Next Article in Journal
Use of Host Feeding Behavior and Gut Microbiome Data in Estimating Variance Components and Predicting Growth and Body Composition Traits in Swine
Next Article in Special Issue
Euarchontoglires Challenged by Incomplete Lineage Sorting
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the PRA1 Genes in Cotton Identifies the Role of GhPRA1.B1-1A in Verticillium dahliae Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methodologies for the De novo Discovery of Transposable Element Families
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contradictory Phylogenetic Signals in the Laurasiatheria Anomaly Zone

by
Liliya Doronina
1,*,†,
Graham M. Hughes
2,*,†,
Diana Moreno-Santillan
3,4,
Colleen Lawless
2,
Tadhg Lonergan
2,
Louise Ryan
2,
David Jebb
5,6,7,
Bogdan M. Kirilenko
8,9,10,
Jennifer M. Korstian
3,
Liliana M. Dávalos
11,
Sonja C. Vernes
12,13,
Eugene W. Myers
5,14,15,
Emma C. Teeling
2,
Michael Hiller
8,9,10,
Lars S. Jermiin
2,16,17,
Jürgen Schmitz
1,
Mark S. Springer
18 and
David A. Ray
3,*
1
Institute of Experimental Pathology, ZMBE, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
2
School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
4
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 92697, USA
5
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany
6
Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany
7
Center for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
8
LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
9
Senckenberg Research Institute, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
10
Faculty of Biosciences, Goethe-University, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
11
Department of Ecology and Evolution and Consortium for Inter—Disciplinary Environmental Research, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
12
School of Biology, The University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9ST, UK
13
Neurogenetics of Vocal Communication Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
14
Faculty of Computer Science, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
15
The Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
16
Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
17
Earth Institute, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
18
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Genes 2022, 13(5), 766; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050766
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 21 April 2022 / Published: 26 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mobile Elements in Phylogenomic Reconstructions)

Abstract

Relationships among laurasiatherian clades represent one of the most highly disputed topics in mammalian phylogeny. In this study, we attempt to disentangle laurasiatherian interordinal relationships using two independent genome-level approaches: (1) quantifying retrotransposon presence/absence patterns, and (2) comparisons of exon datasets at the levels of nucleotides and amino acids. The two approaches revealed contradictory phylogenetic signals, possibly due to a high level of ancestral incomplete lineage sorting. The positions of Eulipotyphla and Chiroptera as the first and second earliest divergences were consistent across the approaches. However, the phylogenetic relationships of Perissodactyla, Cetartiodactyla, and Ferae, were contradictory. While retrotransposon insertion analyses suggest a clade with Cetartiodactyla and Ferae, the exon dataset favoured Cetartiodactyla and Perissodactyla. Future analyses of hitherto unsampled laurasiatherian lineages and synergistic analyses of retrotransposon insertions, exon and conserved intron/intergenic sequences might unravel the conflicting patterns of relationships in this major mammalian clade.
Keywords: retrophylogenomics; exon concatenation; exon coalescence; Laurasiatheria; Scrotifera; anomaly zone retrophylogenomics; exon concatenation; exon coalescence; Laurasiatheria; Scrotifera; anomaly zone

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Doronina, L.; Hughes, G.M.; Moreno-Santillan, D.; Lawless, C.; Lonergan, T.; Ryan, L.; Jebb, D.; Kirilenko, B.M.; Korstian, J.M.; Dávalos, L.M.; et al. Contradictory Phylogenetic Signals in the Laurasiatheria Anomaly Zone. Genes 2022, 13, 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050766

AMA Style

Doronina L, Hughes GM, Moreno-Santillan D, Lawless C, Lonergan T, Ryan L, Jebb D, Kirilenko BM, Korstian JM, Dávalos LM, et al. Contradictory Phylogenetic Signals in the Laurasiatheria Anomaly Zone. Genes. 2022; 13(5):766. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050766

Chicago/Turabian Style

Doronina, Liliya, Graham M. Hughes, Diana Moreno-Santillan, Colleen Lawless, Tadhg Lonergan, Louise Ryan, David Jebb, Bogdan M. Kirilenko, Jennifer M. Korstian, Liliana M. Dávalos, and et al. 2022. "Contradictory Phylogenetic Signals in the Laurasiatheria Anomaly Zone" Genes 13, no. 5: 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050766

APA Style

Doronina, L., Hughes, G. M., Moreno-Santillan, D., Lawless, C., Lonergan, T., Ryan, L., Jebb, D., Kirilenko, B. M., Korstian, J. M., Dávalos, L. M., Vernes, S. C., Myers, E. W., Teeling, E. C., Hiller, M., Jermiin, L. S., Schmitz, J., Springer, M. S., & Ray, D. A. (2022). Contradictory Phylogenetic Signals in the Laurasiatheria Anomaly Zone. Genes, 13(5), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050766

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop