1. Introduction
KIF6 (Kinesin family member 6) is a protein encoded by the
KIF6 gene. Proteins in this family serve a vital function as microtubule motors that transport vesicles, organelles, protein complexes, and messenger ribonucleic acids toward the cell nucleus [
1,
2]. Typical kinesins are homodimeric molecules consisting of two N-terminal domains (“heads”) that move along microtubles and C-terminal domains (“tails”) that interact directly with the transported cargos or indirectly through adapter molecules. The
KIF6 719Arg polymorphism (NM_145027.6(
KIF6):c.2155T > C (
p.Trp719Arg), 6:39325078-A g (hg19), rs20455) replaces a non-polar residue (Trp) with a basic residue (Arg) near the cargo-binding tail domain; thus, this polymorphism has the potential to alter the affinity of the cargo molecules or possibly to modulate the motor activity of the KIF6 protein.
Extensive investigations over a decade (including large-scale prospective studies) identified a close association between one specific
KIF6 variant (
KIF6 719Arg) and the incidence of myocardial infarction. Additionally, in extensive population studies, it was found that
KIF6 variants were associated with salutary reduction in myocardial infarction and fatal coronary events with statin therapy [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12].
In a preliminary investigation [
13], we were able to identify an association between the same
KIF6 variant and the likelihood of thoracic aortic aneurysm patients suffering an aortic dissection. Specifically, carriers of the
KIF6 719Arg variant were found to have a two-fold increase in susceptibility to aortic dissection (OR 2.14, confidence interval (CI) 1.18–3.9). That study was based on 140 thoracic aortic dissection cases and 497 non-dissection cases from three countries (United States, Hungary, and Greece).
In the present study, we have augmented the patient number substantially and have investigated once again the association between the KIF6 719Arg variant and the incidence of aortic dissection. The patient number is now large enough to permit sound conclusions, in contradistinction to the initial exploratory investigation previously performed.
Confirmation of a close association between this specific variant in this gene of key importance and intracellular function could potentially improve natural history prognostication in thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) disease and enhance criteria for surgical intervention. A biomarker capable of enhancing prediction in TAA disease could help to prevent dreaded dissection events, while concurrently sparing patients from potentially unnecessary major thoracic aortic surgery.
2. Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the Human Investigations Committee of Yale University (ID: 0109012617, ID1609018416) (and for the early specimens by the respective Institutional Review Boards of Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary and Evangelismos General Hospital in Athens, Athina, Greece).
Study subjects (including those from the original study and those recruited in intervening years) numbered 1108:899 with aortic aneurysm alone (henceforth called “aneurysm” patients), and 209 with aortic dissection in the setting of aneurysm disease (henceforth called “dissectors”).
KIF6 719Arg variant determination was performed on blood specimens, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [
5] by Celera Diagnostics (637 patients), by PCR by the Yale University Clinical Chemistry Laboratory or Quest Diagnostics (KIF6 Genotype, CardioIQ
® Quest Diagnostics, Secaucus, NJ, USA) (41 patients), or by whole exome sequencing of (430 patients) by the Yale University Genetics Laboratory.
We captured and analyzed the impact of
KIF6 variant status on three subtypes of dissection-spectrum pathologies: typical flap-type aortic dissection (henceforth called “dissection”), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) [
14]. These subtypes of dissection pathology were analyzed separately and then in combinations.
For years, we have applied a surgical threshold diameter of ~5.0 cm ascending aortic diameter, based on our natural history studies [
15]. Many patients in this study underwent surgery when their aortic diameter exceeded 5 cm. This criterion has just been adopted in the latest societal guidelines [
16]. So, our traditional surgical threshold has long been in accordance with the very newest guidelines.
Positive family history refers to 1st order relatives, and such history was determined by the senior investigator in family consultation.
Statistical analysis. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages and were analyzed with the chi-squared test or the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Normality was evaluated with the Komolgorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables were normally distributed and were presented as means with standard deviations. Independent sample t-tests were used to analyze normal distributions. Univariable logistic regression models tested the association between the KIF6 genotypes and aortic dissection. Additionally, multivariable logistic regression models evaluated this association--including age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, bicuspid aortic valve, and presence of syndromic connective tissue disease as covariates. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and the log-rank test or Gehan–Breslow test, as appropriate, were used to describe the effect of the KIF6 719Arg variant on freedom from aortic dissection and freedom from dissection or death. A two-tailed α level was set at 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with R software, version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
3. Results
Characteristics of aneurysm and dissection patients are presented in
Table 1.
KIF6 719Arg status was ascertained in 1108 patients; there were 209 patients with thoracic aortic dissection and 899 patients with non-dissected thoracic aorta aneurysm. Of the 209 dissection cases, 181 were typical, 25 were IMH, and three were PAU. The mean age in the dissection group was 61.7 years, and in the non-dissected group, 60.8 years. The mean aortic size was 5.6 cm in the dissection group and 5.1 cm in the non-dissection group. A proportion of 16.2% of dissectors had a family history of aneurysm disease, and 24.2% of non-dissectors. The Caucasian race predominated in both dissectors (91.3%) and non-dissectors (97.8%). The dissectors had a higher percentage of descending and combined ascending/descending aneurysms (55.4%) than the non-dissectors (15.6%). Bicuspid valves were more common in the non-dissectors (1.9% vs. 15.2%). Hypertension was more common in the dissectors (76% vs. 65.8%).
Table 2 indicates the relationship between the presence or absence of dissection and
KIF6 719Arg status. Please note that having any Arg allele (homozygous or heterozygous, that is Arg/Arg or Arg/Trp) was significantly more common in dissectors (69.8%) than in non-dissectors (58.5%) (
p = 0.003). Even just being heterozygous for a single Arg allele also was highly significantly more common in the dissectors (51.6%) than the non-dissectors (44.4%) (
p = 0.008).
Table 3 presents the data from the converse point of view: that is, clinical characteristics by
KIF6 719Arg allele category. Please note that all
KIF6 719Arg categories (homozygous or heterozygous) had a statistically higher fraction of dissectors than the non-Arg category (
p = 0.003).
Table 4 presents the odds ratios for
KIF6 719Arg positivity for patients with each aortic dissection type. We separated by typical, IMH, and PAU characteristics of the dissection phenomenon. Please note the substantially higher odds ratios of
KIF6 719Arg positivity for all combinations of categories, ranging from 1.63 to 1.94. The OR for typical dissection (probably the most clinically relevant and discrete) ranges from 1.63 for the hetero- or homozygous category to 1.94 for the exclusively homozygous category. These odds ratios were adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking status, bicuspid aortic valve, and presence of syndromic connective tissue disease.
Table 5 presents a brief summary of odds ratios for different dissection type groupings (typical, IMH, PAU)—all substantially elevated and statistically significant.
Appendiceal
Table A1,
Table A2,
Table A3,
Table A4,
Table A5 and
Table A6 present data for various groupings of aortic dissection types: Either all (typical + IMH + PAU) or just (typical + IMH), each considered in cohorts with vs. without coronary artery disease (CAD)), and with ascending vs. descending aneurysms. Findings remain robust for all except isolated heterozygous descending categories.
Because concomitant CAD could potentially confound the observed association between the
KIF6 719Arg variant and thoracic aortic dissection, we reanalyzed the data after excluding those with CAD. The adjusted OR ratio remained significant after that adjustment (OR 1.74). We performed this additional analysis for completeness, despite the fact that our extensive clinical aortic investigations have shown that ascending aortic aneurysm patients (in contradistinction to descending and thoracoabdominal patients) are highly protected from atherosclerosis, as assessed by multiple accepted measures, including intimal medial thickness (IMT), total calcium score, and rate of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction [
17,
18,
19].
Figure 1 shows survival free of aortic dissection (starting at 20 years of age; dissections are very rare in the teenage years). Please note that the two curves diverge, with a higher incidence of dissection in the
KIF6 719Arg carrier group (
p = 0.04).
Figure A1 in the appendix shows a small but significant increase in the rate of dissection or death in the
KIF6 719Arg carrier group.
In an effort to minimize the possibility of any confounding factors, we performed a number of additional statistical calculations. (1) Analysis of Caucasian patients only. To counteract influence of ethnic factors, we recalculated the ORs with all non-Caucasian patients eliminated. The ORs continued to be robust and strongly significant statistically. (2) Analysis after exclusion of patients with family history of aortic disease. To counteract the influence of any family clusters within the patients studied, we eliminated the seven patients who were enrolled from families with more than one member represented in our study. The ORs continued to be robust and strongly significant statistically. (3) Exclusion of batch effect. To exclude possible batch effect from the original vs. the supplemental cohort, we performed statistical analysis on the new patient cohort (471 patients) separately. The ORs continued to be robust and strongly significant statistically.
Finally, the KIF6 719Arg variant that we are investigating is known to appear in cis with another KIF6 variant (6:39325077-C-T), albeit an extremely rare one (gnomAD frequency of 5.3 × 10−5 in the European non-Finish cohort). The combined effect of this multiallelic variant is to change the tryptophan residue to glutamine. In analyzing our exome sequencing cohort of patients (n = 430) to determine the presence of this multiallelic KIF6 variant, we did not find it to be present in any of our patients.
Serial aortic measurements were available in 102 patients in this study. Mean growth rate was 0.05 cm/year in KIF6 positive patients and 0.01 cm/year in KIF6 negative patients. Although this data indicates more rapid growth in the KIF6 variant patients, this result did not reach statistical significance. We look forward to more robust growth rate data (as more patients are studied in the future) in order to determine if the noted trend toward more rapid growth in the KIF6 variant patients might be confirmed statistically.
Table 6 presents the results of whole exome sequencing performed in the patients in this study. We see many aneurysm genes represented in both
KIF6 variant carriers and non-carriers (at various levels of pathogenetic likelihood).
4. Discussion
We have found, in this large sample of thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, that the KIF6 719Arg genetic variant confers substantially increased risk of aortic dissection. The ORs approaching 2.00 are quite substantial for association of a single genetic polymorphism with a complex clinical disease. This risk was reflected in a statistically significantly higher rate of dissection over the long term as shown by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Aortic dissection, especially when presenting lethally, is often underdiagnosed. Accordingly, we also assessed the combined endpoint of dissection (diagnosed) or death; for this metric as well, KIF6 719Arg positivity conferred a statistically significant increased risk.
It is worth examining the biological plausibility of an important clinical impact of
KIF6 on aortic biology and clinical prognosis. Firstly, KIF6 has been localized in blood vessels and in the endothelium [
20]. Furthermore, another study found, in zebrafish, that mutations in
KIF6 are related to scoliosis [
21]. We know that skeletal abnormalities are prominent in syndromic thoracic aortic diseases (e.g., Marfan disease). Furthermore, very recently published research from our own team [
22] has found that scoliosis appears to be part of the zebrafish phenotype of variants that cause thoracic aortic aneurysm in humans. Thus, there appears to be fundamental biological evidence supporting a possible role of the kinesin family, and KIF6 in particular, in promoting aortic aneurysm disease.
We have briefly described in the introduction the important intracellular roles served by kinesins such as KIF6 and the early studies by Iakoubova, Schiffman, and colleagues [
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12], demonstrating that KIF6 is intimately involved with atherosclerosis and also with statin responsiveness. The fundamental molecular roles of KIF6 and its clinical associations are certainly critical enough that a major physiologic impact would not be unexpected from variations in its genetics. In terms of any specific potential mechanisms for predisposition to aortic dissection, these are currently unknown. Additionally, although original studies have associated
KIF6 variants with coronary artery disease (CAD) and statin responsiveness, this connection has been questioned as more data have become available [
23] In our study (
Table A1) we find a lack of association between CAD and dissection. This dissociation between CAD and ascending aortic disease is in keeping with multiple studies from our team [
17,
18,
19] showing that ascending aortic aneurysm patients are remarkably free of atherosclerotic disease; in fact, ascending aortic aneurysm patients have less total body vascular calcification, a lower intimal medial thickness (IMT) in the carotid artery, and almost complete protection from myocardial infarction. Additionally, ascending aortic aneurysm patients have much lower LDL than non-aneurysmal patients [
24] These findings seem paradoxical compared to general dogma regarding atherosclerosis until one recognizes that ascending aneurysms are non-calcified, smooth contoured, and non-thrombus containing. This stands in contradistinction to descending and abdominal aortic aneurysms, which are frankly atherosclerotic, with heavily calcified walls, irregular contour, and heavy thrombus burden. These novel perspectives differentiating ascending from descending aortic disease are also completely consonant with the findings in
Table A2 that
KIF6 has as a stronger impact on ascending than on descending aortas.
Our dissected aortas were, on average, 0.52 cm larger than the non-dissected aortas; this is fully consistent with the findings by our group and others that the aorta grows substantially at the moment of aortic dissection [
15,
25]
Limitations: Despite the markedly expanded patient pool, considerable for a rather infrequently diagnosed disease like aortic dissection, this study has limitations.
We have demonstrated important associations of the KIF6 719Arg variant with aortic dissection, which we hope will enhance prediction and patient triage. However, this association does not prove causation. The protean, fundamental actions of KIF6 suggest that a role in causation is indeed plausible, although this awaits elucidation.
The
KIF6 719Arg variant is very common in the general population (0.41 overall frequency as shown in gnomAD and other genetic databases) [
26], arguing against a strong physiologic effect from this gene alone. We suspect that the adverse effect of
KIF6 is minimal unless combined synergistically with other disease-causing aneurysm variants (such as those in
Table 6), in which case
KIF6 719Arg increases the overall virulence. Nonetheless, within the limited context of our thoracic aortic patient group,
KIF6 719arg variant status appears to confer a substantial superimposed vulnerability to aortic dissection. We see
KIF6 719Arg not as a conventional disease-causing sole variant, but as contributor to dissection outcome which can serve as a predictor to encourage increased clinical monitoring of aneurysm patients and, possibly influence the clinical decision to operate.
Patients dying upon initial presentation from aortic dissection are generally not included in our
KIF6 analysis, as
KIF6 719Arg testing, a specialized laboratory test, would not have been a priority or a feasibility under such urgent circumstances. The impact of absent lethal cases on the analysis could be substantial [
27]. For example, a presumptive preferential mortality of Arg/Arg homozygotes could artificially underestimate the predictive effect of
KIF6. If anything, this factor makes our positive findings more rather than less cogent.
The determination of KIF6 719Arg variant status was done via multiple means. However, since KIF6 719Arg variant status is a binary characteristic, it is unlikely to be influenced by the specific method of determination. A quantitative, non-binary characteristic would be more susceptible to such an issue.
Midway through this study, we began to recognize a “predictive” ability of the KIF6 719Arg variant vis à vis aortic dissection. Accordingly, we triaged a number of patients to surgery partly on this basis. This factor would also tend artificially to underestimate the effect of KIF6. If anything, this factor makes our positive findings more rather than less cogent.
Additionally, although we included patients from three different geographic sources, there were few non-Caucasian participants. So, the findings may not be representative for individuals of all origins.
Our study did not include gene expression analysis, which may, in future studies, clarify the biological pathways through which the KIF6’s impact is exerted.
It is possible that any non-dissectors in this study who were operated at low surgical threshold diameters could have progressed to dissection if followed for longer periods. However, recent evidence from our group and from others [
15] has shown that the aorta expands acutely at the moment of aortic dissection—by ~0.8 cm. So, this would bring the true pre-dissection size of our dissectors down below the size of our non-dissectors, likely abrogating this concern.
We consider our findings to me most relevant to typical aortic dissection (the most common type by far), as intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer, while often included in the category of dissection phenomena, are very different clinical entities.
Despite these limitations, we are encouraged by the robustness of our
KIF6 719Arg findings along two axes. Firstly, the findings achieve high odds ratios and levels of statistical significance, unusual for a single biological variable in a complex disease. Secondly, the findings remain robust no matter which way the patients are grouped—ascending or descending or combined—or typical dissection with or without IMH and PAU. [
28]
We feel that this study raises the possibility that KIF6 719Arg variant status may serve as a useful clinical predictor for the likelihood of aortic dissection. If so, this KIF6 719Arg status would represent a welcome “non-size” criterion for surgical intervention, broadening the scope of variables to be considered in clinical decision making. In a patient with borderline aortic enlargement—a so-called “judgment call” case—KIF6 719Arg positivity might reasonably tilt the decision in favor of prophylactic aortic surgery. The advent of such “non-size” criteria promises to enhance decision making regarding surgical intervention in aortic disease, along avenues not previously available.
5. Conclusions
In our initial pilot study of KIF6 719Arg’s impact on aortic dissection, we stated: “If the association of the KIF6 719Arg variant with thoracic aortic dissection is further confirmed, this variant could be useful in assessing thoracic aortic dissection risk”. The present study provides the further confirmation that was eagerly anticipated.
While we are excited to present this interesting data regarding another clinical factor to inform decision making for aneurysm patients, we hasten to point out that we consider our findings to be valuable yet still emerging clinical data, worthy of further replication and confirmation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: J.A.E., B.A.Z. and M.A.Z. Investigation: J.A.E., B.A.Z., M.A.Z., D.M. and H.Z. Formal statistical analysis: J.J.V., Y.L., J.A.R. and A.K. Writing—original draft: J.A.E. Writing—Review and editing: All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was approved by the Yale University School of Medicine Human Investigation Committee.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained for one patient cohort (surgically treated patients) in this study (as part of a surgical protocol) and in another cohort (medically treated patients); informed consent was waived as part of a retrospective data collection study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns.
Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Elefteriades is a Principal of CoolSpine (no clinical product). The other authors have no conflict to disclose.
Appendix A
Table A1.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (typical and intramural hematoma cases), with or without CAD.
Table A1.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (typical and intramural hematoma cases), with or without CAD.
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Including CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.73 | 1.25–2.43 | <0.001 | 1.74 | 1.25–2.47 | 0.013 |
Arg/Arg | 1.88 | 1.19–2.95 | 0.006 | 1.77 | 1.09–2.83 | 0.017 |
Arg/Trp | 1.69 | 1.20–2.40 | 0.002 | 1.73 | 0.84–1.93 | 0.002 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Without CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.74 | 1.22–2.51 | 0.002 | 1.74 | 1.20–2.55 | 0.003 |
Arg/Arg | 1.88 | 1.19–2.95 | 0.006 | 1.92 | 1.15–3.18 | 0.011 |
Arg/Trp | 1.66 | 1.17–2.35 | 0.004 | 1.68 | 1.14–2.51 | 0.009 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Table A2.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (typical and intramural hematoma cases).
Table A2.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (typical and intramural hematoma cases).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Ascending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.77 | 1.17–2.76 | 0.008 | 1.73 | 1.13–2.71 | 0.013 |
Arg/Arg | 1.74 | 0.95–3.12 | 0.064 | 1.62 | 0.87–2.94 | 0.116 |
Arg/Trp | 1.79 | 1.15–2.82 | 0.010 | 1.77 | 1.13–2.82 | 0.013 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Descending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.52 | 1.01–2.34 | 0.008 | 1.49 | 0.98–2.32 | 0.065 |
Arg/Arg | 1.95 | 1.11–2.38 | 0.017 | 1.79 | 1.00–3.16 | 0.044 |
Arg/Trp | 1.39 | 0.89–2.18 | 0.143 | 1.39 | 0.89–2.22 | 0.149 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Table A3.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (all; typical, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer cases).
Table A3.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (all; typical, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer cases).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Including CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.62 | 1.19–2.82 | 0.002 | 1.64 | 1.17–2.31 | 0.003 |
Arg/Arg | 1.78 | 1.12–2.78 | 0.012 | 1.66 | 1.03–2.65 | 0.033 |
Arg/Trp | 1.59 | 1.13–2.25 | 0.007 | 1.63 | 1.14–2.33 | 0.006 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Without CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.62 | 1.15–2.33 | 0.006 | 1.61 | 1.12–2.35 | 0.010 |
Arg/Arg | 1.89 | 1.16–3.05 | 0.009 | 1.78 | 1.07–2.93 | 0.024 |
Arg/Trp | 1.54 | 1.06–2.25 | 0.022 | 1.56 | 1.06–2.31 | 0.023 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Table A4.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (All; typical, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer cases).
Table A4.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (All; typical, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer cases).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Ascending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.72 | 1.13–2.65 | 0.011 | 1.67 | 1.09–2.60 | 0.019 |
Arg/Arg | 1.68 | 0.92–3.01 | 0.080 | 1.56 | 0.84–2.83 | 0.14 |
Arg/Trp | 1.73 | 1.12–2.72 | 0.014 | 1.71 | 1.09–2.71 | 0.19 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Descending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.43 | 0.95–2.18 | 0.011 | 1.40 | 0.92–2.16 | 0.019 |
Arg/Arg | 1.83 | 1.05–3.16 | 0.029 | 1.68 | 0.94–2.94 | 0.071 |
Arg/Trp | 1.31 | 0.84–2.04 | 0.225 | 1.31 | 0.84–0.89 | 0.234 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Table A5.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (only typical cases).
Table A5.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with thoracic aortic dissection (only typical cases).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Including CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.69 | 1.20–2.41 | 0.002 | 1.71 | 1.20–2.46 | 0.003 |
Arg/Arg | 2.02 | 1.26–3.22 | 0.003 | 1.94 | 1.19–3.15 | 0.007 |
Arg/Trp | 1.59 | 1.11–2.31 | 0.012 | 1.63 | 1.12–2.39 | 0.010 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Without CAD | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.61 | 1.11–2.37 | 0.012 | 1.60 | 1.09–2.39 | 0.017 |
Arg/Arg | 2.15 | 1.30–3.52 | 0.002 | 2.06 | 1.22–3.46 | 0.005 |
Arg/Trp | 1.45 | 0.97–2.18 | 0.066 | 1.46 | 0.97–2.22 | 0.071 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Table A6.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (only typical cases).
Table A6.
Association of KIF6 719Arg with ascending and descending thoracic aortic dissection (only typical cases).
| Unadjusted | Adjusted * |
---|
Genotype | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
---|
Ascending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.83 | 1.17–2.92 | 0.008 | 1.78 | 1.13–2.86 | 0.014 |
Arg/Arg | 2.01 | 1.08–3.66 | 0.023 | 1.88 | 1.00–3.48 | 0.043 |
Arg/Trp | 1.77 | 1.11–2.88 | 0.018 | 1.74 | 1.08–2.86 | 0.023 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Descending ◊ | | | | | | |
Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp | 1.47 | 0.95–2.32 | 0.087 | 1.45 | 0.93–2.31 | 0.106 |
Arg/Arg | 2.01 | 1.11–3.57 | 0.017 | 1.88 | 1.02–3.41 | 0.036 |
Arg/Trp | 1.30 | 0.81–2.11 | 0.274 | 1.31 | 0.81–2.15 | 0.270 |
Trp/Trp | REF | | | REF | | |
Figure A1.
Freedom from dissection or death in the KIF6 719Arg carriers and non-carriers. Note the small but statistically significantly increased rate of events in the positive carriers.
Figure A1.
Freedom from dissection or death in the KIF6 719Arg carriers and non-carriers. Note the small but statistically significantly increased rate of events in the positive carriers.
References
- KIF6 KinesinFamily Member 6 [Homo sapiens (Human)] Gene ID: 221458. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?Db=gene&Cmd=DetailsSearch&Term=221458 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
- Li, Y.; Iakoubova, O.A.; Schiffman, D.; Devlin, J.J.; Forrester, J.S.; Spuerko, H.R. KIF6 polymorphism as a predictor of risks of coronary events and of clinical event reduction by statin therapy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2010, 106, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Sabatine, M.S.; Tong, C.H.; Ford, I.; Kirschgessner, T.G.; Packard, C.J.; Robertson, M.; Rowland, C.M.; Bare, L.A.; Shepherd, J.; et al. Genetic variants in the KIF6 region and coronary event reduction from statin therapy. Hum. Genet. 2011, 129, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iakoubova, O.A.; Robertson, M.; Tong, C.H.; Rowland, C.M.; Catanese, J.J.; Blaw, G.J.; Jukema, J.W.; Murphy, M.B.; Devlin, J.J.; Ford, I.; et al. KIF6 Trp719Arg polymorphism and the effect of statin therapy in elderly patients: Results from the PROSPER study. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2010, 17, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iakoubova, O.A.; Sabatine, M.S.; Rowland, C.M.; Tong, C.H.; Catanese, J.J.; Ranade, K.; Simonsen, K.L.; Kirchgessner, T.G.; Cannon, C.P.; Devlin, J.J.; et al. Polymorphism in KIF6 gene and benefit from statins after acute coronary syndrome: Results from the PROVE-IT-TIMI 22 study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shiffman, D.; Sabatine, M.S.; Louie, J.Z.; Kirchgessner, T.G.; Iakoubova, O.A.; Campos, H.; Devlin, J.J.; Sacks, F.M. Effect of pravastatin therapy on coronary events in carriers of the KIF6 719Arg allele from the cholesterol and recurrent events trial. Am. J Cardiol. 2010, 105, 1300–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parthan, A.; Leahy, K.J.; O’Sullivan, A.K.; Iakoubova, O.A.; Bare, L.A.; Devlin, J.J.; Weintein, M.C. Cost effectiveness of targeted high=dose atorvastatin therapy following genotype testing in patients with acute coronary syndromve. Pharmacoeconomics 2013, 31, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiffman, D.; Chasman, D.I.; Zee, R.Y.; Iakoubova, O.A.; Louie, J.Z.; Devlin, J.J.; Ridker, P.M. A kinesin family member 6 variant is associated with coronary heart disease in the Women’s Health Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Iakoubova, O.; Shepherd, J.; Sacks, F.J. Association of the 719Arg variant of KIF6 with both increased risk of coronary events and with greater response to statin therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iakoubova, O.A.; Tong, C.H.; Rowland, C.M.; Kirshgessner, T.G.; Young, B.A.; Arellano, A.R.; Shiffman, D.; Sabatine, M.S.; Campos, H.; Packard, C.T.; et al. Associaton fo the Trp 719Arg polymorphism in kinesin-like protein 6 with myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in 2 prospective trials: The CARE and WOSCOPS trials. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bare, L.A.; Morrisno, A.C.; Rowland, C.M.; Shiffman, D.; Luke, M.M.; Iakoubova, O.A.; Kane, J.P.; Malloy, M.J.; Ellis, S.G.; Pankow, J.S.; et al. Five common gene variants identify elevated genetic risk for coronary heart disease. Genet. Med. 2007, 10, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shiffman, D.; O’Meara, E.S.; Bare, L.A.; Rowland, C.M.; Louie, J.Z.; Arellano, A.R.; Lumley, T.; Rice, K.; Iakoubava, O.; Luke, M.M.; et al. Association of gene variants with incident myocardial infarction in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iakoubova, O.A.; Tong, C.H.; Catanese, J.; Rowland, C.M.; Luke, M.M.; Tranquilli, M.; Elefteriades, J.A. KIF6 719Arg genetic variant and risk for thoracic aortic dissection. Aorta 2016, 4, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chau, K.; Elefteriades, J.A. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms protect against myocardial infarction. Int. J. Angiol. 2014, 23, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ziganshin, B.A.; Zafar, M.A.; Elefteriades, J.A. Descending threshold for ascending aortic aneurysmectomy: Is it time for a "left-shift" in guidelines? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019, 157, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isselbacher, E.M.; Preventza, O.; Hamilton Black, J., 3rd; Augoustides, J.G.; Beck, A.W.; Bolen, M.A.; Braverman, A.C.; Bray, B.E.; Brown-Zimmerman, M.M.; Chen, E.P.; et al. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022, 146, e334–e482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chau, K.; Bender, J.R.; Elefteriades, J.A. Silver lining in the dark cloud of ascending aortic aneurysm disease. Cardiology 2014, 128, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achneck, H.; Modi, B.; Shaw, C.; Rizzo, J.; Albornoz, G.; Fusco, D.; Elefteriades, J.A. Ascending thoracic aneurysms are associated with decreased systemic atherosclerosis. Chest 2005, 128, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hung, A.; Zafar, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Tranquilli, M.; Scoutt, L.M.; Elefteriades, J.A. Carotid intimamedia thickness provides evidence that ascending aortic aneurysm protects against systemic atherosclerosis. Cardiology 2012, 123, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://pharos.nih.gov/tragets/KIF6 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
- Buchan, J.G.; Gray, R.S.; Gansner, J.M.; Alvarado, D.M.; Burgert, L.; Gitlin, J.D.; Gurnett, C.A.; Goldsmith, M.I. Kinesin family member 6 (kif6) is necessary for spine development in zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 2014, 243, 1646–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prendergast, A.; Ziganshin, B.A.; Papanikolaou, D.; Zafar, M.A.; Nicoli, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Elefteriades, J.A. Phenotyping Zebrafish Mutant Models to Assess Candidate Genes Associated with Aortic Aneurysm. Genes 2022, 13, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Topal, E.J.; Damani, S.B. The KIF6 Collapse. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 56, 1564–1566. [Google Scholar]
- Weininger, G.; Ostberg, N.; Shang, M.; Zafar, M.; Ziganshin, B.A.; Liu, S.; Erben, Y.; Elefteriades, J.A. Lipid proviles help to explain protection from systemic atherosclerosis in patients with ascending aortic aneurysm. J. Thorac.Cardiothorac. Surg. 2022, 163, e129–e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rylski, B.; Blanke, P.; Beyersdorf, F.; Desai, N.D.; Milewski, R.K.; Siepe, M.; Kari, F.A.; Czerny, M.; Carrel, T.; Schlensak, C.; et al. How does the ascending aorta geometry change when it dissects? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 63, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/6-39325078-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r2_1 (accessed on 7 January 2023).
- Williams, P.; Pendyala, L.; Superko, R. Survival bias and drug interaction can attenuate cross-sectional case-control comparisons of genes with health outcomes. An example of the kinesin-like protein 6 (KIF6) Trp 719 polymorphism and coronary-heart disease. BMC Med. Gen. 2011, 12, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Coady, M.A.; Rizzo, J.A.; Elefteriades, J.A. Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas. Cardiol. Clin. 1999, 17, 637–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).