Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study Revealed Putative SNPs and Candidate Genes Associated with Growth and Meat Traits in Japanese Quail
Previous Article in Journal
A Scalable and Robust Chloroplast Genotyping Solution: Development and Application of SNP and InDel Markers in the Maize Chloroplast Genome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Lignin Biosynthesis and Its Diversified Roles in Disease Resistance

by
Qing-Hu Ma
State Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
Genes 2024, 15(3), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15030295
Submission received: 11 January 2024 / Revised: 6 February 2024 / Accepted: 23 February 2024 / Published: 25 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Lignin is complex, three-dimensional biopolymer existing in plant cell wall. Lignin biosynthesis is increasingly highlighted because it is closely related to the wide applications in agriculture and industry productions, including in pulping process, forage digestibility, bio-fuel, and carbon sequestration. The functions of lignin in planta have also attracted more attentions recently, particularly in plant defense response against different pathogens. In this brief review, the progress in lignin biosynthesis is discussed, and the lignin’s roles in disease resistance are thoroughly elucidated. This issue will help in developing broad-spectrum resistant crops in agriculture.

1. Introduction

Lignin is a main structural component of cell walls in vascular plants (pteridophytes, gymnosperms, and angiosperms) during the process of thickening the secondary wall. Lignin is principally deposited in the secondary wall of certain plant tissues, including xylem, sclerenchyma, phloem fiber, and periderm, which are involved in hydrophobic protection and the mechanical support of plant tissues. Some parenchyma cells may also have the lignin deposition in the primary wall, but the degree of lignifications is low. Lignin is linked to cellulose and hemicellulose in the cell wall to form an extracellular matrix. This structure increases the mechanical intensity and supportable ability of plant tissues. It contributes to rigidity and strength of the plant stem, which is related to the lodging-resistant and seed-coat-protecting phenotypes in crop plants [1,2,3]. Because the natural property of hydrophobicity, lignin imparts water impermeable plant cells. This function is very important, not only for xylem and phloem to transport water and mineral components, but also for the successful colonization of land by plants. In fact, the terrestrial vascular plants are proposed to evolve on the earth by the concomitant evolution of lignin biosynthesis that originated about 450 million years ago in the Silurian Period [4]. Therefore, lignin is a substance unique to vascular plants such as pteridophytes, gymnosperms, and angiosperms. The unicellular and non-vascular plants, such as algae and bryophytes, do not contain the cells filled with lignin, but they do have some lignin biosynthesis-related genes [5]. In addition, lignin accumulation in the cell wall forms a physically structural barrier to effectively protect the plant from pathogens, and the lignin synthesis is induced in response to various kinds of abiotic and biotic stresses [6,7]. We will discuss this topic in later sections.
Second only to cellulose, lignin is one of the most plentiful biopolymers on earth, which accounts for about 1.4 × 1012 kg of carbon fixed into terrestrial plants annually [8]. Lignin content varies among different classes of plants. In trees, lignin content represents 27–32% of dry weight, while it accounts only 14–25% of dry weight in herbaceous plants. As a bio-undegradable biopolymer in plant, lignin is also intimately related to industry and agriculture. Lignin content and composition are limiting factors associated with both the quality of paper production and the digestibility of forage crop. In the pulping process, lignin must be removed by costly and environmentally hazardous protocols, spending large amounts of energy and chemicals which may lead to serious environmental pollution. It would be beneficial to treat plant tissues with either less lignin or lignin with an altered chemical reactivity [9]. Lignin content in forage crops is negatively corrected with forage digestibility for ruminant animals, while lignin composition also affects the forage digestibility. Increasing the digestibility of forage crop is important in husbandry [10]. Lignin is also an important determinant in bio-fuel production. The value of lignin depends on its final purpose of utilization. Due to its high heat value, lignin is desirable for conversion by gasification or pyrolysis to produce bio-oil plus useful gas such as H2 and CH4 [11]. Conversely, ethanol production with enzymatic saccharification in lignocellulose is restricted by lignin-derived compounds [12,13]. Lignin-derived monomers are valuable precursors to produce aromatic chemicals in the biorefinery [14,15]. In the terrestrial environments, lignin is a main component of organic substance that served as the important carbon sink in carbon sequestration [16].
In this review, we will not discuss every aspect in the lignin research field. Instead, we focus on lignin’s actions on disease resistance, which have made comprehensive progress recently.

2. Unique Features of Lignin Biosynthesis

Lignin biosynthesis is a complex biochemical pathway which is initiated in deamination of L-phenylalanine or tyrosine into cinnamic acid, then a series of hydroxylation and methylation reactions convert cinnamic acid into a variety of hydroxycinnamic acids. These hydroxycinnamic acids act as precursors not only for lignin, but also for flavonoids. Activation of hydroxycinnamic acids to their corresponding co-enzyme A (CoA) thioesters, followed by successive reductions, produce monolignols which are thought to build into the lignin polymer by polymerization (Figure 1). This conventional pathway of lignin biosynthesis, introduced in the 1980s, has much modification after extensive research in biochemistry, molecular biology, and genetics [17,18,19]. A complete enumeration of each step in lignin biosynthesis is considerably beyond the scope of this review. Here, we just list some important achievements in recent years.
Generally, lignin is derived from three major hydroxycinnamyl alcohols (monolignols), namely p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol, which convert into p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl (S) lignin, respectively. In addition, caffeyl alcohol (forming catechyl lignin, C) has been found naturally in some species [20]. 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol forms a 5-hydroxyguaiacyl (5HG) unit that arises from the transgenic plants by down-regulated caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) and also occurs naturally in the cactus seed coat [21]. Ubiquitous existence of these non-canonical monolignols still requires more investigations [19]. Tricin, a flavone compound, has shown to be present in all grass lignin, where it is suggested to serve as an initiator for polymerization [22,23].
New enzymes have been identified recently in the lignin pathway. Caffeoyl shikimate esterase (CSE) has been demonstrated to convert caffeoyl shikimate (and to a lesser extent coumaroyl shikimate) into the free acid [24]. This fills the gap for a series of reactions termed ‘shikimate shunt’ or ‘esters pathway’ that involve hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) and coumaroyl shikimate3′-hydroxylase (C3′H). This strengthens the cross-talking between the phenylpropanoid pathway with shikimate and the aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. The real biological significance remains open to be investigated. The functions of some old enzymes have also been revised. It was known that L-tyrosine ammonia-lyase (TAL) activity was present in monocot plants. A recent report has shown that purple false brome (Brachypodium distachyon) possesses 8 phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) genes. One of them encodes a bi-functional PAL/TAL (PTAL). This PTAL is preferentially involved in S lignin synthesis. Isotopic labeling experiments have shown that approximately 50% of the lignin is synthesized from L-tyrosine rather from L-phenylalanine [25]. Ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H) is a cytochrome-P450-dependent monooxygenase that was originally thought to catalyze the hydroxylation at the C5 position of ferulic acid to form 5-hydroxyferulic acid, which was the precursor to S lignin. However, a serial of work from the transgenic plants, feeding tests, and in vitro biochemistry have demonstrated that F5H actually used coniferaldehyde and coniferyl alcohol to form 5-hydro-coniferaldehyde and 5-hydro-coniferyl alcohol then syringyl alcohol. Over-expressing F5H in transgenic tobacco and poplar gave rise to lignin that was composed of almost S units [26,27,28]. Therefore, F5H is now also called coniferaldehyde 5-hydroxylase (CAld-5H) [29]. Furthermore, F5H in lycophytes can catalyze S lignin synthesis directly from p-coumaraldehyde and p-coumaryl alcohol, which is different to angiosperms [30,31].
The monolignols are polymerized into high molecular weight lignin that catalyzed with laccases (using O2) and peroxidases (using H2O2). Both laccases and peroxidase have many isoforms that encoded by large gene families, for instance, Arabidopsis contains 17 laccase genes and 73 class III peroxidase genes [32,33]. The exact roles for each member of laccases and peroxidase in monolignol polymerization are still not quite clear. Some reports showed that laccase might be indispensable in initiating lignification of vascular tissues [34,35,36]. It was proposed that laccase might be important in the initiation stage, while peroxidase plays the roles in the bulk polymerization of lignin [37,38]. However, recent findings showed that peroxidase was also essential for lignin polymerization in Casparian strip in root tissues [39].
Dirigent (DIR) is a new class of proteins which were first isolated from weeping forsythia (Forsythia suspense) [40]. It has been shown that DIR protein, in the presence of an oxidase or one electron oxidant, can stereo-selectively couple two coniferyl alcohol molecules into a (+)-pinoresinol. This dimer, known as lignan, was presumed to couple more monolignols and then formed lignin polymer. However, direct evidence to support DIR’s roles in lignin biosynthesis is still rare, until recently. A DIR protein, namely ESB1 (enhanced suberin 1), has been shown to play an essential role for the correct formation of lignin in Casparian strip [41]. Moreover, the sub-class of DIR, namely DIR-E, including ESB1, has been demonstrated to be essential for both the localized lignin polymerization required for Casparian strip biogenesis and for the attachment of this strip to the plasma membrane to seal apoplast [42]. An enduring mystery remains that many other members of DIR have not been involved in lignin synthesis, instead promoting lignan synthesis and increase stress response in plants [43,44]. Some DIRs can fuse with other proteins to form chimeric proteins. An interesting example is DIR fused with jacalin to form monocot chimeric jacalin, a novel subfamily of lectins [45,46]. An enigma remains whether DIR is involved in lignin polymerization outside of the Casparian strip. Therefore, two hypotheses of random coupling and strict regulation to address how connecting monolignol radical to produce a functional lignin molecule are still in debate [47,48].
There are some unique features of lignin which are distinct from other macromolecules such as protein and cellulose.
(1). Heterogeneity. Lignin is synthesized from three main monolignols, namely p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol. This forms hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G) and syringyl (S) units in lignin polymers, respectively. In addition, there are various kinds of intermonomeric linkages with up to 16 types in theory in the lignin molecule [49]. The most frequent inter-unit linkage is the C-O-C4 (β-aryl ether) linkage, and it is also the one most easily degraded chemically. The other common linkages are the C-C aryl linkage, including C-C5, C-C1, C-C, and C5-C5, which are all more resistant to chemical degradation. Lignin has diverse compositions in various plant taxons. Gymnosperms contain mainly G lignin, dicot plants contain G and S lignin, while monocot plants have the lignin composed of G-, S-, and, H-monomers in various ratios [50]. For example, pine trees contain G lignin, and tobacco has an almost similar amount of G and S lignin, while wheat lignin constitutes approximately 50% S plus 40% G and 10% H units. The composition of lignin will also change upon different tissues and developmental stages of plants. This makes the elucidation of the lignin’s functions more sophisticated.
(2). Having properties both for primary and secondary metabolism. On the one hand, lignin is an indispensable and important component of plant cell walls, while on the other hand, lignin belongs to the phenylpropanoid pathway including flavonoids and lignans, which is the typical secondary metabolism.
(3). Contribution to plant development and defense response. Lignin has a crucial role in plant growth and development; it exhibits ubiquitous synthesis in the middle and later stages of plant development. Also, lignin’s synthesis is inducible upon pathogen invasion in the specific tissues which confer resistance to associated pathogens. How to coordinate lignin’s roles in these different aspects remains an enduring mystery. This issue will be discussed more comprehensively in the following section.

3. Multifarious Functions of Lignin in Plant Defense Responses

There is a myriad of documents reporting lignin’s involvement in plant disease resistance. To give a clear picture, we strive to sort out these vast data according to their different mechanisms.

3.1. Lignin as the Critical Barrier Contributing to Basic Disease Resistance

Lignin is an intricate polymer that serves the physical barrier in the defense response to pathogen infection, as lignin is un-degradable to most microorganisms [51,52]. When pathogens invade a cell, they induce lignin deposition in the cell wall which provides a physical barrier to resist pathogen infection by limiting the entry of pathogen toxins and cell wall-degrading enzymes into plants and preventing the nutrient transmission from the host to the pathogen [53,54]. It is important to know how lignin accumulation will affect disease resistance in plants. The majority of data shows that the high lignin levels will increase disease resistance, but contrary results were also reported that low lignin content in plants exhibited less disease severity [55,56,57]. As a highly labile heteropolymer, lignin composition was also proposed to affect the disease severity in plant. Here, the data showed that S, G, or H lignin might affect disease severity. More G and H units were accumulated when soft rot pathogens infected in Chinese cabbage [58]. The S unit concentration was increased in false flax (Camelina sativa) and wheat upon fungal penetration [53,59]. The contradictory results mainly derive from the different plants in study, which are complicated by the many unrestrained genetic and developmental factors possibly impacting defense responses.
In an array of transgenic tobacco plants with modified lignin content or composition by altering single gene, we examined the relationship between lignin content, composition, and disease resistance. The results showed that lower total lignin content aggravated the disease severity, while increased S lignin alleviated the disease symptoms. Neither G nor H lignins exhibited any influences on disease resistance. These data suggest that both total lignin content and S lignin are the main factors that are involved in basic defense response [60]. This sheds light on the complexity of lignin’s connection with plant defense response.

3.2. Lignin Related Chemicals Inducing Immune Reaction

Lignin and some related compounds can play as a signal to activate plant-specific immune response. It has reported that silencing Gh4CL30 will promote caffeic acid and ferulic acid accumulation, which inhibit the growth of fungal hyphal and increase resistance to Verticillium wilt in cotton [61]. Many molecules associated with the lignin pathway can serve as phytoalexins which restrict pathogens [62]. Coumarins (including umbelliferone, esculetin, and scopoletin) are synthesized through p-coumaryl-CoA and feruloyl-CoA. They have been proposed to be regulators in plant microbiomes [63]. Stilbenes are phenolic phytoalexins. Its skeleton (stilbene skeleton) synthesis is catalyzed by stilbene synthase (STS) through the conversion of p-coumaryl-CoA. The defensive roles of stilbene against pathogens have also been documented [64]. Recently, a large-scale and in-depth investigation of the phyllosphere microbiome in rice has revealed that 4-hydroxycinnamic acid (4-HCA), a precursor compound in lignin synthesis, is the main driver for enrichment of beneficial Pseudomonas, and inhibition of harmful bacteria Xanthomonas. OsPAL02 is responsible for 4-HCA synthesis, and therefore maintains healthy phyllosphere homeostasis in rice. It is proposed that regulating microbiome-shaping genes become a new strategy as ‘M gene breeding’ in plant disease resistance breeding alone with the current strategy known as ‘R gene breeding strategy’ [65].
Lignans are phenylpropanoid dimmers synthesized via the monolignol pathway, with coniferyl alcohol as the direct precursor [66]. Dirigent proteins have been shown to act in initiating lignan synthesis [44]. Both dirigent and lignan are proposed to have vital roles in defense responses [67,68,69]. Particularly, some dirigent proteins boost disease resistance by directly promoting lignan accumulation [70].
Besides these lignin compounds’ ability to act directly on pathogens, cell wall damage will affect cell wall integrity (CWI) and then release damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) which trigger immunity reactions [71]. Lignin is proposed to play the critical part during this process [72]. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) and stress-related hormones, such as jasmonate (JA) and salicylic acid (SA), are involved in lignin’s action to disease resistance [73]. A dirigent protein DIR7 has been identified which play the important role in response to plant CWI impairment [74]. Blue copper binding (BCB) protein is involved in electron transfer during oxidative stress response. A BCB, namely GhUMC1, has been demonstrated to increase cotton resistance through H2O2, JA signaling, and lignin metabolism [75]. It remains uncertain that lignin-specific molecules trigger a burst of ROS or ROS-strength lignin deposition. It has been proposed that polymerizing monolignol into lignin required hydrogen peroxide which is a detoxification process for ROS. Some enzymes in the monolignol pathway are linked to this mechanism, including p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H), CSE, and cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) [19]. Alternatively, ROS is a signal that directly plays a role in stress responses [76].

3.3. Lignin Related Genes Serving Target in Defense Response

In plants, resistance genes (R) play a vital part in disease resistance. Most R genes encode the NLR class of proteins [77]. Upon pathogen recognition of R genes, it triggers a defense response that includes hypersensitive response (HR). HR leads a rapid cell death in infection site. It has been reported that maize has two NLRs, Rp1-D, and Rp1-dp2. Combination of Rp1-D and Rp1-dp2 will lead to activated HR without pathogen infection. Two key enzymes in lignin biosynthesis, HCT and caffeoyl CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), have been demonstrated to suppress this HR by interacting with the Rp1-D21 complex. The enzymatic activities of HCT and CCoAOMT are not necessary to suppress HR. It is proposed that HCT, CCoAOMT, and Rp1 proteins form a complex. Pathogen effectors may target on the lignin pathway as its importance to plant defense, in turn, NLR proteins will monitor special components during this process [78,79]. This model is reminiscent to resistosome, which has been elucidated recently [80].
Pathogenesis is also involved in lignin by targeting its synthetic enzymes. An F-box protein (ZmFBL41) has been identified that confers resistance to banded leaf and sheath blight (BLSB) in maize. ZmFBL41 interacts with cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), the final enzyme in the monolignol pathway, leading to the ubiquitination and degradation of CAD. Two amino acid substitutions in the natural allele of resistant maize lines prevent this interaction. It is proposed that the pathogen (Rhizoctonia solani) may deliver effectors to directly or indirectly interact with ZmFBL41 or ZmFBL41-ZmSKP1-ZmCAD complex and increase susceptibility of the host [81]. The protein containing tetratrico-peptide repeats (TPRs) is the largest functional family that maintains protein organization and homeostasis through a complicated chaperone network [82]. A mutant, namely bsr-k1 (broad-spectrum resistance Kitaake-1), has been identified in rice. Bsr-k1 confers broad-spectrum resistance against the fungal pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) and bacterial pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae). Bsr-k1 encodes a tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs)-containing protein, which binds to PAL mRNAs (OsPAL1-7) and promotes their turnover. Loss of Bsr-k1 function results in lignin accumulation and increases resistance to rice blast and bacterial blight [83].

3.4. The Regulating Network Linking Lignin with Immune Reaction

The transcriptional regulation on plant metabolism and development is important, which also participates in immune reaction through lignin metabolism. MYB proteins are one of the largest transcription factor families which play an important part in plant growth and development. Some members of MYB are master regulators in the lignin pathway, usually form MBW ternary complex that consists of MYB, basic helix-loop-helix, and WD40 [84,85]. A R2R3 MYB transcription factor, namely GhODO1, was isolated from cotton. GhODO1 interacts with the promoters of lignin genes Gh4CL1 and GhCAD3, activates their expression, and increases lignin accumulation and resistance to Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahlia). JA-mediated defense signaling is also proposed to be involved in this process [86]. AtMYB15 has been reported to regulate defense-induced lignification and contribute to resistance to Pseudomonas syringae (Pst DC3000). Furthermore, effector-triggered immunity (ETI) responses to Pst DC3000 challenge are required for AtMYB15-mediated lignification. This suggests that MYB15 plays a central part in pathogen-induced lignification [87,88]. BnMYB43 from oilseed rape has been shown to regulate vascular lignification, plant morphology and potential yield, but negatively affect resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, therefore being a growth-defense trade-off participant [89]. Recently, an ethylene response factor (ERF) MdEFR114 has been shown to interact with R2R3-MYB and WRKY transcription factors. This complex will directly bind to a peroxidase promoter and increase lignin accumulation and resistance to replant disease in apple tree [90].
Small GTP-binding proteins exist ubiquitously in eukaryotes, which regulate different cell functions such as organogenesis, polar growth, cell division, and defense response [91,92]. ROP is a subfamily of small GTP-binding proteins that exclusively occur in plants. There are 11 ROPs in Arabidopsis, 7 in rice, and 6 in wheat [93]. OsRac1, one member of ROP in rice, has been reported to affect on CCR, the first enzyme special to lignin monolignol pathway, and then increase defense responses [94]. Furthermore, we have shown that wheat TaRac1 interacted with TaCCR, up-regulated CCR, and CAD gene expression, enhanced total lignin accumulation and S lignin proportion. This will increase broad-spectrum disease resistance. Collective data suggest that only Group II ROPs have the important roles during defense response in monocot crop [95]. AtRop9, the dicot plant homologue of Group II, is the regulator on ABA and auxin signaling in embryo and lateral root development instead of pathogen response [96]. It is proposed that some ROPs will form a protein network called the defensome, in which ROP serve as a molecular switch to interact with many different effector proteins [97,98]. This bears a resemblance to resistosome complex that was reported recently [80].

3.5. The Metabolic Flux towards Lignin Affecting Defense Response

The metabolic reprogramming is a common phenomenon in regulating metabolism of plant. Its relation with plant innate immunity and lignin pathway remain largely unknown. A novel glycosyltransferase UGT73C7 was identified from Arabidopsis. It has shown that UGT73C7 could glycosylate p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid, the upstream compounds in the lignin pathway. This will up-regulate SNC1 expression, a Toll/interleukin 1 receptor-type NLR gene, and then activate immunity in the plant. UGT73C7 is an important regulator to redirect lignin metabolism upon pathogen challenge [99]. Recently, we have demonstrated that wheat DFRL exerted disease resistance through shifting NADP pool and lignin synthesis [100]. Hm1 is a first-cloned R gene from maize, which encodes an enzyme that detoxifies the Helminthosporium carbonum (HC) toxin from the special pathogen Cochliobolus carbonum [101]. However, the homologous Hm genes have also been found from other monocot crops, including rice, barley, and wheat, although they are not the host of C. carbonum. Hm homologs are similar with dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) in sequence, an important rate-limiting enzyme in flavonoid pathway; therefore they are named as dihydroflavonol-4-reductase like (DFRL). Our studies have shown that wheat TaDFRL has the broad substrate preference, including dihydroflavonol (such as taxifolin), flavonol, and flavones (such as quercetin and apigenin), and use both NAD and NADP as co-enzyme, which is different with DFR. Up-regulated TaDFRL alters NAD(H) and NADP(H) pools towards high NADPH levels. Subsequently, the expressions of CAD and CCR genes are increased, which required NADPH as reducing equivalent. This leads to the enhancement of lignin accumulation and resistance to broad-spectrum diseases [100]. This provides a novel mechanism about increasing host defense responses by elevating metabolic flux towards lignin biosynthesis.

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

The increasing reports on lignin’s role in disease resistance have been shown in the recent scientific literature. As we discuss in this review, many questions remain to be solved on this issue. The heterogeneity in lignin synthesis and the different stress-induced lignin to developmental lignin make our understanding on the relationships between lignin and defense more sophisticated, which lead to many conflicting reports. Therefore, it is reasonable to excavate and distinguish the different mechanisms behind these actions in order to fully comprehend each specific case. In this review, we sum up five action models concerning lignin with defense responses. Hopefully, this will help to deepen research in this field.
In the future, we suggest that studies on this subject should focus more on authentic mechanisms in each special case. Particularly, it should pay attention to different pathogens (bacteria, fungi) and ecotypes (necrotrophic, saprophytic) which will distinguish them among unique actions. The cross-talk with other defense signals needs to be considered in studies such as JA, SA, and ethylene. The metabolic flux across the different pathways should also be addressed to elucidate the mechanism behind the investigation. With more research data available, there will be more models to be uncovered, and then we will have a panoramic insight on these complicated events. This will help to develop high-resistant crops by a molecular breeding strategy.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070326).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070326). The author sincerely thanks Xianzhi He of Noble Foundation, and Lance Hartung of University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA, for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ma, Q.-H. The expression of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase in two wheat genotypes differing in lodging resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2763–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Q.; Fu, C.; Liang, C.; Ni, X.; Zhao, X.; Chen, M.; Ou, J. Crop lodging and the roles of lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose in lodging resistance. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Niu, Y.; Chen, T.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, M. Lodging prevention in cereals: Morphological, biochemical, anatomical traits and their molecular mechanisms, management and breeding strategies. Field Crops Res. 2022, 289, 108733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peter, G.; Neale, D. Molecular basis for the evolution of xylem lignification. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2004, 7, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Xu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Hu, J.; Zhou, X.; Ye, X.; Reichel, K.L.; Stewart, N.R.; Syrenne, R.D.; Yang, X.; Gao, P.; et al. Comparative genome analysis of lignin biosynthesis gene families across the plant kingdom. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10 (Suppl. S11), S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dixon, R.A.; Achnine, L.; Kota, P.; Liu, C.J.; Reddy, M.S.S.; Wang, L. The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence—A genomics perspective. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yadav, S.; Chattopadhyay, D. Lignin: The building block of defense responses to stress in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 6652–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Battle, M.; Bender, M.L.; Tans, P.P.; White, J.W.C.; Ellis, J.T.; Conway, T.; Francey, R.J. Global carbon sinks and their variability inferred from atmospheric O2 and δ13C. Science 2000, 287, 2467–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baucher, M.; Halpin, C.; Petit-Conil, M.; Boerjan, W. Lignin: Genetic engineering and impact on pulping. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 38, 305–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jung, H.-J.G.; Samac, D.A.; Sarath, G. Modifying crops to increase cell wall digestibility. Plant Sci. 2012, 185/186, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leng, E.; Guo, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Xue, J.E.Y. A comprehensive review on lignin pyrolysis: Mechanism, modeling and the effects of inherent metals in biomass. Fuel 2022, 309, 122102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, F.; Dixon, R.A. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guragain, Y.N.; Herrera, A.I.; Vadlani, P.V.; Prakash, O. Lignins of bioenergy crops: A review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, G.; Gong, Z.; Luo, X.; Chen, L.; Shuai, L. Bonding wood with uncondensed lignins as adhesives. Nature 2023, 621, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hall, S.J.; Ye, C.; Weintraub, S.R.; Hockaday, W.C. Molecular trade-offs in soil organic carbon composition at continental scale. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, Z.-B.; Ma, Q.-H.; Xu, Y. Lignin biosynthesis and its molecular regulation. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2003, 13, 321–328. [Google Scholar]
  18. Weng, J.-K.; Chapple, C. The origin and evolution of lignin biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2010, 187, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dixon, R.A.; Barros, J. Lignin biosynthesis: Old roads revisited and new roads explored. Open Biol. 2019, 9, 190215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, F.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Havkin-Frenkel, D.; Dixon, R.A.; Ralph, J. A polymer of caffeyl alcohol in plant seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 1772–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weng, J.-K.; Mo, H.; Chapple, C. Over-expression of F5H in COMT-deficient Arabidopsis leads to enrichment of an unusual lignin and disruption of pollen wall formation. Plant J. 2010, 64, 898–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lan, W.; Lu, F.; Regner, M.; Zhu, Y.; Rencoret, J.; Ralph, S.A.; Zakai, U.I.; Morreel, K.; Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J. Tricin, a flavonoid monomer in monocot lignification. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1284–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lan, W.; Rencoret, J.; Lu, F.; Karlen, S.D.; Smith, B.G.; Harris, P.J.; Rio, J.C.D.; Ralph, J. Tricin-lignins: Occurrence and quantitation of tricin in relation to phylogeny. Plant J. 2016, 88, 1046–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vanholme, R.; Cesarino, I.; Rataj, K.; Xiao, Y.; Sundin, L.; Goeminne, G.; Kim, H.; Cross, J.; Morreel, K.; Araujo, P.; et al. Caffeoyl shikimate esterase (CSE) is an enzyme in the lignin biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. Science 2013, 341, 1103–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Barros, J.; Serrani-Yarce, J.C.; Chen, F.; Baxter, D.; Venables, B.J.; Dixon, R.A. Role of bifunctional ammonia-lyase in grass cell wall biosynthesis. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Franke, R.; McMichael, C.M.; Meyer, K.; Shirley, A.M.; Cusumano, J.C.; Chapple, C. Modified lignin in tobacco and poplar plants over-expressing the Arabidopsis gene encoding ferulate 5-hydroxylase. Plant J. 2000, 22, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, Z.; Wang, N.; Hisano, H.; Cao, Y.; Wu, F.; Liu, W.; Bao, Y.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Fu, C. Simultaneous regulation of F5H in COMT-RNAi transgenic switchgrass alters effects of COMT suppression on syringyl lignin biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 836–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shafiei, R.; Hooper, M.; McClellan, C.; Oakey, H.; Stephens, J.; Lapierre, C.; Tsuji, Y.; Goeminne, G.; Vanholme, R.; Boerjan, W.; et al. Downregulation of barley ferulate 5-hydroxylase dramatically alters straw lignin structure without impact on mechanical properties. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1125003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Takeda, Y.; Koshiba, T.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Murakami, S.; Yamamura, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Takano, T.; Hattori, T.; Sakamoto, M.; et al. Regulation of CONIFERALDEHYDE 5-HYDROXYLASE expression to modulate cell wall lignin structure in rice. Planta 2017, 246, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weng, J.-K.; Akiyama, T.; Ralph, J.; Chapple, C. Independent recruitment of an O-methyltransferase for syringyl lignin biosynthesis in Selaginella moellendorffii. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2708–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Renault, H.; Werck-Reichhart, D.; Weng, J.-K. Harnessing lignin evolution for biotechnological applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Turlapati, P.V.; Kim, K.W.; Davin, L.B.; Lewis, N.G. The laccase multigene family in Arabidopsis thaliana: Towards addressing the mystery of their gene function(s). Planta 2011, 233, 439–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Duroux, L.; Welinder, K.G. The peroxidase gene family in plants: A phylogenetic overview. J. Mol. Evol. 2003, 57, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, Q.; Nakashima, J.; Chen, F.; Yin, Y.; Fu, C.; Yun, J.; Shao, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Dixon, R.A. LACCASE is necessary and nonredundant with PEROXIDASE for lignin polymerization during vascular development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3976–3987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, Y.; Bouchabke-Coussa, O.; Lebris, P.; Antelme, S.; Soulhat, C.; Gineau, E.; Dalmais, M.; Bendahmane, A.; Morin, H.; Mouille, G.; et al. LACCASE5 is required for lignification of the Brachypodium distachyon culm. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khandal, H.; Singh, A.P.; Chattopadhyay, D. MicroRNA397b-LACCASE2 module regulates root lignification under water- and phosphate deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 1387–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tobimatsu, Y.; Schuetz, M. Lignin polymerization: How do plants manage the chemistry so well? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hoffmann, N.; Benske, A.; Betz, H.; Schuetz, M.; Samuels, A.L. Laccases and peroxidases co-localize in lignified secondary cell walls throughout Arabidopsis stem development. Plant Physiol. 2020, 184, 806–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rojas-Murcia, N.; Hématy, K.; Lee, Y.; Emonet, A.; Ursache, R.; Fujita, S.; Bellis, D.D.; Geldner, N. High-order mutants reveal an essential requirement for peroxidases but not laccases in Casparian strip lignifications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 17, 29166–29177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Davin, L.B.; Wang, H.-B.; Crowell, A.L.; Bedgar, D.L.; Martin, D.M.; Sarkanen, S.; Lewis, N.G. Stereoselective bimolecular phenoxy radical coupling by an auxiliary (dirigent) protein without an active center. Science 1997, 275, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hosmani, P.S.; Kamiya, T.; Danku, J.; Naseer, S.; Geldner, N.; Guerinot, M.L.; Salt, D.E. Dirigent domain-containing protein is part of the machinery required for formation of the lignin-based Casparian strip in the root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14498–14503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, Y.-Q.; Huang, J.-Q.; Reyt, G.; Song, T.; Love, A.; Tiemessen, D.; Xue, P.-Y.; Wu, W.-K.; George, M.W.; Chen, X.-Y.; et al. A dirigent protein complex directs lignin polymerization and assembly of the root diffusion barrier. Science 2023, 382, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deng, J.; Guan, R.; Liang, T.; Su, L.; Ge, F.; Cui, X.; Liu, D. Dirigent gene family is involved in the molecular interaction between Panax notoginseng and root rot pathogen Fusarium solani. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kapoor, P.; Rakhra, G.; Kumar, V.; Joshi, R.; Gupta, M.; Rakhra, G. Insights into the functional characterization of DIR proteins through genome-wide in silico and evolutionary studies: A systematic review. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2023, 23, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ma, Q.-H. Monocot chimeric jacalins: A novel subfamily of plant lectins. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2014, 34, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ma, Q.-H.; Han, J.-Q. Identification of monocot chimeric jacalin family reveals functional diversity in wheat. Planta 2021, 253, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sederoff, R.R.; MacKay, J.J.; Ralph, J.; Hatfield, R.D. Unexpected variation in lignin. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1999, 2, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lewis, N.G. A 20th century roller coaster ride: A short account of lignification. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1999, 2, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mansfield, S.D.; Kim, H.; Lu, F.; Ralph, J. Whole plant cell wall characterization using solution-state 2D NMR. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Moura, J.C.; Bonine, C.A.; de Oliveira Fernandes Viana, J.; Dornelas, M.C.; Mazzafera, P. Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cesarino, I. Structural features and regulation of lignin deposited upon biotic and abiotic stresses. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Eynck, C.; Séguin-Swartz, G.; Clarke, W.E.; Parkin, I.A.P. Monolignol biosynthesis is associated with resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Camelina sativa. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2012, 13, 887–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dong, N.-Q.; Lin, H.-X. Contribution of phenylpropanoid metabolism to plant development and plant-environment interactions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2021, 63, 180–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Peltier, A.J.; Hatfield, R.D.; Grau, C.R. Soybean stem lignin concentration relates to resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Funnell-Harris, D.L.; Pedersen, J.F.; Sattler, S.E. Alteration in lignin biosynthesis restricts growth of Fusarium spp. in brown midrib sorghum. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Jikumaru, Y.; Kamiya, Y.; Tang, Y.; Dixon, R.A. Selective lignin downregulation leads to constitutive defense response expression in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). New Phytol. 2011, 190, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, S.-H.; Yang, Q.; Ma, R.-C. Erwinia carotovora ssp. carotovora infection induced “defense lignin” accumulation and lignin biosynthetic gene expression in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Menden, B.; Kohlhoff, M.; Moerschbacher, B.M. Wheat cells accumulate a syringyl rich lignin during the hypersensitive resistance response. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ma, Q.-H.; Zhu, H.-H.; Qiao, M.-Y. Contribution of both lignin content and sinapyl monomer to disease resistance in tobacco. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xiong, X.-P.; Sun, S.-C.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Li, Y.-J.; Liu, F.; Xue, F.; Sun, J. The cotton lignin biosynthetic gene Gh4CL30 regulates lignification and phenolic content and contributes to Verticillium wilt resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2021, 34, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ninkuu, V.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Ziemah, J.; Ullrich, M.S.; Kuhnert, N.; Zeng, H. Lignin and its pathway-associated phytoalexins modulate plant defense against fungi. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stassen, M.J.J.; Hsu, S.-H.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Stringlis, I.A. Coumarin communication along the microbiome-root-shoot axis. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Song, P.; Yu, X.; Yang, W.; Wang, Q. Natural phytoalexin stilbene compound resveratrol and its derivatives as anti-tobacco mosaic virus and anti-phytopathogenic fungus agents. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Su, P.; Kang, H.; Peng, Q.; Wicaksono, W.A.; Berg, G.; Liu, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhang, D.; Cernava, T.; Liu, Y. Microbiome homeostasis on rice leaves is regulated by a precursor molecule of lignin biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Suzuki, S.; Umezawa, T. Biosynthesis of lignans and norlignans. J. Wood Sci. 2007, 53, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Harmatha, J.; Dinan, L. Biological activities of lignans and stilbenoids associated with plant-insect chemical interaction. Phytochem. Rev. 2003, 2, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luo, R.; Pan, W.; Liu, W.; Tian, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Cui, L. The barley DIR gene family: An expanded gene family that is involved in stress responses. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 1042772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hano, C.F.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Davin, L.B.; Cort, J.R.; Lewis, N.G. Lignans: Insights into their biosynthesis, metabolic engineering, analytical methods and health benefits. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 630327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, Q.-H.; Liu, Y.-C. TaDIR13, a dirigent protein from wheat, promotes lignan biosynthesis and enhances pathogen resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bacete, L.; Méelida, H.; Miedes, E.; Molina, A. Plant cell wall mediated immunity: Cell wall changes trigger disease resistance responses. Plant J. 2018, 93, 614–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Miedes, E.; Vanholme, R.; Boerjan, W.; Molina, A. The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens. Front. Plant. Sci. 2014, 5, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Denness, L.; McKenna, J.F.; Segonzac, C.; Wormit, A.; Madhou, P.; Bennett, M.; Mansfield, J.; Zipfel, C.; Hamann, T. Cell wall damage induced lignin biosynthesis is regulated by a reactive oxygen species and jasmonic acid-dependent process in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1364–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Engelsdorf, T.; Kjaer, L.; Gigli-Bisceglia, N.; Vaahtera, L.; Bauer, S.; Miedes, E.; Wormit, A.; James, L.; Chairam, I.; Molina, A.; et al. Functional characterization of genes mediating cell wall metabolism and responses to plant cell wall integrity impairment. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 320. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhu, W.; Gao, E.; Shaban, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Nie, X.; Zhu, L. GhUMC1, a blue copper-binding protein, regulates lignin synthesis and cotton immune response. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 504, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Waszczak, C.; Carmody, M.; Kangasjarvi, J. Reactive oxygen species in plant signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 209–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kourelis, J.; van der Hoorn, R.A.L. Defended to the nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, G.-F.; He, Y.; Strauch, R.; Olukolu, B.A.; Nielsen, D.; Li, X.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Maize homologs of hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, bind the nucleotide binding leucine-rich repeat Rp1 proteins. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2230–2243. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang, G.-F.; Balint-Kurti, P.J. Maize homologs of CCoAOMT and HCT, two key enzymes in lignin biosynthesis, form complexes with the NLR Rp1 protein to modulate the defense response. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2166–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wang, J.; Hu, M.; Wang, J.; Qi, J.; Han, Z.; Wang, G.; Qi, Y.; Wang, H.-W.; Zhou, J.-M.; Chai, J. Reconstitution and structure of a plant NLR resistosome conferring immunity. Science 2019, 364, eaav5870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, N.; Lin, B.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Yang, F.; Ding, X.; Yan, J.; Chu, Z. Natural variation in ZmFBL41 confers banded leaf and sheath blight resistance in maize. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1540–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Graham, J.B.; Canniff, N.P.; Hebert, D.N. TPR-containing proteins control protein organization and homeostasis for the endoplasmic reticulum. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 54, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, X.; Liao, H.; Chern, M.; Yin, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, C.; Zhao, W.; et al. Loss of function of a rice TPR-domain RNA-binding protein confers broad-spectrum disease resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3174–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhong, R.; Lee, C.; Ye, Z.-H. Evolutionary conservation of the transcriptional network regulating secondary cell wall biosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ohtani, M.; Demura, T. The quest for transcriptional hubs of lignin biosynthesis: Beyond the NAC-MYB-gene regulatory network model. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhu, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, H.; Ge, X.; Li, F.; Hou, Y. GhODO1, an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, positively regulates cotton resistance to Verticillium dahliae via the lignin biosynthesis and jasmonic acid signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 201, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chezem, W.R.; Memon, A.; Li, F.-S.; Weng, J.-K.; Clay, N.K. SG2-type R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB15 controls defense-induced lignification and basal immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1907–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kim, S.H.; Lam, P.Y.; Lee, M.-H.; Jeon, H.S.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Park, O.K. The Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB transcription factor MYB15 is a key regulator of lignin biosynthesis in effector-triggered immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 583153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jiang, J.; Liao, X.; Jin, X.; Tan, L.; Lu, Q.; Yuan, C.; Xue, Y.; Yin, N.; Lin, N.; Chai, Y. MYB43 in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) positively regulates vascular lignification, plant morphology and yield potential but negatively affects resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Genes 2020, 11, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ai, S.; Liu, C.; Ma, F.; Li, C. MdERF114 enhances the resistance of apple roots to Fusarium solani by regulating the transcription of MdPRX63. Plant Physiol. 2023, 92, 2015–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ma, Q.-H. Small GTP-binding proteins and their functions in plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 26, 369–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Engelhardt, S.; Trutzenberg, A.; Hückelhoven, R. Regulation and functions of ROP GTPases in plant-microbe interactions. Cells 2020, 9, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Christensen, T.M.; Vejlupkova, Z.; Sharma, Y.K.; Arthur, K.M.; Spatafora, J.W.; Albright, C.A.; Meeley, R.B.; Duvick, J.P.; Quatrano, R.S.; Fowler, J.E. Conserved subgroups and developmental regulation in the monocot rop gene family. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1791–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kawasaki, T.; Koita, H.; Nakatsubo, T.; Hasegawa, K.; Wakabayashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Umemura, K.; Umezawa, T.; Shimamoto, K. Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, is an effector of small GTPase Rac in defense signaling in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ma, Q.-H.; Zhu, H.-H.; Han, J.-Q. Wheat ROP proteins modulate defense response through lignin metabolism. Plant Sci. 2017, 262, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Nibau, C.; Tao, L.; Levasseur, K.; Wu, H.-M.; Cheung, A.Y. The Arabidopsis small GTPase AtRAC7/ROP9 is a modulator of auxin and abscisic acid signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3425–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nakashima, A.; Chen, L.; Thao, N.P.; Fujiwara, M.; Wong, H.L.; Kuwano, M.; Umemura, K.; Shirasu, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Shimamoto, K. RACK1 functions in rice innate immunity by interacting with the Rac1 immune complex. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2265–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kawano, Y.; Kaneko-Kawano, T.; Shimamoto, K. Rho family GTPase-dependent immunity in plants and animals. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Huang, X.-X.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J.-S.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.-J.; Liu, Q.; Wang, G.-F.; Xu, F.; Liu, L.; Hou, B.-K. The novel pathogen-responsive glycosyltransferase UGT73C7 mediates the redirection of phenylpropanoid metabolism and promotes SNC1-dependent Arabidopsis immunity. Plant J. 2021, 107, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ma, Q.-H.; Li, Y.-L. Wheat dihydroflavonol-4-reductase like gene confers disease resistance by modulating NADPH pool and lignin biosynthesis. Curr. Plant Biol. 2023, 35–36, 100299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Johal, G.S.; Briggs, S.P. Reductase activity encoded by the HM1 disease resistance gene in maize. Science 1992, 258, 985–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The general biosynthesis pathway of lignin. PAL: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TAL: tyrosine ammonia-lyase; C4H: cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; C3H: p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; C3′H: coumaroyl shikimate3′-hydroxylase; 4CL: 4-coumarate: CoA ligase; HCT: hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate/Quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase; F5H: ferulate 5-hydroxylase; CSE: caffeoyl shikimate esterase; CCR: cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; COMT: caffeic acid O-methyltransferase; CAD: cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; LAC: laccase; POD: peroxidase; DIR: dirigent; H: hydroxyphenyl lignin; C: catechyl lignin; G: guaiacyl lignin; S: syringyl lignin.
Figure 1. The general biosynthesis pathway of lignin. PAL: phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; TAL: tyrosine ammonia-lyase; C4H: cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; C3H: p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; C3′H: coumaroyl shikimate3′-hydroxylase; 4CL: 4-coumarate: CoA ligase; HCT: hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate/Quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase; F5H: ferulate 5-hydroxylase; CSE: caffeoyl shikimate esterase; CCR: cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; COMT: caffeic acid O-methyltransferase; CAD: cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; LAC: laccase; POD: peroxidase; DIR: dirigent; H: hydroxyphenyl lignin; C: catechyl lignin; G: guaiacyl lignin; S: syringyl lignin.
Genes 15 00295 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Q.-H. Lignin Biosynthesis and Its Diversified Roles in Disease Resistance. Genes 2024, 15, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15030295

AMA Style

Ma Q-H. Lignin Biosynthesis and Its Diversified Roles in Disease Resistance. Genes. 2024; 15(3):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15030295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Qing-Hu. 2024. "Lignin Biosynthesis and Its Diversified Roles in Disease Resistance" Genes 15, no. 3: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15030295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop