Next Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Factor C20orf7 Facilitates the EMT-Mediated Cancer Cell Migration and the Proliferation of Colon Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
Extracellular Vesicles as Potential Biomarkers in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Cloning and Functional Analysis of NoMYB60 Gene Involved in Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recommendations for Interpreting and Reporting Silent Carrier and Disease-Modifying Variants in SMA Testing Workflows
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

PCR-Based Screening of Spinal Muscular Atrophy for Newborn Infants in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan

Genes 2022, 13(11), 2110; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112110
by Yoriko Noguchi 1,†, Ryosuke Bo 2,†, Hisahide Nishio 3,4,*, Hisayuki Matsumoto 1, Keiji Matsui 1, Yoshihiko Yano 1, Masami Sugawara 5, Go Ueda 6, Yogik Onky Silvana Wijaya 3,7, Emma Tabe Eko Niba 3,8, Masakazu Shinohara 3, Yoshihiro Bouike 9, Atsuko Takeuchi 10, Kentaro Okamoto 11, Toshio Saito 12, Hideki Shimomura 13, Tomoko Lee 13, Yasuhiro Takeshima 13, Kazumoto Iijima 2,14, Kandai Nozu 2 and Hiroyuki Awano 2add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Genes 2022, 13(11), 2110; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13112110
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Accepted: 9 November 2022 / Published: 14 November 2022 / Corrected: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetics of Motor Neuron Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript describes a case study for the PCR screening for spinal muscular atrophy in newborn infants in Japan. The methods are rigorous described in adequate detail and the  data presentation is clear. Upon review I recommend this article for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

The mansucript of Noguchi et al. is presenting the first results of PCR-based Screening for SMA in one of the Japanese prefecture between February 2021 and August 2022. An unexpected fouding is a large number of high false positve cases, however this phenomenon is well diucussed by the authors. Also, the disease course of two patients is decribed in detail.

The topic is of interest to the community working on genetics and pediatrics. The mansucript is very logically written, clear and understandable. The methodology and results are sound and well decribed. The conculsions are structured, formulated in three clear points. 

Altogether I found the manuscript well-written and structured. The topic is interesting to the general public given the therapeutic possibility. The positive numbers are quite small, but it is understandable given the duration of the program and the fact that data are only from one prefecture. The introduction is providing a structured background for the one that does not have much orientation in the topic. Methods are clear and the tables are facilitating the understanding of text. Results are also presented clearly and soundly from the scientific point of view. The discussion encompasses the most important points, but it is concise. The conclusions are written into three points.   Regarding the scientific part, I agree with the authors that an exact incidence rate is difficult to obtain based on the available data. The two patients are well characterized. The most interesting finding I found was a high false positives rate and the discussion on the influence of heparinized/diluted blood. The hypothesis is well illustrated with images.   From my point of view, the manuscript can be accepted in its current form. However, if I were to give some comments or questions they would be:   1. At what stage was genetic counseling provided and by whom? Did parents of the false positives children get genetic counseling as well? 2. Is any data from other prefectures in Japan published on this topic? 3. Can there be any other explanation for the high false positives (apart from the dilution/heparinization) theory? Are the same reagents as in other countries used? Are there differences with test interpretation between countries?

 

Back to TopTop