; Du, Y.; Xie, S.; Yang, X.; Lian, F.; Zhou, Z.; Qian, C. Structural and mechanistic insights into UHRF1-mediated DNMT1 activation in the maintenance DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 3218–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Liu, X.; Gao, Q.; Li, P.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Koseki, H.; Wong, J. UHRF1 targets DNMT1 for DNA methylation through cooperative binding of hemi-methylated DNA and methylated H3K9. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ma, H.; Chen, H.; Guo, X.; Wang, Z.; Sowa, M.E.; Zheng, L.; Hu, S.; Zeng, P.; Guo, R.; Diao, J.; et al. M phase phosphorylation of the epigenetic regulator UHRF1 regulates its physical association with the deubiquitylase USP7 and stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4828–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cheng, J.; Yang, H.; Fang, J.; Ma, L.; Gong, R.; Wang, P.; Li, Z.; Xu, Y. Molecular mechanism for USP7-mediated DNMT1 stabilization by acetylation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dar, A.; Shibata, E.; Dutta, A. Deubiquitination of Tip60 by USP7 determines the activity of the p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 33, 3309–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wu, H.T.; Kuo, Y.C.; Hung, J.J.; Huang, C.H.; Chen, W.Y.; Chou, T.Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Chen, Y.J.; Cheng, W.C.; et al. K63-polyubiquitinated HAUSP deubiquitinates HIF-1α and dictates H3K56 acetylation promoting hypoxia-induced tumour progression. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gagarina, V.; Bojagora, A.; Lacdao, I.K.; Luthra, N.; Pfoh, R.; Mohseni, S.; Chaharlangi, D.; Tan, N.; Saridakis, V. Structural Basis of the Interaction Between Ubiquitin Specific Protease 7 and Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ding, X.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, P.; Liu, L.; Wan, X.; Yuan, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; et al. Mixed Lineage Leukemia 5 (MLL5) Protein Stability Is Cooperatively Regulated by O-GlcNac Transferase (OGT) and Ubiquitin Specific Protease 7 (USP7). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yi, L.; Cui, Y.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, Y. Stabilization of LSD1 by deubiquitinating enzyme USP7 promotes glioblastoma cell tumorigenesis and metastasis through suppression of the p53 signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 36, 2935–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Liu, J.; Feng, J.; Li, L.; Lin, L.; Ji, J.; Lin, C.; Liu, L.; Zhang, N.; Duan, D.; Li, Z.; et al. Arginine methylation-dependent LSD1 stability promotes invasion and metastasis of breast cancer. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e48597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Q.; Ma, S.; Song, N.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Yang, S.; Ding, X.; Shan, L.; Zhou, X.; Su, D.; et al. Stabilization of histone demethylase PHF8 by USP7 promotes breast carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2205–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhang, Z.M.; Rothbart, S.B.; Allison, D.F.; Cai, Q.; Harrison, J.S.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Strahl, B.D.; Wang, G.G.; Song, J. An Allosteric Interaction Links USP7 to Deubiquitination and Chromatin Targeting of UHRF1. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jurkowska, R.Z.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Jeltsch, A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. ChemBioChem A Eur. J. Chem. Biol. 2011, 12, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Walton, E.L.; Francastel, C.; Velasco, G. Maintenance of DNA methylation: Dnmt3b joins the dance. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 1373–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wong, K.K. DNMT1, A key drug target in triple-negative breast cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 72, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wong, K.K. DNMT1 as a therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Cell. Oncol. 2020, 43, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kanai, Y.; Hirohashi, S. Alterations of DNA methylation associated with abnormalities of DNA methyltransferases in human cancers during transition from a precancerous to a malignant state. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 2434–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Du, Z.; Song, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Guda, K.; Yang, S.; Kao, H.Y.; Xu, Y.; Willis, J.; Markowitz, S.D.; et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Qin, W.; Leonhardt, H.; Spada, F. Usp7 and Uhrf1 control ubiquitination and stability of the maintenance DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 112, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jenkins, Y.; Markovtsov, V.; Lang, W.; Sharma, P.; Pearsall, D.; Warner, J.; Franci, C.; Huang, B.; Huang, J.; Yam, G.C.; et al. Critical role of the ubiquitin ligase activity of UHRF1, a nuclear RING finger protein, in tumor cell growth. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 5621–5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ibrahim, A.; Alhosin, M.; Papin, C.; Ouararhni, K.; Omran, Z.; Zamzami, M.A.; Al-Malki, A.L.; Choudhry, H.; Mély, Y.; Hamiche, A.; et al. Thymoquinone challenges UHRF1 to commit auto-ubiquitination: A key event for apoptosis induction in cancer cells. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 28599–28611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hashimoto, H.; Horton, J.R.; Zhang, X.; Bostick, M.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Cheng, X. The SRA domain of UHRF1 flips 5-methylcytosine out of the DNA helix. Nature 2008, 455, 826–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Avvakumov, G.V.; Walker, J.R.; Xue, S.; Li, Y.; Duan, S.; Bronner, C.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; Dhe-Paganon, S. Structural basis for recognition of hemi-methylated DNA by the SRA domain of human UHRF1. Nature 2008, 455, 822–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bostick, M.; Kim, J.K.; Estève, P.O.; Clark, A.; Pradhan, S.; Jacobsen, S.E. UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science 2007, 317, 1760–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sharif, J.; Muto, M.; Takebayashi, S.; Suetake, I.; Iwamatsu, A.; Endo, T.A.; Shinga, J.; Mizutani-Koseki, Y.; Toyoda, T.; Okamura, K.; et al. The SRA protein Np95 mediates epigenetic inheritance by recruiting Dnmt1 to methylated DNA. Nature 2007, 450, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kim, J.K.; Estève, P.O.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Pradhan, S. UHRF1 binds G9a and participates in p21 transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Achour, M.; Fuhrmann, G.; Alhosin, M.; Rondé, P.; Chataigneau, T.; Mousli, M.; Schini-Kerth, V.B.; Bronner, C. UHRF1 recruits the histone acetyltransferase Tip60 and controls its expression and activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 390, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ashraf, W.; Bronner, C.; Zaayter, L.; Ahmad, T.; Richert, L.; Alhosin, M.; Ibrahim, A.; Hamiche, A.; Mely, Y.; Mousli, M. Interaction of the epigenetic integrator UHRF1 with the MYST domain of TIP60 inside the cell. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, CR36, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Unoki, M.; Nishidate, T.; Nakamura, Y. ICBP90, an E2F-1 target, recruits HDAC1 and binds to methyl-CpG through its SRA domain. Oncogene 2004, 23, 7601–7610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Bronner, C. Control of DNMT1 abundance in epigenetic inheritance by acetylation, ubiquitylation, and the histone code. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, pe3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Harrison, J.S.; Cornett, E.M.; Goldfarb, D.; DaRosa, P.A.; Li, Z.M.; Yan, F.; Dickson, B.M.; Guo, A.H.; Cantu, D.V.; Kaustov, L.; et al. Hemi-methylated DNA regulates DNA methylation inheritance through allosteric activation of H3 ubiquitylation by UHRF1. eLife 2016, 5, e17101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Houliston, R.S.; Lemak, A.; Iqbal, A.; Ivanochko, D.; Duan, S.; Kaustov, L.; Ong, M.S.; Fan, L.; Senisterra, G.; Brown, P.J.; et al. Conformational dynamics of the TTD-PHD histone reader module of the UHRF1 epigenetic regulator reveals multiple histone-binding states, allosteric regulation, and druggability. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 20947–20959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Alhosin, M.; Omran, Z.; Zamzami, M.A.; Al-Malki, A.L.; Choudhry, H.; Mousli, M.; Bronner, C. Signalling pathways in UHRF1-dependent regulation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, CR35, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Beck, A.; Trippel, F.; Wagner, A.; Joppien, S.; Felle, M.; Vokuhl, C.; Schwarzmayr, T.; Strom, T.M.; von Schweinitz, D.; Längst, G.; et al. Overexpression of UHRF1 promotes silencing of tumor suppressor genes and predicts outcome in hepatoblastoma. Clin. Epigenet. 2018, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sambuudash, O.; Kim, H.S.; Cho, M.Y. Lack of Aberrant Methylation in an Adjacent Area of Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer. Yonsei Med. J. 2017, 58, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Nishiyama, A.; Yamaguchi, L.; Sharif, J.; Johmura, Y.; Kawamura, T.; Nakanishi, K.; Shimamura, S.; Arita, K.; Kodama, T.; Ishikawa, F.; et al. Uhrf1-dependent H3K23 ubiquitylation couples maintenance DNA methylation and replication. Nature 2013, 502, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Misaki, T.; Yamaguchi, L.; Sun, J.; Orii, M.; Nishiyama, A.; Nakanishi, M. The replication foci targeting sequence (RFTS) of DNMT1 functions as a potent histone H3 binding domain regulated by autoinhibition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 470, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Qin, W.; Wolf, P.; Liu, N.; Link, S.; Smets, M.; La Mastra, F.; Forné, I.; Pichler, G.; Hörl, D.; Fellinger, K.; et al. DNA methylation requires a DNMT1 ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) and histone ubiquitination. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 911–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Marsh, D.J.; Ma, Y.; Dickson, K.A. Histone Monoubiquitination in Chromatin Remodelling: Focus on the Histone H2B Interactome and Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Seligson, D.B.; Horvath, S.; Shi, T.; Yu, H.; Tze, S.; Grunstein, M.; Kurdistani, S.K. Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Nature 2005, 435, 1262–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Vaissière, T.; Sawan, C.; Herceg, Z. Epigenetic interplay between histone modifications and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Mutat. Res. 2008, 659, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, Q.; Chen, B.J.; Hu, S.; Qi, S.L.; Li, L.Y.; Yang, J.F.; Zhou, H.; Yang, C.C.; Chen, L.J.; Du, J. Emerging role of RNF2 in cancer: From bench to bedside. J. Cell. Physiol. 2021, 236, 5453–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Marsh, D.J.; Dickson, K.A. Writing Histone Monoubiquitination in Human Malignancy—The Role of RING Finger E3 Ubiquitin Ligases. Genes 2019, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Cohen, I.; Bar, C.; Ezhkova, E. Activity of PRC1 and Histone H2AK119 Monoubiquitination: Revising Popular Misconceptions. BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2020, 42, e1900192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Benitz, S.; Regel, I.; Reinhard, T.; Popp, A.; Schäffer, I.; Raulefs, S.; Kong, B.; Esposito, I.; Michalski, C.W.; Kleeff, J. Polycomb repressor complex 1 promotes gene silencing through H2AK119 mono-ubiquitination in acinar-to-ductal metaplasia and pancreatic cancer cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 11424–11433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Sarkari, F.; Wheaton, K.; La Delfa, A.; Mohamed, M.; Shaikh, F.; Khatun, R.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; Frappier, L.; Saridakis, V.; Sheng, Y. Ubiquitin-specific protease 7 is a regulator of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbE2E1. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 16975–16985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, Y.; Chan, H.L.; Garcia-Martinez, L.; Karl, D.L.; Weich, N.; Slingerland, J.M.; Verdun, R.E.; Morey, L. Estrogen induces dynamic ERα and RING1B recruitment to control gene and enhancer activities in luminal breast cancer. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz7249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chan, H.L.; Beckedorff, F.; Zhang, Y.; Garcia-Huidobro, J.; Jiang, H.; Colaprico, A.; Bilbao, D.; Figueroa, M.E.; LaCava, J.; Shiekhattar, R.; et al. Polycomb complexes associate with enhancers and promote oncogenic transcriptional programs in cancer through multiple mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Benitz, S.; Straub, T.; Mahajan, U.M.; Mutter, J.; Czemmel, S.; Unruh, T.; Wingerath, B.; Deubler, S.; Fahr, L.; Cheng, T.; et al. Ring1b-dependent epigenetic remodelling is an essential prerequisite for pancreatic carcinogenesis. Gut 2019, 68, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sánchez-Molina, S.; Figuerola-Bou, E.; Blanco, E.; Sánchez-Jiménez, M.; Táboas, P.; Gómez, S.; Ballaré, C.; García-Domínguez, D.J.; Prada, E.; Hontecillas-Prieto, L.; et al. RING1B recruits EWSR1-FLI1 and cooperates in the remodeling of chromatin necessary for Ewing sarcoma tumorigenesis. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. de Bie, P.; Zaaroor-Regev, D.; Ciechanover, A. Regulation of the Polycomb protein RING1B ubiquitination by USP7. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 400, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Vidal, M.; Tempst, P.; Jones, R.S.; Zhang, Y. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 2004, 431, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wheaton, K.; Sarkari, F.; Johns, B.S.; Davarinejad, H.; Egorova, O.; Kaustov, L.; Raught, B.; Saridakis, V.; Sheng, Y. UbE2E1/UBCH6 Is a Critical In Vivo E2 for the PRC1-catalyzed Ubiquitination of H2A at Lys-119. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 2893–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. van der Knaap, J.A.; Kumar, B.R.; Moshkin, Y.M.; Langenberg, K.; Krijgsveld, J.; Heck, A.J.; Karch, F.; Verrijzer, C.P. GMP synthetase stimulates histone H2B deubiquitylation by the epigenetic silencer USP7. Mol. Cell 2005, 17, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Squatrito, M.; Gorrini, C.; Amati, B. Tip60 in DNA damage response and growth control: Many tricks in one HAT. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Judes, G.; Rifaï, K.; Ngollo, M.; Daures, M.; Bignon, Y.J.; Penault-Llorca, F.; Bernard-Gallon, D. A bivalent role of TIP60 histone acetyl transferase in human cancer. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Judes, G.; Dubois, L.; Rifaï, K.; Idrissou, M.; Mishellany, F.; Pajon, A.; Besse, S.; Daures, M.; Degoul, F.; Bignon, Y.J.; et al. TIP60, an actor in acetylation of H3K4 and tumor development in breast cancer. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 1415–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tang, Y.; Luo, J.; Zhang, W.; Gu, W. Tip60-dependent acetylation of p53 modulates the decision between cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Mol. Cell 2006, 24, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sykes, S.M.; Mellert, H.S.; Holbert, M.A.; Li, K.; Marmorstein, R.; Lane, W.S.; McMahon, S.B. Acetylation of the p53 DNA-binding domain regulates apoptosis induction. Mol. Cell 2006, 24, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Altun, M.; Kramer, H.B.; Willems, L.I.; McDermott, J.L.; Leach, C.A.; Goldenberg, S.J.; Kumar, K.G.; Konietzny, R.; Fischer, R.; Kogan, E.; et al. Activity-based chemical proteomics accelerates inhibitor development for deubiquitylating enzymes. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 1401–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Xie, W.; Song, C.; Young, N.L.; Sperling, A.S.; Xu, F.; Sridharan, R.; Conway, A.E.; Garcia, B.A.; Plath, K.; Clark, A.T.; et al. Histone h3 lysine 56 acetylation is linked to the core transcriptional network in human embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 2009, 33, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Stejskal, S.; Stepka, K.; Tesarova, L.; Stejskal, K.; Matejkova, M.; Simara, P.; Zdrahal, Z.; Koutna, I. Cell cycle-dependent changes in H3K56ac in human cells. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 3851–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Das, C.; Lucia, M.S.; Hansen, K.C.; Tyler, J.K. CBP/p300-mediated acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56. Nature 2009, 459, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yamagishi, M.; Uchimaru, K. Targeting EZH2 in cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2017, 29, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lim, S.; Janzer, A.; Becker, A.; Zimmer, A.; Schüle, R.; Buettner, R.; Kirfel, J. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is highly expressed in ER-negative breast cancers and a biomarker predicting aggressive biology. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Lan, F.; Nottke, A.C.; Shi, Y. Mechanisms involved in the regulation of histone lysine demethylases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Tsukada, Y.; Ishitani, T.; Nakayama, K.I. KDM7 is a dual demethylase for histone H3 Lys 9 and Lys 27 and functions in brain development. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Feng, W.; Yonezawa, M.; Ye, J.; Jenuwein, T.; Grummt, I. PHF8 activates transcription of rRNA genes through H3K4me3 binding and H3K9me1/2 demethylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kim, K.H.; Roberts, C.W. Targeting EZH2 in cancer. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Duan, R.; Du, W.; Guo, W. EZH2, a novel target for cancer treatment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Varambally, S.; Dhanasekaran, S.M.; Zhou, M.; Barrette, T.R.; Kumar-Sinha, C.; Sanda, M.G.; Ghosh, D.; Pienta, K.J.; Sewalt, R.G.; Otte, A.P.; et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature 2002, 419, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kirmizis, A.; Bartley, S.M.; Kuzmichev, A.; Margueron, R.; Reinberg, D.; Green, R.; Farnham, P.J. Silencing of human polycomb target genes is associated with methylation of histone H3 Lys 27. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1592–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Lee, T.I.; Jenner, R.G.; Boyer, L.A.; Guenther, M.G.; Levine, S.S.; Kumar, R.M.; Chevalier, B.; Johnstone, S.E.; Cole, M.F.; Isono, K.; et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006, 125, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Mas, Y.M.S.; Barbon, M.; Teyssier, C.; Déméné, H.; Carvalho, J.E.; Bird, L.E.; Lebedev, A.; Fattori, J.; Schubert, M.; Dumas, C.; et al. The Human Mixed Lineage Leukemia 5 (MLL5), a Sequentially and Structurally Divergent SET Domain-Containing Protein with No Intrinsic Catalytic Activity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165139. [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhou, P.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, C.; Liu, L.; Wan, X.; Zhang, F.; Ding, X.; Wang, C.; Xiong, S.; et al. Mixed lineage leukemia 5 (MLL5) protein regulates cell cycle progression and E2F1-responsive gene expression via association with host cell factor-1 (HCF-1). J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 17532–17543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Ellinger, J.; Kahl, P.; Mertens, C.; Rogenhofer, S.; Hauser, S.; Hartmann, W.; Bastian, P.J.; Büttner, R.; Müller, S.C.; von Ruecker, A. Prognostic relevance of global histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methylation in renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2360–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. He, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xie, D.; Ye, H.; Xiao, Z.; Cai, M.; Xu, K.; Zeng, Y.; Li, H.; et al. High expression of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2012, 43, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Benard, A.; Goossens-Beumer, I.J.; van Hoesel, A.Q.; de Graaf, W.; Horati, H.; Putter, H.; Zeestraten, E.C.; van de Velde, C.J.; Kuppen, P.J. Histone trimethylation at H3K4, H3K9 and H4K20 correlates with patient survival and tumor recurrence in early-stage colon cancer. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Prusevich, P.; Kalin, J.H.; Ming, S.A.; Basso, M.; Givens, J.; Li, X.; Hu, J.; Taylor, M.S.; Cieniewicz, A.M.; Hsiao, P.Y.; et al. A selective phenelzine analogue inhibitor of histone demethylase LSD1. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1284–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Amente, S.; Milazzo, G.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Ambrosio, S.; Di Palo, G.; Lania, L.; Perini, G.; Majello, B. Lysine-specific demethylase (LSD1/KDM1A) and MYCN cooperatively repress tumor suppressor genes in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 14572–14583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Lv, T.; Yuan, D.; Miao, X.; Lv, Y.; Zhan, P.; Shen, X.; Song, Y. Over-expression of LSD1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35065. [Google Scholar]
  128. Ketscher, A.; Jilg, C.A.; Willmann, D.; Hummel, B.; Imhof, A.; Rüsseler, V.; Hölz, S.; Metzger, E.; Müller, J.M.; Schüle, R. LSD1 controls metastasis of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells through PXN and LPAR6. Oncogenesis 2014, 3, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shao, P.; Liu, Q.; Maina, P.K.; Cui, J.; Bair, T.B.; Li, T.; Umesalma, S.; Zhang, W.; Qi, H.H. Histone demethylase PHF8 promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition and breast tumorigenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 1687–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liu, Q.; Pang, J.; Wang, L.A.; Huang, Z.; Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Xie, Q.; Huang, Y.; Tang, T.; Tong, D.; et al. Histone demethylase PHF8 drives neuroendocrine prostate cancer progression by epigenetically upregulating FOXA2. J. Pathol. 2021, 253, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhu, G.; Liu, L.; She, L.; Tan, H.; Wei, M.; Chen, C.; Su, Z.; Huang, D.; Tian, Y.; Qiu, Y.; et al. Elevated expression of histone demethylase PHF8 associates with adverse prognosis in patients of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Cheng, J.; Yang, Y.; Fang, J.; Xiao, J.; Zhu, T.; Chen, F.; Wang, P.; Li, Z.; Yang, H.; Xu, Y. Structural insight into coordinated recognition of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3) by the plant homeodomain (PHD) and tandem tudor domain (TTD) of UHRF1 (ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domains, 1) protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Gelato, K.A.; Tauber, M.; Ong, M.S.; Winter, S.; Hiragami-Hamada, K.; Sindlinger, J.; Lemak, A.; Bultsma, Y.; Houliston, S.; Schwarzer, D.; et al. Accessibility of different histone H3-binding domains of UHRF1 is allosterically regulated by phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Colland, F.; Formstecher, E.; Jacq, X.; Reverdy, C.; Planquette, C.; Conrath, S.; Trouplin, V.; Bianchi, J.; Aushev, V.N.; Camonis, J.; et al. Small-molecule inhibitor of USP7/HAUSP ubiquitin protease stabilizes and activates p53 in cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Kategaya, L.; di Lello, P.; Rougé, L.; Pastor, R.; Clark, K.R.; Drummond, J.; Kleinheinz, T.; Lin, E.; Upton, J.P.; Prakash, S.; et al. USP7 small-molecule inhibitors interfere with ubiquitin binding. Nature 2009, 550, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Pozhidaeva, A.; Valles, G.; Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Sterner, D.E.; Nguyen, P.; Weinstock, J.; Kumar, K.G.S.; Kanyo, J.; Wright, D.; et al. USP7-Specific Inhibitors Target and Modify the Enzyme’s Active Site via Distinct Chemical Mechanisms. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017, 24, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Nininahazwe, L.; Liu, B.; He, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.S. The emerging nature of Ubiquitin-specific protease 2017, 7 (USP7): A new target in cancer therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2021, 26, 490–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 13 00042 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the domain structure of HAUSP (herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease). The structure of HAUSP includes seven domains, N-terminal TRAF-like (Tumor necrosis factor Receptor–Associated Factor) domain, intermediate catalytic core and five consecutive C-terminal ubiquitin-like domains (Ubiquitin-like domains), UBL1-5. The N-terminal TRAF-like domain and the five UBL domains are sites for the binding of HAUSP to many proteins. Through the catalytic core domain, HAUSP binds ubiquitin and cleave the is peptide bond between ubiquitin and HAUSP substrate [17,18,31].
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the domain structure of HAUSP (herpes virus-associated ubiquitin-specific protease). The structure of HAUSP includes seven domains, N-terminal TRAF-like (Tumor necrosis factor Receptor–Associated Factor) domain, intermediate catalytic core and five consecutive C-terminal ubiquitin-like domains (Ubiquitin-like domains), UBL1-5. The N-terminal TRAF-like domain and the five UBL domains are sites for the binding of HAUSP to many proteins. Through the catalytic core domain, HAUSP binds ubiquitin and cleave the is peptide bond between ubiquitin and HAUSP substrate [17,18,31].
Genes 13 00042 g001
Genes 13 00042 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of interactions of HAUSP domains with various epigenetic players. HAUSP via its TRAF-like domain interacts with the ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain (PHD) and an interesting new gene (RING) finger domains 1 (UHRF1) [38], histone acetyltransferase TIP60 [50], the histone lysine methyltransferase MLL5 (Mixed-lineage leukemia 5) [53] and the lysine specific histone demethylase PHF8 (PHD finger protein 8) [56]. HAUSP through the C-terminal region which covers its five UBL domains can interact also with UHRF1 [48], histone acetyltransferase CBP (CREB binding protein) [51], histone methyltransferase EZH2 [52] and DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) [38]. HAUSP can also bind to LSD1 but the interaction site is not yet known [54].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of interactions of HAUSP domains with various epigenetic players. HAUSP via its TRAF-like domain interacts with the ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain (PHD) and an interesting new gene (RING) finger domains 1 (UHRF1) [38], histone acetyltransferase TIP60 [50], the histone lysine methyltransferase MLL5 (Mixed-lineage leukemia 5) [53] and the lysine specific histone demethylase PHF8 (PHD finger protein 8) [56]. HAUSP through the C-terminal region which covers its five UBL domains can interact also with UHRF1 [48], histone acetyltransferase CBP (CREB binding protein) [51], histone methyltransferase EZH2 [52] and DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) [38]. HAUSP can also bind to LSD1 but the interaction site is not yet known [54].
Genes 13 00042 g002
Genes 13 00042 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of role of HAUSP in DNA methylation maintenance through regulating the stability UHRF1/DNMT1 dual. HAUSP, via its UBL domains, interacts with the targeting sequence (TS) domain of DNMT1, whereas HAUSP, through its TRAF-like domain, interacted with the SET- and RING-associated (SRA) domain of UHRF1, thereby promoting the stability of UHRF1 and DNMT1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination [38]. The trimeric complex located at promoter regions of target TSGs on chromatin. During DNA replication, the SRA domain of UHRF1 can read methylated CpG sites (hemi-methylated DNA) located within the promoter regions and via the same SRA domain, UHRF1 recruits DNMT1 and guide it to methylate the “unmethylated” cytosine of the newly synthetized DNA strand leading to hypermethylation of TSG promoter.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of role of HAUSP in DNA methylation maintenance through regulating the stability UHRF1/DNMT1 dual. HAUSP, via its UBL domains, interacts with the targeting sequence (TS) domain of DNMT1, whereas HAUSP, through its TRAF-like domain, interacted with the SET- and RING-associated (SRA) domain of UHRF1, thereby promoting the stability of UHRF1 and DNMT1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination [38]. The trimeric complex located at promoter regions of target TSGs on chromatin. During DNA replication, the SRA domain of UHRF1 can read methylated CpG sites (hemi-methylated DNA) located within the promoter regions and via the same SRA domain, UHRF1 recruits DNMT1 and guide it to methylate the “unmethylated” cytosine of the newly synthetized DNA strand leading to hypermethylation of TSG promoter.
Genes 13 00042 g003
Genes 13 00042 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the effect of HAUSP overexpression in cancer on the chromatin effector proteins and the related downstream events. High expression of HAUSP in cancer deubiquitinate and stabilizes the chromatin effector proteins causing abnormal DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications which contribute to the silencing epigenetic of TSGs.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the effect of HAUSP overexpression in cancer on the chromatin effector proteins and the related downstream events. High expression of HAUSP in cancer deubiquitinate and stabilizes the chromatin effector proteins causing abnormal DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications which contribute to the silencing epigenetic of TSGs.
Genes 13 00042 g004
Table
Table 1. Role of HAUSP in the regulation of epigenetic players and related events.
Table 1. Role of HAUSP in the regulation of epigenetic players and related events.
Epi-PartnerRole of Epi-PartnerHAUSP Interaction SiteEpi-Partner Interaction SiteRelated Epigenetic EventsRefs.
UHRF1Reader of both epigenetic marks (DNA methylation and histone code)UBL1 domain
(residues 560–664)		A linker region encompassing amino acids 600–687 between the SRA and RING finger domains of UHRF1Promoting the stability of UHRF1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination[48]
TRAF-like domainSRA domainPromoting the stability of UHRF1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination[38]
(UBL1-2) domainsA polybasic region (PBR) in the C terminus Promoting the association of the TTD-PHD domains of UHRF1 with chromatin and, hence, efficient H3K9me3 binding[57]
DNMT1DNA methyltransferase 1C-terminal domainTargeting sequence (TS) domainPromoting the stability of DNMT1 through HAUSP-dependent deubiquitination[38]
UBL domains (residues 560–1102)KG linker (residues 1109–1119)Promoting the stability of DNMT1 through acetylation of KG linker of DNMT1[49]
TIP60Histone acetyltransferaseTRAF-like domain Increased levels of H2AK 5 and H4K5 [50]
CBPHistone acetyltransferaseRegion encompassing amino acids 600–687CH3 domainIncreased levels of H3K56Ac[51]
MLL5Histone lysine methyltransferaseTRAF domainMultiple domainsIncreased levels of H3K4m3[53]
EZH2Histone lysine N-methyltransferaseC-terminal region489PRKKKRK495 regionIncreased levels of H3K27m3[52]
LSD1Lysine specific demethylase 1 [54]
A region encompassing amino acids 600–687Demethylation of H3K4me2 and H3K9me2[55]
PHF8Histone lysine demethylaseTRAF-like domainThe C-terminal regionDemethylation of H3K9me1,2, H3K27me2, and H4K20me1[56]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdullah, O.; Alhosin, M. HAUSP Is a Key Epigenetic Regulator of the Chromatin Effector Proteins. Genes 2022, 13, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010042

AMA Style

Abdullah O, Alhosin M. HAUSP Is a Key Epigenetic Regulator of the Chromatin Effector Proteins. Genes. 2022; 13(1):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdullah, Omeima, and Mahmoud Alhosin. 2022. "HAUSP Is a Key Epigenetic Regulator of the Chromatin Effector Proteins" Genes 13, no. 1: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010042

APA Style

Abdullah, O., & Alhosin, M. (2022). HAUSP Is a Key Epigenetic Regulator of the Chromatin Effector Proteins. Genes, 13(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop