Next Article in Journal
Novel Variants in the VCP Gene Causing Multisystem Proteinopathy 1
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcription of WNT Genes in Hematopoietic Niche’s Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Different Responses to Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for Gene Expression Studies in an Equine Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation Model by Proteome Analysis and Reverse-Transcriptase Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Genetic Thrombophilia Markers in Thrombosis Events in Elderly Patients with COVID-19
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/genes14030675
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Heterogeneity of Pediatric AML with Atypical Promyelocytes Accumulation in Children—A Single Center Experience

by
Aleksandra Borkovskaia
1,
Sofia Bogacheva
1,
Tatiana Konyukhova
1,
Elina Dadakhanova
1,
Marina Gaskova
1,
Olga Soldatkina
1,
Maria Dubrovina
1,
Alexander Popov
1,
Ekaterina Mikhailova
1,
Evgenia Inushkina
2,
Marat Kazanov
1,3,4,
Evgeniy Matveev
1,3,4,
Galina Novichkova
1,
Michael Maschan
1,
Alexey Maschan
1,
Yulia Olshanskaya
1 and
Elena Zerkalenkova
1,*
1
Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Samora Maschela Str. 1, 117998 Moscow, Russia
2
Moscow Regional Oncology Hospital, Karbisheva Str. 6, 143900 Balashikha, Russia
3
Institute for Information Transmission Problems (the Kharkevich Institute, RAS), Bolshoy Karetny per. 19, bld. 1, 127051 Moscow, Russia
4
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Boulevard 30, bld. 1, 121205 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(3), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030675
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Revised: 4 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 8 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Blood Disorders)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) pathogenesis is based on RARA gene translocations, which are of high importance in the diagnosis of and proper therapy selection for APL. However, in some cases acute myeloid leukemia (AML) demonstrates APL-like morphological features such as atypical promyelocytes accumulation. This type of AML is characterized by the involvement of other RAR family members or completely different genes. In the present study, we used conventional karyotyping, FISH and high-throughput sequencing in a group of 271 de novo AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation. Of those, 255 cases were shown to carry a typical chromosomal translocation t(15;17)(q24;q21) with PML::RARA chimeric gene formation (94.1%). Other RARA-positive cases exhibited cryptic PML::RARA fusion without t(15;17)(q24;q21) (1.8%, n = 5) and variant t(5;17)(q35;q21) translocation with NPM1::RARA chimeric gene formation (1.5%, n = 4). However, 7 RARA-negative AMLs with atypical promyelocytes accumulation were also discovered. These cases exhibited TBL1XR1::RARB and KMT2A::SEPT6 fusions as well as mutations, e.g., NPM1 insertion and non-recurrent chromosomal aberrations. Our findings demonstrate the genetic diversity of AML with APL-like morphological features, which is of high importance for successful therapy implementation.

1. Introduction

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subvariant of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Distinctive features of APL are the accumulation of atypical promyelocytes and chromosomal translocations affecting the RAR family genes [1]. The RAR genes encode the retinoic acid steroid receptors of three isotypes: RARA, RARB and RARG, which differ in their ability to bind to the SMRT corepressor [2]. The RARA (retinoic acid receptor α) isotype is a transcriptional repressor that predominates in cells and binds to the RXR (retinoid X receptor). Normally, this heterodimeric complex with attached corepressors (SMRT, N-CoR, Sin3a) and HDAC histone deacetylase binds to a specific DNA region—RARE (retinoid acid responsive element)—thus blocking RNA synthesis in the absence of retinoic acid. Upon activation of the RARA receptor by retinoic acid, its conformation changes, eventually leading to normal myeloid cell differentiation [3,4].
More than 90% of APL carry a chromosomal translocation t(15;17)(q24;q21) with PML::RARA chimeric gene formation, where PML is a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 15 [3,5]. Such a translocation is typical for both the classical hypergranular AML-M3 and the hypogranular M3v, in accordance with the FAB classification [6,7,8]. PML-RARA inhibits the activity of genes responsible for hematopoietic differentiation, which leads to impaired maturation of promyelocytes, their accumulation in the bone marrow and impaired apoptosis. Three types of PML::RARA were identified with different breakpoints in PML: bcr1 in intron 6, bcr2 in exon 6 and bcr3 in intron 3 (58–75%, 5–10% and 15–33%, respectively), while RARA gene rupture occurs in intron 2 [9,10,11]. PML::RARA may also form as a result of cryptic chromosomal material exchange between chromosomes 15 and 17 with no t(15;17)(q24;q21) detectable by karyotyping or FISH [12].
In 1–2% of APL, RARA may fuse to other partners forming t(11;17)(q23;q21)/ZBTB16::RARA, t(5;17)(q35;q21)/NPM1::RARA, t(11;17)(q13;q21)/NuMa::RARA, t(17;17)(q11;q21)/STAT5b::RARA, etc. [9,13,14]. However, in some cases of AML with cytological characteristics closely resembling M3 or M3v FAB morphology, no RARA rearrangement can be detected. This group of RARA-negative AML with APL-like morphological features is either associated with other RAR family genes rearrangements such as RARB and RARG [2] or lacks any RAR rearrangements at all [5,15]. The diagnosis of these AML types is difficult, and therapy with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is not effective due to the lack of specific drug binding sites [1,16]. Therefore, variant RARA rearrangements as well as RARB and RARG cases exhibit an unfavorable prognosis. In the current work, we aimed to study tumor-specific genetic lesions in AML with APL-like morphological features, with a focus on RARA-negative cases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

From 2010 to 2022, 271 cases of de novo AML with atypical promyelocytes were investigated at the Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (age 0 to 18 y.o., median 10 y.o., male:female ratio 1:1, typical hypergranular M3 n = 126, hypogranular M3v n = 47, M3 not specified n = 98). Further characterization was carried out using immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and molecular genetic methods.

2.2. Morphological Examination

Samples were selected by the morphology of bone marrow (BM) smears corresponding to the M3 or M3v FAB subtype [6,7,8]. All obtained BM smears were stained according to Pappenheim–Kryukov for a general assessment of cell morphology. According to the FAB classification [6], there are two morphological variants of APL: hypergranular (M3) 60–70% of APL and hypogranular (M3v). However, in either form, atypical promyelocytes with irregularly shaped nuclei or abnormal dicots are seen.
The hypergranular variant is characterized by an excess of cytoplasmic azurophilic granules and numerous Auer rods (faggot cells). The hypogranular type is represented by a low content or absence of granules in the cytoplasm of promyelocytes, as well as single faggot cells containing 1–3 Auer rods [13]. If there was an equal percentage of cells of both forms or if due to a small number of promyelocytes in smear cases they could not be attributed to specific variant, they were recorded in the group “M3 not specified”.
In addition, to accurately differentiate AML from APL and monocytic leukemia, all samples were subjected to cytochemical analysis consisting of 5 reactions: assessment of myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, Sudan black (SB) staining for lipids, Schiff (PAS) reaction, assessment of nonspecific esterase and suppression of esterase with sodium fluoride. Promyelocytes have strong staining in reactions to MPO and SB, in contrast to undifferentiated blasts. In addition, in APL, the PAS reaction demonstrates the diffuse distribution of the dye, and the excess of nonspecific esterase in myeloid cells is not suppressed by sodium fluoride.

2.3. Flow Cytometry

Diagnostic immunophenotyping was performed as described previously [17]. The antigen expression profile of tumor blasts was investigated by 6–10-color MFC using three-laser flow cytometers: FACS Canto II (Becton Dickinson, BD, San Jose, CA, USA) or Navios (Beckman Coulter, BC, Indianapolis, IN, USA). EuroFlow guidelines for machine performance monitoring were used [18]. Cytometer Setup and Tracking Beads (BD) and Flow-Check Pro Fluorospheres (BC) were used for daily cytometer optimization. The fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies used were listed previously [19]. At least 50,000 nucleated cells were acquired. Flow cytometric data were analyzed with Kaluza 2.1 software (BC). Residual normal lymphocytes were used as control cells for the positivity/negativity definition. Leukemic cell gating was performed mainly according to dim CD45 expression and appropriate side-scatter (SSC) values [17]. Positivity thresholds were set as 20% for surface antigens and 10% for intracellular antigens [17].

2.4. Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics

BM aspirate obtained at diagnosis was cultured overnight without mitogenic stimulation and processed as previously described [20]. G-banded karyotyping was performed in accordance with An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2020) [21].
FISH screening for t(15;17)(q24;q21) was performed with Kreatech PML-RARa DCDF probe (Leica Microsystems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) in any newly diagnosed AML. Cases with atypic promyelocytes by morphological examination but PML::RARA-negative by FISH were further analyzed with Kreatech RARA DCBA probe (Leica Microsystems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for other types of RARA rearrangements. Kreatech KMT2A DCDF probe (Leica) was used for all patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities and patients without metaphase plates. All FISH procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and at least 100 interphase nuclei were analyzed.
Total DNA and RNA were simultaneously extracted from the BM samples using the InnuPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with the Biomed multiplex system for PML::RARA was used in routine [22]. NPM1::RARA was analyzed with a nested PCR system [23,24]. The same qPCR and nested PCR systems were used for follow-up monitoring. The primers used are listed in Table S1.
Samples negative for RARA gene rearrangements by either method were subjected to whole transcriptome sequencing with NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA library preparation kit (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) and sequenced on Illumina NextSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Alignment to NCBI preformatted GRCh38 reference genome [25] was performed using STAR (ver. 2.7.9a) [26]. Fusion transcripts were detected using Arriba (ver. 2.1) [27]. Additional somatic mutations were detected with Human Myeloid Neoplasms NGS panel (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Single-nucleotide variants were called with Pisces (ver. 5.3) [28] and annotated with InterVar (ver. 2.0.2) [29]. Short indels were called with Pindel [30]. A KMT2A-positive sample was also subjected to LDI-PCR [31]. Fusion-specific primers for direct genomic DNA PCR and RT-PCR were used for follow-up monitoring. The primers used are listed in Table S1.

2.5. Statistics

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from the date of diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to the first event—relapse or death from any cause. Survival rates were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method [32], and standard errors were calculated according to the Greenwood method. Differences in outcome between groups were compared using the log-rank test. ExcelStat-16 was used to perform statistical analysis.

3. Results

According to morphological examination, most patients had hypergranular M3 AML (46.5%, 126 of 271). Hypogranular M3v AML was found in 17.3% (47 of 271), and in 36.2%, M3 and M3v could not be differentiated (98 of 271).
Standard karyotyping was successful in 69.4% cases (188 of 271). T(15;17)(q24;q21) was found to be a sole abnormality in 64.4% (121 of 188), while it conjoined with additional abnormalities in 23.4% (44 of 188), and had complex structure in 3.7% (7 of 188; Table S2). In 5.9% no t(15;17)(q24;q21) was found (11 of 188).
The presence of PML::RARA was confirmed by FISH in 94.1% patients (255 of 271). Of those, 173 were studied by routine qRT-PCR. It revealed bcr3 to be the most common (50.3%, 87 of 173), followed by bcr1 (37.6%, 65 of 173) and bcr2 (6.4%, 11 of 173). In 5.8% of patients, the type of PML::RARA was not determined (10 of 173).
No translocation between chromosomes 15 and 17 was found in 5.9% (16 of 271). Additional studies with RARA DCBA were performed and 1.48% RARA-rearranged PML::RARA-negative cases were uncovered (4 of 271). All of them carried NPM1::RARA transcript detected by nested RT-PCR.
Patients RARA-negative by either FISH approach (4.43%, 12 of 271) were first analyzed by routine qRT-PCR. This uncovered 1.9% cases of cryptic 15q25 and 17q21 chromosomal material exchange leading to PML::RARA formation (5 of 271) transcribed as bcr3 and bcr1 subtypes (n = 3 and 2, respectively). This left seven cases negative for any type of detectable RARA rearrangement. They were further subjected to RNAseq which revealed only 0.8% of unconventional fusion transcripts (TBL1XR1::RARB and KMT2A::SEPT6, 1 of 271 each).
TBL1XR1::RARB-positive sample was found to have conventional hypergranular M3 morphology (Figure 1a) and exon 5–exon 2 breakpoint junction (Figure 1b–d). Tumor immunophenotype was characterized by a strong expression of conventional myeloid antigens (CD13, CD33, CD15, MPO), although no monocytic (CD14, CD64, CD11c, CD11b, lysozyme), megakaryoblastic (CD61, CD41) and lymphoid (CD7, CD19, iCD79a, CD56, CD2) markers were found. Leukemic cells were HLA-DR-negative, although another known sign of APL, CD117-positivity, was not found. Among precursor markers, CD34 was negative, while strong expression of CD99 was detected.
Another PML::RARA-negative AML demonstrated numerous promyelocytes with bilobed nuclei and hypogranular vacuolated cytoplasm (Figure 2b). MPO and SB staining were strongly positive in the leukemic cells. The morphologic and cytochemical findings suggested AML of the M3v subtype. Flow cytometry revealed the population of leukemic cells positive for CD45, CD33, CD34, CD15, HLA-DR, CD123, CD4 and MPO; slightly positive for CD11a, CD11c and CD13; negative for CD117, CD14 and NG2, with co-expression of CD56 and cytoplasmic CD79a. This phenotype was not characteristic for APL (Figure 2a). Conventional karyotyping revealed ins(X;11)(q24;q14q25) (Figure 2c). Blast cells contained KMT2A gene rearrangement and no t(15;17)(q22;q21) (Figure 2d,e). None of the PML::RARA fusion transcript types were found by RT-PCR. Eight of the most frequent KMT2A fusions with partner genes EPS15, AFF1, MLLT3, MLLT1, AFDN, MLLT10, MLLT6 and ELL were also excluded. KMT2A intron 11 was fused to the SEPT6 intron 1 as found by LDI-PCR (GenBank MH973319.1; Figure 2f,g). RNAseq showed the expression of two KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion transcript variants. The Sanger sequence analysis of the products confirmed the identity of the chimeric transcript by showing KMT2A exon 11 fused to SEPT6 exon 2 and an alternatively spliced transcript of KMT2A exon 10 fused to SEPT6 exon 2 (Figure 2g,h). The exact same fusion gene was found in relapse in BM blasts as well as in cells from cerebrospinal fluid.
The remaining five patients did not carry any gene fusions (1.8%; Table S2). All these patients were positive for CD33, CD13 and MPO, while negative for HLA-DR. CD117-positivity was detected in three of them, while one child was CD34-positive as well. Expression of CD123 was found in four patients, CD15 in three, and lysozyme displayed low expression in all three patients who were tested. Only in one case lymphoid antigen (CD2) was found.
Fusion-negative AML with APL-like morphological features did not carry any recurrent chromosomal aberrations. They included two cases of non-recurrent chromosomal rearrangements and three AMLs with normal karyotype. Additional mutations affected PTPN11, NRAS, IDH2 and a single case of NPM1 insertion and FLT3-ITD co-occurrence. Nonsynonymous deleterious exonic variants are listed in Table S3. The overall morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular heterogeneity of pediatric AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation is summarized in Table 1.
Outcome data were available for 86.3% of the studied cohort (234 of 271). The three-year OS rate in patients with RARA gene rearrangements placed on ATRA combined with cytarabine and daunorubicin therapy was 90.0 ± 2.0%, while EFS was 75.0 ± 5.0% (n = 227). RARA-negative patients were treated with either APL approach (same as RARA-positive group; n = 6) or AML intermediate risk approach (cytarabine, mitoxantrone, etoposide; n = 1). RARA-negativity was associated with lower survival rates (OS 67.0 ± 27.0%; EFS 33.0 ± 25.0%); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance due to the small size of the RARA-negative cohort (p = 0.8 and 0.11, respectively). Survival curves are depicted in Figure 3. First-line treatment and outcome data of pediatric AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation are summarized in Table 1.

4. Discussion

Atypical promyelocytes accumulation, as defined by morphology, strongly correlates with the RARA gene rearrangements. In our study, 94.1% of patients demonstrated classic APL with t(15;17)(q24;q21)/PML::RARA, 1.9% carried cryptic PML::RARA and 1.5% had t(5;17)(q35;q21)/NPM1::RARA variant (255, 5 and 4 of 271, respectively). PML::RARA bcr1:bcr2:bcr3 ratio was reported to be roughly 2:1:2 in both adult and pediatric APL [10,33]. In our cohort, the major subtype was bcr3 accounting for 50.3% of studied cases. The information on transcript subtypes was used for subsequent MRD monitoring by qRT-PCR which is a current standard for this type of AML [34].
NPM1::RARA fusion transcript was found in four patients and exhibited a conservative exon 4–exon 3 breakpoint junction. NPM1 gene at 5q35 encodes the nucleophosmin protein and moves between the nucleus, nucleolus and cytoplasm, participating in the regulation of p53, the tumor suppressor ARF and many other cellular functions [35,36]. NPM1::RARA acts as a retinoic acid-dependent transcriptional activator similarly to PML::RARA [5]. However, rare cases of RARA-negative AML with APL-like features were also described featuring RARB or RARG [16,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47], KMT2A fusions [33,48,49] and various other genetics [15,33,50,51,52] (see Table S4). In our study, they accounted for 4.4% of the studied cohort and included one case of RARB isotype gene rearrangement TBL1XR1::RARB (0.4%), one case of KMT2A-rearranged AML (0.4%) and five patients without fusions (1.9%).
TBL1XR1 (transducin β-line 1 X-linked receptor 1) is located at 3q26 and encodes WD-40 protein, which has the LiSH domain [53]. Transcription of this gene affects the interaction of its products with some histones and N-COR and SMRT corepressors, reducing their repressive functions. TBL1XR1::RARB transcript discovered in the study had breakpoints in exon 5 and exon 2, respectively, which was previously described in APL [41,43]. The oncogenic protein is similar to PML::RARA in its action and reduces the transcriptional activity of the retinoic acid pathway [33].
An unusual case of KMT2A::SEPT6-positive AML resembling APL at diagnosis deserves special attention. KMT2A, also known as MLL, located at 11q23, encodes a lysin-specific histone methyltransferase critical for the HOX genes expression. As a result of KMT2A rearrangements, upregulated HOX expression in hematopoietic stem cells leads to disruption of their differentiation and development of leukemogenesis [54]. Septin genes are rarely but recurrently translocated to KMT2A, and SEPT6 is the most widespread among them [55]. They encode ubiquitously expressed small GTP-binding proteins that are involved in various cellular processes, including cytoskeletal organization, cytokinesis and membrane dynamics [56].
Although most pediatric patients with KMT2A rearrangements were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, it was suggested that the KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion gene tends to induce differentiation of cells into the myeloid lineage [57]. The described patient, being a 3-year-old girl, falls within the characteristic age group. She lacked hepatosplenomegaly, but showed central nervous system (CNS) involvement both initially and in relapse, where it was especially prominent and resulted in left-side face paralysis.
There is a limited number of reports on KMT2A-rearranged AML with morphological features resembling APL but without RARA rearrangement [33,48,49]. None of them carried KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion.
Despite the cytomorphological characteristics typical of APL, leukemia cells in the reported case lacked the signature characteristic immunophenotypic signs of malignant promyelocytes observed in APL, i.e., they were positive for HLA-DR, CD34 and brightly positive for CD117. On the other hand, they exhibited typical features of KMT2A-rearranged AML, such as very bright expression of CD33 and HLA-DR and expression of CD4 and CD56, which have been noted [58]. NG2 expression, which is considered very specific for aberrations involving KMT2A [59,60], was not found on the tumor cells. Thus, being not typically promyelocytic by immunophenotype, the leukemia described did not represent all characteristic KMT2A-rearrangement antigen profiles as well.
The leukemic cells of the other six PML::RARA-negative AML cases with APL-like morphological features, except the KMT2A-positive patient (due to the specific tumor biology), had more or less a typical myeloid immunophenotype, with strong expression of pan-myeloid antigens (CD33, CD13, MPO). Moreover, all of them were HLA-DR-negative as can be expected for APL cases [61]. On the other hand, it is known that HLA-DR-negativity is frequently found in non-APL cases of AML [62]. The expression of CD117, which is also frequently described for APL [63], was found only in part of the cohort, and in several cases progenitor markers (CD99 and CD34) were also expressed. Partial expression of lysozyme is not typical for APL as well. Overall, it can be summarized that PML::RARA-negative AML cases with APL-like morphological features displayed relatively heterogeneous antigen expression profiles with a mix of typical and atypical APL immunophenotypic features.
Modern therapy for classical APL with PML::RARA is considered to be a combination of ATRA and ATO which both lead to disruption of the fusion protein and restore the activity of the retinoic acid receptor pathway, unblock myeloid differentiation and decrease the proliferative capacity of abnormal cells [2,4,64,65,66]. ATRA, in combination with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, has been shown to significantly improve APL outcomes in both adults and children with a 10-year OS of 89% and a 10-year EFS of 76%, as demonstrated by the GIME-MA-AIEOP AIDA 0493 study [67]. We have achieved comparable results (a 3-year OS of 90% and a 3-year EFS of 75%) with this treatment approach.
Variant X::RARA-associated APLs are considered to have the same pathogenetic mechanism and were shown to respond to ATRA therapy. However, NPM1::RARA cases require a higher dosage of ATRA due to the high affinity for corepressor molecules and are at higher risk of relapse [64,66,68,69]. PLZF::RARA, STAT3::RARA, STAT5B::RARA, or CPSF6::RARA were shown to have poor response to ATRA [70]. On the other hand, in some cases of TBL1XR1::RARA, remission was achieved after prolonged treatment with ATRA, ATO and chemotherapy [71]. As for the cohort described in the present work, survival data were available for two NPM1::RARA-positive patients who received ATRA and chemotherapy, who reached the first CR confirmed by RT-PCR and were alive in CR for 28 and 44 months.
The limited data on ATRA therapy in APL-like AML with retinoic receptors B and G isotypes involvement show their adverse clinical effects. RARB and RARG demonstrated ATRA resistance and frequent relapses [33,37,41,70]. A complex case was described of a patient with NPM1::RARG::NPM1 fusion and M3 morphology who had clinical resistance to ATO and ATRA drugs due to the lack of binding sites for these substances [16]. Thus, in the treatment of atypical APL, the effectiveness of the ATRA-based regimen is strictly individual, and HSCT may be accounted as an option. Our reported TBL1XR1::RARB-positive patient received APL induction therapy, achieved morphological remission, was set to HSCT but was lost for follow-up 2 months after diagnosis.
ATRA therapy is even more questionable in AML with APL-like morphological features but without any trans-retinoic acid targets. KMT2A::SEPT6-positive AMLs meet adverse risk stratification criteria, and intensive induction therapy followed by HCST is a generally recommended treatment option [72]. As for molecular features, the reported case carried KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion with KMT2A intron 11 involvement which was reported to attribute to the lowest survival rate [73]. Our reported KMT2A::SEPT6-positive patient started treatment with ATRA combined with cytarabine and daunorubicin. Complete remission was achieved and confirmed by BM morphology and qRT-PCR for KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion transcript. The patient received chemotherapy consolidation consisting of two additional courses of cytarabine and daunorubicin and was placed on maintenance therapy with daily mercaptopurine, weekly methotrexate and ATRA for 2 weeks every 3 months. Due to initial CNS involvement (two cells per mm3 and 64% blasts in cerebrospinal fluid tap) the patient was also placed on CNS therapy consisting of five intrathecal injections of cytarabine, methotrexate and dexamethasone after the onset of the disease. Six months after remission, the patient presented with left-side face paralysis and was hospitalized. Combined BM and CNS relapse was diagnosed confirmed by BM morphology, qRT-PCR for KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion transcript and direct genomic PCR for KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion gene in cerebrospinal fluid. The patient received high-dose cytarabine and anthracycline without ATO; however, the leukemia proved to be resistant and the patient died because of the progression of the disease.
Cases mimicking various features of acute promyelocytic leukemia that do not carry any fusion genes were also reported [15,33,51]. Arana Rosainz et al. reported a small series of adult AML with immunophenotypic features of APL but without gene fusions, where all patients harbored NPM1 exon 12 insertion accompanied by FLT3-ITD in 60% [15]. A case by Sun et al. was also NPM1 and FLT3-ITD-positive [51]. Oppositely, a larger series by Zhao et al. containing 12 AMLs with morphological features of APL without gene fusions exhibited only one NPM1 and FLT3-ITD-positive case [33]. RARA-negative AML with APL-like features described in the literature are summarized in Table S4. Overall, neither cytogenetics nor molecular genetics revealed any characteristic features of this group in our data either; only one patient of five was NPM1 and FLT3-ITD-positive and the rest carried various other mutations.
Regarding therapeutic options, these AML should not be classified as APL, but as intermediate-risk AML according to the ELN recommendations [72]. APL-targeted treatment results in a higher induction failure rate and lower survival rates in APL-like AML compared to PML::RARA-positive APL [33]. However, since APL is associated with significant early mortality due to complications of coagulopathy and differentiation syndrome [74], it is highly desirable to start treatment as soon as possible. If any available cytogenetic or molecular method fails to subsequently demonstrate RARA rearrangement, Zhao et al. show a possible approach to transition to AML mode (not M3) starting from the second induction course after the first APL induction course. This resulted in an improved survival of patients who switched to an AML regimen, compared to patients treated with an APL regimen, although the difference was not statistically significant [33]. In our cohort, four patients received ATRA combined with cytarabine and daunorubicin (same as RARA-positive group) and one patient received cytarabine, mitoxantrone and etoposide (as intermediate risk AML). All patients achieved CR. Remission status was confirmed by flow cytometry, as a unified molecular assessment could not be used in this group. Later, two patients relapsed (9 months after diagnosis each) and were subjected to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Three patients stayed in the first CR for 14, 25 and 32 months.
The literature data, as well as our own data, suggest that AML mimicking the morphological, cytochemical and immunophenotypic features of APL may arise from different mechanisms other than PML::RARA gene formation, and are a heterogeneous AML subgroup. Thus, confirmatory molecular methods are obligatory for chromosomal translocations verification in patients with APL-like features. Our study adds some important traits to characteristics of AML with APL-like features which might help to select appropriate therapy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14030675/s1, Table S1: Primers and probes used in the study; Table S2: Patients’ bone marrow morphology, karyotyping, FISH results and fusion genes; Table S3: Patients’ additional mutations in genes significant for myeloid neoplasm development (Qiagen Human Myeloid Neoplasm, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany); Table S4: RARA-negative AML with APL-like features described in the literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.Z., A.B. and S.B.; methodology, E.Z.; software, M.K. and E.M. (Evgeniy Matveev); validation, A.B., S.B. and E.D.; formal analysis, M.K. and E.M. (Evgeniy Matveev); investigation, T.K, M.D., E.M. (Ekaterina Mikhailova), A.P. and M.G.; resources, T.K., M.D., E.M. (Ekaterina Mikhailova), M.G., O.S., A.P. and E.I.; data curation, E.Z., A.B. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B. and S.B.; writing—review and editing, E.Z. and Y.O.; visualization, E.M. (Evgeniy Matveev); supervision, M.M., A.M. and G.N.; project administration, E.Z.; funding acquisition, E.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Cytogenetics and fusion transcripts assessment was supported by the “Nauka—detiam” charity foundation. KMT2A rearrangement assessment was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant № 17-29-06052 and Presidential grant № MK-1645.2020.7 (075-15-2020-338).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology (protocol code 11/2018, 20 November 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent for the diagnostic work-up was obtained from the legal guardians of the patients.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or supplementary material. The sequences of KMT2A fusion gene and transcript can be found in the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank, accessed on 4 March 2021) under accession numbers mentioned in the paper. High-throughput sequencing data are publicly unavailable due to ethical restrictions and are only available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all doctors, nurses and laboratory personnel in participating institutions who were involved in patient diagnostics and management. The authors thank Yaroslav Menchits for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guarnera, L.; Ottone, T.; Fabiani, E.; Divona, M.; Savi, A.; Travaglini, S.; Falconi, G.; Panetta, P.; Rapanotti, M.C.; Voso, M.T. Atypical Rearrangements in APL-Like Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Molecular Characterization and Prognosis. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 871590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marinelli, A.; Bossi, D.; Pelicci, P.G.; Minucci, S. A redundant oncogenic potential of the retinoic receptor (RAR) alpha, beta and gamma isoforms in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2007, 21, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Melnick, A.; Licht, J.D. Deconstructing a disease: RARα, its fusion partners, and their roles in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1999, 93, 3167–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sternsdorf, T.; Phan, V.T.; Maunakea, M.L.; Ocampo, C.B.; Sohal, J.; Silletto, A.; Galimi, F.; Le Beau, M.M.; Evans, R.M.; Kogan, S.C. Forced retinoic acid receptor alpha homodimers prime mice for APL-like leukemia. Cancer Cell 2006, 9, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Yu, W.; Jin, J. Current views on the genetic landscape and management of variant acute promyelocytic leukemia. Biomark. Res. 2021, 9, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bennett, J.M.; Catovsky, D.; Daniel, M.T.; Flandrin, G.; Galton, D.A.; Gralnick, H.R.; Sultan, C. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann. Intern. Med. 1985, 103, 620–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bennett, J.M.; Catovsky, D.; Daniel, M.T.; Flandrin, G.; Galton, D.A.; Gralnick, H.R.; Sultan, C. A variant form of hypergranular promyelocytic leukaemia (M3). Br. J. Haematol. 1980, 44, 169–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bennett, J.M.; Catovsky, D.; Daniel, M.T.; Flandrin, G.; Galton, D.A.; Gralnick, H.R.; Sultan, C. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br. J. Haematol. 1976, 33, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liquori, A.; Ibañez, M.; Sargas, C.; Sanz, M.Á.; Barragán, E.; Cervera, J. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: A constellation of molecular events around a single PML-RARA fusion gene. Cancers 2020, 12, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pandolfi, P.P.; Alcalay, M.; Fagioli, M.; Zangrilli, D.; Mencarelli, A.; Diverio, D.; Biondi, A.; Lo Coco, F.; Rambaldi, A.; Grignani, F.; et al. Genomic variability and alternative splicing generate multiple PML/RAR alpha transcripts that encode aberrant PML proteins and PML/RAR alpha isoforms in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reiter, A.; Saussele, S.; Grimwade, D.; Wiemels, J.L.; Segal, M.R.; Lafage-Pochitaloff, M.; Walz, C.; Weisser, A.; Hochhaus, A.; Willer, A.; et al. Genomic anatomy of the specific reciprocal translocation t(15;17) in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 36, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Grimwade, D.; Gorman, P.; Duprez, E.; Howe, K.; Langabeer, S.; Oliver, F.; Walker, H.; Culligan, D.; Waters, J.; Pomfret, M.; et al. Characterization of cryptic rearrangements and variant translocations in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1997, 90, 4876–4885. [Google Scholar]
  13. Adams, J.; Nassiri, M. Acute promyelocytic leukemia a review and discussion of variant translocations. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2015, 139, 1308–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grimwade, D.; Biondi, A.; Mozziconacci, M.J.; Hagemeijer, A.; Berger, R.; Neat, M.; Howe, K.; Dastugue, N.; Jansen, J.; Radford-Weiss, I.; et al. Characterization of acute promyelocytic leukemia cases lacking the classic t(15;17): Results of the European Working Party. Groupe Francais de Cytogenetique Hematologique, Groupe de Francais d’Hematologie Cellulaire, UK Cancer Cytogenetics Group and BIOMED 1 European Community-Concerted Action "Molecular Cytogenetic Diagnosis in Haematological Malignancies. Blood 2000, 96, 1297–1308. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arana Rosainz, M.J.; Nguyen, N.; Wahed, A.; Lelenwa, L.C.; Aakash, N.; Schaefer, K.; Rios, A.; Kanaan, Z.; Chen, L. Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated NPM1 mimics acute promyelocytic leukemia presentation. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2021, 43, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, X.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Teng, W.; Cao, P.; Ma, X.; Liu, M.; Tian, Y.; Wang, T.; Nie, D.; et al. A novel NPM1-RARG-NPM1 chimeric fusion in acute myeloid leukaemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukaemia but resistant to all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 1023–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mikhailova, E.V.; Kashpor, S.A.; Zerkalenkova, E.A.; Semchenkova, A.A.; Dubrovina, M.E.; Plyasunova, S.A.; Olshanskaya, Y.V.; Kalinina, I.I.; Maschan, M.A.; Maschan, A.A.; et al. Immunophenotypic characterization of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/CBFb-MYH11. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. Immunopathol. 2021, 20, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popov, A.M.; Verzhbitskaya, T.Y.; Movchan, L.V.; Demina, I.A.; Mikhailova, E.V.; Semchenkova, A.A.; Permikin, Z.V.; Shman, T.V.; Karachunskiy, A.I.; Novichkova, G.A. Flow cytometry in acute leukemia diagnostics. Guidelines of Russian-Belarusian multicenter group for pediatric leukemia studies. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. Immunopathol. 2023, 22, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kalina, T.; Flores-Montero, J.; van der Velden, V.H.; Martin-Ayuso, M.; Bottcher, S.; Ritgen, M.; Almeida, J.; Lhermitte, L.; Asnafi, V.; Mendonca, A.; et al. EuroFlow standardization of flow cytometer instrument settings and immunophenotyping protocols. Leukemia 2012, 26, 1986–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Den Nijs, J.I.; Gonggrijp, H.S.; Augustinus, E.; Leeksma, C.H.W. Hot bands: A simple G-banding method for leukemic metaphases. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 1985, 15, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McGowan-Jordan, J.; Hastings, R.J.; Moore, S. An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2020). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2020, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gabert, J.; Beillard, E.; van der Velden, V.H.J.; Bi, W.; Grimwade, D.; Pallisgaard, N.; Barbany, G.; Cazzaniga, G.; Cayuela, J.M.; Cavé, H.; et al. Standardization and quality control studies of ‘real time’ quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of fusion gene transcripts for residual disease detection in leukemia—A Europe Against Cancer Program. Leukemia 2003, 17, 2318–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Downing, J.R.; Shurtleff, S.A.; Zielenska, M.; Curcio-Brint, A.M.; Behm, F.G.; Head, D.R.; Sandlund, J.T.; Weisenburger, D.D.; Kossakowska, A.E.; Thorner, P.; et al. Molecular detection of the (2;5) translocation of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Blood 1995, 85, 3416–3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Van Dongen, J.J.M.; Macintyre, E.A.; Gabert, J.A.; Delabesse, E.; Rossi, V.; Saglio, G.; Gottardi, E.; Rambaldi, A.; Dotti, G.; Griesinger, F.; et al. Standardized RT-PCR analysis of fusion gene transcripts from chromosome aberrations in acute leukemia for detection of minimal residual disease. Report of the BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Investigation of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia. Leukemia 1999, 13, 1901–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Genome_Reference_Consortium. GRCh38 UCSC Analysis Set Files. Available online: https://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg38/bigZips/analysisSet/ (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  26. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Uhrig, S.; Ellermann, J.; Walther, T.; Burkhardt, P.; Frohlich, M.; Hutter, B.; Toprak, U.H.; Neumann, O.; Stenzinger, A.; Scholl, C.; et al. Accurate and efficient detection of gene fusions from RNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2021, 31, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dunn, T.; Berry, G.; Emig-Agius, D.; Jiang, Y.; Lei, S.; Iyer, A.; Udar, N.; Chuang, H.Y.; Hegarty, J.; Dickover, M.; et al. Pisces: An accurate and versatile variant caller for somatic and germline next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1579–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Q.; Wang, K. InterVar: Clinical Interpretation of Genetic Variants by the 2015 ACMG-AMP Guidelines. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ye, K.; Schulz, M.H.; Long, Q.; Apweiler, R.; Ning, Z. Pindel: A pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2865–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meyer, C.; Schneider, B.; Reichel, M.; Angermueller, S.; Strehl, S.; Schnittger, S.; Schoch, C.; Jansen, M.W.; van Dongen, J.J.; Pieters, R.; et al. Diagnostic tool for the identification of MLL rearrangements including unknown partner genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kaplan, E.L.; Meier, P. Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1958, 53, 457–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, J.; Liang, J.W.; Xue, H.L.; Shen, S.H.; Chen, J.; Tang, Y.J.; Yu, L.S.; Liang, H.H.; Gu, L.J.; Tang, J.Y.; et al. The genetics and clinical characteristics of children morphologically diagnosed as acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1387–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schuurhuis, G.J.; Heuser, M.; Freeman, S.; Bene, M.C.; Buccisano, F.; Cloos, J.; Grimwade, D.; Haferlach, T.; Hills, R.K.; Hourigan, C.S.; et al. Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: A consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2018, 131, 1275–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garzon, R.; Garofalo, M.; Martelli, M.P.; Briesewitz, R.; Wang, L.; Fernandez-Cymering, C.; Volinia, S.; Liu, C.G.; Schnittger, S.; Haferlach, T.; et al. Distinctive microRNA signature of acute myeloid leukemia bearing cytoplasmic mutated nucleophosmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3945–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zarka, J.; Short, N.J.; Kanagal-Shamanna, R.; Issa, G.C. Nucleophosmin 1 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Genes 2020, 11, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ha, J.S.; Do, Y.R.; Ki, C.S.; Lee, C.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, W.; Ryoo, N.H.; Jeon, D.S. Identification of a novel PML-RARG fusion in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1992–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, T.; Wen, L.; Yuan, H.; Wang, Y.; Yao, L.; Xu, Y.; Cen, J.; Ruan, C.; Wu, D.; Chen, S. Identification of novel recurrent CPSF6-RARG fusions in acute myeloid leukemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2018, 131, 1870–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, K.; Chen, X.H.; Li, Y.C.; Sun, Y.; Liu, L.F.; Yu, H.Y.; Zhu, H.H. A novel entity of acute myeloid leukaemia with recurrent RARG-rearrangement resembling acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Leuk. Res. 2019, 77, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miller, C.A.; Tricarico, C.; Skidmore, Z.L.; Uy, G.L.; Lee, Y.S.; Hassan, A.; O’Laughlin, M.D.; Schmidt, H.; Tian, L.; Duncavage, E.J.; et al. A case of acute myeloid leukemia with promyelocytic features characterized by expression of a novel RARG-CPSF6 fusion. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Osumi, T.; Tsujimoto, S.I.; Tamura, M.; Uchiyama, M.; Nakabayashi, K.; Okamura, K.; Yoshida, M.; Tomizawa, D.; Watanabe, A.; Takahashi, H.; et al. Recurrent RARB Translocations in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Lacking RARA Translocation. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 4452–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qin, Y.Z.; Huang, X.J.; Zhu, H.H. Identification of a novel CPSF6-RARG fusion transcript in acute myeloid leukemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2018, 32, 2285–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shiba, N.; Yoshida, K.; Hara, Y.; Yamato, G.; Shiraishi, Y.; Matsuo, H.; Okuno, Y.; Chiba, K.; Tanaka, H.; Kaburagi, T.; et al. Transcriptome analysis offers a comprehensive illustration of the genetic background of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 3157–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, Y.; Hou, J.; Wan, L.; Liu, K.; Zhou, C.; Wei, S.; Zhang, G.; Lin, D.; Li, Y.; Fang, Q.; et al. A short report of novel RARG-HNRNPM fusion gene in resembling acute promyelocytic leukemia. Hematology 2022, 27, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Su, Z.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Hu, W.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, H.; Feng, X.; Zhang, S.; Yang, J.; Shi, X.; et al. Novel reciprocal fusion genes involving HNRNPC and RARG in acute promyelocytic leukemia lacking RARA rearrangement. Haematologica 2020, 105, e376–e378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Such, E.; Cervera, J.; Valencia, A.; Barragan, E.; Ibanez, M.; Luna, I.; Fuster, O.; Perez-Sirvent, M.L.; Senent, L.; Sempere, A.; et al. A novel NUP98/RARG gene fusion in acute myeloid leukemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2011, 117, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, M.; Lin, H.; Chu, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, X.; Cen, J.; Shen, H.; Pan, J.; Wang, Y.; Shen, H.; et al. Identification of a recurrent fusion NUP98-RARG in acute myeloid leukaemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2022, 197, e73–e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, L.C.; Smith, S.V.; Kaiser-Rogers, K.; Rao, K.; Dunphy, C.H. Two cases of acute myeloid leukemia with t(11;17) associated with varying morphology and immunophenotype: Rearrangement of the MLL gene and a region proximal to the RARalpha gene. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2005, 159, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Xu, H.; Li, J.; Yu, W. MLL-rearrangement can resemble acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2019, 60, 2841–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bruyere, H.; Sutherland, H.; Chipperfield, K.; Hudoba, M. Concomitant and successive amplifications of MYC in APL-like leukemia. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2010, 197, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, J.; Ning, S.; Feng, R.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Xing, B.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Pei, L.; Liu, H. Acute myeloid leukemia with cup-like blasts and FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations mimics features of acute promyelocytic leukemia: A case of durable remission after sorafenib and low-dose cytarabine. Anticancer. Drugs 2022, 33, e813–e817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Frater, J.L.; Hoover, R.G.; Bernreuter, K.; Batanian, J.R. Deletion of MYC and presence of double minutes with MYC amplification in a morphologic acute promyelocytic leukemia-like case lacking RARA rearrangement: Could early exclusion of double-minute chromosomes be a prognostic factor? Cancer Genet. Cytogenet 2006, 166, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.M.; Chang, Q.; Zeng, L.; Gu, J.; Brown, S.; Basch, R.S. TBLR1 regulates the expression of nuclear hormone receptor co-repressors. BMC Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Armstrong, S.A.; Staunton, J.E.; Silverman, L.B.; Pieters, R.; den Boer, M.L.; Minden, M.D.; Sallan, S.E.; Lander, E.S.; Golub, T.R.; Korsmeyer, S.J. MLL translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Meyer, C.; Burmeister, T.; Groger, D.; Tsaur, G.; Fechina, L.; Renneville, A.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.C.; Emerenciano, M.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S.; et al. The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2017. Leukemia 2018, 32, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Neubauer, K.; Zieger, B. The Mammalian Septin Interactome. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cerveira, N.; Micci, F.; Santos, J.; Pinheiro, M.; Correia, C.; Lisboa, S.; Bizarro, S.; Norton, L.; Glomstein, A.; Asberg, A.E.; et al. Molecular characterization of the MLL-SEPT6 fusion gene in acute myeloid leukemia: Identification of novel fusion transcripts and cloning of genomic breakpoint junctions. Haematologica 2008, 93, 1076–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wuchter, C.; Harbott, J.; Schoch, C.; Schnittger, S.; Borkhardt, A.; Karawajew, L.; Ratei, R.; Ruppert, V.; Haferlach, T.; Creutzig, U.; et al. Detection of acute leukemia cells with mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene rearrangements by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibody 7.1. Leukemia 2000, 14, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, X.; Cherian, S. Acute Myeloid Leukemia Immunophenotyping by Flow Cytometric Analysis. Clin. Lab. Med. 2017, 37, 753–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zerkalenkova, E.; Mikhaylova, E.; Lebedeva, S.; Illarionova, O.; Baidun, L.; Kashpor, S.; Osipova, E.; Maschan, M.; Maschan, A.; Novichkova, G.; et al. Quantification of NG2-positivity for the precise prediction of KMT2A gene rearrangements in childhood acute leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2021, 60, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gorczyca, W. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: Four distinct patterns by flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Pol. J. Pathol. 2012, 63, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mikhailova, E.V.; Mochalova, N.S.; Kashpor, S.A.; Zerkalenkova, E.A.; Konyukhova, T.V.; Plyasunova, S.A.; Olshanskaya, Y.V.; Kalinina, I.I.; Maschan, M.A.; Maschan, A.A.; et al. Low specificity of HLA-DR expression for diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. Immunopathol. 2022, 21, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fang, H.; Wang, S.A.; Hu, S.; Konoplev, S.N.; Mo, H.; Liu, W.; Zuo, Z.; Xu, J.; Jorgensen, J.L.; Yin, C.C.; et al. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: Immunophenotype and differential diagnosis by flow cytometry. Cytom. B Clin. Cytom. 2022, 102, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bolouri, H.; Farrar, J.E.; Triche, T., Jr.; Ries, R.E.; Lim, E.L.; Alonzo, T.A.; Ma, Y.; Moore, R.; Mungall, A.J.; Marra, M.A.; et al. The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lo-Coco, F.; Cicconi, L.; Voso, M.T. Progress and criticalities in the management of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 99221–99222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sobas, M.; Talarn-Forcadell, M.C.; Martinez-Cuadron, D.; Escoda, L.; Garcia-Perez, M.J.; Mariz, J.; Mela-Osorio, M.J.; Fernandez, I.; Alonso-Dominguez, J.M.; Cornago-Navascues, J.; et al. PLZF-RARalpha, NPM1-RARalpha, and Other Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Variants: The PETHEMA Registry Experience and Systematic Literature Review. Cancers 2020, 12, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Testi, A.M.; Biondi, A.; Lo Coco, F.; Moleti, M.L.; Giona, F.; Vignetti, M.; Menna, G.; Locatelli, F.; Pession, A.; Barisone, E.; et al. GIMEMA-AIEOPAIDA protocol for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in children. Blood 2005, 106, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chattopadhyay, A.; Hood, B.L.; Conrads, T.P.; Redner, R.L. Extrinsic apoptosis is impeded by direct binding of the APL fusion protein NPM-RAR to TRADD. Mol. Cancer Res. 2014, 12, 1283–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Papaemmanuil, E.; Gerstung, M.; Bullinger, L.; Gaidzik, V.I.; Paschka, P.; Roberts, N.D.; Potter, N.E.; Heuser, M.; Thol, F.; Bolli, N.; et al. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2209–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wen, L.; Xu, Y.; Yao, L.; Wang, N.; Wang, Q.; Liu, T.; Pan, J.; Cen, J.; Zhou, H.; Miao, M.; et al. Clinical and molecular features of acute promyelocytic leukemia with variant retinoid acid receptor fusions. Haematologica 2019, 104, e195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, C.; Li, C.; Ru, K.; Rao, Q.; Xing, H.; Tian, Z.; Tang, K.; Mi, Y.; et al. TBLR1 fuses to retinoid acid receptor alpha in a variant t(3;17)(q26;q21) translocation of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2014, 124, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dohner, H.; Wei, A.H.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Craddock, C.; DiNardo, C.D.; Dombret, H.; Ebert, B.L.; Fenaux, P.; Godley, L.A.; Hasserjian, R.P.; et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 2022, 140, 1345–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Emerenciano, M.; Meyer, C.; Mansur, M.B.; Marschalek, R.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S.; Brazilian Collaborative Study Group of Infant Acute, L. The distribution of MLL breakpoints correlates with outcome in infant acute leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2013, 161, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gregory, J.; Kim, H.; Alonzo, T.; Gerbing, R.; Woods, W.; Weinstein, H.; Shepherd, L.; Schiffer, C.; Appelbaum, F.; Willman, C.; et al. Treatment of children with acute promyelocytic leukemia: Results of the first North American Intergroup trial INT0129. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2009, 53, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Genes 14 00675 g001 550
Figure 1. RARA-negative AML demonstrating (a) blasts with APL-like morphology as depicted by Pappenheim–Kryukov staining in BM smear, (b) TBL1XR1::RARB fusion transcript in RNAseq data, (c) RT-PCR and (d) Sanger validation on TBL1XR1::RARB fusion transcript (for primers, see Table S1).
Figure 1. RARA-negative AML demonstrating (a) blasts with APL-like morphology as depicted by Pappenheim–Kryukov staining in BM smear, (b) TBL1XR1::RARB fusion transcript in RNAseq data, (c) RT-PCR and (d) Sanger validation on TBL1XR1::RARB fusion transcript (for primers, see Table S1).
Genes 14 00675 g001
Genes 14 00675 g002a 550Genes 14 00675 g002b 550Genes 14 00675 g002c 550
Figure 2. RARA-negative KMT2A-positive AML patient analysis: (a) BM cells immunophenotyping (surface and intracellular (“i”) expression of characteristic markers by flow cytometry; on the dot plots, tumor cells are red while remaining BM cells are gray); (b) blasts with APL-like morphology as depicted by Pappenheim–Kryukov staining in BM smear; (c) GTG-banded karyotyping showing ins(X;11)(q24;q14q25); (d) FISH with Kreatech ON KMT2A break-apart probe; (e) FISH with Kreatech ON t(15;17) PML::RARA dual-color dual-fusion probe; (f) KMT2A LDI-PCR on BM DNA (2 and 4 are wild-type bands, 1 and 3 are rearranged bands); (g) RT-PCR on BM RNA (315 bp band refers to KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 11–exon 6 fusion transcript, 201 bp band refers to KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 10–exon 6 fusion transcript); (h) Sanger validation of KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion gene, KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 11–exon 6 fusion transcript, KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 10–exon 6 fusion transcript (top-down). For primers, see Table S1.
Figure 2. RARA-negative KMT2A-positive AML patient analysis: (a) BM cells immunophenotyping (surface and intracellular (“i”) expression of characteristic markers by flow cytometry; on the dot plots, tumor cells are red while remaining BM cells are gray); (b) blasts with APL-like morphology as depicted by Pappenheim–Kryukov staining in BM smear; (c) GTG-banded karyotyping showing ins(X;11)(q24;q14q25); (d) FISH with Kreatech ON KMT2A break-apart probe; (e) FISH with Kreatech ON t(15;17) PML::RARA dual-color dual-fusion probe; (f) KMT2A LDI-PCR on BM DNA (2 and 4 are wild-type bands, 1 and 3 are rearranged bands); (g) RT-PCR on BM RNA (315 bp band refers to KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 11–exon 6 fusion transcript, 201 bp band refers to KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 10–exon 6 fusion transcript); (h) Sanger validation of KMT2A::SEPT6 fusion gene, KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 11–exon 6 fusion transcript, KMT2A::SEPT6 exon 10–exon 6 fusion transcript (top-down). For primers, see Table S1.
Genes 14 00675 g002aGenes 14 00675 g002bGenes 14 00675 g002c
Genes 14 00675 g003 550
Figure 3. Survival data of pediatric AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation: (a) three-year OS; (b) three-year EFS.
Figure 3. Survival data of pediatric AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation: (a) three-year OS; (b) three-year EFS.
Genes 14 00675 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical and molecular-genetical characteristics of pediatric RARA-negative patients having AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation.
Table 1. Clinical and molecular-genetical characteristics of pediatric RARA-negative patients having AML with atypical promyelocytes accumulation.
N579394172194235242
Age, years81438011
SexFMFMMFF
WBC *793.47.12.21135560
BM morphologyM3vM3vM3vM3M3M3M3
Atypical promyelocytes54.5%78%94.5%89%85.5%55%98.5%
ImmunophenotypeCD33+ CD13+/− CD15+/− CD64+ CD117+ MPO+ CD123+ CD11c+/−CD33+ CD13+ CD34+ CD2+ CD117+ MPO+ CD123+/−CD33+ CD34+ CD15+ CD13+/− CD123+ CD56+ MPO+ iCD79a+ HLA−DR+CD33+ CD13+ CD117+/− MPO+ CD123+ Lysozyme+/−CD33+/− CD13+ CD15+/− CD99+ MPO+ CD123+/− Lysozyme+/−CD33+/− CD13+ CD15+/− CD99+ MPO+ Lysozyme+/−CD33+ CD13+ CD15+ CD99+ MPO+
CytogeneticsNK **der(8)t(8;8)(q24;q12), der(11)t(8;11)(q12;p15)ins(X;11)
(q24;q14q25)		i(17)(q10), del TP53NKNKNK
FISH for t(15;17)negativenegativenegativenegativenegativenegativenegative
RT-PCR for PML::RARAnegativenegativenegativenegativenegativenegativenegative
Fusion geneno fusionsno fusionsKMT2A::SEPT6no fusionsno fusionsno fusionsTBL1XR1::RARB
Detected mutationsNPM1 p.W288Cfs*12
FLT3 p.F594_K602dup		--NRAS p.G12R---
First-line therapycytarabine, mitoxantrone, etoposideATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicinATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicinATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicinATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicinATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicinATRA, cytarabine, daunorubicin
Follow-up time88 months30 months30 months25 months31 months14 months2 months
OutcomeAlive in 3rd CR ***Alive in 3rd CRReached 1st CR, died of relapseAlive in 1st CRAlive in 1st CRAlive in 1st CRReached 1st CR, lost for follow-up
* White blood cell count, /ul, ** Normal karyotype, *** Complete remission
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borkovskaia, A.; Bogacheva, S.; Konyukhova, T.; Dadakhanova, E.; Gaskova, M.; Soldatkina, O.; Dubrovina, M.; Popov, A.; Mikhailova, E.; Inushkina, E.; et al. Molecular Heterogeneity of Pediatric AML with Atypical Promyelocytes Accumulation in Children—A Single Center Experience. Genes 2023, 14, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030675

AMA Style

Borkovskaia A, Bogacheva S, Konyukhova T, Dadakhanova E, Gaskova M, Soldatkina O, Dubrovina M, Popov A, Mikhailova E, Inushkina E, et al. Molecular Heterogeneity of Pediatric AML with Atypical Promyelocytes Accumulation in Children—A Single Center Experience. Genes. 2023; 14(3):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borkovskaia, Aleksandra, Sofia Bogacheva, Tatiana Konyukhova, Elina Dadakhanova, Marina Gaskova, Olga Soldatkina, Maria Dubrovina, Alexander Popov, Ekaterina Mikhailova, Evgenia Inushkina, and et al. 2023. "Molecular Heterogeneity of Pediatric AML with Atypical Promyelocytes Accumulation in Children—A Single Center Experience" Genes 14, no. 3: 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030675

APA Style

Borkovskaia, A., Bogacheva, S., Konyukhova, T., Dadakhanova, E., Gaskova, M., Soldatkina, O., Dubrovina, M., Popov, A., Mikhailova, E., Inushkina, E., Kazanov, M., Matveev, E., Novichkova, G., Maschan, M., Maschan, A., Olshanskaya, Y., & Zerkalenkova, E. (2023). Molecular Heterogeneity of Pediatric AML with Atypical Promyelocytes Accumulation in Children—A Single Center Experience. Genes, 14(3), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14030675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop