Next Article in Journal
First Description of Inheritance of a Postzygotic OPA1 Mosaic Variant
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic Screening to Identify Food Trees Potentially Dispersed by Precolonial Indigenous Peoples
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/genes13030477
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Presentation of Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Bradycardia in Three Families Carrying HCN4 Pathogenic Variants

by
Agata Paszkowska
1,†,
Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk
2,†,
Elżbieta Ciara
2,
Alicja Mirecka-Rola
1,
Monika Brzezinska
1,
Dorota Wicher
2,
Grażyna Kostrzewa
3,
Jędrzej Sarnecki
4 and
Lidia Ziółkowska
1,*
1
Department of Cardiology, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Medical Genetics, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of Medical Genetics, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
4
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(3), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030477
Submission received: 17 February 2022 / Revised: 6 March 2022 / Accepted: 7 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous cardiomyopathy in which myocardium consists of two, distinct compacted and noncompacted layers, and prominent ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses are present. LVNC is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and thromboembolic events. Familial forms of primary sinus bradycardia have been attributed to alterations in HCN4. There are very few reports about the association between HCN4 and LVNC. The aim of our study was to characterize the clinical phenotype of families with LVNC and sinus bradycardia caused by pathogenic variants of the HCN4 gene. Methods: From March 2008 to July 2021, we enrolled six patients from four families with diagnosed isolated LVNC based on the clinical presentation, family history and echocardiographic and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) evidence of LVNC. Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was undertaken for the evaluation of the molecular basis of the disease in each family. Results: A total of six children (median age 11 years) were recruited and followed prospectively for the median of 12 years. All six patients were diagnosed with LVNC by echocardiography, and five participants additionally by CMR. The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was found in three children. Sinus bradycardia and dilation of the ascending aorta occurred in five studied patients. In four patients from three families, the molecular studies demonstrated the presence of rare heterozygous HCN4 variants. Conclusion: (1) The HCN4 molecular variants influence the presence of a complex LVNC phenotype, sinus bradycardia and dilation of the ascending aorta. (2) The HCN4 alteration may be associated with the early presentation of clinical symptoms and the severe course of the disease. (3) It is particularly important to assess myocardial fibrosis not only within the ventricles, but also in the atria in patients with LVNC and sinus bradycardia.

1. Introduction

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous cardiomyopathy in which myocardium consists of two distinct compacted and noncompacted layers, and prominent ventricular trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses are present. The frequency of LVNC has increased and it has been reported as comprising 9% of all childhood primary cardiomyopathies in recent studies [1,2]. This form of cardiomyopathy may be sporadic or familial. LVNC is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and systemic thromboembolic events, both in pediatric and adult populations [3,4]. The spectrum of arrhythmias is very wide, with the most common one being ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias and the Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome. Less frequently, bradyarrhythmias, including sinus bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome and varying degrees of atrioventricular (AV) block, including complete heart block, were observed in individuals with LVNC [5,6,7,8].
In the literature, there have been reports of children with LVNC in association with sinus bradycardia, suggesting the possibility that the two diseases may have a common cause [9,10]. Although familial forms of primary sinus bradycardia are recognized, they have been attributed to molecular variants in HCN4, SCN5A and ANK2. However, there are very few reports in the literature on the association between HCN4 dysfunction and LVNC [11].
The aim of our study was to characterize the clinical phenotype of families with LVNC and sinus bradycardia caused by the HCN4 gene alterations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Patients

From March 2008 to July 2021, we prospectively enrolled 6 patients from 4 families with diagnosed LVNC hospitalized in the Department of Cardiology of the Children’s Memorial Health Institute. The inclusion criteria were age <18 years at the time of LVNC diagnosis based on the clinical presentation (history, symptoms, sinus bradycardia in electrocardiogram and familial occurrence of LVNC) and echocardiographic evidence of isolated LVNC. The echocardiographic criteria for LVNC diagnosis were: (1) presence of a two-layer structure with a compacted (C) and noncompacted (NC) myocardial layer of trabecular meshwork with deep endomyocardial spaces; (2) maximal end-systolic ratio of NC/C layers of >2; (3) color Doppler evidence of deep perfused intertrabecular recesses [12]. Only patients with sinus bradycardia diagnosed according to the criteria recommended in the literature were included in the study [13,14]. The exclusion criteria from the study were the presence of congenital heart disease, other forms of cardiomyopathy or neuromuscular disorders.
The Institutional Ethics Committee approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

2.2. Data Collection

Patients’ demographics, clinical symptoms, family history of cardiomyopathies and sudden cardiac death (SCD), as well as the results of echocardiography, 12-lead resting ECG with assessment of heart rate (HR), 24 h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) with analysis of minimal, maximal, average HR, occurrence of sinus pauses (RR pauses) >2 s and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were collected. Information on clinical symptoms, such as chest pain, arrhythmias, episodes of syncope and past thromboembolic events, were recorded, and NYHA functional class was evaluated. Serum NT-proBNP level was analyzed in all patients. Each patient underwent genetic blood tests for evaluation of the molecular basis of the disease.

2.3. Echocardiographic Studies

Echocardiography, including two-dimensional, Doppler and M-mode imaging, was performed at rest, as previously described [15], using Philips Epiq7 (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA, USA). Echocardiographic images included parasternal long- and short-axis and apical two-, three- and four-chamber views. LVNC was diagnosed based on Jenni’s criteria, when LV NC/C ratio was ≥2.0, when measured in the parasternal short-axis view in end-systolic phase, below the papillary muscle [12]. Echocardiographic measurements included LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), assessed using the Simpson’s method. The results were referenced against the available pediatric normative values [16,17]. LV enlargement was diagnosed when z-score was >2; LV systolic function impairment was defined as LVEF < 55%. Measurements of the ascending aorta were taken in the parasternal long-axis view and indexed to the patient’s BSA. Ascending aorta dilation was defined as z-score > 2 [18].

2.4. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

In all patients without contraindications, CMR studies were performed, utilizing a 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner (Magnetom AvantoFit, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), as previously described [19]. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images of the heart were acquired at breath-hold, in the standard 2-, 3- and 4- chamber views and in short-axis, with ≥25 phases/cardiac cycle. The studies were analyzed on a dedicated diagnostic workstation using CVi42 (Circle, Calgary, AB, Canada) software. LVNC was diagnosed based on Petersen’s criteria [20] if NC/C ratio at end-diastole was >2.3. LV volumes and EF were assessed semi-automatically based on the short-axis images with papillary muscles excluded from the volumes and included in the myocardial mass [21]. The results were referenced against the multicenter pediatric CMR normative values [22]. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images were obtained 10–15 min after intravenous administration of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer, Berlin, Germany) and were visually evaluated for areas of myocardial hyperintensity visible in two distinct planes.

2.5. Molecular Studies

DNA samples were obtained from the peripheral blood by automatic isolation with MagCore Nucleic Acid Extractor HF16Plus (RBC Bioscience, New Taipei City, Taiwan). Candidate gene sequencing was performed on the HiSeq 1500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) using the TruSight One Sequencing Panel (Illumina) in Family 1 and the original CMHI pediatric panel of 1000 clinically relevant genes (Roche) in the remaining families. A set of 222 and 165 cardiomyopathy-associated genes were analyzed, respectively (Supplementary Material). Study protocol has been described in detail in our previous manuscript [23].
Analysis and prioritization of discovered variants considered: (1) the minor allele frequency (MAF) determined with the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/ (accessed on 14 January 2022)), Exome Variant Server (EVS, https://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/ (accessed on 14 January 2022), UK10K Project (https://www.uk10k.org/ (accessed on 14 January 2022)) and in-house database comprising >5000 individuals (Department of Medical Genetics; DMG); (2) the pathogenicity of the variants, using in silico prediction algorithms: CADD, SIFT, MutationTaster, PolyPhen2_HDIV, PolyPhen2_HVAR, MutationAssessor, MetaSVM, MetaLR and FATHMM; (3) phenotypic descriptions in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim (accessed on 7 January 2022)), the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk (accessed on 7 January 2022)), ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ (accessed on 14 January 2022)) and Pubmed.
All variants were validated by Sanger sequencing and reported with the HCN4 NM_005477.3 (NP_005468.1) reference sequences. Sanger sequencing was also used for parental segregation analysis.

3. Results

Baseline characteristics. A total of six children from four families were enrolled and followed prospectively for the median of 12 (6–13) years. The median age of patients was 11 (6–16) years. Clinical characteristics of the study patients are presented in Table 1.
In echocardiography, the median NC/C ratio in all patients was 2.29 (2.13–2.40), which met Jenni’s criteria for the diagnosis of LVNC. Dilation of the ascending aorta exceeding the standard indexed to BSA was found in five study participants. In five of the six children, CMR imaging was performed to further assess cardiac morphology and function and to screen for features of myocardial fibrosis. In one child, CMR was not performed due to his severe clinical condition, hemodynamic instability and low body weight. Among the five patients who underwent CMR, the diagnosis of LVNC was confirmed in all according to Petersen’s criteria, with a median of NC/C ratio of 3.73 (3.14–4.25). All patients studied were diagnosed with sinus bradycardia in accordance with the recommendations in the literature [13,14].
Characteristics of families. The pedigrees of individual families are presented in Figure 1.

3.1. Family 1

Two sisters, one 2 years old and the other 6 years old, diagnosed with LVNC, were admitted to our institute for cardiologic evaluation. Family history revealed that their grandfather (father’s father) was diagnosed with sinus bradycardia and a pacemaker was implanted. However, his echocardiographic examination is not known, and we cannot state whether there were LVNC features. The younger girl (F I-1) diagnosed with LVNC at 3 months of age and progressive heart failure was admitted to the intensive care unit with symptoms of severe heart failure (NYHA group IV) and multi-organ injury. Upon echocardiography, the NC/C ratio was 3.34 and LV size was normal, but the LV systolic function was reduced. In addition, there was a dilation of the ascending aorta. In the resting ECG recording, the heart rate was 130 beats per minute (bpm), whereas the average daily rhythm in the 24 h Holter study was 90 bpm (the child was treated with an infusion of catecholamines). In the course of the disease, the child developed ischemic cerebral stroke. The girl died due to the mechanism of sinus bradycardia. The second girl (F I-2) underwent cardiological examinations after the diagnosis of LVNC in her sister. Clinical symptoms included dyspnea and fatigue on effort (NYHA class II). The resting ECG showed sinus bradycardia (67 bpm), and, in the 24 h Holter monitoring, the average daily rhythm was 64 bpm. Echocardiography revealed LVNC features with a NC/C ratio of 2.35 and dilation of the ascending aorta. In CMR, the NC/C ratio was 4.60 and no LGE was found. In both imaging studies, the LV size and function were within the normal range. ACE inhibitors and spironolactone were included in the treatment.
NGS analysis performed in this family in the younger girl revealed the heterozygous known HCN4 molecular variant c.1444G>A p.Gly482Arg that was subsequently confirmed in her affected sister and her father. Nine of the used in silico algorithms (CADD, MetaSVM, MutationAssessor, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, MetaLR, SIFT, FATHMM, MutationTaster) predicted this change as deleterious. The c.1444G>A variant was not found in the utilized frequency population databases (gnomAD, EVS, UK10K) or in our DMG cohort. It was reported as a disease-causing variant in sinus bradycardia and myocardial noncompaction cases in HGMD (ID: CM159293), and also as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in Brugada syndrome patients in ClinVar (ID: 197253).

3.2. Family 2

An 11-year-old girl (F II-3) was admitted for cardiac diagnostics due to observed sinus bradycardia and a positive family history of LVNC. Her mother had been diagnosed with LVNC and syncope, and a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. In addition, her brother’s daughters were also diagnosed with LVNC. During hospitalization, the patient did not report any complaints and did not present any symptoms of heart failure (NYHA class I) and bradycardia. The ECG showed sinus bradycardia of 60 bpm, whereas the average 24 h heart rhythm in the Holter examination was 60 bpm. Echocardiography showed a NC/C ratio of 2.22, and the size of the ascending aorta was within the normal range. CMR examination confirmed the diagnosis of LVNC, and the NC/C ratio was 3.00, but no LGE was found. In both of the above studies, the LV size and systolic function were normal. Pharmacological treatment was not started.
The heterozygous known HCN4 molecular variant c.1454C>T p.Ala485Val was identified in the proband and further confirmed in her mother. Eight in silico algorithms (CADD, MetaSVM, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, MetaLR, SIFT, FATHMM, MutationTaster) predicted this change as deleterious. The c.1454C>T variant was not found in the EVS, UK10K and DMG databases, but it was noted in gnomAD with MAF < 0.00001. This variant has no ClinVar submission but appeared in HGMD as a disease-causing variant in sinus bradycardia patients (ID: CM104901).

3.3. Family 3

A 17-year-old patient (F III-4) was admitted to our institute due to sinus bradycardia and a family history of bradycardia and cardiomyopathy in other family members. Family history revealed that his sister was diagnosed with LVNC and sinus bradycardia, while the other sister was also treated for bradycardia. The boy’s father was diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a syncope, and he had a pacemaker implanted. The patient’s clinical symptoms included only dyspnea and fatigue on effort (NYHA class II). The electrocardiogram showed a sinus rhythm of 44 bpm (Figure 2).
The mean 24 h heart rate during the Holter test was 47 bpm. Echocardiography revealed LVNC phenotypic features with a NC/C ratio of 2.40 and dilation of the ascending aorta. In the CMR study, the NC/C ratio was 3.73 and the presence of LGE in the LV myocardial wall was found. Both echocardiography and CMR showed a normal LV size and LV systolic function. The patient was receiving treatment for heart failure (ACE inhibitor, spironolactone) and salbutamol for sinus bradycardia.
The heterozygous known HCN4 molecular variant c.1438G>C p.Gly480Arg was found in the proband, and was also identified in his father (DNA from his sisters was not available for testing). Nine in silico algorithms (CADD, MetaSVM, MutationAssessor, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, MetaLR, SIFT, FATHMM and MutationTaster) predicted this change as deleterious. The c.1438G>C variant was not present in the frequency population databases. It was reported as disease-associated polymorphism in sinus bradycardia asymptomatic association with HGMD (ID: CM073122), and was classified as pathogenic in two patients with sick sinus syndrome in ClinVar (ID: 5176).

3.4. Family 4

The siblings, a 16-year-old girl (F IV-5) and her 11-year-old brother (F IV-6), were admitted to our Department of Cardiology due to sinus bradycardia. Family history revealed that their father had been diagnosed with sinus bradycardia and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); he had a pacemaker implanted. Moreover, their father’s brother also had a pacemaker implanted due to sinus bradycardia. The girl was asymptomatic, and no syncope was present. She only reported increased fatigue during exercise (NYHA class II). A nodal rhythm of approximately 39 bpm was recorded in the resting ECG. In the 24 h Holter ECG, the average daily rhythm was 55 bpm. Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and supraventricular premature beats were diagnosed. Echocardiography revealed LVNC with a NC/C ratio of 2.06 and dilation of the ascending aorta. In the CMR examination, the NC/C ratio was 3.91, and foci of LGE were found both in the myocardial wall of the left ventricle and in the wall of the left atrium (Figure 3).
In both echocardiography and CMR, the LV was enlarged, with a borderline systolic function. The girl received treatment for heart failure (ACE inhibitor, spironolactone) and salbutamol due to sinus bradycardia.
The second sibling, the boy, had no symptoms of sinus bradycardia or syncope. Clinical symptoms included dyspnea and fatigue on effort (NYHA class II). The heart rate on the ECG was 56 bpm, with a mean daily heart rhythm on the 24 h Holter study of 50 bpm. The patient was diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome and premature supraventricular beats, without episodes of supraventricular tachycardia. Echocardiography revealed typical LVNC features, with a NC/C ratio of 2.13 and LV enlargement with normal systolic function. There was also a dilation of the ascending aorta. CMR confirmed the diagnosis of LVNC (the NC/C ratio was 3.27), whereas the LV size and systolic function were normal. Like his sister, the boy was found to have LGE in the LV myocardial wall and in the left atrium. The patient is treated with medications such as ACE inhibitors and salbutamol.
A molecular analysis performed on the girl revealed no candidate pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in the studied cardiomyopathy panel.

4. Discussion

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous myocardial disease characterized by multiple prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. It is a relatively new, yet rare, clinical entity, but nevertheless the third most common cardiomyopathy in childhood, and is associated with congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, atrioventricular conduction disorders, sudden cardiac death and/or thromboembolic events. However, patients with isolated LVNC can also be asymptomatic and diagnosed after an abnormal ECG, echocardiogram or family screening [24,25].
In the literature reports, the relationship between LVNC and sinus bradycardia has been described in approximately 55% of cases, although the basis of conduction disturbances remains unclear [8,26]. The results of other studies demonstrated that the cause of sinus bradycardia in patients with LVNC may be the presence of a pathogenic variant in the HCN4 gene [11,27,28].
Molecular variants in HCN4 are thought to predominantly underlie sinoatrial node (SAN) disorders because HCN4 expression is mostly limited to the cardiac conduction system, and especially the SAN area [27]. HCN4 is the most prominent channel in the sinoatrial node, being a major determinant of the cardiac pacemaker current (If) and playing a crucial role in the automaticity of the sinus node through the generation of a slow diastolic depolarization during phase four of the cardiac action potential. Thus, this is a crucial channel for appropriate pacemaker activity and conduction system function [27,29]. Cardiac pacemaker current channel malfunction due to HCN4 dysfunction may result in cardiac function disorders. They have been reported mainly in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and Brugada syndrome. However, in recent years, a broad spectrum of conditions, including sinus bradycardia, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular block, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, left ventricular noncompaction, myocardial infraction, sudden infant death syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, dilation of the aorta and chronotropic incompetence, have been noted [27,30].
The epidemiology of HCN4 pathogenic variants in LVNC patients is not fully determined, with limited data concerning, in particular, the pediatric population. This can be due to the rare occurrence of childhood LVNC, lack of widespread routine genetic testing and lack of HCN4 in the applied gene panels. Van Waning et al. [31] collected data from papers published between January 1999 and March 2018 with clinical and molecular characteristics of 561 LVNC cases (adults and children) and found twenty-two subjects (4%) who carried HCN4 alterations causative for the disease. HCN4 variants accounted for 10% of (likely) pathogenic variants identified in a cohort of 95 adults diagnosed with LVNC by Richard et al. [32], as well as in a similar group reported on by Cambon-Viala et al. [33]. In a recent study, Hirono et al. [34] found two children with HCN4-related LVNC among 206 patients aged less than 16 years.
Milano et al., were the first to describe the coexistence of LVNC, sinus bradycardia and molecular variants in the HCN4 gene and emphasized the role of their familial occurrence [11]. Although there are reports showing significant phenotypic heterogeneity in pathogenic HCN4 gene variants, only patients who have the LVNC phenotype have been described. Moreover, the detection of pathogenic variants in patients with LVNC identifies cases (and their family members) who are at risk of developing adverse cardiac events, including arrhythmias [35].
To date, at least 50 (likely) pathogenic HCN4 molecular variants have been collected in the Human Gene Mutation Database Professional 2021v.3. All molecular variants identified in this study are known changes that affect highly evolutionary conserved amino acids located in close proximity with the essential pore-forming domain of the protein (Figure 4).
These variants have been reported previously, mainly in adults with a complex phenotype of LVNC and sinus bradycardia and myocardial noncompaction [28,32,33,36,37], whereas pediatric presentations are rare. Familial forms of SSS caused by HCN4 alterations rarely manifest themselves clinically in childhood and are mainly recognized after adolescence. Only a few literature descriptions of teenage patients manifested with a complex phenotype of sinus bradycardia and LVNC can be found in literature. Ishikawa et al., described a case of a 13-year-old girl with significant sinus bradycardia requiring permanent pacing at the age of 17 years [37]. Millat et al. [28] reported on a family with three sisters (12, 18 and 24 years old) who presented with a similar phenotype: sinus bradycardia in combination with LVNC. In our study, we present early onset of clinical symptoms of the disease. Both siblings from Family 1 were diagnosed before 6 years of age, with severe multi-organ dysfunction and ischemic cerebral stroke resulting in death at 2 years in one of them.
Different base substitution at the same HCN4 nucleotide position (c.1438, c.1444 and c.1454) leading to the same or various amino acid changes has been reported in multiple studies [11,29,32,33], highlighting the important role of this region for the proper functioning of the HCN4 channel. The functional effect of these variants has been studied extensively, demonstrating that the p.Gly480Arg, p.Gly482Arg and p.Ala485Val variants severely abolish pacemaker currents, with a hyperpolarization shift in the voltage dependence of activation [11,29,38,39]. Recent literature reports indicate that the molecular etiology of LVNC is detected in approximately 40% of cases [40]. As in the reports of other authors [11,28], in our patients, a significant relationship between LVNC, sinus bradycardia and HCN4 molecular variants has been demonstrated. The molecular etiology of heart abnormalities was confirmed in three out of four families (a total of four patients). It should be emphasized that, in Family 4, despite the typical course of LVNC and sinus bradycardia, no molecular cause was identified.
A very important aspect of the clinical evaluation of our patients is to demonstrate the presence of dilation of the ascending aorta. There are only a few studies showing an association of the HCN4 gene alterations with dilation of the ascending aorta. As reported by Vermeer et al., evidence was provided that dilation of the ascending aorta also constitutes a part of the clinical spectrum of HCN4 changes. Moreover, these authors demonstrated that HCN4 variant carriers have aortic dilation with age, which undoubtedly influences the prognosis and cardiac care in this group of patients [41].
According to the literature, the presence of LGE in the LV myocardium is found in 40% of LVNC patients [42]. In our study, out of five patients who underwent CMR examination, three (60%) children showed LGE in the LV myocardium and in the left atrium. The presence of LV fibrosis is a strong independent predictor of poor prognosis, not only in LVNC but also in another form of childhood cardiomyopathy, i.e., hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [43]. The results of published studies show that the prognosis worsens in patients with LVNC and the presence of LGE and/or global impairment of LV systolic function [44,45]. These authors also emphasize that only hypertrabeculation meeting current LVNC diagnostic criteria has no significant impact on patient prognosis, but, when the LVNC pattern is associated with a DCM-like phenotype and/or LGE, the prognosis deteriorates significantly. Among our three patients with LVNC and the presence of LGE, two children had LV enlargement requiring further regular cardiological control.
The literature presents the results of a study showing that atrial fibrosis, quantified with CMR-LGE, is an important predictor of clinically significant sinus node dysfunction and sinus bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation [46]. It should be especially emphasized that, in our group of three children with LVNC and LGE, two had LGE both in the LV wall and within the left atrial wall. These patients were diagnosed with sinus node dysfunction and sinus bradycardia, and further investigation was scheduled prior to qualification for permanent pacing implantation.
In summary, a systematic search for HCN4 molecular variants should be undertaken in patients with such a complex clinical picture. Additionally, we emphasized the role of CMR in LVNC, not only regarding diagnosis but also risk stratification and future medical treatment. This is important for everyday clinical practice and for further patient care, as it enables targeted treatment and further management.

5. Conclusions

  • The HCN4 molecular variant influences the presence of a complex LVNC phenotype, sinus bradycardia and dilation of the ascending aorta;
  • HCN4 alteration may be associated with the early presentation of clinical symptoms and severe course of the disease;
  • It is particularly important to assess myocardial fibrosis not only within the ventricles, but also in the atria in patients with LVNC and sinus bradycardia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13030477/s1, Supplementary Material: Cardiomyopathy-related genes analyzed in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: L.Z., A.P. and D.P.-A.; methodology: D.P.-A., A.P., L.Z., A.M.-R., J.S., G.K., E.C. and M.B.; validation: L.Z., D.P.-A., A.M.-R., J.S. and M.B.; formal analysis: A.P., D.P.-A., L.Z. and D.W.; investigation: A.P., D.P.-A., L.Z., A.M.-R., J.S., G.K., E.C. and D.W.; resources: A.P., L.Z., D.P.-A., J.S. and M.B.; data curation, A.P., D.P.-A., L.Z., A.M.-R., J.S., E.C. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation—A.P., D.P.-A., L.Z., M.B. and J.S.; writing—review and editing, L.Z., A.P. and D.P.-A.; supervision—L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially founded by The Children’s Memorial Health Institute (statutory grant no. S177/2018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of The Children’s Memorial Health Institute (protocol code 45/KBE/2018 and date of approval 24 October 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and their parents involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Tsai, S.F.; Ebenroth, E.S.; Hurwitz, R.A.; Cordes, T.M.; Schamberger, M.S.; Batra, A.S. Is Left Ventricular Noncompaction in Children Truly an Isolated Lesion? Pediatr. Cardiol. 2009, 30, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ergul, Y.; Nisli, K.; Demirel, A.; Varkal, M.A.; Oner, N.; Dursun, M.; Dindar, A.; Aydogan, U.; Omeroglu, R.E. Left ventricular non-compaction in children and adolescents: Clinical features, treatment and follow-up. Cardiol. J. 2011, 18, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Miszalski-Jamka, K.; Jefferies, J.L.; Mazur, W.; Głowacki, J.; Hu, J.; Lazar, M.; Gibbs, R.A.; Liczko, J.; Kłyś, J.; Venner, E.; et al. Novel Genetic Triggers and Genotype–Phenotype Correlations in Patients with Left Ventricular Noncompaction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2017, 10, e001763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Oechslin, E.; Jenni, R. Left ventricular non-compaction revisited: A distinct phenotype with genetic heterogeneity? Eur. Heart J. 2011, 32, 1446–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hoedemaekers, Y.M.; Caliskan, K.; Majoor-Krakauer, D.F. Clinical Features of Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy; Departments of Clinical Genetics and Cardiology, Erasmus, MC: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta, U.; Makhija, P. Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series of a Clinically Heterogeneous Disease. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2017, 38, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Celiker, A.; Ozkutlu, S.; Dilber, E.; Karagoz, T. Rhythm Abnormalities in Children with Isolated Ventricular Noncompaction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2005, 28, 1198–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarnecki, J.; Paszkowska, A.; Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, J.; Kubik, A.; Feber, J.; Jurkiewicz, E.; Ziółkowska, L. Left and Right Ventricular Morphology, Function and Myocardial Deformation in Children with Left Ventricular Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy: A Case-Control Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Egan, K.R.; Ralphe, J.C.; Weinhaus, L.; Maginot, K.R. Just Sinus Bradycardia or Something More Serious? Case Rep. Pediatr. 2013, 2013, 736164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ozkutlu, S.; Onderoglu, L.; Karagöz, T.; Celiker, A.; Sahiner, U.M. Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium with fetal sustained bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome. Turk. J. Pediatr. 2006, 48, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
  11. Milano, A.; Vermeer, A.M.; Lodder, E.M.; Barc, J.; Verkerk, A.; Postma, A.; van der Bilt, I.A.; Baars, M.J.; van Haelst, P.L.; Caliskan, K.; et al. HCN4 Mutations in Multiple Families With Bradycardia and Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jenni, R.; Oechslin, E.; Schneider, J.; Jost, C.A.; Kaufmann, P.A. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: A step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart 2001, 86, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Fleming, S.; Thompson, M.; Stevens, R.; Heneghan, C.; Plüddemann, A.; Maconochie, I.; Tarassenko, L.; Mant, D. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: A systematic review of observational studies. Lancet 2011, 377, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Baruteau, A.-E.; Perry, J.C.; Sanatani, S.; Horie, M.; Dubin, A.M. Evaluation and management of bradycardia in neonates and children. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2016, 175, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paszkowska, A.; Sarnecki, J.; Mirecka-Rola, A.; Kowalczyk-Domagała, M.; Mazurkiewicz, Ł.; Ziółkowska, L. Imaging Features of Pediatric Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy in Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kampmann, C.; Wiethoff, C.M.; Wenzel, A.; Stolz, G.; Betancor, M.; Wippermann, C.-F.; Huth, R.-G.; Habermehl, P.; Knuf, M.; Emschermann, T.; et al. Normal values of M mode echocardiographic measurements of more than 2000 healthy infants and children in central Europe. Heart 2000, 83, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chubb, H.; Simpson, J.M. The use of Z-scores in paediatric cardiology. Ann. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2012, 5, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gautier, M.; Detaint, D.; Fermanian, C.; Aegerter, P.; Delorme, G.; Arnoult, F.; Milleron, O.; Raoux, F.; Stheneur, C.; Boileau, C.; et al. Nomograms for Aortic Root Diameters in Children Using Two-Dimensional Echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 105, 888–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarnecki, J.; Obrycki, Łukasz; Feber, J.; Chełstowska, S.; Jurkiewicz, E.; Litwin, M. Isolated systolic hypertension is associated with increased left ventricular mass index and aortic stiffness in adolescents. J. Hypertens. 2022; Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petersen, S.E.; Selvanayagam, J.B.; Wiesmann, F.; Robson, M.D.; Francis, J.M.; Anderson, R.H.; Watkins, H.; Neubauer, S. Left Ventricular Non-Compaction: Insights From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005, 46, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reiter, G.; Reiter, U.; Rienmüller, R.; Gagarina, N.; Ryabikin, A. On the value of geometry-based models for left ventricular volumetry in magnetic resonance imaging and electron beam tomography: A Bland–Altman analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. 2004, 52, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van Der Ven, J.P.G.; Sadighy, Z.; Buechel, E.R.V.; Sarikouch, S.; Robbers-Visser, D.; Kellenberger, C.J.; Kaiser, T.; Beerbaum, P.; Boersma, E.; A Helbing, W. Multicentre reference values for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging derived ventricular size and function for children aged 0–18 years. Eur. HearT J.-Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 21, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lipiński, P.; Ciara, E.; Jurkiewicz, D.; Płoski, R.; Wawrzynowicz-Syczewska, M.; Pawłowska, J.; Jankowska, I. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3: Report of four clinical cases, novel ABCB4 variants and long-term follow-up. Ann. Hepatol. 2021, 25, 100342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brescia, S.T.; Rossano, J.W.; Pignatelli, R.; Jefferies, J.L.; Price, J.F.; Decker, J.A.; Denfield, S.W.; Dreyer, W.J.; Smith, O.; Towbin, J.A.; et al. Mortality and sudden death in pediatric left ventricular noncompaction in a tertiary referral center. Circulation 2013, 127, 2202–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kobza, R.; Jenni, R.; Erne, P.; Oechslin, E.; Duru, F. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients with Left Ventricular Noncompaction. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2008, 31, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salerno, J.C.; Chun, T.U.; Rutledge, J.C. Sinus bradycardia, Wolff Parkinson White, and left ventricular noncompaction: An embryologic connection? Pediatr. Cardiol. 2008, 29, 679–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Servatius, H.; Porro, A.; Pless, S.A.; Schaller, A.; Asatryan, B.; Tanner, H.; de Marchi, S.F.; Roten, L.; Seiler, J.; Haeberlin, A.; et al. Phenotypic Spectrum of HCN4 Mutations: A Clinical Case. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018, 11, e002033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Millat, G.; Janin, A.; de Tauriac, O.; Roux, A.; Dauphin, C. HCN4 mutation as a molecular explanation on patients with bradycardia and non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Med Genet. 2015, 58, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schweizer, P.A.; Schröter, J.; Greiner, S.; Haas, J.; Yampolsky, P.; Mereles, D.; Buss, S.J.; Seyler, C.; Bruehl, C.; Draguhn, A.; et al. The Symptom Complex of Familial Sinus Node Dysfunction and Myocardial Noncompaction Is Associated With Mutations in the HCN4 Channel. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Towbin, J.A. Ion channel dysfunction associated with arrhythmia, ventricular noncompaction, and mitral valve prolapse: A new overlapping phenotype. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014, 64, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Van Waning, J.I.; Moesker, J.; Heijsman, D.; Boersma, E.; Majoor-Krakauer, D. Systematic Review of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e012993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Richard, P.; Ader, F.; Roux, M.; Donal, E.; Eicher, J.; Aoutil, N.; Huttin, O.; Selton-Suty, C.; Coisne, D.; Jondeau, G.; et al. Targeted panel sequencing in adult patients with left ventricular non-compaction reveals a large genetic heterogeneity. Clin. Genet. 2018, 95, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cambon-Viala, M.; Gerard, H.; Nguyen, K.; Richard, P.; Ader, F.; Pruny, J.-F.; Donal, E.; Eicher, J.-C.; Huttin, O.; Selton-Suty, C.; et al. Phenotype/Genotype Relationship in Left Ventricular Noncompaction: Ion Channel Gene Mutations Are Associated With Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Biventricular Noncompaction. J. Card. Fail. 2021, 27, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hirono, K.; Hata, Y.; Miyao, N.; Okabe, M.; Takarada, S.; Nakaoka, H.; Ibuki, K.; Ozawa, S.; Origasa, H.; Nishida, N.; et al. Increased Burden of Ion Channel Gene Variants Is Related to Distinct Phenotypes in Pediatric Patients With Left Ventricular Noncompaction. Circ. Genom. Precis. Med. 2020, 13, e002940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mazzarotto, F.; Hawley, M.H.; Beltrami, M.; Beekman, L.; de Marvao, A.; McGurk, K.A.; Statton, B.; Boschi, B.; Girolami, F.; Roberts, A.M.; et al. Systematic large-scale assessment of the genetic architecture of left ventricular noncompaction reveals diverse etiologies. Genet. Med. 2021, 23, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chanavat, V.; Janin, A.; Millat, G. A fast and cost-effective molecular diagnostic tool for genetic diseases involved in sudden cardiac death. Clin. Chim. Acta 2016, 453, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ishikawa, T.; Ohno, S.; Murakami, T.; Yoshida, K.; Mishima, H.; Fukuoka, T.; Kimoto, H.; Sakamoto, R.; Ohkusa, T.; Aiba, T.; et al. Sick sinus syndrome with HCN4 mutations shows early onset and frequent association with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular noncompaction. Heart Rhythm 2017, 14, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Laish-Farkash, A.; Glikson, M.; Brass, D.; Marek-Yagel, D.; Pras, E.; Dascal, N.; Antzelevitch, C.; Nof, E.; Reznik, H.; Eldar, M.; et al. A Novel Mutation in the HCN4 Gene Causes Symptomatic Sinus Bradycardia in Moroccan Jews. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2010, 21, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nof, E.; Luria, D.; Brass, D.; Marek, D.; Lahat, H.; Reznik-Wolf, H.; Pras, E.; Dascal, N.; Eldar, M.; Glikson, M. Point Mutation in the HCN4 Cardiac Ion Channel Pore Affecting Synthesis, Trafficking, and Functional Expression Is Associated With Familial Asymptomatic Sinus Bradycardia. Circulation 2007, 116, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dong, X.; Fan, P.; Tian, T.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X. Recent advancements in the molecular genetics of left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Clin. Chim. Acta 2017, 465, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Vermeer, A.M.; Lodder, E.M.; Thomas, D.; Duijkers, F.A.; Marcelis, C.; van Gorselen, E.O.; Fortner, P.; Buss, S.J.; Mereles, D.; Katus, H.A.; et al. Dilation of the Aorta Ascendens Forms Part of the Clinical Spectrum of HCN4 Mutations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 2313–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wan, J.; Zhao, S.; Cheng, H.; Lu, M.; Jiang, S.; Yin, G.; Gao, X.; Yang, Y. Varied distributions of late gadolinium enhancement found among patients meeting cardiovascular magnetic resonance criteria for isolated left ventricular non-compaction. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2013, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Petryka-Mazurkiewicz, J.; Ziolkowska, L.; Kowalczyk-Domagala, M.; Mazurkiewicz, L.; Boruc, A.; Spiewak, M.; Misko, J.; Bieganowska, K.; Marczak, M.; Brzezinska-Rajszys, G. LGE for Risk Stratification in Primary Prevention in Children With HCM. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 2684–2686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Andreini, D.; Pontone, G.; Bogaert, J.; Roghi, A.; Barison, A.; Schwitter, J.; Mushtaq, S.; Vovas, G.; Sormani, P.; Aquaro, G.D.; et al. Long-Term Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Left Ventricle Noncompaction: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 2166–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grigoratos, C.; Barison, A.; Ivanov, A.; Andreini, D.; Amzulescu, M.S.; Mazurkiewicz, L.; De Luca, A.; Grzybowski, J.; Masci, P.G.; Marczak, M.; et al. Meta-Analysis of the Prognostic Role of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Global Systolic Impairment in Left Ventricular Noncompaction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 12, 2141–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akoum, N.; Mcgann, C.; Vergara, G.; Badger, T.; Ranjan, R.; Mahnkopf, C.; Kholmovski, E.; Macleod, R.O.B.; Marrouche, N. Atrial Fibrosis Quantified Using Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI is Associated With Sinus Node Dysfunction Requiring Pacemaker Implant. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2011, 23, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Genes 13 00477 g001 550
Figure 1. Pedigree of four families with LVNC and sinus bradycardia. Circle—females; square—males; arrow—proband. In red—patients affected by left ventricular non-compaction, in blue—bradycardia, in green—HCN4 molecular variant, in yellow—hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, in pink circle—dilated cardiomyopathy. A strikethrough field—death.
Figure 1. Pedigree of four families with LVNC and sinus bradycardia. Circle—females; square—males; arrow—proband. In red—patients affected by left ventricular non-compaction, in blue—bradycardia, in green—HCN4 molecular variant, in yellow—hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, in pink circle—dilated cardiomyopathy. A strikethrough field—death.
Genes 13 00477 g001
Genes 13 00477 g002 550
Figure 2. ECG recording shows sinus bradycardia of 44 bpm in a 17-year-old patient.
Figure 2. ECG recording shows sinus bradycardia of 44 bpm in a 17-year-old patient.
Genes 13 00477 g002
Genes 13 00477 g003 550
Figure 3. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) PSIR images showing midwall LGE in the mid anterior and anteroseptal segments of the left ventricle (A)—short-axis view and LGE in the left atrium (B)—4-chamber view, in a 16-year-old female patient.
Figure 3. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) PSIR images showing midwall LGE in the mid anterior and anteroseptal segments of the left ventricle (A)—short-axis view and LGE in the left atrium (B)—4-chamber view, in a 16-year-old female patient.
Genes 13 00477 g003
Genes 13 00477 g004 550
Figure 4. Heterozygous molecular variants c.1444G>A, c.1454C>T, and c.1438G>C identified in this study: (A) NGS results displayed in Integrative Genomics Viewer v.2.10.0 (http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/ (accessed on 14 January 2022)); (B) Sanger sequencing electropherograms. Arrows indicate an altered nucleotide; (C) Multiple alignment of HCN4 region of interest, showing amino acid residues conserved between species (bold font); (D) schematic topology of HCN4 with the altered amino acids indicated. The S1–S6 blocks denote structural segments, with the pore-forming region comprising amino acids in positions 465–486.
Figure 4. Heterozygous molecular variants c.1444G>A, c.1454C>T, and c.1438G>C identified in this study: (A) NGS results displayed in Integrative Genomics Viewer v.2.10.0 (http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/ (accessed on 14 January 2022)); (B) Sanger sequencing electropherograms. Arrows indicate an altered nucleotide; (C) Multiple alignment of HCN4 region of interest, showing amino acid residues conserved between species (bold font); (D) schematic topology of HCN4 with the altered amino acids indicated. The S1–S6 blocks denote structural segments, with the pore-forming region comprising amino acids in positions 465–486.
Genes 13 00477 g004
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study patients.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study patients.
Family-PatientAge (yrs)NYHA ClassSyncopeEmboliceventsNTpro-BNP pg/mLHR (ECG) bpmMin HR (Holter) bpmMax HR (Holter) bpmAverage HR (Holter) bpm RR Pauses > 2 sNC/C (Echo)LVEF (Simpson) %LVDd mm (z-Score)Ao asc mm (z-Score)LVEF (CMR) %LV EDV/BSA (z-Score)NC/C (CMR)LGETreatment
F I-12IV01N/A130611339003.345928.4
(+0.5)		21
(+4.2)		N/AN/AN/AN/A1
F I-26II00110.8067361296402.356435.6 (−0.5)25.4 (+4.0)71.073 (0.7)4.6001
F II-311I00<5.0060371476002.227046.3 (+0.9)19.4 (−0.7)71.369.6 (1.2)3.0000
F III-417II0032.9544321194702.407141.1 (+0.8)35.2 (+5.9)63.7125.8 (−1)3.7311
F IV-516II0091.103940925502.065759.5 (+2.5)36.9 (+4.2)54.2122.1 (3.7)3.9111
F IV-611II0019.045643795002.136247.3 (+2.3)34 (+4.7)70.2114.1 (1.2)3.2711
F I-IV—families, 1–6—family members, NYHA—New York Heart Association, yrs—years, NTproBNP—N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, HR—heart rate, bpm—beat per minute, ECG—electrocardiogram, Min—minimal, Max—maximal, RR pauses—sinus pauses, s—seconds, NC/C—noncompacted to compacted myocardial layer ratio, LVEF—left ventricular ejection fraction, LVDd—left ventricular diastolic diameter, Ao asc—ascending aorta, CMR— cardiovascular magnetic resonance, BSA—body surface area, LV EDV—left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LGE—late gadolinium enhancement, N/A—data are not available, ‘’0′’—were not present, “1”—were present.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paszkowska, A.; Piekutowska-Abramczuk, D.; Ciara, E.; Mirecka-Rola, A.; Brzezinska, M.; Wicher, D.; Kostrzewa, G.; Sarnecki, J.; Ziółkowska, L. Clinical Presentation of Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Bradycardia in Three Families Carrying HCN4 Pathogenic Variants. Genes 2022, 13, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030477

AMA Style

Paszkowska A, Piekutowska-Abramczuk D, Ciara E, Mirecka-Rola A, Brzezinska M, Wicher D, Kostrzewa G, Sarnecki J, Ziółkowska L. Clinical Presentation of Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Bradycardia in Three Families Carrying HCN4 Pathogenic Variants. Genes. 2022; 13(3):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paszkowska, Agata, Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk, Elżbieta Ciara, Alicja Mirecka-Rola, Monika Brzezinska, Dorota Wicher, Grażyna Kostrzewa, Jędrzej Sarnecki, and Lidia Ziółkowska. 2022. "Clinical Presentation of Left Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy and Bradycardia in Three Families Carrying HCN4 Pathogenic Variants" Genes 13, no. 3: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop