Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Non-Destructive Visceral Swab and Tissue Biopsy Sampling Methods for Genotyping-by-Sequencing in the Freshwater Mussel Fusconaia askewi
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial: Polar Genomics in a Changing World
Previous Article in Journal
Efficiency of Biological Typing Methods in Maize Hybrid Genetic Purity Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Temperature-Related Short-Term Succession Events of Bacterial Phylotypes in Potter Cove, Antarctica
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Circadian Gene Repertoire of the Patagonia Blennie Eleginops maclovinus—The Closest Ancestral Proxy of Antarctic Cryonotothenioids

by
Chi-Hing Christina Cheng
1,*,
Angel G. Rivera-Colón
1,
Bushra Fazal Minhas
2,
Loralee Wilson
1,
Niraj Rayamajhi
1,
Luis Vargas-Chacoff
3,4,5 and
Julian M. Catchen
1
1
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behavior, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
2
Informatics Program, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA
3
Laboratorio de Fisiología de Peces, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
4
Centro Fondap de Investigación de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL), Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
5
Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2023, 14(6), 1196; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061196
Submission received: 18 April 2023 / Revised: 26 May 2023 / Accepted: 26 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polar Genomics)

Abstract

:
The basal South American notothenioid Eleginops maclovinus (Patagonia blennie or róbalo) occupies a uniquely important phylogenetic position in Notothenioidei as the singular closest sister species to the Antarctic cryonotothenioid fishes. Its genome and the traits encoded therein would be the nearest representatives of the temperate ancestor from which the Antarctic clade arose, providing an ancestral reference for deducing polar derived changes. In this study, we generated a gene- and chromosome-complete assembly of the E. maclovinus genome using long read sequencing and HiC scaffolding. We compared its genome architecture with the more basally divergent Cottoperca gobio and the derived genomes of nine cryonotothenioids representing all five Antarctic families. We also reconstructed a notothenioid phylogeny using 2918 proteins of single-copy orthologous genes from these genomes that reaffirmed E. maclovinus’ phylogenetic position. We additionally curated E. maclovinus’ repertoire of circadian rhythm genes, ascertained their functionality by transcriptome sequencing, and compared its pattern of gene retention with C. gobio and the derived cryonotothenioids. Through reconstructing circadian gene trees, we also assessed the potential role of the retained genes in cryonotothenioids by referencing to the functions of the human orthologs. Our results found E. maclovinus to share greater conservation with the Antarctic clade, solidifying its evolutionary status as the direct sister and best suited ancestral proxy of cryonotothenioids. The high-quality genome of E. maclovinus will facilitate inquiries into cold derived traits in temperate to polar evolution, and conversely on the paths of readaptation to non-freezing habitats in various secondarily temperate cryonotothenioids through comparative genomic analyses.

1. Introduction

The perciform suborder Notothenioidei consists of non-Antarctic and Antarctic lineages, historically classified in eight taxonomic families [1]. Three basal families—Bovichtidae, Pseudaphritidae, and Eleginopidae diverged along the southern coasts of Southern Hemisphere land masses and never experienced polar climate adaptation. The other five families—Nototheniidae, Artedidraconidae, Harpagiferidae, Bathydraconidae, and Channichthyidae—evolved and diversified in situ in the oceanographically and thermally isolated Southern Ocean (SO). They formed an adaptive radiation and became the dominant fish group endemic to the freezing SO [2,3]. As a rare marine species flock [4,5] that successfully overcame and flourished in otherwise uninhabitable icy freezing conditions for ectothermic teleosts, the Antarctic clade of notothenioid fishes (cryonotothenioids) have been the subject of decades of numerous studies covering all aspects of its biology and evolution.
The extraordinary ecological success of cryonotothenioids resulted from the evolutionary innovation of macromolecular antifreeze glycoproteins (AFGP) [6,7], which avert death from freezing by preventing internal ice nucleation [8,9] along with biochemical and physiological adaptive changes that enable cellular and life processes at rate-depressive and protein denaturing subzero temperatures [10,11,12]. Becoming highly adapted and specialized to chronic cold apparently came at the cost of developing extreme stenothermy, with extant cryonotothenioids exhibiting greatly reduced thermal tolerance [13,14]. In parallel, certain essential traits have been lost, hypothesized to result from relaxation of selective pressure in the polar environment for their maintenance. The most ostensible are the loss of the classic inducible heat shock response (HSR) across cryonotothenioids [15,16,17] presumably due to the lack of large thermal variations in the cold-stable SO, and the loss of hemoglobin and red blood cells in the icefish family Channichthyidae [18,19], where stably cold and oxygen-rich SO waters presumably provide a reliable oxygen source that made simple diffusion a viable mechanism for oxygen transport.
Understanding the cold adaptive and specialized states in cryonotothenioids continues to be an active pursuit, particularly in light of the vulnerability of these stenothermal fishes to increasing threats of climate change. Thus, added to the historical interest of how cryonotothenioids evolved cold adaptation and specialization to dominate the SO fish fauna, are pressing questions regarding whether their derived polar character harbors sufficient plasticity and adaptive potential to survive the changing contemporary SO environment. To this end, the fast trajectory of generating high quality genome assemblies of species across Notothenioidei promises to be an accelerator in our ability to address a wide range of important questions, including variations in genetic diversity, mutation rates, transposable element mobilization [12,20,21], genome structures [22], protein genes experiencing positive or relaxed selective pressures [23], and historical and extant demography (by whole genome resequencing of populations) shaped by Antarctic glacial cycles [24], among others, that would inform on the degree of resilience of the cryonotothenioids under climate change scenarios. Seventeen draft genomes of notothenioids with various degrees of completeness have been published since 2014. A large advancement in genome resources in form of an additional two dozen new draft genomes are becoming publicly available [21].
Investigations of derived polar characters in cryonotothenioids by necessity would require having an appropriately related non-Antarctic species representing the ancestral state for comparison, to discern and/or test hypotheses of Antarctic-specific trait changes. Species of the three basally divergent non-Antarctic notothenioid families—Bovichtidae, Pseudaphritidae, and Eleginopidae—all constitute candidates as ancestral proxy. A chromosome level genome of one bovichtid species C. gobio has been published [25], but it represents the most basally divergent lineage, which may be less informative in deciphering the temperate to polar transition. The Patagonia blennie (locally known as róbalo), E. maclovinus, the monotypic species of the family Eleginopidae, long recognized as the taxonomic and phylogenetic direct sister species of the Antarctic clade [26,27,28] would serve as the most fitting closest ancestral state for evaluating trait changes and reconfigurations shaped by Southern Ocean selective pressures during cryonotothenioid evolution. A few studies have utilized E. maclovinus as the ancestral reference, namely the nature of the native chaperome [29], loss of the classical heat shock response [15], proliferation of transposable elements and a number of developmental traits during cold adaptation [20], and the state of the AFGP orthologous genomic region prior to the emergence of the AFGP genotype [22]. Apart from these more visible traits, there are expectedly myriad subtler trait changes across the genetic blueprint, requiring a well assembled and gene-complete genome to decode.
A draft genome of the Patagonia blennie has previously been reported using Illumina short reads, and is thus lacking contiguity [20]. In this study, we generated a highly contiguous and gene-complete, chromosome-level genome assembly of E. maclovinus using PacBio CLR (continuous long read) sequencing and HiC scaffolding. We found substantial differences in the genome structures between C. gobio and E. maclovinus, while the E. maclovinus genome and those of nine cryonotothenioids species representing all five families of the Antarctic clade share a larger degree of structural conservation. We further evaluated E. maclovinus as an ancestral reference for addressing functional trait change in cryonotothenioids by characterizing the network of genes that choreograph the circadian rhythm, a trait that is likely distinct due to disparate light regimes between temperate and high polar latitudes. We found E. maclovinus to share a more similar pattern of retention of functional circadian genes with cryonotothenioids than C. gobio. These genome scale findings solidify E. maclovinus as an evolutionarily strategic sister species of the Antarctic clade, and its chromosome-level genome an important resource, in furthering our inquiries into cryonotothenioid evolution, past and present.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection and Sample Preservation

Specimens of E. maclovinus were collected from two Chilean coastal water locations. In June 2008, several young individuals (~80–100 gm) were collected using rod and reel from the Patagonian waters near Puerto Natales, Chile (51.82° S, 72.63° S). We are deeply thankful to Mathias Hüne for the collection. Blood cell DNA of one male individual from this collection was used for whole genome sequencing in this study, and liver from the same fish was collected for Hi-C sequencing. Fresh whole blood was obtained from the live specimen on ice through the caudal vein using needle and syringe. The blood cells were spun down, washed with notothenioid fish ringer (0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH8.0, adjusted to 420 mOsm with NaCl) to remove plasma proteins, then embedded in 1% low-melt agarose blocks (Bio-Rad Plug Kit #1703591) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) to preserve DNA integrity. The embedded blood cells were lysed exhaustively in situ using 1% lithium dodecyl sulfate in notothenioid ringer, then stored in 0.5M EDTA, pH 8.0, at 4 °C until use. Post bleeding, the fish was immediately dissected on ice to obtain the liver and other tissues. The excised liver and tissues were cut into small cubes, and each tissue was submerged in 20 mL glass vials filled with −20 °C pre-chilled 90% ethanol (made with pure 100% ethanol and ultrapure water). The ethanol was replaced with a fresh volume twice within the next 2–3 h, followed by storing the tissue vials in a non-frost free −20 °C freezer. The handling and sampling of fish complied with Protocol #07053 approved by the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
The other collection, a cohort of about 30 small juvenile (~10–20 gm) E. maclovinus specimens were collected for a prior study [15] using a small seine in the near-shore water of Valdivia, Chile during the austral winter of 2014. Specimens were used for the study at the Laboratorio Costero de Recursos Acuáticos Calfuco of the Universidad Austral de Chile. Collection and aquarium maintenance of specimens were conducted with approved protocol 11/10 by the Comité de Bioética Animal, Universidad Austral de Chile. The post-experiment specimens were quickly dissected on ice to obtain the liver and other internal organs. These small tissues were submerged in 20 mL glass vials filled with −20 °C pre-chilled 90% ethanol. Each dissected fish carcass was then submerged in a 50 mL tube of −20 °C pre-chilled 90% ethanol. Handling and sampling of fish were conducted in compliance with Protocol #12123 approved by the University of Illinois IACUC. All samples from both collections were air freighted back to the University of Illinois on dry ice, then stored in a non-frost free −20 °C freezer until use. In this study, pectoral fin tissue from twelve of the ethanol preserved carcasses of juvenile E. maclovinus from the second collection were taken for RNA isolation to obtain full-length transcripts using PacBio (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA) Iso-Seq sequencing.

2.2. HMW DNA Preparation and CLR Sequencing

To isolate agarose-embedded high molecular weight (HMW) DNA, each agarose block was melted (70 °C, 10 min), and digested with 2 units of β-agarase (New England Biolab, Ipswich, MA, USA) (42 °C, one h). The released DNA was extracted using the Nanobind CBB Big DNA Kit and protocol (Circulomics, Baltimore, MD, USA; acquired by Pacific Bioscience in 2021) with adjustments in reagent volumes. DNA concentration was determined with Qubit Broad Range DNA (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) fluorometry, purity with Nanodrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and MW and integrity with pulsed field electrophoresis (CHEF Mapper, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The recovered E. maclovinus DNA showed high quality preservation (>50 to >150 kbp) through 12 years of storage prior to sequencing.
The PacBio CLR (Continuous Long Read) library was prepared using unsheared HMW DNA, size selected for ≥45 kbp inserts using the BluePippin (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA) and sequenced on two SMRT cells on Sequel II for 30 h of data collection at the University of Oregon Genomics & Cell Characterization Core Facility (GC3F). A total of 10.12 million reads were obtained, with an average length of 10.86 Kbp, and a read N50 of 22.07 Kbp. Total read length was 110.7 Gb, equivalent to 142× genome coverage, based on a genome size of ~780 Mb previously estimated with flow cytometry of erythrocytes (mean c-value 0.798 pg) [20]. Based on assembled length of 606 Mbp (see Section 3), the genome coverage was 180×.

2.3. Hi-C Library and Sequencing

For genome scaffolding, a chromatin proximity ligation Hi-C library was prepared from the ethanol preserved liver of the same male E. maclovinus specimen by Phase Genomics Inc. using its Proximo Hi-C kit. The library was sequenced for paired-end 150 bp on Illumina NovaSeq6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, which generated 204.5 million paired-end reads.

2.4. Genome Assembly

Following a published assembly optimization strategy [30], we generated subsamples of the raw PacBio CLR read data covering various distributions of read lengths and depths of coverage, and assembled each subsampled dataset to arrive at the most optimal contig-level assembly. These contig-level assemblies were generated using WTDBG2 v2.5 [31]. The assemblies were then self-corrected using the GenomicConsensus arrow v2.3.3 tool from PacBio (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/GenomicConsensus, accessed on 24 October 2019), which identifies and fixes small indels and other errors in the assembled genome based on the sequence consensus present in the aligned raw reads. After polishing, each separate assembly was assessed based on contiguity metrics using QUAST v4.4 [32] and gene completeness metrics using BUSCO v3.0.1 [33] with the actinopterygii_odb9 reference ortholog set. The best contig-level assembly, i.e., the most contiguous and gene-complete, was obtained from reads 10–40 Kb in length, and a depth of coverage of 64×.
The optimal contig-level assembly was then integrated with the Hi-C data to generate chromosome-level scaffolds. The 3D-DNA program from Juicer v1.6.2 [34] was used to identify Hi-C junctions and perform integration and ordering of the contigs into super-scaffolds. This chromosome-level assembly was reassessed for contiguity using QUAST and for gene-completeness using BUSCO v5.1.3 [35] with the actinopterygii_odb10 reference ortholog set. Additional manual inspection and curation of this scaffolding process was conducted using a conserved synteny analysis (methods described below), e.g., verifying that structural variants were not limited to the boundaries of a contig/scaffold, or that the large-scale organization of the chromosomes was supported by patterns of within-species synteny. Any manual changes made to the assembly were propagated to the corresponding structure (AGP), annotation (GTF), and sequence files (FASTA) using a custom Python program, as described in [22].

2.5. Repeat and Protein-Coding Gene Annotation

Repeat elements in the genome were annotated by first building a de novo repeat library with the RepeatModeler v2.0.2a pipeline [36], using the BuildDatabase option and the NCBI database as input (-engine ncbi). We then used the RepeatModeler option to generate the final repeat library, using ltrharvest [37] to perform the discovery of LTRs (-LTRStruct). We then extracted teleost-specific repeats using the famdb.py script from RepeatMasker (-species Teleostei) and combined these teleost-specific repeats with the de novo repeat library generated by RepeatModeler. Final annotation and masking were completed using RepeatMasker v4.1.2-p1, using our custom library (-lib).
To annotate protein coding genes, we used the RNAseq data available in NCBI SRA under accession number SRX2523921 we previously generated to build a de novo reference transcriptome for E. maclovinus [15]. The RNAseq reads were aligned to the reference assembly using STAR [38] v2.7.1.a (--runMode alignReads). These alignments were used as input to the BRAKER v2.1.6 annotation pipeline [39,40] in transcript mode (--bam). In addition, we also ran BRAKER in protein mode, using the orthodb v10.1 [41] zebrafish reference protein sequences as input (--prot_seq). The output of both BRAKER runs were then aggregated using TSEBRA v1.0.1 [42], obtaining a curated set of protein-coding gene annotations supported by both transcript and protein evidence.

2.6. Conserved Synteny Analysis

We used the Synolog software [43,44] to evaluate conserved synteny and determine orthologous chromosomes between E. maclovinus and other notothenioid species. A total of ten notothenioid genomes were used for comparisons against E. maclovinus, which include the basal, non-Antarctic C. gobio (Bovichtidae) [25], five red-blooded cryonotothenioids across four different families (Trematomus bernacchii (Nototheniidae) [21], Dissostichus mawsoni (Nototheniidae) [45], Gymnodraco acuticeps (Bathydraconidae) [21], Harpagifer antarcticus (Harpagiferidae) [21], and Pogonophryne albipinna (Artedidraconidae) (NCBI GCA_028583405.1), and four white-blooded icefishes (Channichthyidae; Champsocephalus esox and Champsocephalus gunnari [22], Chaenocephalus aceratus (NCBI GCA_023974075.1), and Pseudochaenichthys georgianus [21]). To run Synolog, we first reciprocally matched the annotated gene models for all species using the blastp algorithm in BLAST+ v2.4.0 [46]. The resulting BLAST outputs and the annotation coordinates then serve as input to Synolog, which finds orthologous genes using reciprocal BLAST best hits and identifies blocks of conserved synteny based on the coordinates of the matched orthologs along a sliding window. The matching of orthologs is further refined by sequential rounds of synteny block identification, which allows for a more accurate identification of orthologous genes between species in the presence of paralogs.
In addition to these ten notothenioid genomes, we also included comparisons against three teleost outgroup species, including zebrafish (Danio rerio), threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and platyfish (Xiphophorous maculatus), in order to validate the annotation of genes of interest (genes participating in circadian rhythm, discussed below). In addition, this conserved synteny approach was used to name the E. maclovinus chromosomal scaffolds. The E. maclovinus chromosomes were numbered according to the orthologous platyfish chromosomes (Figure S1), as this outgroup species serves as an example of the ancestral teleost karyotype of 24 chromosomes [47]. Accession information for the genome assemblies used for the comparative synteny analysis and circadian gene curation (next section) is given in Table S1.

2.7. Notothenioid Species Phylogeny Reconstruction

We leveraged our new E. maclovinus genome data and reconstructed an abbreviated species phylogeny of the 11 notothenioids and the two teleost outgroups in this study using genome wide single-copy ortholog genes to reaffirm E. maclovinus’ phylogenetic relationship to the cryonotothenioids. We first clustered the annotated protein sequences of the 13 species into orthogroups using the orthofinder v2.5.4 package [48,49]. We ran orthofinder (-M msa) to generate multiple sequence alignments (MSA) using MAFFT v7.310 [50], filtering columns in the alignment composed of >90% gaps and retaining alignments with lengths of ≥500 sites (default settings), followed by tree inference using RAxML v8.2.11 (-T raxml) [51]. A total of 2918 single-copy orthologs across the 13 species were identified, which orthofinder internally uses to generate a species tree using STAG [52] and rooting it using STRIDE [53].
The concatenated MSA for these 2918 orthologs were used as input to generate a maximum likelihood phylogeny using IQ-TREE v 2.2.2.5 [54]. We ran the iqtree2 executable, selecting the best partition and substitution models for this multi-gene amino acid alignment (--seqtype AA) using -m MFP+MERGE. To reduce analysis runtime, we limited the search to nuclear substation models (--msub nuclear) and testing only the top 10% of partition schemes (--rclusterf 10). Support of the inferred trees was evaluated with 1000 ultra-fast bootstrap replicates (-B 1000) [55]. The resulting tree was visualized, and midpoint rooted using FIGTREE v1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/, accessed on 15 May 2023).

2.8. Curation of Predicted Circadian Network Genes from Genome Assemblies

We performed a comparative analysis on the presence and absence of 33 genes of known circadian function (Table S2) in E. maclovinus and the 10 abovementioned notothenioid genome assemblies. First, we identified the respective IDs and sequences of these genes in the zebrafish (D. rerio); 2 of the 33 are absent in the zebrafish annotation, thus references from the threespine stickleback (G. aculeatus) were used. For each query assembly, we located the orthologs of the 33 model teleost reference genes by comparative synteny analysis in Synolog. Synolog identifies orthologous sequences first by identifying reciprocal BLAST best hits between a query and subject species (e.g., E. maclovinus vs. D. rerio), which are then refined by sequential rounds of conserved synteny identification. A reference gene was denoted as absent from a query assembly when no orthologous sequence could be identified by Synolog. Once orthologs were identified in each query assembly, we used a custom Python script (see Data Availability Statement) to extract the corresponding peptide sequences and annotation coordinates for use in downstream analyses.

2.9. Phylogenetic Verification of Circadian Gene Orthologs

The query assemblies used for the curation of circadian network genes were not all RefSeq assemblies (see Table S1) and thus may contain annotation errors. We evaluated the accuracy of a subset of the curated circadian genes—the arntl/BMAL, Clock, Cry, and Per paralogs, which participate in the core circadian feedback loop using phylogenetic analyses. A MSA for the protein sequences of each gene family and the orthologous sequences from human (Table S3) and zebrafish were generated with MUSCLE [56], and maximum likelihood phylogeny was constructed using IQ-TREE v 2.2.2.5 [54]. We ran the iqtree2 executable with --m MPF implementing the model selection tool modelfinder [57] to identify the best-fit substitution model for each MSA (--seqtype AA). modelfinder identified the best-fit substitution models as follows: arntl/BMAL- JTT+F+R3; Clock- JTT+F+I+G4; Cry- JTT+R4, Per- JTT+F+I+G4. We tested the support of each inferred tree using 1000 ultra-fast bootstrap replicates (-B 1000) [55]. Trees were visualized and midpoint rooted using the USER TREE menu in MEGA v11.0.13 [58].

2.10. Fin RNA Isolation, Iso-Seq Transcriptome Sequencing and Curation of Circadian Network Gene Transcripts

Teleost fins are known sites of peripheral circadian clock [59,60]. We evaluated functionality of the predicted circadian network genes in E. maclovinus by PacBio Iso-Seq sequencing of fin transcriptome. About 5–10 mg of pectoral fin tissue from each of the 12 ethanol preserved juveniles mentioned above were homogenized in Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 0.5 mm zirconium oxide beads using a Bullet BlenderR (Next Advance Inc. Troy, NY. USA), followed by extraction of total RNA according to the Invitrogen protocol. RNA purity and concentrations were initially assessed with the Epoch Take 3 microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Winoosk, VT, USA), and RNA integrity by visualizing ~1 μg of RNA electrophoresed on a 1% formaldehyde agarose gel. Equal amounts (2 µg) of RNA from each sample were pooled into a single sample and treated with DNaseI with added RNase Inhibitor (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), then purified using the MonarchR RNA Cleanup Kit (New England Biolabs). The quality of the cleaned, pooled RNA sample was checked using Qubit Broad Range RNA fluorometry (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for concentration, Nanodrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for purity, and Agilent 5200 Fragment Analyzer (AATI) (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for RNA Quality Number; the pooled RNA sample achieved a RQN over 8.
Iso-Seq library construction and sequencing were conducted at the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. About 300 ng of the pooled RNA sample was converted to cDNA with PacBio Iso-SeqR Express Oligo Kit (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA), and the sequencing library was constructed with the PacBio SMRTBell Express Template Prep kit 3.0. The library was sequenced on one SMRT cell 8M on a PacBio Sequel IIe using the CCS (circular consensus sequencing) mode for 30 h of data collection. Over 3.3 million HiFi reads totaling 6.18 million bases were obtained. Removal of primers, trimming of polyA tails and other clean ups of the HiFi reads, followed by de novo clustering and consensus calling of transcripts were performed using PacBio SMRTLink v.11 software, producing a final set of 167,428 high-quality (99.99% accuracy) consensus transcript isoforms.
The coding sequences of the 33 predicted circadian network genes were used as queries to identify their expressed transcripts from the high-quality Iso-Seq transcript dataset by blastn search. Since almost all circadian network genes occur in two or more paralogs, and blastn search would match a given query to all its paralogs, the assignment of the transcript/s specific to each paralog was based on >99–100% nucleotide identity to the query gene model. The transcripts were extracted and aligned with the query gene model to ascertain absence of mutations.

3. Results and Discussion

A priori, the long recognized position of E. maclovinus in notothenioid taxonomy [26] and molecular phylogeny [27,28] as the closest non-Antarctic sister species to the Antarctic notothenioid radiation indicates its suitability as proxy for the ancestral notothenioid state, useful for deciphering evolutionary changes in the Antarctic clade. Our study provides robust whole genome evidence that supports this hypothesis, through generating a long-read, chromosome-level assembly of E. maclovinus genome, comparing its genome architecture with the genomes of the basal C. gobio and nine derived notothenioids representing all five Antarctic families, a species phylogeny constructed with 2918 genome-wide proteins of single-copy orthologous genes, and comparing its repertoire of circadian network genes against the same ten genomes.

3.1. Genome Assembly and Annotation

We generated a chromosome-level genome assembly of the Patagonian blennie using PacBio CLR sequencing and Hi-C scaffolding. The final assembly was 606 Mb in length, smaller than the 744 Mb scaffold-level E. maclovinus assembly first described by [20]. The longer length of the original, short read-based assembly could be attributed to its low contiguity (scaffold N50 of 695 Kb), likely reflecting unassembled repetitive regions and alternative haplotypes. Our newly generated PacBio assembly is highly contiguous, with a contig and scaffold N50 of 7.6 Mb and 26.7 Mb, respectively (Table 1). A total of 99.98% of the total sequence length was assembled into 24 chromosome-level scaffolds, in agreement with the 2n = 48 karyotype previously described for the species [61]. In addition to its contiguity, the E. maclovinus assembly is 96.5% gene complete, according to BUSCO v5.3.1 analysis. The combination of high contiguity and gene-completeness indicates the smaller size of the PacBio long-read assembly compared to the short-read E. maclovinus assembly is not likely caused by portions of the true genome missing. Instead, the updated PacBio assembly is a better representative of the genome architecture of E. maclovinus.
A total of 25 thousand protein-coding genes were annotated using a combined proteome- and transcriptome-based annotation. This number is comparable with the 20–30 thousand protein-coding genes described in other notothenioid assemblies [21,22,62], and the 23 thousand genes annotated for the Illumina short-read assembly [20]. With regard to repeat content, this assembly is composed of 33.2% repetitive sequences, characterized from a de novo repeat library. Nearly half of the repetitive fraction (15.8% of the total genome) was annotated as DNA mobile elements, with the second largest classified fraction (5.1% of the genome) being composed of LINE sequences (Table 1). The 33% repetitive fraction of the genome in E. maclovinus is smaller than observed in other cryonotothenioids [21,22,62]. In the context of genome evolution across Notothenioidei, this result reinforces the idea that expansion of repeat elements and associated increase in genome size observed in cryonotothenioids [63] is specific to the Antarctic clade. As the direct extant outgroup of the Antarctic clade, the E. maclovinus genome likely reflects the ancestral state of the genome architecture in this group.

3.2. Conserved Synteny

Using a comparative synteny analysis, we identified conservation in the large-scale genome organization between basal, non-Antarctic notothenioids and highly derived members of the Antarctic clade. The genomes of both C. gobio and E. maclovinus, both basal, non-Antarctic species, show conservation in size (~600 Mb) and one-to-one correspondence of 24 orthologous chromosomes (Figure 1A). A similar relationship is observed when comparing these two basal species to representative members of the Antarctic clade. When compared to E. maclovinus, both the red-blooded D. mawsoni (Figure 1A) and the white-blooded C. gunnari (Figure 1B) also exhibit clear correspondence across 24 orthologous chromosomes; however, both species exhibit larger genomes sizes, which are linked to the expansion in repeat elements observed in the Antarctic clade [25,63]. This same relationship, one-to-one correspondence between 24 chromosomes and an increase in genome size in cryonotothenioids, is also observed when we compared the E. maclovinus genome against other Antarctic species with chromosome-level assemblies, namely P. georgianus and C. esox. While changes to the number of chromosomes have previously been observed, including independent evolution of sex chromosomes [64,65,66] and extensive chromosomal fusions leading to karyotype reduction [67], this one-to-one relationship is largely seen across both basal and derived notothenioid species, and provides further evidence for an ancestral karyotype of 24 chromosomes in the group.
Focusing on individual chromosomes, we find evidence for numerous changes in the chromosomal structure between basal and derived notothenioids. Several chromosomal rearrangements, including inversions and translocations, are observed between orthologous chromosomes in C. gobio and E. maclovinus (Figure 1C,D). In accordance with their well-recognized phylogenetic placement—in which E. maclovinus is the immediate sister taxon to cryonotothenioids [3,28]—we observe a higher degree of conservation in the chromosome structure and organization between E. maclovinus and C. gunnari, in which synteny is completely conserved along whole chromosomes (Figure 1C). However, other orthologous chromosomes show extensive evidence of chromosomal rearrangements between these linages (Figure 1D). This finding indicates that, while genome structure may be largely conserved, there is evidence for the independent evolution of chromosomal organization between basal and Antarctic notothenioids. Nonetheless, given the substantial chromosomal differences observed between E. maclovinus and C. gobio, and the relatively large degree of conservation between E. maclovinus and cryonotothenioid genomes, the E. maclovinus assembly may be better suited as an outgroup for future genome-wide comparisons in Antarctic notothenioids.

3.3. Phylogenomic Analyeses Affirm E. maclovinus as Immediate Sister to Cryonotothenioids

We utilized our new E. maclovinus genome assembly, and the other 10 notothenioid genomes and two non-notothenioid reference teleost genomes included in this study to generate a large, genome-wide dataset of 2918 single-copy protein orthologs discoverable from these genomes to reconstruct an abbreviated notothenioid species phylogeny. As expected, the phylogenetic relationships among non-Antarctic and Antarctic notothenioids are in accordance with prior phylogenetic hypotheses of the group [3,21,28]. Members of the Antarctic clade form a single monophyletic group comprising the five cryonotothenioid families, with the Patagonia blennie E. maclovinus as the immediate sister taxon (Figure 2), supported with 100% bootstrap proportions. This independent affirmation of the monotypic E. maclovinus as the immediate sister taxon to the cryonotothenioids further supports the prevailing acceptance of its suitability as an ancestor proxy when investigating derived adaptive phenotypes in members of the Antarctic notothenioid clade.

3.4. Circadian Gene Repertoire in E. maclovinus and Ten Notothenioids

In addition to establishing E. maclovinus as a better ancestral reference for whole genome architecture evolution and re-affirming its immediate sister relationship to the cryonotothenioids through phylogenetic reconstruction using genome scale protein data, we further evaluate its suitability as a reference for addressing functional trait evolution in the Antarctic clade. We analyzed the network of genes that choreograph the circadian rhythm, arguably the most crucial endogenous process guiding the tempo of cellular functioning, systems physiology and whole animal activity throughout life.
E. maclovinus and other basal non-Antarctic notothenioids are expected to have a usual circadian rhythm based on their evolutionary distribution in temperate latitudes where diurnal and seasonal light-dark cycles predictably occur. The evolutionary status of the circadian process in Antarctic notothenioids, however, is at present completely unknown. The variable photoperiod regimes in the polar region means light-dark zeitgebers, which are major cues that entrain the oscillation of the circadian network, would be irregular for the endemic species. Thus far, circadian rhythms have been investigated in depth for only one Southern Ocean organism, the Antarctic krill Euphausia superba [68,69]. In free-running conditions, the krill exhibited endogenous rhythmic transcriptional expression of several circadian clock genes, but at shortened periodicities from the typical 24 h to ~12–15 h. That correlated with similarly shortened periodicities of functional outputs in enzymatic and metabolic activities and diel movements in the water column. These observations were hypothesized to represent a circadian adaptation to the extreme range of polar photoperiodic variability [68,69]. Antarctic krill occupies or is most abundant in relatively lower Southern Ocean latitudes (~53–65° S) [70]. The variability of the polar light regime would reach its utmost for the benthic notothenioid fishes localized in the highest latitude Antarctic coastal waters and embayments such as McMurdo Sound (78° S), where prolonged thick sea surface fast ice cover further reduces, or completely excludes light penetration into their habitats seasonally, leading to drastic reduction or protracted absence of light cues. In the marine realm, water temperature changes and tidal cycles could also time the circadian clock [71]. High-latitude Antarctic coastal sites, however, are nearly always at freezing, showing negligible summer warming [72,73], and circum-Antarctic coastlines are microtidal because their narrow continental shelves with deep shelf slopes do not significantly amplify tidal currents [74]. How the circadian network is entrained in the highest latitude endemic fish fauna and other marine organisms that experience these unique environmental conditions is particularly rich ground for inquiry. For notothenioids it begins with documenting and comparing the repertoire of the circadian network genes between the cryonotothenioids and the non-Antarctic ancestral proxy E. maclovinus.
Leveraging publicly available chromosomal or near-chromosomal scale genomes of 10 notothenioids, and the E. maclovinus genome in this study, and using a set of 33 circadian network genes from the reference teleosts D. rerio and G. aculeatus, we curated the orthologs from these 11 notothenioid species that represent seven of the eight families of the Notothenioidei suborder (Table S2). Figure 3B summarizes the curated circadian gene orthologs found in the notothenioids, and contrasts gene presence and absence relative to the teleost reference set, and between the basal species (C. gobio and E. maclovinus) and the nine derived cryonotothenioids. The 33 reference circadian genes/paralogs were selected based on their known function in the widely studied circadian system in Drosophila [75] and in mammals [76,77], and that orthologs are present in teleost fish. Figure 3A provides a simplified depiction of the autonomous cellular transcription-translation negative feedback regulatory loops underlying circadian rhythmicity, and the positions of the 33 genes/paralogs in the circadian process. The core loop comprises the phasic interactions of the activator proteins of arntl/BMAL and clock with the suppressor proteins of cry and per paralogs (gene names highlighted in light yellow in Figure 3B). Secondary loops involve CK1e/CK1d, and the nuclear receptors nr1d and ror paralogs (gene names highlighted in light green in Figure 3B), whose proteins regulate the core clock genes. Timeless protein (not shown in Figure 3A) also participates in a secondary loop, interacting with per proteins and others to suppress arntl/BMAL activation of per.
Relative to the teleost reference set, several paralogs of the core loop clock genes, namely arntl1b, cry3b, cry4, and per1a, as well as nr1d1 and rorab of the secondary loops were absent across all basal and derived notothenioids (Figure 3B), suggesting these six genes were absent in the common ancestor of the suborder. Within notothenioids, the two basal lineages differ in their circadian gene repertoire. The maintained set of genes (27) in E. maclovinus is similar to the teleost reference, while C. gobio has apparently undergone lineage-specific loss of additional cry (cry1a, cry3a) and per (per2a, per3) paralogs since the two basal taxa diverged. Between E. maclovinus and the derived cryonotothenioid species, the core clock genes cry1b, cry2 have undergone Antarctic-specific loss. Per2a and per3 were also lost in the cryonotothenioids, separately from their loss in C. gobio, since they are present in E. maclovinus the closest sister taxon to the Antarctic clade.
The remaining core clock genes are largely conserved between E. maclovinus and the derived cryonotothenioids. However, the cryptochrome paralog cry3a was not detected by Synolog in D. mawsoni (nototheniid) or the P. albipinna (artedidraconid) genome, suggesting varied losses in the Antarctic clade, or inaccuracy in the current state of the genome annotations of these two species. By manual BLAST searches, we recovered a full-length copy of cry3a from both species (Figure S2). Through manual annotation, we found D. mawsoni cry3a (in HiC_scaffold_10; Table S2) to be completely conserved in gene structure but contains a 1-nt indel in each of two exons, which would result in a frameshifted protein gene model with little sequence similarity to intact cry3a, thus eluding detection by Synolog. Cry3a in the artedidraconid P. albipinna (in scaffold CM053253.1; Table S2) however, is completely mutation free, and thus a structurally intact gene (Figure S2). It has eluded detection likely because the current annotation has split up the gene into two halves, each with a hypothetical protein as annotation. With the manual recovery of D. mawsoni and P. albipinna cry3a, it appears likely that this core clock gene paralog is preserved across the Antarctic clade. In contrast, manual search for cry3a in C. gobio draft genome only found an orphan exon 1 in an unplaced scaffold, verifying definitive loss.
Presence of the rhythmic genes of the secondary regulatory loops—timeless, and paralogs of CK1d/e (casein kinase 1) and ror (retinoic-acid-related orphan receptors) is conserved throughout notothenioids (Figure 3B). In contrast, the two paralogs of nr1d2 (nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D) appear to have undergone varied loss in different Antarctic lineages. This nr1d evolutionary pattern is difficult to interpret, and how much bioinformatics inaccuracy plays a part remains to be evaluated.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analyses of Core Regulatory Loop Circadian Genes

Given the annotation pitfalls encountered, we performed phylogenetic analyses to validate the automated annotation of the paralogs of the core clock gene families arntl/BMAL, Clock, Cry, and Per from the notothenioids. Besides the teleost reference, human orthologs of each gene family are also included, allowing for assessment of which teleost paralog is the evolutionary functional counterpart. The Maximum Likelihood tree of each circadian gene family is shown in Figure 4. The ML trees recovered each paralog in each of the four circadian gene families as a monophyletic clade with robust (97% to 100%) node support, indicating overall accuracy of the gene curation using Synolog. The topology of each gene clade also reflects biologically sensible phylogenetic positions of the human and teleost (D. rerio) references as outgroups of the notothenioid clades. Within the notothenioid ingroups, the gene tree topology in most cases matches known species/family phylogeny, with genes of the non-Antarctic E. maclovinus and C. gobio being the basal branches relative to the Antarctic cryonotothenioids.
However, annotation inaccuracies are also evident in various forms. Most visible is the substantially shorter protein lengths (amino acid numbers indicated with an asterisk, Figure 4) for some species compared to the typical lengths across species of the gene clade. This led to atypical long branches, for example, in the case of several H. antarcticus genes including arntl1a and BMAL2 (Figure 4A), and clock b and npas2 (Figure 4B), which also resulted in the harpagiferid oddly nesting within the icefish lineages (Figure 4B). C. gobio arntl1a (Figure 4A) is another instance of the error affecting H. antarcticus clock b and npas2, despite the C. gobio genome assembly is a RefSeq genome.
In manual assessments, atypical lengths of the predicted protein, which often also contained divergent sequence segments, were found to likely result from splice junction errors, leading to various structural outcomes. These include reading frame changes and premature truncation of the encoded protein, inclusion of sequences from intron locations, and/or exclusion of bona fide coding exons. As an example, arntl1a of P. albipinna, annotated in the database as hypothetical protein (GeneID JOQ06_002371, Table S2), was excessively long in length (806 aa) compared to lengths of 620–650 aa of orthologs from other species (Figure 4A), but it was also prematurely truncated. We manually found the C-terminus coding exons in the adjacent unannotated region. The long protein length resulted from the presence of a repeated sequence segment covering a second copy of exon2 through exon9 after a gap in the middle of the annotated gene (Figure S3). This repeated segment was likely due to assembly error, and the repeated exons were annotated as part of the predicted protein, leading to the atypical long length of 806aa. We resurrected the complete and correct gene sequence, which is 638 amino acids long, and which shares high sequence identity with E. maclovinus arntl1a and included it in the input dataset for the ML tree (Figure 4A). This is a second P. albipinna circadian gene (the first one being cry3a described above) with a similar annotation error of splitting the gene. It underscores the state of the quality and annotation inaccuracy of the current public versions of some of the assemblies used in this study, perhaps due to the lack of, or inadequate species-specific supporting transcript evidence. Manual scrutiny to curate the correct coding sequences from these assemblies (even for ReSeq genomes) is essential prior to utilizing them in experimental studies or phylogenetic inferences as was also cautioned by others [80].
The phylogenetic analyses included human circadian genes as references, as their gene functions are well studied through the use of mammalian models, so we may glean insights into the evolution of the circadian network genes and function in the notothenioids. For the arntl/BMAL family, members of which form the central circadian pacemaker with a clock gene, the notothenioids have three paralogs—arntl1a, arntl2, and BMAL2 (Figure 4A) that can participate in this function. The single arntl1 gene—arntl1a, which forms a monophyletic clade with human BMAL1, would be the putative functional counterpart of the latter, while arntl2 and/or BMAL2 would be that of the single human BMAL2. For clock genes, humans have two paralogs—CLOCK and NPAS2 (Figure 4B). Notothenioids, like zebrafish, have two duplicated clocksclocka and clockb, either of which could fulfill the role of the human CLOCK. The neurally expressed npas2 (neuronal PAS domain Protein 2) is similarly a single copy between human and fish. For the cryptochromes, members of which complex with a period protein to regulate the pace setting activity of heterodimerized arntl/BAML and clock proteins, humans have two copies—CRY1 and CRY2 (Figure 4C). In contrast, the Cry family has diversified substantially in various teleost lineages, with zebrafish possessing eight paralogs (Figure 3B). E. maclovinus has five of these paralogs, which were reduced to four in the cryonotothenioids (Figure 3B). Cry1a, which is the single cry1 retained across the cryonotothenioid families, form a monophyletic clade with human CRY1 (Figure 4C), suggesting it is the functional equivalent for the latter in these Antarctic fishes. Cry3a, the immediate sister clade to Cry1, and which is also maintained across the cryonotothenioids, potentially can fulfill the same role. It is also sister to Cry2 in the E. maclovinus and C. gobio, and thus may also be able to serve the role of human CRY2. For period genes, cryonotothenioids have lost Per3 present in E. maclovinus and zebrafish, retaining only two paralogs—Per1b and Per2 (Figure 3B and Figure 4D) which are likely functional counterparts of human PER1 and PER2 respectively based on their close phylogenetic relationships (Figure 4D). These inferences will certainly require experimental testing for biological function in future studies, and the analyses here serve as a starting platform for experimental design.

3.6. Transcriptional Expression of E. maclovinus Circadian Network Genes

Curation of circadian network genes from genomes serves to catalog the set of potentially active contributors to circadian rhythm generation. To ascertain the functionality of these predicted genes requires transcriptional evidence at minimal. Having transcriptional expression evidence is also crucial as a starting point for testing actual biological function as mentioned above. We thus obtained high-quality long read transcripts for E. maclovinus by PacBio Iso-Seq sequencing of fin tissue, where peripheral clock is known to operate in teleost fishes [59,60]. Where Iso-Seq transcript is missing for a given gene, we searched the multi-tissue reference transcriptome assembled from published Illumina RNAseq short reads [15].
In total, we found mRNA expressions for 24 of the 27 predicted circadian genes/paralogs in the E. maclovinus genome (Figure 3B; sequences in File S1). Of the 24 expressed genes, 20 are supported by full-length cDNAs (complete coding sequences) in the transcriptomes. They are indicated with uppercase letter T (Figure 3B) as follows: 18 (white letter T) are full-length Iso-Seq transcripts, one (red letter T) full-length is from overlapping partial Iso-Seq transcripts and partial transcripts from the RNAseq reference transcriptome, and one (orange letter T) full-length is from overlapping partial transcripts from the RNAseq reference transcriptome. The other four (indicated with white lowercase t) are three per paralogs (per2, per2a, per3) and one ror paralog (rorb), with expression evidence as partial transcripts in the RNAseq reference transcriptome.
Transcripts of the remaining three E. maclovinus clock genes—BMAL2, clocka and npas2—are lacking in both the Iso-Seq and RNAseq transcriptome. Their absence can either be due to the genes being inactive, or their mRNA not being represented in the RNA sample that was sequenced. Npas2 (neuronal PAS domain Protein 2) is the clock paralog with demonstrated expression in teleost brain [81,82]. Whether it is expressed in a peripheral tissue such as the fin is unknown, thus its absence in the fin Iso-Seq transcriptome may be due to tissue specificity of expression. The RNAseq reference transcriptome did include whole brain in the pooled RNA sample [15], but its small fractional input (1 of 11 tissues) might not have yielded sufficient sequence coverage to encompass the full complement of circadian network genes. An additional constraint in capturing the full circadian transcriptome is the interlocking phasic up- and down-regulation of gene expression in the different regulatory loops, such that genes that are transcriptionally activated at the time of tissue sampling are more likely to be captured, while those that are repressed or undergoing degradation are not. The tissues used for the two transcriptomes came from the same individuals sampled over an afternoon for the purpose of the published study [15]. To definitively ascertain transcriptional functionality of BMAL2, clocka and npas2 will require using RNA from tissues (both fin and brain) sampled at regular intervals over a complete (24 h) circadian time period for additional sequencing.
In sum, the E. maclovinus genome contains orthologs of 27 of the 33 reference circadian network genes/paralogs of model teleosts, with gene functionality of 24 validated by transcript evidence predominantly in full length Iso-Seq cDNAs. The five missing circadian genes are also absent in the more basally divergent bovichtid C. gobio, reflecting their loss in the common ancestor of Notothenioidei. C. gobio further lost cry1a and cry3a and would be reliant on cry1b and cry2 as the participating cryptochrome paralogs in the core regulatory loop. In contrast, functional cry1a and cry3a are maintained in E. maclovinus and gene models are present across species of the Antarctic clade. In the latter, cry1a and cry3a would likely become the core loop repressors, as cry1b and cry2 were lost after their divergence from E. maclovinus. Overall, E. maclovinus and cryonotothenioids share more of the same retained circadian genes than between the latter with C. gobio. This supports E. maclovinus as the better candidate as an ancestral reference for investigating circadian and other functional trait changes during polar evolution of cryonotothenioids. It can also serve as a reference for inquiries into potential changes in the re-colonization of non-freezing environments by secondarily temperate notothenioids.

4. Conclusions

The Patagonia blennie E. maclovinus occupies a strategically important phylogenetic position in Notothenioidei, as the monotypic species of the basal, non-Antarctic family Eleginopidae and immediate sister lineage to the Antarctic clade of cryonotothenioids. Using PacBio CLR sequencing and HiC scaffolding, our study provided a highly contiguous and gene-complete chromosomal-level assembly for this species. Through comparative whole genome architecture analyses with the genomes of 10 other notothenioids collectively covering seven of the eight notothenioid families, substantial structural divergence can be seen between the two basal species C. gobio and E. maclovinus, while there is a larger degree of conservation between E. maclovinus and derived cryonotothenioids. Our reconstruction of an abbreviated notothenioid phylogeny covering the same species using the largest genome wide dataset to date—2918 proteins from predicted single-copy ortholog genes—solidly affirms E. maclovinus as the direct sister species to Antarctic cryonotothenioids. We curated and compared the circadian network genes from E. maclovinus and the 10 notothenioid genomes to evaluate the changes in the gene complement during evolution under extreme polar photoperiodic variability and inferred functional roles of the retained circadian genotypes referenced to known functions of human orthologs as informed through phylogenetic analyses. In our new E. maclovinus assembly, we documented a repertoire of 27 circadian network genes, and provided expression evidence supporting active transcription for most of them. Comparison of the pattern of circadian gene/paralog retention and loss among the same 10 species used for genome structure analysis, again illustrates greater similarity between E. maclovinus and the cryonotothenioids than between C. gobio and the latter. Results in this study collectively reinforce unequivocally the suitability of E. maclovinus as an ancestral proxy in investigating genome character and functional trait evolution in the derived Antarctic clade during its evolution in extreme polar conditions. We additionally suggest that E. maclovinus can also serve as a comparison in understanding the nature of the evolutionary path and mechanisms underlying secondary adaptation to non-freezing environments of various cryonotothenioid lineages that have undergone polar to temperate transition.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes14061196/s1: Figure S1: Conserved genome-wide synteny between E. maclovinus and the platyfish, X. maculatus; Figure S2: Manually curated and annotated cry3a from D. mawsoni and P. albipinna genome; Figure S3: Errors in automated annotation of the circadian gene arntl1a in P. albipinna genome assembly. Table S1: Genome assemblies used for conserved synteny analysis and curation of circadian genes; Table S2: Reference circadian genes from model teleosts zebrafish and threespine stickleback, and their orthologs in 11 notothenioid genomes with genomic locations indicated. Table S3: Reference human circadian genes. File S1: Transcript sequences of circadian genes in E. maclovinus obtained from Iso-Seq and RNAseq transcriptomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-H.C.C. and J.M.C.; methodology, formal analysis, investigation, C.-H.C.C., A.G.R.-C., B.F.M., L.W., N.R. and J.M.C.; resources, C.-H.C.C. and L.V.-C.; data curation, C.-H.C.C. and A.G.R.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.C.C. and A.G.R.-C.; writing—review and editing, C.-H.C.C. and A.G.R.-C.; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, C.-H.C.C. and J.M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the United States National Science Foundation grant 1645087 to J.M.C. and C.-H.C.C., and NSF ANT Grant 1142158 to C.-H.C.C. and Arthur L. DeVries. L.W. was supported by the University of Illinois Foundation Cheng-DeVries Research Fund. L.V.-C. was supported by Fondap-IDEAL 15150003 and ANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program-Center ICM-ANID ICN2021_002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal use in the study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign on 5 April 2007, for Protocol no. 07053, and on 11 June 2012, for Protocol no.12123, and by Comité de Bioética Animal, Universidad Austral de Chile on 2 August 2010, for Protocol No 11/10.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw PacBio and Hi-C Illumina reads used for the E. maclovinus genome assembly are available on NCBI under BioProject PRJNA917608. A copy of the E. maclovinus reference assembly and annotation, alongside the gene models and annotation for all studied notothenioid species, and copies of all bioinformatic scripts used for analysis are available on DRYAD (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qbzkh18nt).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Arthur L. DeVries for his assistance in sampling experimental specimens of E. maclovinus used in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eastman, J.T. The nature of the diversity of Antarctic fishes. Polar Biol. 2005, 28, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matschiner, M.; Hanel, R.; Salzburger, W. On the Origin and Trigger of the Notothenioid Adaptive Radiation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Near, T.J.; Dornburg, A.; Kuhn, K.L.; Eastman, J.T.; Pennington, J.N.; Patarnello, T.; Zane, L.; Fernández, D.A.; Jones, C.D. Ancient climate change, antifreeze, and the evolutionary diversification of Antarctic fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3434–3439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Eastman, J.T.; McCune, A.R. Fishes on the Antarctic continental shelf: Evolution of a marine species flock? J. Fish Biol. 2000, 57 (Suppl. A), 84–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lecointre, G.; Améziane, N.; Boisselier, M.-C.; Bonillo, C.; Busson, F.; Causse, R.; Chenuil, A.; Couloux, A.; Coutanceau, J.-P.; Cruaud, C.; et al. Is the species flock concept operational? The Antarctic shelf case. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Chen, L.; DeVries, A.L.; Cheng, C.-H.C. Evolution of antifreeze glycoprotein gene from a trypsinogen gene in Antarctic notothenioid fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 3811–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cheng, C.-H.C.; Zhuang, X. Molecular Origins and Mechanisms of Fish Antifreeze Evolution. In Antifreeze Proteins Volume 1: Environment, Systematics and Evolution; Ramløv, H., Friis, D.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 275–313. [Google Scholar]
  8. DeVries, A.L. Glycoproteins as biological antifreeze agents in Antarctic fishes. Science 1971, 172, 1152–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. DeVries, A.L.; Cheng, C.-H.C. Antifreeze proteins and organismal freezing avoidance in polar fishes. In The Physiology of Polar Fishes; Farrell, A.P., Steffensen, J.F., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2005; Volume 22, pp. 155–201. [Google Scholar]
  10. Todgham, A.E.; Hoaglund, E.A.; Hofmann, G.E. Is cold the new hot? Elevated ubiquitin-conjugated protein levels in tissues of Antarctic fish as evidence for cold-denaturation of proteins in vivo. J. Comp. Physio. B 2007, 177, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Beers, J.M.; Jayasundara, N. Antarctic notothenioid fish: What are the future consequences of ‘losses’ and ‘gains’ acquired during long-term evolution at cold and stable temperatures? J. Exp. Biol. 2015, 218, 1834–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Daane, J.M.; Detrich, H.W. Adaptations and Diversity of Antarctic Fishes: A Genomic Perspective. Ann. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2022, 10, 39–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bilyk, K.T.; DeVries, A.L. Heat tolerance and its plasticity in Antarctic fishes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2011, 158, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Somero, G.N.; DeVries, A.L. Temperature tolerance of some Antarctic fishes. Science 1967, 156, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bilyk, K.T.; Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Cheng, C.H.C. Evolution in chronic cold: Varied loss of cellular response to heat in Antarctic notothenioid fish. BMC Evol. Biol. 2018, 18, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hofmann, G.E.; Buckley, B.A.; Airaksinen, S.; Keen, J.; Somero, G.N. The Antarctic fish Trematomus bernacchii lacks heat-inducible heat shock protein synthesis. J. Exp. Biol. 2000, 203, 2331–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Saravia, J.; Paschke, K.; Oyarzún-Salazar, R.; Cheng, C.H.C.; Navarro, J.M.; Vargas-Chacoff, L. Effects of warming rates on physiological and molecular components of response to CTMax heat stress in the Antarctic fish Harpagifer antarcticus. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 99, 103021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. di Prisco, G.; Cocca, E.; Parker, S.K.; Detrich, H.W., III. Tracking the Evolutionary Loss of Hemoglobin Expression by the White-blooded Antarctic Icefishes. Gene 2003, 295, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sidell, B.D.; O’Brien, K.M. When bad things happen to good fish: The loss of hemoglobin and myoglobin expression in Antarctic icefishes. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 209, 1791–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, L.; Lu, Y.; Li, W.; Ren, Y.; Yu, M.; Jiang, S.; Fu, Y.; Wang, J.; Peng, S.; Bilyk, K.T.; et al. The genomic basis for colonizing the freezing Southern Ocean revealed by Antarctic toothfish and Patagonian robalo genomes. GigaScience 2019, 8, giz016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bista, I.; Wood, J.M.D.; Desvignes, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Matschiner, M.; Ning, Z.; Tracey, A.; Torrance, J.; Sims, Y.; Chow, W.; et al. Genomics of cold adaptations in the Antarctic notothenioid fish radiation. bioRXiv 2022, 494096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rivera-Colón, A.G.; Rayamajhi, N.; Minhas, B.F.; Madrigal, G.; Bilyk, K.T.; Yoon, V.; Hüne, M.; Gregory, S.; Cheng, C.H.C.; Catchen, J.M. Genomics of Secondarily Temperate Adaptation in the Only Non-Antarctic Icefish. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2023, 40, msad029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bilyk, K.T.; Zhuang, X.; Papetti, C. Positive and Relaxed Selective Pressures Have Both Strongly Influenced the Evolution of Cryonotothenioid Fishes during Their Radiation in the Freezing Southern Ocean. Genome Biol. Evol. 2023, 15, evad049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lu, Y.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Zhai, W.; Zhou, X.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, S.; Liu, T.; Wang, H.; Hu, R.; et al. Population genomics of an icefish reveals mechanisms of glacier-driven adaptive radiation in Antarctic notothenioids. BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bista, I.; McCarthy, S.A.; Wood, J.; Ning, Z.; Detrich Iii, H.W.; Desvignes, T.; Postlethwait, J.; Chow, W.; Howe, K.; Torrance, J.; et al. The genome sequence of the channel bull blenny, Cottoperca gobio (Günther, 1861). Wellcome Open Res. 2020, 5, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Balushkin, A.V. Classification, phylogenetics, and origins of the families of the suborder Notothenioidei (Perciformes). J. Ichthyol. 1992, 32, 90–110. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bargelloni, L.; Marcato, S.; Zane, L.; Patarnello, T. Mitochondrial Phylogeny of Notothenioids: A Molecular Approach to Antarctic Fish Evolution and Biogeography. Syst. Biol. 2000, 49, 114–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lecointre, G.; Bonillo, C.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Hureau, J.C. Molecular evidence for the origins of Antarctic fishes: Paraphyly of the Bovichtidae and no indication for the monophyly of the Notothenioidei (Teleostei). Polar Biol. 1997, 18, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bilyk, K.T.; Zhuang, X.; Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Cheng, C.H.C. Evolution of chaperome gene expression and regulatory elements in the antarctic notothenioid fishes. Heredity 2021, 126, 424–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rayamajhi, N.; Cheng, C.-H.C.; Catchen, J.M. Evaluating Illumina-, Nanopore-, and PacBio-based genome assembly strategies with the bald notothen, Trematomus borchgrevinki. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2022, 12, jkac192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ruan, J.; Li, H. Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Durand, N.C.; Shamim, M.S.; Machol, I.; Rao, S.S.P.; Huntley, M.H.; Lander, E.S.; Aiden, E.L. Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. Cell Syst. 2016, 3, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Manni, M.; Berkeley, M.R.; Seppey, M.; Simão, F.A.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 4647–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Flynn, J.M.; Hubley, R.; Goubert, C.; Rosen, J.; Clark, A.G.; Feschotte, C.; Smit, A.F. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 9451–9457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ellinghaus, D.; Kurtz, S.; Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dobin, A.; Davis, C.A.; Schlesinger, F.; Drenkow, J.; Zaleski, C.; Jha, S.; Batut, P.; Chaisson, M.; Gingeras, T.R. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brůna, T.; Hoff, K.J.; Lomsadze, A.; Stanke, M.; Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: Automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2021, 3, lqaa108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoff, K.J.; Lange, S.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M.; Stanke, M. BRAKER1: Unsupervised RNA-Seq-Based Genome Annotation with GeneMark-ET and AUGUSTUS. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 767–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kriventseva, E.V.; Kuznetsov, D.; Tegenfeldt, F.; Manni, M.; Dias, R.; Simão, F.A.; Zdobnov, E.M. OrthoDB v10: Sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D807–D811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gabriel, L.; Hoff, K.J.; Brůna, T.; Borodovsky, M.; Stanke, M. TSEBRA: Transcript selector for BRAKER. BMC Bioinform. 2021, 22, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Catchen, J.M.; Conery, J.S.; Postlethwait, J.H. Automated identification of conserved synteny after whole-genome duplication. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Small, C.M.; Bassham, S.; Catchen, J.; Amores, A.; Fuiten, A.M.; Brown, R.S.; Jones, A.G.; Cresko, W.A. The genome of the Gulf pipefish enables understanding of evolutionary innovations. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Jae Lee, S.; Kim, J.H.; Jo, E.; Choi, E.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.G.; Chung, S.; Kim, H.W.; Park, H. Chromosomal assembly of the Antarctic toothfish ( Dissostichus mawsoni) genome using third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C technology. Zool. Res. 2021, 42, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Amores, A.; Catchen, J.; Nanda, I.; Warren, W.; Walter, R.; Schartl, M.; Postlethwait, J.H. A RAD-Tag Genetic Map for the Platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus) Reveals Mechanisms of Karyotype Evolution Among Teleost Fish. Genetics 2014, 197, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: Phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. STAG: Species Tree Inference from All Genes. bioRXiv 2018, 267914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Emms, D.M.; Kelly, S. STRIDE: Species Tree Root Inference from Gene Duplication Events. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3267–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Minh, B.Q.; Schmidt, H.A.; Chernomor, O.; Schrempf, D.; Woodhams, M.D.; von Haeseler, A.; Lanfear, R. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Hoang, D.T.; Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q.; Vinh, L.S. UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Beale, A.; Guibal, C.; Tamai, T.K.; Klotz, L.; Cowen, S.; Peyric, E.; Reynoso, V.H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Whitmore, D. Circadian rhythms in Mexican blind cavefish Astyanax mexicanus in the lab and in the field. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Foulkes, N.S.; Whitmore, D.; Vallone, D.; Bertolucci, C. Chapter One—Studying the Evolution of the Vertebrate Circadian Clock: The Power of Fish as Comparative Models. In Advances in Genetics; Foulkes, N.S., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; Volume 95, pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mazzei, F.; Ghigliotti, L.; Coutanceau, J.-P.; Detrich, H.W.; Prirodina, V.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Pisano, E. Chromosomal characteristics of the temperate notothenioid fish Eleginops maclovinus (Cuvier). Polar Biol. 2008, 31, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, B.-M.; Amores, A.; Kang, S.; Ahn, D.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, I.-C.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; et al. Antarctic blackfin icefish genome reveals adaptations to extreme environments. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Auvinet, J.; Graça, P.; Belkadi, L.; Petit, L.; Bonnivard, E.; Dettaï, A.; Detrich, W.H.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Higuet, D. Mobilization of retrotransposons as a cause of chromosomal diversification and rapid speciation: The case for the Antarctic teleost genus Trematomus. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Ghigliotti, L.; Cheng, C.-H.C.; Pisano, E. Sex determination in Antarctic notothenioid fish: Chromosomal clues and evolutionary hypotheses. Polar Biol. 2016, 39, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Morescalchi, A.; Hureau, J.C.; Olmo, E.; Ozouf-Costaz, C.; Pisano, E.; Stanyon, R. A multiple sex-chromosome system in Antarctic ice-fishes. Polar Biol. 1992, 11, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morescalchi, A.; Pisano, E.; Stanyon, R.; Morescalchi, M.A. Cytotaxonomy of antarctic teleosts of the Pagothenia/Trematomus complex (Nototheniidae, Perciformes). Polar Biol. 1992, 12, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Amores, A.; Wilson, C.A.; Allard, C.A.H.; Detrich, H.W.; Postlethwait, J.H. Cold Fusion: Massive Karyotype Evolution in the Antarctic Bullhead Notothen Notothenia coriiceps. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 2195–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Piccolin, F.; Pitzschler, L.; Biscontin, A.; Kawaguchi, S.; Meyer, B. Circadian regulation of diel vertical migration (DVM) and metabolism in Antarctic krill Euphausia superba. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Teschke, M.; Wendt, S.; Kawaguchi, S.; Kramer, A.; Meyer, B. A circadian clock in Antarctic krill: An endogenous timing system governs metabolic output rhythms in the euphausid species Euphausia superba. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Höring, F.; Biscontin, A.; Harms, L.; Sales, G.; Reiss, C.S.; De Pittà, C.; Meyer, B. Seasonal gene expression profiling of Antarctic krill in three different latitudinal regions. Mar. Genom. 2021, 56, 100806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Häfker, N.S.; Andreatta, G.; Manzotti, A.; Falciatore, A.; Raible, F.; Tessmar-Raible, K. Rhythms and Clocks in Marine Organisms. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2023, 15, 509–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cziko, P.A.; DeVries, A.L.; Evans, C.W.; Cheng, C.-H.C. Antifreeze protein-induced superheating of ice inside Antarctic notothenioid fishes inhibits melting during summer warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14583–14588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hunt, B.M.; Hoefling, K.; Cheng, C.-H.C. Annual warming episodes in seawater temperatures in McMurdo Sound in relationship to endogenous ice in notothenioid fish. Antarct. Sci. 2003, 15, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Dalrymple, R.W.; Padman, L. Are Tides Controlled by Latitude? In Latitudinal Controls on Stratigraphic Models and Sedimentary Concepts; Fraticelli, C.M., Markwick, P.J., Martinius, A.W., Suter, J.R., Eds.; Society for Sedimentary Geology: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2019; Volume 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Scully, A.L.; Kay, S.A. Time Flies for Drosophila. Cell 2000, 100, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Minami, Y.; Ode, K.L.; Ueda, H.R. Mammalian Circadian Clock: The Roles of Transcriptional Repression and Delay. In Circadian Clocks; Kramer, A., Merrow, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cox, K.H.; Takahashi, J.S. Circadian clock genes and the transcriptional architecture of the clock mechanism. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2019, 63, R93–R102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Buhr, E.D.; Takahashi, J.S. Molecular Components of the Mammalian Circadian Clock. In Circadian Clocks; Kramer, A., Merrow, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Takahashi, J.S. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Toloza-Villalobos, J.; Arroyo, J.I.; Opazo, J.C. The Circadian Clock of Teleost Fish: A Comparative Analysis Reveals Distinct Fates for Duplicated Genes. J. Mol. Evol. 2015, 80, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bolton, C.M.; Bekaert, M.; Eilertsen, M.; Helvik, J.V.; Migaud, H. Rhythmic Clock Gene Expression in Atlantic Salmon Parr Brain. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 761109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Martins, R.S.T.; Gomez, A.; Zanury, S.; Carrillo, M.; Canario, A.V.M. Photoperiodic Modulation of Circadian Clock and Reproductive Axis Gene Expression in the Pre-Pubertal European Sea Bass Brain. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Patterns of conserved synteny across basal temperate and derived Antarctic notothenioid genomes. (A) Genome-wide synteny shows a one-to-one correspondence between the 24 chromosomes of the basal temperate C. gobio (top), the basal temperate E. maclovinus (middle), and the Antarctic red-blooded D. mawsoni (bottom). Each line represents an orthologous gene between the compared genomes, color-coded according to their chromosome of origin. (B) Genome-wide conserved synteny shows a one-to-one correspondence between the genomes of C. gobio (top), E. maclovinus (middle), and the Antarctic, white-blooded C. gunnari (bottom). Color annotation as described in panel A. (C) Conserved synteny between orthologous chromosomes in C. gobio-13 (top), E. maclovinus-18 (middle), and C. gunnari-18 (bottom). Lines represent orthologous genes between the species, color coded according to their respective synteny clusters. Chromosomes are not drawn to scale. Several chromosomal inversions and translocations are observed between C. gobio and E. maclovinus, while the chromosome organization is fully observed between E. maclovinus and C. gunnari. (D) Conserved synteny between orthologous chromosomes in C. gobio-14 (top), E. maclovinus -11 (middle), and C. gunnari-11 (bottom). Color notation as described in panel C. Several examples of chromosomal rearrangements are observed between the three species.
Figure 1. Patterns of conserved synteny across basal temperate and derived Antarctic notothenioid genomes. (A) Genome-wide synteny shows a one-to-one correspondence between the 24 chromosomes of the basal temperate C. gobio (top), the basal temperate E. maclovinus (middle), and the Antarctic red-blooded D. mawsoni (bottom). Each line represents an orthologous gene between the compared genomes, color-coded according to their chromosome of origin. (B) Genome-wide conserved synteny shows a one-to-one correspondence between the genomes of C. gobio (top), E. maclovinus (middle), and the Antarctic, white-blooded C. gunnari (bottom). Color annotation as described in panel A. (C) Conserved synteny between orthologous chromosomes in C. gobio-13 (top), E. maclovinus-18 (middle), and C. gunnari-18 (bottom). Lines represent orthologous genes between the species, color coded according to their respective synteny clusters. Chromosomes are not drawn to scale. Several chromosomal inversions and translocations are observed between C. gobio and E. maclovinus, while the chromosome organization is fully observed between E. maclovinus and C. gunnari. (D) Conserved synteny between orthologous chromosomes in C. gobio-14 (top), E. maclovinus -11 (middle), and C. gunnari-11 (bottom). Color notation as described in panel C. Several examples of chromosomal rearrangements are observed between the three species.
Genes 14 01196 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship among non-Antarctic and Antarctic notothenioids. Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood tree for 11 notothenioids and two teleost outgroup species generated from the protein alignment of 2918 single-copy orthologous genes. Branch lengths describe the number of substitutions per amino-acid site. Ultra-fast bootstrap support values are shown for each non-outgroup node. Vertical colored bars on the right show the placement of Antarctic notothenioids (blue), non-Antarctic notothenioids (beige), and teleost outgroups (violet). The placement of E. maclovinus as immediate sister taxon to the Antarctic notothenioid clade is recovered with 100% support.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship among non-Antarctic and Antarctic notothenioids. Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood tree for 11 notothenioids and two teleost outgroup species generated from the protein alignment of 2918 single-copy orthologous genes. Branch lengths describe the number of substitutions per amino-acid site. Ultra-fast bootstrap support values are shown for each non-outgroup node. Vertical colored bars on the right show the placement of Antarctic notothenioids (blue), non-Antarctic notothenioids (beige), and teleost outgroups (violet). The placement of E. maclovinus as immediate sister taxon to the Antarctic notothenioid clade is recovered with 100% support.
Genes 14 01196 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of circadian regulatory loops and the circadian network genes identified from the genome and transcriptomes of E. maclovinus and from genomes across Notothenioidei. (A). A simplified depiction of the circadian regulatory loops based on mammalian studies [78,79] relating the positions of the orthologous genes identified from notothenioids in the circadian network. Briefly, the activator core clock proteins arntl/BMAL (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like and brain and muscle arnt-like are alternate names) and clock (circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput) heterodimerize and bind to regulatory elements containing E-box sequences of a large number of clock-controlled genes (Ccgs) including the repressor genes cry and per. The cry and per proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm, interact with each other and the serine/threonine casein kinases CK1e and CK1d. The complex translocates back into the nucleus and suppresses target gene activation by arntl/BMAL and clock, leading to their own transcriptional repression. Timeless protein also interacts with per proteins and others to suppress arntl/BMAL activation of per1. The regulation of arntl/BMAL and clock transcription is in turn effected through a loop involving nuclear receptor proteins REV-ERB and ROR. Activation of nr1d by arntl/BMAL and clock, and of ROR through an intervening activator, produces REV-ERB (encoded by nr1d paralogs) and ROR proteins, respectively. These compete for their common binding sequence element RORE in arntl/BMAL promotor, where ROR initiates and REV-ERB inhibits arntl/BMAL transcription. (B). Evolutionary status of circadian network genes in genomes of notothenioid fishes identified using 33 reference genes from zebrafish D. rerio and three-spined stickleback G. aculeatus. All reference genes (violet squares) except two are from D. rerio, with * indicating G. aculeatus as the source since it is absent in D. rerio. Names of the core loop circadian genes are highlighted in light yellow, and the secondary loop rhythmic genes in light green, with paralogs of each gene family grouped under a blue bar. Light blue squares indicate presence of notothenioid orthologs in the genome annotation of each species determined with Synolog, and uncolored (white) squares indicate gene absence. A cladogram on the left depicts the phylogenetic relationship of the included notothenioid species, which represent seven of the eight families—Bo (Bovichtidae), E (Eleginopidae), N (Nototheniidae), H (Harpagiferidae), A (Artedidraconidae), B (Bathydraconidae), and C (Channichthyidae). Synolog did not detect cry3 in D. mawsoni or P. albipinna. Its presence in these two species was determined by manual BLAST search and annotation, which found D. mawsoni cry3 (blue outlined white square) gene structure to be conserved except for two 1-nt frameshift mutations, and P. albipinna cry3 (blue square with white star) to be complete and mutation-free. Circadian gene repertoire in the two basal non-Antarctic notothenioids differ, with E. maclovinus retaining more of the reference teleost set, while apparent C. gobio-specific loss of two cry (cry1a, cry3a) and two per (per2a, per3) paralogs had occurred since the two species diverged. Transcript evidence supporting functionality of the circadian network genes in E. maclovinus indicated by the letter “T” or “t” are as follows: T (white)—Iso-Seq transcript, complete cds; T (red)—complete cds from overlapping partial Iso-Seq + partial Trinity assembled RNAseq transcripts; T (green)—overlapping Trinity transcripts, complete cds; t (white)—partial Trinity assembled RNAseq transcript.
Figure 3. Schematic of circadian regulatory loops and the circadian network genes identified from the genome and transcriptomes of E. maclovinus and from genomes across Notothenioidei. (A). A simplified depiction of the circadian regulatory loops based on mammalian studies [78,79] relating the positions of the orthologous genes identified from notothenioids in the circadian network. Briefly, the activator core clock proteins arntl/BMAL (aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-like and brain and muscle arnt-like are alternate names) and clock (circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput) heterodimerize and bind to regulatory elements containing E-box sequences of a large number of clock-controlled genes (Ccgs) including the repressor genes cry and per. The cry and per proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm, interact with each other and the serine/threonine casein kinases CK1e and CK1d. The complex translocates back into the nucleus and suppresses target gene activation by arntl/BMAL and clock, leading to their own transcriptional repression. Timeless protein also interacts with per proteins and others to suppress arntl/BMAL activation of per1. The regulation of arntl/BMAL and clock transcription is in turn effected through a loop involving nuclear receptor proteins REV-ERB and ROR. Activation of nr1d by arntl/BMAL and clock, and of ROR through an intervening activator, produces REV-ERB (encoded by nr1d paralogs) and ROR proteins, respectively. These compete for their common binding sequence element RORE in arntl/BMAL promotor, where ROR initiates and REV-ERB inhibits arntl/BMAL transcription. (B). Evolutionary status of circadian network genes in genomes of notothenioid fishes identified using 33 reference genes from zebrafish D. rerio and three-spined stickleback G. aculeatus. All reference genes (violet squares) except two are from D. rerio, with * indicating G. aculeatus as the source since it is absent in D. rerio. Names of the core loop circadian genes are highlighted in light yellow, and the secondary loop rhythmic genes in light green, with paralogs of each gene family grouped under a blue bar. Light blue squares indicate presence of notothenioid orthologs in the genome annotation of each species determined with Synolog, and uncolored (white) squares indicate gene absence. A cladogram on the left depicts the phylogenetic relationship of the included notothenioid species, which represent seven of the eight families—Bo (Bovichtidae), E (Eleginopidae), N (Nototheniidae), H (Harpagiferidae), A (Artedidraconidae), B (Bathydraconidae), and C (Channichthyidae). Synolog did not detect cry3 in D. mawsoni or P. albipinna. Its presence in these two species was determined by manual BLAST search and annotation, which found D. mawsoni cry3 (blue outlined white square) gene structure to be conserved except for two 1-nt frameshift mutations, and P. albipinna cry3 (blue square with white star) to be complete and mutation-free. Circadian gene repertoire in the two basal non-Antarctic notothenioids differ, with E. maclovinus retaining more of the reference teleost set, while apparent C. gobio-specific loss of two cry (cry1a, cry3a) and two per (per2a, per3) paralogs had occurred since the two species diverged. Transcript evidence supporting functionality of the circadian network genes in E. maclovinus indicated by the letter “T” or “t” are as follows: T (white)—Iso-Seq transcript, complete cds; T (red)—complete cds from overlapping partial Iso-Seq + partial Trinity assembled RNAseq transcripts; T (green)—overlapping Trinity transcripts, complete cds; t (white)—partial Trinity assembled RNAseq transcript.
Genes 14 01196 g003
Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood trees for verification of circadian gene orthologs. Maximum Likelihood trees were constructed with IQ-TREE v 2.2.2.5 using aligned peptide sequences of annotated circadian network genes from the notothenioid species representing seven families and the teleost reference in Figure 3B. Human orthologs were also included as reference. Gene members of the (A) Arntl/BMAL, (B) Clock, (C) Cry, and (D) Per gene families, which set the pace of the core circadian feedback loop, were analyzed. By convention, human clock gene names are capitalized. The paralog of each gene family from the sampled species formed a monophyletic clade, highlighted in color blocks and labeled with the gene family name. All four gene trees were midpoint rooted. For the arntl/BMAL, the tree was additionally rooted on the Homo sapiens BMAL1/teleost arntl1a clade to capture the relationships more accurately between members of this gene family. Ultra-fast Bootstrap support values > 50% are shown at the nodes. Amino acid lengths of the predicated proteins are given in parentheses next to species names. Asterisk (*) denotes reduced protein length and/or potential errors in annotation of the predicted amino acid sequences. One species, D. mawsoni (family Nototheniidae) was excluded from the analysis due to annotation inaccuracies in almost all of the core clock genes, such that manual re-annotation would be prohibitively laborious. The Nototheniidae family is represented by T. bernacchii.
Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood trees for verification of circadian gene orthologs. Maximum Likelihood trees were constructed with IQ-TREE v 2.2.2.5 using aligned peptide sequences of annotated circadian network genes from the notothenioid species representing seven families and the teleost reference in Figure 3B. Human orthologs were also included as reference. Gene members of the (A) Arntl/BMAL, (B) Clock, (C) Cry, and (D) Per gene families, which set the pace of the core circadian feedback loop, were analyzed. By convention, human clock gene names are capitalized. The paralog of each gene family from the sampled species formed a monophyletic clade, highlighted in color blocks and labeled with the gene family name. All four gene trees were midpoint rooted. For the arntl/BMAL, the tree was additionally rooted on the Homo sapiens BMAL1/teleost arntl1a clade to capture the relationships more accurately between members of this gene family. Ultra-fast Bootstrap support values > 50% are shown at the nodes. Amino acid lengths of the predicated proteins are given in parentheses next to species names. Asterisk (*) denotes reduced protein length and/or potential errors in annotation of the predicted amino acid sequences. One species, D. mawsoni (family Nototheniidae) was excluded from the analysis due to annotation inaccuracies in almost all of the core clock genes, such that manual re-annotation would be prohibitively laborious. The Nototheniidae family is represented by T. bernacchii.
Genes 14 01196 g004
Table 1. Assembly and annotation metrics for the E. maclovinus genome.
Table 1. Assembly and annotation metrics for the E. maclovinus genome.
Assembly Contiguity
ScaleContigScaffold
Total Size (bp)606,099,673606,289,673
Number of Fragments40626
Largest Fragment (bp)19,993,18437,057,500
N50 (bp)7,582,35426,674,500
L502711
Number of Chromosome-Scale Scaffolds--24
Total Bases in Chromosomes (bp)--606,192,173
Percent of Assembly in Chromosomes--99.98%
BUSCO v5.3.1 Gene Completeness
Complete3513 (96.5%)
Complete and Single Copy3476 (95.5%)
Complete and Duplicated37 (1.0%)
Fragmented12 (0.3%)
Missing115 (3.2%)
Total3640
Reference Gene Setactinopterygii_odb10
Gene Annotation
Number of Protein Coding Genes25,081
Repeat Annotation
Total Repeats33.18%
LTR2.92%
SINE0.64%
LINE5.06%
DNA15.84
Unclassified5.72%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, C.-H.C.; Rivera-Colón, A.G.; Minhas, B.F.; Wilson, L.; Rayamajhi, N.; Vargas-Chacoff, L.; Catchen, J.M. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Circadian Gene Repertoire of the Patagonia Blennie Eleginops maclovinus—The Closest Ancestral Proxy of Antarctic Cryonotothenioids. Genes 2023, 14, 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061196

AMA Style

Cheng C-HC, Rivera-Colón AG, Minhas BF, Wilson L, Rayamajhi N, Vargas-Chacoff L, Catchen JM. Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Circadian Gene Repertoire of the Patagonia Blennie Eleginops maclovinus—The Closest Ancestral Proxy of Antarctic Cryonotothenioids. Genes. 2023; 14(6):1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061196

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Chi-Hing Christina, Angel G. Rivera-Colón, Bushra Fazal Minhas, Loralee Wilson, Niraj Rayamajhi, Luis Vargas-Chacoff, and Julian M. Catchen. 2023. "Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Circadian Gene Repertoire of the Patagonia Blennie Eleginops maclovinus—The Closest Ancestral Proxy of Antarctic Cryonotothenioids" Genes 14, no. 6: 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061196

APA Style

Cheng, C. -H. C., Rivera-Colón, A. G., Minhas, B. F., Wilson, L., Rayamajhi, N., Vargas-Chacoff, L., & Catchen, J. M. (2023). Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Circadian Gene Repertoire of the Patagonia Blennie Eleginops maclovinus—The Closest Ancestral Proxy of Antarctic Cryonotothenioids. Genes, 14(6), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061196

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop