Next Article in Journal
Chloroplast Genomes of Vitis flexuosa and Vitis amurensis: Molecular Structure, Phylogenetic, and Comparative Analyses for Wild Plant Conservation
Previous Article in Journal
Looking into the Quantification of Forensic Samples with Real-Time PCR
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Sweet Potato MYB Transcription Factor IbMYB330 Enhances Tolerance to Drought and Salt Stress in Transgenic Tobacco
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Small Auxin-Up RNA Gene, IbSAUR36, Regulates Adventitious Root Development in Transgenic Sweet Potato

1
Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
2
Key Laboratory of Phylogeny and Comparative Genomics of the Jiangsu Province, School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(6), 760; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060760
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Revised: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 5 June 2024 / Published: 10 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Genetic Breeding of Sweetpotato)

Abstract

:
Small auxin-upregulated RNAs (SAURs), as the largest family of early auxin-responsive genes, play important roles in plant growth and development processes, such as auxin signaling and transport, hypocotyl development, and tolerance to environmental stresses. However, the functions of few SAUR genes are known in the root development of sweet potatoes. In this study, an IbSAUR36 gene was cloned and functionally analyzed. The IbSAUR36 protein was localized to the nucleus and plasma membrane. The transcriptional level of this gene was significantly higher in the pencil root and leaf.This gene was strongly induced by indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), but it was downregulated under methyl-jasmonate(MeJA) treatment. The promoter of IbSAUR36 contained the core cis-elements for phytohormone responsiveness. Promoter β-glucuronidase (GUS) analysis in Arabidopsis showed that IbSAUR36 is highly expressed in the young tissues of plants, such as young leaves, roots, and buds. IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots were obtained by an efficient Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated root transgenic system. We demonstrated that overexpression of IbSAUR36 promoted the accumulation of IAA, upregulated the genes encoding IAA synthesis and its signaling pathways, and downregulated the genes encoding lignin synthesis and JA signaling pathways. Taken together, these results show that IbSAUR36 plays an important role in adventitious root (AR) development by regulating IAA signaling, lignin synthesis, and JA signaling pathways in transgenic sweet potatoes.

1. Introduction

Sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is an important tuberous root crop cultivated worldwide [1,2,3]. The tuberous root development is a complex biological process for sweet potato yield [4,5,6]. The sweet potato adventitious roots (ARs) originated from root primordia located on the nodes as well as at the cut ends. These ARs became ‘thick’ pigmented storage roots(SRs), ‘thick’ pigmented pencil roots (PRs), and white fibrous roots (FRs) [7,8]. Therefore, they can contribute to improving sweet potato yield and development.
In general, the root expansion is not only regulated by endogenous phytohormones and genes, but is also affected by the external environment [9,10,11]. Previous studies have demonstrated that auxins, mainly indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), play an essential role in the initiation of SR swelling, and auxin concentration increase with the increase inroot diameter in the early stage of root expansion [12,13]. During the early stage of storage root development, the endogenous IAA content and SRD1 transcript level increased concomitantly, SRD1-overexpressing transgenic sweet potato plants cultured in vitro produced thicker and shorter fibrous roots than wild-type plants, suggesting an involvement of SRD1 during the early stage of the auxin-dependent development of the storage root [14]. The early accumulation of IAA in the rooting zone stimulated the formation of ARs in cuttings [13,15]. Many studies suggest that the genes related to phytohormone, IAA, jasmonic acid (JA), and lignin biosynthesis are widely used for clonal plant propagation in sweet potato SRs [15,16,17].
Plants can quickly sense and respond to changes in auxin levels, and these responses involve several major classes of auxin-responsive genes, including the auxin/indole-3-acetic acid (Aux/IAA) family, the auxin response factor (ARF) family, small auxin-upregulated RNAs (SAURs), and the auxin-responsive Gretchen Hagen3 (GH3) family [18].
SAURs are early auxin-responsive genes, with a large family in plants [19,20,21,22]. Many studies suggest that the SAURs gene family plays important roles in root formation. The overexpressionof CsSAUR31 exhibited longer roots in cucumber [23]. It revealed that OsSAUR11 positively enhanced the ratio of deep rooting in transgenic rice [24]. The PagWOX11/12a-PagSAUR36 module significantly promoted AR development via the auxinsignaling pathway in transgenic poplar [25]. However, it is unclear whether some SAURs participate in the development of ARs in sweet potato.
The initiation of SR bulking and the subsequent thickening process of sweet potatoes is a complex biological process, including the accumulation of morphogenesis and assimilation products. Such information does not reflect an accurate relationship between those ARs andstorage root development, and it is unclear how many of those ARs actually become SRs. Also, it is unclear whether SRs emanate from these initial ARs. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of AR development can contribute to the root architecture. Here, we identified a candidate SAUR gene, IbSAUR36, which regulates AR development in sweet potatoes. The results suggest that IbSAUR36 may be a useful potential target for further molecular breeding of high-yielding sweet potatoes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Sweet potato cultivars Jishu25 (JS25), Jishu29 (JS29), and Xuzihsu 8(XZ8) were planted in the greenhouse of the Crops Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China. JS25 and JS29 were used to isolate the IbSAUR36 gene and analyze the expression in different tissues, respectively. XZ8 has been used to characterize the gene functionas described by Yu et al. (2020) [26]. The function of the IbSAUR36 promoter was identified using Arabidopsis thaliana (Columbia-0, wild type, WT).

2.2. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of IbSAUR36 and Its Promoter

The Trizol Up Kit (ET111, Transgen, Beijing, China) was used to extract the total RNA and then transcribe the first-strand cDNA with the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit and gDNA Eraser kit (PR047A, Takara, Beijing, China). The full-length cDNA of IbSAUR36 was amplified from the first-strand DNA using the homologous cloning method with specific primers. The open-reading frame (ORF) of IbSAUR36 was analyzed with ORF Finder. The molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of IbSAUR36 were calculated with ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 1 December 2023). Amino acid sequence alignment was analyzed using DNAMAN V6 software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 7.0 software with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Genomic DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. The genomic sequence and promoter sequence of IbASUR36 were amplified from genomic DNA using the homologous cloning method with specific primers. All the specific primers are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The cis-acting regulatory elements in its promoter were analyzed using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 1 December 2023).

2.3. Expression Analysis

The transcript levels of IbSAUR36 in leaf, stem, hair root, pencil root and storage root tissues of the 125-day-old field-grown plants of JS25 and JS29 was analyzed with quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, the 2-week-oldof JS25 and JS29 plants were stressed in Hoagland solutionwith H2O (control) and 100 mM IAA, and 100 mM MeJA, respectively, and sampled at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after treatments for analyzing the expression of IbSAUR36. Ibactin (AY905538) was used to normalize the expression levels in sweet potato. All the specific primers are showed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.4. Function Analyse of IbSAUR36 Promoter

The promoter of IbSAUR36 was inserted into the DX2181 vector with the β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene, and then it was transferred into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The transgenic Arabidopsis plants were produced and further grown in pots to obtain T3 seeds. The GUS activity in transgenic Arabidopsis was examined by GUS histochemical staining solution. After staining, tissues were cleared by replacing the staining solution with several changes of 70% (v/v) and 90% (v/v) ethanol as necessary.

2.5. Regeneration of the Transgenic Sweet Potato Plants

The coding region of IbSAUR36 was inserted into a pUBI.U4::IbSAUR36-CaMV35S::DsRed expression cassette pNRT expression vector. The constructs wereused for A. rhizogenes-mediated transformation as described by Yu et al. (2020) [26]. The transgenic roots were harvested with the help of red fluorescent protein (RFP). In order to explore the cross-sectional structural characteristics of the root cells, the root tissues were collected from CK and transgenic lines for paraffin sections and dyed with sarranine and solid green. Theexpression level of IbSAUR36 was analyzed with qRT-PCR using primers in different roots (Supplementary Table S1). The phytohormone contents of the roots were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

2.6. RNA-Sequencing

To analyze the function of IbSAUR36, the roots of transgenic sweet potato and CK were used for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). The RNA-seq library was constructed using an Ultra RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Fragments were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 according to the standard method (Illumina). Total reads were mapped to the Ipomoeatrifida genome (sweet potato GARDEN (kazusa.or.jp)). Differentially expressed genes were identified using Cuffdiff with default criteria (fold change > 1.5) and an adjusted false discovery rate (p value < 0.05). Three independent biological replicates were used for the RNA-sequencing analysis. An analysis using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway was conducted according to database instructions (KEGG PATHWAY Database). The gene expression patterns were graphically represented in a heat map by cluster analysis using TBtools software v2.041.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Three biological replicates were conducted and the data were presented as the mean ± SE. All were analyzed using Student’s t-test (two-tailed analysis). Significance levels at p < 0.05 weredenoted bydifferent small letters, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of IbSAUR36 and Its Promoter in Sweet Potato

We obtained a SAUR family gene from the previous comparative transcriptome analysis of root development in two sweet potato cultivars, JS25 and JS29. This gene was named IbSAUR36 by homology analysis. The 626-bp cDNA sequence of IbSAUR36 included 507-bp ORF and encoded a protein of 168 aa (molecular weight: 19.167 kDa) with a predicted pI of 10.98. Multiple sequence alignment showed that the new SAUR protein contained an auxin-inducible domain and has high homology with SAUR36 proteins from Ipomoea triloba (ItSAUR36, XP_031111161.1, 96.4%), Ipomoea nil (InSAUR36, XP_019189087.1, 93.5%), Capsicum annuum (CaSAUR36, XP_016557650.2, 60.1%), Nicotiana attenuata (NaSAUR36, XP_019258606.1, 57.6%), and Solanum tuberosum (StSAUR36, XP_006347888.1, 56.4%) in the NCBI database (Figure 1A). Phylogenetic analysis of SAUR proteins with a neighbor-joining method revealed that the new SAUR protein has high homology with ItSAUR36 proteins from Ipomoea triloba (Figure 1B). The SAUR gene sequence is the same as that of IbSAUR36 (Ibat.Brg.04E_G002670.1) from the updated genome assembly and annotation for the sweet potato variety I. batatas Beauregard. Thus, the new SAUR gene was named IbSAUR36. The 1494-bp promoter region of IbSAUR36 contained several phytohormone-responsive, cis-acting regulatory elements (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.2. Expression Analysis

To study the potential function of IbSAUR36 in sweet potato, the expression was analyzed with qRT-PCR in different tissues and treatments of JS25 and JS29. For the field-grown plants, the expression level of IbSAUR36 was highest in the leaves and pencil roots (Figure 2A). The IbSAUR36 was downregulated in different developmental stages of the storage roots after 30 days (Figure 2B). The expression of IbSAUR36 peaked at 3 h after IAA treatment (Figure 2C) and downregulated after MeJA treatment (Figure 2D). These results suggest that IbSAUR36 might be involved in root development, IAA, and JA response pathways.

3.3. Functional Analysis of IbSAUR36 Promoter

The promoter region of IbSAUR36 contained several phytohormone-responsive cis-acting regulatory elements, including auxin, MeJA, SA, zein and ABA (Figure S1). The IbSAUR36 promoter fused to the GUS reporter gene has been introduced into Arabidopsis. GUS analysis of different tissues showed that IbSAUR36 was active in the young tissues of plants, such as the germinated seed, immature plant root, fruit, and bud of transgenic Arabidopsis (Figure 3). These results suggest that IbSAUR36 might be involved in tissue development through plant hormone pathways.

3.4. IbSAUR36 Affected Phytohormone Homeostasis in Transgenic Sweet Potato Roots

To investigate the role of the IbSAUR36 gene in phytohormone signaling pathways of sweet potato, the overexpression vector pNRT-IbSAUR36 was constructed and introduced into sweet potato XZ8, while the XZ8 (CK) and the XZ8 introduced by pNRT (NRT) served as as negative controls. The RFP signal was observed in transgenic roots, but not in CK roots (Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B, the histological analysis of the transverse section revealed a higher number of lignified cells around xylem bundles in NRT roots than that of the CK lines. However, there was no obvious change in lignin deposition patterns in the roots between the IbSAUR36OE and CK lines. A qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression level of IbSAUR36 was significantly increased in IbSAUR36-overexpressingroots compared with that of CK and NRT roots (Figure 4C). Meanwhile, the IAA content significantly increased in IbSAUR36-overexpressing roots (Figure 4D).

3.5. IbSAUR36 Regulates the Genes Involved in IAA, JA, and Lignin Signaling Pathways

To explore the mechanism of IbSAUR36 in the transgenic roots, differentially expressed genes and metabolic pathways in transgenic sweet potato were analyzed by RNA-Seq. Using CK and NRT as the control groups, we obtained a total of 8931 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which, 4344 genes were further analyzed by the KEGG database (Figure 5A). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the 4344 DEGs in overexpressing roots were primarily enriched plant phytohormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and starch and sucrose metabolism pathways (Figure 5B).
The DEGs of auxin biosynthesis (transcript14004, transcript18952) and import transduction (transcript7691) pathway were upregulated, while the auxin transferred gene (transcript14625), auxin outport gene (transcript23779), auxin signal transduction genes (transcript3105, transcript21118), JA-associated genes (transcript6686, transcript6860, transcript4522 and transcript6161), and lignin biosynthesis genes (transcript10314, transcript22370) were downregulated (Figure 5C). The results indicate that overexpression of IbSAUR36 might regulate the IAA, JA, and lignin pathways.

3.6. IbSAUR36 Regulated the Genes Involved in Root Development

The initiation and development of SRs are intricately regulated by a transcriptional regulatory network, including the biosynthesis of lignin, flavanols, and starch. To explore the mechanism of IbSAUR36 in the pre-swelling stage, we chose 9 storage-associated genes and analyzed their relative expression. The results showed that auxin pathway enzyme genes IbYUCCA6, IbTAR2, IbAUX1, and IbIAA26 were upregulated, while the auxin glycosyltransferase gene IbUGT74, JA signal transduction enzyme gene IbJAZ, lignin biosynthesis enzyme genes Ib4CL and IbCAD, and root development-related transcription factor gene IbNAC83 were downregulated in IbSAUR36 overexpressing roots (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

4.1. IbSAUR36 Is anImportant Factor in Auxin and JA Signaling Pathways

The phytohormone auxin and JA play essential regulatory roles in multiple aspects of plant growth and development and in stress responses [27,28,29]. The YUCCA and TAR members are key enzymes of the IAA-biosynthetic pathway [30,31]. Glycosylation of IAA is carried out by UDP-glycosyltransferase 84B1 (UGT84B1), while UGT74D1 is implicated in the glycosylation of the irreversibly formed IAA catabolite oxIAA in Arabidopsis [32]. The content of IAA and expression levels of IbYUCCA6 and IbTAR2 were significantly increased, while those of IbUGT74 were significantly reducedin the IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Further, the auxin-responsive genes, including Aux/IAA, ARF, SAUR, and GH3, have roles in the tuberization process in sweet potatoes [33]. Many studies have shown that the genes in the auxin signaling pathway are able to regulate the genes in the JA pathway. StARF16 regulates defense gene StNPR1 during the JA-mediated defense response upon necrotrophic pathogen interaction [34]. The GH3 genes are cytosolic, acidic amido synthetases of the firefly luciferase group that conjugate auxins, jasmonates, and benzoate derivatives to a wide group of amino acids [35]. SAURs and GH3 have been shown to be specifically induced by the plant hormone auxin and JA. The transcription factors MYC2 and SAUR21 play a central role in the hormonal balance between JA-Ile and IAA [36]. The JA receptor JASMONATE-ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) protein, JAZ4, has a prominent function in canonical JA signaling as well as the auxin signaling pathway [37]. The SAUR family is an important factor in auxin signal transduction pathways, which include approximately 200 members in sweet potato [33]. In this study, we characterized an auxin-regulated gene, IbSAUR36, in sweet potato. This IbSAUR36 gene was upregulated after IAA treatment and downregulated after JA treatment (Figure 2). The IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato root exhibited a better RFP signal and more accumulation of IAA (Figure 5). The genes in auxin and JA signaling pathways were upregulated in the IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots (Figure 6). Based on all the above results, we propose that IbSAUR36 positively regulates the IAA and the JA signaling pathways.

4.2. IbSAUR36 Regulated the Lignin in Root Development

Numerous studies have confirmed that auxin plays a key role in AR formation [13,38,39,40,41]. SAUR is the largest gene family with auxin-responsive factors [21]. The main candidate genes, including MdSAUR2, MdSAUR29, MdSAUR60, MdSAUR62, MdSAUR69, MdSAUR71, and MdSAUR84, regulated the root growth angle in apples [42]. It was found that PbrSAUR13 promoted the synthesis and accumulation of stone cells and lignin, while PbrSAUR52 inhibited the synthesis and accumulation of stone cells and lignin [43]. OsSAUR11 positively regulates deep rooting in rice through participating in the regulation of auxin signaling [24]. The findings revealed high levels of CsSAUR31 expression within the root and male flower tissues, and CsSAUR31-overexpressing plants exhibited longer roots and hypocotyls in cucumbers [23]. However, the function of the SAUR gene family in sweet potato is largely obscure.
Sweet potato is an important tuberous root crop, and its yield depends on a change in the developmental fate of ARs into SRs [2,44]. The lignin biosynthesis limits sweet potato yield formation in storage roots [45]. The AP2/ERF transcription factor, IbRAP2.4, inhibited SR formation in transgenic sweet potato by comprehensively upregulating lignin biosynthesis pathway genes [46]. Transcriptional profiling of sweet potato roots indicates down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis and up-regulation of starch biosynthesis at an early stage of SR formation [47]. The lignin biosynthesis genes IbPAL, IbC4H, Ib4CL, IbCCoAOMT, and IbCAD were upregulated under GA treatment in the sweet potato roots [5]. MtCAD1 knockout medicago truncatula plants have reduced lignin content and display slower growth than WT [48]. IbCAD1-overexpressing plants displayed lower root weights and lower ratios of tuberous roots to pencil roots than WT [49]. In this study, overexpression of IbSAUR36 regulatedlignified cell development in ARs (Figure 4B). Further, the lignin biosynthesis genes Ib4CL and IbCAD were downregulated in the IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots (Figure 6). The results show that IbSAUR36 may regulate the lignin biosynthesis in root pre-swelling development.

5. Conclusions

In this study, an IbSAUR36 gene was cloned and functionally analyzed. We demonstrated that the overexpression of IbSAUR36 promoted the accumulation of IAA, upregulated the genes encoding IAA synthesis and its signaling pathways, and downregulated the genes encoding lignin synthesis and JA signaling pathways. Taken together, these results show that overexpression of IbSAUR36 may impact root development by IAA signaling, lignin synthesis, and JA signaling pathways in transgenic sweet potato.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15060760/s1, Figure S1: Promoter of IbSAUR36 showing different cis-acting regulatory elements associated with phytohormone responses. Table S1: Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.H.; methodology, Y.Z. and F.H.; validation, Y.Z., Z.L. and F.H.; data curation, Y.Z., A.L., T.D., Z.Q. and F.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and F.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., A.L. and F.H.; visualization, Y.Z., Z.Q. and F.H.; supervision, F.H.; project administration, Q.W. and L.Z.; funding acquisition, L.Z., Q.W. and F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (2021LZGC025), China Agriculture Research System of MOF andMARA (CARS-10-GW08), Technical System of Potato Industry in Shandong Province (SDAIT-16-04), and the technological innovation project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CXGC2024A01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kitahara, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Otani, M.; Hamada, T.; Nakayachi, O.; Takahata, Y. Carbohydrate components in sweetpotato storage roots: Their diversities and genetic improvement. Breed. Sci. 2017, 67, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, M.; Nie, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Jarret, R.; Zhao, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, J. Exploring and exploiting genetics and genomics for sweetpotato improvement: Status and perspectives. Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amagloh, F.C.; Yada, B.; Tumuhimbise, G.A.; Amagloh, F.K.; Kaaya, A.N. The potential of sweetpotato as a functional food in Sub-Saharan Africa and its implications for health: A review. Molecules 2021, 26, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, V.; Zemach, H.; Shabtai, S.; Aloni, R.; Yang, J.; Zhang, P.; Sergeeva, L.; Ligterink, W.; Firon, N. Proximal and distal parts of sweetpotato adventitious roots display differences in root architecture, lignin, and starch metabolism and their developmental fates. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 609923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, V.; Sergeeva, L.; Ligterink, W.; Aloni, R.; Zemach, H.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Yang, J.; Zhang, P.; Shabtai, S.; Firon, N. Gibberellin promotes sweetpotato root vascular lignification and reduces storage-root formation. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villordon, A.Q.; Clark, C.A. Variation in virus symptom development and root architecture attributes at the onset of storage root initiation in ‘beauregard’ sweetpotato plants grown with or without nitrogen. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ma, J.; Aloni, R.; Villordon, A.; Labonte, D.; Kfir, Y.; Zemach, H.; Schwartz, A.; Althan, L.; Firon, N. Adventitious root primordia formation and development in stem nodes of ‘Georgia Jet’ sweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas. Am. J. Bot. 2015, 102, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Belehu, T.; Hammes, P.S.; Robbertse, P.J. The origin and structure of adventitious roots in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Aust. J. Bot. 2004, 4, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanaka, M.; Takahata, Y.; Nakatani, M. Analysis of genes developmentally regulated during storage root formation of sweet potato. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wanjala, B.W.; Ateka, E.M.; Miano, D.W.; Low, J.W.; Kreuze, J.F. Storage root yield of sweetpotato as influenced by sweetpotato leaf curl virus and its interaction with sweetpotato feathery mottle virus and sweetpotato chlorotic stunt virus in Kenya. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.Q.; Zhang, D. Gene expression activity and pathway selection for sucrose metabolism in developing storage root of sweet potato. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kondhare, K.R.; Patil, A.B.; Giri, A.P. Auxin: An emerging regulator of tuber and storage root development. Plant Sci. 2021, 306, 110854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Druege, U.; Franken, P.; Hajirezaei, M.R. Plant hormone homeostasis, signaling, and function during adventitious root formation in cuttings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Noh, S.A.; Lee, H.S.; Huh, E.J.; Huh, G.H.; Paek, K.H.; Shin, J.S.; Bae, J.M. SRD1 is involved in the auxin-mediated initial thickening growth of storage root by enhancing proliferation of metaxylem and cambium cells in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, R.; Zhao, P.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Tang, Z. The role of IAA in regulating root architecture of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) in response to potassium deficiency stress. Plants 2023, 12, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bararyenya, A.; Olukolu, B.A.; Tukamuhabwa, P.; Gruneberg, W.J.; Ekaya, W.; Low, J.; Ochwo-Ssemakula, M.; Odong, T.L.; Talwana, H.; Badji, A.; et al. Genome-wide association study identified candidate genes controlling continuous storage root formation and bulking in hexaploid sweetpotato. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ji, C.Y.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, C.J.; Park, S.U.; Lee, H.U.; Kwak, S.S.; Kim, H.S. Comparative transcriptome profiling of sweetpotato storage roots during curing-mediated wound healing. Gene 2022, 833, 146592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Guilfoyle, T.J. Auxin regulated gene expression and gravitropism in plants. Asgsb Bull. 1995, 8, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Luo, J.; Zhou, J.J.; Zhang, J.Z. Aux/IAA gene family in plants: Molecular structure, regulation, and function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jain, M.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. Genome-wide analysis, evolutionary expansion, and expression of early auxin-responsive SAUR gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Genomics 2006, 88, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Markakis, M.N.; Boron, A.K.; Van Loock, B.; Saini, K.; Cirera, S.; Verbelen, J.P.; Vissenberg, K. Characterization of a small auxin-up RNA (SAUR)-like gene involved in Arabidopsis thaliana development. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, Y.; Hao, X.; Cao, J. Small auxin upregulated RNA (SAUR) gene family in maize: Identification, evolution, and its phylogenetic comparison with Arabidopsis, rice, and sorghum. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Luan, J.; Xin, M.; Qin, Z. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the roles of SAUR gene family members in the promotion of cucumber root expansion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xu, K.; Lou, Q.; Wang, D.; Li, T.; Chen, S.; Li, T.; Luo, L.; Chen, L. Overexpression of a novel small auxin-up RNA gene, OsSAUR11, enhances rice deep rootedness. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, R.; Wen, S.S.; Sun, T.T.; Wang, R.; Zuo, W.T.; Yang, T.; Wang, C.; Hu, J.J.; Lu, M.Z.; Wang, L.Q. PagWOX11/12a positively regulates the PagSAUR36 gene that enhances adventitious root development in poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 7298–7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yu, Y.C.; Xuan, Y.; Bian, X.F.; Zhang, L.; Pan, Z.Y.; Kou, M.; Cao, Q.H.; Tang, Z.H.; Li, Q.; Ma, D.F.; et al. Overexpression of phosphatidylserine synthase IbPSS1 affords cellular Na(+) homeostasis and salt tolerance by activating plasma membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiport activity in sweet potato roots. Hortic. Res. Engl. 2020, 7, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sybilska, E.; Daszkowska-Golec, A. A complex signaling trio in seed germination: Auxin-JA-ABA. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 873–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mei, S.; Zhang, M.; Ye, J.; Du, J.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Y. Auxin contributes to jasmonate-mediated regulation of abscisic acid signaling during seed germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2023, 35, 1110–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Machado, R.A.; Robert, C.A.; Arce, C.C.; Ferrieri, A.P.; Xu, S.; Jimenez-Aleman, G.H.; Baldwin, I.T.; Erb, M. Auxin is rapidly induced by herbivore attack and regulates a subset of systemic, jasmonate-dependent defenses. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xue, L.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wei, Z.; Zhai, H.; He, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, N.; et al. IbNF-YA1 is a key factor in the storage root development of sweet potato. Plant J. 2024; early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, T.; Chen, K.; Dong, N.Q.; Ye, W.W.; Shan, J.X.; Lin, H.X. Tillering and small grain 1 dominates the tryptophan aminotransferase family required for local auxin biosynthesis in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 581–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mateo-Bonmati, E.; Casanova-Saez, R.; Simura, J.; Ljung, K. Broadening the roles of UDP-glycosyltransferases in auxin homeostasis and plant development. New Phytol. 2021, 232, 642–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mathura, S.R.; Sutton, F.; Bowrin, V. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L. ] Lam.) ARF, Aux/IAA, GH3, and SAUR gene families. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kalsi, H.S.; Karkhanis, A.A.; Natarajan, B.; Bhide, A.J.; Banerjee, A.K. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 16 (StARF16) regulates defense gene StNPR1 upon infection with necrotrophic pathogen in potato. Plant Mol. Biol. 2022, 109, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wojtaczka, P.; Ciarkowska, A.; Starzynska, E.; Ostrowski, M. The GH3 amidosynthetases family and their role in metabolic crosstalk modulation of plant signaling compounds. Phytochemistry 2022, 194, 113039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Iqbal, M.A.; Miyamoto, K.; Yumoto, E.; Parveen, S.; Mutanda, I.; Inafuku, M.; Oku, H. Plant hormone profile and control over isoprene biosynthesis in a tropical tree Ficus septica. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 492–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Demott, L.; Oblessuc, P.R.; Pierce, A.; Student, J.; Melotto, M. Spatiotemporal regulation of JAZ4 expression and splicing contribute to ethylene- and auxin-mediated responses in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 2021, 108, 1266–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhao, S.; Zhao, X.; Xu, X.; Han, Z.; Qiu, C. Transcription factor IAA27 positively regulates P uptake through promoted adventitious root development in apple plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pacurar, D.I.; Perrone, I.; Bellini, C. Auxin is a central player in the hormone cross-talks that control adventitious rooting. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 151, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Du, M.; Spalding, E.P.; Gray, W.M. Rapid auxin-mediated cell expansion. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2020, 71, 379–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pan, R.; Liu, Y.; Buitrago, S.; Jiang, W.; Gao, H.; Han, H.; Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X. Adventitious root formation is dynamically regulated by various hormones in leaf-vegetable sweetpotato cuttings. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 253, 153267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Lan, Q.; Yu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, S.; Bao, Z.; Li, X.; Zheng, C. Analysis of the small Auxin-Up RNA (SAUR) genes regulating root growth angle (RGA) in apple. Genes 2022, 13, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, M.; Manzoor, M.A.; Wang, X.; Feng, X.; Zhao, Y.; He, J.; Cai, Y. Comparative genomic analysis of SAUR gene family, cloning and functional characterization of two genes (PbrSAUR13 and PbrSAUR52) in Pyrus bretschneideri. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zierer, W.; Ruscher, D.; Sonnewald, U.; Sonnewald, S. Tuber and tuberous root development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 551–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liang, Q.G.; Chen, H.R.; Chang, H.L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.N.; Wu, J.T.; Liu, Y.H.; Kumar, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.L.; et al. Influence of planting density on sweet potato storage root formation by regulating carbohydrate and lignin metabolism. Plants 2023, 12, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bian, X.; Kim, H.S.; Kwak, S.S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Ma, P.; Jia, Z.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yu, Y. Different functions of IbRAP2.4, a drought-responsive AP2/ERF transcription factor, in regulating root development between Arabidopsis and sweetpotato. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 820450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Firon, N.; Labonte, D.; Villordon, A.; Kfir, Y.; Solis, J.; Lapis, E.; Perlman, T.S.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Hetzroni, A.; Althan, L.; et al. Transcriptional profiling of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) roots indicates down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis and up-regulation of starch biosynthesis at an early stage of storage root formation. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, Q.; Tobimatsu, Y.; Zhou, R.; Pattathil, S.; Gallego-Giraldo, L.; Fu, C.; Jackson, L.A.; Hahn, M.G.; Kim, H.; Chen, F.; et al. Loss of function of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 1 leads to unconventional lignin and a temperature-sensitive growth defect in Medicago truncatula. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13660–13665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, C.J.; Kim, S.E.; Park, S.U.; Lim, Y.H.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, W.G.; Ji, C.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Tuberous roots of transgenic sweetpotato overexpressing IbCAD1 have enhanced low-temperature storage phenotypes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Multiple alignment (A) and phylogenetic analysis (B) of IbSAUR36with its homologs from other plants.
Figure 1. Multiple alignment (A) and phylogenetic analysis (B) of IbSAUR36with its homologs from other plants.
Genes 15 00760 g001
Figure 2. Relative expression of IbSAUR36. (A) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in different tissues of 125-day-old field-grown JS25 and JS29. L, leaf; ST, stem tip; YS, young stem; OS, old stem; PR, pencil root; SR, storage root. (B) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in different developmental stages of JS25 and JS29. d, day. (C,D) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in JS25 and JS29 after IAA or MeJA treatments. h, hour.The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Figure 2. Relative expression of IbSAUR36. (A) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in different tissues of 125-day-old field-grown JS25 and JS29. L, leaf; ST, stem tip; YS, young stem; OS, old stem; PR, pencil root; SR, storage root. (B) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in different developmental stages of JS25 and JS29. d, day. (C,D) Relative expression of IbSAUR36 in JS25 and JS29 after IAA or MeJA treatments. h, hour.The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Genes 15 00760 g002
Figure 3. Tissue-specific localization of the IbSAUR36 protein in transgenic Arabidopsis identified by histochemical analysis of GUS activity driven by the IbSAUR36 promoter. (A) The germinating seed. (B) 4-day-old seedling. (C) Immature silique. (D) Leaf in immature stage. (E) Bud. (F) Silique in mature stage. (G) Rosette leaf. (H) Internode with leaf. (I) Internode. (J) Seed. (K) Rosette. (L) Mature root. (M) Col-0. Bars = 100 μm (A,D,J,L), 500 μm (B,C,EI,K,M).
Figure 3. Tissue-specific localization of the IbSAUR36 protein in transgenic Arabidopsis identified by histochemical analysis of GUS activity driven by the IbSAUR36 promoter. (A) The germinating seed. (B) 4-day-old seedling. (C) Immature silique. (D) Leaf in immature stage. (E) Bud. (F) Silique in mature stage. (G) Rosette leaf. (H) Internode with leaf. (I) Internode. (J) Seed. (K) Rosette. (L) Mature root. (M) Col-0. Bars = 100 μm (A,D,J,L), 500 μm (B,C,EI,K,M).
Genes 15 00760 g003
Figure 4. Production of the IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots. (A) The root of transgenic sweet potato under red fluorescent protein(RFP) laser irradiation. (B) The histological analysis of transgenic sweet potato roots and CK. Bar = 0.1 mm. (C) Expression analysis of IbSAUR36 in the transgenic roots and CK. (D) IAA content of transgenic sweet potato roots and CK. CK, roots of XZ8. NRT, roots of pNRT transgenic sweet potato. IbSAUR36OE, roots ofpNRT-IbSAUR36 transgenic sweet potato. The data are presented as the means ± SEs (n = 3). The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Figure 4. Production of the IbSAUR36-overexpressing sweet potato roots. (A) The root of transgenic sweet potato under red fluorescent protein(RFP) laser irradiation. (B) The histological analysis of transgenic sweet potato roots and CK. Bar = 0.1 mm. (C) Expression analysis of IbSAUR36 in the transgenic roots and CK. (D) IAA content of transgenic sweet potato roots and CK. CK, roots of XZ8. NRT, roots of pNRT transgenic sweet potato. IbSAUR36OE, roots ofpNRT-IbSAUR36 transgenic sweet potato. The data are presented as the means ± SEs (n = 3). The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Genes 15 00760 g004
Figure 5. Venn, KEGG, andexpression analyses of DEG in transgenic sweet potato. (A) Venn analysis. (B) KEGG analysis. (C) Expression analysis.
Figure 5. Venn, KEGG, andexpression analyses of DEG in transgenic sweet potato. (A) Venn analysis. (B) KEGG analysis. (C) Expression analysis.
Genes 15 00760 g005
Figure 6. Expression of the genes related to root development in IbSAUR36 overexpressing lines. CK, root of XZS8. NRT, root of pNRT transgenic sweet potato. IbSAUR36OE, root of pNRT-IbSAUR36 transgenic sweet potato. The data are presented as the means ± SEs (n = 3). The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Figure 6. Expression of the genes related to root development in IbSAUR36 overexpressing lines. CK, root of XZS8. NRT, root of pNRT transgenic sweet potato. IbSAUR36OE, root of pNRT-IbSAUR36 transgenic sweet potato. The data are presented as the means ± SEs (n = 3). The different small letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test.
Genes 15 00760 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, Y.; Li, A.; Du, T.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, Z.; Hou, F. A Small Auxin-Up RNA Gene, IbSAUR36, Regulates Adventitious Root Development in Transgenic Sweet Potato. Genes 2024, 15, 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060760

AMA Style

Zhou Y, Li A, Du T, Qin Z, Zhang L, Wang Q, Li Z, Hou F. A Small Auxin-Up RNA Gene, IbSAUR36, Regulates Adventitious Root Development in Transgenic Sweet Potato. Genes. 2024; 15(6):760. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060760

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Yuanyuan, Aixian Li, Taifeng Du, Zhen Qin, Liming Zhang, Qingmei Wang, Zongyun Li, and Fuyun Hou. 2024. "A Small Auxin-Up RNA Gene, IbSAUR36, Regulates Adventitious Root Development in Transgenic Sweet Potato" Genes 15, no. 6: 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15060760

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop