Next Article in Journal
Ischemic Stroke Genetics: What Is New and How to Apply It in Clinical Practice?
Next Article in Special Issue
Gene–Environment Correlation over Time: A Longitudinal Analysis of Polygenic Risk Scores for Schizophrenia and Major Depression in Three British Cohorts Studies
Previous Article in Journal
A Nonsense Variant in CCDC65 Gene Causes Respiratory Failure Associated with Increased Lamb Mortality in French Lacaune Dairy Sheep
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/genes13010047
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gene-Environment Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions: The Role of Unhealthy Food Habits

by
Lin Li
1,*,
Mark J. Taylor
2,
Katarina Bälter
2,3,
Tian Xie
4,
Berit Skretting Solberg
5,6,
Jan Haavik
5,7,
Alejandro Arias Vásquez
8,
Catharina A. Hartman
4 and
Henrik Larsson
1,2
1
School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70172 Örebro, Sweden
2
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Department of Public Health Sciences, Mälardalen University, 72220 Västerås, Sweden
4
Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands
5
Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, 7804 Bergen, Norway
6
Child- and Adolescent Psychiatric Outpatient Unit, Hospital Betanien, 5012 Bergen, Norway
7
Bergen Center of Brain Plasticity, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway
8
Departments of Psychiatry & Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010047
Submission received: 30 November 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gene-Environment Interplay in Human Complex Traits)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Dietary habits were investigated as environmental risk factors for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, no previous studies explored the effects of dietary factors on modifying the role of genetic factors on ADHD. Methods: Based on a Swedish population-based twin study with 1518 twin pairs aged 20–47 years, we tested whether the importance of genetic and environmental effects on ADHD varied as a function of dietary habits. Self-reported dietary habits and ADHD symptoms were collected. Twin methods were used to test the degree to which high-sugar and unhealthy food intake moderated the genetic and environmental influences on ADHD symptoms. Results: In middle-aged adults, genetic influences on inattention symptoms were statistically significantly higher among individuals with higher levels of high-sugar (45%, 95%CI: 25–54%) and unhealthy food intake (51%, 95%CI: 31–60%), compared with those with lower levels of consumption of high-sugar (36%, 95%CI: 25–47%) and unhealthy foods (30%, 95%CI: 20–41%). Similar patterns were also found for the associations between hyperactivity/impulsivity and high-sugar/unhealthy food intake, even though the moderation effects were not statistically significant. Conclusion The present study suggests that genetic factors play a more prominent role in individual differences of ADHD symptoms in the presence of the high consumption of sugar and unhealthy foods. Future longitudinal studies with multiple assessments of ADHD and dietary habits are needed to replicate our findings.

1. Introduction

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by developmentally excessive inattention–disorganization and hyperactivity–impulsivity symptoms [1]. Although onset is in early childhood, ADHD commonly persists into adulthood [2,3]. ADHD is associated with many adverse outcomes across development, exerting a considerable burden on physical and mental health [1,4]. Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk of ADHD. Twin research indicates moderate-to-large genetic contributions; the estimated heritability (that is, the proportion of phenotypic variation attributable to genetic variation) for ADHD is 30–80%, depending on the age, the assessment method used, and the informants [5,6,7]. However, so far, molecular genetic studies identified only a small number of genetic variants that may be directly involved in the aetiology of ADHD, which also explain very little of the variance in ADHD [8,9]. The mismatch between the estimated heritability of ADHD from quantitative genetic research and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), together with the multifactorial and polygenetic nature of ADHD [10,11], suggests that, in addition to individual genes and environmental factors, interactions of several genes with each other and with the environment may also influence variations in the phenotype.
A key framework for understanding the complex contribution of both genetic and environmental influences on ADHD is gene–environment interactions (G × E), that is, the importance of genetic factors may be dependent on key environmental factors [12]. Studies demonstrated that environmental exposures can modify gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms, for example, in psychiatric disorders [13]. The identification of G × E effects is important to advance the understanding of genetic and clinical heterogeneity of ADHD symptoms over time [14]. To date, the most widely accepted model of G × E influences on psychopathology is the diathesis–stress model, in which genes and stressful environments exert risk synergistically. That is, environments may moderate the effects of genetic factors in a phenotype by magnifying the likelihood that genetically vulnerable individuals will develop negative outcomes, resulting in higher genetic variance in adverse environments but lower genetic variance in beneficial environments [14,15,16]. Alternatively, interactions can follow the so-called bioecological model, in which genetic influences on the condition are thought to be more influential in the absence of adversity, resulting in higher heritability in low-risk environments [15,17].
As suggested by available studies, genetic risk variants associated with ADHD seem to have a stronger impact on the presence of unfavourable environmental conditions [18]. Emerging evidence indicates that diet may modify the genetic liability underlying ADHD. Previous research found a direct association between the Western/unhealthy diet (characterized by high consumption of refined sugar and saturated fat but low consumption of fruits and vegetables) [7,19,20] and a low adherence to a Mediterranean diet with elevated ADHD symptoms [21]. Higher sugar intake was found to be associated with more ADHD symptoms in children over 7 years old, and adults with elevated levels of ADHD symptoms were found to be associated with a higher intake of high-sugar food, meat and fat, as well as a lower intake of fruits and vegetables [7]. Findings from a twin study further indicated that genetic factors could only explain a minor part of this association [7].
Several studies used a candidate gene (e.g., 480-bp DAT1, LPHN3 rs1868790) approach to explore G × E interactions in ADHD [22,23,24]. However, studies of candidate G × E interactions are problematic as a priori chosen genetic risk variants rarely replicate in other samples [25,26]. In contrast, latent G × E interactions tested in twin studies examined the aggregate effects of genetic variation rather than the effect of specific genetic variants. Such studies are needed to provide directions for genome-wide G × E studies and G × E studies based on polygenic risk scores [27]. Available twin G × E interaction studies in ADHD focused on family environmental risk factors. For example, Pennington et al. found diathesis–stress effects for socioeconomic status (SES), with higher heritability estimates in disadvantaged households [15]. In contrast, Nikolas et al. reported bioecological interactions for ADHD and parental behaviours, with stronger genetic effects found in some beneficial environments (e.g., lower levels of parental conflict [28] and more parental involvement [29]). Another study suggested that SES moderated the heritability of inattention or hyperactive/impulsive symptoms [30]. However, no previous study explored the effects of dietary factors on modifying the role of genetic effects on ADHD.
The purpose of the present study was to study how dietary habits influence the magnitude of genetic and environmental contributions to ADHD in adults, considering the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom dimensions separately. Based on previous literature, we hypothesized that genetic factors associated with ADHD were more likely to cause the disorder among adults with unhealthier food habits, as compared to adults with healthier food habits.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Data were collected from participants in the Study of Twin Adults: Genes and Environment (STAGE), which only includes twins born in Sweden between 1959 and 1985 [31]. In the present study, we used data from participants that filled out a web-based survey regarding their sociodemographic information, lifestyle, food habits, mental, and physical health from 2005 to 2006. Standard and validated questions through genotyping were used to assess physical similarity in order to establish zygosity [7]. The study sample comprised 1518 twin pairs with completed information on all study variables.

2.2. Measures

Self-reported ADHD symptoms: were obtained via an 18-item questionnaire derived from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), with two subscales reflecting the inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom dimensions [32]. Both inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity showed a good internal consistency, and Cronbach’s α was 0.79 and 0.77, respectively [32]. As suggested in previous twin and genetic studies, ADHD is best viewed as the extreme of a continuous trait that is genetically linked with ADHD [33], in this study, ADHD symptoms were measured on a continuum rather than collapsed to a dichotomous diagnosis.
Food habits: were assessed by a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with 94 food items. For each food item, the participants reported their average consumption frequency over the past year by selecting one of the following frequencies: never, 1–3 times/month, 1–2 times/week, 3–4 times/week, 5–6 times/week, 1 time/day, 2 times/day, 3 times/day. The frequency for each food item was converted into number of servings per day. Consistent with a previous study [7], high-sugar foods included cookies, crackers, cake, chocolate, candy, ice cream, jam, berry cream, juice, energy drink, honey, and ketchup. Unhealthy food included pizza, sausage, fried potato, French fries, minced meat/meatball, pork, beef, cookies, crackers, cake, chocolate, candy, ice cream, jam, berry cream, juice, energy drink, hamburgers, chips, dressing, mayonnaise, cream, and ketchup. Their overall intake frequencies, respectively, were thereafter summed up and categorized into tertiles; (1) high-sugar food: low (≤1.56 servings/day), middle (1.56 to 2.90 servings/day) and high consumption (≥2.90 servings/day); (2) unhealthy food: low (≤2.61 servings/day), middle (2.61 to 4.00 servings/day) and high consumption (≥4.00 servings/day).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Twin data can be used to estimate the genetic and environmental contributions to variation in a trait by comparing the similarity between monozygotic twins (MZ, who share 100% of their segregating genes) and dizygotic twins (DZ, who share approximately 50% of their segregating genes). In the additive model, total phenotypic variance of a trait can be broken down into three components: A—additive genetic influences, or narrow-sense heritability; C—shared environmental influences, which are common to both twins in a pair and make them similar; and E—non-shared environmental influences, which impact the twins individually, and also include random measurement errors [34].
Intra-class correlations were calculated for MZ and DZ twins by ADHD symptom dimensions and each dietary habit group. For our primary analyses, we first standardized the log-transformed ADHD symptoms to have means of 0 and standard deviations of 1. Age and sex were included as covariates on the mean of the phenotype. Second, we estimated the variance of ADHD by A, C and E components. We then excluded C component to test if the AE model was not statistically significantly different from the full ACE model (i.e., the shared environmental component C was not significant), if so, AE models were used in further analyses.
Next, we expanded our analyses by evaluating whether dietary habits moderated the aetiology of ADHD using the ‘extended univariate G × E’ model (Figure 1), which estimates how variance in phenotypes changes across levels of a measured environmental moderator by including its effect on the paths for each component [35]. G × E is demonstrated by moderation of the three variance components (A, C, and E). Depending on the direction of the moderation effects, a gene–environment interaction could then manifest as an increase or decrease in the heritability of a trait. For example, if the moderator variable decreased genetic variance while increasing shared or non-shared environmental variance, the proportion of total variance explained by genetics would decrease.
To test the gene–environment interaction hypotheses, we determined whether the moderation paths significantly improved the fit of the full ACE/AE moderation model using a negative two times the log-likelihood value (−2lnL) statistic. First, a global test of moderation was conducted by constraining the moderation effects on all of the components to be zero. Second, to test whether the moderation was driven by specific pathways, we then fitted a series of nested models, dropping moderation of the mean components, the variance components and all moderation separately and assessing the change in fit. If dropping moderation paths statistically and significantly reduced model fit (indicated by a significant chi-square χ2 statistic), then the result supported the hypothesis that the environmental variable moderated the heritability of ADHD symptoms. Otherwise, if the model fit was not significantly worse with moderator paths excluded, then dietary habits did not modify the heritability of ADHD symptoms [30].
All analyses were performed by using the structural equation modelling in the statistical software R version 3.6.1, with the OpenMx package (2.14.11).

3. Results

Descriptive statistics for the study population are presented in Table 1. The average age (mean ± std.) of the 3036 individuals was 33.17 ± 7.76 years old, the majority were female (67.56%) and had higher levels of socioeconomic status (SES) (74.20%). A total of 47.36% of the individuals were monozygotic twins and 52.64% were dizygotic twins with the same or opposite sex. ADHD symptom scores were significantly higher in the group with a high consumption of high-sugar and unhealthy foods, compared to the groups with a low and average consumption, indicating that the higher consumption of high-sugar and unhealthy foods was associated with more ADHD symptoms. The univariate model-fitting results are displayed in Supplementary Material Table S1. AE models provided the best fit to the data on ADHD symptom dimensions; therefore, we used only AE models in further analyses. Twin correlations and basic estimates of heritability are presented in Table 2. We found that both ADHD symptoms and food habits showed a moderate genetic influence. For ADHD symptoms, genetic and non-shared environmental factors explained 38–41% and 59–62% of the variance, respectively. The corresponding estimates for food habits were 35–37% and 63–65%.
Next, to address our main research question, we tested the significance of the moderation between ADHD symptoms and dietary habits by dropping parameters from the best-fitting AE models. Table 3 shows the fit statistics for the full moderation models, followed by the fit statistics after dropping the moderation of the mean and variance components, and then the no-moderation model (with all moderation paths dropped). We found that the full AE model fitted best for inattention and diets, while dropping the variance moderation model fitted best for hyperactivity/impulsivity and diets. We additionally report separately the path estimates for the variance components of the full AE models with moderation effects for inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms in Table S2. Overall, we found similar patterns among the associations between ADHD symptoms and dietary habits. The mean and total variance of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity was higher with an increased level of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake. We then plotted the variance components, A and E, as a function of dietary habits. Figure 2 illustrates that, at higher levels of high-sugar or unhealthy food intake, genetic components had stronger influences on ADHD symptoms. Specifically, for inattention, the influence of genetic effects on inattention was higher among those with higher consumptions of high-sugar food (genetic factors accounted for 45% of the variance in inattention at the highest level but 36% at the lowest level) and unhealthy food (genetic factors accounted for 51% at the highest level and 30% at the lowest level), while the non-shared environmental effects were lower with the increased levels of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake. Similar patterns were also found in the associations between hyperactivity/impulsivity and high-sugar/unhealthy dietary intake, even though their moderation effects were not statistically significant (Table 3).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first twin study to test whether two dietary habits, high-sugar food and unhealthy food, moderate the heritability of ADHD symptoms. We found that in middle-aged adults, dietary habits significantly moderated genetic and non-shared environmental contributions to ADHD symptomatology. Specifically, genetic influences on ADHD symptoms increased at higher levels of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake but were lower when consuming less of these diets. By contrast, non-shared environmental contributions to ADHD symptoms were highest at lower levels of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake and decreased as these dietary consumptions increased. Such findings thus serve to not only illuminate the origins of ADHD, but also provide important empirical support the diathesis–stress model of G × E (with the stressors being high-sugar and unhealthy foods).
There are several potential explanations for how dietary factors moderate the influence of genetic and environmental effects on ADHD. Firstly, the field of nutrigenomics has yielded valuable information on how dietary and nutrition influences an individual’s genetic composition and gene expression [36,37]. Results from nutrigenomics studies suggested that a high-sugar diet remodelled fundamental aspects of gene regulation (such as differential DNA methylation, differential gene expression, alternative splicing, and implications for microRNA alterations) that have the potential to impact pathogenesis of metabolic and psychiatric disorders [38]. Secondly, there is increasing evidence suggesting that the microbiome–gut–brain axis is involved in the aetiology of ADHD [39]. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome [40], which then plays an important role in regulating the availability of circulating tryptophan, altering the expression of some CNS receptors, thereby enabling them to directly influence brain excitability and function as well as to exert epigenetic control of gene expression [41]. Therefore, diet could potentially modify the complicated genome–microbiome associations in ADHD. Third, animal studies indicated that regular sugar consumption could change gene expression and the availability of dopamine receptors in brain regions related to reward sensitivity and motivation [42]. Furthermore, many ADHD-related genes are highly expressed in the hypothalamus, which is a key regulator of food intake [43]. Therefore, it is possible that both the gene expression and the function of dopamine can be altered in certain areas of the brain from habitual intake of high-sugar or unhealthy diets, which subsequently increases the risk of ADHD. Future molecular genetic insights into the effects of gene–environment interactions would improve our understanding of the aetiology of ADHD.
Some limitations of the study warrant discussion. Firstly, the current sample was underpowered for examining G × E effects separately by sex and age. Even though we found stable phenotypic and genetic associations between ADHD symptoms and dietary habits across age, sex and SES groups, and we also adjusted for age and sex in the G × E modelling, the future examination of sex and age differences in aetiological mechanisms, including G × E effects, remains important. Second, we examined ADHD symptoms dimensionally by using self-reported data. Given that self-reports among adults typically underestimate the presence of ADHD symptoms and also generate lower heritability estimates compared to reports from other informants (e.g., self- and parent-ratings combined) [5], future studies of gene–environment interactions need to use alternative measurement methods [5]. Our findings may not necessarily generalize to clinically diagnosed ADHD. However, examining inattention and hyperactivity–impulsivity separately could provide additional clues regarding the heterogeneity of aetiological mechanisms in ADHD [44]. Further, food intake was self-reported and may suffer from potential misclassification bias. Additionally, diet was only assessed once in this cross-sectional study, which did not take into account changes over time. Finally, although the findings suggested the presence of a G × E interaction between ADHD symptoms and dietary habits, they may be partly explained by G × E correlation, which reflects genetic differences in the exposure to particular environments [35,45]. As genetic correlations between ADHD symptoms and high-sugar/unhealthy food intake were reported to be relatively weak, ranging from 0.05 to 0.16 [7], the presence of G × E correlation may not fully explain the observed effects of G × E interactions [46]. Models (extended bivariate G × E models) were developed to take into account the G × E correlation effects [35], but such models suffer from a series of methodological problems [35,47] and larger sample sizes are needed than those we currently have at our disposal. Thus, we restricted our analyses to more stable univariate models. Previous studies also reported robust results when extending univariate to bivariate G × E models [16].

5. Conclusions

The present study showed that the heritability of ADHD symptoms was higher with a high consumption of high-sugar and unhealthy foods, a finding that supports the diathesis–stress model. The finding provides further insights into a better understanding of mechanisms underlying ADHD, as well as directions for genome-wide G × E studies. Future longitudinal studies with multiple assessments of ADHD and dietary habits are still needed to replicate our findings.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13010047/s1, Table S1. Univariate model-fitting results of bivariate analysis of with 95% confidence intervals and dietary intake; Table S2. Genetic and environmental effects for ADHD symptoms dimensions in different level of dietary intake (with 95%CI).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L., M.J.T., K.B., A.A.V., C.A.H. and H.L.; methodology, L.L., M.J.T. and H.L.; software, L.L. and M.J.T.; formal analysis, L.L. and M.J.T.; data curation, L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, L.L., M.J.T., K.B., T.X., B.S.S., J.H., A.A.V., C.A.H. and H.L.; visualization, T.X.; supervision, M.J.T. and H.L.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L. and A.A.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge The Swedish Twin Registry for access to data. The Swedish Twin Registry is managed by Karolinska Institute and receives funding through the Swedish Research Council under the grant No. 2017-00641. This project also received funding from the Swedish Research Council (2018-02599), the Swedish Brain Foundation (FO2018-0273) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 728018. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the by the Regional Ethics Committee at the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (DNR: 03–224).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from The Swedish Twin Register (https://ki.se/en/research/the-swedish-twin-registry) upon reasonable request. (accessed on 30 November 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

H.L. has served as a speaker for Evolan and Shire and has received research grants from Shire; all outside the submitted work. J.H. has served as a speaker for Medice, Biocodex, Takeda and Shire. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Faraone, S.V.; Asherson, P.; Banaschewski, T.; Biederman, J.; Buitelaar, J.K.; Ramos-Quiroga, J.A.; Rohde, L.A.; Sonuga-Barke, E.J.; Tannock, R.; Franke, B. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Biederman, J.; Faraone, S.V. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2005, 366, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Larsson, H. Commentary: Important design features to consider in observational research on the long-term outcomes of ADHD—reflections on Sibley et al. (2017) and Swanson et al. (2017). J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2017, 58, 679–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Posner, J.; Polanczyk, G.V.; Sonuga-Barke, E. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2020, 395, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brikell, I.; Kuja-Halkola, R.; Larsson, H. Heritability of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2015, 168, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Larsson, H.; Chang, Z.; D’Onofrio, B.M.; Lichtenstein, P. The heritability of clinically diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Psychol. Med. 2014, 44, 2223–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, L.; Taylor, M.J.; Bälter, K.; Kuja-Halkola, R.; Chen, Q.; Hegvik, T.; Tate, A.E.; Chang, Z.; Arias-Vásquez, A.; Hartman, C.A.; et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and dietary habits in adulthood: A large population-based twin study in Sweden. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2020, 183, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, L.; Neale, B.; Liu, L.; Lee, S.; Wray, N.; Ji, N. Psychiatric GWAS Consortium: ADHD Subgroup. Polygenic transmission and complex neuro developmental network for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Genome-wide association study of both common and rare variants. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. B 2013, 162, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Demontis, D.; Walters, R.K.; Martin, J.; Mattheisen, M.; Als, T.D.; Agerbo, E.; Baldursson, G.; Belliveau, R.; Bybjerg-Grauholm, J.; Bækvad-Hansen, M. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Faraone, S.V.; Larsson, H. Genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 2019, 24, 562–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Banerjee, T.D.; Middleton, F.; Faraone, S.V. Environmental risk factors for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Acta Paediatr. 2007, 96, 1269–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aubuchon-Endsley, N.; Morales, M.; Giudice, C.; Bublitz, M.H.; Lester, B.M.; Salisbury, A.L.; Stroud, L.R. Maternal pre-pregnancy obesity and gestational weight gain influence neonatal neurobehaviour. Matern. Child Nutr. 2016, 13, e12317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kubota, T.; Miyake, K.; Hirasawa, T. Epigenetic understanding of gene-environment interactions in psychiatric disorders: A new concept of clinical genetics. Clin. Epigenet. 2012, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Rose, R.J.; Rutter, M. Genes and behavior: Nature-nurture interplay explained. Eur. Psychol. 2007, 12, 240–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pennington, B.F.; McGrath, L.M.; Rosenberg, J.; Barnard, H.; Smith, S.D.; Willcutt, E.G.; Friend, A.; Defries, J.C.; Olson, R.K. Gene X environment interactions in reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dev. Psychol. 2009, 45, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Burt, S.; Klump, K. Parent–child conflict as an etiological moderator of childhood conduct problems: An example of a ‘bioecological’ gene–environment interaction. Psychol. Med. 2014, 44, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Friend, A.; DeFries, J.C.; Olson, R.K. Parental education moderates genetic influences on reading disability. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Franke, B.; Neale, B.M.; Faraone, S. Genome-wide association studies in ADHD. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 126, 13–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Howard, A.L.; Robinson, M.; Smith, G.J.; Ambrosini, G.L.; Piek, J.P.; Oddy, W.H. ADHD Is Associated With a “Western” Dietary Pattern in Adolescents. J. Atten. Disord. 2010, 15, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiles, N.J.; Northstone, K.; Emmett, P.; Lewis, G. ‘Junk food’ diet and childhood behavioural problems: Results from the ALSPAC cohort. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ríos-Hernández, A.; Alda, J.A.; Farran-Codina, A.; Ferreira-García, E.; Izquierdo-Pulido, M. The Mediterranean diet and ADHD in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2017, 139, e20162027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. McNeill, R.V.; Palladino, V.S.; Brunkhorst-Kanaan, N.; Grimm, O.; Reif, A.; Kittel-Schneider, S. Expression of the adult ADHD-associated gene ADGRL3 is dysregulated by risk variants and environmental risk factors. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 22, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kahn, R.S.; Khoury, J.; Nichols, W.C.; Lanphear, B.P. Role of dopamine transporter genotype and maternal prenatal smoking in childhood hyperactive-impulsive, inattentive, and oppositional behaviors. J. Pediatr. 2003, 143, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Gu, X.; Hou, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, X.; Wu, J. LPHN3 gene variations and susceptibility to ADHD in Chinese Han population: A two-stage case-control association study and gene-environment interactions. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2019, 28, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Border, R.; Keller, M.C. Commentary: Fundamental problems with candidate gene-by-environment interaction studies—reflections on Moore and Thoemmes (2016). J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2017, 58, 328–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wermter, A.-K.; Laucht, M.; Schimmelmann, B.G.; Banaschweski, T.; Sonuga-Barke, E.J.S.; Rietschel, M.; Becker, K. From nature versus nurture, via nature and nurture, to gene × environment interaction in mental disorders. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2009, 19, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Dick, D.M. Gene-Environment Interaction in Psychological Traits and Disorders. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2011, 7, 383–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Nikolas, M.; Klump, K.L.; Burt, S.A. Youth appraisals of inter-parental conflict and genetic and environmental contributions to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Examination of GxE effects in a twin sample. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2012, 40, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Nikolas, M.A.; Klump, K.L.; Burt, S.A. Parental involvement moderates etiological influences on atten-tion deficit hyperactivity disorder behaviors in child twins. Child Dev. 2015, 86, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gould, K.L.; Coventry, W.L.; Olson, R.K.; Byrne, B. Gene-Environment Interactions in ADHD: The Roles of SES and Chaos. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2017, 46, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lichtenstein, P.; Sullivan, P.F.; Cnattingius, S.; Gatz, M.; Johansson, S.; Carlström, E.; Björk, C.; Svartengren, M.; Wolk, A.; Klareskog, L.; et al. The Swedish Twin Regis-try in the Third Millennium: An Update. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 2006, 9, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Larsson, H.; Asherson, P.; Chang, Z.; Ljung, T.; Friedrichs, B.; Larsson, J.O.; Lichtenstein, P. Genetic and environmental influences on adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: A large Swedish population-based study of twins. Psychol. Med. 2013, 43, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Larsson, H.; Anckarsater, H.; Råstam, M.; Chang, Z.; Lichtenstein, P. Childhood attention-deficit hyper-activity disorder as an extreme of a continuous trait: A quantitative genetic study of 8,500 twin pairs. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2012, 53, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Knopik, V.S.; Neiderhiser, J.M.; DeFries, J.C.; Plomin, R. Behavioral Genetics; Macmillan Higher Education: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  35. Purcell, S. Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Res. 2002, 5, 554–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Müller, M.; Kersten, S. Nutrigenomics: Goals and strategies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mead, M.N. Nutrigenomics: The genome--food interface. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, A582–A589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Meng, Q.; Ying, Z.; Noble, E.; Zhao, Y.; Agrawal, R.; Mikhail, A.; Zhuang, Y.; Tyagi, E.; Zhang, Q.; Lee, J.-H.; et al. Systems Nutrigenomics Reveals Brain Gene Networks Linking Metabolic and Brain Disorders. EBioMedicine 2016, 7, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Checa-Ros, A.; Jeréz-Calero, A.; Molina-Carballo, A.; Campoy, C.; Muñoz-Hoyos, A. Current Evidence on the Role of the Gut Microbiome in ADHD Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Implications. Nutrients 2021, 13, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. David, L.A.; Maurice, C.F.; Carmody, R.N.; Gootenberg, D.B.; Button, J.E.; Wolfe, B.E.; Ling, A.V.; Devlin, A.S.; Varma, Y.; Fischbach, M.A.; et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014, 505, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Mohajeri, M.H.; La Fata, G.; Steinert, E.R.; Weber, P. Relationship between the gut microbiome and brain function. Nutr. Rev. 2018, 76, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spangler, R.; Wittkowski, K.M.; Goddard, N.L.; Avena, N.M.; Hoebel, B.G.; Leibowitz, S.F. Opiate-like effects of sugar on gene expression in reward areas of the rat brain. Mol. Brain Res. 2004, 124, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yadav, S.K.; Bhat, A.A.; Hashem, S.; Nisar, S.; Kamal, M.; Syed, N.; Temanni, M.-R.; Gupta, R.K.; Kamran, S.; Azeem, M.W.; et al. Genetic variations influence brain changes in patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 2021, 11, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Willcutt, E.G.; Pennington, B.F.; DeFries, J.C. Etiology of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in a community sample of twins with learning difficulties. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2000, 28, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schrempft, S.; van Jaarsveld, C.H.M.; Fisher, A.; Herle, M.; Smith, A.D.; Fildes, A.; Llewellyn, C.H. Variation in the Heritability of Child Body Mass Index by Obesogenic Home Environment. JAMA Pediatrics 2018, 172, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tuvblad, C.; Grann, M.; Lichtenstein, P. Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: Gene-environment interaction. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2006, 47, 734–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rathouz, P.J.; Van Hulle, C.A.; Rodgers, J.L.; Waldman, I.D.; Lahey, B.B. Specification, testing, and interpretation of gene-by-measured-environment interaction models in the presence of gene-environment correlation. Behav. Genet. 2008, 38, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Genes 13 00047 g001 550
Figure 1. Path diagram for gene–environment interaction model. A: additive genetic influences; C: shared environmental influences; E: non-shared environmental influences; A is correlated to 1 between monozygotic twins (MZ) and 0.5 between dizygotic twins (DZ), respectively; C is correlated to 1 for both MZ and DZ twins; a, c, and e: unmoderated components; βa, βc and βe: moderated components of a, c, and e; m: grand mean; βm: effect of moderator (diets). ADHD: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Figure 1. Path diagram for gene–environment interaction model. A: additive genetic influences; C: shared environmental influences; E: non-shared environmental influences; A is correlated to 1 between monozygotic twins (MZ) and 0.5 between dizygotic twins (DZ), respectively; C is correlated to 1 for both MZ and DZ twins; a, c, and e: unmoderated components; βa, βc and βe: moderated components of a, c, and e; m: grand mean; βm: effect of moderator (diets). ADHD: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Genes 13 00047 g001
Genes 13 00047 g002 550
Figure 2. Genetic (A) and non-shared environmental (E) variance of ADHD symptoms change with different levels of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake. (a) Full moderation model for inattention and high-sugar food; (b) Full moderation model for inattention and unhealthy food; (c) Full moderation model for hyperactivity/impulsivity and high-sugar food; (d) Full moderation model for hyperactivity/impulsivity and unhealthy food.
Figure 2. Genetic (A) and non-shared environmental (E) variance of ADHD symptoms change with different levels of high-sugar and unhealthy food intake. (a) Full moderation model for inattention and high-sugar food; (b) Full moderation model for inattention and unhealthy food; (c) Full moderation model for hyperactivity/impulsivity and high-sugar food; (d) Full moderation model for hyperactivity/impulsivity and unhealthy food.
Genes 13 00047 g002
Table
Table 1. Means and standard deviations (S.D.) for ADHD scales and intake frequency of high-sugar food and unhealthy, respectively, by age and sex group.
Table 1. Means and standard deviations (S.D.) for ADHD scales and intake frequency of high-sugar food and unhealthy, respectively, by age and sex group.
Total Consumption of High-Sugar FoodConsumption of Unhealthy Food
n = 3036Low Level
(n = 1007)		Middle Level
(n = 984)		High Level
(n = 1045)		Low level
(n = 995)		Middle Level
(n = 1010)		High Level
(n = 1031)
Age 33.17 ± 7.7633.87 ± 7.8133.40 ± 7.7332.29 ± 7.63 *33.40 ± 7.8633.51 ± 7.6832.63 ± 7.69 *
Sex
Male985 (32.44)255 (25.32)301 (30.59)429 (41.05) *234 (23.52)315 (31.19)436 (42.29) *
Female2051 (67.56)752 (74.68)683 (69.41)616 (58.95)761 (76.48)695 (68.81)595 (57.71)
SES
Low level573 (25.80)165 (21.57)180 (24.46)228 (31.67) *163 (22.18)189 (24.74)221 (30.61) *
High Level1648 (74.20)600 (78.43)556 (75.54)492 (68.33)572 (77.82)575 (75.26)501 (69.39)
Zygosity
MZ1438 (47.36)464 (46.08)468 (47.56)506 (48.42)454 (45.63)491 (48.61)493 (47.82)
DZ1598 (52.64)543 (53.92)516 (52.44)539 (51.58)541 (54.37)519 (51.39)538 (52.18)
Inattention2.05 ± 2.111.79 ± 1.952.08 ± 2.102.28 ± 2.24 *1.89 ± 2.001.97 ± 2.062.30 ± 2.23 *
Hyperactivity/impulsivity2.08 ± 2.141.94 ± 2.052.09 ± 2.182.21 ± 2.19 *1.98 ± 2.091.98 ± 2.112.28 ± 2.20*
* p-value < 0.05 for mean difference based on Linear mixed effect model; for proportion difference based on chis-q test; SES: socioeconomic status; MZ: monozygotic twins; DZ: dizygotic twins.
Table
Table 2. Intra-class correlations and estimates from univariate twin models with 95% confidence intervals for ADHD trait dimensions and dietary variables.
Table 2. Intra-class correlations and estimates from univariate twin models with 95% confidence intervals for ADHD trait dimensions and dietary variables.
Intraclass CorrelationsParameter Estimates
MZDZAE
Inattention0.41 (0.35, 0.47)0.11 (0.04, 0.18)0.41 (0.36, 0.47)0.59 (0.53, 0.64)
Hyperactivity/impulsivity0.42 (0.36, 0.48)0.11 (0.04, 0.18)0.38 (0.32, 0.43)0.62 (0.57, 0.68)
High-sugar food0.39 (0.33, 0.45)0.16 (0.09, 0.22)0.37(0.31, 0.42)0.63 (0.58, 0.69)
Unhealthy dietary pattern0.39 (0.33, 0.45)0.17 (0.10, 0.23)0.35 (0.29, 0.41)0.65 (0.59, 0.71)
p-value < 0.05 for all presented analyses. MZ: monozygotic twins; DZ: dizygotic twins; A: additive genetic influences, or narrow-sense heritability; E: non-shared environmental influences.
Table
Table 3. Model-fitting results of moderation models with 95% confidence intervals and dietary variables.
Table 3. Model-fitting results of moderation models with 95% confidence intervals and dietary variables.
Fit of Model Compared to Saturated Model
EP−2lnLdfχ2∆dfp-ValueAIC
IA: High-sugar dietary intake moderation model
Full AE model612,842.4829990.2910.596844.47
Drop moderation of the mean components614,204.8329991362.641<0.0018206.83
Drop moderation of the variance components412,858.99300116.8030.0016856.99
Drop all moderation314,238.4230021396.234<0.0018234.42
IA: Unhealthy dietary intake moderation model
Full AE model612,857.3530030.2110.656851.35
Drop moderation of the mean components514,242.1730041384.821<0.0018234.17
Drop moderation of the variance components312,873.33300615.9730.0016861.33
Drop all moderation214,314.5530071457.194<0.0018300.55
HI: High-sugar dietary intake moderation model
Full AE model612,980.033004<0.001116972.03
Drop moderation of the mean components614,363.2630041383.231<0.0018355.26
Drop moderation of the variance components412,986.5830066.5430.166974.58
Drop all moderation314,373.9230071393.884<0.0018359.92
HI: Unhealthy dietary intake moderation model
Full AE model612,995.5730080.0610.806979.57
Drop moderation of the mean components614,376.530081380.991<0.0018360.5
Drop moderation of the variance components413,001.7930106.2830.1016981.79
Drop all moderation314,391.4230111395.914<0.0018369.42
EP: Estimated parameters, IA: Inattention, HI: Hyperactivity-impulsivity, LL: Log Likelihood; df: degree of freedom; AIC: Akaike’s Information Criterion.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, L.; Taylor, M.J.; Bälter, K.; Xie, T.; Solberg, B.S.; Haavik, J.; Arias Vásquez, A.; Hartman, C.A.; Larsson, H. Gene-Environment Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions: The Role of Unhealthy Food Habits. Genes 2022, 13, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010047

AMA Style

Li L, Taylor MJ, Bälter K, Xie T, Solberg BS, Haavik J, Arias Vásquez A, Hartman CA, Larsson H. Gene-Environment Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions: The Role of Unhealthy Food Habits. Genes. 2022; 13(1):47. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Lin, Mark J. Taylor, Katarina Bälter, Tian Xie, Berit Skretting Solberg, Jan Haavik, Alejandro Arias Vásquez, Catharina A. Hartman, and Henrik Larsson. 2022. "Gene-Environment Interactions in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptom Dimensions: The Role of Unhealthy Food Habits" Genes 13, no. 1: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13010047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop